Turkey to scrap four army brigades — newspaper

Reuters
July 23 2004
Turkey to scrap four army brigades — newspaper
23 Jul 2004 13:24:08 GMT

ANKARA, July 23 (Reuters) – Turkey’s military General Staff plans to
abolish four brigades, cutting the size of NATO’s second biggest army
by 18,000 in a drive to improve efficiency and flexibility, the
Referans daily said on Friday.
Those to be scrapped are the 33rd armoured brigade near the Bulgarian
and Greek borders, the 7th mechanised brigade on the Armenian border,
the 10th infantry brigade on the Iranian border and the ninth
armoured division in central Anatolia, it said.
The report said the General Staff also aimed to scrap its Aegean army
next year in a move seen as underlining much-improved ties with
Greece, a NATO ally but traditional rival with which Turkey almost
went to war as recently as 1996.
The General Staff declined to comment on the report.
The cuts could save cash-strapped Turkey about 65 trillion Turkish
lira ($44.29 million), the report said, adding that they had been
authorised by the head of the General Staff, General Hilmi Ozkok.
The report, written by Lale Sariibrahimoglu, who is also Turkey
correspondent for the respected British-based Jane’s Defence Weekly,
said Ozkok had initially intended a more radical shakeup, slashing
the land forces from 400,000 to 280,000. Turkey’s Defence Ministry
statistics show Turkey’s defence budget for 2004 stood at 9,880
trillion lira, about 3.4 percent of gross national product (GNP).
But these figures do not include substantial extra-budgetary funds,
for example, an estimated 2,400 trillion lira allocated to the
gendarmerie, or military police, and the coast guard.
Under reforms sought by the European Union, which Turkey aims to
join, Turkey recently agreed to allow full parliamentary scrutiny of
all future military spending.
The armed forces have a special place in Turkish society and see
themselves as the ultimate guardian of the country’s secular
democracy, but they are having to accept a big reduction in their
political influence as Turkey moves closer to the EU.
Turkey has a total of 800,200 people serving in its armed forces, the
bulk of them conscripts, making it second in size only to the United
States in the 26-nation NATO alliance. ($1=1467500 Turkish Lira)

BAKU: Aliyev received head of OSCE Baku office

Azer Tag, Azerbaijan State Info Agency
July 23 2004
PRESIDENT OF AZERBAIJAN RECEIVED HEAD OF OSCE BAKU OFFICE
[July 23, 2004, 19:06:28]
President of the Azerbaijan Republic Ilham Aliyev received the newly
appointed head of the OSCE Baku Office ambassador Maurizio Pavesi, 23
July.
President Ilham Aliyev congratulated Mr. Maurizio Pavesi on his new
mission and wished success in his activity in the Country.
Noting that Azerbaijan is the OSCE member and takes regular part in
the arraignments of the Organization, head of Azerbaijan state said
that the Republic attaches great significance to cooperation with
this Organization.
Touching upon the settlement of the Armenia-Azerbaijan, Nagorny
Karabakh conflict, President Ilham Aliyev said that OSCE Minsk Group
is engaged in resolution of the conflict, at the same time stressed
that hitherto it has failed in finding solution to the problem. Head
of Azerbaijan state underlined that the conflict jeopardizes
stability and security in the entire region and it can be settled
only in the frame of international laws and principles. He stated
that Azerbaijan makes great contribution in ensuring safety in the
region and the Republic takes active part in the regional projects.
All these serve strengthening of peace and safety in the region. Head
of Azerbaijan state underlined that in Azerbaijan economy develops
intensively and it has notable influence on the entire development of
the region, Social problems are solved successfully and a lot is
being done to better the life conditions of over one million of
refugees and IDPs who as a result of Armenian aggression were ousted
form their homelands, the president said.
Noting success of the democratization process in the Republic,
President of Azerbaijan dwelt on the active cooperation with the
international organizations. Azerbaijan has fully implemented its
obligations before the council of Europe since it became its member
three years ago.
President Ilham Aliyev expressed hope that integration of the Country
to the European structures and European family would successfully
continue in the years ahead and OSCE will assist to Azerbaijan in all
these processes.
Expressing his gratitude to President Ilham Aliyev for sincere
reception, Mr. Maurizio Pavesi said the Organization he represents
bases on principles of strengthening of cooperation in Europe, noted
that Azerbaijan and OSCE are successfully cooperating. The guest
expressed confidence that this cooperation would further continue and
he personally would make his contribution to the existing relations
between Azerbaijan and the Organization.
Head of the foreign relations department of President Administration
Novruz Mammadov took part at the reception.

Israel Tries Mending Eroded Alliance With Turkey

Israel Tries Mending Eroded Alliance With Turkey
By K. Gajendra Singh
Al-Jazeerah, July 23, 2004
When questioned by journalists during his visit to Turkey last
September, whether the United States was working to create a new axis
between India, Turkey and Israel, Indian prime minister Atal Bihari
Vajpayee replied in the negative, but added that India was expanding
its defence co-operation to a higher level. The question was posed
because Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon had visited India a few
weeks earlier, during which a number defence co-operation agreements
were signed and many decades long relationship between Turkey and
Israel had blossomed almost to a level of an alliance with Israeli
and Turkish air force jets exercising together over central Anatolia.
But the Turkish Israeli relationship has recently come under severe
strain after Turkish prime minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan repeatedly
characterized Israel’s policy in Gaza as’ state terrorism’ and media
reports claimed that Israel was interfering in Iraqi Kurdistan which
could have adverse repercussions among Turkey’s own Kurds in
adjoining south east.
Israel’s deputy Prime Minister Ehud Olmert visited Ankara in mid July
to mend deteriorating relations between the two countries. Before
returning home he said “I was reassured of the continuity and
stability of relations. ” The visit for an economic joint commission
meeting by Olmert was the first high-level contact after Prime
Minister Erdogan’s harsh criticism of Sharon’s policies. To which
Israel would have normally replied sharply but it needs its only
friend in the region, Turkey.
Olmert’s visit began on a wrong note with an “appointment crisis”
with Prime Minister Erdogan leaving Ankara for holidays, a few hours
before Olmert’s arrival, after holding talks with Syrian Prime
Minister Naji al- Otri. Israel said that Olmert’s visit could not be
proponed as he was busy in Brussels. It was as well. In his May 25
meeting with Israeli Infrastructure Minister Yousef Paritzky, Erdogan
asked the Israeli minister: “What is the difference between
terrorists, who kill Israeli civilians and Israel, which also kills
civilians?’
But it was an article in New Yorker magazine by veteran US journalist
Seymour Hersh about Israel providing training to Peshmarga commando
units in north Iraq and running covert operations in neighbouring
countries which brought out in the open brewing differences between
Turkey and Israel. The media reports were denied by both Israel and
north Iraq Kurdish leadership. But Turkey was far from convinced.
Israel is also reportedly infiltrating agents into Iran to plot
Iran’s clandestine nuclear weapons program for a possible pre-emptive
strikes by the Israeli Air Force. Israel believes that Tehran is
about a year away from a breakthrough in that program and is
accelerating its Shehab intermediate-range ballistic missile program.
Israel would prefer a weak and decentralized Iraq if not a divided
one.
According to Beirut’s Daily Star of 17 July, ` it appears that
Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul, one of Erdogan’s closest confidants,
was behind the leak on Israeli interference in Kurdistan, to
demonstrate Ankara’s deepening anxiety that Kurdish aspirations of
independence will be fueled by Israeli interference. Indeed, the US
debacle in Iraq is driving neighbors Turkey, Syria and Iran into each
other’s arms as all fear chaos in Iraq in the coming months’ It added
that ` Erdogan’s government has embarked upon a high-profile
diplomatic effort to bolster relations with the Arab and Muslim world
which were blighted by Israel’s 1996 military agreements with Turkey.
Turkey temporarily withdrew its ambassador and consul- general from
Israel. Relations took a turn for the worse when the Israeli airline
El Al had to suspend for two weeks 6 weekly flights to Turkey from
June 24 in a row over security at Istanbul airport.
Annual trade between the two countries now amounts to $1.4bn
excluding defence sector. Last year, more than 300,000 Israeli
tourists (8% of population ) visited Turkey. Israelis find Turkey
(and a few other countries like Romania) safer for holidays to escape
tensions at home. During Paritzky’s visit agreements were signed for
a US$800 million deal for the construction of three power plants in
Israel. In March, the two sides signed an agreement for Turkey to
sell to Israel more than 50 million cubic meters of water annually
for the next 20 years.
Strained relations between Turkey and Israel caused serious concern
to USA. US president George W. Bush asked Erdogan ` to tighten
Turkey’s relationship with Israel.’ Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronot
said that Washington’s concerns were conveyed by Bush in Ankara prior
to the June NATO summit in Istanbul. It added that Bush stressed that
friendly relations between Turkey and Israel would `contribute
towards the best interests of the United States and expressed concern
that an escalation in tension may spark instability in the Middle
East.’
Soner Cagaptay of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy
commented recently. “The groundwork of the Turkish-Israeli
relationship as it stands in Turkey is eroding. It’s too early to be
alarmist, but I would say that the relationship is under a serious
challenge.” “What once was a marriage of love has become a marriage
of convenience,” said Dr Anat Lapidot-Furilla, a research fellow at
Hebrew University’s Truman Institute in Jerusalem. “It is obvious
that the ‘strategic alliance’ is in a period of erosion,” commented
Turkish columnist Erdal Guven in Radikal.
History of Turkish- Israeli Relations;
Through out history Turks had good relations with the Jews. When
expelled from Spain, Jews found shelter with the Ottoman empire. Even
after the gut wrenching events of the First World War, when the
Ottoman empire collapsed, Armenians were massacred, Christians
exchanged with the Turks from Greece, Jews continued to live in
Turkey, mostly in Istanbul, providing the financial acumen earlier
supplied by Armenians and Christians.
There has been no love lost between the Arabs and the Turkic people.
Many Turks have still not forgiven the Arabs for stabbing the
Ottomans in the back in First World War by the Arab revolt led by
Lawrence of Arabia. After all, the Sultan Caliph in Istanbul was the
guardian of Muslim sacred shrines in Mecca, Medina and Jerusalem.
Turkey joined Organisation of Islamic Conference ( OIC) only to
garner support from Muslim states on Cyprus. Economic relations
improved with Arab states when post 1973 jump in oil prices brought
in sudde! n wealth.
But after the 1967 was and even after the 1973 war when the Arabs
used the oil weapon, Turkey did not break relations with Israel.
There was close cooperation on rightist and leftist and revolutionary
student movements which affected Turkey, specially during 1960s and
1970s. In 1971 Turkish students assassinated Israeli Consul General
in Istanbul, a former senior Mossad officer.
Israel has developed a top rate defence industry based on support and
cooperation from USA. After the end of cold war, Turkey specially its
armed forces felt a little left out. So Turkey sold itself as a
barrier between Europe and the Middle East and the Caucasus, both
`cauldrons of fundamentalism and chaos. ` Its informal alliance with
Israel, encouraged by Washington was useful for U S grants of
sophisticated arms and equipment.
The fall of the Berlin wall also brought in far-reaching shifts in
geo-strategic parameters. The potential threats from the Middle East
grew with many countries acquiring stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and arsenals of ballistic missiles. Beyond
potential threats, terrorist groups like PKK and others in the region
were another menace. They could acquire chemical and biological
agents. So Turkey could no longer afford to overlook possible new
threats from the Middle East.
While Turkish policy towards Israel started changing in early 1990s,
only in 1996 the two went public and signed an agreement on military
cooperation. Much has written about this evolving relationship with
some political analysts calling it an “axis,” an “entente” or even an
`alliance. Of course there are no explicit commitments to assist one
another in the event of an armed conflict but a careful
interpretation of the provisions of the document shows that the
enhanced cooperation could even reach levels usually among allies.
Many joint military air and naval exercises were carried out since
1996. For example the so called “Anatolian Eagle,” took place in
central Anatolia in early July 2001. It included air force units of
Turkey, Israel and the United States and the air defense systems of
all three countries. The exercise simulated defense as well as combat
operations against a comprehensive air attack. Such trilateral
military exercises have put in place a mechanism for advanced
military coordination.
Then 11 September attacks against USA complicated the strategic
environment.
But the Palestinian cause always had supporters on the religious
right, the “progressive” left and even in the Turkish mainstream. The
Palestinians were faithful to the Ottoman Empire in the First World
War. Many held high Ottoman posts and intermarried with Turks. Media
coverage of the Palestinian intifada further affected the Turkish
public. Then in November, 2002 elections the Justice and Development
party (AKP), which has Islamic roots, won 2/3rd seats , although it
got only 34% of votes cast . Over 90% of Turkish population opposed
US invasion of Muslim Iraq, which the secular Turkish military was
very keen to join forcing the parliament to reject US request to open
a ! second front against Iraq. Turkish -US relations nose-dived , but
are now satisfactory.
Israel guilty in North Iraq unless proved innocent
When Erdogan publicly criticized Ariel Sharon’s policies in Occupied
Territories accusing Israel of `state terrorism `, members of his
ruling AKP, were even harsher, lambasting US policies too in Iraq.
Turkish -Israeli relationship reached a low point. Erdogan turned
down an invitation to visit Israel and temporarily withdrew his
ambassador and consul general from Israel.
Then the New Yorker revelations made the simmering differences
public. Turks were aware of Israeli activities in north Iraq. On June
23, the Israeli ambassador to Turkey, Pini Aviv, denied the New
Yorker report that Israel took advantage of the US occupation of Iraq
by expanding Israeli presence in the northern Iraq. He reassured the
Turkish foreign ministry that Israel! had decided long ago not to
meddle in Iraqi affairs.
Foreign minister Gul accepted Israeli denials. “The Israelis tell us
those allegations are not true. But everybody understands regional
and Turkish sensitivity to this issue, so we have to believe what we
are told,” the semi-official Anatolia news agency quoted Gul as
saying. “I hope our trust [of Israel] won’t prove wrong,” he added.
Turkey’s problem with its own Kurds
Turkey has serious problems with its own Kurds, who form 20 percent
of the population. But after 5 years of comparative peace and quiet
in Turkey’s southeast, there is now some upsurge in violent rebel
activity. Kurdish rebellion since 1984 against the Turkish state led
by Abdullah Ocalan of the Marxist Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) cost
over 35,000 lives, including 5,000 soldiers. With a third of the
Turkish army tied up in the southeast, the cost of countering the
insurgency at its height amounted to between $6 billion to $8 billion
a year.
When ever there has been chaos and instability in north Iraq, as
during the Iraq-Iran war in 1980s or after 1991 Gulf war, PKK
activity peaked up in Turkey. The rebellion died down after the
arrest and trial of Ocalan in 1999, when a ceasefire was declared by
PKK. After a Turkish court commuted to life imprisonment the death
sentence passed on Ocalan in 2002 and the parliament granted rights
for the use of the Kurdish language, some of the root causes of the
Kurdish rebellion were removed. TV broadcasts in Kurdish have already
begun. Till mid-1980s even the use of word Kurd was taboo and could
even lead to imprisonment.
Turkey fears that any moves to bolster Kurdish autonomy in Iraq could
pave the way to the formation of a Kurdish state in Iraq and
eventually fuel separatism among its own Kurds. Turkey also uses the
pretext of protecting the rights of its ethnic cousins the Turkmen,
traditionally settled around Kirkuk.
Olmert’s Visit to Ankara
Ehud Olmert is an influential figure in the Israeli Cabinet and is in
charge of ministries of industry, trade and labor. Apart from a
meeting with President Ahmet Necdet Sezer, he had a “friendly,
sincere and serious discussion” with Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul.
Olmert said that “Gul repeated again the commitment of Turkey to
carry on the relations with Israel on the friendly basis as in the
past.’ Olmert added that Israeli officials would soon visit Turkey to
“continue the dialogue that we started. He also assured the Turkish
leaders that Israel was not engaged in any relationship with Iraqi
Kurds in northern Ira! q that co! uld jeopardize Turkish interests.
Gul made no public comments but many analysts believe that Turkey is
reassessing relations that were so close in the past. Erdogan offered
a warm reception to Syria’s visiting prime minister, Naji al- Otri
hours before Olmert’s arrival which Abdullah said was just a
coincidence. There was an important Iranian delegation too in town.
Olmert played down Erdogan’s outbursts and his not being able to meet
with him in an interview with CNN-Turk television. “The two countries
enjoy economic relations that are constantly growing deeper. Our
relations are stable and will keep on growing. Israel wants to
maintain its strategic ties with Turkey,” said Olmert. He also denied
reports that Israeli agents were operating in northern Iraq and
provided training to Iraqi Kurdish peshmergas. “Israel has no
relations with Kurds in the north of Iraq. Turkish authorities know
about all the details. We want a united Iraq. We would never act
against the interests of Turkey,” Olmert told CNN-Turk.
In Olmert’s talks with Abdullah Gül, apart from bilateral relations,
the two sides focused on Turkey`s role in the Middle East peace
process and recent developments. Olmert said that Israel considered
Turkey a powerful force for stability in the Middle East. “Turkey
would play an important role and would be a great power in the
region,’ he added. Olmert also informed Gul about plans for the
Israeli army withdrawal from the Gaza strip but cautioned that
preparations would require some time. “One must understand that
pulling out the settlements is not a simple operation. It has to be
carefully prepared, and! it takes time. We are in favor of
accelerating ! the preparations anyway if it is possible, so we shall
see,” he said.
Abdullah Gül on the other hand said “Sustainable peace in the Middle
East should be provided immediately. Turkey is ready to do its best,
” Gül said. He reiterated Turkey`s readiness to mediate with a view
to finding a solution to the Middle East conflict.
Olmert told the daily Sabah that Israel proposed setting up a
telephone hotline between Israel and Turkey to help avoid further
tensions between the two allies. Israel was willing to give detailed
information about their policies on a daily basis.
Yilmaz Oztuna wrote in Turkiye that ` rescuing Palestinians from
oppression and forging an Arab-Israeli peace, — is a `mission
impossible.’ Former US President Bill Clinton couldn’t manage it.
This knot won’t be untied anytime soon. — We don’t have the power to
be a Middle East peace broker. Even if we had it, this would go
against our interests. Anyway, what Mideast country would ask us to
serve as mediator? These are hard political realities, not stuff for
romantics and idealists.’
Yes, but the Turkish offer to mediate in Middle East is a policy
change brought in by Erdoagn government, which earlier was of benign
neglect. Once annoyed when told that there were El Al planes in
Istanbul, Turkish president Turgut Ozal told the visiting Saudi
foreign minister that it was Turkish policy not to meddle in disputes
amongst its former subjects.
Olmert meets with Turkish Media
Olmert was more assertive in his breakfast meeting with Turkish
journalists. When asked whether Turkey would undertake a role to find
a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, Olmert said that
Israel was carrying out unilateral action (with drawl from Gaza and
parts of the West bank) as setting up a dialogue would be a waste of
time. It was to change the situation in the region. Neither Turkey
nor the United States could do much now adding that Turkey would play
an important role in future to provide stability and promote
democracy in the region. Stressing that unilateral wit! hdrawal o! f
Israel from Gaza strip was of historic importance, Olmert stressed
that it was being achieved under the Likud leadership.
When questioned on relations between Israel and Syria, Olmert said
that Israel gave priority to withdrawal from Gaza strip and formation
of the coalition government. Asked about the West Bank barrier,
recently ruled as a violation of international laws by the
International Court of Justice, Olmert said it was purely a defensive
measure. ” Once the terror ends, the fence will be removed. The fence
is reversible, death is not.” The standard Israeli line.
Olmert and his Turkish counterpart for the Joint Economic Committee
meeting, Agriculture and Rural Affairs Minister Sami Guclu, set an
ambitious goal of doubling the two-way trade. Olmert said that an
effort would be made to create better investment climate for the
Turkish companies, which were doing well in Israel. He showed
interest in energy projects in southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP)
(the project is in Turkey’s Kurdish region across Iraqi Kurdistan ).
Other areas identified for cooperation were in technology,
telecommunication, agriculture and infrastructure.
Recent changes in Turkey
Prime minister Erdogan’s AK party emerged from the ashes of 4 Islamic
parties, banned earlier by the secular establishment led by the armed
forces, but it now feels more secure. Taking advantage of Europe
Union requirement to harmonise Turkey’s system to Copenhagen
criteria, AKP has successfully sidelined the military, which had
exercised power through its domination of the National Security
Council (NSC). From a top policy making forum, NSC has now been
reduced to an advisory role. Compared to earlier regimes perceived as
corrupt, AKP has further strengthened itself by following transparent
governance. It did very well in April municipal elections.
There is a clear erosion in the strategic relationship between Turkey
and Israel which denotes a decline of the Turkish military in
politics, said Amnon Barzilie in Haa’rez. A decision to put Turkey on
a course towards EU membership would strengthen Erdogan, and weaken
the military, according to Israeli Defense Ministry. EU membership
would mean that the Turkish government would wield all its influence
to make arms deals with EU countries instead of Israel.
Since 1996, when the strategic dialogue between Israel and Turkey
began, numerous deals were signed with the Israeli arms industry in
order to “punish” EU countries, which refused EU membership to
Turkey, the Israeli defense establishment says. In December, the
heads of the EU will decide on a date for Turkey to begin accession
talks. While full membership is unlikely soon, some via media would
be found with Turkey coming closer to EU policies
According to this analysis a EU decision to delay membership for
Turkey would strengthen the Turkish military which could even depose
Erdogan and call for fresh elections. One of the first moves would
then be a large arms deal with Israel. Now, the Turkish military has
no choice but to sit tight. Erdogan’s harsh criticism of Israel’s
actions in the territories was a powerful expression of that change.
But Turkey still looks at Israel as its partner in this part of the
world and, therefore, where security and economic interests are
concerned, there would be no change for the worse. Israeli Defense
analysts noted that the U.S. sees strategic importance in ! Turkey’s
joining the EU, as it regards Turkey as a model to prove that there
is no contradiction between a Muslim state and a democratic one.
Dr. Alon Liel, chairman of the Turkey-Israel Chamber! of Commerce
believed that the Turkish army is getting weaker, but that the
Defense Ministry is suffering from fixed ideas and indifference.
“It’s true that in the short term Turkey’s entrance into the EU will
harm arms sales to Israel but the implications for the Middle East
will be so dramatic that in the final analysis it will work to
benefit Israel,” Liel said. This is a farfetched analysis.
Without question, the Iraq war and, in particular, the developments
in northern Iraq have kindled a rapprochement between Turkey and Iran
and Turkey and Syria in spite of US opposition. Turkey now pursues a
strategy of strengthening its ties with the countries in the region.
Since AKP’s coming to power two years ago, Turkey has strengthened
relations with other eastern countries, while making all efforts t! o
fulfill Copenhagen criteria to join EU. EU countries to some extent,
are trying to maintain their relationship with Tehran and Damascus. A
Turkish diplomat said that this should be evaluated, not as
opposition to the United States, but as a result of the recent
developments.
India- Israel relations;
Of course relations between India and Israel would now remain
unobtrusive and in low key. Even the Bhartiya Janta party led Indian
government had balanced Sharon’s September visit last year by
receiving a week earlier Palestinian foreign minister Nabil Sha’ath
as President Yasser Arafat was under siege. Two days before the
Sharon’s visit a senior Indian official said, `We accept and
recognize Yasser Arafat as the President of Palestine.’
There were many write ups against Sharon’ visit and his policies in
Indian media. Opposition parties from the left of the centre i.e. the
communist parties; the Samajwadi Party, the Rashtriya Janata Dal and
the Janata Dal (S) participated in protests against the visit. The
Congress party, then in opposition, did not join in the protests but
made it clear that the party’s position of supporting the Palestine
cause and an independent state of Palestine remained undiluted.
US-Israeli-Indian axis
The idea of so called tripartite US-Israeli -Indian axis was mooted
after the September 11 attacks on USA and was publicly broached by
India’s national security adviser, Brajesh Mishra in Washington at
the annual meeting of the American Jewish Committee, where many
American congressmen were also present. After emphasizing the
similarities between the three countries, he said: “India, the US and
Israel have some fundamental similarities. We are all democ! racies,
sharing a common vision of pluralism, tolerance and equal
opportunity. Stronger India-US relations and India-Israel relations
have (therefore) a natural logic”. He then called for the
establishment of a US-Israel-India axis to fight “the menace of
global terrorism” by military means, i.e. “fight terror with terror”.
The proposal was warmly welcomed by US officials and pro-Israeli
lobby. Jews and Indian Americans also came together in USA. Despite
their obvious differences, the alliance has the potential to increase
the clout of the two communities which are about 5.2 million Jews and
1.8 million Indians, but highly educated, affluent and attached to
democratic homelands facing what they increasingly view as a common
enemy. But how much influence it has exercised on USA on India’s core
problem of cross border terrorism!
Ed Blanche wrote in Beirut’s `The Daily Star ` on July 17,’ In India,
the demise of the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
government in parliamentary elections in May was seen as potentially
major setback for Israel’s plans for extending its influence into the
subcontinent to help contain Pakistan’s nuclear and ballistic missile
programs and into the energy-rich Muslim republics of Central Asia in
conjunction with the Americans.
The BJP had become a major buyer of Israeli arms and
counter-intelligence expertise and had forged unprecedented ties with
the Jewish state. The new government under the Congress Party, which
throughout the Cold War was staunchly pro-Arab and has said it will
take a more even-handed approach to the Middle East, is not expected
to be so pro-Israel. The new government unveiled its policy road map
on May 27, which said that India would remain committed to the cause
of a Palestinian homeland and that new impetus would be given to
diplomatic and economic relations with Arab states.
A recent scandal in India’s premier intelligence agency, the Research
and Analysis Wing (RAW), in which a senior officer recruited by the
CIA defected as security authorities closed in on him, has raised
fears that the US and Israeli intelligence services have penetrated
India’s intelligence establishment.
Asian intelligence sources told The Daily Star that Israel’s Mossad,
as well as the CIA, sought to recruit Indian intelligence operatives
attending seminars in Israel in recent years and apparently succeeded
in some cases. All this is likely to further damage Israel-India
relations.
US and Israeli analysts believe that the Congress Party, which
restored relations with Israel in 1992, will issue some tough
statements, “then things will settle down.” But even the Americans
are bracing for some policy shifts by the Congress-led government in
New Delhi, which relies on the support of leftists, who oppose
proximity to the US and the occupation of Iraq, to survive. Some US
officials in Washington, along with Jewish organizations, are deeply
! concerned about a rupture in Indian-Israeli relations that were
enthusiastically supported by the Bush administration, especially the
hawks in the P! entagon, in part to help counterbalance China,
America’s emerging strategic rival.
There is no expectation at this time that either Ankara or New Delhi
plan to sever relations with Israel. But it is clear that their
relationships with the Jewish state are becoming more hard-headed,
particularly because of Israeli heavy-handedness with the
Palestinians and because of Iraq. Whether this will result in reining
in Sharon remains to be seen, but some big changes may be in the
offing.’
Conclusion And if US can not enforce its will, how can Israel hope to
shape the region. Disruption and chaos, yes . And if US were forced
to withdraw even with a face saving solution with help from
international community, it might then look for a scapegoat.
If Israel wants to play a role in creating an independent Kurdistan,
it would become a willing tool in the regional balance at US behest.
But such a development would be inimical to Turkey and would not be
accepted by it. By now it should be clear that the developments in
Iraq would be determined by the growing insurgency now blossoming
into full-fledged resistance for removing US occupation and for
freedom. Certainly Bush administration and even those opposing it now
in USA can see the strength, depth and ! resilience of Iraqis who
refuse to be subjugated. How would the dice roll for Iraqi Kurds is
difficult to predict. But a break up of Iraq would have unforeseen
consequences even beyond the region. The struggle has only begun in
full earnest.
With a stock of nearly 100 nuclear bombs as reported in the media,
Egypt shackled and thus neutralized and with a US veto on demand,
Israel has shown itself as a wild and irresponsible state in the
region, bent upon creating chaos.
(K Gajendra Singh, served as Indian Ambassador to Turkey and
Azerbaijan in 1992-96. Prior to that, he served as ambassador to
Jordan (during the 1990-91 Gulf war), Romania and Senegal. He is
currently chairman of the Foundation for Indo-Turkic Studies. The
views expressed here are his own.- [email protected] )

