Armenians, Life Insurance Company Settle on 1915 Policies

Voice of America
Jan 26 2005
Armenians, Life Insurance Company Settle on 1915 Policies
By Barbara Schoetzau
New York

Five New York area Armenian charities are splitting $3 million with
four Armenian groups in Los Angeles as a result of a $20 million
settlement between the New York Life Insurance Company and
descendants of Armenians killed in the Turkish Ottoman Empire 90
years ago.
Each of the charities received $333.333. The rest of the money will
be split among potential heirs and beneficiaries of the 2,300 life
insurance policies New York Life sold to Armenians living in the
Ottoman Empire prior to 1915.
Armenians say more than 1.5 million Armenians were killed in the
waning days of the Ottoman Empire from 1915 until 1919. They call it
a genocide, but Turkey rejects the claim saying the numbers have been
exaggerated.
Three lawyers of Armenian background filed the class action lawsuit
in 1999, contending that New York Life never compensated the families
of those who bought policies. New York Life researched the issue and
found 2,300 unpaid policies. Lawyer Brian Kabateck, says the
particular charities were chosen because of their efforts to help
Armenians who fled to the United States from the Ottoman Empire in
1915.
“The reason $3 million is being distributed immediately to charities
is that a number of organizations that involve helping Armenians were
selected because a number of families completely perished in the
genocide and left no survivors,” he said. “As a result of that, the
money that is being distributed today is symbolic of money for
charities and for charitable organizations.”
The charities must use the money for educational and cultural
purposes or to help needy Armenians in the United States and abroad.
Descendants of survivors have until March 16 to file claims. They can
find information on the website armenian insurance settlement.com.
Mr.Kabateck says many of the beneficiaries do not live in the United
States.
“We have taken a substantial effort to publicize in other centers of
the world where Armenians have large populations: Russia, of course,
Armenia. We have had people in Armenia giving press conferences and
talking to people over there and making lists available in rural
parts of Armenia. [In] Argentina, there is a very large Armenian
population. France, in Marseilles there is a large population,” he
added.
Mr. Kabateck says the lawyers are now trying to reach a settlement
with two other insurance companies, but he would not divulge their
names.

ASBAREZ Online [01-26-2005]

