Tehran-Damascus train gives travelers an appreciation of the real wo

Tehran-Damascus train gives travelers an appreciation of the real world
It may not be fast, but the 3-day trip offers plenty to see

By Paul Cochrane
Special to The Daily Star
Wednesday, September 29, 2004

DAMASCUS: Some train trips have a legendary aura about them.

The Trans-Siberian is famous for being the longest train trip on earth,
connecting Moscow with Vladivostok, over 9,000 kilometers away. It
is possibly the ultimate train ride, taking seven days and covering
seven different time zones.

The Orient Express has a reputation as one of the most luxurious train
rides, connecting Istanbul with London, and is also the setting for
a famous Agatha Christie murder mystery novel “Murder on the Orient
Express.”

By comparison, a lightweight contender with no prior history or fame
is the Tehran to Damascus train trip.

Established two years ago after lengthy bureaucratic discussions
between the Iranian, Turkish and Syrian governments, the direct route
began with little public fanfare.

The modern era, after all, is one of speed and convenience – the
era of the airplane. Traveling 2,500 kilometers over 70 hours when
a three-hour plane ride would suffice might seem a waste of time to
some. But unlike air travel, the train gives an appreciation of the
actual size of the world, and of the changing landscapes and peoples
seen through the window of a train carriage. Unless you travel the
length of Russia by land, for example, it is hard to truly conceive
of that nation’s vastness – the train keeps going for days on end. The
same can be said of Turkey and Iran, both huge landmasses.

The length of the Azerbaijan route (Western Iran is known as
Eastern Azerbaijan) from Tehran to the border at Razi, is 958
kilometers. Turkey requires a further 1,000 kilometers of train track,
as well as six hours to cross Lake Van by ferry. The remaining
500 kilometers from Northern Syria to Damascus seem relatively
inconsequential. In terms of the monotonous, flat desert scenery of
Syria, and after three nights on the train, it is the final lap of
the trip, and one you want to see end as rapidly as possible.

Starting in the south of the bustling and polluted Iranian capital,
a city almost devoid architecturally and physically of any sense of
Iran’s past other than that reflected in Tehran’s numerous museums,
the train begins to roll past fields and mountains.

It is completely full – mostly Iranians going to Damascus on holiday,
in search of work or on pilgrimage to the Shiite Muslim shrine of
Zeinab. The remaining handful are Syrians and one Afghan. One carriage
consisted of 32 Iranian teenage schoolgirls all dressed in their black
chadors going on pilgrimage. Such trips are not available for young
men as after the age of 16 males cannot leave the country until they
have completed the year long military service.

Tickets, costing between $55 and $70, are booked a month in advance
for the bi-weekly trip. Everyone started in first class sleepers of
four bunks to a compartment, the price difference only noticeable
when switching from the Iranian to Syria train – where the extra cost
ensured a double sleeper compartment rather than a reclining seat.

As the 20-year-old East German-manufactured train chugs through the
countryside past mud houses made from wattle and daub, and winds
through valleys of weathered red sandstone, the scenery resembles
a miniature version of the Canyonlands National Park in Utah, USA –
an arid landscape, but not without diversity, color or beauty.

Dinner is taken in the dining car as the sun goes down, and consists
of the staple fare for Iranians when dining out – soup, yogurt,
buttered rice and chicken or meat kebab.

After the evening meal, the train stops at the city of Zanjan for 20
minutes so passengers can use the station mosque to pray or wander
along the platform for a stretch of the legs. Others sit in their
compartments drinking tea, reading, talking or sleeping as sheets,
blankets and pillows are brought by attendants.

The next morning at 9 a.m., the train pulls into Salmas station, where
a three-hour wait begins for passports to be processed. Around 400
passengers pile off the train to sit in waiting rooms, take breakfast
on the grass outside the station, or walk to local shops. Conversations
start with strangers, and tea becomes a highly sought after beverage.

Once all the documents are processed, an Iranian official comes out
with huge stacks of passports and is immediately accosted by men,
women and children waiting for their name to be called out. This
waiting game was repeated three more times, taking around 15 hours
of the total trip, at the borders into and out of Turkey and on
entering Syria. Without such lengthy waits – late at night in the
case of Turkey and Syria – the trip would certainly flow faster and
have been more enjoyable for all concerned.

The Tehran to Damascus train ride however is not really geared
towards enjoyment. It is instead a cheap people carrier between the
two capitals, but more comfortable than three days on a bus – those
with cash obviously take the plane.

Still, the trip down to Van goes through ancient Armenian areas
of Eastern Turkey, and past picturesque, fertile plains of grass,
sunflowers and tilled fields awaiting seeding. The border between
Iran and Turkey is not just a line dividing the two politically as
the difference in landscape is striking. From barren, dusty terrain
in Iran to rolling hills of rich agricultural land, lakes and olive
trees in Turkey.

At Lake Van, the largest body of inland water in Turkey, the Iranian
train draws to a halt at the harbor where the goods carriage is shunted
onto a ship, and all passengers carry their belongings aboard. There,
travelers lie on carpets brought to sell in Damascus on the top deck
of the single smokestack ferry, dozing or killing time looking out over
the watery expanse lit by the moon. If you have ever wondered where the
stains on your Persian carpet came from, it is probable they came from
the steel deck of a ship rather than tea spilled in a nomad’s tent.

Docking in Tatvan, the Syrian train waits alongside Tehran-bound
passengers leaning on their baggage. Two nights follow, spent on
the Syrian train in comfortable sleeper compartments complete with
duvets and washbasins. Unlike the Iranian train, meals are included,
although they resemble more a school packed lunch than the culinary
delights of the Orient Express.

A full day passes as the train rambles through the cities of Mus,
Elazig, and Malatya until Gaziantep, where the train cuts down to wind
along the Syrian border. After the now-expected wait for visa stamps,
the diesel-powered vehicle passes through Aleppo overnight to arrive
in Damascus at 1 p.m. – only 18 hours longer than the official 52
hours initially cited in Tehran.

For some, Damascus is the end of train travel for a while. For others,
the Syrian capital serves merely as a brief respite before taking
the train all the way back.

BAKU: Azeri army spokesman upbeat on ties with NATO

Azeri army spokesman upbeat on ties with NATO

Zerkalo, Baku
25 Sep 04

Azerbaijan will continue its cooperation with NATO despite the recent
cancellation of the Cooperative Best Effort 2004 exercises in Baku, a spokesman for
the Azerbaijani Defence Ministry has said. At the same time, Col Ramiz Malikov
accused Armenia of playing a double game in order to discredit Azerbaijan in
the eyes of the international community. Touching on the Karabakh problem, he
said that “Azerbaijan is doing everything possible to avoid a military solution
to the Nagornyy Karabakh conflict”. However, Armenia’s defeat is unavoidable
if the hostilities resume because Azerbaijan has a stronger economy, he said.
The following is an excerpt from C. Sumarinli and F. Teymurxanli report by
Azerbaijani newspaper Zerkalo on 25 September headlined “The cancellation of the
military exercises in Baku will not influence ties between Azerbaijan and
NATO” and subheaded “Col Ramiz Malikov thinks that the unity of the Azerbaijani
people and the government gained victory over the diseased ambitions of
Armenia”. Subheadings have been inserted editorially:

The cancellation of the Cooperative Best Effort 2004 exercises, planned in
Baku by the NATO command, triggered many questions in the Azerbaijani public.
One of the major factors causing such questions was the “information war”
against official Baku launched by several politicians close to the leaderships of
the USA, NATO and Armenia.

We wonder what impediments Azerbaijan might encounter in its integration into
the North Atlantic alliance. We put this and several other questions to the
head of the press service of the Azerbaijani Defence Ministry, Col Ramiz
Malikov.

Armenia plotting to deal a deadly blow to Azerbaijan’s image

[Correspondent] What is your assessment of the cancellation of the NATO
exercises scheduled for 14 September in Azerbaijan?

[Malikov] One of the main signs typical of the “Armenian syndrome” is to
“deal a deadly blow by taking advantage of the opportunity”. And the Cooperative
Best Effort 2004 exercises were viewed by the Armenians as an opportunity to
deal a blow to Azerbaijan’s prestige. The exercises served as a double game for
Armenia: whether the Armenians would have come to Baku or not, there was only
one target, i.e. to discredit Azerbaijan in the eyes of the international
community.

If the Armenians had arrived in Baku, then unrest would have taken place in
Azerbaijan, certain forces would have protested against the authorities and
domestic political stability would have been disrupted. In this case, Armenia
would have said to NATO and the whole world – look what state you are cooperating
with, and it is impossible to conduct such an important peacekeeping mission
in a country which is in the grip of chaos and anarchy. Thus, the Armenians
would have said to the international community that it is impossible to resolve
the Karabakh problem at a negotiating table with a country which lacks
domestic political stability. And the fate of the “Karabakh people” (the Armenians
have invented a new nation) cannot be entrusted to “Azerbaijan’s cruel
oppressors”.

According to the second option, i.e. if the Armenians had not come to Baku,
which was actually the case – thanks to the will and unity of the Azerbaijani
people and the authorities, the officers of the Armenian armed forces who have
the blood of Azerbaijani elders, women and children on their hands, failed to
set foot in Baku. The people of Azerbaijan and the authorities took a single
position which served as a basis for victory over the diseased ambitions of the
Armenians.

The disguised ideas of cooperation between the Armenians and NATO did not
materialize. Some foreign forces, which pander to 200-year-old Armenian terror,
also failed.

Cancellation of NATO war games will not damage ties with Baku

[Correspondent] What do you think is the prospect for cooperation between
Azerbaijan and NATO after the incident? Will this incident have an effect on our
country’s cooperation with the alliance?

[Malikov] After the cancellation of the war games in Baku by the NATO
leadership, we could have said the following: “With this gesture, NATO supported the
aggressor country, which is pursuing a policy of terror and separatism at the
state level.” But our judgment is as follows. We believe that the NATO
leadership took this step due to its adherence to its principles. We say that
representatives of the occupying Armenian armed forces did not deserve to participate
in the Partnership for Peace programme for the reason that Armenia is not a
peace champion in the South Caucasus and in the whole of Europe. If Armenia
wished peace, then the 10-year Armenian-Azerbaijani negotiations would have
resulted in a peaceful solution to the conflict.

The cancellation of the exercises by the NATO leadership will in no way have
a negative influence on relations between Azerbaijan and the North Atlantic
alliance. First, because relations between Azerbaijan and NATO have deeper
roots, and second, the principles of security in NATO member states and throughout
the world meet the interests of the Azerbaijani people and state.
Consequently, we consider that our cooperation with NATO will develop further and from
this point of view, the incident is of little importance.

Armenia has never been candid in its ties with NATO

[Correspondent] At this stage, Armenian experts claim that Baku and Yerevan
have swapped places in the issue of integration into NATO.

[Malikov] Armenia will never be able to replace Azerbaijan in the sphere of
partnership with NATO since official Yerevan has never been candid in its
cooperation with NATO. In this issue, Armenia is engaged in waffling and has “put
on a mask” of international cooperation. Moreover, Armenia cannot be sincere
for the reason that it is a vassal state deprived of its freedom of action. My
words are proved by the fact that currently, Russian border guards are guarding
Armenia’s borders and there is a big military base on the territory of this
state.

Let Armenia not celebrate the cancellation of the NATO exercises in Baku.
This country betrayed the principles of peace, stability, security and
cooperation again. I consider that the NATO leadership should pay attention to the
circumstance that Armenia regards the cancellation of the exercises as its own
victory.

In the field of relations with NATO, one cannot place Azerbaijan and Armenia
on the same level. With its participation in the Cooperative Best Effort 2004,
Armenia pursued only one aim: to deal a blow to the idea of peacekeeping and
cooperation, which it did not achieve. We sincerely wish the NATO leadership
to pay attention to this. We hope that the leadership of this major
international structure will not allow the Armenians to “poke their nose” into its
affairs in the future.

Azerbaijan is more important to NATO than Armenia

[Correspondent] Has the Azerbaijani Defence Ministry sent a statement to
NATO, explaining the reasons for denying the Armenians entry visas?

