Issue Of Armenian Genocide Should Not Be Exploited In Preelectoral P

ISSUE OF ARMENIAN GENOCIDE SHOULD NOT BE EXPLOITED IN PREELECTORAL PROGRAMS, CHAIRMAN OF RAMKAVAR-AZATAKAN PARTY OF ARMENIA CONVINCED

Noyan Tapan
Apr 20 2007

YEREVAN, APRIL 20, NOYAN TAPAN. The current Turkish government
using all agitation means continues policy of large-scale crimes,
distortion of historic facts and religious intolerance adopted from
its ancestors. The statement of Ramkavar-Azatakan Party of Armenia
published at the April 20 press conference read this.

Haroutiun Arakelian, Chairman Ramkavar-Azatakan Party of Armenia,
said that on their initiative a working group of traditional Armenian
parties, Ramkavar-Azatakan Party of Armenia, ARF Dashnaktsutiun and
Social-Democrat Hnchakian Party, was created in February in Paris. The
working group should "voice louder" the issue of condemnation and
recognition of Armenian Genocide by international community.

Touching upon the parliamentary elections to be held in May,
H. Arakelian considered inadmissible the conduct of the candidates for
deputacy who "exploit the issue of the Genocide in their preelectoral
programs."

CIS Interparliamentary Assembly’s Monitoring Mission Positively Esti

CIS INTERPARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY’S MONITORING MISSION POSITIVELY ESTIMATES PROCESS OF PREPARATION FOR PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN RA

Noyan Tapan
Apr 20 2007

YEREVAN, APRIL 20, NOYAN TAPAN. Receiving on April 20 Vice-Chairman of
Federal Council of RF Federal Assembly, Alexander Torshin and Secretary
General of CIS Interparliamentary Assembly Mikhail Krotov, RA President
Robert Kocharian once more emphasized government’s resolution in the
issue of organizing elections meeting international standards and
creating proper conditions for implementation of monitoring missions.

According to the report provided to Noyan Tapan from RA President’s
Press Office, A. Torshin and M. Krotov head the delegation of
CIS Interparliamentary Assembly observing Armenian parliamentary
elections. The goal of their visit is to study the process of
organization of preparatory activities for the parliamentary elections.

During the meeting the interlocutors discussed issues related to
the preparatory stage of elections and observation of the electoral
process.

M. Krotov said that Yerevan Office of CIS Interparliamentary Assembly’s
International Institute of Monitoring of Development of Democracy,
Parliamentarianism and Human Rights has been working in Armenia
since March. Its working group consisting of 29 observers presents
weakly accounts on the electoral process to the CIS Interparliamentary
Assembly. In the words of CIS observers, by the first impression the
observation results show that the preparatory activities are done
rather well and the shortcomings of the previous electoral processes
have been mainly corrected."

Armenian Weight-Lifters Continue To Win Medals At European Champions

ARMENIAN WEIGHT-LIFTERS CONTINUE TO WIN MEDALS AT EUROPEAN CHAMPIONSHIP

Noyan Tapan
Apr 20 2007

STRASBOURG, APRIL 20, NOYAN TAPAN. At the European Women’s
Weight-Lifting Championship in Strasbourg (France), 19-year-old
Hripsime Khurshudian from Kasakh (75 kg) showed the 262 kg result
(snatch – 122 kg, clean and jerk – 140 kg) on April 19 and took first
place, winning the title of champion. Nazik Avdalian from Gyumri
(69 kg) showed the 241 kg result (snatch – 105 kg, clean and jerk –
136 kg), taking second place.

In the men’s competition, Tigran Martirosian from Gyumri (69 kg)
won the silver medal – a result of 331 kg (155+176).

The Armenian national team is in second place by the number of medals
won, yielding only to the Russian team.

Ramkavar Azatakan Has No ‘Sponsors’ For Parliamentary Race

RAMKAVAR AZATAKAN HAS NO ‘SPONSORS’ FOR PARLIAMENTARY RACE

Arminfo
2007-04-20 19:26:00

Ramkavar Azatakan party is not running for the parliament because it
has no "sponsors."

The leader of the party Haroutyun Arakelyan says that Armenian
businessmen sponsor parties in order to get parliamentary seats or
because they have relatives there. The political system of Armenia is
strongly monopolized, there is no political culture in our country,
says Arakelyan.

To remind, earlier Arakelyan said that he would run for the parliament
in a single-mandate district but now he is on the ticket of Dashink
party.

Vice Chairman Of The Federation Council Of Russia Is Surprised At Th

VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE FEDERATION COUNCIL OF RUSSIA IS SURPRISED AT THE PACE OBSERVERS’ CRITICISM CONCERNING THE PRE-ELECTORAL CAMPAIGN IN ARMENIA

Arminfo
2007-04-20 19:24:00

Alexander Torshin, the Vice Chairman of the Federation Council
of Russia and a member of the observation mission of the CIS
Interparliamentary Assembly, is surprised at the negative conclusion
given by the PACE observation mission about the course of the
pre-electoral campaign in Armenia.

At today’s press-conference A.Torshin expressed incomprehension
about the PACE conclusion which points out a passivity and an apathy
of the voters and the political field in Armenia. He recalled that
25 political parties are taking part in the election. There can be
no statements about technical shortages when the lists of voters
are placed in the Internet and there are so many other technical
innovations that other countries lack. For instance, no observers
are allowed to follow elections in Italy, and there are no lists
of voters in others countries at all, A.Torshin noted. "There are
shortages everywhere, but before criticizing one had better study
the national history and traditions of the country and get familiar
with the legislation. On the whole, everything is quite natural –
it is also democracy," he said.

On his part, Stanislav Chernyavsky, the Director of the International
Institute of Monitoring Democracy Development, pointed out that a
close cooperation is being developed between the European and CIS
observers on generalizing the standards of holding elections.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Head Of OSCE/ODIHR Observation Mission Is Satisfied With Pre-Elector

HEAD OF OSCE/ODIHR OBSERVATION MISSION IS SATISFIED WITH PRE-ELECTORAL SITUATION IN ARMENIA

Arminfo
2007-04-20 19:06:00

The process of registration of parliamentary candidates and political
parties was almost perfect, the head of the OSCE/ODIHR observation
mission Boris Frlec said when meeting the speaker of the Armenian
parliament Tigran Torossyan.

The parliamentary press service reports Frlec to express satisfaction
with the transparent work of the Central Electoral Commission and 15%
participation of women in the party lists. He noted that the Armenian
authorities are showing strong commitment to conduct free and fair
election. Frlec stressed the necessity of enrolling representatives of
all political forces in a special group for monitoring the electoral
processes. The OSCE/ODIHR mission is ready to actively cooperate with
that group.

Torossyan said that the observers and the local political forces have
a common goal – to conduct free and fair election.

The sides noted that the electoral situation in Armenia is calm and
is based on political consensus and competition. Torossyan and Frlec
urged the Armenian police to quickly detect and punish the organizers
and the participants of the Apr 19 skirmish in Yerevan.

To remind, the OSCE/ODIHR mission has been monitoring the electoral
campaign since Apr 8.

BAKU: Editor-In-Chief Of An Azerbaijani Paper Arrested

EDITOR-IN-CHIEF OF AN AZERBAIJANI PAPER ARRESTED

Trend News Agency, Azerbaijan
April 20 2007

Azerbaijan, Baku/ Trend , corr. K. Zarbaliyeva/ The legal proceedings
on the special accusatory suit â brought by the Chief of the
Centre for Protection of the Rights of refugees and IDPs, Tatyana
Chaladze against the founder and editor-in-chief of the Newspapers –
"Realniy Azerbaidjan" ("Real Azerbaijan") and "Gundalik Azarbaycan"
("Daily Azerbaijan"), Eynula Fatullayev, has gone on in the Yasamal
District Court of Baku City today, a source in the Court has said.

In his testifying at the Court, Eynalla Fatullayev noted that he did
not consider himself the guilt. He said that he had added nothing on
his own in the recently-published article named "The Diary of Karabakh"
by stressing that all the words which were in the article belong to
his interlocutors.

Linguist Rufat Valiyev, who has been invited to the Court as a
specialist, has said that the article does not contain any word or
expression that could insult the honour and dignity of dwellers of the
Azerbaijani Small Town of Khodjali, which was subjected to genocide
by Armenians in February, 1992.

According to the specialist, in the article, the author had written
only the opinions of the parties.

Some of dwellers of Khodjali, participating at the judicial sitting,
were gone out of the Court hall because their interrupting the legal
proceedings.

