Public Advocates Union To Hold Seminar In Yerevan

PUBLIC ADVOCATES UNION TO HOLD SEMINAR IN YEREVAN

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
Oct 16 2006

YEREVAN, October 16. /ARKA/. Public Advocates Union is to hold a
seminar on Tuesday in Yerevan.

The union’s press office says the seminar aims to present programs
being implemented in provinces, to estimate the current situation
and to outline ways for problems solution.

Representatives of Armenian Public Utilities regulation Commission,
companies providing public utilities, NGOs and international
organizations are invited for the event.

Mostly Economic Issues To Be Discussed At Sitting Of Armenian-Russia

MOSTLY ECONOMIC ISSUES TO BE DISCUSSED AT SITTING OF ARMENIAN-RUSSIAN INTERPARLIAMENTARY COMMISSION

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
Oct 16 2006

YEREVAN, October 16. /ARKA/. Mostly economic issues will be discussed
at the sitting of the Armenian-Russian parliamentary commission, Vahan
Hovhannisyan, vice-speaker and co-chair of the commission reported.

"The legislative basis for facilitating the activity of economic
entities and promoting entry to each other’s markets will be
discussed," the vice-speaker said.

"There will be spokesmen from the executive power, particularly from
the ministries of transport and communication, and trade and economic
development," Hovhannisyan reported.

Besides this, he said that the issue about putting the Armenian
enterprises, transferred to Russia against the debt, will be also
discussed.

Inflation Rate To Jump To 5% In Armenia

INFLATION RATE TO JUMP TO 5% IN ARMENIA

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
Oct 16 2006

YEREVAN, October 16. /ARKA/. The inflation rate, planned for 2006
in the state budget, will increase to 5%, Vardan Aramyan, head of
the department for foreign economic relations of the Central Bank of
Armenia reported at the hearings on the AMD exchange rate in 2005-2006,
organized by the Anti-criminal movement He said that the inflation has
been planned at the level up to 3% for 2006, but the abrupt reduction
of harvests in the agriculture resulted in decrease in supply and
price rise, particularly for potato by 40%.

"Taking into account the price rise on international markets, we cannot
oppose the inflation with our limited resources, and keeping it at
a lower level can jeopardize the country’s economy," Aramyan said.

He reported that it is planned to amend the law and make the planned
level of inflation higher.

"Otherwise, the Central Bank would have to resort to more rigid
measures, and it is not ruled out that as a result, the AMD revaluation
would have turned deeper, but such measures are not reasonable in
the given situation, as the current inflation is ‘the inflation of
supply’," Aramyan reported.

According to the Central Bank, the inflation will exceed the target
level of 3% at the end of 2006 (compared to December 2005). Such rise
of the inflation has occurred first of all due to the strengthening
external inflation pressures.

In particular, the risks include the high rate of world prices for
energy carriers and other goods (basic metals and granulated sugar)
that occurred during the year, and also the anticipated reduction of
grain-crops in Russia and Ukraine.

At the end of September 2006, the Armenian government approved the
proposal for amendments to the law "On State Budget of Armenia for
2006", and suggested that the CBA take measures for keeping the
inflation in December 2006 at the level of 5% (+- 1.5%) compared to
the corresponding period of 2005.

Turkey, France: Ankara Seeks French Businesses’ Help Against Armenia

TURKEY, FRANCE: ANKARA SEEKS FRENCH BUSINESSES’ HELP AGAINST ARMENIAN GENOCIDE BILL

Monday Morning, Lebanon
Oct 16 2006

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who has asked French companies
to lobby French legislators against a parliamentary bill making it
an offense to deny that Armenians were the victims of genocide

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan met in Istanbul with
representatives of French companies doing business in Turkey in a bid
to enlist their support against a controversial French bill that has
threatened to poison bilateral ties.

The bill, to be debated in the French Parliament, makes it an offense
to deny that Armenians were the victims of genocide under the Ottoman
Empire during World War I.

"Erdogan asked French companies to lobby French legislators to try
to abort the bill", Mustafa Abdullahoglu, an executive with a firm
he did not name, told reporters after the meeting. "He said the bill
would damage bilateral ties if adopted".

