Australian Boxing News

EastsideBoxing.com

Australian Boxing News

31.03.05 – By Anton Williams: Anthony Mundine is currently sparing world
light heavyweight contender Paul Briggs on the Gold Coast and has raised a
few eyebrows by requesting the services of Manny Siaca ahead of his world
title fight with Mikkel Kessler in Sydney on May 11th. Reports suggest that
Mundine is training harder than ever and the last training session with
Briggs was as brutal a sparring session as any in recent times. Briggs is
reported to have said that Mundine is looking fitter and stronger than ever
and is now “prepared to get his hands dirty” in order to prepare for what he
(Mundine) says is the biggest fight of his life. Stay tuned for further
developments.

In other boxing news Kostya Tszyu is training upwards of six hours a day at
the Institute of Sport in Canberra (Australia’s number 1 elite sports
training academy) in preparation for his June 4 World Title Fight with Ricky
Hatton in Manchester, England. The fight which is scheduled for 2am to
satisfy American TV commitments was sold out in a British Sporting Record
time of 2 hours. With 22000 Englishmen booing an Aussie it promises to be a
great fight.

My early prediction is that with Hatton being a fighter that gets hit a lot
and Tszyu being the hardest hitting junior welterweight I have seen, Kostya
should stop Hatton in no more than 5 rounds. Still on Kostya. With only one
year left in the fight game he is already looking to promote fights and has
taken up managing an incredibly gifted and powerful fighter by the name of
Anton Solopov who interestingly enough beat Miguel Cotto(World Champ) as an
amateur. For the record Kostya has stated he has 3 fights left in him. The
Hatton fight, one in Russia, (his homeland) and one here in Sydney so
whatever you do try not to miss his last three fights because it will be a
while until we see another tough, gifted and incredibly humble champion like
him.

Also it has been Thirty Years since the Flyweight Division has been unified
(to hold two or more Titles in the One Division). Vic Darchinyan recently
won the IBF Flyweight World Title and has a remarkable record of 22 Fights
for 22 Wins (17 KO’s).

One of the most devastating punchers ever seen in the lower weight classes
in many years (he benchpresses close to 250lb), Vic Darchinyan impressed
Jeff Fenech at the 2000 Sydney Olympic Games whilst representing Armenia,
building up an impressive amateur record of 152 wins from 170 bouts. The
former world champion saw something special in the big punching southpaw and
he has been proven correct.

Darchinyan left a trail of destruction when winning the IBF flyweight world
title from long standing and previously undefeated Irene Pacheco. The
“Raging Bull” is now looking towards world domination in the flyweight
division. I’ll keep you updated on his progress over the coming months.

Other World Class Boxers that will feature in future news include Nedal
‘Skinny’ Hussein, Lovemore NDOU as well as the captain of Australia’s 2004
Olympic Boxing Team to Athens, Jamie PITTMAN. If you want me to cover a
fighter here in Australia just let me know and I’ll hunt him down for you.

Until next week this Eastside Boxing’s roving reporter in Sydney, Australia.

Anton Williams

ANKARA: Turkish FM denies rift with EU over Customs Union protocol

Turkish foreign minister denies rift with EU over Customs Union protocol

Anatolia news agency
31 Mar 05

Ankara, 31 March: Turkish Foreign Minister and Deputy Prime Minister
Abdullah Gul said on Thursday [31 March] that there is no difference
of opinion between Turkey and the European Union on the subject of
Customs Union Additional Protocol. “The problem arose due to the
improper translation of diplomatic terms and words in the media.”

Minister Gul held a press conference with the visiting Foreign
Minister of Congo Rodolphe Adada.

Asked by a journalist if there is a difference of opinion between
Turkey and the EU on whether the Turkish sea and airports would be
included in the Customs Union Additional Protocol or not, Gul replied
that there is no such disagreement. “If one looks at the statements
issued by EU officials, the absence of a disagreement would be clearly
understood.”

In response to a question if there is any connection between US
demands to utilize the Incirlik [southern Turkey] air base and the
possibility of a new resolution at the US Congress on the so-called
Armenian genocide, Gul answered that these topics have no direct
relationship. “I have elaborated on Incirlik in the recent
past. Certain demands for cooperation do exist. Yet these are not well
portrayed in the media. We are currently thinking on this topic and
will evaluate the matter.