[Malikov] We have not sent any statement. But the Defence Ministry leadership
believes that cooperation between Azerbaijan and NATO in the military sphere
will continue in its previous course.

At a meeting between Col-Gen Safar Abiyev and Deputy Assistant Secretary for
European and Eurasian Affairs Steven Pifer, the defence minister regretted the
incident. He said that Azerbaijan was ready to develop its ties with NATO and
the USA at a higher level.

We are continuing cooperation with NATO within the framework of the
Partnership for Peace programme and are taking part in all the events of the alliance.
Our country has a monthly plan of participation in activities under the
Partnership for Peace programme and you will see their implementation soon.

[Correspondent] Some politicians recently claimed that the rumpus around the
visit to Baku by the Armenians was in vain: Azerbaijan has lost the
information war, the visit to Baku by the Armenians has nothing in common with the
resolution of the Karabakh problem and so on.

[Malikov] I am not a politician. However, a politician fighting for the
national interests of his state and our people should not be thinking this way. The
Azerbaijani people proved to the Armenians that the people and state share a
single position. The time will come and this cohesive unity will wipe away the
Armenian occupiers from Nagornyy Karabakh and seven other districts around
it.

As for the opinions that Azerbaijan has lost the information war, this is far
from being the truth. Official Baku and the Azerbaijani people, as a whole,
are trying to tell the world community the truth about Armenia’s actions and
policy. How can officers of the Armenian armed forces, which have occupied the
territory of a neighbouring country and brought a lot of trouble to the
Azerbaijani people, come to Baku and participate in exercises?! Such impudence is
characteristic only of Armenians. What other actions should official Baku have
urged NATO to take against Armenia? Against the country which has occupied 877
villages, settlements and towns, has razed the town of Susa to the ground and
has wiped out 7,000 residents of Xocali [a settlement near Xankandi].

[Passage omitted: NATO decided to open an office in Tbilisi long before this
incident]

Azerbaijan will retake occupied lands at all costs

[Correspondent] In your opinion, what is the probability of military
hostilities resuming at the moment?

[Malikov] Azerbaijan is doing everything possible to avoid a military
solution to the conflict. We are in favour of resolving the problem in a peaceful
way. However, in this issue, the Armenians have “put on a mask” of supporters of
peace by stating that they allegedly adhere to a peaceful settlement. However,
this is wide of the mark, the Armenians support hostilities. They have placed
a huge amount of illegal weapons in our occupied land.

Azerbaijan will retake its occupied territories at all costs since the
Azerbaijani armed forces are able to do so. If we add to this the country’s economy
and moral support, then Armenia’s defeat is unavoidable if the hostilities
resume.

Germany: Bavarian minister on security fears over Turkey’s EU entry

Germany: Bavarian minister on security fears over Turkey’s EU entry

ddp news agency, Berlin
28 Sep 04

entitled “Beckstein: Integrating Turkey would make the EU security situation
deteriorate”

Passau: Bavarian Interior Minister Guenther Beckstein, Christian Social
Union (CSU), has warned against a deterioration in the EU’s security
situation following the integration of Turkey. In an interview with
Passauer Neue Presse (28 September edition), Beckstein said: “As a
friend of Turkey, I am glad that Germany does not have to get along
with neighbours like the ones the government in Ankara has. Syria,
Iraq, Iran and Armenia – all these countries have enormous security
problems. These difficulties, which are unlikely to be solved, would
move even closer to the EU should Turkey join the EU.” This applies
to terrorism as well as to organized crime and the narcotics trade.

2004 ARPA International Film Festival Screenings

2004 ARPA INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL SCREENINGS

Arclightcinemas.com
September 28, 2004

The ARPA International Film Festival is dedicated to cultivating
cultural understanding and global empathy, creating a dynamic forum for
international cinema with a special focus on the work of filmmakers
who explore the issues of Diaspora, exile and multi-culturalism. It
also celebrates the ideals of independent thought, artistic vision,
cultural diversity and social understanding.

