UCLA Today: Acts of Kindness and Compassion

Mannik Sakayan
UCLA Office of Government and Community Relations
(310) 794-0760 (phone)
(310) 794-6827 (fax)
[email protected]
December 17, 2004

[Reprinted from “UCLA Today” December 14, 2004]

Acts of kindness and compassion
Their giving spirit extends near and far

It’s become our holiday tradition at UCLA Today to recognize and
commend faculty and staff members who give selflessly of their talents
and time to help the less fortunate in their communities. This year’s
Bruin Angels, selected from departments across the campus, have
reached out to those near and far, from East Los Angeles to a town
in Armenia. As our thoughts this season turn to giving, we honor them.

ISHIYAMA and AKARAGIAN

Not many travelers pack surgical drills for their trips abroad, but
a UCLA medical team did just that twice this year – in March and
November – when they donated their time and services to travel to
Armenia to perform the region’s first cochlear-implant surgeries.

“It’s really so different from what we know here,” said surgeon
Akira Ishiyama, associate professor of head and neck surgery at the
David Geffen School of Medicine. “All of the infrastructure and the
machinery they have are so outdated.” Working with him to give seven
deaf children the gift of hearing were audiologist Stanton Jones,
anesthesiologist Denise Hawkins, surgical nurse Diane Sennott and nurse
Salpy Akaragian, director of the UCLA International Nursing Center.

The cross-cultural project was a few years in the making; team
members had to train their Armenian counterparts from the Erebouni
Medical Center.

Meanwhile, the nonprofit Armenian International Medical Fund raised
money to cover most of the expenses, including the purchase of
state-of-the-art screening equipment.

All the preparation and hard work paid off. “The whole country
was talking about these surgeries,” said Akaragian, who speaks
Armenian. “They called the project ‘Man-Made Miracles.’ ”

For Ishiyama, the experience was also a personal triumph. “These were
completely deaf people. [It’s] very rewarding that you can make them
hear,” he said. “I take a lot of pride in doing this.”

Akaragian echoes Ishiyama’s sentiments. “I will never forget
the parents’ emotional reaction when we told them the surgery was
successful,” she said. “I felt good about it. I feel like I have done
my deed in this world now.” – S.S.

Aliyev on relations with Iran, Karabakh settlement

AZERBAIJAN’S PRESIDENT ON RELATIONS WITH IRAN, KARABAKH SETTLEMENT

RIA Novosti, Russia
Dec 18 2004

BAKU, December 17 (RIA Novosti) – The dialogue between Azerbaijan and
Iran proves that normal relations are possible of the countries do
not interfere in each other’s affairs, Azerbaijan’s President Ilkham
Aliyev told journalists on Friday.

In his words, Azerbaijan does not interfere in Iran’s domestic
affairs. “We adhere to this principle and I am happy that Iranian-Azeri
relations are being created on this basis,” Mr. Aliyev said. The
two countries are building their relations on the basis of mutual
understanding and respect, therefore, “Iranian-Azeri dialogue has
been recently intensified,” the head of state stressed.

Speaking about Iran’s position on the Armenian-Azeri conflict, Ilkham
Aliyev said that “Iran had often claimed its support for Azerbaijan’s
territorial integrity and backed Azerbaijan in this conflict, including
within international organizations.”

According to the president, Iran’s relations with Armenia and other
states are the sovereign affairs of the Iranian side. However,
“we live in a very sensitive region”, therefore, such factors as the
violation of Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity should be taken into
account in interstate relations in the South Caucasus, Azerbaijan’s
leader said. In his opinion, “regional countries and international
organizations should express their clear-cut position on this issue”.

At all forums Ilkham Aliyev stresses that Armenia is the conflicting
side because Baku is conducting negotiations on the Nagorny Karabakh
settlement with Yerevan. “If Armenia claims that we should negotiate
with Nagorny Karabakh it should step aside, withdraw troops from Azeri
territories and stop allocating money to Nagorny Karabakh form its
budget. Then will shall settle the conflict by all means in a short
while,” Mr. Aliyev said at the session of the UN General Assembly
in New York in late November which focused on the situation on the
occupied Azeri lands on Baku’s initiative.

According to President Aliyev, “all discussions of the Armenian-Azeri
conflict in the UN, Council of Europe and other international
organizations aim to bring to public the occupationist nature of
Armenia and, accordingly, to play a role in the conflict settlement.”

ANKARA: Armenian patriarch lends support to Turkey’s EU bid

ARMENIAN PATRIARCH LENDS SUPPORT TO TURKEY’S EU BID

Star, Turkey
Dec 17 2004

I advocate Turkey’s membership in the European Union, said Armenian
Orthodox Patriarch Mesrob II yesterday. Mesrob emphasized that EU was
not a Christian club. “Parliaments of the EU member countries do not
make decisions according to the doctrines of the Bible, and the
Turkish Parliament does not make its decisions according to the
Koran,” Mesrob II said. Asked about expatriate Armenians pushing
recognition of the so-called Armenian genocide as a condition for
Turkey’s EU membership, Mesrob II said, “The disaster in 1915 is an
issue which can be abused. To this end, foreigners will raise this
issue when they have the opportunity. But we should defuse its
potential for exploitation by beginning dialogues on the issue, both
official and unofficial.” /Star/

Profile of Latest EU Applicant

Profile of Latest EU Applicant
By Laura Scott and Emily Pennink, PA

The Scotsman, UK
Dec 17 2004

Prime Minister Tony Blair is expected to offer to back Turkey’s EU
membership bid today after winning support from fellow European
leaders.

The Republic of Turkey is spread over 779,452 square kilometres and
has a population of around 68.1 million.

Turks account for 85% of the population, Kurds 12%, and 3% are other
Islamic peoples, Armenians and Jews.

Languages spoken are Arabic, Turkish, Armenian, Greek and Kurdish.
The predominant religion is Muslim (Sunni).

Major industries in the country include textiles, food processing,
tourism, motor vehicles, mining, lumber, petroleum and construction.

Trading partners are mainly the UK, United States, Germany, Italy,
France and Russia. A fifth of Turkish imports come from British firms
and half of Turkey’s trade is with the EU.

Ankara is the capital city. Located in the Central Anatolian steppe,
it has been the political heart of the country since 1920 while
Istanbul takes its place as the cultural centre.

Turkey’s “hero” is Ataturk (Mustafa Kemal), who made it his job to
recreate Turkish society following the country’s bitter victory in
the War of Independence (1920-22).

By the time of his death in 1938, a constitution had been adopted,
Islam was removed as the state religion and women obtained the right
to vote. There are many statues of him across the land.

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office advises travellers there is still
a “high threat from terror in Turkey”.

In November last year, there were attacks against the British
Consulate-General and the headquarters of HSBC and bomb attacks on
two synagogues in Istanbul. Responsibility was claimed by the Turkish
militant group IBDA-C, jointly with al Qaida.

Turkey’s links with the EU were recognised in 1963 when it made an
Association Agreement. In October, the European Commission judged
Turkey meets the EU’s political criteria and is ready to negotiate
membership.

Over the last three years, Turkey has undergone some reforms,
including the abolition of the death penalty and improvements to the
rights of minority groups, in an attempt to bring the country closer
to Europe.

Azerbaijani president: Armenia too dependent on Russia in territoryd

Azerbaijani president: Armenia too dependent on Russia in territory dispute talks
By AIDA SULTANOVA

The Associated Press

BAKU, Azerbaijan (AP) – Russia is taking too active a role in the
negotiations over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh enclave, whose unresolved status
remains a source of tension for Azerbaijan and Armenia, Azerbaijan’s president said
Friday.

Ilham Aliev was reacting to comments by Russian parliament speaker Boris
Gryzlov, who said that Armenia was Russia’s outpost in the Caucasus region.
Gryzlov made the statement Wednesday at a meeting between Armenian legislators
and their Russian counterparts.

“We are confused: We have always considered Armenia a state, but now it
turns out that it is an outpost,” Aliev told journalists Friday.

“So whom should we negotiate with now – the outpost or the master of the
outpost?” he said.

Azerbaijan and Armenia have been locked in a bitter dispute over
Nagorno-Karabakh, an ethnic Armenian enclave in Azerbaijan’s territory. Ethnic Armenian
forces drove Azerbaijani troops out of Nagorno-Karabakh in the 1990s. Since a
1994 cease-fire, the sides have been separated by a demilitarized buffer
zone, but occasional shooting breaks out and each side accuses the other of
mounting small incursions.

“I believe that if these negotiations are conducted in a constructive way,
and the Armenian side does not go back on earlier agreed-upon positions …
we can come to certain agreements,” Aliev said.

Baku wants Armenian forces to withdraw from Nagorno-Karabakh before a peace
treaty can be signed.

Aliev also said Friday that Azerbaijan is ready to fully reopen its railway
connection with neighboring Georgia only after it receives guarantees that
the cargo is not redirected to Armenia.

Azerbaijan closed its railway link with Georgia for five days in November,
barring about 1,500 train cars carrying oil and other cargo, on the grounds
that some of the cargo had ended up in Armenia. Baku then reopened the
connection partially – allowing in some trains, mostly those carrying oil – after
Azerbaijan and Georgia agreed that no cargo would be redirected to Armenia.

But Aliev said Friday that “smuggling and falsifications” were still
taking place.

“If it persists, the border will remain closed,” Aliev said. “We
understand that it causes harm to us and to a certain extent to Georgia, but we have
no other choice.”

12/17/04 11:22 EST

Chirac: Turkey will need to recognize Armenian killings during entry

Chirac: Turkey will need to recognize Armenian killings during entry talks
By RAF CASERT

The Associated Press
12/17/04 13:17 EST

BRUSSELS, Belgium (AP) – French President Jacques Chirac told Ankara on
Friday it would have to recognize the mass killings of Armenians in the early
20th century if it wants to become a member of the European Union, insisting the
French would otherwise vote Turkey out in a referendum.

In an extremely guarded welcome to the announcement that the EU will open
membership negotiations with Turkey next October, Chirac said Ankara needed to
go even beyond the list of conditions imposed on it at the EU summit Friday.

“The French people will have the last word,” Chirac told reporters about
the possible referendum if Turkey’s membership negotiations are successful in
ten to 15 years’ time.

He said the French would resolutely vote against membership if the Armenian
massacres are not recognized by the Turkish government.

“If this work is not done then the French would clearly draw conclusions
from this,” he said.

Many French have grave misgivings about Turkey joining, fearing an influx of
cheap labor to France, already stung by 10 percent unemployment. Many here
also question Turkey’s human rights record and its people’s embrace of Islam.

Armenia accuses Turkey of genocide in the killings of up to 1.5 million
Armenians as part of a 1915-1923 campaign to force them out of eastern Turkey. At
that time, Armenia was part of the Ottoman Empire.

Turkey remains extremely sensitive to the issue. It denies the genocide,
says the death count is inflated and that Armenians were killed or displaced
along with others as the Ottoman Empire tried to quell civil unrest.

All EU nations must approve any new member, effectively giving each country
a veto.

Chirac said he was confident Turkey would move toward that recognition in
time, but the episode on Armenia highlighted a press conference flush with
warnings and conditions that there were many ways the negotiations could go wrong.

“Turkey will have to make a remarkable effort,” Chirac said, although he
recognized the country had already made “formidable efforts” in pushing
through political and economic reforms to make it to candidate member status.

He stressed that any member can block talks on any chapter under review for
membership and said that if Turkey is found guilty of human right violations,
the talks would be suspended.

Overall, Chirac said, “no one can prejudge what will happen. Possibly
things can go wrong and you can have a crisis, either from the EU or Turkish side.
Then you would have a rift.”

French-Turkish ties became strained in 2001, when French parliament’s
recognition of the killings as a genocide sparked a boycott of French goods and an
exclusion of French companies from Turkish defense contracts.

EU Set to Negotiate Letting Turkey Join

Chicago Tribune
Dec 17 2004

EU Set to Negotiate Letting Turkey Join

VAN, Turkey — European Union leaders decided Thursday to open
negotiations with Turkey next year on EU membership, but the road to
acceptance will be bumpy.

“Tonight the European Union has opened its door to Turkey … making
a balanced offer,” Jose Manuel Barroso, president of the European
Commission, said in Brussels. “I genuinely believe this is an offer
that Turkey should be glad to accept.”

The 25 EU leaders at the Brussels meeting will propose Oct. 3 as the
start date for the talks, The Associated Press reported.

Turkish membership has been controversial, and EU leaders are likely
to try to calm their wary citizens by attaching conditions ensuring
that Turkey’s full membership will be 10 to 20 years away.

Chirac’s comment

French President Jacques Chirac told his nation this week: “My answer
is, `Yes, if.’ Yes, if Turkey totally meets the conditions we
impose.”

The “ifs” are expected to require continuing progress on human-rights
reforms and expansion of the rights of Turkey’s Kurdish population.

Other potential conditions could be far tougher for Turkey to
swallow, such as recognizing the mass killings of Armenians between
1915 and 1923 as “genocide” and recognizing the Greek Cypriot
government of Cyprus.

German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder said he thought the major hurdle
was the Cyprus issue. Ankara recognizes the breakaway Turkish Cypriot
state in the north but not the internationally recognized Greek
Cypriot one in the south.

Turkey signaled its readiness to agree to open-ended negotiations,
but Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan warned that he would not
accept conditions that go beyond the criteria applied to other
countries.

“If they try to impose any unacceptable conditions, it is not
possible for us to accept this,” he said in Brussels after lobbying
EU leaders. “We’ll definitely put this issue on ice and continue on
our way.”

Erdogan hitched his future to Turkey’s EU bid when his party swept to
power in November 2002. Substantial reforms were pushed through
parliament, including curbing the influence of the military and
improving human-rights protections.

A Western diplomat cautioned that a rejection of Turkey by the EU
could reverse the reform process and possibly weaken Erdogan to the
point where the military could stage a coup.

Most Turkish political analysts reject the possibility of a military
coup, but the consensus is that Erdogan needs to start EU talks on a
positive note to solidify his political power and keep the country
aligned with Europe and the U.S.

The main objections to Turkey’s membership have been that it is too
big, too poor and too Muslim. Politicians in France, Austria and
Netherlands have been particularly skeptical, warning of a flood of
migrant workers that would send Europe’s Muslim population soaring.

Turkey objects to permanent restrictions that would permit EU members
to restrict the flow of Turkish workers. Ankara argues that it should
receive the same treatment as other new entrants who have faced
restrictions for a limited time.

Turkey, which is a NATO member, has strong allies in Britain,
Germany, Spain and Italy. Leaders in those countries argue that
embracing a secular democracy that borders Syria, Iran and Iraq would
help build a bulwark against extremism and send an encouraging signal
for democracy in the Middle East.

“If we succeed in integrating an Islamic country, this would
tremendously increase our security,” Schroeder said.

Earliest entry is 2015

Turkey could not join the EU until 2015 at the earliest. The
negotiations will require an even greater transformation of its
economy and society.

Kurdish activists angered Erdogan earlier this week with a large
advertisement in European newspapers demanding greater rights.

“Until Turkey recognizes all its own citizens as full members of this
country, it is not ready for membership in a larger union of
democratic nations,” said a businessman, who would not give his name,
in Van, a predominantly Kurdish city in eastern Turkey.

Most diplomats and human-rights advocates argue that the best way to
continue the reform process in Turkey is to pursue EU membership.

“The EU accession process has already helped bring about significant
human-rights improvements in Turkey,” Jonathan Sugden, who monitors
Turkey for Human Rights Watch, said in a statement. “A `yes’ . . .
would maintain that momentum.”

By Catherine Collins

EU and Turkey Reach Historic Agreement

EU and Turkey Reach Historic Agreement
By CONSTANT BRAND

The Associated Press
12/17/04 14:11 EST

BRUSSELS, Belgium (AP) – The European Union and Turkey reached a
historic agreement Friday to begin talks next year aimed at bringing
the populous Muslim nation into the EU after hammering out a compromise
over Ankara’s relationship with Cyprus.

Turkey accepted an offer from the 25 EU leaders during their two-day
summit to begin talks on Oct. 3, 2005, launching a process that could
take years and could transform the political and social landscape of
both parties.

If the talks succeed, Turkey would become the largest EU member, with
a population of 71 million – expected to grow as high as 85 million
by 2020. But its per capita income is roughly one-third of the average
of longtime EU member states, requiring far-reaching economic reforms.

Turkish membership would also add millions of citizens to the EU at a
time when many Europeans are questioning whether their countries, which
have Christian heritage, can absorb large numbers of Muslim immigrants.

Nevertheless, EU leaders hailed the agreement as a historic step,
which would expand the borders of the EU from Ireland to Iran.

“If I think back on today, I believe we can say that we have been
writing history today, and the agreement we reached today will acquire
full significance in the years ahead,” said Dutch Prime Minister Jan
Peter Balkenende, whose country holds the EU presidency.

British Prime Minister Tony Blair said the decision to accept Turkish
membership shows “that those who believe there is a fundamental clash
of civilizations between Christians and Muslims are actually wrong;
that they can work together; that we can cooperate together.”

During the summit, EU leaders also agreed to start entry talks with
Croatia next March if it hands over an indicted war crimes suspect
to the international tribunal in The Hague.

The leaders also formally closed membership talks with Romania and
Bulgaria, paving the way for them to join in 2007.

But the main attention fell on Turkey. Despite widespread public
misgivings about Turkish membership, the leaders agreed Thursday to
offer Ankara accession talks.

But the deal nearly fell apart because of an EU requirement that
Turkey initial an agreement Friday expanding its customs union with
the EU to include Cyprus and nine other members that joined in May. The
agreement would have to be signed by October.

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan balked at the requirement,
which EU diplomats said amounted to tactic recognition of the Greek
Cypriot government.

Turkey invaded Cyprus in 1974 to block a coup by Greek Cypriots,
and decades of diplomacy have failed to reunite the Mediterranean
island. About 40,000 Turkish troops remain in northern Cyprus, which
is controlled by Turkish Cypriots.

After hours of intensive negotiations, the EU agreed to accept a
statement from Erdogan that he would sign the customs agreement before
the talks start and that the move would not constitute recognition
of Cyprus.

“This is a win-win agreement,” Erdogan said. “We’re at a point where
we reaping the reward of 41 years of work. The process from now on
will be even more difficult … but I strongly believe Turkey will
be able to achieve this.”

EU officials said the talks would be open-ended and without a guarantee
of eventual EU membership.

Nevertheless, the admission of Turkey to the EU is still strongly
opposed in several EU countries, whose citizens fear an influx of
culturally different migrants who would compete for jobs.

French President Jacques Chirac, who has promised a referendum on
Turkish membership if the talks succeed, said the Turks would have to
it would have to accept the mass killings of Armenians in the early
20th century.

Austrian Chancellor Wolfgang Schuessel said he would also call a
referendum because bringing a Muslim country into the EU “must not
be decided in an ivory tower … We cannot be indifferent about
public opinion.”

Supporters of Turkey’s entry maintain that the country could be a
bridge between Europe and the Middle East and stand as an example of
a democratic state with Islamic traditions. Turkey, a longtime NATO
member, has been legally secular since the collapse of the Ottoman
Empire after World War I.

Associated Press correspondents Suzan Fraser, Raf Casert, Art Max
and Robert Wielaard contributed to this report.

BAKU: Aliyev votes at municipal elections

Azer Tag, Azerbaijan
Dec 17 2004

AZERBAIJAN PRESIDENT ILHAM ALIYEV VOTES AT MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS
[December 17, 2004, 21:14:37]

December 17, 2004 enters the history of independent Azerbaijan as a
date of regular municipal elections. This day, millions of voters
arrive at polling stations to vote for the most deserved candidates
who will be engaged in solving their local problems within the next 5
years.

All necessary measures had been taken on the base of the new Election
Code for citizens to express their will freely. This fact was also
confirmed the day before the by the international observers who had
arrived in Azerbaijan to monitor the election process.

Special activity today was observed at the polling station N6 of the
election districts N29 of Sabail district located in Baku
school-lyceum “Intellect” named after Tofig Ismayilov, where
President of the Republic of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev and first lady
Mehriban Aliyeva arrived to vote at 11 a.m.

After the voting, the President viewed the school at which he used to
study.

Then, the Head of State answered questions from local and foreign
journalists.

Q: Mr. President, what is you opinion about the course of the
elections, and do you generally think about raising the status of
municipalities after the elections?

A: I am sure the elections will be going well. This is the second
municipality election in Azerbaijan and there is certain experience.
The status of municipalities will be probably raised; they will be
engaged in concrete activities at the local level. So, this
institution is already formed in Azerbaijan, and will be developed in
the future.

Q: Mr. President, what do you think about non-participation of the
opposition, and some political parties in the elections?

A. I consider every political force should take part in all
elections. Especially, taking into account that now there is no
quorum factor in elections in Azerbaijan, and therefore it has no use
of boycott. As to the reason of their non-participation, there is
also no secret. General state of opposition, of course, does not
allow them to assist their candidates in places. Besides, the
opposition has few candidates in places. Current state of opposition
shows that they are possibly obliged to hide their force, or,
weakness and have chosen the tactics of boycott. But this is their
concern, and I do not interfere with.

Q. Mr. President, You have stated in London that we are need for
active and constructive opposition. You have regretted that there is
no such an opposition in Azerbaijan. What should be done to achieve
this and when we shall have such an opposition?

A. You know, this question does not depend only on the power, or any
political party. Now, in Azerbaijan, there is every condition to
engage in political activity. There is an ongoing democratic process
in Azerbaijan, significant steps are taken for democratization of
society and the international organizations watch and support it.

Azerbaijan implements all obligations it has taken before the
international organizations. It means, there is every condition for
activity of normal opposition. As to when they will be more active,
this depends on their activity. I have stated many times that the
political forces that failed in presidential and parliament
elections, of course, will not be shown any respect. The opposition
should be renewed, new forces and new leaders should come to
opposition. Hostility should remain in past. We need constructive
relations. Unfortunately, despite our efforts, it was not possible
normal dialogue with leaders of the present opposition. The future
will show, in any case, I am not satisfied with current situation. I
consider, after parliament elections, the opposition cannot pull
together from the blow it stroke itself. When it will come to itself,
the time will show.

Q. Mr. President, You are expected to visit Iran shortly. Azerbaijan
takes into account sensitiveness of Iran in connection with the
Middle East problem, the Middle East policy. But last days, it seems
Iran, in its policy towards Armenia, does not take into consideration
sensitiveness of Azerbaijan connected to the Nagorny Karabakh
question. Will You focus the item during your visit?

A. You know, Azerbaijan pursues an independent foreign policy. Our
bilateral relations should also meet interests of both countries. The
latest dialogue established between Azerbaijan and Iran shows that
when the countries do not interfere with internal affairs of each
other, it became possible to establish good relations. We adhere
these principles. I am pleased that the latest relations between Iran
and Azerbaijan are created just on this ground. We establish our
links on mutual respect and understanding. You, possibly, have seen
that the dialogue between Iran and Azerbaijan has intensified. The
documents signed during successful visit of the Iranian president to
Azerbaijan gives reason to say that there will be opportunity for
real affairs in the years ahead.

As to the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict, Iran has many times openly
supported territorial integrity of Azerbaijan. In general, Iran has
supported Azerbaijan in this question, on all the international
organizations, including in the United Nations in the latest time
Iran held a positive position. As to the links of Iran with other
countries, of course, it is its own concern to keep relations with
Armenia or other country.

At the same time, we live in a sensitive region and territorial
integrity of Azerbaijan has been violated, Armenia has occupied
Azerbaijan lands. As a result, one million of our citizens have
become refugees and IDPs. All these factors, of course, should be
taken into account in the ongoing processes in region. I hope the
aggressor should be unequivocally blamed for establishment of peace
and stability here and the international organizations, regional
states should state their positions in this question.

Q. Mr. President, there is consent between foreign ministers of
Azerbaijan and Armenia to resume second round of the talks on
settlement of the Nagorny Karabakh problem. What has given the first
round to Azerbaijan and what will bring the second round?

A. I would not divide it to phases. I consider the process of
negotiations goes ahead at all. To view the history of negotiations,
there appeared some new frames of talks in the last year. Especially,
there is a process called “the Prague process” and the OSCE documents
already refer to the Prague process. What is the Prague process?
Simply, it is phase-by-phase settlement of the problem. You know that
Azerbaijan’s position in this question is resolute and unambiguous. I
am pleased that the forces engaged in the questions come closer. The
phase-by-phase settlement is a key to this problem. The future talks,
therefore, should be carried out in this frame. I consider that
should the talks be constructive, the Armenian side, as earlier,
should not step back from the agreed positions, we can come to
certain consent.

But I want to draw your attention to the following question. As you
know, being recently in Armenia, chairman of the State Duma of Russia
has stated that Armenia is an advanced post of Russia on the Southern
Caucasus. We always considered that Armenia is the state, and now
appeared, that it is an advanced post. Therefore, we now do not know
with whom to negotiate – with an advanced post or with its owner? If
Armenia will be determined on the given question, the best conditions
for successful negotiating will be created.

Q. Mr. President, was the rise in price of project “Shahdeniz” for 25
percent was discussed with the international financial organizations?

A. The said questions were discussed. Being in London, I discussed
this question also with the management of the Bp Company. Certainly,
it disturbs both the investor and us. In the oil industry there are
such facts. And the project is very large. It is extremely important
project for Azerbaijan, its future. Both sides are interested in that
charges have not increased. But also in case of increase we cannot
leave uncompleted our common deed. Therefore, the “Shahdeniz” project
should be carried out by all means. Azerbaijan will involve the
oil-and-gas potential in full scale.

Q. Mr. President, I would touch the following moment connected to our
internal affairs. It is connected to education system of Azerbaijan.
Despite of presence of problems in education system of Azerbaijan, in
the country already during many years the law on education in any way
does not pass. Every time when you are interested, the management of
parliament, chairman of the commission answer: “There are extremely
important points which we should coordinate with the President.
Whether you will hold within the next few days the said question
under attention, and, as a whole how you would want to see this
system?

A. As you know, I am not the expert in the said area. Certainly, for
me the opinion of experts becomes decisive. I talked to management of
parliament about it, carried out exchange of opinions. But I want
that experts have expressed their opinion. In that bill, there are
some moments, which are perceived ambiguously. I repeat again – I
never prosecute subjects in which deeply I do not understand. I want
that wide discussions have been carried out, various opinions, that
this question has been investigated in all details. Only then, my
position will become known. I think that at present stage, there is a
necessity for wide discussions, all disputable moments should be
analyzed, and offers are brought.

Q. Mr. President, in connection with situation on the
Georgia-Azerbaijan border you have stated that investigations will
continue until doubts will be eliminated. How are the things now?

Mr. President, as the second part of this question. We would like to
know your attitude as the President, to the occurring events
concerning Azerbaijanis living in Georgia. Whether disturb you events
occurring there?

A. The question on border has cleared up and various measures have
been taken. Representatives of corresponding structures of Azerbaijan
already are in Georgia and together with the colleagues carry out
investigation. As I have already noted, after we completely shall
make sure that it will be impossible to transport a gram of cargo to
Armenia, all problems on border will be eliminated. The Georgian side
also with understanding approaches the given question and our
position. As you know, in Georgia there is a powerful struggle
against smuggling, in Azerbaijan, this struggle is at the same high
level. There were cases of smuggling, cases of falsification, swindle
and therefore there was possible transportation of cargoes to Armenia
through territory of Azerbaijan.

Now it will not be possible. We have put an end to this and we do not
allow it more. If there will be established normal regime there,
certainly, the border will be open. Otherwise, the border will remain
closed. We understand, that it also damages us and in the certain
sense the damage is rendered also to Georgia. But we do not have
other way.

As if to your second question, that, certainly, the quiet life of
Azerbaijanis abroad is for us extremely important question. Making
visits to the countries in which Azerbaijanis compactly live, I
always carried out meetings with their representatives, expressed my
sincere feelings, the given question is constantly discussed with
heads of these countries. In Ukraine, Russia, Georgia where our
Diaspora, our live… The given question was discussed with management
of these countries. For example, being in Russia, as you remember,
for the first time the President of Russia and I have taken part in
the Forum of All-Russia Congress. After that the best conditions for
quiet life of Azerbaijanis there have been created.

I can tell, that, being in Georgia, for the first time in the
history, the head of Azerbaijan together with the President of
Georgia have visited places of residing of Azerbaijanis. The given
question repeatedly has been discussed at all levels. Certainly, at
level with all other inhabitants of Georgia, the Azerbaijanis enjoy
the equal rights on all questions. But it is the fact, that
Azerbaijanis living in Georgia are citizens of Georgia. Certainly,
they should respect the laws of Georgia, not suppose cases of
infringement of the law, provocations. There are some forces, which
aspire to strike on relations between Georgia and Azerbaijan. We
know, who are these forces. Unfortunately, such forces are also
inside Azerbaijan. But the main forces are outside of Azerbaijan. We
do not suppose that certain damage has been caused to strategic
partnership between Georgia and Azerbaijan. We cannot admit that
there was any obstacle for our joint activity. We should not succumb
to any provocation, diversion.

Our embassy in Georgia works very actively. Meetings with all
executives are on regular basis carried out. We keep links at all
levels, and I am confident, that the accrued discontent will be
eliminated shortly.

Q. Mr. President, the decision concerning date of discussions on the
beginning of process of negotiations between Turkey and the European
Union will be made today. Irrespective of, will this date be
determined or not, how you estimate it from the point of view of
regional policy?

A. No, it will be determined and there cannot be such thing. It
should be necessarily determined. I have repeatedly said – injustice
of some circles in relation to Turkey is inadmissible. Turkey for a
long time already should become a member of the European Union. For
this purpose, Turkey has all opportunities and right. But we see,
that in the world, there are double standards, and it is proved in
various questions. I am confident and I hope, that today this
historical decision will be made and between Turkey and the European
Union negotiations will begin. Certainly, as a result of these
negotiations, Turkey should and will become a full member of the
European Union. Here, there cannot be any conditions. There should be
an identical approach. If not will be the identical approach, then,
as a whole, we cannot even speak on justice, human rights and
democracies in the world. In some cases we see that in the given
questions there appear discrimination. In the attitude to our region,
under covering of democracy and human rights, the certain political
intentions are pursued. But when the genuine democracy undergoes
test, we see that there are other approaches. Therefore, there should
be single approach to all questions. In the question of territorial
integrity, admission of Turkey into the European Union, the
Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict, there should be a single position.
Otherwise, let there nobody does remarks to us.

Q. Mr. President, I want to ask last question. At presidential
elections, very active role has played the youth, which was one of
your basic supports. But today the youth expects from you solution of
some problems in the country. And those young people in the country,
which take a stable place of work and stable earnings, face a serious
problem of habitation. But in the country, the law on the mortgage
does not inure in any way, and the youth waits for it from you. Will
the question be under your attention?

A. Yes, you are right. Unfortunately, the mentioned question yet has
not found its reflection in life. Though, we know, in other cities,
in other countries, these projects are very successfully carried out.
In particular, the mortgage will allow providing young people with
houses and habitation.

As you know, my attitude to youth always was very good. To tell the
truth, I am already above this age, but despite of it, I feel always
with them. I aspire and shall aspire henceforth to that the new
generation growing up in Azerbaijan was even more educated, knowing,
loved the Motherland even more. For achievement of it, I do my
utmost. In my last activity – in sphere of sports it also has found
the reflection.

For example, as you know, on the basis of the adopted program within
forthcoming three years all schools in Azerbaijan will be equipped
with computers. Even at the smallest school in the most remote area,
a computer class will be created. It means knowledge, it means
education, and it means future. That is, all these questions
constantly are in the center of my attention. The same is in the
field of mortgage and we shall undertake certain measures.
Corresponding instructions have been given, now the question is
studied. I hope that shortly we shall start solution of the said
question.

Thanks.

–Boundary_(ID_KIz5ewzZ50+maeiILyJ9rg)–

ANKARA: Turkish Historical Society Chairman Says He Can ProvideDocum

Anadolu Agency
Dec 17 2004

Turkish Historical Society Chairman Says He Can Provide Documents On
How Armenians Massacred More Than 519,000 Turks

ANKARA (AA) – Turkish Historical Society (TTK) Chairman Prof. Dr.
Yusuf Halacoglu has stated that there is no document that could lead
to accusation of Turkey with the so-called Armenian genocide.
”However, I can easily provide documents how 519,000 Turks were
massacred by Armenians along with the names of villages these Turks
lived in,” said Halacoglu.
Halacoglu remarked that the issue of the so-called Armenian
genocide must be discussed extensively and in details by a committee
of scholars from Turkey, Armenia, Great Britain, France, Germany,
Austria, Russia and the United States who will convene to study
Russian, British, American, French and Armenian confidential and
classified documents. ”Those who continuously talk about genocide
should reveal what they had in their own archives. Lets see what they
have in Hinchak archives. We will possibly see in that archive how
the Armenians massacred Turks, and how they planned such brutal acts,
and why they massacred Turks,” told Halacoglu.

-OTTOMAN ARCHIVES-

Halacoglu said that they opened Ottoman archives and they even
put it into internet. Halacoglu further expressed that based on their
studies in the archives worldwide, they have not come across even
with a single document that may prove Armenian claims of a genocide.
”Did the Armenians suffer difficulty which could be termed as a
tragedy? Yes. Yet the Turks suffered more than the Armenians. The
Muslims suffered a true tragedy. Armenians constantly claim that
there was a genocide committed by Turks. We must note that the
Armenians can not refer to any document which may prove that there
was indeed a genocide. The bottom line is that the Armenians are
lying.”

-ATTITUDE OF FRANCE-

Halacoglu said France refers to the incidents about Armenians in
early 20th century as ”tragedy.” ”How were relations between
France and the Armenians at the time? How did France use and arm the
Armenians of the Ottoman Empire against the Ottoman army? How many
Armenian legionnaires were there in French Army? What was the birth
places of those legionnaires? Were those people from Ottoman Empire
or Armenia? What were French and Armenian ties during the Dardanelles
wars? Who were the Armenians died between 1914-1918 for France?” The
beginning of discussions of the issue with France will also reveal
the role France played in the ”tragedy” of Armenians. ”If they
trust themselves, they must speak about this issue as well.”
Halacoglu stated that, in historical discussions, the documents
submitted play a vital role in coming to conclusions. ”That’s why
they refrain from discussing it. The Armenians have no documents
proving the so-called genocide and they are reluctant to join
discussions on the so-called genocide of Armenians. The Armenians do
not want to abandon the current political benefits of claiming that
they suffered a genocide,” said Halacoglu. ”Armenians are afraid of
the consequences of a historical committee’s conclusions. Having no
document on a genocide, Armenians prefer to stay away from historical
discussions of historians.”
”Currently, France attempts to please its domestic Armenian
population by putting forward the issue continuously,” he said,
”France promised Armenians in 1918 that it would strongly support an
Armenian state in Cilicia and now it pays the price of this
promise.”

-ARMENIAN DOCTORS-

Halacoglu told that Armenian claims that assert the use of
Armenians as guinea-pigs in vaccination tests are also baseless.
”What will do Armenians do if I prove that half of the doctors
conducting tests were of Armenian origin? What will be the Armenian
reaction if I prove that Armenian doctors used Armenian patients as
guinea-pigs?”
Noting that there is no document that could lead Turkey’s being
accused with the so-called Armenian genocide, Halacoglu said:
”However, I can easily provide documents how 519,000 Turks were
massacred by Armenians along with the names of villages these Turks
lived in.”
Halacoglu said that he could also prove that the officials
claimed to misuse their authority were brought before Ottoman courts.

-”WE’LL MAKE PUBLIC THE DOCUMENTS WE HAVE”-

Halacoglu criticized the ”Armenian Genocide Museum” Director’s
comments about the Turkish Historical Society that this society can
not be trusted. ”It is not yet known whether the Armenian delegation
will attend an upcoming meeting in Vienna in 2005. We find it hard to
understand why the Armenians look at the TTK as untrustable. Of
course, they do not have to believe us. We are not establishing a
firm. We will just make a discussion with scientists. It is not so
important if the scientists trust each other in a discussion. We will
just speak on the documents that we put forward. Consequently,
neither do I nor does he have to trust each other. We have to discuss
this as scientists and civilized human beings without deviating from
humanely values. We are always ready for such a discussion.”
”The meeting between Turkish and Armenian delegations were
planned to be held in Vienna in 2005 after two processes of document
exchange. But this meeting seems not certain. If they do not show up
in this meeting, we will make public the documents we have.”

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress