Wings of Unity campaign disrupted by alleged relative of Armenian ruling party

Boris Nahapetian
Panorama, Armenia
May 14 2026

Armenia’s opposition Wings of Unity party  said its campaign event in Yerevan’s Erebuni district was disrupted by a man who aggressively defended Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and the ruling Civil Contract party.

Party member Davit Ananyan wrote on social media on Thursday that the group had been distributing leaflets and speaking with residents when an older man “literally attacked us, frantically defending Nikol Pashinyan and his government.” Ananyan said attempts to engage in constructive dialogue failed as the man shouted over them.

According to Ananyan, the individual was later identified by locals as the uncle of Civil Contract lawmaker Hayk Konjoryan. “If that is true, it explains a lot,” Ananyan wrote, suggesting the man’s behavior reflected personal ties and vested interests rather than ideological conviction.

Ananyan described the incident as emblematic of what he called “the tragedy of Nikol-worship”, arguing that loyalty to the government has shifted from principle to the defense of personal benefit.

—

Georgia’s drift from the West opens a strategic window for Armenia on Europe-

Baghdasarian Karlen
BNE Intellinews
May 14 2026

By IntelliNews May 13, 2026

As geopolitical instability redraws Eurasian trade routes, the Centre for Eastern Studies (OSW) says the South Caucasus is emerging as an increasingly important transit bridge between Europe and Asia. Yet while Georgia currently dominates this east-west corridor, mounting political tensions with Western partners may create an opening for Armenia to position itself as an alternative route.

A new report by Warsaw-based think-tank OSW argues that the region’s strategic value has risen sharply “amid the war in Ukraine and instability in the Middle East,” with the so-called Middle Corridor becoming an increasingly attractive alternative to routes passing through Russia or Iran.

At the heart of that route lies Georgia, which OSW describes as “the central hub of the Middle Corridor, owing to regional political conditions and existing infrastructure.” But the report warns that this dominant position may no longer be assured.

“The main challenge may lie not in the operational viability of the trade routes running through Georgia, but in Tbilisi’s political unpredictability,” OSW said. It added that the country’s “growing authoritarianism and the resulting deterioration in its relations with the EU” could erode confidence among both investors and regional partners.

That assessment comes as Georgia’s relations with the West have become increasingly strained over the past two years, following domestic political controversies that have triggered criticism from Brussels and Washington. The governing Georgian Dream has faced accusations from opponents and Western officials of democratic backsliding, particularly over legislation targeting foreign-funded civil society groups and a broader crackdown on dissent.

According to OSW, those developments are beginning to carry economic implications beyond domestic politics.

“These factors undermine the long-standing assumption that Georgia remains a stable political partner in the region,” the report said, adding that they are “also weakening the trust of Turkey and Azerbaijan in Georgia as a transit partner.”

Georgia currently forms a vital link in the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route (TITR), also known as the Middle Corridor, which connects China and Central Asia to Europe through the Azerbaijan–Georgia–Turkey axis. The corridor gained strategic importance after Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, as businesses and governments sought alternatives to the traditional northern route through Russian territory.

Georgia’s role has been reinforced by infrastructure upgrades, including the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway, whose upgraded Georgian section was completed in 2024. OSW noted that the line’s annual capacity increased from 1mn tonnes to 5mn tonnes, while container traffic rose dramatically in early 2025.

But Georgia’s infrastructure development has relied heavily on European financing, and that may become a vulnerability if political ties worsen further.

“The EU’s position may also prove significant, as it has been an important source of funding for the development of Georgia’s transport infrastructure,” OSW said, citing major support from the European Investment Bank. “Georgia’s continued drift away from the West could make it more difficult to secure funding for new infrastructure projects.”

That creates an opportunity for Armenia, which has until now remained outside the main transit route because of its closed borders with Azerbaijan and Turkey and comparatively weak infrastructure.

OSW said Armenia’s role has grown since the 2020 Second Nagorno-Karabakh War, after which Yerevan began moving away from “its previous model of economic cooperation with Russia in favour of normalising relations with neighbouring countries and diversifying its economic ties.”

This strategic reorientation has underpinned Armenian efforts to market itself as a future transport hub. Central to that is Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s Crossroads of Peace initiative, which aims to reopen transport links with Azerbaijan and Turkey and transform Armenia into a connector between regional markets.

OSW said the project could “reshape the regional transport landscape, particularly in the road transport sector, potentially reducing Georgia’s importance while increasing the capacity of the TITR.” The report also references the so-called TRIPP initiative, a proposed transport corridor in southern Armenia that would connect mainland Azerbaijan with its Nakhchivan exclave.

As Georgia’s political trajectory raises concerns in European capitals, Yerevan has strengthened ties with the EU and presented itself as a more cooperative partner.

The EU has already pledged €270mn under its Resilience and Growth Plan for Armenia for 2024-2027, while broader support under the Global Gateway framework could reach approximately €2.5bn, including transport and connectivity projects.

“This means that, should the political situation in the region improve, Armenia could gain access to substantial funding for the development of transport routes,” OSW said.

Still, the think-tank cautions that Armenia’s ambitions remain contingent on unresolved political risks. The proposed transport projects remain “dependent on the opening of the country’s borders with Azerbaijan and Turkey,” and so far “neither the TRIPP nor the CoP has progressed beyond the conceptual phase.”

Domestic politics could also complicate the picture. Armenia’s parliamentary elections, expected in June, may prove decisive.

“Should Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan lose the upcoming vote, projects such as the CoP and the TRIPP could lose momentum or even be abandoned, particularly if relations with Azerbaijan deteriorate,” the report said.

For now, Georgia remains the undisputed artery of the Middle Corridor. But the OSW analysis suggests that politics, rather than geography, may ultimately determine the South Caucasus’ transport map.

“In the short term, the current configuration of transport routes in the South Caucasus is unlikely to change significantly,” the report said. “In the longer term, however, should Armenia make further progress in normalising its relations with Azerbaijan and Turkey and succeed in opening its borders, the country’s infrastructure could begin to gain importance as a complement to the existing network.”


—

‘You visited the first Christian nation, yet ignored the Catholicos of All Arm

Emil Lazarian
Panorama, Armenia
May 14 2026

The prestigious French periodical Le Journal du Dimanche has published an open letter from the former Ambassador of Armenia to the Holy See, Mikayel Minasyan, addressed to French President Emmanuel Macron. Notably, the letter has also been officially delivered to the Élysée Palace.

Tert.am presents the Armenian translation of the message addressed to President Macron, in which Minasyan details the issues facing the Armenians of Artsakh, as well as the persecutions and repressions carried out against the Armenian Apostolic Church.

Addressing the President of France, Mikayel Minasyan wrote:

“Days ago, you were hosted in my homeland, Armenia, where you were welcomed with the warmth characteristic of the Armenian people. The friendship between France and Armenia has centuries of history and deep roots in shared values; however, allow me to state a simple truth: just as Armenia is not Nikol Pashinyan, France is not you.

Your visit was not a mission to support an allied people, but rather overt and harsh political propaganda in favor of Nikol Pashinyan, just one month before the elections. Your obsession with flattering the incumbent authorities was so overwhelming that you even resorted to falsehoods, claiming that no such visits to Armenia had occurred prior to 2018. Meanwhile, all three of your predecessors paid official visits to our country, earning the utmost respect of the people and an equally warm reception.

During this visit, you chose to see only the ‘Nikol-aligned’ side of Armenia. You avoided hearing the voices of those Armenians who do not forgive and do not forget how, on October 6, 2022, in Prague—under your direct auspices—Nikol Pashinyan recognized Artsakh as part of Azerbaijan. Many of the authors of that black page of history have already left the political stage, as you and your protégé will one day. However, what remains are the 120,000 Armenians of Artsakh and their descendants, who, as a result of your ‘peace agenda,’ suffered under blockade for eight months, faced starvation, and in September 2023, were forcibly displaced from their millennial homeland following ethnic cleansing and military aggression—all amid the silence and inaction of you, your protégé, and your colleagues.

Today, you make loud statements about Pashinyan’s ‘courage.’ If surrendering one’s own homeland and people to the enemy is courage to you, then to us, it is national treason. But you did not meet those Armenians.

You did not see the Artsakh Armenians being manhandled and subjected to brutal force on the streets of Yerevan because police cordons kept them far from your sight. You visited the Genocide Memorial, yet you never learned that the director of the Genocide Museum—a distinguished scholar—was recently dismissed by Nikol simply for daring to present a book about Artsakh to the Vice President of the United States.

You visited the first country to adopt Christianity, yet you ignored the Catholicos of All Armenians, who has long been subjected to open persecution for refusing to renounce Artsakh and for defending Armenian spiritual heritage. The persecution unleashed against the Armenian Apostolic Church is not limited to the campaign against the Supreme Patriarch. Today in Armenia, four bishops and high-ranking clergy of the Church remain in custody, held solely on fabricated and politically motivated charges. Furthermore, the movements of the Catholicos of All Armenians are effectively restricted within the country, and members of his family have become political hostages, ending up behind bars.

You visited Gyumri, but you were not told that the leader of that diocese, Archbishop Mikayel, spent about a year in prison for his commitment to free speech and the truth, and is currently under house arrest. During your visit, the faithful of Gyumri, who attempted to raise their voices to you, were barred by brutal police force from even approaching your motorcade.

Armenia today is submerged in total repression. The existence of political prisoners, the violent silencing of free speech, and the collapse of democratic institutions are documented even in the reports of reputable international organizations. Pashinyan does not shy away from persecuting prominent figures of the Diaspora—some of whom, incidentally, were part of your own delegation. You cannot be unaware of all this.

The Armenians you failed to meet are certain: history will yet deliver its harsh verdict on the ‘courage’ you so diligently praise.

They are also glad that, just as Armenia is not Nikol Pashinyan, France is not you.”

—

Pashinyan explained Armenia’s position on imposing sanctions against Russia

Babken Chilingarian
Oreanda
May 14 2026
OREANDA-NEWS  Armenia will not impose sanctions against Russia. This statement was made by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, answering questions from journalists, according to the Armenian Press.

“We have stated that we will not enter the sanctions regime, but we will not take steps to avoid falling under it ourselves,” the politician explained.

Earlier, Russian Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu noted that if Armenia joins the European Union (EU), Yerevan will be forced to impose sanctions against Russia and will lose many privileges after leaving the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).

In April, the head of the European Commission (EC), Ursula von der Leyen, said that the EU welcomes Armenia’s measures to combat circumvention of anti-Russian sanctions.

https://www.oreanda-news.com/en/v_mire/pashinyan-explained-armenia-s-position-on-imposing-sanctions-against-russia/article1591692/

—

Armenia has received a proposal from Russia to build a modular nuclear power p

Vanyan Gary
Oreanda
May 14 2026
OREANDA-NEWS  Armenia has received proposals for the construction of a modular nuclear power plant from a number of countries, including Russia, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan told reporters.

“We have received offers from Russia, Korea, and France. Our calculation is that at our rate of solar energy, we do not need a nuclear power plant with a capacity of 600-1000 MW. A modular nuclear power plant is suitable for us. There is such a station in Russia, a floating station,” he said.

According to him, Armenia is discussing this issue with Russia, the United States, France, Korea, and China: “We will look at technologies, prices, and choose the best offer. This is not a political choice, but an economic issue.”

The current Armenian nuclear power plant is one of the main sources of electricity in the country. The plant has a single unit with a first-generation VVER-440 reactor, which is supplied by TVEL (part of Rosatom).

At the end of December, Rosatom handed over to Armenia a package of detailed proposals for the construction of a new nuclear power plant in the republic.

Earlier, Pashinyan stated that the life of the Armenian NPP could be extended until 2046, and the construction of a new power unit is currently being discussed with Russia, the United States, France, South Korea and China.

On February 9, US Vice President Jay Dee Vance said at a briefing in Yerevan that the United States would invest $9 billion in Armenia’s nuclear energy sector.

https://www.oreanda-news.com/en/tek/armenia-has-received-a-proposal-from-russia-to-build-a-modular-nuclear-power-/article1591700/

—

Armenia as Something to Eat? PM Pashinyan Refuses to Cut Map-Like Cake

Emil Lazarian
PRAVDA, Russia
May 14 2026
 14.05.2026 16:10
World

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan refused to cut a cake shaped like the map of Armenia during a campaign trip to the community of Gyulagarak, drawing attention on social media and in local media coverage.

Residents prepared the cake to welcome the prime minister during his pre-election visit. The dessert featured the outline of Armenia colored in orange and blue, matching the colors used in the government’s election campaign branding.

Pashinyan Declines Symbolic Gesture

Video published by Radar Armenia showed Pashinyan thanking supporters but declining to cut the cake.

“No, no, thank you very much. I understand what you meant, of course, but we will not cut this cake. And I ask you very much — cakes, and generally anything edible, should not be made in the shape of Armenia,” Pashinyan said.

The moment quickly spread across Armenian social media platforms, where users debated the symbolism behind the prime minister’s reaction.

Campaign Focus on Armenia’s Recognized Borders

The incident comes as Armenia’s internationally recognized borders have become one of the central themes of Pashinyan’s political messaging ahead of upcoming elections.

Earlier, the Armenian leader described the 1988 movement seeking the unification of Nagorno-Karabakh with Armenia as a “fatal mistake,” signaling a major shift from previous nationalist narratives that dominated Armenian politics for decades.

Pashinyan has increasingly emphasized the importance of preserving Armenia’s sovereignty within its internationally recognized borders while pursuing normalization efforts with neighboring countries.

Position on Russia Sanctions

During separate remarks to journalists, Pashinyan also reiterated that Armenia does not plan to join sanctions against Russia.

“We have stated that we will not enter the sanctions regime, but we also will not take steps that would cause us to fall under sanctions ourselves,” he explained.

Armenia maintains close economic ties with Russia while simultaneously seeking deeper cooperation with Western countries and regional partners, forcing Yerevan to balance competing geopolitical pressures.

Analysts note that Armenia’s leadership continues to pursue a cautious foreign policy strategy aimed at avoiding direct confrontation with either Moscow or the West.

Author`s name Anton Kulikov

Editor Dmitry Sudakov

—

Türkiye and Armenia remove restrictions on direct trade after 33 years

Chmshkian Vicken
May 14 2026
By Doğa Usanmaz
  • Türkiye and Armenia are restarting formal trade ties after 33 years, removing restrictions on declaring each other as final destinations for goods.
  • Trade still has to pass through a third country for now, but the move is expected to cut costs, improve transparency, and boost official trade flows.
  • The agreement is seen as a step towards normalised relations, with border reopening talks and a revived Kars-Gyumri railway link also under way.

Türkiye and Armenia are resuming formal trade relations following a 33-year hiatus, announced the Turkish foreign ministry on Wednesday, 13 May. 

Goods shipped from Türkiye were previously not permitted to list Armenia as their final destination, and vice versa. This restriction has now been lifted.  

Direct trade between the two countries has been halted since 1993, when Türkiye closed the border in support of its close ally, Azerbaijan, which was at war with Armenia over disputed territory in the Nagorno-Karabakh region. As a result, goods passing between Türkiye and Armenia had to do so via Georgia. 

Goods moving from Türkiye to Armenia will still need to pass through a third country, given the absence of a functioning border crossing between the two. However, exporters would initially list the third country as the destination; a second invoice would then be issued listing the actual destination. 

Taxes were also imposed as the goods were transited through the intermediary, making their sale more expensive. 

“The bureaucratic preparations regarding the initiation of direct trade between our country and Armenia have been completed as of 11 May,” said Turkish Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Öncu Keçeli. “The necessary bureaucratic and technical work for the border between the two countries to open is still ongoing,” he added.

Turkish exports to Armenia were recorded as $2.25 million in 2024, according to the United Nations (UN) Comtrade database. This reflects a significant drop from the previous year, which brought $22.6 million in exports. The decline is attributed to logistical and reporting barriers, alongside the 2023 reescalation of the Azeri-Armenian conflict. 

The recent initiative removes the need for expensive ‘middleman’ operations in third countries, brings transparency to the countries’ bilateral trade, and is expected to be reflected in official trade data.

“We would like to emphasise that this is an important step toward the establishment of full and normalised relations between the two countries, which could logically continue through the opening of the Armenia-Turkey border and the establishment of diplomatic relations,” said Armenian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Ani Badalyan.

Last month, the two countries also agreed to jointly restore the operationalisation of the railway connecting Eastern Anatolia’s Kars and the Armenian city of Gyumri. The railway is seen as part of the ‘middle corridor’ linking South-East Asia and China to Europe. According to 2023 analysis by the World Bank, the full use of a functioning middle corridor would safeguard China-Europe supply chains and triple trade flows by 2030.

—

Turkey approves new regulations to boost direct trade with Armenia

Maral Takmazian
JAM News
May 14 2026

“Significant step” in normalizing bilateral relations.

May 14, 2026

Turkey and Armenia have taken a major stride in settling their historical differences, agreeing on a bureaucratic framework to promote direct trade between the two states.

The Turkish Foreign Ministry announced May 13 that Ankara had approved streamlined regulations for goods moving to/from Turkey and Armenia via third countries. A ministry statement added that the two states are now working towards reopening their shared border.

“The necessary technical and bureaucratic studies for the opening of the common border between the two countries are still ongoing,” it stated.

Due to historical grievances, Armenia and Turkey have never had diplomatic relations. Their shared border has remained closed since 1993, when Turkey sealed it in a show of solidarity with Azerbaijan during the First Karabakh War, which saw Armenian forces secure the disputed Nagorno Karabakh territory, along with broad swathes of Azerbaijan proper. 

Turkish and Armenian officials have been engaged in a process aimed at normalizing relations since 2022. A previous joint initiative to establish diplomatic relations, launched in 2009, eventually stalled.  

Officials in Yerevan applauded the Turkish decision to ease trade rules, describing it as “an important step” in efforts to establish diplomatic relations.  

“This decision is essential from the perspective of expanding trade and business circles between the two countries, boosting economic connectivity in the region, and ensuring peace and prosperity,” read an Armenian Foreign Ministry statement. 


—

Armenia Season – 2026 Parliamentary Election

Garnik Tadevosian
Commonspace.eu
May 14 2026
14 May 2026
Live blog 0 updates

The campaign for Armenia’s parliamentary elections began on Friday (8 May), with 17 parties and two electoral blocs competing for seats in parliament. They are seeking the support of around 2.5 million eligible voters across the country.

With the campaign now underway, political forces are already working to mobilise public opinion and define themselves against their rivals. The election campaign is being shaped by several major divides, including peace versus a reconsideration of the current peace process, European versus Russian geopolitical orientations, and populist versus democratic tendencies. Each party is targeting different sections of the Armenian electorate, hoping that its message and strategy will be enough to secure representation in parliament.

On commonspace.eu, we are closely following developments ahead of Armenia’s parliamentary elections, which will take place on 7 June. This page brings together our coverage, analysis, interviews and updates on the campaign. 

13 May, As Armenia’s election campaign starts, parties compete over rival visions for the country’s future

“The campaign for the Armenian parliamentary elections began on Friday (8 May), with 17 parties and two electoral blocs in the running. All are seeking to enter parliament and win the support of around 2.5 million eligible voters across Armenia. With the campaign underway, each party is already mobilising public opinion against the other. Parties are divided on different themes: peace vs reconsideration of the current peace process, European vs Russian trajectories, and populist vs democratic tendencies, among other political cleavages shaping the campaign. Each party is targeting different segments of the Armenian electorate and hoping that its strategy will secure seats in parliament.”

11 May, Monday Commentary: Europe goes to the Caucasus, but that is just the beginning of the story

“Dozens of European presidents, prime ministers, and other senior leaders descended on Yerevan last week to participate in the 8th Summit of the European Political Community (EPC). For a day or two, you could not go anywhere in the centre of the Armenian capital without bumping into a European leader and his entourage.

The summit itself was by and large uneventful, with seven-minute set-piece speeches, during which leaders heaped praise on Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan. This followed the traditional welcome, whereby leaders were greeted individually by Pashinyan, which lasted for hours. There was an unusually long “red carpet’. NATO Secretary General, Mark Rutte sprinted the last part of his walk, remarking that this was the “longest red carpet ever”. But otherwise, the Summit was uneventful. There was speculation about the Azerbaijani participation in the Summit. In the end, President Ilham Aliyev addressed the summit online. It would have been nice if he were present in person, but clearly, not possible yet, and an online presence was the next best thing.|

11 May, Azerbaijan stand-off with the European Parliament

“On 30 April, the European Parliament issued a resolution titled “Supporting democratic resilience in Armenia”. The resolution focused primarily on Armenia’s upcoming elections on 7 June (EP resolution on 30 April).

However, the resolution also criticised Baku over the treatment of Armenian detainees, the rights of displaced ethnic Armenians, and the protection of Armenian cultural and religious heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh.

In response on 1 May, the Azerbaijan foreign ministry summoned the EU Ambassador, and the Azerbaijan Parliament cut institutional co-operation with the European Parliament, and its involvement with Euronest.”

8 May, A serious election, in which voters have clear options

“The registration process for parties and blocs participating in the elections has been completed. A total of 19 political forces—two blocs and 17 parties—will participate in the election race, which begins on May 8 and concludes on June 5. The electoral threshold is set at 4% for parties and 8% for blocs.

Although the official campaign starts on May 8 according to electoral law, many parties de facto launched their campaigns long ago, at least since January of this year.

Key Contenders:

The following forces have a realistic chance of entering the National Assembly of Armenia:

  • “Civil Contract” Party: Led by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.
  • “Strong Armenia” Party: Led by Samvel Karapetyan, an oligarch based in Russia.
  • “Armenia” Bloc: Led by former President Robert Kocharyan.
  • “Prosperous Armenia” Party: Led by Gagik Tsarukyan, an oligarch and close friend of Alexander Lukashenko.

It appears that administrative resources and financial capabilities grant these forces a significant advantage. Furthermore, the primary political struggle is unfolding between Nikol Pashinyan on one side and three pro-Russian forces—those of Karapetyan, Kocharyan, and Tsarukyan—on the other. Effectively, a bipolar model has emerged in Armenian domestic politics.”

7 May, LINKS Europe panel discussion – ‘Armenia between a historic summit and a crucial election’

“On 6 May 2026, LINKS Europe Foundation hosted an online webinar titled “Armenia between a historic summit and a crucial election.” The event was chaired by Alexandra Dumitrescu, International Coordinator at LINKS Europe, and brought together experts from Yerevan and Brussels to discuss Armenia’s evolving election environment and broader geopolitical developments.

The panel featured Johnny Melikyan, Senior Fellow at the Orbeli Center; Narek Minasyan, Associate Expert at the Armenian Council Research Center; and Amanda Paul, Deputy Head of the Europe in the World Programme and Senior Policy Analyst at the European Policy Centre in Brussels.”

6 May, Armenia’s parliamentary elections: Polarisation and hybrid threats

“The upcoming parliamentary elections in Armenia will undoubtedly be crucial for the country’s future. We can already observe significant social polarisation, the use of hate speech, and brutal media attacks by competing electoral entities on each other. Unlike Georgia or Moldova, Armenia is operating under intense and immediate security pressure following the end of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Border issues, normalisation of relations with Azerbaijan, and relations with Türkiye are not just foreign policy issues; they are existential political issues. This raises the stakes of the election and increases the likelihood of hardline rhetoric that could complicate post-election management.

Armenia continues to hold genuinely competitive, free elections. Compared to countries such as Russia, this remains an important strength. The main problem is not the lack of competition, but the quality of it.  Currently, politics is highly polarised and often based on support for or opposition to Nikol Pashinyan. This risks narrowing the political debate and turning elections into referendums on leadership rather than on future-oriented programmes.

There are real threats and risks of disinformation or hybrid interference in these elections.”

5 May, Armenia and EU agree on strategic co-operation, but the 7 June elections will define the future

“In a landmark diplomatic moment, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan hosted the first-ever bilateral summit between Armenia and the European Union at the presidential residence in Yerevan on 5 May. While it did not deliver any major announcements, the summit reflected the ongoing deepening of the bilateral  relation and a show of support from Europe for Pashinyan, who is seeking re-election in parliamentary elections in June.”

4 May, EPC summit in Armenia was an _expression_ of European support for Nikol Pashinyan

“Leaders from more than 45 European countries and beyond gathered today in Yerevan for the eighth summit of the European Political Community (EPC). The summit was the largest gathering of European leaders ever held in the South Caucasus. Apart from the set piece events in plenary session, many leaders also held private bilateral meetings. commonspace.eu special correspondent, Alex Verge, was at the summit, from where he filed this report:

European Union Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, France President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky were amongst the myriad of European leaders that gathered on Monday for 8th summit of the European Political Community. Prime Minister of Canada Mark Carney was also present, making him the first non-European leader to take part in an EPC summit.”

3 May, The European Parliament dips into the South Caucasus; Azerbaijan is not amused and cuts relations

“In support of the incumbent rule of PM Pashinyan, the EU has intensified its support to Armenia, particularly since the Strategic Agenda for the EU-Armenia Partnership was set in December 2025 to May 2026. On 29 January, the EU adopted the second assistance measure to Armenia within the framework of the European Peace Facility, doubling the total amount to 20 million EURO from the first assistance measure provided in July 2024. The next day the EU extended the European Union Mission in Armenia – an unarmed civilian monitoring mission deployed on the Armenian side of the Armenia–Azerbaijan border since January 2023 (continuing the EUMCAP established in October 2022) – for two more years, until 19 February 2027, with a budget of over €44 million. In March, the sides inked the financing agreement for the remaining amount (140 million EURO) from of the €270 million Resilience and Growth Plan for Armenia the EU adopted in April 2024. On 16–17 March 2026, Kaja Kallas announced that, following Armenia’s request, the EU would deploy a Hybrid Rapid Response Team to Armenia to help counter threats ahead of the elections, explicitly framing this as support against foreign interference. Separately, EU ambassadors reportedly approved in mid-April a new civilian mission to Armenia focused on hybrid threats, with later political endorsement expected by EU foreign ministers. The next summit of the European Political Summit is planned to be held in Yerevan on 4 May, followed by the first EU-Armenia on the next day.”

2 May, Opinion: Armenian June 2026 parliamentary elections: a test for national stability, regional peace and Russian influence in the South Caucasus

“When Armenians vote in parliamentary elections on 7 June, it will have been almost ten years since elections were last held on schedule. In the decade since the last regular parliamentary elections in 2017, the country has experienced a period of significant political upheaval and conflict. The 2018 Velvet Revolution forced out an entrenched political elite and set the country on a path of institutional and political reform. The conflict with Azerbaijan over the region of Nagorno-Karabakh in turn came to a decisive end, with Armenia suffering military defeat in 2020 and an Azerbaijani offensive in 2023 leading to the displacement of almost all of the local Armenian population – approximately 100,000 people – and the end of the Republic of Artsakh as a breakaway state.

The key national political figure over the course of this decade has been the current Prime Minister, Nikol Pashinyan, who is seeking re-election as the leader of the Civil Contract party. Then, a leading figure of the opposition, Pashinyan, first came to power during the 2018 revolution. He subsequently won snap elections in 2018 and 2021, with the latter held in response to the 2020 War and the last election in Armenia to date.”

2 May, Background information on the 7 June Parliamentary Elections in Armenia

“The Armenian Parliamentary Elections will be held on Sunday, 7 June 2026. Citizens who maintain a permanent residence in Armenia and are at least 18 years old can vote. These elections will be the first regularly scheduled national elections since 2017, following two snap elections held in 2018 and 2021 that were triggered by constitutional crises. In these parliamentary elections, the revised thresholds for entering the government are:

  • 4% for single parties
  • 8% for alliances of two parties
  • 9% for three and 10% for alliances of more parties.

Alongside these rules, up to four seats in parliament are reserved for national minorities to ensure their representation (one for each of the four largest national minorities, Yezidis, Russians, Assyrians, and Kurds). There is also no minimum turnout required for parliamentary elections to be considered valid. This means that regardless of how many people vote, the results of the election will still stand.”

30 April, Armenia’s Russia debate deepens ahead of 2026 elections

“For decades, Russia was Armenia’s main security and economic partner. But cooperation has weakened in recent years, with Armenia freezing participation in the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) alliance, Russian border guards withdrawing from some locations, and Yerevan expanding ties with the European Union and the United States.

A major point of dispute is Armenia’s railway system, operated by a Russian company under a concession agreement signed in 2008. In a press statement on 13 February, Pashinyan said Armenia could consider bringing in a third-country operator if Russia cannot modernise or restore key sections of the network. Russian officials reacted sharply: Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu reportedly called the idea “ill-conceived,” while Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova described it as “bizarre and unacceptable.””

30 April, Thursday Interview: Dr. Andrzej Klimczyk

“The Armenian parliamentary elections on 7 June are crucial in more ways than one. A fragile peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan is still at stake. While progress has been made since President Trump’s August 2025 meeting with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, where a peace agreement was initialled, much remains uncertain. Key elements of the settlement are yet to be finalised, and the political will required to sustain momentum will depend heavily on the outcome of the vote. The peace agenda is heavily politicised, adding further sensitivity to the process, as conduits for Kremlin policy continue to disseminate fear and uncertainty within Armenian society regarding the ongoing peace process with Azerbaijan.

In this week’s Thursday Interview, former Polish diplomat Dr. Andrzej Klimczyk draws on decades of experience across the post-Soviet space to reflect on Armenia’s upcoming parliamentary elections and the wider dynamics in the South Caucasus. He argues that while the European Union has the potential to play a stronger geopolitical role in the region, its approach remains too bureaucratic and insufficiently attuned to local realities.”

Armenian Election Monitor:

The ‘Armenia Election Monitor 2026′ will publish, twice a week, between 1 May and 15 June 2026, an analysis of events and developments around the 2026 Armenia Parliamentary elections. The nonpartisan and independent newsletter will monitor developments and present experts’ opinions to help provide an understanding of events and statements. The goal of the newsletter is to enhance democratic principles through fact-based, informed opinions.

The 12 newsletters will be produced by LINKS Europe Foundation, in collaboration with local partners. The issues will be sent to our Caucasus Concise Newsletter subscribers and added to our website here:

Issue 1: 1 May 2026 – Armenia Election Monitor 

Issue 2: 6 May 2026 – Armenia Election Monitor – The needs of the Armenian people must be centre-stage in the 7 June parliamentary elections

Issue 3: 8 May 2026 – Armenia Election Monitor – Europeans rally around Pashinyan, but the Russians are not amused

Issue 4: 13 May 2026 – Armenia Election Monitor – As Armenia’s election campaign starts, parties compete over rival visions for the country’s future

—

Armenia’s parliamentary elections: Polarisation and hybrid threats

Emil Lazarian
Commonspace.eu
May 14 2026

This commentary was prepared by Dr Andrzej Klimczyk for the Armenian Election Monitor 2026. 

The upcoming parliamentary elections in Armenia will undoubtedly be crucial for the country’s future. We can already observe significant social polarisation, the use of hate speech, and brutal media attacks by competing electoral entities on each other. Unlike Georgia or Moldova, Armenia is operating under intense and immediate security pressure following the end of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Border issues, normalisation of relations with Azerbaijan, and relations with Türkiye are not just foreign policy issues; they are existential political issues. This raises the stakes of the election and increases the likelihood of hardline rhetoric that could complicate post-election management.

Armenia continues to hold genuinely competitive, free elections. Compared to countries such as Russia, this remains an important strength. The main problem is not the lack of competition, but the quality of it.  Currently, politics is highly polarised and often based on support for or opposition to Nikol Pashinyan. This risks narrowing the political debate and turning elections into referendums on leadership rather than on future-oriented programmes.

There are real threats and risks of disinformation or hybrid interference in these elections.

Not only during the campaign, but also on election day and afterwards. The greatest threat is the constant flow of hate-driven narratives, which reinforce existing polarisation rather than creating a stable pre-election environment.

Disinformation can also target the diaspora. Armenia’s large diaspora is an asset, but it also allows narratives to spread outside the country and return through social media platforms.

Armenia is partly prepared to counter external disinformation. For sure, Armenia is better prepared than it was a decade ago, but its defences against hybrid interference are still not fully integrated.

There are many organisations, civil society groups, and independent media outlets actively engaged in fact-checking and monitoring, often with support from the European Union. This is an important strength.

In this context is worth noting that on April 21, the EU approved a new civilian mission in Armenia, EUPM (EU Partnership Mission to Armenia), aimed at combating hybrid threats (election interference, cyberattacks, illicit financing).

The mission was created at the request of the Armenian side ahead of the parliamentary elections scheduled for June 7. Yerevan asked Brussels to deploy a “rapid response team” to protect against external interference.

The European Council established the EUPM Armenia within the framework of the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP), further contributing to efforts to strengthen Armenia’s democratic resilience and crisis management capacity. The mission will support Armenia in countering multifaceted threats, such as foreign information manipulation and interference (FIMI), cyberattacks, and illicit financial flows. EUPM Armenia will provide strategic advice and capacity-building to various ministries and government institutions in developing policies to counter the threats facing society and government, as well as support the development of a horizontal, whole-of-government approach.

Key objectives of the mission are,

  • Combating disinformation and cyberthreats
  • Preventing illicit financial flows in politics
  • Advising security agencies

EUPM should help Armenia to fill out institutional gaps, including the lack of a fully integrated, state-led strategy that combines cybersecurity, strategic communications, platform engagement, and crisis response. Faster and clearer communication from authorities is needed to prevent information vacuums. Coordination across social platforms and closer cooperation with major technology companies may also be necessary to detect coordinated behaviour at an early stage.

The greatest risk is not that the elections will be technically manipulated, but that the information environment becomes so polarised that the outcome is widely questioned.

Another problem is low public awareness, which causes weak or poorly documented claims to quickly gain popularity.

There is a need for faster official communication. Clear, timely updates from authorities are necessary to prevent an information vacuum.

  • In summary, elections will be competitive in a very polarized electoral environment. Compared to countries like Russia, Armenia continues to hold truly competitive elections. The bigger problem isn’t the lack of competition, but the quality of it. Politics is highly polarized, largely based on support for or opposition to Nikol Pashinyan. This polarization risks narrowing the political debate and turning elections into referendums on leadership rather than on forward-looking agendas. On April 23, the Central Election Commission registered 19 entities: 17 political parties and 2 electoral unions, as candidates to participate in the elections. At present, I do not observe a real contest over programmes, but rather a contest over names. Voters are being asked to choose between party leaders, not between program proposals.
  • A specific problem for the opposition is its difficulty uniting. In Armenia, opposition forces often coalesce around protest movements but struggle to maintain cohesive electoral coalitions. This situation favours the ruling party, despite persistently high levels of public dissatisfaction with Nikol Pashinyan’s rule.
  • There are real threats, not only during the election campaign, but also on election day and the day after. In my opinion, the greatest threat is the constant flow of “hate” narratives that reinforce existing polarization rather than creating a stable and peaceful pre-election atmosphere.
  • Armenia has made real strides in electoral administration since 2018—better transparency, more credible vote counting, fewer blatant abuses of administrative resources compared to earlier periods. But public trust in institutions remains uneven. Many voters still suspect elite bargaining or external influence behind political outcomes, even when procedures are sound.  Post-election stability: Even a technically well-run election could be followed by protests if the result is politically contested.

The main challenge isn’t whether votes are counted correctly; it’s whether the outcome is broadly accepted as legitimate in a society under significant internal and external strain.

Armenia is better prepared than it was a decade ago, but its defences against hybrid interference are not yet fully integrated. The greatest risk isn’t that the elections will be “hacked,” but that the information environment will become so controversial that the legal outcome will be widely questioned—a problem that is both political and technical.

Source: Dr Andrzej Klimczyk is a former Polish diplomat with over 25 years of experience in post-Soviet countries. Dr. Klimczyk is an expert in fields such as the promotion of democracy and human rights pertaining to electoral systems, as well as freedom of speech in mass media. Moreover, he has broad experience in the security and defense sector. Dr Klimczyk is a former Political Officer in the OSCE Mission to Moldova (2001-2008) and Political Officer in the NATO Liaison Office in Georgia ( 2010-2017). Additionally, he has served as a former journalist and press attaché in the Polish Embassy in Moscow (1996-2000). Dr Klimczyk has significant experience observing general, local, and municipal elections in Russia, Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova. He is the founder of the“Anush Klimczyk Foundation”.The foundation was established in March 2025 in Yerevan, Armenia. 


—