Abdullahoglu said he feared a boycott of French goods in Turkey if
the bill was passed.

Representatives of carmakers Peugeot and Renault, the food giant
Danone, the construction materials producer Lafarge and supermarket
chain Carrefour were among the participants in the meeting.

Members of a Turkish-French business group flew to Paris to lobby
against the bill, which calls for a five-year prison term and a fine of
45,000 euros (57,000 dollars) for anyone who denies that the massacres
of Armenians constituted a genocide.

The Turkish Foreign Ministry warned that the adoption of the bill
could jeopardize "investments, the fruit of years of work, and France
will — so to speak — lose Turkey".

The bill was first submitted in May but the debate ran out of
parliamentary time before a vote could be held.

The head of Turkey’s largest business group TUSIAD also condemned
the bill, calling it the reflection of "fears that Turkey’s bid
for European Union membership can materialize" and an attempt at
"disrupting efforts for constructive dialogue and analytical debate".

"I appeal to French politicians: Don’t you see that you are
jeopardizing all the political, economic and social relations that
France has had with Turkey for centuries for the sake of your own
political interests?" Omer Sabanci said in a statement, carried by
the Anatolia news agency.

In 2001 France passed a resolution recognizing the killings as
"genocide", prompting Ankara to retaliate by sidelining French
companies from public tenders and cancelling several projects awarded
to French firms.

Armenians claim up to 1.5 million of their kin were slaughtered
in orchestrated killings between 1915 and 1917. Turkey rejects the
genocide label, arguing that 300,000 Armenians and at least as many
Turks died in civil strife when Armenians rebelled against Ottoman
rule in Eastern Anatolia and sided with invading Russian troops as
the Ottoman Empire was falling apart.

Beirut: Armenians Rally Against Turkish UNIFIL Force

ARMENIANS RALLY AGAINST TURKISH UNIFIL FORCE

Monday Morning, Lebanon
Oct 16 2006

As troops from various countries were traveling or preparing to travel
to join the reinforced UNIFIL, thousands of Lebanon’s Armenians
rallied in Beirut against Turkish troops taking part in the force,
on the same day France moved to make denial of the "Ottoman genocide
of Armenians" a crime.

Armenian political and religious leaders attended the demonstration,
which came just two days after the first contingent of Turkish
peacekeepers arrived.

The rally took place on Beirut’s Martyrs’ Square, which honors six
Lebanese nationalists who were hanged by the Ottomans during World
War I.

The crowd, drawn from an Armenian community of about 140,000 people,
held high banners denouncing the presence of Turkish troops as "an
insult to the collective memory of the Armenian people", while waving
Armenian, Lebanese and French flags.

Overriding widespread opposition, the Turkish Parliament approved a
government motion on September 5 to contribute troops to UNIFIL.

In total, Turkey is to deploy some 700 soldiers in Lebanon, including
troops aboard naval ships. Those who landed last Tuesday were the
first Muslim peacekeepers to arrive in the country.

Turkey contests the term "genocide" and strongly opposed the French
bill. It says 300,000 Armenians, and at least as many Turks, died in
civil strife when Armenians took up arms for independence and sided
with invading Russian troops as the Ottoman Empire fell apart during
World War I.

Armenians say up to 1.5 million of their ancestors were slaughtered
in orchestrated killings, which they maintain can only be seen as
genocide.

The French bill must now go to the Senate, or upper house of
Parliament, for another vote.

Armenian Car Imports Up In 2006

ARMENIAN CAR IMPORTS UP IN 2006
By Anna Saghabalian

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Oct 16 2006

The Armenian customs reported on Monday a 30 percent jump in the number
of cars imported to the country during the first nine months of this
year, presenting it as another indication of rising living standards.

Armen Avetisian, the chief of the State Customs Committee (SCC),
said almost 60 percent of the 17,000 or so imported vehicles were
second-hand European cars worth up to $5,000. "Most of the imported
cars are inexpensive and intended for the growing middle class,"
he said.

The SCC data show that local dealerships and private individuals
brought in a total of some 16,500 cars during the whole of last year.

The bulk of them were sold in Yerevan where traffic has grown much
heaver in recent years and where rush-hour traffic jams are an
increasingly serious problem.

The number of cars is continuing to rise despite a further drop in
imports of petrol and diesel fuel which the SCC said shrunk by 7,000
metric tons from January through August. Avetisian attributed this
to local motorists’ growing reliance on the much cheaper liquefied gas.

Retail sales of propane have soared during the period in question,
he said.

The customs figures also indicate growing demand in brand new and
expensive cars that are imported by Armenian companies usually
operating as official distributors of Western and Russian automakers.

According to the SCC, those companies imported more than 5,500 such
vehicles in 2006. However, the 43 dealerships registered in Armenia
claimed to brought in only a total of 552 cars.

The State Commission on Protection of Economic Competition (SCPEC)
said last August that it has launched an official inquiry into the
huge discrepancy between the reported figures. Its findings have not
been made public yet.

ANKARA: Syrian Armenians Disapprove Of French Bill

SYRIAN ARMENIANS DISAPPROVE OF FRENCH BILL
By Bostan Cemiloglu, Cihan News Agency, Damascus

Zaman, Turkey
Oct 16 2006

Armenians living in Syria have expressed their disapproval of a French
bill that makes it a crime to deny that a genocide of Armenians was
perpetrated by Ottoman Turks during World War I.

Edward Halladciyan, the son of a family forced to emigrate from
Kahramanmaras to Syria, has been operating a tourism agency called
Al Boustan with his Turkish friend Yusuf Isa for fifteen years.

Halladciyan believes the decision of the French parliament was purely
political, expressing that the government used the Armenian issue as
a political trump card.

Halladciyan, who has the Armenian flag on his desk and a picture of
Sultanahmet Mosque on his wall, asserted that problems between Turks
and Armenians have been left in the past.

"In Syria, we are like brothers with the Turks. It has been years since
we forgot the allegations that Turkey committed genocide against the
Armenians. This is an issue which dates over a century.

We Armenians are used to living with Turks," Halladciyan said.

Thinking that France is using the Armenian issue as a way to block
Turkey’s EU bid, he added that if a real solution was being sought,
then both sides should come together and reach a compromise through
negotiations.

Construction Boom ‘Adds To Armenian Currency Appreciation’

CONSTRUCTION BOOM ‘ADDS TO ARMENIAN CURRENCY APPRECIATION’
By Ruzanna Khachatrian

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Oct 16 2006

An ongoing construction boom, the driving force behind Armenia’s
double-digit economic growth, has also contributed to the dramatic
strengthening of the national currency, the head of the Armenian
Central Bank said on Monday.

The Armenian dram has gained more than 40 percent in value against
the U.S. dollar since December 2003 and is continuing to appreciate,
hurting domestic manufacturers and many people dependent on cash
remittances from their relatives working abroad. The process has
sparked opposition allegations that the Armenian authorities have been
deliberately boosting the dram to siphon off a large part of those
remittances and to benefit wealthy government-connected importers.

The authorities, backed by the International Monetary Fund and the
World Bank, strongly deny any exchange rate manipulation. The Central
Bank has said all along that dram’s strengthening has primarily
resulted from recent years’ increase in hard currency wired home by
hundreds of thousands of Armenians living abroad. Their total amount
is expected to exceed $1 billion this year.

According to the bank’s chairman, Tigran Sarkisian, the rapidly
growing construction sector is also responsible for the exchange
rate fluctuations. Official figures show the sector expanding by
more than 40 percent during the first half of this year. The growth
is particularly visible in central Yerevan where dozens of expensive
apartment blocks are currently under construction.

"Today 45 buildings are being constructed in the center of Yerevan
alone," Sarkisian told hearings on the issue held at the Armenian
parliament. "Their dollar-based market value varies from $20 million
to $25 million."

The growth of Armenia’s construction sector is good for everyone,
including the low-income stratum of the population which is getting
jobs, high salaries," he added.

Trade and Economic Development Minister Karen Chshmaritian, who
also attended the hearings, acknowledged that Armenian manufacturers
increasingly have trouble competing with imported goods and selling
their production abroad. "Of course the stronger is inflicting damage
[on the manufacturing sector,]" he told RFE/RL.

But Chshmaritian insisted that Armenia’s industrial output, excluding
polished diamonds, has not shrunk as a result. He said local exporters
can offset negative effects of the dram’s strengthening by improving
their management and becoming more competitive.

But Suren Bekirski, director of the export-oriented textile company
Tosp, disagreed, warning that it risks facing bankruptcy. "As a local
manufacturer selling goods here, I gain something [from the stronger
dram]," he told RFE/RL. "But as an exporter, I lose twice as much …

If things go on like this, we will last for only a few more months."

According to official data released by the State Customs Committee
on Monday, Armenia’s net exports fell by more than 6 percent to 296
billion drams ($777 million) while imports rose by 16 percent to 573
billion drams ($1.5 billion) during the first nine months of the year.

The customs chief, Armen Avetisian, downplayed the increased trade
deficit, saying that the physical volume of Armenian goods sold abroad
was the same as during the same period last year. He claimed that the
monetary value of the exports has decreased mainly due to a drop in
international prices of some of Armenia’s key exports such as diamonds,
molybdenum and even gold.

ANKARA: I Don’t Trust Chirac

I DON’T TRUST CHIRAC
By Tufan Turenc

Turkish Press
Oct 16 2006

HURRIYET- I want to write very harsh words about French President
Jacque Chirac. I’m trying hard to stop myself. I don’t trust Chirac
at all. His majesty called Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and
told him that he was very sorry. He said that he understands and
shares our feelings and criticism and that this development stems
from the upcoming general elections. Then he promised that he would
do his best to make sure the bill won’t become law. So kind of him!

Where has he been until now as France’s president? I wonder if Chirac
is making fun of the Turkish nation. They immediately forgot the
show that he made in the Armenian capital Yerevan last week. I also
wonder if he didn’t say last week that each country has to face up
to its tragedies and mistakes in the past in line with its level of
development and that Turkey should recognize the Armenian genocide in
order to gain European Union membership. What sort of a statesmanship
is this? How can the Turkish nation trust a president whose words
now contradict what he said just a week before? Who can guarantee
that his majesty won’t say something against Turkey tomorrow? Chirac
should realize that the Turkish nation knows better than to take
him seriously.

I wonder what Erdogan and the Cabinet ministers think about Chirac. I
believe they don’t trust him either. Turkey should act coolly now. We
should see that this nonsensical, illogical law which completely
violates democratic values has damaged France’s international
respectability and we should make use of it very well. We should make a
dignified response to this hostile stance of France. Let’s not sully
our just cause with pointless displays like throwing eggs at the
doors and windows of French representatives and setting their flag
on fire. Let’s not forget that trying to impose excessive sanctions
on commercial interests would only harm us. The Turkish Republic is
a state of law. Harming French firms which have invested in Turkey
would hit us like a boomerang. Our struggle with France should be
done through political and legal avenues. Turkey has the resources,
experience and diplomatic culture to do this.

George Horton: An American Witness In Smyrna

GEORGE HORTON: AN AMERICAN WITNESS IN SMYRNA
By James L. Marketos

GREEK NEWS, New York
Oct 16 2006

Posted on Monday, October 16 @ 12:00:57 EDT by greek_news

Exactly eighty-four years ago yesterday (September 13, 1922), a
massive fire broke out in the Armenian quarter of Smyrna (modern-day
Izmir). Ever since, controversy has raged over who started the fire,
whether it was an intentional act of genocide, and how many people were
killed. Estimates range from one or two thousand to over 100,000. There
is no dispute, however, that this was the 20th centuryʼs first
holocaust.

In 1922, Smyrna was a large and important commercial port on the Asia
Minor coast. Its population was about 400,000. Roughly 43% were Turkish
Muslims, 45% were Greek and Armenian Christians, 6% were Jews, and 5%
were foreigners. The Greek and Armenian Christians had deep roots in
Smyrna going back countless generations. Many owned successful and
long-established businesses. Others were professionals, artisans,
or educators. They had a thriving cultural life.

The fire raged for four days. A strong breeze drove the flames away
from the Turkish quarter and toward the waterfront, and with it
the cityʼs horrified Greeks and Armenians. The fire eventually
consumed all of the city except the Turkish quarter.

By late afternoon of the 13th, the fire had pinned thousands of victims
on the harborside quay, where they had fled hoping to finds means of
escape. On the narrow quay they found themselves trapped between the
raging fire at their backs and the deep harbor in front.

There they were subjected to unspeakable atrocities while the
uncontrollable fire burned itself out. And over the following weeks
and months, more perished from starvation and exposure while waiting
to be evacuated.

Tragically, the entire scene was witnessed by representatives of
the Allied Powers. They had pledged themselves to neutrality at the
Paris Peace Conference following World War I, and so they watched from
warships anchored about 250 yards offshore. All vessels that had been
tied up along the quay (including the U.S. destroyer Litchfield) had
to move off due to the intense heat of the fire. The foreign crews
evacuated their respective nationals from any danger in Smyrna and
plucked from the sea as many victims as could swim out to the ships.

At night, the foreign vessels drowned out the terrible screams coming
from the quay with band music and tried to keep rapes and murders to
a minimum with occasional sweeps of their powerful searchlights.

Some Turkish apologists contend that resentful, demoralized retreating
Greek army troops started the fire. Others contend that Armenians,
some disguised as Turkish soldiers, started the fire. They also
question why Turks would want to burn such a rich city.

By contrast, the Greek and Armenian version of events is that regular
Turkish army soldiers started the fire by spreading and igniting
petroleum in houses and other locations, and that the numbers
that perished are at the higher end of the estimates. This version
also contends that Turkish nationalist troops rampaged through the
city before and during the fire, assaulting, looting, and killing
Christians. The Greek and Armenian case is persuasively supported by
the testimony of an American eyewitness:

George Horton.

Biographical Information Horton was a literary man. He was a scholar
of both Greek and Latin.

He translated Sappho. He wrote a guide for the interpretation of
Scripture. He wrote several novels and was a renowned journalist in
Chicago, a member of what was called the "Chicago Renaissance."

He was also a professional diplomat who loved Greece. He became U.S.

Consul in Athens in 1893, where he actively promoted the revival of the
Olympic Games and inspired the U.S. teamʼs participation. He wrote
a lyrical visitorʼs guide to Athens and composed a reflective
description of a few monthsʼ stay in Argolis. And he married
Catherine Sacopoulo, a Greek American woman.

He served twice as U.S. Consul in Athens (1893-1898; 1905-1906). He
also served in Thessaloniki (1910-1911) and then in Smyrna up to the
U.S.ʼs break-off of diplomatic relations with the Ottoman Empire
(1911-1917) in World War I. He served again as consul in Smyrna
after the war (1919-1922) and remained in Smyrna until after the
fire began on September 13, 1922, spending the last hours before his
evacuation signing passes for those entitled to American protection
and transportation to Piraeus.

Today, George Horton is best remembered for his book about the events
leading up to and during the fire. The book was published in 1926,
and its title, The Blight of Asia, unabashedly refers to the abominable
behavior of the Turks. By the time of publication Horton had resigned
his diplomatic commission, and he wrote strictly in the capacity of
a private citizen, drawing on his own observations and those of the
people he quotes. In these remarks, I draw mostly on Hortonʼs
book, but also informative is the long cable he wrote to the State
Department from the Athens consulate two weeks after the fire.

Horton wanted his book to make four main points.

First, he wanted to illustrate that the catastrophic events in Smyrna
were merely "the closing act in a consistent program of exterminating
Christianity throughout the length and breadth of the old Byzantine
Empire."

Second, he wanted to establish that the Smyrna fire was started by
regular Turkish army troops with, as he put it "fixed purpose, with
system, and with painstaking minute details."

Third, he wanted to emphasize that the Allied Powers shamefully
elevated their selfish political and economic interests over the
plight of the beleaguered Christian populations of Asia Minor, thereby
allowing the Smyrna catastrophe to unfold without any effective
resistance and, as he said, "without even a word of protest by any
civilized government." And fourth, he wanted to illustrate that pious
western Christians were deluded in thinking they were making missionary
headway in the Muslim world. I will address only the first two points.

Historical Background To understand these two points, we first need to
review briefly the key events in Asia Minor in the period leading up to
1922. In World War I, the Ottoman Empire sided with Germany. Horton,
you will recall, was at his consular post in Smyrna during the war
until 1917.

After the war, the victorious Allies gathered at Versailles to
formulate peace terms. Among the Peace Commissionʼs thorniest
tasks was partitioning the defeated Ottoman Empire.

Greece entered the war late, but sided with the eventually victorious
Allies. At the Peace Conference, Greeceʼs prime minister,
Eleutherios Venizelos, lobbied hard for the annexation to Greece of
Eastern Thrace, Constantinople, and a large territory along the Asia
Minor coast. In all of these areas there were large populations of
indigenous Greek Christians engaged mostly in commerce and agriculture.

In May 1919, the Supreme Council of the Paris Peace Commission
endorsed the Greek armyʼs landing at Smyrna and the establishment
of a Greek administrative zone. From Smyrna, the Greek army pushed
eastward into Anatolia, the Turkish heartland, successfully expanding
the Greek zone; and Greeceʼs claims not only to this zone but
also to Eastern Thrace were ratified by the 1920 Treaty of Sèvres,
which the Great Powers imposed on the humbled Ottoman Empire.

There remained, however, the problem of a rising Turkish nationalist
movement in Anatolia led by a charismatic former Ottoman army officer,
Mustafa Kemal, whose military strength the Great Powers and Greece
dangerously underestimated. The result was the rout of Greeceʼs
over-stretched, war-weary army by Kemal near Afyonkarahisar on August
30, after which Kemalʼs nationalist troops began a relentless
advance toward Smyrna. Before them they drove the remnants of the
Greek army and hordes of frightened Christian farmers and villagers.

According to Horton, news of the Kemalist advances began reaching
Smyrna soon after the Greek defeat and produced immediate panic among
the Christian population. Their panic was completely understandable,
he said, as he had predicted in a consular dispatch that if the
Greek Army retreated in Asia Minor it would be followed by the entire
Christian population. His prediction was based on his nearly thirty
years of consular service and, as he put it, on "some things which
all men who have had long residence in this country absolutely know."

First, the city filled with refugees from the interior, mostly
small farmers, who were lodged in the churches, schools, and other
public institutions. Many got away in the first days on steamers and
sailboats. "Then," says Horton, the defeated, dusty, ragged Greeks
soldiers began to arrive, looking straight ahead, like men walking
in their sleep. . . .

In a never-ending stream they poured through the town toward the
point on the coast to which the Greek fleet had withdrawn. Silently
as ghosts they went, looking neither to the right nor the left. From
time to time some soldier, his strength entirely spent, collapsed on
the sidewalk or by a door.

Then they learned that the Turkish army was moving on the city. The
Turkish cavalry units arrived on the morning of September 9, filing
along the quay toward their barracks at the Konak (the Turkish
administrative headquarters building) at the other end of the city.

In the evening of the same day, the looting and killing began in the
Armenian quarter. The following morning, Americans began to report
seeing corpses lying in the streets in the interior of the city.

Horton himself saw Turkish civilians armed with shotguns watching
the windows of Christian houses ready to shoot at any head that
might appear.

The shooting continued in the Christian quarters the night of September
10. Throngs of frightened people were begging to be let into various
American institutions. After the Armenian quarter had been thoroughly
sacked for nearly four days, the fire erupted in the Armenian quarter.

**** A lecture by James L. Marketos at the AHI Noon Forum, on September
14, 2006

To be continued

php?name=News&file=article&sid=5594

–Bou ndary_(ID_wiHhiUstPzP2J68a2RHEKg)–

http://www.greeknewsonline.com/modules.