Alexan Harutyunyan: Teamwork won at Eurovision

Alexan Harutyunyan: Teamwork won at Eurovision

ArmRadio.am
26.05.2006 18:20
These days many publications in the media include views, general
wording of which is as follows: `It was not Andre that won at the
Eurovision but Alexan Harutyunyan through his ties and means. Just the
way Lusine Tovmasyan acquired the title of `Vice Miss Europe.’
In his interview to `Radiolur’ correspondent Alexan Harutyunyan,
President of the Council of Public Radio and Television of Armenia,
did not agree with the idea, saying that he merely headed the team
that participated in the contest. `The most important here are the
singer, the song, the team, the instrumentation. We would not succeed
if these were not good, no matter how hard I would try to promote.’
Generally, the diverse views and evaluations do not surprise Alexan
Harutyunyan, He considers it is natural. Mr. Harutyunyan was surprised
only with the atmosphere over the song and the singer in Armenia
before the contest, which was exerted as pressure on the part of
specialists and political figures.
`Doing such things is merely impermissible, such phenomena do not
exist in any other country. But it’s good that these negative
evaluations perished after the results were issued and everyone saw
that what we did was not incorrect, ‘ Alexan Harutyunyan said. His
personal evaluation of Armenia’s performance at Eurovision is
positive. This is a show watched not only in Europe but also all over
the world, and only participation here is of great importance
already. This is show business, which has its own rules, which we
should follow.
`I think that what we did was not bad for our first entry, it was even
good, since many countries participating for the 40th ` 45th time did
not even enter the top ten. Our next representative will go directly
to the final. This was also a good opportunity to make whole Europe
and the world speak about Armenia. It was a chance to speak about
Karabakh, since the singer was coming from there. It was important
also for the unification of Armenia and the Diaspora,’ President of
the Council of Public Radio and Television considers.
Alexan Harutyunyan does not share the views that the voting was
politicized.
`The votes were cast in most part by young people, who are not that
politicized. Of course, the factor of being neighbors or speaking the
same language sometimes plays its role here; however, the opposite can
be noticed as well. In the semi-final we received points from Spain,
Belgium, Moldova, where there are no large Armenian communities.’
It has not been decided so far who will represent Armenia at
Eurovision next year. This time, however, different from our first
entry we have more time to work and correct the faults.
`Considerable resources were spent, which were unprecedented for
Armenia but yielded their results. It was worth doing only for the
inspiration the Armenians and Diaspora experienced,’ Alexan
Harutyunyan said.

NKR: Adoption of Constitution is Another Step Towards Development

ADOPTION OF CONSTITUTION IS ANOTHER STEP TOWARDS DEVELOPMENT

Azat Artsakh, Nagorno Karabakh Republic [NKR]
26 May 2006

Interview with NKR Attorney General Armen Zalinian, the head of the
Task Force on NKR Constitution. AA: “Mr. Zalinian, you have been
working on the NKR Constitution bill for over a year. In what stage
are you now?” Armen Zalinian: “Generally, the process of working out
and adopting a constitution defies hastiness. Every point requires a
thorough consideration, meaningful and tried approaches and tools. We
are guided by these principles, and considerable work has been done so
far. The concept of the NKR Constitution has been published, and
currently the constitutional committee is discussing the first two
chapters, namely the provisions on constitutional order and the basic
human and civil rights, freedoms and duties. It means that soon we are
going to have the main law of our country.” AA: “What are the basic
tenets of the NKR Constitution?” Armen Zalinian: “Those are reflected
in the concept. As a constitution of a sovereign, democratic, legal,
social state, in the NKR Constitution the right for self-determination
fulfilled by the people of Artsakh, promotion of democracy, rule of
law, human rights and freedoms, promotion of local governance,
establishment of a civil society will be set down. These are the main
components, upholding law and lawfulness between the society and the
state.
The key idea of the Constitution is the following scheme: rule of
right through the law.” AA: “In the long run, how will Nagorno
Karabakh benefit from the adoption of the Constitution? After all, the
country has existed without a constitution for 15 years.” Armen
Zalinian: “A country’s constitution is the determinant and the result
of a people’s historical evolution. A constitution imbibes the spirit
of a people, its legal thought and heritage, established in the course
of centuries, the system of values, which guide the aspirations of
these people. The fact that Karabakh lived without a constitution for
years on is ordinary from the standpoint that a newly established
country is unable to adopt a constitution in a short period of time.
It is necessary to have experience in state building and a choice of
guidelines. Besides, the people of NKR were forced into a war and
then had to overcome the hardships of this war in the legal, social
and economic, spiritual and cultural and, why not, home political
spheres. Over the past 15 years a tangible experience in state
building has been accumulated, which is a sufficient ground for having
our own constitution.” AA: “Is the NKR Constitution going to be a copy
of the Constitution of the Republic of Armenian in terms of contents
and form?” Armen Zalinian: “The NKR Constitution will be a
constitution of a sovereign, democratic, legal, social state with
semi-presidential governance. It will be consistent with the
tendencies and demands of development of constitutionalism in the
world. And the reality determined by the necessity of strengthening
our independent statehood will certainly be taken into consideration.
The necessary tools have been worked out. In this context, the
constitutional experience of the Republic of Armenia, the logic and
philosophy of the constitutional reform are very important. Several
provisions introduced in the renewed Constitution of Armenia will be
used in our Constitution. The constitutional experience of other
countries is also taken into consideration. In other words, we pick
up everything that is positive, everything that proved successful.”
AA: “What will be the procedure of adopting the Constitution?” Armen
Zalinian: “Naturally, a referendum. I believe that our people will
vote to the referendum on the Constitution, because the adoption of
the Constitution will be another important step towards the
establishment and strengthening of our republic.”
SVETLANA KHACHATRIAN.
26-05-2006

Armenian premier pledges aid in developing southern Georgian region

Armenian premier pledges aid in developing southern Georgian region
Mediamax news agency
25 May 06

Yerevan, 25 May: Armenian Prime Minister Andranik Markaryan and
Georgian Deputy Prime Minister Giorgi Baramidze met in Dushanbe within
the framework of the session of the council of prime ministers of the
CIS states.
Markaryan and Baramidze noted with satisfaction the intensification of
bilateral relations in various spheres, the government’s press service
told Mediamax today.
The sides stressed that the Armenian and Georgian prime ministers will
head the Georgian-Armenian intergovernmental commission on economic
cooperation which will promote resolution of a number of issues as
well as elaboration of the joint programmes in the spheres of energy,
transport and tourism.
Andranik Markaryan and Giorgi Baramidze expressed satisfaction with
the process of demarcation of the Armenian-Georgian border, noting
that a regular joint session of relevant commissions is planned to be
held in Yerevan in August.
While speaking about the problems of the Armenian population in
Samtskhe-Javakheti, Andranik Markaryan expressed Armenia’s readiness
to assist the Georgian authorities in the implementation of a
comprehensive programme on restoring infrastructure of this region.
The Armenian prime minister expressed the view that it would be useful
to involve the local population and entrepreneurs in the construction
work to soften the “noticeable tension in the region”.
Andranik Markaryan said that according to the bilateral agreements, at
this stage Armenia will help restore some educational institutions in
Javakheti, whereas the volumes and the methods of the future
assistance will be specified after Armenia studies the comprehensive
programme.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Kuwaiti Armenian School recovers from the latest war in the region

Kuwaiti Armenian School recovers from the latest war in the region
Azad-Hye, Dubai, 26 May 2006: After the formation of the United Arab
Republic in Egypt and Syria (1958), many Armenians emigrated to the United
States, Canada, Australia, Argentina and elsewhere. Some of them arrived in
Kuwait, then a desert Emirate, with limited modern comforts.
In 1961 priest Barouyr Sarkissian settled down in Kuwait City and served the
community for more than thirty years, including 9 years as a Principal of
the Armenian School (1961-1970).
The Kuwaiti Armenian community was originally formed by bachelors who were
employed in light industries, auto repair shops, electronics, services etc.
Eventually they got married and brought to Kuwait their brides from their
countries of origin (Syria, Lebanon, Iran, etc.).
As their children reached schooling age, the need for learning the Armenian
language, history and religion led to the establishment of a school in the
late 1960’s.
The new premises of the school was inaugurated in 1972, during the tenure of
Principal Manuel Charshafian (1972-1978).
Since then the number of the Armenians in Kuwait expanded and reached a peak
of 10000 in the mid 1980’s. The number of students enrolled in the Armenian
School scored a record 700 pupils. High School section (Jemaran) was
introduced, enabling graduates to get enrolled in University studies
worldwide. Today the school covers the whole range from kindergarten to the
12th grade.
Asadour Boghosian has been Principal during two different terms (1978-1983)
and (2000-2004).
The invasion of Kuwait by Iraq caused damage to the State of Kuwait and the
Armenian Community. Fortunately the invasion took place in August (1990),
during which many Armenian families were already outside the country and did
not directly suffer the consequences of the invasion. Only 500 Armenians
remained in Kuwait during the six months of the Iraqi invasion, many fled
the country through the Saudi border.
After the restoration of national authority in Kuwait, many Armenians
returned to their positions in Kuwait, yet a considerable number continued
living in new places. The returned ones were compensated by the Kuwaiti
government (through special arrangement with the United Nations) with
monthly salaries that covered the complete period of invasion.
The present day Principal is Dr. Manoug Manougian, a graduate of Karen Jeppe
Armenian High School (Aleppo, 1983) and Dentistry Faculty (Yerevan, 1990).
Dr. Manougian gave us the latest statistics concerning the school.
The number of the students in the 2005-2006 school-year has been 373. The
breakdown is as follows:
94 students in the Kindergarten
135 students in the Elementary level (1-5 grades)
88 students in the Intermediate level (6-9 grades)
56 students in the Secondary level (10-12 grades)
The number of students just two years ago was 324. Therefore we can say that
there is an increase of about 15%. This figure is very close to the
1999-2000 school-year (before the latest war in the region), when the number
of students was 376.
Dr. Manougian gave us also the overall number of the educational and
auxiliary staff as follows:
Educational staff (teachers): 37 (26 Armenians)
Administrative staff: 4 (all Armenians)
Auxiliary staff (drivers, caretakers, etc.): 10 (3 Armenians)
Total number: 51 (33 Armenians)
The number of the Armenians in Kuwait, according to Dr. Manougian is no more
than 3300. More than 70% are Syrian-Armenians and the rest are from Lebanon
and other countries. Lebanese Armenians are mainly from Ainjar
(Mousalertsi).
Until 1990 (the year of the Iraqi invasion), the percentage of the Iranian
Armenians was 30%, but almost all of them emigrated later to Western
countries. Currently many Syrian-Armenians use the so-called Armenian
passport for Diaspora (special residency status), which is easier for
obtaining Kuwaiti residency visa.
The number of graduates from the Secondary level (Jemaran) is 381, although
thousands of students have attended the school during different periods of
time. The mobile status of the families living in Kuwait has contributed to
the fluctuation of the figures.
Azad-Hye had also the opportunity to meet with the newly appointed Deputy
Principal Peggy Tokmakjian (graduate of Aleppo College and English
Literature Department in the University of Aleppo 1990, former Principal of
“Accad” Computer Science Center in Aleppo, Syria). She briefed us on the
educational aspects of the Armenian School in Kuwait.
See complete set of photos of the Armenian School in Kuwait here:
ure.asp?al=qhsdtrnshy111376a
net/news/viewnews.asp?newsId=734ajg67
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Dr. Nora Arissian lectures on the “Armenians in the Syrian Press”

Dr. Nora Arissian lectures on the “Armenians in the Syrian Press”
Azad-Hye, Dubai, 26 May 2006: The Islamic Educational Scientific and
Cultural Organization (ISESCO) has chosen Aleppo as the capital for Islamic
culture for the year 2006 (Damascus is going to be the Islamic culture
capital in 2008).
Activities in this respect include holding various expositions and cultural
seminars in addition to screening of historical and documentary films on the
historical and architectural aspects of Aleppo.
As an integral part of the Syrian population, the Armenians in Aleppo also
are involved in this year-long celebration. One of the recent events was a
lecture delivered by Dr. Nora Arissian, the well-known scholar of oriental
research, on 20th May 2006 in “Aram Manougian” center, organized by the
Armenian Youth Union in Aleppo.
Dr. Arissian dealt with the subject of “The Armenians in the Syrian press”.
A number of University lecturers, several press representatives (local “Al
Jamahir” daily and correspondents of pan-Arab newspapers, public figures and
a large number of people attended the event.
Dr. Arissian highlighted the participation of the Armenians in the Syrian
public life and society in general, a fact that has been obvious in almost
all economic and social fields. She referred to the tolerance of the Arab
majority towards the Armenians, a tradition that stems from the teachings of
the Holy Quran.
Based on her researches she pointed out to the Armenian themes published in
the Syrian press, arguing that they are echoes of the Armenian presence in
this country. She brought examples from known newspapers such as “Al
Shahba”, “Al Mouqtabas” and “Al Asima” (the later was the formal
governmental gazette).
She said that although Syrians for a short period of time had their own
doubts about the wave of the Armenian refugees coming to their country
(especially in terms of employment opportunities and economic
competitiveness and hardships), nevertheless, the humanitarian aspects had
gained precedence and the Press of the time has echoed extensively to the
efforts of the Syrians to alleviate the burden on the Armenians and to host
them in the new environment. Especially the Government of the newly
appointed King Faysal (after the Ottoman withdrawal in 1918) has been very
much sympathetic towards the Armenian orphans and has provided aid to the
Armenian tradesmen to start their financial activity in Syria.
Dr. Arissian highly appreciated the stance of the Syrian Arab journalists
especially in referring to the plight of the Armenian people with boldness
and without any compromise. The bulk of these reports provide nowadays as a
rich resource for documentation on the subject of the Armenian Genocide.
At the end of the lecture Dr. Arissian mentioned the significance of the
decision for choosing Aleppo as a capital of Islamic culture, since it is a
city of tolerance and coexistence between different religions and cultures.
It can serve also as a best example of the harmonization of civilizations.
See Armenian text at:
734ajh67
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ASBAREZ Online [05-26-2006]

OUR NEXT ISSUE: In observance of Memorial Day and Armenian Independence Day,
Asbarez offices will be closed on Monday, May 29; our next issue will be
posted
on Tuesday, May 30.
ASBAREZ ONLINE
TOP STORIES
05/26/2006
TO ACCESS PREVIOUS ASBAREZ ONLINE EDITIONS PLEASE VISIT OUR
WEBSITE AT <;HTTP://WWW.ASBAREZ. COM 1) First ANCA Telethon Raises $2.7 Million Communities Across the U.S. Unite to Support ANCA's Mission 2) Armenian Independence Day Festival in Little Armenia Sets Stage for Dynamic Celebration 3) Montenegro Referendum Sets Important Precedent for Karabagh 4) American Police Hand over Suspect to Armenian Counterparts 5) TAKE ACTION: Urge Judiciary Committee to Remove Hostile Amendment to Genocide Legislation 6) ARS Luncheon to Be Held at Ararat Home 7) 'The Armenian Adam Smith:' UCLA Holds Conference in Honor of Armenian Economist 8) You're Talking Nonsense, Mr. Ambassador: By Robert Fisk 9) Which One Is It: Alzheimer's, Depression, or Normal Aging Memory Decline?: By Dr. Haygoush Kalinian 10) Critics' Forum: Literature: By Hovig Tchalian 11) EIs: On the March Again: By Garen Yegparian 12) JUNE 6 ELECTION: CHOOSE, BUT CHOOSE WISELY!: By SKEPTIK SINIKIAN 1) First ANCA Telethon Raises $2.7 Million Communities Across the U.S. Unite to Support ANCA's Mission WASHINGTON, DC--In an overwhelming display of unity behind the Armenian National Committee of America's mission to educate, motivate, and activate our communities, Armenian Americans, organizations, and communities across the United States raised $2.7 million during the ANCA Telethon on May 21 with additional donations still coming in. The groundswell of donations came from the entire spectrum of the Armenian community demonstrating the widespread support for the ANCA's accomplishments and the desire to see its work expand further. "The Telethon was one of the ANCA's most ambitious endeavors to date, pulling together every part of our grassroots network, and the results demonstrate the overwhelming support for our mission to unite the community behind the Armenian Cause--Hai Tahd," said Ken Hachikian, National Chairman of the ANCA. "We are gratified by the confidence Armenian Americans across the nation have placed in us and pledge to the Armenian community that we will make every dollar count as we work to vigorously pursue and represent the interests of the community in the local, national and international political and policy arenas," said Hachikian. The Telethon touched a common emotional desire in people to support the Armenian Cause in all the different parts of our communities, regardless of organizational affiliations or politics. Countless organizations, volunteers, churches, community leaders, ANC local chapters, performing artists, Members of Congress, and state legislators from across the nation participated in the Telethon contributing to its enormous success. The Telethon also featured several documentaries that highlighted the various ANCA programs and results the ANCA has achieved over the years largely through its volunteer and grassroots network. In addition to hundreds of thousands of viewers who watched the Telethon on TV in all major US media markets, thousands--nationally and internationally--also watched the Telethon via a simultaneous webcast over the Internet and donated online. While the Telethon raised funds for the ANCA Endowment, it also served to expand the level of knowledge and understanding within the community about the important work that is being done on a daily basis by the ANCA. One of the ANCA's goals is to engage and activate more segments as part of the ANCA's grassroots network and the Telethon helped expand that reach. Donations are still being accepted for the ANCA Telethon and those interested in contributing should call 1-866-402-2622 (ANCA) or go to <; and click on the Telethon logo to make a donation online. 2) Armenian Independence Day Festival in Little Armenia Sets Stage for Dynamic Celebration --Los Angeles Mayor Villaraigosa, diverse entertainment, and vendors all a part of unprecedented 'block party' HOLLYWOOD--The Armenian Cultural Foundation has joined forces with the Armenian Youth Federation - Western Region (AYF-WR), in coordination with Los Angeles Council President Eric Garcetti, to present a dynamic festival in the heart of Little Armenia on Sunday, May 28, 2006. Though the festival is an annual event for the AYF-WR in celebrating Armenia's first independence, this year's celebration is unprecedented because portions of Hollywood Boulevard (between Vermont and Alexandria) will be blocked-off just for the event. The festival is the result of extensive teamwork between Council President Garcetti's office, the ACF, and AYF, and will include special visits by representatives of the Armenian Consulate in LA, and Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. A variety of vendors, diverse entertainers, performers, writers, and organizations will be on hand from 10:00 AM to 6:00 PM, highlighting Armenian culture and raising awareness about Armenian history. Traditional Armenian food and artifacts will also be a part of the festivities, all in the tradition of celebrating Armenia's cultural wealth. "The Armenian Youth Federation celebrates and recognizes the importance of our nation's victories in establishing, after 600 years of oppression, the first independent republic of Armenia on May 28, 1918, which laid the foundation of today's independent republic," explains AYF-WR Chairman Tro Tchekidjian. Entertainment at the festival will also include performances by Element Band, Vokee, Sako, Ara Sahagian, Karnig Sarkissian, Nersik Ispirian, Paul Baghdadlian, Gor Mkhitarian, Ara Shahbazian, and many more. Various dance groups are also scheduled to perform traditional and contemporary interpretations of Armenian folk dances throughout the day. Organizations participating in the festival include the Armenian Relief Society, Shant Student Association, Homenetmen (Armenian General Athletic Union and Scouts), and the Armenian National Committee of America. For more information on the festival, please contact the AYF Western Region office at (818) 507-1933 or visit <; 3 ) Montenegro Referendum Sets Important Precedent for Karabagh (PanArmenian)This week's referendum for independence in Montenegro demonstrated the international community's willingness to accept people's right to self-determination, setting an important precedent for Mountainous Karabagh Republic (MKR), said a statement released by its Foreign Affairs Ministry. The Foreign Affairs Ministry, which regards the referendum as a positive development, said: "We are convinced that respect of peoples' right to self-determination is a cornerstone of conflict settlement and tool to establish political stability." The statement went on to note that the people of MKR were denied their right to self-determination after voting in a December 10, 1991 referendum for independence, instead being subjected to military aggression by Azerbaijan. "Further neglect of MKR people's right to self-determination... will postpone the prospect of finding a mutually acceptable solution and establishment of lasting peace in the region," continued the statement. The President of MKR, Arkady Ghoukassian, also commented on the referendum in Montenegro saying that it sets a very important precedent for his country. "If the international community is ready to recognize Montenegro's and Kosovo's independence, then I think it will be very difficult for them to explain, why they do not recognize MKR's," Ghoukassian said. Ghoukassian added that Karabagh has more legal and geographic grounds for expecting recognition of independence. "The people of Nagorno Karabagh have survived the war imposed by Azerbaijan and have statehood now. I believe we have all grounds for expecting international recognition of independence," he said. The President said he is certain the international community will recognize Karabagh sooner or later. "The sooner it does it, the better the chances for peace to be sustained in the region," said Ghoukassian. 4) American Police Hand over Suspect to Armenian Counterparts YEREVAN (Armenpress)American law enforcement officers handed over to their Armenian counterparts A. R. Yeranosian, 32, a resident of Yerevan who was wanted by Armenian law enforcement for an armed attack that took place on May 11 at a Yerevan café. Yeranosian was arrested on May 14 in Los Angeles and transported to Yerevan ten days later via Amsterdam. In the attack, Yerevan resident Ispirian was shot and immediately taken to the hospital. During the operation, the bullet was successfully removed and his life saved. The Armenian Chief Prosecutor's Office said that a criminal case has been opened against Yeranosian. If guilty, he will face between eight years and life in prison. 5) TAKE ACTION: Urge Judiciary Committee to Remove Hostile Amendment to Genocide Legislation The California State Senate Judiciary Committee passed SB 1524, the "Armenian Genocide Bank and Looted Assets Recovery Act" on May 9, granting Armenian genocide victims and their heirs access to California courts to recover bank deposits wrongfully withheld since the Armenian genocide. During consideration of SB 1524, the committee voted to accept a hostile amendment that attaches another act, SB 1765 to the Armenian Genocide Bank and Looted Assets Recovery Act. Vetoed three times by consecutive administrations, the attached bill entitles lawsuits to be filed for wrongfully repatriated Mexican Americans during the 1930s. As a result, the Armenian bill that had previously enjoyed bi-partisan backing and unanimous support since its introduction is now attached to a highly controversial and unrelated bill, endangering its ability to be signed by the Governor and become law. This bill would make the operation of its provisions contingent upon the enactment of SB 1765. What You Can Do: Introduced by Senate Judiciary Committee member Martha Escutia, the hostile amendment received the support of Committee chairman Joseph Dunn, and members Martha Escutia, Sheila Kuehl and Dick Ackerman. While the ANCA-WR supports the correcting of all historic wrongs, it urges the separation of the two distinct bills so that each is considered separately, based on individual merits. The ANCA-WR urges members of the community to contact these members of the Judiciary Committee to express disappointment with the hostile amendment and urge the senators to restore the separate status of each act. They can be reached at their Sacramento offices by calling: Senator Joseph Dunn (D-Garden Grove) - (916) 651-4034 - [email protected] Senator Dick Ackerman (R-Fullerton) - (916) 651-4033 - [email protected] Senator Martha Escutia (D-Montebello) - (916) 651-4030 - [email protected] Senator Sheila Kuehl (D-Los Angeles) - (916) 651-4023 - [email protected] 6) ARS Luncheon to Be Held at Ararat Home MISSION HILLS--An annual luncheon sponsored by the Armenian Relief Society of the Western US (ARS-WR) Regional Executive and its 26 chapters will be held Tuesday, June 6 at 11:00 AM, in the George Deukmejian Grand Ballroom at Ararat Home. Sponsoring the June luncheon is an ARS-WR tradition that provides financial assistance to the home--which provides assisted living, nursing, and convalescent care for hundreds of elderly Armenians. Entertainment during the luncheon will be provided by Allen, a violinist. Last year, his music inspired several residents, who were attending the luncheon, to dance. Allen, a social worker for the ARS-WR Social Services, is returning to bring some excitement to both residents and visiting ARS members. ARS members attending the luncheon will also have the opportunity to visit residents and tour the Ararat-Eskijian Museum, which is located steps from the banquet hall. The luncheon attracts ARS members, their friends, visitors, and residents. Everyone is welcome. To make reservations, please call the ARS-WR headquarters at (818) 500-1343. The Ararat Home Mission Hills campus is located at 15105 Mission Hills Road, Mission Hills, CA 91345. 7) 'The Armenian Adam Smith:' UCLA Holds Conference in Honor of Armenian Economist LOS ANGELESA conference titled, "Armenia: Challenges of Sustainable Development" brought together experts in economics, finance, and public policy to the University of California, Los Angeles earlier this month to discuss the achievements and shortcomings of Armenia's economy. The conference about economic growth, poverty reduction, and financial sector development in Armenia was dedicated to Professor Armen Alchian, a world-renowned Armenian-American economist and UCLA Professor. Professor Alchian, who was born in Fresno in 1914, received his PhD in Economics from Stanford University in 1943, served in the US Army Air Force during World War II, and joined the UCLA faculty and the Rand Corporation in 1946. Professor Alchian is widely known to his students and colleagues as the founder of the "UCLA tradition" in economics, a tradition that continues to this day. It emphasizes that individual behavior is self-seeking and "rational" and that this has many unanticipated consequences. Above all, Alchian is noted for the impact he has had on generations of UCLA graduate students, in no small measure through his first year course in microeconomics. Among his many well-known students is William Sharpe, who received the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Science in 1990 for his work on finance. Professor Alchian continues to teach and has been at UCLA for 60 years. Alchian was born in 1914 in Fresno, California, where his father had immigrated from Erzerum. His mother was one of the first native-born Armenians in California, a member of the pioneering Normart family of Fresno. Alchian has vivid childhood memories of General Antranig (Ozanian), who lived with his family for several months in the 1920s, and of Mrs. Ozanian's constant fear that the lad might hurt himself as he played with Antranig's sword. 'Armenia: Challenges of Sustainable Development' At the May 6 conference, Armenian Educational Foundation Chair in Modern Armenian History at UCLA, Professor Richard Hovannisian opened the day with an overview of the historical role of Armenians in the world economy. Turning to the Republic of Armenia, he highlighted the tradeoff Armenia has had to make since 1991 between pressures to privatize the economy and move swiftly to a full free-market system, on the one hand, and the inadequate preparation and negative social impact of these processes, on the other hand. As for the current conference, he stated: "After sixteen semiannual conferences on Historic Armenian Cities and Provinces and, more recently, on the Armenian genocide, the present one takes us in a new direction with a hard look at the immediate challenges facing the Republic of Armenia and its citizenry." He added that it was a pleasure to have the young organization, Armenian International Policy Research Group (AIRPG), serve as a cosponsor and noted that several of the participants were also members of that group, which seeks to facilitate public policy discussions in Armenia and in the diaspora and to foster interaction among researchers and professionals in economics, political science, law, and government. Professor Harold Demsetz, a long-time colleague and friend of Armen Alchian, also spoke, assessing Alchian's important contributions to development of economic theory, his major works in the field relating to consumer rationality and behavior of the firm, and his enduring legacy as a teacher and mentor. He lauded Alchian for his "clarity, originality, willingness to break free from old approaches," Professor Alchian then was introduced to a highly appreciative audience that rose to applaud him before he reflected briefly on his life and career. The first plenary session of the conference focused on the recent book on Armenia published by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), "Growth and Poverty Reduction in Armenia: Achievements and Challenges," and was moderated by another prominent UCLA economist, Professor Michael Intriligator who called Alchian the "Armenian Adam Smith." The presenter, IMF's former mission chief to Armenia, Dr. Enrique Gelbard, outlined the key elements of Armenia's macroeconomic performance in recent years. While focusing on impressive aggregate growth and low inflation numbers in Armenia, Dr. Gelbard also emphasized the need for more structural reforms, particularly those in the governance realm, for Armenia to sustain this growth momentum. This was followed by comments from three discussantsProfessor William Ascher of Claremont McKenna College and AIPRG Advisory Board; Professor Daniel Mazmanian of the University of Southern California; and Professor Ara Khanjian of Ventura College and AIPRG. The afternoon session was chaired by Professor Lee Ohanian of UCLA Economics Department. The first of the three presentations, made by Dr. David Grigorian of the IMF and AIPRG, touched on the issue of low tax revenue collection in Armenia and factors behind this phenomenon. Subsequently, Dr. Federica Saliola of the World Bank and University of Rome III presented her work on business climate and firm productivity in Armenia in 2002-2005, and put that in perspective with Armenia's regional competitors. Finally, Nerses Yeritsyan of the Central Bank of Armenia and AIPRG discussed the achievements and challenges of Armenia's financial sector and laid out the Central Bank's ambitious plan of reforming the sector. At the conclusion of the conference, Professor Hovannisian made the closing remarks and the crowd gave a standing ovation to the 92 year old Armen Alchian, who listened attentively throughout the program. Mr. and Mrs. Vahik and Alice Petrossian of the Armenian Educational Foundation hosted the participants, other visiting scholars from Armenia, Great Britain, and Canada, and the UCLA Armenian Studies faculty to a post-conference dinner reception with a number of other AEF members. This conference was organized by the Armenian Educational Foundation Chair in Modern Armenian History at UCLA, Professor Richard Hovannisian, and the Armenian International Policy Research Group, Dr. David Grigorian, with support from the UCLA Center for Near Eastern Studies and Department of Economics. 8) You're Talking Nonsense, Mr. Ambassador By Robert Fisk (The Independent)--A letter from the Turkish Ambassador to the Court of Saint James arrived for me a few days ago, one of those missives that send a shudder through the human soul. "You allege that an 'Armenian genocide' took place in Eastern Anatolia in 1915," His Excellency Mr. Akin Alptuna told me. "I believe you have some misconceptions about those events..." Oh indeedy doody, I have. I am under the totally mistaken conception that one and a half million Armenians were cruelly and deliberately done to death by their Turkish Ottoman masters in 1915, that the men were shot and knifed while their womenfolk were raped and eviscerated and cremated and starved on death marches and their children butchered. I have met a few of the survivors--liars to a man and woman, if the Turkish ambassador to Britain is to be believed--and I have seen the photographs taken of the victims by a brave German photographer called Armin Wegner whose pictures must now, I suppose, be consigned to the waste bins. So must the archives of all those diplomats who courageously catalogued the mass murders inflicted upon Turkey's Christian population on the orders of the gang of nationalists who ran the Ottoman government in 1915. What would have been our reaction if the ambassador of Germany had written a note to the same effect? "You allege that a 'Jewish genocide' took place in Eastern Europe between 1939 and 1945... I believe you have some misconceptions about those events...' Of course, the moment such a letter became public, the ambassador of Germany would be condemned by the Foreign Office, our man in Berlin would--even the pusillanimous Blair might rise to the occasion--be withdrawn for consultations and the European Union would debate whether sanctions should be placed upon Germany. But Mr. Alptuna need have no such worries. His country is not a member of the European Union--it merely wishes to be--and it was Mr. Blair's craven administration that for many months tried to prevent Armenian participation in Britain's Holocaust Day. Amid this chicanery, there are a few shining bright lights and I should say at once that Mr. Alptuna's letter is a grotesque representation of the views of a growing number of Turkish citizens, a few of whom I have the honor to know, who are convinced that the story of the great evil visited upon the Armenians must be told in their country. So why, oh why, I ask myself, are Mr. Alptuna and his colleagues in Paris and Beirut and other cities still peddling this nonsense? In Lebanon, for example, the Turkish embassy has sent a "communiqué" to the local French-language L'Orient Le Jour newspaper, referring to the "soi-disant (so-called) Armenian genocide" and asking why the modern state of Armenia will not respond to the Turkish call for a joint historical study to "examine the events" of 1915. In fact, the Armenian president, Robert Kocharian, will not respond to such an invitation for the same reason that the world's Jewish community would not respond to the call for a similar examination of the Jewish Holocaust from the Iranian president--because an unprecedented international crime was committed, the mere questioning of which would be an insult to the millions of victims who perished. But the Turkish appeals are artfully concocted. In Beirut, they recall the Allied catastrophe at Gallipoli in 1915 when British, French, Australian, and New Zealand troops suffered massive casualties at the hands of the Turkish army. In all--including Turkish soldiers--up to a quarter of a million men perished in the Dardanelles. The Turkish embassy in Beirut rightly states that the belligerent nations of Gallipoli have transformed these hostilities into gestures of reconciliation, friendship, and mutual respect. A good try. But the bloodbath of Gallipoli did not involve the planned murder of hundreds of thousands of British, French, Australian, New Zealand--and Turkish--women and children. But now for the bright lights. A group of "righteous Turks" are challenging their government's dishonest account of the 1915 genocide: Ahmet Insel, Baskin Oran, Halil Berktay, Hrant Dink, Ragip Zarakolu and others claim that the "democratic process" in Turkey will "chip away at the darkness" and they seek help from Armenians in doing so. Yet even they will refer only to the 1915 "disaster," the "tragedy," and the "agony" of the Armenians. Dr. Fatma Gocek of the University of Michigan is among the bravest of those Turkish-born academics who are fighting to confront the Ottoman Empire's terror against the Armenians. Yet she, too, objects to the use of the word genocide--though she acknowledges its accuracy--on the grounds that it has become "politicized" and thus hinders research. I have some sympathy with this argument. Why make the job of honest Turks more difficult when these good men and women are taking on the might of Turkish nationalism? The problem is that other, more disreputable folk are demanding the same deletion. Mr. Alputuna writes to me--with awesome disingenuousness--that Armenians "have failed to submit any irrefutable evidence to support their allegations of genocide." And he goes on to say that "genocide, as you are well aware, has a quite specific legal definition" in the UN's 1948 Convention. But Mr. Alputuna is himself well aware--though he does not say so, of course--that the definition of genocide was set out by Raphael Lemkin, a Jew, in specific reference to the wholesale mass slaughter of the Armenians. And all the while, new diplomatic archives are opening in the West, which reveal the smell of death--Armenian death--in their pages. I quote here, for example, from the newly discovered account of Denmark's minister in Turkey during the First World War. "The Turks are vigorously carrying through their cruel intention, to exterminate the Armenian people," Carl Wandel wrote on 3 July 1915. The Bishop of Karput was ordered to leave Aleppo within 48 hours "and it has later been learned that this Bishop and all the clergy that accompanied him have been... killed between Diyarbekir and Urfa at a place where approximately 1,700 Armenian families have suffered the same fate... In Angora... approximately 6,000 men... have been shot on the road... even here in Constantinople (Istanbul), Armenians are being abducted and sent to Asia..." There is much, much more. Yet now here is Mr. Alptuna in his letter to me: "In fact, the Armenians living outside Eastern Armenia including Istanbul... were excluded from deportation." Somebody here is not telling the truth. The late Mr. Wandel of Copenhagen? Or the Turkish Ambassador to the Court of St. James? Article Courtesy of Harry Koundakjian 9) Which One Is It: Alzheimer's, Depression, or Normal Aging Memory Decline? By Dr. Haygoush Kalinian From time to time, we all forget where we left our keys, walked into a room not knowing why we went there in the first place, or have trouble recalling what we ate last night. If we are elderly, our first thought or fear is "Am I getting Alzheimer's?" Well, not necessarily. There are over 100 conditions that mimic dementia (memory and thinking problems), which are actually reversible and treatable. These are sometimes called "pseudodementia"--"pseudo" meaning "not genuine or false." In other words, disorders or conditions that mimic dementia-like symptoms. For example, reactions to medications could produce effects symptomatic of cognitive decline such as, emotional distress or depression, vision and hearing problems (undetected problems of vision or hearing may result in inappropriate responses, which may be misinterpreted as dementia), nutritional deficiency, endocrine abnormalities (hypothyrodism can cause confusion that mimics dementia), infections (older people can develop infections that produce a sudden onset of confusion), subdural hematoma, normal pressure hydrocephalus, brain tumors that cause mental deterioration, or stroke. The reason an elderly person's memory is not as sharp as when he/she was younger could also be subsequent to normal aging process of the brain. As the body ages, so does the brain. When the body ages, it becomes physically more difficult to perform. When the brain ages, it becomes slower and loses its ability to think efficiently. The proportion of US citizens older than 65 years of age is growing steadily. It is estimated that 20% of the population will be over 65 years of age by 2030. This aging of the population is expected to bring an increase in the incidence of depression and dementia. It has been estimated that as many as 10-20% of people over the age of 65 may be affected by chronic brain syndromes with a rise of 25% when individuals over the age of 80 yeas old are considered separately. As many as 4 million people have an intellectual impairment severe enough to meet the criteria for dementia." Although depression and dementia have many similarities, they also have important distinctions. How to differentiate between dementia and depression? "Dementia" is a syndrome consisting of disturbances in distinct cognitive functions. The main symptom in dementia is memory loss, but other functions are also affected, such as orientation, reasoning, problem solving, judgment, visual-spatial performance, language, and change in personality and emotions. Dementia is an acquired disorder with evidence of decline in cognitive functions from a previous level of function, as demonstrated by history and cognitive testing. As a result, social, occupational, and functional abilities can deteriorate. The most common "pseudodementia" and the most easily misdiagnosed is that associated with depression. General internists and family practitioners fail to recognize major depression in up to 20% of their outpatients with the disorder, either as depression misdiagnosed as dementia or vice versa. The ability of primary-care physicians to recognize and correctly treat depression is important since only approximately 20% of people with depression are treated by mental health professionals. This is especially crucial since both disorders especially depression, are treatable and misdiagnosis may cause an individual with potential full cognitive function to be unnecessarily confined in long-term care faculties. While cognitive and behavioral difficulties (i.e., forgetfulness, bad mood, slow thinking) in depression are similar to those with suspected dementia, performance on neuropsychological tests offers a distinct profile. To diagnose dementia, a complete medical and neuropsychological evaluation is recommended and a complete patient history is very important. It is of vital importance that the physician understands the differences between depression and dementia. What is Alzheimer's disease? Alzheimer's disease is a degenerative and progressive brain disorder characterized by memory loss and problems with language, planning and organization, reasoning and judgment, spatial abilities, and changes in personality and behavior. It occurs most often in individuals over the age of 65 years. A person's chance of developing the disease increases with age. Individuals 85 years of age and older have the highest rates of the disease. While there are several types of dementia, Dementia of Alzheimer's Type (DAT) is the most common form seen in the elderly and may be the single greatest source of dysfunction in people older than 85. Researchers have estimated that approximately 360,000 new cases of DAT will occur each year. More than 4 million Americans have DAT, and this number is expected to triple over the next 20 years with increasing life expectancies and the aging of the "baby boomers" generation. Women are more likely than men to develop DAT, partly due to their longer life expectancy. Although there is no cure for DAT, effective medical and behavioral treatments are available. These treatments may help to slow the progression of the disease. Early diagnosis is important for managing the effects of the disease. The average time between the diagnosis of DAY and death is 8-10 years, but this can vary from person to person. Therefore, legal and financial arrangements should be made regarding the individual's estate and ongoing care. What happens to the brain when it ages? With advancing age every organ of the body undergoes alterations in one way or another. The brain is no exception. Effects of aging on the brain are well-documented. The brain's volume is at its peak until the age of 30 and declines gradually over the following decades. Some structures are affected more than others. Cortical atrophy (shrinkage associated with decrease in number and size of nerve cells) first shows up in the 40s, followed by dilation of ventricular size in 40s for men, bur not until 50s in women. Studies have shown modest age related changes particularly in areas responsible for storage and retrieval of memory (i.e., temporal lobe, hippocampus, and basilar-subcortical regions). For every decade after the 40s, the hippocampus loses 5% of its cells. This is very important as the ability to learn new information, retain and recall at a later time is processed by the cells in the hippocampus. Other brain changes seen in nondemented "normal" elderly persons include the presence of senile plaques and neurofibrilary tangles, abnormalities associated with Alzheimer's disease. However, there is a distinction between normal aging and Alzheimer's disease based on the distribution and extent of those features. Major cognitive changes that occur with aging appear in nonverbal learning and memory, retention of verbal material, reaction time, visual-spatial processing speed, and concentration. These cognitive changes do not necessarily have to mean impairment affecting daily living or quality of life. Even healthy elderly people show age-related decline in some cognitive functions. Research has shown the regular aerobic exercise may slow the rate of cognitive decline and even reverse it. Increased blood flow during exercise provides for better oxygenation of the brain. Even playing video games may be good mental exercise for older person as it can speed up reaction time. Evidently, exercise and healthy lifestyle are not only good for general physical health, but also helps the brain work efficiently. For more information on these and other neuropsychological disorders, please visit: 10) Critics' Forum Literature An Archive in A Footnote: The Legacy Project By Hovig Tchalian Now that the tumult of events surrounding Genocide commemoration has subsided, it is worth taking pause and considering the aftermath. The inevitable moment after (especially once the celebrations of May 28th also end) brings up the difficult but enduring question--"What now?" or, more skeptically, "Is this all there is?" An ambitious project, sponsored by the Hamburg Institute for Social Research and The Rockefeller Foundation, offers perhaps the most satisfying and propitious answer--allowing the act of remembrance to outlive the moment of its inception. The Project consists primarily of a website (<;www .legacy-project.org) that, as the site's own description puts it, "will build a global exchange on the enduring consequences of the many historical tragedies of the 20th century." In essence, the site archives the various reactions to the historical tragedies of the previous century, in the hope of preventing their future occurrence, or at least dampening their detrimental effects on society. The website's "events index" provides a comprehensive alphabetical list of the nearly 25 "events" included in the archive--from "African Conflicts," Apartheid, the Armenian genocide, and the "Cambodian Killing Fields," through the Holocaust and the struggles of "indigenous peoples," to the two World Wars. Admittedly, the strand tying all these "events" together--the issue of social injustice, broadly conceived--is somewhat tenuous. And the categorization scheme may be suspect. (What about "indigenous peoples" constitutes a set of "events"?) Perhaps a better way of linking these various themes together is under the even broader theme of remembrance, the complex "legacy" that gives the project its name. According to the website, "the Legacy Project offers a channel for mutual recognition across generations and geography. Through scholarly research and innovative presentation, The Legacy Project will create new--and shared--frameworks for cultural expressions of loss, drawn from Africa, the Americas, Asia, and Europe. Our work will help define the language of human loss--its forms, its symbols, its grammar... The Legacy Project seeks a collective, retrospective reflection on the losses that constitute the legacy of the last century." The real value of the project--the genuine goal of active remembrance and comparative historical study facilitated by the creation of a central archive of various human injustices--is overshadowed by the quite ambitious but nonetheless diffuse goal of defining "the language of human loss," a goal arguably more akin to academic studies than to historical reality. The site nonetheless admirably achieves its more modest goal of preserving the poems, plays, speeches, films, historical commentary, and a host of other reactions to the tragedies that have defined our century and the prior one. Unlike the more strictly historical mission of, say, the Zoryan Institute, which carries out the important work of preserving the commentaries of Genocide survivors and legal and historical documents related to the event itself, the Legacy Project preserves the reactions of the generations that succeeded them. By doing so, it carries out the equally important work of archiving in one place what would otherwise constitute a scattered series of footnotes, the "secondary" memory of the historical events that record the shock registered in the minds and hearts of more than a century's worth of indirect witnesses. In this sense, the website performs the much-needed function of commemorating the act of commemoration itself--testimony to the enduring will of those who would see the tragedies halted and continual fodder for all of us looking for a viable answer to the question with which we began, "What now?" The selections included on the site are nothing short of remarkable. As of the last viewing, the website includes virtual exhibitions of "Frank Stella, the Polish Village Series;" "The "Art of Afterwards;" and a study of "Echoes of the Guernica." There is also a "Virtual Symposium" of Holocaust-related issues, as well as the discussions of the partition of India and Pakistan in 1947. The site also includes a searchable database of the various literary, artistic and film materials included on the site. Excerpts of the work of Armenian poet and writer Peter Balakian are represented, as are the enigmatic and powerful historico-philosophical ruminations of the German-Jewish cultural critic, Walter Benjamin. Despite the Legacy Project's sophistication and the breadth and depth of its archives, there are nonetheless some glaring omissions in its website content. A search for Atom Egoyan or his film, "Ararat," for instance, will return no results. And there is a noticeable dearth of items about the Genocide more generally. Luckily, the remedy is readily available. The website provides the following email address for feedback and suggestions: [email protected]. What better way to make one's voice heard while helping transform the footnotes of the Genocide and other historical tragedies into a growing archive that will survive the few weeks of their commemoration? Hovig Tchalian holds a PhD in English literature from UCLA. He has edited several journals and also published articles of his own. You can reach him or any of the other contributors to Critics' Forum at [email protected]. This and all other articles published in this series are available online at <;www.critics forum.org. To sign up for a weekly electronic version of new articles, go to <;www.cri ticsforum.org/join. Critics' Forum is a group created to discuss issues relating to Armenian art and culture in the diaspora. 11) EIs: On the March Again By Garen Yegparian It's election time again and our good buddies, the Electoral Idiots (EIs) have ventured forth anew to wreak political ruin for our community. This time around the stakes are higher, not just city council seats, but a State Assembly seat; in California; one of only 80; governing some 36 million people, almost 12.5% of the US population. For those not living in California's 43rd Assembly District, this may seem remote, irrelevant, and possibly an outright waste of ink, but please, read on. You may come to change your mind since the issues arising in this race can teach universal lessons. And see my recommendations for statewide elected office and a smattering of other races. Let's establish, affirmatively, what our community's goals should be in the electoral realm. It will serve as a reference point for evaluating EI behavior. It seems simple and straightforward to me. We should develop interested, talented people. We should advocate strong engagement with the broader host communities we live in on the political level. We should break down barriers to civic/political participation by members of our community. We should put forward for election those among us who have demonstrated competence and integration, as the culmination of the individual's and our community's efforts. We should actively dissuade those "not yet ready for prime time" from running. We should not be held hostage to the facile argument of "support me just because I'm Armenian." We should not tolerate those who run for office in our name but are unwilling to heed our community's needs. We should penalize those who act in ways detrimental to our interests. The cast of EIs is somewhat different than last year. Some are back for a return engagement, others are newbies. But what's ironic is that this time, they're not even running for office. They're just acting as spoilers for someone else. You gotta wonder what motivates some of these pathetic creatures. Is it money? Is it a moment of glory and visibility? Is it sheer sniveling? Is it the Homo Ottomanicus syndrome I've described? Is it hatred--of self or competing organizations and people? No matter, the outcome is the same--our community suffers. Here's the scoop. In the 43rd, whoever wins the Democratic Primary on June 6 has the November election locked up--this thanks to the last round of gerrymandering by the legislature. The 43rd is also home to the largest number of Armenians of any Assembly District in California. This is one we should truly have significant, if not determinant, sway over. This year, we even have a competent Armenian candidate, Paul Krekorian, not an EI such as those who played spoilers in Glendale's election last year. There is another candidate in the Democratic primary, Frank Quintero, along with one each on the Republican and Libertarian slates. Not surprisingly, the contested Democratic primary is generating some heat, but it has taken an ugly turn during the last few days. The County Registrar of Voters has been sending out letters to some voters in the 43rd requiring confirmation of their signature on the vote-by-mail (VBM) request form they had submitted. It seems the Registrar didn't like the signature; it wasn't close enough to the original. Here, let me share a story from my experience. Last year, I registered all four members of a family, my neighbors. When the time came to vote, they opted to VBM. Two of the four had no problems. One was able to vote, but only after extended discussions--close to two hours, via telephone, with the Registrar's office, with me. The other had to report to the City Clerk's office to be able to vote. Why? The Registrar didn't like the signature--not on the VBM form, but the original voter registration! Who gave these people the right to dictate what someone's signature ought to look like? You can see that the Registrar is not perfect. Couple this with the understandable difficulty many employees have with our names, and you've got a recipe for serious, ongoing headaches. Quintero's campaign has taken the Registrar's queries, chosen to interpret them as fraud, and promulgated this "finding" through a press conference on the steps of the Glendale post office. Among those in attendance and speaking was a bigot with a record of spewing anti-Armenian poison during Glendale City Council meetings. This creature "rhetorically" asked if it wasn't illegal for people to assist aging voters in their homes. Can you fathom the unmitigated gall? An Armenian organization noted for its virtual non-existence was also on display and spoke its piece. This show generated a lot of media coverage, the same media that was virtually silent (LA Times, Daily News, Burbank Leader) or favoring Quintero (Glendale News Press) through much of the campaign. Of course our EIs have chimed in, amplifying Quintero's spurious accusations through their organizations, TV shows, and plain old word of mouth. Have they no shame? Some of these Armenians may have legitimate PERSONAL concerns and interests in supporting Quintero. These could and should be quietly, discretely pursued. Most do not have even this excuse at their disposal. But duplicitously attempting to transform such concerns into our community's interests is the height of arrogance and selfishness. For example, the chair of the Armenia Fund has no business supporting Quintero when the bulk of our community is behind Krekorian. This demonstrates poor judgment that reflects poorly on and damages the credibility of a valuable institution we need to support our homeland. Organizations that have little or no support in the community are using this as an opportunity to promote themselves, hoping that if Quintero wins, the crumbs he'll toss their way will allow them to gain standing among Armenians. This latter class of people--better yet slugs--are those who would've sided with the Turks during the Genocide, as a friend poignantly observed. Quintero is fortunate to have these slugs at his disposal. They seem willing to do anything to divide our community and weaken it--whether now, during Genocide commemorations, or last year's elections. Krekorian's campaign has registered over 1500 new voters and helped thousands new to the voting process navigate their way through it. Naturally this scares an opponent. It seems to have driven him to the world of slime, and who better to provide it than our community's slugs? Over the next few days as these slugs "march" on, poisoning the atmosphere, ask them what, why, when, how, who. When they holler "fraud," ask them according to whom? Has the (faulty) Registrar said so? On what grounds? Has this case been prosecuted? Who's been found guilty by what court? Just poke a thousand holes in their arguments, it's not difficult, particularly when it's on one of the numerous call-in shows serving our community. Remember, this is about electing the most competent, decent, and forthcoming candidate, Paul Krekorian. Imagine what we can expect of a candidate who resorts to such slimy tactics during his campaign once he's elected? It does not become you, Mr. Quintero. Be sure to vote. Be sure to vote for Paul Krekorian if you're in the district. And take a look at my other picks in the accompanying box. I've only selected names when more than one person is running in a given party's primary. I won't pretend to explain my choices of candidates. It's far too messy for such a small space. Regarding Propositions 81 and 82, both introduce long needed programs, and the latter also has the added benefit of making the wealthiest among us pay their fair share. BALLOT MEASURES Proposition 81: Yes Proposition 82: Yes GOVERNOR Phil Angelides (Democratic) Arnold Schwarzenegger (Republican) LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR Jackie Speier (Democratic) Tom McClintock (Republican) SECRETARY OF STATE Debra Bowen (Democratic) CONTROLLER Joe Dunne (Democratic) Abel Maldonado (Republican) TREASURER Keith S. Richman (Republican) ATTORNEY GENERAL Jerry Brown (Democratic) INSURANCE COMMISSIONER Cruz Bustamante (Democratic) SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC EDUCATION Jack T. O'Connell (Nonpartisan race) SENATE DISTRICT 20 Cindy Montanez (Democratic) ASSEMBLY DISTRICT 44 Anthony Portantino (Democratic) 12) JUNE 6 ELECTION: CHOOSE, BUT CHOOSE WISELY! By SKEPTIK SINIKIAN Every time it's Spring in Los Angeles it seems as though people act stranger than usual. Maybe it's the warm weather or hormones. Or maybe it's just the fact that I live in Glendale and the upcoming June primary elections are driving everyone nuts. I'm going to delve into this topic because I feel it's important that someone knows what's going on in their community, particularly when it comes to politics. To most Armenians, discussing politics means sitting in a backyard at a family barbecue and discussing the Israeli-Palestinian conflicts and tying that in to vague recollections of the civil war in Lebanon or remembering where they were when Khrushchev banged his shoe on the lectern at the UN or when the US Embassy was taken over in Iran. Don't act like you've never been part of any of these conversations! I don't even go to that many family barbecues and I've overheard more of these conversations than I'd care to remember. What amazes me the most however, is that whenever it comes to politics in America, domestic issues, Armenians are overall very apathetic. Unless a decision made in Congress raises the luxury tax on BMWs or Mercedes Benzes, they'd rather not vote or be involved. But over the last six years, this has changed in areas like Southern California and most visibly in Glendale where practically 8 of the city's 15 elected officials are Armenian. There's even an elected clerk and most people can't tell me what a clerk's responsibilities are! Even stranger was that three or four Armenians ran for that job! It seems as though insanity ensues whenever these elections roll around, be they in April or June. Lawn signs pop up in the most random places which make you wonder who in the world climbed up to the side of that hill to place it there and who did they think would see it or be impressed by it. "Look honey, the coyotes have endorsed Hovik Hovikian for Ombudsman of Glendale!" My favorite is the Armenian grocery stores that will try to appeal to everyone by putting up everyone's signs as though to say "We have no principles, we just want your money! Our lahmajunes love EVERYONE!!" I'd bet some of these places are the same ones that sell Turkish products instead of Armenian ones. So what does this mean for our community? Well, for one thing, there are a few important races involving Armenians on the state level. And no, it's not Senator Poochigian's bid for the Republican nomination for Attorney General. He's running virtually unopposed and will run away with the nomination. There's a race in Anaheim/Yorba Linda (President Richard Nixon's old stomping grounds) in which an Armenian-American, Marty Simonoff is vying for the Republican nomination. He's been active in the community and quite outspoken. Good guy and deserves any support the Armenians in Orange County and Montebello can give him. But the real battle royale is taking place in Glendale in the 43rd Assembly District where the election has gotten uglier than one of Michael Jackson's passport photos. Why has it gotten so ugly? Well, for one, Latino leaders see this seat as belonging to a Latino candidate even though Armenians outnumber Latinos in Glendale. The other reason is because one of the candidates, Glendale councilman Frank Quintero, has been using a handful of clueless Armenian to bolster his involvement in the Armenian community. That's all fine and dandy but when the opponent is an activist leader in the Armenian community like School Board President Paul Krekorian, then there is virtually no comparison. Krekorian is leading the race by many accounts--support amongst the Democratic party faithful, various polling, and general likeability. At one point he was even leading in money, but because some of our community members are more interested in their bank accounts than advancing the general public's interest, Quintero has raised over $100,000 from Armenian developers, banquet hall owners, and other business owners. Here's the list of folks that looks like the menu at the Chicken Ranch in Texas. (That's a brothel and yes I'm making that connection) Look at the names for yourself if you don't believe me. php?committee=1279156 This is an interesting site and you might even be interested to see who some our "community leaders" are looking out for our interests. Krekorian has worked his tail off for the Armenian-American students in Burbank and being a leading voice in the Democratic party in California when few other individuals were doing that. Quintero has been in a few marches and says "parev" on TV and some Armenians are ready to name their newborn daughter Frankush. It's insane and doesn't make sense. The election is June 6 and if you don't think that this is important than read the following article from Capitol Weekly--a Sacramento inside publication that tracks races. =743 So vote! Make your voice heard! Because if the right guy for the job (that would be Krekorian for my slower readers) doesn't win on June 6... well, let's just say that opportunities like this one don't grow on trees. I just hope that the Quintero donors realize their mistakes before it's too late. All of this election insanity and the Armenian community reminded me of the following anecdote. One day while campaigning against Dwight Eisenhower during the 1952 presidential election, Adlai Stevenson was approached by a female admirer. "Governor," she enthused, "every thinking person will be voting for you." "Madam, that is not enough," Stevenson replied. "I need a majority!" So tell your family. Tell your friends. Get out and vote. Because on June 6, being smart or committed is not enough. We need a majority! Skeptik Sinikian urges everyone go out and vote on June 6 and make the wise choice. If you disagree with Skeptik, you can reach him at [email protected] or visit his blog at <;www.si nikian.blogspot.com. All subscription inquiries and changes must be made through the proper carrier and not Asbarez Online. ASBAREZ ONLINE does not transmit address changes and subscription requests. (c) 2006 ASBAREZ ONLINE. All Rights Reserved. ASBAREZ provides this news service to ARMENIAN NEWS NETWORK members for academic research or personal use only and may not be reproduced in or through mass media outlets.

www.anca.org
www.ayfwest.org.
www.neuropsychconsultant.com.
www.aroundthecapitol.com/electiontrack/lookup.
www.capitolweekly.net/news/article.html?article_id

AGBU: Armenian Women in AGBU Make a Difference

AGBU Press Office
55 East 59th Street
New York, NY 10022-1112
Phone: 212.319.6383, x141
Fax: 212.319.6507
Email: [email protected]
Website:
PRESS RELEASE
Thursday, May 25, 2006
ARMENIAN WOMEN IN AGBU MAKE A DIFFERENCE: AGBU’s Professional Women
Make Their Mark Worldwide
With numerous milestones, celebrations and international holidays
taking place in 2006, such as the AGBU Centennial, AGBU Armenian Youth
Association’s (AYA) 75th Anniversary, and International Women’s Day on
March 8, AGBU women’s groups are honoring the contributions and
talents of Armenian women around the world. AGBU’s Lebanon and Syria
Districts, along with the Plovdiv Chapter and Los Angeles Hye Geen
have sponsored lectures, conferences and receptions that focus on the
important role Armenian women play in their communities.
Founded in 1906, AGBU is dedicated to preserving and promoting the
Armenian identity and heritage through educational, cultural, and
humanitarian programs. Together, AGBU’s volunteers, donors and
supporters serve some 400,000 Armenians in 35 countries annually.
To find out more about AGBU events or to view the accompanying photos
online, please visit

www.agbu.org
www.agbu.org/pressoffice/article.asp?ID=337.

ANKARA: US Recalls Armenian Envoy for Saying ‘Genocide’

Zaman Online, Turkey
May 26 2006
US Recalls Armenian Envoy for Saying ‘Genocide’
By Anadolu News Agency (aa), Washington
Published: Friday, May 26, 2006
zaman.com
United States President George W. Bush recalled the United States
Ambassador to Erivan, John Evans, who termed the incidents that
occurred during World War I as `genocide.’
The White House announced in a statement that it nominated United
States Ambassador to Dushanbe, Richard Hoagland, as replacement
ambassador to the Armenian capital Erivan instead.
State Department Spokesman Sean McCormack said Evans will leave his
post in Erivan, but offered no explanation as to why ambassador Evans
was leaving the three- year position after only two years.
More than 60 deputies from the Armenian lobby in the House of
Representatives reacted against the decision in a letter they wrote
to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, which cited they are worried
about the development and asked for a clarification about Evans’
condition.
The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA), an umbrella
organization for radical Armenian institutions in that United States,
announced Evans was unseated because he called the Armenian incidents
`genocide.’
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Experts deciphering A-320 flight recorders’ data

ITAR-TASS, Russia
May 26 2006
Experts deciphering A-320 flight recorders’ data

MOSCOW, May 26 (Itar-Tass) — Experts are deciphering information
from flight recorders of the Armenian A-320 that crashed offshore
Sochi on May 3, a source at the Interstate Aviation Committee (IAC)
told Itar-Tass on Friday.
The technical commission has finalized the first phase of
investigation at the crash scene, the source said.
`Commission members, including Armenian and French specialists, are
deciphering information from flight recorders, which may be useful
for the investigation,’ the source said.
The flight recorders were delivered to the IAC on Thursday.
Meanwhile, IAC head Tatiana Anodina had doubts about intactness of
the flight recorders. She said the information would be deciphered in
Russia with the use of French equipment, as France is the
manufacturer of the A-320.
Flight recorders monitor flight parameters and conversations in the
cockpit.
The Armavia plane fell down into the Black Sea when landing. The
crash killed 113 people onboard.

Cairo: The world outside

Al-Ahram Weekly, Egypt
May 26 2006
The world outside
Egypt’s varying degrees of historical independence reflected on its
foreign policy, writes Professor Yunan Labib Rizk

A great deal of information was put forth in previous issues of the
Diwan about the nature of Egyptian foreign relations in the
contemporary period. Among this was the fact that after Egypt fell
under Ottoman rule in 1517 and lost its independence, it no longer
had political representatives in other countries. Moreover, the
representatives of states, particularly European, within Egypt were
limited to a number of consuls concerned with the affairs of their
citizens and economic matters. Their meetings with Egypt’s pasha took
place in the presence of a high-ranking official called the “pash-
turgoman”, or chief translator, who was assisted by a number of
translators who were proficient in several European languages and who
were often Armenian.
With the establishment of the modern state at the hands of Egypt’s
remarkable governor Mohamed Ali Pasha and Egypt’s economic and
political debut in dealing with Europe, the pash-turgomans and their
assistants disappeared, to be replaced by a new administration. This
formed one unit among the seven departments Mohamed Ali established
and was called the Department of Commerce and Foreign Affairs. Its
specialisations varied in keeping with the state’s needs. Mohamed Ali
continued to depend on Armenians to head this department, the most
famous of whom was Bughus Youssefian. Yet because Egypt remained
subordinate to the Ottomans, the pasha was not allowed to send
political representatives abroad. Thus Mohamed Ali sufficed with
sending deputies to states such as Britain, France and Italy that
Egyptian interests required representation in.
During the era of Ismail (1863-1879), this department’s name was
changed to the Ministry of Foreign affairs, which soon became a unit
within the cabinet that was established one year prior to the famed
khedive’s ousting. For the first time, Egyptians held the post of
foreign minister, and while the Armenian Noubar Pasha held the post
during that period (five years), the Egyptian Boutros Ghali Pasha
held it for much longer (16 years) during the ensuing period.
This ministry continued to form one of the most important
institutions in the Egyptian political system until the announcement
in 1914 of the British protectorate over Egypt. The two foundations
upon which this system was established were that the protecting state
would assume responsibility of foreign relations and that it would
undertake administration of the military forces. This ministry was
dissolved following the declaration of the protectorate and replaced
with a department affiliated to the British high commissioner’s
headquarters, a fact that was a significant source of Egyptian anger.
The Foreign Ministry was re-established by the 28 February 1922
declaration that legally granted Egypt independence. Its
subordination to Al-Dubara Palace was cut, but instead of
transferring actual subordination to the cabinet as should have taken
place, it remained more closely affiliated to Abdin Palace, a
situation that King Fouad was most keen on maintaining.
Although the 1923 constitution deemed that the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs be included among the ministries, the opinion of Abdin Palace
following the establishment of partisan governments as authorised by
the constitution was to distance ministries from government
supervision so that they would not suffer from partisan struggles.
The palace would thus retain its control of them, including the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the armed forces, and religious affairs
as run by Al-Azhar Mosque and the religious endowments.
Concerning the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, most of the royal
appointment edicts for the new diplomatic corps were issued during
the terms of governments loyal to the king, not during the terms of
the Wafdist governments, which refused, whether in the time of Saad
Zaghloul or Mustafa El-Nahhas, to concede any of their powers to His
Majesty. It can thus be said that the periods of this ministry’s
animation always took place during the terms of minority or royal
governments.
The close relationship between the Foreign Ministry and Abdin Palace
is indicated by the fact that most of the royal cabinet’s cadre came
from this ministry. In turn, when political circumstances required
the ousting of a palace official, he was often placed in the Foreign
Ministry. This occurred with Hassan Nashaat Pasha and Zaki El-Ibrashi
Pasha, and it also took place during the reign of King Farouk. The
most famed of the palace’s men came from this institution — Ahmed
Hassanein Pasha, Hafiz Afifi Pasha, and Hassan Youssef Pasha. And it
is a custom followed until this day, for the spokesman of the
republic’s president is always chosen from among Egypt’s diplomatic
corps. Moreover, advisors close to the president, the most famous of
whom are Osama El-Baz and Mustafa El-Fiqi, who held the post of the
president’s press secretary for a short period, are also diplomats.
This confirms that it is an “old-new” relationship.
But let us return to the historical developments of Egypt’s foreign
relations. The 1936 Anglo-Egyptian Treaty left a deep mark on them,
for on the one hand they rejected any British tutelage by raising the
level of diplomatic exchange with Egypt to the rank of ambassador
despite this move being incomplete as is made clear below. On the
other hand, it paved the way for Egypt joining the League of Nations
the following year after the capitulations were annulled at the
Montreaux Convention. This freed the Wafd government’s hand, if to a
relative degree, in foreign relations, a fact that was not a source
of satisfaction for Abdin Palace, whose lord, Fouad I, had in the
meantime passed away. His son succeeded him, and did away with
El-Nahhas Pasha a few short months after assuming his constitutional
powers. Following the formation of the Mohamed Mahmoud government in
early 1938, it seemed as though the issue of foreign relations had
become its primary preoccupation, a product of its desire to turn
Egyptians’ attention abroad, away from domestic tensions.
ONLY A FEW SHORT WEEKS had passed following the formation of the
government of Mohamed Mahmoud Pasha when foreign relations became its
primary preoccupation.
Al-Ahram recorded the changes that took place in these relations in
its editorial of 12 March 1938 titled “Egypt’s position among
nations”. It stated that following Egypt’s alliance with Britain and
the cancellation of the capitulations, “it has taken possession of
its own affairs as all independent states do. The states with which
we are connected via mutually shared interests feel nothing but
friendship and goodwill towards us.” It offered as evidence the
successive visits undertaken by various states’ politicians and
ministers, including the French minister of education, who inspected
the country’s scientific institutes and praised them upon his return
home, and Monsieur Pietre, the head of the Franco- Egyptian
Association, “which works to strengthen the ties of friendship
between the two countries.” It also noted the friendly reception
given to the members of the Egyptian delegation to the medical
conference held in Baghdad. Al-Ahram concluded by drawing attention
to the connotations of this all, and quoted the prime minister as
saying, “Our international position during the current period
requires from us the greatest alertness and awareness.”
A few days later it published an exclusive interview that Mohamed
Mahmoud Pasha had given to the British newspaper the Daily Mail. In
it, he defined Egypt’s foreign policy as defending the sovereignty it
had recently won, including the continued flow of water from Lake
Tana and the sources of the Nile, and safeguarding the status quo of
the Suez Canal. He lauded “Egypt’s geographic importance” in that it
is “the Western portal leading to the East and the ancient key to
Africa. Its land is the most fertile on Earth, and we have attempted
to mix the best of culture in the West with the most noble of
traditions in the East. This is a mixture that will last and whose
ties will hold firm.”
This lovely remark was put to the test of experience following the
clouding atmosphere of international relations that autumn (1938)
during the Nazi invasion of Czechoslovakia. It appears that Egypt’s
representatives abroad were not up to par with the crisis. Al-Ahram
wrote that the reports received by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
were inadequate, lacked a detailed conception of the situation, and
some contained information that had already been published by
newspapers. Al-Ahram wrote that this experience offered an
opportunity for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to learn the weak
points of its diplomatic corps, and it stressed Egypt’s unique
geographical position and the fact that its international future
depended on the aptitude of its representatives abroad. “The current
political crisis is a good opportunity to meet this goal.”
On this matter, Al-Ahram learnt from foreign representatives,
foremost the British ambassador in the Egyptian capital, of their
disregard of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and direct contact with
the prime minister. “Some of them meet some of the other ministers
and top officials without the mediation of the minister of foreign
affairs or seeking his permission as international convention
requires in other countries. This fact was recorded by the foreign
affairs committee in the senate in its report on the foreign affairs
budget: “It is necessary to point out the convention on which our
political traditions in Egypt are based. Ministers plenipotentiary in
Egypt have grown accustomed to taking recourse to the prime minister
regarding most affairs, while their reference should naturally be the
minister of foreign affairs.”
Once again, Al-Ahram stressed the necessity of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs exhibiting its interest and drawing the people into
following the developments of the current crisis so that a mature
public opinion could be formed that would have specific orientations
for foreign policy “just as occurred with domestic policy”.
The government at that time soon turned this into a fact. It began to
hold a series of meetings to study the effect of foreign policy
developments on the country. Instructions were issued from the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs to Egypt’s representatives in Europe
requesting communication with it on the current crisis. Coded
telegrams began to pour into Cairo, bearing the developments and
incidents they witnessed.
Al-Ahram commented on this interest by saying that the crisis
developments warned of British involvement in the war and the
possibility of Italy entering into it in addition to Germany. “If
this happens, and it is not unlikely, Egypt will have commitments it
must uphold with its ally Britain on the one hand, and there will be
danger threatening Egypt’s Western borders on the other.”
It seems that the global crisis grew more complicated still with the
appearance of Japanese intentions. Japan had previously been keen to
stay distanced from European conflicts, but the new Japanese
intentions were made clear by Japan’s ambassador in Berlin:
“Britain’s dominion in the Far East has ended forever. The new China
will become Manchurian again, for it is establishing several
independent governments in the manner of the United States of America
and allying with Japan, who administrates its political and military
relations.”
This led Al-Ahram to comment that this meant tightening relations
between the Tokyo government and the Rome- Berlin axis, a fact that
warned of excessive danger. “It is incumbent upon Egyptian
politicians in these circumstances to end partisan animosity and call
on all children of the nation to unite so that the country can
address its foreign policy position with the wisdom and careful
consideration it requires.”
Yet this call was not answered as wished for by Wafd Party circles.
The party’s mouthpiece, Al-Wafd Al-Misri, commented that Egypt had
grown to follow British policy. “It is being led this time to
agreement as it was led previous times to dissension. Our sole role
is to follow England in signing onto an international agreement on
matters that vitally affect us.”
There is no doubt that these developments breathed life into the
government departments and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which
began to leaf through its old papers. Among the news that leaked out
on this was the undertaking of a review of the international treaties
Egypt had signed that were related to states of war and international
conduct during times of war. The most significant of the treaties the
Cairo government had signed was the treaty on prisoners of war and
one that stipulated that submarines not attack commercial ships, as
well as the treaty on improving the status of ill persons and those
injured in combat.
Yet from another perspective, some newspapers wanted to exit the
crisis by drawing a picture of foreign policy that Egypt should
follow in all cases, what they described as “positive policy”.
Unusually, Al-Muqattam, which was known for its loyalty to Britain,
call for this in three successive articles. In its first article,
Al-Muqattam tried to answer a question it posed — “What positive
policies does Egypt choose?” It responded by saying that Egypt was
preparing means of defence to ward off the danger of war and its
disastrous consequences. “With this policy, the government has
received public support because Egyptians refuse for their country to
be a target of this danger when it has barely begun to enjoy the
blessing of its independence. If we follow the policy of giving in to
reality on the basis of nothing better being possible, then we will
be subject to the same consequences of overlooking policy related to
national defence.”
In the second article, Al-Muqattam drew attention to the issue of the
Nile sources that Italy had taken control of in Ethiopia and the
issue of the Suez Canal, which Italy was also turning to. It held
that the government should prove that Egypt was an independent and
sovereign state with dominion over its territory. This orientation
was supported, according to the paper, by the fact that the countries
of the east had their eyes on Egypt and that Arab states considered
it their elder.
Starting from that early time, Al-Muqattam drew attention to Egypt’s
possession of factors that allowed it to follow positive foreign
policies. This orientation was strengthened following WWII,
particularly in the period following the Wafd government (1950-1952).
This became a declared policy during the Nasser period, placing this
approach in the category of old-new policies.
Yet Al-Muqattam did not suffice with proposing this idea, rather
clarifying it in its third and final article. It held that pursuing
this policy required dependence on a strong economic base, something
that could not be actualised without a tight irrigation system and
the combating of pests that assailed the cotton crops. This was a
toilsome task, “but if we consider that done by others among those we
imitate, then it is clear that there is no escape from taking on this
serious work, especially as we live in a world that is floating, and
what all peoples need the most is the factor of stability.”
As matters escalated in this direction, it was natural that interest
was given to improving Egypt’s political representation abroad. The
Anglo-Egyptian Treaty’s provisions for raising the rank of Egypt’s
representative in London to that of ambassador was supposed to have
been followed by raising all the remaining ministers plenipotentiary
to the same rank. The Mohamed Mahmoud government did not do this,
however, a fact pointed out by a parliamentary representative who
expressed his conviction that establishing an Egyptian embassy in
Turkey would not conflict with the treaty’s provisions, particularly
after Turkey had signed “the two charters of the Balkan alliance and
the eastern alliance.”
This led Abdallah Hussein, a lawyer and writer in Al-Ahram, to stress
that the treaty did not bar Egypt from establishing embassies in
other countries. “As long as that is the case, it is possible for our
government to begin thinking about promoting some of our large
legations to embassies so as to close all doors of interpretation on
issues that affect our foreign command and attempt to limit it,
particularly since we now have a diplomatic corps and men qualified
to be ambassadors.”
IT WAS NATURAL for the Egyptian government to respond to these
raising voices within and beyond parliament. This fact is made clear
by a collection of various related news items that can be followed in
Al-Ahram over a lengthy period.
Some of this news was about Egypt joining the eastern alliance
through what was known as the Saadabad charter, which was signed
between Turkey, Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan, and that Rushdi Aras, the
Turkish foreign minister, was on his way to Cairo to negotiate on
this matter.
The Turkish minister indeed arrived in the Egyptian capital and an
Al-Ahram reporter rushed to learn definite news on this issue. He
confirmed that the Turkish government had made an offer and that it
was being discussed with top officials in the Egyptian Ministry of
Foreign Affairs. Abdel-Fattah Yehia Pasha was to present the Turkish
minister’s opinion to the cabinet.
Al-Ahram added that Aras would return within a month to complete the
documents related to the treaty of friendship and goodwill the
minister plenipotentiary had signed in Ankara. At that time,
negotiations would begin on Egypt signing onto the eastern alliance
charter. Yet Al-Ahram did not make reference to the issue again from
near or afar.
Confidential British documents, in contrast, indicate that the
British embassy headquarters intervened to prevent the Egyptian
government from advancing far in this matter, on the basis that
Egypt’s obligations through joining the alliance conflicted with the
stipulations of the treaty of alliance and friendship with London’s
government. At this point, Mohamed Mahmoud’s government halted its
impermissible talk.
Following that, Egyptian policy was transformed into a role of
leadership in the Islamic world. Information on this can be gleaned
from European newspapers including the English Daily Telegraph.
The Daily Telegraph presented an entire design of Egyptian officials’
thought on this matter, stressing that Egypt’s religious standing
allowed it to hold a special place in the Islamic world. The design,
according to the newspaper’s characterisation, had ripened in the
minds of experienced and trusted men, and was based on a number of
points. The most important of these were that the king would become
the head of the caliphate and the acknowledged leader of the Islamic
nations whose borders fell on the shores of the Mediterranean Sea and
which controlled major sea and air routes between the East and West,
and that Egyptian princesses would marry Arab princes and kings.
A French newspaper confirmed that there was movement towards Egypt
occupying the role of leadership in the Islamic world. Its
correspondent in Cairo, Maurice Berneaux, drew attention to the fact
that during its term the El-Nahhas government had declined signing
onto the eastern charter and had exhibited solidarity with the Arabs
of Palestine. “Supporters of Islamic politics view that Egypt, which
is today at the forefront of Islamic states, must follow policy in
conformity with the public interest of Islam. They even make
reference to re- establishing the caliphate and granting its
authority to King Farouk.”
The paper closed by saying, “Egypt must not forget that 17 caliphs
succeeded each other in Cairo over two centuries of time, and that
the heart of Islam continues to beat in Al-Azhar University. The
feelings that will throb in the chest of King Farouk if he assumes
the caliphate will be that he is returning to Egypt the distinction
it was stripped of with the Turkish conquest. This theory has had a
strong effect on the heart of the young king since Egypt has regained
its independence and its feelings of the homeland’s glory and
greatness have increased.”
A surprising fact of that long-ago era is Egypt’s interest in playing
a role in the African continent despite most of it being under
European colonial control at the time. An Al-Ahram editorial titled
“Egypt between Africa and Europe” mentioned in its opening that all
of the African nations turned their eyes towards Egypt. It
ascertained that Egypt’s future depended on that of the Nile Valley,
and that “Egypt’s success is also based on its success.”
On this issue, Al-Ahram made a comparison between Africa during WWI
and the world war whose threat had begun to appear on the horizon. It
noted that the battles of the first had all taken place in Europe,
while the imminent war “is expected to be of paramount importance.
Italy has occupied Ethiopia despite the resolutions of the League of
Nations and the position of Britain, and the nationalist Spaniards
are seeking the aid of Moroccans from the countryside in their war
against Madrid. Italy has taken care to fortify Libya, and turned it
into an arena for military practice and manoeuvres. Recently, Germany
has risen up and demanded African colonies. As such, Egypt cannot
afford to close its eyes to what is taking place before it with
regard to the African continent.”
Egyptian interest in the African continent was highlighted in the
London Sunday Times in an article titled “Shared interests between
Egypt and South Africa.” It stated that South Africa had undertaken
leadership of the countries in central and southern areas of the
continent. “Yet the next step, in which our security is concerned, is
for measures to be taken to distribute the scope of our influence to
the shores of the Mediterranean and the banks of the Suez Canal.”
As the new system of governance in Egypt was concerned with
organising a modern army, and there was no doubt that the Egyptian
government and South Africa had some shared interests, particularly
in the security of the Suez Canal, it was possible for any
discussions between the two parties to have led to far-reaching
consequences affecting them both.
With this outline of all these policies, it is possible to see that
at that early period near the end of the 1930s, Egyptians had already
become aware of their position that made them a central link not only
in the Arab world but also the eastern and Islamic world and the
African continent. They turned to this fact even more following WWII,
and it was soon turned into a planned policy during the Nasser era
for the areas surrounding Egypt. Yet it seems that the principles of
foreign policies discussed by Egyptians at that time have remained
constant despite the succession of generations, for the realities of
geography have always made them old-new.
cls.htm