Chess: Anand starts favourite

Times of India, India
July 21 2004
Anand starts favourite
PTI[ WEDNESDAY, JULY 21, 2004 07:41:58 PM ]

DORTMUND: World Rapid champion and World number two Viswanathan Anand
would start as hot favourite in the Dortmund Sparkassen chess
tournament that begins with a new format here on Thursday.
The Indian stalwart comes back to competitive chess after nearly a
months rest. Earlier in June Anand had led the World team to victory
over Armenia in a match organised in Moscow to mark the 75th Birth
Anniversary of late Armenian world champion Tigran Petrosian.
This time the Dortmund saga changes in a big way as the format of the
event has been changed completely.
Till 2003 it used to be a 10-player round robin tournament. But this
time around, the organisers have found a unique way of holding the
preliminaries, semi-finals, classification matches and the finals.

As a result of this apparently fine shift – expected to give more
decisive and hard-fought games – the players have been divided into
two groups of four.
Anand heads his group along side Grandmasters Peter Svidler of
Russia, his compatriot and 2004 Aeroflot open champion Sergei
Rublevski and local talent GM Arkadij Naiditsch.
Briangames champion Grandmaster Vladimir Kramnik of Russia, also
second seeded, leads the other group.
Kramnik is expected to face a stiff challenge from GMs Peter Leko of
Hungary, defending champion Viktor Bologan of Moldova and youngest
ever Grandmaster Sergei Karjakin of Ukraine.

No compromise acceptable in Nagorno-Karabakh – Aliyev

Interfax
July 21 2004
No compromise acceptable in Nagorno-Karabakh – Aliyev
BAKU. July 21 (Interfax) – During a visit to a border checkpoint in
Khudata in northern Azerbaijan, President Ilham Aliyev said his
country will make no concessions in settling the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict.
Aliyev said that negotiations with Armenia on Nagorno-Karabakh have
produced no results and the OSCE and other international
organizations have been calling for compromise to settle the
conflict.
“The question of making compromises on the issue of restoring the
country’s territorial integrity cannot be discussed,” Aliyev said.
Azerbaijan lost control of Nagorno-Karabakh and seven neighboring
districts in a bloody conflict with Armenia in the 1990s. The UN
Security Council has denounced Armenia’s occupation of Azerbaijani
lands and has demanded that it withdraw its forces. The OSCE Minsk
Group, composed of representatives from the U.S., Russia and France,
is working to help settle the conflict.

BAKU: Milli Majlis speaker meets Romanian Ambassador

Azer Tag, Azerbaijan State Info Agency
July 21 2004
MILLI MAJLIS SPEAKER MEETS ROMANIAN AMBASSADOR
[July 21, 2004, 21:39:33]
Chairman of the Milli Majlis Murtuz Alasgarov received Ambassador of
Romania to Azerbaijan Nikolae Ureke at the Parliament’s Heydar Aliyev
Hall on 21 July.
During the conversation, Speaker Murtuz Alasgarov noted in
particular, that Azerbaijan and Romania had maintained close contacts
in trade, cultural, scientific and education spheres as early as
during the Soviet Union. After the independence, according to him,
the relations between the two countries began to develop more
intensively. Mr. Alasgarov pointed out as well that very important
documents had been signed between the two countries during the visits
by nationwide leader of the Azerbaijani people Heydar Aliyev to
Romania, and by Romanian leaders to Azerbaijan. These documents have
special importance for deepening of our relationship, and today, our
countries are closely cooperate in the framework of such regional
protects as the Great Silk Route, TRACECA and others, he said.
Touching upon the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh,
the Speaker emphasized that President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev had
repeatedly stated that the country stands for peaceful solution to
the conflict. Under the UN’s known resolutions, the Armenian armed
forces must unconditionally leave the Azerbaijani lands; this
conflict seriously impedes provision of security in Europe, and the
international community should intensify its efforts for the problem
to be solved soon. Azerbaijan welcomes the Romanian position in this
relation, and believe the stance of the official Bucharest will
remain unchangeable in the future, Chairman Murtuz Alasgarov said.
Having thanked the Speaker for the warm meeting, Ambassador Nikolae
Ureke stated that his country is also very interested in development
of relations with Azerbaijan. Today, we are widely cooperating in
political, cultural, scientific and educational spheres, but our
trade relations are not on a due level, he said.
The Ambassador noted that there are good opportunities to increase
commodity turnover between the two countries. Along with energy
sphere, according to him, there are wide opportunities for
development of agriculture and other sectors in Azerbaijan, and the
Romanian businessmen could invest in these spheres, as well. Mr.
Nikolae Ureke announced as well that Romanian President Ion Iliyesku
had invited Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev to visit Bucharest, and
that the invitation had been accepted by Mr. Ilham Aliyev. Prior to
the visit, which is expected in October this year, a sitting of the
Azerbaijan-Romania intergovernmental commission will be held, the
Ambassador said.
Touching on the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh,
Mr. Ureke said that his country resolutely support Azerbaijan’s
stance in the matter. The Nagorno-Karabakh problem shall be settled
on the basis of the international legal norms and principles of
territorial integrity of Azerbaijan, he stressed.
Then, MM Speaker Murtuz Alasgarov and Romanian Ambassador Nikolae
Ureke exchanged vies on a number of other issues of mutual interest.

