PRESS RELEASE
Armenian National Committee of Toronto
45 Hallcrown Place
Willowdale, Ontario
M2J 4Y4
Contact: Lori Avakian
Email: [email protected]
91st Anniversary of the Armenian Genocide – Commemorative Events
This year marks the 91st anniversary of the Armenian Genocide, a year
in which important strides have been made to further international
recognition of the Genocide. The Armenian National Committee of Toronto
(ANCT) is determined to make 2006 stand out as one of action. ANCT’s
focus this year is on Genocide education, as well as your role and
responsibility to raise awareness and recognition in today’s society.
The ANCT is hosting the Genocide commemoration on April 23rd 2006
and supporting the events listed below, which we urge you to attend
and publicize enthusiastically within your circle of friends and
colleagues, in order for the Armenian Cause to extend beyond the
confines of the Armenian community.
We would appreciate it if you could make a concerted effort to
be present.
Date: Friday, April 21st, 2006
Time: 5:30 pm.
Location: Hart House, Debates room auditorium, downtown UofT.
Event: “Armenian Orphan Survivors: The Georgetown Boys” – A documented
history of survival and resettlement underlying the emergence of
Diaspora in Canada. Lecture to be given by Lorne Shirinian, a professor
at the Royal Military College in Kingston. Event hosted by University
of Toronto’s Armenian Student Association.
Date: Friday, April 21st, 2006
Time: 8:00 pm.
Location: Queens Park, In front of Ontario Legislature Buildings.
Event: Candlelight Vigil, Organized by UofT, York and Ryerson ASAs,
ARF Youth Organization of Canada and ACYOC.
Date: Sunday April 23rd, 2006
Time: 4:30pm
Location: Armenian Community Centre, 45 Hallcrown Place. (Victoria
Park and Hwy 401)
Event: Commemoration of the 91st Anniversary of the Armenian
Genocide. There will be a Tribute to the Genocide Victims at 4:30
with the official commemoration at 5:00. Organized by the ANCT and
the ARF YOC.
Date: Monday, April 24th, 2006.
Time: 12:00 noon
Location: Turkish Embassy – 197 Wurtemburg Street, Ottawa
Event: Rally in Ottawa in front of the Turkish Embassy. Departure
at 6:30am from the Armenian Community Centre, 45 Hallcrown Place,
Willowdale, Ont.
____________________________________________ ________________________________
The ANCT is part of the largest and the most influential
Canadian-Armenian grassroots political organization. Working in
coordination with a network of offices, chapters, and supporters
throughout Canada and affiliated organizations around the world,
the ANCT actively advances the concerns of the Canadian-Armenian
community on a broad range of issues.
To be on the mailing list and receive the latest news and upcoming
events, go to and on the bottom right corner of the
page submit your email.
You may contact the ANCT at [email protected].
AAA: Assembly Position On Mass. Genocide Denial Case Reinforced BySi
Armenian Assembly of America
1140 19th Street, NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202-393-3434
Fax: 202-638-4904
Email: [email protected]
Web:
PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 17, 2006
CONTACT: Christine Kojoian
E-mail: [email protected]
ASSEMBLY POSITION ON MASS. GENOCIDE DENIAL CASE REINFORCED BY SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT RULING
Washington, DC — A recent U.S. Sixth Circuit Court decision virtually
echoed the language used by the Armenian Assembly in its amicus curiae
(“friend of the court”) brief in the Massachusetts Genocide Denial
Case, when it ruled that a state, has in effect, broad discretion
in determining the appropriate framework on policy issues of public
interest.
Ruling that the state of Tennessee can put on its license plates any
message it chooses, the Court said that the tags are “government
speech” and “not a public forum,” and that nothing in the First
Amendment prohibits it.
It went on to say: “Although this exercise of government one-sidedness
with respect to a very contentious political issue may be ill-advised,
we are unable to conclude that the Tennessee statute contravenes the
First Amendment,” Judge John M. Rogers said in his ruling.
Last month, the Assembly filed an amicus brief in response to a
lawsuit brought by the Assembly of Turkish American Associations
(ATAA) and others who are attempting to rewrite history with respect
to the Armenian Genocide. The brief states in part: “There is no
First Amendment basis for objecting to the government’s choice in a
curricular guide simply because it expresses a viewpoint with which
the plaintiffs disagree. Indeed, the fundamental flaw in plaintiffs
suit, and the reason why it must be dismissed, is that the Curricular
Guide is government speech and there is no First Amendment basis for
objecting when the government chooses to speak.”
Citing a Fifth U.S. Circuit Court decision, the Assembly brief
further says, “The Supreme Court repeatedly has emphasized that the
government may speak and that there is no basis for a First Amendment
claim objecting to the government’s expressive choices.”
The Assembly brief also said: “As the Fifth Circuit recently declared:
The government undoubtedly has the authority to control its own
message when it speaks or advocates a position it believes is in the
public interest.”
“. . .the Curricular Guide is speech by the government, and the law
is absolutely clear that government speech inherently does not violate
the First Amendment,” the brief continues.
The ATAA lawsuit seeks the right to inject genocide denial materials
into the Massachusetts school curriculum and claims that doing so
is a violation of the “freedom of speech” protection of the First
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
The Armenian Assembly is the largest Washington-based nationwide
organization promoting public understanding and awareness of Armenian
issue. It is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt membership organization.
####
NR#2006-034
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
AAA: Foreign Minister Oskanian Addresses Assembly’s National Confere
Armenian Assembly of America
1140 19th Street, NW, Suite 600
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: 202-393-3434
Fax: 202-638-4904
Email: [email protected]
Web:
PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 17, 2006
CONTACT: Christine Kojoian
E-mail: [email protected]
FOREIGN MINISTER VARTAN OSKANIAN ADDRESSES ASSEMBLY’S NATIONAL CONFERENCE IN WASHINGTON
Minister Welcomes Signing of MCC Compact & Announces Rural Poverty Plan
Washington, DC – During a major speech at the Assembly’s National
Conference last month, Armenia’s Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian
thanked the U.S. for including Armenia in the Millennium Challenge
Cooperation (MCC) Compact, a five-year $235 million agreement which
will help the country reduce rural poverty.