The plaintiff insisted on the Court’s sentencing Mr. Fatullayev to
a three-year imprisonment.

However, by the decision made by the Court, Mr. Fatullayev was
sentenced to two-year and six-month imprisonment, and arrested right
in the Court hall.

–Boundary_(ID_5iVUSOstZo1cHyIRSLiMFg)–

The US Dilemma: Do We Share The Burden Of Turks, Or Support Our Curr

THE US DILEMMA: DO WE SHARE THE BURDEN OF TURKS, OR SUPPORT OUR CURRENT ALLY–THE KURDS?
by Aram Azez

OpEdNews, PA
April 20 2007

Despite all its negative approaches towards the US interests in the
region, Turkey is still considering itself an old ally to the US and a
member of NATO, which deserves to receive the same political, military,
and financial support from the US that it used to prior to the Second
Gulf War. However, with the backstab that the United States experienced
by Turkey when it engaged in the "Freedom Iraq Oppression," how much
more and for how much longer should the US take the burden of and old
"ally" when, in stead, it has the essential and loyal collaboration
of the Kurds?

The worst of Turkey’s burdens for the US to share are: financial,
military, and political support to cover up its unprecedented Kurdish
issue, the Armenian Genocide, the Islamic orientation, the Cyrus issue,
its human rights violations, its so-called freedom of expression,
etc. Most of these issues are conditions for Turkey’s membership into
the European Union. But Ankara is "allergic" to and quite sensitive
about mentioning any of these points. In many aspects, however, the US
has a responsibility to press Turkey to obey the criteria set by the
EU; otherwise, the load will not be an easy one for America to share.

It is a heavy weight on US shoulders to share with an old ally, which
is now a more restrictive and problematic regime for the World Super
Power in the region than any other country. Recently, the Turkish
government rejected, once again, the requests made by the US Air Force
to conduct training flights in the Mediterranean Sea air space and
overnight fighter air raids over Turkey. The main backstab by Turkey;
however, was when it declined the US troops access to their land in
the 2003 Iraq War, which is a clear factor in affecting the strategic
relationship between the two countries.

Moreover, Turkey threatens to invade the Kurdish region of Iraq every
now and then, further attempting to halt the US efforts in the area.

Meanwhile, Turkey’s political and military leaders are expressing their
need for more US military and financial support to eradicate PKK,
Turkey’s Kurdish rebels. Turkey is asking the US to be reluctant in
supporting the Kurdish objective over an independent Kurdish state
in Iraq’s northern region. The Bush administration is playing much
smarter than Turkey in this regard. The United States has come to
realize that the Kurdish leaders are their key ally, and they would
not jeopardize this robust relationship over an old, retired one.

Senator and wife of the former US President Clinton, has lately
realized the significance of this relationship. "I think we have a
vital national security interest and obligation to try to help the
Kurds manage their various problems in the north so that one of our
allies, Turkey, is not inflamed and they [the Kurds] are able to
continue their autonomy," she has said.

The only stable region that the US can depend on where it feels
welcomed, at the present time and in the aftermath of its potential
withdrawal from Iraq, is Kurdistan. US officials have now become well
aware of the Kurdish support for Americans in the region, and they
should respect Kurdish ‘sensitivities.’

Although the US blacklisted PKK, naming it a "terrorist" organization
in the 1990s – to keep Turkey happy at the time – it is now realizing
that taking action against any Kurdish political party would mean
taking action against the Kurdish nation as a whole. This is regardless
to the part of Kurdistan for which the party is struggling. If the
Bush administration will take Turkey’s burden at least in this matter,
it should prepare itself to face other more serious circumstances
in the region. Such a move by the US would be viewed by the Kurds as
another betrayal in a series of betrayals by America.

In 1975, Iran agreed with former US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger
to close its doors and end its support to the Kurdish people,
leaving them at the mercy of Saddam Hussein in 1975 – still vivid
in the memories of the Kurdish people. In 1991, under the rule of
George Bush Senior, the US encouraged the Kurds to rise up against
the now obsolete Iraqi regime, but did not keep its promise, leaving
the Kurds, once again, completely helpless. As a result, more than
one million Kurdish civilians fled to neighboring Iran and Turkey.

The struggle to survive as a nation is a continuing theme for the
Kurds, the largest ethnic group in the world without a state of their
own. The Kurds are living in the mountainous border regions among
Turkey, Iran, Iraq, and Syria. They are the second largest US ally,
offering their land to US forces as a frontier in the 2003 war on the
Iraqi regime. The Kurds have taken an active part in the Iraqi war
from its beginning. They collaborated with the US despite all fears
of more possible chemical attacks by Iraq – something the Kurds had
already experienced in 1988. Now, instead of another US betrayal,
the Kurds say they deserve full support of the US for an independent
Kurdish state.

Turks’ "Kurd-phobia"

Denying an ancient nation like the Kurdish nation, with all
assimilation and exodus, the eradication attempts by the Turkish
regime reached its climax in the 1980s. During the 1980 military coup
by Turkish leader and now ex-President Kenan Evren, who once denied
the very existence of Kurds in Turkey, the Kurds were given the lowest
status given to human beings in the history of mankind. His regime did
not only restrict the use of the Kurdish language; it also described
the Kurdish people, who had lived in the region for millennia prior
to the arrival of the Turks, as "mountain Turks". He said the name
"Kurd" came from the noise their boots made when walking in the
snow {Kurt.-Kurt}.

Even in the current millennium, Turkey’s worst nightmare remains to be
an independent Kurdistan. Ankara fears that such a move would bring
together some 40-45 million Kurds, the majority of whom live within
the borders of modern Turkey – in the country’s southeast boundaries.

Recently, to ease Turkey’s anxiety, President of Kurdistan Region
Massoud Barzani said, "Turkey should get used to the idea of an
independent Kurdistan." The independence and statehood for Kurds,
who live in a region that straddles Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria,
is a "legitimate and legal right."

The scenario of an independent Kurdish state will move a step
closer by the end of this year, by which time Article 140 of
the Iraqi Constitution must be implemented. According to the new
Iraqi Constitution, this Article is to reverse the policies of the
"Arabization Campaign" conducted by Saddam Hussein in the 1980s and
1990s which drove thousands of Kurds out of their homes and replaced
them with Arabs. After the "normalization" of the city, a census is to
follow, then the referendum during which the people of the oil-rich
city of Kirkuk will decide whether they want to stay as part of the
Iraqi federal government or to join Iraq’s Kurdistan region.

This will be a more painful time for Turkey.

US officials have been criticized by Turkish nationalists over the
usage of the word "Kurdistan." For instance, during his farewell
speech in Erbil, former US Ambassador to Iraq Zalmay Khalilzad, said,
"There has been too much pain and violence in many parts of Iraq, but
thank God not in Kurdistan." As usual, Ankara reacted to his remarks.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was also pinched into the quarrel
after the Turkish government took her to undertaking over the use
of the word "Kurdistan." Speaking before the Senate Appropriations
Committee last February, Rice referred to the Kurdish rebels who
were "operating on the border between Turkey and Kurdistan." Turkish
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan called Rice’s description of the
region "wrong," adding that Turkey would pass "necessary messages"
to US authorities.

The Armenian Genocide – Another controversial issue for Turkey

According to PanArmenian.net, a group of prominent Armenians and
Turks initiated a third-party study in 2002 of the procedures of
1915-1918 when they equally came up to the International Center
for Transitional Justice (ICTJ). In a comprehensive report, the
New York-based organization fulfilled that the Armenian massacres
included "all of the elements of the crime of genocide" as distinct
by a 1948 United Nations convention. The Armenian Genocide Resolution
(S. Res. 106) calls upon George W. Bush to ensure that the foreign
policy of the United States reflects suitable sympathy and sensitivity
regarding issues related to human rights, ethnic cleansing, and
genocide recognized in the United States evidence relating to the
Armenian Genocide.

U.S. President George W. Bush has also cited the ICTJ study in his
annual messages to the Armenian-American community. Bush’s most recent
statements called it "a significant contribution toward deepening our
understanding of these events". However, both the US defense secretary
and US Secretary of State have sent a letter to senior members of the
US Congress indicating the damage that Turkish-US ties could suffer
if the pending resolution on Armenian claims of genocide at the hands
of the Ottoman Turks is passed.

"It is no secret that the strategic relationship between the United
States and Turkey has undergone some turbulence in recent years,"
Gates said, in his first public speech after becoming Secretary of
Defense. It was not by accident that he spoke at a Turkish-American
event, Gates said, adding that Turkey and the United States should
avoid damaging attitudes, such as the Armenian genocide resolution
pending at the US Congress and the worsening anti-American stance
in Turkey.

Human rights and freedom of expression violations

Despite the escalating pressure by the European Union on Turkey –
an EU-hopeful country – regarding freedom of expression, in recent
years, hundreds of politicians, writers, journalists and academics
have been prosecuted in Turkey for expressing their views. Among
them were 2006 Nobel Prize winner, Orhan Pamuk and renowned Turkish
novelist Elif Shafak. According to Turkey’s Article 301, mentioning
the Armenian genocide or raising the Kurdish issue or praising Kurdish
leaders, are criminal offenses. According to this notorious Article,
criticizing Turkey in any way is considered "denigrating Turkishness
or undermining Turkey’s national unity."

A 92-year-old retired Turkish archaeologist, Muazzez Ilmiye Cig, who
is also an expert on the ancient Sumerian civilization of Mesopotamia,
has claimed in one of her books that the headscarf worn by Muslim women
was first used by women in ancient Sumerian era – for pre-Islamic
sexual rites. She went on trial in Turkey for expressing her views,
which the government considered "insulting Islam."

In recent years, hundreds of prominent Kurdish politicians and
intellectuals have faced charges for referring to Abdullah Ocalan
as honorific, or simply for having raised the Kurdish issue. Current
Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan, himself, was accused of referring to
Ocalan as "Sayin" or esteemed in an interview in 2000. Prosecutors
examined recordings of the comments, but found him not guilty.

On March 6, a Turkish court ordered blocking access to You Tube because
of videos allegedly insulting Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the founder of
the modern Turkish state. Many Kurdish-English websites, newspapers,
and TV channels are also being banned in Turkey – something that
George Bernard Shaw of the New York Times called "the extreme form
of censorship". EU skepticism over an Islamic Turkish government

The skepticism of the European Union towards the efforts of Turkey’s
Islamist government to meet the EU standards has much elevated.

Turkey has been at the center of the altercation between Islamism and
freedom of speech. Scientists say religious Muslims in the government,
that has its roots in political Islam, are trying to push Turkish
education away from its traditionally secular approach.

Reuters newly noticed: Now here’s a hilarious conundrum for the idiot
left that cheers on reactionary Islamism as heroic anti-imperialism.

Are we supposed to oppose this garbage when conservative Christians do
it in the US, but support it when conservative Muslims do it in Turkey?

Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan has met and invited his Palestinian
counterpart Ismail Haniya of the hardliner Islamist Hamas movement
to visit Ankara. Haniya heads the new Palestinian government that
includes Hamas, which is regarded as a terrorist group by Israel and
the West. Turkey also has strong relations with Iran, which nowadays
is almost an isolated regime in the international community, especially
in relations with the US and its allies.

Turkish Islamist administration was annoyed by an EU mug in Brussels
last March. The mug was offered to the French President by German
Chancellor Angela Merkel at the last European Union summit, but Turkish
media said the lid of the mug portrayed the 1799 defeat of Turkish
forces by Napoleon in Egypt. Although Turks are sensitive nationalists
in the matter of their related issues, experts believe that the recent
reaction by Turkish Foreign Minister was likely religion-related.

Another crucial trouble of Turkey with the EU is Cyprus. Last December,
the EU suspended talks in 8 of the 35 areas because of Ankara’s refusal
to open its ports and airports to traffic from Cyprus, an EU member
that Turkey does not recognize.

Now, it is still up to the US to decide whether to share Turkey’s heavy
burden, which includes political, military, and financial assistance
to overcome its ‘Kurd-phobia,’ the Armenian genocide, the Cyrus issue,
the human rights violations, trouble joining the EU and so forth. Or,
to support its’ new and loyal Kurdish ally in Kurdistan on which the
Americans can depend without facing any hostilities and where, from the
beginning of the Iraq War up to now – not a single US soldier has died.

Aram Azez is a Kurdish Political Journalist. He writes about
the Kurdish and Middle East Issues in both Kurdish and English
languages. Most of his articles are published in Kurdish-English
Newspapers and Websites(see for his articles
in English .) Currently he is editor-in chief of printed Kurdish
Newspaper, Newand .

e_070420_the_us_dilemma_3a_do_w.htm

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_aram_az
www.newand.net
www.kurdishmedia.com

U.S. Revises ‘Anti-Armenian’ Karabakh Statement

U.S. REVISES ‘ANTI-ARMENIAN’ KARABAKH STATEMENT
By Emil Danielyan

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
April 20 2007

Facing strong Armenian protests, the U.S. State Department has
revised a controversial passage in its latest human rights report
that described Nagorno-Karabakh as an Azerbaijani territory occupied
by Armenia.

The original version of the annual report released on March 4
said Armenia "continues to occupy the Azerbaijani territory of
Nagorno-Karabakh and seven surrounding Azerbaijani territories." The
statement was welcomed by many in Azerbaijan but was rejected as
inaccurate by the Armenian government and Armenian lobbying groups
in the United States.

Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian said later in March that Armenian
diplomats have raised the issue with State Department officials. He
said the latter admitted that it was an "obvious mistake on their part"
and promised to "try to make a correction in that document."

The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) likewise expressed
"profound concern" at the reference. "To say that Nagorno-Karabakh is
an Azerbaijani territory and that Armenia occupies Nagorno-Karabakh
and other territories is to ignore the very fundamentals of this
conflict," Ken Hachikian, the ANCA chairman, said in an April 3 letter
to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

The revised version of the U.S. report’s chapter on human rights
practices in Armenia does not refer to Karabakh as an internationally
recognized part of Azerbaijan and stops short of explicitly accusing
Yerevan of occupying Azerbaijani districts surrounding the disputed
enclave. "Armenian forces occupy large portions of Azerbaijan territory
adjacent to Nagorno-Karabakh. Armenian officials maintain that they
do not "occupy" Nagorno-Karabakh itself," reads the report posted on
the State Department’s website.

The Armenian Foreign Ministry refused to comment on what is a rare
change in the text of a department report made after its official
release. A ministry spokesman only reiterated Oskanian’s earlier
comments on the issue.

The ANCA, for its part, was only partly satisfied with the revision
which it said was made public this week. "We remain concerned that
the amended text continues to fall short of accurately describing the
situation, as well as by the fact that the Azerbaijan section of the
report continues to make incorrect assertions, thus making its text
inconsistent with the State Department’s own revision of the Armenia
section," its executive director, Aram Hamparian, said in a statement.

Washington has always stated that it supports Azerbaijan’s territorial
integrity in the Karabakh dispute. But that has not kept it from
helping to draft over the past decade peace proposals that would
essentially pave the way for international recognition of Karabakh’s
secession from Azerbaijan.

Karabakh’s Ghukasian Names Favored Successor

KARABAKH’S GHUKASIAN NAMES FAVORED SUCCESSOR
By Astghik Bedevian

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
April 20 2007

Arkady Ghukasian has effectively lent support to plans by the chief of
his security service to succeed him as president of the unrecognized
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic (NKR), it emerged on Friday.

A senior member of Ghukasian’s Democratic Artsakh Movement (ZhAM)
party said the governing party has decided to back Bako Sahakian,
chief of the NKR’s National Security Service, during a presidential
election scheduled for July 19.

"The Democratic Party of Artsakh has approved the idea of supporting
Bako Sahakian’s candidacy," Vahram Atanesian told RFE/RL by phone.

Other officials in Stepanakert said Sahakian has already filed
for registration as an election candidate. Masis Mayilian, the
Armenian-controlled territory’s deputy foreign minister, is widely
expected to be his main challenger.

According to Atanesian, the ZhAM is now trying to get the three
other parties represented in the Karabakh parliament to also endorse
Sahakian. One of those parties, Azat Hayrenik, is a junior partner in
Ghukasian’s coalition cabinet. The two others, the Karabakh branch
of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutyun) and the
Movement-88 party, are in opposition.

A local Dashnaktsutyun leader, Artur Mosiyan, confirmed that his
party is holding talks with the ZhAM on the issue but would not say
whether it is prepared to support the Ghukasian-backed candidate.

Dashnaktsutyun issued a statement earlier this month harshly
criticizing the Karabakh government’s policies.

The Karabakh parliament set the election date on April 4 after
Ghukasian, in power since 1997, reaffirmed his decision not seek a
third term in office.