Armenia facing pressure on NK issue

Eurasianet Organization
July 21 2004
ARMENIA FACING PRESSURE ON NAGORNO-KARABAKH ISSUE
Samvel Martirosyan: 7/21/04
Armenian President Robert Kocharian’s administration appears to be
facing increasing pressure to soften its stance on the
Nagorno-Karabakh issue. Reports suggesting that Armenia is willing to
explore the return of Azerbaijani territory seized during the
Karabakh conflict are threatening to stir domestic political trouble
for Kocharian.
Both Armenian and Azerbaijani media have reported that the United
States, in seeking to break the existing stalemate in Karabakh peace
talks, is pressing Armenia to agree to the return of Azerbaijani
regions captured during the 1991-94 conflict. [For background see the
Eurasia Insight archive]. According to the reports, Armenia is being
asked to return anywhere between three and six of the seven areas
seized from Azerbaijan. The only area that reportedly has not come up
in discussions is Lachin, the corridor of land that connects Karabakh
with Armenia proper. Kocharian has adamantly opposed giving back what
Armenians describe as “liberated territories” as a precondition to a
comprehensive peace settlement. [For background see the Eurasia
Insight archive].
A recent article published by the Turkish newspaper Zaman quoted
Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul as saying that Yerevan was
prepared to discuss the return of the territories. Gul mentioned a
meeting of the foreign ministers of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkey,
held on the sidelines of the June 28-29 NATO summit in Istanbul,
saying that the Armenian participant, Vartan Oskanian, declared: “We
[Armenia] can withdraw from all territories except Karabakh.”
Oskanian subsequently denied making any such statement during the
meeting.
Kocharian’s ambiguous comments during a June 23 session of the
Council of Europe’s Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) helped fuel
speculation about a possible deal. Kocharian stated at one point that
the question of what Azerbaijani insists are “occupied lands” could
have been settled long ago if Baku had implemented the so-called Key
West principles, which reportedly mandated that Armenia vacate
captured Azerbaijani territory. He also emphasized that any potential
handover would have to be part of overall Karabakh settlement.
“We are ready for serious negotiations on a full-scale solution to
the conflict,” Armenia Today reported Kocharian as telling PACE.
“That is exactly why we have accepted the last formula for resolution
offered by international mediators which, unfortunately, [was]
rejected by Azerbaijan.”
Some Armenian observers have speculated that Kocharian may have been
seeking to prepare Armenian public opinion for a policy shift on the
territory handover issue. Azerbaijan has denied that any bargain was
struck during the Key West peace talks in 2001. [For background see
the Eurasia Insight archive].
The speculation swirling around the Karabakh issue comes at an
awkward political moment for Kocharian. Though opposition coalition
protests that roiled Yerevan this spring have been suspended,
Kocharian critics remain committed to a six-month boycott of the
Armenian parliament. [For background see the Eurasia Insight
archive]. Despite the coalition’s relative weaknesses, any effort to
return Azerbaijani territory could potentially give the opposition an
issue with which it could inflict considerable damage on Kocharian’s
administration.
Kocharian is no doubt mindful of the circumstances that led to his
rise to the presidency. In 1998, the willingness of then-president
Levon Ter-Petrosian to embrace a gradual approach to a
Nagorno-Karabakh settlement sparked a chain of events that led to his
forced resignation.
A June 25 opinion poll, carried out by the Armenian Center for
National and International Studies, underscored the risks for
Kocharian. It found that only 1 percent of the 1,950 respondents
polled nationwide believed that the captured territories should be
returned to Azerbaijan. By contrast, 45.5 percent wanted the lands to
remain under Armenian control. Another 11.2 percent called for the
regions to be equally divided between Armenia and Azerbaijan, while
just under a third said that they should be made part of
Nagorno-Karabakh. At the same time, only 2.5 percent of the survey’s
respondents expressed trust in the Armenian authorities to resolve
the Karabakh stalemate.
Meanwhile, there are signs coming out of Azerbaijan that Baku’s
Karabakh negotiating position is hardening. In July 16 talks with the
OSCE Minsk Group, which oversees the Karabakh peace process,
Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, Foreign Minister Elmar
Mammadyarov and Defense Minister Safar Abiyev maintained that Armenia
must meet four 1993 UN resolutions that call for the country’s
unconditional withdrawal from land outside of Karabakh. During a
public appearance July 20, Aliyev vowed that Azerbaijan “would
liberate its occupied territories at any cost,” the Turan news agency
reported.
The Minsk Group’s US, French and Russian co-chairmen — Steven Mann,
Henri Jacolin and Yuri Merzlyakov — cautioned that the two
countries’ failure to compromise could lead to a resumption of
hostilities over Karabakh. Concerns about a renewed outbreak of
fighting have risen in recent weeks.
Editor’s Note: Samvel Martirosyan is a Yerevan-based journalist and
political analyst.