Oskanian, who joined Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice for
the signing of the Armenia Compact on March 27, told Conference
participants that that Armenia will launch a rural poverty plan that
builds on its partnership with the MCC. The Foreign Minister urged the
Armenian Diaspora to join this effort and help eradicate poverty in
the homeland. He also thanked the Armenian Diaspora for its efforts
in strengthening the U.S.-Armenia relationship and said Armenia is
fortunate to receive
The National Conference, a three-day advocacy push led by the
community’s major non-partisan organizations – the Armenian Assembly
of America, the Armenian General Benevolent Union (AGBU) and the
Eastern and Western Diocese of the Armenian Church – brought hundreds
of committed Armenian activists to the nation’s capital to advocate
on behalf of community issues.
Below is the full text of Foreign Minster Oskanian’s prepared speech:
I want to thank you for the invitation to speak here today. I
especially appreciate the fact that in this hall are members and
activists from the Assembly, the Armenian Church, the AGBU, and
individuals – all of whom are here to plan together, to work together,
to register successes together.
Since independence, we have indeed registered successes together –
significant US assistance to Armenia, trade privileges, military
assistance parity, progress in genocide recognition and education
efforts, a better understanding by opinion and policy makers of
Armenia’s geographic, historic and economic limitations.
If I think back, I don’t know where Armenia would have been without
the Diaspora. The dedicated, focused efforts of the Armenian Assembly
of America have resulted in a support base that is essential for
Armenia. We know we can always depend on the real, sincere, deep
commitment of the Assembly leadership and the dedicated work of the
Assembly staff.
In Yerevan, we are very aware that for you to be able to promote
Armenia, its policies, its future, Armenia must be the kind of
place that you can and want to promote. The Diaspora will promote
and support an Armenia that reflects its own best dreams, values and
ambitions. The Armenian-American Diaspora will promote and support
an Armenia that is a friend of the United States.
And we are. Despite the huge geographic distance between Yerevan
and Washington, we are partners in the war on terror, in supporting
the non-proliferation of weapons, in searching for global peace thru
regional security, in supporting the rule of law, as well as democratic
and economic freedoms.
Not only are we ideological partners, but we share the values that
have made America. We want those values to be not just aspirations
for the citizens of Armenia but solid realities, to be comfortably
taken for granted.
The US is the country that makes it possible for individuals to
reinvent themselves – to relocate, to take on new careers, to pursue
new challenges and new directions.
Armenians have been a people who have reinvented themselves throughout
the centuries on every continent. The challenge in this century is:
for the first time in history, will we be able to reinvent ourselves
on our own land?
Do we want to become a country where every man and woman assumes
they have a right to speak their mind, to cast their vote, to affect
change? Of course we do.
Do we want to become a country where we can take the impartiality
of judges, the decency of policemen and the ethics of teachers for
granted? Of course we do.
Do we want to become a country where you pay taxes to the system
rather than fees to the official? Of course we do.
Do we want to become a country where the difference in rich and poor
is only a matter of time and not a matter of destiny? Of course we do.
Do we want to become a country where each person believes that he or
she can individually reinvent themselves? Of course we do.
That is the Armenia we want. That is the Armenia you want.
How do we get there? You are blissfully unaware of the difficulties
and travails of the process of becoming a democracy because Americans
live in the only country to have been born democratic. America was
built from the ground up, democratic institutions were defined and
created as you went along. As such, you have the good fortune to be
able to take this system for granted.
The entire process of nation-building has been different for us,
since we had to undo an existing system and build a new one. That is
why we have welcomed the various US programs which have supported our
institutional, democratic and economic reforms. We also appreciate that
in anticipation of the elections of 2007 and 2008, the US has proposed
additional, targeted assistance so we can hold normal elections and
rise to the next level of democratic development.
But democracy is more than elections. Democratic institutions and
processes are not just ends. They are also means to creating the
necessary political and economic environment which lead to distributed
growth and dignified development. The cruelties inherent in the process
of massive economic readjustment which we have been making have led
to a sense of powerlessness on the part of ordinary citizens. So,
democracy is a tool for development, just as economic development is
a facilitator of democratization.
This afternoon, I will be attending the signing of a
visionary instrument that drives both economic development and
democratization. The Millennium Challenge Compact is intended to
bolster development in countries where the society and leadership
comprehend their political responsibility to nurture and sustain
democratic practices. This is the single largest government investment
in Armenia’s economy. It consists of $235 million over 5 years. Before
I tell you what we’re going to do with the money, let me tell you
why we were fortunate enough to receive this grant.
The US government chose Armenia as one of the potential recipients
because Armenia is needy. That’s no secret. But there are lots of
needy countries in the world. Why Armenia? Because the US government
determined to contribute to the budgets of those countries that are
themselves attempting to grow in the right direction – to govern
justly, to encourage economic openness and to invest in people.
Armenia is. And being made eligible for the MCC is evidence of
this. Simply put, Armenia is a part of the MCC because not only is
there plenty about our society that needs to be put right, but because
we are on a path that is right. This farsighted program provides a
generous push in the direction that we have chosen for ourselves.
I said to Ambassador Danilovich when the decision was made, and I say
this to you now, Armenia has the honor and the obligation to build
on the confidence that has been placed in our government and our
people. And so, even as we spend these funds to turn mud into asphalt
and to give farmers the irrigation water that is their lifeblood,
we will work to make sure that good governance and the principles of
an open and fair society take root in our homeland.
In the 21st century, philanthropy is more than charity. It is
about finding lasting solutions to deep-seated social and economic
problems. That is what the MCC intends to do. And so I am going to
use this opportunity to say to the Diaspora loudly and clearly that
that is what the Diaspora should do as well.
Before I ask you to do more, and I’m going to do just that, let
me thank you for all that you have done. The Armenia – Diaspora
collaboration has been invaluable in this decade and a half of
upheaval, confusion and learning. The value of the Diaspora is in
its ingenuity, non-conformity, its belief in a dream, its access to
networks, its ability to be international and national all at the
same time, and its tremendous resources.
I am now going to ask you to partner with Armenia – even more deeply
and broadly and seriously than you have already done -in addressing
Armenia’s domestic and international challenges.
Look, most of you have been to Armenia. It is clear that not all
Armenians have been able to share in the double digit growth of which
we are justifiably proud. As soon as one leaves Yerevan, the statistics
become reality: One out of every two Armenians still lives in poverty,
mostly in Armenia’s rural areas. Half of those living in poverty,
live on less than one dollar a day. Yet, these rural men and women
represent a critical portion of Armenia’s economy.
If we want to ensure that these rural communities are not destined
to remain stagnant, permanent pockets of poverty, that Armenians are
not born into a cycle of poverty, then we cannot allow development to
simply take its course. Even at this current fast pace, it will take
decades before we reach the average European level of prosperity. We
must take practical steps to intervene, to take a short-cut towards
an improved quality of life for our rural citizens.
This is the first time that I am announcing from a podium that at the
next Armenia Diaspora Conference, we will be launching a Rural Poverty
Eradication program – a kind of Diaspora Marshall Plan for Armenia.
The Millennium Challenge Account has indeed taken on the renovation
or construction of two of the most expensive infrastructure sectors –
roads and irrigation canals.
Imagine that a village will, in a few years, have irrigation water
and roads.
But imagine that there will be no drinking water, no health care,
no school, no gas or electricity in that village.
Imagine children growing up in a 21st century rural community without
access to telephone, television or internet.
Now imagine what we could do together if the Armenian government,
Armenia’s business community, international organizations, and you,
the Armenian Diaspora came together to leverage the MCC contributions
and to build on the MCC momentum. Imagine a country where development
is comprehensive, even, fair and just.
Imagine an Armenia whose borders are secure because its border
communities are stable, where cross-border interaction is possible,
where out-migration is minimal. Imagine a day in the village filled
with pride and satisfaction, rather than tears and frustration.
As investments and growth spread through Yerevan, this program will
coordinate information about the many wonderful, generous programs
that are already being implemented in rural Armenia by Armenian
and international organizations and individuals. This program will
work to remove the real and artificial obstacles to productivity,
and will help identify access to markets and finance to make the
village economically sustainable.
If you are wondering whether those with personal interests will allow
this kind of access and transparency, join me in challenging those
who obstruct. Rally the forces of the diaspora and the international
community and see if we can’t replace obstacle with opportunity.
Through this program, we will approach every individual, organization,
parish, family and business in the Diaspora and will solicit your
participation. Your time, your money, your expertise, your contacts
– they are all needed so that the infrastructure is rebuilt and a
village is reinvented. This program will strive to bring a new look,
a new ethic, new hope to each rural community in Armenia, starting
with the border villages first.
In plain language, by eradicating poverty you will be eradicating
hopelessness. You will bring prospect and possibility to
the most vulnerable in our society. Hope, faith and confidence
transform economically empowered citizens into politically empowered
citizens. And it is they who will be the best defenders of their votes,
their voices and their rights in meetings, elections and throughout
the governing process.
These are the major domestic challenges that Armenia faces
today. But our foreign policy challenges are no less difficult and
complicated. Fundamental among them are relations with our neighbors,
transportation, energy diversification and conflict resolution.
Our agenda with the US today is very broad and diversified. We have
transcended from being a one issue country and our relations today
are built on mutual respect and interest. Armenia needs America. And
America needs Armenia as a reliable partner in the region.
This year we’ll be celebrating the 15th anniversary of Armenia’s
independence. 15 years of independence,15 years of statehood, 15 years
that Armenians around the world have had an Armenia that is theirs,
to which they belong, that they represent.
No longer are we just Armenian-Americans, but now, we are, whether we
want it or not, whether we feel it or not, perceived as being piece
of that country, that place. Our identity has changed.
The Diaspora exists, it will continue to exist, and you will need
Armenia, not to substitute but to complement what you have.
The Republic of Armenia exists, it is independent, and it is ours. It
still needs its Diaspora, more than ever. We must cooperate, not
compete, in order to turn the Armenia of our dreams into the Armenia
of our future.
The Armenian Assembly is the largest Washington-based nationwide
organization promoting public understanding and awareness of Armenian
issue. The Armenian General Benevolent Union is the world’s largest
philanthropic organization devoted to education, cultural and
humanitarian efforts. Both are 501(c)(3) tax-exempt membership
organizations.
The Diocese of the Armenian Church of America (Eastern) is the
spiritual and administrative head of the Armenian Apostolic Church in
the Eastern United States. The Eastern Diocese and its counterpart,
the Western Diocese of the Armenian Church of America, exist under
the authority of the ancient Mother See of the Armenian Church in
Holy Etchmiadzin.
NR#2006-033
Photographs available on the Assembly’s Web site at the following link:
/2006-033-1.jpg
Caption: Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian addressed Armenian activists
at the Assembly’s National Conference last
An Interview With British Journalist Robert Fisk
An Interview With British Journalist Robert Fisk
A meeting with the Middle East correspondent of The Independent of London
Horizon Weekly, Canada
April 14, 2006
By Aris Babikian
Earlier this year renowned British journalist Robert Fisk recently published
`The Great War For Civilization: The Conquest of the Middle East,’ an
outstanding book on the recent history of the Middle East. In a 50-page
chapter on the Armenian Genocide, Fisk deftly condensed the 90-year-old
history of the Genocide with fairness, rendering justice to the victims and
to the survivors of the first genocide of the 20th century. The extensive
chapter covered the history, the circumstances, the betrayal, the cover up,
the denial, and the political intrigues behind the Armenian Genocide.
During his visit to Toronto to promote the book, we met him to discuss his
views on the Armenian Genocide.
Aris Babikian: Reading your chapter `The First Holocaust’ on the Armenian
Genocide, I was amazed by your ability to encapsulate the complex history of
the Armenian Genocide in 50 pages. Can you tell me how did you stumble on
the Armenian Genocide? What was your motivation in exploring the calamity?
Robert Fisk: The book is partly about the First World War and the results of
that war. I realized, because my father was a soldier in the First World
War – he took part in the Gallipoli landing, that the Armenian Genocide took
place in a context of that war, not a civil war.
When I first arrived to Lebanon in 1976, during the civil war there, I
become aware of the Armenian Community. Armenians were playing this
difficult role, being neither with the Christian Falange nor with the Moslem
and Palestinian militia. So I started to meet Armenians, at that stage – in
`76. There were still Armenian Genocide/ Holocaust survivors then. I call it
Holocaust with capital H, just like I call the Jewish Holocaust with capital
H. At that stage the Armenian Genocide was not my main issue. I was
covering the civil war. But then I went to Anjar. I saw this Armenian city.
I learnt about Mousa Dagh, and gradually while covering the Lebanese war,
the Iraq-Iran war, the Iranian Revolution, I noticed that always there were
Armenians on the periphery. The Armenian Community invited me to visit their
community centres in Tehran and in Northern Syria, in Kamishly. As the years
went by I learnt more and more about the Armenian Genocide and came to
realize clearly it prefigured the Jewish Holocaust, as well. It was a while
before I realized how closely it prefigured the Jewish Holocaust . . . the
fact that the rail cars, the box cars to transfer the Armenians by rail, the
fact that German diplomats had seen the Armenian Genocide, and later the
same scenes popping up in Eastern Europe – the killing of the Jews by the
Wehrmacht or the SS . . . it is clear lines of direct contact between that
Armenian Genocide and the second genocide of that century.
Then I went to the Syrian Desert and to Deir ez Zorr. This was in 1993. It
was a major photo story. I went with French photographer, to do pictures on
the Genocide and what had happened in the northern Syrian Desert. The story
is in the book. We went looking for this hill called Halgada. We knew about
it from an old Armenian lady . . . the location of where her family was
killed, next to the Khabur River. But there was nothing next to the Khabur
River. It was only when we got to the top of the hill that we realized the
Khabur River has moved about a mile to the east since 1915. Perhaps because
of the number of bodies in it. There must have been heavy rainstorms; I was
wondering around what must have been once an island in the river. Isabel
[the photographer] was walking down a newly cut hillside. She said: `Robert,
Robert come here.’ I went across the top of the hill. At first I thought
she was in trouble. As I walked towards her I saw the side of the hill was
lined with skeletons. Some of them with bits of materials on the bones. They
were tied together. I used my car key to pull the skull . . . there were
teeth of young people, of women and children, as well as men. So, we found
the killing fields.
Later on they took me up to these caves where the Turks had lit bonfires
outside to set the smoke into [the caves] and to asphyxiate Armenians in the
world’s first gas chambers. We made a huge report on this and, off course,
endured the usual hate mail from Turkey. At that time, we are talking about
1993, it wasn’t normal for British newspaper or any newspaper to do a big
investigation on the Armenian Holocaust. I saw it as an outrageous
injustice. You know the Jews of Europe have quite rightly received
compensation for their Holocaust. The Germans have owned up and constantly
apologized for that Holocaust. But the Turks don’t want admit to the
Armenian Genocide. They paid nothing, and they went on saying that it was
the fault of the victims and that there was no Genocide, anyway. I still
think that unless there is full acknowledgment by the Turkish authorities
that their Ottoman Turkish predecessors carried out the Holocaust/Genocide .
. . I think the outrageous nature of the denial of this Genocide–as a
political issue – is almost as deplorable as the actual genocide originally.
It’s outrageous that the American press, which exposed the original
Genocide, should have spent so many years recently giving the Turkish point
of view and denials. It is a shameful piece of journalism. Can you imagine
running a story saying that 6 million Jews died in Europe and many Germans
say it did not happen. We will never write that; we will never dream of
that.
AB : As a journalist, why you think that the international media has a
double standard when it comes to the Armenian Genocide – even though some of
these newspapers, you mentioned the New York Times, and here in Canada the
Globe and Mail, have plenty of archives on this issue.
RF: You know, the Globe and Mail carried an article by me about the Genocide
and deleted the word `Genocide’ and included `tragedy.’ When I talked to
them I was told that it was done by an editor… as if that is an excuse.
AB: Why do you think so much of the international media has a double
slandered on this topic?
RF: Because Turkey is in NATO and because the media have this balancing act.
They don’t associate the Genocide with the Holocaust. That is why I call it
the Armenian Holocaust. Also, because journalists think they are giving
balance to everything. Anyone who denied anything gets in the newspaper his
denial. He gets 50% of the story. Which is ridiculous. We wouldn’t allow the
Germans to deny the Jewish Holocaust; why would we allow the Turks to deny
the Armenian Holocaust? And it is also the gutless sense of American
journalism, to go along with the authorities. The attitude is this: since
the U.S administration is not prepared to call it a Genocide that’s
sufficient for us not mess with our Turkish allies our, NATO ally. Right? We
need them for their air bases. So, why upset them? Look what happened to
France. The moment the National Assembly brought the Armenian Genocide to
the table and said it happened, they lost so much, so many economic
agreements [between Turkey and major French companies] including weapon
agreements were cancelled. Lockheed and Boeing are not going to support the
recognition of the Armenian Genocide. So it is very much an economic thing.
The fact that the New York Times, which exposed the Armenian Genocide in the
first place, should now spend so many paragraphs to Turkish denials is
amazing.
AB: Do you think that the concept of uniqueness of the Holocaust in certain
circles within the Jewish community and the Jewish diaspora has anything to
do with the issue of the recognition of the Armenian Genocide?
RF: We know that Shimon Perez has publicly stated it was not Genocide. It is
in my book. He was admonished, quite rightly so, by Israel Charny, the
Holocaust scholar. He [Charny] does not want to be associated with the Perez
statement. Mr. Charny is a very moral man. Over and over again, even the
Israeli ambassador to Yerevan announced that it was not Genocide.
The Armenian Genocide issue is very straightforward. It happened, and people
are denying it and those who deny it are wrong. I told the San Francisco
Bay Area Armenian Community four, five years ago, that there was one way to
turn the story around – changing the narrative back to reality. It’s for
Armenians to honour those brave Turks who helped Armenians during the
Genocide. Here are these brave Turks . . . we dare the Turks to honour their
brave men…
AB: You are right. Many Turks did help Armenians during the Genocide.
RF: I have suggested to Armenians to do what the Israelis do – honour brave
Gentiles who saved Jews. Let’s honour Turks who helped the Armenians, who
upheld the honour of the Turkish nation when the Turkish Government was
destroying its own Armenians. I don’t know what the Armenians have done
[about this idea]. The Turkish Government will have a big problem if this
becomes a major issue. Are they to honour brave Turks who upheld the honour
of their nation or are they to despise them and honour the men who destroyed
the honour of the nation by killing the Armenians? These are major moral
issues. I don’t think at the moment that Armenians have really looked on
this issue the way they might. But again, it’s for Armenians to decide. I am
not Armenian.
AB: When it comes to Armenian Genocide denial, you least expect the Israeli
state to be a party to denial. Their policy on such a moral issue is ironic,
considering the Jewish Holocaust and its deniers.
RF: Israel puts Israel first as Armenians put Armenians first. But the fact
that you have someone like Shimon Perez adopting the Turkish line on the
Armenian Genocide is astonishing. It is not astonishing because the Israelis
demand the uniqueness of the Jewish Holocaust. It is unique in terms of
numbers but in terms of structural, political, direct physical relationship
the Armenian Genocide is Genocide as is the Holocaust. It was a clear
attempt to eliminate the Armenian people as a people, as a nation. It was
similar to the Holocaust. Turks managed to do their best to thrash
Morgenthau. But look at all the other reports. Look at the photographs. Look
at Armin Wagner’s pictures. I point, in my book, documents never quoted
before – from Britons, showing the women walking naked to Deir ezz Zor.
British readers wrote to me, with their long-dead fathers’ notebooks,
written in their handwriting about this material. They were never published
before. They did not tell a lie. They were not dreaming when they wrote in
their notebooks.
AB: Is it the economic, military, intelligence alliance between Turkey and
Israel that makes Israel join Turkey in denying the Armenian Genocide?
RF: And Turkey and the United States.
AB: There are many righteous Jews in support of Armenian Genocide
recognition.
RF: Yes there are. Armenians who live in Jerusalem and speak Hebrew call it
the Armenian Shoah, the Hebrew word for Holocaust. The Jerusalem Post wrote
fine articles about the Armenian Genocide. And The Jerusalem Post being
pretty right wing Israeli paper.
AB: You now see many countries coming forward, acknowledging the fact of the
Genocide. Even Germany recently passed a very strong resolution, even though
they did not use the word Genocide.
RF: You are getting there. You are getting there, slowly but surely.
AB: Can we conclude that these current alliances and denials are not based
on moral or historical facts but on short-term political and economic
factors?
RF: Of course. Of course.
AB: There are some Europeans who are using the issue of Armenian Genocide as
a pretext to block Turkey’s entry to the European Union. Under the
circumstances, wouldn’t it be wiser for the Turkish Government to come to
terms with the Armenian Genocide issue?
RF: Of course it would. You know, an increasing number of Turks are
admitting it. I gave a lecture in Sabanci University [Istanbul] a year ago
and mentioned the Armenian Genocide. A former Turkish army colonel stood up
at the end and said: `You are right.’ When I was covering the Turkish
earthquake, in 1999, I talked to large number of seismologists and civil
servants. During a big dinner gathering in Istanbul, I raised the Genocide
issue. `You are absolutely right. It happened. We did it. We should
acknowledge it,’ they all said.
AB: Why is it that they do not come forward?
RF: Because of ultra-nationalist arrogance. Because the ultra-nationalist
elements in the Turkish society, which identify with Moustafa Kamal Ataturk,
altough Ataturk himself, in interviews, said that the people responsible for
the Genocide should be hanged. He knew it had happened. `Our Christian
citizens,’ he called Armenians. There is a newspaper interview with him
which I have a copy in English.
AB: Is it the Los Angeles Examiner interview?
RF: Yes.
AB: You know, some Turks now deny that Ataturk did give such an interview.
RF: I have the original. I have seen the original newspaper and I have a
photocopy. It is real, of course.
AB: Recently we have witnessed some Turkish scholars and intellectuals
questioning the Turkish Government’s policy of denial. Some have been
threatened, blackmailed . . .
RF: They have suffered for it. They have suffered for it.
AB: What do you think of this phenomenon? How far it will go?
RF: They cannot be stopped. Once you open the door to discussion, you cannot
close the door again. People lose their fear. If any element loses its fear
you can not inject fear into it again. Once historical scholarship loses its
fear . . . you cannot lock it back again. So, it is out of the bag. The door
is open. You can only move forward. You can not go back. Even if you lock up
all the scholars it becomes bigger strain and there will be more scholars.
It is little bit like water coming under the door. You can seal the bottom
of the door, but eventually it will come from the top of the door. Why it
happened [Turkish scholars researching the Armenian Genocide]? I don’t know.
I hate journalists who talk through the top of their heads on subjects like
that. I am sure it’s like the situation in the U.S. where Turkish
scholarship has contaminated American universities through the system of
Turkish Government sponsorship of chairs of Turkish studies. So more and
more Turkish academics, younger academics, have been trained to work abroad
and learn the necessity of starting scholarship outside the politically
accepted dogma. I will give you practical example. A young Turkish girl who
must remain anonymous. She was a student who came to work in America. And by
chance she lived in a U.S. city with a large Armenian community. She started
to take an interest in the Genocide. Until then she had believed that what
had happened in 1915 was a civil war. Armenians had suffered; Muslims had
suffered. Then she started interviewing Armenians. And talking to Armenians
she realized that there was a genocide. She started cataloguing the stories
of the Armenians in Turkish. Two years ago she turned out in southeast
England, to talk to a very old lady who had seen children set on fire by
Turkish gendarmes. I interviewed her. She is in my book. In the book I
mentioned the letter she had received from a Turkish woman who said that she
was so sorry for what her people had done. That Turkish woman is preserving
the Genocide records in Turkey in Turkish.
So it is out. You cannot go back no matter how the nationalist opposition
fights it.
AB: What do you think of the Turkish integration into the European Union?
Will the Genocide recognition play a big role whether Turkey is admitted?
RF: The problem around the European issue is this: Europeans who don’t want
Turkey in the European Union will use the issue of the Armenian Genocide not
for your view but for there’s. You might think they would stand up for
freedom of information and force the Turks to indulge in the truth. They
will be working from the principle that the Turks will not recognize the
truth. Therefore, they will keep them out of the European Union. That is a
big danger for Armenians. You will have `friends’ of the Armenians who
demand Turkish recognition of the Armenian Genocide as a condition of entry
to the European Union, in the hope that the Turks would refuse to recognize
and thus Europeans will be able to keep Muslim Turkey out. That’s about
their interests. My theory is that if Turkey joins the European Union many
Armenians, who have European passport, can claim compensation for the
property taken from their ancestors.
AB: Did you receive complaints about your writings on the Armenian Genocide?
RF: Yes. I have received anonymous phone calls from Turks; probably calling
from London, saying `why do you hate the Turkish people?’ I had one or two
complaints from the Turkish Embassy sent to my paper. But we reply most
vigorously to them, saying `don’t waste our time writing letters and saying
the truth isn’t the truth.’
AB: Armenians in the diaspora are facing an uphill struggle, lobbying to
bringing this matter to the attention of the international community.
RF: You have done a lot better than the Palestinians. The Armenian diaspora
is very wealthy, compared to other minorities whose history has been denied.
AB: What do you think of the reconciliation talks between Turks and
Armenians, without Turkish Government’s acknowledgment of the Genocide?
RF: It sounds strange to me. Unless the Turkish Government recognizes the
Genocide what you got to reconcile about?
Intensive Course in Facial Surgery PR
PRESS RELEASE
Armenian Association of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Microsurgery
58 Abovyan St.
Yerevan, Armenia
Contact: Gevorg Yaghjyan MD, PhD
Secretary General
Tel: (37410) 560636
E-mail: [email protected]
Web:
Intensive Course in Facial Surgery
Yerevan, April 21-22, 2006
Armeni an Association of Plastic Reconstructive Surgery and
Microsurgery(AAPRSM), as well as the Yerevan State Medical University
will organized an Intensive Course in “Facial Surgery ”
The symposium will take place on April 21-22, in the Conference Hall
of the Yerevan State Medical University. About 60 ENT, maxillofacial
surgeons and reconstructive surgeon from different hospitals of
Yerevan will attend.
The symposium will be lead by Dr. Artavazd Sahakyan MD, PhD – the
president of AAPRSM and invited lecturer Dr. Der-Sarkisian Raffi MD
from Boston Facial Group
Dr. Der-Sarkisian board certified Facial Plastic and Reconstructive
Surgeon, Assistant Clinical Professor of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck
Surgery Boston University School of Medicine
Author of many articles abstracts, and book chapters
The lectures will be dedicated to Reconstruction of the Nose, Scalp
and Lip, as also in the using a technologies in reconstructive surgery
of the face .
The goal of the symposium is to present the latest information,
the experience and knowledge of the international faculty members to
Armenian doctors.
Symposium is open for all doctors, resident and student upon the
registration on the web site:
We hope that the program of this kind will be continued in the future
and help to enhance the professional level of local specialists
through the gained theoretical knowledge and discussions.
AAPRSM is a non-for-profit organization of medical professionals,
aimed at improving the health care system of the community and
advancing medical sciences in Armenia.
NEWS: Activist Appointed to LA Human Relations Commission
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Armenian National Committee of America – Western Region
104 North Belmont Street, Suite 200
Glendale, California 91206
Phone: 818.500.1918 Fax: 818.246.7353
[email protected]
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
PRESS RELEASE +++ PRESS RELEASE
For Immediate Release: Monday, April 17, 2006
Contact: Armen Carapetian
Tel: (818) 500-1918
DEIRMENJIAN’S DIVERSE BACKGROUND LANDS HIM SEAT ON LA HUMAN RELATIONS
COMMISSION
— ANCA Activist Chosen to Serve on Commission’s Advisory Committee
LOS ANGELES, CA – Los Angeles City Council President Eric Garcetti has
appointed Raffe Deirmenjian to serve on the city’s Human Relations
Commission Advisory Committee that strives to promote positive race
and human relation in the increasingly complex and multicultural county
of Los Angeles, reported the Armenian National Committee of America –
Western Region (ANCA-WR).
Deirmenjian, a member of the West San Fernando Valley ANCA, has
worked diligently to have the Armenian Genocide included in the Los
Angeles Unified School District’s curriculum, and during a time of
racial conflict at local Grant High School, worked with students and
administrators to successfully settle the conflict. ANCA-WR Chairman
Steven Dadaian described Deirmenjian as an ideal candidate for the
position.
“Having worked closely within the ANCA, Raffe has the necessary
background in not only managing human relations, but also grasping
the ideals that help to overcome prejudice, bias, and other divisive
attitudes that can lead to inter-cultural tension,” said Dadaian.
The Commission teams with law enforcement, schools, cities,
community-based organizations, youth, academics, policy makers,
businesses and other leaders, to bring key players together to resolve
immediate inter-cultural conflicts.
“It’s rare to find a person with such a diverse background,” stressed
Dadaian who points to Derimenjian’s current position as a Second Vice
President of Wealth Management at Smith Barney, who also carries
education in political science and business marketing and has five
years of hands-on experience on Wall Street, coupled with consistent
and practical public policy experience within the ANCA. “He fits the
ideal profile to serve on this Commission whose mission is to lay the
groundwork for a long-term campaign to eradicate unfair practices,
while working within the system,” remarked Dadaian.
Also appointed to the Human Relations Commission Advisory Committee
were Vicky Ortega, Karen Hallock, Al Garcia, and Jose Roberto
Hernandez.
The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) is the largest
and most influential Armenian American grassroots political
organization. Working in coordination with a network of offices,
chapters, and supporters throughout the United States and affiliated
organizations around the world, the ANCA actively advances the concerns
of the Armenian American community on a broad range of issues.
#####
The Facts And Forces That Drive Syria
THE FACTS AND FORCES THAT DRIVE SYRIA
Canberra Times – Australasia
Apr 17, 2006
Full Name: Syrian Arab Republic Capital: Damascus Location: Syria is
in the Middle East, bordering Lebanon and Turkey Border countries:
Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey Area: 185,180sqkm Highest
point: Mount Hermon, 2814m Oceans: The western coastline meets the
Mediterranean Sea Coastlines: 193km Population: 18,881,361 Population
growth rate: 2.3 per cent Life expectancy: Total population: 70.32
years.
Male: 69.01 years, female: 71.7 years Natural resources: Petroleum,
phosphates, chrome and manganese ores, asphalt, iron ore, rock salt,
marble, gypsum, hydropower Languages: Arabic (official); Kurdish,
Armenian, Aramaic, Circassian, and French and English is understood
Ethnicity: Arab 90.3 per cent, Kurds, Armenians, and other 9.7 per
cent Religion: Sunni Muslim, Alawite, Druze, Christian and Jewish
Labor force: Agriculture 30 per cent, industry 27 per cent, services
43 per cent Unemployment rate: 12.3 per cent Industries: Petroleum,
textiles, food processing, beverages, tobacco, phosphate rock mining
Crops: Wheat, barley, cotton, lentils, chickpeas, olives, sugar beets
Livestock: Beef, mutton, eggs, poultry, milk Exports: Crude oil,
petroleum products, fruits and vegetables, cotton fiber, clothing,
meat and live animals Currency: Syrian pound.
A PBS Documentary Makes Its Case For The Armenian Genocide,With Or W
A PBS DOCUMENTARY MAKES ITS CASE FOR THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE, WITH OR WITHOUT A DEBATE
New York Times
April 17 2006
TV Review
It is impossible to debate a subject like genocide without giving
offense. PBS is supposed to give offense responsibly.
Photo: Two Cats Productions
A scene from “The Armenian Genocide” on PBS; a follow-up panel will
not be shown on many PBS stations.
Readers’ Opinions
Forum: Television
And that was the idea behind a panel discussion that PBS planned
to show after tonight’s broadcast of “The Armenian Genocide,”
a documentary about the extermination of more than one million
Armenians by the Turkish Ottoman Empire during World War I.
The powerful hourlong film will be shown on most of the 348 PBS
affiliate stations. But nearly a third of those stations decided to
cancel the follow-up discussion after an intense lobbying campaign
by Armenian groups and some members of Congress.
The protesters complained that the panel of four experts, moderated
by Scott Simon, host of “Weekend Edition Saturday” on NPR, included
two scholars who defend the Turkish government’s claim that a genocide
never took place. The outrage over their inclusion was an indication
of how passionately Armenians feel about the issue; they have battled
for decades to draw attention to the genocide.
But the fact that so many stations caved is a measure of something
else: PBS’s growing vulnerability to pressure and, perhaps accordingly,
the erosion of viewers’ trust in public television.
The camera lends legitimacy, but as Senator Joseph R. McCarthy’s
performance on Edward R. Murrow’s “See It Now” famously showed, it
also can undermine credibility. Panel discussions in particular give
people with outlandish views a hearing – and also an opportunity to
expose the flaws in their arguments.
That is certainly the case with the discussion program “Armenian
Genocide: Exploring the Issues.” It turns out that there is only one
articulate voice arguing that Armenians died not in a genocide but
in a civil war between Christians and Muslims – that of Justin A.
McCarthy, a history professor at the University of Louisville. His
Turkish counterpart, Omer Turan, an associate professor at the Middle
East Technical University in Ankara, tries ardently to back him up,
but his English is not good enough to make a dent. And the two other
experts, Peter Balakian, a humanities professor at Colgate University,
and Taner Akcam, a visiting professor of history at the University
of Minnesota and a well-known defender of human rights in Turkey,
lucidly pick Mr. McCarthy’s points apart.
Mr. Balakian, who is one of the experts cited in the documentary,
gets the last word. “If we are going to pretend that a stateless
Christian minority population, unarmed, is somehow in a capacity to
kill people in an aggressive way that is tantamount to war, or civil
war,” Mr. Balakian says, “we’re living in the realm of the absurd.”
Tone and appearance on television can be as persuasive as
talk. Mr. McCarthy mostly sounds condescending and defensive, while
Mr. Balakian is smooth and keeps his cool.
“The Armenian Genocide ” which was made by Andrew Goldberg in
association with Oregon Public Broadcasting, does not ignore the
Turkish government’s denial, or its repression of dissidents in Turkey
who try to expound another point of view. One of the film’s merits
is that it tries to explain both the circumstances that led to the
atrocities of 1915 and the reasons why Turkish officials are still
so determined to keep that period unexplored. “There is a feeling
that Turkey would be putting itself permanently in the company
of Adolf Hitler,” Samantha Power, the author of “A Problem >>From
Hell: America and the Age of Genocide,” says. “That same stain would
envelop Turkey as it seeks, of course, to be a major player on the
international stage.”
Several of the experts in the film, including Turkish scholars,
argue that because Turkey is seeking admission to the European Union,
its leaders will eventually have to bend to international will and
acknowledge responsibility. But official Turkish denial remains fierce,
and intellectuals and even well-known writers like Orhan Pamuk can
still be brought to trial for mentioning the treatment of Armenians
and Kurds.
The documentary, which is partly narrated by Julianna Margulies,
Ed Harris and others, includes rare clips of Turkish scholars
acknowledging the anti-Armenian campaign as genocide as well as Turkish
villagers recounting their ancestors’ stories about participating in
the killings. “They caught Armenians and put them in a barn and burned
them,” a man in a town in eastern Turkey says to an interviewer. There
are also shots of ordinary Turks who insist their ancestors were
incapable of that level of barbarity.
Mostly, however, the film painstakingly makes the case that a genocide
did take place, relying on archival photographs, victims’ memoirs
and the horrified first-hand accounts of diplomats, missionaries and
reporters. The forced deportations and killings did not take place
unnoticed – public figures like Theodore Roosevelt and H. L. Mencken
spoke out about the horrors. In 1915, The New York Times published
145 stories about the systematic slaughter of Armenians.
Even after World War II, the fate of Turkey’s Armenian population was
high on the list of crimes against humanity. The film includes a clip
from a 1949 CBS interview with Raphael Lemkin, a law professor who
in 1943 coined the term genocide. “I became interested in genocide
because it happened so many times,” he tells the CBS commentator
Quincy Howe. “First to the Armenians, then after the Armenians,
Hitler took action.”
The documentary honors the victims of the Armenian genocide and also
pays tribute to dissidents in Turkey who are brave enough to speak
out despite government censorship. And that makes it all the odder
that so many public television stations here censored the follow-up
program as soon as a few lobby groups complained.
The Armenian Genocide
PBS, tonight at 10 Eastern and Pacific times; 9 p.m., Central time.
Written, directed and produced by Andrew Goldberg. Produced by Two
Cats Productions in association with Oregon Public Broadcasting.
Narrated by Julianna Margulies, Ed Harris, Natalie Portman, Laura
Linney and Orlando Bloom.
evision/17stan.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx= 1145253012-5IP/u2P2UMOiY01zgtOe0A&oref=login
CPTV Shows Genocide Documentary
CPTV SHOWS GENOCIDE DOCUMENTARY
Hartford Courant,
April 17 2006
The Turkish government still denies the overwhelming evidence of the
first genocide of the 20th century: more than 1 million Armenians
killed by Ottoman Turks during World War I.
A new documentary, “The Armenian Genocide” (CPTV, 10 p.m.), lays
out the record in a way that should allay any doubts. But a planned
panel discussion that was to have accompanied the film was scotched,
in part because it was to include a denier.
[parts omitted]
Palestinian Conference Concludes Its Work In Tehran
PALESTINIAN CONFERENCE CONCLUDES ITS WORK IN TEHRAN
IRNA website
16 Apr 06
Tehran, 16 April: The Third International Conference on Qods and
Support for the Rights of Palestinian People concluded its work here
on Sunday [16 April].
The final declaration of the conference was read by MP from Tehran and
head of the committee in charge of codification of the declaration,
Hoseyn Sheykholeslam.
The conference kicked off here Friday evening with a keynote speech
by the supreme leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed
Ali Khamene’i.
President Mahmud Ahmadinezhad, Majlis Speaker Gholamali Haddad-Adel,
judiciary chief Mahmud Hashemi-Shahrudi as well as domestic and foreign
political and cultural figures participated in the opening ceremony
of the conference, organized upon the initiative of the supreme leader.
The conference was attended by 600 foreign officials including 20
parliament speakers from Syria, Lebanon, Algeria, Sudan, Indonesia,
Uganda, Cameroon, Congo, Zimbabwe, Sierra Leon, Cuba, Comoros,
Madagascar, Malaysia, Qatar, Mauritania, Mauritius, the Seychelles,
Sri Lanka and Guinea.
Eleven parliament vice-Speakers from Libya, Palestine, Jordan,
Morocco, Bahrain, Oman, Tunisia, the Philippines, Gambia, Togo and
Senegal were also present in the conference.
Representatives from parliaments of South Africa, Kuwait, Russia,
Mexico, Kenya, Somalia, Benin, Mali, Bosnia, Armenia and Albania were
among other participants in the conference.
Political figures, personalities, intellectuals discussed Palestine
issues from different points of view as the most basic issue of the
Islamic world.
Over 200 foreign reporters residing in Tehran along with 50 foreign
and 200 domestic reporters covered the conference.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress