Why White House woos Azerbaijan

From: “Alexanian, Moorad”
Subject: Why White House woos Azerbaijan
from the April 28, 2006 edition –
html
Why White House woos Azerbaijan
President Ilham Aliyev’s visit to Washington Friday comes as the
country’s oil and geography make it increasingly important.
By Brendan Hoffman | Contributor to The Christian Science Monitor

WASHINGTON – In the boxing ring of international diplomacy and
influence, Azerbaijan punches above its weight.
Coming at the White House’s invitation, Azerbaijan’s President Ilham
Aliyev will meet Friday with top administration officials – including
President Bush – in his first official visit to the US since taking
office in a widely criticized election in October 2003
The visit, analysts say, is part of a broader effort by the Bush
administration to gain support in a key region in the face of a
growing confrontation with Iran, particularly from Muslim countries.
But Azerbaijan’s history of corruption and its poor human rights
record have raised eyebrows about strengthening ties with the Central
Asian country, and many point to oil as another driving factor in the
relationship.
The visit is “a little anomalous,” admits Cory Welt, deputy director
of the Russia and Eurasia program at the Center for Strategic and
International Studies, though he adds that there are “a number of
reasons why Azerbaijan is of particular interest to the US now.”
The predominantely Shiite Muslim country of 8 million shares a
380-mile border with Iran, with whom it retains close economic and
cultural links, though it maintains its political distance. That
geographical position makes Azerbaijan a natural ally for the US, said
Azeri Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov on a recent visit to
Washington.
“The US is improving its relations with all countries on Iran’s
periphery,” explains Ariel Cohen, senior research fellow at the
Heritage Foundation. “In case economic sanctions or other measures are
to be taken on the Iran issue, we should have a better relationship
with Azerbaijan than the other side.”
Dr. Welt adds that soured relations with Uzbekistan, home to a key US
military base, impelled the US to develop other potential military
allies in the region.
But many experts point to a different key factor: oil. A major oil
pipeline stretching 1,000 miles from Azerbaijan’s capital of Baku
through Georgia to the Turkish port of Ceyhan on the Mediterranean was
recently completed and the first tanker ship will be filled this
summer. A natural-gas pipeline is being constructed parallel to the
so-called BTC (Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan) oil pipeline, designed to deliver
upward of a million barrels of oil a day.
Azerbaijan’s location may become even more pivotal if a plan to extend
the pipeline eastward to provide an outlet for gas and oil from
Kazakhstan, currently under negotiation, bears fruit. Vice President
Cheney will travel to Kazakhstan to meet President Nazarbayev in early
May.
With oil prices at record highs, Azerbaijan’s state oil company will
soon see an unprecedented influx of cash. The government has
established a special fund to manage the extra oil revenue, and
President Aliyev has indicated that the money will be used for
military budget and citizen benefits such as improving living
conditions for internally displaced persons.
Up to a million Azeris fled their homes in the autonomous
Nagorno-Karabakh territory during fighting in the early 1990s with
Armenian soldiers, who remain there. More than 100,000 still live in
refugee camps while tensions simmer under a cease-fire agreement.
While some experts have expressed concern that the conflict could boil
over and draw in other countries, more international attention has
been focused on Azerbaijan’s poor governance.
The US vocally criticized its elections last fall, one in a string of
polls held since gaining independence from the Soviets in 1991 that
have not met international standards.
According to Transparency International, an anticorruption watchdog
group, Azerbaijan is one of the most corrupt countries in the
world. And human rights groups like Amnesty International have
criticized forceful responses to political protests and politically
motivated arrests. This week, Human Rights Watch called on President
Bush to push for concrete improvements to Azerbaijan’s human rights
record.
But if the US is to leverage the two countries’ growing closeness to
promote change in Azerbaijan, it will have to be “much more upfront
and harsher with [Aliyev],” says Charles King, a professor of foreign
service and government at Georgetown University in Washington.
| Copyright © 2006 The Christian Science
Monitor. All rights reserved.

