ASBAREZ ONLINE
TOP STORIES
05/19/2006
TO ACCESS PREVIOUS ASBAREZ ONLINE EDITIONS PLEASE VISIT OUR
WEBSITE AT <;HTTP://WWW.ASBAREZ. COM
1) House Subcommittee Maintains Military Aid Parity between Armenia And
Azerbaijan
2) Turkey Uses Blackmail to Block Passage of Armenian Genocide Bill
3) Armenian Independence Day Festival to Be Held in Little Armenia
4) Armenian Singer Andre in Eurovision 2006 Final
5) No Agreement Reached Yet on Armenian-Azeri Summit
6) Kocharian Appoints Yesayan Deputy Minister of Education
7) Opposition Newspaper Editor Harshly Beaten in Azerbaijan
8) Sunday's Telethon to Raise Funds for ANC Programs
9) The New York Times Rebukes Turkey over Armenian Genocide Denial
10) Genocide Seminar for High School Students Held in Fresno
11) `From Need to Greed:' New film documents illegal logging and deforestation
in Armenia
12) The `Buzz' about Bezzerides: Film about Armenian-Greek screenwriter
featured at Southeast European Film Festival
13) The Conflict in Darfur: By Representative Joe Schwartz, MD
14) Critics' Forum: Visual Arts: By Adriana Tchalian
15) Irritants III: By Garen Yegparian
16) SKEPTIK TAKES ON GOLDBERG: By SKEPTIK SINIKIAN
1) House Subcommittee Maintains Military Aid Parity between Armenia And
Azerbaijan
WASHINGTON, DC--Early reports from Capitol Hill sources indicate that the
House
Appropriations Subcommittee on Foreign Operations approved by voice vote to
maintain military assistance parity between Armenia and Azerbaijan, despite
the
Bush Administration's request to break the parity agreement and provide 40%
more in assistance to Azerbaijan, reported the Armenian National Committee of
America (ANCA).
Sources on Capitol Hill reported that the key foreign aid panel also
allocated
$62 million in US aid for Armenia and $5 million for Karabagh for fiscal year
(FY) 2007. The amount represents a $12 million increase over President Bush's
FY 2007 budget request, but is lower than last year's appropriation of $75
million. The Subcommittee also rejected efforts by Azerbaijan's lobbyists to
weaken Section 907 restrictions on US assistance to Azerbaijan, due to its
ongoing blockades of Armenia and Karabagh.
Overall, the Subcommittee approved $21.3 billion in foreign aid spending, an
increase of $600 million over last year's budget.
"We commend the members of the Foreign Operations Subcommittee for
contributing to the continued stability of the Caucasus by maintaining parity
in military aid to Armenia and Azerbaijan and fighting back attempts to
further
weaken Section 907," stated Aram Hamparian, Executive Director of the ANCA.
"We
also appreciate the efforts of our friends to increase Armenia's assistance
above the level proposed by the President and to provide $5 million in aid to
Nagorno Karabagh. We look forward to action by the Senate--and later in
conference committee--to bring assistance to Armenia to at least last year's
figure of $75 million," added Hamparian.
Military assistance to Armenia and Azerbaijan will include $3.5 million in
foreign military finance (FMF) and $790,000 in International Military and
Education Training (IMET). Economic assistance to Azerbaijan was set at $29
million, $1 million more than the Administration's budget request.
"We want to express our appreciation to Congressman Joe Knollenberg for his
advocacy within the Subcommittee, to thank Chairman Jim Kolbe, and Ranking
Member Nita Lowey for their leadership, and to share our gratitude for the
support of John Sweeney, Steve Rothman, Mark Kirk, and Chaka Fattah, and our
other friends on this vitally important panel," said Aram Hamparian, Executive
Director of the ANCA.
On March 16 of this year, Representative George Radanovich (R-CA) and
Congressional Armenian Caucus Co-Chairman Frank Pallone (D-NJ) sent a
letter to
the leadership of the Subcommittee, cosigned by 48 of their House colleagues,
calling for an earmark of at least $75 million for Armenia; maintaining equal
levels of military aid for Armenia and Azerbaijan; an additional $5 million in
direct aid to Karabagh for FY 2007; and keeping in place the Section 907
restriction on aid to Azerbaijan.
The names of the fifty signatories are as follows: Tom Allen (D-ME), Robert
Andrews (D-NJ), Xavier Becerra (D-CA), Howard Berman (D-CA), Michael Bilirakis
(R-FL), Eric Cantor (R-VA), Lois Capps (D-CA), Dennis Cardoza (D-CA), John
Conyers (D-MI), Jim Costa (D-CA), Joseph Crowley (D-NY), William Delahunt
(D-MA), David Dreier (R-CA), Eliot Engel (D-NY), Mike Ferguson (R-NJ), Barney
Frank (D-MA), Scott Garrett (R-NJ), Rush Holt (D-NJ), Michael Honda (D-CA),
Dale Kildee (D-MI), James Langevin (D-RI), Sander Levin (D-MI), Frank LoBiondo
(R-NJ), Stephen Lynch (D-MA), Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Edward Markey (D-MA),
Doris Matsui (D-CA), Thaddeus McCotter (R-MI), James McGovern (D-MA), John
McHugh (R-NY), Michael McNulty (D-NY), Martin Meehan (D-MA), Grace Napolitano
(D-CA), Frank Pallone (D-NJ), Donald Payne (D-NJ), Collin Peterson (D-MN),
George Radanovich (R-CA), Bobby Rush (D-IL), H. James Saxton (R-NJ), Adam
Schiff (D-CA), Joe Schwarz (R-MI), Christopher Shays (R-CT), Brad Sherman
(D-CA), Rob Simmons (R-CT), Mark Souder (R-IN), Edolphus Towns (D-NY), Diane
Watson (D-CA), Henry Waxman (D-CA), Anthony Weiner (D-NY), and Lynn Woolsey
(D-CA).
2) Turkey Uses Blackmail to Block Passage of Armenian Genocide Bill
(Combined Sources)--Armenian Revolutionary Federation (ARF) Bureau member and
Parliament Vice Speaker Vahan Hovhannisian said on Friday that the
derailing of
the Armenian genocide bill in French Parliament is yet another example of
Turkey's blackmailing policies.
"Blackmailing has been the main method in Turkey's politics for the past 250
years," Hovhannisian said. "Therefore, it didn't come as a surprise to us."
He added that Turkish reaction to Armenian foreign policy is a sign that the
policies are working.
The French bill would have made it a punishable offense to deny the Armenian
genocide. Facing threats of trade sanctions by Turkey, President of the French
Parliament, Jean-Louis Debré, blocked passage of the bill and delayed its
discussion until October.
"I believe that France cannot delay this issue forever," Hovhannisian went on
to say. "I think, France, as a progressive European nation, will return to
this
issue, and we will succeed this time."
3) Armenian Independence Day Festival to Be Held in Little Armenia
(HOLLYWOOD)--The Armenian Cultural Foundation, in conjunction with the
Armenian
Youth Federation (AYF) Western Region, will host a festival on May 28 to
commemorate Armenia's independence. The festival will take place in Little
Armenia, on Hollywood Blvd. between the streets of Alexandria and Vermont,
from
10:00 AM to 6:00 PM.
The festival will feature performers such as, Element, Vokee, Sako, Ara
Sahagian, Karnig Sarkissian, Nersik Ispirian, Paul Baghdadlian, Gor
Mkhitarian,
Ara Shahbazian, and many more who will all be accompanied by the Knar Band. In
addition to the many singers there will also be various dance groups
performing
traditional and contemporary Armenian folk dances.
Organizers of the festival aim to promote Armenian culture and raise
awareness
within the greater Los Angeles community. The festival will feature various
aspects of the Armenian culture through different vendors, entertainers,
performers, writer, traditional Armenian foods, and artifacts.
Other Armenian organizations participating in the festival include the
Armenian Relief Society, Shant Student Association, Homenetmen (Armenian
General Athletic Union and Scouts), and Armenian National Committee of
America.
"The Armenian Youth Federation celebrates and recognizes the importance of
our
nation's victories in establishing, after 600 years of oppression, the first
independent republic of Armenia on May 28, 1918, which laid the foundation of
today's independent republic," said Tro Tchekidjian chairman of the AYF
Western
Region.
4) Armenian Singer Andre in Eurovision 2006 Final
(Combined Sources)--Armenian singer from Karabagh, Andre Hovhanyan, qualified
Friday night to participate in the final round of the Eurovision Song Contest
being held this weekend in Athens. Andre is representing Armenia for the first
time in the contest with a song called "Without you love."
Andre was one of 10 participants voted on to Saturday's final round. Russia,
Macedonia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Lithuania, Finland, Ukraine, Ireland, Sweden,
and Turkey also made the cut after a public text and telephone vote.
5) No Agreement Reached Yet on Armenian-Azeri Summit
YEREVAN (RFE/RL)--Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian said on Friday that he and
his Azeri counterpart Elmar Mamedyarov did not set a date for the next
Armenian-Azeri summit on Karabagh during talks in Strasbourg the previous
night.
The two men met in the presence of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs on the
sidelines of a regular session of the Council of Europe's Committee of
Ministers.
"Discussions focused on the proposals and ideas that have been on the table,"
he said, referring to the Strasbourg talks. "Overall, it was not a bad
meeting.
However, there are still many issues that have not yet been agreed on."
Oskanian said that that Baku and Yerevan have not yet laid the groundwork for
the crucial summit between the two countries' presidents.
"While not ruling out the possibility of such a meeting at this point, I
can't
say for certain that it will take place, because a lot depends on the
co-chairs' high-level visit to the region," said Oskanian.
The co-chairs will begin their visit on May 25 together with more
high-ranking
diplomats, including US Assistant Secretary of State Dan Fried and Russian
Deputy Foreign Minster Grigory Karasin. The mediators will discuss with the
conflicting parties their new, unpublicized peace proposals put forward after
the February meeting of Aliyev and Kocharian, which took place in Rambouillet,
France.
"The co-chairs see a new momentum after Rambouillet and they believe that by
raising the level [of their diplomacy] they can attract more attention and
will
try during their visit to create a situation that will convince the parties to
agree to a meeting of the presidents," said Oskanian.
6) Kocharian Appoints Yesayan Deputy Minister of Education
YEREVAN (RFE/RL)--President Robert Kocharian's special Anti-corruption Adviser
and Armenian Revolutionary Federation (ARF) member Bagrat Yesayan, was
relieved
of his duties and appointed Deputy Minister of Education on Friday.
The promotion follows the withdrawal of Orinats Yerkir from the ruling
coalition. Sergo Yeritsian, a former Orinats Yerkir leader who has headed the
Armenian Ministry of Science and Education for nearly three years, was
replaced
on Wednesday by Levon Mkrtchian, also a member of the ARF, one of the two
remaining governing parties.
Aside from advising Kocharian on anti-corruption matters, Yesayan headed a
"monitoring commission" to oversee implementation of the legislative measures
aimed at combating corruption.
7) Opposition Newspaper Editor Harshly Beaten in Azerbaijan
BAKU (AP)--Bahaddin Khaziyev, editor of the Bizim Yol (Our Way) newspaper, was
seized late Thursday in the Azeri capital, Baku, by five men who put a bag
over
his head and drove him to a lake outside the city, said the head of the
opposition Popular Front, Ali Kerimli.
"There, Khazhiyev was savagely beaten and, as a result of his injuries,
lay on
the lakeside until morning," Kerimli said.
Khaziyev, also the deputy leader of the Popular Front, recounted that one of
his assailants called someone on a cell phone to say: "We did everything you
asked," Kerimli said.
The opposition leader said the attack had been ordered. "It did not happen by
chance, and is part of the war waged in recent years in Azerbaijan against the
free press," he said.
An official with the presidential administration, Ali Hasanov, condemned the
assault and pledged that authorities in the oil-rich Caspian Sea state would
fully investigate it and punish those guilty.
Last year, opposition magazine editor Elmar Huseinov was shot and killed in
the lobby of his Baku apartment building. Western countries have called on
President Ilham Aliyev and investigators to do more to solve that killing.
Aliyev has been at the helm of his former Soviet nation since 2003, when he
came to power in flawed elections, succeeding his father and longtime ruler
Heydar Aliyev.
