NO-SHOW ARMENIAN GROUP IRKS FLORIDA FARM OFFICIALS
By Susan Salisbury
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Palm Beach Post, FL
Sept 28 2005
Where in the world are the Armenians who were to spend 10 days touring
the farms of Florida?
University of Florida officials – who spent three months planning an
itinerary, reserving motel rooms, booking vans and making arrangements
for the 10-person group – want to know. They’ve contacted the federal
Department of Homeland Security after the group failed to show up
Sunday night at the Gainesville airport.
Gene McAvoy, a UF agricultural extension director, waited for several
hours at the airport for the Armenians, finally giving up close
to midnight. It was only Tuesday morning that he heard from them
via e-mail.
“What it said is they went to L.A. The tickets cost so much, they
could not afford to come to Florida,” McAvoy said.
The Armenians apologized, he said, but “it seems like a pretty lame
excuse.”
“This is America. There are cellphones,” said McAvoy, who spent the
morning Tuesday canceling the remaining hotel and other reservations
for the group.
Their stay, scheduled for Sept. 25 through Oct. 5, was to include
a statewide tour of farms and farmers’ markets, including stops in
West Palm Beach, Fort Pierce and Florida City.
Leah Yoon, a spokeswoman for U.S. Customs and Border Protection,
said Tuesday she did not know whether an investigation is under way,
but said the details of the Armenians’ non-arrival in Florida sounded
“highly unusual.”
McAvoy said immigration officials at Los Angeles International Airport
would not tell him anything, and they didn’t return calls seeking
comment Tuesday.
McAvoy said he had someone call Armenia to talk to the Agro
Association, the sponsor of the group, which included Andreas Melikyan,
eight farmers and a translator.
“They said they didn’t know anything, but said they knew them and
wanted us to let them know if we found out where they were,” he said.
Melikyan, who could not be reached by phone and did not reply to an
e-mail message, visited Florida in 2001 on a similar agricultural tour.
Lisette Staal, assistant director at UF’s International Programs
office in Gainesville, did not want to discuss the episode in depth.
She did say she had heard from the group, however.
“They told me they had a flight problem, and they have canceled their
program here,” she said. “We are as puzzled as the next person.”
Southern California is home to an estimated 350,000 Armenians, the
largest Armenian community outside the Republic of Armenia itself,
according to the University of Southern California.
Varoujan Der Simonian, executive director of the Armenian Technology
Group Inc. in Fresno, Calif., which works to help Armenian farmers,
was not familiar with the Agro Association.
However, he said, travelers from Armenia to the United States must
state their destination and it must match their airline tickets.
“Something is wrong, either with the airline or the connection. Ten
people can’t just change planes,” Der Simonian said. “You can’t just
change your mind and decide to go to L.A. instead of Florida.”
Ken Gioeli, a St. Lucie County-based natural resources agent for UF,
also waited in vain at the Gainesville airport with McAvoy.
“They either ran out of money, or something happened,” Gioeli said.

ARMENIA HIGHLIGHTS EUROPEAN INTEGRATION EXPERIENCE OF FINLAND
Pan Armenian News
27.09.2005 06:57
/PanARMENIAN.Net/ Today Chairman of the National Assembly of Armenia
Artur Baghdassaryan met with Finnish President Tarja Halonen being
in Yerevan on an official call, reported the Press Service of the
Armenian Parliament.
Matters of development of the Armenian-Finnish relations were
discussed during the meeting. The indicated remarked the importance
of strengthening political, economic, scientific and cultural ties
between the two countries.
Special attention was paid to promotion of interparliamentary
relations. It was also noted that an Armenian-Finnish friendship
group is formed in the Armenian Parliament. At the instance of
the guest A. Baghdassaryan presented the democratic reforms being
implemented in Armenia, as well as emphasized the importance of use
of Finland’s experience in the matter. The delegation headed by the
Finnish President also met with Vice-Speaker T. Torosyan, chairmen
of standing parliamentary commissions, heads of political factions.
