Chances are high that the Nagorno Karabakh conflict will be settled

Regnum, Russia
March 18 2006

Chances are high that the Nagorno Karabakh conflict will be settled
in 2006 (Semneby, EU Special Representative for South Caucasus)

Baku, 18 March 2006 (Regnum – website) – “To be sure in rightful
coordination of initiatives on settlement of Nagorno Karabakh conflict,
I will regularly keep in touch with co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk
Group,” EU Special Representative for South Caucasus Peter Semneby
has announced.

According to him, chances are high that the conflict will be settled
in 2006: “Taking into consideration that the latest meeting of the
Armenian and Azerbaijani presidents failed to justify hopes, it is
difficult to say how strongly these hopes are bound to the reality.

For closer examination of the situation I should visit Azerbaijan and
Armenia, exchange opinions with the co-chairs. But if I had not been
so sure in the Nagorno Karabakh conflict settlement, I would not have
given my consent to the appointment,” Day.az quotes Semneby as saying.
From: Baghdasarian

BAKU: 369 kinds of ammunition to be moved from Akhalkalak to Armenia

369 kinds of ammunition to be moved from Akhalkalak to Armenia by this year’s end

Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
March 18 2006

[ 18 Mar. 2006 13:26 ]

Russian military base #62 in Samtse-Javakhati region will be moved
from Georgia by this year’s end. Georgian defense minister, Mamuka
Kudava told journalists, APA bureau in Georgia reports.

Mr. Kudava stated that Russia has already submitted the withdrawal
schedule of the military bases to official Tbilisi. The schedule
intends to move 358 kinds of ammunitions and military equipment as
well as 113 tanks and other equipment from Georgia to Russia by sea.
369 kinds of heavy military equipment as well as 35 tanks and other
equipment will be taken to Russian base #102 in Gumru, Armenia. /APA/

ANKARA: Turkey: No opening border with Armenia before normalization

Turkey: No opening border with Armenia before normalization of relations

New Anatolian, Turkey
March 18 2006

Turkish officials decisively informed U.S. Assistant Secretary of State
for European and Eurasian Affairs Daniel Fried that Ankara would not
open a border gate with Yerevan unless there was a normalization of
ties between Turkey and Armenia.

Fried, who paid an official visit to Ankara, met with Turkish Foreign
Ministry Undersecretary Ali Tuygan and Deputy Undersecretary Ahmet
Uzumcu late Thursday. During the meeting, he urged Ankara to open its
border gate with Armenia in order to facilitate the peace process in
the divided-enclave of Nagorno-Karabakh, still a point of contention
between Armenia and Azerbaijan.

However, Ankara reiterated its previous position and made known that
the issue was part of the normalization process of relations between
Turkey and Armenia, sources said.

According to sources, Fried expressed Yerevan’s willingness to
normalize relations with Ankara. He also underlined both Armenia and
Azerbaijan’s decisiveness to find a solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh
dispute, making reference to his separate meetings with Armenian
President Robert Kocharian and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev.

As a part of the U.S. efforts to contribute to a solution to the
Nagorno-Karabakh dispute, Fried visited Ankara following his round
of meetings in Caucuses.

Declining to predict a possible timetable regarding a solution on the
enclave, Fried told the Turkish officials of the U.S.’ readiness to
extend any kind of support for the solution.

Fried took up with his Turkish counterparts Iran’s nuclear program.

Ankara and Washington agreed to seek a diplomatic solution to the
crisis which emerged between the West and Iran over Tehran’s nuclear
ambitions, diplomatic sources told The New Anatolian. However,
according to the sources, Fried conveyed to Ankara that Washington
will not rule out military operations against Iran if the issue were
to be deadlocked.

The Cyprus problem also dominated the talks between Tuygan and Fried.

Tuygan stressed the necessity to end the isolation of Turkish
Cypriots. Although the Turkish side has always taken positive steps
towards a solution on the divided island, it has not got a positive
response from the international community, he said.

In criticism of the international community towards the Turkish
Cypriots, Tuygan told Fried that although the Greek Cypriots have
always been the uncompromising side, the international community has
always rewarded them, said the sources.

During a press conference on late Thursday following his talks Fried
also touched on the Armenian genocide claims, saying, “The attitude
of the U.S. on this issue is well known. U.S. President George W.

Bush is likely to make a statement on this issue in April, like
every year.”

Online Audio and video files of Armenian entry for Eurovision SongCo

Audio and video files of Armenian entry online

Belgovision.com, Belgium
March 18 2006

Armenian broadcaster ARMTV has published audio- and video files of the
Armenian entry for Athens on its website. With the song Without your
love Armenian singer Andre will be the first Armenian representative
at the Eurovision Song Contest, in the semifinal on Thursday 18th May.

Andre will take the stage in Athens with the love song Without
your love, a sensitive and fascinating mixture of modern and ethnic
elements. Without your love was composed by the Conductor of Jazz
Orchestra of Armenia, Mr. Armen Martirosyan. The arrangement
and instrumentation is done by a miracle man, one of the best
representatives of the music field in Armenia, Mr. Ara Torosyan.

Through this link the Armenian entry for the Eurovision Song Contest
2006 can be heard. On the same website, the video clip of Without
your love is available.

lgovision.com/en/index_f.php?id=867

http://www.armtv.com/eurovision/eng
http://www.be

BAKU: Azeri court sentences three servicemen for Armenian conspiracy

Azeri court sentences three servicemen for Armenian conspiracy in October 2005

Azad Azarbaycan TV, Baku
18 Mar 06

[Presenter] Counter-intelligence measures have established that a
junior warrant officer of a military unit of the Azerbaijani Defence
Ministry, Ruslan Bakirov, 21, who was in Armenian captivity from 15
February to 7 May last year, was involved in secret collaboration
with Armenia’s special services. It was also identified that Bakirov,
a conscript from the Samkir District conscription office, received
instructions from Armenia to commit terrorist acts, the public
relations department of the Azerbaijani National Security Ministry
has said.

[Correspondent, over video of Bakirov, archive footage] Ruslan
Bakirov was deceived by the Armenians together with his subordinate
privates, Xayal Abdullayev, 20, and Hikmat Tagiyev, 23, into
committing high treason by deserting into the enemy side while
standing on duty. Immediately after being released with the help of
the International Committee of the Red Cross, Ruslan Bakirov admitted
that he had been involved in secret collaboration with the Armenians.
However, measures later proved that his confession was part of the plan
prepared by the Armenian special services. The serviceman voluntarily
unveiled the truth following counter-intelligence measures.

It became known that the Armenian special services worked purposefully
to collaborate with Ruslan Bakirov, Xayal Abdullayev and Hikmat
Tagiyev. Seven meetings were held with Ruslan Bakirov, who confirmed
his secret collaboration in writing and on a video recording. They
gave him the nickname Ramin, agreed on communication methods and
promised to give him a reward of 3,000-4,000 dollars for carrying out
every assignment. An employee of the Armenian special services, who
introduced himself as Rudik, briefed Ruslan Bakirov on his activities
after returning to Azerbaijan. One of Bakirov’s main targets would
be the Azerbaijani president.

[Ruslan Bakirov] They told me to go and check along which route the
presidential motorcade moves, mine the road and explode it.

[Correspondent] Bakirov would also carry out explosions on the
Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline [carrying Caspian oil to world
markets], gas pipes, at Heydar Aliyev International Airport, photograph
different strategic installations and send the images to Armenia.

The prosecution has proven all the charges. The Military Court on
Grave Crimes on 7 October 2005 ruled to sentence Ruslan Bakirov and
Xayal Abdullayev to 12 years and Hikmat Tagiyev to 11 years in prison.

Irada Mammadova for “Son Xabar” [programme].

Daniel Fried turns to the Armenian Gencide issue in Ankara

Daniel Fried turns to the Armenian Gencide issue in Ankara

ArmRadio
18.03.2006 14:16

“The issue of acknowledgement of the Armenian Genocide is a complex
question, which should be daringly discussed by the two parties,”
Assistant to the US Secretary of State Daniel Fried said during his
visit to Ankara.

Following the meeting with representatives of the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs Daniel Fried declared that it is necessary to evaluate the
tragedies of the past years, since the people should think about
their future. The American diplomat underlined that “the position of
the Unites States on this issue is known. US President George Bush
will most probably make a traditional annual statement on the issue
in April.”

Daniel Fried added that the issue of Washington’s demand to open the
border with Armenia was addressed during the discussions in Ankara.

Turkish nationalists protest in Berlin over resolution on Armenians

Turkish nationalists protest in Berlin over resolution on Armenians

Deutsche Presse-Agentur
March 18, 2006, Saturday
13:05:49 Central European Time

Berlin

More than 2,000 Turkish nationalists demonstrated in Berlin on Saturday
in support of denials that a genocide of Armenians took place under
the Ottoman Empire in 1915.

The protestors demanded among other things the repeal of a resolution
passed by a unanimous vote in the German parliament last year that
called on Turkey to hold an open dialogue on the Armenian massacre.

The resolution has contributed to a rift between Germany and Turkey.

According to independent estimates, more than a million Armenians
were killed in the massacre.

A Berlin court on Friday allowed the demonstration to take place under
strict conditions, included not characterizing the Armenian massacre
as a lie in either speech or on placards.

The march had originally been banned by the police. dpa fse bk mga cb

Destructive power of the architecture of war

Destructive power of the architecture of war

Canberra Times (Australia)
March 18, 2006 Saturday
Final Edition

ROBERT BEVAN appraises “the power of the built form”, architecture,
but from one peculiar, critical angle only. The Destruction of Memory
examines how monumental, venerable buildings can contribute to our
national sense of ourselves, and, conversely, how their destruction
in war constitutes “ethnic cleansing or genocide by other means”.

Bevan assesses our lamentable war-time record of destroying buildings,
monuments, even whole cities, as a way of wrecking our enemies’
morale and rooting out their national memory. As he notes, “There is a
bestial carousel quality to the past century’s destructive acts.” Bevan
concentrates on “enforced forgetting”, through “destruction of cultural
artefacts of an enemy people or nation as a means of dominating,
terrorising, dividing or eradicating it altogether”.

His review of our destructiveness covers much familiar ground: the
demolition of 6000 monasteries in Tibet; the fire-bombing of Dresden;
9/11; the blowing up of the Bamiyan Buddhas; the architectural
dimension of the Armenian genocide; and, particularly, the wholesale
devastation in the recent Balkans wars.

Bevan graduated from being an “architecturally obsessed child”
to editing the British architectural magazine, Building Design. His
fascination with his subject sometimes tempts him into academic jargon
(“commodification” or “the physicality of politics”) or esoteric
digressions (Lacanian mirror theory lost me). There is, though,
a lot of robust common sense in this book.

He is especially good on the conquistadors’ assaults on the New World,
“the world’s largest-ever cultural and human genocide”. He is thorough
and interesting on wanton destruction of mosques, libraries and bridges
in Bosnia. He is well read and acute in a commentary on the burning of
Anglo-Irish “big houses” during the Irish civil war, as well as on the
attentiveness of factions in Islam to sacred spaces and geometry. He
even complains about the deleterious impact of helicopter movements
at a current United States base on the site of ancient Babylon.

That selection of examples demonstrates the eclectic charms in The
Destruction of Memory. The text is complemented by grainy but poignant
black-and-white photographs, before-and-after shots which show what
we have lost. Sometimes we have lost what we had never known. I had
never heard of the five Armenian churches clustered among mountains
at Khitzhonk, but, on the basis of these pictures, am prepared to
mourn their passing.

Bevan invites a few quarrels. I would argue with his account of
Jerusalem, especially the eccentric suggestion that the city’s streets
are now “viscous with local people and lifeless lacunae”. Generally,
though, allowing for the abundance of jargon at the start, this book
makes its case admirably. Bevan’s hero seems to be the German general,
von Choltitz, the man who defied the Fuhrer’s orders to blow up Paris,
saving for all of us what may still be the most beautiful city in
the world.

Another book (or a second one by Bevan) might explain why some sites
which have been utterly destroyed (such as Troy, or Carthage) remain
so evocative. That book could remark on our occasional restraint,
perhaps using the American reluctance to bomb Japan’s ancient capital,
Kyoto, as an example.

Other scholars could also hazard a guess on why Australians seem
so little attached to our built environment. We would lament the
destruction of the MCG, the Opera House and the Harbour Bridge, but
that is about the sum of our list of architectural icons. We need to
understand more about where our idea of the past actually resides;
Pierre Ryckmans has done absorbing work on that subject in relation
to China. Where past and present intersect, in a building as in a
song or a myth, we obtain a clearer insight into those lies which we
collectively agree to tell to each other about ourselves.

Mark Thomas is a Canberra reviewer.

Lyon: rassemblement houleux contre la construction d’un memorialarme

Lyon: rassemblement houleux contre la construction d’un memorial armenien

Agence France Presse
18 mars 2006 samedi 2:37 PM GMT

Un rassemblement d’associations franco-turques contre la construction
d’un memorial du genocide armenien s’est tenu, samedi après-midi dans
le centre de Lyon, sous les huees de centaines de personnes, dont
certains manifestants anti-CPE, a constate un journaliste de l’AFP.

Plus d’un millier de manifestants franco-turcs ont investi la place
Bellecour, arborant drapeaux et pancartes indiquant: “non au memorial
d’un pretendu genocide” ou “il n’y a jamais eu de genocide armenien”,
et entonnant des chants nationaux.

Aucun chiffre sur le nombre de manifestants n’a ete fourni par
la police.

Des etudiants et lyceens qui venaient de participer a la manifestation
anti-CPE, qui a reuni en matinee de 10.000 a 25.000 personnes, ainsi
que des passants, ont hue et invective le cortège.

Sur la place Bellecour, un cordon de policiers s’est aussitôt mis
en place entre les deux groupes, separes egalement par le service
d’ordre des associations franco-turques.

Des gendarmes mobiles ont ensuite fait usage de gaz lacrymogènes pour
disperser les etudiants, qui commencaient a jeter des bouteilles en
direction des forces de l’ordre. Ces dernières ont elargi le perimètre
de securite separant les deux camps.

Annoncee en avril 2003, par le senateur-maire PS de Lyon, Gerard
Collomb, la construction du memorial du genocide armenien est suspendue
a un avis de la commission regionale des sites.

Les massacres et deportations d’Armeniens sous l’empire Ottoman,
de 1915 a 1917, ont fait 1,5 million de morts, selon les Armeniens,
entre 300.000 et 500.000, selon Ankara qui rejette categoriquement
la qualification de genocide.

La France a reconnu le genocide armenien en 2001.

–Boundary_(ID_bNJI7NiquoIJPH0Zk0Pnrg)–

Genocide armenien: plus de 2.000 nationalistes turcs manifestent aBe

Genocide armenien: plus de 2.000 nationalistes turcs manifestent a Berlin

Agence France Presse
18 mars 2006 samedi 1:29 PM GMT

Plus de 2.000 nationalistes turcs ont manifeste samedi a Berlin
pour protester contre les accusations de genocide a l’encontre de
la Turquie concernant le massacre d’Armeniens entre 1915 et 1917,
selon les organisateurs.

Les manifestants ont reclame le retrait d’une resolution du Bundestag
(chambre basse du parlement) appelant l’an dernier au dialogue sur
les massacres massifs des Armeniens sous l’empire Ottoman en 1915/1916.

Ce texte avait suscite a l’epoque des tensions dans les relations
germano-turques.

Les massacres et deportations d’Armeniens sous l’empire Ottoman,
de 1915 a 1917, ont fait 1,5 million de morts, selon les Armeniens,
entre 300.000 et 500.000, selon Ankara qui rejette categoriquement
la qualification de genocide.

La manifestation prevue initiamement mercredi avait ete interdite
par la police lundi a Berlin avant d’etre autorisee vendredi par la
Haute Cour administrative de Berlin sous conditions.

Toutes les affiches et banderoles ont dû etre montrees a la police
au cours de cette manifestation où il etait interdit de qualifier le
genocide armenien de mensonge.

A Francfort (ouest), plusieurs milliers de Kurdes se sont rassembles
samedi a l’occasion du Newroz, la fete du nouvel an kurde du 21 mars,
pour reclamer la reconnaissance de leur culture et de leur langue
par Ankara et protester contre l’oppression dont ils font l’objet
en Turquie.

Ils ont egalement demande la liberation du chef separatiste kurde
Abdullah Ocalan, arrete le 15 fevrier 1999 au Kenya et incarcere a
vie sur l’île-prison d’Imrali, dans le nord-ouest de la Turquie.

–Boundary_(ID_Y3HKloOlJjIp7rM0XuYSew)–