The film festival is produced annually by the Arpa Foundation for
Film, Music and Art (AFFMA). Founded in 1995, the non-profit AFFMA
was formed for the purpose of promoting the arts and enhancing the
cultural environment of our community, especially providing support
to filmmakers exploring subjects of social and cultural importance
through their medium.

The 2004 ARPA INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL will be held between October
5-10, 2004.

This year marks the 7th festival, and once again at ArcLight
Cinemas in Hollywood. This year’s festival theme is “Films Without
Borders.” The festival will feature over 60 films from 20 different
countries, including the United States, France, Italy, India, Iran,
Germany, Croatia, Mexico and Armenia. Every film is displayed on an
illuminating pedestal and is aimed at drawing the audience to admire,
examine and challenge. Arpa echoes a truth that is ever present in
Los Angeles, that to love mankind during times of war is difficult,
but not impossible if only through the love of cinema.

For further information about AFFMA, visit
<;.

For futher information about ARPA
Int’l Film Festival Screenings, visit:
;seriesId=&eventType=series&dateText=10/5/2004&forward=/Detail2678.jsp&path=cs

http://www.affma.org&gt
http://www.arclightcinemas.com/do/seriesDetail?venueCode=Arclight&amp
www.affma.org

BAKU: Official visit of Chairman of Az. parliament to Ukraine ended

OFFICIAL VISIT OF CHAIRMAN OF AZERBAIJAN PARLIAMENT TO UKRAINE ENDED
[September 28, 2004, 22:07:41]

Azer Tag, Azerbaijan
Sept 28 2004

On September 27, in the House of the Government of Ukraine, the Prime
Minister of the country Victor Yanukovich has received parliamentary
delegation of Azerbaijan led by Chairman of Milli Majlis (Azerbaijan
Parliament) Murtuz Alaskarov, the Kiev-based correspondent of AzerTAj
reported.

Warmly having welcomed our delegation, Prime Minister V. Yanukovich has
informed on economic situation in Ukraine, the course of pre-election
struggle for the main state post in the country.

In turn, the head of the Azerbaijan parliament has told about the
stable political situation in our country, deep economic reforms,
and consecutive rate of President Ilham Aliyev on construction in
Azerbaijan a democratic, prospering society.

M. Alaskarov has touched also the main problem of Azerbaijan – the
Armenian aggression against Azerbaijan, occupation by the Republic
of Armenia of the Azerbaijan territory – the Nagorny Karabakh and
7 adjoining regions, and also on the presence in Azerbaijan over
one million of refugees and internally displaced people. He has
expressed profound gratitude to the Ukrainian side for understanding
in this question and support of territorial integrity of Azerbaijan
by official Kiev.

Speaker of Milli Majlis has noted the historical event – adoption
in Kiev on September 23 of the Declaration on creation of the
Parliamentary assembly of GUUAM opening prospects before this
international association.

The meeting has passed in warm, friendly atmosphere. Talat Aliyev,
ambassador of Azerbaijan Republic to Ukraine, Elbrus Abdullayev,
the deputy of the Rovno oblast Rada, Ogtay Efendiyev, chairman of
the Congress of Azerbaijanis of Ukraine have taken part in it.

In his interview to AzerTAj correspondent, the chairman of Milli Majlis
Murtuz Alaskarov has expressed deep satisfaction with the results of
official visit of the Azerbaijan parliamentary delegation to Ukraine.

The same day, the parliamentary delegation of Azerbaijan led by M.
Alaskarov has left from Kiev with official visit for Bulgaria.

Europe, USA lobby Armenia to settle Karabakh problem – paper

Europe, USA lobby Armenia to settle Karabakh problem – paper

Aravot web site, Yerevan
28 Sep 04

September entitled “Like a bolt from the blue” and subheaded “At
meetings with political party leaders, Western European diplomats
said that the Karabakh problem should be resolved on the basis of
Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity”

We have obtained details of a series of meetings between ambassadors
of European Union member countries [to Armenia] and representatives
of the National Unity Party, where the Karabakh settlement and ties
between Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkey were in the focus. Concrete
issues were discussed, which testifies to the fact that European
structures, in all probability, have already drawn up proposals which
will be submitted to the conflicting sides in the near future.

The German ambassador, Heike-Renate Peitsch, paid special attention
to these issues and held a lengthy conversation with the leader of
the National Unity Party [NUP], Artashes Gegamyan. On 24 September,
the NUP leader also met the deputy chairman of the Assembly of the
Western European Union and head of the Italian delegation to the
union, Marco Zacchera (he visited Armenia as part of his regional
trip aimed at drawing up a report on the South Caucasus countries),
the Italian ambassador to Armenia, Marco Clemente, and (?Floris Dego),
a representative of the assembly of the European Security and Defence
Identity.

Serious debates of processes that could take place in the region
and possible challenges and, in this context, Armenia’s potential
role were discussed. Although members of the delegations said that
the Karabakh problem should be resolved on the basis of compromises,
they nevertheless noted that they recognize Azerbaijan’s territorial
integrity and this should be a major principle in the settlement.

In turn, Armenia, it goes without saying, should put forward its
position and make it clear if it has an ally in this issue which
supports its approaches and is ready to reject the principle of
territorial integrity publicly backed by almost all countries. By
strange coincidence, almost at the same time, European countries
started kind of lobbying – the secretary-general of the Council of
Europe, Terry Davis, presented his report [on Nagornyy Karabakh],
and the US co-chairman of the OSCE Minsk Group, Steven Mann, issued a
statement on inadmissibility of delaying a settlement to the conflict.

Dose this show that the moment when they will force us to settle
the Karabakh conflict is approaching? Artashes Gegamyan agreed with
this. “Western European countries and US diplomats never do anything by
chance, they always demonstrate tested and coordinated approaches,” the
NUP leader said. “It is noteworthy that after meeting me, Zacchera and
Clemente were to meet ambassadors of European Union member countries.”

Gegamyan also commented on the report by Terry Davis, which, he said,
the Armenian authorities are trying to go round by all means. “The
report mentions four UN Security Council resolutions which recognize
Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity and the necessity of withdrawal
of Armenian troops from the liberated lands,” Gegamyan said. “No
comment is needed if we take into consideration Davis’s statement
that if the talks are deadlocked, the problem could be submitted to
the International Justice Court.”

The NUP chairman said he was bewildered that “the Armenian authorities
are dealing with insignificant issues and are trying to involve
the opposition in their discussions”. “How can they at this crucial
moment for the country deprive the opposition of opportunities to
debate these issues with officials live on TV so that the public is
informed about a possible turn of events. Alas, the authorities are
again playing bizarre games behind people’s back and one day they will
tell us about their decision like a bolt from the blue,” Gegamyan said.

New Turkish Penal Code full of anti-democratic articles

KurdishMedia, UK
Sept 28 2004

New Turkish Penal Code full of anti-democratic articles

“The reform” exaggeratedly applauded by Verheugen is a deceit

The Turkish Parliament finally adopted on September 26, at an
extraordinary sitting, the controversial reform of the Turkish penal
code. Although applauded exaggeratedly by Commissionner Verheugen and
some other EU leaders because of the absence of the mention of
adultery, the new Turkish Penal Code is full of many anti-democratic
articles.

Ten days after the withdrawal by the government of the project in
order to introduce a clause penalizing adultery, the last two
articles of the Penal Code, like two other bills aiming at reforming
the legal system, were voted after the debates which lasted longer
than envisaged because of last minute amendments as well as conflict
on the calendar of application.

The meeting was marked by recriminations of the deputies of the
Republican People’s Party (CHP ) social-democrat opposition) against
the Recep Tayyip Erdogan Prime Minister, absent at the debates, whom
they accused ofhaving created an useless crisis while trying to
penalize adultery.

“We did not succeed in convincing him, it happened to be necessary
that he goes to Brussels for being convinced by Verheugen”, a CHP
said ironically. He referred to the talks Thursday between Mr.
Erdogan and Geunter Verheugen, European Commissionner for
Enlargement, who put an end to one week of crisis between Ankara and
Brussels.

The deputies of the opposition also criticized the fact that the new
penal code will be applied in three times — a first part, on the
wild urbanization, immediately, the large part of the law on April 1,
2005, and the articles penalizing the pollution of the environment on
April 1, 2007.

The CHP announced that it would seize the Constitutional court to
make cancel the clause delaying until 2007 the penalization of
environment’s pollution, like some other amendments of last minute
imposed by the AKP.

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan declared Saturday sure that the
European Union (EU) will give in December its green light to the
opening of negotiations for the country’s adhesion.

“I would like to affirm firmly and clearly that a date for the
opening of negotiations of adhesion will be fixed this year in
December”, said Erdogan in his monthly address to the Nation,
diffused by TV.

The Prime Minister’s speech intervenes 48 hours after his visit to
Brussels during which he ensured the European Commissionner for
Enlargement, Guenter Verheugen, that adultery would not be mentioned
in the new Turkish penal code.

“My conclusion is that there is no more obstacle on the table. From
my point of view, Turkey does not have additional conditions to fill
for allowing the Commission to make a recommendation “, had declared
Guenter Verheugen at the end of this visit.

However, Mr. Verheugen, as many other leaders of the European Union,
is fooled once more, because the new Turkish Penal Code is full of
antidemocratic and repressive articles for the freedom of expression
and the press. Many of these articles already existed in the former
Penal Code, borrowed in 1926 from Mussolini’s Penal Code (for example
Articles 158, 159 et 312).

These articles were imposed by the military and approved one by one
by the Grand National Assembly with the complicity of the opposition
party (CHP).

The Journalists’ Association of Turkey (TGC) has established the
following list of these new antidemocratic articles.

If the “crimes” defined in these articles are committed by any kind
of written, audio-visual and electronic media (newspapers, magazines,
radio, TV and/or Internet), the punishment will be increased one-half
or one-third according to the case.

So, even with this new Turkish Penal Code, adopted without mention of
adultery, Turkey will always remain as a country where freedom of
expression and the press is subject to the State repression.

Antidemocratic articles of the New Penal Code

Article 215 – Praising a committed crime or a person who committed
this crime: up to 2 years (if committed by the means of media, to be
increased one-half).

Article 216 (new form of Article 312) – Instigating a part of the
people having different social class, race, religion, sect or region
to hatred or hostility against another part of the people in a way
dangerous for the public security: up to 3 years (if committed by the
means of media, to be increased one-half).

Article 220/8 (new form of Article 169) – Propaganda of an
organization founded for committing crime: up to 3 years (if
committed by the means of media, to be increased one-half).

Article 285 – Spreading confidential information on a legal
investigation: up to up to 3 years (if committed by the means of
media, to be increased one-half).

Article 300 (new form of Article 158) – Insulting the President of
the Republic: up to 4 years (if committed by the means of media, to
be increased one-third).

Article 301 (new form of Article 145) – Insult to the Turkish flag or
to anything having the Turkish State’s symbol (crescent and star): up
to 3 years (if committed by a Turkish citizen abroad: to be increased
one-third); Insult to the Turkish national anthem: up to 2 years (if
committed by a Turkish citizen abroad: to be increased one-third).

Article 302 (new form of Article 159) – Insulting the Turkish
national identity, the Republic or the Grand National Assembly of
Turkey: up to 3 years (if committed by a Turkish citizen abroad: to
be increased one-third); Insulting the Turkish Government, the
judicial organs, military or security institutions: up to 2 years (if
committed by a Turkish citizen abroad: to be increased one-third).

Article 306 – Acting against fundamental national interests for
directly or indirectly receiving benefits from foreign persons or
institutions: up to 10 years. (According to the statement of reasons
for this article, written by the Parliamentary Commitee of Justice, a
citizen who demands the withdrawal of Turkish soldiers from Cyprus or
declares that the Armenian genocide actually took place during the
First World War, can be pursued by virtue of this article).

Article 319 – Instigating the people against military service: up to
2 years (if committed by the means of media, to be increased
one-half).

Article 324 – Spreading unfounded news or information during a war:
up to 10 years (if committed as a propaganda campaign against the
military and in accordance with a foreigner, up to 20 years).

Article 330 – Unveiling the information that should remain
confidential for the sake of the State’s security or its internal and
external political interests: up to 10 years (if committed during the
war or the preparation of the war: up to 15 years).

Article 331 – Unveiling, with the purpose of political or military
spying, the information that should remain confidential for the sake
of the State’s security or its internal and external political
interests: Life prison.

Article 337 – Unveiling the information that is forbidden by the
competent authorities and should remain confidential because of its
nature: up to 5 years (if committed during the war or the preparation
of the war: up to 15 years).

Article 338 – Unveiling, with the purpose of political or military
spying, the information that is forbidden by the competent
authorities and should remain confidential because of its nature: up
to 15 years (if committed during the war or the preparation of the
war: life prison). (Info-Turk, September 27, 2004)

For all latest news on the situation of human rights in Turkey:

All news on the situation of human rights in Turkey since 1998:

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

http://www.info-turk.be
http://www.info-turk.be/bulletins.htm

20% of Armenia’s electricity to be generated from Iranian gas

20% of Armenia’s electricity to be generated from Iranian gas

Tehran Times
Sept 28 2004

YEREVAN (Interfax) — Armenia plans to consume up to 20% of the
electricity it generates from Iranian gas, Armen Movsesian, the
Armenian energy minister, told reporters.

Armenian officials earlier said Armenia would export all the
electricity it generates with Iranian gas to Iran and, possibly, to
Georgia.

The Energy Ministry said it would export 3 kilowatt-hours of
electricity to Iran for 1 cubic meters of gas received from Iran.

Armenia and Iran have signed a $30-million credit agreement to
finance the construction of the Armenian section of the Iran-Armenia
gas pipeline. The pipeline is 141 km long, inducing 41 km in Armenia
and 100 km in Iran. The total cost of the project is estimated at
$210-$220 million. The pipeline is expected to be launched before
January 1, 2007.

Gas should start to arrive in Armenia from January 2007 and will be
used at Armenian thermal power plants to produce electricity for
export to Iran. Iran will supply 36 billion cubic meters of natural
gas to Armenia over 20 years according to the document.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

FM holds meetings in New York

FM HOLDS MEETINGS IN NEW YORK

ArmenPress
Sept 28 2004

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 28, ARMENPRESS: On 27 September Foreign Minister
Vartan Oskanian held several meetings in New York, within the framework
of the 59th General Assembly of the United Nations.

In their fourth meeting, Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul
and Minister Oskanian explored bilateral issues as well as regional
concerns. This meeting followed a meeting with Minsk Group co-chairman
Ambassador Steven Mann. Earlier in the day, the Minister had met with
US Undersecretary of State Mark Grossman, with whom they explored
bilateral issues, including the upcoming Armenia-US Task Force meeting
and the Millennium Challenge Account.

The Minister also met with Jean Obeid, Foreign Minister of Lebanon,
who was also in New York for the UN General Assembly.

The Minister will remain in NY through Wednesday September 29 when
he will address the General Assembly.

Hunting & Fishing tourism planned to develop

HUNTING AND FISHING TOURISM PLANNED TO DEVELOP

ArmenPress
Sept 28 2004

YEREVAN, SEPTEMBER 28, ARMENPRESS: Conditions for hunting of moufflons
and wild goats are created in Vayots Dzor which is possible due to
increased reproduction rates, Natural Resources Management Agency head
Artashes Ziroyan told Armenpress. “We should think about providing for
reproduction and sale of international demanded species,” he said,
adding that in case of a desired level of reproduction is secured,
hunting of bears, especially of old males, may also be organized.

According to A. Ziroyan, the initiative aims to create preconditions
for development of hunting tourism in Armenia, supported by an
Italian company. In his words, hunting tourism is becoming a matter
of discussion for the Armenian government.

“There are some animals in Red Book which may be put under limited
hunting in case their reproduction is properly secured. The money
collected from hunting will be re-directed back to their reproduction
and natural protection,” the agency head said, saying that the price
of one moufflon ranges from $4-6,000 in international market.

The ecotourism development project envisages also conditions for funs
of fishery who would like to travel to Armenia.