BAKU: Condoleeza Rice: USA considers Azerbaijan close friend & ally

Azer Tag, Azerbaijan State Info Agency
July 23 2004
CONDOLEEZZA RICE: `USA CONSIDERS AZERBAIJAN CLOSE FRIEND AND ALLY’
[July 23, 2004, 22:15:35]
Minister of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan Elmar Mammadyarov who is
staying with a working visit in Washington on the invitation of the
US State Secretary Colin Powell, on July 22 and 23 has carried out a
number of meetings in the capital of US.
As the correspondent of AzerTAj informs, during the discussions which
have been carried out with the assistant of the State Secretary on
Europe and Eurasia affairs Elizabeth Jones, the assistant on
military-political affairs Lincoln Bloomfield, the assistant on
democracy, human rights and work by Michael Cossack, the Ambassador
Plenipotentiary on international religious freedom John Hanford, Mr.
Elmar Mammadyarov has in detail informed about carried out in
Azerbaijan political and economic reforms, integration of our country
into the NATO and other European structures, the steps undertaken by
the government in the direction of improvement of situation,
connected with human rights. The sides have carried out exchange of
opinions on a wide spectrum of relations between the USA and
Azerbaijan.
At the meeting with the American co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group
and the adviser on diplomacy of the Caspian basin Steven Mann,
discussed were ways of settlement of the Armenia-Azerbaijan, Nagorny
Karabakh conflict and power projects carried out in our region.
Mr. Elmar Mammadyarov also has met assistant to the US President on
national security affairs Condoleezza Rice. Madam Rice has thanked
the Azerbaijan side for the support rendered to struggle against
global terror. Having expressed satisfaction with development of
connections between our countries, Ms. Rice has told: `The United
States considers Azerbaijan its `close friend and ally’.
Elmar Mammadyarov has told about situation in the complex geo-politic
region in which Azerbaijan is located, about reforms carried out in
our country. The Minister has noted, that the relations between
Azerbaijan and the USA continue to remain at the level of strategic
partnership.
The sides also have had exchange of views on development and
transportation of power resources of the Caspian basin, programs of
the US assistance in region of Southern Caucasus, relations of
Azerbaijan with the next states. The Armenia-Azerbaijan, Nagorny
Karabakh conflict was one of themes of negotiations. Condoleezza Rice
has emphasized, that the US are interested in the immediate peace
settlement of the problem and as the intermediary in the given area
would support efforts on search of ways of settlement of the
conflict.
Minister of Foreign Affairs of Azerbaijan has met also Congressmen –
James Gibbon and chairman of subcommittee on external operations of
the House of Representatives by James Coble. On discussions with
American legislators, Elmar Mammadyarov has emphasized, that the
decision of the Congress on granting in 2005 fiscal year of the
military aid to Azerbaijan and Armenia in the identical size has not
been unequivocally perceived in the country. He has stated: `While
from first day of antiterrorist struggle Azerbaijan shows real
support to the US, the Congress’s similar decisions directs the
public of our country false political message. In reply to it, the
Congressmen have noted, that they would try to bring to the notice of
their colleagues the position of Azerbaijan in the said question.
Elmar Mammadyarov also met the board of editors of the newspaper
`Washington Times’, has answered their numerous questions.
The American-Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce has held a reception in
honor of Minister of Foreign Affairs of our country. On reception,
there were representatives of a diplomatic corps in Washington, the
governmental structures of the US, the non-governmental
organizations.
On July 24, Mr. Elmar Mammadyarov is to come back to Baku.

Georgia: Frustration Grows Among Azeri Community

Radio Free Europe, Czech Rep
July 23 2004
Georgia: Frustration Grows Among Azeri Community
By Jean-Christophe Peuch

While Georgia is striving to restore control over its northern
separatist province of South Ossetia, tension is brewing in its
predominantly Azeri southern districts. Local residents blame the
Georgian president for failing to deliver on pre-election pledges to
improve social conditions in the region. The situation has sparked
concerns in neighboring Azerbaijan, where voices are rising in
defense of Georgia’s largest Muslim minority.
Prague, 23 July 2004 (RFE/RL) — Since they were elected a few months
ago, the two young leaders of Azerbaijan and Georgia have been vowing
mutual friendship and pledging to take neighborly ties to new
heights, while increasing bilateral trade to unprecedented levels.
Yet, concerns over the fate of Georgia’s sizable Azeri community have
cast a shadow over this idyllic picture.
Estimates generally put the number of Georgia’s Azeris at around
350,000. Most of them live in four of the six administrative
districts of the southwestern Kvemo Kartli region, an area that is
known as Borcali in Azeri. Azeris account for nearly 50 percent of
the Kvemo Kartli population.
Tensions began rising after Georgian security forces two months ago
raided Azeri border villages and arrested a number of residents as
part of what was officially presented as an attempt to put an end to
smuggling operations from Azerbaijan.
In recent weeks, Baku-based newspapers have been reporting on alleged
extortion, arbitrary detentions, and other forms of harassment
against Azeri community leaders. First among them has been the
Russian-language “Zerkalo” daily, which has been spearheading a
campaign of support to Kvemo Kartli Azeris.
But Georgian authorities deny any wrongdoing.
Kvemo Kartli Governor Soso Mamzishvili tells our correspondent that
such accusations are unfounded:
“All these reports about alleged violations of ethnic Azeris’ rights
are out of place. What [these people in Baku] say or write is sheer
provocation. Neither I nor any other Georgian has had any conflict
[with ethnic Azeris]. There can be no talk of rights violations
against [Georgia’s] Azeris,” Mamzishvili said.
Azeris are Georgia’s second-largest ethnic minority group after the
Armenians.
They are also among the least integrated — a circumstance that
officials in Tbilisi generally ascribe to the fact that 90 percent of
them reportedly do not speak Georgian.
Azeris, in turn, blame the successive Georgian governments that took
over from Soviet rule.
When the Soviet Union collapsed, collective property was abolished
throughout Georgia. But as Azerbaijani poet Eyvaz Borcali tells
RFE/RL, the then government of hard-line nationalist President Zviad
Gamsakhurdia denied Kvemo Kartli Azeris the right to purchase land.
Borcali is a native from Kvemo Kartli who runs a Baku-based
nongovernmental group known as the Borcali Society. He says most
Azeris continued to be denied land ownership rights after former
Georgian Communist Party head Eduard Shevardnadze returned to power
following Gamsakhurdia’s ouster.
“Shevardnadze has done nothing good [for the Azeris]. He made only
empty pledges, and he did nothing [to correct his predecessor’s
policy]. Many Azeris are denied access to lands that belonged to
their ancestors. Those lands have been taken by Georgians and are
being given to Azeris for temporary use. [Sometimes] the Georgian
owners are not even from the region. There are cases of urban
Georgians who own lands in villages that have been Azeri since the
dawn of time and let them to local residents,” Borcali said.
Unofficial figures show up to 70 percent of Kvemo Kartli’s
predominantly rural Azeris are still denied access to land and are
forced either to rent plots or hire themselves to Georgian farmers.
Georgia’s Azeris are now showing signs of impatience.
Earlier this year, Azeri demonstrators picketed Saakashvili’s office
in Tbilisi to request that land be redistributed fairly among Kvemo
Kartli residents. They also demanded that steps be taken to restore
Turkic village names that were
“Georgianized” under Gamsakhurdia and that Azeris be better
represented in local administrations.
Observers generally agree that simmering tension in Kvemo Kartli
partly stems from the high expectations raised by the recent change
of political leadership in Tbilisi.
During his election campaign in December 2003, Saakashvili promised
Kvemo Kartli residents that he would meet their political and social
demands, vowing to grant all citizens equal rights regardless of
their ethnicity.
As other Georgian regions, Kvemo Kartli voted massively for
Saakashvili’s National Movement-led coalition in the 28 March
legislative elections. But now local Azeris are demanding action.
Unlike many in Baku, Azerbaijani lawyer Isaxan Asurov — another
native of Kvemo Kartli — does not believe the situation of Georgia’s
Azeris has significantly deteriorated under the new Georgian
leadership. Yet, neither has it improved, he says.
“One cannot say that the situation has worsened. Simply it remains
unchanged, and that worries people. During his election campaign,
Saakashvili himself raised such issues as the land reform or the
under-representation of local Azeris in official structures. But he
has still to fulfill his promises. That explains why we are unhappy,”
Asurov said.
Kvemo Kartli Governor Mamzishvili denies Georgia’s new leaders have
remained idle in the past seven months and says measures are being
taken to address the land issue.
“We are taking steps. We are currently reviewing all land contracts.
With respect to land, Georgians and Azeris alike face problems. We
are taking back all lands that have been purchased without being put
up for auction and we will organize new tenders. We are
redistributing land according to the existing legislation,”
Mamzishvili said.
Mamzishvili is the third governor to run the region since
Shevardnadze’s ousting. He claims that, since he was appointed last
February, he has managed to bring gas and electricity supplies in the
region to near nationwide standards.
Borcali says that, even if that were true, that would not be enough
to alleviate the plight of Kvemo Kartli Azeris. “When one is supplied
with gas and electricity,” he says, “that does not mean that one’s
problems are solved.”

Gul pleased Turkey will continue the occupation of EU territory

Cyprus Press and Information Office: Turkish Cypriot Press Review
July 23 2004
Gul pleased because Turkey will continue the occupation of EU
territory without political cost
Istanbul YENI SAFAK newspaper (22.07.04) publishes an interview with
Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul by Yeni Safak Ankara Representative
Mustafa Karaalioglu aboard the flight to occupied Cyprus under the
title “No obstacles to negotiations”.
The Turkish Foreign Minister made the following disclosures
concerning the issues on the political agenda.
EU: No gray areas left for Europe
“I do not see any hurdles to the commencement of negotiations with
the EU. I am not saying this in the fashion of an ordinary politician
or statesman. I am not saying it either in a manner intended to get
across the message that “we should have started negotiations two
years ago.” I am a deputy prime minister and foreign minister brave
enough to say some three months ago that “if I were writing the
progress report, I would not write a favorable one.” We had
shortcomings then. However, while I certainly cannot say Turkey is
flawless, nobody can now accuse our country of having shortcomings
great enough to disqualify it. Can you imagine the degree of our
determination? Not even the bureaucracy has been able to keep pace
with us. We convened Parliament during the summer recess and on the
last night before the deadline, we passed two important EU bills we
had promised to enact. We passed the Associations Bill as well as a
bill regarding the ‘Compensation of Damages Resulting From the
Struggle Against Terrorism.’ There is only one way for Europe. There
are no gray areas left.”
Negotiations should last ten years yet …
“The issue of whether negotiations can start in April or March is a
minor detail. What is important is that the date of negotiations be
set in a way that leaves no room for doubt whatsoever. The talks will
take some ten years. We as Turkey would prefer the negotiations to
last long. This is how it should happen because where large countries
are in question, major preparations are required. The negotiation
process is really a very complicated thing in itself.”
Israel: Their own Ministers are leveling criticisms
“The state of our relations with Israel should not be interpreted as
being the result of the change in regional balances. Turkey can never
act blindly. We are maintaining very good relations with regional as
well as non-regional countries. The thing about Israel is this: We
are not the only country to criticize Israel for some of its
policies. Israel’s own Justice Minister and other countries have
criticized Israel, too. Indeed, everybody has criticized Israel. Have
Israel’s relations with Turkey been severed because of this? No, they
have not. On the contrary, our relations with Israel and Palestine
are increasing our capability to contribute to the peace process.
[Israel’s] Deputy Prime Minister came to Turkey. We talked with him
openly and sincerely and told him what we think. Our relations [with
Israel] are continuing as part of our foreign policy. We are also
holding talks [with Israel]. These will continue.”
Armenia: We wish them well
“Such an issue (relations with Armenia) cannot be left frozen while
all other issues are being solved. We are trying to settle that
problem, too. Armenia is beset by economic troubles in many ways. We
would not want the people of a neighboring country to be wracked by
troubles regardless of which country might be in question. We would
want to help. Yet there are circumstances restricting our ability to
proffer help. At a time when some 20 percent of Azerbaijani territory
is under [Armenian] occupation … There are difficulties created by
this situation. We feel responsible about this matter and we are
trying to play the role of catalyst for the settlement of this
problem. I cannot say that we have gone a long way toward achieving
this purpose yet during the Istanbul meeting, all three countries at
least expressed their determination to hold talks about the problem
and work on it. There is a need to be courageous.”
Northern Iraq: We are making a great contribution to Iraq
We see Iraq as a whole rather than talking about a north or a south.
Important things are happening there. As far as Turkey’s interests
are concerned, there is no need for anyone to be worried. We as
Iraq’s neighbors are going to discuss the situation in Iraq for the
seventh time in Egypt. The UN is keeping a close watch on Iraq. The
Americans are also keeping a close watch on this country. This is a
very difficult period. Yet Turkey is doing its best to make favorable
contributions to Iraq. And we are contributing a lot.
The seminary is a global issue
Some work is being conducted in connection with the Halki Seminary.
However, this is a long-standing issue. There are no dates set for
anything. There are problems. This is not like Germans coming to
Manavgat to open a church. This is a historical and global issue. On
the other hand, we attach a lot of importance to religious freedoms
regardless of anything. We will consider everyone within this
framework, Muslims and non-Muslims alike. Efforts are continuing yet
it is not as if a briefing has been held at this point for the
President or the Prime Minister.
Cyprus: Our gain is worth more than any amount of money
There are two important topics in the Cyprus issue: first, the future
of Turkish Cypriots, second, the incredible problems being created
for Turkey by those using Cyprus as an excuse. A crucial turning
point regarding both matters was reached sometime ago. This issue
used to be exploited as a flimsy pretext to conduct an incredible
propaganda campaign and create an unfavorable international image for
Turkey. By being represented as a quarrelsome country trying to
achieve certain military interests, unable to comprehend Europe’s
culture of compromise, entirely incapable of talking peace, and
always relying on crude force, Turkey was forced to pay incredible
political prices. Our latest polices and the results of the Cyprus
referenda have relieved Turkey. From now on, nobody can exploit
Cyprus to Turkey’s detriment. Not only have the obstacles placed
before Turkey by those abusing the Cyprus issue been removed through
our policies but they have also turned into pluses for Turkey. It has
been proven that Turkey supports peace and compromise. This is a gain
worth more than billions of dollars.
Direct flights to start
It has been understood who wants peace on the island, is open to
compromise, and supports coexistence. Because of their confidence in
the Greek Cypriots, many world leaders felt deceived [in the wake of
the Cyprus referenda]. They began to realize the injustices done to
the Turks. Where once they did not think it right to shake hands with
Turkish Cypriots’ representatives and their President and Prime
Minister, let alone calling them president or prime minister,
visiting them in their offices, or inviting them to official
functions, the Russian, American, and British foreign ministers are
now coming together with the Prime Minister of the “Turkish Republic
of Cyprus”. Let me also point out that the first direct flights will
be starting soon and there will be more to follow.
The support of the Islamic Conference Organization
Last year, Mr Denktas took part in the joint meeting of the
Organization of Islamic Conference and EU Foreign Ministers as “the
representative of the Muslim people of Cyprus.” At this year’s
meeting in Istanbul, it was decided to refer to the Turkish Cypriot
side at the General Assembly of the Organization of Islamic
Conference not as a Muslim community but as the Turkish Cypriot
State. Certain foreign ministers from Muslim countries visited
[Northern Cyprus]. Others will start paying visits from now on. There
is a lot that we must do and there is a lot that the Turkish Cypriot
Republic must do. The Turkish Cypriot government should effect a
rapprochement with Islamic countries and increase the number of
visits to these countries.
We too would have decided to carry out an operation 30 years ago
One should not brag about the 30-year Turkish foreign policy in
talking about Cyprus because Turkey went to Cyprus 30 years ago with
very just reasons and powers invested by international agreements. We
would have made the same decision if we had been in power then. Yet
during recent years, Turkey followed a policy that regarded
non-settlement itself as a solution. Denktas was the person who
implemented this policy. Yet the policy had become very detrimental
to both Cyprus and Turkey. It needed to be changed. We did that very
courageously. Now what is in question is an achievement acclaimed by
the entire world.
Denktas sounded like he was talking at a coffeehouse
I disregarded the manner of Denktas’ remarks during the 30th
anniversary celebrations. For, he gave the kind of speech that one
would make at a coffeehouse, a political arena, or an election rally.
There were representatives of the Turkish Republic and Government
before him. He should not have delivered the sort of speech that one
would make at an election rally or in a coffeehouse. Yet I am willing
to overlook it. I was not offended either. We are going to continue
to do what we believe to be right.

