Lawyer: youths kill Armenian teen while yelling ‘Glory to Russia!’

Lawyer: youths kill Armenian teen while yelling ‘Glory to Russia!’ in Moscow
suburb

AP Worldstream; May 30, 2006
Prosecutors opened a hate crime investigation into the fatal stabbing of an
Armenian teenager at a Moscow suburban train station, a prosecutors’ official
said Tuesday.
Artur Sardaryan, 19, was killed Thursday in the latest in a string of
racially motivated attacks in Moscow and throughout Russia.
Yelena Rossokhina, a spokeswoman for Moscow regional prosecutors, said three
young men approached Sardaryan as he sat on a regional commuter train around
11:30 p.m. and stabbed him for no apparent reasons. He died later on the way
to a hospital, she said.
Lawyer Simon Tsaturyan told Ekho Moskvy radio that witnesses reported the
youths yelling “Glory to Russia!” and “Long Live Russia!”
Russia in recent years has seen an increase in racially motivated attacks on
foreigners and dark-skinned immigrants from the poorer Caucasus region and
Central Asia.
Last month, an apparent skinhead fatally stabbed an Armenian student on a
central Moscow subway platform.

BAKU: MP Akram Abdullayev: “Key to solving NK is in Russia’s hands”

Today, Azerbaijan
May 29 2006
MP Akram Abdullayev: “Key to solving Nagorno Karabakh is in Russia’s
hands”

29 May 2006 [20:14] – Today.Az

Azerbaijani parliamentarian Akram Abdullayev said that the Nagorno
Karabakh problem is a legacy of the Soviet Union to Azerbaijan and
Armenia and therefore the key to a solution rests in Russia’s hands.

Speaking to The New Anatolian in an exclusive interview, Abdullayev,
who describes himself as a close friend to Turkey, also dismissed the
efforts of Turkey, Azerbaijan and Armenia towards finding a solution
to the disputed enclave of Nagorno Karabakh, saying that the issue is
more complicated than was predicted. He urged the big powers to work
in cooperation with Russia in order to find a solution.
Warning against the dangers of a failure to find a diplomatic
solution to the disputed enclave, Abdullayev said that the
Azerbaijani people might think of military options since it is
unacceptable for them to give these lands to Armenia. Citing the
growing Azerbaijani economy and military, and predicting that the
Azerbaijani military budget will equal Armenia’s in the years to
come, Abdullayev stated that time is on Azerbaijan’s side.
Abdullayev, a member of the Turkish-Azerbaijani Interparliamentary
Friendship Group, expressed his hope for further development and
strengthening of relations between the two countries in various
areas, calling on Turkey and other Turkic nations to bring the
genocide committed against the Turks to the agenda of European
parliaments in retaliation for Armenian genocide claims.
Touching on the Iranian nuclear standoff, the Azerbaijani
parliamentarian said his country favors a diplomatic solution to the
crisis, warning of the dangers of military action against Iran for
the region. Abdullayev also hinted at Azerbaijan’s readiness to act
like a bridge between the U.S. and Iran to bring the nuclear standoff
to an end, citing his country’s good relations with the U.S. and
historic ties with neighboring Iran.
Amid the current row between the Iranian Azeris and Tehran over an
Iranian newspaper’s publication of humiliating cartoons of Iranian
Azeris, Abdullayev stated that although the Iranian Azeris play an
important role in their country’s politics, they would not push for a
regime change in the country, despite the assertions of some U.S.
circles. Warning against any kind of foreign intervention in the
domestic affairs of a country, Abdullayev said, “The Iranian people
choose their presidents and their regime. Foreign intervention would
create dangerous results and many problems.”
Here’s what Akram Abdullayev had to tell us:
TNA: How do you see the level of relations between Turkey and
Azerbaijan, and what could be done to further develop relations?
Abdullayev: I see no problem in bilateral relations. During the
latest visit of Turkish President Ahmet Necdet Sezer to Azerbaijan,
the two sides had consultations on how to further develop relations,
and this visit was also the confirmation of strategic friendship and
cooperation between the two countries. Whenever Azerbaijan faces a
problem during Council of Europe (CoE) meetings, Turkey is the sole
supporter of Azerbaijan. The mutual support during the Council of
Europe Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) meetings is another indicator of
our warm relations and friendship. I hope our relations will be
further developed in various areas.
TNA: What’s your idea about the Nagorno Karabakh problem? Are you
hopeful about a solution?
Abdullayev: Certainly, all the problems have solutions. Talks to find
a peaceful solution to the dispute will continue. President Ilham
Aliyev also discussed this issue during his meeting with U.S.
President George W. Bush in Washington. But should no peaceful
solution be found to the disputed enclave, the Azerbaijani people are
in favor of regaining these lands through military means. We won’t
give up these lands. We won’t present them to Armenia. If a solution
isn’t found through peace, the last resort for us is war.
TNA: What are your expectations from Turkey in this dispute?
Abdullayev: In this problem, Turkey is Azerbaijan’s political
partner. Turkey has an important role in the process of finding a
solution to the Nagorno Karabakh dispute but at the same time Turkey
has its own problems with Armenia. Armenians brought the Armenian
genocide claims to the agenda of the world in order to create a
headache for Turkey. Turkey has to work for the benefits of
Azerbaijan.
TNA: Could the process of normalization of relations between Turkey
and Armenia contribute to efforts to find a peaceful solution to the
Nagorno Karabakh dispute?
Abdullayev: This problem can’t be solved even if Turkey establishes
diplomatic relations with Azerbaijan or within the process of
normalization of relations because the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute isn’t
