Armenian opposition leader says Karabakh peace ideas “in favour of Azerbaijan”
Aravot, Yerevan
12 Apr 06
Excerpt from Margarit Yesayan report by Armenian newspaper Aravot on
12 April entitled “To root out the evil is the most important task”
An interview with the leader of Anrapetutyun [Republic] Party, Aram
Sarkisyan.
[Correspondent] Mr Sarkisyan, what do you think of the sale of the
Razdan power plant?
[Aram Sarkisyan] I think that the “Property for Debt” and “Property
for Gas” programmes are in fact addressing a different problem that
may be described as “everything for debt”. Obviously the Armenian
energy security has received one final blow from the authorities. The
problem is not at all about being a vassal of Russia. The problem
regards the state and statehood. We cannot speak about independence
and profitability when the state property is being sold to Russia or
any other state for that matter.
[Passage omitted: reiterates the point]
[Correspondent] So you are against the deal. But what do you suggest,
another revolution?
[Sarkisyan] If there is another option, please suggest. The gas price
will rise, but in three years time. I suppose that one day three years
later we shall find out that a “cheaper” gas price cost us not only
the Razdan power plant but also shares in the Iran-Armenia gas
pipeline.
[Passage omitted: Sarkisyan speculates on other possible consequences
of selling property]
[Correspondent] But what is the way out? What does the opposition
suggest?
[Sarkisyan] In our country the authorities consider the opposition
their enemy. Today we can only be against this. But
tomorrow…[ellipses as published]. All I can say is that our party is
drafting a law on nationalization because if there is a law on
denationalization and privatization, there should also be a law on
nationalization to avoid abuses. This law will give an opportunity to
annul all the illegal deals.
[Correspondent] You have put forward your proposal for the Karabakh
issue settlement. Did they reply?
[Sarkisyan] No, they did not. But today’s options for a settlement of
the Karabakh issue are in favour of Azerbaijan. And there is no mutual
compromise. I am sure we shall be able to root out the evil and
produce good results. But if not, Armenians will continue to leave
Armenia. We shall then lose this state and turn into a nation which
will be making toasts on foreign shores. [reference to Armenians
living abroad]
[Correspondent] How will the political field look before the
parliamentary election 2007?
[Sarkisyan] It is too early to speak about this election. That is the
field of the authorities and they are preparing for that election. But
I am sure that it would just be an imitation. Actually the year of
2006 raised serious questions for our country and the region as it is
considered to be a year of the Karabakh issue settlement.
The presidents of the two countries may meet again in May. All the
parties are awaiting the results of that meeting, especially the
ruling party as it does not know what will happen afterwards, what
parties it will unite and whose interests it will support.
Armenian paper looks at reasons for US backing of incumbent leader
Armenian paper looks at reasons for US backing of incumbent leader
Aykakan Zhamanak, Yerevan
14 Apr 06
Text of unattributed report by Armenian newspaper Aykakan Zhamanak on
14 April headlined “The double outpost”
Australia’s the Australian newspaper has carried a report which said
that the American Armenians determined the US policy towards
Armenia. This provides answers to many questions. In particular, it
explains why the American authorities are so kind to the incumbent
government of Armenia which is authoritarian by nature.
The USA is not just kind to the Armenian authorities, but it has
itself become an accessory to their illegal acts and fraud. Many
people do not yet realize the reason for this. And it cannot be ruled
out that there is only one reason – the Armenian lobby of the USA has
persuaded the Washington administration that this is necessary. In
fact, the Armenian lobby advocates committing even more illegal acts
in Armenia to prolong Robert Kocharyan’s stay in office. But why are
American Armenians so much concerned about perpetuating the current
situation in Armenia?
The point is that our compatriots from the Armenian diaspora do not
mean Yerevan, Sevan, Echmiadzin or Dilizhan [towns in Armenia] when
they say Armenia – they mean Mus, Van, Agahan and Adana [towns in
Turkey claimed by Armenia]. They have only one problem connected with
Armenia: the Armenian genocide. That is to say, for the Armenian lobby
in the USA, Armenia is more of an outpost against Turkey, a
springboard towards their country [eastern part of Turkey claimed by
Armenia], rather than a motherland or an independent state.
The problem is that Robert Kocharyan is the perfect president for
turning Armenia into such an outpost and the incumbent Armenian
government is the perfect one to turn our country into a regional
aggressor. They are ready to fulfil all the orders of the diaspora at
any price. And the immoral constitutional referendum on double
citizenship is evidence of this. Thus, the American diaspora and
Robert Kocharyan have a rich potential for cooperation and for
implementing their plans. They will do everything possible in order
not to leave any independently thinking people in Armenia, so that
when our American brothers give a directive to cross the Araz River
[separating Armenia and Turkey] there would be no person in Armenia
who would dare to object at the wisdom of such a move. Representatives
of the diaspora will watch the event on their computers monitors and
will gamble our lives.
This is the reason why American Armenians who have lived there for
many years hate those who emigrated from Armenia to the USA over the
past decade, as they had to stay in Armenia and act as their
pawns. This also explains the uproar among the American Armenians in
the wake of reports about possible recall of the US ambassador to
Armenia, John Evans. Now it becomes clear that Evans is not only a US
ambassador, but also an ambassador of the Armenian lobby of the
USA. We should finally understand and recognize the realities and
challenges because without surmounting these challenges Armenia faces
inevitable destruction.
Christians from around the world mark Easter Sunday at Jerusalem sit
Christians from around the world mark Easter Sunday at Jerusalem holy site
AP Worldstream; Apr 16, 2006
ARON HELLER
Thousands of Christian pilgrims from around the world gathered on
Sunday at Jerusalem holy sites to celebrate Easter Sunday, marking the
day with prayer and hymns.
The Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, Michel Sabbah, the top Roman
Catholic official in the Holy Land, celebrated Mass at the Church of
the Holy Sepulcher, built over the skull-shaped rocky mount believed
to be the place where Jesus was crucified.
Easter Sunday marks the resurrection of Jesus and caps holy week,
which includes Palm Sunday, when Jesus return to Jerusalem, and Good
Friday, which marks his crucifixion. Thousands filled the narrow
streets of the Old City of Jerusalem on Friday as well, retracing the
route that Jesus followed on his way to the crucifixion.
On Sunday, Armenian priests cloaked in black gowns and head dress
followed Sabbah into the candlelit church singing the Lord’s
Prayer. The Catholic priest emerged from the Sepulcher with a flame
and lit worshippers’ candles that gradually illuminated the painted
dome ceiling erected in the Crusader era.
Worshippers crowded into the grotto-like church as organs played
solemn tunes. Outside, the masses, including some from Serbia, Greece
and England, marched past droves of pictures of Jesus on a cloudy,
overcast day.
Crowds were larger than in recent years, encouraged by a relative lull
in Israeli-Palestinian violence.
Although police did not have an exact crowd size for the Easter Sunday
celebrations, the Israeli Tourism Ministry said 90,000 tourists are
visiting the country for Easter and the Jewish holiday of Passover
this year, up 20 percent from last year.
Israel’s tourist economy suffered during the Palestinian uprising,
which erupted in late 2000. But the flow of visitors has steadily
increased since a cease-fire was declared in early 2005, despite
recent tensions between the sides following Hamas’ victory in
Palestinian legislative elections.
The Easter services underlined one of Christianity’s doctrinal
differences: Roman Catholics believe Jesus Christ was buried in the
Holy Sepulcher, while many Protestant denominations believe he was
buried in the nearby Garden Tomb.
There will be other processions through the Old City this week when
Orthodox Christians, who follow a different calendar than the Western
Church, celebrate Good Friday and Easter Sunday according to their own
tradition.
Dr. Robert Krikorian To speak at Sonoma State CSHG
PRESS RELEASE
Sonoma State University Center for the Study of the Holocaust and Genocide
The Alliance for the Study of the Holocaust at Sonoma State University
1801 East Cotati Avenue
Rohnert Park, CA 94928
Contact: Christyne Davidian
Tel: 707-738-1919
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:
Dr. Robert Owen Krikorian will speak at the 23rd Annual Sonoma State
University Holocaust and Genocide Lecture Series on Tuesday, April 25th from
4:00PM to 5:40PM at Warren Auditorium, Ives Hall, at Sonoma State
University. Dr. Krikorian will present “Living with Genocide: The Armenian
Experience” for the first annual Armenian Genocide Memorial Lecture, a newly
established lecture established in commemoration of the 90th anniversary of
the Armenian Genocide and funded in part by the generosity of the Thomas
Family Foundation, the Bay Area Armenian National Committee, members of the
Armenians of the North Bay, and other community members.
This is the second Armenian Genocide lecture given by Dr. Robert Krikorian
at the SSU Holocaust and Genocide Lecture Series. Dr. Krikorian is a
Professorial Lecturer at the Elliott School of International Affairs, George
Washington University, teaching courses on the Caucasus and Eurasia, and a
Research Associate at GW’s Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian
Studies. Dr. Krikorian obtained his Doctorate in History and Eurasian
Studies at Harvard University, specializing in the history and politics of
Russia and Eastern Europe, the Caucasus, and Central Asia. He also earned an
MA in Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations from Harvard and an MA in
Political Science from George Washington University.
The SSU Holocaust and Genocide Lecture Series is offered annually every
spring semester as a student course and for free to the public. This lecture
series is sponsored by the Sonoma State University Center for the Study of
the Holocaust and Genocide and The Alliance for the Study of the Holocaust
at Sonoma State University. The Alliance for the Study of the Holocaust,
founded in 1982, is a University-community partnership that co-sponsors the
Lectures Series, supports the Center for the Study of the Holocaust and
Genocide, provides outreach to the community including teachers and
community groups working with issues related to the Holocaust and Genocide.
Both SSU and the Alliance have provided support and a forum for the study of
the Armenian Genocide for the last 4 years and are dedicated to the
continuation of inclusion annually with the establishment of the Armenian
Genocide Memorial Lecture 501(c)3 non-profit fund.
All lectures are broadcast via LIVE WEBCAST at:
aust_lectures.html. All
lectures are also posted for streaming video approximately one week after
each lecture.
Those wishing to learn more about the SSU Center for the Study of the
Holocaust and Genocide, the Alliance for the Study of the Holocaust at
Sonoma State University, the Armenian Genocide Memorial Lecture Fund, and/or
Armenians of the North Bay, please contact Christyne Davidian.
Christyne Davidian
Board Member
Alliance for the Study of the Holocaust
Championnat d’Europe super-moyens – Mkrtchian detrone Chanet
Agence France Presse
14 avril 2006 vendredi 9:55 PM GMT
Championnat d’Europe super-moyens – L’Arménien Mkrtchian détrône Chanet
(COMPTE-RENDU)
REIMS 14 avr 2006
L’Arménien Mger Mkrtchian a détrôné le Français Jackson Chanet,
tenant du titre de champion d’Europe des poids super-moyens, par KO à
la 11e reprise, vendredi à Reims (Marne), devant 3500 spectateurs.
Seul tricolore encore champion du Vieux Continent, le Bragard a été
cueilli par un crochet du gauche, le faisant vaciller, avant qu’une
série ne l’expédie lourdement à terre.
Il fallut de longues minutes au Français pour récupérer des coups
reçus et de sa déception aussi car, selon les juges, deux d’entre eux
lui accordaient six points d’avance au moment du dénouement, le 3e
optant pour le nul.
Mais, d’entrée le pugiliste basé à Saint-Pétersbourg avait refroidi
le camp local en envoyant pour la première fois de sa carrière le
champion à terre. Dense du torse, il donnait alors une formidable
impression de puissance.
Jackson Chanet prenait toutefois la mesure de son rival, saignant
abondamment du nez, à partir du 4e round. Il avançait et variait sa
boxe en touchant souvent Mkrtchian au visage, lui ouvrant également
l’arcade sourcilière droite.
Rassuré par l’énergie de son favori, l’assistance craignait alors les
coups de tête qui avait valu au challengeur un avertissement à la
mi-combat. Elle était loin de se douter que l’ancien challengeur WBO
avait encore de la foudre dans les poings.
Chanet a commis l’erreur de baisser les bras à partir de la 10e
reprise, ce dont a profité le pugiliste de l’Est, légèrement plus
grand, qui a d’autant plus facilement trouvé l’ouverture.
Le nouveau et percutant champion a probablement signé, à 29 ans, la
plus probante de ses 23 victoires (dont 17 acquises avant la limite)
pour 2 défaites.
Invaincu jusque là en 26 combats, pour autant de succès (dont 15
avant terme), Jackson Chanet devra s’interroger sur la catégorie dans
laquelle il doit poursuivre, s’il le souhaite, à 28 ans, sa carrière.
Il a manifestement perdu de sa puissance des mi-lourds et de la
fraîcheur qu’il affichait à l’époque.
Livres Rares Du Collectionneur Gulbenkian exposes a Istanbul
Agence France Presse
14 avril 2006 vendredi 11:31 AM GMT
Les livres rares du collectionneur Calouste Gulbenkian exposés à
Istanbul
ISTANBUL 14 avr 2006
Le musée Sakip Sabanci d’Istanbul exposera à partir de samedi quelque
75 livres anciens et rares appartenant à la collection du riche
amateur d’art d’origine stambouliote Calouste Sarkis Gulbenkian, mort
en 1955 à Lisbonne.
La doyenne des oeuvres présentées est un livre de prières de 241
pages aux couleurs remarquablement conservées, réalisé sur parchemin
à la fin du XIIIe siècle en Italie.
L’exposition, intitulée “L’art du livre de l’Orient à l’Occident”,
présente également jusqu’au 28 mai de nombreux ouvrages anciens
français, ottomans, iraniens et japonais, ainsi que des éditions
rares et illustrées de livres plus récents, de Victor Hugo, Honoré de
Balzac, Rabindranath Tagore notamment.
Aux côtés des livres prêtés par la fondation Gulbenkian de Lisbonne
sont exposées des broderies ottomanes et des céramiques d’Iznik
(nord-ouest de la Turquie) prisées par le collectionneur d’origine
arménienne, né en 1869 à Istanbul et qui a vécu en France, en
Grande-Bretagne et au Portugal.
“Nous n’avions jamais réalisé cette combinaison de livres d’orient et
occidentaux. Nous voulions que cette exposition ait une valeur
symbolique de pont entre les deux cultures de notre fondateur”, a
expliqué vendredi à l’AFP Emilio Rui Vilar, président du conseil
d’administration de la Fondation Gülbenkian.
“D’autre part, je pense qu’aujourd’hui le dialogue entre les cultures
est non seulement une tche urgente mais aussi un devoir”, a ajouté
M. Rui Vilar, venu à Istanbul pour la présentation de l’exposition à
la presse.
Le musée Sakip Sabanci, ouvert en 2002 dans une ancienne demeure
ottomane sur la rive occidentale du Bosphore, aspire à devenir un
centre d’attraction d’envergure internationale.
Sa précédente exposition, consacrée au peintre espagnol Pablo
Picasso, a battu tous les records d’entrées en Turquie avec quelque
250.000 visiteurs.
Il accueillera en juin quelque 140 oeuvres du sculpteur français
Auguste Rodin -principalement prêtées par le musée Rodin de Paris-, a
indiqué à l’AFP sa conservatrice Nazan Ölçer.
Une proposition de loi pour punir la negation du genocide armenien
Agence France Presse
13 avril 2006 jeudi 6:04 PM GMT
Une proposition de loi pour punir la négation du génocide arménien
MARSEILLE 13 avr 2006
Le groupe socialiste à l’Assemblée nationale va proposer une loi
sanctionnant la négation du génocide arménien lors de la séance
d’initiative parlementaire le 18 mai, a-t-on appris auprès jeudi du
Conseil de coordination des organisations arméniennes de France
(CCAF) à Marseille.
Cette proposition de loi, si elle est adoptée, viendra compléter la
loi du 29 janvier 2001 dans laquelle l’Etat français reconnaissait le
génocide arménien, a expliqué le président du CCAF Marseille-Provence
Pascal Chamassian.
Le président du conseil général des Bouches-du-Rhône, Jean-Noël
Guérini, a annoncé officiellement jeudi soir que le groupe PS allait
proposer cette loi, rédigée à l’initiative de députés du département
et qui a été appuyée par l’ensemble des élus socialistes à
l’assemblée.
“Pour nous c’est une grande nouvelle car la loi de 2001, magnifique
pour nous, était tronquée à la base: tous les négationnistes
pouvaient continuer à oeuvrer tranquillement”, a expliqué à la presse
M. Chamassian.
La communauté arménienne de Marseille et de France se prépare à
commémorer le 91ème anniversaire du génocide arménien, le 24 avril.
Un mémorial, le premier financé par l’Etat, doit notamment être
inauguré à Marseille en présence du préfet de région Christian
Frémont, du président du Conseil régional Michel Vauzelle, du maire
de la ville Jean-Claude Gaudin, de M. Guérini et du président de
l’Assemblée nationale d’Arménie Arthur Baghdassarian.
Les Arméniens affirment que jusqu’à 1,5 million des leurs ont péri
dans un génocide orchestré par l’empire ottoman (1915-1917). Ankara
soutient que 300.000 Arméniens et au moins autant de Turcs ont été
tués au cours de troubles suscités par des soulèvements d’Arméniens
et leur ralliement aux armées russes en guerre contre l’empire
ottoman, et lors des déportations qui ont suivi.
Members of EU-Armenia Coop Comm to visit the Armenian-Turkish border
Members of the EU-Armenia Cooperation Commission to visit the
Armenian-Turkish border
ArmRadio.am
15.04.2006 14:10
Next week members of the EU-Armenia Cooperation Commission will visit
the Armenian-Turkish border.
The 8th sitting of the EU-Armenia Parliamentary Cooperation Commission
will be held April 18-19 in Yerevan.
In the framework of the visit members of the Commission will have
meetings with RA President Robert Kocharyan, Chairman of the National
Assembly Arthur Baghdasaryan, Prime Minister Andranik Margaryan,
Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan and Human Rights Defender Armen
Harutyunyan.
Members of the delegation will meet also representatives of
independent TV Channels, Head of the OSCE Office in Yerevan Vladimir
Pryakhin and Ambassadors of EU member states.
BAKU: Protests at Hungarian sentence continue in Azeri towns
Protests at Hungarian sentence continue in Azeri towns
ANS TV, Baku
15 Apr 06
[Presenter Natavan Babayeva] Protest actions continue against the life
sentence by a Budapest court to Ramil Safarov accused of killing
Armenian officer Gurgen Markaryan [at a NATO course in Hungary].
Young people staged an unauthorized protest action outside State
University of Languages a short while ago. The protesters chanted:
“Down with injustice”, “Freedom to Ramil Safarov” and “Karabakh is
ours and will be ours”. They tried to march towards Azadliq Square
along Rasid Behbudov Street [central Baku]. Police stopped them and
detained five people.
The local branch of the Karabakh Liberation Organization, war veterans
and families of martyrs today staged a march and rally in Mingacevir
[central Azerbaijan] to protect the rights of Ramil Safarov. They
chanted “Freedom to Ramil Safarov” and demanded that the Budapest
court’s unfair verdict be cancelled. The rally also said that this was
not just the violation of Ramil Safarov’s rights, but that of war
veterans and families of martyrs. The march started at the town’s
Heydar Aliyev Avenue and ended at the Martyrs’ Avenue. The action
passed off without incidents.
A group of young people tried to stage a picket in the central square
in Ganca [northwestern Azerbaijan] with the same demands. Ten minutes
following the beginning of the action policemen arrived at the square
and dispersed the pickets. Two pickets were detained and taken to the
Nizami district police department. The ANS Ganca bureau reports that
Irada Agayeva and Elsan Mammadov were released after the two-hour
detention in the police department. The young people spoke about their
plans to continue protests against the verdict by the Budapest
court. The Ganca town police department said that the picket was
dispersed because it was unauthorized and the actions of this nature
will be thwarted in the future as well.
[Video showed protest actions]
Fisk Editorial&Opinion: Traitors, martyrs or just brave men?
Editorial&Opinion: Traitors, martyrs or just brave men?
The Independent – United Kingdom; Apr 15, 2006
ROBERT FISK
More than 15 years ago, I travelled to the Belgian city of Ypres with
an Irish friend. She was from a good Fine Gael family which nursed a
healthy disrespect for the amount of romantic green blossom draped
around Padraig Pearse’s neck for the militarily hopeless but
politically explosive Dublin Easter Rising of 1916. But she displayed
an equally admirable suspicion of British – or “English” as she would
have put it – intentions towards Ireland, north and south. Her mother
once recalled for me a British military raid on their home in County
Carlow. “I was a little girl and one of the soldiers patted me on the
head and I told him: ‘You keep your hands off me.'”
But at Ypres one evening, beneath the great Menin Gate – upon which
are carved the names of 54,896 First World War British soldiers whose
bodies were never found – my Irish friend faced a real political
challenge. She had noted, among those thousands, the names of hundreds
of young Irishmen who had died in British uniform while their
countrymen at home were fighting and dying in battle against the same
British Army. She looked at one of the names. “Why in God’s name,” she
asked, “was a boy from the Station House, Tralee, dying here in the
mud of Flanders?” And it was at this point that an elderly man
approached us and asked my Irish friend to sign the visitors’ book.
She looked at the British Army’s insignia on the memorial volume with
distaste. There was the British crown glimmering in the evening
light. And the Belgian firemen who nightly play the Last Post beneath
the gate were already taking position. There was not much time. But
my friend remembered the young man from Tralee. She thought about her
own small Catholic nation and its centuries of suffering and she
realised that the boy from Tralee had gone to fight – or so he thought
– for little Catholic Belgium. She decided to inscribe the British
Army’s book in the Irish language. Do thiortha beaga,” she wrote. “For
little countries.”
All this happened years before an economically powerful and
self-confident Irish Republic would face up to the sacrifice its
pre-independence soldiers made in British uniform’ the estimated
35,000 Irishmen who died in the 1914-18 war wildly outnumber the few
hundred who fought in the Easter Rising. The total of dead, wounded
and missing among Irish Protestants in the 36th (Ulster) Division on
the Somme and at Ypres came to 32,180. The same statistics among
soldiers of the 10th and 16th Irish Divisions – most of them Catholics
– amounted to 37,761.
My own father was to fight alongside the Irish on the Somme in 1918
although – a fact I used to keep quiet about when I was The Times’s
correspondent in Belfast in the early 1970s – he was originally sent
to Ireland in the aftermath of the Rising. I have a faded photograph
of Bill Fisk, then in the Cheshire Regiment, kissing the Blarney
Stone, and some pictures he took of the front gate of Victoria
Barracks – now Collins Barracks – in Cork, its stonework plastered
with ap-peals to Irishmen to join the British Army and fight for
Catholic Belgium and France. It was only when I was invited to give
the annual Bloody Sunday memorial lecture in Derry – the first Brit to
be asked to honour the memory of the 14 Catholics who were killed by
the 1st Battalion, the Parachute Regiment in 1972 – that I talked
about my Dad’s fight against Sinn Fein (whom he always called the
“Shinners”). If Padraig Pearse had not raised the flag over the Dublin
Post office in Easter Week of 1916, I told my audience, Bill Fisk
might have been sent to die in the first Battle of the Somme three
months later – and his son Robert would not exist. So did I owe my
life to Pearse? I can already hear that most polemical, visceral,
poignant, absolutely infuriating, brilliant and doggedly insulting
Irish Times columnist Kevin Myers bursting into fits of sarcastic
laughter and carefully aimed fury at such a remark. Kevin was among
the fir st to hammer away at Ireland’s shameful refusal to acknowledge
the vast sacrifice of its sons in the 1914-18 cauldron. And Kevin it
has been, while foolishly taking the Turkish line of denial of the
Armenian genocide of 1915, who has repeatedly tried to hack down the
reputations of martyrs Pearse and James Connolly and John MacBride –
and Eamon de Valera, who escaped execution because of his American
passport – and present the Rising as not only a military disaster but
an unnecessary sacrifice of civilian life and the first example of
“green fascism”.
I don’t like the way the “fascist” label gets stuck on anyone we
dislike.
Lefties used to call policemen fascists. And now we have
“Islamofascism” which effectively binds Mussolini to one of the
world’s great religions. No wonder we could draw those outrageous
cartoons of the Prophet with a bomb in his turban.
But I’m still not at all sure how to regard the men of 1916. The very
best book on the Rising – George Dangerfield’s magnificent The
Damnable Question -proves that the “rebels” (as my father called them)
were very brave as well as very dismissive of their own and others’
lives. They were not to know the deviant way in which their “blood
sacrifice” – which was not exactly the first in Irish history – would
be adopted by later armed groups who sought their mandate in blood
shed before those 1916 British execution parties.
Had they not been so cruelly shot down as punishment for their armed
assault on British power, would they have been so honoured in the
long, dark, stagnant Ireland of the 1920s and 30s and then in the
terrible and much later years of the civil conflict in Northern
Ireland? Do you have to be a martyr to have honour?
I was much struck by this thought five years ago when I was searching
through the British National Archives at Kew for details of the
execution of a young Australian soldier in the British Army whom my
father was ordered to shoot at the end of the First World War. Bill
Fisk refused, so another officer performed the dirty deed. But there
in the documents of British military executions – routinely filed
under 1916 – were the names of Pearse and Connolly and McBride. The
exemplary punishment accorded to them and their comrades in Dublin
turned Irish public scorn to sympathy and admiration. But to the
Brits, it was just another act of military law, the shooting by firing
squad of traitors to the Crown – in just the same way as deserters,
army murderers and cowards were shot at dawn behind the trenches of
France. The martyrs of the Easter Rising suffered Western Front
punishment.
And now Ireland’s minister for defence tells us the military Easter
Rising pomp in Dublin this weekend symbolises the end of the war in
the North. Maybe.
But who will remember the boy from the Station House, Tralee?
The leaders of the Easter Rising suffered Western Front punishment