When Bilingual Is Silver, Trilingual Is Gold

WHEN BILINGUAL IS SILVER, TRILINGUAL IS GOLD
By Domenico Maceri

The Seoul Times, South Korea
Oct 18 2005

Special Contribution

Asian students in the US “English gets boring sometimes” stated
Donna Nguyen, a senior at James Lick High School in San Jose,
California. Donna does not get bored very often. She can speak
English, Spanish, and Vietnamese. She can also read and write these
languages. So when she graduated from high school, she received
a recognition for her fluency in the form of a newly-instituted
bilingual certificate.

Her accomplishments are marked on her diploma as well as her
transcripts. The bilingual certificate is a new program available
only in a small number of American schools. It should be expanded to
recognize and encourage multilingualism, which is essential to make
it in today’s world.

To qualify for the bilingual certificate, students need to demonstrate
linguistic fluency and literacy in at least two languages. Students
need to show their language skills by passing an Advanced
Placement test in a foreign language if their native language is
English. Students whose home language is not English must pass an
Advanced Placement test in their home language and also pass the
state’s English standardized test.

Although the most likely combination is English-Spanish, the 82
students who met the criteria at Eastside Union School District in
San Jose also included French and German.

Glendale Unified School District, northwest of Los Angeles, also
recognizes bilingualism. On graduation day, students who can speak
two languages wear a silver medallion and trilingual students wear
a gold one. In 2004, one student qualified in Armenian, Russian,
German, and English.

Montreal in Canada Although the U.S. is a country of immigrants,
the native languages brought in tended to disappear quickly. Indeed,
being an American often meant speaking English and only English. Those
sentiments are still alive and well but more and more people are
beginning to see the value of bilingualism. It’s not just the marketing
value of two or more languages. International relations pretty much
dictate that monolingualism is not just a disadvantage but a danger
as well.

Serious shortages of bilingual personnel, for example, have been
reported in many areas of government. Soon after 9/11, it was revealed
that a vast amount of data had not been analyzed because of limited
linguistic resources.

In both Afghanistan and Iraq, US government officials have had to rely
a lot on local interpreters and translators and the results have been
far from positive.

The situation is so bad that the American government is considering
a targeted military draft for people with special skills such as
computer knowledge or foreign languages.

Unfortunately, bilingualism still conjures negative images in the
minds of some Americans. Some fear a Balkanization of the country
upon hearing the word bilingual. Images of Canada come to mind right
away. Also, fear that bilingualism may not lead to integration of
new arrivals pushes people to lobby for English-only laws.

Twenty-seven states have passed laws declaring English the official
language, but nothing has changed with regards to reducing immigration
nor the number of languages people speak.

Quebec City in Canada Fear that immigrant kids were not learning
English fast enough pushed California, Arizona, and Massachusetts
voters to virtually do away with bilingual education. The laws
eliminating bilingual education have been passed through the referendum
process in which voters were asked to choose along simplistic lines
of English-yes and Spanish-no.

Yet, most states are continuing bilingual education programs, which
in spite of their name, are not designed to develop skills in two
languages. Bilingual education programs in the U.S. aim to use the
students’ native languages as a springboard to eventual English-only
instruction by ensuring that immigrant students don’t fall behind
academically those born in the U.S.

Developing bilingual skills is really the focus of dual-language
schools which teach subjects in two languages. The numbers of these
type of schools in the U.S. are very small but they are expanding
rapidly as parents increasingly realize the value of bilingualism
for their kids.

Unfortunately, dual-language schools do not go beyond junior high
school. In the vast majority of American highs schools the focus is
on English. So when some high schools begin to recognize and foster
bilingualism, it’s an event worth celebrating.

As English increases its dominance in the world as the language to
know, it’s too easy to rest on our laurels and let the others learn our
language. It’s also dangerous. The smart thing is to go for the gold.

d.php?idx=770

http://theseoultimes.com/ST/?url=/ST/db/rea

Roman Ruler’s Head Found In Sewer

ROMAN RULER’S HEAD FOUND IN SEWER

The Seoul Times, South Korea
Oct 18 2005

Life of “Saint Constantine” Who Cristianized Rome

Head statue of The Holy Emperor Constantine

A 1,700-year-old carved marble head of Emperor Constantine has been
found in a sewer in central Rome.

Archaeologists found the 60cm (2ft) head while clearing an ancient
drainage system in the ruins of the Roman Forum.

Eugenio La Rocca, superintendent of Rome’s artefacts, described the
head as a rare find and said it was possible it had been used to
clear a blocked sewer.

Constantine, who reigned from 306 to 337, is known for ending
persecution of Christians and founding Constantinople.

Although most of his subjects remained pagans, he is credited with
helping to establish Europe’s Christian roots by proclaiming religious
freedom.

The white marble head was confirmed as a portrait of Constantine by
experts who compared it with coins and two other giant heads kept in
Rome’s Capitoline Museums.

