ANKARA: Turkish Official Returns French Medal In Protest Over Armeni

TURKISH OFFICIAL RETURNS FRENCH MEDAL IN PROTEST OVER ARMENIAN GENOCIDE BILL

Anatolia news agency, Turkey
16 Oct 06

Ankara, 16 October: Higher Education Board (YOK) Chairman Prof
Dr Erdogan Tezic returned "Commandeur" medal of merit which was
presented to him by French President Jacques Chirac (two years ago),
as a reaction to the adoption (by French national assembly) of a bill
on so-called Armenian genocide.

YOK stated on Monday [16 October] that Tezic returned "Commandeur"
medal of merit which is one of the highest ranks of Legion d’Honneur
and presented to him on 17 September 2004.

"As a reaction to French national assembly’s adopting the bill making
a crime the denial of so-called Armenian genocide, Tezic, the only
owner of Commandeur medal in Turkey, sent back the medal to Chirac
together with a letter.

This medal, which was started to be presented on Napoleon I era to
very few people in the world, is returned for the first time back to
France," stated YOK.

In his letter to Chirac, Tezic says although it was stated that the
draft was proposed by parliamentarians, and the government has nothing
to do in this issue, President Chirac expressed that Turkey committed
so-called Armenian genocide during his visit to Armenia, thus it was
obviously confirmed that this idea is a state policy of France.

Tezic wrote that he is sending back the medal as this issue
(acknowledgment of so-called Armenian genocide) has become a state
policy of France.

ANKARA: "Turkish-French Relations Were Harmed" – Turkish Foreign Min

"TURKISH-FRENCH RELATIONS WERE HARMED" – TURKISH FOREIGN MINISTER

Anatolia news agency, Turkey
15 Oct 06

Ankara, 15 October: Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul left for
Luxembourg to attend foreign ministers’ meeting of Turkey-EU Troika.

Gul replied to the questions of reporters prior to his departure from
Ankara’s Esenboga Airport.

Asked whether he considered French President Jacques Chirac (who
telephoned Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and said he was
sorry for the adoption of a bill in the French National Assembly that
would make it a crime to deny so-called Armenian genocide) "sincere",
Gul said Erdogan discussed all the issues in question with Chirac.

"We have concerns. Unfortunately Turkish-French relations were
harmed. I hope France will become aware of this," Gul noted.

Gul stated that all the international community and the EU circles
criticized this bill, indicating that, "France is discredited. I hope
French politicians and statesmen will become aware of this and take
necessary measures."

Gul said Turkey would maintain its efforts within the framework of
a programme to prevent the bill become a law. He said many measures
were in question, stating that all those would be discussed in a
special agenda of the Turkish parliament on Tuesday [17 October].

Giving information about the Turkey-EU Troika meeting, Gul said
during his contacts in Luxembourg, he would explain [to] EU executives
Turkey’s expectations as regards to the Progress Report expected to
be made public on 8 November.

Gul said the meeting was important as it takes place immediately
after the screening process and prior to the Progress Report.

Turkish FM indicated that the studies that were fulfilled within the
framework of Turkey’s EU membership and the future studies would be
discussed in detail with the EU partners. He said Turkey’s negotiation
process would be reviewed and at the same time the parties would
exchange views on various regional and international matters.

Gul said the EU party explicitly displayed its will on dialogue and
cooperation with Turkey on various international matters with the
effect of several developments that occurred recently.

"The role that Turkey may play on regional issues and global issues
like the alliance of civilizations become more apparent recently. The
crisis which erupted in the Middle East in July is the best example
for this," Gul added.

Stating that the Troika meeting would take place at a time when
Turkey was passing through an important corner in EU membership
process, Gul said, "to this end, I have no doubt that both parties
would benefit from the meeting in the best way to further improve
Turkish-EU relations."

Gul also said he would have the opportunity to meet foreign ministers
of several EU member countries during his visit to Luxembourg.

Replying to a question about Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code
(TCK), Gul said, "all the ideas, unless they include violence or incite
violence, should be spoken and written in Turkey. It would be injustice
to Turkey to say that people cannot express their views in Turkey."

Gul pointed out that there were several problems stemming from
implementation, and noted that, "we are closely pursuing them. We
will do what is necessary."