Choosing leaders from the war zone

International Herald Tribune
Choosing leaders from the war zone
John Kael Weston IHT July 23, 2004
BAGHDAD We write from Iraq, where the war is not over and the mission still
to be accomplished. Our group, Donkeys in the Desert (Democrats Abroad,
Iraq), is diverse and growing; members range from active and reserve
soldiers serving in the U.S. Army and Marine Corps to civilians working for
private contractors and the State Department
Individually, we wear many hats: interpreter, lieutenant colonel, force
protection, diplomat, sergeant, trade adviser, captain, fuel inventory
specialist and others. But it is as Democrats that we meet weekly and talk
politics, discuss non-partisan absentee voter outreach and, occasionally,
simply vent among the politically like-minded
Our group forms part of Democrats Abroad, a Democratic Party organization
that includes 70 other country committees worldwide, from Armenia to
Thailand
Fellow Democrats will gather later this month to nominate John Kerry and
John Edwards to our party’s 2004 presidential ticket. It is unclear how much
of the Iraq debate will pervade Boston the last week of July – probably
some, but in our view, not enough. Given continued American and Iraqi deaths
framed by graphic violence, Iraq might be even further sidelined during the
Republican Party convention in August
Why? Iraq is divisive on both sides of the political aisle; party unity,
unsurprisingly, will instead be the theme on display throughout the
conventions. For a few days in late July and August, Iraq amnesia could
overtake Boston and New York City
We Donkeys are in Iraq because we chose to contribute concretely to U.S.
reconstruction efforts, largely putting aside personal politics. Our
presence here is fundamentally about American credibility – not lost, but
damaged – and our nation’s long-term national-security interests
Some of our members disagree strongly about how our country got here in the
first place, with limited substantive international support and alienated
allies, motivations driven by neoconservative ideology, and a reconstruction
plan undermined by stubborn missteps and poor planning
We are where we are, however, and understand the need to follow through
pragmatically with American commitments, especially those on such a grand
scale and with deep strategic implications globally
Iraq, this distant and dangerous place where we find ourselves, is all about
high stakes – for Iraq it self, the United States and our allies, the Middle
East region and beyond, for years to come
We write also as concerned Americans, a category that transcends our party
identification. The Iraq debate back home especially worries us. It is time
for less partisanship and more civility, more balance. The consequences of a
premature U.S. pull-out from Iraq (as advocated by some Democrats and, most
vocally, by Ralph Nader) would be disastrous. To claim otherwise is to
pursue an “exit strategy” not grounded in current realities. We know; we
are here
In the coming months, we will be mailing our absentee ballots to voting
districts across America – in Red, Blue and swing states. There is nothing
like serving in a war zone to focus attention on life priorities; exercising
the right to vote in a crucial presidential election constitutes a top one
in our minds right now
The Boston and New York conventions represent an opportunity to set high
expectations for both nominees from the outset. Sidestepping Iraq does not
constitute presidential behavior
The election of a new American president will bring opportunities to rebuild
torn alliances and restore a U.S. role where we lead by example and choose
to act together with friends in the international community
Regrettably, the multinational force in Iraq has so far failed to include
many of our closest allies, and the costs of Iraq’s reconstruction have
overwhelmingly fallen on the backs of the American taxpayer
Our ability to build a better Iraq is enhanced by broad international
support, which we presently lack in concrete terms. The Bush/Cheney
instinctive go-it-alone approach has frustrated this objective. Worse, the
administration’s policy has divided allies and put us at odds with friends
A four-year job extension for the current White House team would only lead
to more expressions of unilateralism (however repackaged or softened) and
will, we believe, make our efforts on the ground in Iraq more difficult and
less likely to succeed
Donkeys in the Desert will continue our own debates in places called
Baqubah, Falluja, Tadji and Baghdad. But we will feel better knowing that
similar discussions are being held in electronic chat rooms, homes, schools,
and civic centers in more familiar places, such as Albuquerque, Blue
Springs, Akron, Tallahassee and countless other towns and cities across
America
We trust the American people to get this critical presidential election
right. Our absentee ballots, sent from the deserts of Iraq, will soon enough
be on their way. We will do our part; Americans back home – we urge you to
do yours, by turning out in record numbers on November 2. Participate.
Question. Compare. Then vote, and set an example for Iraqis. It is the
democratic thing to do. And, in so doing, give us a new commander-in-chief
John Kael Weston is serving in Iraq as a civilian adviser to the 1st Marine
Expeditionary Force. This article originally appeared in The Boston Globe.

ASBAREZ Online [07-23-2004]

ASBAREZ ONLINE
TOP STORIES
07/23/2004
TO ACCESS PREVIOUS ASBAREZ ONLINE EDITIONS PLEASE VISIT OUR
WEBSITE AT <;HTTP:// 1- ANCA Endorses Kerry For President 2- ANCA's Outreach to the White House and Republican Leaders 3- ANCA Backs up Endorsement by Calling for Greater Grassroots Activism 4- The Bush/Kerry Record 5- Armenian Democrats to Join Ethnic Diversity Celebration at Democratic Convention 6- Ethnic Democrats Caucus Meeting, Workshop at Democratic National Convention 7- Russia Cuts Off Georgia's Gas Supplies 8- Bush Administration's Shameful Attempt at Politicizing The Law 9- A Dark Day for Truth And A Darker Day for Republicans 1- ANCA Endorses Kerry For President Cites Senator Kerry's Long Record of Support on Armenian American Issues, President Bush's Retreat from his Pledge to Recognize the Armenian Genocide WASHINGTON, DC--In a move expected to impact electoral outcomes in key presidential election swing states this November, the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA), the nation's grassroots Armenian American organization, today announced its endorsement of the Kerry-Edwards ticket. "For Armenian Americans, the clear choice is John Kerry," said ANCA Chairman Ken Hachikian. "Senator Kerry has been a friend of the Armenian American community for over twenty years, with a proven track record of fighting hard for issues of concern to Armenian Americans across the nation. He faces an incumbent, President Bush, whose record on Armenian issues has grown progressively more disappointing throughout his tenure in the White House, beginning with his broken campaign pledge to recognize the Armenian Genocide, including his Administration's attempt to end military aid parity between Armenia and Azerbaijan, and up until this week, with his Administration's strident attacks on legislation recognizing the Armenian Genocide." John Kerry welcomed the ANCA endorsement, stating that, "John Edwards and I would like to thank the ANCA for its endorsement. We are looking forward to working with all Armenian Americans to create a stronger America, more respected in the world. ANCA largest grassroots organization" "We call on Armenian Americans to compare the respective records of Senator Kerry and President Bush, to weigh the importance of their ballot for the future of US-Armenian relations, and to cast their vote for the Kerry-Edwards ticket on November 2nd," added Hachikian. The ANCA endorsement follows closely in the wake of the Bush Administration's forceful attack on the Schiff Amendment, a provision adopted last week by the US House that prevents Turkey from using US foreign aid to lobby against the Genocide Resolution. Armenian Americans, particularly those in key swing states such as Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Florida, are positioned to play a decisive role in what looks, by all accounts, to be a hotly contested election. 2- ANCA's Outreach to the White House and Republican Leaders The ANCA has, on several occasions over the past four years, specifically asked for a meeting between President Bush and the Armenian American community leadership. These formal requests, which never received a response, were supported by a series of ANCA and community-wide letters outlining the views and disappointments of Armenian Americans on specific issues, ranging from the Armenian Genocide to foreign aid policy. In April of this year, the ANCA sent detailed letters to the Chairman of the Bush-Cheney campaign, Marc Racicot, and the Congressional Republican leadership voicing disappointment over the Bush Administration's record on Armenian issues, and expressing frustration with the lack of responsiveness by the White House to the concerns of the Armenian American community. The ANCA's concerns were grouped, in this letter, into three broad categories: unfulfilled commitments, opposition to community concerns, and failure to prioritize Armenian issues. The Senate and House letters, addressed to House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL) and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN), highlighted the powerful leadership demonstrated by a great many Republicans on Armenian issues, notably by Armenian Caucus Co-Chairman Joe Knollenberg (R-MI) Genocide Resolution author George Radanovich (R-CA), and Senators such as Mitch McConnell (R-KY), John Ensign (R-NV), George Allen (R-VA), Elizabeth Dole (R-NC), and many others. These letters included more than a dozen specific recommendations by the ANCA about how the Congressional leadership could encourage the White House to improve its standing among Armenian American voters. Neither the President nor his campaign responded to the ANCA's appeal for their intervention to help establish a constructive dialogue between the Administration and the Armenian American community. For additional information on the ANCA's outreach to Republican leaders concerning the Bush Administration's record on Armenian issues, visit: <;pressregion=anca>
.anca.org/anca/pressrel.asp?prid=554&pressregion=anca
3- ANCA Backs up Endorsement by Calling for Greater Grassroots Activism
Along with its Presidential endorsement, the ANCA reminded Armenian Americans
that their ability to impact policy-level decision-making depends, first and
foremost, on the continued expansion of advocacy efforts at all levels of
government. The ANCA’s detailed Congressional endorsements, which will be
announced later this year, will represent an important element of this process
by providing Armenian American voters with the information they need to
solidify the strong support our community enjoys in Congress.
“The challenge before the Armenian American community, as in years past,
remains growing our activism and strengthening our voice in the public policy
debates and within the foreign policy community,” said Hachikian. “We call on
Armenian Americans to meet this challenge by increasing our engagement with
the
Executive Branch and providing the strongest possible support for our friends
in the US House and Senate on November 2nd and throughout the 109th Congress.”
4- The Bush/Kerry Record
The Kerry Record

During his long tenure in the US House and Senate, Senator Kerry has
consistently been a leading advocate of issues of concern to Armenian
Americans. As a US Senator, Kerry has forcefully fought for US recognition of
the Armenian Genocide, and is currently a cosponsor of the Genocide
Resolution,
S.Res.164. In 1990, Senator Kerry voted on the Senate floor for Senator Bob
Dole’s (R-KS) Genocide Resolution.
The Massachusetts Senator has been a vocal and effective champion of stronger
US-Armenia relations and has consistently backed legislative initiative to
increase aid and expand trade with Armenia. He is currently a cosponsor of
legislation, S.1557, which would grant Armenia permanent normal trade
relations
status.
Senator Kerry has spearheaded a number of initiatives to lift the Turkish and
Azerbaijani blockades. In 1991, he was the lead sponsor of legislation, which
was later enacted as Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act, restricting US
aid
to the government of Azerbaijan until its blockades of Armenia and Mountainous
Karabagh are lifted. He also worked for the adoption of the Humanitarian Aid
Corridor Act, which called for US aid to Turkey to be cut off unless Turkey
lifted its blockade of Armenia. As recently as this January, Senator Kerry
formally called on President Bush to press the visiting Prime Minister of
Turkey to lift his nation’s illegal blockade of Armenia.
The Bush Record
The full text of the Armenian American Presidential Report Card on the
Administration of George W. Bush is provided below:
Broken campaign pledge to recognize the Armenian Genocide
Almost immediately after taking office, President Bush abandoned his campaign
pledge to recognize the Armenian Genocide. This promise, which he made in
February of 2000 as Texas Governor, was widely distributed among Armenian
Americans prior to the hotly contested Michigan primary. It read, in part, as
follows: “The twentieth century was marred by wars of unimaginable brutality,
mass murder and genocide. History records that the Armenians were the first
people of the last century to have endured these cruelties. The Armenians were
subjected to a genocidal campaign that defies comprehension and commands all
decent people to remember and acknowledge the facts and lessons of an awful
crime in a century of bloody crimes against humanity. If elected President, I
would ensure that our nation properly recognizes the tragic suffering of the
Armenian people.”
Rather than honor this promise, the President has, in his annual April 24th
statements, used evasive and euphemistic terminology to avoid describing
Ottoman Turkey’s systematic and deliberate destruction of the Armenian people
by its proper name – the Armenian Genocide.
Opposition to the Congressional Genocide Resolution
The Bush Administration is actively blocking the adoption of the Genocide
Resolution in both the House and Senate. This legislation (S.Res.164 and
H.Res.193) specifically cites the Armenian Genocide and formally commemorates
the 15th anniversary of United States implementation of the U.N. Genocide
Convention. The Genocide Resolution is supported by a broad based coalition of
over one hundred organizations, including American Values, the NAACP, National
Council of Churches, Sons of Italy, International Campaign for Tibet, National
Council of La Raza, and the Union of Orthodox Rabbis.
As recently as July 16th of this year, the Bush Administration reiterated its
opposition to legislation recognizing the Armenian Genocide. In response the
adoption by the US House of the Schiff Amendment, which blocks Turkey from
using US aid to lobby against the Genocide Resolution, the Administration
pressed Congressional leaders to prevent the enactment of any provision
recognizing the Armenian Genocide.
Failure to condemn Turkey’s denial of the Armenian Genocide
The Bush Administration has failed to condemn Turkey’s recent escalation of
its campaign to deny the Armenian Genocide. Notably, the Administration has
remained silent in the face of the decree issued in April of 2003 by Turkey’s
Education Minister, Huseyin Celik, requiring that all students in Turkey’s
schools be instructed in the denial of the Armenian Genocide.
The State Department’s 2003 human rights report on Turkey uses the
historically inaccurate and highly offensive phrase “alleged genocide” to
mischaracterize the Armenian Genocide. In addition, despite repeated protests,
the Bush Administration’s State Department continues to host a website on
Armenian history that fails to make even a single mention of the Genocide.
()
The Waiver of Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act
The Bush Administration, in 2001, aggressively pressured Congress into
granting the President the authority to waive Section 907, a provision of law
that bars aid to the government of Azerbaijan until it lifts its blockades of
Armenia and Nagorno Karabagh. President Bush has subsequently used this
authority to provide direct aid, including military assistance, to the
government of Azerbaijan, despite their continued violation of the provisions
of this law.
Reduction in aid to Armenia
In the face of the devastating, multi-billion dollar impact of the Turkish
and
Azerbaijani blockades on the Armenian economy, President Bush has, in each of
the past three years, proposed to Congress that humanitarian and developmental
aid to Armenia be reduced.
Abandonment of the Military Aid Parity Agreement
The Bush Administration abandoned its November 2001 agreement with Congress
and the Armenian American community to maintain even levels of military aid to
Armenia and Azerbaijan. Instead, the Administration, in its fiscal year 2005
foreign aid bill, proposes sending four times more Foreign Military Financing
to Azerbaijan ($8 million) than to Armenia ($2 million). This action tilts the
military balance in favor of Azerbaijan, rewards Azerbaijan’s increasingly
violent threats of renewed aggression, and undermines the role of the US as an
impartial mediator of the Nagorno Karabagh talks.
Mistaken Listing of Armenia as a Terrorist Country
The Bush Administration, through Attorney General John Ashcroft, sought,
unsuccessfully, in December of 2002 to place Armenia on an Immigration and
Naturalization Service watch list for terrorist countries. This obvious error
was reversed only after a nation-wide protest campaign. Neither the White
House
nor the Department of Justice has apologized for the offense caused by this
mistake.
Neglect of US-Armenia relations
While the Bush Administration has maintained a formal dialogue with
Armenia on
economic issues through the bi-annual meetings of the US-Armenia Task
Force, it
has, as a matter of substance, failed to take any meaningful action to
materially promote US-Armenia economic ties. Specifically, the Administration
has not provided leadership on legislation, spearheaded by Congressional
Republicans and currently before Congress, to grant Armenia permanent normal
trade relations (PNTR) status. Nor has the Administration initiated any steps
toward the negotiation of a Tax Treaty, Social Security Agreement, Trade and
Investment Framework Agreement, or other bilateral agreements to foster
increased US-Armenia commercial relations.
The President neither visited Armenia nor has he invited the President of
Armenia to visit the United States.
Failure to maintain a balanced policy on Nagorno Karabagh
The Bush Administration, to its credit, took an early initiative to help
resolve the Nagorno Karabagh issue in the form of the Key West summit meeting
in 2001 between Secretary of State Powell and the presidents of Armenia and
Azerbaijan. After Azerbaijan’s failure to honor its Key West commitments,
however, the Administration failed to hold Azerbaijan accountable for
unilaterally stalling the Nagorno Karabagh peace process.
Increased grants, loans and military transfers to Turkey
The Bush Administration has effectively abandoned America’s responsibility to
link aid, loans, and arms transfers to Turkey’s adherence to basic standards
for human rights and international conduct. The most notable example was
the $8
billion loan package provided to Turkey in 2003 despite Turkey’s refusal to
allow US forces to open a northern front during the war in Iraq.
Taxpayer financing of the Baku-Ceyhan bypass of Armenia
The Bush Administration is supporting American taxpayer subsidies for the
politically motivated Baku-Ceyhan pipeline route that, at the insistence of
Turkey and Azerbaijan, bypasses Armenia.
Refusal to pressure Turkey and Azerbaijan to end their blockades
The Bush Administration has not forcefully condemned the Turkish and
Azerbaijani blockades as clear violations of international law, nor,
outside of
occasional public statements, has it taken any meaningful steps to pressure
the
Turkish or Azerbaijani governments to end their illegal border closures.
Lobbying for Turkish membership in the European Union
The Bush Administration has aggressively pressured European governments to
accept Turkey into the European Union, despite Turkey’s consistent failure to
meet European conditions for membership, on issues ranging from the
blockade of
Armenia and the Armenian Genocide to the occupation of Cyprus and human
rights.
Down-grading relations with the Armenian American community
Breaking with the tradition of the last several Administrations, the Bush
White House failed to reach out in any meaningful way to our nation’s one
and a
half million citizens of Armenian heritage. While the State Department,
Pentagon and National Security Council maintained their long-standing,
policy-level dialogue with the Armenian American community leadership, the
White House itself essentially neglected Armenian Americans as a political
constituency. Perhaps the most telling example of this is that, during the
course of the past three years, despite repeated requests, the President did
not hold any community-wide meetings with the leadership of the Armenian
American community, nor did his Secretary of State or National Security
Advisor.
Armenian American appointments
To the Administration’s credit, the President appointed Joe Bogosian to an
important Deputy Assistant Secretary position at the Commerce Department, John
Jamian to a key maritime position in the Department of Transportation, and
Samuel Der-Yeghiayan as a Federal Judge in the Northern District of Illinois.
5- Armenian Democrats to Join Ethnic Diversity Celebration at Democratic
Convention
BOSTON–The Armenian American Democratic Leadership Council (AADLC) and
Armenian American Democrats from across the country will participate in a
celebration of ethnic community activism hosted by the National Democratic
Ethnic Leadership Council (NDELC) at next week’s 2004 Democratic National
Convention in Boston. The reception is part of a series of programs, meetings
and events spotlighting the key role of ethnic communities in this election
season and throughout the American political process.
Grassroots leaders representing a diverse groups of ethnic American
communities, including Albanians, Arabs, German, Greeks, Italians, Irish,
Polish, Serbian among many others, will be joining together at the
reception on
Wednesday, July 28th, at The Harp, across from the Fleet Center. Participation
in the “NDELC’s Celebration and Appreciation of Ethnic Democrats” is by
invitation only and has received enthusiastic responses from Convention
delegates, Members of Congress and community leaders who understand the
pivotal
role that ethnic voters are expected to play in electoral swing states this
November. The reception is one of several daytime and evening functions
organized by ethnic communities throughout the Convention week.
“The Armenian American Democratic Leadership Council is proud to partner with
the NDELC as it brings together ethnic community leaders from across the
country in support of the Democratic Party agenda,” stated NDELC Board Member
and AADLC activist Sushan Demirjian. “We look forward to mobilizing the
Armenian American community, with its active presence in key swing states
across the country, to play a decisive role in support of the Kerry/Edwards
ticket and pro-Armenian democratic candidates on November 2nd.”
The National Democratic Ethnic Leadership Council (NDELC) is an ethnic
constituency based organization encompassing the community of immigrants and
descendants of immigrants who primarily trace their heritage from Europe and
the Mediterranean. During the Clinton presidential campaign in 1992,
democratic
activists began a deliberate initiative to redefine the Democratic Party’s
relationship with Ethnic Americans. Over the past twelve years, the party has
made great strides to ensure that Ethnic Democrats continue to be players in
American politics. The NDELC, with its diverse membership including
representatives of the Armenian American Democratic Leadership Council,
plays a
pivotal role in nurturing that relationship.
6- Ethnic Democrats Caucus Meeting, Workshop at Democratic National Convention
The 2004 Democratic Convention will also feature a first-ever Caucus Meeting
and Workshop bringing together ethnic leaders committed to a Kerry-Edwards
victory in November. Community representatives will participate in briefings
and a full agenda of activities on Wednesday, July 28th from 10:00am to
12:00pm
at the Sheraton Hotel.
“Ethnic Americans have always been a base in the Democratic party. The values
of family, hard work, faith and opportunity are the values that they bring to
the Democratic Party and contribute to building a stronger America,” explained
John Kerry for President Director of Ethnic Outreach George Kivork, who is
helping to coordinate the function.
The AADLC works with the Democratic National Committee to foster support
within the Armenian American community for the Democratic Party and national
Democratic office holders, while promoting the election of Armenian American
Democrats to political office and encouraging participation by Armenian
American Democrats at all levels of the public policy process.
7- Russia Cuts Off Georgia’s Gas Supplies
TBILISI (AFP)–Russia has begun to cut off gas supplies to the Georgian
capital
of Tbilisi, amid escalating tensions with its neighbor over the pro-Russia
separatist region of South Ossetia.
Tbilisi officials confirmed on Thursday that Russia’s Gazprom energy giant
began to limit supplies on Wednesday and that four of the city’s regions would
be left without gas by Thursday evening.
The Tbilgaz official said Gazprom was demanding payments from the
impoverished
republic that dated back half a year.
“Tbilisi needs 370,000 cubic meters of gas and now we will only be getting
200,000 cubic meters,” Tbilgaz’s Leval Pertselatse said by telephone.
Georgia is exclusively reliant on Russia for gas supplies and has for years
struggled to pay its debts.
But the latest delivery cut came during the current rift between Moscow and
Tbilisi in regards to the South Ossetian conflict.
Gazproma Russian state-controlled companyhas previously cut supplies to
Ukraine and Belarus on Russia’s western border during diplomatic disputes with
the two former Soviet republics.
The move comes at a time when both Russia and Georgia are widening their
military presence in South Ossetia, and only a day after Tbilisi threatened to
break a 1992 peacekeeping agreement. The agreement was signed after Georgia
lost to South Ossetian forces, which had received military assistance from
Moscow. The region then declared its desire to become part of Russia.
Georgia’s border with South Ossetia is now patrolled by Russian, Georgian and
South Ossetian troops. All sides claim that the others are sending additional
supplies and reinforcements in breach of the agreement.
Earlier this week, Georgia accused Russia of sending 40 armored personnel
carriers and tanks destined for the South Ossetian forces. Russia denied the
accusation and said the supplies were intended for vehicle repairs.
8- Bush Administration’s Shameful Attempt at Politicizing The Law
Seto Boyadjian, Esq.
The Bush Administration’s persistent courtship of Turkey during recent months
give the impression that President Bush and the Republican leadership are
treating the Republic of Turkey as the 51st state of the Union. In the
political markets of the Middle East, the Transcaucasus and Europe, our
President and his envoys–discarding all traditional norms of international
diplomacy–have embarked on special missions in defense of Turkish interests.
What’s worse, they are employing similar conduct in our country as well.
Against the will of the American people, and sometimes even at the cost of
discarding the law of the land, they are using the governmental apparatus in
defense of purely Turkish objectives.
This pro-Turkish campaign manifested a dangerous aspect last week, when the
State Department and the Congressional Republican leadership had the temerity
to question a legislative initiative proposing the implementation of law. At
issue here is an amendment to the fiscal year 2005 Foreign Aid Bill HR 4818
that was introduced on the House floor by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA). The
Representatives passed the amendment by a voice vote and added it to HR 4818.
Soon after, the House passed the entire Foreign Aid Bill by a vote of 365 to
41, with 27 non-voting.
The Schiff Amendment provides that funds made available under the Foreign Aid
Bill cannot be used by the Government of Turkey in contravention of Section
1913 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 USC Sec 1913), for purposes of
lobbying against H Res 193 that reaffirms support for the Genocide
Convention.
In essence, the amendment is a reiteration of a law of the land–namely 18
USC
Sec. 1913, that makes it a crime and prohibits lobbying with appropriated
moneys. It provides that no part of the money appropriated by Congress
shall be
used to influence in any manner a Member of Congress, to favor or oppose, by
vote or otherwise, any legislation or appropriation by Congress. This law
applies to all involved in lobbying and to all circumstances involving
lobbying. Thus, the Schiff Amendment is simply an expression of this law that
should also be applicable to all moneys appropriated for Turkey.
Instead of respecting the law, the Republican leadership of the legislative
body entrusted with the enactment of our laws, showed its fiercest reaction to
the Schiff Amendment.
A few hours after Foreign Aid Bill passed, House Speaker Dennis Hastert
(R-IL), Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX) and Majority whip Roy Blunt (R-MO)
posted a joint statement on the front-page of Speaker Hastert’s website,
declaring they are “strongly opposed” to the Schiff Amendment. The statement
also avers that the Bush Administration has expressed its “strong
opposition to
the amendment,” as well. (A few hours earlier, however, the very same Messers.
DeLay and Blunt, instead of opposing HR 4818, voted favorably for its passage;
as for Mr. Hastert, he was apparently absent at the time of the vote).
In their joint statement, the Republican leadership trio also reaffirmed they
“have no intention of scheduling H Res 193. . . during the remainder of this
Congress.” As for their position, they base their opposition to the Schiff
Amendment on two points: first, that for decades Turkey has been a reliable
ally of the United States; second, that the amendment is meaningless, because
current US law already prohibits foreign governments from using American
foreign aid for lobbying purposes.
The next day, on July 16, the State Department joined the Bush
Administration’s anti-amendment onslaught. State Department spokesperson
Richard Boucher announced in a press statement that the “Administration
strongly opposes this amendment which seeks to restrict US assistance to
Turkey.” Indicating that Turkey is “our key NATO ally, and Armenia, our close
friend,” Mr. Boucher stated that the amendment is “detrimental to the
cause” of
“reconciliation between Turkey and Armenia.” He further underscored, “Our goal
is to bolster cooperation between these two countries rather than to separate
them.”
However, we should not be misled by the Administration’s double-talk. No one
is naive enough to believe that the Schiff Amendment will disrupt the State
Department’s illusory concept of cooperation between Turkey and Armenia. No
one
is ignorant enough to accept that Turkey is really a reliable ally. The
objective of the Bush Administration is blatantly transparent. It is merely
attempting to politicize a legislative enactment that is based on the
fundamental laws of the United States. The arguments forwarded by the State
Department and the House Republican leadership have no bearing on Title 18,
Section 1913, of the US Code. The Schiff Amendment does not question the Bush
Administration’s policy in defense of Turkey. Nor does it attempt to curtail
appropriated funds earmarked for Turkey. In fact, Turkey is entitled and
should
receive all the funds made available under the Act. In compliance with US law,
however, Turkey cannot use such funds in our country for lobbying purposes.
And
that’s the law.
Beyond the legal attributes of the Schiff Amendment, the Bush
Administration’s
arguments and positions raise serious questions involving our national
concepts
of legality and moral values.
First, over the past months, the damaging effects of our experience with the
Turkish Government cast serious doubts about Turkey’s reliability as an ally.
Last year, Turkey refused to allow US forces to open a northern front during
the war in Iraq; as a result, our armed forces suffered added casualties. More
often than not, the use of US bases in Turkey is denied or restricted. Nearly
two thirds of Turkey’s population holds an unfavorable view of Americans.
Second, the Schiff Amendment cannot be viewed as meaningless merely because a
current US law already exists for that purpose. Such a simplistic
argument–coming from the Speaker of the legislative branch of our
government–is neither acceptable nor tolerable. According to adopted
procedures, a legislative enactment often includes provisions of procedural
and
substantive laws in order to ensure the acts proper and lawful implementation.
Third, the Schiff Amendment does not seek to restrict US assistance to
Turkey.
It merely ensures that US funds made available to Turkey are used in a manner
prescribed by US laws. As such, the amendment cannot and should not disrupt
State Department efforts at bolstering relations between Turkey and Armenia.
No matter how hard the Bush Administration tries to paint Turkey as a
reliable
ally, the stubborn facts will always refute such illusory claims. At best,
Turkey may be viewed as a precarious ally. And precarious allies are
necessarily unreliable partners.
No matter how resourceful the Bush Administration may be at its attempts to
politicize the law, 18 USC Sec. 1913 will not cease being the law of the land.
And in our country no one can be above the law–not even President George W.
Bush or his protégé Turkey.
9- A Dark Day for Truth And A Darker Day for Republicans
By Skeptik Sinikian
The other day I was driving down Ventura Boulevard in Sherman Oaks when I saw
a bumper sticker on a car that said “Friends Don’t Let Friends Vote
Republican.” That bumper sticker pretty much sums up how I feel this week
after
reading the joint statement from Speaker, Majority Leader and Whip of the
House
of Representatives on the Schiff Amendment regarding the Genocide. I’m too
angry and tired to do a recap of the last week’s events regarding the Genocide
resolution. I suggest that all the oblivious cave dwellers reading this column
spend a few seconds on the Asbarez website and catch up to the rest of us.
Don’t worry. We won’t go anywhere. We’ll wait for you.
OK, now that you’re back, we can move on. Wasn’t that one of the worst
statements made by any elected official pertaining to Armenians? After I read
it, I had that emotionally wrecked and numb look on my face like Michael
Corleone when he found out that Fredo had set up their brother Sonnie to be
killed in the second Godfather movie. I just held the printout of the email my
friend gave me and stared at it for what seemed like a full hour. The words
were so harsh, I wasn’t able to distinguish whether this malarkey was a dream
or reality. Never in my life did I think that the Republican leadership of
Congress would so blatantly slap Armenian-Americans in the face. They didn’t
just insult us as Americans, but also spat on us as voters–and in a year when
their fearless leader in the White House can use ever last vote that his
friends can muster up. Don’t the Republicans realize that at the rate
President
Bush is going, he’ll need a relative as Governor in every state, if he’s going
to pull-off a victory this November? He needs every vote he can get.
I let the statement fall from my hands, stared at my friend, and coldly said,
“There is no way in hell that I will vote for any Republican this
November.” My
friend, who is a Republican but can’t explain why, looked at me and responded.
“You know this is all just a political game. The only reason they [Democrats]
introduced this amendment is to put the Republicans in a tough spot with
Turkey, especially in an election year!”
I don’t know what was more sad. His explanation, or the fact that he actually
believed it. Here’s what upsets me and should upset any Armenian American who
is a registered Republican. In Speaker Hastert’s statement there is the
obligatory mention of refusing to raise the genocide as an issue, out of fear
of offending Turkey as an important NATO ally. That would make some sense only
if Turkey actually WAS an ally instead of a backstabbing, barbaric, fair
weather friend who’s idea of loyalty means extorting 32 billion dollars from
American tax payers. That’s almost twice what we spend every year fighting the
war on drugs in this country.
So what if this amendment was a Democratic, Republican, Green, Pink or
whatever kind of political game. Good for whoever decided to play it. I think
Armenians should push for more in election years, otherwise what’s the whole
point of voting? And more important, the genocide issue shouldn’t be a
political football in anyone’s hands. It’s a political no-brainer–especially
since Turkey has been screwing with us time and again over the course of the
last three years. I challenge Hastert and DeLay to name me one positive,
proactive thing that Turkey has done since 9/11. JUST ONE!
What Speaker Hastert, Majority Leader DeLay, and Majority Whip Blunt
should do
is stop for just one second, take a real close look at Turkey, and decide
whether they want to give any more money or respect to this country.
Even the Israeli have beef with Turkey now. The strategic partnership has
become strained since Turkey refused to sell water to Israel, and began
publicly criticizing the construction of the wall around the Palestinian
territories. The only reason Turkey is even criticizing Israel over its
treatment of its Palestinian population is because its: a) trying hard not to
further offend any number of Muslim nations that already hate Turkey, and b)
trying to curry favor with Europe which it is trying desperately to join.
I mean c’mon people, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist or an Ivy League
educated psychiatrist to see the game Turkey is playing here.
I’m tired of our members of Congress and the Republican leadership playing
hardball with everyone around the globe and at home, except for Turkey. Does
Turkey have some sort of mental problem we should all be aware of and treat it
differently because it’s special? I say forget Turkey and forget the
Republicans. From here on out, the gloves need to come off and the showdown is
November 2nd.
If there are any Armenians American Republicans left out there with a
shred of
dignity and self respect, they would put their trust funds where their mouths
are (be sure to remove the silver spoon first) and call up these clowns who
call themselves Leaders and give them a piece of their mind.
In a letter written in 1891, the immortal Mark Twain described Members of
Congress as “the smallest minds and the selfishest souls and the cowardliest
hearts that God makes.” After reading the joint statement from the Republican
Leadership in the House, I’m not sure even God wants to take credit for this
group of clowns.
I just wrote an entire column and I still can’t believe what I read. Where
have you gone Senator Bob Dole? The Republican Party needs your moral clarity,
poise, and honesty now more than ever. We need our Republican friends who
believe in what’s right to stand up. But until they do folks, never let them
vote Republican again, until we have made out point loud and clear.
Visit the ANCA website if you’re mad as hell and want to share your thoughts
with our Congressional Leaders.
Skeptik Sinikian refuses to divulge his party registration but assures his
readers that this week’s diatribe was in no way, shape, or form motivated by
his personal, non-Armenian political views. He encourages everyone to write to
Congress and protest, and copy their letters to him at
[email protected].
All subscription inquiries and changes must be made through the proper carrier
and not Asbarez Online. ASBAREZ ONLINE does not transmit address changes and
subscription requests.
(c) 2004 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved.
ASBAREZ provides this news service to ARMENIAN NEWS NETWORK members for
academic research or personal use only and may not be reproduced in or through
mass media outlets.

WWW.ASBAREZ.COM
www.anca.org.

Construction begins on Iran section of Iran-Armenia gas pipeline

Oil & Gas Journal
July 23
Construction begins on Iran section of Iran-Armenia gas pipeline

By OGJ editors

HOUSTON, July 23 — ZAO Armrosgazprom has begun construction on the
100 km Iranian section of the $210-220 million Iran-Armenia natural
gas pipeline that will promote gas deliveries from Turkmenistan
through Iran to Armenia (OGJ, Feb. 3, 2003, p. 62). Iran is funding
its section, which is being built by an Iranian contractor, Russia’s
Interfax news agency reported Thursday.

Armrosgazprom, a consortium of Russia’s OAO Gazprom, 45%, Armenia’s
Energy Ministry 45%, and Russia’s Itera 10%, will operate the
Iran-Armenia pipeline.

Gazprom has completed a feasibility study for the Armenian section,
which will extend 41 km from the Iranian border to Kajaran, about 320
km from Yerevan in southeastern Armenia. The $140 million Armenian
section also will include rehabilitation and partial replacement of
parts of the existing Kajaran-Yerevan gas pipeline. Armenia is
seeking funding for its project, and investor proposals have not yet
been announced.

Under terms of an agreement the two nations signed in May, the 700 mm
diameter pipeline initially will deliver 1.1 billion cu m/year of
natural gas to Armenia for 20 years, increasing to 2.3 billion cu m
at the end of the contract, which could be extended by 5 years. The
gas, slated for first delivery in January 2007, will be used to fuel
Armenian power plants that will export electric power to Iran and
Georgia.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Iran Begins Building Gas Pipeline to Armenia

RigZone
July 23 2004
Iran Begins Building Gas Pipeline to Armenia

Iran has begun building a 140 km long gas pipeline to Armenia, said
the Itar-Tass news agency monitored here Thursday.
The two countries signed an agreement on the project worth around
120m
US dollars in May, when Iranian Oil Minister Bizhan Namdar- Zanganeh
visited Yerevan.
Under its provisions, Iran will be supplying 36bn cubic meters of
natural gas to Armenia annually from 2007 through to 2027.
Itar-Tass, citing OPEC sources in Vienna, said that the pipeline
might be used to ship Iranian gas to Georgia, Ukraine and farther on
to Europe in the future.
The news agency said the sources had got the news from Armenian
ambassador to Tehran, Gegam Garibdzhanyan
To make the whole scheme possible, a 550-kilometre-long section of
the pipeline will be laid at the floor of the Black Sea, stretching
from the Georgian port of Supsa to Feodosiya in the Crimean, it said.
According to the same sources, the project is estimated to cost about
five billion US dollars.
Forecasts suggest that once the project is implemented, the Iranian
gas supplies to Europe may reach 60bn cubic meters a year, of which
Ukrainian imports will likely account for 10bn cubic meters.
Tehran has already a multi-billion-dollar contract with neighbouring
Turkey to supply gas for 25 years.
The gas flow was launched in December 2001 via a 2,577 km pipeline,
running from the northeastern city of Tabriz to Ankara, which
supplies gas from southern Iran near the Persian Gulf.
The contract has been a boon to Iran’s bid to become a sustainable
gas supplier to Turkey and Europe.
Looking for alternative markets, Tehran has also held talks with the
Persian Gulf littoral states and the Central Asian nations for the
sale of gas.
The country sits on the second largest proven gas reserves of the
world after Russia, which has been a headache for Iran by getting
into, what is feared to be, an unnecessary and costly competition.
Iran has begun building a 140 km long gas pipeline to Armenia, said
the Itar-Tass news agency monitored here Thursday.
The two countries signed an agreement on the project worth around
120m
US dollars in May, when Iranian Oil Minister Bizhan Namdar- Zanganeh
visited Yerevan.
Under its provisions, Iran will be supplying 36bn cubic meters of
natural gas to Armenia annually from 2007 through to 2027.
Itar-Tass, citing OPEC sources in Vienna, said that the pipeline
might be used to ship Iranian gas to Georgia, Ukraine and farther on
to Europe in the future.
The news agency said the sources had got the news from Armenian
ambassador to Tehran, Gegam Garibdzhanyan
To make the whole scheme possible, a 550-kilometre-long section of
the pipeline will be laid at the floor of the Black Sea, stretching
from the Georgian port of Supsa to Feodosiya in the Crimean, it said.
According to the same sources, the project is estimated to cost about
five billion US dollars.
Forecasts suggest that once the project is implemented, the Iranian
gas supplies to Europe may reach 60bn cubic meters a year, of which
Ukrainian imports will likely account for 10bn cubic meters.
Tehran has already a multi-billion-dollar contract with neighbouring
Turkey to supply gas for 25 years.
The gas flow was launched in December 2001 via a 2,577 km pipeline,
running from the northeastern city of Tabriz to Ankara, which
supplies gas from southern Iran near the Persian Gulf.
The contract has been a boon to Iran’s bid to become a sustainable
gas supplier to Turkey and Europe.
Looking for alternative markets, Tehran has also held talks with the
Persian Gulf littoral states and the Central Asian nations for the
sale of gas.
The country sits on the second largest proven gas reserves of the
world after Russia, which has been a headache for Iran by getting
into, what is feared to be, an unnecessary and costly competition.
Iran has begun building a 140 km long gas pipeline to Armenia, said
the Itar-Tass news agency monitored here Thursday.
The two countries signed an agreement on the project worth around
120m
US dollars in May, when Iranian Oil Minister Bizhan Namdar- Zanganeh
visited Yerevan.
Under its provisions, Iran will be supplying 36bn cubic meters of
natural gas to Armenia annually from 2007 through to 2027.
Itar-Tass, citing OPEC sources in Vienna, said that the pipeline
might be used to ship Iranian gas to Georgia, Ukraine and farther on
to Europe in the future.
The news agency said the sources had got the news from Armenian
ambassador to Tehran, Gegam Garibdzhanyan
To make the whole scheme possible, a 550-kilometre-long section of
the pipeline will be laid at the floor of the Black Sea, stretching
from the Georgian port of Supsa to Feodosiya in the Crimean, it said.
According to the same sources, the project is estimated to cost about
five billion US dollars.
Forecasts suggest that once the project is implemented, the Iranian
gas supplies to Europe may reach 60bn cubic meters a year, of which
Ukrainian imports will likely account for 10bn cubic meters.
Tehran has already a multi-billion-dollar contract with neighbouring
Turkey to supply gas for 25 years.
The gas flow was launched in December 2001 via a 2,577 km pipeline,
running from the northeastern city of Tabriz to Ankara, which
supplies gas from southern Iran near the Persian Gulf.
The contract has been a boon to Iran’s bid to become a sustainable
gas supplier to Turkey and Europe.
Looking for alternative markets, Tehran has also held talks with the
Persian Gulf littoral states and the Central Asian nations for the
sale of gas.
The country sits on the second largest proven gas reserves of the
world after Russia, which has been a headache for Iran by getting
into, what is feared to be, an unnecessary and costly competition.