ASBAREZ ONLINE
TOP STORIES
01/26/2005
TO ACCESS PREVIOUS ASBAREZ ONLINE EDITIONS PLEASE VISIT OUR
WEBSITE AT <;HTTP:// 1) Armenia Reacts to PACE Resolution 2) Reference of Genocide to be Included in Turkish Textbooks 3) Armenian Caucus Co-chairs Call on Bush Administration to Renounce Accusations by State Department Official on Karabagh 4) Melkonian Trust Monitoring Group Meets with Patriarch in Support of Legal Action 5) Turkish Army Warns Iraqi Kurds, US over Kirkuk 6) European Court of Justice Demands Turkey to Pay up for Inhumane Treatment 1) Armenia Reacts to PACE Resolution Foreign Ministry emphasizes Minsk Group's role in negotiations, non-binding nature of resolution YEREVAN (RFE/RL)--Armenia's Foreign Ministry spokesman Hamlet Gasparian criticized, on Wednesday, a Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) resolution that addresses the Armenian occupation of Azeri territories around Mountainous Karabagh. Adopted on Tuesday, the resolution states that "the occupation of foreign territory by a member state constitutes a grave violation of that state's obligations as a member of the Council of Europe." It also notes that the Karabagh war has led to the creation of "mono-ethnic areas which resemble the terrible concept of ethnic cleansing." Gasparian called the document flawed, saying that it "addresses consequences of the conflict without looking into its root causes." "Nonetheless, the resolution is not legally binding. It is only advisory and declarative," he said in a statement. The Foreign Ministry's statement emphasizes that the Karabagh peace process is spearheaded by the OSCE's Minsk Group and the Council of Europe. "We believe that the positive and negative sides of the resolution will not have much of an impact on negotiations." Levon Mkrtchian of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation, a member of the government coalition, warned of pitfalls lying ahead. "I don't think that the document will have a direct influence on the Minsk Group process," he said. "But it could complicate the situation in a different way. It could create an illusion among Azerbaijan's leaders that they can toughen their position and exert pressure on Armenia with such methods." 2) Reference of Genocide to be Included in Turkish Textbooks ANKARA--The Republic of Turkey's Education Ministry recently announced that elementary-level history textbooks will, for the first time, include reference to the genocide committed against the Ottoman-Armenians. The textbooks, however, will include both, what Turkey refers to, the "Armenian version" of the genocide, and an "official" government sanctioned version of the events. The chairman of the Education Ministry's committee on textbooks, Moustafa Safran, explained that the inclusion of the genocide arose from the fact that Armenians have insisted that the events that occurred between 1915-1923 qualify as "genocide." In order to address the issue, Safran said, the committee decided to include both the Armenian and Turkish perspectives--a move allowing students the information necessary to form an educated opinion--according to the committee. Safran noted his committee realizes that it is impossible nowadays to shield Turkish school children from "Armenian claims," and that it is their intention to bolster the government's position on the issue by including archival Ottoman documents, which reportedly prove that the genocide never occurred. Safran's committee has also decided to exclude incendiary remarks such as "we crushed the Greeks," and be particular in its definitions of "heroes" and "traitors." Textbooks will note that numerous Kurdish tribes assisted Mustafa Kemal's efforts in establishing a "modern" Turkey. 3) Armenian Caucus Co-chairs Call on Bush Administration to Renounce Accusations by State Department Official on Karabagh WASHINGTON, DC--US Reps. Joe Knollenberg (R-MI) and Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ), cochairmen of the Congressional Caucus on Armenian Issues, called on the US State Department to formally renounce remarks by a State Department official in Moscow that described the government of Mountainous Karabagh Republic as "criminal secessionists." The lawmakers made the request in a letter to Secretary of State nominee Condoleezza Rice, referring to a statement made by Assistant Secretary of State Elizabeth Jones during a January 13 digital video-conference with journalists at US Embassies in Moscow, Rome, and Bratislava. Expressing serious concern about the inaccurate characterization of Karabagh, the co-chairs said, "These unfounded and incendiary accusations undermine the very principles underlying our role as an honest broker in the Organization for Security and Cooperation's Minsk Group Nagorno-Karabakh peace process." The letter also stresses the damage of such remarks as it "unfairly denigrates the tremendous progress that the people and government of Nagorno-Karabakh have made in establishing democratic institutions, even as they have struggled to rebuild their homes, schools and farms destroyed by years of brutal Azerbaijan aggression." Jones's false charge that the government is "criminal," the lawmakers said, "only serves to further encourage irresponsible senior Azerbaijani leaders that are already calling for a military solution to the Karabakh issue." 4) Melkonian Trust Monitoring Group Meets with Patriarch in Support of Legal Action ISTANBUL--The Armenian Patriarch of Istanbul Mesrob Mutafyan, held a meeting with members of the Monitoring Group on the Melkonian Trust (MGMT) to discuss the pending suit against New York-based Armenian General Benevolent Union (AGBU). The January 24 meeting took place Armenian Patriarchal headquarters in Istanbul. The MGMT members thanked the Patriarch for his willingness to act on the issue in order to assure that the historic school continues to function. As reported on January 20, Archbishop Mutafyan, in his fiduciary capacity as Patriarch of Constantinople, filed a lawsuit against New York-based Armenian General Benevolent Union (AGBU) on January 13, 2005. The suit, which mainly addresses the formal announcement made by the AGBU in March 2004 that it would be closing the Melkonian Educational Institution in Nicosia, Cyprus at the end of the 2005 school year, was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles by plaintiff Mutafyan's California-based attorney Mark Macarley. In July 1921, wealthy Armenian businessman Garabed Melkonian donated a gift to then Patriarch of Constantinople Zaven Der Yeghyayan, to establish and maintain Armenian schools, as well as carry out various charitable works for the Armenian people. In 1924, the value of the gift was at least $3.5 million and per Melkonian's request, an Armenian school and orphanage named the Melkonian Educational Institute was established in Nicosia, Cyprus. In 1925, Patriarch Der Yeghyayan transferred the entire Melkonian gift, including the Melkonian Educational Institute, to the AGBU due to the latter's expressed ability to better manage the trust's assets and execute the donor's intentions. Archbishop Mutafyan informed the members of the MGMT that he first became aware of the existence and contents of the 1926 Deed of Amendment to the Melkonian Trust on December 28, 2004, through the Melkonian Educational Institute Alumni in Los Angeles, and emphasized that he is now cognizant of the multiple obligations the AGBU accepted from his predecessor, Patriarch Der Yeghyayan, in 1926. The suit, Arch. Mesrob Mutafyan vs. Armenian General Benevolent Union, petitions to compel AGBU to perform the Trustee's duties and redress a breach of trust by payment of money or otherwise. 5) Turkish Army Warns Iraqi Kurds, US over Kirkuk ANKARA (AFP)--Ethnic strife in Kirkuk, sparked by Kurdish attempts to take control of the oil-rich city in northern Iraq, would create "serious" security concerns for Turkey, the Turkish army warned on Wednesday. It might also open a rift with the United States, it said. The number two in line, in the influential Turkish military, renewed Ankara's charges that more Kurds than those expelled from Kirkuk under Saddam Hussein's regime have now settled in the city and registered for Sunday's elections in Iraq. "We have repeatedly said that such a situation may make the election results in Kirkuk disputable and make it almost impossible to find a fair and lasting solution for Kirkuk," General Ilker Basbug told a news conference. "Moreover, we are concerned that such developments will pose a threat to Iraq's territorial and political unity and create a great security problem in the region," he said. "Such a development will also create a serious security problem for Turkey." Ankara is vehemently opposed to Kurdish control of Kirkuk, which many Kurds want to incorporate into their enclave in northern Iraq and even see as the capital of a future independent Kurdish state, a nightmare scenario for Iraq's neighbors. Earlier this month the Kurds reached a deal with the Iraqi government that cleared the way for an estimated 100,000 Kurds said to have been expelled from Kirkuk in the past, to vote for the new local government in the elections. The deal effectively tipped the balance of power to the Kurds, fanning ethnic tensions in the city, home to a large number of Turkmen, a community of Turkish descent backed by Ankara. Basbug warned that post-election disputes in Kirkuk "may lead to confrontations...and may pull the trigger for a civil war in Iraq." Asked about the United States's role in preventing unrest in the region, the general conceded that "the circumstances in Iraq are very difficult," but cautioned that ethnic tensions in Kirkuk might deal a blow to Turkey's ties with its long-standing ally. "If the people of Kirkuk endorse the election results, we will conclude that no major problem exists," he said. "But if the opposite happens, then we will see that we have differences" with the US. 6) European Court of Justice Demands Turkey to Pay up for Inhumane Treatment The European Court of Justice demanded on January 25 that Turkey pay 10,000 euros to a man who was subjected to harm and electric shock when taken into custody by Turkish police. On the night of April 1, 1996, 29-year-old Hussein Syunal was taken to jail and endured inhumane treatment, including electric shock. The same night, Syunal was taken to the hospital, where he was reported to have had numerous injuries to his head, body, including his tongue. It later became apparent that during questioning, the police had tied electric lines to his tongue. All subscription inquiries and changes must be made through the proper carrier and not Asbarez Online. ASBAREZ ONLINE does not transmit address changes and subscription requests. (c) 2005 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved. ASBAREZ provides this news service to ARMENIAN NEWS NETWORK members for academic research or personal use only and may not be reproduced in or through mass media outlets.

WWW.ASBAREZ.COM

From Yuroz’ Human Rights Mural: Using multiple points of view simul

Coral Springs Potpourri
A modern cubist, a furniture embellisher, and two chicks named Grace —
lassoed together
BY MICHAEL MILLS
newtimesbpb.com
27 Jan 2005
>From Yuroz’ Human Rights Mural: Using multiple points of view simultaneously
“Yuroz’s Narrative Culture of Cubism,” “Felipe R. Luque: Arte Decorativo,”
“Grace Dubow: Simply Grace!”, and “Grace Fishenfeld: Moving Along Through
Media and Idea.”
On display through February 19.
Where: Coral Springs Museum of Art, Coral Springs Center for the Arts, 2855
Coral Springs Dr., Coral Springs, 954-340-5000.
Necessity, so it goes, is the mother of invention. In the case of the Coral
Springs Museum of Art, the need is to fill about 8,000 square feet of
display space on a regular basis. Amazingly, director Barbara K. O’Keefe
does it and does it well, continuing to work with limited resources (a
minuscule budget, a staff consisting mostly of part-timers and volunteers)
and within the confines of city government.
Visit at pretty much any given time and you’ll see the results of O’Keefe’s
inventiveness. Right now, for instance, the museum is host to four solo
exhibitions: “Yuroz’s Narrative Culture of Cubism,” “Felipe R. Luque: Arte
Decorativo,” “Grace Dubow: Simply Grace!”, and “Grace Fishenfeld: Moving
Along Through Media and Idea.” The big center gallery is also temporarily
home to a separate Yuroz work, the massive painting installation United
Nations’ Human Rights Mural 2004.
Off to one side of that main gallery, the museum’s current artist in
residence, Barbara W. Watler, is also at work. (Let’s just say, for the
moment, that a sewing machine and fingerprints are involved.) Adjacent to
Watler’s makeshift workspace are the beginnings of a new art library,
featuring books donated by patrons and custom-made bookshelves. And in the
formerly open space on the other side of the center gallery, behind the
Yuroz mural, there’s now a little seating area furnished with functional art
by W.F. Withers, whose fluid designs for a trio of chairs and a table
beautifully mesh with the museum’s overall look and feel.
As for the exhibitions, while they’re all respectable — O’Keefe rarely
curates a clinker — they also vary in quality. Yuroz, born Yuri Gevorgian
in 1956 in the Soviet (at the time) Republic of Armenia, is the headliner
here. His “Narrative Culture of Cubism,” originally scheduled to end in
November but now extended through mid-February, consists of nearly 30 works,
most of them fairly large oil paintings on canvas or board, supplemented by
a few charcoal drawings.
Yuroz, as the show’s title indicates, specializes in cubism, making him
something of an oddity in contemporary art. He hasn’t, as might be expected,
imposed any radical reinterpretation on the once-revolutionary technique of
using multiple points of view simultaneously. Rather, he has adapted the
classic cubism of Picasso, Georges Braque, and Juan Gris to his own ends.
At first glance, some of Yuroz’s paintings could almost be mistaken for the
work of such early-20th-century cubist pioneers. The carefully controlled
palette, the emphasis on geometric shapes, even the subject matter — all
the basic elements are there. Again and again, Yuroz returns to the same
visual ingredients: men holding or playing guitars, women, wineglasses,
flowers, fruit.
And the subjects are almost always couples. There’s one threesome (two men
and a woman) included in the show, and a few paintings feature solo men or
women, although the women, in particular, tend to look forlorn or at least
bored without male companionship. Then again, all of Yuroz’s characters have
more or less the same blank look. Almost anything could be read into this
lack of affect. In at least one piece, Evening Light, a woman’s pose and
demeanor suggest that she’s a prostitute waiting for a customer — naked
except for a pair of bright-red heels, she sits alone with a glass of wine
at a small table, legs crossed, one arm propped on the table with the hand
cupping her chin, a cigarette dangling from the other hand, an impossibly
world-weary look on her face.
It’s tempting to speculate that women, who are almost always nude in Yuroz’s
pictures, are little more than props for the artist, except that his men
aren’t much more animated. In the exhibition’s handout, Matthew Lutt writes:
“In the art of Yuroz, lovers embrace each other with such passionate
intimacy that it is hard to tell where one ends and the other begins. They
offer roses, exchange fruit, or dance in celebration of their togetherness.”
This sounds exciting, but the paintings don’t exactly bear it out. The
couples indeed seem to melt together, although their closeness seems more a
function of the cubist style than any physical intimacy or emotional
connection. (Occasionally they even resemble conjoined twins.) Those blue
roses and pomegranates Lutt refers to, like the ubiquitous guitars and
glasses of wine, are there to lend variety to the compositions. Cubism’s
tendency to freeze its subjects is probably why its inventors favored the
still life and may be why a Yuroz painting such as Still Life with Blue
Roses by Window is, paradoxically, more alive than his portraits of people.
A huge exception — literally — is the United Nations’ Human Rights Mural
2004, which, despite the generic title, is full of vibrant life. It consists
of six big canvases of overlapping imagery, crammed with people engaged in
all sorts of activities. Individually, the components were the artwork for
stamps issued in the United States, France, and Austria; together, they form
a dramatic narrative of the worldwide struggle for human rights.
Surrounding the mural and stretching beyond the center of the main gallery
are a dozen and a half pieces of furniture by Felipe R. Luque. The native
Spaniard, who settled in Boca Raton after living in New York, works with
wood, iron, and glass, accented with marble, granite, and quartz, all of
which he transforms into tables and consoles of varying dimensions and
shapes (and, in one dazzling piece, into a tiny bench that serves as a base
for a long, narrow, smoky mirror framed by pieces of wood that look like
tree branches).
As the introduction by Roger S. Selby explains, Luque is fond of working
with found objects, each of which might once have been part of something
else — “It might have been a tool, an armoire or a part of a machine. It
already had a predetermined configuration and a patina from constant use” —
which are then incorporated, often with minimal alterations, into the
artist’s work. This accounts for the irregular forms, as well as for a
certain poignancy unusual for furniture.
The small galleries clustered on the museum’s south side feature two Graces
with very different styles and approaches. Grace Dubow, a Texan who came to
Florida by way of Michigan, is the more traditional of the two, working
mostly in watercolors and favoring floral compositions. One grouping
features six versions of Egrets, each executed in a different medium (the
batik version is the best); it’s an interesting experiment made less
interesting by its subject matter. Of the florals, the watercolor White
Cattleya and White Orchid Tree, in painted silk, are the standouts.
Grace Fishenfeld, who still splits her time between Florida and New York, is
more adventurous, dabbling in media ranging from watercolor, pastel, and
acrylic to collage, woodcut, and gouache. She’s also more ambitious, which
can be admirable or lamentable, depending upon the outcome.
Fishenfeld often runs the risk of overconceptualizing, as in the mixed-media
piece Adam & Eve in the City or the dozen gouaches that make up The Myths.
And she can’t seem to resist editorializing, as in this description of the
pastel Anticipating a Visit: “The elderly eagerly await a visit from
children and friends and hope not to be forgotten.” She’s much better off
when her lofty subject matter is secondary to the medium, as in the woodcut
Acrobat and in several mixed-media reliefs incorporating sand.
If Artist in Residence Barbara Watler is at her post, don’t be afraid to
approach and ask her about her art, and don’t be taken aback if she keeps
right on sewing. Quilting, of all things, is the Hollywood-based artist’s
medium of choice, and sample panels and photo albums of her work are
available for examination.
It’s Watler’s quilting quirk, however, that’s of interest. She takes
individual fingerprints (there’s an ink pad and paper at hand if you’d like
to donate yours), enlarges them to varying degrees, then transforms them
into lovely abstracts on her trusty sewing machine. Leave it to the Coral
Springs Museum’s O’Keefe to find such an unusual artist and bring her to our
attention.