VoA: Aliyev: No Compromise in Country’s Territorial Integrity

Voice of America
July 21 2004
Azerbaijani President: No Compromise in Country’s Territorial
Integrity
VOA News

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev says his country will not
compromise its territorial integrity in a dispute with Armenia.
During a visit in northern Azerbaijan Wednesday, President Aliyev
said concessions on Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity are not even a
topic of discussion.
Armenia and Azerbaijan have been at odds over Nagorno-Karabakh, an
ethnic Armenian enclave that declared independence from Azerbaijan in
1988. A six-year war over the area claimed some 35,000 lives.
Meanwhile, Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammedyarov held talks
in Washington with Secretary of State Colin Powell and other
officials.
A State Department spokesman says talks with Secretary Powell Tuesday
focused on bilateral ties and cooperation in the global war against
terrorism. The spokesman says Mr. Powell stressed Washington’s
continued support for political and economic reform in the former
Soviet republic.

Photojournalists eligible for nine-month course in Armenia

International Journalist’s Network
July 21 2004
Photojournalists eligible for nine-month course in Armenia
Photojournalists from countries in the Commonwealth of Independent
States (CIS) can apply for a new nine-month photojournalism course in
Yerevan, Armenia.
Organized by the Caucasus Media Institute and World Press Photo, the
program is scheduled for October 2004 through June 2004. Students
will learn about the history of photojournalism, different genres and
developments in the industry, and ways to confront the most common
problems facing photojournalists.
The participants will work for local print media, photo and news
agencies in Yerevan during the course of the program. They are also
eligible to participate in CMI’s other journalism courses.
World Press Photo will hold an exhibition of the students’ work in
Amsterdam, the Netherlands, following the completion of the course.
Citizens between 17 and 30 years old from CIS countries are eligible
to apply. They should submit a completed application form, available
at in English
and 22 in Russian,
along with a curriculum vitae, a letter explaining why they want to
attend, and examples of published photojournalistic work. Details are
available at

Kocharian Chief Economic Advisor Hold Press Conference in DC

U.S. Newswire (press release), DC
July 21 2004
Chief Economic Advisor to President of Armenia to Hold Press
Conference in Washington Aug. 10
To: Assignment Desk, Daybook Editor
Contact: Peter Hickman, 301-530-1210 or 202-662-7540, for the
National Press Club, or Haik Gugarats of the Embassy of Armenia,
202-319-1976, ext. 348
News Advisory:
Vahram Nercissiantz, chief economic adviser to the President of
Armenia, will hold an “Afternoon Newsmaker” news conference, Tuesday,
Aug. 10 at 2 p.m. in the Zenger Room of the National Press Club, 529
14th St., N.W., in Washington, D.C.
Nercissiantz will discuss the Armenian economy, regional cooperation
and the Millennium Challenge Account (MCA), for which the U.S. has
selected Armenia as a potential recipient of a new form of
developmental assistance.
Nercissiantz is responsible for coordinating economic legislation and
reforms and was recently appointed deputy chairman of an Armenian
government working group to coordinate preparation for the MCA.

Worried About Yukos

Moscow Times
July 22 2004
Worried About Yukos
By Alexei Bayer

I recently approached a number of Jewish businessmen in Russia about
contributing money to an American charity, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid
Society.
HIAS was founded by Russian Jews in New York in the 1880s to assist
those fleeing the pogroms in the Pale of Settlement. Over the years,
it helped generations of Jewish refugees, including thousands of
Holocaust survivors, to resettle in a safer diaspora. Half a million
Soviet Jews have come to the United States under its auspices since
1967. But now, the flow of refugees has slowed to a trickle, and HIAS
is facing an uncertain future.
I was initially skeptical about discussing HIAS with successful
Russian Jews. I had interviewed some of them for an article in 2002
and found them uninterested, even hostile, to the idea of leaving
Russia. They were putting their money and effort into strengthening
the Jewish community in Russia, and they supported local charities
and organizations that helped Russian Jews stay put, not emigrate.
Most of them still say they do not want to leave. But all of a sudden
they feel that a Jewish refugee organization is worth preserving, and
are willing to fund it. This response will no doubt hearten HIAS, but
it left me extremely uneasy. What has happened over the past two
years to change their minds?
Although many of the disgraced oligarchs running afoul of President
Vladimir Putin — notably Boris Berezovsky, Vladimir Gusinsky and
Mikhail Khodorkovsky — are either wholly or partially Jewish, even
the president’s harshest critics have not accused him of singling out
Jews in his attack on private business. Many things in Putin’s Russia
are reverting to the Soviet model, but official anti-Semitism is not
one of them. The bad old days when Jews were barred from prestigious
universities, denied employment and promotion and vilified for
wanting to go to Israel are no more. Anti-Semitism may be more in the
open in post-Soviet Russia, and some prominent members of the State
Duma are given to making nasty, bigoted statements, but it is
definitely not the policy of the Russian government.
Nevertheless, the state’s campaign against Yukos is the main reason
why Russian Jews, especially those in business, are starting to feel
nervous. Since time immemorial, Jews have been blamed for economic
failures. The Russian government may not currently pursue
anti-Semitic policies, but Russian society remains intolerant of
foreigners. For now, its prejudice is directed predominately against
immigrants from Central Asia and the Caucasus. Persecution of such
“blacks” has a semi-official flavor: the government often closes its
eyes when they are harassed by the police and government officials.
At the height of the anti-Jewish campaign in the Soviet Union, the
following joke used to make the rounds in Moscow. An old Armenian is
dying. His family is waiting for some parting words of wisdom, but
all he keeps telling them instead is that they will have to protect
the Jews.
“Why should we bother with the Jews, grandpa?” they ask him. “Because
once they’re done with the Jews, they’ll start on the Armenians.”
Now this joke has been turned on its head. The hardships of everyday
life, such as rising consumer prices, are being blamed on “blacks,”
who are seen as street vendors and petty merchants. But the Jews may
once more become scapegoats if Russia suffers another economic
crisis. Because the Jews, as is well known, control big business and
the financial markets.
With its attack on Yukos, and the systematic return of large-scale
private enterprise to bureaucratic control, the Putin administration
is making sure that Russia’s economy will eventually go down the
drain. The Kremlin has been determined to squander the opportunities
that high oil prices and the weak ruble have thrown its way in the
early years of the millennium. Instead of promoting foreign
investment, strengthening market mechanisms and modernizing the legal
and physical infrastructure of the country, it is steadily
re-Sovietizing the economy.
The era of high oil prices will not last forever. But even if Russia
continues to derive strong earnings from oil, gas and other commodity
exports, the money is certain to be wasted. Places like Nigeria and
Venezuela have shown how a rapacious, incompetent bureaucracy can
make hundreds of billions of dollars disappear without a trace. The
Soviet-Russian bureaucracy, still very much in charge of the country,
has a remarkable track record of turning a fabulously resource-rich
country into an economic, environmental and social basket case.
The post-Yukos Russian economy will be a precarious construct. It
will combine inefficiency, rigidity and corruption characteristic of
a state-run system with half-baked financial markets and a
rudimentary banking system. It will be an environment ripe for a
major economic crisis and, ultimately, for another surge of
anti-Semitism. It will be tempting, of course, for the government to
blame an economic debacle on the rapaciousness of the Jews, rather
than admit its own ineptitude.
It would be a good thing for HIAS if wealthy Russian Jews came to its
support. But this might also presage another wave of Jewish
immigration. Russian Jews are the last significant Jewish community
in Eastern Europe. Moscow, with its extensive and varied Jewish
cultural and religious life, its Jews prominent in the arts,
sciences, commerce and the white-collar professions, is the heir to
such brilliant early 20th-century cities as Vienna, Prague, Budapest,
Berlin and Warsaw. It would be a tragedy for Jews, Russia and,
ultimately, Europe, if this community were to follow the others into
oblivion.
Alexei Bayer, a New York-based economist, writes the Globalist column
for Vedomosti on alternate weeks. He contributed this comment to The
Moscow Times.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Soccer: Second round takes shape

UEFA.com
July 21 2004
Second round takes shape
FC Pyunik weathered a spirited fightback from FK Pobeda before
booking a second-round meeting with FC Shakhtar Donetsk of Ukraine
courtesy of a 4-2 aggregate win.

Frayed nerves
The Armenian champions, 3-1 victors in the first leg, were given a
scare after 23 minutes when Dragan Dimitrovski gave the F.Y.R.
Macedonian visitors the lead. A 2-0 victory would have put Pobeda
through on away goals, however Galust Petrosyan finally calmed
Pyunik’s frayed nerves with an equaliser 13 minutes from time.
Pobeda’s Borce Manevski was sent off in the 89th minute as the tie
slipped away from his side.
Kottila header
Elsewhere, a 27th-minute goal from Mika Kottila, his second winner is
as many Champions League matches this season, gave HJK Helsinki a 1-0
victory against Linfield FC to put the Finnish champions through 2-0
on aggregate.
Maccabi Tel-Aviv await
The vital strike arrived after 27 minutes when Kottila headed into
the net following good interplay between Liro Aalto, Tommi Grönlund
and Petri Oravainen. “Our next opponents [Maccabi Tel-Aviv FC of
Israel] are going to be harder,” said HJK coach Keith Armstrong.
Tense night in Tirana
It was also a tense night for KF Tirana, who advanced to a meeting
with Ferencvárosi TC of Hungary despite a 1-0 home defeat against
Belarussians FC Gomel. The Albanians squeaked through 2-1 on
aggregate. Meanwhile, FC WIT Georgia fell to a surprise 3-2 defeat in
the Faroe Islands against HB Tórshavn, but still won 7-3 overall and
will now play Poland’s Wisla Kraków.
No problems for Skonto
Skonto FC had few problems as they won 3-1 in Wales against Rhyl FC
to wrap up a 7-1 aggregate victory. Mihails Miholpas was on target
twice for the Latvians who will now face Trabzonspor of Turkey. Gary
Powell’s goal for Rhyl was the club’s first in European compeition.
Kaunas power
FBK Kaunas powered to a 6-1 aggregate win against Sliema Wanderers FC
after beating their Maltese visitors 4-1. Andrius Gedgaudas, Darius
Sanajevas, Saulius Mikoliunas and Marius Zaliukas scored for Kaunas
while Michael Mifsud, in his last game for Sliema before a move to
Norway, was also on target. The Lithuanians will face Djurgårdens IF
of Sweden in the next round.
Match overshadowed
However, this victory, and NK Gorica’s tie with FC Flora, remained
overshadowed by the death yesterday of former Lithuanian
international Valdemaras Martinkenas, who worked as goalkeeping coach
for the Estonian champions and national team.
Black armbands
Flora players wore black armbands in Martinkenas’ memory, but fell
3-1 on the night against the hosts, for whom Jani Šturm scored twice,
and 7-3 on aggregate. The Slovenians will now play Denmark’s FC
København.