www.csmonitor.com

CURRENT REALITY SUGGESTS RECOGNITION OF NKR

CURRENT REALITY SUGGESTS RECOGNITION OF NKR
Lragir.am
25 April 06

The joint statement of the parliamentary groups and factions of the
National Assembly of Nagorno Karabakh Republic on the settlement of
the Karabakh-Azerbaijani conflict
The parliamentary factions of Democracy and Hayrenik and the
parliamentary group ARF-Movement 88 of the National Assembly of
Nagorno Karabakh Republic,
reporting
compliance of the Declaration of Nagorno Karabakh Republic and all the
legal and political steps, emanating from the NKR Declaration, with
the tenets of the international law and the legislation of the USSR;
emphasizing
that the Azerbaijani Republic did not use the opportunity to settle
all its problems with Nagorno Karabakh Republic through a dialogue,
and carried out a policy of ethnic intolerance, resorted to coercion,
and it has not given up the policy of resolving the conflict through
military means so far;
noting that
the peoples involved in the conflict suffered tremendous human and
material losses, and are still endangered by resumption of the armed
confrontation and its unpredictable consequences;
announcing
they are responsible for about half a million Armenians displaced by
violence and massacres in the former Soviet Socialist Republic of
Azerbaijan;
asserting
commitment to an overall resolution of the existing issues through
negotiations, which would enable preventing hostilities, and efforts
to change the agreements through force,
define the armed Karabakh-Azerbaijani conflict of 1991-1994 as
aggression of the Azerbaijani Republic against Nagorno Karabakh
Republic, further actions of NKR as self-defense of people which
underwent aggression, observation of the indivisible right set down in
Article 51 of the UN Conventions, and the current reality of the
conflict area as the consequences of this aggression;
find that Azerbaijan as an aggressor is responsible for the war it
waged and its consequences, the fate of hundreds of thousands of
people of the conflict parties displaced by military actions, and
internally displaced persons, therefore it has to pay material and
moral damages, considering the factor of loss of homeland, independent
of ethnic identity;
starting
from the 1994 protocol of Bishkek on the ceasefire and the pact signed
in the same year, ratified by the envoys of Nagorno Karabakh Republic,
Azerbaijan, Armenia and the mediators, as well as the conclusions of
the OSCE Summit in Budapest and other documents in which Nagorno
Karabakh was recognized as a conflict party;
invite the OSCE Ministerial Council to honor the equal participation
of Nagorno Karabakh Republic in the talks for the settlement of the
conflict, for any agreement without NKR cannot have legal force;
believe that the recognition of independent, democratic and viable
Nagorno Karabakh Republic, established under the results of the
universal referendum of December 10, 1991, by the international
community is the current reality and will become an important factor
of regional stability and security;
inform the OSCE Chairman-in-Office, the parliaments of the OSCE Minsk
Group members, the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, the Council of Europe,
NATO, the European Parliament.
On behalf of the parliamentary factions of Democracy and Hayrenik and
ARF-Movement 88 parliamentary group of the National Assembly of
Nagorno Karabakh Republic about the adoption of this document,
Vahram ATANESYAN
Arayik HARUTIUNYAN
Armen SARGSYAN
Stepanakert
NKR
21 April, 2006

Lyon: source de polemiques,le memorial du genocide armenien inaugure

Agence France Presse
23 avril 2006 dimanche
Lyon: source de polémiques, le mémorial du génocide arménien inauguré
lundi (AVANT-PAPIER)
LYON 23 avr 2006
Le mémorial lyonnais du génocide arménien, objet de vives polémiques
ainsi que d’une récente profanation, est inauguré lundi après-midi,
jour de la commémoration du 91e anniversaire d’un génocide reconnu en
janvier 2001 par l’Etat français mais qui reste nié par la Turquie.
Plusieurs milliers de participants sont attendus dans le centre de
Lyon lors de cette manifestation qui fera l’objet de dépôts de gerbe
et discours, dont celui d’un responsable de l’Union des étudiants
juifs de France (UEJF), le mémorial ayant vocation, selon ses
concepteurs, à rendre hommage aux victimes de tous les génocides du
XXe siècle.
Vendredi et samedi, un colloque international sur “les mémoires
partagées des génocides et des crimes contre l’humanité” est par
ailleurs organisé à Lyon, par le collectif d’associations
Reconnaissance.
“Certaines choses nous ont éprouvés, alors nous sommes heureux
d’arriver à l’inauguration”, a déclaré à l’AFP Jules Mardirossian,
président de l’Association pour le mémorial lyonnais du génocide
arménien et du collectif Reconnaissance, au terme d’une construction
ponctuée de polémiques.
La plus vive a éclaté le 18 mars après l’apparition de slogans
négationnistes – “Non au mémorial d’un prétendu génocide”, “Il n’y a
jamais eu de génocide arménien” – lors d’une manifestation
pro-turque.
Critiqué pour avoir autorisé le défilé, dont le télescopage avec un
rassemblement anti-CPE avait provoqué des heurts, le préfet du Rhône
avait indiqué que tout autre cortège de ce type serait interdit.
Le 18 avril, la polémique a toutefois rebondi avec la profanation du
mémorial, toujours sur la base de slogans négationnistes.
Outre les représentants de la communauté arménienne, cette
profanation de 5 des 26 stèles du monument a entraîné de vives
condamnations, notamment dans le monde politique, par le PS et le
ministre de l’Intérieur Nicolas Sarkozy.
Entre-temps, le mémorial, érigé Place Antonin Poncet, dans le IIe
arrondissement, a également fait l’objet d’une “guérilla juridique”,
selon les termes de la mairie centrale, de la part de riverains
opposés “par esthétisme” à sa construction.
Malgré une brève suspension des travaux, l’inauguration a néanmoins
pu être maintenue au 24 avril, date à laquelle une célébration
identique a lieu à Marseille. Selon la fédération euro-arménienne
pour la justice et la démocratie, au moins 500.000 personnes
d’origine arménienne vivent en France. M. Mardirossian estime que
80.000 Arméniens résident dans la région Rhône-Alpes.
“Si on dénombre une trentaine de mémoriaux arméniens en France, c’est
sans doute celui de Lyon qui émerge le plus dans l’espace public. Il
est en coeur de ville, dans un lieu très passant”, avance Jules
Mardirossian pour justifier la controverse inédite autour du mémorial
lyonnais.
Conséquence de cette polémique, le groupe socialiste à l’Assemblée
nationale a annoncé qu’il allait déposer une proposition de loi afin
de compléter la loi du 29 janvier 2001, dans laquelle l’Etat français
reconnaît le génocide arménien mais ne prévoit pas de poursuites pour
propos négationnistes.
De 1915 à 1917, les massacres et déportations d’Arméniens sous
l’empire Ottoman ont fait 1,5 million de morts, selon les Arméniens,
entre 300.000 et 500.000, selon Ankara qui rejette catégoriquement la
qualification de génocide.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Bush’s Presidential Message

