Normalization Of Armenian-Turkish Relations To Become Natural Result

NORMALIZATION OF ARMENIAN-TURKISH RELATIONS TO BECOME NATURAL RESULT OF PROGRESS IN NK SETTLEMENT

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
March 7 2006

YEREVAN, March 7. /ARKA/. Normalization of the Armenian-Turkish
relations will become a natural result of a progress in the Karabakh
settlement, Deputy Assistant of State for European and Eurasian
Affairs Matthew Bryza told reporters.

“I touch upon the problem of the Armenian-Turkish relations during
all my visits to Turkey or Armenia,” he said.

Bryza pointed out that during his current visit to Armenia,
issues related to electric energy exports and cooperation in
the Euro-Atlantic family were discussed in the context of the
Armenian-Turkish relations.

USA Believes In Democratization Process In Armenia: State Department

USA BELIEVES IN DEMOCRATIZATION PROCESS IN ARMENIA: STATE DEPARTMENT REP.

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
March 7 2006

YEREVAN, March 7. /ARKA – “Novosty-Armenia”/. The USA believes in
the democratization process in Armenia, Deputy Assistant of State
for European and Eurasian Affairs Matthew Bryza told reporters.

“Armenia now is in the process of democratization. We believe in
this process, otherwise, we would not propose to include Armenia in
‘Millennium Challenge Account’ program,” he said.

According to him, as any other process, democratization requires
big work.

“Political will of the authorities is necessary to spread this idea
among the people,” Bryza said.

According to him, regular citizens should also take part in building
democracy through civil society and participation in elections.

“Political parties, including oppositional ones, should be active
and constructive,” Bryza said.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Neighbours Armenia, Azerbaijan trade accusations

NEIGHBOURS ARMENIA, AZERBAIJAN TRADE ACCUSATIONS

Agence France Presse — English
March 7, 2006 Tuesday 4:36 PM GMT

Baku

Azerbaijan accused neighbouring Armenia Tuesday of breaching a
ceasefire in the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh and causing
the death of an Azeri soldier, in the latest round of feuding between
the rivals.

Armenia quickly denied the charge and responded with
counter-accusations that Azeri troops had killed an Armenian soldier
last week.

The Azeri defence ministry said Armenian soldiers had opened fire
early Tuesday. A second soldier was said to be seriously wounded.

Nagorno-Karabakh, the focus the dispute, is a largely Armenian
populated enclave on Azeri territory. When the two former Soviet
republics became independent, they fought a war over the region that
claimed around 25,000 lives and displaced hundreds of thousands.

It ended in a tense ceasefire in 1994 with Armenian forces in control
of most of the enclave and seven surrounding Azerbaijani regions,
but Karabakh’s status remains unresolved.

The Armenian side quickly denied Tuesday’s accusation.

“The information from Azerbaijan about the death of a soldier does
not correspond to the facts,” a spokesman for the defence force in
Karabakh told AFP. “We are also tired of Armenia’s periodic violations
of the ceasefire.”

The Armenian defence ministry in Yerevan had previously issued a
statement saying Azeri forces had opened fire on March 3 in the
direction of northern Armenia causing head wounds to a 19 year-old
soldier who had later died in hospital.

The Armenian ministry claimed Azerbaijan had violated the ceasefire
on March 4,5,6 and 7.

Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev said last week talks on Nagorno
Karabakh enclave were at a dead end and signalled that his country
should prepare for renewed war with Armenia.

“The Armenian side is stalling for time and the fact that the
negotiating process has reached a dead end is the fault of the Armenian
side,” Aliyev said.

“We are the victimized party and this gives us the right to resolve
the issue by any means. We must get ready and the population must be
mobilized,” Aliyev said.

Russia Remains Key Trade Partner To South Caucasus – Diplomat

RUSSIA REMAINS KEY TRADE PARTNER TO SOUTH CAUCASUS – DIPLOMAT
by Tigran Liloyan

ITAR-TASS News Agency
March 7, 2006 Tuesday

Russia will remain a key trade partner to all South Caucasian countries
for a long time, U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for European
and Eurasian Affairs Matthew Bryza said in Yerevan on Tuesday.