A. Baghdassaryan said that he is sure that the visit of the delegation
will encourage development of bilateral relations. In his words,
pursuing a European integration policy, Armenia highlights study of
the Finnish experience. Appreciating the activities of the Armenian
Center founded in Finland, the Armenian Speaker expressed readiness to
assist the Center in acquiring new literature. The Finnish President
hoped that the Constitutional reforms in Armenia will be held in an
atmosphere of accord.
At the end of the meeting T. Halonen made a record in the book of
honorary guests.

ARMENIA BECOMES 64TH MEMBER OF ADB
Kazinform, Kazakhstan
Sept 28 2005
MANILA. September 28. KAZINFORM. Armenia has become the 64th member
of the Asian Development Bank. Armenia’s membership became effective
on 20 September 2005 upon completion of all formalities.
Armenia has subscribed to 10,557 shares of the capital stock. ADB’s
authorized capital stock is 3,509,728 shares equivalent to US$51.6
billion, Kazinform refers to the Bank’s press service.
The Asian Development Bank is dedicated to reducing poverty in the
Asia and Pacific region through pro-poor sustainable economic growth,
social development, and good governance. Established in 1966, it is
owned by 64 members, with 46 from the region. In 2004, it approved
loans and technical assistance totaling $5.3 billion and $196.6
million, respectively.

EYE ON EURASIA: MILITIAS THREATEN RUSSIA
By Paul Goble
United Press International
Sept 28 2005
Published September 27, 2005
VIENNA — Setting up local armed militias to support the work of the
authorities highlights the weakness of state power in the Russian
Federation and simultaneously threatens both the existing state system
and the territorial integrity of the country.
According to Sergei Markedonov, a specialist on ethnic affairs at the
Moscow Institute of Political and Military Analysis, local officials
who set up “druzhinniki” are dangerously mistaken in believing that
these groups of armed citizens will strengthen the state and its
institutions (prognosis.ru/news/secure/2005/9/22/sr.html).
Several ethnically Russian regions have taken this step in recent
months, but Markedonov’s comments came following an announcement two
weeks ago by Sergei Arenin, the interior minister of North Osetia,
that his republic has already set up “druzhinniki” in the capital
city and plans to create more.
According to RIA Novosti news agency on Sept. 12, Arenin said that the
creation of such groups will not only help the government protect key
institutions but also give citizens who possess weapons the opportunity
to register them with the authorities. And he added that he believes
that in his republic, “the more druzhinniki [we have], the better.”
In his discussion of Arenin’s plans, Markedonov suggests that the
“druzhinniki” Mozdok is establishing will not strengthen the position
of the authorities but rather instead highlight and exacerbate their
weaknesses. And as a result, this move will not calm ethnic tensions
there and in the region but rather make those conflicts more violent.
Officials in North Osetia should understand all this on the basis
of their own experience, Markedonov continues, because this is not
the first attempt by the authorities there to make use armed popular
groups in the name of promoting North Osetian interests.
The first of these came at late 1991 — early 1992. At that time,
officials and local activists worked to create what they called
“detachments of self-defense” in the Ingush villages of the Prigorodniy
rayon. The result? An armed conflict between Osetians and Ingush
in which 583 people died, 939 were wounded, and 40,000 were forced
to flee.
Given the dangers involved of arming the population during periods
of political and social instability, Markedonov says, it is striking
that no one in Moscow or in the apparatus of the force structures
subordinate to the Southern Federal District has denounced Arenin’s
plans or taken any steps to stop them.
Their inaction is all the more striking given that officials in
neighboring republics of the north Caucasus have reacted negatively.
Musa Aliyev, the deputy minister of internal affairs of Ingushetia,
for example, described Arsenin’s ideas as of “doubtful” value.
What Arsenin is doing may be especially dangerous given the tinderbox
quality of the north Caucasus. But unfortunately, Markedonov notes,
it is far from unique. Astrakhan Gov. Sergei Zhilkin has called for
the creation of similar “druzhinniki” in his area, as have government
leaders in Stavropol, Krasnodar, and the Kuban.
