President Of Serbia Met With Catholicos Of All Armenians

PRESIDENT OF SERBIA MET WITH CATHOLICOS OF ALL ARMENIANS

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
29.07.2009 19:06 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Today, the Serbian President Boris Tadic met with
the Catholicos of All Armenians Garekin II, press service of the
Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin told a PanARMENIAN.Net reporter.

During the meeting they discussed the issues related to the
significance of religion, presented gifts to each other. Garegin II
gifted a cross, symbol of all Christians, and photoalbum to Boris
Tadic. In turn, Serbian President Boris Tadic gave the Catholicos
of All Armenians Serbian icons. Garegin II led the tour of Serbian
President, told about the construction of Mother See of Holy
Etchmiadzin and relics of Armenian spiritual culture.

New MG OSCE Co-Chairs Will More Often Communicate With Stepanakert

NEW MG OSCE CO-CHAIRS WILL MORE OFTEN COMMUNICATE WITH STEPANAKERT

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
29.07.2009 19:11 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ MG OSCE CO-Chairs replacement contains a number of
messages directed to NKR conflict parties, Head of Eurointegration
social organization Karen Bekaryan told a news conference in Yerevan.

"Publication of Madrid principles is among those messages. By
publicizing them, Co-Chairs let parties know they have no problems with
each other and unproductiveness in negotiations can’t be explained
by assumed problems between Co-Chairs. Besides, the CO-Chairs meant
to brief Armenian and Azeri societies on the format and basic points
of negotiations," Armenian expert emphasized.

He added that by replacement of Co-Chairs mediators meant to show
their lack of satisfaction with work conducted and a need for more
drastic measures. According to Bekaryan, will more often communicate
with Stepanakert. "Co-Chairs will try to demonstrate NKR is informed
of the process and involved in negotiations. This will last till NKR
actually becomes a negotiating party."

Dwelling on MG OSCE American Co-Chair Matthew Bryza’s statements on
compromising, Armenian expert emphasized that US diplomat is already
envisioning continuation of his career in Baku, for which he’s trying
to provide a breeding ground.

Armenia And Serbia Intend To Develop Trade And Economic Collaboratio

ARMENIA AND SERBIA INTEND TO DEVELOP TRADE AND ECONOMIC COLLABORATION

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
29.07.2009 19:39 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ RA Economy Minister Nerses Yeritsyan and Serbian
Minister of Trade and Services Slobodan Milosavljevic discussed
development of economic collaboration between the two countries. The
parties emphasized the importance of strengthening collaboration in
the sphere of information technologies, agriculture, food production,
pharmacy and tourism.

The ministers exchanged views on implementation of joint programs,
expressing their readiness to support any initiative aimed at
stimulation of forming trade and economic relations between Armenia
and Serbia.

Nerses Yeritsyan and Slobodan Milosavljevic also discussed organization
of business forum in nearest future.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Agriculture Is Promising Sphere To Strengthen Armenian-Serbian Relat

AGRICULTURE IS PROMISING SPHERE TO STRENGTHEN ARMENIAN-SERBIAN RELATIONS

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
29.07.2009 20:49 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ On July 29 RA prime minister Tigran Sargsyan met
Serbian President Boris Tadic . The officials discussed issues of
Armenian-Serbian cooperation in various spheres, press service of
the Government reports.

The sides emphasized that agriculture, food processing industries are
the most promising for bilateral relations. As officials mentioned,
the age-old Armenian-Serbian friendship and cultural cooperation will
give a new quality to bilateral relations.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Turkey Wants To See Resolute From Armenia To Normalize Ties

TURKEY WANTS TO SEE RESOLUTE FROM ARMENIA TO NORMALIZE TIES

/PanARMENIAN.Net/
29.07.2009 22:18 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said
Wednesday that Turkish government was still resolute to normalize
relations with neighboring Armenia.

"But at the same time, it is important for us to see the same
determination from the international community and especially from
Armenia on the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan," Davutoglu
told at press conference.

Davutoglu said Turkish government was hopeful over the normalization
process with Armenia.

"We believe that the most extensive normalization would be seen in
our region in the coming period," Davutoglu said, AA reported.

The Struggle Between Kemalists And Islamists In Turkey May Collapse

THE STRUGGLE BETWEEN KEMALISTS AND ISLAMISTS IN TURKEY MAY COLLAPSE THE STATE
Karine Ter-Sahakyan

PanARMENIAN.Net
28.07.2009 GMT+04:00

The hearing on Ergenekon, to which the government of Recep Tayyip
Erdogan attempts to pin the army, may develop into a process in which
there’ll be no winners.

Any idea of a united nation state, even if it is based on European
values, sooner or later results in disintegration and crash. Ideology
can serve as faith and truth only until a specific time, after
which it changes into a dogma, which prevents the development of the
country. Moreover, it is utterly unimportant what way the development
takes – whether it advances or returns to "primeval state". Roughly
this is the case with present-day Turkey, which after 75 years of
Kemalism is gradually returning to Islam.

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ It should be noted that this Islam, however, has
nothing in common with the radical Shias, but, who can be sure that
this very fact won’t make it more dangerous. The slow, but accurate
settlement of Europe with the Turks indicates that sooner or later the
Christian world will have to admit the fact that not Turkey became
part of Europe, but quite the contrary. Let us add to this also the
demographic factor, and everything will fall into place. However, the
situation is not so terrible after all: the internal political events
of the past two years indicate that the struggle between Kemalists
and Islamists has not yet ended, and no one can predict the exact
conclusion of it. The trial on Ergenekon, to which the government
of Recep Tayyip Erdogan attempts to pin the army, may develop into a
process in which there’ll be no winners. On the one hand, the ruling
Justice and Development Party (AKP) strives into Europe, on the other
hand, it is eager to secure itsel!

f with the absolute support of the 70-million population for final
regulation of the Kurdish question like the Armenian one, about which
we have been repeatedly writing. But, the country cannot do without
the army, and it means Erdogan will not be able to finally dismiss
the Joint Staff, i.e. to change the constitution. It is even possible
that he’ll suffer the same fate as Menderes did; servicemen in Turkey
do not like jokes…

Against this background the normalization of Armenian-Turkish
relations seems difficult or even unattainable a concern, in spite of
the statements of ministers and experts, to say nothing of NGOs and
media outlets. The Armenian question once was the indirect reason
for the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, but history has a habit
of repeating itself and not always in the form of farce. Ankara
perfectly understands that after the Armenian issue she will have
to solve the Cyprus and Kurdish questions as well, to say nothing
of fulfillment of obligations before Europe in some part of reforms,
which simply do not reach eastern provinces because of needlessness of
the afore-mentioned. But these issues seemed to be little, and Turkey,
on Azerbaijan’s advice, decided to undertake also the settlement of
the Karabakh conflict, which in a wider sense is in no way necessary
to her. The slogan "one nation, two states" proved to be a time bomb,
placed by Heydar Aliyev for the sole purpose !

of ensuring his son at least one ally in the region. But even this
may work against Baku. Real diplomacy has very little in common with
the factual statements of foreign ministers of any of the countries
in the region. Especially because the pressure of EU and the USA
on Turkey for opening the border with Armenia has recently been
increased both by the European Union and the USA. Russia thus far
remains neutral, but if the closed boundary begins to interfere with
the imperial ambitions of Moscow, it may behave like the USA and
Europe. Azerbaijan will instantly turn her back on Ankara and will
be carrying out Gazprom’s immediate orders. Paraphrasing the popular
saying, we can say: "What is good for Gazprom is good for Russia".

As far as the normalization of Armenian-Turkish relations is concerned,
advancement can be outlined in this issue judging by the publications
in the Turkish media outlets. According to Egemen Bagis, Minister of
State of Turkey and Chief negotiator on the integration of Turkey
into the EU, the reconstruction of the Armenian Church on Akhtamar
Island will be accomplished before Serzh Sargsyan’s arrival in
Turkey and a cross will be inaugurated on the church. "Why not? In
fact Islam respects all religions. If Europe does not put any bans
on opening mosques, why should we do so? Besides, this church will
attract pilgrim Armenians here, what will help to develop tourism in
this region. Closed borders are the vestige of communism and we must
struggle them. It was Stalin who loved keeping boundaries under lock
and key; why should we follow him? We say Greeks are bad, Kurds are
bad too. How long will we be at loggerheads? We should put an end to
animosity." Bagis declared. Whether t!

his statement will be put into effect is difficult to say. The fact
is that very little time is left until October 14 and if the border
is not opened, the President of Armenia simply will not attend the
return football match between the Armenian and Turkish national
football teams. "I will attend the return match only in case the
Armenian-Turkish border is opened or the sides are on the threshold
of unblocking Armenia," declared President Sargsyan in Yerevan,
during a joint press conference with his Serbian counterpart Boris
Tadic. "There is little time left till the match. We expect Turkey
to take constructive steps towards normalization of relations,"
stated Sargsyan.

In his turn, director of the RA NAS Institute of Oriental Studies,
Professor Ruben Safrastyan considers that Turkey’s decision to
inaugurate a cross on Surb Khach (St. Cross) Armenian Church on
Akhtamar Island doesn’t imply any change of Ankara’s position. "The
church will be reconstructed but inauguration of a cross on it sounds
unrealistic. It may arouse Muslims’ displeasure. Intolerance towards
other religious is growing in Turkey. This country’s religious policy
is still anti-Christian," notes Safrastyan.

At the same time, Professor at Istanbul University Bilgi Turgut Tuncel
noted that Turkey and Armenia are engaged in a belated process of
mutual acquaintance and communication. "To reach accomplishment,
both sides have to pay great attention to the sensitivities of the
other side. One of the psychological barriers for Armenians is the
feeling of being ignored and disregarded by the Turks or the Turkish
State. Turks and the Turkish State must realize this situation and
take the necessary measures to show that Armenians are not ignored
by them," Tuncel noted. In his view, it must be recognized that
Armenians lived and still live in Anatolia. The hostile and insulting
rhetoric prevalent in school textbooks and popular media must be
stopped, and the Armenian cultural heritage in Anatolia should be
respected. "Accordingly, recognition of the Armenian remnants in
Anatolia as Armenian vestiges and renovating them as cultural heritage
of Anatolia is of major importance. In this way, !

Turkey not only can show Armenians that she respects the Armenian
nation, but will also provide the younger Turkish generation with a
truthful historical consciousness," he said.

The Invention Of History: Azerbaijan, Armenia, And The Showcasing Of

THE INVENTION OF HISTORY: AZERBAIJAN, ARMENIA, AND THE SHOWCASING OF IMAGINATION

AZG Armenian Daily
30/07/2009

History

Rouben Galichian has written a new book, The Invention of History:
Azerbaijan, Armenia, and the Showcasing of Imagination.

Mr. Galichian’s new book focuses on the history of Azerbaijan. He
argues that Azerbaijan as an entity north of the River Araks is
an invention of 1918, and that the edifice of Azerbaijani national
history is built with bricks that have their Armenian inscriptions
hacked off of them.

The falsification of Azerbaijan’s history, especially as it relates
to Karabakh, concerns Mr. Galichian. But he is especially concerned
by Azerbaijani efforts to propagate a novel history of Armenia,
one that does not include Armenians until the beginning of the
nineteenth century.

Historical maps have been a major focus of Mr. Galichian’s interest
until now. He is the author of Historic Maps of Armenia: The
Cartographic Heritage^A (London: I.B. Tauris, 2004), Countries of the
Caucasus in Medieval Maps: Armenia, Georgia and Azerbaijan^A (London:
Gomidas Institute, 2007), and a book about Armenia in world maps.

In an interview with Armenian Reporter editor Vincent Lima Rouben
Galichian said that the reason he wrote the book is exactly that
"in 1918, when the countries south of the Caucasus Mountains became
independent, the country that is now called the Republic of Azerbaijan
was originally supposed to be called the Southeastern Transcaucasian
Republic. But the Musavat nationalist party decided on the name
Azerbaijan, purely for political reasons.

The political reason was that they were trying to establish an
Islamic belt of countries that started from Turkey toward Central
Asia. Azerbaijan was going to be one of them. Another reason was that
they intended to take control of the Iranian province of Azerbaijan
too.

The Iranian province of Azerbaijan, which Armenians call Atpatakan,
is about 2,000 years old, and in the past has been part of Lesser
Media. The name Atpatakan – or Atropatakan – comes from the name of the
general Atropat, who protected the country and wouldn’t let Alexander
the Great conquer it. It had always been south of the River Araks,
never to the north of it. Suddenly in 1918, north of the River Araks,
a country appears, with the same name. It is analogous to today’s
Macedonia and Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.

But that was not enough.

The newly established country wanted to show the world that it had
all of the cultural and historical background [of a legitimate nation].

It was a mixture of various races: Persian, Turkic, Tatar, Mongol,
local Albanians – who had evolved and converted to Islam and became
Lezgins – and Shirvanis, and God knows how many peoples. According
to the ancient historians there were 26 tribes living in Caucasian
Albania in ancient times.

But there was a problem. There were some Islamic monuments there,
which they could point to and say, "This is our heritage," but
a majority of the monuments were Christian. There were churches,
there were tombs, there were khachkars, and all sorts of things that
could not be Islamic. Therefore the Azerbaijani authorities began a
campaign saying, "We are actually the descendants of the Caucasian
Albanians. They were our ancestors. They used to be Christian and
they converted to Islam. And we are them."

At the same time, to be in Turkey’s good books, they claimed that they
are the descendants of the Oghuz Turks – the Kara Koyunlu, Ak Koyunlu,
etc. – and the various tribes.

This is a contradiction. One is a central Caucasian tribe; the other is
a Central Asian tribe. How could you have two ancestors so different
from each other? You must be a mixture of races. Well, they said no,
we are Albanian and the Turkish population has been in this part of
the world for over 2,500 years".

I Will Attend The National Teams’ Match Only Of Turkish-Armenian Bor

I WILL ATTEND THE NATIONAL TEAMS’ MATCH ONLY OF TURKISH-ARMENIAN BORDER IS OPENED: SARGSYAN

Focus News
July 29 2009
Bulgaria

Yerevan/Ankara. Armenia’s President Serzh Sargsyan set a condition for
his visit to Turkey to attuned the football match of the country’s
national teams. He said he would attend the match only if the
Turkish-Armenian border is opened, the NTV channel informs.

Sargsyan said this during a joint press conference with visiting
Serbian President Boris Tadic.

"If Turkey opens the border and puts an end to the blockade against
Armenia, I would got to Turkey for the match between the two national
teams," said the Armenian head-of-state. He expressed hope and
expectation to see positive steps in that direction soon on behalf
of his Turkish counterparts.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Christians In Iran: Threatening Situation

CHRISTIANS IN IRAN: THREATENING SITUATION

Iran Press Watch

July 29 2009

Dr. Wahied Wahdat-Hagh-July 29th, 2009

The regime in Tehran is sending out mixed signals as to whether Iran’s
Criminal Code will now impose the death penalty on Muslims who forsake
Islam to convert to Christianity. A final decision on the question
should finally be taken this autumn. The bill’s first reading in the
Majlis last September passed by a large majority: 196 representatives
voted yes, seven voted no, and there were two abstentions.

Now, supposedly, the Majlis has excised this intended change to the
Criminal Code. According to media reports on June 27, the Chairman
of the Majlis Legal Affairs Committee, Hojatoleslam Ali Schahroki,
said that the regulation on "renunciation ofIslam" wouldn’t even be
mentioned in the bill. According to the Farsi Christian News Network,
Christians in Iran are surprised and irritated by this statement,
because the truth is that the Council of Guardians and the Supreme
Leader have the final say on this unsettled question.

The disputes within Islamist factions over this element of the Criminal
Code are increasingly visible, and there may be a connection with the
protests that followed the disputed presidential election. Joseph K
Grieboski, President of the Institute on Religion and Public Policy
in Washington, sees no sign that this debate indicates an opening up,
but only the regime protecting itself. "If the regime were to uphold
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s presidency and then push through a restrictive
penal law, international pressure on the Iranian regime would be
unbearable." According to the International Society for Human Rights,
the announced withdrawal of the bill is a "purely cosmetic move." There
is still the possibility of being executed for renunciation of Islam
under Iran’s Islamic laws.

Up to now, punishment for renunciation of Islam – also known as
apostasy – has been practiced arbitrarily in Iran. Once it becomes
part of the Criminal Code, every Iranian court would be bound to
enforce it. It’s certain that Christians who convert from Islam
will continue to be arrested and convicted. This doesn’t include
so-called ethnic Christians – members of the Armenian and Assyrian
churches – but specifically evangelical Christians who actively
pursue missionary work. The independent online Persian news agency
Rooz, which is critical of the regime, reported on July 15 that two
Christian women, 30-year-old Marsiye Aminsadeh and 27-year-old Mariam
Rostampur, had been arrested in Tehran about four months earlier. The
pair are social workers who without pay, help people in trouble
regardless of race or religion. The two Christians were charged
with apostasy and violations of national security and are being
held at the notorious Evin Prison. Interrogated on a daily basis,
they are held under very harsh conditions with no access to legal or
medical assistance. According to Rooz, there are currently at least 50
Christians in Iranian prisons in Tehran, Schiras, Maschad and Urumije,
among others.

Recent political events in Iran have ushered in a new phase in
the emergence of a totalitarian dictatorship. Pressure on Iranian
Christians is growing just as foreign powers are being blamed for
rioting that broke out due to the electoral fraud. The argument on the
influence of foreign powers is well known to Iranian Christians. Under
the Islamic regime, they are regularly accused of embracing Western
influence. The narrative of these allegations is this: that Iranian
Christians are often in touch with European or American churches and
associate themselves with their networks. The regime focuses on this,
even accusing them of spying for foreign powers. Time and again,
Iranian Christians are held hostage to the regime’s problems with
the West.

Of necessity, collaboration with Christian Web sites or Christian TV
channels that transmit their programs via satellite, takes place in
secret. Christians in Iran are dependent on the flow of information
from precisely these media, because with the help of modern technology,
this is how the Persian-language bible, Christian children’s books
and prayers are disseminated. The Farsi Christian News Network (FCNN)
– a central source of news about Christian communities in Iran –
reports that there are hundreds of thousands of Iranians who would
embrace the message of Jesus Christ. Accordingly, Iranian Christians
can expect a new wave of oppression and persecution.

It’s interesting in this context to assess how Iranian Christians
behaved during the recent presidential election. The agency says
that a majority of those who participated in the elections voted for
presidential candidate Mir Hussein Mussawi because they hoped, "bad
would be better than worse." But the elections have clearly shown
that the political system of "Guardianship of the Islamic Jurists
[Velayat-e-faqih]" doesn’t allow opposing political positions to
have a serious chance. Those who believed that there was a "minimal
democracy" in Iran have now been disabused, according to FCNN.

In another report by FCNN, clear positions are staked out.

"There is a political power struggle between two elements, both
of which are despotic and repressive. There is no struggle between
despotism and freedom. Therefore, we have to expect even more pressure
put on churches. We know that difficult times lie ahead. Nevertheless,
under no circumstances will Iranian Christians give up their new
faith."

However, following the recent riots and repression, more and more
Christians are abandoning Iran. Since the first government of
Ahmadinejad came into office, the situation of Iranian Christians
has worsened significantly. It’s not yet clear what the nature of the
future threat will be. But at the same time, FCNN has reported on an
increase of interest in Christianity among Iranian young people. At
least 70 percent of Iranians support more freedom for religious
minorities and support the separation of religion and state. The more
people are impacted by the violence of despotic rule, the more they
will be drawn toward Christianity.

Josef Hovsepian, son of Iranian Bishop Haik Hovsepian Mehr who
was kidnapped and murdered in 1994, told FCNN in a conversation on
July 4 that, "in times of crisis, the unity of our communities is
strengthened." In particular, "young people are looking for a religion
that isn’t being forced on them."

In another conversation, a Christian woman remembers the period
before the 1979 Islamic Revolution, when she lived happily in the
town of Schiras among other Christians, Jews, Bahai and followers
of Zoroastrianism. But one day in the 1980s, two of her girlfriends
were taken from their classroom by strange men. Later she learned
from their mother that their father, a Bahai, had been arrested and
executed. In her family, it is now assumed that the situation for
Christians will worsen in a similar fashion.

In the midst of these threats and persecution, there are a number of
events that reflect a touch of humor. The story goes that one day the
satellite dish of an Iranian priest was stolen from the roof of his
house. The thief had taken a good look at some Christian broadcasts
and, as a result, became a member of an illegal home church.

The home church movement remains fragile and underground, since in
the official churches people aren’t even allowed to hear prayers
in Persian. This is because Iran’s rulers fear that if they were,
more people would be drawn to Christianity. As recently as May of
this year, a home church in Karadsch was discovered and raided by
paramilitary units of the Basij. The home church members were arrested.

[Dr. Wahied Wahdat-Hagh is a Senior Fellow
with the European Foundation for Democracy. This
article was first published on July 23, 2009 in German at:
ion=com_content&view=article&id=13484& catid=4&Itemid=22
and an English translation was made available at:
ion=com_content&view=article&id=13488& catid=4&Itemid=22.]

http://www.iranpresswatch.org/post/4577
http://www.europeandemocracy.org/index.php?opt
http://www.europeandemocracy.org/index.php?opt

BELGRADE: Tadic With Armenian Prime Minister And Patriarch

TADIC WITH ARMENIAN PRIME MINISTER AND PATRIARCH

Radio Srbija
July 29 2009
Serbia

On the second day of his visit to Armenia, Serbian President Boris
Tadic will have talks in Yerevan with Armenian Prime Minister Tigran
Sargsyan. After that, Tadic will meet in Etchmiyadzin, the spiritual
center of Armenia, with Patriarch Karekine II. It is also planned for
Tadic to lay wreaths on the monument to Yugoslav pilots who died in
the plane crash in 1988, while transferring the humanitarian aid to
the victims of the catastrophic earthquake, which took 25 thousand
lives in the town of Spitak. Yesterday, during the meeting with
Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan, it was agreed that the regional
conflicts, such as those in Kosmet and Agorno-Karabakh must be resolved
without the use of force, solely through talks and in line with the
international law principles.