He said that Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia should choose the way
of cooperation with Russia.

Bryza’s negotiations in Yerevan centered on energy security.

Positive cooperation between Armenia and Russian gas suppliers has
been developed for years, and should naturally go on, he said. Yet
the best way to energy security is diversification of supplies, the
diplomat said. He said it is a matter of gas, hydro and thermal power,
and nuclear energy.

Rates of the development of military-political relations between the
United States and Armenia depend on Yerevan, the official said.

Armenia has taken many important steps towards closer cooperation with
the Euro-Atlantic community, he said, emphasizing the Armenia-NATO
individual partnership plan.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

USA Welcomes Military-Political Cooperation With Armenia

USA WELCOMES MILITARY-POLITICAL COOPERATION WITH ARMENIA

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
March 7 2006

YEREVAN, March 7. /ARKA/. The USA welcomes military-political
cooperation with Armenia, Deputy Assistant of State for European
and Eurasian Affairs Matthew Bryza told reporters. “This cooperation
depends on the Armenian Government, and we welcome it,” he said.

“I do not think that Armenia will advance in this cooperation at such
a rate that would be too rapid for us,” Bryza said.

He pointed out that he was satisfied with the level of cooperation
with Armenia in this sphere. Particularly, the representative of State
Department pointed out the development of Armenia’s interaction with
the NATO in the frameworks of the IPAP program.

“I highly appreciate Armenia’s support in peacemaking missions,”
Bryza said and added that the USA will do everything to deepen these
processes.

One Azerbaijani Serviceman Dies, One Injured In Shelling Incident

ONE AZERBAIJANI SERVICEMAN DIES, ONE INJURED IN SHELLING INCIDENT
by Sevindzh Abdullayeva and Viktor Shulman

ITAR-TASS News Agency
March 7, 2006 Tuesday

Baku

One Azerbaijani serviceman was killed on Tuesday when positions
of the national army came under fire in the Tertersky district in
western Azerbaijan, spokesman for the republic’s Defense Ministry
Ilgar Verdiyev said.

The fatality was identified as Private Perviz Dzhangirov, 20. The fire
was opened by Armenian armed groups from the neighboring occupied
territories, Verdiyev said, adding that Azerbaijan’s positions in
the Fizulinsky district in the southwest of the country were also
shelled on Tuesday. One serviceman was injured in the incident.

In a separate incident on Tuesday, national army positions in the
Kazakhsky district in the west of the country were shelled. There
were no casualties, according to the Azerbaijani Defense Ministry.

A Tuesday report by Itar-Tass correspondent in Yerevan Tigran Liloyan
citing the Armenian Defense Ministry said the Azerbaijani army shelled
border positions of Armenian army units in the Vaiksky, Taushsky and
Idzhevansky districts last night and on Monday.

Armenia did not return fire. There have been no casualties, Armenian
Defense Ministry spokesman Seiran Shakhsuvaryan said.

Armenian ACBA Director General Chairs UBA

ARMENIAN ACBA DIRECTOR GENERAL CHAIRS UBA

ARKA News Agency, Armenia
March 7 2006

YEREVAN, March 7. /ARKA/. Director General of the Agricultural
Corporate Bank of Armenia (ACBA) Stepan Gishyan was elected Chairman
of the Union of Banks of Armenia (UBA). The decision was made at a
special general meeting of the UBA.

The meeting approved the new wording of the UBA Statute and elected a
new 9-member UBA Board. Formerly, the UBA Board had six members. The
UBA was chaired by Samvel Chzmachyan, president of the “Bank Anelik”.

The UBA is a member of the European Bank Federation.

ACBA was founded in 1995 and incorporated on March 29, 1996. The bank
was founded by the farm unions of Armenian regions under the EU TACIS
program.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Where Killers Roam, The Poison Spreads

WHERE KILLERS ROAM, THE POISON SPREADS
By Nicholas D. Kristof

The New York Times
March 7, 2006 Tuesday
Late Edition – Final

Along The Chad-Sudan Border

For more than two years, the world has pretty much ignored the
genocide unfolding in the Darfur region of Sudan, just as it turned
away from the slaughter of Armenians, Jews, Cambodians and Rwandans
in earlier decades.

And now, apparently encouraged by the world’s acquiescence, Sudan is
sending its proxy forces to invade neighboring Chad and kill and rape
members of the same African tribes that have already been ethnically
cleansed in Darfur itself.

I’ve spent the last three days along the Chad-Sudan border, where this
brutal war is unfolding. But “war” doesn’t feel like the right term,
for that implies combat between armies.

What is happening here is more like what happens in a stockyard.

Militias backed by Sudan race on camels and pickup trucks into Chadian
villages and use machine guns to mow down farming families, whose only
offense is that they belong to the wrong tribes and have black skin.

I found it eerie to drive on the dirt track along the border because
countless villages have been torched or abandoned. Many tens of
thousands of peasants have fled their villages, and you can drive for
mile after mile and see no sign of life — except for the smoke of the
villages or fields being burned by the Sudan-armed janjaweed militia.

In some places the janjaweed, made up of nomadic Arab tribes that
persecute several black African tribes, have turned villages into
grazing lands for the livestock they have stolen. At one point,
my vehicle got stuck in the sand, and a group of janjaweed children
materialized and helped push me out. The children were watching a
huge herd of cattle with many different brands. Their fathers were
presumably off killing people.

This is my sixth trip to the Darfur region, and I’ve often seen burned
villages within Darfur itself, but now the cancer has spread to Chad.

One young man, Haroun Ismael, returned with me — very nervously —
to the edge of his village of Karmadodo, between the towns of Adre
and Ade. Eleven days earlier, Sudanese military aircraft and a force
of several hundred janjaweed had suddenly attacked the village. Mr.

Haroun and his wife had run for their lives, with his wife carrying
their 3-month-old baby, Ahmed.

The janjaweed raiders overtook Mr. Haroun’s wife and beat her so badly
that she is still unconscious. They also grabbed Ahmed from her arms.

“They looked at the baby,” Mr. Haroun added, “and since he was a boy,
they shot him.”

Sudan is also arming and equipping a proxy army of Chadian rebels under
a commander named Muhammad Nour. The rebels were repulsed when they
tried to invade Chad in late December, and now they are regrouping
for another attempt.

Sudan’s aim seems to be to overthrow Chad’s president and install a
pawn in his place, in part because this would allow Sudan’s Army to
attack rebels in Darfur from both directions.

Regardless of whether the rebels succeed in overthrowing Chad’s
government, they could ignite a new civil war in Chad. Much will depend
on whether the French will use their military base in Chad to fight any
Sudanese-sponsored invasion; the French aren’t saying what they’ll do.

Chad’s army is too small to defend its border, so it tries to
defend potential invasion routes. That leaves villages in other
areas defenseless.

“See that smoke over there?” asked Ali Muhammad in the market town
of Borota. “The janjaweed are burning our fields today.”

“Most people here have fled,” he added, “but I have old family members
to look after, so I can’t leave.”

These areas are too insecure for the United Nations and most
international aid workers, who are already doing a heroic and dangerous
job in Darfur and Chad. So Mr. Ali and others left behind get no food
aid and go hungry.

In the last few weeks, President Bush has shown an increased
willingness to address the slaughter in Darfur. He should now encourage
the French to use their forces to defend Chad from proxy invasions,
make a presidential speech to spotlight the issue, attend a donor
conference for Darfur, encourage the use of a NATO bridging force
until U.N. peacekeepers can arrive, enforce a no-fly zone and open
a new initiative for peace talks among the sheiks of Darfur.

The present Western policy of playing down genocide and hoping
it will peter out has proved to be bankrupt practically as well as
morally. Granted, there are no neat solutions in Darfur. But ignoring
brutality has only magnified it, and it’s just shameful to pretend not
to notice the terrified villagers here, huddling with their children
each night and wondering when they are going to be massacred.

Turkey’s Strategic Outlook Making Significant Shift

TURKEY’S STRATEGIC OUTLOOK MAKING SIGNIFICANT SHIFT
Igor Torbakov 3/07/06

EurasiaNet, NY
March 7 2006

Turkey’s strategic outlook is making a gradual shift away from the
West, driven by Ankara’s growing concern about the potential for
instability on the country’s southern and eastern flanks. Turkish
leaders are now seeing eye-to-eye with Russia on several important
geopolitical issues.

Turkey continues to publicly cast itself as a country with an
unshakable Western orientation, serving as a long-time NATO member
and a strategic partner of the United States, as well as and aspiring
to European Union membership. [For background see the Eurasia Insight
archive]. But behind the official rhetoric, geopolitical developments
in recent years, especially the Iraq imbroglio, have shaken the faith
of many in Ankara about the country’s Western orientation.

The major factor prompting Turkish leaders to reevaluate their
geopolitical views is Iraq. Turkish policymakers and pundits are
extremely worried that their southern neighbor is ready to implode.

At a March 3 briefing in Istanbul with a group of leading
foreign-policy columnists, officials warned that the escalation of
civil and sectarian strife in Iraq could turn the country into a “new
Lebanon.” Under Ankara’s nightmare scenario, an Iraqi civil war would
give birth to an independent Kurdistan – a possible development with
dire potential consequences for Turkey’s own territorial integrity.

Bush administration bumbling is responsible for much of what has
gone wrong in Iraq, many Turks believe. “If Iraq disintegrates and a
Kurdish state is created in the north, the Turkish people will take
this as something of US making,” the former Turkish president Suleiman
Demirel said in a recent interview published by the Turkish Daily
News. Such a development will inevitably seriously exacerbate the
already existing tension in relations between Ankara and Washington,
the veteran politician added.

Turkish wariness of US political designs extends beyond Iraq, covering
the greater Middle East. Few in Ankara approve of Washington’s tough
line against Iran and Syria, for example. [For additional information
see the Eurasia Insight archive]. “There is sufficient evidence to
suggest that the two countries do not see eye-to-eye on these regional
issues,” notes Semih Idiz, the Milliyet daily’s foreign-policy analyst.

Instead of following the US push to isolate Iran and Syria, Turkish
leaders favor engagement. At the same time, Ankara is firmly opposed
to any attempted use of force with the aim of promoting regime change
in the Middle East. In its advocacy of engagement, Turkey has found
common ground with Russia, which is championing the continuation of
the talks with Tehran to resolve the crisis over its nuclear program.

[For background see the Eurasia Insight archive]. Though sharing
the same aims, the motives of the two countries are divergent:
Ankara’s stance is mainly driven by the fear of destabilization in
its geopolitical backyard, while Russia is more interested in keeping
the United States out of what has traditionally been Moscow’s sphere
of influence.

Policy-makers in Turkey see Moscow’s stance as a useful counterbalance
to what the Turks perceive as potentially harmful US policies. “In
the final analysis, Turkey’s views are different from the West and
closer to Russia,” argues the influential political analyst Sami
Kohen in a commentary published in the Milliyet newspaper.

Both Ankara and Moscow also appear to perceive US policies in the
South Caucasus as being destabilizing. The two countries have been
keen to preserve the status quo in the region, in sharp contrast to
the United States, which has been a staunch backer of Georgia’s Rose
Revolution led by President Mikheil Saakashvili. When it comes to
democratization, both Turkey and Russia favor an incremental approach
that does nothing to upset a delicate economic equilibrium.

“Democratization is a process, and it should be expected to proceed
at a different pace in different countries,” said Turkish Foreign
Minister Abdullah Gul in a written statement released on March 5.

In addition, while advocating the peaceful resolution of the so-called
“frozen conflicts” in the South Caucasus – involving the territories of
Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Nagorno-Karabakh – Ankara, like Moscow,
fears that efforts to hurry political settlements could end up
disrupting the economic order.

Turkey’s changing internal political dynamics are also working to
alter the country’s international outlook. The governing Justice and
Development Party (AKP) – an entity with roots in political Islam –
has introduced a pronounced religious dimension into Turkish political
life, given that the party’s core constituency consists of pious
Muslims. As a result, a significant number of Turks are viewing
geopolitical developments through a religious prism. Recent public
opinion research helps support this view. For instance, in its annual
survey, Transatlantic Trends 2005, the German Marshall Fund reported
that 42 percent of Turks think that Turkey does not belong to the EU
because it is predominantly Muslim. Overall, the percentage of Turks
who believe EU membership would be beneficial for Turkey dropped from
73 percent in 2004 to 63 percent in 2005.

Editor’s Note: Igor Torbakov is a freelance journalist and researcher
who specializes in CIS political affairs. He holds an MA in History
from Moscow State University and a PhD from the Ukrainian Academy
of Sciences. He was Research Scholar at the Institute of Russian
History, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow; a Visiting Scholar at the
Kennan Institute, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars,
Washington DC; a Fulbright Scholar at Columbia University, New York;
and a Visiting Fellow at Harvard University. He is now based in
Istanbul, Turkey.

AbuDhabi: Etisalat Academy’s 5th Middle East HR Conference

ETISALAT ACADEMY’S 5TH MIDDLE EAST HR CONFERENCE

Emirates News Agency
March 7, 2006 Tuesday 3:40 PM EST

Under the patronage of Mohammed Hassan Omran, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, Emirates Telecommunications Corporation – Etisalat,
and with the presence of Nasser Bin Obood, Deputy CEO, Etisalat,
Etisalat Academy has opened the 5th Middle East HR Conference and Expo.

The theme of the conference for this year is ‘Importance of Human
Capital’..

The two-day conference is being held on the 7th and 8th of March
in the Majlis Al Salam Ballroom of Madinat Jumeriah, Dubai, and is
attended by a number of experts, international HR consultants and
delegates representing government and private organizations and
prominent corporations and companies from across the GCC and the
Middle Eastern region.

The conference focuses on the latest HR mechanisms of developing
and enhancing human resources at the GCC, regional and international
levels.

Delegations from Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Sudan,
Egypt, Palestine, India, Pakistan and The Republic of Armenia are
participating..

Dr. Doaa Fares, General Manager of Etisalat Academy said: “The two-day
conference brings into focus the human asset, the HR challenges and
the potential value that human resources adds to corporate activities.

Other topics are also discussed during the conference such as the
future of human resources, HR executive competency, professional and
career development assessment, staff survey and evaluating the role
of HR development as a key player in corporate success.”

“The conference highlights the obstacles faced by ‘Change Management’..

The career building processes discussed would focus on international
developments in measuring competency, income to human investment
relation platforms, the latest in training systems and designing and
managing human resources projects”, he added..

The conference is headlined by Professor Stephane Garelli, of the
International Institute for Management Development and the University
of Lausanne, Switzerland, and past Managing Director of the World
Economic Forum and of the Davos Symposium.

The conference will also host the international expert, David Creelman,
CEO, Creelman Research, HR.Com, Ken Graham, Consultant, Leadership
Development, USA, Virender Kapoor, Director of Symbiosis Institute
of Management, India, Professor William Scott-Jackson, Co-Director,
Center for Applied HR Research Management, Oxford Brookes University,
, UK, Abdulaziz Al Sawaleh, Executive Vice President- HR, Etisalat,
discussing ‘Leadership Re-engineered – The Pragmatic Essentials’
and Mr. Abdulqader Obaid Ali, Chairman of Dubai Quality Group,
discussing the mechanisms of HR management and measurement..

Each day of the conference concludes with a panel discussion to
discuss the role of HR development as a major asset in the success
of any organization..

Speakers will talk about studying and analyzing the role of the HR
departments in corporations, determining the role of HR in performance
management, leadership culture, how IT can sustain the role of HR
and many other related issues..

Aisha Bin Swaira, Training Operations Manager, Etisalat Academy said:
“The good response from different participants has assured us of the
necessity and importance of this event.

Participants such as regional and international governmental and
private departments and companies prove the impact of the event by
incorporating its recommendations into their practices.”

The conference has been exceptionally successful over the last four
years, attracting many executives, decision makers, hiring and HR
development managers, training and localization experts, manpower
and HR consultants and specialists as well as a large number of
professionals interested in performance and statistical indicators
in both the GCC and Middle Eastern regions.