Armenian Atomic Dilemma

Armenian Atomic Dilemma
Aging nuclear power station is a vital source of energy for Armenia, but its
future is uncertain given its location on geological and political
faultlines.
By Kerob Sarkisian in Yerevan, Sophie Bukia in Tbilisi and Idrak Abbasov in
Baku (CRS No. 271, 26-Jan-05)
Its four giant cooling towers dominating the skyline outside Yerevan, the
Metsamor nuclear power station is a huge presence in Armenia – and a major
controversy outside it.
Armenians depend on the station for about 40 per cent of their electricity,
so most believe they cannot do without Metsamor – even bearing in mind the
potential risks from the earthquake-prone land it has stood on for three
decades.
“I have worked at the station for many years and I don’t think it is more
dangerous than any other in the world,” said Metsamor employee Araik
Ovsepian. “Of course, it would be better to live further away from it,
especially as they keep the nuclear waste on site. But I want to work in my
own [professional] field, and I need to feed my family.”
Constructed in 1976, the twin-reactor station sits near major geological
faultlines, one of which caused the Spitak earthquake that killed at least
25,000 people in 1988. Metsamor is also in one of Armenia’s most densely
populated areas. The capital Yerevan is 30 kilometres away.
Only one 440-megawatt reactor is running today, but the European Union says
that given the plant’s location and age and the need for its nuclear fuel to
travel by air, Metsamor should close down altogether. The plant, which is
managed by Russian electricity giant RAO UES, also gives rise to concerns in
the immediate region. The Turkish border is just 16 kilometres away, Iran’s
about 60 kilometres, and Azerbaijan and Georgia are less than 150 kilometres
away.
“God forbid that there should be an earthquake there. There would be a
catastrophe, and there would be radiation fallout within a radius of at
least 400 kilometres,” said Yetermishli Kurban, deputy director of
Azerbaijan’s Seismological Centre.
Georgian Green Party leader Giorgi Gachechiladze added, “According to
computer modelling done by our experts, if anything happens on the Armenian
plant’s territory, we’d have only eight hours to evacuate Tbilisi’s
population,”
Alvaro Antonian, the head of Armenia’s own National Seismic Protection
Service, said he couldn’t rule out the possibility of another major
earthquake before 2008 or 2010, it would happen in the south of the country,
relatively far away from Metsamor.
Armenian officials insist that Metsamor was specially built by Soviet
engineers to survive earthquakes of up to 8-9 on the Richter scale. And
although of a similar vintage, the VVER-440 reactor it uses is safer than
the type at Chernobyl, experts say.
During the 1988 earthquake, the nuclear plant withstood tremors measuring
five to six on the Richter scale. Both reactors at the plant were shut down
in the aftermath of that earthquake, but the second unit was restarted in
1995 because of the country’s dire need for energy.
While Metsamor was out of action, the country suffered electricity
rationing, economic decline and environmental damage as people felled trees
to get through the freezing winters.
“The tragedy was that many people left in winter, while those who stayed had
to warm themselves with firewood and other fuel. This led to deforestation
of Yerevan and the surrounding areas and reduction of the population by a
third,” said a report by the PA Consulting Group, which represents USAID in
Armenia.
The European Union argues that the risk of accidents or earthquakes is too
great, and that more effort must be made to find alternative power sources.
In June last year, the EU froze a grant of 100 million euros because of what
it said was the Armenian government’s slowness in fulfilling earlier
commitments to close the station.
One detail that worries the EU – which wants to see the closure of
Chernobyl-era power plants right across Europe – is Metsamor’s lack of a
secondary containment facility, a failsafe in case of radioactive spills.
Another problem is the need to fly in fuel on Russian planes through
Georgian airspace to Armenia. That “is the same as flying around a potential
nuclear bomb” said Alexis Louber, head of the EU delegation in Armenia, who
has been quoted as saying the plant poses “danger to the entire region”.
Metsamor general director Gagik Markosian said the flights, which pass over
Georgia, take place once a year.
However, Soso Kuchukhidze, in charge of nuclear energy matters at the
Georgian environment ministry, insisted that flights are made only once
every five years. and said he thought there was no danger.
“We know precisely when the fuel is to be transported and on what plane. The
fuel which is carried through Georgia’s airspace is totally harmless and
presents no danger whatsoever until it enters the reactor’s active zone and
the chain reaction begins. When passing through Georgian airspace, the fuel
is a normal substance emitting no radiation.”
Kuchukhidze said the last load was shifted in the summer of 2004, when two
planes transported about 32 tonnes of fuel.
Many Georgians appear poorly informed about the issue, which is rarely, if
ever discussed in the media.
Gachechiladze, the Green Party chairman, said he had never been told. “The
law says no sort of nuclear materials can be transported through Georgian
territory. We are not talking about ordinary fuel. It must be enriched
uranium, which is very dangerous..
“Those who allow it should be imprisoned. Can you imagine what will happen
if such a plane crashes?”
An additional worry is the waste material generated at Metsamor, said Akob
Sanasarian from the Union of Armenian Greens. The practice of burying the
waste on site – in facilities constructed with technical aid from French
firm Fromatom – “cannot be allowed from a security and ecological
standpoint,” he said.
But the main obstacle to shutting down Metsamor is that Armenia simply does
not have the natural resources or the money to find working alternatives.
Energy minister Armen Movsisian said it would cost one billion dollars to
stop the plant. “Negotiations with the [European] Commission are still
underway. Armenia is offering to identify what sources could become the
basis for building new, alternative capacities. But today, when we have no
financial means available, we cannot talk about the closure or any
timelines.”
One plan, which part of the EU grant was meant to help finance, is to lay a
gas pipeline from Iran. However, Movsisian said using gas to power
thermoelectric stations would result in higher electricity bills and have a
negative effect on the economy as a whole.
Electricity tariffs in Armenia are already double those in Russia, according
to RAO UES head Anatoly Chubais. Prices in Georgia are still higher.
Hydroelectric schemes are also limited by the lack of major water resources
in Armenia other than Lake Sevan, which is already suffering the effects of
Soviet-era ecological damage.
While some have even called for a new nuclear plant to be built, Armenian
and Russian experts believe that Metsamor can still function safely for at
least another 11 years.
Plant director Markosian said 35 million dollars had been spent on
improvements since the reopening of the reactor, and 22 million euros have
been provided under the EU’s TACIS programme. “The safety level at power
plant two has increased since 1995 compared with 1989 when the plant was
stopped. We can say with assurance that the safety of the plant has been
growing yearly.”
Markosian said that this second unit should be kept running to the end of
its 30-year service life. Taking into account the six-year period it was
switched off after the earthquake, that would be 2016. However, similar
Russian plants have seen their service life extended by another 15 years,
raising the possibility that Metsamor will stay in operation until 2031.
For neighbouring Georgia, the Metsamor debate is complex. Though some fear
potential disaster, Georgia has its own energy shortages and relies in part
on electricity that Armenia, thanks to Metsamor, is able to export.
Georgia buys between 100 and 150 megawatts of electricity daily from
Armenia – not from Metsamor, but from the Razdan thermoelectric power
station. Bur Georgian energy minister Nika Gilauri warns, “if the Armenian
nuclear power station stops, it will be impossible for Armenia to export
electricity to Georgia. Armenia will have available 400 megawatts less than
now,”
Despite its oil and gas resources, Azerbaijan also experiences electricity
shortages – particularly in the southern Nakhichivan autonomous region,
which is separated from the rest of the country by Armenian territory,
leaving it somewhat isolated ever since the war over Nagorny Karabakh in the
early Nineties.
Armenian energy ministry representative Levon Vardanian said at an
EU-sponsored conference in Baku last November that Yerevan was ready to
export electricity to Nakhichevan.
“We know that there are certain problems with electricity supplies in the
Nakhichivan Autonomous Republic, and we are prepared to cooperate with
Azerbaijan in restoring existing links,” Vardanian said. “Energy specialists
are always ready for cooperation and politicians must set aside the
problems.”
However, Azerbaijan’s deputy prime minister Abid Sharifov said there was no
chance of such cooperation as long as the conflict between Azerbaijan and
Armenia remained unresolved.
“As long as there is no peace deal with Armenia, there can be no talk of
mutual links. They can come here to take part in conferences, but that does
not mean we want to begin some sort of links with them,” he said.
Kerob Sarkisian is a correspondent for Iravunk newspaper in Yerevan. Sophie
Bukia is a correspondent for 24 Hours newspaper in Tbilisi. Idrak Abbasov is
a correspondent for Ayna newspaper in Baku. All three journalists
participate in IWPR’s South Caucasus Network project.

Coalition pull-out from Iraq gathers pace

Coalition pull-out from Iraq gathers pace
By Peter Spiegel in London
Published: January 26 2005 22:19 | Last updated: January 26 2005 22:19
FT.com
Even as US forces struggle to stabilise Iraq during the tense election
period, they may soon face another challenge following Sunday’s vote: the
determination of several coalition members to withdraw thousands of troops
from the region.
Several allied countries, many of them eastern European, that were part of
the original “New Europe” group backing the Iraqi war have said they will
either completely withdraw or substantially reduce their forces in Iraq
after the January 30 elections.
The largest reduction is expected to come from Ukraine, which currently has
some 1,600 troops in Iraq, making it the sixth-largest contingent. Earlier
this month, outgoing President Leonid Kuchma ordered the defence ministry to
draw up plans to begin a complete withdrawal by the middle of the year,
after eight Ukrainian soldiers were killed in an explosion.
The move has been backed by incoming President Viktor Yushchenko, who
campaigned on a promise to bring the troops home. “The withdrawal of the
Ukrainian peacekeeping force is one of our priorities,” said a statement by
Mr Yushchenko’s political organisation. He was planning to address it soon
after taking office last weekend.
The move follows a decision by Poland, one of the US’s closest allies in the
Iraq war and with the fifth-largest contingent of 2,400 troops, to reduce
its presence by nearly a third, to 1,700, by the end of next month. The
Polish government has faced intense political pressure domestically, where
its participation is increasingly unpopular, and the reduction may be
followed by a complete withdrawal by the end of the year.
Polish military officers, who command the multinational division in
south-central Iraq, have said their reduced numbers combined with a
Ukrainian withdrawal could force them to cut the number of provinces they
patrol – a decision that may force the US to fill the gaps.
Another eastern European ally, Hungary, had intended to leave its 300 troops
through the elections, but the plan was voted down by parliament, and all
Hungarian forces – save for some logistical personnel responsible for
bringing back military equipment – arrived home last month.
Not all of the countries pulling out forces are from eastern Europe,
however. Earlier this month Jan Peter Balkenende, the Dutch prime minister,
said the Netherlands would move forward with its plan to withdraw its 1,400
troops by the end of March despite intense US and British pressure.
“I understand the feelings of the Americans and British, but even they can’t
avoid the conclusion that the Netherlands has delivered a considerable
contribution in that area of Iraq,” he told reporters.
In addition, Portugal said earlier this month that it would end its
120-strong police mission in Iraq on February 12. Those moves follow Spain’s
withdrawal last year and the refusal of several western European Nato
members – including France, Germany, Belgium, and Spain – to participate in
the alliance’s new training mission in Baghdad, a stance that has infuriated
American officials.
“When it comes time to perform a mission, it seems to us to be quite awkward
for suddenly members in that international staff to say, ‘I’m unable to go
because of this national caveat or national exception’,” Colin Powell,
outgoing secretary of state, said last month. “You are hurting the
credibility and the cohesion of such an international staff or
organisation.”
Despite the growing number of withdrawals, there will still be 24 countries
other than the US and Britain with troops after the announced departures.
Italy, with the largest European contingent, has vowed to keep its 3,100
troops in the region, and South Korea actually increased its presence in the
north of Iraq to 3,600 late last year, making it the largest force other
than the US and UK.
In addition, some of the European Nato members pulling troops out of Iraq –
including Poland, the Netherlands and Hungary – have agreed to send forces
back as part of a security force attached to the Nato training mission.
US officials have vowed to continue to push for more foreign troops,
insisting that requests for help are made frequently by President George W.
Bush during bilateral meetings with world leaders. Some senior US officials
hope that the United Nations-backed election will be a spur to encourage new
deployments.
“After this election is over, we have a chance now to, as an international
community, support a new, elected Iraqi government,” Condoleezza Rice,
incoming secretary of state, said during her recent confirmation hearings.
“And it may be a time that we can enhance the contributions of some members
of the international community.”
It is an effort that may have already paid off, albeit in a small way: last
month, Armenia voted to send 46 soldiers to southern Iraq.
The troops arrived in the southern Iraqi town of Hilla on Friday.

They Don’t Believe Evans at Azeri Foreign Ministry

THEY DON’T BELIEVE EVANS AT AZERI FOREIGN MINISTRY
Azg/arm
27 Jan 05
They don’t believe at Azeri Foreign Ministry that John Marshal Evans,
the US ambassador to Armenia, could have said that “the US is the
second country after Armenia that renders humanitarian aid to Nagorno
Karabakh.”
“Anyway, Azerbaijan should send a note to the US. This country has a
definite position in the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. Recently, Colin
Powel affirmed in the letter addressed to Elmar Mammediarov, that the
US supports Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity. That is why, the
abovementioned statements should be considered as insinuations of the
mass media. I don’t believe,” Mertin Mirza, the press secretary of the
Azeri Foreign Ministry, said according to the Baku Ekho newspaper.
“Don’t we and the international community know that the US renders
annual aid that amounts to millions of dollars to Nagorno Karabakh?
Besides, the American know that Karabakh is ruled by an
anti-democratic administration that is engaged in the trade of arms
and drugs,” Elmar Ghahramanov, lawmaker from Yeni Azerbaijan party
said.

Atkinson’s Report Becomes Formula

ATKINSON’S REPORT BECOMES FORMULA
Azg/arm
27 Jan 05
The report of David Atkinson, British parliamentarian, on Nagorno
Karabakh issue was heard and adopted at the PACE session, on January
25. The Armenian side suggested three corrections. Only one of them
was adopted. In fact, the report prepared by Terry Davis, former
reporter on Nagorno Karabakh issue and current Secretary General of
European Parliament, became a formula that hasno legal force, but it
is very important from the viewpoints of politics and propaganda.
According to Regnum agency, all the formulae that are not favorable
for the Armenians remained unchanged in the report. In particular, the
Nagorno Karabakh authorities were characterized as “separatist forces,
the Armenian forces still keep the major part of Azerbaijan in
occupation,” or “the separatist forces still control the region of
Nagorno Karabakh”. Armenia is obviously condemned in annexing a
territory of another country that caused “ethic exile.”
BBC reminds that Atkinson is the life chairman of the World-Wide
Concordance of the Christians organization, while the baroness
Caroline Cox, member of the House of Lords, is its head. Baroness
Caroline Cox is known for rendering help to the Armenians.
Let’s see, what kind of mistakes were made in the report. We have the
impression that the members of the Armenian delegation at PACE
hasnâ=80=99t read this document or didn’t understand that or they are
not aware of elementary information about Karabakh.
The third point of “Explanatory Notes of the Reporter” says the
following: “The conflict includes the territory of the former NKAR, as
well the eight neighboring regions of Azerbaijan partly or fully”. If
our parliamentariansknew that seven and not eight regions are under
the control of Karabakh forces, they would show in their speeches that
Davis and Atkinson are not only pro-Azeri but also unaware of the
situation.
The formula is entitled “The Conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh Region
Dealt by the OSCE Minsk Group”. It’s worth mentioning that the Minsk
Congress was to be held in the spring of 1992, but it wasn’t. The
working Minsk group was shaped, instead. So, Davis and Atkinson showed
that they are totally unaware of the Nagorno Karabakh negotiation
process. We don’t even speak of our delegation.
The authors of the report suggest thanking Minsk group co-chairs and
the personal representative of the OSCE chairman “for their efforts
made in achieving ceasefire on May 12, 1994.” This sentence is another
proof of their ignorance, as in 1994 neither Minsk group
co-chairmanship was formed, nor the position of the personal
representative of the OSCE Chairman. The ceasefire was achieved by the
mediation of Russia.
Those who read the report of Davis and Atkinson and are aware of the
Nagorno Karabakh conflict’s chronology can find dozens of small and
big violations of facts. As for the mental, lingual, diplomatic and
lobbyist abilities of the Armenian delegation at PACE, daily Azg will
touch them on in a separate article.
By Tatoul Hakobian

Hitler Bound Jews and Armenians Together Forever

HITLER BOUND JEWS AND ARMENIANS TOGETHER FOREVER
Azg/arm
27 Jan 05
RA foreign minister said in his speech at the 28th session of the UN
General Assembly that Hitler bound the Jews with the Armenians
forever. The 28th session was dedicated to 60th anniversary of
liberating the prisoners of Auswenzin concentration camp.
“Who remembers the annihilation of Armenians,” Hitler said few days
before entering Poland. The cynical statement made by Hitler about the
Armenians is properly represented at the Holocaust Museum in
Washington,” Oskanian said. “After Auswenzin we all are Jews,
gypsies, we all are banished and hated by someone, somewhere. After
Auswenzin a human being’s consciousness can’t remain the same.”
“These notorious places have their names for the victims of 15
genocides that took place in the 20th century. For Armenians this
place is Der Zor desert, for the Cambodians such a place is the Valley
of Massacres, while for the children of the 21st century Darfur is
such a place. While, the Jews, the Polish and all our generation that
grew up after the World War II remembers Auswenzin.”
“On behalf of the Armenian people and its government, and as an
descendent of the Genocide survivors, I think that it is my imperative
to be here today and join the survivors and participate in this
arrangement of commemoration,” Vartan Oskanian said in his speech on
January 24.

Armenian Charities Receive Settlements

The Morning Call Online
January 26, 2005, 4:28 PM EST
Armenian Charities Receive Settlements
By Associated Press
NEW YORK AP) — Five Armenian charities received checks for $333,333 each
Wednesday as part of an insurance settlement with descendants of Armenians
massacred 90 years ago by the Turks.
The checks are part of a $20 million settlement with New York Life Insurance
Co., which issued 2,300 policies to Armenians in Turkey before 1915 that
were never paid, according to plaintiffs’ attorney Brian Kabateck.
Armenians contend that 1.5 million people were executed between 1915 and
1919 by Turkish authorities who accused them of helping the invading Russian
army during World War I. Turkey rejects the genocide claim and says
Armenians were killed in civil unrest during the collapse of the Ottoman
Empire. France and Russia are among countries that have declared the
killings genocide, but the United States has not.
The agreement set aside at least $11 million for descendants, $3 million for
charities and $2 million for administrative costs. Four charities in Los
Angeles will receive the rest of the $3 million.
Descendants of the policy holders have until March 16 to file claims.
The settlement, approved last year by a federal judge in Los Angeles, is
believed to be the first involving the events of the era.

Karabakh deputy foreign minister receives OSCE delegation

Karabakh deputy foreign minister receives OSCE delegation
Mediamax news agency
26 Jan 05
YEREVAN
The deputy foreign minister of the Nagornyy Karabakh Republic (NKR),
Masis Mailyan, received in Stepanakert today the employees of the
Office of the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office.
The coordinator of the OSCE Tbilisi Office, Imre Palatinus, presented
to Masis Mailyan the newly appointed field assistant of the Personal
Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office, Thorsten Ahren
(Sweden), Mediamax was told in the press service of NKR Foreign
Ministry today.
Masis Mailyan highlighted the normal working relations established
between the NKR Foreign Ministry and the OSCE mission in Stepanakert,
and expressed hope for their further continuation. He stated the
readiness of the NKR Foreign Ministry to continue assisting to the
activity of the OSCE representation in Nagornyy Karabakh and provide
necessary conditions for its activity.
The sides also discussed the organizational issues concerning the
forthcoming visit to NKR on 30 January of the OSCE delegation, which
includes the Minsk Group cochairmen on Nagornyy Karabakh and a
fact-finding mission.