Chris Bohjalian Launching New Novel at Armenian Museum of America with Author

Watertown News, MA

June 26, 2026

The following announcement was provided by the Armenian Museum of America:

The Armenian Museum of America is pleased to announce an evening of conversation with bestselling novelist Chris Bohjalian and acclaimed author Nancy Kricorian in celebration of the launch of Bohjalian’s highly anticipated new novel, “The Amateur.”

The event will take place on Tuesday, August 11, 2026, at 7 p.m. at the Armenian Museum of America in Watertown. Bohjalian and Kricorian will engage in a thought-provoking discussion exploring literature, history, storytelling, and the creative process.

Recently named a New York Times Book Review “Novel Everyone Will Be Talking About in 2026” and an Oprah Daily Best Book of Summer 2026, The Amateur has already garnered widespread critical acclaim.

Set in 1978, “The Amateur” follows Mira, a teenage golf prodigy whose life is irrevocably altered after a tragic accident on a golf course. What begins as a devastating moment unfolds into a compelling story of heartbreak, resilience, class divisions, hidden secrets, and the far-reaching consequences of a single event. Combining literary suspense, coming-of-age storytelling, and courtroom drama, “The Amateur” has been hailed as one of the most anticipated novels of the year.

Publishers Weekly, in a starred review, called the novel “a masterpiece,” while Kirkus Reviews praised it as “irresistible” and “a perfect novel.” Library Journal described it as “an engrossing read that will offer much discussion for book clubs,” and bestselling author Clare Leslie Hall called it “a joyous novel with an unforgettable narrator who will break your heart.”

Chris Bohjalian is the #1 New York Times bestselling author of more than 25 books, including “The Flight Attendant,” “The Sandcastle Girls,” “Hour of the Witch,” and “The Lioness.” His novels have been translated into more than 30 languages and have earned numerous literary awards and distinctions. Known for his meticulous research and compelling storytelling, Bohjalian frequently explores themes of history, identity, justice, and human resilience.

Joining him in conversation will be Nancy Kricorian, an acclaimed novelist, essayist, and educator whose work examines the Armenian Diaspora, memory, displacement, and intergenerational storytelling. She is the author of “Zabelle,” “Dreams of Bread and Fire,” “All the Light There Was,” and “The Burning Heart of the World.” A respected voice in Armenian-American literature, Kricorian has taught at institutions including Columbia University and has been recognized for her significant contributions to contemporary Armenian literature and culture.

“This special evening brings together two extraordinary literary voices whose work explores themes of identity, history, memory, and the human experience,” said Executive Director Jason Sohigian. “We are delighted to welcome Chris Bohjalian back to the Museum for the Boston area launch of his 26th novel!”

This is a ticketed event and space is limited. Tickets are $35 for current museum members and $50 for non-members, and both tiers include a signed hardcover copy of “The Amateur.” For tickets and additional information, contact the Museum at 617-926-2562 x102 or visit
www.armenianmuseum.org/rsvp.

—

Armenia arrests opposition figure for ‘inciting’ foreign officials to ensure

OC Media

June 25, 2026

The Armenian authorities have arrested opposition figure Avetik Chalabyan for allegedly traveling and meeting with officials of an unnamed state to ‘incite them to ensure the victory of their preferred political force’.

Chalabyan, who is a member of the Armenian Referendum civil society group, was arrested on Wednesday, according to Armenia’s Investigative Committee.

According to Armenpress, Chalabyan was remanded to two months of pre-trial detention. The outlet cited the Investigative Committee as saying the reason behind his arrest were visits Chalabyan had conducted abroad in May 2026, where he met with ‘officials of another country’.

‘[He] persuaded them and incited them to use their official and governmental powers and their influence to hinder the free exercise of electoral rights of Armenian citizens’, the agency said, according to Armenpress.

Independent news outlet Civilnet cited the committee as saying that Chalabyan had reached an agreement with foreign officials to ‘force Armenian employees of that country’ to come to Armenia and vote for the Strong Armenia Alliance — an opposition group recently founded by Russian–Armenian tycoon Samvel Karapetyan.

While the country which Chalabyan had allegedly visited was not specified, Armenian officials and local watchdogs repeatedly warned prior to the 7 June elections of potential Russian interference.

Is the Armenian election really about the West vs Russia?

Russia, a long-time traditional ally of Armenia, has yet to congratulate Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan on his Civil Contract party’s victory.

