Armenian businessman Ghazarian denies report in Turkey daily

ARMENIAN BUSINESSMAN DENIES REPORT IN TURKISH DAILY

ArmenPress
Feb 10 2005

YEREVAN, FEBRUARY 10, ARMENPRESS: Arsen Ghazarian, the chairman of
the Union of Manufacturers and Businessmen, denied today a report by
a Turkish daily Zaman that said Ghazarian and Sarkis Asatrian, the
head of the Youth Party of Armenia, met Wednesday in Ankara with
Ankara Trade Chamber president Sinan Aygun.
Aygun was quoted by Zaman as saying that turning incidents of the
past into a blood feud will bring no benefit, but only disturb
people.
Speaking to Armenpress Arsen Ghazarian said no delegation visited
Turkey and never met with Aygun. “The report in Zaman is another
concoction of the Turkish press and it is not the first instance when
I have to deny its reports. This comes to prove one again that one
should not take seriously what Turkish newspapers write,” he said.

BAKU: FM of Azerbaijan meets with Turkish president in Ankara

FOREIGN MINISTER OF AZERBAIJAN MEETS WITH TURKISH PRESIDENT IN ANKARA

Azer Tag, Azerbaijan
Feb 10 2005

[February 10, 2005, 21:30:16]

Foreign Minister of Azerbaijan Elmar Mammadyarov, who arrived February
10 in Ankara at the invitation of his Turkish counterpart Abdullah
Gul, was received on the same day by President of the country Ahmet
Necdet Sezer.

Minister E. Mammadyarov conveyed to the Turkish President greetings
and invitation to visit Baku from President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev,
and updated him on his official visit to Ankara.

For his part, President Ahmet Necdet Sezer asked the Minister pass
on his greetings to President Ilham Aliyev, and noted that social
and political processes taking place in Azerbaijan are in the focus
of his constant attention.

The meeting was also focused on a number of political, economic and
cultural issues including those related to the Armenia-Azerbaijan,
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, construction of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan
oil and Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum gas pipelines, Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway,
as well as some regional and international problems.

Classical Spin: Anja Lechner and Vassilis Tsabropoulos

Georgia Straight, Canada
Feb 10 2005

Classical Spin: Anja Lechner and Vassilis Tsabropoulos
By alexander varty

Publish Date: 10-Feb-2005

Chants, Hymns and Dances (ECM New Series)

As gurus go, Georges Ivanovich Gurdjieff was not a bad one. Even if
he did like his acolytes to keep him in baronial splendour, his
open-ended belief system–which included elements of Christian,
Buddhist, and Sufi thought as well as a kind of sceptical
humanism–remains a useful guide to navigating the world.

The Greek-Armenian mystic, who died in 1949, viewed music and
movement as powerful conduits for the divine presence, and his
students were required to embrace a variety of “sacred gymnastics”
aimed at calming the mind and strengthening the body. These gestures
were often accompanied by melodies created by Gurdjieff and arranged
for piano by his musically gifted student Thomas de Hartmann. Chants,
Hymns and Dances includes 11 of these short works, sensitively
performed by cellist Anja Lechner and pianist Vassilis Tsabropoulos,
in addition to five similarly flavoured pieces written by the latter.

In hindsight, it’s easy to see Gurdjieff’s music as a precursor of
the contemporary school known as sacred minimalism. Like Arvo Pärt
and John Tavener, the most acclaimed exponents of that relatively new
genre, Gurdjieff sought to express spiritual ecstasy in a musical
marriage of East and West. As interpreted by Lechner and
Tsabropoulos, his tunes are haunting and timeless; the pianist’s own
compositions are also dark without being dour and contemplative
without being catatonia-inducing. Music does have magical powers to
unlock deep feeling, and there’s proof of that in every note on this
lovely CD.

–Boundary_(ID_6YbzjdpbNE4128uxB/rW0g)–

Beirut: Lebanon’s Eligible Voters are 59% Muslims, 40.8% Christians,

Lebanon’s Eligible Voters are 59% Muslims, 40.8% Christians, 0.2% Jews

NaharNet.com, Lebanon (LebaneseLobby.org)
Feb 10 2005

Naharnet.com

The interior ministry posted the final lists of eligible voters with
official departments responsible for Lebanon’s 26 electoral districts
on Thursday, showing a drastic Muslim majority over Christian
communities.

The figures, as reported by An Nahar, show that Lebanon nowadays has
a total of 3,029,138 eligible voters–51.4% females and 48.6% males.
Muslims make up 59%, Christians 40.8% and Jews 0.2%.

The lists also show that 26.5% of the voters are Sunni Muslims, 26.2%
Shiites, 22.1% Maronites, 7% Greek Orthodox, 5.6% Druze, 5.2%
Catholics and 3% Armenian Orthodox. Other sectarian denominations
account for the rest at less than 1% each.

With more than three million are eligible to vote, Lebanon’s overall
population would probably stand at more than five million.

Family’s tale illuminates old tragedy

Family’s tale illuminates old tragedy
By CAROLYN FEIBEL, STAFF WRITER

NorthJersey.com, NJ
Feb 10 2005

Penal Code 306 really makes his blood boil.

Peter Balakian, a poet and historian who grew up in Bergen County,
understands you’ve probably never heard of 306, a Turkish law enacted
last September. That’s one reason he’s trekking cross-country to
promote his book on the genocide of more than 1 million Armenians in
Turkey 90 years ago.

Penal Code 306 punishes people who speak about the genocide with up
to 10 years in prison. If Germany passed a similar law about the
Holocaust, there would rightly be a global outcry, Balakian said. On
306, there’s been hardly a peep.

In a way, Balakian said, that’s not surprising. The slaughter and
expulsion of Armenian Christians from 1915 to 1923 – the “forgotten
genocide” – has long been denied by the Turkish government. But
historians agree it was a well-documented tragedy that ushered in a
new type of state-sponsored mass killing.

Balakian, 53, teaches poetry and genocide studies at Colgate
University in New York. He grew up in Teaneck and then Tenafly, part
of North Jersey’s Armenian community. Although his grandmother was a
genocide survivor, he knew little about her story when he was a
child. His 1997 memoir, “Black Dog of Fate,” chronicles languid
Sundays spent eating cheese pastries and lamb kebabs out on the
patio. While family members celebrated Armenian foods and Armenian
painters, it was harder for them to talk about the genocide.

To fill in the gaps, Balakian began researching his own family’s
trauma. His grandmother lost her first husband in a massacre, endured
a death march with two young daughters and eventually secured their
passage to New Jersey, where she married an Armenian man working in
Paterson’s silk mills.

“She was almost a widow bride,” Balakian said. “Out of the mouth of
death.”

While promoting the memoir, Balakian realized that Americans from all
cultures have forgotten their own historical connection to the
Armenian genocide. Starting in the 1890s, he said, Turkish
persecution of Armenians was the charitable cause in the United
States, drawing in celebrities, rich industrialists, writers,
suffragists and politicians.

Balakian’s new book, “The Burning Tigris: The Armenian Genocide and
America’s Response,” aims to resurrect that forgotten history.

“It was America’s first international human rights movement, and
nothing has ever topped it in longevity or intensity,” Balakian said.
“It’s the first harnessing of a civilian response and
non-governmental organizations and philanthropy.”

Key leaders included Julia Ward Howe, a suffragist and author of “The
Battle Hymn of the Republic,” and Clara Barton, head of the American
Red Cross. The movement attracted writers (Ezra Pound, Henry James),
politicians (Theodore Roosevelt), wealthy philanthropists (John D.
Rockefeller and Henry Ford). Thousands of high schools, churches,
synagogues, Kiwanis Clubs and Rotary Clubs collected donations to
save “the starving Armenians.”

The movement raised $110 million for relief – equivalent to $1.3
billion today – for food and medical supplies for refugee camps and
schools for Armenian orphans. Donations also helped Armenians
resettle in Europe and America.

Many settled in North Jersey. Bergen County now has a thriving
community of more than 8,300 Armenian-Americans, almost 1 percent of
the population.

Balakian said the movement drew on the same utopian, spiritual
energies that fueled abolition, civil rights and feminism – but it
has largely faded from accounts of American history.

“There’s been a big misunderstanding of this, that Americans didn’t
understand this, and didn’t care,” he said. “That’s crazy.”

Balakian recounts in the book how the word “genocide” and the phrase
“crimes against humanity” were first coined in response to the
Armenian slaughter. But he said the grass-roots movement could not
persuade the U.S. government to intervene.

“My book is the story of American gridlock,” he said. “We have the
people petitioning for real intervention and real justice and we have
the State Department refusing to take political action.”

Balakian believes the book could help to reawaken Americans to the
roots of their human rights activities.

“It set in motion the traditions we now have for international human
rights work and activism, such as Amnesty [International], the
engagements with the Balkans … and the Holocaust Museum. All owe
something to a process that started back then in the period of the
1890s to 1920s.”

Aftershocks of Ukraine and Georgia are stirring up rallies in Centra

Aftershocks of Ukraine and Georgia are stirring up rallies in Central Asia.
By Fred Weir, Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor

Democracy rising in ex-Soviet states
February 10, 2005

MOSCOW – The peaceful street revolts that recently brought democratic
change to Georgia and Ukraine could spawn copy-cat upheavals against
authoritarian regimes across the former Soviet Union, experts say.

Waving orange scarves and banners – the colors of Ukraine’s revolution
– dozens of Uzbeks demonstrated in the capital Tashkent last week
over the demolition of their homes to make way for border fencing.

According to the Institute for War and Peace Reporting, the protest
compelled the autocratic government of Islam Karimov, widely condemned
for human rights abuses, to pay compensation.

In Bishkek, capital of Kyrgyzstan, hundreds of pro-democracy activists
rallied on Saturday to demand that upcoming parliamentary elections
be free and fair.

>> From Kyrgyzstan on the Chinese border to Moldova, where Europe’s
only ruling Communist Party faces elections next month, opposition
parties are eagerly studying Georgia’s “Rose Revolution” and Ukraine’s
“Orange Revolution,” which led to the triumph of pro-democracy
forces. Opposition groups are even selecting symbols for their banners
when the moment arrives – tulips for the Kyrgyz opposition, grapes
for Moldova’s anticommunists.

“The recent events in Ukraine have made people everywhere understand
that taking to the streets gets the authorities’ attention,” says
Tatiana Poloskova, deputy director of the independent Institute of
Modern Diaspora, which studies Russian minorities in former Soviet
countries.

Georgian President Mikhael Saakashvili and newly inaugurated Ukrainian
President Viktor Yushchenko were clearly addressing their former
Soviet colleagues last month when they hailed their revolts as the
leading edge of “a new wave of liberation that will lead to the final
victory of freedom and democracy on the continent of Europe.”

The prospect has sent shudders through the Kremlin, still smarting from
the “loss” of pro-Moscow regimes in Georgia and Ukraine, and reeling
in the face of its own grass-roots revolt by pensioners protesting
cuts in social services. For Russia, where authoritarian methods have
been taking root under President Vladimir Putin (news – web sites),
the prospect of pro-democracy rebellions sweeping the former Soviet
Union seems to threaten the underpinnings of domestic stability. The
pro-Western bent of the new regimes in Ukraine and Georgia may also
threaten the economic ties Russia has built with post-Soviet regimes
from Armenia to Uzbekistan.

First in line could be Kyrgyzstan, where any official attempt
to rig parliamentary elections slated for Feb. 27 could trigger
Ukrainian popular action. Strongman Askar Akayev, who’s ruled the tiny
central Asian state for the past 15 years, has already faced street
demonstrations over a failed attempt to ban his chief opponent from
the parliamentary race. Mr. Akayev has pledged to step down in October,
and appears to be grooming his daughter, Bermet, to succeed him. After
a recent Moscow visit with Vladimir Putin, Akayev warned that if the
opposition takes to the streets, “it would lead to civil war.”

But some Russian experts see a “Tulip Revolution” in the near
future for Kyrgyzstan, which hosts both Russian and US military
bases. “Akayev is lost,” says Alexei Malashenko, an expert with the
Carnegie Center in Moscow. “The opposition is strong, well-organized,
and has international as well as domestic backing.”

The Kremlin may fear that political ferment in Kyrgyzstan could spread
to more important allies in central Asia. The long-time leader of
oil-rich Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev, who has fixed elections
and changed the Constitution to extend his rule, last month dissolved
the leading opposition party after it sent a delegation to Ukraine
to study the Orange Revolution. He also moved to close down a local
institute funded by global financier George Soros, who has backed
pro-democracy movements in Ukraine and elsewhere.

In Uzbekistan, which also hosts a key US military base, President
Karimov, a former Soviet politburo member, has ruled with an iron fist
since the demise of the USSR. Karimov recently jeered publicly at those
“who are dying to see that the way the elites in Georgia and Ukraine
changed becomes a model to be emulated in other countries.” He warned
bluntly: “We have the necessary force for that.”

Some experts argue that, while velvet revolution may be possible in
semi-authoritarian Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan, it is a very distant
prospect in Uzbekistan because democracy and civil society are barely
developed there. Last week’s protests in Tashkent, though based on
a narrow economic issue, hint that instability may lie just beneath
the regime’s tough and orderly surface.

Uzbekistan’s gas-rich neighbor, Turkmenistan, is run by a North
Korean-style dictatorship that permits no dissent of any kind. “In
absolutely authoritarian regimes like [Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan]
the threat of ‘Orange Revolution’ is just used by the leaders to
crack down harder,” says Masha Lipman, an expert with the Carnegie
Center in Moscow. “There is no chance for the opposition to actually
organize anything, much less a revolution.”

That paradox may help to explain why Georgians were able to rally
successfully against the lethargic regime of Eduard Shevardnadze, when
it attempted to rig the 2003 parliamentary polls, while protesters
in neighboring Azerbaijan were put down when the much more efficient
dictatorship of Gaidar Aliyev imposed the succession of his son,
Ilham, through fraudulent elections just a month earlier.

Ukrainians were able to successfully mobilize against vote-rigging late
last year in part because Ukraine had relatively free institutions,
including a parliament and Supreme Court that the president was not
able to control. In next-door Belarus, which US Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice (news – web sites) has labeled “the last outpost
of tyranny in Europe,” dictator Alexander Lukashenko has crushed the
opposition and banished nongovernmental organizations, and looks set
to be handily reelected in showpiece elections later this year.

But an upsurge looks increasingly likely in ex-Soviet Moldova, where
Communist President Vladimir Voronin has lost Moscow support. He faces
a strong challenge in next month’s parliamentary elections from the
pro-Western Christian Democrats, who reportedly are sporting orange
scarves and flags in the capital.

“The Kremlin suddenly finds itself severely challenged to change its
strategies, both at home and in former Soviet countries,” says Sergei
Kazyonnov, an expert with the independent Institute for National
Security and Strategic Research in Moscow. “It can go on depending
on political manipulations and under-the-carpet deals with local
elites. But it is already becoming obvious that there are just too many
different realities here, and an unworkable multiplicity of carpets.”

e-SIM MMI to Provide Complex Language Support for Mobile Handsets wi

e-SIM MMI to Provide Complex Language Support for Mobile Handsets with
nCore’s Multilingual Software; Companies Partner to Provide Complete Rendering and
Editing of Complex Languages on Mobile Handsets

Business Wire
Feb 10, 2005

e-SIM Ltd. (OTCBB: ESIMF.OB), a leading provider of MMI (Man-Machine
Interface) solutions for mobile handsets and nCore Ltd. a leading
provider of internationalization solutions, announced today that
they have partnered to supply complete multiple-language support
for mobile handsets. To facilitate the success of this solution the
companies have integrated nCore’s multilingual engine, nScript, into
e-SIM’s MMI solution. e-SIM plans on supplying the nScript engine as
part of its complete MMI offering to its customers.

With this partnership, e-SIM’s customers will be able to sell handsets,
which include complete editing and rendering support for languages
such as Arabic, Armenian, Chinese, Russian, Farsi, Georgian, Greek,
Hebrew, Hindi, Japanese, Malay, Malayalam, Pashto, Takalog, Thai,
Urdu and Vietnamese, in addition to the Latin and Chinese scripts
already supported by e-SIM. nScript will also enable handsets, based on
e-SIM’s MMI solution, to include a rich text editor, which allows for
the creation of styled text messages that can include in-line graphics.

e-SIM’s market-proven, end-to-end MMI solution includes a complete MMI
reference design, a comprehensive set of RapidPLUS(TM) development
and customization tools, and a broad range of professional
services. e-SIM’s business model is based on licensing its MMI
reference design, licensing its RapidPLUS(TM) development tools,
and collecting runtime royalties for each handset incorporating
its technology.

nCore’s multilingual engine, nScript, is an embedded software component
optimized for devices with limited memory and processor speed. The
restricted operating environment, together with the complex algorithms
needed for text layout, place tough demands on efficiency of design
and implementation. nScript implements two main components of any
user interface design: sophisticated text rendering and text input.

The e-SIM – nCore integrated product will be demonstrated at
the upcoming 3GSM World Congress in Cannes between February
14th and 17th. To schedule a demonstration please contact
mailto:[email protected].

“Collaboration between e-SIM and nCore further enhances our complete,
pre-integrated MMI solution,” commented Reuven Kleinman, VP Business
Development and Marketing at e-SIM. “With nCore’s technology, e-SIM
can now provide handset manufacturers a competitive edge entering
the fast-growing emerging markets in Asia and the Middle East.”

“We are excited to see the nCore localization technology integrated
with e-SIM’s complete MMI solution and look forward to a long term
partnership. With this cooperation e-SIM licensees are getting the
best value and performance proposition for designing handsets for
all market areas.” said Tapio Koivuniemi, CEO of nCore Ltd.

About e-SIM Ltd.

Founded in 1990, e-SIM Ltd. () is a major
provider of MMI (Man-Machine Interface) solutions for wireless and
other electronic products. A wide range of platform vendors and
wireless handset manufacturers use e-SIM’s MMI solutions including
Texas Instruments, Freescale (formerly Motorola SPS), NEC, Kyocera,
BenQ, Sasken, and others. e-SIM’s advanced MMI solution technology
is built into millions of handsets on the market today.

About nCore Ltd.

Focused on localization of embedded devices, nCore
Ltd. () is specialized in making the latest
technological advancements accessible globally. The company’s main
product is a multilingual text rendering engine and editor. nCore’s
internationalization technology enables access to all market areas
world-wide.

Certain matters discussed in this news release are forward-looking
statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties including,
but not limited to, significant fluctuations and unpredictability of
operating results, risks in product and technology development and
rapid technological change, dependence on a single product line,
extent of demand for the Company’s product, impact of competitive
products and pricing, market acceptance, lengthy sales cycle, changing
economic conditions, risks of joint development projects, dependence
on key personnel, difficulties in managing growth, risks relating
to sales and distribution, risks associated with international
sales, risks of product defects, dependence on company proprietary
technology. For a more detailed discussion of these and other risk
factors, see the Company’s Form 20-F as filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission.e-SIM Ltd. Media: Yardena Cogan,
+1 888-742-9364 [email protected] or Investors: Yaron Eldad,
+972-2-587-0770 [email protected] or nCore Ltd. Tapio Koivuniemi,
+358 50 386 9143 [email protected]

http://www.e-sim.com/
http://www.ncore.fi

ANKARA: Turkish foreign minister: Karabakh solution will establishre

Turkish foreign minister: Karabakh solution will establish regional peace

TRT 1 television, Ankara
10 Feb 05

[Announcer] Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul, reacting to views that the
Turkish-Armenian border should be opened in the EU accession process,
stated: The people of Azerbaijan should not worry. For peace, the
occupation of Nagorno-Karabakh should come to an end.

Gul met with Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov, who is
currently visiting Ankara. In a joint news conference, Gul declared
that the termination of the occupation in Nagorno-Karabakh is a
prerequisite for the establishment of peace in the region.

[Gul] We hope that these peace talks will be fruitful, and a peaceful
conclusion will be reached in this regard. We hope that the occupation
will end. Only then all the relations will be normalized. This is
what I have to say on this subject. Turkey’s theses on this issue
are evident. I encountered such questions when I visited Azerbaijan
as well. The people of Azerbaijan should not worry. Turkey’s policy
is very clear.

[Announcer] Mammadyarov, in turn, said that the Baku-Tbilisi-Erzurum
natural gas line can become operational in 2006 or 2007, adding that
this natural gas can be delivered to Europe via Turkey.

The Cyprus issue was also discussed at the meeting. Gul stated that a
step to be taken by Azerbaijan towards the removal of the isolation
imposed on the [self-declared] Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus
will serve as an example for other countries. Mammadyarov said that
his country is exploring the possibilities for cooperation, and it
will encourage Azerbaijani firms to invest in north Cyprus.

Georgian president urges better ties with Russia in address toparlia

Georgian president urges better ties with Russia in address to parliament

Rustavi-2 TV, Tbilisi
10 Feb 05

President Mikheil Saakashvili has set out the challenges he sees
facing Georgia in his annual address to parliament and said that he is
ready to go to Russia to meet President Putin to improve relations. He
said, however, that “compromise is a two-way street” and that the two
countries should meet each other halfway. He described relations with
Georgia’s other immediate neighbours, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkey,
as “ideal and idyllic” and again welcomed the election of Georgia’s
“friend” Viktor Yushchenko as Ukrainian president. Most of the
50-minute address was devoted to the government’s “achievements”
over the past 12 months. Saakashvili said that in that period a
“demoralized” country had been transformed into “a functioning state
with powerful institutions”. He also acknowledged the existence
of problems such as insufficient new jobs, low salaries in the
education sector and the need to reform the judiciary. The following
is an excerpt from Saakashvili’s address on 10 September, which was
broadcast live by Rustavi-2 TV; subheadings inserted editorially:

[Saakashvili] Madam Speaker, Your Holiness, esteemed chairman of the
Constitutional Court, chairman of the Supreme Court, esteemed members
of parliament and the public. Before I commence my speech, I would
like to say that much has been said about the late Zurab Zhvania in
recent days and I do not want to repeat anything. I simply want to
mention that the late Zurab Zhvania’s mother Rema and wife Nino are
attending this session today. I want us all to greet them as well as
[Zhvania’s children] little Liza, Busa and Anna. [Applause]

Please, take your seats.

Achievements

More than a year has passed since Georgia made its choice for
freedom and since the Georgian nation decided on the country’s new
orientation and embarked on a new, complex and ambitious road towards
regaining the motherland that had been lost and taken away from us. A
little more than a year has passed since I was sworn in as Georgia’s
president. Shortly afterwards this parliament was elected. I, as
a member of several previous parliaments, can say with confidence
that this is the best parliament to meet in this hall. Before we
begin discussing our present and future and before we talk about our
achievements and plans, I suggest we recall what Georgia was like a
year ago.

Georgia was a failed state – disintegrated, demoralized and
humiliated. It was a country that had lost all attributes of statehood;
a country where corruption, lawlessness and injustice reigned supreme;
a country where ordinary citizens were routinely cheated by the state;
a country where the state and its representatives were constantly
extorting money from ordinary citizens; a country that had no budget
and that never fulfilled social pledges to its citizens; a country
where human rights were blatantly violated; a country that had no
defence capabilities, not a single working tank or enough ammunition
to last for just an hour in battle. The army had been starving for
months. It was a country that had already disintegrated and fallen
into the hands of clans, feudal lords and fiefs.

We are now used to seeing in this hall the chairman of Ajaria’s
government and Ajaria’s other leaders. However, a year ago Ajaria
was ruled by a separatist feudal lord who, as a matter of principle,
refused to come to Tbilisi and the Georgian president had to pay
him visits and beg him to comply in a most humiliating way. It was a
country that had lost its international reputation and no-one anywhere
respected it; a country which was devoid of national ideals and which
had lost its direction and sense of purpose; a country that was losing
its most respectable sons and daughters every day and whose people
had completely lost a sense of unity; a country where citizens mainly
dreamt of escaping as quickly as possible and finding refuge abroad.

That is how we see it now and what the Georgian people has achieved
in a year, which is a negligible period in history.

This is certainly not the right time for self-congratulation. We have
no right to discuss or to be content with our achievements. Last year
was only a beginning. However, it is important to ask this question:
how much ground have we covered this year? Today Georgia is a proper
state. When people ask us about our main achievement, we say that
our main achievement is that for the first time in modern history,
Georgia has become a proper state.

The past year has witnessed budgetary successes, a tripling of
the budget, better revenue collection, the curbing of contraband,
introduction of a new tax code, successful work with all international
organizations. In that respect, Georgia is a model country where every
programme is working in a model way. Financial amnesty. These success
stories are important, however what they mean to our daily lives is
even more important. It means that we have managed to clear pension
and wage arrears accumulated over a decade. It means that we have kept
our promise and doubled pensions. Wages and pensions are being paid
without delay and we are all used to it now. It means that for the
first time in our country’s history government employees manage to
live on their salaries. That has become possible, so the main motive
for taking bribes has disappeared. It means social pledges that have
been fulfilled and increased wages in various sectors.

[Passage omitted]

Privatization

I would like to talk about our economic plans. We have begun the
privatization process and we must understand what it is for. It does
not mean, as is often presented, that we used to have property and
now we have none left. On the contrary, we have property that needs
investing in. This is not like the privatization that took place
before, like the so-called privatization programmes where people
would get facilities for free in return for investing 20m 20 years
later. No way, invest now so that you have a return on this investment,
so that you create jobs, so that enterprises start working and so
that we get some money out of this.

This is a favourable position to be in, especially for four major
sectors. This includes the energy sector. We have to improve power
supply by next winter, which at present is the biggest failure of
our government. Tbilisi and Batumi are supplied with electricity 24
hours a day, but in the rest of Georgia there are problems almost
everywhere. This is where investments have to be made and this is
what we need the money for.

In health care, we urgently need money to build new hospitals, because
we are losing our medicine, which is effectively is on the verge of
ruin. In education, we are building new schools. There will be a new
school of administration in Kutaisi where representatives of national
minorities will also study. It is very important that this school is
properly funded and that the funding of our universities and scholars
is also increased.

As regards defence capabilities, the country should no longer be
a pushover. All of this costs money and this money is not going to
come easily. Georgia has no oil, Georgia’s main asset is its people
and this asset should start working, people should start working in
enterprises and these enterprises should have real owners. This is
what privatization is about.

[Passage omitted]

Challenges, future reforms

Those were our achievements in the past year, and I am sure that this
is only a beginning. But I am asking this question: is it enough? Of
course not, we should not be content with it. Of course our main
goals are yet to be achieved. We are still facing major challenges.

We have managed to double pensions and establish order in the payment
of salaries. However – I know this very well and I always remember this
– we have not been able to increase salaries for teachers and other
education professionals, but we will certainly do it this year. We have
eradicated corruption and lawlessness in the energy sector, but, as you
know and as I have told you, this still remains a very serious problem
in some regions, especially in Samegrelo and Imereti. We have carried
out structural reorganization of the public sector, we have reduced
bureaucracy and streamlined the public sector. But we also had to make
job cuts, which was inevitable. No-one should have illusions about it.

Unfortunately, we have been unable to create a sufficient number
of new jobs in the private sector, and that is a very painful issue
for us. Georgia has managed to overcome a crisis when it seemed that
we were doomed to fail, but we have not been able to transform our
country into a European-type economy.

So what are our tasks now? Above all, it is new jobs. This cannot
be achieved through mechanical growth. We should develop spheres
which can create more jobs: tourism, tourism infrastructure, service
industries, processing of agricultural produce and penetration of
new markets. We should facilitate business initiatives not only
in Tbilisi but, especially, in other parts of Georgia. We should
develop infrastructure in order to develop business. But only the
state can invest in infrastructure projects like roads, bridges and
water supply systems. We should tackle the energy crisis. No matter
how much more electricity we produce, demand will continue to rise
as the economy grows.

We should complete education reforms. That is very important, we cannot
retreat here, and we will not give in to any blackmail, because that
is something our children, grandchildren and their grandchildren
will benefit from. That is something which will, in the long term,
transform Georgia into a truly developed country.

We should carry out reforms of the judiciary. When we started these
reforms, they were based on correct principles, but a dry place cannot
exist in the middle of a swamp. That reform was not followed by reforms
in the police and prosecutor’s office and, in reality, courts have
been discredited. I support the efforts by the parliament’s legal
committee. We will be unable to work miracles here, but we should
achieve real independence for the courts. This independence is not what
some judges think it is. This is not independence from conscience,
law and justice. This is independence from pressure, but it also
means an enormous responsibility to the public, rather than to the
authorities. Unfortunately, currently there is no such feeling of
responsibility in 90 per cent of the judiciary. This problem needs
serious attention if we want to achieve anything. I am grateful to
[Supreme Court Chairman] Mr Kote Kemularia who has started serious
processes. He will probably do more in his new position [as justice
minister]. He will also be chairman of the Council of Justice.

As regards local government reform, unlike my predecessor, I admit
that I am not good enough – and nobody is, not even some reincarnated
genius – to fill all local government jobs from the centre. That
is impossible, and whoever tried it has failed. Of course, at local
government level, district administrators and all mayors in Georgia
should be elected through an appropriate voting system. This should
be implemented next year, and we should pass appropriate legislation
this year.

I am grateful to Mr Vano Khukhunaishvili’s [parliamentary] committee
which has done a lot in this regard. I am grateful to Mr Ivliane
Khaindrava [MP] who has submitted very interesting proposals
about creating regional legislative bodies that would keep tabs
on the activities of appointed governors. We should implement the
subsidiarity principle in Georgia by taking into account all these
proposals and initiatives.

As regards the reduction of the number of parliament deputies to 150,
I discussed this issue with various parliamentary groups yesterday
and I am very grateful to all groups who supported this idea. This
is a test for Georgian parliamentarianism and the Georgian political
spectrum. Some 2.3m people said [in a 2003 referendum] that the
number of parliament deputies should not exceed 150. Anyone who
rejects this will be simply spitting in the face of 2.3m people.
We must understand this. In a normal, democratic country people would
never forgive that. Of course, this should be a balanced reduction,
of course there should remain at least 50 deputies from single-seat
constituencies, and of course the system of proportional representation
[party lists] should also be retained.

We should also think about establishing an upper house as it is in
other democratic countries. Work on this model is under way. Parliament
is based on the principle of checks and balances. Of course, we should
do it. This will be our main test which will reveal if this parliament
has again become a corporate parliament or it has developed into a
truly popular body which always listens to voters, a parliament which
always thinks how to interact with voters, rather than thinks that,
once elected, it can rest assured for four years.

I really admire our parliament. This is the first parliament which has
set a major record – for a year deputies have not beaten each other
up. That is an amazing achievement of Georgian democracy. [Passage
omitted]

Foreign relations

Now, as regards our foreign policy, you will have noticed that
Georgia has become a completely different country, a country that
is particularly attractive to the rest of the world. I know of few
countries in the world that attract such interest. I do not think
that what I have just said is an exaggeration.

This interest is justified not because Georgia’s leader has
destroyed something somewhere [reference to former President Eduard
Shevardnadze’s role in the fall of the Berlin Wall]. That is not a
good advertisement for Georgia, even if you have destroyed something
that was worth destroying.

This interest does not arise solely because we are some kind of
corridor [reference to President Shevardnadze’s Eurasian transit
corridor project]. However good the corridor, it is still not nice
when you are merely a corridor.

The reason for this interest is not that we have performed some miracle
here and that strange things keep happening here, so the entire world
is ready to support us as long as we calm down.

No, we are indeed an interesting country. Heads of several leading
committees in the Russian Duma, when asked about last year’s
highlights, named Georgian reforms. That is despite the fact that
throughout the year they were being shown films such as “Misha”
[profile of Saakashvili shown on Russian NTV last October] and others
portraying Georgia in the most terrible light. Nevertheless, they
have said that Georgia is a most successful country.

You have seen what happened in friendly Ukraine. Another country has
emerged on former Soviet territory which has a similar government
based on similar principles. Therefore, being a genuinely democratic
country, it is Georgia’s true friend. That is the elected government
of our friend [President] Viktor Yushchenko and [Prime Minister]
Yuliya Tymoshenko.

With our closest neighbours, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkey, we
have idyllic relations, ideal and idyllic. We should cherish these
relations.

Naturally, with our other neighbour, Russia, there were problems but
we should certainly overcome these problems. However, compromise is a
two-way street, rather than Chiaberashvili’s triangle in the centre of
Tbilisi [reference to a controversial one-way traffic system introduced
recently by Tbilisi mayor Zurab Chiaberashvili]. When we take steps,
so should the other party. When we compromise, so should the other
party. On these terms, we are ready to reach agreement.

I am ready to go to Moscow again. I am ready to meet President Putin
again. I am ready to extend our hand of friendship again, which,
despite the fact that Georgian society welcomed this a year ago,
has remained in the air.

We should also understand and we should agree – [changes thought]
By the way, I really liked [opposition Conservative Party MP] Koba
Davitashvili’s statement two days ago. There are many things Koba does
that I do not like at all. However, this was the right thing to do. He
said that there are certain principles which all political parties
should accept. No political party or person can overstep this mark.

We should all decide and agree on what these principles are. They
are Georgia’s European orientation, the principle that there should
be no foreign bases on Georgian territory, the principle that any
party announcing that Georgia does not need a European orientation,
will not integrate into international organizations we are trying
to join, that we need foreign bases and foreigners should interfere
in Georgia’s development by military or some other illegal means –
any such party should automatically be declared outside the law.

This kind of party won parliamentary elections in Lithuania. It was
almost certain to form a parliamentary majority. However, all other
parties, which had always been fighting each other, decided to unite
and say: let us put everything aside because Lithuanian independence
is the most important thing now. They managed to form a parliamentary
majority and stopped that party coming to power, a party which had
spent hundreds of millions of dollars that had come from abroad to
seize power in that country by democratic means. We should learn to
operate in this way if we want our independence to survive.

Ethnic minorities

At the same time, we should learn to cooperate in a different way with
the various ethnic groups. Not only should they respect the Georgian
state, [ethnic] Azerbaijanis who are being taught Georgian should
not question the benefits of learning Georgian. They should know
that, once they have become part of the Georgian state, they will
be appointed to senior posts, they will have proper salaries, and
their rights will be exactly the same as those of all other citizens
of Georgia. In that case, not only will they learn the language and
not only will they not run away anywhere, but they will also serve in
the Georgian army, be ready to spill blood to defend Georgia and be
an inalienable and incorruptible part of the Georgian state organism.

We have destroyed many myths. For example, I have visited Akhalkalaki
[mainly ethnic Armenian populated town in southern Georgia]. For many
years there was talk that it was dangerous even to go to Akhalkalaki,
let alone walk in the streets and speak to local people. In fact, it is
a part of Georgia like any other, a place where people love our flag,
anthem and statehood, just as they do in the rest of Georgia. They
were offended by claims to the contrary that had been made for so
many years.

When we talk about our [ethnic] Azerbaijanis, we must understand
that they are our people. When there was some trouble there in 1991,
villagers did not bring their produce to our markets for two days,
so a famine started in Tbilisi. These people have successfully worked
in the fields of culture and science for decades and centuries and
they are an inalienable part of Georgian society.

That is why we are setting up a school of administration to train
these people and select the best among them. They will then serve
in customs and tax services and in parliament as both officials
and MPs. Some of them are already MPs but there should be more of
them. They should work at ministries.

There are very many interesting people. There is one person I wanted
to be here today. His name is Alik Kozaev. He is a young man, an
NGO activist from Tskhinvali. Last summer he helped more than 800
children from Tskhinvali, Java, Kvaisa, Znauri District and other
places in the Tskhinvali region to come here. He was taking risks
and he was doing it without receiving any remuneration. He was doing
it in order to destroy the wall of mistrust and hatred that exists
between Georgia and the Ossetians living there and replace it with
a bridge of friendship and brotherhood.

The price this man had to pay is that for many months now he
has been in prison in Tskhinvali, on the territory of Georgia. We
should be ashamed of the fact that this is still possible today. The
international community should also be ashamed that it is keeping
quiet about it and pretends that these are merely small aspects of
an ordinary conflict. If we turn a blind a eye to this, then we will
certainly turn a blind eye to an even bigger tragedy in the future. I
would like to ask you to stand up, applaud Alik Kozaev and demand
his release. [Applause, everybody rises]

What have we learnt in the past year? We have learnt that Georgia can
be a functioning state with powerful institutions. We have learnt that
our nation draws its strength from its unique historical experience
and the fact that it consists of many ethnic groups. There are so many
different people here, which is our strength. We draw our strength
from our great culture of tolerance and from our unity. We have learnt
that unity is our strength. By the way, we were taught this best by
Davit Aghmashenebeli [medieval Georgian king]. The main lesson we
have learnt about when Georgia was strong is that it happened when
Georgia belonged to all its sons and daughters at the same time, when
the authorities recognized everyone, considered everyone’s interests
and respected every religion.

Orthodox Church

Naturally, I confirm that the Orthodox religion has always played a
special role in Georgia. Any attempts – I do not want to beat about
the bush here – to undermine the unity of the Georgian Orthodox Church,
any attacks on the Georgian patriarch, are in fact totally unacceptable
political steps. There are certain rules of the game in politics. We
should not overstep this mark. It is wrong to score political points
by starting intrigues within the church. The unity of our church and
its special role at the most crucial times in our history, when on 22
November 2003 the chair in which His Holiness is sitting now was empty
[reference to the patriarch not arriving for the opening session of
parliament] – [changes tack] This was not participation in politics. It
was an act of civil heroism through nonparticipation. [Applause]

[Passage omitted]

Government

We have learnt that the country can be both democratic and stable. We
have learnt that we can have an honest, decent government that
is trusted by the people. We may not like the government – there
are many aspects of its work I am unhappy about – however, everyone
acknowledges that this is a clean government, the cleanest government
on the territory of the former Soviet Union.

This government has replaced real dinosaurs. The majority of them have
now spent some time in appropriate places and, just as we promised
the people, have paid back some of the money they stole. However,
there are still some people who have again become candidates [for
imprisonment] and we are building separate facilities for them.

Completely different people have arrived, which is something that
should be especially appreciated. We have nominated Zurab Noghaideli
as prime minister. There is just one reason why I have nominated
Zurab Noghaideli. If there is one area in which we can claim success,
it would be the timely payment of salaries and pensions and increased
revenues. This has been achieved by the Finance Ministry. When a person
works so well, he should be promoted. This is a simple principle in
proper politics and a matter of fairness.

The government is also getting stronger because the chairman
of the Supreme Court [Kote Kemularia] is now becoming deputy
prime minister and minister of justice. The Ministry of Justice
is very important. Almost all the ministers will remain in their
posts. Naturally, there are some changes. Naturally, there will be
frequent reshuffles. All the past reshuffles have proved successful.
[Irakli] Okruashvili is the best defence minister we have ever
had. [Giorgi] Baramidze was a better interior minister than his
predecessors. Then, an even better interior minister, Okruashvili,
replaced him. Then, Okruashvili was replaced by an even better
interior minister, [Vano] Merabishvili. Okruashvili was a good
prosecutor-general but he was replaced by an even better one, [Zurab]
Adeishvili. Every reshuffle has resulted in an improvement. That is
why we should not be afraid of this.

It is also true that our best professionals are in parliament. On the
one hand, it would be risky to drain parliament of its human resources,
but, on the other hand, there is a feeling that many of them – this is
linked to the down-sizing of parliament – should be in the executive
because that is where everyday problems are decided. Having said that,
I would like to express my gratitude to you for the work you have
carried out here. [Passage omitted]

We have created a genuinely effective government. It is thanks to the
effectiveness of the government, as demonstrated by the latest events,
that we can deal with any unexpected changes, tragedies and terrorist
acts and remain strong, so that we still stand firm on our own two
feet, so that we are not disorientated, so that we respond quickly
and appropriately. A country in our position has no other choice. We
are a country which has to reclaim the most attractive part of its
territory and which faces the strongest and most aggressive – perhaps
not the strongest but certainly the most aggressive – forces in the
world. They are resisting us. We are a country that has to carry out
titanic work, a country that, out of nowhere, has to find the strength
to solve a task that is almost impossible to solve. Without it, we will
be unable to continue with large-scale development. In order to solve
this task – [changes tack] Our main achievement is that Georgia has
learnt to be successful. We have learnt to protect this success and
we have learnt to fight to ensure a better future for our children. A
better future will be impossible without each of us working, looking
after the country and having a sense of responsibility for the future
of our country.

Good bless our motherland. Long live Georgia.

Dallas hosts southern meeting for young church members

PRESS OFFICE
Diocese of the Armenian Church of America (Eastern)
630 Second Avenue, New York, NY 10016
Contact: Jake Goshert, Coordinator of Information Services
Tel: (212) 686-0710 Ext. 60; Fax: (212) 779-3558
E-mail: [email protected]
Website:

January 10, 2005
___________________

ACYOA COMPLETES SUCCESSFUL REGIONAL CONFERENCE SERIES

“Lord, I am a conductor with tired hands, smeared notes, and missing
musicians, working to bring alive the greatest symphony” — so went a
prayer written by a group of young Armenian Church members during a
recent one-day conference in Dallas, TX.

As part of the conference organized by the Armenian Church Youth
Organization of America (ACYOA), participants examined a prayer written
generations ago by St. Gregory of Narek. They were then asked to craft
their own prayer. It was just one of the activities at the ACYOA
Southern Regional Conference designed to strengthen individual ties to
God and local ACYOA chapters.

Participating in the conference — held at the St. Sarkis Church in
Dallas, TX, on Saturday, January 29, 2005 — were ACYOA members from
both the Dallas chapter and the St. Kevork Church in Houston. They
gathered to talk about their faith as well as the ACYOA organization.

“The conference far exceeded my expectations,” said Karoun Charkoudian,
a member of the St. Kevork Church. “The passionate discussions and
interactive workshops provided an open, comfortable atmosphere so that
we could all explore our feelings about Christianity as it relates to
spirituality, marriage, and sex.”

Fr. Mikael Devejian, pastor of St. Sarkis Church, and ACYOA Executive
Secertary Nancy Basmajian served as presenters at the Southern
conference.

“This was a great opportunity to discuss how God is a part of our daily
lives and also get to know one another better,” Fr. Devejian said.

The ACYOA Central Council, which sponsors an annual series of regional
conferences in four different areas, was represented at each program by
the group’s regional liaisons.

“The smaller, more intimate settings of the regional conferences allow
the participants to have in-depth discussions while focusing on their
own thoughts regarding spirituality and their individual faith
experiences,” said Maria Derderian, the ACYOA Central Council member who
attended the Southern Regional meeting. “Through witnessing their faith
and coming together in true Christian fellowship, they form a stronger
connection with each other, which then continues to strengthen their
ACYOA chapters.”

LAST IN A SERIES

The meeting in Texas was the last in the current series of regional
gatherings organized by the ACYOA.

Earlier, members in New England met on January 15, 2005, at the St.
James Church of Watertown, MA, where they heard from Fr. Arakel
Aljalian, pastor of the St. James Church; Fr. Vasken Kouzouian, pastor
of the Holy Trinity Church of Cambridge, MA; and Yn. Arpi Kouzouian,
coordinator of youth outreach for the Diocese.

Other conferences were held for members in the Midwest region on October
23, 2004, at St. John’s Church of Southfield, MI; and in the
Mid-Atlantic region on November 6, 2004, at St. Mary Church in
Livingston, NJ.

The next major event for the ACYOA will be the 6th Annual National Young
Adult Leadership Conference from February 18 to 20, 2005, at the Don
Bosco Retreat Center in Stony Point, NY. The conference is free, and
parishes are asked to send two representatives each. Parishes are also
encouraged to help their representatives cover travel costs, to ensure
as many young people as possible can attend.

A number of participants in past ACYOA National Young Adult Leadership
Conferences have gone on to serve their home parishes as parish council
members and in other leadership positions.

This year the conference will explore the theme “Fellowship: A Common
Life in Christ”. Those seeking more information are encouraged to visit
or e-mail Nancy Basmajian at [email protected].

— 2/10/05

E-mail photos available on request. Photos also viewable in the News
and Events section of the Eastern Diocese’s website,

PHOTO CAPTION (1): Participants in the ACYOA southern regional retreat
gather at the St. Sarkis Church of Dallas, TX, on Saturday, January 29,
2005.

PHOTO CAPTION (2): ACYOA members in Texas take part in a Bible study
discussion during the ACYOA southern regional retreat on Saturday,
January 29, 2005.

# # #

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

www.armenianchurch.org
www.acyoa.org
www.armenianchurch.org.