8) Sunday's Telethon to Raise Funds for ANC Programs
GLENDALE (Glendale News Press)--The Armenian National Committee of America has
done a lot for the Armenian community through its programs, but in order to do
more, it needs more money, organization officials said.
So it will host a telethon on Sunday to raise money for its general endowment
-- the nonprofit and non-political arm of the group that funds educational
programs.
"The purpose is to raise funds for the endowment, whose purpose is to fund
education efforts to encourage civic participation and voter registration,"
said Zanku Armenian, a board member of the Western Region of the Armenian
National Committee based in Glendale.
The general endowment funds several programs a year that encourage civic
involvement, provide internship programs for university students and encourage
voter registration, all within the Armenian-American community, Armenian
said.
It also helps to fund Armenian Genocide education efforts in schools, he
said.
"In terms of a grassroots effort, the [Armenian National Committee of
America]
has done a tremendous job," said Armond Aghakhanian, an executive board member
of the Glendale-based Armenian American Chamber of Commerce.
"It is very difficult, engaging communities who are new to this country and
the voting system, who come from eastern blocs where there was no trust
when it
came to the government, and a lot of corruption," he said.
The organization has had to deal with a lot of barriers, but has been able to
lift those barriers, Aghakhanian said. Additional funding will hopefully allow
it to continue expanding its programs, he said.
The nationally televised telethon, which is being broadcast from Glendale
Studios, will tap Armenian American communities not only in Glendale, but in
all parts of the country, Armenian said.
It is being broadcast in Glendale because of the size of the Armenian
American
community in the city, but the organization has volunteers from across the
country participating to bring the telethon together, Armenian said.
This is the first time the Armenian National Committee of America is
hosting a
telethon to raise money for its endowment fund, he said.
"We don't have a benchmark at this point, but every dollar helps," Armenian
said. "The larger the amount the better, because we are trying to reach more
Armenian Americans in the country... When you take on an endeavor of this
magnitude, you hope to get a large amount. The point is, we are hoping in the
millions."
Many local officials, congressman and prominent members of the Armenian
American community have been invited to attend the six-hour marathon.
The local and national community will likely come together to make the
telethon a success, Aghakhanian sad.
"I believe it's going to turn to be very successful," he said. "It's a great
cause."
The telethon will air in Glendale, La Crescenta, and Burbank on Channel 55
from 3 to 9 PM.
9) The New York Times Rebukes Turkey over Armenian Genocide Denial
-- Editorial Decries Turkey's "Self-Destructive Obsession" with Denial of the
Genocide
NEW YORKIn an editorial published Tuesday, May 15, The New York Times pointed
out Turkey's `self-destructive obsession with denying the Armenian genocide,'
earning praise from the Armenian National Committee (ANC) of the Eastern
United
States. Noting Turkey's inflammatory and intimidating response to governments
and individuals who speak truthfully about the first genocide of the 20th
century, The Times cited three of the many deeply troubling examples.
`The Turks pulled out of a NATO exercise this week because the Canadian Prime
Minister used the term genocide in reference to the mass killings of Armenians
in Turkey during and after World War I. Before that, the Turkish ambassador to
France was temporarily recalled to protest a French bill that would make it
illegal to deny that the Armenian genocide occurred. And before that, a
leading Turkish novelist, Orhan Pamuk, was charged with `insulting Turkish
identity' for referring to the genocide,' stated The Times.
As Turkey attempts to join the European Union, it is coming under increasing
pressure to recognize the Genocide, in which 1.5 million Armenians were
systematically exterminated. Turkey faces growing difficulty, and now
editorial reproach from the paper of record, for its ninety-one year practice
of persecuting journalists, government officials, and ordinary citizens who
exercise what should be their right to free speech. Publisher Ragip Zarakolu
and journalist Hrant Dink, who recently addressed Armenian communities in the
US, are only two of many brave individuals who have been prosecuted for
informing the Turkish public about the Genocide.
`The Armenian National Committee and the Armenian American community are
gratified to see that after changing its policy by allowing its reporters to
describe the events of 1915 as genocide, the New York Times has come to rebuke
Turkey for its sinister and anti-democratic campaign of genocide denial.
Decades of hard, thoughtful work to get the Times and the Boston Globe to
attune their coverage of the issue with historical scholarship have borne
valuable fruit,' said Dikran Kaligian, Chairman of the ANC in the Eastern
United States.
The Armenian National Committee (ANC) is dedicated to advancing the concerns
of Armenian-Americans, the foremost of which is achieving recognition of the
Armenian Genocide. In light of the Turkish government's campaign to have US
media organizations as well government officials deny the genocide, the ANC
strives to oppose revisionist agendas, which either out of racist or other
unscrupulous motives, defame a people through attempting to negate the
historicity of its mass victimization.
A full text of the editorial is provided below:
Turkey, Armenia and Denial
Turkey's self-destructive obsession with denying the Armenian genocide seems
to have no limits. The Turks pulled out of a NATO exercise this week because
the Canadian prime minister used the term `genocide' in reference to the mass
killings of Armenians in Turkey during and after World War I. Before that, the
Turkish ambassador to France was temporarily recalled to protest a French bill
that would make it illegal to deny that the Armenian genocide occurred. And
before that, a leading Turkish novelist, Orhan Pamuk, was charged with
`insulting Turkish identity' for referring to the genocide (the charges were
dropped after an international outcry).
Turkey's stance is hard to fathom. Each time the Turks lash out, new
questions
arise about Turkey's claim to a place in the European Union, and the Armenian
Diaspora becomes even more adamant in demanding a public reckoning over what
happened.
Granted, genocide is a difficult crime for any nation to acknowledge. But it
is absurd to treat any reference to the issue within Turkey as a crime and to
scream `lie!' every time someone mentions genocide. By the same token, we do
not see the point of the French law to ban genocide denial. Historical truths
must be established through dispassionate research and debate, not
legislation,
even if some of those who question the evidence do so for insidious motives.
But the Turkish government considers even discussion of the issue to be a
grave national insult, and reacts to it with hysteria. Five journalists who
criticized a court's decision to shut down an Istanbul conference on the
massacre of Armenians were arrested for insulting the courts. Charges against
four were subsequently dropped, but a fifth remains on trial.
The preponderance of serious scholarship outside Turkey accepts that more
than
a million Armenians perished between 1914 and 1923 in a regime-sponsored
campaign. Turkey's continued refusal to countenance even a discussion of the
issue stands as a major obstacle to restoring relations with neighboring
Armenia and to claiming Turkey's rightful place in Europe and the West. It is
time for the Turks to realize that the greater danger to them is denying
history.
10) Genocide Seminar for High School Students Held in Fresno
FRESNO--One hundred and ten students from junior highs and high schools around
Fresno and Clovis participated in a successful Genocide Seminar on Saturday,
May 13, at the Armenian Community Center in Fresno.
The Seminar speakers Dr. Matthew Ari Jendian and Hasmig Tatiossian addressed
the similarities between the mass killings, political ramifications, and
social
issues surrounding the Armenian, Cambodian, Darfur, and Rwandan genocides.
They
also discussed the implications for individual and collective responses to
these events.
Hygo Ohanessian, chairperson of the Armenian National Committee of Central
California, introduced the speakers. The event was organized by the ANC and
funded by the Bertha and John Garabedian Foundation.
Sato Sanikian, learning director from Selma high school, advised the students
on conduct, rules, and regulations to abide by at the seminar.
The speakers began the day with an ice-breaker exercise that celebrated the
diversity in the room and emphasized that we are all part of the human race,
the most similar of all species on the earth.
They then discussed the word "genocide," (literally "race murder" from the
Greek word "genos" and the Latin "cide") coined by Raphael Lemkin in 1944.
The Genocide Convention adopted by the United Nations in 1948, defined
genocide as certain "acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in
part, a national ethnical, racial, or religious group."
The great irony, however, of the 20th century and genocide is that the 20th
century saw many treaties defining and codifying genocide, yet it was one of
the bloodiest centuries in human history.
Unfortunately, after almost every case of genocide, denial has been a common
response. This denial, Tatiossian said, can grow over time and come to define
the identity of the person or people who are denying the events. As Cornell
West has said, "Denial of history represents a lack of maturity." The first
step towards healing is to acknowledge the wrong we have done.
With each case of genocide discussed--Armenian, Cambodian, and Rwandan--the
speakers pointed to the lack of intervention of the international community
and, specifically, the United States. As Samantha Power notes in her book `A
Problem from Hell,' the most common response to the question of "Why does the
world and the United States stand so idly by when genocide is occurring" is,
"We didn't know" or "We didn't fully appreciate the magnitude of the
situation." But these answers are demonstrably not true. However, Power says,
the real reason the United States has not done what it could do and should do
to stop genocide is that US leaders lacked the will to do something--they
believed it was wrong, but they were not prepared to invest the military,
financial, diplomatic, and domestic political capital needed.
The speakers also gleaned lessons from Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.,
teaching that we all have a human responsibility to prevent injustice when we
see it:
`Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.'
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to
perpetrate it.'
`There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor
political, nor popular; but one must take it because it is right.'
As Dr. Jendian said, "Knowledge is potential power; it becomes powerful when
it is acted upon." Taking action on behalf of others requires empathy--putting
yourself in the other person's place and identifying strongly with the
circumstances and pain of another human being.
One of the greatest lessons from Dr. King that should be passed on to
students
is that the struggle for justice is not pitted against people; rather, it's
against injustice itself. Instead of having students think that they need
to do
the right thing by fighting against a person--the "enemy"--the student must
understand that the real enemy is injustice, not the person committing it.
In light of that, Tatiossian shared a quote from King's "Walk for Freedom":
"Love must be at the forefront of our movement if it is to be a successful
movement. And when we speak of love, we must speak of understanding good will
toward all men. We speak of a creative, a redemptive sort of love, so that as
we look at the problem, we see that the real tension is not between the Negro
citizens and the white citizens of Montgomery, but is a conflict between
justice and injustice, between the forces of light and the forces of darkness,
and if there is a victory--and there will be a victory--the victory will
not be
merely for the Negro citizens and a defeat for the white citizens, but it will
be a victory for justice and a defeat of injustice. It will be a victory for
goodness in its long struggle with the forces of evil."
Dr. Jendian is an Assistant Professor of Sociology and Director of the
American Humanics Nonprofit Administration Program at California State
University, Fresno. He received his Baccalaureate degree from CSU, Fresno in
Sociology with minor degrees in Psychology and Armenian Studies, and his
Master's and Doctoral degrees from University of Southern California. Dr.
Jendian teaches courses on race and ethnicity, terrorism and genocide, and
contemporary social issues at California State University, Fresno.
Hasmig Tatiossian is the Southern California Regional Assistant
Coordinator of
The Genocide Education Project, a nonprofit organization whose mission it
is to
assist educators in teaching about human rights and genocide, particularly the
Armenian Genocide, by developing and distributing instructional materials,
providing access to teaching resources and organizing educational workshops
(see ). Tatiossian received her Baccalaureate degree from
UC Berkeley in International Relations with an Emphasis on Genocide and Human
Rights Violations.
11) `From Need to Greed:' New film documents illegal logging and deforestation
in Armenia
A 20-minute film about illegal logging and deforestation in Armenia, titled
`From Need to Greed,' was released this week by Vem Media Arts in Yerevan. The
fourth in a series of environmental films, the documentary was funded by
Armenia Tree Project, Armenian Forests NGO, and the World Wildlife Fund
Caucasus Office.
In the opening of the film, Armenian children declare the importance of
forests in supporting animals and birds, absorbing carbon dioxide and
generating oxygen, absorbing dust from the air, and preventing landslides.
`The
number of forests in Armenia is very few. We need to protect the existing
forests and plant new trees,' states one child.
Produced by Manuk Hergnyan of Vem and written by Inga Zarafyan, the
documentary explains that forests provide food, shelter, clothing, and fuel
for
people, but over time humans have started to destroy this vital lifeline.
According to historical data, forests covered 20 percent of Armenia at the
turn
of the 20th century, but by the early 1990s this area was reduced to 11
percent
and is now below 10 percent.
Massive logging started in 1992 as a result of the energy crisis in the
country. Nearly half of the forests in the Vanadzor forest were destroyed,
with
much of the tree loss occurring on steep slopes and resulting in devastating
landslides. Reforestation projects were carried out in the Lake Sevan basin in
the 1950s to prevent erosion, but many of those forests were destroyed or
damaged during the severe winters of the 1990s.
Although the crisis of energy shortages has diminished, tree cutting has
continued and taken on new forms, notes the film. Since wood is treated as an
inexpensive source of fuel, 70 percent of the logged wood is still used as
firewood. The actual volume of logging was estimated in 2003 by World Bank
experts to be one million cubic meters, most of which is illegal logging since
the annual number of trees subject to felling does not exceed 70,000 thousand
cubic meters.
Aside from the segments of the population that rely on forests for their
survival, much of the tree cutting is widely believed to be done by oligarchs
who are illegally exporting wood from Armenia. The State Environmental
Inspectorate, however, denies the role of oligarchs in this sector.
`I myself haven't come across any oligarch involved in forest consumption,'
states one government official from that office. `There are organizations that
are implementing forest consumption in due manner, signing a contract with
Hayantar (Forestry Department). People have won a certain land area by tender,
and have taken the wood out of there, one part as construction timber, the
remaining as firewood.'
`The situation is different than it was in the early 1990s with the energy
crisis,' notes Armenian Forests NGO President Jeffrey Tufenkian. `There is
still need-based cutting for people who can't afford fuel other than wood, but
it has moved from need to greed. The greed of a few who are taking truckloads
of wood out of the forest and keeping local villagers from entering the
forest.'
One of Hayantar's chief foresters also points out some questionable
practices.
They include the abuse of logging licenses by using them several times and
questionable methods used to gain access to valuable walnut wood that is
exported to Europe for use in luxury automobiles. In fact, the film documents
the export of oak, walnut, ash, and hornbeam wood to countries including
France, Italy, Spain, United Arab Emirates, Germany, Iran, and even Turkey.
Experts agree that even if logging is halted, the forests in Armenia will not
be able to be restored naturally. It would be possible to save them only if
there is a national forest recovery program and strict controls in place, but
for now, the monitoring conducted by governmental structures is ineffective.
`How else can we explain the fact that in 2005, the State Environmental
Inspectorate recorded illegal logging of only 9,018 trees with 8,130 cubic
meters in volume, or 15-20 times less than in reality?' asks the narrator.
According to data from the National Program Against Desertification, 80
percent of Armenia's territory has already undergone desertification. If this
continues unchecked, soil humidity will decrease, pastures will shrink, cattle
head will drop, and production of fruits and vegetables will go down. `Thus,
Armenia will turn to a desertnot to the classical ecosystembut into a desert
created by man himself, and it will become an environment not fit for life
anymore,' concludes the narrator.
Near the end of the film, representatives of Armenian Forests NGO and Armenia
Tree Project offer their views on steps that need to be taken to eliminate
illegal logging and allow Armenia's forests to regenerate. `First, public
awareness needs to be raised, and environmental education is a useful way to
arouse public opinion,' states ATP Foundation President Susan Klein. `In
addition, reforestation is an important goal for today. We in this generation
must preserve this for future generations.'
The 20-minute documentary film `From Need to Greed' is being made available
for personal and public viewing in DVD format. To acquire a copy of the
film in
the diaspora with English subtitles, contact Armenia Tree Project via email at
[email protected].
12) The `Buzz' about Bezzerides: Film about Armenian-Greek screenwriter
featured at Southeast European Film Festival
This year, the Southeast European Film Festival has chosen as its closing
night
film `Buzz,' a film about a legendary Hollywood scriptwriter of Armenian-Greek
descent. The closing night event, during which the film about Albert Isaac
`Buzz' Bezzerides will be screened, will take place at 7:30 PM on Wednesday,
May 24 at the Fine Arts Theatre in Beverly Hills.
`Buzz' is a memorable, absorbing, and illuminating profile of the legendary
Hollywood scriptwriter (and acclaimed novelist) Bezzerides, whose most notable
credits include Robert Aldrich's `Kiss Me Deadly' (1955), Jules Dassin's
`Thieves' Highway' (1942), and Raoul Walsh's `They Drive By Night' (1940).
Bezzerides is known as `The King of Noir'--in fact, François Truffaut, an
authority on film noir, considered the Bezzerides-scripted `Juke Girl' (1942)
to be America's first real film noir.
`Buzz' traces Bezzerides' arrival in the US and pre-Hollywood existence. Born
in 1908 in the Black Sea city of Samsun in the Ottoman Empire, Bezzerides fled
to the US with his family on the eve of the Genocide. His Armenian mother and
Greek father settled in Fresno, California where Bezzerides grew up in the
Armenian community. The fruit truckers of Fresno and the community in which he
grew up provided him with much of the material for his novels and
screenplays.
As a screenwriter, Bezzerides had a fascinating career. "Graylisted" during
the McCarthy era, he was one of many talents to suffer from the
industrial-style practices of Hollywood at the time, where writers were
regarded as being at the bottom of the food chain and frequently denied screen
credits.
Bezzerides himself is now well into his tenth decade, but as evidenced by
director Spiro N. Taraviras's loving tribute he has not lost his famous zip
and
joie de vivre.
Interviewed for the film between 1999 and 2002, Bezzerides proves enormously
engaging company as he takes an idiosyncratic tour down memory lane. Anecdotes
abound, featuring the likes of William Faulkner (with whom Bezzerides had a
particularly strong, mutually-beneficial relationship), Marilyn Monroe, Ronald
Reagan, Humphrey Bogart, Robert Mitchum, and many more.
The film has won several awards including the Greek Film Critics Association
Award for Best Film of the Year (2005) and the Greek State Film Award for Best
Feature Documentary Film awarded by the Ministry of Cultural Affairs (2005).
For more information about the festival or to purchase tickets to see the
film, call (800) 838-3006 or visit
<;www.seefilm la.org.
Screening info:
Wednesday, May 24
Fine Arts Theatre, Beverly Hills
8556 Wilshire Blvd.
Beverly Hills, CA 90211
13) The Conflict in Darfur
By Representative Joe Schwartz, MD
Those with Armenian, Jewish, and Cambodian heritage, among others, understand
all too well what happens when good people remain silent and allow atrocities
to continue unabated. On April 30, 2006, they were among the thousands who
attended a rally in Washington DC for those affected by the strife and unrest
in Darfur. Although many at the rally had divergent political and economic
views, tragic situations have a unique way of compelling many people to speak
with one voice.
The Darfur conflict began in February 2003, when rebels launched attacks
seeking greater political autonomy. In response, Sudan's Islamic government
dispatched troops and pro-government militias known as the Janjaweed to quell
the uprising. The militias embarked on a campaign of terror, killing, and
raping civilians mostly from ethnic groups.
On occasion, the conflict in Darfur has been labeled as a fight between Arabs
and black Africans. Yet, the truth is more complicated in that African and
Arab
identities are often indistinguishable in Sudan. In fact, the true division in
Darfur is between ethnic groups, divided between herders and farmers. The
dialect of its members and whether they tend to the soil or herd livestock is
the true determinant of whether an individual is identified as `African' or
`Arab.'
Despite any real ability to distinguish between bloodlines, this 3-year-old
conflict is responsible for the deaths of at least 200,000 people and for
causing more than 2.5 million to flee their homes and seek shelter in refugee
camps inside Darfur or to neighboring Chad. In the last month alone, more than
60,000 people have been forced to evacuate.
While the United States has been a leader, providing over $1.3 billion a year
in humanitarian assistance, we must continue to actively express our
disapproval and outrage at those who condone the genocidal actions of the
Janjaweed and their associates. For this reason, I supported HR 3127, `The
Darfur Peace and Accountability Act,' approved 416-3 on April 5, 2006 in the
House of Representatives.
HR 3127 directs the President to deny visas for entry into the US of any
person responsible for acts of genocide or crimes against humanity in Sudan.
This bill authorizes the President to reinforce the deployment and operations
of the African Union (AU) peacekeeping mission in Darfur, and directs the
President to instruct our US Ambassador to NATO to lobby for a NATO
peacekeeping force in Darfur. In addition, the bill encourages the President
to consider pushing for an expansion of the mandate of the UN peacekeeping
mission already in Sudan supporting the north-south peace agreement.
Given the authorization provided by HR 3127, I also voted in favor of the
2006
Defense Supplemental bill that specifically included $303 million for the
peacekeeping mission in Darfur. This money will be used to sustain and expand
the 7,700-member AU mission, supported by US and NATO logistics, surveillance,
and airlift.
Finally, I signed a letter to the Secretary of State along with 119 other
members of Congress urging her to appoint a special envoy to Sudan. As the
letter states, I am concerned that there is not a single person whose sole
responsibility is to monitor the situation in Darfur and Southern Sudan and
answer directly to the Secretary of State. I believe the appointment of a
special envoy with a clear mandate, who has the ear of the Secretary of State,
will communicate to the Sudanese government and the world community the
seriousness of our government's intent to see the suffering in Darfur ended.
While the pressure being placed on the government of Sudan and the three
rebel
factions may yet yield a peaceful result in Darfur, it will not come easily.
Mediators from the AU have already had to extend the deadline for agreement on
a peace settlement in order to bridge the gap on the issues of reintegration
and disarmament, as well as on wealth and power sharing.
There is no doubt that there are going to be some extraordinarily difficult
challenges, but it is not too late for appropriate and constant pressure to
convince the Sudanese government to do the right thing, to cease the mindless
and brutal genocide in Darfur, and to bring some order and tranquility back to
that part of Africa.
To its credit, the administration has dispatched Deputy Secretary of State
Robert Zoellick to Abuja, Nigeria, where negotiations are being held to
encourage a successful end to the horrific situation in Darfur. Success in
this effort is a must.
Representative Joe Schwarz is a Congressman representing Michigan's 7th
District.
14) Critics' Forum: Visual Arts
Joanne Julian: Concerning the Spiritual in Art
By Adriana Tchalian
The title of my article, `Concerning the Spiritual in Art,' comes from a book
written by twentieth-century Modernist Wassily Kandinsky on the subject of art
and spirituality (1910). He, along with others such as Piet Mondrian, was
strongly influenced by religious and spiritual subjects of his times, and as a
result created art that reflected this awareness. Compared to the charismatic,
angst-ridden artists of today, these early twentieth-century Modernists were
sage and poet in one, creating works that reflected their inner life rather
than generating `art for art's sake' or imbuing their work with social or
political purpose.
In fact, ever since Paleolithic man began sketching crude renderings of
animals on the ceilings of the Lascaux caves (France, 13,000 BC), art has
become an expression or a reflection of one's creedfor these renderings were
not meant for decorative or social purposes but rather as some type of
ritualistic magic. Assuming that one agrees that art has a purposewhether
cultural, political, or otherwiseand is not merely `art for art's sake,' empty
of meaning or purpose, it is clear that the most significant role of art has
been the expression of one's religious or spiritual creed. The centrality of
the spiritual in art is undeniable, be it in the art of India or the art of
the
Italian Renaissance, the interior of an ancient cave or the ceiling of the
Sistine Chapel, or to offer a more contemporary example, the open-air ceiling
of James Turrell's Roden Crater, an extinct crater that has been excavated to
function as an open-air observatory just outside of Flagstaff, Arizona.
And although some contemporary western artists do not offer much by way of
the
spiritual in art, even they are keenly aware of its absence. As art critic and
historian Suzi Gablik writes, `the real crisis of Modernism, as many people
have claimed, is the pervasive spiritual crisis of Western civilization: the
absence of a system of beliefs that justifies allegiance to any entity beyond
the self.' Gablik goes on to say that even twentieth-century Abstract
Expressionists were closet spiritualists, quietly revering the early
Modernists' efforts to distill their spiritual explorations into fine art.
Having made this argument about art and spirituality, then, how do we
apply it
to contemporary Armenian art? Enter the likes of Joanne Julian, a Los
Angeles-based Armenian artist who is a virtual unknown in the Armenian
diasporan community, yet one whose work is well-recognized amongst mainstream
art circles.
There is nothing intrinsically Armenian about Julian's graphite and ink
drawings. The critic Robert McDonald describes her work as possessing `the
discipline and spirit of Taoist painting.' It is this proclivity towards
things
spiritual that is the driving essence behind her work. Having traveled
throughout Asia, Julian has cultivated an extensive Asian visual vocabulary,
which is reflected in the simplicity and beauty of her drawingsimmense
brushstrokes, reminiscent of Asian calligraphy, are set against the glistening
sheen of the graphite, forming an exquisite contrast of color, texture, and
shape.
In February of this year, Julian, along with William Amundson and Robin Dare,
participated in an exhibitionDrawn to Scaleat the Spokane Falls Community
College Art Gallery in Washington. The exhibit was co-curated by Louise Lewis,
gallery director and professor of art history at California State University,
Northridge.
According to Lewis, `The juxtaposition of a delicately drawn silver braid
entwined within a vibrant circle of crimson or gold suggests an unusually
exuberant Zen exercise, ironically made more intimate by the all-enveloping
scale. In Horizontal Braid, the intricately drawn tress stretches within the
bottom portion of nearly 3' high gold and circle, provocatively inviting the
viewer to contemplate the secrets within the circle.'
The presence of someone of Julian's talent in both the Armenian diasporan and
American contexts suggests that the yearning for the spiritual is alive and
well, even among the most avant-garde artists in our communities. In an
earlier
article, I had posed the question of whether or not there was an Asian
aesthetic in Armenian visual art. It appears as if Joanne Julian's work more
than answers that call, while transcending the limits of even that description
in the process.
Adriana Tchalian holds a Masters degree in Art History and has managed
several
art galleries in Los Angeles. You can reach her or any of the other
contributors to Critics' Forum at [email protected]. This and all
other
articles published in this series are available online at
To sign up for a weekly electronic version of new articles, go to
Critics' Forum is a group created to discuss issues
relating to Armenian art and culture in the diaspora.
15) Irritants III
By Garen Yegparian
OK, this week, let's just have some fun. It's been a year and a half since I
went on a whining spree and there are weighty issues coming next week.
As I quoted before, Jean Paul Sartre said, `Hell is other people,' and boy
was/is he right!
You go to the grocery market, and they've got `cluster tomatoes.' They look
pretty good. They're actually RED, not orange-red. They even smell like
tomatoes instead of some sterile gauze. But of course, some jerk is picking
off
the `best' ones and avoiding paying for the `massive' excess weight of the
stems. You start imagining a shotgun blast turning his head tomato colored...
Some drunken fool's stomach decides it can't take any more, and you're
treated
to the stench and scenery in your building's elevator. Hey, no need to clean
up, it's OK. Or, you watch as some other pathetic human barfs all over the
floor at Versailles (the palace), yummy...
Some rocket-scientist of an Armenian starts `enlightening' those around
him/her about perceived defects found among our kind, starting with `You know
what I can't stand about Armenians...?' Then of course you hear about an
admittedly irritating, though generically human, behavior that is found
equally
among any grouping from Angles-Saxons-Jutes to Russians to
environmentalists to
right-wing-whackos. The only reason such pontificators believe their own
spoutings is that they live such insular lives that the only significant
contact they have is with their own group.
Here it is. A good 30 years since major migrations of Armenians to the US
commenced, and the notion, `You're not Armenian if you don't speak Armenian'
persists. Fortunately, it is now subtler, indicating a weakening of the
mythology, and isn't used to demean some of our compatriots. Of course this
makes it more insidious. What's worse, some of the yoyos who think this way
would sooner eat a burger than kebab, can't tell a shoorch-bar from a highland
reel, don't set foot in an Armenian church but for weddings, baptisms, and
funerals (`What's a sharagan?' they wonder, `A predatory Armenian fish?'),
wouldn't recognize traditional garb if it squeezed them like a boa, and whose
idea of maintaining Armenian customs is smoking cigarettes with a queer
tilt of
the head.
Humans exist in this day and age and society who have not yet grasped the
merits of bathing. Conversely, we have the water wasting weirdoes who think
nothing of showering three or more times a day. But, the real kicker is users
of perfumes and colognes. These people think that anointing themselves with
extracts of animals' organs soaked in alcohol is pleasing to others' olfactory
receptors. Frequently, `the more the merrier' seems to be these folks'
approach
to using these pungent liquids. Many also seem to think that slathering these
expensive concoctions masks body odor rather than yielding a noxious hybrid.
There you are, minding your own business, riding the bus on the way to work.
Next thing you know, you think you've got tinnitus. Then you realize that
annoying pinging sound is just the overflow noise coming from some idiot's
headset. You wonder how he/she tolerates such loud noise pumped directly into
the ear. But, that's not your business. So you proceed to politely request
they
turn it down. After the initial uncomprehending stare, if you're lucky, the
volume will get reduced, sometimes even attended by an apology. More often,
you'll get asked if you can hear it, with a grudging reduction following.
Other
times you'll get ignored, cursed, get a volume increase, and once even a
threatening warning that you should watch your back. All this when radio
playing is forbidden on public transit.
What about public toilets? There's always some vermin who're afraid to touch
the lever and actually flush the toilet or urinal. So we've found a remedy!
Yay! But wait, the Law of Unintended Consequences (LUC) has kicked in. The
automatic flushers, activated whenever the field of the sensor is disturbed,
cause thousands of gallons of wasted water. Walking past a urinal?
Flushhhhhhhhhhhh. Stand up at the toilet? Flushhhhhhhhhhhh. But wait, now
you've got all that paper in the bowl and you're waving you're hands madly in
front of the sensor to get another flush. Of course, it doesn't cooperate. And
that's after you got off one of those seats with the tubular plastic cover
(Chicago's Ohare Airport has them). But there's LUC again. Sure the seat's
protected, as are successive users except... the mechanism that drives the
plastic sticks way up from the seat and if you're even slightly larger than
what some designer imagined, your rump is pushing right up against that
(unprotected) gizmo. Sanitary and swell isn't it?
If you're not yet convinced that automation is ill-suited to toilets, how
about this: automated taps. Great! Put your hand under it, water runs... well
sometimes. Eventually it comes, but beware, move your hands millimeter in the
wrong direction and you're dry again. As if that's not frustrating enough, you
don't get to choose the temperature of the water. It's preset. How
difficult is
it to have it be adjustable? What if you don't enjoy having your hands
scalded,
or just want to splash your face with some cool water after a long flight?
Carpool (HOV) lanes? Great idea, right? Except morons get in them who drive
under the speed limit so that regular lanes, congested as they are, move
faster
than you do as you formulate plans for mounting a rocket propelled grenade
launcher on your hood for the next time this occurs. Not bad enough?
California
now allows single occupant hybrids in these lanes, uhhhh, what part of `high
occupancy vehicle' connotes the number one?
And now, for the hoity-toity art lovers among us, a perspective on the Getty
Art Museum. I've had the misfortune of being dragged there thrice. The first
time was early in its life when finding parking was a bigger challenge than on
Broadway in New York's theatre district on a Friday night. The synagogue
across
the street had some event, and generally disallows museum parking anyway. I
ended up three miles away, near the UCLA campus, looking for parking, then a
shuttle bus that no one seemed to know about. By the time I got to the museum,
I had lost what little interest I had in being there. Then came the
`agh-beeber' of my friends bickering over what time we would leave and docents
describing manuscript illumination who'd never heard of the (significant)
Armenian contribution the genre. The second Getty trip was with a date who
wanted to attend a poetry reading/discussion, oooh, goody, my favorite.
Finally, I got dragged to a Gustave Courbet exhibition last weekend. Turns out
old Gustave liked to paint nature, among other things, but the pictures look
blurry--maybe it's because of the `incredible brush strokes' described by my
tormentor. I did notice one fun thing: Courbet, a fat guy, is described in the
museum's literature as `robust.' It reminded me of Armenia, where fat folk are
referred to as `aroghch'--`healthy,' an interesting coincidence of euphemistic
usage.
16) SKEPTIK TAKES ON GOLDBERG
By SKEPTIK SINIKIAN
In any given week, I receive a dozen or so emails from around the world from
various readers. I try to respond to as many as I can but sometimes it
will be
one of those weeks where I don't get to respond as quickly as I want or to
everyone who wrote to me. In fact, I owe some folks from Bulgaria and Hungary
apologies for my delays in getting back to them. This was just one of those
weeks and on top of everything else, I was forwarded more e-vites (electronic
invitations) to different parties or fundraisers than Paris Hilton gets in a
month. That's the great thing about being Armenian--you never have to worry
about having an empty social calendar. For instance, I received an email the
other day from an organization that is raising money for something called the
Armenian Cosmic Ray Division (CRD).
Now the name Armenian Cosmic Ray Division may sound more like the name of a
boy band from Armenia who covers 80s pop hits from groups like Depeche Mode
and
the Pet Shop Boys than a serious research group. But the CRD is actually a
world class scientific organization in Armenia that has made an international
impact in the area of cosmic and space weather observation. I don't know what
this all means because during Earth Science class in the 8th grade, I was more
interested in finding out if Tammy Portafino's hair smelled like strawberries
and cream than I was interested in learning about sun-spots and space
weather.
But lo and behold, Armenia's science community is making an impact in
international research and all thanks to this little research facility nestled
atop Mount Aragats in Armenia. And their work is important to you as well
because many everyday services such as cell phones, weather reports, TV
programs, and even safe airline flights and electricity depend on accurate and
reliable space weather forecasting. See, I bet you didn't know that. Next
time you're chatting it up at Starbucks on your Nokia Razor phone trying to
look important for the ladies while talking to your grandmother, remember that
your cell phone service relies on a group of Armenian scientists who spend
morning eating `khash'* and evenings studying the stars. (*Khash is Armenian
menudo--or menudo is Mexican khash depending on your perspective) Anyway, you
can learn more about the CRD by visiting
Another reader forwarded me an excerpt from an interview with documentary
filmmaker Andrew Goldberg and the Kurdish Media in New York, which was
published online on May 14, 2006 and can be found at
Goldberg was the guy who made the documentary `The Armenian Genocide' that PBS
wanted to show followed by a panel discussion/debate with denier propagandists
pushing the Turkish agenda and Armenian-American authors and scholars. The
idea of having a legitimate documentary on the Genocide followed by folks
`debating' a non-debatable issue which remains a sensitive topic because of
Turkish proactive denial is reminiscent of a twisted sideshow from a three
ring
circus. It was such a big deal that PBS received tens of thousands of emails
from Armenian Americans and from Turks around the country and the globe. The
Armenians were writing to not have the panel aired after the documentary. The
Turks were writing to have the documentary pulled entirely.
When I read the question in the Kurdish Media interview and Goldberg's
response, I felt the need to put in my two cents' worth. Particularly since I
actually attended his screening in LA, made a pretty decent contribution
for my
own meager means and also bought one of the overpriced DVDs (it was selling
for
30 bucks but it was for a good cause, right?) Anyway, here's the question and
Goldberg's answer:
KurdishMedia: `Do you have any future plans to further explore the Armenian
genocide or other historical events in the region?'
Goldberg: `No. This was a very upsetting experience for me. Seeing PBS get so
incredibly assaulted by the whole world--justified or not--was very upsetting
to watch. Seeing Congressmen try to stop PBS from showing either the film or
the panel, regardless of the value of either, reminded me of Turkey where
government controls the media. Terrifying. For the record, I never want to
live
in a country where the government tells the press what to do. The people can
always speak out instead. Our government cannot even build a sidewalk and yet
we are [to] take seriously their nonsensical efforts at censorship? Again, no
matter how offensive something is--the government cannot be the ones to
tell us
what we can and cannot say. It must only be the people and the viewers.
Going on, being attacked, often with fabrications, by nationalists in the
Armenian press in California was very upsetting and uncalled for. In my
opinion, it is press like this that only harms efforts at recognition. It
divides rather than unites and prevents any consistent voice to speak for the
issues.
Furthermore, raising money was nearly impossible. I was told by one of our
funders that a man named Walter Karabian actually suggested that supporting
our
efforts was a mistake! But we were able to finish the film and we are very,
very proud of what we achieved for journalism and for human rights.
As for the Armenian organizations such as ANCA (Armenian National Committee)
and the Armenian Assembly? We tried to work with them many times but we found
them to be entirely non-responsive. The AGBU [Armenian General Benevolent
Union] on the other hand was amazing, outstanding, and incredible. They were
truly wonderful to work with and I wish I had such talented and generous
people
to work with on all our projects.'
Mark Twain, one of the sharpest American satirists of all time once said that
`It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and
remove all doubt.' If Goldberg read Twain, then he'd have saved him the
embarrassment that I'm about to spank him with. First of all, in the previous
part of his interview (which I didn't print due to space limitations but you
can read online), Goldberg dishes out a critique that there is not enough
research being done by non Armenians on the Genocide. Well DUH!! But there's
still work being done by non-Armenians scholars such as Donald Miller and
Israel Charney to name a few. But he's right. More can be done. Yet in the
same breath he mentions that his film was funded exclusively by Armenians.
What I'd like to ask Mr. Goldberg is why he didn't receive any funding from
any other sources? Why did the Armenian community have to foot the bill one
more time? Was it because we're so generous and hospitable? Well, that can't
be the case at all, because as Mr. Goldberg said `As for the Armenian
organizations such as ANCA (Armenian National Committee) and the Armenian
Assembly? We tried to work with them many times but we found them to be
entirely non-responsive.' This was the statement that caught my eye.
First of
all, let me just say that I do not know of the Assembly's activities, nor do I
particularly care. But I do have first hand sources that after reading the
Goldberg interview, informed me that the ANCA worked as hard as they could to
help him with this screenings in Washington, DC. Yet at the same time, they
urged community members and activists to urge PBS to not air the panel
following the documentary. They did all this while working on the dozens of
other issues they usually work on--Artsakh, aid to Armenia, State Department
issues in the Caucasus, etc.
I don't know what Goldberg expected from the ANCA? It's not like his
documentary was earth-shattering or presented anything new that we hadn't seen
before. Every week the ANCA is approached by folks who are working on
different projects that require some assistance, and how does a group that's
extremely limited in resources decide who and what to help and how much? I
don't envy them at all. Not only that, but Goldberg's documentaries remind me
of the yellow jacket books that you see at Borders with titles like `Poker for
Dummies.' Goldberg's previous works and films on Armenians (although
well-shot
and edited) usually neglect key elements that do not do justice to the subject
matter. I never commented on this before because it was never an issue before
and because I didn't know that Goldberg was involved in these previous
movies.
But here's a BIG example from his past movie about Armenians titled
`Armenians:
A Story of Survival,' which aired on PBS a few years ago. The movie
chronicled the early history of Armenians through Christianity and eventually
to modern day Armenia and the struggles in Artsakh. But here's what pissed me
off about the movie--it talked about the difficulties Armenia has
developing as
a democracy and how the Soviet system has embedded a lot of corruption. This
was said/implied while showing an image of your classic Yerevan police officer
with a huge pot belly waving a baton. Soon after this image, the movie ends.
I had issues with this scene and I'll tell you why...
Now here's my question to you and my critique of Goldberg. If you're
making a
documentary about Armenians and survival, what do you think has been the most
critical event of the last twenty years that has affected Armenia as a
nation?
What image of the last twenty years conveys survival more than the war in
Artsakh? If you said the 1988 earthquake in Armenia--which killed over 25,000
people and left over half a million people homeless in a country of a
population of roughly 3 million--then you should be making documentaries
instead of Goldberg. And right after this earthquake, our neighbors--Turkey
and Azerbaijan--in violation of US laws, cut off the railway lines and
prevented Armenia from receiving any humanitarian aid (that's right...
HUMANITARIAN) and still do so today. This led to one of the largest
humanitarian aid airlifts in the history of the world, making the Berlin
Airlift seem like a Boy Scout Canned Food Drive. And Armenia has been
surviving like this since then. SINCE 1989!! But did Goldberg cover this
critical, crucial, indispensable portion of Armenia's recent history which
still affects its economic development and even drives a few desperate people
to desperate measures??? ABSOLUTELY NOT! Instead, he showed a fat Yerevan
cop
with a fat belly! That's just poor filmmaking and there are no excuses for
that.
When I met Goldberg at his film's premier in Hollywood, I congratulated
him on
a job well done. I hadn't made the connection between the two films he'd
worked on at the time because I usually don't care much about stuff like this.
I'm usually only pissed off for about three hours and then I forget about it.
But reading Goldberg's statement blasting Armenian community organizations in
Washington DC and then doing some research on my own just brought back the
frustration. And it made me realize that sometimes, if you want something
done
right, I guess you just have to do it yourself. So, I'm going to go buy a
video
camera today. I'll see you next week.
Skeptik Sinikian asks Mr. Goldberg to respond to his article by writing to
[email protected]. He promises to publish Goldberg's entire letter
response, unedited, on his blog at
All subscription inquiries and changes must be made through the proper carrier
and not Asbarez Online. ASBAREZ ONLINE does not transmit address changes and
subscription requests.
(c) 2006 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved.
ASBAREZ provides this news service to ARMENIAN NEWS NETWORK members for
academic research or personal use only and may not be reproduced in or through
mass media outlets.
Antelias: The MECC General Secretary in Antelias
PRESS RELEASE
Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
Contact: V.Rev.Fr.Krikor Chiftjian, Communications Officer
Tel: (04) 410001, 410003
Fax: (04) 419724
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:
PO Box 70 317
Antelias-Lebanon
Armenian version:
THE GENERAL SECRETARY OF MECC VISITS HIS HOLINESS ARAM I
His Holiness Aram I met with the General Secretary of the Middle East
Council of Churches (MECC), Dr. Georges Saleh in his office on May 17. Dr.
Saleh provided the Catholicos with a copy of the MECC action plan for the
next five years and asked his opinion on it before finalizing the document.
The General Secretary and His Holiness also spoke about the challenges
Christianity faces in the Middle East and issues related to the
Christian-Muslim dialogue and MECC. His Holiness stressed the importance of
further activeness and organization in the work of the council in light of
the developments in the region and the needs and expectations of churches.
In this context His Holiness stressed the important role of the Armenian
Church in the various fields of ecumenical affairs, including the area of
Christian-Muslim dialogue.
##
The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia is one of the two Catholicosates of
the Armenian Orthodox Church. For detailed information about the Ecumenical
activities of the Cilician Catholicosate, you may refer to the web page of
the Catholicosate, The Cilician Catholicosate, the
administrative center of the church is located in Antelias, Lebanon.
Antelias: Chairman of Homenetmen Central Committee in Antelias
PRESS RELEASE
Catholicosate of Cilicia
Communication and Information Department
Contact: V.Rev.Fr.Krikor Chiftjian, Communications Officer
Tel: (04) 410001, 410003
Fax: (04) 419724
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:
PO Box 70 317
Antelias-Lebanon
Armenian version:
HIS HOLINESS ARAM I RECEIVES THE CHAIRMAN
OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF “HOMENETMEN”
His Holiness Aram I received the chairman of the Central Committee of
“Homenetmen” Armenian General Athletic Union and Scouts, Karnig
Meguerditchian, in his office in Antelias on May 18. The visit’s purpose was
to brief His Holiness on the works carried out by the committee, as well as
the upcoming pan-“Homenetmen” camping in Armenia next July.
The Pontiff praised the function carried out by the Union, considering it a
mission the aim of which is to provide Armenian education with moral and
national values to the new Armenian generations. He advised that bearing
this in mind, -“Homenetmen” should give an impetus to its efforts both in
Armenia and the Diaspora.
##
The Armenian Catholicosate of Cilicia is one of the two Catholicosates of
the Armenian Orthodox Church. For detailed information about the history and
mission of the Cilician Catholicosate, you may refer to the web page of the
Catholicosate, The Cilician Catholicosate, the
administrative center of the church is located in Antelias, Lebanon.
CoE: Signatures and ratifications of CoE treaties
PRESS RELEASE
Council of Europe Press Division
Ref: 288a06
Tel: +33 (0)3 88 41 25 60
Fax:+33 (0)3 88 41 39 11
[email protected]
internet:
Signatures and ratifications of Council of Europe treaties on the
occasion of the 116th session of the Committee of Ministers
Strasbourg, 19.05.2006 – On the occasion of the 116th session of the
Committee of Ministers taking place today in Strasbourg (see our press
release 276a06 of 10.05.2006), the following treaties have been ratified
or signed by the member states below:
Convention on Cybercrime (CETS No. 185
< ueVoulezVous.asp?NT=3D185&CM=3D1&CL=3DENG& gt; )*
This treaty was ratified by Bosnia and Herzegovina
Protocol No. 13 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms, concerning the abolition of the death penalty in
all circumstances (CETS No. 187
< ueVoulezVous.asp?NT=3D187&CM=3D1&CL=3DENG& gt; )*
This treaty was signed by Armenia
Additional Protocol to the Convention on cybercrime, concerning the
criminalisation of acts of a racist and xenophobic nature committed
through computer systems (CETS No. 189
< ueVoulezVous.asp?NT=3D189&CM=3D1&CL=3DENG& gt; )*
This treaty was ratified by Bosnia and Herzegovina
Protocol No. 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms, amending the control system of the Convention
(CETS No. 194
< ueVoulezVous.asp?NT=3D194&CM=3D1&CL=3DENG& gt; )*
This treaty was ratified by the following States : Azerbaijan, Bosnia
and Herzegovina, Czech Republic and Portugal
Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (CETS No.196
< n/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=3D196&CM=3D1&CL=3DE NG> )*
This treaty was ratified by Russia and signed by the following States :
Latvia, Slovakia and Slovenia
Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human
Beings (CETS No. 197
< ueVoulezVous.asp?NT=3D197&CM=3D1&CL=3DENG& gt; )*
This treaty was ratified by Moldova and signed by the following States :
Latvia, San Marino and Slovakia
Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and
Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of
Terrorism (CETS No. 198
< ueVoulezVous.asp?NT=3D198&CM=3D1&CL=3DENG& gt; )*
This treaty was signed by Latvia
Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage
for Society (CETS No. 199
< ueVoulezVous.asp?NT=3D199&CM=3D1&CL=3DENG& gt; )*
This treaty was signed by San Marino
In addition, the Council of Europe Convention on the avoidance of
statelessness in relation to state succession (CETS No. 200
< ueVoulezVous.asp?NT=3D200&CM=3D1&
CL=3DENG > )* was opened for signature.
Ukraine signed this Convention
* * *
Detailed information on the Council of Europe treaties (full text, chart
of signatures and ratifications, reservations and declarations, summary,
explanatory report) is available on the Treaty Office’s web site
—————
( *) CETS : Council of Europe Treaty Series
To receive our press releases by e-mail, contact :
[email protected]
A political organisation set up in 1949, the Council of Europe works to
promote democracy and human rights continent-wide. It also develops
common responses to social, cultural and legal challenges in its 46
member states.
CENN: Round Table – Regulation of Water Supply Services
Round Table – Regulation of Water Supply Services
Public Advocates Union (PAU) invites you to participate at the round table
discussion on current problems in the process of regulation of water supply
services. The discussion will take place at Tekeyan Centre, on May 23rd
2006, at 11:00.
Representatives of Public Services Regulatory Commission, State Committee of
Water Systems and other stakeholder organizations will participate in the
discussion.
Public Advocates Union
23 Marshal Baghramyan Ave. #25a, 375019
Yerevan, Armenia,
Tel: (37410) 58 88 37
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: <;
CENN INFO
Caucasus Environmental NGO Network (CENN)
Tel:+995 32 75 19 03/04
Fax:+995 32 75 19 05
E-mail:
URL: <;
116th Session of the Committee of Ministers – Conclusions of Chair
PRESS RELEASE
Council of Europe Press Division
Ref: 292a06
Tel: +33 (0)3 88 41 25 60
Fax:+33 (0)3 88 41 39 11
[email protected]
internet:
116th Session of the Committee of Ministers
(Strasbourg, 18-19 May 2006) –
Conclusions of the Chair
The main theme of the 116th Session of the Committee of Ministers,
chaired by Mr Mihai-Razvan Ungureanu, Minister for Foreign Affairs of
Romania, was the follow-up to the Third Council of Europe Summit, one
year on from Warsaw.
In reviewing progress with the implementation of the Summit decisions,
the Ministers identified the following priorities:
– consolidation of the Council of Europe’s system of human rights
protection;
– relations between the Council of Europe and the European Union;
– reinforcement of the Council of Europe’s action in favour of democracy
and good governance;
– the Council of Europe’s action to develop intercultural dialogue;
– implementation of Part V of the Action Plan of the Third Summit,
concerning Council of Europe reform.
During their discussions, the Ministers noted the position and
intentions of the Committee of Ministers’ institutional partners in the
Council of Europe on the issues on the agenda. They noted in particular
the positive assessment made of the work carried out in the areas of
intercultural dialogue and democracy (including local and regional
democracy and transfrontier cooperation). In this context, they took
note of the offer by Ukraine to host the plenary session of the Forum
for the Future of Democracy in 2009. They underlined the importance of
joint efforts from all Council of Europe actors for the success of the
current reform process carried out under Chapter V of the Action Plan.
The participants in the session also took note with interest of the
interim report of the Group of Wise Persons entrusted with drawing up a
comprehensive strategy to secure the long-term effectiveness of the
European Convention on Human Rights, which was presented by the Group’s
Chairman, Mr Iglesias.
The Ministers’ decisions and conclusions on the range of issues which
were on their agenda appear in the Session Communiqué.
The Council of Europe’s action in favour of democratic stability in
Europe though the promotion of its values and principles in the fields
of human rights, democracy and the rule of law was foremost in the
discussions. In this connection, the exchange of views with Mr Martti
Ahtisaari, Special Envoy of the Secretary General of the United Nations
for the future status process for Kosovo, at the informal ministerial
meeting on the evening of 18 May, provided an opportunity to take stock
of the negotiations on this subject and to discuss the Council of
Europe’ possible contribution to the process, in particular on matters
relating to human rights protection, minority rights, decentralisation
and the preservation of cultural heritage.
Beyond Kosovo, particular attention was paid to the more general issue
of stability in south-east Europe, having in mind the important
referendum on Montenegro’s independence, scheduled for 21 May. It was
underlined that the referendum must be conducted in full respect of the
relevant international standards and Ministers called on all the
political forces of Serbia and Montenegro to act responsibly and to
accept the results of the ballot. It was also recognised that a crucial
phase would begin after the referendum, irrespective of the results.
Reference was made to the need to continue the reforms in the fields of
human rights, democracy and the rule of law and the Ministers agreed
unanimously that the Council of Europe should continue the activities
which it has carried out to this end for several years, in consultation
with the other international bodies concerned.
Several Ministers also expressed concern that Serbia and Montenegro was
still not giving the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former
Yugoslavia (ICTY) the full and entire co-operation expected. They
recalled that this co-operation was one of the fundamental undertakings
entered into by Serbia and Montenegro when it joined the Council of
Europe and they called on the country’s authorities to take immediate
steps to comply with this commitment.
Another issue addressed concerned the conduct of free and democratic
elections in Europe. The Ministers expressed satisfaction that the
parliamentary elections in Ukraine on 26 March 2006 had been in
conformity with the relevant international standards. They also noted
with satisfaction the positive assessment made by the Parliamentary
Assembly of the rerun of the parliamentary elections in ten
constituencies in Azerbaijan on 13 May, which was a prelude to future
major elections in this country. In order to ensure that these
elections take place in a fully democratic manner, the Committee of
Ministers recalled the necessity of revising the electoral legislation
in co-operation with the Venice Commission as soon as possible. The
same point was made with regard to the current revision of the Armenian
Electoral Code.
In the case of Belarus, several Ministers regretted that the
presidential election of 19 March 2006 had not respected the
international standards referred to above and expressed great concern
about the continued deterioration of the situation concerning human
rights and fundamental freedoms following the election. In this
context, they urged the Belarus authorities to release all the persons
arrested before and after the elections and to embark resolutely on a
democratic reform process, particularly by guaranteeing the exercise of
freedom of expression and association, in accordance with the country’s
international undertakings. In this respect, it was hoped that the
Belarus authorities would co-operate actively in the implementation of
the action plan recently adopted by the Council of Europe in order to
foster its values and principles in the fields of human rights,
democracy and the rule of law in Belarus.
It was noted that more than ever, the Council of Europe’s
standard-setting acquis and its adaptation to meet the new challenges
facing Europe were critical elements for the strengthening of democratic
stability in Europe. In this context, the Ministers welcomed the opening
for signature at the Session of the Council of Europe’s 200th treaty,
the Convention on the Avoidance of Statelessness in relation to State
Succession.
The Ministers also took note with satisfaction of the signatures and
ratifications in recent months of (i) the Convention on the Prevention
of Terrorism, (ii) the revised Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure
and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of
Terrorism and (iii) the Convention on Action against Trafficking in
Human Beings.1 They reaffirmed the importance of these legal
instruments in the international fight against terrorism and human
trafficking and consequently encouraged countries that had not yet
signed or ratified these conventions to do so as soon as possible.
It was also pointed out that it was essential not only to sign and
ratify conventions but also to implement effectively Council of Europe
standards in domestic law and practice. The Ministers again stressed
member states’ individual and collective responsibility for ensuring
that judgments of the European Court of Human Rights were fully applied,
as an essential condition for the credibility of the Convention’s
supervisory system. They referred in particular to the four interim
resolutions adopted by the Committee of Ministers in the case of Ilascu
and others v. Moldova and Russia. They expect the Court’s judgment in
this case to be executed without any further delay.
Finally, the Ministers welcomed the emphasis placed over the past six
months on areas where joint action by member states, based on Council of
Europe values, could make a major contribution to democratic stability.
In particular they:
– welcomed the efforts of the Council of Europe, on the strength of the
Romanian Chairmanship’s input, to promote a culture of democracy with
the authorities and citizens of the member states, in particular through
the network of political schools aimed to train new generations of
leaders in the fundamental values of the Council of Europe (the first
conference of the schools took place on 27 and 28 April in Bucharest),
and the three-year action plan on education for democratic citizenship
and human rights, launched on the occasion of the evaluation conference
of the European Year of Citizenship through Education (2005) held in
Sinaia on 27 and 28 April;
– noted with satisfaction the launch in early 2006 of the activities of
the High-Level Task Force on Social Cohesion in the 21st century, which
had been mandated to review the Council of Europe’s strategy in this
area. In this connection, they welcomed the adoption in April of the
Ten-Year Action Plan on Equal Rights for People with Disabilities and
the Romanian authorities’ support for the plan’s implementation, in the
form of a regional seminar held in Constanta on 14-16 May 2006;
– gave their support for the Council of Europe’s three-year programme
“Building a Europe for and with Children”, inaugurated in Monaco on 4
and 5 April 2006, after the conference on children’s rights held in
Bucharest on 1 and 2 February, expressing the hope that the programme
would rapidly lead to practical and significant measures to improve
children’s rights, particularly where they live in difficult economic
and social conditions;
– recalled their firm commitment to the total abolition of the death
penalty in Europe and beyond. In this regard, they noted with
satisfaction that since their previous session Protocol No. 13 to the
ECHR had been ratified by Monaco, the Netherlands, Turkey and
Luxembourg, and signed by Armenia on 19 May at the Treaty event
organised in parallel to the session;
– stressed the importance of efforts to foster the rights of persons
belonging to national minorities (including Roma and Travellers). They
also welcomed the fact that, since the inauguration of the European
Forum for Roma and Travellers in late 2005, the Romanian Chairmanship
had supported this initiative, in particular by organising a conference
in Bucharest on 4 May on the implementation and harmonisation of
national policies on Roma, Sinti and Travellers;
– reiterated the importance they attach to the work carried out by the
Council of Europe of Europe in the area of the protection of national
minorities, particularly through the competent expert committee (DH-MIN)
which held its 3rd meeting in Bucharest in March 2006. In this context
they paid tribute to the Romanian Chairmanship’s initiative in
organising the same month in Brasov an international conference on the
role of consultative bodies in the promotion of the participation of
members of national universities in decision-making processes;
– gave their support to the Romanian Chairmanship in its efforts to
promote intercultural dialogue, through the 3rd Intercultural Forum of
the Council of Europe on “The promotion of intercultural dialogue
between generations” (Bucharest, 17-18 March 2006) and the seminar on
“Identity, citizenship and cohesion” (Bucharest, 5 May 2006), as well as
to encourage the protection of the environment and sustainable
development, with the Regional Conference held in Bucharest on 27 and 28
April 2006.
The Ministers once again underlined the importance of ensuring efficient
interaction and creating synergies between the Council of Europe and its
main partners on the European stage, so that citizens may reap practical
benefits from international action in these different areas. In this
respect they welcomed the useful cooperation between the Council of
Europe, the European Union and the OSCE over the last six months,
including through the high-level meetings held in Brussels on 30 January
with the OSCE and in Strasbourg on 15 March with the European Union.
At the end of the session, Mr Sergey Lavrov, Minister for Foreign
Affairs of the Russian Federation, informed his colleagues of the
Russian Chair’s priorities for the Committee of Ministers over the next
six months. The transfer of the chairmanship from Mr Ungureanu to Mr
Lavrov took place immediately afterwards.
1 7 new signatures and 2 ratifications were recorded during the Session.
This brought the number of signatures to 33 for the Convention on the
Prevention of Terrorism, 21 for the revised Convention on Laundering,
Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the
Financing of Terrorism and 28 for the Convention on Action against
Trafficking in Human Beings
To receive our press releases by e-mail, contact :
[email protected]
A political organisation set up in 1949, the Council of Europe works to
promote democracy and human rights continent-wide. It also develops
common responses to social, cultural and legal challenges in its 46
member states.
ARS Chair Visits Artsakh
ARMENIAN RELIEF SOCIETY, INC. CENTRAL EXECUTIVE BOARD
PRESS RELEASE NO. 4
Armenian Relief Society, Inc.
Telephone£ 617-926-5892
Central Office
Fax: 617-926-4855
80 Bigelow Avenue
e-mail: [email protected]
Watertown, MA 02472
Website:
PRESS RELEASE
ARS CHAIRPERSON VISITS ARTSAKH
Yerevan, May 16 — On Moday, May 8, The Chairperson of the Armenian
Relief Society, Mrs. Hasmig Derderian left for Artsakh on a three-day
field work program. Three days before her departure, Mrs. Derderian,
along with the President of the Republic and numerous high government
officials, had attended a special Requiem Mass, celebrated by His
Holiness Vazgen I, in memory of the victims who perished off the shore
of Sochi in the Armenian Airlines crash.
On the very day of her arrival at Stepanakert, the
Chairperson met with the ARS/Artsakhÿs Executive Board and discussed
the entityÿs organizational issues and its activities around the
region. During the meeting, the Executive Board Chairperson, Mrs. Nelly
Ghoulian presented, in detail, the current picture of the 10 ARS
“Soseh” Kindergartens spread out across Artsakh. Daily, more than 500
children receive free sustenance and education in these nurseries,
thanks to the generous moral and financial support of ARS entities
throughout the world.
All across the Homeland, the Armenian Relief Society – whose Armenia
affiliate is preparing to celebrate its 15th Anniversary in September of
this year – continues to implement its various programs in support of
the orphaned children of the fallen warriors of the Artsakh liberation
struggle, needy students, etc., coordinated by the ARS Central Executive
Board. In view of the fact, that many of those youngsters have reached
college age, the ARS has decided to start a program of assistance to the
scholastic needs of those who wish to continue their education by
attending colleges and institutes of their choice.
Mrs. Derderian was delighted to hear, that ARS/Artsakh is firmly
committed to participate in the ARS Centennial Pan-Armenian
Fund-drive, which will secure the necessary funds allowing the
continuation of the Organization’s world-wide humanitarian activities.
The following day, on the occasion of the 14th Anniversary of the
liberation of the City of Shoushi, Chairperson Derderian laid wreathes
on the monuments of the martyred hero, Ashot-Bekor Ghoulian and those
who fell on the field of honor during World War II; she also visited the
site of the Tank which serves as a memorial at the entrance of the city,
following which, she joined those who attended the commemorative
services held in the Ghazanchetsvots Cathedral.
On Wednesday, the Chairperson visited the ARS “Soseh” Kindergarten of
Stepanakert – the oldest on the growing list of “Soseh” Kindergartens
in Artsakh. Mrs. Derderian, who was in Paris from the 26th to 30th of
April, participating in the deliberations of the Armenian Blue Cross
of France Regional Convention, later attended, in Yerevan, on May 2-4,
the plenary meeting of the “Armenia” Pan- Armenian Fund’s Board of
Trustees.
The ARS Chairperson departed from Armenia on Sunday, May 14. Until that
date, she continued her field work with the local ARS leadership and a
fellow ARS/CEB member, Mrs. Karine Hovhannisian, resident of Armenia.
Richard Hovannisian’s “Republic” Released in Armenian
PRESS RELEASE
Armenian Center for National and International Studies
75 Yerznkian Street
0033 Yerevan, Armenia
Tel: (+374 – 10) 52.87.80 or 27.48.18
Fax: (+374 – 10) 52.48.46
Email: [email protected] or [email protected]
Website:
May 19, 2006
Richard Hovannisian’s “Republic” Released in Armenian
Yerevan–Professor Richard G. Hovannisian, chairholder in Modern Armenian
History at UCLA, was publicly honored today on the occasion of the
Armenian-language publication of the first volume of his four-part epic,
entitled “The Republic of Armenia: The First Year, 1918-1919.” The event was
organized by the National Academy of Sciences and the Writers’ Union of
Armenia, with support from the Armenian Center for National and
International Studies (ACNIS). The presentation brought together prominent
specialists in Armenian studies, leading scholars and intellectuals,
political and public figures, diplomats, and media representatives.
Held in the auditorium of the Writers’ Union of Armenia, the program was
opened by Academician Vladimir Barkhudarian, vice president of the National
Academy of Sciences. “There remain historical phenomena which call for
further, deeper research. One such experience is the history of the first
Republic of Armenia which, through four decades of diligent dedication and
groundbreaking work with a wealth of primary sources, Academician Richard
Hovannisian has fully and objectively brought to light,” he said.
The next speaker was chairman Levon Ananian of the Writers’ Union. In his
words, “The Republic of Armenia” is a colossal oeuvre and thus one of the
greatest achievements in contemporary Armenian studies. “It is noteworthy
that the author of the book is a unique symbol of our national pride. An
incisive thinker and a scholar with professional methodology, Hovannisian’s
international standing and pre-eminence in the field keep growing.”
Volume One of “The Republic of Armenia” was presented in detail by Professor
Ashot Melkonian, director of the Academy’s Institute of History. He first
underlined the historiographic value of the work. According to Melkonian, in
the 1960s and 1970s, when the historical truth about the First Republic was
concealed by political strictures, this masterpiece by Richard Hovannisian
was an underground imperative for those in Soviet Armenia who were
researching and studying the topic. “The ultimate importance of this book is
that the concept of statehood forms its entire backbone,” he concluded.
In his turn, Professor Babken Harutiunian, chairholder in Armenian History
at Yerevan State University, commended “The Republic of Armenia” in terms of
its reliance on a broad spectrum of sources as well as its application of
the precept of continuity in historical science. “Aside from presenting the
historical record completely and truthfully, each chapter and every line of
the work are founded in a supreme notion of patriotism.” It is not a
coincidence, he continued, that owing directly to the incessant efforts of
Professor Hovannisian a school of modern Armenian history has been developed
in the diaspora.
Raffi Hovannisian, founding director of ACNIS and Armenia’s first Minister
of Foreign Affairs, congratulated his father on the accomplishment of
finally bringing the whole history of the First Republic home to Armenia.
“Comprehensively researched and objectively presented, Richard Hovannisian’s
authoritative account both gives cause for moments of historic pride and
achievement and offers a record of losses and shortcomings which the new
Armenia must avoid repeating. It is a valuable lesson of liberty and
legitimacy, democracy and diplomacy, sovereignty and security, which must be
drawn today–in the name of the Republic of Armenia, past and present.”
Also noteworthy were artistic contributions by literary expert Svetlana
Khanumian and professor of theology Khoren Palian.
Finally, Richard Hovannisian took the floor and extended his deep
appreciation to the organizers of the event, the scholars, intellectuals and
everyone present, and acknowledged Vrezh Markosian, director of the Tigran
Mets Publishing House, for his high-caliber production of the volume.
Hovannisian shared vignettes from his childhood, his student years, and his
four-decade quest for “The Republic of Armenia.” A well-rounded
understanding of the history of the First Republic, he said, will enable its
modern-day heir to steer clear of mistakes and never place false hope in
paper guarantees for security, which we have trusted on numerous historical
occasions and suffered setbacks as a result.
The capacity crowd of assembled leaders, intellectuals, and students stood
to express their appreciation of the work and its creator.
MediaDialogue Newsletter – 05/18/2006
Yerevan Press Club presents web site, featuring the
most interesting publications from the press of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia
and Turkey on issues of common concern. The latest updates on the site are
weekly delivered to the subscribers.
************************************ ***************************************
RECOGNIT ION OF THE GENOCIDE – THE RIGHT TO RETURN
| “Golos Armenii” newspaper (Armenia) | Aris Ghazinian | 18-May-2006 |
In early XX, the Armenian people lost not only the demographic majority but
also the historical homeland – at least 90% of the area, making the natural
habitat of national settlement. Thus, on the eve of the First World War the
Armenian factor was still the dominant demographic and cultural-constructive
element of the upland. In this respect, the catastrophe of the Armenian
people has no precedent, since there is no other nation forced to build its
statehood on the tenth part of the historically assimilated Homeland.
There is an obvious difference between the concepts of Fatherland and
Statehood. While, due to various historical reasons the Armenian people,
dozens of times losing political independence, each time found the strength
and ability to restore the state set-up of national life. The guarantee for
restoration of sovereignty was not only the traditional vector of
orientation (general character of the Armenian of pre-20th century, aimed at
recovery of the lost statehood) but also the fact of the presence of
Homeland proper. Irrespective of any political formation, the national life
in a historical Homeland did not interrupt. However, in early past century
it is the Fatherland that the nation lost first. So if the process of
restoring statehood is possible to imagine, the mechanism of restoring the
Homeland (the right for life in natural habitat of national activity) is not
worked out. To this effect, we need a special ideology.
In short-term perspective, Turkey may afford recognition of the Armenian
Genocide, and there is ground to suppose that it will be the case. It is
obvious however that herein Ankara’s traditional preconditions will again
come up: before expressing official readiness to this revolutionary step of
theirs, the Turkish authorities will by all means demand guarantees of the
Armenian side. In particular, Yerevan will be proposed to sign (in exchange)
under the point for RA being ineligible for setting any territorial claims
to Turkey.
Doubtlessly, none of the heads of Armenian state has a right to sign such a
document. It is also obvious that the refusal of official Yerevan will
become subject for foreign policy speculations by Ankara. It is also
possible that Turkey will lift the blockade of the border and will even act
as apologist for establishing diplomatic relations with RA. However, does
the Armenian nation today have an ideology, capable of facing the coming
challenges? What will be the position of the official Yerevan if Ankara
pledges its willingness before the international community: a) to recognize
the Armenian Genocide; b) deblock the border; c) establish diplomatic
relations with Armenia? Won’t the Armenian statehood be placed in a certain
ideological vacuum in this case?
The official line of RA, aimed at international recognition of the Genocide,
should be formulated quite clearly and rigidly. In various forms and on
various levels it is recognized in over two dozens of states, however, the
priority provision – the Homeland lost after the Genocide – is not mentioned
in any of respective documents.
RA President Robert Kocharian repeatedly stated (to the Turkish journalists
as well) that the issue of Turkey’s recognition of the Armenia Genocide is
not linked to the territorial problem that should be viewed within the
aspect of the Sevres Treaty. Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian
stated on his behalf that the current authorities of the country will not
raise this issue, “however, theoretically it can be raised by one of the
subsequent heads of the Republic”. Nevertheless the fact of losing the
Homeland proper – the natural habitat of the Armenian settlement – is not on
the agenda of RA foreign policy. Apparently, no one except Yerevan will
raise this issue.
Currently, there is a vital necessity for adapting the previously chaotic
intention for Genocide recognition on more pragmatic ground with the demand
for guaranteed (by the international community) right for repatriation of
the peoples deprived of the homeland. If the Armenian people is now ready
for repatriation is another matter. However, in any case we need to
officially state that by the process of Genocide recognition, Yerevan also
views the right of the Armenian people for return.
EDWARD SHEVARNADZE: “IF WE ARE NEITHER A NORMAL COUNTRY NOR HAVE A NORMAL
PRESIDENT, WE CAN EXPECT ANY TROUBLE”
| “Georgian Times” newspaper (Georgia) | Maya Margvelani | 16-May-2006 |
– What is your assessment of the recent activities of the Georgian
authorities, their statements addressed to Russia? How adequate is the
reaction of the Russian side?
– Russia’s actions towards Georgia are a factual blockade. It is a classical
manifestation of Russian policy. Wine, alongside “Borjomi”, are our maim
products. When they are not sold in Russia, it naturally raises concerns. In
fact, the world market already has set preferences, and the loss of the
Russian market is very alarming.
– Is it Russia’s response to the tough policy of our authorities?
– We had quite a negative experience with the Russian authorities but it did
not go as far as the breakup of the union. Georgia’s accession to CIS was
not a forceful one, though Russia insistently recommended us to join the
Commonwealth. If my friends – presidents of other countries – had not joined
the CIS, we would probably do the same. I heeded their opinion; without
mutual support, it would be hard to find common ground with Russia. We are
on good terms with President Putin though even then both in Abkhazia and
South Ossetia their behavior was very bad. However, Putin is a flexible
person with a mild character.
– If he has a mild character, how do you explain his attitude to Georgia?
– We should pay attention to Putin’s speech in response to the statements of
our leaders. It was a balanced political speech. He said, “The friendly
Georgian people experiences grave economic problems, and we will try to find
a solution”. However, subsequent statements of our high-ranking officials
aggravated the situation.
– You mean the Defense Minister?
– The statement of the Defense Minister would be insulting for any country.
I am not initiated into the details but possibly the speech of the
Parliament Chairman in Saint Petersburg also had its share. Burjanadze
enraged Duma. I do not justify Russia, a lot happens with its approval. At
the same time, I would note that Putin’s speech was more balanced and sound.
– Where is the way out?
– We are now in actual blockade. I think the meeting of the Presidents of
Russia and Georgia is obligatory. Besides, it is the Georgian President who
should take the initiative. The relations will not improve without the
high-level meeting, moreover they might deteriorate.
– Can Russia toughen the sanctions still more?
– Russia has many levers of pressure. It may stop the supply of gas and oil
products. Once we have other gas, we can speak on different terms. When the
gas pipeline was blown up, we accused the Russian authorities. Indeed,
someone blew it up but it might be an Ossetian, a Russian or a Georgian! The
Russian authorities had no motivation for the explosion of the pipeline: we
buy gas from them and at quite high prices. In the future, it might grow
even more expensive. So that Russia may enact quite a lot of levers, as I
already mentioned… I think Russia’s irritation comes from the dislocation
of its bases. I also was categorical about their liquidation. They mostly
withdrew the bases. As for Akhalkalaki base, it was decided back in 1998,
however I was not very anxious to dislocate the base, since several
thousands of locals were employed there, while we did not have an
opportunity to give them jobs. By the way, during my presidency we
dislocated the Russian military base from Vaziani without any scandal. I
think the dislocation of the Akhalkalaki base was not a very urgent issue.
– You mean to say that Putin must not be negatively disposed to the
Georgians?
– Actually he was not. I will bring an example. I always tried to have as a
priority Georgia’s good relations with both Russia and US, as far as it is
possible. The recent meeting with Putin took place in Alma Ata. I told him
about my request to USA for support in army training. He was a bit upset
over it and said that Russia could also help. Then by the end of the summit,
someone asked him about his attitude to US supporting the Georgian army.
Putin turned around and replied, “Georgia is an independent country with a
right for choice. If it views America as its friend, how can we object?” So
we can see that Putin is a flexible person, open to cooperation and
compromise. In Georgia, there is a tough opinion about him, and he is now
thinking over a possible solution. Our tense relations really need
discharging.
– What is your opinion about the special operations of the Interior
Ministry, which often end up with victims…
– During my presidency, there was an escape of the prisoners but we did not
shoot them… Law is binding for all! So when the officials neglect the law,
it is already troublesome.
– It is a fact that you personally expressed condolences to the Girgvliani
family (scandalous murder of the young man, in which high-ranking officials
are involved – Trans.), while Mikhail Sahakashvili is still silent about
this barbarous crime.
– It is impossible in a normal country. I am convinced that sooner or later
the President will provide adequate assessment of this murder, and the
public will be informed about his decision. I repeat that it is the case in
a normal country, and if we are neither a normal country nor have a normal
president, we can expect any trouble. I am convinced that Sahakashvili will
give a proper assessment of the incident. He is well aware that he should
give his reaction to such facts.
COMPLICATED ISSUES
| “Milliyet” newspaper (Turkey) | Sami Kohen | 16-May-2006 |
When Prime Minister of Canada Stephen Harper made a statement on April 24 in
support of the Armenian Genocide allegations, it slipped the attention of
the Canadian public. The Canadian media took up this issue only after Turkey
has summoned its Ambassador in Ottawa Aydemir Erman to Ankara for
consultation. This speech by the Prime Minister is not the first event in
Canada, supporting Armenian Genocide allegations. In Canada, there are a
hundred thousand Armenians with an active Armenian lobby. Two years ago, the
Canadian Parliament adopted a law on the recognition of the Genocide. A
large share of it was with the Conservative Party, then oppositional, headed
by Harper. After the victory of the conservatives at the elections, the
Armenian lobby started to pressure the government of the country to ratify
the law adopted by the Parliament. Prime Minister Harper kept to his stance
and made a statement recognizing the fact of Genocide. Thus, the Genocide
allegations are supported in Canada both on parliamentary and government
level.
The Situation is Different in France
In this respect, the situation in Canada and France is different. Thus, In
France the government did not make any clear and official statements,
recognizing the Armenian Genocide. However, today the French Parliament is
considering a draft law, stipulating a punishment for denying the Armenian
Genocide, which is even worse.
The presence and influence of the Armenians in France is a common knowledge.
Internal political factors often make the French parliamentarians take the
side of the Armenian community.
What is the case in Canada? Not only in Canada: in many countries of Latin
America and Europe, where the Armenian communities are not numerous, the
Parliaments take similar decisions.
Herein, the organized activity of the Armenian Diaspora and its influence in
these countries doubtlessly has a large role.
On the other hand, Turkey itself has long abstained from these campaigns. It
cannot boast with effective presentation of its position, nor did it work
out new strategies on the “Armenian issue”.
Overall, Ankara takes measures on this issue post factum, and they are
usually short-term. In certain cases, the feedback of Ankara not only lacks
preventive force but also impedes bilateral relations. It has already been
the case with France and other European countries…
Canada’s Example
What to do with Canada?
Turkey recalled its ambassador in Ottawa for a few days, and prior to it,
the country did not participate in NATO exercise in Canada…
Alongside such “symbolic” steps, other measures, like weakening of trade and
economic relations, are also discussed. The turnover between the two
countries makes about 1 billion dollars today, and the investments of the
Canadian firms in Turkey – 700 million dollars… Besides, there are other
important joint projects (for example in nuclear energy sphere). The issue
is what will be the practical results of Canada’s isolation? Will such a
“punishment” change the position of its authorities? What will be the impact
of the isolation of large international companies on the inflow of
international investments in Turkey as a whole? Shouldn’t we think over this
aspect of the issue as well?
IRAN WILL REMIND BAKU OF ITS ANTIIRANIAN STATMENTS, expert from Iran
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad milieu announces
| “Zerkalo” newspaper (Azerbaijan) | G. Inanj | 16-May-2006 |
Azerbaijan unwillingly finds itself in the epicenter of regional processes
that are sometimes quite dangerous for it. At this stage official Baku is
given a very disguised role of mediator between the USA and Iran, claiming
to be a regional power. Yet Tehran has not forgiven the official Baku
certain steps and statements on Iran,.
In the exclusive interview to “Zerkalo”, given by Iranian expert Jalal
Mohammadi, known in the West for his proximity to the President of Iran
Ahmadinejad, interesting aspects of Azerbaijani policy of official Tehran
can be traced between the lines. Notably, in the West the statements by
Mohammadi are equaled to the opinion of official Tehran.
– The threats of US about attacking Iran that have been going on for four
years is nothing but a psychological war. Washington discusses different
ways, including a military way of solving the uranium enrichment issue in
our country. For this reason some statements voiced by American officials on
the plans of attacking Iran must not be considered as a fact.
– Do you exclude the military attack on Iran?
– The USA cannot apply military force against Iran. In the modern history
our country is a strong state of both Middle East and of Islamic world.
Under the circumstances the intrusion into Iran is not a simple question.
The aim of the Cold War is to present Iran as an unstable country and to
obstruct the development of its cooperation with other countries, including
its neighbors.
The promotion of the idea of how invincible the USA are among the smaller
countries is a part of the US anti-Iranian policy. Washington attempts to
frighten all these states into worshipping it. Contrary to everything I
would like to state that Iran is thoroughly ready for any form of aggression
from the USA, including military.
The US attempts to weaken Iran from inside, to ignite a domestic crisis
bring the Iranians together around the national idea which is today the
nuclear program.
Washington, on the one hand uses international organizations to exercise
pressure on Iran, on the other – it attempts to create ethnic problems
inside the country. the USA allocated 74 million USD for the Iranian
opposition.
– The “Zerkalo” sources in Tbilisi confirm the rumors, disseminated in media
about a certain arrangement between Georgia and USA about the use of
Georgian basin of the Black Sea in the case of military aggression against
Iran. In the US-Iranian confrontation Washington has a different role for
Azerbaijan.
– The leader of Islamic revolution Ayatollah Imam Khomeini once announced
that if the US decides to wage a war against Iraq, they will face a war from
all sides. For me the war from all sides means one thing – all the parties,
supporting the aggressor in the war launch, will get their punishment.
– After the well-known incident during the Second Congress of Azerbaijani,
Baku and Tehran have a concealed tension between them. Does Iran have a
stone in the pocket?
– Much earlier, after the presidents exchanged visits, Baku and Tehran had
positive relations. Yet the anti-Iranian statements at the 2nd Congress of
Azerbaijanis in Baku revealed the lack of firmness in the Iranian policy of
Azerbaijan and set ground for the lack of trust between the countries. Iran
does recognize the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan and the fact of
Mountainous Karabagh occupation, and the official Baku allows some
questionable people to speak against the territorial integrity of Iran. Such
statements set fertile soil for Armenia and other unfriendly countries to
actively oppose our cooperation. The response of Iran on the statements
questioning the territorial integrity of the country will become known
later.
– You are implying Israel. But the Jewish lobby supports Azerbaijan in the
issues, important for the country, such as confronting Armenian lobby.
– Since the rule of the Popular Front a group of Azerbaijani politicians
believes that by cooperating with Jewish lobby and Israel they can oppose
the Armenian lobby.
The illusions about solving the Mountainous Karabagh conflict with the help
of Jewish lobby have vanished. Not a centimeter of occupied territories has
been liberated as a result of 15-year long cooperation between Baku and
Jerusalem. These politicians obviously are unaware of the priorities of
world political relations. the Western empire has two wings – the Armenian
and Jewish lobby.
– One of the reasons the USA gave up the idea of “colored revolution” in
Azerbaijan is the Iranian policy of Washington and the role given to Baku in
the scenario. The White House did not risk shattering the stable political
situation in the neighboring Azerbaijan before the serious dialogue with
Tehran.
– Firstly, the official Baku has made its conclusions after the Georgian and
Ukrainians events and cleared the government of officials, capable of
supporting the “colored”. Also, the Azerbaijani opposition is weak and does
not enjoy the support of the people. No one supports it but for the US
Embassy in Baku.
But the USA are not that omnipotent. Washington did not manage to clear the
way for a
House from the scenario of the power change in Baku also includes the
neighborhood of Azerbaijan and Iran, the Shiite Islam in the two countries,
the culture and history, uniting our nations.
– To a certain extent the lack of solution to the Mountainous Karabagh
conflict also ties the hands of the White House in terms of realization
their interest-related plans. Is it the reason for the recent haste that the
West displays in the Mountainous Karabagh resolution process?
– The haste of the West in the resolution of the conflict is related to the
inner problems in Armenia and Azerbaijan, the international ties of
Azerbaijan and geopolitical situation. The factors listed complicate the
conflict resolution even more. The occupied territories are not liberated at
a negotiations table. Certainly, the war results in losses of human force as
well as inflicts moral and financial damages. What can be done, the
political organization of the world is unfair.
Many countries use the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict in their interests.
They use their present status quo, but are in no way interested in the
resolution of the conflict. The continuation of the conflict is in the
interests of France, Russia and Turkey.
Turkey links the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict with the relations between
Armenia and Turkey and the interstate problems. Ankara, waving the
occupation of MK as a flag, tries to prove the aggressive policy of Armenia
and to protect itself against the psychological and political pressure of
Armenian lobby demanding the recognition of the Armenian genocide in the
Ottoman Empire.
************************************************ ***************************
For comments or questions please contact the Editor: [email protected].
Website:
Diocese Clergy Conference focuses on brotherhood
PRESS OFFICE
Diocese of the Armenian Church of America (Eastern)
630 Second Avenue, New York, NY 10016
Contact: Jake Goshert, Coordinator of Information Services
Tel: (212) 686-0710 Ext. 60; Fax: (212) 779-3558
E-mail: [email protected]
Website:
May 19, 2006
___________________
CLERGY GATHER FOR ANNUAL DISCUSSIONS
Clergy from throughout the Diocese of the Armenian Church of America
(Eastern) gathered for the annual Clergy Conference from May 1 to 4, 2006,
at the Star Lodge Resort in Bloomingdale, NJ.
“This is also an opportunity for the clergy to gather in prayer and
strengthen the bonds between each other by sharing our experiences with each
other,” said Archbishop Khajag Barsamian, Primate. “It is a wonderful
opportunity to learn from each other.”
The Primate, presided over the gathering of 43 clergymen from the Eastern
Diocese, Fr. Zareh Zargarian, a representative of the Canadian Diocese, and
two visiting clergy from the Mother See of Holy Etchmiadzin, Fr. Zaven
Yazijian and Fr. Baruyr Avedisyan, who spoke about the continued renewal and
growth of Christianity in the Republic of Armenia.
“The faith in Armenia is finding its footing, rooting itself again in our
brothers and sisters of the motherland,” the Primate said. “And these young
clergymen are examples of how Armenians are reawakening to their faith.”
A message from His Holiness Karekin II, Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos of
All Armenians, was also read to the clergymen. Later, the Primate expressed
gratitude to the Catholicos for sending his annual message of encouragement
and blessings to the clergy.
“This is again a connection that binds us as servants of the same Apostolic,
Orthodox church,” the Primate said.
He also spoke with the clergy about the Diocesan theme for the next year:
“Church and Home: One in Spirit.” The theme was introduced by Diocesan
staff, who asked the clergy for ideas and suggestions for programs to build
that united spiritual life in Armenian families. The clergy will meet again
with Diocesan staff on June 6 to further this discussion.
Along with discussing programming ideas, clergy also heard from three
distinguished panelists who spoke on the theological and pastoral traditions
of the Armenian Church in relation to suicide. Speaking were Fr. Krikor
Maksoudian, Fr. Benedict Groeschel, and Dr. Carlo Bayrakdarian, a geriatric
psychologist.
The conference was co-chaired by Fr. Haigazoun Najarian and Fr. Untzag
Nalbandian, with Fr. Shnork Souin and Dn. Levon Giragosian serving as
English and Armenian secretaries respectively.
— 5/19/06
E-mail photos available on request. Photos also viewable in the News and
Events section of the Eastern Diocese’s website,
PHOTO CAPTION (1): Clergy at the 2006 Clergy Conference discuss various
issues and proposals during the four-day event from May 1 to 4, 2006.
PHOTO CAPTION (2): Fr. Bedros Kadehjian, the newest priest of the Diocese,
celebrates the Divine Liturgy at the St. Leon Church of Fair Lawn, NJ,
during the close of the Clergy Conference.
PHOTO CAPTION (3): Clergy from throughout the Diocese of the Armenian
Church of America (Eastern) gather for the Clergy Conference, which ran from
May 1 to 4, 2006.