Whitehouse.gov (press release), DC
April 24, 2006
/04/20060424-8.html
Presidential Message
April 24, 2006
Today, we remember one of the horrible tragedies of the 20th century
— the mass killings and forced exile of as many as 1.5 million
Armenians in the final days of the Ottoman Empire in 1915. This was a
tragedy for all humanity and one that we and the world must never
forget.
We mourn this terrible chapter of history and recognize that it
remains a source of pain for people in Armenia and for all those who
believe in freedom, tolerance, and the dignity and value of every
human life. It is a credit to the human spirit and generations of
Armenians who live in Armenia, America, and around the globe that
they have overcome this suffering and proudly preserved their
centuries-old culture, traditions, and religion.
We praise the individuals in Armenia and Turkey who have sought to
examine the historical events of this time with honesty and
sensitivity. The analysis by the International Center for
Transitional Justice, while not the final word, has made a
significant contribution toward deepening our understanding of these
events. We encourage dialogues, including through joint commissions,
that strive for a shared understanding of these tragic events and
move Armenia and Turkey towards normalized relations.
Today, we look with hope to a bright future for Armenia. Armenia’s
Millennium Challenge Compact reflects our confidence and the
importance we place in Armenia making progress on democratic reform
and advancement of free markets. We seek to help Armenia bolster its
security and deepen its inclusion in the Euro-Atlantic family. We
remain committed to securing a peaceful and lasting settlement of the
Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and hope the leaders of Armenia and
Azerbaijan will take bold steps to achieve this goal.
On this solemn day of remembrance, Laura and I express our deepest
condolences to the Armenian people. Our nations stand together,
determined to create a future of peace, prosperity, and freedom for
the citizens of our countries and the world.
GEORGE W. BUSH

Inauguration chargee d’emotion pour le memorial du genocide armenien

Agence France Presse
24 avril 2006 lundi 7:22 PM GMT
Inauguration chargée d’émotion pour le mémorial du génocide arménien
à Lyon (ACTUALISATION, PAPIER GENERAL)
LYON 24 avr 2006
Le mémorial du génocide arménien à Lyon a été inauguré dans le
recueillement et dans l’émotion, lundi après-midi dans le centre de
la ville, en présence de 3.000 à 4.000 personnes.
L’inauguration du mémorial, objet de polémiques et d’une profanation
durant sa construction, s’est déroulée dans le calme. Un dispositif
de sécurité, important mais jugé “classique” par la police pour une
manifestation de ce type, avait été déployé.
La célébration a débuté vers 16H40 sur la grande Place Bellecour.
Gérard Collomb, sénateur-maire (PS) de Lyon, accompagné de
l’ambassadeur d’Arménie en France, Edward Nalbandian, et de Jules
Mardirossian, président de l’association pour le mémorial du génocide
des Arméniens, ont déposé une première gerbe de fleurs.
Ils ont été suivis par Dominique Perben, ministre des Transports – et
candidat déclaré UMP aux prochaines municipales à Lyon – qui a déposé
la seconde gerbe au nom du président de la République Jacques Chirac.
Le cortège, composé de personnes de tous ges et arborant des
drapeaux français et arméniens, a ensuite pris le chemin de la Place
Antonin Poncet, où a été érigé le mémorial, sous les clameurs: “Ni
haine, ni vengeance: justice pour le peuple arménien”, “Nous voulons
la reconnaissance, 91 ans de silence”.
L’architecte concepteur du monument, Leonardo Basmadyian, un des
premiers à prendre le parole, a déclaré, au bord des larmes: “Nous
offrons ce monument aux passants afin qu’ils comprennent notre
douleur et puisse la partager avec nous”.
Ponctuée de chants, la cérémonie a ensuite donné lieu à un discours
enflammé du maire de Lyon. “Le temps du silence, de l’indifférence,
de l’effacement et de la négation est définitivement révolu (…), le
souvenir du génocide arménien sera pour toujours désormais présent au
coeur de notre cité”, s’est exclamé Gérard Collomb.
Le maire a rappelé qu’une proposition de loi serait déposée par le
groupe socialiste à l’Assemblée nationale le 18 mai pour punir les
propos négationnistes, complétant ainsi la loi de janvier 2001 sur la
reconnaissance du génocide arménien par la France.
“Compte tenu de la part des Arméniens dans l’histoire de Lyon, il est
légitime qu’un tel mémorial prenne place en coeur de ville”, a lui
aussi jugé M. Perben, qui a exprimé la “profonde émotion” et “la
solidarité” du président de la République.
Après le dépôt d’autres fleurs au pied des stèles, le mémorial,
financé en grande partie par des fonds privés, a été béni par Mgr
Norvan Zakarian, évêque de l’Eglise arménienne de Lyon.
D’autres discours ont suivi, parmi lesquels celui du président de
l’Union des étudiants juifs de France, le monument ayant vocation,
selon ses concepteurs, à rendre hommage aux victimes de tous les
génocides du XXe siècle.
Lundi matin, l’inauguration d’un autre mémorial avait eu lieu à
Marseille, en présence de quelque 2.000 personnes.
Marseille et la région Rhône-Alpes comptent chacune 80.000 personnes
d’origine arménienne, sur les 500.000 de France.
Si plusieurs dizaines de mémoriaux arméniens existent déjà sur le sol
national, la construction du monument lyonnais a donné lieu à de
vives controverses, dont une manifestation au cours de laquelle ont
été relevés des slogans négationnistes pro-turques le 18 mars.
Ce qui est survenu à Lyon vient “souligner l’urgence de rajouter à la
loi française un deuxième article sanctionnant la négation du
génocide des Arméniens”, a fait valoir lundi Jules Mardirossian.
De 1915 à 1917, les massacres et les déportations d’Arméniens sous
l’empire Ottoman ont fait 1,5 million de morts selon les Arméniens,
entre 300.000 et 500.000 selon Ankara qui rejette catégoriquement la
qualification de génocide.

Norma Sherry: Genocide

Scoop.co.nz (press release), New Zealand
April 26 2006
Norma Sherry: Genocide
Wednesday, 26 April 2006, 12:48 pm
Opinion: Norma Sherry
Genocide
By Norma SherryAs a people who praise humanity; as a human race we
have a despicable history. Since the beginning of time we, as a
people, have abolished those with whom we didn’t like or agree with,
or those who had what we wanted: like land or rich resources. We
haven’t changed much. It appears we haven’t learned from our past and
as the acts of genocide pile high, clearly, we’re doomed to keep
repeating these atrocious acts.
Throughout history cultural genocide has occurred throughout the
world with little or no punishment. What does that say about us?
Before our ancestors embarked on the shores of what was to become the
Americas in 1492, it was inhabited by indigenous people known to all
today as the American Indian.
Conservative estimates the population of the United States prior to
European contact was greater than 12-million. Four centuries later,
the population was reduced by 95% or 237-thousand.
In 1493, when Columbus returned to the Hispaniola, he implemented
policies of slavery and mass extermination of the Taino population of
the Caribbean. Within three years, five-million were dead. Bartolomé
de Las Casas, priest, scholar, historian and 16th century human
rights advocate was the primary historian of the Columbian era. He
wrote of many accounts of the horrors that the Spanish colonists
inflicted upon the indigenous population: hanging them en mass,
hacking their children into pieces to be used as dog feed, and other
horrific cruelties.
The Removal Act of 1830 set into motion a series of events which led
to the “Trail of Tears” in 1838, a forced march of the Cherokees,
resulting in the destruction of most of the Cherokee population. As
appalling as it is, we now also know that the Indians were
intentionally exposed to smallpox by Europeans.
In California and Texas there was blatant genocide of Indians. In
California, the decrease from about a quarter of a million Indians to
less than 20,000 is primarily due to the cruelties and wholesale
massacres perpetrated by the gold miners and early settlers who were
assured their land by the Homestead Act of 1862.
We have a rich history of killing; of annihilating those who are
deemed inferior. Not just in America, but in the world.
We have a bad track record.
In Canada, the aboriginal natives, the Beothuk people are completely
extinct as a result of loss of habitat and importation of European
diseases. As the European settlements grew, the Beothuk’s withdrew
into the interior of the island and subsequently starved.
Between 1880 and 1920, under the rule of King Leopold II, the Congo
Free State, (before it was taken over by Belgium and became the
Belgium Congo), suffered great loss of life due to criminal
indifference to its native inhabitants in the pursuit of increased
rubber production. Over 10-million natives were the victims of
murder, starvation, exhaustion induced by over-work, and disease.
The Ustashe regime of Croatia committed genocide against Serbs, Jews
and Gypsies during World War II. They also mass murdered other
political opponents. Mile Budak, the Minister for Education &
Culture, said in July 1941 that `The basis for the Ustashe movement
is religion. For minorities such as the Serbs, Jews, and Gypsies, we
have three million bullets. We will kill a part of the Serbs. Others
we will deport, and the rest we will force to accept the Roman
Catholic Religion. Thus the new Croatia will be rid of all Serbs in
its midst in order to be 100% Catholic within 10 years.’
In Hitler’s Nazi Germany, 11-million people were systematically
starved, tortured, shot and gassed. Six-million were Jews, including
1.5 million children in the Nazi’s Final Solution to the Jewish
Question. The plan was to rid the world of all Jews, all disabled,
all Gypsies, Slavs, Poles, and Communists.
The world knew it was happening and yet it sat silent while millions
were gassed in Hitler’s ovens. As the world came face to face with
the horrors of Hitler’s Holocaust, we vowed that it would never
happen again. And yet, genocide around the globe continues.
In 1985, German General Lothar von Trotha attempted to exterminate
the Herero and Namaqua peoples of Southwest Africa. Sixty-five
thousand Herero (80 percent of the total Herero population), and
10,000 Nama (50 percent of the total Nama population) were killed or
perished. Characteristic of this genocide was death by starvation and
the poisoning of wells for the Herero and Nama populations that were
trapped in the Namib Desert.
Between 1920 and 1945 the Japanese massacred hundreds of thousands of
its citizens. Some authorities claimed 300,000 people killed during
the three months following the fall of Nanjing to the Japanese.
Reportedly, Unit 731 conducted biological and chemical warfare
experiments on living humans.
When British Malaya fell to the Japanese Imperial Forces in February
1942, ethnic Chinese in Singapore were systematically exterminated on
the pretext of eliminating “anti-Japanese” elements. The death toll
ranged upwards of 100,000. Smaller scale Genocide was also targeted
at Koreans, Filipinos, Dutch, Vietnamese, Indonesians and Burmese.
In the Philippines, at least one-million civilians perished from
outright slaughter, disease, and famine between 1899 and 1908. A
largely forgotten genocide of at least three-million Roman Catholics
and over a half a million Jews took place in the Commonwealth of
Poland-Lithuania by Orthodox, Protestants and Muslims. One-third of
its population was slaughtered between 1648 and 1662.
Nearly two-million Armenians were killed during the Ottoman Empire
from 1915 to 1923. During the Bangladesh Liberation War of 1971, in
267-days 1 to 3 million ethnic Bengalis were killed by the Pakistan
Army and 200,000 women were raped. Between 1975 and 1979, 1.7-million
Cambodians were killed by the Khmer Rouge.
After Kashmiri uprising began in late 1989 over 100,000 Kashmiri
Muslim and Hindu civilians have been killed and over 500,000 people
have been driven away from their homes. Other atrocities including
rape, torture and massacre are attributed to the Indian Army
personnel in the region.
The Sri Lanka authorities have been committing systematic genocide
against the Tamil people since 1958. Murder, rape, arson, maiming and
pillage are all acts perpetrated upon the Tamils.
In 1992-1995 there was an organized killing of thousands of Bosnians
and displacing of a million more. A hundred days in 1994 took almost
a million lives in Rwanda. Hutus with machetes in hand slaughtered
their Tutsis neighbors in their effort to annihilate all Tutsis from
Rwanda. The Belgian police left, the U.N. ran for cover and the blood
ran down the streets and no country came to their protection.
In 2002, Sudan was accused of the genocide of more than two-million
lives and the displacement of more than four-million people since the
Sudanese War started in 1983. In 2004 it became widely known that
there was an organized campaign by Janjaweed militias (nomadic Arab
shepherds with the support of Sudanese government and troops) to get
rid of 80 black African groups from the Darfur region of western
Sudan. These peoples include the Fur, Zaghawa and Massalit.
Knowing that the atrocities are taking place the Western world is
still unwilling to take action. The death toll rises every day. The
inhumanity of man upon man, woman and child is so appalling, so
horrible that the words are inexplicably inadequate.
The Western world is not innocent. In fact, there are more instances
of intrusion, escalation and insertion than this article can include.
But, there is one issue that must be stated and that is Depleted
Uranium: The dream child of Dick Cheney. In 1991 he was responsible
for the wholesale use of radioactive munitions back in the Bush I
administration. It is the genocide that keeps on giving, disabling
and killing all that come into contact with it and leaving its
devastating effects on generations contaminating the air, water and
earth and every aspect of living free of contaminates. It is a price
our enlisted men and women know all too well as they are sick and
dying of a myriad of immobilizing diseases.
If, as 1776 author, David C. McCullough wrote, `History is who we are
and why we are the way we are’ is true, we’re in trouble. Our history
does not speak well for us. George Bernard Shaw said, `We learn from
history that we learn nothing from history’. How sad and how true is
that statement?
If this partial list – and yes, folks, this horrific accounting is
only a partial list of carnage isn’t enough to cause one to rethink
our place in this world and what we owe to one another then we are
doomed to keep repeating our shocking history. Is this acceptable? Is
this what we want for us, for our children, for our history?
Why is it that as a human race we think killing, raping, mayhem,
mutilation and butchery is an acceptable means for change? For years
we’ve watched as religious disagreements waged on as wars destroying
entire nations. Some of our ancestors have witnessed first hand the
inhumanity of man and gasped at the horror. After Hitler’s expansive
Holocaust the world swore never to allow it again, and yet, here we
are in the twenty-first century and everywhere in this world someone
is being killed, beaten, imprisoned, raped, and pillaged because
someone else thought them inferior.
On a smaller scale murder, rape and arson are crimes of every
community. Local police departments deploy officers to school yards
with Tasers in hand to disrupt volatile youngsters. Parents’ abuse
their children in unspeakable ways and spouses beat one another in
numbers too many to count. Are these symptoms of our greater ill?
What is our remedy? Are we destined to destroy ourselves with hatred?
We can no longer ignore the pain of others whether in our community
or our country or the world with which we all live. Silence is not an
option.
As Edmund Burke so eloquently stated, `The only thing necessary for
the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”
*************
Norma Sherry 2006
Norma Sherry is an award-winning writer/producer. She is the host of
The Norma Sherry Show on WQXT-TV. She is also co-founder of Together
Forever Changing, an organization designed to enlighten and encourage
citizens to fight for our liberties.
S00318.htm
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Big Taxpayers Paid 61.2 Billion Drams

BIG TAXPAYERS PAID 61.2 BILLION DRAMS
Lragir.am
26 April 06
In the first quarter of 2006 the 1000 large taxpayers of Armenia
paid 61.2 billion drams to the state budget. The news agency ARKA
informs that 33.7 billion out of 61.2 billion is return on tax, and
27.6 billion is return on customs duties. Like in 2005, in the first
quarter of the current year the first three taxpayers are Zangezour
Copper and Molybdenum Factory, Armentel and Armrusgasard. Next come
Flash and Petrol Service. The Distribution Networks of Armenia,
Grand Tobacco, the Nuclear Plant of Armenia, Mika Armenia, ARMENIA
International Airports, Coca Cola are in the first hundred.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Let’s Get Ready To Get Compensation In The Visible Future

LET’S GET READY TO GET COMPENSATION IN THE VISIBLE FUTURE
Lragir.am
26 April 06
In the visible future Turkey cannot have a positive approach to the
Armenian genocide, but the United States will recognize the Armenian
genocide and the European Union will put forward the recognition
of the Armenian genocide as a stipulation for Turkey’s membership,
announced Ruben Safrastyan, the head of the Department of Turkey of
the Institute of History, NAS, April 26, in a round-table meeting
“Global Processes of Recognition of the Armenian Genocide. Prospects
of Recognition of the Genocide”.
Safrastyan says Turkey is implementing a policy of pressure, trying to
reach adoption of decisions in Armenia that favor Turkey and offers
three conditions for the establishment of diplomatic relations:
borders, Karabakh, recognition of the genocide. Ruben Safrastyan
disagrees to a recently repeated viewpoint that Europe recognizes the
Armenian genocide not out of sympathy for Armenians but to prevent
Turkey’s membership to the EU. It is true that the stipulations of
the West for Turkey are determined by their interests and not those
of the Armenians’, but “public opinion in Europe changed dramatically
in the past two or three years. The intelligentsia is increasingly
often considering condemning Turkey.
If Germany admitted its faults, why shouldn’t Turkey do the same?”
According to Safrastyan, public opinion in Turkey has changed too,
but very slowly and very little. “People have started talking about the
genocide and in such a totalitarian country public opinion is opposed
to the government,” states the expert on Turkish studies. There is
nothing we could do, it is their turn to understand and condemn,
thinks Ruben Safrastyan, and enumerates the spheres where we, the
Republic of Armenia, have to act. “We have to shift the struggle for
the recognition of the genocide to the plane of the international
law and think about getting recovery. And the recovery can be in
different forms, including territory,” thinks Ruben Safrastyan. For
the line of struggle, it should be decided in an all-Armenian rally
which also must be organized by the leadership of Armenia.
Another expert on Turkish studies Lusineh Sahakyan, assistant of
the head of the Department of Turkish Studies of Yerevan State
University, says the recognition of the genocide has a strategic
importance for us. Probably in Turkey they also understand this
because Lusineh Sahakyan says Turkey has a sophisticated arsenal and
a scientific mechanism of denying the Armenian genocide, starting
from historical falsification, cleansing of Turkish archives since
1918, to manipulating strategic partnership with the Unites States
and breaking commercial relations with countries which recognize the
Armenian genocide.
The Armenians do not have such an arsenal for the recognition of the
Armenian genocide. Ruben Safrastyan finds, however, that it would
be better if others spoke about the recognition of the genocide for
Turkey not to say that Armenians are repeating their lies.

Valdas Adamkus: No Genocide Can Be Justified

VALDAS ADAMKUS: NO GENOCIDE CAN BE JUSTIFIED
ArmRadio.am
26.04.2006 16:50
“No genocide can be justified,” President of Lithuania Valdas Adamkus
declared during the meeting with faculty and students of Yerevan
State University.
The Lithuanian President expressed the opinion that Armenia should
continue ” the dialogue on recognition of the Armenian Genocide.”
“I’m hopeful that some day the correct response will come out,
therefore do what you consider is correct,” The President noted.
In Adamkus’s words, the recognition of the Armenian Genocide y
Lithuania did not have an impact on Turkish-Lithuanian relations.

Today Is The 20th Anniversary Of The Chernobyl Disaster

TODAY IS THE 20TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE CHERNOBYL DISASTER
ArmRadio.am
26.04.2006 17:56
Today is the 20th anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster.
“Armenpress” was told at the Ukrainian Embassy in Armenia that more
than 145 sq. km. of Ukrainian, Russian and Belarusian territory
was radioactively polluted; over 5 million people suffered from
the disaster, about 5 thousand settlements were subject to nuclide
contamination. 20 years after the disaster a number of issues are
still awaiting settlement.
Ukraine will always remember the courage of more than 3 thousand
Armenians, who did their best to soften the results of the Chernobyl
disaster. Later 400 of these died because of radiation.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress