The Armenian Apostolic Church will celebrate the Easter tomorrow

The Armenian Apostolic Church will celebrate the Easter tomorrow

ArmRadio.am
15.04.2006 13:10
Tomorrow the Armenian Apostolic Church will celebrate the Holy Resurrection
of Jesus Christ, the Easter, which in Armenian means estrangement from sins
and return to God. The Holy Easter is the greatest holiday of Christianity.
On this day the believers paint eggs. The egg symbolizes resurrection and
start of a new life. The red color symbolizes Jesus Christ’s blood.
This evening holy services will be delivered in the Churches, with which the
celebration of Easter starts.

Antelias: Dialogue with the youth-Number 5

PRESS RELEASE
Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
Contact: V.Rev.Fr.Krikor Chiftjian, Communications Officer
Tel: (04) 410001, 410003
Fax: (04) 419724
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:
PO Box 70 317
Antelias-Lebanon
THE IMPERATIVE Of A FAITH-SUSTAINED LIFE
(Dialogue with the youth- Number 5)
This year, in my Easter message I emphasized the crucial importance of
faith. I based my reflection on the following verse of St. Paul: “Let us
hold firmly to the faith we profess” (Hebr. 4: 14). As we spiritually
prepare ourselves to celebrate the Easter, I would like to share briefly
with our youth the following few points:
First, in its general understanding, faith is an inner drive of human being
to yearn for, and to have confidence in a reality that is beyond the scope
of human life. The human being is a limited creature endowed with a life
marked by limitations. Therefore, the desire for a transcendental reality,
in order to protect and support him, has been a permanent and salient
feature of human existence from its very inception. In the course of
history, each religion has identified its own object of faith, which has
provided the substance, context and basis of a religion’s life, thought and
vision. The object of faith could vary from religion to religion; yet faith
is a basic necessity. The human being cannot live without some sort of
faith.
For Christianity, faith is not a mere attachment to, or close interaction
with a supernatural reality; it is a full allegiance, dependence and
obedience to God. In fact, God is the source and the cause of human
existence and the sustaining power of earthly life in all its forms and
expressions. The true faith is a powerful force even if it is “as small as a
mustard seed”, it can “move the mountain from here to there” (Mt. 17: 20).
Second, the source of our faith is the Triune God who is not a conceptual
notion, an abstract idea or an unapproachable and ungraspable essence. God
is a living being, both immanent and transcendental, who has revealed
Himself to humanity in history. God has revealed and communicated Himself to
human beings through Jesus Christ. Therefore, faith for Christianity is of
an incarnational nature. In the Nican creed, which is recited during the
eucharistic celebration after the Gospel reading, the basic components and
aspects of our faith are clearly defined and articulated.
Indeed, the unique importance of faith has been at the heart of Christ’s
teachings and miracles: “Your faith has healed you” (Mt. 9: 22) was a major
message of Christ’s ministry. The healing, empowering, life-giving,
reconciling and transforming power of faith was also dominant in the events
pertaining to the early church in the apostolic period.
Third, being Christian does not mean merely knowing about our faith or even
witnessing about it. It means keeping firm our faith. This is the message of
our Lord Jesus Christ. The church, the mystical body of Christ, constantly
reminds her faithful to remain faithful to the Christian faith by responding
to its challenges, demands and implications. What does this mean?
a) It means placing the faith at the center of our life by making it the
guiding force of our thoughts, of our dreams, of our work. The Apostle says:
“We live by faith” (2 Cor. 5: 7). Without faith our life will lose its
integrity, its identity and purpose. To what extent faith is a living
reality in our lives? To what degree our thoughts, our commitments, our
projects, our relations, our friendships are determined and underpinned by
faith? Let us think about these questions. Our daily prayer must be: Lord,
increase and strengthen our faith. This is how we pray every day in the
Armenian Church. Let us always remember what Jesus said to His disciples:
“If you believe, you will receive whatever you ask for in prayer” (Mt. 21:
21).
b) It means preserving the integrity of our faith. The source of Christian
faith is the Bible as taught and interpreted by our church fathers, by
saints and theologians. Nowadays, I see a tendency to give pre-eminence to
the form rather than to the substance of faith. I see an emerging trend to
expose ourselves to the sort of perceptions and norms that are not
compatible with biblical teachings and with the traditions of our church.
Let us listen to what Christ says: “Watch out for false prophets. They come
to you in sheep’s’ clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves: (Mt. 7:
12).
c) It means participating fully and actively in the life and mission of the
church. The church is not an institution in the ordinary sense of the word;
it is essentially a community of faith. It is, therefore, by participating
in the life and witness of the community of faith that we deepen our faith.
Believing means belonging to the body of Christ. As Armenian Christians, we
must be careful not to follow the kind of erroneous teachings and heterodox
practices that reduce the Christian to a self-contained existence. I cannot
imagine a genuine Christian life, an authentic expression of Christian
faith outside of the community of faith.
d) And finally, keeping firm our faith means translating the faith into
work. As the Apostle points out, “faith by itself, if it is not accompanied
by action, is dead” (James 2: 17). Christianity by its very nature and
vocation is action-oriented. Reflections, meditation and prayer need to be
changed into a quality of action that transforms the life of individual and
the community.
We cannot survive in the terrible storm of this world without faith. We
cannot maintain our Christ-based identity in this globalized world without
faith. We cannot preserve our integrity in the midst of morally and
spiritually decaying societies without faith. We must keep firm our faith in
Christ. This is a faith sustained by hope and strengthened by love, a faith
enriched by spirituality and translated into action. This is the real
understanding of Christian faith; this is the kind of faith that we are
called to live out and articulate in our individual and community life.
Therefore, we are called to renew our faith in Him who always remains our
way, our truth and our life (Jn. 14:6).
ARAM I
CATHOLICOS OF CILICIA
12 April 2006
Antelias-Lebanon
##
The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia is one of the two Catholicosates of
the Armenian Orthodox Church. For detailed information about the youth
activities of the Cilician Catholicosate, you may refer to the web page of
the Catholicosate, The Cilician Catholicosate, the
administrative center of the church is located in Antelias, Lebanon.

Die of anger, defiant Iran tells the West

Die of anger, defiant Iran tells the West
By Anne Penketh and Angus McDowall
The Independent/UK
14 April 2006
Iran kept up its defiant rhetoric after the head of the international
nuclear agency urged Iranian leaders to co-operate in reining in
sensitive activities that have raised suspicions that they are bent on
building a bomb.
Mohamed ElBaradei, the director general of the International Atomic
Energy Agency, was circumspect after holding talks with Iranian
nuclear experts aimed at heading off a growing crisis over Iran’s
nuclear ambitions. But there was no apparent breakthrough.
He confirmed that he had discussed with his Iranian hosts a UN
proposal for Iran to resume a freeze on uranium enrichment until
questions over the full extent of its nuclear programme have been
resolved.
However, the chief Iranian nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, indicated
suspension was not an option during a joint news conference with Mr
ElBaradei. “Such proposals are not very important ones,” he said.
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad issued a typically inflammatory
statement only hours before Mr ElBaradei arrived in Tehran. “Our
answer to those who are angry about Iran obtaining the full nuclear
cycle is one phrase, we say: Be angry and die of this anger,” he said.
“We will not hold talks with anyone about the Iranian nation’s right
(to enrichment) and no one has the right to step back, even one iota.”
Mr ElBaradei went to Tehran as he prepares to report back to the UN
Security Council at the end of the month on Iranian compliance with
IAEA and UN demands. If Iran continues its defiant stand, it risks
increased diplomatic pressure from the UN although Russia and China –
Iran’s allies on the council – are adamant that sanctions should not
be imposed.
Uranium enrichment is the key to developing the fuel for a reactor or
for a nuclear weapon. Although Iran insists that its intentions are
peaceful, the announcement on Tuesday that its scientists had enriched
uranium prompted a chorus of international condemnation.
Even Russia and China, urged Iran to resume its uranium enrichment
freeze.
Estimates vary as to how long it would take Iran to produce a nuclear
bomb, which requires 90 per cent levels of enriched uranium but it is
at least two years away. So far, Iran says it has only mastered the
technology for enriching uranium to the 3 per cent needed for reactor
fuel.
The timeline for building a weapon depends on Iran’s ability to
operate large numbers of spinning centrifuges that enrich uranium but
which are unreliable. Nuclear experts say it would take 200
centrifuges at full capacity for six to nine months to make sufficient
highly enriched uranium for a bomb – without the IAEA safeguards that
are in place.
Iran has announced that it had enriched uranium using 164 centrifuges
at its Natanz plant. Mr ElBaradei said yesterday that IAEA inspectors
had taken samples but was unable to confirm Iran’s claim.
Iran also reaffirmed on Wednesday that it intends to move toward
large-scale uranium enrichment involving 3,000 centrifuges by late
2006, and then expand the programme to 54,000 centrifuges. However, no
time-frame was given.
Mr ElBaradei said yesterday that the IAEA inspectors had “not seen
diversion of nuclear material for weapons purposes but the picture is
still hazy and not very clear”. He noted that Iran had failed to come
clean on the full extent of its activities for 20 years.
Mr ElBaradei also held talks with Gholamreza Aghazadeh, head of Iran’s
Atomic Energy Organisation. He did not meet Mr Ahmadinejad, or Iranian
spiritual leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei who has supreme authority over
the nuclear programme, which has become a matter of national pride.
Iran kept up its defiant rhetoric after the head of the international
nuclear agency urged Iranian leaders to co-operate in reining in
sensitive activities that have raised suspicions that they are bent on
building a bomb.
Mohamed ElBaradei, the director general of the International Atomic
Energy Agency, was circumspect after holding talks with Iranian
nuclear experts aimed at heading off a growing crisis over Iran’s
nuclear ambitions. But there was no apparent breakthrough.
He confirmed that he had discussed with his Iranian hosts a UN
proposal for Iran to resume a freeze on uranium enrichment until
questions over the full extent of its nuclear programme have been
resolved.
However, the chief Iranian nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, indicated
suspension was not an option during a joint news conference with Mr
ElBaradei. “Such proposals are not very important ones,” he said.
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad issued a typically inflammatory
statement only hours before Mr ElBaradei arrived in Tehran. “Our
answer to those who are angry about Iran obtaining the full nuclear
cycle is one phrase, we say: Be angry and die of this anger,” he said.
“We will not hold talks with anyone about the Iranian nation’s right
(to enrichment) and no one has the right to step back, even one iota.”
Mr ElBaradei went to Tehran as he prepares to report back to the UN
Security Council at the end of the month on Iranian compliance with
IAEA and UN demands. If Iran continues its defiant stand, it risks
increased diplomatic pressure from the UN although Russia and China –
Iran’s allies on the council – are adamant that sanctions should not
be imposed.
Uranium enrichment is the key to developing the fuel for a reactor or
for a nuclear weapon. Although Iran insists that its intentions are
peaceful, the announcement on Tuesday that its scientists had enriched
uranium prompted a chorus of international condemnation. Even Russia
and China, urged Iran to resume its uranium enrichment freeze.
Estimates vary as to how long it would take Iran to produce a nuclear
bomb, which requires 90 per cent levels of enriched uranium but it is
at least two years away. So far, Iran says it has only mastered the
technology for enriching uranium to the 3 per cent needed for reactor
fuel.
The timeline for building a weapon depends on Iran’s ability to
operate large numbers of spinning centrifuges that enrich uranium but
which are unreliable. Nuclear experts say it would take 200
centrifuges at full capacity for six to nine months to make sufficient
highly enriched uranium for a bomb – without the IAEA safeguards that
are in place.
Iran has announced that it had enriched uranium using 164 centrifuges
at its Natanz plant. Mr ElBaradei said yesterday that IAEA inspectors
had taken samples but was unable to confirm Iran’s claim.
Iran also reaffirmed on Wednesday that it intends to move toward
large-scale uranium enrichment involving 3,000 centrifuges by late
2006, and then expand the programme to 54,000 centrifuges. However, no
time-frame was given.
Mr ElBaradei said yesterday that the IAEA inspectors had “not seen
diversion of nuclear material for weapons purposes but the picture is
still hazy and not very clear”. He noted that Iran had failed to come
clean on the full extent of its activities for 20 years.
Mr ElBaradei also held talks with Gholamreza Aghazadeh, head of Iran’s
Atomic Energy Organisation. He did not meet Mr Ahmadinejad, or Iranian
spiritual leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei who has supreme authority over
the nuclear programme, which has become a matter of national pride.

Turkish army to launch Satellite in 2007 to spy on Kurdish fighters

Turkish army to launch Satellite in 2007 to spy on Kurdish fighters
Milliyet website, Istanbul
13 Apr 06

Text of report by Barkin Sik, headlined “Gokturk satellite will
monitor PKK”, by Turkish newspaper Milliyet website on 13 April
The Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) has named its spy satellite Gokturk
after the first state in history to use the name Turk. The satellite
is planned for launch in 2007. The spy satellite project is being run
for the TSK, which calculated any armed force not active in space
would be unable to provide effective security. The summoning paper
containing the TSK’s expectations for the satellite has been sent to
candidate producers. Meetings arranged with leading satellite
producers such as the United States, Israel, France, the United
Kingdom and South Korea are still in progress.
Will report on movements
The satellite is aimed to cost around 200m dollars and be able to
report on the movements of objects 60cm in size. With this capability
the terrorists’ every move will be able to be followed.
Institutions such as TUBITAK [Scientific and Technological Research
Council of Turkey] and ASELSAN [Military Electronics Industry] will
play an active role in the project. The satellite will orbit at an
altitude of 600-650 kilometres and monitor an area extending from
Europe to the Caucasus and the Middle East. The satellite will have a
life span of four to six years. Turkey is monitoring movement in the
region using Israeli and US satellites and the Ikonos satellite, a
low-orbit satellite belonging to the Cukurova Group’s Space Turk
Company.

april/15

Thursday, April 13, 2006
************************************
No one in his right mind now questions the fact that the attacks of 9/11 were planned and executed by Al Qaeda terrorists. Many books have already been written on the subject. But increasingly now books are also being written about the failures of the Bush administration to prevent it. In one of them, titled FOG FACTS: SEARCHING FOR TRUTH IN THE LAND OF SPIN by Larry Beinhart (New York, 2005) I read: “The standard excuse for having ignored the warnings is that such attacks were unimaginable.”
*
Was our Genocide unimaginable? Not if you consider the warnings that preceded it in 1894, 1895, 1896, and 1909.
*
For every ten or even a hundred books on the Genocide we need at least one that will document the failures of our own leadership. If so far our academics have ignored that aspect of the Genocide it may be because our leadership does not relish the idea of being investigated, in the same way that no one within the Bush administration wanted an investigation, because, writes Larry Beinhart, “the kindest thing that could be said about them was that they had been asleep at the wheel.”
*
Four days ago, not far from here, eight members of a motorcycle gang were massacred by fellow members. At the funeral of one of them, the rabbi is quoted as having said this in his eulogy: “He was the sort of guy who could manage to get reservations at a restaurant when nobody else could.” My first thought: Is that something to brag about? My second thought: I will be more than happy if in my eulogy (assuming there will be one) a priest says: “He was the sort of guy who would never eat in a restaurant that required reservat
Thursday, April 13, 2006
************************************
No one in his right mind now questions the fact that the attacks of 9/11 were planned and executed by Al Qaeda terrorists. Many books have already been written on the subject. But increasingly now books are also being written about the failures of the Bush administration to prevent it. In one of them, titled FOG FACTS: SEARCHING FOR TRUTH IN THE LAND OF SPIN by Larry Beinhart (New York, 2005) I read: “The standard excuse for having ignored the warnings (of the 9/11 holocaust) is that such attacks were unimaginable.”
*
Was our Genocide unimaginable? Not if you consider the massacres that preceded it in 1894, 1895, 1896, and 1909.
*
For every ten or even a hundred books on the Genocide we need at least one that will document the failures of our own leadership. If so far our academics have ignored that aspect of the Genocide it may be because our leadership does not relish the idea of being investigated, in the same way that no one within the Bush administration wanted an investigation, because, writes Larry Beinhart, “the kindest thing that could be said about them was that they had been asleep at the wheel.”
*
Four days ago, not far from here, eight members of a motorcycle gang were massacred by fellow members. At the funeral of one of them, the rabbi is quoted as having said this in his eulogy: “He was the sort of guy who could manage to get reservations at a restaurant when nobody else could.” My first thought: Is that something to brag about? My second thought: I will be more than happy if in my eulogy (assuming there will be one) a priest says: “He was the sort of guy who would never eat in a restaurant that required reservations.”
#
Friday, April 14, 2006
************************************
WHY I WRITE THE WAY I WRITE
*************************************
I write as I do because if you don’t know what went wrong, you can’t fix what’s going on.
*
CARCINOGENIC AGENTS
******************************
It is a well-known fact that many illnesses have psychosomatic origins. Norman Mailer may have been justified is describing a certain type of nasty characters as “cancer.” I remember to have read somewhere that no inmate of an insane asylum has ever died of cancer. After writing for Armenians for more than three decades I am tempted to ascribe my present cancer-free state to a miracle, and I don’t believe in miracles.
*
STATISTICS
******************
Victims of tuberculosis, terror, treason, neglect, starvation, and miscellaneous carcinogenic agents, the average lifespan of Armenian writers has been about 31. The average lifespan of bosses, bishops, and benefactors, about 89. I have a theory about that….
*
POLLYANNA’S GLAD GAME
**************************************
When teenagers insult me, I think, “They read me because I am accessible.” When adults insult me, I think, “I must have exposed a raw nerve.” When a moderator silences me, I think, “He is a yellow-belly fascist afraid of free speech.” When I meet a wall of silence, I think, “They are afraid to make asses of themselves by contradicting the obvious,” even as I suspect the cause may well be apathy.
*
IN PRAISE OF SLUMS
******************************
One good thing about being a slum-dweller is that you will never have a lawyer as a neighbor.
#
Saturday, April 15, 2006
**********************************
A TURKISH EDITOR
********************************
Whenever Armenians are discussed in odar circles these days it is in connection with the Genocide. Take away the Genocide and the chances are we will be reduced to the status of an anonymous displaced minority on its way to extinction. On the radio an interview with someone identified as “a Turkish editor in France.” The subject, you guessed it — the Genocide. “The only way to solve our differences is by engaging in dialogue,” the Turkish editor says, and goes on: “I understand Armenians…their feelings, their frustrations. I am myself an Armenian….”
*
THE GREAT ONES
********************************
There are only passing references to the Genocide in Antranik Zaroukian’s gossipy and compulsively readable last book, THE GREAT ONES…AND THE OTHERS (Beirut, 1992), a memoir of such contemporaries as Oshagan, Zarian, Shant, Aghbalian, Chobanian, and Shavarsh Missakian. In the chapter on Oshagan, Zaroukian quotes an Armenian hotel owner in Aleppo saying, Oshagan can stay in his hotel for as long as he likes free of charge, because “Oshagan is a great man, and that’s the least I can for him.” Zaroukian comments: “Mihran effendi [the owner] was an illiterate man, and for him anyone who had written a book was a great man. One day, after being informed that I had published a critical article about His Holiness Ardavast, he reprimanded me with the words, “That will not do, my boy – criticizing His Holiness…the man has written three books.”
*
THE OTHERS
***********************
I look around in search of a “great one” today and I only see pundits and academics who write as if they were interchangeable units. And what do they write about? Turkish barbarism.
*
CONFESSIONS
*********************
I point out contradictions in others because I have observed the same contradiction in myself. In that sense my criticism is also a confession. But perhaps all criticism is. I ask our forum moderators and editors, whose favorite subject is Turkish barbarism: “What is the difference between silencing a writer and cutting his tongue out?”
#

MFA: Minister Oskanian Receives OSCE Minsk Co-Chair Bernard Fassier

MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
—————————————— —-
PRESS AND INFORMATION DEPARTMENT
375010 Telephone: +37410. 544041 ext 202
Fax: +37410. 562543
Email: [email protected]
PRESS RELEASE
14-04-2006
Minister Oskanian Receives OSCE Minsk Co-Chair Bernard Fassier
Minister Oskanian received Ambassador Bernard Fassier, French Co-chair of
the OSCE Minsk Group, on April 13.
The two discussed the present state of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict
settlement process and exchanged views on the prospects for negotiations.

www.armeniaforeignministry.am

MFA: Ambassador Galoyan Presents Credentials to Lech Kaczynsk

MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA
—————————————— —-
PRESS AND INFORMATION DEPARTMENT
375010 Telephone: +37410. 544041 ext 202
Fax: +37410. 562543
Email: [email protected]
PRESS RELEASE
14-04-2006
Ambassador Ashot Galoyan Presents Credentials
to Lech Kaczynski, President of the Republic of Poland
On April 11, Ashot Galoyan, Ambassador Extraordinary and
Plenipotentiary of the Republic of Armenia to the Republic of Poland,
presented his credentials to Lech Kaczynski, President of the Republic
of Poland.
The President congratulated Ambassador Galoyan on the occasion of his
appointment and wished him good luck in his mission.
During the discussion that followed the ceremony, both stressed the
need for further development of the bilateral relations in all
spheres.
Taking into account Poland’s experience in European integration, the
Ambassador expressed Armenia’s willingness to develop Armenia-Poland
interaction in the framework of the European Neighborhood Policy.
President Kaczynski and Ambassador Galoyan also discussed a number of
international and regional issues of mutual interest.

www.armeniaforeignministry.am

Primate to Bless Government Officials

Western Diocese of the Armenian Church of America
3325 North Glenoaks Blvd.
Burbank, Ca 91504
Tel: 818-558-7474
Fax: 818-558-6333
Web:
Primate to Bless Government Officials During
Easter Week Ceremony

The Western Diocese would like to announce that for the first time
in the history of the Diocese prominent leaders from the Los Angeles
area have been invited by His Eminence Archbishop Hovnan Derderian to
participate in the traditional ceremony of the `Washing of the Feet.’
His Eminence is pleased that the Honorable Supervisor Michael
Antonovich has accepted his invitation to participate in the
observance.

The Washing of the Feet, which is observed on Maundy Thursday during
Holy Week, is one of the most beautiful and meaningful services in the
Armenian Church. It commemorates the blessed occasion when Jesus took
a towel and girded Himself and began washing His disciples’ feet,
setting an example of humility and love for the earliest members of
the Christian Church. It is on this occasion that we contemplate the
true meaning of sacrifice and service. It is these qualities that
define a true leader; therefore it is all the more meaningful that
our elected officials become part of this service.

In regards to the upcoming ceremony His Eminence Archbishop Hovnan
Derderian said, `We, as Armenian-Americans, are truly blessed to be
members of a society where our leaders have become vital participants
in the life of our community. We should extend our hand to them and
become partners in building better cities, and better communities. As
part of this partnership I wish to offer to them the opportunity to
become integrated in all aspects of our culture, so that while
serving as our representatives they can have a true understanding of
what it is to be Armenian.’

The Service of the Washing of the Feet will be conducted by
Archbishop Derderian at St. James Armenian Church, located at 4950
West Slauson Ave., Los Angeles, California 90056. The service will
begin at 7:00pm. All faithful of the Armenian Church are invited to
attend. For more information please call the Western Diocese at (818)
558-7474.

OFFICE OF THE WESTERN DIOCESE
April 6, 2006
Burbank, California

Dedication of Flowers to the Sacred Memory of the Martyrs

PRESS RELEASE
Organization: ARMENIAN WRITERS ASSOCIATION OF CALIFORNIA
Tel: 818-500-1532
Fax: 818-500-1542
E-mail: [email protected]

WHAT: Dedication of Flowers to the Sacred Memory of the Martyrs of
Armenian Genocide.
WHEN: at 6-8 PM, on Sunday, April 23 2006.
WHERE: Armenian Church of North America, Western Diocese, Kalaydjian
Hall, 3325 North Glenoaks Blvd, Burbank, CA 91504.
MISC: Armenian writers will read poems of the martyred
writers. Organized by the Armenian Writers Association of California
(AWAOC), under the auspices of His Eminence Archbishop Hovnan
Derderian, Primate of the Armenian Church of North America. Each
individual may bring a single flower to dedicate to the memory of the
Martyrs at the Khachkar. Admission is free.

ArmeniaNow – 04/14/2006

ARMENIANOW.COM
Administration Address: 26 Parpetsi St., No 9
Phone: +(374 1) 532422
Email: [email protected]
Internet:
Technical Assistance: (For technical assistance please contact Babken
Juharyan)
Email: [email protected]
LIFE IN PRISON FOR SAFAROV: HUNGARIAN COURT REACHES VERDICT FOR KILLER OF
MARGARYAN
By John Hughes
>From Internet news reports
Ramil Safarov, the Azerbaijani Army officer who admitted hacking to death
Armenian Army Lieutenant Gurgen Margaryan was sentenced to life in prison by a
court in Budapest, Hungary Thursday.
In handing down its sentence the district court said Safarov’s murder
was `premeditated, malicious and unusually cruel’. It is the harshest sentence
allowable by law in Hungary, where the death penalty was abolished in 1990.
Safarov, 29, was also found guilty of plotting to kill another Armenian
officer, although the plan was not carried out. He will be eligible for parole
in 30 years.
On February 19, 2004, Safarov attacked Margaryan while the victim was asleep
and, using an axe, mortally wounded the Armenian, nearly decapitating him.
“Compassion and remorse were completely missing from (Safarov’s) testimony,”
Judge Andras Vaskuti said, announcing the sentence. “During the whole case we
waited for him to be at least a bit sorry for the Armenian soldier he killed
brutally and for (Margaryan’s) family.”
The officers were participants in an English-language regional training
program, ironically titled `Partnership for Peace’, sponsored by NATO in the
Hungarian capital.
The killing enflamed smoldering anger between publics in Armenia and
Azerbaijan, bitter enemies since the late 1980s, when the Armenians in
Karabakh initiated a movement to secede from Azerbaijan in the Armenian-
populated Nagorno Karabakh. The enclave had been under Azeri rule since the
days of Josef Stalin. The countries have been in an uneasy ceasefire since
1994, after a four-year war.
Earlier this year passions were again stirred when an Azeri political party
named Safarov `Man of the Year’, sparking angry public demonstrations in
Armenia, and leading a fringe party leader to announce a bounty on Safarov’s
life, should he not receive the maximum sentence.
Safarov has said the murder was a revenge killing, carried out to avenge
losses his family suffered during the war.
During a statement in court Thursday, however, he denied that the killing was
premeditated, saying it was provoked because Margaryan had ridiculed and
insulted him during the training program.
“My conscience was clouded as a result of the insults and humiliating and
provoking behavior, and I lost all control,” Safarov told the court. “It would
not be correct to consider it as merely a premeditated act caused by the
awakening of revenge and hate upon seeing the Armenians.”
Safarov’s lawyer, Gyorgy Magyar, said he would appeal the verdict. He also
said it was not clear whether Safarov would serve the sentence in Hungary or
be extradited to Azerbaijan. (Republic of Armenia Ministry of Defense
representative Hayk Demoyan, who participated in the trial, told A1+ news
agency that Hungarian law stipulates that Safarov’s sentence be served in
Hungary.)
Margaryan family attorney Nazeli Vartanyan called the outcome `a good decision
for the Hungarian court and for Armenian society’.
ARMENIANOW EXCLUSIVE: FORMER COACH HENK WISMAN TALKS ABOUT DISPUTED CONTRACTS,
UNFIT PLAYERS AND THE SORRY STATE OF ARMENIAN FOOTBALL
By Suren Musayelyan
ArmeniaNow reporter
Editor’s Note: In the past four seasons, the Armenian National football team
has had four different head coaches. It has had as many coaches as victories
in that period. Henk Wisman, the latest to get the axe from the Armenian
Football Federation says officials are unrealistic in their approach to the
sport.
Wisman spoke exclusively with ArmeniaNow to give his assessment of the soccer
state of affairs.
Fired national football team coach Henk Wisman wants his contract with the
Armenian Football Federation respected and intends to stay in Armenia until
his deal expires or until his claims are satisfied.
The Dutchman was hired to coach Armenia’s national football team and football
club Pyunik last May, but was sacked last week. He claims he has three months
left on his contract. The Football Federation says it fired Wisman because of
his record of one win, one draw and six defeats over nearly a year. Meanwhile,
the 48-year-old Dutchman argues that he has been fired for his `realistic
approach to Armenian football.’
Originally Wisman had a 7-month plus 2 years contract with the Federation,
meaning that after seven months if both sides agreed he would sign a contract
to coach Armenia for two years. He says in late December, the Armenian
Federation proposed a two-year contract to him. But, according to him, he
asked for an intermediate contract until July 1, after which he would decide
on further extending his contracts.
`I said I needed half a year to make an evaluation, because I wanted a lot of
things in Armenian football professionalized, like players, accommodation,
medical equipment and facilities, clothes,’ Wisman said in an exclusive
interview with ArmeniaNow. `If no progress was made, I would then stop the
contract. And likewise the Federation could refuse to extend a contract with
me if they were unsatisfied with my work.’
Wisman says he has been paid for the first three month of the year and now,
after being sacked, he wants his salary for the remaining three months paid as
well. (Neither Wisman nor the federation would say how much the coach was
being paid. Football journalists speculate that the position pays anywhere
from $60,000-200,000.)
`It is normal that when a club or federation fires you they pay you till the
end of your contract. It is so in Holland,’ he says, adding that the
Federation broke the contract unilaterally. Meanwhile, the Federation says
that they have not received any claim either from Wisman or from the Dutch
Football Federation regarding the payment of the salary.
Federation spokesman Arayik Manukyan told ArmeniaNow that they had an
agreement after the seven months of Wisman’s contract expired that they would
make the decision about further extending it after the draw for Euro-2008,
which took place in January.
`As it was officially stated by the Federation, the contract with Henk Wisman
was not extended by the Federation president after they failed to come to
agreement during the negotiations,’ Manukyan said, without elaborating. He
said the Federation did not have any information regarding Wisman’s claims.
But now Wisman says it is a legal matter between the Armenian and Dutch
football associations.
Wisman, who played for Ajax for eight years and was involved in the Dutch U-18
and U-21 national teams, stopped playing football young to take up a coaching
career. He was hired by the Armenian Federation following the transfer of
Armenia’s young talented striker Edgar Manucharyan to FC Ajax (Amsterdam) as
the Armenian Federation then expressed a desire to hire a coach with Ajax
background.
Now he continues to attend football matches in Armenia, as a spectator,
pending a solution to his dispute with the Federation.
Meanwhile, the Federation is reportedly looking for another foreign coach to
succeed Wisman.
Wisman, who sounded optimistic about his future weeks ago in an interview with
, says the decision of the Football Federation was a surprise to
him.
`The only explanation that I heard was that players were not in physically
good shape. We became champions with Pyunik, we won the Super Cup, we
qualified for the semifinal in the CIS Cup in Moscow for the first time, while
opting out of the match with Azerbaijan’s champion Neftchi was not my
decision. It cannot be a reason to fire me.’
Regarding the national team, Wisman says that he has played the best possible
football with the set of players he had.
`Armenia does not have a strong national championship, there is no strong
competition in the country and most of the few players who play abroad are not
involved in strong leagues,’ Wisman says. `One should understand that not much
can be expected from a team that plays against competitors of a much higher
level and quality.’
Wisman says he wants Armenia to play the Dutch way, but as he says with the
given team he could not play offensive football against the strong national
teams like Holland, the Czech Republic, Romania in the latest WC-2006
qualifying round.
`But when I saw an opportunity for that, I played the team the Dutch way, such
as in the match against Andorra when we dominated the field and played very
attractive and spectacular football,’ he says. (Armenia beat Andorra away – 3-
0).
Wisman says the team accepted his tactics and he was satisfied with how the
players realized his designs on the pitch.
Armenia and Pyunik veteran defender and captain Sargis Hovsepyan, 33,
describes Wisman as a good specialist. `I am satisfied with the work with Henk
Wisman, with the trainings that he had with us, with the exercises and
tactical schemes he proposed. He tried to train us to play Dutch football, not
only running about the field with the ball, but also thinking. He had normal
relations with all players,’ he told ArmeniaNow.
Hovsepyan says Wisman was also satisfied with the way the team realized his
tactics on the pitch. `I agree that Armenia should play realistic football
now. You can’t play offensive football against Holland or other leading teams
if you don’t have a sufficient level,’ the veteran defender said.
`If the coach cannot achieve a result with lots of high-level footballers
playing in strong leagues, then he is to blame for the failure, but in my case
I didn’t have the required level of players to oppose strong European sides,’
Wisman explains.
`Edgar Manucharyan, who is now in Ajax, is a very talented player, but he has
been injured most of the time. Why? Because the Ajax level is too high for
him. The intensity and frequency of the trainings are high for him. His
physical fitness is not good enough for them at this moment. Maybe he will be
good enough for them in a year or two. I am sorry, but that’s the deference
between Holland and Armenia. It is a reality.’
Unlike his predecessor, French coach Bernard Casoni, who was fired for not
being `in touch’ with Armenian football, Wisman has stayed in Armenia on a
permanent basis.
He says he knows all players in Armenia and outside and knows their strong and
weak sides well enough.
Wisman says that there are a lot of conditions needed for Armenia to become a
strong football nation, like an improved economic situation, more investments
into football on all levels, a good level of the national championship and
players playing in strong foreign sides. Acknowledging Football Federation
President Ruben Hayrapetyan as a man who takes care of Armenian football
matters and tries to promote investments in this sport, Wisman says that above
all he wanted from him more time.
`The Federation president is doing a very good job for Armenia. But he must
be realistic and give more time and responsibility to the coach to work on it.
He shouldn’t expect a miracle to happen within a few months. I think it is too
much to change four foreign coaches in as many years,’ he says.
GAS AND HOT AIR: SELL OF ENERGY FACILITIES RAISES DEBATE
By Marianna Grigoryan
The decision by the Government of Armenia to sell off another section of a
thermal power plant and partial rights to the Iran-Armenia gas pipeline to
Russia as a barter for reduced gas prices has been called an `attempt to
prolong the incumbency’, `illogical’ and even `national treason’ in the wake
of last week’s announcement.
On April 5, President Robert Kocharyan told the public that gas prices would
increase by only 10-15 percent, rather than the expected 52 percent. The next
day, it was learned that a deal with Russia for Armenian energy facilities
paved the way for the reduction of prices. The latest agreement puts nearly
70 percent of Armenian energy in the hands of the Russians.
Officials in Armenia have not yet confirmed the pipeline deal, although the
Russian agency GazProm says it is completed.
Critics say the latest `property for debt’ agreement turns Armenia into
a `gubernia’ – a province of Russia.
`In this situation maintaining an energy ministry appears needless,’ says
renowned economist Eduard Aghajanov. `According to our authorities the more
energy structures we sell the more independent we are. The activities of the
authorities in the energy sphere defy logic.’
Aghajanov explains the problem is not the price of the power bloc but the
principle. He says a country shouldn’t sell almost all its energy resources to
a foreign country.
`There is nothing anti-Russian in my words,’ says the specialist. `I mean the
alternative; it is inadmissible to give all to one country. The energy
security of Armenia demands other players in our market. The challenge is that
Russia in fact owns not only the power production resources but also its
distribution structure. Russia can thus form a rigid structure that will
deprive Armenia of energy security.’
But while economists, political analysts and common citizens are likening the
sale to `selling the cow for the price of milk’, authorities say the deal is
favorable to Armenia.
`The deal was good business and was sold in a proper way,’ says the RA Prime
Minister Andranik Margaryan.
`The fifth bloc (of the power plant) is like a three-storied house with only
the basement built, and nothing else,’ says the RA Minister of Defense Serge
Sargsyan. `There are non-governmental groups and people who perceive the
word `Russia’ like a bull perceived the red color.’
Sargsyan says it was not practical to keep total control of the bloc.
`The bloc would cost at least $180 million. And the expenses would at best be
compensated in 10 years,’ he said. `That is, we would have an enterprise
working with profits in 2017 at best. What would be the profit? How much would
the gas price grow by that time, would there be profit or not, only
Nostradamus would say, what would happen in 11-12 years.’
Sargsyan says the Russian side had offered to buy the 5th bloc several years
ago, but the Armenian authorities have only recently accepted the offer.
`What do we need as a nation, as a state now? To sell something that does not
exist for $250 million now, or wait till 2017 when we may get very little,’
says Sargsyan.
But Aghajanov holds to his opinion.
`Gas is a geopolitical instrument for Russia that it uses to solve all of its
political problems,’ says the economist. `It’s not a new thing as Russia has
always had a policy of colonization.’
LOVE-HATE SONG: ARMENIA’S EUROVISION ENTRY CAUSES DEBATE AND THREATS
Gayane Abrahamyan
ArmeniaNow reporter
On May 18th and 20th Armenian pop singer Andre will appear before the European
TV viewing public under the Armenian flag at the Eurovision international song
competition in Athens. He will perform a song that has become the focus of
debate and even political speculation, even gaining discussion among
Parliament Members.
Critics say the song `Without Your Love’ does not represent Armenian music and
that it is in fact Arabic or Turkish and that Armenia is pandering to European
tastes by presenting such a song.
`If Europe loves it today we serve it, if it wishes Indian, we will write an
Indian one. Armenian is not in respect, forget it,’ says the Chairman of the
Union of Composers of Armenia Robert Amirkhanyan, then dismisses the song as
not being worth his criticism.
The music was written by the leader of the State Jazz Band of Armenia,
composer Armen Martirosyan, with instrumental arrangements by Ara Torosyan
(Murzik) and lyrics by Katrin Bekian.
`Yes, Europe is inclined towards Eastern (culture), but we are not the West
either,’ says arranger Torosyan. `Armenians have not heard their folk songs
for so long that they don’t differentiate between the Armenian and the
Turkish; this song is a compilation of the European and the Eastern, just as
we are between Europe and the East. Here there is no deviation from
ethnographic music and the Armenian tune.’
Other pop singers view the song as well-suited for the competition, which is
held annually. The winner is selected by means of phone and SMS messages and
the number of votes also decides the top ten countries to participate
automatically in the next year’s finals. One of the important preconditions is
that a country cannot vote for its own song.
`There is no need to make a scandal,’ says singer Shushan Petrosyan. `We have
numerous other reasons for talking about Arabic and Turkish motives in the
Armenian pop music; this is not the case, we just need to be willing and do
everything for Andre to win.’
Singer Aramo says he likes the instrumental arrangement of the song more than
the lyrics and the video. Aramo says the song does not fit Andre somehow, and
the East is embellished in the song, which is not typical to Armenian music.
But conductor Tigran Hekekyan says there is no need to present a piece of
national cultural value in such a festival. He describes the competition as
a `market’, adding that the best chance of winning is whatever `sells’.
Hekekyan also says that the debate over eastern influence in Armenian music
seems a little late.
`The song is not born occasionally, it’s the mirror of a whole cultural layer
and there is a need in discussing the problem of that layer existence and not
cling on one song,’ says Hekekyan.
Debate on the matter is useless, says the Chairman of the Board of the Public
Television Alexan Harutyunyan, since he is the one to decide the song and the
singer to be sent to the competition.
`This is the musical competition of the European broadcasters union and the
choice of the song to be presented is ascribed purely to us. I could make the
decision myself but I listened and took the opinion of the best musicians and
(popular music) authorities of the republic,’ says Harutyunyan.
And while Armenians are discussing the song, Azerbaijanis are flooding Andre
with threats. A month ago the Minister of Culture of Azerbaijan addressed a
letter to Eurovision protesting Andre’s participation, citing the fact that
the singer was born in `Nagorno Karabakh Republic’ an `occupied territory’ of
Azerbaijan.
The singer has even gotten death threats on Internet forum discussions.
`Nobody can kill me, they simply envy me,’ Andre told ArmeniaNow. `For me it
was more unpleasant at first to hear the criticism on the Armenian side, but I
don’t pay attention to them either. Let them not listen to my song if they
don’t like it.’
FAVORITES: ANB SAYS BBC AWARD `FOR ALL ARMENIANS’
Gayane Abrahamyan
Armenia Now reporter
Members of the Armenian Navy Band met with media Wednesday to say that winning
the `Audience Award’ of the BBC World Music competitions was `a victory for
all Armenians’.
Last Friday night in London, the group was named winner of the award,
described by BBC as `intended to reflect the musical popularity of different
groups across the whole spectrum of World Music and listeners voted online for
the group or artist they admired most.’
Group leader and founder Arto Tuncboyaciyan was called to London, where he
received the award from African musician and emcee of the ceremony Hugh
Masekela at the Brixton Academy Hall.
`Arto was invited to take part in the award ceremony but he didn’t know why he
was going – to receive the award or to return empty-handed, everything was
surprising,’ says ANB saxophone player Davit Nalchajyan.
The 12-member band was also nominated for Best Group from Europe, an award
that went to Fanfare Ciocarlia of Romania. Over the years, the Audience Award
has gone to such prominent performers Chronos Quartet and Cesaria Evora.
`For us it is very important that we got especially the Audience Award since
this is a true, sincere evaluation,’ says saxman Armen Hyusnunts.
`WEAK’ BUT NOT `FAILED’: AUSTRIAN SPECIALIST ASSESSES ARMENIA IN `CHANGING
WORLD’
By Vahan Ishkhanyan
ArmeniaNow reporter
A member of the National Defense Academy of Austria Martin Malek describes the
phenomenon of collapsed and weak states that emerged beginning in the second
half of the 20th century in his article `Collapse of States as a Phenomenon of
International Relations’. Several of the definitions of weak states fit
Armenia.
The article is published in an 825-page book `Armenia in a Transforming World’
by the Armenian Center for National and International Studies (ACNIS).
A presentation of the book took place on Wednesday at the center
().
The three parts of the book present analyses of Armenian experts dealing with
regional conflicts and solutions to energy problems, the revolutions in CIS
countries, Armenian-Russian economic relations, the Iranian nuclear problems.
Malek’s article is the only view from outside. He writes that unlike
historical states that disappeared because of military conquests, in the
modern world states are ruined from within. There are many countries whose
state institutions are so wrecked that their presence on the maps, in the UN
and other international organizations is only explained by the fact that
unlike previous times there are none willing to occupy them.
Malek defines Failed States with several characteristics (unformed,
collapsing, insolvent) – sovereignty (when public force centers and non-
governmental organizations gain part of sovereign rights), the quality of
democracy (states that play democracy), the lack of legitimacy of power,
security problems, control of territory and borders, efficiency of state
institutions, corruption, etc.
He writes: `In collapsing states at best the executive power works, and the
legislature, if it exists, is a tool in the hands of the executive
authorities. Democratic orders are very vague or are absent. The judicial
power is corrupted and depends on the executive, and because of that citizens
do not pin hopes on courts, especially in matters with the state.’ There are
countries where there is nothing left to collapse, for example in Afghanistan
and a number of third world countries. However, CIS countries are not among
them.
Malek classifies two of the republics of the South Caucasus among the failed
states: `Already for 15 years Georgia and Azerbaijan have not controlled parts
of their territories on which the monopoly of state power is not spread. For
this reason they are classified among failed states unlike Armenia, although
in this states a number of state institutions are weak, corruption is
thriving, the judicial power is ineffective.’
Collapsing and weak states become a threat for the West, as terrorist
organizations are formed in them, they become sources of disseminating drugs,
and refugees from these countries pour into Europe.
Malek says that there is no threat of terrorism from the countries of the
South Caucasus, the flow of refugees is insignificant. The only problem for
the West is that this territory has become a transit corridor for drugs from
Central Asia to Europe.
CRIME REVIEW: POLICE CONCERNED ABOUT INCREASE OF `HEAVY’ CRIMES
Arpi Harutyunyan
The latest report on crime by the Yerevan Police shows an increase this year
over last.
During the first three months of 2006, 1,098 crimes were committed in Yerevan,
an increase of 127 over the same period last year.
Police department head Nerses Nazarayan, however, says the increase can partly
be attributed to better record keeping.
Drug related crimes were among the growing number, as police made 80 arrests
for drug dealing and 309 for possession. Police confiscated more than two
kilograms of illegal drugs, though they would not specify what type.
Yerevan city law enforcement are particularly concerned that the number of
murders more than doubled during the time period. During the first three
months, the capital recorded 8 homicides, compared with three in the same time
last year.
Police say the number of home burglaries has increased from 57 to 110 during
the time period. Many, Nazaryan said, involved copied keys.
The Police Mashtots Division has recently arrested a criminal group of two
that has committed seven attacks using firearms (6 of the attacks were made in
recent years). Another criminal group of two apprehended by the Police Malatia
Division committed 116 robberies.
The Yerevan community of Arabkir has been noticed this year not only for
robbery, but for other types of thefts as well. Burlaries of basements have
become regular. In the last two months basements of four residents have been
robbed at Aram Khachatryan 10 in Arabkir community. The details of these four
robberies have not been yet disclosed.
Gagik Madoyan, Deputy Head of the Police Arabkir Division on Operative Issues,
also says the number of burglaries has grown in general. He says criminal
gangs from Georgia are partly to blame, for the upswing in crime.
TRADITION CHALLENGED: FEAR OF EGGS NOT LIKELY TO HAMPER ARMENIA’S EASTER
RITUALS
By Gayane Lazarian
ArmeniaNow reporter
Beginning in the middle of every March 75-year-old Shoghik Markosyan starts
collecting onion peels, for use in dying Easter eggs. It is an awaited and
special ritual for her. She carefully arranges dry onion peel in a copper
bowl, arranges the eggs, adds a spoonful of salt, then closes the lid and puts
the pot on a low fire.
This year, Shoghik feared there’d be no such tradition, due to concerns about
bird flu.
`I thought if that bird flu continued we would not dye eggs, but it is good
that passions started to calm down and they now speak less about this
disease,’ she says.
Like Shoghik all housewives throughout Armenia were worried, but not
contradicting the tradition of the festival many of them will dye eggs.
`How can one imagine Easter without eggs. My children can’t wait till that day
comes,’ says housewife Anahit Margaryan.
For many the ritual of dying eggs begins on the Thursday preceding the Easter
Sunday when according to tradition seven eggs must be already dyed in the
evening.
Shop assistant Marine Grigoryan says egg sales – by customers previously shy
of poultry products – have doubled since the beginning of the week. Her shop
is selling about 300 instead of usual 150 eggs a day. (The price of one egg
fluctuates between 40 and 60 drams, from 9-13 cents).
`They say, we’ll take them to catch bird flu, let’s see what it is,’ Marine
tells jokingly.
At Echmiadzin resident Vardan Abrahamyan’s home, however, eggs will not be
dyed. Abrahamyan slaughtered his chickens in February, fearing that they may
have bird flu.
`I don’t trust anyone,’ Abrahamyan says. `I only trust my own instincts. We
will not eat eggs at Easter, we will only eat fish and pilaf. God will not
take offense on us until all this calms down. How come that bird flu was
reported in Georgia and Azerbaijan, and we don’t have it?’
With the biggest day for poultry products at hand, bird flu does have some
impact.
At at least one café in Yerevan Wednesday, customers ordering Ajarian
khachapouri were told no egg dishes were being served, due to bird flu
concerns.
Cactus restaurant manager Agata Hovakimyan says the demand of poultry dishes –
which make up a third of the restaurant’s menu – is down by 20 percent since
February.
And at Mister Toaster bistro, director Tom Rostomian says that problems
connected with poultry products are considerable.
`Eighty percent of chicken is not sold,’ he says. `We had sandwiches that
sold well, now if we sell just one such sandwich we consider it something.’
Meanwhile, poultry product produces continue insisting there’s nothing to
worry about.
On Sunday, it is likely even the skeptical will believe the businessmen, or at
least put their faith in tradition on this Easter.
YEREVAN’S CAFÉ CULTURE: WHAT IS THE PRICE OF `A CUP OF COFFEE’ IN THE CAPITAL?
By Vahan Ishkhanyan
In 1998, there were 197 cafes in the city center (`Kentron’) of Yerevan. At
the end of last café season there were 427. Considering the center’s
population of about 130,000, that means there is one café per 304 residents.
And as this season has begun, the number continues to increase.
Comparisons must rely on approximation rather than hard data. But a casual
stroll in Yerevan any night between May and October would offer evidence that
this may be the per-capita café capital of this continent. (They are
not `cafes’, officially, but `objects of public catering’, a hold over
category from Soviet times.)
Where once city parks held green spaces and benches for public rest, a seat
now comes with a price – at least the cost of a cup of coffee (about 50
cents), and open greenery has been replaced with jarringly bright
advertisement umbrellas. The latest trend, in fact – proudly displayed in such
places as Astral and Jazzve – is to pave over parks and replace them, not with
simply chairs and tables, but with plush accommodations that turn the out-of-
doors into something approximating open-air living rooms.
For about six months out of the year, these cafes apparently bring enough
revenue to justify the fact that they are limited to seasonal operation. (In
some cases, owners of cafes also own restaurants with indoor service year-
round.)
>From easy business opportunity to phenomenon
`In the beginning the reasons for building cafes were different than now,’
says Lyudmila Harutyunyan, the Head of the Sociology Department of the Yerevan
State University. `Medium-sized business was not developed and it was
difficult to produce competitive goods for foreign markets. The market was
narrow, the borders were closed (and remain so).
`As the sphere of service required little investments people began to open
cafes. If it was possible to earn money on something, they capitalized on
that. Today the situation is different. Running a café became a lucrative
business. The jostle for vital locations is constant. Competition is for a
narrow territory and it is clearly seen how they seize sidewalks and lawns.’
A good monthly income of a café in central Yerevan is about $12,000.

But one owner of one of the most popular cafes says that he gets an average of
3,000 customers per day. And only about 10 percent are there simply for a 50-
cent cup of coffee.
(It is worth noting that, while the mushroom growth of cafes is phenomenal,
café culture has always been a distinguishing mark of Yerevan. At a time when
Soviet cities were made from the same mold, Yerevan was known throughout the
USSR for its abundance of open-air cafes. It was even joked that cleaning
ladies would bark at lingering customers: `Those of you who have been sitting
here since yesterday, get out!’)
Today, the image of `the poor Armenians’ is hardly upheld if café season in
the capital is the scale by which well being is measured.
And nowhere is the picture of a city at ease more vivid than in the area
around the Opera House, a Yerevan landmark.
Where, in the late 1980s, thousands stood in the yards to rally for a free
Karabakh and give the place its informal name `Freedom Square’, today
thousands sit and sip in what has become a café mall, practically obscuring
the famous and recently renovated majestic home of the musical arts.
The park is some 50,000 square meters, and over the past four years has been
divided up – mostly by government officials who have taken over the property
out-right, or by having it purchased in the name of a relative – into 15 cafes
with about 300 tables where empty seats are a summertime rarity.
In the greater area ringing the park, there are 70 cafes on 115 hectares.
While the city center has become a capital of casual consumption, the expense
has been the destruction of green space that once was a haven of free escape
from the noise and dirt of a compact city.
(There are significantly fewer cafes in the suburbs. For example, in the
district of Ajapnyak, five kilometers from the city center, there are about 20
cafes. With 106,600 residents, there is about one café for every 5,330
residents.)
Even official architects admit that the appearance of the city center has been
distorted by cafes taking over green areas.
`Of course, all this is abnormal, but we need to be patient, it will get to
normal,’ says Armen Lalayants, deputy to the chief architect of the city. He
hopes that the time will come when the café phenomena will pass as a fashion,
and the way will be cleared again for green areas.
`Visiting a café in Armenia is the reflection of a Mediterranean culture,’
says Harutyunyan. `Armenians like living in a community which is not typical
for northern peoples.’
The cost of `a cup of coffee’
At least 130 cafes have been constructed on property that was previously a
public park.
According to the data of the Social-Ecological Association, between 1995-2002
the city lost more that 1,000 hectares of public green territories because of
construction (including cafes). Meanwhile, green space decreased to 3.6
percent. It was 30.6 percent in 1986.
Srbuhi Harutyunyan, head of the Social-Ecological Association, is among
activists who are disturbed to see construction in general, and oligarch-owned
cafes in particular, rob Yerevan of its greenery.
She cites a World Health Organization study that says city residents need 50
square meters of green territories per resident to have healthy oxygen intake.
According to Harutyunyan’s research, in 1986 Yerevan had 42.3 square meters of
green for each resident. By 1995, the number had decreased to 27.6 square
meters. And, today, there are only 4.5 square meters of green space for each
of the capital’s one million residents.
During a 60-year period of development in Yerevan city planners created 1,930
hectares of public green space. Today there is only 503 hectares left. And,
significantly, 77 percent of the loss occurred in the past eight years – long
after Armenia’s energy crisis was the cause for the cutting of trees.
(One of the most outrageous examples cited by journalists as a moral violation
was a report in 2004 that the Minister of Nature Protection, the very guardian
of Armenia’s ecology, had dug up evergreen trees from one of the republic’s
few nature preserves and replanted them around a café owned by his wife, where
the trees soon wilted and died.)
Stopping the further loss of green space has become a celebrated cause in
Yerevan media. Non Governmental Organizations (NGOs) have been founded with
the express purpose of saving whatever is left. But protests have had
practically no impact.
Harutyunyan, the sociologist, says that one of the causes of the easy
appropriation of green areas is that Yerevan retains a village mentality and
has never formed a culture of a modern urban society. (It is not accidental
that in some suburbs, cows are pastured in lawns.)
`The small city was destroyed in the 1960s, the village filled the city and
the village absorbed the city in itself instead of the opposite,’ Harutyunyan
says. `As a result, the tradition of city values (especially parks) has
disappeared.’
The sociologist says, too, that the popularity of cafes (in spite of the
disdain with which they are viewed by some) is an indication of an emerging
middle class.
`The cafes of the center became the sitting place for bourgeoisie,’ says
Harutyunyan. `Who visits a café? Those who visit it are a newly born middle
class but not a stratum that forms the country’s policy. . .’
(This article appears in the latest issue of AGBU magazine, )
SPORT ROUNDUP: KICKING, WRESTLING, THINKING, FIGHTING . . .
By Suren Musayelyan
ArmeniaNow reporter
Football
A draw for the 2006 Intertoto Cup held at the UEFA headquarters in Switzerland
pitted an Armenian club that will qualify for participation in the tournament
in June against a team from Georgia.
The most likely participant in the Intertoto Cup from Armenia is Yerevan’s FC
Kilikia, fifth place finishers in the national championship last season.
Its Georgian opponent is not known yet either. Armenian and Georgian clubs
have already played each other as part of UEFA club competitions in the past.
In the latest match Yerevan’s FC Banants eliminated Tbilisi’s FC Lokomotiv in
the UEFA Cup last year.
If the Armenian club manages to overcome the first hurdle in the 2006
Intertoto Cup it will face an Austrian representative (not known yet either).
The first match between the Armenian and Georgian clubs will be played on June
17 or 18.
Today (April 14) FC Pyunik (Yerevan) and FC Gandzasar (Kapan) will play at the
Vazgen Sargsyan `Republican’ Stadium and Gyumri’s FC Shirak will play FC Mika
(Ashtarak) in Gyumri to open the 15th national championship of Armenia in
which eight clubs participate. April 15, FC Ararat (Yerevan) will play FC
Banants (Yerevan), and FC Ulis (Yerevan) will play FC Kilikia (Yerevan).
(Based on reports by A1 Plus, the Football Federation of Armenia)
WRESTLING
Four Russian freestyle wrestlers have received permission from the Wrestling
Federation of Russia (WFR) to continue their career in the national team of
Armenia, Regnum news agency reports, quoting a document signed by WFR
President Mikhail Mamiashvili.
The move is part of the plan of Armenian National Olympic Committee President
Gagik Tsarukyan to secure medals for the Olympic team of Armenia at the Games
in Beijing. In particular, in mid-March Tsarukyan said that eight Russian
wrestlers, including world and European champions, will join the national
wrestling team of Armenia. According to a preliminary agreement, in the event
of winning the 2008 Olympics each of the Russian wrestlers will receive
$500,000 from Armenia’s National Olympic Committee; in case of winning the
Olympic gold Armenians will receive $700,000.
The most famous of the four whose names have already been confirmed is Ruslan
Kokayev (up to 74kg) who became the European champion in his weight category
in 2004 performing under Russia’s flag. Vadim Laliyev (up to 84kg), Shamil
Gitinov (up to 96kg) and Ruslan Basiyev (up to 120kg) are also considered
strong athletes in their respective weight categories.
All the four are included in the preliminary application of Armenia for the
European championships to be held in Moscow on April 25-30. But their actual
participation in the tournament is still under question.
CHESS
Armenian chess players GMs Artashes Minasyan, Ashot Anastasyan, Tigran L.
Petrosyan, IMs Arman Pashikyan, Tigran Kotanjyan, WGMs Lilit Lazarian, Elina
Danielyan, Nelli Aghinyan, WIM Siranush Andreasyan are participating in the
7th European Men’s and Women’s Individual Chess Championships held in Aydin,
Kusadasi (Turkey) on April 4-17.
After eight rounds of the tournament Armenian grandmasters Ashot Anastasyan
and Artashes Minasyan have 5.5 points each and share 3rd-19th places, half a
point behind second-placed Vasiliy Ivanchuk (Ukraine). The leader is Croatian
Zdenko Kozul with 6.5 points.
Tigran Kotanjyan and Tigran Petrosyan are in the middle of the table with 4.5
points, and Arman Pashikyan has 3.5 points.
Among women Elina Danielyan and Lilit Lazarian have 5 points each and share
11th-30th places and still have chances to finish among the top three if they
win their games in the remaining three rounds. Siranush Andreasyan and Nelli
Aghinyan have 4.5 points each and share 31st-44th places.
JUDO
The President of the European Judo Union Marius Vizner (Romania) was on a
three-day visit to Yerevan this week at the invitation of the Judo Federation
of Armenia.
It was agreed that one of the most prestigious judo tournaments, the Grand
Prix, will be held in Yerevan in October 2007.
As the host of the tournament in 2007 Armenia will have one participant in
each weight category. $250,000 will be spent on the tournament, including a
$100,000 prize fund. (A1 Plus, Armenpress)

www.armenianow.com
www.uefa.com
www.acnis.am
www.agbu.org.