the problem of the region. The efforts of Turkey, Azerbaijan and
Armenia aren’t enough to solve the problem. We need the efforts of
big powers and organizations. The key to a solution is especially in
the hands of Russia. The Russian Army is in Armenia and if Azerbaijan
tries to find a solution through military means, it will face the
Russian Army.
It seems to me that finding a solution to the divided enclave is very
difficult. But time is on Azerbaijan’s side. This year Armenia’s
total budget is $1 billion, and the Azerbaijani military’s share of
the total budget is $600 billion. According to Aliyev’s estimates,
the Azerbaijani military’s share of the budget will be higher that
Armenia’s budget in the years to come. Azerbaijan is building up its
military but Armenia is unable to do that. Azerbaijan’s total budget
is more than $4 billion this year and it will be more than $6 billion
next year. As our country will develop economically, we will take our
deserved place among the world states and will have a big position.
TNA: Why aren’t Russia and other big powers working for a solution?
Do they have any interests in the continuation of the dispute in
Nagorno Karabakh?
Abdullayev: There are visible and invisible sides of politics. The
Nagorno Karabakh dispute didn’t start yesterday, it stems from the
1988 events while Gorbachev was president. Fifteen republics split
off from the Soviet Union. At that time the Soviet Union created
problems for each split-off republic in order to stop their
development. For instance, it created the Abkhazia problem for
Georgia, the Crimean problem for Ukraine and the Nagorno Karabakh
problem for Azerbaijan and Armenia. At that time nobody wanted the
dissolution of the Soviet Union but this process was inevitable in
general. The Nagorno Karabakh dispute is the legacy of the Soviet
Union to Azerbaijan. For these reasons, a solution could only be
found as a result of negotiations between Russia and other big
powers.
TNA: What is Azerbaijan’s position towards the Armenian genocide
claims and the French bill introducing prison terms for people who
question these claims?
Abdullayev: While bringing the genocide claims to the agenda of
European parliaments, Armenia aimed at creating an obstacle for
Turkey’s membership bid in the European Union. Those who brought the
issue to the French Parliament are the European parliamentarians well
paid by the Armenian lobby. Today, neither the Turkish genocide nor
the Armenian genocide is important for France.
Turks are a nation which faced a brutal genocide. But they didn’t
make their voices heard in the world. I think both Turkey and other
Turkic nations should bring the genocide committed against the Turks
to the world’s agenda and should work for the recognition of the
genocide by the international community.
TNA: What’s the position of Azerbaijan towards the nuclear standoff
between Iran and the West?
Abdullayev: Azerbaijan supports finding a diplomatic solution to the
nuclear crisis and it opposes military action against Iran.
Azerbaijan is a historic neighbor of Iran and the two countries have
good relations. There are some 20 million Iranian Azeris living in
Iran. Therefore, Azerbaijan can’t accept military action against Iran
and can’t stand to shed the blood of our brothers.
TNA: Can Azerbaijan play a mediator role between Iran and the U.S. in
the nuclear crisis, given the role of the Iranian Azeris?
Abdullayev: It might be or might not be. Since 2001 Azerbaijan has
become a member of the anti-terror coalition. It has good relations
both with the U.S. and Iran. Besides, it has cultural ties with Iran.
Iranian Azeris play a role in Iranian politics. For those reasons,
Azerbaijan can be a bridge between the U.S. and Iran. The U.S. hasn’t
suggested that Azerbaijan play such a role yet, but the Azerbaijani
Parliament might consider debating this issue.
TNA: Can the Iranian Azeris be a catalyst for regime change in Iran,
as asserted by some U.S. circles?
Abdullayev: I don’t accept the interference of any country in the
domestic affairs of another. If the Iranian citizens want to change
the regime, they will vote in accordance with this aim. The Iranian
president and regime are determined by the votes of its citizens.
Therefore, this issue should be left to the citizens. Even if the
U.S. wants to change the regime, it would be very difficult, and
intervention in Iranian politics would create dangerous consequences.
/

URL:

www.thenewanatolian.com/

Turkey: Circassian minority asserts its identity

AKI, Italy
May 29 2006
TURKEY: CIRCASSIAN MINORITY ASSERTS ITS IDENTITY

Istanbul, 29 May (AKI) – Long considered Turkey’s most integrated and
harmonious ethnic minority, the Circassians have recently started
claiming more community rights including own language schools and
want the international community to pressure Russia into recognising
what they say was a “genocide” carried out by Czarist troops in the
mid 1860s. The move coincides with the start of Turkey’s membership
talks with the European Union which has enshrined minority rights in
many of its policies.
According to estimates, some 120,000 Circassians live in Jordan,
45,000 in Syria, and 4,000 in Israel, but the bulk of the diaspora –
3.5 million – live in Turkey. This figure is four times more than the
population living in the Circassians’ traditional homeland in the
North Caucasus, a mountaneous region north of Georgia and Azerbaijan
consisting of several semi-autonomous republics in the Russian
Federation.
Circassians, who are mostly Sunni Muslim, annually commemorate May 21
in rememberance of the mass deportation of their compatriots
beginning on that day in 1864 following the end of the
Russian-Circassian War.
The war ended with the fall of Circassia and was followed by the
forced removal of between 1.2 and 1.5 million Circassians from their
lands. Up to 500,000 died of hunger and illness during the forced
exodus, a deathtoll that Circassian activists say formed part of a
genocidal plan by the Czarist troops to obliterate their nation.
“May 21” commemoration activities have steadily increased in recent
years in different parts of Turkey. The main event this year was an
international conference held in Istanbul last week and attended by
Circassian and Russian intellectuals to discuss the mass
deportations. Titled the International Caucasus Conference, the
gathering was organised by the Caucasus Foundation. Another major
event was a meeting in Kefken a town on the Black Sea coas where the
first Circassians, landed in Turkey after being deported. That
gathering was organised by the Caucasus Federation representing 51
Circassian associations
The recent upsurge in Circassian activism have led some observers to
associate it with attempts by Kurds in Turkey to assert their
autonomy and by Armenian lobbying the international community to
force Turkey to acknowledge as “genocide” the mass deaths of
Armenians during Ottoman rule between 1915-20.
“Circassians have begun realising their identity and painful history
in recent years. There were no such events five years ago,” says
Mehdi Nuzhet Cetinbas, honorary president of the Caucasus Foundation,
in an interview with Adnkronos International (AKI).
“We are discussing some possible initiatives on the recognition of
the Circassian ‘genocide’ by parliaments around the world. The
Turkish parliament hesitates recognising the Circassian genocide
because of Western pressure on [Ankara to] recognise the Armenian
‘genocide’.
“When the Duma (the lower house of Russia’s parliament) accepted a
proposal about Armenians last year, some Turkish deputies [by way of
retort] suggested recognising the Circassian genocide in return last
year, but it was impossible because of Turkey’s warm economic
relations with Russia,” Cetinbas told AKI.
Last year the Circassian Congress, a nongovernmental organisation
based in Maikop, capital of Adygea Republic (a north Caucasus
traditional home of Circassians), applied to the Duma and the
Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) to
recognise the Circassian genocide. The Russian parliament has to date
given no response so far.
Fehim Tastekin, the founder editor of the Agency Caucasus, a news
agency based in Russia’s Caucasus region, says that Moscow is
increasing the pressure on Circassian’s living in ethnic group’s
traditional regions.
“Russia has recently abolished local constitutions in Circassian
regions such as Adygea, Karachay-Cherkes and Kabardino-Balkaria.
According to new Russia legislation, if Circassians returning home
apply for citizenship, they will only be able to have Russian
citizenship and not Circassian. They will need to speak Russian and
show they have lived in Russian territory for at least five years.
“Also Circassian regions are losing their autonomy rights. Now they
can’t choose their president directly. The Kremlin appoints local
leaders in accordance with the new law,” Tastekin told AKI.
Asked whether Circassians living abroad are seeking land compensation
from Russia, Cetinbas replied: “For now this is not on our agenda. We
know Russia will not help on this point and international communities
will not give their support. But if parliaments recognise that the
genocide took place, this will mark a start that will allow us to
talk about more tangible means of compensation.”
“The Circassian diaspora wants to return home. The young generations
do not speak our language. To change this it is crucial that the
Turkish government supports the opening of Circassian language
schools. It is not enough to give permission for private language
courses to be held. We want positive discrimination because
Circassians see Turkey like their own homeland, and are co-founders
of the modern republic,” Cetinbas said.
While current diplomatic barriers continue to frustate Circassian
attempts for international recognition, Cetinbas remains confident
that circumstances will change in the future. “I hope all nations
will know about the Circassian’s tragedy,” he said.
php?cat=Trends&loid=8.0.303906484&par=0

Armenian Soldier Killed In Fresh Skirmish On Azeri Border

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
May 29 2006
Armenian Soldier Killed In Fresh Skirmish On Azeri Border

By Emil Danielyan
Armenia’s Defense Ministry reported on Monday that one of its
soldiers has been fatally shot in what it described as a truce
violation by Azerbaijani forces in the tensest section of the
Armenian-Azerbaijani border.
The ministry said in a statement that Sergeant-Major Levon Adamian,
20, was wounded in the chest and died as he was rushed to hospital
late on Saturday. It said the incident occurred near the northern
Armenian town of Noyemberian. No other details were reported.
Adamian is at least the second Armenian soldier killed in the area
bordering Georgia since February. Skirmishes between Armenian and
Azerbaijani troops deployed there appear to have become more frequent
in recent months, with each side accusing the other of breaching the
ceasefire. The Azerbaijani military did not report any fighting in
the westernmost section of the heavily militarized frontier in recent
days, though.
According to the Azerbaijani news agency APA, an Azerbaijani soldier
was wounded and hospitalized on Saturday about 300 kilometers east of
the area, along the main Armenian-Azerbaijani line of contact around
Nagorno-Karabakh. The information was not immediately confirmed by
the Defense Ministry in Baku. The ministry said earlier that a
19-year-old Azerbaijani army conscript, Egdar Hajigayibov, was shot
and killed by Armenian forces near a village just north of Karabakh
on May 17.
The latest upsurge in Armenian-Azerbaijani shootouts followed the
collapse of long-awaited talks between Presidents Ilham Aliev and
Robert Kocharian near Paris last February. The two leaders are
scheduled to meet again in Bucharest early next week amid fresh hopes
for a breakthrough in the Karabakh peace process.
High-ranking diplomats from France, Russia and the United States
sounded cautiously optimistic about the outcome of the summit as they
wrapped up a two-day visit to Baku and Yerevan last Thursday. In a
joint statement, they said the conflicting parties are now `at the
point where a mutually beneficial agreement is achievable.’
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Parliament Speaker resigns after his party quit governing coalition

Pravda, Russia
May 29 2006
Armenian parliament speaker resigns after his party quit governing
coalition

Orinats Yerkir had been part of the three-party governing coalition
since 2003, when it teamed up with the Republican Party and
Dashnak-Tsutyun. It had 20 seats in the 131-seat parliament, but
Bagdasarian said when he announced plans to resign earlier this month
that nine of the lawmakers had quit the party in the previous weeks.
Bagdasarian triggered a political scandal in the Caucasus Mountain
nation last month when he reportedly told a German newspaper that
Armenia’s future lies with the European Union and NATO, and that
Russia should not block its Westward path, the AP reports.
President Robert Kocharian quickly disavowed the speaker’s statement,
saying that Armenia’s close military ties with Russia and other
regional countries provide sufficient security and that it has no
pans to join NATO.
Critics of Kocharian say he has violently cracked down on dissent,
allowed corruption to flourish and done little to improve the lot of
impoverished Armenia’s 3.3 million people.

BAKU: Aliyev: We will never allow NK to be separated from Azerbaijan

AzerTag, Azerbaijan
May 29 2006
PRESIDENT ILHAM ALIYEV: `WE WILL NEVER ALLOW NAGORNO-KARABAKH TO BE
SEPARATED FROM AZERBAIJAN’
[May 29, 2006, 22:24:54]
`Our lands are under occupation, and therefore, we, of course, demand
from Armenia first to leave the occupied territories on its own
accord.
Azerbaijan is getting stronger and stronger. We shall use all
opportunities – political, diplomatic, economic, transport and if
needed, the military opportunities. It is our right. Nobody needs
war. Who can wish bloodshed and people’s death? But on the other
hand, if negotiations will remain ineffectual, what is our choice
then? We shall not have any choice. Therefore, the matter is already
taking a very serious turn. I `d like to repeat once again that the
latest visit to Azerbaijan by the Minsk Group co-chairmen, the visit
by high-ranking diplomats, the talks give hope for peaceful
settlement’, said President llham Aliyev in a ceremony marking 28
May, Republic Day.
According to the President, as long as such opportunities are not
exhausted, Azerbaijan will use them.
`But we will never allow the second Armenian state to appear in the
Azerbaijani land, and will never allow Nagorno-Karabakh to be
separated from Azerbaijan’, the President said.

Faded Black Sea port putting on a fresh face

International Herald Tribune, France
May 30 2006
Faded Black Sea port putting on a fresh face
By Andrew E. Kramer The New York Times
TUESDAY, MAY 30, 2006

BATUMI, Georgia Welcome to Georgia’s new beach town.

Two years after this city was wrested from a separatist leader in one
of the former Soviet Union’s obscure little conflicts, Batumi is on a
crash development program as a resort.

The 19th-century port built by French architects is a place where the
palm and grapevine covered foothills of the Caucasus Mountains
cascade onto gray pebble beaches, where stately hotels like the
London are getting a fresh coat of paint, and where the coffee is
served in the Turkish style, mixed with grounds.

But try getting a room in one of the beachfront hotels, and you will
learn there has not been a vacancy here since 1993: the hotels are
occupied by refugees, who, with no home to return to, checked in and
never left.

In its second beach season since central authority was restored,
Batumi is still ironing out some kinks. Since the breakup of the
Soviet Union, the leader of the Adjaria region, Aslan Abashidza, shut
Batumi from the world and used the port for smuggling guns and
alcohol, frightening away tourists, until he was ousted on May 5,
2004, by Mikheil Saakashvili, the president of Georgia who assumed
power in 2003, vowing to rein in the country’s three separatist
conflicts – two in former beach resorts.

The refugees come from a different and still unresolved conflict in
Abkhazia, also on the Black Sea coast – and therein lies the secret
of the money pouring into Batumi’s mini-tourism boom. Georgian
officials are hoping this town will become a shining example of
development and international investment that comes when a separatist
region becomes part of a recognized state.

The city, they say, is becoming a showcase of how quickly one of the
so- called “frozen conflicts” of the former Soviet Union –
Nagorno-Karabakh in Armenia, Abkhazia and South Ossetia in Georgia
and Transnistria in Moldova – can thaw out.

“We should communicate to them that they have a future,” Saakashvili
said of residents of nearby Abkhazia, in an interview. “It will take
two or three years, but they will notice. When we have yachts in the
harbor, they will see.”

Like Beirut on the Mediterranean Sea, another cosmopolitan seafront
town that dropped off the map because of war, Batumi on the Black Sea
is now shaking out of its stupor and hanging out a welcome sign.

Adjaria is ethnically Georgian though distinct from the rest of the
country for a minority Muslim population, but still, most experts
say, harbored no deep-seated ethnic tension. Georgia’s other two
separatist enclaves are far thornier social, ethnic and political
challenges.

Still, Levan Varshalomidze, the 34- year-old new governor of Adjaria,
is hopeful the tourists trickling back to the eastern Black Sea will
soften his separatist neighbors.

“When people make money they find a common language,” he said.

The transformation is fast.

French consultants suggested the Goni Russian tank base, being
vacated, be converted to a golf course. On a bluff over the Black
Sea, it recalls the rolling green fairways overlooking the Pacific at
Pebble Beach in California. Two years after Abashidza fled to Moscow,
Novotel, the French hotel chain, has signed a contract to open a
hotel.

Under Abashidza, 14 kilometers, or about 10 miles, or roads were
paved. In the past two years the new government laid down 120
kilometers of fresh asphalt.

In one of his last acts as strongman, Abashidze mined a bridge
leading into town. An amusement park that is being dubbed Georgia’s
Disneyland is going up near the spot this summer.

In the largest investment to date, the TuranAlem bank of Kazakhstan
bought 21 hotels, which also came with the refugees. As part of the
investment, the bank will pay each refugee family $7,000 to move out,
enough for a modest apartment in an outlying district.

The deal is seen as an important and positive sign that money from
oil-rich former Soviet states is being invested in their poorer
neighbors.

When the refugees are gone, the Kazakh investors will raze and
rebuild some hotels and refurbish others. The hotels are now home to
1,912 families, or about 6,000 people.

At present, the Meskheti hotel is more fire-trap than tourist
attraction. A large puddle has formed in the lobby from a dripping
ceiling. Scruffy men in track suits lounge in the shade drawing on
cheap cigarettes. Marina Gahukidze, 42, has lived in a 10th floor
single room with a view of the beach since 1993. She and her husband
raised three children in the room. On a recent visit, two boys were
unloading backpacks and settling into homework.

“We didn’t expect to live here so long,” she says of the only home
her children have known.

About 15 kilometers south of town is a Byzantine castle with a
crenellated wall, now guarding a courtyard of citrus trees, also
making a debut to the modern world as a tourist attraction; it was in
a closed border zone and off limits in Soviet times. The detritus of
stone Roman waterworks are scattered beside a magnolia; the smell of
mandarin trees in bloom waft over the old rocks.

The now abandoned castle is emblematic of the potential of tourism in
Georgia, where the landscape resembles northern California.

“It will be a key part of economic growth,” Irakli Chogovadze, the
minister of economy of Georgia, said in an interview, while attending
the ribbon cutting at the Intourist Palace hotel in Batumi on May 24.
“Wherever you put your finger on the Georgian map, you have
potential.”

Beside a bubbling fountain in the hotel foyer, waitresses in pressed
white shirts weaved through a crowd of diplomats with trays of
Champagne flutes and caviar canapés.

The Georgian economy grew 9 percent last year, with foreign visits up
14 percent. Most of the visitors are coming from the former Soviet
Union, Turkey and Iran. The Iranians began slipping over last summer
for a few days of freedom, including booze and girl watching.

Boston: Mayor Menino opposes Armenian memorial on Greenway

Boston Globe, MA
May 30 2006
Menino opposes Armenian memorial on Greenway
By Thomas C. Palmer Jr., Globe Staff | May 30, 2006
Placing a memorial donated by the Armenian-American community on the
Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway would open the door to other groups
with causes and is “a dangerous precedent to start,” said Mayor
Thomas M. Menino.
Menino has joined a chorus of influential public officials and
others who don’t have a direct say in what gets built on the Greenway
— the city’s rainbow at the end of 15 years of urban disruption —
but have weighed in against the memorial.
Other opponents include Rose Kennedy Greenway Conservancy board
members, who have questioned whether the park corridor is an
appropriate location for a memorial.
“We could have 44 out there — what prevents that?” Menino said in
an interview. “It’s a dangerous precedent to start.”
The Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, which oversaw the Big Dig and
is constructing the new parks, plans to install a park to be paid for
by the Armenian Heritage Tribute and Genocide Memorial Foundation.
The design includes a 12-sided sculpture recalling the 12 former
provinces of Armenia, a water jet and pool, and a 60-foot-diameter
labyrinth of paved granite and grass, symbolizing renewal and hope.
Senator Edward M. Kennedy told the Globe that the conservancy, a
nonprofit group organized to fund and maintain the emerging corridor
of downtown parks, should decide whether the memorial belongs there.
“The conservancy should try to make the judgment,” Kennedy said. The
senator suggested a moratorium on proposals for Greenway memorials,
similar to one that has been in effect since 2003 on the National
Mall in Washington.
The National Mall has now become home to 19 memorials or plaques,
while Greenway planners over the last decade have said they don’t
want to dot the new parks with commemorative monuments.
Kennedy’s suggestion for a moratorium is consistent with the wishes
of the 10-member board of the conservancy. At this month’s meeting,
chairman Peter Meade said the board hoped to go at least five years
before considering proposals for groups that want space on the
Greenway.
Menino said there could be another suitable place in Boston for a
small park that would recall the Armenian Genocide that began in
1915. “If there’s an alternate site, I’d be willing to work with the
Armenian community to put it there,” Menino said.
In 2000, the Legislature directed the Turnpike Authority to study
whether there was a place — the legislation did not specify where —
for a memorial to the Armenian Genocide.
James M. Kalustian, president of the board of about 45 religious and
cultural institutions that make up the Armenian heritage foundation,
said their proposal fits in with Greenway parks planned for the North
End and Chinatown.
“To say there’s no ethnicity on the Greenway, I don’t think that’s a
fair statement,” he said. But those two parks were conceived as both
public and neighborhood-oriented parks from the start, and unlike the
Armenian park will be located in largely ethnic neighborhoods.
The proposed park was shown publicly for the first time at a meeting
of North End and Wharf District residents last month, and Turnpike
officials made clear they plan to build it on a piece of land near
Christopher Columbus Park.
“It’s going there,” said Fred Yalouris, director of urban
architecture for the Big Dig. “The only question is the design, and
what the inscriptions are.”
Supporters, including state Representative Peter J. Koutoujian, say
that the park would display the names of accomplished
Armenian-Americans, as well as those of the former provinces.
Koutoujian and others have emphasized that the park will recall the
struggles of other groups as well as Armenians.
“It will be as universal in its message as possible,” Donald J.
Tellalian of Tellalian Associates Architects & Planners LLC of
Boston, the lead designer, said this month.
The park would cost about $4 million and is to be funded and
maintained by its sponsors. That would save the Turnpike and
conservancy considerable amounts of money.
But US Representative Michael E. Capuano, whose district includes the
North End and Chinatown sections of the Greenway, said he also was
concerned about fairness in the consideration of proposals by groups
representation.
“We should put every one of these projects under the same criteria,”
said Capuano, who joined Kennedy last week at the groundbreaking of
the Greenway park in Chinatown.

BAKU: PACE Moscow meeting to close discussion on elections in Azerb.

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
May 30 2006
PACE’s Moscow meeting decides to close discussion on elections in
Azerbaijan – MP Seyidov

Source: Trend
Author: R.Agayev

30.05.2006

As the report on parliamentary elections and re-run elections in
Azerbaijan was discussed at a meeting of the PACE Monitoring
Committee in Budapest, Dutch rapporteur, Leo Platvoed got restricted
only with 5-10-minute estimation of the situation in a mini-session
of the organization in Moscow and no discussions followed. MP Samed
Seyidov, the head of the Azerbaijani parliamentary delegation to the
Parliamentary assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) told Trend
special correspondence in Moscow.
`A report by Platvoed predominantly contained positive milestones and
are estimated as success in the democratic reforms held in
Azerbaijan,’ he underlined.
As a result of discussions MP noted that there was taken a decision
on closing the discussions over elections in Azerbaijan and put
forward the issue at June session of the PACE.
Seyidov appreciated the conduct of current PACE meting in Moscow, as
Russia will chair at the CE over the subsequent 6 months.
Taking advantage of the situation Seyidov inquired the Russian
Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov whether Russia was going to use the
CE’s experience in the resolution of the Armenian-Azerbaijani
conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh with consideration that Russia is an
OSCE Minsk Group co-chair, the CE adopted a relevant resolution on
the Nagorno-Karabakh and these is Ad Hoc Committee on
Nagorno-Karabakh. In his turn Lavrov answered that `Of curse, any
experience is important for us. The OSCE Minsk Group is involved in
the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, as it holds a
relevant mandate. I’m pleased to note that there is a progress in
the negotiation process.’
Basing on CE’s experience Seyidov reaped from these words that the
territorial integrity of Azerbaijan cannot be hence the topic of
talks.
Seyidov said that in this stage the EU does not hide its will to get
involved in the resolution of the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict,
while only the OSCE Minsk Group has relevant mandate. However,
unproductiveness and sometime inefficiency of the OSCE MG impedes the
resolution process.

BAKU: Azeri, Armenian Prezes probable to meet in Bucharest – ROA FM

TREND Information, Azerbaijan
May 30 2006
Azeri, Armenian presidents probable to meet in Bucharest – Armenian
FM

Source: Trend
Author: À.Mammadov

30.05.2006

The Azerbaijani and Armenian Presidents will more probably meet in
Bucharest on 4 June, Vardan Oskanian, the Armenian Foreign Minister,
told journalists in Yerevan.
The meeting will be held within the framework of Back Sea Forum for
Dialogue and Partnership. `The President gave their agreement on the
meeting,” Oskanian underscored.
The FM said that the talks on the resolution of the Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict are too far from the situation allowing the signing of any
document, Novosti Armenia reports.
“A document on principles is on the table awaiting the Presidents,’
Oskanian stressed.
According to Oskanian, if all rule of the document are accorded, it
could gain more volumetric shape. “At the moment there is no
agreement no agreement around these principles,’ the minister
underlined.
“Though some principles have been coordinated, there are still
disputable rules. The presidents meet merely to try to find solution
to these problems,’ he added.