In the last of these places, armed “druzhinniki” are already playing
a role in the operation of the notorious filtration camps where
“undesirable” arrivals are detained. And Markedonov reports, there
are ever more “demands to arm the Cossacks and give them the right
to protect law and order — above all, against outsiders.”
The immediate consequences of such steps, Markedonov, will be more
clashes among the ethnic groups in this region, but over the longer
term, the impact of these “druzhinniki” could be more serious because
the existence of such groups will convince ever more people that
neither the local authorities nor Moscow can defend them.
And those who reach this conclusion will thus become ever more inclined
to “arm themselves, to defend ‘their own population and lands,’ thereby
undermining the unity of [the country’s] legal s pace and creating
the conditions for the flourishing of illegal armed formations.”
No one should be under any illusion that this dangerous trend can be
stopped without Moscow’s intervention, Markedonov argues — or that
it may not be fatal for the state, noting that “similar mass arming
of the population in Karabakh, Abkhazia and Transdniestria took place
at the time of the collapse of the Soviet Union.”
Law enforcement then and now, Markedonov points out, “cannot be a
subject of ‘the creativity of the masses'” because if that happens,
people “at first not believing in the militia, the Federal Security
Service (FSB) and the army will begin to defend themselves.” And after
that, they will begin to redefine the territory worth defending as
less than the country as a whole.
If armed patrols of the citizenry spread in Ingushetia, this process
is likely to jump over quickly to adjoining Russian regions where
Cossacks will be allowed to conduct “‘purges'” of non-Russian groups,
something that officials in Moscow ought to understand, given what
happened only 15 years ago.
But so far, Markedonov concludes, those in the central Russian
government do not appear to be aware of just how dangerous all this
is, and as a result, they are acting or rather not acting in ways
that may push the Russian Federation as a whole “along the path of
self-destruction.”

HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES IN TURKEY HIGHLIGHTED AS EU MEMBERSHIP TALKS APPROACH
Christian Post
Sept 27 2005
Ahead of the historical European Union accession talks with Turkey next
month, the human rights situation of the predominantly Muslim nation
has again been highlighted as a major obstacle. Most recently, the
President of Greece openly urged Turkey to respect religious freedom.
“If Turkey hopes to sincerely and substantially enter into the EU on
the basis of its principles and values, it should adopt the fundamental
principles of democracy,” the Greek President Carolos Papoulias said as
he greeted the visiting Orthodox Patriarch Bartholomew I on Thursday,
according to the Middle East Times.
Turkey’s membership in EU has provoked a vigorous debate. In the midst
of many different opinions, the most fundamental and common concern
regarding its entry to EU is the country’s poor human rights record.
In a statement issued by the EU last December, the bloc mentioned
that in Turkey, “religious freedom is subject to serious limitations
as compared with European standards.”
Religious freedom is often under threat in Turkey, the most populous
Muslim country in Europe with very small Christian communities.
According to the 2004 International Religious Freedom Report prepared
by the U.S. Department of State, 99 percent of the population in Turkey
consists of Muslims. The Turkish Government officially recognizes only
three communities of religious minorities – Greek Orthodox Christians,
Armenian Orthodox Christians, and Jews.
Under the law, religious services may take place only in designated
places of worship; only the Government can designate a place of
worship; and if a religion has no legal standing in the country,
it may not be eligible for a designated site. Police occasionally
raid unauthorized Christian gatherings meeting in private apartments.
Many churches in Europe had expressed vocal opposition to Turkey’s
bid for membership in the EU. The president of the Bishops’ Conference
of France Archbishop Jean-Pierre Ricard wrote a letter to the France
President Jacques Chirac last December, stressing his concern that
“some fundamental rights, in particular religious freedom, are not
totally respected in Turkey, despite the reforms undertaken.”
The archbishop also expressed his regret that “the opening of eventual
negotiations with Turkey was not subordinated to complete respect for
all fundamental rights, whether freedom of expression and association,
the status of women, or religious freedom, rights that constitute
the foundation of the European Union’s cohesion.”
CNN reported that before Pope Benedict XVI was elected as Pope,
he had made statement showing his dismay to Turkey’s EU membership.
“The roots that have formed Europe, that have permitted the
formation of this continent, are those of Christianity,” CNN quoted
the then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger as saying. “Turkey has always
represented another continent, in permanent contrast with Europe.”
“Turkey is founded upon Islam … Thus the entry of Turkey into the
EU would be anti-historical.”
According to a report from CNN, the foreign ministry of Turkey said
last Thursday it had invited Pope Benedict to make an official visit
to the country in 2006. It is believed to be an attempt to gain the
Pope’s support for the membership in EU.
On Sept. 23, an Istanbul court’s decision to block a conference on the
World War I massacre of Armenians embarrassed Turkey at a sensitive
moment and angered EU states less than two weeks before the planned
start of EU entry talks on Oct. 3, Reuters reported.
Turkey is alleged of carrying out a systematic genocide against
Armenians in 1915 in an attempt to eliminate them and create a
homogeneous Turkish state. Turkey has always denied the claim
of killing the Armenians and said they were victims of a partisan
conflict that also claimed thousands of Turkish lives.
The Armenian people had lived in the Turkey homeland for nearly 3000
years and were traditionally Christian.
“The absence of legal motivations and the (timing) of this decision
a day before the conference looks like yet another provocation,”
Krisztina Nagy, the EU executive’s spokeswoman for enlargement,
said to Reuters on Friday.
Meanwhile, those supporting Turkey’s EU membership believe that the
predominantly Muslim nation in the EU can become a bridge between
Europe and the Middle East, therefore spreading stability and security,
and promoting dialogue with the Islamic world.
Turkey has been waiting for the accession talk with the EU for 40 years
since Ankara first signed an association deal in 1963. Last December,
the 25-member bloc finally approved the talk, which is scheduled on
Oct. 3, 2005.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

THE VIOLENCE OF HISTORY, IN PICTURES
By Steve Kettmann The New York Times
International Herald Tribune, France
Sept 27 2005
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 28, 2005
ISTANBUL Tucked away for more than 40 years, the 120 black-and-white
photographs that were on display in a gallery here recently have the
stark appearance and potential emotional impact of evidence presented
in a legal proceeding.
And that, it turns out, is what they are.
One image shows a mob outside a row of stores, with some people
watching passively and others cheering as a shop is ransacked. A
young man stands with his fist raised in the air, as if he is
egging on the vandals; his other hand rests passively on his hip,
suggesting nonchalance. A boy stares up numbly, as if looking in
vain for answers. Above him, a man in the shell of the shop’s wrecked
building heaves a baby carriage to the street below.
Fifty years ago this month, erroneous reports spread that Greeks had
set fire to the childhood home of Kemal Ataturk, modern Turkey’s
founder, in Salonika, Greece. The rumors prompted an angry mob to
converge on Taksim Square in Istanbul for an anti-foreigner pogrom
that left thousands of houses and many hundreds of shops destroyed.
Gallery officials said that about a dozen people were killed, but
the death toll has never been confirmed because of official secrecy.
Cemeteries were desecrated, dozens of churches were burned and many
schools were plundered.
Fahri Coker, a former assistant military prosecutor, served as a
legal adviser to the investigation of the events of Sept. 6-7, 1955,
an inquiry that historians describe as a whitewash. Coker had 250
photographs that had been taken by foreign news photographers and
government employees, and even a few by Ara Guler, one of Turkey’s
leading photographers. Coker held on to the pictures and left word that
they could be displayed only after his death, which occurred in 2001.
To mark the 50-year anniversary of the long night of violence, Karsi,
a gallery in the Beyoglu neighborhood, where the pogrom occurred,
organized an exhibition of the photos to open on Sept. 6. Although
curators were no doubt aware that the pictures would arouse strong
feelings, given the emotion surrounding historical discussions in
Turkey, they were surprised by the passions unleashed by the show.
The opening was disrupted by a group of nationalists who entered the
gallery, carrying a Turkish flag. Chanting slogans like “Turkey,
love it or leave it!” they vandalized some of the photographs and
tossed others out the window. They also threw eggs at the pictures.
“We left it that way, but unfortunately, after a few days it started
to smell,” Ozkan Taner, one of the gallery’s directors, said of the
exhibition, which the gallery then cleaned and restored, putting it
back on display until it closed this week.
News of the attacks spread quickly, and attendance was heavy, exceeding
expectations. On a recent day, dozens of people crowded into the
gallery to study the images. The pictures, as might be expected,
showed faces riven by anger and fear, but the photos were also packed
with small surprises.
One centered on the monument at the center of Taksim Square, so crowded
with young protesters that some were falling off as others rose to take
their places. At the top of the image, a small group was working to
hoist the Turkish flag, while a young man in a crisp, clean suit held
a small portrait of Ataturk over his head. But away from the monument,
the people in the crowd turning to face the photographer had blank,
uncertain expressions, as if they were as unnerved by the outpouring
as many of the gallery’s visitors were.
In the beginning, the photo exhibition was hailed as a major step
forward for a country that is trying to show a more democratic face
in preparation for possible membership in the European Union.
“For the first time in the history of Turkey, a shameful happening
has been brought out into the open,” said Ishak Alaton, chairman of
the board of Alarko Holdings and a leader of Turkey’s tiny Jewish
population. “Sept. 6, 1955, was our Kristallnacht.”
Ozcan Yurdalan, a freelance photographer who denounced the attacks
on the exhibition, said that the straightforward documentary style
of the photographs had made them more disturbing.
“They show directly what they saw in life,” he said. “If you take
straight photographs, they show the reality – the faces of the people,
some fearful, some thinking, ‘Yeah, we are doing something well
against our enemy.”‘
He added, “The pictures showed me this is not the past. We are still
living in the same condition today. I am ashamed of that, and also
very fearful.”
Greek-Turkish tensions over the future of Cyprus were running high
in 1955, and the future of Cyprus remains unresolved, threatening to
hold up Turkey’s bid to join the EU. More broadly, Western ideas of
the role of dissent have been limited in Turkey.
A best-selling novelist, Orhan Pamuk, has been charged with
public denigrating of Turkish identity for telling a newspaper:
“Thirty-thousand Kurds were killed here, one million Armenians as
well. And almost no one talks about it.”
Mehmet Guleryuz, an Abstract Expressionist-style painter who helped
organize a protest against the attack on the exhibition, said: “We’re
going through sensitive times. We have to have the ability to open
up hidden parts of our history and deal with it. We have to have the
ability to argue.”

PROFESSOR REACTING DURING ARMENIAN CONFERENCE REMOVED
By Emre Soncan
Zaman, Turkey
Sept 27 2005
zaman.com
Tensions rose during the second day of the conference titled “Ottoman
Armenians during the Decline of the Empire: Issues of Scientific
Responsibility and Democracy” held at Istanbul Bilgi University.
Upon the reactions of retired Professor Ilhan Cuhadaroglu, who was
among the guests, he was removed from the conference hall. Speakers
of the conference criticized for being unilateral at times quarreled
with each other.
Associated Professor Fatma M. Gocek accusing remarks made by Professor
Baskin Oran opposing the Armenian diaspora of being inconsistent.
Professor Cuhadaroglu taking the floor during the 9th session titled
“Armenian cases” criticized the conference, “There is an atmosphere
of lamentation in the conference. I felt as though I was in Bulgaria
or Greece.”
Cuhadaroglu receiving reactions from participants and the chairwomen
shouted, “You cannot bear hearing my comments, but you have to
get used to them.” In the aftermath of the experienced tension,
Chairwomen Professor Nuket Sirman from Bogazici University said she
closed the session.
“Why don’t any of you react against the decision taken in
Switzerland?” Cuhadaroglu insisted. Associated Professor Halil Berktay
sitting in front of Cuhadaroglu said, “I condemn it.”
Since the atmosphere became very tense, security guards removed
Cuhadaroglu out of the conference hall. Professor Cuhadaroglu told
to reporters that he was not invited to the conference; however,
entered the conference since he said he was a professor.
Saying he could not bear the representations given in the conference,
Cuhadaroglu went on that he was himself a Yugoslavian immigrant:
“They call it genocide. They deal with the Kurdish issue. No one
has right to tread our history underfoot. Armenians were elected as
deputies and entered any public institution. Turks were also massacred
in Urfa, Erzurum. Do those Turks not have any parents?”
Bumin: You could not persuade me
Another tension occurred during the speech of Professor Oran when he
used the term of “massacre” for the incidents that occurred in 1915
against the Armenians. Oran who also made accusations relating to
the Armenian diaspora said, “While calling on Turkey to discuss the
issue is taboo in Turkey, it is not consistent to attempt to prevent
discussions taking place in Switzerland and France.”
Participants of the conference reacted against Oran’s remarks during
the question session. Associated Professor Gocek uttered that blaming
the entire diaspora was erroneous. Upon Oran’s remark that 98 percent
of the Armenian diaspora thought same, the atmosphere tensed even
more. While some of the participants supported Oran by applauding,
Gocek accused Oran of being inconsistent.
Furthermore, Professor Mete Tuncay qualified that the Armenian
deportation as a “great tragedy” and emphasized that the insistence
on the expression of “genocide” will not contribute to a solution.
Yeni Safak newspaper columnist Kursat Bumin criticizing the commonly
held genocide allegations disclosed, “Those supporting genocide could
not even persuade me during this conference.”
Fehmi Koru and Ahmet Hakan, two prominent columnists in Turkey,
who were expected to speak at the conference, did not attend. While
attacks with eggs continued during second day of the conference,
protesters also tried to remove the European Union (EU) flag from
the front of the university building.
Representations to be combined into a book
Rectors of the Istanbul Bilgi University, Sabanci University and
Bogazici University made a joint announcement at the end of the
conference. Sabanci University rector Tosun Terzioglu said the
conference was significant in terms of the university’s autonomy and
the representations of the speakers will be combined in a book.
European Parliament (EP) Deputy Cem Ozdemir, on the other hand,
revealed holding the conference will decrease foreign pressures
on Turkey.

‘JUDICIARY OBSTRUCTS DEMOCRATIZATION IN TURKEY’
By Cihan News Agency
Zaman, Turkey
Sept 27 2005
zaman.com
A recent conference on Armenians during the decline of the Ottoman
Empire in Turkey did not attract the expected level of attention from
the European media.
Despite recent reforms that have been made in line with plans to
become a member of the European Union (EU), Turkey’s judicial system
was “riddled with loopholes” the British newspaper The Financial
Times commented.
German Suddeutsche only reported that the conference location was
changed at the last moment and that the “taboos” were gradually
disappearing.
As for the cancellation of the conference on Armenians, The
Financial Times said, “Nobody yet knows whether the progressives
or the reactionaries have won the battle over free speech that has
raged in Turkey for the past few days. One thing is clear, however:
despite years of reforms, the country’s justice system is riddled
with loopholes.”
Commenting on Turkish novelist Orhan Pamuk, who will appear in court
because due to his remarks on Armenians and Kurds to a Swiss newspaper,
the Financial Times noted:
“The two incidents suggest how the criminal justice and judicial
systems steeped in decades of nationalist ideology, reinforced by
an authoritarian constitution, can betray a reforming government’s
best intentions.”
The Guardian said, “The European commission accused the Turkish
judiciary of “provocation” on Friday, after an Istanbul court prevented
the conference from opening.”
Ankara’s opponents in the EU would have been strengthened if the ban
over the conference had succeeded, The Guardian wrote.
German newspaper Die Welt assessed that the conference would be
boring news if organized in another country, but it caused a scandal
in Turkey.
Turkey was absolutely against the so-called genocide thesis the
newspaper continued, and that the government had launched a campaign
to refute this opinion.
Die Welt claimed that mentioning the so-called Armenian genocide was
a crime in Turkey. The conference, asserted in Die Welt, passed in a
peaceful atmosphere and that none of the historians attending dared
to utter the word “genocide” during their presentations.

ARMENIAN GROUPS IN GEORGIA ADVOCATE AUTONOMY
Journal of Turkish weekly
Sept 27 2005
Jan SOYKOK (JTW) – A group of non-governmental organizations based
in Georgia’s southern region of Javakhk, predominately populated by
ethnic Armenians, held a conference on September 23-24 to discuss
current problems in the region, Armenian newspaper Asbarez reported.
According to the report the Armenians demanded greater autonomy
including elections for all bodies. The Georgia experts argue that
such claims mean separation of Georgia.
The Council of Armenian non-governmental organizations in Javakhk also
called on the Tblisi leadership to consider granting autonomy to the
region with `broad authority for self-governance, including the right
to hold elections for all bodies of governance.’ The resolution further
says that by offering the broadest form of autonomy to South Ossetia
and Abkhazia, the Georgian authorities are `discriminating against
other ethnicities living in Georgia–the rights of other ethnicities
who have demonstrated civil loyalty are being ignored,’ it reads.
However Dr. Yesim Sahiner says the declaration simply means a
separation of Georgia: “Armenians seek to establish their own country
in Georgia. They hope they could separate Javakity from Georgia. They
will then annex the territory to Armenian Republic. Another Armenian
aim is to separate Ossettia and Abkhazia. In Abkhazia in particular
there is a significant Armenians and they plan to establish a
Abkahazian-Armenian state.”
Kemal Yurteri, a Turkish Caucaus expert, similarly warn both Georgians
and Armenians that such a separation would be a disaster for the
region:
“None of the Caucasian countries need more territories. Armenian
irredentism caused great catastrophe in the past. Armenian forces
occupied almost 20 percent of Azerbaijan and attacked the other
Azeri province of Nahcivan. However none of the Armenian problems has
been solved since then. The EU and the OSCE accuse Armenia of being
occupier in Karabakh. Armenia still relies on Russian military while
the other countries aim to integrate their economies. If the Georgia
Armenians undermine Georgia’s territorial integrity, it will damage
both Georgia and Armenia. Turkey and the United States should take
measures to prevent the separatist movements in Georgia. Otherwise
the Western and Turkish interests too will be damaged a lot”.

CHINA TO PROVIDE GRATUITOUS AID OF 10 MLN YUANS FOR ARMENIA
Noyan Tapan News Agency, Armenia
Sept 27 2005
BEIJING, SEPTEMBER 27, NOYAN TAPAN. The delegation headed by Artashes
Tumanian, Head of the RA Presidential Administration and Chairman
of the Armnenian part of the Armenian-Chinese Trade and Economic
Commission, left for Beijing on September 26 in order to participate
in the fourth sitting of the Commission.
During the meeting with Chinese Deputy Minister of Trade Tszin,
the sides presented to each other the process of economic reforms
in Armenia and China and discussed the prospects of developing the
bilateral economic cooperation. It was noted that the realtions between
the two countries in the political, economic, cultural, scientific and
other spheres started developing intensively after the establishment
of diplomatic relations between Armenia and China in 1992.
According to the RA MFA Press and Information Department, at the end
of the sitting on the first day, an agreement was signed, under which
China will provide a gratuitous aid of 10 mln yuans (about 1 mln 120
thousand USD) for Armenia.
The Commission’s sitting was continued on September 27.