Chechens Yearn to Return to Mountains

A1+

CHECHENS YEARN TO RETURN TO MOUNTAINS
[01:35 pm] 14 April, 2007

Deserted villages are mute testimony to a history of deportation and
war.

As the mountain road winds its way past the Chechen mountain village
of Shatoi higher to the small settlement of Tuskharoi, the signs of
habitation get fewer. At one point, you glimpse the breathtaking sight
of two whitewashed houses deep in the heart of a virgin forest.

Tuskharoi lies at the very top of the mountain. Fifteen years ago, a
90-year-old old man named Alauddin lived here next to a family of
Chechen herders, who had left behind good jobs in the Baltic port of
Kaliningrad to resettle in their ancestral village.

When Stalin deported the entire Chechen population from their homeland
in 1944, these mountain villages – the oldest Chechen settlements –
fell into disrepair. When the Chechens were allowed to return from
exile by Nikita Khrushchev in 1957, they were forbidden to resettle in
the highlands. Those who defied the ban and tried to live in their
ancestral villages were forcibly moved down to the plains.

Only in the early Nineties, when Chechnya declared unilateral
independence from Moscow, did people begin to repopulate these old
villages.

In recent years, as war has raged in Chechnya, history has repeated
itself and the highland areas have again become a no-go area,
accessible only to the Russian military. Now a struggle is under way
between locals, the military and the Chechen government to determine
who has the right of access to these ancient beautiful areas.

Chechen experts say the restricted border zone along the frontier with
Georgia should extend only five kilometres into the interior, and must
skirt inhabited areas. So a village like Tuskharoi, 40 kilometres from
the border, should be openly accessible. However, this village of
35-40 households is still deserted and the owners have yet to return
because of a long-running dispute with the military.

Magadin Albastov, who comes from the village but now lives in lowland
Chechnya, told IWPR, "My father and brothers were among those who
rebuilt Tuskharoi in the early Nineties. I lived in my home village
too, earning a living for my family from farming. I am ready to return
to the land of my ancestors at any moment – but the military gives us
no chance to do so.

"We cannot live in an area where the military are located, nor do we
want to. This is a small area high in the mountains where you can’t
build a house at a distance from other people. And the reality of
Chechnya is that it isn’t safe to stay next door to men who are armed
to the teeth."

Ismail Munayev, who heads the Chechen branch of the Russian service
for protecting cultural heritage, said a military barracks had been
built in Tuskharoi without consultation with the local authorities,
and without his consent.

The highland areas are home to Chechnya’s most valuable architectural
heritage. For centuries, inaccessible steep-sided gorges, ravines and
high cliffs have protected hundreds of ancient mountain towers, vaults
and shrines from marauders.

However, these buildings have suffered badly from the years of
conflict, and have also been damaged by the Russian soldiers deployed
in the mountains.

The old buildings are supposed to be cared for by the Argun Museum
Reserve, which covers a large area of the southern and south-eastern
Chechen mountains. But the whole area has been controlled by the
Russian military and border guards for the past several years, after
airborne troops captured it in 2000.

Said Saratov, director of the Argun reserve, said military leaders had
told him that they would now agree to the return of the highland
villagers, but he said the trouble was that the villagers feared
living in proximity to Russian soldiers.

"The mountain villagers themselves don’t want to live in villages and
hamlets side by side with the military; they want the units to be
withdrawn. That’s the disagreement, one that cannot be resolved for
the time being," he said.

It is only within the last year, as fighting has ebbed in Chechnya,
that heritage officials Ismail Munayev and Said Saratov have been
allowed back into the area.

Since then there has been confusion about who owns these lands. In
December, the Chechen government decided to lease more than 3,000
hectares of the Argun reserve’s territory to the military and border
guards. Then in February, the government overturned its own decision.

"Besides, the Argun Museum Reserve has [Russian] federal status," said
Munayev. "And it’s up to the federal authorities to take decisions
regarding reserve lands."

In an attempt to ease tensions, the military has offered compensation
to the residents of Tuskharoi, but some villagers have refused to
accept it, saying they want to be allowed to return home
unconditionally.

"Some mountain villagers did receive compensation for lost property,"
said Shamil Tangiev, head of the Grozny office of the human rights
organisation Memorial. "But since they’d given up hope of returning to
home, they spent the money on day-to-day things."

Some 20 villages in the remote Vedeno and Shatoi regions are still
off-limits to Chechen officials and villagers alike.

"This [off-limits] territory includes the medieval settlements of Khoi
and Makazhoi, where a large number of monuments are concentrated,"
said museum director Saratov. "Even as director of the reserve, I have
been unable to influence the situation, as access to the area has been
blocked, and my ID card means nothing at checkpoints located any
further up than than Kharachoi."

Saratov said he had asked a Russian military commander for a written
permit to pass through checkpoints but had been refused.

Even when the highland villagers do get back home, says
non-governmental activist Yelena Burtina, there is almost nothing for
them there. Most of the houses have been destroyed and there is no
infrastructure in the mountain villages. The villagers have no money
to start farming, and their livestock is under threat from wild
predators, which have proliferated in the absence of human settlement.

The Chechen authorities are beginning to edge closer towards saving
their ancient medieval settlements from destruction, but it will be
many years before they can actually be inhabited.

By Amina Visayeva in Grozny

Amina Visayeva is a correspondent with the Groznensky Rabochy
newspaper. Institute for War and Peace Reporting’s Caucasus Reporting
Service

Democratic Party is government, not a pro-government force

Democratic Party is government, not a pro-government force

16-04-2007 11:40:52 – KarabakhOpen

`I would say the political sphere in Karabakh is in the stage of
formation. Although we have the ARF Dashnaktsutyun, which has
experience of over a hundred years and has achieved a lot in terms of
organization. The Democratic Party of Artsakh also had considerable
success in the parliamentary election, and can take pride in tangible
results. We are trying our best to make the party’ s activities
independent from personalities, for the party to develop as a force
and as a political unit,’ said Arayik Harutiunyan, the leader of the
Azat Hayrenik Party, commenting for the KarabakhOpen on the
pre-election arrangement of forces.

`After the parliamentary election the Democratic Party did not make a
statement but separate members of the party noted in their statements
that the party is responsible for the activities of the government. It
means the Democratic Party is government, not a pro-government force.

Dashnaktsutyun and Movement 88 positioned as opposition. We stated
that we will conduct a constructive policy and support the policy of
the government. Although we have to admit that we have not managed to
do a lot,’ said Arayik Harutiunyan.

The party is not likely to overestimate or underestimate the other
political forces ` each of them has its sphere of influence. `It is
obvious, however, that a party has influence if it is a parliament
force. The parties outside the parliament can hardly influence the
political process. Especially that the civil society in the country is
not fully established yet,’ said the member of parliament.

`The post of president is great responsibility’

`The post of president is great responsibility’

Azat Artsakh
16-04-2007 11:41:48 – KarabakhOpen

Interview with the head of the NKR State Security Service Bako
Sahakyan

Mr. Sahakyan, the recent polls give you the highest rating among the
likely presidential candidates in NKR. What is your attitude?

I am happy that the institution of the public opinion is developing in
the country. As to the likely presidential candidates, I think this
question needs a more serious consideration.

What do you mean?

It is a highly responsible decision for any person who realizes that
the post of president is first of all great responsibility for the
fate of people and the state rather than a political privilege. I
realize this as a citizen, and as a public official, therefore I
cannot express my attitude earlier.

How about today?

Recently we’ve had meetings with the leaders of the influential
parties and NGOs. Representatives of the intelligentsia and the youth,
the veterans of World War II and the war in Artsakh came up to me with
proposals. During these meetings I felt real support and now I can
say that I may be running in the presidential election. And if I am
nominated, it will be a conscious decision acknowledging the great
responsibility which I will assume if I am elected president.

Does it mean that you already have agreement with the political forces
over your nomination?

I have already said that there is timing set down in the law. The
present stage is a stage of consultations. Besides, if I make up my
mind, I will prefer nomination on a civil initiative not to offend any
of the parties whom I respect and whose support I will need.

"Zharangutiun" And Its Actions Are Too Cordial For Me – L Alaverdian

"BOTH "ZHARANGUTIUN" PROGRAM AND WAY OF ACTIONS OF THAT PARTY ARE TOO
CORDIAL FOR ME," LARISA ALAVERDIAN SAYS

YEREVAN, APRIL 16, NOYAN TAPAN. "Being non-partisan, I support the
political line and ideas fostered by the "Zharangutiun" (Heritage)
party. First RA Ombudsperson Larisa Alaverdian made such a statement
in the interview to Noyan Tapan. In her opinion, today the labour and
property rights of a person are widely violated in the country, and
for their protection it is not enough to struggle within the framework
of only public organizations, particularly, within the framework of
the "Against Legal Wilfulnesses" NGO headed by her.

Consequently, as L. Alaverdian mentioned, understanding the necessity
of the political struggle as well, she, not hesitating, received
"Zharangutiun" party leader Raffi Hovannisian’s proposal for being
involved in the proportional list of that party. "Both that party
program and, all the more, the way of its action are too cordial for
me," L. Alaverdian summed up.

Earthquake That Took Place on April 13 in Azerbaijan Felt in Artsakh

EARTHQUAKE THAT TOOK PLACE ON APRIL 13 IN AZERBAIJAN FELT IN ARTSAKH,
TOO

YEREVAN, APRIL 16, NOYAN TAPAN. Earthquake with magnitude 3 took
place on April 13, at 11:12 by local time in the territory of
Azerbaijan, 25 km east from the town of Aghdam. In the epicenter it
measured 4-5. As Noyan Tapan was informed from Seismic Protection
National Service, the earthquake was also felt in a number of
populated areas of Nagorno Karabakh: in particular, in Stepanakert,
Martakert the earthquake measured 3, in Martuni 4.

Memorial Dedicated to Victims Of A-320 Plane Accident To Be Erected

MEMORIAL DEDICATED TO VICTIMS OF A-320 PLANE’S ACCIDENT TO BE ERECTED
IN YEREVAN

YEREVAN, APRIL 16, NOYAN TAPAN. A memorial dedicated to the victims of
Yerevan-Sochi plane, which had an accident on May 3 2006, will be
erected in Nor Nork’s 5th district. As Noyan Tapan was informed by
Chief Architect of Yerevan, Samvel Danielian, the memorial’s project
has been already introduced to RA government. Another details about
the memorial will be reported after project’s approval.

In S. Danielian’s words, project’s construction will start after
government’s approval and the respective financing.

NKR: Accreditation Of Observers Started

ACCREDITATION OF OBSERVERS STARTED

Azat Artsakh Daily, Republic of Nagorno Karabakh [NKR]
16 April 07

The NKR Central Electoral Commission has started accreditation of
reporters and observers for the NKR presidential election on July 19,
2007. The political parties and NGOs whose bylaws include human rights
and democracy and which will not support a candidate can observe the
election. The accreditation of the local observers will last till July
9, the international observers till July 18. DEMOGRAPHIC INDICES FIRST
QUARTER 2007 The NKR National Statistics Service reported that 468
children were born in NKR from January to March 2007, which is up by 3
or 0.6 percent compared with January-March 2006. The rate of death was
335, and is down by 24 or 6.7 percent compared with the first quarter
of 2006. The rate of natural growth was 133 and increased by 27 or
25.5 percent. In the first quarter of 2007, 162 marriages were
reported against 153 in the first quarter of 2006, the rate of divorce
was 25 against 31, the NSS reported.

16-04-2007

Nagornyy Karabakh denies Azeri report of air force drills

Nagornyy Karabakh denies Azeri report of air force drills

Mediamax news agency
16 Apr 07

Yerevan, 16 April: The Nagornyy Karabakh [NKR] Defence Ministry has
denied the Azerbaijani report that "airplanes belonging to
Azerbaijan’s air force have implemented exercises in Agdam, on the
territory controlled by Armenia".

The head of the NKR defence army press service, Lt Senor Asratyan,
said that "the anti-aircraft forces of the Karabakh army are able to
destroy any trespasser of air borders".

He said that the military readiness of the anti-aircraft forces of the
NKR defence army is at a high level as it was during the war when
nearly 25 Azerbaijani military airplanes were destroyed.

Asratyan said that Azerbaijani airplanes implement exercises at a
distance of 30-35 km from the border where the Azerbaijani and NKR
military forces intersect.

Asratyan described as "honest disinformation" the report that during
the exercises of the Azerbaijani air force, the Karabakh forces fired
at Azerbaijani positions in Agdam.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenia, Egypt sign agreements on cooperation

Armenia, Egypt sign agreements on cooperation

Arminfo
16 Apr 07

Yerevan, 16 April: Armenia and Egypt have signed eight agreements on
cooperation in a number of fields. Documents were signed during
Armenian President Robert Kocharyan’s visit to Egypt.

A meeting of Presidents Robert Kocharyan and Husni Mubarak, as well as
a meeting between the Armenian president and Egyptian Prime Minister
Ahmad Nazif took place during the visit. An Armenian-Egyptian business
forum also took place.

Entrepreneurs from both countries agreed to create an
Armenian-Egyptian business council. An agreement was signed on
cooperation between Yerevan State Medical University and the medical
department of Cairo University.

Armenian Public TV reported that during the news conference Kocharyan
expressed Armenia’s readiness to create a joint free market zone,
which will improve the trade turnover between Armenia and
Egypt. Kocharyan also said that the Egyptian market is open to
Armenian entrepreneurs and creates positive conditions for the
implementation of joint projects in the fields of information
technologies and manufacturing.

Soros adds voice to debate over Israel lobby

Soros adds voice to debate over Israel lobby

Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:39 PM ET

By Bernd Debusmann, Special Correspondent

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The billionaire investor George Soros has added
his voice to a heated but little-noticed debate over the role of
Israel’s powerful lobby in shaping Washington policy in a way critics
say hurts U.S. national interests and stifles debate.

In the current issue of the New York Review of Books, Soros takes issue
with "the pervasive influence of the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee (AIPAC)" in Washington and says the Bush administration’s
close ties with Israel are obstacles to a peace settlement between
Israel and the Palestinians.

Soros, who is Jewish but not often engaged in Israel affairs, echoed
arguments that have fueled a passionate debate conducted largely in the
rarefied world of academia, foreign policy think tanks and parts of the
U.S. Jewish community.

"The pro-Israel lobby has been remarkably successful in suppressing
criticism," wrote Soros. Politicians challenge it at their peril and
dissenters risk personal vilification, he said.

AIPAC has consistently declined comment on such charges, but many of its
supporters have been vocal in dismissing them. Historian Michael Oren,
speaking at AIPAC’s 2007 conference in March, said the group was not
merely a lobby for Israel. "It is the embodiment of a conviction as old
as this (American) nation itself that belief in the Jewish state is
tantamount to belief in these United States," he said in a keynote
speech.

The long-simmering debate bubbled to the surface a year ago, when two
prominent academics, Stephen Walt of Harvard and John Mearsheimer of the
University of Chicago, published a 12,500-word essay entitled "The
Israel Lobby" and featuring the fiercest criticism of AIPAC since it was
founded in 1953.

AIPAC now has more than 100,000 members and is rated one of the most
influential special interest groups in the United States, its political
clout comparable with such lobbies as the National Rifle Association.

Its annual conference in Washington attracts a Who’s Who of American
politics, both Republicans and Democrats.

UNWAVERING SUPPORT

Mearsheimer and Walt said the lobby had persuaded successive
administrations to align themselves too closely with Israel.

"The combination of unwavering support for Israel and the related effort
to spread ‘democracy’ has inflamed Arab and Islamic opinion and
jeopardized not only U.S. security but much of the rest of the world,"
they wrote.

No other lobby group has managed to divert U.S. foreign policy so far
from the U.S. national interest, while simultaneously convincing
Americans that U.S. interests and those of Israel are essentially
identical, they wrote.

Once considered an honest broker in the Middle East, the United States
is now seen in much of the Arab world as an unquestioning backer of
Israel, according to international opinion polls.

Peace moves have been at a near-standstill since the failure of
Israeli-Palestinian talks in 2000 at the end of Bill Clinton’s
presidency. The Bush administration, accused by the Arab world of
relative neglect, has said it hopes to promote peace in its final two
years despite the political weakness of Israeli and Palestinian leaders.

The two academics said that pressure from Israel and its lobby in
Washington played an important role in President George W. Bush’s
decision to attack Iraq, an arch-enemy of Israel, in 2003.

Mearsheimer and Walt found no takers for their essay in the U.S.
publishing world. When it was eventually published in the London Review
of Books, they noted it would be hard to imagine any mainstream media
outlet in the United States publishing such a piece.

It has been drawing criticism that ranged from shoddy scholarship to
anti-Semitism, chiefly from conservative fellow academics and political
supporters of the present relationship between Washington and Israel.

In his contribution to the debate, Soros said: "A much-needed
self-examination of American policy in the Middle East has started in
this country; but it can’t make much headway as long as AIPAC retains
powerful influence in both the Democratic and Republican parties."

That influence is reflected by the fact that Israel is the largest
recipient of U.S. aid in the world.

GOING MAINSTREAM

Mearsheimer and Walt are now working on expanding their article into a
book — to be published in September by Farrar, Straus and Giroux. The
company has not commented on online reports that it paid the two authors
a $750,000 advance and plans to print one million copies.

Another mainstream publisher, Simon and Schuster, already discovered
that it not only is it possible to publish criticism of Israel but it
can also be good for the bottom line.

Former President Jimmy Carter’s book "Palestine Peace Not Apartheid"
shot up the bestseller lists after its publication last November, stayed
there for more than three months and is still selling well.

It had an initial print run of 300,000 copies and there are now 485,000
copies in print, said Victoria Meyer, a spokeswoman for Simon and
Schuster.

Carter’s book and its reference to apartheid provoked angry reactions —
more in the United States than in Israel, where leftists opposed to the
occupation of the West Bank have been accusing the government of
apartheid practices for years and where the word has lost its shock
value.

In response to charges of bias and anti-Semitism, Carter said he wanted
to provoke a discussion of issues debated routinely and freely in Israel
but rarely in the United States.

"This reluctance to criticize any policies of the Israeli government is
because of the extraordinary lobbying efforts of the American Israel
Political Action Committee and the absence of any significant contrary
voices," he wrote in the Los Angeles Times during a tour to promote his
book. "It would be almost politically suicidal for members of Congress
to espouse a balanced position between Israel and Palestine."

According to Oren, the pro-AIPAC historian, the Carter book and the
Mearsheimer-Walt paper had the same "insidious thesis" and suffered from
the same flaw — ignoring oil as a driving element in U.S. policies on
the Middle East.

(c) Reuters 2007. All rights reserved.