ANKARA: Turkey Does Not See E.U. Membership As An Absolute Necessity

Cihan News, Turkey
July 21 2004
Turkey Does Not See E.U. Membership As An Absolute Necessity

PARIS (CIHAN) – Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on
Tuesday that Turkey wants EU membership, but it is not an absolute
necessity.
Erdogan told reporters at Paris’ International Conference Center that
Turkey adopted the Copenhagen criteria to enhance the living
standards of the Turkish people. “Turkey will adopt the Copenhagen
political criteria and consider them as the Ankara political
criteria. We will continue progressing on our own path even if the EU
fails to open accession talks with Turkey.”
Erdogan has been paying a three-day visit to France to promote
Turkey’s EU membership drive.
EU leaders will decide in December whether to open entry talks with
Ankara. France is seen as the only large EU state that still harbors
reservations about admitting Turkey.
London, Berlin, Rome and Madrid support Turkey’s EU membership while
Paris and Vienna are still skeptical.
The Turkish Prime Minister said that there is a false impression
created among the European public that Turkey would become a EU
member in December. “In fact, Turkey will just start accession talks
in December 17 EU summit.”
Erdogan said that Turkey would not accept a conditional opening of
accession talks. He said that the Copenhagen criteria are the
conditions for opening accession talks. “The EU should open accession
talks with when Turkey fulfills the EU criteria.”
Erdogan also said Turkey and the Turkish Cypriots have taken advanced
steps to bring about a solution to the Cyprus conflict in line with
the expectations of EU countries.
Turkish Cypriots voted heavily in favor of reunification (65% voted
yes) on the April 24 referendum while Greek Cypriots, defying
international community, overwhelmingly rejected (only 25% voted yes)
the UN peace plan and entered EU as the only representative of the
island.
Prime Minister Erdogan said that the accession of the Greek Cypriot
side into the EU contravenes EU law.
When asked about acknowledging an Armenian genocide, Erdogan said
that historians should deal with the issue. “As politicians, we
should not scratch the wounds of the past but concentrate on building
the future.”
Erdogan said that Turkey is ready to open its border with Armenia,
which has been closed for years over the Nagorna Karabag issue. He
said the border could be opened if the Armenian Diaspora finishes its
campaign for recognition of a genocide.”
The French National Assembly, despite warnings from Turkey, adopted a
draft bill in 2001 acknowledging an Armenian genocide.
Erdogan reiterated that Turkey is against the superiority or
dominance of one ethnic group over another in Iraq. “The autonomy of
one ethnic group in Iraq could spark civil war,” Erdogan warned.
Erdogan also added that there is no crisis with Israel. “By acting
wrongly Israel opened itself to criticism. Israel did the wrong thing
during its raid into the Janin refugee camp where dozens of people
were killed. We told Israel that they made a mistake.”