Armenian dancers, musicians to perform at HWS

 Finger Lakes Times 
Jan 17 2024


GENEVA — Straight from Armenia, the Golden Gates Dancers, a group of young talented dancers and musicians, will be in Geneva Wednesday, Jan. 17, through Friday, Jan. 19, and will present a public performance on Thursday at 7 p.m. at Albright Auditorium at Hobart and William Smith Colleges.

The group is coming under the auspices of the Reunite Cultures Fund, which supports programs that promote good will between the people of America and other countries to develop a better understanding of cultures, music and traditions and build cultural bridges.

Students from Armenia and Lithuania have previously visited Geneva under the same program. The Geneva Rotary Club is facilitating their stop in the city. Members of the group are staying with Rotarians while they are here.

Golden Gates started to tour the United States nationally in 2003. Each tour lasts four to five weeks and covers 20 to 25 states.

Besides the performance at HWS, the Dancers will perform at Geneva High School on Thursday, and the Rotary Club is organizing a dinner for the students and the adults traveling with them at the Sons and Daughters of Italy lodge.

They will perform elaborate lyrical suites and pulsating dances of foot-stomping ferocity, bringing to life a taste of their culture in a whirlwind of colorful costumes and exotic sounds.

The company offers audiences an entertaining and authentic glimpse into Armenian culture through music, song and dance. The program is broad and varied, with something to appeal to everyone, including audience participation through clapping and learning Armenian songs and words.

Spiritual duduk, a double-reed woodwind instrument, dynamic dohl, a double-headed drum, qanun, an Arabic stringed instrument, kamancheh, a Persian bowed string instrument, traditional dances and superb vocals combine for an exhilarating and educational performance for audiences of all ages.

“This is a chance for real people to meet and get a glimpse of Armenian culture,” said Vitally Bezrodnov, leader of the Reunite Cultures Fund, who travels with the group.

https://www.fltimes.com/arts_and_entertainment/around-the-lakes-armenian-dancers-musicians-to-perform-at-hws/article_3c7d1eb8-b3ee-11ee-9fe3-ef58db980858.html

Exchange students from Armenia to perform at HWS

 Finger Lakes Times 
Jan 17 2024

  •   

    GENEVA — Young musicians from Armenia will perform on the campus of Hobart and William Smith Colleges Thursday night.

    Albright Auditorium will host the performance of ArmFolk, a folk ensemble of high school students from Armenia visiting the United States as part of Rotary International Friendship Program. The show is free and open to the public and will begin at 7 p.m.

    While in Geneva, the group will perform at Geneva High School on Thursday morning.

    The group will offer a presentation of Armenian culture through music and dance. Traditional instruments such as the Spiritual Duduk (woodwind instrument), Dhol (double-headed drum) and Qanun (string instrument) will provide exotic and captivating sounds to accompany musical compositions incorporating lively dances, superb vocals and vibrant costumes.

    A dinner and reception will be held prior to the performance at the home of President Mark D. Gearan and Mary Herlihy Gearan at 690 S. Main St.

    As part of Rotary International Friendship Program, Geneva Rotarians are hosting the exchange students in their homes.

    Exchange Students from Armenia to Perform In Geneva

    Finger Lakes Daily News
    Jan 17 2024

    Young musicians from Armenia will perform in Albright Auditorium on Thursday, Jan. 18.

    Hobart and William Smith will host the performance of ArmFolk, a folk ensemble of high school students from Armenia, who are visiting the U.S. as part of Rotary International Friendship Program. The show is free and open to the public and will begin at 7 p.m. on Thursday, Jan. 18 in Albright Auditorium. While in Geneva, the group will also perform at Geneva High School on Thursday morning.

    The group of talented performers will offer a presentation of Armenian culture through music and dance. Traditional instruments such as the Spiritual Duduk (woodwind instrument), Dhol (double-headed drum) and Qanun (string instrument) will provide exotic and captivating sounds to accompany musical compositions incorporating lively dances, superb vocals and vibrant costumes.

    A dinner and reception will be held prior to the performance at the home of President Mark D. Gearan and Mary Herlihy Gearan at 690 South Main St.

    As part of Rotary International Friendship Program, Geneva Rotarians will host the exchange students in their homes.

    Listen to the FLX Morning Podcast Interview

    https://www.fingerlakesdailynews.com/local/ontario-seneca-wayne/exchange-students-from-armenia-to-perform-in-geneva

    Can Armenia’s refugee crisis catalyse health-system reforms?

    THE LANCET
    Jan 16 2024

    • Christopher MarkosianKim Hekimian, 
    • Kent Garber
    • Ara Darzi
    • Shant Shekherdimian

    Published:DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02459-5


    After more than 30 years, the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict has culminated in a sudden mass exodus of more than 100 000 refugees from the region to Armenia. Since 1991, Nagorno-Karabakh (also known as Artsakh), has existed as a de facto state, predominantly inhabited by ethnic Armenians. The latest conflict in the region erupted on Sept 19, 2023, with a military offensive by Azerbaijan leading to a Russian-mediated ceasefire on Sept 20. On Sept 28, authorities of the enclave made the formal decision to dissolve the state by the end of the year.

    1
    Subsequently, nearly the entire Nagorno-Karabakh population fled westward to Armenia, increasing the country's population of 2·8 million by more than 3% in the span of less than 1 week. Refugees with few belongings crammed in cars, buses, and trucks fled to pass through the Lachin Corridor on their journeys over multiple days.

    2

     The refugees have since been dispersed throughout the country wherever shelter was available (appendix).

    3

     Emergency medical care and supplies are being provided by the Armenian Government, non-governmental organisations, and international agencies, such as WHO, Doctors Without Borders, World Food Programme, and UNICEF. However, meeting the health needs of this vulnerable population disseminated throughout a country with scarce resources has proven arduously complex.

    The immediate health needs of the refugees are immense.

    3

     Before the exodus, people of Nagorno-Karabakh had been living under a punitive 9-month blockade, resulting in malnutrition and worsening health conditions due to scarcity of food, medicine, and vaccines.

    4

     During their exile, a fuel depot explosion led to hundreds of casualties among refugees.

    5

     Other factors contributing to medical needs include the suddenness of displacement, forfeiture of medical records, and loss of established longitudinal health-care providers.

    But as headlines fade and humanitarian priorities shift elsewhere, Nagorno-Karabakh refugees will continue to face challenges in accessing high-quality health care. The Armenian Government intends to integrate displaced people into the health-care system, providing them with the same care as their host communities. However, Armenia has a health-care infrastructure with scarce resources and of inadequate quality. Given this reality, it would be wise for the global health response—typically focused on the acute needs of the refugees, and sometimes guilty of setting up health programming in parallel to government efforts—to simultaneously strengthen local health services towards universal health coverage, improved primary care, and optimised outcomes. Addressing the urgent needs, such as infectious and chronic diseases and mental health and psychosocial factors (eg, disruption of social support, loss of homeland, or absence of employment), in an evidence-based manner with the aim of health-care system strengthening will build preparedness in a region with ongoing conflict.
    KH is an adviser to the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Armenia; is a member of the Strategy and Operations Committee of Health Network for Armenia Foundation; and is a policy fellow of the Applied Policy Research Institute of Armenia. KG has served as a consultant for WHO and the World Bank. AD is a non-executive director of National Health Service England; is the chair of the Pre-emptive Health and Medicine Initiative at Flagship Pioneering; and is the chair of the Aurora Prize Selection Committee. SS is the associate director for Healthcare Outreach for the Promise Armenian Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles; is an adviser to the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Armenia; is a member of the Strategy and Operations Committee of the Health Network for Armenia Foundation; and was the director of the Board of Trustees of City of Smile–USA. CM declares no competing interests.
    Editorial note: The Lancet Group takes a neutral position with respect to territorial claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
     

    Cyprus sends medical aid to Armenian refugees

    Cyprus Mail
    Jan 17 2024

    The ministry of foreign affairs and the civil defence announced on Wednesday that Cyprus has sent humanitarian aid to the people of Armenia.

    “Cyprus could not remain uninvolved […] after the recent dramatic events and the displacement of more than 100,000 people from the Nagorno-Karabakh region to Armenia as a result of the military enterprise of Azerbaijan,” the announcement said.

    Responding to a request by the EU civil protection mechanism, after completion of acceptance procedures by Armenia, the Republic of Cyprus on Tuesday sent €15,200 worth of medical and pharmaceutical supplies, donated by the state health services (Okypy) for the treatment of refugees who fled to Armenia.

    The shipment of the cargo was carried out by air in the afternoon, on a flight by Cyprus Airways which waived the transport cost.

    The ministry thanked the participants in the aid effort for their contribution.

    “We hope that our cooperation will be extended to other humanitarian actions and initiatives,” it said.

    Untying the Karabakh Knot

    Czech Rep. – Jan 16 2024

    With the South Caucasus sore spot now largely off the table, Armenia and Azerbaijan could ironically finally be on the brink of a historic peace deal.

    On 7 December 2023, Armenia and Azerbaijan surprised the international community by publishing a joint statement, which some commentators immediately hailed as a landmark deal. The two countries – at war over Nagorno-Karabakh multiple times in the past three decades – announced the mutual release of captured Armenian and Azerbaijani servicemen, raising hopes for a long-lasting peace agreement.

    After the bloody second Nagorno-Karabakh war in 2020, which saw Azerbaijan victorious and thousands dead, Baku repeatedly declared the Karabakh dispute over. Consensus, however, remained elusive as neither the Armenian side nor Russian and Western stakeholders endorsed that approach.

    Azerbaijan’s mid-September 2023 military campaign against the self-declared breakaway state of Nagorno-Karabakh, which led to the surrender of the separatists and mass exodus of the region’s ethnic Armenians, changed everything. The international community – whether it liked it or not – came to accept that the Karabakh conflict had indeed reached its conclusion.

    Paradoxically, then, the outcome of the military offensive has laid the groundwork for a normalization process between Armenia and Azerbaijan: as the Karabakh issue had historically stood as a major stumbling block between the belligerent parties, its resolution opened an avenue for less fraught relations.

    The Sticking Points

    The negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan have in recent months been based on the basic principles that Baku proposed in 2022:

    • mutual, formal recognition of respect for the sovereignty, territorial integrity, inviolability of internationally recognized borders, and political independence of each state;
    • delimitation and demarcation of the state border (apparently according to the 1991 Almaty declaration establishing the Commonwealth of Independent States), and establishment of diplomatic relations;
    • unblocking of transportation and other communications, building other communications as appropriate, and establishing cooperation in other fields of mutual interest;
    • mutual confirmation of the absence of territorial claims against each other and acceptance of legally binding obligations not to raise such a claim in the future; and
    • obligation to refrain in their inter-state relations from undermining the other’s security, from threat or use of force both against political independence and territorial integrity, and in any other manner inconsistent with the UN Charter.

    Repeated statements have asserted that the parties have reached an agreement on the first three of the five points.

    An agreement encompassing these basic principles could serve as a foundational framework rather than an all-encompassing resolution, setting the stage for subsequent negotiations. In Baku, the urgency that dominated the pre-September atmosphere has waned as Azerbaijan perceives the 30-year conflict as resolved on its end. The prevailing viewpoint in Baku suggests that Armenia, in seeking peace and normalization, must take a proactive role. According to this logic, Yerevan currently needs a deal more than Baku does and needs to address the issues that may still serve as a source of concern and irritation for the latter.

    These issues include the fate of the Azerbaijani exclaves outside Karabakh currently under Armenian occupation. (Despite being collectively known as the exclave villages, only four of eight Azerbaijani villages are technically exclaves, since the remaining four have a land connection with mainland Azerbaijan.) While recognizing these 86.6 square kilometers as Azerbaijani territory, Armenia has yet to formulate a clear position and avoid ambiguity on these exclaves. A territorial swap could be an option, but the return of the exclave villages to Azerbaijan may not be realistic as Baku would need a land connection to control them. Moreover, a strategic roadway connecting Tbilisi and Yerevan passes through one of these settlements, presenting a potential stumbling block, as Armenia may be reluctant to relinquish control over the road.

    Complicating matters further, even though Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has declared several times that Karabakh is part of Azerbaijan, Armenia’s legislation still harbors territorial claims: the Armenian Declaration of State Sovereignty of 21 September 1990 references a joint decision in 1989 on the unification of Nagorno-Karabakh with Armenia. This legal backdrop has raised concerns in Azerbaijan, foreseeing scenarios in which the Armenian Constitutional Court could reject a peace agreement or a subsequent power shift in Yerevan might resurrect territorial claims. Azerbaijan finds the presence of such documents worrying, given the potential risks they pose, underscoring the fragility of the ongoing normalization process.

    In Baku it is widely felt that Armenia’s repeated attempts to insert a clause about the status of Karabakh or the rights or possibly return to Azerbaijan of the Karabakh Armenians have been a brake on the progress of the peace agreement. The Azerbaijani side has either rejected this formulation completely or demanded a mirror clause on the return of ethnic Azerbaijanis expelled from Armenia in the late 1980s, when the conflict first broke out.

    Another issue is simply the format of the ongoing talks along two major “tracks.” While the Western track had for some time achieved significant progress – and the EU may be considered to be the most honest broker in the 30-year history of Armenian-Azerbaijani talks – the engagement of France has, in the Azerbaijani perspective, yielded more harm than good. This negative perception stems from France’s supply of military equipment to Armenia, introducing a complicating factor that undermines the impartiality of the negotiation process. Furthermore, European and U.S. officials have made various statements that sounded or were perceived as anti-Azerbaijani in Baku, eroding Azerbaijani trust in this particular diplomatic avenue. With the stalemate in the Western track and given the reluctance of both Baku and Yerevan to achieve something substantial within the parallel Moscow framework, the Azerbaijani side has championed Georgia as an alternative facilitator – to save the process, it says. The idea is either direct Armenian-Azerbaijani talks with Georgia as a mediator or within an Armenian-Azerbaijani-Georgian regional cooperation framework.

    Armenian Fears

    Worth mentioning is the Zangezur Corridor, a main talking point in the international media after the surrender of the Karabakh separatists in September. Armenia, Western countries, and the international press warned about an “anticipated” Azerbaijani attack on southern Armenia to carve out this corridor between mainland Azerbaijan and the landlocked Nakhchivan exclave (with a further extension to Turkey). Those reports generated much surprise and confusion within Azerbaijani political circles. While such a military assault had never been seriously discussed in the Azerbaijani capital, Baku had floated the idea of an extraterritorial Zangezur Corridor as a reciprocal equivalent to the extraterritorial Lachin Corridor (preceding last year’s military campaign, Azerbaijan had installed a checkpoint along this road, which connected Armenia and Armenian-inhabited Karabakh, having secured effective control over the route).

    However, given that the military campaign removed the relevance of the Lachin Corridor, Azerbaijan has adjusted its position on Zangezur and is no longer insisting on its extraterritorial nature. Notably, Azerbaijan has now displayed a keen interest in any viable route bridging mainland Azerbaijan and Nakhchivan – even if it involves Armenian checkpoints. Despite Baku’s flexibility, Armenia has exhibited reluctance, compounded by opposition from Iran toward such a route. (Moreover, Azerbaijan, if intent on securing Zangezur by force, would not have engaged in discussions with Iran to explore an alternative route, dubbed the Araz Corridor.)

    In any case, it would be in the best interest of Azerbaijan to have both Armenian and Iranian routes to Nakhchivan to afford flexibility and reduce dependence on either side. In its turn, Armenia should be interested in revitalizing the Zangezur Corridor, which might fit into Yerevan’s much-advertised “Crossroads of Peace” initiative and could also provide Armenian leadership with strong leverage on Azerbaijan as the provider of a connection with Nakhchivan.

    Normalization with Azerbaijan might also be beneficial for Armenia in its pivot to the West. Armenia definitely needs Turkey not only for boosting bilateral political and economic relations, but also as a window to the West, but Yerevan must secure normalization with Baku first. As an Armenian expert recently complained to this author, “Yerevan is not surrounded by Baku and Ankara, but rather by two Bakus.” In other words, the road to an Armenian-Turkish rapprochement also goes via Azerbaijan.

    Azerbaijan could even directly support Armenia’s changing foreign policy orientation given the former’s history of extending a hand to those whom Russia has squeezed in the past. Baku has accumulated enormous experience in providing support, for instance, to Georgia during its 2008 war with Russia (electricity, gas, and cash); to Belarus during the 2009 “milk war” between Minsk and Moscow (cash to Belarus for repaying Russian loans); to Moldova (gas amid Gazprom’s recent pressure on Chisinau); and most recently to Ukraine (free fuel, humanitarian aid, demining equipment, and allegedly even weapons).

    How to Speed Up the Peace Process

    While Azerbaijan is apparently not in the rush it was prior to September 2023, a sense of urgency could reawaken to speed up the seemingly stalemated talks.

    The first factor that can accelerate the process is a possible Russian comeback to the region. With the theater of war in Ukraine at a relative standstill, this year could bring at least some sort of truce between Russia and Ukraine. In turn, the Kremlin might be able to switch its attention back to regions neglected over the past two years, especially in the Caucasus and Central Asia. Given the historical record of Russia’s leverage on Armenia and Azerbaijan via the Karabakh issue, it would be in the interests of both countries to end hostilities and simultaneously Russia’s Karabakh-based manipulation.

    An additional factor that may inject a sense of urgency is the conceivable spillover of the Middle Eastern conflict into the South Caucasus. The ongoing Israel-Hamas war – coupled with Iran’s active participation, in both the South Caucasus and the Middle East – introduces a variable that could significantly influence the regional landscape. As tensions in the Middle East have a historical tendency to reverberate in adjacent regions, the potential ramifications for the South Caucasus underscore the need for a proactive approach to addressing evolving dynamics and mitigating the risk of instability.

    Lastly, in November, Azerbaijan will host the COP29 UN climate change summit, one of the most prestigious and well-attended events globally. As the Azerbaijani leadership is investing both energy and finances into this massive event, the regime might see a peace deal and normalization with Armenia as a way to signal stability in the region and the country’s positive intentions.

    As noted, the Azerbaijani side may not be in a hurry to sign a peace agreement with Armenia both because it has the upper hand and has raised several concerns (or sources of irritation) that Armenia should, it believes, address first. At the same time, there should be no surprise if a peace deal happens seemingly out of the blue in the coming weeks. The authorities in Baku may even be considering a normalization process without any formal agreement by referring to other cases such as Japanese-Russian relations, which progressed after the Second World War without a formal peace treaty.

    Even the phrase “out of the blue” may not be quite correct – joint statements from Baku and Yerevan show they are continuing their communication through back channels and progress could come quickly. Indeed, despite the general tension, distrust, and unresolved issues between the two belligerent parties, 2024 could see the signing of a momentous peace deal with the prospect of reshaping the region for many years to come.

    Rusif Huseynov is a foreign affairs expert specializing in post-Soviet ethnic conflicts. He is the director of the Baku-based Topchubashov Center, an adjunct faculty member at ADA University, and a 2021 ReThink.CEE Fellow at the German Marshall Fund. He tweets at @RusifHuseynov2.



    Armenian Christmas Celebrations Reinforce Cultural Identity at Sts. Vartanantz Church Mourad School

    Jan 17 2024

    By: Momen Zellmi

    In a heartwarming celebration of heritage and unity, the Sts. Vartanantz Church Mourad Armenian School in Providence, R.I., marked Armenian Christmas on January 6, 2024, with a vibrant array of spiritual and cultural activities. The day commenced with a Christmas Badarak and the Blessing of the Water ceremony. Notably, 7th grade students, clad in traditional Armenian attire, recited the Havadamk (Nicene Creed), a testament to the school’s commitment to preserving their cultural legacy.

    The day’s highlight was the honor bestowed upon Matt Burke, recognized as the Godfather of the Holy Cross during the ceremony. The religious services were followed by a Christmas Hantes (recital) held in the Aramian and Fermanian Halls, which drew an enthusiastic crowd of approximately 180 guests, including students and their parents.

    Emphasizing the significance of retaining Armenian identity and heritage, Co-Directors June Mangassarian and Lala Attarian underscored the role of education and community initiatives. They brought attention to the Sister School program with the “Nor Oughi” school in Armenia, an endeavor designed to foster connections between the students and their ancestral homeland.

    The Mourad School Committee Chairman, Hagop Khatchadourian, spoke on the importance of nurturing future leaders and educators within the Armenian community, resonating with the proclamation of 2024 as the “Year of Human Resources Preparation” by His Holiness Catholicos Aram I. Khatchadourian also heralded the upcoming 90th anniversary of the Mourad Armenian School, marking a significant milestone in its history.

    The event reached its crescendo with performances by the students, including melodious songs and a piano solo. Santa’s presence, distributing gifts donated by local organizations and individuals, added an even more festive air to the celebration. The event wrapped up with Rev. Fr. Kapriel Nazarian expressing appreciation for everyone’s involvement. The Ladies’ Guild and the Men’s Club prepared a veritable feast for the guests, with the day’s success owing much to the generous contributions from local businesses and community members.

    EU Warns Azerbaijan over President Aliyev’s Claims and Statements on Armenian Territory

    ATLAS NEWS
    Jan 16 2024

    By: OurWarsToday
    EU Warns Azerbaijan Over Territory Claims:

    The EU has issued several statements including warnings to Azerbaijan that diplomatic relations will be severely injured if President Aliyev carries out his proposed plan of taking control of eight Armenian villages, as well as plans to create an extraterritorial corridor to the Azerbaijani Nakhichevan exclave, an Azerbaijani claimed autonomous republic, to the west of Southern Armenia.

    European Commission spokesperspn Peter Stano speaking to Armenpress said: “The European Union has spared no diplomatic efforts to help reach a mutually acceptable settlement of the conflict over the past few years… We have been in close contact with the Armenian and Azerbaijani leaderships, tirelessly reiterating our support for the sovereignty, territorial integrity of both countries and the resolution of issues exclusively by peaceful means. Our communication channels remain open… The EU has been using every opportunity to pass clear messages to Azerbaijan that any violation of Armenia’s territorial integrity would be unacceptable and will have severe consequences for our relations… We remain firm and steadfast in this stance… The President of the European Council Charles Michel, the High Representative /Vice-President Josep Borrell and the EU Special Representative Toivo Klaar continue their engagement for a sustainable and lasting peace between Armenia and Azerbaijan,”

    Azerbaijan’s Justification and Intentions:

    Azerbaijani leader Illham Aliyev made these threats in recent territorial claims where-in he said Armenia must give control of the villages which he calls as Azerbaijani instead of Armenian, as well as designate land between the exclave and Azerbaijan so as to create a corridor for goods supply. Additionally he seeks to prevent Armenian goods inspection on Nakhichevan cargo back and forth.

    Aliyev’s backing for these claims was that under Soviet Azerbaijan these areas were delineated to their nation, Soviet borders were redrawn between Armenia and Azerbaijan several times and neither side has accepted the various choices for decades. All eight villages claimed exist on or near the border, and one next to Nakhichevan. Aliyev said in a speech on January 10th: “As for the occupied Azerbaijani villages, there are enclave and non-enclave villages. The villages that are not enclave, the four villages should be returned to Azerbaijan without any preconditions. The villages that are enclave, a separate expert group should be established and this issue should be discussed. Azerbaijan believes that all enclaves should be returned. The roads leading to these enclaves should have the necessary conditions and the people living there should be accommodated in these enclaves… Azerbaijan is not going back anywhere. Neither from the positions of May 2021 nor from the positions of September 2022. Azerbaijan is not taking a step back because that border must be defined… Armenia continues to occupy Azerbaijan’s villages, and this is unacceptable. This issue will be clarified during the meeting of the commissions at the end of this month [January of 2023].”

    Aliyev also announced new and planned Azerbaijani infrastructure and city building projects in the recently seized Artsakh/Nagorno-Karabakh region.

    Background and Regional Conflict:

    In recent years when Azerbaijan has made similar demands and claims for Armenian territory which is not met, it follows with an invasion that seizes the land by force utilizing its larger military force and population to brute strength attacks and hold frontlines that have steadily grown, such as the recent seizure of the enclave of Artsakh/Nagorno-Karabakh. Supply by Turkey and Israel to Azerbaijan of advanced military technology and armaments such as drones has enabled them to swiftly strike Armenian defenses and vehicles before sending in ground troops to overwhelm thinned out positions and then occupy them.

    Armenia’s Energy Security Faces Frosty Relations With Russia – Analysis

    Jan 17 2024

    By IWPR

    By Gayane Markosyan

    Armenia’s strained relations with Russia, its traditional strategic ally, may have an impact beyond political and security alliance, affecting the country’s energy security as Moscow supplies most of Yerevan’s gas needs.

    Armenia is officially considered a self-sufficient country in terms of its volume of electricity, generating up to 98 per cent of its needs in-country. Experts, however, warn that the reality is more complex.

    “Our self-sufficiency depends on the countries from which we import the gas and the uranium that operate our thermal and nuclear power plants. And when our government officials speak about our self-sufficiency, why do they forget to say how we maintain it?” energy expert Armen Manvelyan told IWPR, noting that in fact over 70 per cent of Armenia’s electricity depended on Russia.

    According to Armenia’s statistical committee, in 2021 thermal power produced 42.9 per cent of the country’s electricity, while 25.4 per cent was provided by nuclear plants with uranium imported from Russia. Internal resources produce about 31.6 per cent of Armenia’s electricity: 27.9 per cent from hydropower and 3.7 percent from solar power plants. 

    In addition, Armenia imports natural gas and oil for most of its energy needs, predominantly from Russia. According to data from the Ministry of Territorial Administration, Russia supplies 87.5 per cent of Armenia’s gas needs via pipeline through Georgia, while Iran covers 12.5 per cent through a barter agreement under which it exports electricity in exchange.

    Armenia also trades electricity with Georgia, though volumes are low since the countries’ networks are not synchronised. Energy interconnections with Azerbaijan and Turkey are inactive for political reasons.

    In an interview on November 15, Iran’s newly appointed ambassador to Armenia, Mehdi Sobhani, hinted that Tehran might help Yerevan reduce its energy dependence on Russia. Since 2009 Armenia has provided Iran with electricity in return for natural gas supplies; the arrangement was due to end in 2026, but in August the two countries agreed to extend and expand it until at least 2030. Russia, however, could turn the tap off as gas giant Gazprom owns the pipeline bringing the gas from Iran to Armenia.

    According to the Statistical Committee of Armenia, in 2021 natural gas accounted for 76.2 per cent of imported energy resources and oil products for 21.9 per cent.

    Armen Manvelyan, an energy expert, noted that amid the strained relations with Russia in the wake of the situation in Nagorny Karabakh, this dependency was problematic. 

    “Armenia is not in the best energy situation right now,” he continued. “Yes, the nuclear power plant is working, thermal power plants are working, but their activities depend on the energy resources supplied from Russia. And if their prices increase, Armenia may face serious problems.”

    While a spike in prices is not imminent, the widening rift between Yerevan and Moscow meant that it cannot be ruled out.

    “Until now, the existing favourable tariffs were determined by the quality of political relations between the two countries,” Manvelyan said. “If you have good political relations, you get a good price. When you start to spoil your political relations, the situation may become dicey and prices may increase.”

    Other experts are more optimistic.

    “I think that the problems associated with the dependence on Russian gas are not as acute and existing issues can be mitigated by diversifying the country’s energy system, for example developing further nuclear and solar energy,” Avetisyan told IWPR, adding that supplies from Russia and Iran were mutually beneficial. 

    “In the case of Iran, this is done within the Gas for Electricity scheme, while in case of Russia, we buy the gas, we do not receive it as a gift.”

    Manvelyan noted that rates were certainly lower for Yerevan. 

    “Armenia pays Russian gas at a low price, 175 dollars per 1,000 cubic metre while Azerbaijan sells gas to its ally Turkey at 290 dollars,” he said, adding that Armenia was short of options in terms of friendly neighbours and should hence “make every effort to ensure good relations with Russia”. 

    “An increase in gas prices will trigger a chain reaction across the country’s economy as prices of our goods will increase, affecting our export opportunities because our products will become uncompetitive,” he concluded.

    To increase its self-sufficiency, the Armenian government has embarked on a path to liberalise the energy market as a way to boost its electricity export capacity and diversify sources. 

    “We support the government of Armenia in implementing reforms in the energy sector. We are working with the Armenian government in three main areas – liberalisation of the electricity market, diversification of energy supplies and development of interstate trade with Georgia,” said Abgar Budagyan, chief of party at Tetra Tech, which implements USAID’s energy programme in Armenia.

    For Prime MInister Nikol Pashinyan, the gradual liberalisation of the electricity market which started in 2022 has opened up new opportunities and created favourable conditions for interstate trade. 

    “We are developing production capacities, carrying out large-scale reconstruction of substations and power lines, and building Armenia-Iran and Armenia-Georgia high-voltage lines, which contribute to the formation of the North-South Electricity Corridor and create new opportunities for increasing exports, imports, transit or seasonal power exchange. Thus, Armenia can become a kind of regional electricity hub,” he said in June. 

    The open market means that consumers can choose an electricity supplier, depending on the offered tariffs. It also means that the Electric Networks of Armenia (ENA) no longer has the monopoly over the electricity supply, although new suppliers still have to use ENA’s distribution network, meaning that the company remains the only guaranteed distributor.

    “Since the introduction of the new market model, the Commission approved the licence for 14 suppliers and seven wholesalers are already operating,” Sergey Aghinyan, a member of the Public Services Regulatory Commission, told IWPR.

    According to official statistics, in the first six months of 2023, 13.1 per cent of consumers chose new electricity suppliers, up from 5.3 per cent in the whole of 2022. The government forecast the share to reach 23 per cent in 2024. 

    Experts and officials noted that the reform contributed to the development of interstate imports and exports.

    “In 2022, Armenia exported 365 million kWh to Georgia; in 2012-2021 the amount remained constant at 242 million. This happened mainly because of market liberalisation,” Vardanyan said. Iran remained the main recipient of Armenia’s electricity, with 1178.3 million kWh of electricity supplied in 2022. 

    But experts remain divided over the benefits of liberalisation. Avetisyan’s assessment one year on is positive as it is “an important process that provides opportunities for free competition for existing market players not only within the country, but also abroad”.

    Manvelyan maintained that authorities should have strengthened state control rather than open the market.

    “Energy is one of the few industries that should be very seriously controlled by the state, it is the only one in the position to build large systems and high-voltage networks,” he said. “If Armenia were a large country, we could also talk about the private sector, but this is not the case of our country.”

    • About the author: Gayane Markosyan is a Yerevan-based investigative journalist whose work focuses on gender, legal and economic issues.
    • Source: This publication was published by IWPR and prepared under the “Amplify, Verify, Engage (AVE) Project”implemented with the financial support of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Norway.
    https://www.eurasiareview.com/17012024-armenias-energy-security-faces-frosty-relations-with-russia-analysis/

    Sports: Carl Greaves trained Newark based when in the UK fighter, Armenian boxer and European welterweight champion David Avanesyan…

    UK – Jan 17 2024

     By Rob Currell

    Armenian boxer and European welterweight champion David Avanesyan who trains in Newark under Carl Greaves was back in the country for his latest fight.

    Avanesyan fought former Olympian Serge Ambomo at The Eastside Roads in Birmingham where he won via a stoppage in the fourth round.

    The two men had previously fought in 2017 when Avanesyan won on points over the Cameroonian boxer.

    "He is currently fourth in the world with the WBC and he has to fight at least every 12 months or he would lose his ranking.

    "We have been promised big names and big fights after the defeat against Terrance Crawford but another big fight has not happened.

    "So we decided to fight Serge on a low profile, small hall fight and David got the victory.

    https://www.newarkadvertiser.co.uk/sport/avanesyan-beats-former-olympian-in-birmingham-bout-9348916/