On Wednesday, prominent Russian propagandist Margarita Simonyan suggested that Armenians who voted for Pashinyan should not be allowed into Russia, claiming that those who supported him ‘support Russophobia’ and ‘hate Russia’.

‘I’m a pure-blooded Armenian and I speak out so that those who support Pashinyan, those who hate Russia, ungrateful creatures who vote for him — entry for them into my native country Russia is forever forbidden’, Simonyan said.

—

Sa’ar to advance resolution recognizing Armenian Genocide

JNS

June 27 2026

Turkey has historically denied genocide allegations against the Ottoman Empire’s conduct during World War I.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar announced on Thursday night that he will propose a resolution in the next Cabinet meeting to officially recognize the Armenian Genocide.

“Recognizing the genocide perpetrated against the Armenian people in the final years of the Ottoman Empire is both a moral and historical duty,” he wrote on X.

“We must also firmly condemn any denial, minimization, or distortion of the historical truth. The resolution will subsequently be brought before the Knesset for a vote,” added Israel’s top diplomat.

Israel’s next Cabinet meeting is scheduled for June 28.

Israeli relations with Turkey have taken a nosedive ever since Recep Tayyip Erdoğan assumed the presidency in 2014. The Turkish leader has repeatedly expressed vehement anti-Israel views and has prohibited commercial ties with the Jewish state.

During World War I, the Ottoman Empire killed roughly 1 million Armenians through mass deportations and death marches into the Syrian Desert, while forcibly converting others to Islam.

To date, 34 countries, including the United States and Greece, have formally recognized the Armenian Genocide. Israel would be the 35th.

Sa’ar’s proposal comes on the backdrop of growing Turkish influence in the region and the U.S. administration weighing an arms delivery to Ankara that could enhance its air force stealth capabilities.

U.S. President Donald Trump hinted on Wednesday that Washington is looking to move ahead with the sale of military equipment to Turkey.

—

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar Pushes for Official Recognition of Arme

Greek City Times
June 27 2026

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar Pushes for Official Recognition of Armenian Genocide

by Athens Bureau

Greek City Times | June 27, 2026

In a significant development that could reshape Israel’s stance on Ottoman-era atrocities, Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar has announced he will submit a government resolution for the official recognition of the Armenian Genocide. The move comes amid growing calls in Israel to also acknowledge the suffering of Pontic Greeks and Assyrian (Syriac) communities during the same period of mass violence.

Sa’ar stated on his official X account that recognizing the genocide against the Armenian people in the final years of the Ottoman Empire is both a “moral and historical duty.” He emphasized that Israel must firmly condemn any denial, minimization, or distortion of these events. The proposal will be presented to the government and subsequently brought before the Knesset for approval.

This initiative builds on statements made by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in August 2025. During an interview on the PBD Podcast with host Patrick Bet-David (of mixed Assyrian-Armenian descent), Netanyahu personally acknowledged the 1915 atrocities against Armenians, Assyrians, and Greeks.

Broader Recognition Advocated

Israeli strategic adviser Shay Gal, a geopolitical analyst and former senior executive at Israel Aerospace Industries, welcomed Sa’ar’s proposal but argued that limiting recognition to the Armenian Genocide would be incomplete. Gal described the events as part of a continuous “Thirty-Year Genocide” targeting Christian populations — including Syriac (Aramean-Assyrian-Chaldean) communities and Pontic Greeks — from the Hamidian massacres through the Young Turk era and into the early Turkish Republic.

“The Armenian Genocide was not an isolated tragedy. The Assyrian Genocide was not an appendix. The Greek Genocide, including the Greeks of Pontus, was not a footnote,” Gal wrote. He stressed that Israel, as the Jewish state, has a special moral responsibility to recognize the full scope of these crimes against humanity.

Gal also referenced the Jewish NILI underground network during World War I, which gathered intelligence against the Ottomans and witnessed the plight of Armenian and other Christian minorities, viewing it as a warning for other groups, including Jews in the region.

Historical Context

The mass atrocities of 1915, known as the Sayfo (“Sword”) among Syriac Christians, resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Armenians, Assyrians, and Greeks. Entire communities were uprooted, churches destroyed, and survivors faced forced conversions and deportations across Anatolia and Mesopotamia.

While many countries have recognized the Armenian Genocide, formal acknowledgment of the Assyrian and Greek dimensions remains more limited. Should Israel proceed with official recognition, pressure is expected to mount for a comprehensive approach that honors all affected Christian peoples.

This potential policy shift marks a notable departure from Israel’s historically cautious position, long influenced by strategic relations with Turkey. It is likely to draw strong reactions from Ankara, which continues to reject the genocide label.

—

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar moves to recognize Armenian Genocide…

Syriac Press

June 27 2026

URISHLEM (JERUSALEM) — Israel has taken what could become a historic step toward confronting one of the darkest chapters of the late Ottoman Empire, after Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar announced that he will bring a proposal before the Israeli government to officially recognize the 1915 Sayfo Genocide, while a prominent Israeli strategic adviser called for extending that recognition to include the Syriac (Aramean-Assyrian-Chaldean) and Greek genocides.

In August 2025, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu already offered his personal recognition of the 1915 Sayfo Genocide in an interview with PBD Podcast host Patrick Bet-David, who comes from a mixed Assyrian-Armenian family from Iran. Asked why Israel, founded in 19148, has not yet formally recognized the Sayfo Genocide while many other countries have and while Holocaust denial is punishable in several nations, Netanyahu responded, “I just did. Here you go.”

Moral and Historical Duty

In a statement published yesterday on his official X account, Gideon Sa’ar said he would present a government resolution recognizing the Sayfo Genocide committed during the final years of the Ottoman Empire. “It is a moral and historical duty to recognize the genocide committed against the Armenian people during the final period of the Ottoman Empire,” Sa’ar wrote in Hebrew. He added that Israel must also condemn “the denial, minimization, or distortion of the historical truth,” noting that the proposal would be submitted to the Knesset for approval.

The Foreign Minister’s announcement marks one of the strongest official signals yet that Israel may reconsider its longstanding reluctance to formally recognize the 1915 Sayfo Genocide, a position that for decades had been shaped by regional diplomatic considerations, particularly relations with Turkey.

Read Also: Netanyahu offers personal recognition of 1915 Sayfo Genocide, absent official recognition by State of Israel

Incomplete Recognition

Shay Gal, an Israeli senior strategic adviser, geopolitical analyst, and former Vice President of External Relations at Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), argued that recognition should not stop with the Armenian people but should encompass all Christian communities targeted during the mass atrocities carried out between the late nineteenth century and the early years of the Turkish Republic.

Writing on X, Gal welcomed Sa’ar’s initiative but described recognition limited to Armenia as “incomplete.”

“The Armenian Genocide was not an isolated tragedy. The Assyrian Genocide was not an appendix. The Greek Genocide, including the Greeks of Pontus, was not a footnote,” he wrote.

Gal described the extermination of Syriac Christians, Armenians, and Pontic Greeks as “the Thirty-Year Genocide,” referring to the period stretching from the Hamidian massacres of the 1890s through the rule of the Young Turks and into the early years of the Republic of Turkey. According to Gal, the successive campaigns represented “one historical crime of extermination, dispossession and denial,” arguing that the changing political leadership did not alter what he described as a continuous policy of ethnic and religious persecution.

He further asserted that Israel, as the Jewish state, carries a unique moral responsibility to recognize all the communities that suffered under those campaigns. “No nation has the moral right to recognize only the part of this history that is easiest to name. Certainly not the Jewish state,” Gal wrote.

Shay Gal also referenced members of the Jewish Netzah Yisrael Lo Yeshaker (NILI) underground group who provided critical military intelligence to the British to help them defeat the Ottoman Empire, including Sarah Aaronsohn and Aaron Aaronsohn, arguing that they understood the implications of the Ottoman Empire’s treatment of Armenians and viewed it as a warning of what could eventually threaten other minorities, including Jews living in the Land of Israel.

The mass atrocities commonly known among Syriacs as the Sayfo (“the Sword”) reached their peak in 1915 and targeted the indigenous Syriac population alongside Armenians and Pontic Greeks. Hundreds of thousands were killed, while many others were forcibly displaced, subjected to mass deportations, forced conversions, and the destruction of churches, monasteries, and entire villages and towns across Anatolia and Upper Beth Nahrain (Mesopotamia). Historians have also documented the participation of local tribal forces allied with Ottoman authorities in many of the massacres.

While numerous countries and several international organizations have formally recognized the Armenian Genocide, recognition of the Syriac and Greek genocides has remained more limited and continues to be the subject of political and historical debate.

Should Israel proceed with formal recognition of the Armenian Genocide, calls such as Gal’s are likely to intensify, urging Israeli leaders to acknowledge the full scope of the atrocities that befell the Armenians, Syriacs, and Pontic Greeks during the final decades of the Ottoman Empire.

For many descendants of the victims, recognition is viewed not only as an act of historical justice but also as a reaffirmation that the suffering endured during the 1915 Sayfo Genocide and the broader campaign of mass violence against the region’s indigenous Christian peoples will not be forgotten.

—

Ethiopian-Armenian Museum Debuts with High-Level Diaspora Dialogue

Capital Ethopia

June 27 2026

Photo by Anteneh Aklilu

In a major celebration of cross-cultural heritage, the Armenian Cultural Center in Addis Ababa officially opened the History Museum of the Ethiopian-Armenian community on June 20. The landmark event was paired with a high-level diaspora dialogue featuring Zareh Sinanyan, Armenia’s High Commissioner for Diaspora Affairs.

Co-organized by the Embassy of Armenia in Ethiopia and the Executive Council of the Armenian Community of Ethiopia, the opening marks a significant milestone in documenting a unique, centuries-old bond between the two nations.

In his welcoming remarks, Sahak Sargsyan, the Armenian Ambassador to Ethiopia, praised the profound impact the small but vibrant Armenian community has historically made on Ethiopia’s modernization and development. 

“The establishment of this History Museum is an important milestone toward preserving and popularizing the shared Armenian-Ethiopian heritage,” Ambassador Sargsyan noted, emphasizing the deep symbolic value of the new institution.

The Ambassador also welcomed High Commissioner Sinanyan, who traveled to Addis Ababa not only to engage with the local community but also to hold strategic meetings with counterparts at the Ethiopian Diaspora Service and the African Union.

Addressing the attendees, Commissioner Sinanyan highlighted the resilience and outsized influence of the local diaspora. Despite its relatively small numbers, Sinanyan stressed that the Armenian community has made an “invaluable and lasting contribution” to various sectors of Ethiopian society over the centuries, acting as a vital bridge between the two cultures while proudly maintaining its own national identity.
The museum’s creation is largely the result of years of dedication by community activist, author, and museum curator Vartkes Nalbandian. During the event, Nalbandian shared insights into the extensive, painstaking work involved in gathering archival materials, photographs, and historical artifacts to bring the exhibition hall to life. 

GeographicReference

—

Israel to officially recognize Armenian Genocide in major diplomatic snub to T

I24, Israel

June 25 2026

Israeli Foreign Minister Sa’ar’s upcoming cabinet resolution breaks decades of strategic silence, aiming a direct blow at Ankara’s institutionalized denial campaign amid soaring regional tension

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar will submit a resolution proposal at the upcoming cabinet meeting calling for the government’s official recognition of the Armenian Genocide.

According to the text of the proposal, Israel will formally recognize the genocide committed against the Armenian people during the final years of the Ottoman Empire, framing the decision as both a moral and historical obligation. The resolution explicitly notes that any denial, minimization, or distortion of the historical truth surrounding these events must be firmly condemned.

The explanatory statement accompanying Foreign Minister Sa’ar’s proposal details the systematic nature of the atrocities, which began in April 1915 with the arrest, deportation, and execution of hundreds of Armenian intellectuals and leaders in Constantinople.

Following the removal of the community’s leadership, the Ottoman government executed a targeted campaign to eliminate the population: men were conscripted into forced labor and systematically murdered, while women, children, and the elderly were uprooted and sent on brutal death marches into the Syrian desert. These actions resulted in the deaths of approximately 1.5 million people and the near-total destruction of a millennia-old cultural heritage in the Anatolian region.


The resolution emphasizes that despite extensive and definitive historical documentation, the Armenian Genocide remains the target of an institutionalized campaign of minimization and denial, characterized largely by a manipulative rewriting of history books by Turkey.

While 32 countries have already formally recognized the Armenian Genocide through legislative acts, parliamentary resolutions, or executive declarations, Israel has historically hesitated to take this step due to complex, fluctuating strategic ties with Turkey.

Moving the resolution forward represents a major shift in Israel’s foreign policy calculus, prioritizing historical memory over diplomatic friction with Ankara. Following cabinet review, the resolution will be forwarded to the Knesset for final parliamentary approval.

—

Armenia’s Constitutional Court begins hearings on challenges to election resul

JAM News
June 26 2026
  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

Armenia‘s Constitutional Court has begun hearing a case concerning the results of the parliamentary elections held on 7 June. The results are being challenged by seven political groups. Despite some differences in the content of the appeals, the court decided to consolidate them into a single case.

The hearings are being held in oral proceedings. The ruling Civil Contract party is participating in the case as a third party, while the Prosecutor-General’s Office, the Interior Ministry and the Anti-Corruption Committee are named as respondents.

Under Armenian law, the Constitutional Court must examine the case and deliver its ruling within 15 days of receiving the applications. This means the court is expected to announce its verdict on 4 July.

Opposition groups argue that the Constitutional Court “suffers from a serious lack of independence, neutrality and impartiality”. At the same time, they have refrained from predicting the outcome of the case.

Yuriy Avagyan, executive director of the Restart Foundation, said that Armenia had not experienced an acute political crisis following the elections, but argued that the country was facing a crisis of legitimacy. He attributed this primarily to the numerous cases of alleged vote-buying by opposition groups identified by the Anti-Corruption Committee.

“Regardless of what decision the Constitutional Court reaches, these problems will remain. They will continue to affect us in both domestic and foreign policy,” Avagyan said.


  • Georgian experts weigh impact of Armenian election on region
  • Opinion from Yerevan: Why Putin hasn’t rushed to congratulate Pashinyan on his election victory
  • ‘Russia’s Plan B has been activated’: analysis of Armenia’s preliminary election results

Demands of political groups appealing to Constitutional Court

The following political groups have appealed to the Constitutional Court:

  • the Strong Armenia alliance;
  • the Wings of Unity party;
  • the Democracy, Law and Discipline party;
  • the Prosperous Armenia party;
  • the For the Republic – Alliance of Defenders of Democracy party;
  • the Armenia alliance;
  • the New Force reformist party.

Of these, only two won seats in parliament: the Strong Armenia and Armenia alliances. Strong Armenia is seeking to have the election results declared invalid and for a second round of voting to be held. The Armenia alliance is seeking only to have the results invalidated.

Arman Babajanyan, leader of the For the Republic party, stressed that his party’s appeal had nothing in common with the others.

He said the basis of their appeal was the question of whether the state could confidently claim that the election results reflected the free will of the people when state institutions themselves had documented evidence of organised, large-scale, repeated and interconnected electoral offences during the campaign. He was referring to the Anti-Corruption Committee’s findings on alleged vote-buying by some opposition groups.

“We are not asking the Constitutional Court to replace the criminal courts. We are not asking it to determine which individual committed which crime. That is a matter for the criminal justice system. We are asking the Constitutional Court to do what only the Constitutional Court can do: assess the constitutionality of the elections,” Babajanyan said.

Possible scenarios: what ruling can the Constitutional Court deliver?

Under Armenian law, the Constitutional Court may issue any of the following rulings:

  1. Uphold the election results.
  2. Uphold the election results and
  • declare the election results invalid;
  • declare the election results invalid and determine a new allocation of parliamentary mandates;
  • order a second round of voting.

The Constitutional Court is empowered to invalidate the election results if it finds violations of electoral rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

Article 7 of the Constitution states that elections to the National Assembly and community councils of elders, as well as referendums, must be held on the basis of universal, equal, free and direct suffrage by secret ballot.

Under Armenia’s Electoral Code, a repeat vote involving the same parties may be held no earlier than 15 days and no later than 30 days after the court’s decision invalidating the election results enters into force.

Article 101 of the Electoral Code provides that if the results of the repeat vote are also declared invalid, fresh parliamentary elections must be held no later than 70 days after the court’s decision enters into force.

According to Yuriy Avagyan, executive director of the Restart Research and Educational Foundation, the post-election period has been marked by an unusually low level of political activity. He argued that if there had been widespread disagreement with the election results, there would have been public statements and mass protests.

Avagyan said such a scenario had not materialised because the two opposition alliances that won seats in parliament – Strong Armenia and Armenia – were ultimately expected to accept the election results and take up their mandates.

He said Armenia had not experienced a political crisis since the 7 June elections, arguing that the outcome had been largely predictable for society. At the same time, he said the country was facing “a certain crisis of legitimacy”, which he attributed to two factors:

  • the Anti-Corruption Committee’s investigations into alleged vote-buying;
  • the fact that votes cast at three of Armenia’s 2,005 polling stations were not counted after the Central Electoral Commission (CEC) decided not to hold repeat voting there.

“There is a discussion, including from a democratic perspective: yes, Civil Contract won a majority, but is that three-fifths majority legitimate? On the other hand, if even a single mandate was obtained through vote-buying, that also creates a crisis of legitimacy,” he said.

The CEC declared the results at three polling stations invalid but decided against holding repeat voting, arguing that this would create a risk of tactical voting.

According to the CEC, “voters’ choices could then be shaped not by their original political preferences and free _expression_ of will, but by calculations based on already known election results”. It therefore concluded that “a repeat vote would not guarantee a fair election outcome”.

The opposition Prosperous Armenia party, however, argued that the more than 200 votes it had received at those three polling stations would have been enough for it to enter parliament. It also claimed that, in such a scenario, the ruling Civil Contract party would have lost its three-fifths majority.

Avagyan argued that, regardless of the Constitutional Court’s ruling, Armenia was likely to face challenges in both its domestic politics and foreign relations.

On the domestic front, he predicted that parliament would be dominated by two competing narratives. According to him, the ruling party would portray the opposition as having entered parliament through vote-buying, while the opposition would continue accusing the authorities of “surrendering Artsakh”. As a result, he argued, the country’s most pressing challenges would be pushed off the parliamentary agenda.

Avagyan also warned that the CEC’s decision not to hold repeat voting at three polling stations could complicate Armenia’s relations with the West.

“This purely democratic issue could be used against Armenia as a club,” he said.

He suggested that the issue could be exploited both by pro-Russian groups within Armenia and by Russian influence networks operating in Eastern Europe.

As an example, he cited Armenia’s dialogue with the EU on visa liberalisation.

“When the time comes for EU member states to vote, many countries that are not favourably disposed towards us may use the situation surrounding those polling stations to create artificial obstacles for the Armenian government – in other words, to derail our plans for closer integration with the EU,” he said.

The head of the Restart Foundation argued that the legitimacy crisis could be overcome if courts delivered rulings in the vote-buying cases and new elections were subsequently held.

“New elections do not necessarily have to take place in two months. They could be held in six months or a year – however long the courts need to issue their rulings,” he said.

According to Avagyan, in order to conduct a swift but effective investigation, the courts could seek support from civil society and the international community. He also suggested asking the EU to share its “toolkit” with the relevant Armenian authorities.

—

Armenians ‘disappointed’ and ‘frustrated’ with Vatican over Azerbaijan ties

The Pillar
July 27 2026

“Azerbaijan has been successful in preventing the Vatican from supporting the protection of our rights and especially our cultural heritage.”

Armenians from the region of Nagorno-Karabakh are “disappointed” and “frustrated” with the Catholic Church over its ties to Azerbaijan and a foundation that has funded hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of restoration projects in the Vatican, a leading activist told The Pillar.

The Cathedral of the Holy Mother of God in 2024. Credit: Golden/wikimedia CC BY 

“Azerbaijan has been successful in preventing the Vatican from supporting the protection of our rights and especially our cultural heritage,” said Beglaryan Artak, former human rights ombudsman and chief minister in the Republic of Artsakh.

“We are quite respectful of the Catholic Church, but we are disappointed with its silence regarding cultural heritage and the rights of the Christian people, because we have been ethnically cleansed also because we are Christians,” he told The Pillar.

Beglaryan is also the founder and current president of the Artsakh Union, an organization that advocates for the rights of the former residents of Nagorno-Karabakh who fled or were expelled following the 2023 Azerbaijani invasion of the disputed region. Artsakh is the Armenian term for Nagorno-Karabakh.

“Azerbaijan has fully instrumentalized the Islamic world’s solidarity, even using ISIS terrorists and mercenaries from Syria and Libya in 2020, to fight against us,” he said.

“But we didn’t see any kind of tangible support from the Christian world, and this should have come, first and foremost, from the Catholic Church, which is the largest and most influential institution in the Christian world. That’s why we feel deep frustration about the Catholic Church’s passive attitude.”

Christian Armenians and mostly Muslim Azerbaijanis lived side-by-side in the mountainous region of Nagorno-Karabakh for centuries. Both Armenia and Azerbaijan were part of the Soviet Union, but as Moscow’s influence waned, tensions rose, until a full-scale war broke out between the communities in 1991. The war led to full Armenian control and the declaration of the Republic of Artsakh – which was never recognized by the international community – and the displacement of the entire Azerbaijani population.

In September 2023, Azerbaijan retook the entire region, leading to an exodus of Armenians.

Beglaryan’s organization monitors the status of Armenian heritage sites, including Christian ones, that are now in the hands of Azerbaijan.

“We have more than 6,000 monuments in Nagorno-Karabakh, mostly within 4,400 square kilometers. This is one of the densest and one of the richest examples of Christian heritage in the world and in Europe, with some churches dating back to the fourth century,” he said.

Significant sites include the 13th century Monastery of Gandzasar, which houses what is believed to be the head of John the Baptist.

But activists say that this heritage is now at risk, due to an Azerbaijani attempt to erase the Armenian identity in the region. Satellite imagery has shown the demolition of at least two major Armenian churches, and Beglaryan claims to have evidence of many more examples of vandalization and destruction, including of cemeteries.

“Many of our churches have been targeted by the Azerbaijani forces. Several of them have been fully demolished, and many have been vandalized,” he said.

The Azeris have also been accused of trying to erase Armenian cultural identity by labeling existing churches as “Caucasian Albanian” rather than Armenian.

One such incident took place in an exhibition on Christian heritage in Azerbaijan, which was held in Rome at the Pontifical Gregorian University.

Speakers criticized Armenians as “aggressive settlers” in Nagorno-Karabakh who had defaced Caucasian Albanian churches to present them as Armenian.

The incident prompted criticism of the Vatican, which has also been accused of allowing Azerbaijan to practice “caviar diplomacy,” in part for allowing an Azeri foundation to fund restoration projects of Vatican cultural sites, valued at hundreds of millions of dollars.

These restoration projects are funded by the Heydar Aliyev Foundation, which is run by Mehriban Aliyeva, wife of the current president of Azerbaijan.

An Armenian academic who asked not to be named told The Pillar that the Vatican’s decision in 2020 to award Mehriban Aliyeva the Order of Pope Pius IX, Dame Grand Cross, was “widely criticized in Armenian circles.”

“Critics interpreted it as prioritizing political and diplomatic interests over cultural and Christian solidarity,” he said.

“The Vatican, on the other hand, officially presented the recognition as an appreciation for cultural and interreligious cooperation, not as a political gesture. However, for a significant portion of Armenians, this cooperation raises moral contradictions, especially in the context of concerns over the state of Armenian churches and monuments in Artsakh,” he added.

Asked if he believed there was a direct connection between this partnership and the Vatican’s silence on the attacks on Armenian heritage, the academic responded, “There is no certain evidence that the Holy See’s public caution or limited response is directly due to its cooperation with the Heydar Aliyev Foundation.”

“Objectively, it should be noted that Vatican diplomacy has historically been very cautious and balanced in managing conflicts,” he continued. “It often avoids harsh public statements, seeking to preserve the possibilities for dialogue and mediation with different states.”

A curial cardinal who spoke to The Pillar on the condition of anonymity said that “the Holy See’s philosophy is to keep the channels of dialogue open with everyone.”

“And some good may come of that,” he said, adding that the Holy See maintains relations with both Armenia and Azerbaijan. “And, as trust grows, opportunities may present themselves for the Church to play a positive role in problems that already exist or that may arise.”

The cardinal noted that Pope Leo recently received a visit from an Armenian patriarch, His Holiness Aram I, Catholicos of the Great House of Cilecia, based in Beirut, Lebanon, which oversees part of the Armenian Apostolic Church in the diaspora.

A senior cleric of the Catholicosate declined to confirm to The Pillar whether Aram and Leo had discussed the issue of the Vatican’s relationship with Azerbaijan, but did say that the Armenian Apostolic Church holds the Holy See in high esteem and does not want to let issues such as this endanger good ecumenical relations.

Meanwhile, the relationship between the Vatican and Azerbaijan seems to be deepening. The prefect of the Dicastery for Interreligious Dialogue, Cardinal George Koovakad, recently visited Baku and met with the president, who extended an invitation for Pope Leo to visit the country. Azerbaijani press highlighted the cardinal’s visit, saying that he also went on a tour of two historical Caucasian Albanian churches.

Neither Cardinal Koovakad nor the Heydar Aliev foundation responded to requests for comment.

—

Armenians Criticize Vatican Over Ties to Azerbaijan Amid Cultural Heritage Des

ASATU NEWS
June 27 2026

Armenian activists from the Nagorno-Karabakh region expressed deep disappointment and frustration with the Catholic Church on June 26, 2026, over its diplomatic ties to Azerbaijan and silence regarding the destruction of Christian cultural heritage sites. The region, also known as Artsakh, saw an exodus of its Armenian population after Azerbaijani forces retook control in September 2023. Activists point to hundreds of millions of dollars in Vatican restoration projects funded by an Azerbaijani foundation as a source of moral contradiction. The Artsakh Union, an organization monitoring the status of over 6,000 historical monuments now under Azerbaijani control, reported that satellite imagery has already revealed the complete demolition of at least two major Armenian churches alongside widespread vandalization of cemeteries.

“Azerbaijan has been successful in preventing the Vatican from supporting the protection of our rights and especially our cultural heritage,” said Artak Beglaryan, former human rights ombudsman and chief minister in the Republic of Artsakh.

The human rights advocate noted that the region contains one of the densest and richest examples of Christian heritage in Europe, with some churches dating back to the fourth century. “We are quite respectful of the Catholic Church, but we are disappointed with its silence regarding cultural heritage and the rights of the Christian people, because we have been ethnically cleansed also because we are Christians,” Beglaryan told The Pillar.

Tensions between Christian Armenians and mostly Muslim Azerbaijanis escalated into full-scale war in 1991 during the collapse of the Soviet Union, leading to initial Armenian control before the 2023 offensive reversed the situation. “Azerbaijan has fully instrumentalized the Islamic world’s solidarity, even using ISIS terrorists and mercenaries from Syria and Libya in 2020, to fight against us,” Beglaryan said.

Activists have accused Azerbaijan of attempting to erase Armenian identity by actively targeting religious landmarks and re-labeling historical Armenian churches as “Caucasian Albanian” during European exhibitions. “But we didn’t see any kind of tangible support from the Christian world, and this should have come, first and foremost, from the Catholic Church, which is the largest and most influential institution in the Christian world. That’s why we feel deep frustration about the Catholic Church’s passive attitude,” Beglaryan added. The widespread concern extends to the Heydar Aliyev Foundation, an organization run by the wife of the Azerbaijani president that funds major Vatican restorations, which critics describe as an exercise in “caviar diplomacy.”

“Many of our churches have been targeted by the Azerbaijani forces. Several of them have been fully demolished, and many have been vandalized,” Beglaryan said.

An Armenian academic speaking on the condition of anonymity noted that the geopolitical partnership previously drew heavy criticism when the Vatican awarded the host nation’s first lady a high papal honor in 2020. “Critics interpreted it as prioritizing political and diplomatic interests over cultural and Christian solidarity,” the academic stated to The Pillar. The Holy See officially maintained that the honor was a gesture of appreciation for interreligious cooperation rather than a political stance, though many Armenians view the relationship as highly contradictory.

“The Vatican, on the other hand, officially presented the recognition as an appreciation for cultural and interreligious cooperation, not as a political gesture. However, for a significant portion of Armenians, this cooperation raises moral contradictions, especially in the context of concerns over the state of Armenian churches and monuments in Artsakh,” the academic added.

When questioned about whether the financial partnership directly caused the Vatican’s public caution regarding the conflict, the academic noted that historical precedents play a significant role. “There is no certain evidence that the Holy See’s public caution or limited response is directly due to its cooperation with the Heydar Aliyev Foundation,” the academic continued.

Vatican diplomats traditionally maintain balanced relationships during international disputes to preserve future opportunities for mediation between conflicting states. “Objectively, it should be noted that Vatican diplomacy has historically been very cautious and balanced in managing conflicts,” the academic said.

A curial cardinal speaking anonymously reinforced this stance, stating that the Vatican prioritizes keeping lines of communication open with both Yerevan and Baku. “the Holy See’s philosophy is to keep the channels of dialogue open with everyone,” the cardinal said. The diplomat suggested that cultivating mutual trust remains essential for the Church to eventually address ongoing bilateral issues.

“And some good may come of that,” the cardinal added.

The remarks follow a recent meeting between Pope Leo and an Armenian diaspora patriarch, His Holiness Aram I, though officials declined to confirm if the relationship with Azerbaijan was explicitly discussed. “And, as trust grows, opportunities may present themselves for the Church to play a positive role in problems that already exist or that may arise,” the cardinal said.

—