"This is a process and we follow the implementation. However, I will
recall the public opinion when I go to the EU. Copenhagen criteria
has already changed with this attitude of France. Turkey is aware
of its deficiencies as a country which is not a full member. We are
exerting efforts to eliminate the deficiencies. We do all those as
our people deserve this," Gul said.

Proposal of Finland

Replying to a question about Cyprus proposal of Finland, Gul said this
country was in good will efforts to find a solution particularly to
Cyprus question and prevent this problem to overshadow the EU process.

Gul said Finland talked about this issue with Turkey before, noting
that, "we said Turkey will welcome every kind of good will efforts.

We will welcome all constructive and objective initiatives. We said
we would cooperate."

Gul said this issue would also be discussed in Luxembourg.

Gul wished the good will steps taken by Turkey to be noticed, and noted
that, "it should not be forgotten that the island has two parties. One
is the Turkish Cypriot party, other is the Greek Cypriot party. The
disagreement is between them. We are not the direct party of the
issue. Thus, everybody should talk to TRNC [self-declared Turkish
Republic of Northern Cyprus] executives in order to make progress
and to be constructive."

Gul said he hoped Finland would talk to TRNC President Mehmet Ali
Talat to understand the matter better and to convince the parties.

ANKARA: Turkish Premier "Deeply Sad" Over French Decision, Hopes Bil

TURKISH PRESIDENT "DEEPLY SAD" OVER FRENCH DECISION, HOPES BILL NOT ENACTED

Anatolia news agency, Turkey
Oct 13 2006

Ankara, 13 October: "President Ahmet Necdet Sezer got deeply sad
over the French National Assembly’s approval of a bill on 12 October
2006 that makes any denial of so-called Armenian genocide a crime,"
said Sermet Atacanli, senior adviser to President Sezer, on Friday
[13 October].

"Mr President hopes that the bill will be received with logic in the
next legislative level and hopes that the bill will not become an
actual law in France," told Atacanli.

Atacanli added that "Mr Sezer wishes that Turkish-French relations
will not get hurt and basic rights of freedom of expression will not
get negatively affected by a French law."

A Pamuk Primer

A PAMUK PRIMER
by Stephanie Yap

The Straits Times (Singapore)
October 15, 2006 Sunday

Despite Turkey’s hostile attitude towards Nobel laureate Orhan Pamuk,
the land of his birth is where his heart belongs

THE name Orhan Pamuk might not ring a bell for most people, but the
54-year-old Turkish writer, who was announced as the 2006 recipient
of the Nobel Prize in literature last Thursday, actually caused quite
an international hullabaloo last year.

In an interview with a Swiss newspaper in February that year, he made
the statement that ‘thirty thousand Kurds and one million Armenians
were killed in these lands, and nobody but me dares to talk about it’.

He was referring to the conflict between the Turkish Army and Kurdish
separatists in the 1980s and 1990s, and the mass killings of Armenians
in 1915. Turkey still does not acknowledge the Armenian slaughter
as genocide.

In December last year, Pamuk found himself standing trial for violating
Article 301 of Turkey’s penal code, which prohibits public denigration
of Turkish national identity, the republic or the national assembly.

However, the trial stalled as soon as it started, with the judge
postponing the proceedings for two months on a technicality. The case
was eventually dropped.

The media at the time speculated that Turkey backed down after
criticism by leaders of the European Union, which Turkey applied to
join in 1987, but has yet to be admitted to.

The writer is now a visiting professor at Columbia University in New
York. However, despite Turkey’s hostile attitude towards him, it is
clear that the land of his birth is where his heart still belongs.

He told the Associated Press in a telephone interview that he accepted
the award not just as ‘a personal honour, but as an honour bestowed
upon the Turkish literature and culture I represent’.

Here’s a look at the newest Nobel laureate, and a rundown of the
works that earned him the $2.2 million prize.

The writer

ORHAN Pamuk was born on June 7, 1952, in Istanbul, Turkey, to a
wealthy industrialist family. He is the younger of two sons. His
father, a businessman, died in 2003.

His older brother, Sevket, is a university professor and a noted
expert on economic history. He sometimes appears as a fictional
character in Pamuk’s books.

The writer attended the exclusive American-style Robert College in
Istanbul, graduating in 1970. He then entered Istanbul Technical
University at the age of 20 to study architecture, but left after
three years as he realised he wanted to be a writer.

He graduated from the Institute of Journalism at Istanbul University
in 1976 but never worked as a journalist.

Instead, he started writing at the age of 23 and published his first
novel, Cevdet Bey And His Sons, seven years later at the age of 30.

Winning both the Orhan Kemal and Milliyet literary prizes – two of
the most prestigious in Turkey – he went on to write six more novels,
the most recent being Snow in 2002.

He writes in Turkish, and all but his first two novels have been
translated into English.

He was a visiting scholar at Columbia from 1985 to 1988, a period
which also included a visiting fellowship at the University of Iowa.

He returned to Istanbul, where he lived until early this year, when
he went back to the United States to take up the position at Columbia.

He married historian Aylin Turegen in 1982, but they divorced in
2001. They have a teenage daughter.

The works

NOVEL #1: Cevdet Bey And His Sons (1982). It is about three generations
of a wealthy Istanbul family, and depicts Turkey changing from an
Eastern identity to a Western one.

NOVEL #2: The Silent House (1984). A novel in five voices, reminiscent
of Virginia Woolf’s The Waves, it is about three siblings who spend
a summer in the 1970s at their dying grandmother’s home outside
Istanbul. Meanwhile, communists and nationalists clash in the city’s
streets.

NOVEL #3: The White Castle (1985), translated into English in 1990.

Set in the 17th century, on the eve of Ottoman decline, it is the story
of a Turkish scholar and a captured Venetian who argue with each other
about whose civilisation is superior. In the end, they swop identities.

NOVEL #4: The Black Book (1990), translated into English in 1994. In
a narrative heavily influenced by Jorge Luis Borges and James Joyce,
an Istanbul lawyer searches for his runaway wife who has fled with a
prominent newspaper columnist. After the couple die in an accident,
the lawyer assumes the identity of the journalist, wearing his clothes
and even writing his columns.

NOVEL #5: The New Life (1995), translated into English in 1997. A
young man falls in love with a girl and the book she is reading. They
then embark on a random tour of Turkey, observing a country that has
forgotten, or wants to forget, its history.

NOVEL #6: My Name Is Red (1998), translated into English in 2001. A
murder mystery set in the late 16th century, it is often seen as
Pamuk’s magnum opus. At the Sultan’s Court, the introduction of
Western Renaissance painting, characterised by realism, threatens
traditional Persian miniature painting, which is rooted in the idea
of Allah as the only creator.

NOVEL #7: Snow (2002), translated into English in 2004. A Turkish
poet who has been living abroad returns to his homeland. There, he
investigates a rumour about a remote village where some girls have
killed themselves rather than remove their headscarves, as Turkish
law requires.

MEMOIR: Istanbul: Memories And The City (2003), translated into
English in 2005. Pamuk’s memoir pays tribute to his hometown, showing
how the melancholy of the once-mighty city permeates the lives of
its inhabitants.

Most of the English translations are available or can be ordered
through major bookstores.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Erdogan Calls On Turks To Embrace Dissident Nobel Winner

ERDOGAN CALLS ON TURKS TO EMBRACE DISSIDENT NOBEL WINNER

Agence France Presse — English
October 16, 2006 Monday 10:23 AM GMT

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has called on his
compatriots to wholeheartedly embrace 2006 Nobel literature laureate
Orhan Pamuk and "put aside" the controversies he has stirred up in
the past, in remarks published Monday.

"Let’s put aside the polemics. The prize is a first for a son of Turkey
and it will be wrong for us to underestimate it," Erdogan said in a
television interview to be aired late Monday, excerpts of which were
published in the best-selling newspaper Hurriyet.

"We must congratulate him," he said. "It would be wrong to mix what
Pamuk has said in the past and the fact that he has won this award."

The 54-year-old Pamuk, who has long had bad blood with the state,
landed himself in court on charges of "insulting Turkishness" and won
the reputation of a "traitor" among nationalist circles when he told
a Swiss magazine last year that "one million Armenians and 30,000
Kurds were killed in these lands."

His remarks were widely seen as an acknowledgement that the Ottoman
Turks committed genocide against Armenians during World War I,
a label that Ankara fiercely rejects.

Ironically, Thursday’s announcement of his Nobel prize came shortly
after the lower house of the French parliament voted a bill that
would make it a crime to deny that the killings were genocide,
infuriating Ankara.

The celebration of Pamuk’s award at home was overshadowed by skeptics
who argued that the author won the favors of the West not for his
literary skills but for his vocal criticism of his country

The divisions plagued even the highest state echelons: while Erdogan
personally called Pamuk, currently in New York, to congratulate him,
President Ahmet Necdet has remained mum, contrary to his tradition
of issuing congratulations to international achievements by Turks.

On Friday, Pamuk joined the chorus of criticism of the French bill,
saying that it flouted France’s "tradition of liberal and critical
thinking."

The court case against Pamuk, in which he risked up to three years
in jail, was dropped on a technicality in January.

The writer first drew the ire of the state in the mid-1990s when he
denounced heavy-handed policies against the Kurdish minority.

The state extended an olive branch in 1998, offering him the accolade
of "State Artist," but Pamuk declined.

Armenia’s FM Aims To Normalise Relations With Turkey

ARMENIA’S FM AIMS TO NORMALISE RELATIONS WITH TURKEY

Agence France Presse — English
October 15, 2006 Sunday

Armenia’s Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanian on Sunday said he would
strive to normalise relations with Turkey despite deep misgivings about
the Turkish refusal to regard the 1915-17 massacres of Armenians by
the Ottoman Turks as genocide.

"That these events… have not been condemned and not recognised
once so far, is in reality a continuation of the genocide," Oskanian
was quoted as saying in an interview with the Swiss newspaper NZZ
am Sonntag.

"However, as foreign minister I have a duty to look to the future
and to seek to establish normal relations with Turkey," he added.

Turkey closed its border with Armenia in 1993, in support for its
ally Azerbaijan, which was then at war with Armenia.

Oskanian in Sunday’s comments reiterated his country’s satisfaction
with the French National Assembly’s vote last Thursday approving a bill
that would make it a crime to deny that the Armenian massacres were
genocide, as well as a similar move by the Swiss parliament in 2003.

However, he also expressed mixed feelings about the practical value
of these measures.

"Whether the French or the Swiss legislation is a good starting point
is hard to say," he said, adding that recognition of the genocide by
other countries "is not a goal in itself".

"Armenia also has no interest in humiliating Turkey," he explained.

Oskanian said the Turkish government’s offer to set up a joint
commission of historians to examine the massacres was "dishonest"
so long as Turkey kept its border with Armenia closed and explicitly
outlawed the use of the word genocide in the sensitive Armenian issue.

"Our President has told (Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip) Erdogan
that Armenia is ready to talk, as soon as the borders are open and
as soon as there are bilateral relations."

"When this is the case, an intergovernmental commission can discuss
this question," he told the newspaper.

The French bill still needs the approval of the Senate and the
president to take effect.

Turkey, which strongly rejects the use of the term genocide in the
Armenian issue, slammed the vote, saying France had dealt "a heavy
blow" to longstanding bilateral relations.

Armenians say up to 1.5 million of their kinsmen were killed in
massacres or deportations between 1915 and 1917.

Turkey rejects this claim, saying that between 250,000 and 500,000
Armenians were killed in civil strife when the Armenians rose up
against their Ottoman rulers.

Georgian Armenians Protest At Arrest Of Activist In Yerevan

GEORGIAN ARMENIANS PROTEST AT ARREST OF ACTIVIST IN YEREVAN

Regnum, Russia
Oct 14 2006

The democratic alliance United Javakhk [Georgia’s Armenian-populated
Samtskhe-Javakheti region] reports that a member of the alliance’s
board, Vaagn Chakhalyan, who on 10 October was subjected to a brutal
attack when entering Yerevan and received serious body injuries, was
arrested the next day by employees of the Armenian National Security
Service (NSC).

A statement issued by the alliance says: "Introducing themselves
as members of the police department, they tricked Vaagn Chakhalyan
into coming to the police station as a victim, but then took him to a
National Security Service isolation cell and arrested him. Ridiculous
charges were levelled against him about illegally crossing the Armenian
state border. On 13 October, with the same ridiculous charge, the
court of the first instance of the Yerevan communities of Tsentr and
Nork-Marash gave permission to sentence Vaagn Chakhalyan to two-months’
preventive detention."

"It is especially outrageous that instead of investigating the violence
meted out against Vaagn Chakhalyan, members of his family and a member
of the alliance, Gurgen Shirinyan, fabricated accusations are being
made against the victim. This incident is clear testimony to a direct
link between the violence committed against Vaagn Chakhalyan and his
subsequent arrest, as well as the fact that certain forces issued an
order. The people of Javakhk are extremely angry about the news from
Yerevan. The United Javakhk is concerned that subsequent events could
lead to dangerous and unpredictable developments.

"Vaagn’s absence and further consistent attempts to disband the
alliance by brutal methods are a severe blow to the present system
which is ensuring stability in Javakhk, in which the United Javakhk,
thanks to the universal support of the population, is playing a
decisive role. Well-known forces and criminal channels are striving
to ensure a monopoly on demonstrations on behalf of the Armenians
of Javakhk, and by their irresponsible and provocative actions are
creating a serious threat to stability in the region.

"The alliance hopes that all interested forces, and the Armenian
authorities in particular, will adopt a more sensible decision
in relation to these forces who can lead to a destabilization
of the region and cause serious damage to Armenian-Georgian
interstate relations," a statement of the political force from the
Armenian-populated region of Georgia, Samtskhe-Javakheti, says.

Armenie : Le PS S’Etonne D’Apprendre La Position De Chirac Par Un Re

ARMENIE : LE PS S’ETONNE D’APPRENDRE LA POSITION DE CHIRAC PAR UN RESPONSABLE D’UN AUTRE ETAT

Agence France Presse
16 octobre 2006 lundi

Le PS s’est etonne lundi que le president Jacques Chirac ait fait
connaître par telephone au Premier ministre turc sa position sur le
vote d’une proposition de loi sur la penalisation de la negation du
genocide armenien, au lieu de le faire savoir aux citoyens francais.

"Nous souhaiterions que le president de la Republique s’exprime
directement, plutôt que d’apprendre sa position par le detour d’un
propos rapporte par le responsable d’un autre Etat", a declare Julien
Dray, porte-parole, lors du point de presse hebdomadaire du parti.

"Le Parlement est souverain, nous ne voyons pas comment le president
de la Republique peut se targuer, dans des entretiens, d’empecher
le Parlement de travailler", a dit encore M. Dray, estimant que si
c’etait le cas "il y aurait la un acte grave d’ingerence dans la vie
parlementaire et un precedent extremement regrettable".

Il a note aussi qu’aucun membre du gouvernement ne s’est exprime sur
la proposition de loi presentee par le Parti socialiste, votee jeudi
en première lecture et qui doit etre soumise au Senat.

Le Premier ministre turc Recep Tayyip Erdogan a indique samedi
soir avoir recu un appel telephonique du president Jacques Chirac
lui exprimant ses "regrets" au sujet de ce vote, et affirmant qu’il
donnait "raison" a la Turquie pour sa forte reaction. M. Erdogan a
indique avoir demande a Jacques Chirac de faire annuler la loi.

Selon l’Elysee, M. Chirac se serait borne a rappeler au Premier
ministre turc sa position sur le genocide armenien. Lors de son
recent voyage en Armenie, Jacques Chirac avait rappele que la France
avait "officiellement reconnu" le genocide. "Le reste relève plus,
aujourd’hui, de la polemique que de la realite juridique", avait-il
ajoute.

–Boundary_(ID_Ip2vFbA7wrcCZQK4W N0ISg)–

"Genocide Armenien": Un Universitaire Turc Renvoie Sa Legion D’Honne

"GENOCIDE ARMENIEN": UN UNIVERSITAIRE TURC RENVOIE SA LEGION D’HONNEUR

Agence France Presse
16 octobre 2006 lundi

Le president de la plus haute institution universitaire turque a
renvoye lundi a la France sa medaille de Commandeur de la Legion
d’Honneur en protestation contre une proposition de loi francaise
reprimant la negation du "genocide armenien", a affirme son bureau
lundi.

Le professeur Erdogan Tezic, president du Conseil superieur de
l’education (YOK), est le seul Turc a avoir ete decore, en septembre
2004, de la plus prestigieuse des distinctions francaises, precise
un communique de la presidence du YOK.

Dans une lettre adressee au president francais Jacques Chirac, M. Tezic
explique que meme si le gouvernement francais s’est distancie de la
proposition de loi controversee, M. Chirac appele le mois dernier la
Turquie a reconnaître le caractère genocidaire de massacres d’Armeniens
en 1915-1917.

"Cette proposition de loi n’eut-elle pas meme ete votee, le fait
qu’ainsi ce sujet ait ete erige comme un principe de la politique
d’Etat ne me permet plus de porter dorenavant la plus haute des
distinctions francaises", affirme la lettre, dont l’AFP a obtenu
une copie.

La Turquie s’est indignee du vote la semaine dernière par l’Assemblee
nationale francaise d’une proposition de loi sanctionnant la negation
du "genocide armenien" de peines allant jusqu’a un an de prison et
45.000 euros (57.000 dollars) d’amende.

Le texte controverse doit encore etre soumis aux senateurs, puis aux
deputes en seconde lecture, avant d’etre definitivement adopte.

Les massacres et deportations d’Armeniens entre 1915 et 1917 dans
l’Empire ottoman ont fait plus de 1,5 millions de morts selon les
Armeniens, 250.000 a 500.000 selon la Turquie, qui recuse la notion de
genocide reconnue notamment par la France, le Canada et le Parlement
europeen.

–Boundary_(ID_EuqFnX04zPb9ab +H50jcrQ)–

Le Projet De Loi Francais Sur Le Genocide Armenien Embarrasse

LE PROJET DE LOI FRANCAIS SUR LE GENOCIDE ARMENIEN EMBARRASSE

Europolitique
16 octobre 2006

" Le vote des deputes francais rendant passible de prison la negation
du genocide armenien est sans effet sur le processus d’accession de la
Turquie a l’Union europeenne ", a estime le 13 octobre la commissaire
europeenne aux Relations exterieures, Benita Ferrero-Waldner. " Ce
qui se passe en France et ce que nous faisons nous, en tant qu’Union
europeenne, avec un pays candidat sont deux choses distinctes ",
a declare la commissiaire a la television finlandaise Yle.

Vote le 12 octobre par l’Assemblee nationale, le projet de loi
rend passibles d’une peine de prison d’un an et d’une amende de 45
000 euros les auteurs de declarations niant le " genocide armenien
". Le resultat du vote a ete communique a Ali Babacan, negociateur
turc, alors qu’il participait a la table ronde annuelle des Amis
de l’Europe, qui se deroulait a Bruxelles sur le thème " l’Etat de
l’Europe ". M. Babacan a exprime sa desaprobation a propos de la
decision parlementaire et a dit esperer que la loi serait rejetee
par le senat ou que le President y opposerait son veto.

Le commissaire a l’Elargissement, Olli Rehn, avait denonce cette
proposition de loi le 9 octobre, la jugeant " contre-productive " et
estimant qu’elle pourrait entraîner de " graves " consequences pour
les relations entre l’UE et la Turquie. " Il s’agit evidemment d’une
loi francaise et c’est bien sûr le problème des deputes francais
mais cela a des consequences potentiellement graves pour l’UE et
ses relations avec la Turquie ", avait declare M. Rehn a quelques
journalistes. Son adoption " aurait deux consequences : cela bloquerait
le debat sur la question armenienne en Turquie et cela ralentirait
et entraverait le debat sur la liberte d’expression en Turquie ",
a estime le commissaire.

Un porte parole de la Commission a rappele le 13 octobre que la
reconnaissance du genocide des Armeniens n’etait pas une condition
a l’adhesion de la Turquie.

" Les relations entre la Turquie et la France, qui se sont
developpees au fil des siècles, ont subi un choc aujourd’hui en raison
d’initiatives irresponsables prises par certains politiciens francais
peu perspicaces, sur la base d’allegations non fondees ", a declare le
ministre turc des Affaires etrangères La reaction du gouvernement turc,
soutenu par les partis d’opposition et des mouvements de protestation
dans tout le pays, n’a pas faibli face aux declarations rassurantes
du gouvernement francais qui a dit ne pas soutenir la loi. Mais,
quelques jours plus tôt, a l’occasion de sa visite dans la capitale
armenienne, le President Chirac avait invite la Turquie, si elle
voulait rejoindre l’UE, a reconnaître la qualite de genocide aux
massacres qui ont coûte la vie a au moins 1.500.000 Armeniens entre
1915 et 1917. Par ailleurs, nul n’ignore que certains membres du
gouvernement francais sont opposes a l’adhesion de la Turquie.

–Boundary_(ID_AQFQ39RoZOFN6WoTi6hlsQ)–