Probably carved between 312 and 325 AD, when Constantine was at the
height of his power, it may have belonged to a statue of the emperor
in full armour.

“Recovering a portrait of this size and in this state of conservation
in the very heart of the city is really extraordinary,” said Mr
La Rocca.

“We have concluded that the head did not fall by accident into the
passage, but was put there on purpose.

“It could have been used as a big piece of stone to divert water from
the drain, or it could have been put there to symbolise the resentment
of a pagan people for their Christian emperor.”

The head’s unceremonious insertion in the drain may have saved it
from the plundering of the Forum after the fall of the Roman empire
in the 5th Century.

It is expected to go on display in Rome’s museums after a brief period
of restoration.

Life of Contantine the Great

‘Constantine the Great’ ‘Saint Constantine’ Flavius Valerius
Constantinus (AD ca. 285 – AD 337)

Statue of The Holy Emperor Constantine

Constantine was born in Naissus, Upper Moesia, on 27 February in
roughly AD 285. Another account places the year at about AD 272 or 273.

He was the son of Helena, an inn keeper’s daughter, and Constantius
Chlorus. It is unclear if the two were married and so Constantine
may well have been an illegitimate child.

When in Constantius Chlorus in AD 293 was elevated to the rank of
Caesar, Constantine became a member of the court of Diocletian.

Constantine proved an officer of much promise when serving under
Diocletian’s Caesar Galerius against the Persians.

He was still with Galerius when Diocletian and Maximian abdicated
in AD 305, finding himself in the precarious situation of a virtual
hostage to Galerius.

In AD 306 though Galerius, now sure of his position as dominant
Augustus (despite Constantius being senior by rank) let Constantine
return to his father to accompany him on a campaign to Britain.

Constantine however was that suspicious of this sudden change of
heart by Galerius, that he took extensive precautions on his journey
to Britain.

When Constantius Chlorus in AD 306 died of illness at Ebucarum (York),
the troops hailed Constantine as the new Augustus.

Galerius refused to accept this proclamation but, faced with
strong support for Constantius’ son, he saw himself forced to grant
Constantine the rank of Caesar.

Though when Constantine married Fausta, her father Maximian, now
returned to power in Rome, acknowledged him as Augustus. Hence, when
Maximian and Maxentius later became enemies, Maximian was granted
shelter at Constantine’s court.

At the Conference of Carnuntum in AD 308, where all the Caesars and
Augusti met, it was demanded that Constantine give up his title of
Augustus and return to being a Caesar. However, he refused.

“Constantine the Great,” The Holy Emperor Constantine

Not long after the famous conference, Constantine was successfully
campaigning against marauding Germans when news reached him that
Maximian, still residing at his court, had turned against him. Had
Maximian been forced abdicate at the Conference of Carnuntum,
then he now was making yet another bid for power, seeking to usurp
Constantine’s throne.

Denying Maximian any time to organise his defence, Constantine
immediately marched his legions into Gaul. All Maximian could do
was flee to Massilia. Constantine did not relent and laid siege to
the city. The garrison of Massilia surrendered and Maximian either
committed suicide or was executed (AD 310).

With Galerius dead in AD 311 the main authority amongst the emperors
had been removed, leaving them to struggle for dominance.

In the east Licinius and Maximinus Daia fought for supremacy and in
the west Constantine began a war with Maxentius. In AD 312 Constantine
invaded Italy. Maxentius is believed to have had up to four times as
many troops, though they were inexperinced and undisciplined.

Brushing aside the opposition in battles at Augusta Taurinorum (Turin)
and Verona, Constantine marched on Rome.

Constantine later claimed to have had a vision on the way to Rome,
during the night before battle. In this dream he supposedly saw the
‘Chi-Ro’, the symbol of Christ, shining above the sun. Seeing this
as a divine sign, it is said that Constantine had his soldiers paint
the symbol on their shields. Following this Constantine went on to
defeat the numerically stronger army of Maxentius at the Battle at
the Milvian Bridge (Oct AD 312).

Constantine’s opponent Maxentius, together with thousands of his
soldiers, drowned as the bridge of boats his force was retreating
over collapsed.

Constantine saw this victory as directly related to the vision he
had had the night before.

Henceforth Constantine saw himself as an ’emperor of the Christian
people.’ If this made him a Christian is the subject of some debate.

But Constantine, who only had himself baptized on his deathbed, is
generally understood as the first Christian emperor of the Roman world.

With his victory over Maxentius at the Milvian Bridge, Constantine
became the dominant figure in the empire. The senate warmly welcomed
him to Rome and the two remaining emperors, Licinius and Maximinus II
Daia could do little else but agree to his demand that he henceforth
should be the senior Augustus. It was in this senior position that
Constantine ordered Maximinus II Daia to cease his repression of
the Christians.

Though despite this turn toward Christianity, Constantine remained
for some years still very tolerant of the old pagan religions.

Particularly the worship of the sun god was still closely related with
him for some time to come. A fact which can be seen on the carvings
of his triumphal Arch in Rome and on coins minted during his reign.

Then in AD 313 Licinius defeated Maximinus II Daia. This left only
two emperors.

At first both tried to live peacefully aside each other, Constantine
in the west, Licinius in the east. In AD 313 they met at Mediolanum
(Milan), where Licinius even married Constantine’s sister Constantia
and restated that Constantine was the senior Augustus. Yet it was made
clear that Licinius would make his own laws in the east, without the
need to consult Constantine. Further it was agreed that Licinius would
return property to the Christian church which had been confiscated
in the eastern provinces.

As time went on Constantine should become ever more involved with the
Christian church. He appeared at first to have very little grasp of
the basic beliefs governing Christian faith. But gradually he must
have become more acquainted with them. So much so that he sought to
resolve theological disputes among the church itself.

In this role he summoned the bishops of the western provinces to
Arelate (Arles) in AD 314, after the so-called Donatist schism had
split the church in Africa. If this willingness to resolve matters
through peaceful debate showed one side of Constantine, then his brutal
enforcement of the decisions reached at such meetings showed the
other. Following the decision of the council of bishops at Arelate,
donatist churches were confiscated and the followers of this branch
of Christianity were brutally repressed. Evidently Constantine was
also capable of persecuting Christians, if they were deemed to be the
‘wrong type of Christians.’

Problems with Licinius arose when Constantine appointed his
brother-in-law Bassianus as Caesar for Italy and the Danubian
provinces. If the principle of the tetrarchy, established by
Diocletian, still in theory defined government, then Constantine
as senior Augustus had the right to do this. And yet, Diocletian’s
principle’s would have demanded that he appointed an independent man
on merit.

But Licinius saw in Bassianus little else than a puppet of
Constantine. If the Italian territories were Constantine’s, then
the important Danubian military provinces were under the control of
Licinius. If Bassianus was indeed Constantine’s puppet it would have
ment a serious gain of power by Constantine. And so, to prevent his
opponent from yet further increasing his power, Licinius managed to
persuade Bassianus to revolt against Constantine in AD 314 or AD 315.

The rebellion was easily put down, but the involvement of Licinius,
too, was discovered. And this discovery made war inevitable. But
considering the situation responsibility for the war, must lie with
Constantine. It appears that he was simply unwilling to share power
and hence sought to find means by which to bring about a fight.

For a while neither side acted, instead both camps preferred to
prepare for the contest ahead. Then in AD 316 Constantine attacked
with his forces. In July or August at Cibalae in Pannonia he defeated
Licinius larger army, forcing his opponent to retreat.

The next step was taken by Licinius, when he announced Aurelius
Valerius Valens, to be the new emperor of the west. It was an attempt
to undermine Constantine, but it clearly failed to work. Soon after,
another battle followed, at Campus Ardiensis in Thrace. This time
however, neither side gained victory, as the battle proved indecisive.

Once more the two sides reached a treaty (1 March AD 317). Licinius
surrendered all Danubian and Balkan provinces, with the exception of
Thrace, to Constantine. In effect this was little else but confirmation
of the actual balance of power, as Constantine had indeed conquered
these territories and controlled them. Despite his weaker position,
Licinius though still retained complete sovereignty over his remaining
eastern dominions. Also as part of the treaty, Licinius’ alternative
western Augustus was put to death.

The final part of this agreement reached at Serdica was the creation
of three new Caesars. Crispus and Constantine II were both sons
of Constantine, and Licinius the Younger was the infant son of the
eastern emperor and his wife Constantia.

For a short while the empire should enjoy peace. But soon the situation
began to deteriorate again. If Constantine acted more and more in
favour of the Christians, then Licinius began to disagree.

>>From AD 320 onwards Licinius began to suppress the Christian church
in his eastern provinces and also began ejecting any Christians from
government posts.

Another problem arose regarding the consulships. These were by now
widely understood as positions in which emperors would groom their
sons as future rulers. Their treaty at Serdica had hence proposed
that appointments should be made by mutual agreement. Licinius
though believed Constantine favoured his own sons when granting
these positions.

And so, in clear defiance of their agreements, Licinius appointed
himself and his two sons consuls for the eastern provinces for the
year AD 322.

With this declaration it was clear that hostilities between the two
sides would soon begin afresh. Both sides began to prepare for the
struggle ahead.

In AD 323 Constantine created yet another Caesar by elevating his
third son Constantius II to this rank.

If the eastern and western halves of the empire were hostile towards
one another, then in AD 323 a reason was soon found to start a new
civil war. Constantine, while campaigning against Gothic invaders,
strayed into Licinius’ Thracian territory.

It is well possible he did so on purposely in order to provoke a war.

Be that as it may, Licinius took this as the reason to declare war
in spring AD 324.

But it was once again Constantine who moved to attack first in AD 324
with 120’000 infantry and 10’000 cavalry against Licinius’ 150’000
infantry and 15’000 cavalry based at Hadrianopolis. On 3 July AD 324
he severely defeated Licinius’ forces at Hadrianopolis and shortly
after his fleet won victories at sea.

Licinius fled across the Bosporus to Asia Minor (Turkey), but
Constantine having brought with him a fleet of two thousand transport
vessels ferried his army across the water and forced the decisive
battle of Chrysopolis where he utterly defeated Licinius (18 September
AD 324).

Licinius was imprisoned and later executed.

Alas Constantine was sole emperor of the entire Roman world.

Soon after his victory in AD 324 he outlawed pagan sacrifices, now
feeling far more at liberty to enforce his new religious policy. The
treasures of pagan temples were confiscated and used to pay for
the construction of new Christian churches. Gladiatorial contests
were outruled and harsh new laws were issued prohibiting sexual
immorality. Jews in particular were forbidden from owning Christian
slaves.

Constantine continued the reorganization of the army, begun by
Diocletian, re-affirming the difference between frontier garrisons
and mobile forces. The mobile forces consisting largely of heavy
cavalry which could quickly move to trouble spots. The presence of
Germans continued to increase during his reign.

The praetorian guard who’d held such influence over the empire for
so long, was finally disbanded. Their place was taken by the mounted
guard, largely consisting of Germans, which had been introduced
under Diocletian.

As a law maker Constantine was terribly severe.

Edicts were passed by which the sons were forced to take up the
professions of their fathers. Not only was this terribly harsh on
such sons who sought a different career. But by making the recruitment
of veteran’s sons compulsory, and enforcing it ruthlessly with harsh
penalties, widespread fear and hatred was caused.

Also his taxation reforms created extreme hardship. City dwellers were
obliged to pay a tax in gold or silver, the chrysargyron. This tax was
levied every four years, beating and torture being the consequences
for those to poor to pay. Parents are said to have sold their daughters
into prostitution in order to pay the chrysargyron.

Under Constantine, any girl who ran away with her lover was burned
alive. Any chaperone who should assist in such a matter had molten
lead poured into her mouth. Rapists were burned at the stake.

But also their women victims were punished, if they had been raped
away from home, as they, according to Constantine, should have no
business outside the safety of their own homes.

But Constantine is perhaps most famous for the great city which came
to bear his name – Constantinople.

He came to the conclusion that Rome had ceased to be a practical
capital for the empire from which the emperor could exact effective
control over its frontiers.

For a while he set up court in different places; Treviri (Trier),
Arelate (Arles), Mediolanum (Milan), Ticinum, Sirmium and Serdica
(Sofia). Then he decided on the ancient Greek city of Byzantium. And
on 8 November AD 324 Constantine created his new capital there,
renaming it Constantinopolis (City of Constantine).

He was careful to maintain Rome’s ancient privileges, and the new
senate founded in Constantinople was of a lower rank, but he clearly
intended it to be the new center of the Roman world. Measures to
encourage its growth were introduced, most importantly the diversion
of the Egyptian grain supplies, which had traditionally gone to
Rome, to Constantinople. For a Roman-style corn-dole was introduced,
granting every citizen a guaranteed ration of grain.

In AD 325 Constantine once again held a religious council, summoning
the bishops of the east and west to Nicaea. At this council the branch
of the Christian faith known as Arianism was condemned as a heresy
and the only admissible Christian creed of the day (the Nicene Creed)
was precisely defined.

Constantine’s reign was that of a hard, utterly determined and ruthless
man. Nowhere did this show more than when in AD 326, on suspicion of
adultery or treason, he had his own eldest son Crispus executed.

One account of the events tells of Constantine’s wife Fausta falling
in love with Crispus, who was her stepson, and made an accusation
of him committing adultery only once she had been rejected by him,
or because she simply wanted Crispus out of the way, in order to let
her sons acceed to the throne unhindered. Then again, Constantine had
only a month ago passed a strict law against adultery and might have
felt obliged to act. And so Crispus was executed at Pola in Istria.

Though after this execution Constantine’s mother Helena convinced the
emperor of Crispus’ innocence and that Fausta’s accusation had been
false. Escaping the vengeance of her husband, Fausta killed herself
at Treviri.

A brilliant general, Constantine was a man of boundless energy and
determination, yet vain, receptive to flattery and suffering from a
choleric temper.

Had Constantine defeated all contenders to the Roman throne, the need
to defend the borders against the northern barbarians still remained.

In the autumn of AD 328, accompanied by Constantine II, he campaigned
against the Alemanni on the Rhine. This was followed in late AD 332
by a large campaign against the Goths along the Danube until in AD
336 he had re-conquered much of Dacia, once annexed by Trajan and
abandoned by Aurelian.

In AD 333 Constantine’s fourth son Constans was raised to the rank of
Caesar, with in the clear intent to groom him, alongside his brothers,
to jointly inherit the empire. Also Constantine’s nephews Flavius
Dalmatius (who may have been raised to Caesar by Constantine in AD
335 !) and Hannibalianus were raised as future emperors.

Evidently they also were intended to be granted their shares of power
at Constantine’s death.

How, after his own experience of the tetrarchy, Constantine saw it
possible that all five of these heirs should rule peaceably alongside
each other, is hard to understand.

In old age now, Constantine planned a last great campaign, one which
was intended to conquer Persia. He even intended to have himself
baptized as a Christian on the way to the frontier in the waters
of the river Jordan, just as Jesus had been baptized there by John
the Baptist.

As the ruler of these soon to be conquered territories, Constantine
even placed his nephew Hannibalianus on the throne of Armenia, with
the title of King of Kings, which had been the traditional title
borne by the kings of Persia.

But this scheme was not to come to anything, for in the spring of
AD 337, Constantine fell ill. Realising that he was about to die, he
asked to be baptized. This was performed on his deathbed by Eusebius,
bishop of Nicomedia.

Constantine died on 22 May AD 337 at the imperial villa at Ankyrona.

His body was carried to the Church of the Holy Apostles, his mausoleum.

Had his own wish to be buried in Constantinople caused outrage in Rome,
the Roman senate still decided on his deification. A strange decision
as it elevated him, the first Christian emperor, to the status of an
old pagan deity.

ad.php?idx=2201

http://theseoultimes.com/ST/?url=/ST/db/re

Justice Needed For Armenian Genocide

JUSTICE NEEDED FOR ARMENIAN GENOCIDE
Mona Karaguozian

The SunDial – Daily Sundial, CA
(California State Univ. at Northridge)
Oct 18 2005

Daily Sundial
October 17, 2005

According to Merriam Webster’s dictionary, the term genocide is
defined as the “deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial,
political or cultural group.”

In April 1915, during World War I, the Ottoman Empire began
systematically annihilating Armenians, by first ridding the
intellectuals, men, elderly, women and then children in the Eastern
Anatolia and Western Armenia region, in what should be known as the
first genocide of the 20th century.

The Turkish government has continuously refused to accept
responsibility for the atrocities that have taken place, and it also
refuses to acknowledge the existence of this “alleged” genocide.

The Turkish government makes claims now that the Armenians who were
killed during that period died as wartime casualties and that many
Turks were killed as well. This is false because only the Armenians
that were living in that region in Turkey were being “relocated”
for safety. Why weren’t the other residents of that region being
relocated? It was a deliberate destruction of a specific group
of people.

Who alleges the massacres of 1.5 million people? How could the
destruction of a substantially large number of people be alleged? The
evidence is in the death toll. There are also photographs, hundreds
of chronicles from American newspapers and documentation depicting
the massacres as they were taking place not to mention countless
horror stories passed down generations.

The issue of the Armenian genocide is less than ten years shy of
being a century- long struggle for recognition. Ninety years might
seem like ages ago, but I, as an American born Armenian, still feel
the effects of the massacres. My grandfather was a survivor of the
genocide. I hold knowledge of eyewitness accounts and experiences of
the genocide that were passed down through him. It pains me to be
a third generation Armenian after the genocide and to see that the
struggle for recognition continues to this day.

There are numerous advocacy groups, such as the Armenian National
Committee of America and the Armenian Assembly that are seeking
justice on behalf of the Armenian people. These activists dedicate
their time and effort to spread awareness of the genocide and to gain
recognition for its occurrence.

In a letter sent to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Oct. 5, ANCA
Chairman Ken Hachikian voiced the profound moral outrage of Armenians
over the Bush administration’s ongoing complicity in Turkey’s campaign
of genocide denial.

Turkey has also been trying to gain admission into the European Union,
yet they continue running into complications. European Union foreign
ministers have attempted to agree on terms for Turkish membership,
but many countries, like Austria, have refused to agree on full
membership. They are only willing to offer Turkey a “privileged
partnership” with the EU until such claims as the Armenian genocide
have been resolved. If the EU is unable to agree on terms with the
Turkish government, there must be a reason. For being just an “alleged”
claim, the Armenian genocide is a substantial cause for concern among
many European countries.

This is not the first attempt by Armenian-Americans to gain a political
voice regarding this issue. Many bills have been presented to Congress,
each of which would have been instrumental toward the fight for
justice, but none have been passed yet.

Instead, all these bills have been shot down. Armenian activists
have also organized many public events, such as marches, protests,
vigils and pickets at the Turkish embassy in Los Angeles as well as
all over the world.

Throughout the years, these activities have gained some local media
exposure. None, however, have had a national effect on legislation.

Many of the local media outlets are familiar with the commemoration
of April 24 due to the heavily concentrated Armenian community Los
Angeles, but the voice is barely heard.

As the years pass the story gets old and people begin to forget. This
is the goal of the denial.

This situation may change with another attempt to pass legislation.

On Sept. 15, after nearly three hours of debate, the House
International Relations Committee, voted overwhelmingly in favor
of two measures calling for proper U.S. recognition of the Armenian
Genocide (H.Res.316 and H.Con.Res.195) and urging Turkey to end its
decades-long denial of this crime against humanity.

The Senate should finish the work started by the House and call
for recognition of the Armenian genocide. Only with the support of
the United Sates will the movement to have the Turkish government
recognize the past crimes of the Ottoman Empire succeed.

Justice needs to be served and not withheld because of politics.

Mona Karaguozian can be reached at [email protected].

ws/display.v/ART/2005/10/17/4353cb4fb78e4

http://sundial.csun.edu/vne

A Joint Working Group On Karabakh Formed At The PACE

A JOINT WORKING GROUP ON KARABAKH FORMED AT THE PACE

DeFacto Agency, Armenia
Oct 18 2005

A working group on the Karabakh issue has been formed at the PACE.

The corresponding decision was rendered at the latest sitting of
the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly Subcommittee on Nagorno
Karabakh.

According to PanARMENIAN.Net, a member of the Azeri delegation at the
PACE Asim Mollazade stated the new working group had been formed on
the initiative of the Subcommittee Chair lord Russell Johnston. Both
Azerbaijan and Armenia are represented in the group. “It is a joint
working group. The group’s sitting was held at the PACE latest session,
and we arranged to conduct a number of meetings, discuss the program
of the Subcommittee activity”, noted Mollazade.

According to Mollazade, the Subcommittee headed by Russell Johnston
has been formed to implement a resolution on the Karabakh conflict
adopted by the PACE. “It is the Subcommittee’s principal goal. The
structure is to present its report and working plan at the PACE
January session, inform of the work done and planned for the future.

We are currently working over the plan of measures referring to the
PACE resolution implementation. Principal goal in the adoption of
the resolution is promotion of the conflict settlement. The Council
of Europe is eager to participate in the settlement of the Nagorno
Karabakh problem”.

The Azeri Parliamentarian noted substitution of the OSCE Minsk group
for the new working group was not subject for discussions. He stressed
the OSCE MG was the main format of mediation between the conflict
sides. “The Council of Europe is trying to settle the conflict in the
aspect of the values it defends. The resolution was adopted before
that, and the work being done is based on the document”. In his words,
the latest steps undertaken by the CE testify to the organization’s
wish to actively participate in the Karabakh conflict settlement. “The
Council of Europe cannot close eyes to the tragedy within Europe. Using
its authority the CE will render all – round assistance to the conflict
settlement in the international organizations as well. Naturally,
we’ll go on acting within the frames of the organization. I believe
it will have a positive influence on the conflict settlement”, stated
Asim Mollazade.

Helsinki: Turkish FM Promises To Meet EU Membership Conditions

HELSINKI: TURKISH FM PROMISES TO MEET EU MEMBERSHIP CONDITIONS

Helsingin Sanomat, Finland
Oct 18 2005

Abdullah Gul thanks Finland for support

Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul promised on Monday that his
country would continue its legislative and economic reforms to meet
all criteria set for membership in the European Union.

During a visit to Finland, Gul commented that meeting the conditions
is in Turkey’s interests as well. He also predicted that his country
would be a member of the European Union in ten years.

Finnish Foreign Minister Erkki Tuomioja noted that Finland had worked
hard to get Turkey accepted as an applicant country. There has also
been widespread support for Turkey’s bid in the Finnish Parliament.

Gul also mentioned that he hopes that the Finnish people would back his
country’s membership bid. In other EU countries, tones have been more
critical. Austria, which holds the EU Presidency in the first half of
2006 (just before Finland), tried to block the launch of membership
talks with Turkey, setting talks with Croatia as a precondition for
its approval.

However, Gul said that he does not expect Austria’s turn at the
Presidency to cause problems. Tuomioja also said that he does not
believe that any country will set a very unique agenda.

“Turkey itself knows that it still has much to do, but this is the
beginning of a long process”, Tuomioja said.

The controversial prosecution of Turkish author Orhan Pamuk, who
has written about the Kurdish question and the Armenian genocide,
is not a problem in Gul’s opinion. The trial of Pamuk has not been
called off, and the hearing is scheduled to go ahead on December 16th.

Turkey has already reformed its criminal code, but before it becomes
a member of the EU, it must resolve a number of issues, such as
its attitude toward the new EU member-state Cyprus, an island whose
northern part has been occupied by Turkey for 30 years.

The continued non-recognition of Cyprus by Turkey remains a problem
for its EU membership bid.

The European Commission is to issue a report on Turkey’s progress
early next month.

Forum Explores Iraq War

FORUM EXPLORES IRAQ WAR
By Rick Malwitz
Staff Writer

New Brunswick Home News Tribune, NJ
Oct 18 2005

Home News Tribune Online 10/18/05

RUTGERS – No matter what form of government is created by the
constitution approved by Iraqi voters over the weekend, do not expect
it to look familiar soon.

“We are not going to install Jeffersonian democracy overnight,”
said U.S. Army veteran Gregg Bumgardner, who joined U.S. Rep. Frank
Pallone, 6th Dist., and Prof. Lloyd C. Gardner at a forum on the war
yesterday at the Student Center.

Listening to the three-man panel were about a 12 students and a
half-dozen members from the community. Based on what the panel had
to say, and questions they were asked, everyone in the room agreed
the United States is committing a major blunder in Iraq.

The most immediate cost is borne by the soldiers, according to
Bumgardner, a Collingswood resident who left the military after
12 years.

“We broke it and we are going to buy it, unfortunately, with the cost
of our troops,” he said.

Bumgardner, who can speak Arabic and Persian Farsi, served in
psychological operations, with the task of providing information to
the local citizens.

“They do not share our world view. They are an Islamic society, and
you are never going to be able to separate Islam from the government,”
said Bumgardner.

He recalled speaking to women prior to an election in January. “I asked
them if they were going to vote. They said, “No, it’s not my place.’ ”

The irony of his observations was not lost on Kay Tsurumi of Highland
Park, a member of the Central Jersey Coalition Against Endless War,
discouraged that the proposed Iraqi constitution does little to protect
the rights of women. “George Bush is the first Christian to establish
an Islamic nation,” she said.

The linkage between religion and the state is not uncommon in the
Middle East. Pallone, the co-chairman of the Congressional Caucus
on Armenian Issues, noted Armenia is 95 percent Christian and that
Armenians “don’t want to separate Christianity from the state.”

Beyond religion, there are other factors Americans find difficult to
understand, said Gardner, who has written 15 books on foreign policy.

He noted how the boundaries of modern Iraq were dictated by the British
at the fall of the Ottoman Empire, who declared: “You are Iraq.”

Gardner noted that the United States, with 172 bases worldwide, is
seen as an occupation force. The United States ought to declare it
will not create permanent bases in Iraq, although he said he did not
believe this is possible. “If they aren’t permanent, we have poured
an awful lot of concrete for no reason,” said Gardner.

Asked if Iraqis would believe the United States if it vowed to
leave Iraq without planting permanent bases, Bumgardner said no:
“They don’t believe anything we tell them.”

He said it’s far easier to get Iraqis to believe rumors, such as a
common rumor that the Americans have imported snipers from Israel.

He said for many Iraqis the greatest challenge is a simple one: Getting
a job to support a family. On some projects, civilian employees have
been brought in from places like Pakistan and Syria, while Iraqis
are on the outside of the fence, looking at foreigners getting paid
for work.

The problem is, said Bumgardner, “nobody trusts the people outside
the wire,” not knowing who is an insurgent and who is not.

Pallone, who said we now have an obligation to mend the broken Iraq,
said his preferred solution is to enlist international organizations –
such as the United Nations and NATO – which formed the broad coalition
that fought the Gulf War in 1991.

“It will dispel the notion that the U.S. is a permanent occupying
force, a theme used by the insurgents to justify their continued
attacks,” said Pallone.

He said that would require the Bush administration to “admit they
were wrong” after embracing a “go-it-alone approach.”

Gardner lamented that so few Rutgers Unviersity students seem
interested in the war. Pallone said the war is not given enough
attention in Washington.

“The hurricane dominated the conversation and the war is no longer
on the front burner,” said Pallone.

e?AID=/20051018/NEWS02/510180397/1001

http://www.thnt.com/apps/pbcs.dll/articl

Iran Gas Production To Up 40m Cubic Meters/Day

IRAN GAS PRODUCTION TO UP 40M CUBIC METERS/DAY

IranMania News, Iran
Oct 18 2005

LONDON, October 18 (IranMania) – Iran?s natural gas production will
increase by 40 mln cubic meters to reach 420 mln cubic meters a day
this winter, said a senior gas industry official.

According to ILNA, Abdolhossein Samari, the National Iranian Gas
Company?s project manager, told reporters that Iran imported 5.8 bln
cubic meters of gas last year, when it exported 315 bln cubic meters.

Rejecting reports that gas exports will impede proper distribution
nationwide, the official said Iran is ready to import up to 40 mln
cubic meters per day of gas from Turkmenistan to meet a possible
shortage of supply in winter.

?However, the Turkmen side has not yet announced its readiness to
export this amount of gas to Iran,? he said, criticizing the National
Iranian Gas Company?s failure to construct adequate underground
gas storages.

He said lack of proper storage facilities will prevent the company
from ensuring adequate supplies at times of consumption peak.

He, however, said gas supply network is doing well, adding that gas
produced in the southern region of Asalouyeh reaches consumers across
the country within just 40 hours.

Samari said the gas swap agreement with Azerbaijan will enter the
executive phase as of next month, noting that as per the contract,
Iran will import Azeri gas and then export the same amount to
Nakhichivan. He put the swap fee at 15%.

On gas export agreement with Armenia, the official said exports could
increase from 1.1 to 2.3 mln cubic meters.

Iran holds the world?s largest gas reserves second only to Russia.

Twenty two phases of the giant project to develop the world?s largest
offshore gas field, South Pars, which holds almost eight % of the
global gas reserves, will become operational by 2012.

The multi-phased project is a top priority on the national development
agenda.

The field straddles Iranian (South Pars) and Qatari (North Field)
sectors of the Persian Gulf, and Iran?s share is being developed in
28 phases.

Armenian MOD Head: Election In Azerbaijan Not To Affect DomesticSitu

ARMENIAN MOD HEAD: ELECTION IN AZERBAIJAN NOT TO AFFECT DOMESTIC SITUATION IN ARMENIA

Pan Armenian
18.10.2005 21:44 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ “If opposition wins the election in Azerbaijan,
we will have to start the talks over the Karabakh issue from the
beginning,” Armenian Defense Minister Serge Sargsyan stated in
a conversation with journalists. In the Minister’s words, if the
incumbent authorities win, the talks will continue. At that the
election in Azerbaijan cannot affect the domestic situation in Armenia,
S. Sargsyan remarked.

First Population Census In NKR History Starts Today

FIRST POPULATION CENSUS IN NKR HISTORY STARTS TODAY

Pan Armenian
18.10.2005 21:35 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Nagorno Karabakh President Arkady Ghukasyan has
addressed a message to NKR society over the population census in
2005. The statement specifically says, “October 18 the first population
census starts in our Republic to be held till October 27. As it is
known, according to international standards, the census is held once
every 10 years. The latest census was held in NK during the Soviet
regime in 1989. Unfortunately, the war imposed upon us by Azerbaijan
and the following complex military and political situation, social,
economic, and democratic situation, as well as the need to restore the
undermined economy, provide at least minimal living conditions for
the population and absence of means conditioned by all this did not
allow conducting the recurrent population census in time. We clearly
understand the importance of the census in securing further social and
economic growth. This will provide an opportunity to realistically
plan our actions aimed at strengthening independent statehood of
Artsakh, enhancement of the development and the defensive potential
of the country.

Satisfying legal and normative basis is formed for the holding of the
census. The NKR Law on Population Census had been passed in 2002. Based
on it the terms of preparation and holding of a population census
was determined. To conduct the census the NKR National Statistical
Service, a state plenipotentiary body, is appointed. All personnel,
technical, methodical problems are solved, specialists are trained
(there are some 600). Besides, the state and self-government bodies are
commissioned to assist holding the census. In short, all preconditions
are available for holding a population census.

Addressing you I consider it my duty to remind you the population
census is compulsory for everyone. Thus, I urge everybody – NKR
citizens, temporary or permanent residents – to respect the census
officers, assist them in fulfilling their duties and provide full
and true answers to their questions. I expect our population to
display understanding and responsibility towards the successful
holding of the census, realizing that it should mark another real
step to self-government and international recognition of the Nagorno
Karabakh Republic.”

Tehran: Imam Reza Shrine Receives Belgian Tourists

IMAM REZA SHRINE RECEIVES BELGIAN TOURISTS

Iranian Cultural Heritage News Agency, Iran
Oct 18 2005

A group of Belgian tourists will visit Imam Reza and Hazrat-e Masumeh
Mausoleums during January holidays.

Tehran, 18 October 2005 (CHN) — European tourists leave on holiday
trips around the world every January. This coming January a group
of Belgian and Luxembourgians will make a 14-day visit to historical
cities of Iran, visiting two holy shrines of Shiites.

The group is going to visit Kerman, Shiraz, Isfahan, Yazd, Qom, and
Mashhad, spending the New Year Eve in the shrine of Imam Reza, the
8th Imam of Shiite Muslims, in Mashhad city in the eastern province of
Khorasan-e Razavi, and Hazrat-e Masumeh, Imam Reza’s sister, in Qom,
near Capital Tehran.

“Last year we arranged for our European tourists to participate in
the New Year ceremony of Armenians of Iran. This year, with the
coordination of the international office of the shrines, we have
arranged for bringing European tourists to the religious ceremonies of
Muslims and to give them the chance to have a talk with the clerics
of the shrines,” says Mehdi Yavar Negoon, manager of Shideh travel
agency in Shiraz which is in charge of bringing in the tourists.

According to Yavar Negoon, since Europeans are the most adve6nturous
tourists of the world, who are always interested in experiencing new
things, “one of the various programs which can be proposed to them
is participating in Muslim religious ceremonies which will be a new
experience for them.”

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress