AGBU Press Office
55 East 59th Street
New York, NY 10022-1112
Phone: 212.319.6383,x109
Fax: 212.319.6507
Email: [email protected]
Website:
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Monday, July 24, 2006
ONE-OF-A-KIND CONCERT HOSTED BY AGBU AYA DAMASCUS PACKS THE HOUSE
Presented for the first time ever in Syria, the Armenian Youth
Association (AYA) of AGBU Damascus sponsored the performance of “The
Epic of Gilgamesh” at the St. Sarkis Armenian Church in Damascus on
July 14 and 15, 2006.
With the support of global mobile telecommunications provider Areeba,
over 600 Armenian and Syrian guests enjoyed the unique performance
composed by Kinan Azmeh on clarinet accompanied by computer-illustrated
art created live by Kevork Mourad.
The earliest known work of literature to man, “The Epic of
Gilgamesh” dates back to the ancient state of Babylonia in 3000
B.C. and is still celebrated as one of the world’s greatest pieces of
literature. Currently residing in New York, Syria-born artists Azmeh
and Mourad teamed up to retell the epic poem through the mesmerizing
merger of music and visual art to create a tantalizing experience
that made the ancient story come alive for contemporary audiences.
Upholding the mission of AGBU, AYA Damascus is committed to
preserving and promoting the Armenian identity and heritage. For more
information on AYA Damascus, please email [email protected] or visit
For more information on AGBU and its worldwide programs, please
visit
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
A one-president summit: Vladimir Putin the host
A ONE-PRESIDENT SUMMIT; Vladimir Putin the host
Agency WPS
What the Papers Say Part A (Russia)
July 21, 2006 Friday
By Vladimir Soloviov, Sergei Strokan
Ten CIS presidents are coming to Moscow for an informal summit;
CIS presidents are coming to Moscow for an informal summit. The CIS
is split into pro-Russian and anti-Russian factions, but it hasn’t
collapsed yet – only because the CIS countries aspiring for integration
into the West still hope to settle their conflicts with Russia first.
Turkmenistan is the only CIS country that won’t be represented by
its president, Saparmurat Niyazov, in Moscow. The Turkmenbashi rarely
attends informal CIS summits.
Ten other CIS presidents are coming – even Mikhail Saakashvili,
Viktor Yushchenko, and Vladimir Voronin. Their fiercely pro-Western
Georgia, Ukraine, and Moldova were the worst affected by a sharp
turn in Moscow’s foreign policy that sparked gas and trade wars with
insufficiently loyal CIS regimes last year.
A meeting between Vladimir Putin and his Georgian counterpart
Saakashvili will probably be the central event of the informal
summit. Russian-Georgian relations are at a record low. Trade wars and
scandalous political statements have escalated into outright threats.
Conflict resolution in Abkhazia and South Ossetia will be in the
focus of attention at the bilateral talks. Everything points to
the conclusion that Saakashvili is going to Moscow to demand,
not to beg. The president of Georgia has some major cards up
his sleeve. For a start, Georgia withdrew its signature from the
bilateral agreement concerning WTO membership for Russia. Secondly, the
parliament of Georgia unanimously passed a resolution on withdrawing
Russian peacekeeping contingents from the Georgian-Abkhazian and
Georgian-Ossetian conflict areas.
The Kremlin in its turn is determined to keep its obstinate neighbor
under pressure. Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov made it plain in his
interview yesterday that Russian peacekeepers are not leaving. Lavrov
accused Georgia of sabotaging the peacekeeping operation and failing to
implement international agreements on regional conflict resolution. The
Russian minister warned Tbilisi against the use of force, and promised
protection of citizens of Russia “by all available means.”
According to our sources, Moscow is considering tougher economic
sanctions against Georgia. The ban on import of wines and mineral
water from Georgia was just a curtain-raiser, it seems. When he
was meeting with Saakashvili in June, Putin hinted that Russia had
another economic lever to use. “Between $1.5 million and $2 billion
is transacted from Russia into Georgia every year,” he said. “That’s
more than any aid from the third countries.” By plugging the financial
channels, the Kremlin would deprive Tbilisi of one of its major sources
of foreign currency. On the other hand, this is not a measure to be
considered lightly.
Unlike his Georgian counterpart, President Voronin of Moldova
is coming to Moscow to try to make peace with the Kremlin. In a
major press conference shortly before his departure for Moscow,
Voronin took the first step towards restoring relations with Russia
and said that he does not perceive any political motives in higher
gas tariffs. The Kremlin must have taken notice. Voronin’s Foreign
Policy Advisor Sergiu Mokanu says that a bilateral meeting between
the Moldovan and Russian president has been scheduled.
However, Putin will probably find himself in the position of a
referee at the summit. There is no love lost between presidents of
some pro-Russian CIS countries. A triangle of hostility exists in
Central Asia – between Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan. It is
usually Dushanbe and mostly Bishkek versus Tashkent. Uzbek secret
services boasted of having captured a Tajik spy shortly before the
summit in Moscow. The spy turned out to be one Furkat Tuigunov,
a citizen of Tajikistan of Uzbek origin. According to the Uzbek
authorities, Tuigunov already confessed and said the Tajik State
Security ministry had recruited him in 2001 and ran him ever since.
Tuigunov allegedly confessed that he had prepared acts of sabotage
on the territory of Uzbek border regions and was tasked to arrange
physical elimination of certain citizens of Uzbekistan. Our sources
indicate that President Emomali Rakhmonov of Tajikistan is going to
raise the topic of Tajik-Uzbek relations at the summit and ask Putin
to intercede on behalf of his country.
Neither can Kurmanbek Bakiyev of Kyrgyzstan boast of any warm relations
with official Tashkent. Bilateral relations soured after the Andijan
events in May of 2005, when Bishkek refused to extradite 500 refugees
to Uzbekistan but helped them move on to other countries instead. Islam
Karimov of Uzbekistan never forgot it. President Ilham Aliyev of
Azerbaijan and President Robert Kocharian of Armenia are also going
to enlist the services of Russia as a go-between. The Nagorno-Karabakh
conflict resolution is in another impasse at this point.
Conversation with Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus promises to
be particularly trying. Elected the president again last spring,
Lukashenko was enraged to hear an ultimatum from the Kremlin: either
he sells Belarussian gas infrastructure to Gazprom or gas tariffs for
Belarus go up to the European level. Lukashenko resisted it as long
as he dared but eventually succumbed to the pressure for fear to lose
everything (the seat of the president, first and foremost). Alexander
Ryazanov of Gazprom flew to Minsk yesterday to sign the protocol on
assets evaluation.
In other words, the forthcoming summit will be rather like Putin’s
waiting room, where the visiting dignitaries will wait their turn to
air their grievances and problems.
P.S.
The informal CIS meeting is taking place right after the G8 summit
in St. Petersburg, and this nuance cannot help having its effect
on the former. No matter what else might be said about the outcome
of the G8 summit, one has to admit that Russia managed to remain in
the elite club and blunt the attacks of critics of Russian democracy
(for how long doesn’t really matter for the time being). In short, the
painstakingly directed return of Russia to the sphere of international
affairs has taken place according to the script. It follows that
Russia is the only member of the commonwealth of outsiders that
simultaneously belongs to the upper segment of world politics.
CIS leaders do not belong to the pick of the crop of the global
politics, and Russia with its global status becomes their Elder Brother
or promoter of their interests in dealings with the centers of world
power. From this standpoint, membership in the CIS with Russia offers
them practically the only chance of integration into the civilized
world (even though this chance is really illusory). Russia in its turn
is given a chance to shift the CIS to a new phase of development, the
one that will benefit Russia itself. The Commonwealth of Independent
States of the 1990s is about to become the Commonwealth of Dependent
States of 2006. And it isn’t closed to new memberships.
Source: Kommersant, July 21, 2006, p. 8
Translated by A. Ignatkin
Four presidents won’t take part in informal CIS summit in Moscow
Four presidents won’t take part in informal CIS summit in Moscow
Prime-Tass Business News Agency, Russia
Prime-Tass English-language Business Newswire
July 21, 2006 Friday 9:11 PM EET
Leaders from four countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States
(CIS) are not expected to take part in the organization’s informal
summit taking place in Moscow Friday and Saturday.
Ukraine’s President Viktor Yushchenko will not take part in the summit
because he has decided to stay home given the “political situation”
in Ukraine, Irina Gerashchenko, Yushchenko’s press secretary, said
Friday, ITAR-TASS reported.
Ukrainian politicians have so far failed to form a coalition government
and appoint the prime minister since the parliamentary election
in March.
Yushchenko plans to send Russian President Vladimir Putin a letter
explaining the reasons for his decision and assuring him that Ukraine
considers Russia a strategic partner, Gerashchenko said, adding that
the Ukrainian president would also invite Putin to visit Ukraine.
The press service of Armenia’s President Robert Kocharyan also said
Friday that Kocharyan would not take part in the summit because he
had come down with a cold, ITAR-TASS reported.
Additionally, the executive office of Georgia’s President Mikhail
Saakashvili also said Friday that Saakashvili had postponed his visit
to the summit, ITAR-TASS said. The executive office did not give a
reason for the postponement.
Merab Antadze, former Georgian deputy foreign minister who is slated
to be appointed conflict resolution minister as a result of the
cabinet’s dismissal on Monday, said Monday that Saakashvili’s visit
had been postponed because the summit’s schedule did not allow the
Russian and Georgian presidents to meet personally. However, they
are expected to meet in the near future, he said.
According to various Russian media reports, Turkmenistan’s President
Saparmurat Niyazov does not usually take part in CIS informal summits
and will not attend the current one as well.
Turkmenistan is an associate member of the CIS, while Ukraine, Armenia
and Georgia are full members. Turkmenistan withdrew from full CIS
membership in 2005.
Georgia, Ukraine, Armenia, Turkmenistan not to attend CIS summit
Georgia, Ukraine, Armenia, Turkmenistan not to attend CIS summit
ITAR-TASS News Agency
TASS
July 21, 2006 Friday 08:25 AM EST
The CIS informal summit to begin later on Friday will not be attended
by Ukrainian, Georgian, Armenian and Turkmen presidents.
Turkmenistan’s President Saparmurat Niyazon, who is holidaying at
the Caspian seaside, said he would not participate in the summit
beforehand, while Ukraine’s Yushchenko, Georgia’s Saakashvili and
Armenia’s Kocharian decided on this spontaneously.
These changes did not affect the summit’s agenda. The assessment of
international situation and the CIS upgrading and reforming will be
of priority.
“Russian President Vladimir Putin invited his counterparts to meet
in Moscow on July 21-22 to discuss the CIS reform informally ahead of
the regular summit in autumn,” presidential aide Sergei Prikhodko said.
Ukraine’s Viktor Yushchenko hesitated for a long while, as his
participation in the forum depended on Ukraine’s political situation.
Earlier in the day, the Ukrainian presidential press service said
Yushchenko has strong intention to come, but a few hours after press
secretary Irina Grishchenko announced of Yushchenko’s refusal.
“Taking into account Ukraine’s internal situation, the president
decided he should stay in the country,” she said.
Yushchenko will wrote a letter to Putin explaining the reason of his
refusal and confirming that Russia remains Ukraine’s strategic partner,
she said.
“In his letter Yushchenko will also invite Vladimir Putin to visit
Ukraine. He hopes that his Russian counterparts will understand his
decision,” Grishchenko said.
Georgia’s Saakashvili, who earlier on Friday dismissed the government,
and soon after re-appointed all ministers, except from state minister
for conflict settlement – Georgy Khaindrava and environment protection
minister – Georgy Papuashvili, decided not to go to Moscow, although
his plane was ready to land off.
Merab Antadze, who replaced Khaindrava and was preparing
Putin-Saakashivili meeting in Moscow said “he failed to agree on the
bilateral meeting within the framework of the CIS summit.”
“However, we’ve agreed to hold such a meeting in the near future,
and the two presidents will be able to consider Tbilisi’s proposals,”
he said.
Armenia’s Robert Kocharian got heavy cold and will not take part.
Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbayev, who currently presides over
the CIS, confirmed his participation and prepared a program document
on the CIS reform for the Moscow summit, Kazakh Foreign Minister
Kasymzhomart Tokayev said.
Moldovan President Vladimir Voronin will also attend the summit. On
July 19, he said he “was not satisfied with current relations with
Russia.”
“Most problems the two countries face are concentrated on the Dniester
region conflict settlement,” he said.
Voronin sees no political undertones in Russia’s gas export price
hikes.
“Russia is reconsidering its economic policy in the CIS, not only in
relation to Moldova, but also to other countries of the CIS increasing
gas export prices for them,” he said.
As for Russia’s ban on import of Moldovan wines, Voronin expressed
the hope that this step “will make Moldova’s winemakers to look for
new markets.”
The schedule of Voronin’s bilateral meeting is now being coordinated,
the Moldovan presidential press service said.
“The Belarussian delegation led by President Alexander Lukashenko will
arrive in Moscow on Friday,” the Belarussian Foreign Ministry’s press
secretary, Andrei Popov, told Itar-Tass. “The program of Lukashenko’s
visit is now being finalized.”
He pointed out that Lukashenko believes that “the CIS has the future
and it is necessary to define areas for further cooperation once
again.”
Azerbaijan’s Ilkham Aliyev will arrive in Moscow after a short
vacation, the head of the presidential administration’s foreign
affairs department, Novruz Mamedov, said.
Aliyev will express “his attitude to cooperation prospects within
the CIS framework,” he said.
Tajikistan’s Emomali Rakhmonov, who also confirmed his participation in
the upcoming summit, believes that “it is too early “to decommission”
the CIS.”
The Kyrgyz and Uzbek presidents are also expected to take part.
Igor Giorgadze: Fights for Georgia
IGOR GIORGADZE: FIGHTS FOR GEORGIA
Moscow News (Russia)
July 21, 2006
By Dmitry Starostin The Moscow News
The Georgian opposition leader has dreams of building another
Switzerland
The man that some Georgian politicians have compared to bin Laden,
whereas others see as the country’s future savior, has been on the
international wanted list for the past 11 years, moving frequently
between undisclosed countries abroad. The son of a Soviet KGB general,
Igor Giorgadze, in 1973, graduated from the KGB Higher School in Moscow
and was sent to work in Georgia. In 1980-81, he fought in the war waged
by the USSR in Afghanistan as part of the Kaskad special task unit. By
the time the Soviet Union disintegrated, he had reached the rank of KGB
lieutenant general. When Georgia’s first president, Zviad Gamsakhurdia,
was toppled, Giorgadze threw his support behind the Military Council
(“triumvirate”) that came to power in the country in March 1992. In
1993, Giorgadze was appointed Georgia’s state security minister. In
1995, Igor Giorgadze left the South Caucasus state after an alleged
assassination attempt on President Eduard Shevardnadze. The ruling
authorities accused him of masterminding the attack and charged him
with terrorism.
In 2001, Giorgadze’s supporters in Georgia formed an opposition party,
known since 2003 as Justice. It also serves as an umbrella group for
the Anti-Soros Movement and a charity foundation.
On May 23, 2006, Vladimir Kolesnikov (then-deputy prosecutor general
of the Russian Federation) said that Russia might grant Igor Giorgadze
political asylum. The Georgian Foreign Ministry immediately protested
the move.
An MN correspondent met with Igor Giorgadze in one of the FSU states.
You have denied any involvement in the assassination attempt on
President Eduard Shevardnadze on August 29, 1995? What happened on
that day?
A presidential election was set for November 1995. By that time, my
disagreements with Shevardnadze over Georgia’s future had come to a
head. April and May polls showed that I was far ahead of Shevardnadze,
as were Aslan Abashidze then-leader of the Georgia region of Adzharia
and Dzhumbert Patiashvili, a former secretary of the Central Committee
of the Communist Party of Georgia. I made it clear that as state
security minister
I would not allow ballot rigging.
An easy way out of that situation was to stage an assassination attempt
on Shevardnadze and then crack down on his political opponents. In its
wake, about 400 people were arrested. Not surprisingly, Shevardnadze
won the election.
Are the people who you say were involved in the act still alive?
Yes, they are.
Do you know who they are?
Shota Kviraya, then-interior minister, and people in charge of
Shevardnadze’s personal security.
There were 14 defendants and 365 witnesses in the 1997-98 trial of the
alleged masterminds and perpetrators of the assassination attempt. None
of them testified against me or produced any physical evidence.
You returned to politics in July 2001. Presumably, you managed to
convince a certain part of the Georgian business community that you
had good political potential.
Luckily, many Georgian businessmen immediately saw through the
“rose revolution.” It was a travesty. Shevardnadze was hated so much
that had he appointed a successor (as Yeltsin had), he would have
been torn into pieces. About two years before the 2003 parliamentary
elections, the Saakashvili-Zhvania-Burdzhanadze troika was cast as an
opposition. As a matter of fact, they were Shevardnadze loyalists,
his followers. Many businessmen both in and outside of Georgia saw
that. And this is how I acquired money and support.
It was to a very large degree through the Russian media that we
managed to galvanize the Georgian population into action. (Georgian
television imposed a virtual news blackout on our activities.) Three
weeks ago, 1,500 party activists marched to the administrative border
with the Republic of Adzharia, to the checkpoint that Saakashvili had
solemnly bulldozed in May 2004. Georgian television showed footage
of the action for just three seconds and from an angle that showed
not more than 20 people.
What was the aim of the action?
There was only one demand: The present government must resign. Early
parliamentary and presidential elections should be held. Georgia
is continuing to slip into a dangerous confrontation with Abkhazia,
South Ossetia, and Russia.
The ruling authorities had not expected that. Nor did they expect
8,000 people to turn out at a protest rally in Tbilisi. The resistance
movement is gaining momentum.
So there is going to be a real revolution in Georgia – not a rose,
but nettle revolution.
There is a view in Russia that the older generation of Georgians tend
to favor rapprochement with Russia, whereas young people are looking
to the West.
This is a delusion. We have a very large proportion of young people
among our party members. Young people can see clearly the results
of confrontation with Russia. They can see that their parents, elder
brothers and sisters work hard all through the year to gather a good
harvest, but then are unable to sell it. The border with Russia has
been closed. The vast Russian market, sought after by the United
States and China, was abruptly closed by Saakashvili because he
suddenly decided that Russia was bad.
The confrontation with Russia was provoked by a group of people who
are still being paid by George Soros. We have the worst kind of a
puppet government in Georgia.
In February 2005, Georgian Prime Minister Zurab Zhvania died under
mysterious circumstances. Do you think it was an accident or an
assassination?
You can stop any Georgian in the street and he will tell you that it
was murder. The Zhvania family also knows this. Consider: Experts from
the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) came to the conclusion that
the concentration of gas in the apartment where Zhvania and regional
governor Raul Yusupov were found dead was insufficient for killing two
persons simultaneously. The FSB report was translated into Georgian
to mean exactly the opposite: The gas concentration had been lethal.
I was not surprised.
You have said that should you come to power, you could start an
effective negotiating process with the breakaway republics of Abkhazia
and South Ossetia. Meanwhile, some people in Abkhazia are saying:
“Better Saakashvili than Giorgadze. If Giorgadze becomes president,
Moscow will force us to come to terms with Tbilisi.”
Abkhazia is heterogeneous, as is Georgia. Since there were people
in Georgia who started the war, so there are people in Abkhazia who
are thus far happy with the status quo. I do not want to criticize
or condemn them. Everyone has a right to uphold his own position.
I can only say that unlike the incumbent authorities, I and my
supporters are campaigning for the reunification of Georgia, not
territorial integrity. These are very different things. Saakashvili
and his team simply want to regain control of these territories by
force. Their main goal is to stick a Georgian state flag on the border
with Russia.
What is really important for me is that our Abkhaz and South Ossetian
brothers remember that there are Georgians who were opposed to this
war right from the start. It was not Georgia but its irresponsible
leadership that started a war against them. We cannot possibly
live in a state of constant war. All conflicts will be resolved one
way or another. Only we would like to take a shortcut to peace. We
recognize Russia’s status as a guarantor of security for the Abkhaz
and South Ossetians. This does not make us the Kremlin agents: We
are pro-Georgian politicians who want to use peaceful means to bring
back into the family fold ethnic groups that were deliberately pitted
against one another. If our party comes to power, we have incomparably
better chances of sitting down at the negotiating table with them
and settling the conflict. This is the central issue in the current
political standoff.
You said earlier that if the incumbent regime stays in power, Georgia’s
disintegration could go even further with Samtskhe-Dzhavakhetia
Armenians and Kvemo Kartli Azeris breaking away.
The people of Dzhavakhetia have repeatedly demanded an autonomy
status. They never did under the Soviet rule or under Gamsakhurdia or
under Shevardnadze. This means that all is not well in our state. And
even though the Azerbaijani authorities are attempting to pacify
Georgia’s ethnic Azeris, I do not rule out that they could also make
this demand.
But disintegration will also move along other lines. A group of U.S.
Senators who recently visited Georgia said there were no obstacles to
Georgia’s accession to NATO without Abkhazia or South Ossetia. Yet
there was no reaction from the Georgian ruling authorities because
they are relying on NATO tanks and combat aircraft to enforce control
over the restive territories. This is where our positions diverge.
You can return these territories, but it will not be a whole Georgia.
You will end up with another Palestine. But we want to build another
Switzerland.
What do you expect from Saakashvili’s visit to Washington?
I believe that the main subject of discussion between Saakashvili and
Bush will be the solution to the South Ossetian and Abkhaz conflicts.
I think that Saakashvili will ask for sanction to use force, but
intuition tells me that the United States will not give him its
blessing. Nevertheless, the Saakashvili team will attempt to escalate
the situation in the zone of the South-Ossetia/Georgia conflict. The
situation in Abkhazia is somewhat different. Abkhazia is no good for
a blitzkrieg, which is exactly what Georgia’s incumbent rulers want.
Do you maintain friendly or business-like relations with Aslan
Abashidze?
No. We had a meeting after he left Adzharia, and I understand that
he has quit politics for good.
Do you think you will become the next Georgian president?
This is a question to the Almighty. Only He knows. I will become
president if the people decide so. If I knew that someone was ready
today to steer Georgia in the right direction, I would be happy to walk
together with this person all the way and cede him the leadership.MN
Mediators Bow out of The Karabakh Game
MEDIATORS BOW OUT OF THE KARABAKH GAME;
Russia, Europe, and the United States ought to declare that war is unacceptable
Agency WPS
What the Papers Say Part A (Russia)
July 21, 2006 Friday
By Nicholas Whyte, Europe Program Director, Sabine Freizer, Caucasus
Project Director, International Crisis Group
An update on the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict; International mediators
have spent 12 years trying in vain to find a way of resolving
the bloody conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over control of
Nagorno-Karabakh. American, French, and Russian mediators have now had
to withdraw, and the opposing sides are preparing to resume their war.
Contrary to expectations, the G8 summit in St. Petersburg did not
include talks between President Robert Kocharian of Armenia and
President Ilkham Aliyev of Azerbaijan. International mediators
have spent 12 years trying in vain to find a way of resolving
the bloody conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over control of
Nagorno-Karabakh. American, French, and Russian mediators have now had
to withdraw, and the opposing sides are preparing to resume their war.
After the USSR collapsed, several armed conflicts broke out in the
Trans-Caucasus – but the largest and most vicious was the conflict
in Nagorno-Karabakh, a region of Azerbaijan with a predominantly
Armenian population. By the time a truce was signed in 1995, around
30,000 people had been killed and over a million people from both
sides had been subjected to forced resettlement. The armed forces
of Nagorno-Karabakh, supported by Armenia, are still holding on to
seven districts of Azerbaijan.
Over the past decade, the opposing sides haven’t managed to sign a
single agreement that might bring political regulation closer. The
high points of many years of effort by Minsk Group mediators were two
meetings between Robert Kocharian and Ilkham Aliyev, held in the first
half of 2006. But even these meetings didn’t produce any concrete steps
toward achieving a stable peace. In an unusually tough statement issued
in late June, the international mediators indicated that they don’t see
any point in continuing intensive shuttle diplomacy or organizing more
meetings at the presidential level. In a statement dated July 3, the
mediators confirmed that they are prepared to facilitate regulation,
while emphasizing that in practice, neither Baku nor Yerevan are
showing any political will to reach agreement.
The basic components of potential regulation are well-known. The
International Crisis Group identified them clearly in two reports
released in 2005. The statement issued by the mediators confirmed these
provisions: all sides must reject the use of force; Armenian troops
should leave the territory of Azerbaijan adjacent to Nagorno-Karabakh;
both sides should undertake to hold a referendum on the ultimate
status of Nagorno-Karabakh, without any “forcible measures” being used;
Nagorno-Karabakh should have a temporary status during this period, and
the international community should provide substantial aid, including
a peacekeeping contingent – especially given that this is Europe’s only
“frozen conflict” where no international observers are present.
The stumbling blocks in the negotiations have been the future status
of two corridors linking Nagorno-Karabakh with Armenia, the conditions
for the proposed referendum, and the requirement to ensure the return
of refugees before the referendum is held. The mediators proposed
reaching agreement on other points first, unblocking the process
itself, and postponing discussion of the most difficult problems –
but this proposal was not accepted.
Armenia’s victory in the military action of 1992-94, when extensive
territories were occupied and their Azeri residents expelled, has
proved to be a Pyrrhic victory. Armenia was left isolated when Turkey
closed its borders. But the political arithmetic accepted in Yerevan
precludes the possibility of conclusive regulation: supporters of
President Kocharian, the former leader of Nagorno-Karabakh, would
never forgive him for making concessions to Azerbaijan.
Baku, kept afloat by its oil export earnings (set to triple
Azerbaijan’s revenues by 2009), seems to be harboring its own plans
for resolving the conflict. Azerbaijan’s defense spending for 2007
will be larger than Armenia’s entire state budget. In the last war,
Azerbaijan was defeated. Clearly, some people in Baku are in a
revanchist mood: Azeri officials, starting with President Aliyev,
are praising their country’s military might.
Although the mediators’ efforts haven’t produced results, the
international community cannot allow events to get out of control;
there is too much at stake. The time has come to revise relations
with both countries.
Armenia is receiving substantial aid from the outside world, some
of which was delivered recently from the United States as part of
the Millenium Challenges program. Azerbaijan is at the center of a
network of energy and security interests – including the gas and oil
pipelines connecting Caspian Sea fields with Turkey and the West.
Some representatives of Azerbaijan are hoping that geopolitical
interests will make the international community turn a blind eye if
Azerbaijan launches a military campaign to regain the territory it
lost in 1994. Russia, Europe, and the United States need to make their
stance on this issue absolutely clear, if that has not already been
done by the mediators’ latest statement. They should indicate that
any renewed use of armed force would negate all commitments regarding
economic and political assistance. If the international community
can’t manage to restore peace to the Trans-Caucasus, it should at least
make it unambiguously clear that resuming the war is unacceptable.
Source: Vremya Novostei, July 20, 2006, p. 5
Translated by Elena Leonova
Armenian Letters from Lebanon
ARMENIAN LETTERS FROM LEBANON
Beirut, July 19, 2006
Dear Friends and Colleagues,
Thankfulness is a good starting point whether in Christian worship or
in human relationships. Indeed, as I write these lines, I cannot but
thank those who, during these past days of turmoil, have exhibited
a sense of solidarity with the people of Lebanon, prayed for peace,
made concrete suggestions, or silently felt with us.
What is going on? How are you doing? What are you doing? What is
going to happen? These have been the questions of those inside and
outside Lebanon.
The country is in a state of shock.
Eight days ago, all we were discussing at Haigazian University was
the student enrollment and financial aid needs for Fall 2006-2007,
now, with a suspended Summer session and uncertain days ahead, we are
simply hoping that by the end of September there will be a start of
the Fall semester, the ruined bridges will be rebuilt, the internal
displacement problems will be solved, and we will see and end to the
hostilities before the Summer ends.
Three weeks ago, my wife and I were touring some beautiful parts of
Lebanon, the Bekaa valley, the valuable ruins of Baalbeck and Anjar
with our commencement speaker, president emeritus of Boston University,
Dr. Aram Chobanian and his wife. Now, there are unattractive ruins
all over the country; they have no touristic value, and we cannot
even get to the closest ruins to us.
A week ago, the supermarkets, petrol stations, and bakeries of Lebanon
were begging customers to choose their branch or brand, now, in most
parts of the country, shelves are being emptied, petrol is being saved,
and US dollars are unavailable in the banks. Note that I am not even
referring to certain villages in the South, where the ill have no
access to medical care, and the hungry have no access to food stores.
These types of villages are increasing by number every day.
Until last week, the Haigazian neighborhood and downtown Beirut were
busy with tourists, students, and businessmen. Now, the whole area
has turned into a relatively safe haven for displaced people from
Southern Beirut and South Lebanon. 500,000 people have been internally
displaced. Up to 100,000 have gone into Syria. On our street alone,
two floors of the Armenian Evangelical College next-door are housing
close to 75 people, including many children; the former School of Law
on our other side is packed with hundreds of families, and the Sanaayeh
Garden near our place is a roofless shelter for many more hundreds.
These people are nervous and devastated. I hear them quarreling with
each other about who should sleep in which corner. Every time they
get bad news from their town or about their relatives, loud cries
erupt from the School of Law 100 meters away. Contrary to my memory of
former times of similar experiences, this time, many of the displaced
families around us are middle income people and somewhat educated. Some
300 people, mostly civilians, have been killed in Lebanon so far and
1000 injured.
Central Beirut is certainly safer than many other parts of the
country. The quiet is interrupted regularly by the sounds of
explosions. Here’s how it has been so far: If loud explosions are
heard early in the morning, then people do not go to work. If they
are heard during the day, the streets are vacated immediately. One or
the other, has been happening every day. Some of the least expected
areas have been targeted outside the southern suburbs of Beirut,
a bomb here and a bomb there, in the port of Beirut, the Manara,
Ashrafieh, Jounieh, Hadath, etc. And these are what I call the safe
areas of this war. We are much safer, so far, than many others in
the country. Some freedom to move around, buy things, communicate
are good gifts in these difficult days.
In a day or two, most foreign countries will have evacuated those
citizens who have wished to leave the country. It is said that this is
the largest wartime evacuation effort of its kind since WW2. Many of
the evacuees feel unhappy they are leaving their friends in unsafe
situations. Most Lebanese feel that once the westerners are out,
attacks will intensify against Lebanon. But I remind myself and
others, we have seen this before and survived. We will survive again,
by faith. Even in these days, there are blessings and reasons for
thankfulness.
Here are some conclusions I need to share:
– The current crisis will certainly lead the young people of this
country, especially the Christians to fall into hopelessness, thus to
intensified attempts to emigrate. Therefore, churches, NGOs and others
will need to be very creative and dedicated in their ministry. We
will need more people who can speak the truth not simply with love,
but mainly with hope.
– As soon as the crisis is over, the Lebanese will want to
rebuild. International help will be desperately needed. The economy has
been hit strongly. Therefore, the already existing financial crisis
of the people will get much much worse. Schools that have welcomed
displaced people will need to be renovated as soon as possible. As
far as Haigazian University is concerned, more financial aid will be
requested by the students.
– The Lebanese did not enter this crisis in a unified stance, and this
is taken advantage of. It is expected that the strikes against Lebanon
will create more tension among the Lebanese. I hope not. Who is to
blame, they ask? We have learnt in politics that blaming is part of a
strategic game. Who started this? Who reacted and how? These questions
seem so insignificant if compared to questions of justice and peace and
love. I would rather ask: Who is being just to whom? What is hurting
in each society? What truths is the media hiding? What misleading
interpretations are being spread? Again, I have been disappointed
(but not surprised) by the poor quality of the international coverage
with some exceptions. Airtime does not mean quality news. Giving
one piece of news from Lebanon and a parallel from Israel is not
necessarily good journalism. Media is also politics. Finding the
truth about matters such as wars is a very complex endeavor. Getting
to the roots of problems has never been the virtue of politicians
and powerful leaders. No easy conclusions can be satisfactory.
– No matter how hard the situation, I should also mention that many
people are also working hard in Lebanon and elsewhere to ease the
pain of others. Many volunteers, including Armenian ones, are helping
their compatriots. Also, even as we prepare for worse days ahead,
it is amazing that some people on the Haigazian University staff are
working six hours a day painting classrooms, moving furniture from
one office to the other, preparing for the Fall Semester!
I hope to keep in touch, hopefully with shorter messages. Keep praying
for us all, for all people inside and beyond all borders.
In conclusion and while US dollars are unavailable in the banks
and with money-changers of Lebanon, I feel we can truly realize and
believe that “in God we trust”.
Faithfully,
Rev. Paul Haidostian, Ph.D. President Haigazian University
P.O.B. 11-1748 Riad El Solh 1107 2090 Beirut, Lebanon
***
Dear friends,
I am sending you an article which I wrote a few days ago, titled “Hear
Our Cry”. As a Lebanese, it is my message-cry regarding the unjustice
that is prevailing in Lebanon. I would appreciate if you help me
circulate it to all those concerned with humanity. I do not wish to
gain anything out of it but just to cry out loud that enough is enough!
Hoping for peace.
Sarine
Hear Our Cry! Enough Is Enough!
I am a citizen of Lebanon living in this biblical land. Currently being
one of those who is living and witnessing the ongoing horror in my
beautiful country, I am enraged, angered, sad, distressed and confused
as to what to do. I am sick and tired of people taking advantage of
my country, carrying out their own wars on my land, cleaning up their
dirty laundry at the cost of my fellow citizens. I am not a supporter
of any political party; I am with the land of “Milk and Honey” as
the Bible states. My rage is against Israel, Hezbollah, Bush’s USA,
Iran, Syria and the previous Lebanese government. How dare they,
under selfish pretexts, which I do not even wish to discern, exploit
our country to settle their horrendous accounts. Hezbollah claims to
be defending its land. I used to admire that group during the years
when Israel had occupied the South, being the only ones to defend the
land. After the occupation, they should have joined the Lebanese Army
if they really intended to defend this land. They have no right to
compel the people of Lebanon to pay the price for their selfish moves!
Bush (yes, Bush, not even Mr. Bush!) has declared himself as
nothing short of the next Messiah who has taken under his ‘wings’
the duty of bringing justice to the world, stopping terror from the
globe!!! What a noble and kindred spirit! Shame on him! What right does
he have to violate the privacies of other countries? Before meddling
internationally, one should clean up the national disorder. What
about the homeless in the USA? What about the educational standards
in a number of public schools? What about the crime rates in the
states? What about substance abuse rates? What about tempered rights
of children?
What about the youth landing home in coffins from Iraq? Israel! Shame
on you for using “God’s Chosen People” as a slogan for every inhumane
action in the world! God’s chosen people should be setting examples
for the rest of the world, not violating every single humanitarian
decree! What will you tell God about the innocent children whose
lifeless bodies are hanging out from their parents’ cars as they are
fleeing your bombs? What will you tell the children whose parents
are lying dead in front of them with their intestines bulging out of
their bodies in front of their tiny innocent eyes? What will you tell
students when they find their schools completely destroyed and leveled
to the ground? How can you justify bombing ambulances and humanitarian
workers when they are selflessly and nobly trying to fulfill their
missions of evacuating people and caring for the wounded? How can
you hit homes and not allow people to remove their dead from under
the rubble? THEIR DEAD! You took their lives, at least leave their
dead bodies to their families!
Syria and Iran! It pains my heart to see those two beautiful countries
who have throughout the history of mankind been pioneers in almost
every aspect of existence (long before the Western world had even
woken up) now taking a back seat in the vehicle ofmodernizing the
world. There exist noble people in those countries who have now been
classified as terrorists because of the dark leadership ruling them.
If that is the way they want their countries governed, they have
every right to do so! But keep Lebanon outof it!
We are not savages, we are not beasts! We are a civilized nation. We
do not accept to have others recklessly run our country. It is time
that we have a strong governing body that prioritizes the needs of
its nation above others.
What we are facing today is Hurricane Katrina and the last Tsunami
combined and then multiplied! Yes modern world, that is what we
have! There are around half a million refugees all around Lebanon
having taken shelter in schools, and yes, even on so-called safe
“streets” sleeping on sidewalks. Do we really understand what that
means? 500,000 people sleeping on the icy ground, with no blankets,
no mattresses, nothing to eat but a bite of bread once a day! Do
wereally know what it means to have 200 people use 4 toilets and not
have a single drop of water to flush it? Do we? Let’s just face the
bare facts for a moment. We read and hear the media say “war” and
“refugees”. Now, picture one of our local schools with your entire
family in it, with your newborn baby crying for milk, with your young
son shaking from fear not grasping why he is sitting on the floor
while his father or mother is bleeding to death in front of him and
the ambulance is not coming! What would you do?
Wouldn’t you spit at the face of this unjust world? Enough is
enough! The Lebanese are a proud and noble nation, who after 30 years
of destructive war caught up with the rest of the world and proved
to everybody that they can be the best in any professional domain.
Let us be, let us help the world with our potentials, allow us to
our basic human rights so we can live andbe able to welcome you on
our biblical land and share with you the “Milk and Honey” that God
has bestowed upon us.
Sarine Khatchikian School Director
***
Dear all,
Let me first thank those of you who inquired about my safety.
I am writing this e-mail from Lebanon. As you all (hopefully) know,
Lebanon has been under Israeli naval and aerial siege for over a
week. Not only that, but our infrastructure has been reduced into a
pile of rubble. No place in Lebanon has been spared. No one in Lebanon
has been spared. So far we have an official figure of 300 civilians
killed and over a 1000 injured and maimed by Israeli aggression. The
security situation was really bad two days ago, with many suburbs
(especially southern suburbs) of the capital city of Beirut being
bombed. The bombings haven’t stopped but yesterday and today have
been relatively calm (part of the reason is that the HezbAllah
resistance fighters have retaliated and hit many strategic facilities
in Israel). I live in a relatively “safe” area, but haven’t been able
to really go to the city center much to take photos, as the Israelis
are now targeting anything that moves. The Armenian community is –
so far – safe, but not for long I presume, since the Israelis have
already bombed “Christian areas” of Beirut where HezbAllah has no
presence at all…
Now I am sure many of you have been following the story, but allow
me to say, your (i.e. Western) media is a joke. I have been watching
what your media has been saying about all this. I doubt that anyone in
USA/Canada/Europe knows what is REALLY going on here. When I say our
infrastructure has been reduced to rubble I do mean it. Our electricity
grid has been bombed save for 2 small plants, which provide electricity
to some areas in Mount Lebanon. The remaining areas are pretty much
cut off from power. The fuel situation is pretty bad too. Many people
have private power generators, but since we are running out of diesel,
those will be irrelevant in a few days. Half a million people have
become displaced, many have fled to Syria. Many have died on the road
to Syria, as Israeli jets have targeted civilian convoys. The food
situation is so far not catastrophic. Well, in the South people are
running out of food, but here there is merely a visible absence of
vegetables and fruits, since all bridges connecting Bekaa and South
Lebanon (major agricultural areas) have been bombed. But as more and
more refugees flock to the capital soon there will be a shortage of
food. People here, in this relatively “actionless” and calm town in
Mount Lebanon have been panicking and stocking up on (mostly canned)
food. So far though prices are reasonable, and most food materials
are still available. But people are bracing for the worst. We don’t
know which area will be next. But the bombings seem to be moving to
the center of the country, where ironically there are no HezbAllah
fighters…
The people here, though at first were against HezbAllah’s rash actions,
are now 100% behind it. With every blow to the Israelis, there is
cheering here in Lebanon, from people of all religions and sects,
including Armenians. There is a feeling of anger at the actions of the
Israelis, which destroyed the fledgling economy of Lebanon. Factories
have been bombed, restaurants have been bombed. Absolutely nothing
has been spared. What is worse, the people are seeing the reaction
of the Western leaders to all this, and it is filling them up with
anger and bitterness. What is good and positive, however, is the
complete unity of the Lebanese people. So there are no sectarian
cracks at the moment, and I doubt there will be any time soon. Well,
not to bore you with such “silly” details…
All is well on my side, and I just wanted to keep you all updated. So
far I have had uninterrupted connection to the internet (both
wi-fi and dial-up – so land lines are working fine in this area),
which is not the case for many people, since more than one ISP
has been the victim of “collateral damage”. I have been keeping
a blog, and making regular updates of the situation here on the
ground. You may find it here:
or (should the domain go down
for some reason). You may pass on the link to family, friends, or
anyone who is interested. I will also be posting pictures whenever
I can. Frankly, the situation is pretty scary so people are avoiding
going out of their houses. So far we have not had the need to go down
to bomb shelters. There is serious shortage of bomb shelters in the
suburbs of Beirut, but here in apartment-lined towns of Mount Lebanon,
I presume that is not the case (we have bomb shelter in our building).
Anyhow, that is all from this part of the world. I was planning on
visiting Armenia in August and paying a surprise visit to the people
I met there, but it won’t be happening… Next year, I guess…..
If you would like to show solidarity with the Lebanese people
(including at least 80,000 Armenians who are suffering due to Israeli
aggression), a quick search will lead you to details on protests in
your areas. I am not sure, but maybe your local Indymedia websites
will have relevant information…
Best,
Shoghig, Beirut, july, 20 2006
When the pen is threatened by the sword
When the pen is threatened by the sword
Sunday Herald, UK
July 23, 2006
Trevor Royle on Turkey’s persecution of its writers
WritersÊmakeÊhandy scapegoats when despotic regimes decide to defend
the indefensible and in so doingÊmakeÊthemselvesÊlook utterly
ridiculous.ÊBeingÊindependent&#x CA;and working largely in isolation,
authors are soft targets and despite the excellent work undertaken
by organisations such as International Pen and Sara Whyatt’s Writers
in Prison Committee, far too many of their kind are being banged
up all over the world for the crime of daring to speak their mind.
The latest victim is the Turkish writer Perihan Magden who will appear
this week before a court in Sultanhamet, Istanbul on charges that she
turned people against military serviceÓ. For the crime of insisting
that conscientious objection to military service is a human right
all Turkish men are subjected to 15 months compulsory service in
the armed forces Ð she faces three years imprisonment in conditions
which will be pretty grim. As the movie Midnight Express showed all
too vividly, Turkish jails are not for the squeamish.
Best known for her novels 2 Girls and The Messenger Boy Murders,
Magden is no stranger to controversy and has been praised by the
leading Turkish author Orhan Pamuk for her Òcombative independence and
steely conscienceÓ. Pamuk knows what he is talking about Ð earlier
this year he, too, faced prosecution, in his case for allegedly
insulting TurkishnessÓ. He only escaped on a technicality.
What makes these cases more worrying is that they are neither
isolated nor unusual and are usually prompted by the military
authorities. Around 80 Turkish writers are currently facing prosecution
on a variety of charges ranging from insulting the state to questioning
government policy.
The trials have also been accompaniedÊbyÊaÊfairÊdegree&# xCA;ofÊgratuitous
^_violence. Witnesses and the judiciary have been intimidated by
braying mobs inside and outside the courts and in one case, the trial
of Armenian Turkish ^_editor Hrant Dink, there were reports of an
attempted lynching. All this makes for disquieting reading at a time
when Turkey is on the verge of becoming a member of the European Union.
There have already been numerous complaintsÊaboutÊTurkey’sÊhuman rights
record and its refusal to allow freedom of expression. Questions have
also been asked about the extent to which the Turkish military has
a free rein and seems to exist outside government control. Coming on
top of existing concerns about the influence of Islamic fundamentalism
within the country and the prosecution of the Kurdish ^_population,
it’s not difficult to see why theÊwriters’ÊtrialsÊareÊcausin gÊsoÊmuch
^_dismay in the literary community.
In the wider scheme of things there are in fact very few reasons to
deny Turkey membership of the EU. Since the 1920s, when the founder
of modern Turkey Kemal Atat~_rk separated religion from the state,
Turks have longed to be part of Europe. And let’s not forget, in
the days of the Ottoman Empire they ruled most of southeast Europe,
and as far north as the Balkans.
Clerics have no political role, religious parties can and
have been outlawed,ÊtheÊeducationÊsystemÊ ;is ^_secular
and Turkey has emerged as a modern and vibrant country
with much to offer its EuropeanÊneighbours.ÊThat’sÊwhat
ma kes the prosecution of the Turkish writers all the more
disappointing. No countryÊaspiringÊtoÊbeÊconside red civilised
should prosecute people for expressing opinions that go against
the grain;ÊtheÊpreservationÊofÊart isticÊand ^_literary freedoms are
central to any democracy.
By offering the hand of friendship to Turkey last autumn the EU
acknowledged that Islam is central to Europe’s identity and not a
persecuted minority. Now,ÊmoreÊthanÊever,ÊTurkey&#x CA;must reciprocate by
ending these preposterous prosecutions.
–Boundary_(ID_UP+CtgFWG2MVaRjP5yzG cw)–
Boxing: Darchinyan-Narvaez flyweight title bout in works by Dan Rafa
Darchinyan-Narvaez flyweight title bout in worksBy Dan Rafael
ESPN.com
July 22, 2006
Promoter Gary Shaw hasn’t only been working on finalizing a third
Diego Corrales-Joel Casamayor fight.
Shaw told ESPN.com on Saturday that he is also putting together a
flyweight unification fight between title holders Vic Darchinyan and
Omar Narvaez for Showtime’s Nov. 4 card.
Shaw, who promotes Darchinyan (26-0, 21 KOs), flew to Argentina two
weeks ago to cut a deal with Narvaez (21-0-2, 15 KOs), who, like
Darchinyan, is a southpaw.
They are also both former Olympians. Darchinyan represented Armenia
in the 1996 Games. Narvaez was a two-time Olympian (1996 and 2000)
for Argentina.
Shaw said that Narvaez’s participation in the fight is contingent upon
him defeating mandatory challenger Rexon Flores Aug. 5 in Cordoba,
Argentina. Shaw said the fight wouldn’t be signed until after the
Aug. 5 fight.
Darchinyan, who is now based in Australia, has made four defenses,
including an eighth-round TKO of previously undefeated Luis Maldonado
on June 3 on Showtime. Narvaez has made six defenses; a win over
Flores would be his seventh.
Darchinyan-Narvaez would be the opening bout on the card, Shaw said.
The main event has not been determined.
The fight matches the pure firepower of Darchinyan against the more
skillful Narvaez.
“I think Darchinyan’s style is always susceptible to a boxer like
Narvaez, but Vic has that spectacular punching power,” Shaw said. “So
he has to cut off the ring and trap Narvaez to knock him out. But
Narvaez can give him trouble style-wise, which is why it’s such a
great fight.”
Dan Rafael is the boxing writer for ESPN.com
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
TBILISI: Peacekeepers Issue Pending Top-Level Talks
Peacekeepers Issue Pending Top-Level Talks
Civil Georgia, Georgia
July 22, 2006
The Georgian government’s steps in respect of Russian peacekeeping
troops stationed in the conflict zones remain unclear, as talks
between the Georgian and Russian leaders have been postponed for so
far unknown date.
President Saakashvili canceled his visit to Moscow planned for July
21-22 after the Russian officials said President Putin had no space
for face-to-face talks with the Georgian leader in his schedule of an
informal summit of CIS leaders. The Ukrainian and Armenian Presidents
also failed to appear in at the summit citing “internal political
situation” and illness, respectively.
President Saakashvili said on July 18, shortly after the Parliament
instructed the government to launch procedures for the withdrawal
of Russian peacekeepers from Abkhazia and South Ossetia, that the
executive authorities will take final decision only after his talks
with Putin. No other comment was made by President Saakashvili about
the Parliament’s resolution so far.
After the Russian side’s refusal to hold Putin-Saakashvili talks,
key leaders of the ruling National Movement parties convened a press
conference and emphasized that the Russian side was also against of
making public statements by the two Presidents after the potential
talks.
An influential parliamentarian Giga Bokeria said Putin “is afraid of
making public statements” together with President Saakashvili.
“If we see again footage of a press conference [held by Putin and
Saakashvili after talks] in St. Petersburg [on June 13] it will become
clear that President Putin feels very uncomfortable while speaking
publicly with Saakashvili,” MP Bokeria said.
Meanwhile, Georgian Foreign Minister Gela Bezhuashvili said on July
21 that consultations are currently underway with the Russian side
to arrange talks between the two Presidents, but he failed to specify
when the meeting might take place.
He said that the Georgian side was offered to hold talks at a horse
race – visiting track by the Presidents was part of the CIS informal
summit agenda, “but a horse race is not a place to discuss serious
issues.”
Officials in Tbilisi say that the Georgian side has prepared a set
of proposals, mainly involving issues related with the conflict
resolution, which should be discussed by the two Presidents. But no
details of these proposals are reported.
“These proposals are very realistic and very fair, which will
contribute positively to the conflict resolution. I hope this meeting
will take place in the future,” Burjanadze told reporters on July 21.