“The Armenian issue is a totally separate issue. This is not the way
allies discuss issues. The topic of Armenians is known very well by
former US Governments and that of President Bush. We are very hopeful
that when the right time arrives the American Administration will
demonstrate the essential sensitivity. Therefore, it would be
incorrect to say that such topics are a matter of bargaining. Our
government is working carefully on certain technical subjects and the
issue will come to a conclusion soon.”

Meanwhile, Gul expressed happiness over seeing the Foreign Minister of
Congo Adada in Ankara.

Gul stressed that Adada and he discussed possible ways to develop
trade between the two countries. “The agreement on economic and
technical cooperation between Turkey and Congo has been ratified at
the Turkish parliament. The Turkish Cooperation and Development Agency
(TIKA) is very active in Africa. TIKA will soon open an office in
western Africa.”

Minister Adada indicated that Turkey is a big and very important
country for Congo. “Businessmen and businesswomen in both countries
must explore ways for mutual investments. Spreading peace and
democracy in the African continent is quiet important for Congo. Our
government is doing all it can to maintain and keep peace.”

NKR: OSCE chief urges Karabakh’s involvement in peace talks – TV

OSCE chief urges Karabakh’s involvement in peace talks – TV

Artsakh Public TV, Stepanakert
31 Mar 05

Text of report by Nagornyy Karabakh’s Artsakh Public TV on 31 March

[Presenter over video of meeting] The NKR [Nagornyy Karabakh Republic]
president, Arkadiy Gukasyan, received the OSCE chairman-in-office and
Slovenian foreign minister, Dimitrij Rupel, at the NKR permanent
representative office in the Republic of Armenia on 30 March.

Mr Rupel said that the people of Nagornyy Karabakh had the right to
participate in discussions of their future. There is a window of
opportunity for Nagornyy Karabakh to sit at the negotiating table,
Rupel said. The OSCE chairman-in-office noted that the OSCE would make
every effort to resolve this issue by summer and it expected the
Karabakh side to come up with initiatives in this respect. Mr Rupel
said provided that Nagornyy Karabakh, Armenia and Azerbaijan reached
agreement, he could organize a trilateral meeting in Slovenia in
spring or summer. Mr Rupel expressed his concern about cease-fire
violations on the contact line between Nagornyy Karabakh and
Azerbaijan and asked the NKR president to comment on this issue.

The NKR president said that the cease-fire violations were the result
of Azerbaijan’s attempts to advance its positions. President Gukasyan
expressed his concern about these attempts. Azerbaijan pursues two
major goals, the NKR president said. The first is to convince its own
population that the authorities are actively trying to regain the lost
territories. The second and more important goal is to blackmail the
international community demanding that its territorial integrity be
restored. President Gukasyan said it was important to create an
appropriate atmosphere for a successful negotiation process. But
Azerbaijan’s bellicose rhetoric does not contribute to that, Gukasyan
said.

Answering Mr Rupel’s question about the future of Nagornyy Karabakh,
President Gukasyan stressed that there is no alternative to the NKR’s
independence.

After the meeting, the NKR president met journalists and answered
their questions. In particular, touching on the issue of a referendum
in Nagornyy Karabakh, the NKR president said that a referendum was
already held in the NKR in 1991. But if the European community insists
on holding a referendum, Karabakh’s answer will be positive, Gukasyan
said.

ANKARA: Turkey’s EU entry important for Switzerland, says Swiss FM

Turkey’s EU entry important for Switzerland, says Swiss foreign minister

Anatolia news agency, Ankara
31 Mar 05

Istanbul, 31 March: Foreign Minister of Switzerland Micheline
Calmy-Rey has said today (Thursday [31 March]) that Turkey’s
membership in the European Union is important for Switzerland. “Just
as the membership is crucial for Turkey, Turkey’s membership in the EU
is a matter of prominence for Switzerland.”

In a meeting organized by the Swiss Chamber of Commerce in Istanbul’s
Ciragan Palace, Calmy-Rey gave a speech entitled “Switzerland’s status
in Europe and relations with Turkey”. Visiting minister Calmy-Rey
stated that Switzerland has good ties with all the European
countries. “We (Switzerland) are known as a neutral country.”
Calmy-Rey indicated that Switzerland continues its relations with the
EU via mutual agreements and trade partnerships. “Turkey and
Switzerland have had good relations for decades.” Calmy-Rey mentioned
that Turkey’s bid to join the EU is a positive step. “Turkey’s
membership in the EU would contribute to regional stability. EU’s
political and economic standards will attract attention in the
region. Turkey’s journey towards full EU membership is one that the
Swiss people are watching with admiration.” According to Calmy-Rey,
Turkey’s membership in the EU would facilitate survival of different
cultures and religious backgrounds.

“EU values support multicultural diversity and standards.” Calmy-Rey
commented that her visit to Turkey should be seen as a symbol that
Switzerland is sincere about developing ties with Turkey. There are
over 80,000 Turkish citizens living in Switzerland whose native
language is Kurdish, remarked Calmy-Rey. “Turkish citizens living in
Switzerland have been successful in integrating in the Swiss society.”
Touching on the economic ties between Turkey and Switzerland,
Calmy-Rey stressed that the Turkish market is given more priority
compared to the Polish, Danish and Finnish markets.

“Switzerland is the sixth biggest investor in Turkey. Swiss
corporations employ about 9,000 Turks throughout Turkey. There are
approximately 304 Swiss companies active in the Turkish market.”

Asked by a journalist about the position of Switzerland on the
so-called Armenian genocide, Calmy-Rey replied that the stand of the
Swiss Federal Government is clear. “We believe that each nation must
handle its own history. As Switzerland, we have to work on the funds
that were taken away from Switzerland during World War II. As we
discussed with his excellency Abdullah Gul, we are in favour of
establishing an international committee of experts to study all
claims. We believe that the Armenian diaspora should have
representation in such a committee.”

Millennium Challenges To Grant Armenia $175 Million

MILLENNIUM CHALLENGES TO GRANT ARMENIA $175 MILLION

Azg/arm
01 April 05

Press service of the Ministry of Finances and Economy informed that
Armenia has already prepared its package of offers that will be
presented to the Millennium Challenges Fund.

The Armenian government is looking forward to receive $175 financial
aid to invest in the spheres of irrigation and road construction.
Government is hopeful that the money will spur economic activity in
rural regions.

The press release of the Ministry informs that on March 25 the board
of trustees headed by PM Andranik Margarian approved the Millennium
Challenges’ Armenian program, which was presented to the Millennium
Challenges Fund in US. The Armenian government and the US Millennium
Challenges Fund will continue negotiations in coming months to draw up
an agreement.

During 14 years of its independence the Armenian Republic has never
received a permanent loan of this size. Therefore it’s a great chance
to totally improve the irrigation system and the road network that are
a guarantee for the further development of agriculture and for
bettering villagers’ life.

By Ara Martirosian

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ANKARA: PM says no link between US base request, Genocide issue

Turkish premier says no link between US base request, Armenian genocide issue

Anatolia news agency, Ankara
31 Mar 05

Rabat, 31 March: Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on
Thursday [31 March] that there was political will to further improve
relations between Turkey and Morocco. [Passage omitted]

Erdogan said, “Turkey does not accept the accusation of so-called
Armenian genocide. Documents refutes such slanders”.

When asked, “what does the United States want from Turkey about the
Incirlik Air Base? Some circles have connected the United States’
request for use of the Air Base with approval of a resolution about
so-called Armenian genocide by the US congress. What do you think
about it?” Prime Minister Erdogan said, “as a democratic, secular and
social state of law, Turkey will continue supporting its ally under
the structure of NATO and under the United Nations humanitarian relief
efforts. However, it is impossible to meet all requests every time.
We do not have any problem about principles. In the meantime, we will
regret any attempts to relate it to so-called Armenian genocide.

The US parliament has never done such a thing, and I believe that it
will not do so in the future”.

Recalling that Turkey had opened its state archives in an effort to
enlighten the facts, Prime Minister Erdogan told reporters, “the
United States should also take action by charging historians and
jurists to make a detailed research. Because, decisions we make do not
concern only one country. These decisions should not affect the other
countries”.

“Turkey has never cherished any resentment or hatred against
Armenia. We declared that we have opened our state archives, and
called for a research. However, they rejected our proposal. Their
baseless slanders are totally unacceptable. Turkey does not accept the
accusation of so-called Armenian genocide since documents refutes such
slanders. Turkey will make a decision soon, and inform all countries
approving resolutions to recognize so-called Armenian genocide,” he
said.

[Passage omitted]

Gunduz Aktan: How shameful (1)

Gunduz Aktan: How shameful (1)

Turkish Daily News
Mar 31, 2005

Two weeks ago David L. Phillips, the organizer of the Turkish-Armenian
Reconciliation Commission (TARC), arrived in Istanbul where he
promoted his book, “Unsilencing the Past.” He took part in conferences
staged at a number of prestigious Turkish universities, participated
in television programs and was interviewed by leading Turkish
newspapers. He had taken an unprecedented step, succeeded in bringing
together the two “intransigent” sides. Some Turkish columnists have
commented on what he has said and written, assessing his
recommendations.

On this occasion another book, the Turkish edition of “The Truth will
set us Free,” has been put on the market as well. Written by an
Armenian named George Jerjian, the book contained a “legal” study into
the 1915 incidents. The study was made by the International Center for
Transitional Justice (ICTJ), a prestigious nongovernmental
organization based in New York at the instigation of the TARC.

The TARC meetings began in earnest in early 2002 and ended in February
2003. Bringing the two sides together was an important first
step. Some Armenian members of the commission braved death threats
from the Dashnaks and attended the meetings.

No common ground could be created during the talks. We suggested a
joint investigation of the incidents by historians, archivists and
psychologists. The Armenian side did not accept our proposals. For
them, what happened between 1915 and 1923 was genocide; the whole
world accepted that fact; and the problem would be over once Turkey
accepted it.

That was “perfect” rhetoric from their standpoint. However, it had a
shortcoming. According to the Genocide Convention only a competent
court would be able to decide whether that had been a case of
genocide. No such court decision existed. And there was no way for the
Armenian side to have a convention (that took force in 1951)
implemented retroactively. However, to overcome that obstacle, Turkey
could accept retroactive application of the convention and Turkey and
Armenia could, together, take this issue to an international tribunal
for adjudication or seek arbitration.

I had made that proposal repeatedly at international forums and the
Armenians had rejected it consistently because they knew that the law
was not on their side. They were dying to kill that proposal since it
constituted a mortal threat to their claims. Phillips rushed to their
aid on this issue. There was an organization named ICTJ. We, the TARC
members, could pose the ICTJ the following question: Can the Genocide
Convention be applied retroactively?

>From the legal standpoint the answer to that question was quite
simple. According to Article 28 of the Vienna Convention on the Law
of Treaties, it was impossible to invoke the genocide convention
retroactively. There was no need to conduct a study to arrive at that
answer. However, since the Armenians wanted it we saw nothing wrong in
going along with that proposal.

The outcome of the ICTJ study was announced on Jan. 28, 2003. In its
first section the report admitted that the convention could not be
retroactive and stressed that, for that reason, the Armenians would
not be able to demand land and compensation from Turkey. That was in
our favor. The second — and longer section; however, claimed that if
the convention could have been implemented retroactively the Armenian
incidents would have been genocide indeed. Answering a question that
had not been posed to it, the ICTJ thus gave the Armenians what they
sought — disguised as a legal opinion.

As the Turkish side we felt deceived and we left the TARC. Soon after
that the TARC died.

The “legal” work of the ICTJ was, in a word, awful. To show how flimsy
the Armenians’ legal theses were, I made the full text of the ICTJ
report appear in the Feb. 17-18, 2003 issues of the Turkish Daily News
(TDN). The TDN’s Feb. 19, 2003 issue carried our side’s views on the
same subject.

Our side’s opinion had been communicated to the ICTJ so that it would
be published together with the ICTJ study. However, the ICTJ did not
even make reference to the Turkish side’s opinion let alone publishing
it. Obviously they did not want the total refutation of the Armenian
thesis that was weak as it was.

Since then I have published five articles on this issue. In the March
27 issue of daily Hurriyet, Ozdemir Ince asks whether the TARC members
knew about the aforementioned ICTJ decision. Obviously my articles
escaped public attention.

The TARC was created and operated according to “track II diplomacy” or
informal diplomacy. When that method is adopted the discussions that
take place during the sessions cannot be published by quoting the
members by name. In his book Phillips not only violates that ethical
rule but he also embellishes the deliberations with stories that are
the fruits of his fertile imagination. Those who read the book can
easily understand that he has certain problems with me and with Ozdem
Sanberk. Our views against the genocide claims must have upset him
together with the Armenians.

Celebrating Sarian in National Library

CELEBRATING SARIAN IN NATIONAL LIBRARY

Azg/arm
01 April 05

The National Library of Armenia organized “The Symphony of Eternity”
arrangement yesterday dedicated to the 125th anniversary of Martiros
Sarian and 85th anniversary of his son, composer Ghazaros Sarian. Two
halls of the Library represented albums, monographs, books, pictures
as well as more than a dozen of new publications from the Diaspora
concerning the Sarians’ life and works. Words of gratitude and
recollections emphasized once again the importance of the Sarian
family in the Armenian culture.

Yervand Qochar wrote about Martiros Sarian: “Sarian is a bright sun in
the sky of Armenian art”.

Composer Ghazaros Sarian, famous for his “Armenia” symphony, headed
the State Conservatoire after Komitas for 26 years and was one of
those who promoted the music of his time far beyond the borders of
Armenia. Great friendship of Edvard Mirzoyan, Alexander Harutyunian,
Arno Babajanian, Adam Ghudoyan and Ghazaros Sarian was, as Dombayev
put it, a new style in music. “Ghazaros Sarian was extraordinarily
moral, and his ethics spread out in his music. The tunes of his music
are as calm, clean and attractive as his personality was”, writer and
painter Vanik Santrian says.

The widow of Ghazaros Sarian, Arax Sarian, says that the composer
tended to the great art being influenced by his great father.

By Gohar Gevorgian

Holy Land rife with Christian symbol of one and many meanings

Worldwide Faith News

[PCUSANEWS] No Subject

>From PCUSA NEWS <[email protected]>

Date Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:02:24 -0600

Note #8683 from PCUSA NEWS to PRESBYNEWS:

05165
March 29, 2005

Cross fertilization

Holy Land rife with Christian symbol of one and many meanings

by Alexa Smith

EAST JERUSALEM – In a mosaic-filled chapel in the corner of Holy Sepulchre
Church, Deacon Artur Harutyunyan is drawing an Armenian cross on a scrap of
paper.

Frustrated by his English, or rather, his lack of it, he draws
instead.

The cross is straight, its three edges upturned, like an inverted crown.
Sprouting from those curves are flowers, blooming wildly.

He looks up earnestly and says: “Yes, like lilies. Or flowers. Maybe
grapes on a vine. It is a symbol of life, yes? Sorry I don’t speak very well
English.”

He has a slight hint of a beard and big eyes. At first glance, he
looks like a priest in his black, cassock-like robe.

But Harutyunyan is a deacon in the Armenian Orthodox Church and he
serves here, singing the liturgy and giving impromptu lessons on the
symbolism of the cross.

That isn’t as simple as it sounds: Transforming an instrument of
torture into a symbol of life takes some doing, not to mention centuries of
theological wrangling.

Which is why Deacon Artur is so persistent, aided now by a young Pole
named Martin who has wandered into the chapel and overheard some of the
discussion.

“You can find in Armenian crosses the tree of life,” Martin says.

“I did not know that,” says Martin’s wife, Margaret, peering over
Artur’s shoulder at a symbol of infinity he is drawing at the bottom of his
sketch. He points out that the cross stands in the midst of eternity.

“And on Armenian crosses, there is no Jesus because Jesus has risen,”
he tells Martin, who duly translates.

The two Christian quarters of Jerusalem’s Old City are full of
crosses ¾ so many, in fact, that they all but disappear.

Rudimentary crosses are carved into the buttresses of ancient
churches, like St. James Armenian Church. More elaborate designs are
sculpted
in seemingly random stones facing the courtyard.

In the vast corridors of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, there are
only a few few ornamental crosses but one is large and dramatic, planted
firmly on the rock that tradition holds is Golgotha.

There are other, simpler crosses, etched in the pavement on the
rooftop chapel where the Copts worship. Others ¾ with the Greek letter X,
the
first letter of Christ’s name, cut into the center are chiseled into the
cement doorways of the Orthodox chapel at Calvary. Those crosses are
remnants
of the holy fire that the Greek patriarch carries from Christ’s tomb on
Orthodox Easter, this year May 1.

Still more crosses are painted above doorways. Another serves as a
hand-hold for pilgrims stumbling up a dimly lit stairway to a rooftop
chapel.

Another is wound in steel above an entrance to a monastery off of the
cathedral’s square central plaza.

They are so basic to Christian tradition, they almost go unseen. But
they are laden with centuries of symbolism culled by the world’s most
ancient
churches. All testify to life overwhelmed by death and violence, suffering
and pain.

The Jerusalem Cross is one of the most popular items in Christian
gift shops here. The design is built around a large, central cross with four
other crosses tucked into the joints where the two beams meet.

Ask a sales clerk what the cross symbolizes and you get a different
answer at every store. One says the four smaller crosses stand for the four
Gospels: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Another says the five crosses
represents the five kings of Europe who launched the Crusades against Islam
in the Middle Ages and murdered their way through Jerusalem. In these
England
is represented by the dominant cross, with France, Spain, Germany and Italy
getting smaller-scale recognition.

An italicized sign in a Christian gift shop in the Old City says the
crosses represent the five wounds of Christ. Some say the Jerusalem cross
symbolizes Calvary: One big cross and two smaller ones on each side.

A dozen sellers will tell you their interpretations, nod
appreciatively at alternative stories and say that the cross means all of
the
above.

But Father Eugenio Alliata, a Roman Catholic archeologist at
Flagellation Monastery on the Via Dolorosa, shakes his head. He says a
fellow
monk studied this in depth, and the original meaning – according to
fourth-century scholar Cyril of Jerusalem – is far more cosmic.

Jerusalem, represented by the stabilizing center cross, is the center of the
world. And it embraces the Earth with its arms – north, south, east and
west.
It is depicted in a fourth-century mosaic in Nazareth. By the fifth century
A.D., it is almost commonplace.

“It is symbolic, not realistic,” Alliata says.

Symbol, he says, is a potent force that early Christians understood.
“Crosses took many shapes from the beginning … and, in the beginning,
there
was no Christ on the cross,” he says.

Early Christians preferred representations of the cross to
naturalistic depictions of the crucifixion.

Rather, it was a boat with a mast, like a cross but not a cross. Or a
male figure standing with his arms stretched out to his sides. Or a letter
of
the ancient Hebrew alphabet, x, or the Greek symbol, T.

“When we represent the cross. we don’t represent a historical (event)
… but the meaning,” Alliata says in a rich Italian accent.

Eastern Christians, he says, have always been more at ease with
symbol, while Westerners lean toward realistic representations – embodied
best in the contemporary Catholic crucifix, which appeared for the first
time
on the door of St. Sabina’s Church in fifth-century Rome.

“Early Christians did not represent Jesus in this way: A dead man on
a cross,” the priest says. “(Maybe) it was too hard to understand the
meaning. … It says this is real history, not mythology. This is something
that happened, really.”

But the meaning of the Catholic cross cannot be graped by seeing only
the moment of death, Alliata says. The faithful must remember the entire
story of Jesus. “The meaning,” he says, “is positive. In the suffering of
this man we see the salvation given by God to all humanity.”

Twenty-eight-year-old Deacon Calistos is standing inside the Holy
Sepulchre’s chapel at Golgotha, helping pilgrims light candles to illuminate
petitions made literally at the foot of the cross.

He is eager to talk about the ornate Greek Orthodox cross, with icons
where the beams cross – usually images of Jesus’ mother Mary and St. John,
his beloved. And the sculpted top of the cross, which depicts God the
Father.
At the foot, typically, is a skull and crossbones, symbolizing death.

It is all about life, the journey of faith.

“The cross,” Calistos says, “is like the soul of each person.
Vertically, it shows how the spirit goes to God, how our heart is dedicated
to Him. And horizontally, it shows love for others. Jesus opened his hands
on
the cross to take in the world.

“It really is the two commandments: Love God with all your heart and
soul and mind. And love your fellow human as yourself.”

For Calistos, who says he no longer has a surname, the symbolism in
the cross is rich and deep and rewards study with insight.

The skull at its base is gruesome, of course. But the blood of Jesus
on the cross washes it away, cleansing even the first sin. Scanning it from
bottom to top illustrates how the human spirit passes from death to life. As
Deacon Calistos says: “All the way up. … If you look at this cross … it
says everything. The passion. The resurrection. All of his life comes to
your
mind.”

The suffering it shows, Calistos says, helps Christians find the
strength to carry on, to carry their own crosses because the life of mercy
and love thay have chosen guarantees pain in a harsh world.

And the icons help people pray, he says.

“When you look at a picture of your mother, your father, someone
close to you – but they are far away – it helps you feel something
different,
even if they are not so close,” he says, and it is much the same with Mary,
St. John, Jesus. Or God.

The cross is a symbol that Orthodox integrate into worship. When
Greek Orthodox children are baptized, they are dunked three times into the
Baptismal font. The sign of the cross is then made all over their tiny
bodies, the hands, the belly, the toes, the chin, the forehead, sealing the
Baptism.

Congregants cross themselves in worship, beginning at the head,
saying, “God is powerful.” Then the belly, saying, “God is immortal.” And
the
right shoulder: “God is merciful,” remembering the thief on the cross who
asked to join Jesus in Paradise.

A Kyrie Eleison (God have mercy) is said as the penitent touches the left
shoulder, remembering the unsaved sinner at the cross.

“The cross,” Calistos says, “is a symbol of victory against death,
against evil.

When you study the cross, it represents life.”

To subscribe or unsubscribe, please send an email to
[email protected] or
[email protected]

To contact the owner of the list, please send an email to
[email protected]

Kazakhstan eyes share of Georgian gas pipelines

Kazakhstan eyes share of Georgian gas pipelines

ASTANA, March 31 (Reuters) – Kazakh firms should get part ownership of
Georgia’s gas pipelines in return for supplying gas, President
Nursultan Nazarbayev said on Thursday, one day after Kazakhstan
muscled in on a huge international oil project.

Nazarbayev was hosting Georgia’s President Mikhail Saakashvili on his
first visit to the energy-rich Central Asian state, which lies across
the Caspian Sea from Georgia.

Saakashvili told a joint news conference that Georgia’s energy needs
would double when new power stations, now under construction, came on
stream. “Kazakh gas could come to Georgia,” Nazarbayev said. “Kazakh
gas suppliers would need to get a large share of control over the
pipeline system in Georgia.”

Saakashvili did not comment on the suggestion and neither president
explained how Kazakh gas would get to Georgia, which relies on
supplies from giant neighbour Russia, where pipelines are controlled
by gas monopoly Gazprom.

Gazprom also wants to own the pipelines, which it uses to supply gas
to Georgia and Armenia.

But the United States, where Saakashvili has close ties, is against a
Gazprom buyout, fearing the monopoly power of the world’s biggest gas
firm in the tiny Georgian market.

Georgia is also the route for the Baku-Ceyhan pipeline, along which a
BP-led consortium is due to start pumping oil later this year,
including crude produced in the Caspian.

BP and Norway’s Statoil also plan to build a gas pipeline from
Azerbaijan to central Turkey via Georgia later this decade, which will
run parallel to Baku-Ceyhan.

Despite its fabulous energy wealth, Kazakhstan faces the problem of
getting its oil and gas to distant markets.

An ENI-led international consortium has a 40-year production sharing
agreement to develop Kazakhstan’s offshore Kashagan oilfield, which is
due to start pumping oil in 2008.

After trying for months to get into the project, Kazakhstan agreed the
purchase of half of BG’s $1.8 billion, 16.67 percent stake in the
giant field.

Kazakhstan has also proposed selling gas to China, and is studying the
possibility of building a pipeline eastwards.

03/31/05 09:03 ET

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress