Some Turks Change Religion To Seek Tickets West

SOME TURKS CHANGE RELIGION TO SEEK TICKETS WEST
By Nicolas Cheviron
Assyrian International News Agency AINA
Oct 4 2006
ISTANBUL — Turkey’s few Muslim converts to Christianity, of which
the hijacker Tuesday of a Turkish airliner claimed to be one, are
a motley, marginal group that includes people on personal spiritual
quests, as well as those in search of more material benefits.
Hakan Ekinci, 28, who hijacked a Turkish Airlines Tirana-Istanbul
flight to Italy on Tuesday, presented himself in an internet blog
adressed to Pope Benedict XVI as one such convert who did not want
to serve in “a Muslim army.”
Whether he actually belongs to any of Turkey’s Christian churches,
however, has come under doubt with the appearance of several articles
in the Turkish press Wednesday saying he has a criminal record for
fraud, in addition to two spells in the stockade for desertion.
Most of Turkey’s “new Christians” — who only number about 1,000 in
a population of 73 million that is more than 99 percent Muslim —
belong to a score of evangelical parishes scattered across Turkey.
“We have about a thousand followers in our churches, mostly Turks,
but also a few foreigners and, when there is only one church in town,
some Armenian Orthodox and Catholics as well,” explained Sait Cakir
of the Ankara Evangelical Community.
The evangelical churches, which are not recognised by the strictly
secular laws of Turkey, are mainly in the three biggest cities —
Istanbul, Ankara and Izmir.
“The fact that we are open to everyone means that we get some strange
followers,” said Ihsan Ozbek, the evangelical pastor for Ankara. “Some
come looking for women, others for money, yet others for visas to
the west.”
Bulent, who works for an international organisation in the Turkish
capital and will not reveal his last name, said his conversion was
the result of an arduous quest for his roots.
“My father always said we were descendents of Turkmens from Central
Asia,” he said. “But one day, I learned that we were in fact a family
of Jews who had converted to Islam.”
After mulling this over for a while, he finally opted in 1993 to join
the Syriac church, in memory of the many tales his grandmother used
to tell him of the Christians of southeast Anatolia, where her family
originated from.
Ferda, who also did not want to give her family name, said she too
felt uncomfortable with her identity as a Turk.
She was raised in a community of Muslim Greeks who were deported to
Turkey during the population exchanges of 1923.
“But when I went to high school,” she said, “I suddenly realised what a
stranger I was to Turkish culture” — so she converted to Catholicism.
But conversions to the Roman church, as to the other mainstream
churches in Turkey — mostly Armenian and Greek orthodox — remain
the exception.

www.middle-east-online.com

Is Turkey Changing Sides?

IS TURKEY CHANGING SIDES?
Perspective on the news by Jack Kelley
Prophezine , TX
Oct 4 2006
In the Qandil (Kandil) Mountains, where Turkey, Iran, Iraq, and Syria
all meet lies the ancestral homeland of the Kurds, known in history
as the Medes, who were partners with Persia in defeating Babylon.
The Kurds call this area Kurdistan, but the land they refer to
technically belongs to the four neighbors mentioned above, none
of whom want to give it up. Turkey is perhaps the most determined,
having suffered numerous terrorist attacks at the hand of the PUK,
a group of militant Kurdish separatists. One of the reasons that
Turkey refused to help in the current war in Iraq is that the USA
refused to deny the Kurds a voice in governing post-war Iraq.
Turkey has been legitimately afraid that in return for Kurdish
assistance in deposing Saddam Hussein (it was the Kurds who
located Saddam and tipped off US troops) the US would permit at
least unofficial attempts to establish a Kurdish homeland on land
that Turkey claims. Turkey has maintained up to 20,000 troops on its
border with Iraq to prevent such a move.
And in fact the US has been vacillating on the Kurdish issue, even
publishing a map of the region showing the presence of a Kurdish
entity. US officials later claimed it didn’t accurately reflect US
policy. Turkey is skeptical.
Iran sees this situation as an opportunity to further strengthen its
regional position and has teamed up with Turkey to assist in removing a
force of 5000 PUK soldiers from the area where Iran abuts Iraq in the
Qandil Mountains. According to several news and intelligence sources
they already have positioned troops some 7-8 km inside Iraq and have
begun shelling the mountain hideouts. The situation for Turkey offers
some big incentives.
Not only do they get help in spanking the PUK, but have made it known
that they have their eye on Kirkuk, an Iraqi city in the area that
produces 40% of Iraq’s oil output, and that Turkey had made claim
to before.
For its part Iran also sees a chance grab a chunk of Northern Iraq
for itself. In addition Iran wants to destroy forward intelligence
positions the Israelis may have secretly placed among the Kurds to
help them receive the earliest possible warning of an Iranian attack
on Israel. Knocking out these posts would give the Iranians two
significant victories against the Israelis within the span of just
a few months, the war in Lebanon being the other. The loss of this
intelligence would no doubt reduce the possibility for a successful
US-Israeli attack against Iran, too. Russian and Iranian intelligence
experts are both predicting such an attack before the end of 2006.
Many observers believe it’s already too late to stop the Turkey-Iran
initiative. The question is whether it will blossom into yet another
Mid-East war pitting the US, Iraq, and Israel against Iran, Turkey,
and possibly Syria.
Students of prophecy should follow these developments closely. Turkey
is felt by most to be a modern component along with Armenia of the
Beth Togarmah mentioned in Ezekiel 38:6. We’ve long said that as long
as Turkey is aligned with the west Ezekiel 38 can’t happen. Bringing
Turkey into the Moslem alliance against Israel would remove one more
roadblock to its fulfillment. There aren’t many left.

Caucasus Reels From Moscow-Tbilisi Fight

CAUCASUS REELS FROM MOSCOW-TBILISI FIGHT
By Mikhail Vignansky in Tbilisi
Institute for War and Peace Reporting, UK
Oct 4 2006
As Russian-Georgian relations hit a new low, the whole region is
nervous.
“I have a ticket to fly to Moscow tomorrow. Will I be able to
fly?” enquires a caller to Tbilisi airport’s information bureau. “There
are no flights to Russia right now. Could you call later? Things may
change,” comes the response.
Over the past few days, operators at the bureau have had to deal with
a flood of such calls.
With Russia and Georgia experiencing probably their stormiest row since
the collapse of the Soviet Union 15 years ago, Moscow has effectively
declared a blockade of Georgia, cancelling all transport and postal
links with its southern neighbour. The shutdown is also hurting
ordinary people and businesses in Armenia and the North Caucasus.
The tough measures followed the very public arrest on September 27 of
four Russian military officers whom the Georgian authorities accused
of spying – and continued to do so even after their release.
Initially, Georgia refused to return the arrested, later changing
its mind.
But even the nature of the handover of the four was insulting for
Moscow.
Lieutenant colonels Dmitry Kazantsev, Alexander Savva, Alexander
Baranov and Captain Alexander Zavgorodny listened to the accusations
of espionage against them outside the Georgian general prosecutor’s
office on October 2 and were then told they were being deported.
Georgian foreign minister Gela Bezhuashvili and current OSCE chairman
in office and Belgian foreign minister Karel De Gucht, who had come
to Georgia specially to resolve the crisis, were present for this
rather theatrical ceremony.
Russian defence minister Sergei Ivanov who met the officers at the
airport in Moscow stressed that the men who were “spies” in Georgia
were heroes in Russia.
President Mikheil Saakashvili said “there are no threats that can
intimidate Georgia”, but also pointed out that he wanted a good
relationship with Russia. “We do not need Russian military officers
but we need Russian tourists. We do not need Russian spies but we
need Russian business. Russia and Georgia are historic partners. Our
countries are linked by cultures and national traditions and have
always lived side by side,” said the Georgian leader.
In a conciliatory gesture, Georgia has also agreed to allow Russian
peacekeepers in Abkhazia to monitor the Kodori Gorge region alongside
UN peacekeepers, something it had previously opposed.
Karel De Gucht urged Moscow to cancel its blockade and “defuse the
situation”.
Russian president Vladimir Putin had earlier accused “foreign
sponsors” of being behind an attempt to “pinch” his country “as hard
as possible.” And he reportedly told US president George Bush that
“any actions by third countries that could be interpreted by Georgia
as encouragement of its destructive policy are unacceptable”.
Political analyst Ramaz Sakvarelidze said it was significant that
the men had been handed over to an intermediary, not directly to
Russia. “So even if this was a concession on Georgia’s part, it was
made to the international community. The international community wanted
to regulate the crisis and we decided not to cause them problems. It
means that Georgia needs a mediator to speak with Russia,” he said.
Georgian politicians dismiss the charge that they are being encouraged
in Washington. Georgian parliamentary speaker Nino Burjanadze
told IWPR, “Russian political circles seem to be running short of
imagination…. Even if we presume that all this is being dictated
from overseas, which is absolutely untrue, it nevertheless becomes
clear how weak Russia’s position is. This means that Russia cannot
dictate to Georgia what is advantageous for it but the United States,
which is thousands of kilometres away can do this.”
Flights between the two countries were halted at midnight Moscow time
on October 3 and Russia has also severed maritime, road, and railway
links as well as postal communications with Georgia.
Russian parliamentary speaker Boris Gryzlov said, “The sanctions that
Russia is imposing are directed against the Saakashvili authorities,
not against the Georgian people.”
However, it is ordinary Georgian citizens who are suffering the
most. “I couldn’t go to my brother’s funeral to Moscow. My heart is
breaking with grief,” said Shota who had not left Tbilisi airport
for three days, waiting for a flight to Moscow.
Citizens of landlocked Armenia are also desperately worried about
the blockade on Georgia, as Georgia provides them with their main
land route to Russia. Businessmen are complaining of halted cargos
and potentially huge losses.
“In the long-term this could do serious damage to the economy of
Armenia as our route not only to Georgia itself but to the countries
of the CIS and Europe lies via Georgia,” said Tatul Manaserian,
economist and member of the Armenian parliament.
Vahan Hovhannesian, deputy speaker of parliament, said, “I think it is
not the first time that Russia is defining its relations with Georgia
and not taking into account the interests of Armenia. Maybe they expect
understanding from us, but I for one don’t have any. Because Russia,
which is our strategic ally, whether it wants it or not, is taking
part in the blockade of Armenia.”
Many in the Russian North Caucasus are also unhappy. The main border
crossing between North Ossetia and Georgia at Verkhny Lars has been
closed since July for “repair work”. A demonstration was held in
Vladikavkaz in September calling for the crossing to be reopened. “Not
just Georgians living in North Ossetia but also Ossetians took part
in it,” said Alexander Rekhviashvili of Vladikavkaz University. “Both
are losing a great deal because the border is closed.”
In Georgia, people are afraid above all of a cold winter without the
electricity and gas that Georgia mainly receives from Russia.
Although the Georgia’s energy ministry frequently reassures people
with statements about alternative energy resources in the event of
an energy blockade by Russia, on the very first day of the downturn
in Russian-Georgian relations, pensioner Nelly Kakabadze found time
to go to the marketplace and buy a kerosene heater.
“I should also stock up on kerosene and flour. Warmth and bread are
the only things that I need,” she told IWPR.
The Russian Duma is also considering banning money transfers to –
and other banking operations – with Georgia. This information was
especially painful news in Georgia. According to information here,
during the first eight months of this year, 324 million dollars in
transfers was sent to Georgia from foreign countries. By far the
largest amount – 219 million dollars – was transferred from Russia
and 61 million dollars was sent from Georgia to Russia during the same
period. According to Russian data broadcast by the Russian television
channel NTV, the remittances to Georgia from Russia are worth 330
million dollars, which is equal to US assistance for Georgia over
the last three years.
Georgians living in Russia say that restrictions are already being
imposed on them. “Yesterday (October 3), there were long lines
of Georgians in almost all banks in Moscow, as we knew that money
transfers would soon be stopped,” Nani Baramidze who lives in Moscow,
told IWPR. “However, by four o’clock yesterday, we were told that it is
already impossible to transfer money to Georgia. I have parents there
and I send them a small sum every month. I do not know what to do.”
There are also expectations in Tbilisi of a rise in the price of
energy resources and food products, including bread.
Economic expert Niko Orvelashvili said it was quite possible
Russia would move to raise the price of the energy it supplies to
Georgia or suspend supplies altogether. “If Russia uses the lever
of energy resources for political purposes, it will show the entire
international community that it cannot be a reliable partner in this
field,” he said. “Anyway, our authorities should already be thinking
about creating stocks of oil products and people about how to survive
one more ‘dark’ winter.”
The crisis has also changed the domestic political climate in
Georgia. Ahead of the October 5 local elections, almost all political
movements, including the opposition, stated that, despite internal
divisions, they had no differences from the government on policy
towards Russia. Opposition Conservative Party leader Koba Davitashvili
called for a “human chain” to be made round the Russian embassy on
October 4 as a demonstration of Georgian unity.
“Russian politicians should not harbour any illusions that any pressure
not only on the government but also Georgia and the Georgian nation
will achieve results, and forces that will agree to succumb to Russia’s
will can emerge in this country,” he said.
Mikhail Vignansky is a correspondent for Spanish news agency EFE and
the Moscow newspaper Vremya Novostei. Armenian journalists Tatul
Hakobian and Diana Markosian and IWPR North Caucasus coordinator
Valery Dzutsev also contributed to this report.

Prosecutor’s Brother Moves To Become Yerevan District Chief

PROSECUTOR’S BROTHER MOVES TO BECOME YEREVAN DISTRICT CHIEF
By Astghik Bedevian
Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Oct 4 2006
Prosecutor-General Aghvan Hovsepian has moved to retain his de facto
control of Yerevan’s western Ajapnyak district by having his younger
brother stand in the local mayoral election slated for October 29.
Ruben Hovsepian’s participation and likely victory in the poll should
also avert a new clash between two mutually antagonistic clans that
hold sway in the area.
Artsrun Khachatrian, Ajapnyak’s incumbent mayor who has governed
the district for the last six years, represents one of those
clans. Khachatrian is a prominent member of a broader faction led by
the influential prosecutor. It mainly consists of prominent natives
of the Aparan district in central Armenia.
The rival camp is headed by senior lawmaker Galust Sahakian and
his brother-in-law Ashot Aghababian. Both men are senior members of
the governing Republican Party (HHK) and longtime associates of its
official leader, Prime Minister Andranik Markarian. Sahakian’s son
Arman was narrowly defeated by Khachatrian in 2003 and planned to
again try to unseat the latter in the upcoming election. The previous
local polls were marred by violence and accusations of vote rigging,
and many observers expected more trouble this time around.
However, Arman Sahakian was effectively forced to pull out of the
race after the HHK’s governing board refused to back his candidacy in
August at the apparent behest of Defense Minister Serzh Sarkisian. The
unexpected move fueled speculation about a deal cut by Sarkisian
and Hovsepian.
Samvel Yeranian, chairman of the Ajapnyak election commission, told
RFE/RL that Khachatrian is not among four men who have applied for
registration as election candidates before Wednesday’s deadline. It
turned out that all of them, including Hovsepian’s brother, are
members of the prosecutor’s Nig-Aparan organization. One of the
hopefuls, Gagik Sargsian, is at the same time affiliated with the
Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutyun), the HHK’s junior
coalition partner that has an uneasy rapport with Hovsepian.
In a newspaper interview published on Wednesday, Khachatrian
claimed that he was not pressurized into quitting the race. “I
made that decision [not to contest the vote] for the sake of the
people of Ajapnyak because I don’t want the community to turn into
a battlefield,” he told the “Haykakan Zhamanak” daily.
The Sahakians, for their part, have said they draw comfort from the
fact that Khachatrian will no longer run the area increasingly seen
as Hovsepian’s stronghold. Ajapnyak is home to several businesses
that are reportedly owned by the prosecutor.
Hovsepian underscored his far-reaching political ambitions last month
as he presided over the founding conference of a coalition of so-called
“compatriots’ unions” that unite prominent natives of various regions
of Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh. Nig-Aparan is expected to play a
leading role in the grouping.
Nig-Aparan is also the driving force behind a recently formed
political party which intends to make a strong showing in next year’s
parliamentary elections. Leaders of the party, called Association for
Armenia, have not ruled out the possibility of forming an electoral
alliance with the HHK.

Ex-Speaker Alleges Armenian Currency Manipulation

EX-SPEAKER ALLEGES ARMENIAN CURRENCY MANIPULATION
By Emil Danielyan
Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Oct 4 2006
Former parliament speaker Artur Baghdasarian launched a blistering
attack on the Armenian authorities late Tuesday, adding his voice
to opposition allegations that they are artificially boosting the
national currency for personal gain.
Risking more accusations of populism, he also announced that his
Orinats Yerkir party, which was forced out of the governing coalition
last spring, will push for a major reduction of key utility fees.
“Elementary calculations show that we are dealing with a direct
embezzlement of $200 million,” Baghdasarian charged in a speech in
parliament, referring to a further surge in the value of the Armenian
dram registered in the last six months. He claimed, without naming
names, that the authorities have engineered the dram’s appreciation
to pocket a large part of hundreds of millions of dollars in cash
remittances sent home by Armenians working abroad.
The Armenian Central Bank and the government strongly deny such
accusations, which have been voiced by opposition leaders and other
government critics ever since the dram began its dramatic rise in
December 2003. The Armenian currency has since gained more than 40
percent in value against the dollar, hurting local manufacturers and
scores of people dependent on the dollar remittances.
The authorities in Yerevan, backed by the International Monetary Fund
and the World Bank, insist that the exchange rate fluctuation is the
result of Armenia’s double-digit economic growth and a substantial
increase in the volume of wire transfers from Russia, Europe and
the United States. The transfers are expected to total at least $1.5
billion dollars this year.
Making his first appearance in the National Assembly since his
resignation in May, Baghdasarian claimed that if the dram’s exchange
was indeed market-based, the basic utility and consumer prices in
Armenia would have fallen by now. “The prices of gas, electricity and
water remain the same, even though the dollar is falling,” he said,
arguing that Armenia imports the bulk of its energy resources.
Baghdasarian added that Orinats Yerkir will seek a Constitutional
Court ruling allowing Armenian citizens to challenge utility prices
set by state regulators in court. Under an existing Armenian law,
decisions taken by the Public Service Regulatory Commission can not
be overturned by local courts.
Baghdasarian and other opposition leaders say the law is
unconstitutional.
Baghdasarian’s initiative seems heralds the start of Orinats Yerkir’s
preparations for next year’s parliamentary elections. The ambitious
ex-speaker has long been accused of resorting to populism to win
votes and his latest comments will likely prompt more such accusations.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Romanian President Visits Armenia

ROMANIAN PRESIDENT VISITS ARMENIA
By Ruzanna Stepanian
Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Oct 4 2006
Romania’s President Traian Basescu was in Armenia Wednesday on a
two-day official visit aimed at strengthening ties between the two
post-Communist states.
Basescu went straight into talks with his Armenian counterpart Robert
Kocharian on his arrival in Yerevan. The two men presided over the
signing of several bilateral agreements, including a memorandum of
understanding on “European and Euro-Atlantic cooperation.”
Kocharian said Romania’s upcoming entry to the European Union and
Armenia’s participation in the EU’s European Neighborhood Policy
program will give a new impetus to Romanian-Armenian ties. “I think
these two process open new opportunities for cooperation between our
countries,” he told a joint news conference with Basescu.
Basescu, who is the third Romanian head of state to visit Yerevan
during Kocharian’s presidency, said his country will seek to facilitate
Armenia’s European integration after securing EU membership next
January. He also said Romanian companies are taking interest in
investing in Armenia.
Kocharian complained in that regard about the modest volume of
bilateral trade, criticizing the work of a Romanian-Armenian
intergovernmental commission on economic cooperation. He said the
commission should do more to boost commercial links between the
two nations.

Markarian Warns Of Russian-Georgian Escalation

MARKARIAN WARNS OF RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN ESCALATION
By Ruzanna Khachatrian
Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Oct 4 2006
Armenia has so far been unaffected by Russia’s blockade of neighboring
Georgia but risks being effectively cut off from the outside world
if the Russian-Georgian crisis continues to escalate, Prime Minister
Andranik Markarian said on Wednesday.
“The blockade is not affecting us yet,” he told parliament. “Hopefully
the situation in Georgia will not become more complicated.”
Markarian insisted that Armenian companies are still able to ship goods
to and from Russia despite Moscow’s decision to sever all transport
links with Georgia. The Georgian Black Sea ports of Batumi and Poti
continue to handle Armenian cargos bound for the Russian market,
he said.
Some Armenian companies have claimed the opposite, saying that they
have trouble ferrying their goods to Russia. But government officials
argue that they could do so via the Ukrainian port of Ilyichevsk that
handles the bulk of Armenian ferry traffic.
Still, Markarian admitted that Yerevan is seriously worried that
the Russian-Georgia row, sparked by the arrest in Tbilisi of four
Russian officers on spying charges, could escalate into a military
confrontation. He said he discussed the situation earlier on Wednesday
with the visiting U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Matthew
Bryza and urged the United States to “take steps” to ease the tensions.
“I told him that if the problem escalates and if certain processes
unfold, Armenia will look like an island and our security will
be in danger,” Markarian said, speaking during his cabinet’s
question-and-answer session at the National Assembly.
The U.S. and the European Union have urged Moscow and Tbilisi to show
restraint and embark on a dialogue. They have also criticized the
Russian sanctions on Georgia. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov
has made it clear, however, that the blockade will not be lifted
“for the time being.”
Asked by a lawmaker whether Yerevan is ready to mediate in the dispute,
the Armenian premier said: “If the Russian or Georgian sides make
such an offer to the government of Armenia, we will consider it. But
we have received no such offers.”

BAKU: Pashayeva: "Separatists And Terrorists Pretend National Minori

PASHAYEVA: “SEPARATISTS AND TERRORISTS PRETEND NATIONAL MINORITIES IF THE PACE DOCUMENTS ARE NOT IMPROVED”
Today, Azerbaijan
Oct 4 2006
Azerbaijan Parliamentary delegation members Genire Pashayeva and Aydin
Mirzezadeh addressed PACE session during the discussion of document
10 961 on Frame Convention for National Minorities’ Rights Defense
signed by COE member states.
Aydin Mirzazadeh said there is no problem with national minorities
in the country. They are represented in all spheres and Azerbaijan
President officially congratulates their national holidays He
said the government plans to build Catholic Church though there
140 Catholics in the country. At the end of his speech Mirzazadeh
mentioned that unlike Azerbaijan Armenia is mono ethnic country. “300
000 Azerbaijanis displaced from Armenia and one million from occupied
by Armenians territories. Armenian Environment Minister insulted
Jewish people. These are ordinary cases in Armenia,” he said
Then Genire Pashayeva made speech and said that every state should
defend the rights of national minorities and the latter should assume
some responsibilities. “Armenians’ rights were defended in all spheres
in Nagorno Karabakh, but they disrespected Azerbaijani language,
symbol and flag. They tried to include Nagorno Karabakh in Armenian
territories or to create second Armenian state there by the support
of Armenian lobby,” she said.
At the end of her speech Pashayeva called on PACE members to improve
the documents and conventions on this matter, otherwise terrorists
and separatists will pretend national minorities, APA correspondent
to COE reports.
URL:

BAKU: Frames Of Convention On Minorities Rights Protection To Be Dis

FRAMES OF CONVENTION ON MINORITIES RIGHTS PROTECTION TO BE DISCUSSED IN PACE SPRING’S SESSION
Author: J. Shakhverdiyev
TREND, Azerbaijan
Oct 4 2006
During the spring`s session of PACE (Parliamentary Assembly of Council
of Europe), frameworks of the convention on protection of national
minorities rights is expected to be discussed, MP Ganira Pashayeva,
a member of the Azerbaijani delegation to PACE told Trend today.
She pointed out that 36 member-states of the Council of Europe out
of the total 46 ones have ratified this convention. Despite of the
fact that 4 countries signed the document, they have not ratified it
yet. Four countries denied doing it at all. During discussing this
issue, our delegation is expected to deliver a speech as well. “It
will be marked that Azerbaijan has no problems with its national
minorities. And it is necessary to review this convention, since
the most of 36 countries signed it with certain conditions”, told
Mrs. Pashayeva.
She also pointed out that during the discussion of this issue, it
will be underlined that once Armenians living in Nagorno-Karabakh
had such a right.
“It will be also marked that they could obtain education in their
mother tongue. They had their own mass media. But after that
they launched carrying out an ethnic clean-up on the territory of
Nagorno-Karabakh, a part of the Azerbaijan territory”, pointed out
the MP.
She pointed out that during the forthcoming discussion, it will be
underlined that Azerbaijan supports the convention.

ANKARA: President Chirac’s So-Called Genocide Remarks Intimidate Fre

FRENCH PRESIDENT CHIRAC’S SO-CALLED GENOCIDE REMARKS INTIMIDATE FRENCH FIRMS
Journal of Turkish Daily,
Oct 4 2006
PARIS – Reactions to French President Jacques Chirac, who implied
during his Yerevan visit that Turkey should recognize the alleged
Armenian genocide to become an EU member, are growing. France is one
of the biggest investors in Turkey.
French firms are now concerned that their investments in Turkey
would be negatively affected by the remarks. The draft law that would
penalize those who deny the alleged genocide has also deepened such
concerns.
French paper Le Monde, drawing attention to the financial difficulties
of the French companies interested in Turkish bids, stressed that the
remarks could cause a substantial loss totaling billions of dollars.
A political advisor of Chirac stated that it has become apparent the
president needs to clarify his remarks.
In Turkey, some of the societies called not to buy French good till
the French President clarify his words.
Speaking to Le Monde, Chirac’s advisor noted that there was no
change in the president’s supportive position regarding Turkey’s
EU membership. The advisor, who stressed that Chirac’s remarks were
political, not legal, noted that it is now imperative for Chirac to
make an explanation to Turkey concerning his statements in Yerevan.
The draft bill that stipulates the punishment of those who deny
the alleged genocide will be discussed in the plenary of the French
parliament on Oct. 12. French firms are highly concerned that the
draft will be adopted because of the upcoming elections. Before
the parliamentary discussions held to review the draft bill in May,
the foreign trade ministry had sent a note to the deputies referring
to the economic risks for France in case of its adoption. The note
published by Le Monde stressed that the firms interested in Turkish
bids would have to face billions of dollars loss if the bill were
adopted. The French firms interested in Turkish bids include large
firms such as AREVA, Eurocopter, Alstom and Credit Agricole.
In a statement he made to Le Monde, French politician of Armenian
origin, Patrick Devedjian, recalling that Chirac has made a clear point
for the first time, cited his remarks as an historical turning point.
Devedjian noted that Chirac, by making the remarks, transformed the
2001 genocide law, which is of legal character, into a political
action. Drawing attention to the analogy Chirac made between the
Holocaust and the alleged genocide, he further noted that Chirac is
the first leader who made a connection between the Jewish genocide
and the alleged Armenian genocide.
ISRAEL REJECTS ATTEMPTS TO CREATE A SIMILARITY BETWEEN THE HOLOCAUST
AND THE ARMENIAN ALLEGATIONS
While Chirac makes connection between the Armenian allegations and the
Jewish genocide, the Jewish people and Israeli Government reject such
attempts. The Nobel Prize winning Israeli statesman, Shimon Peres,
for instance says the 1915 Events was not genocide:
“We reject attempts to create a similarity between the Holocaust
and the Armenian allegations. Nothing similar to the Holocaust
occurred. It is a tragedy what the Armenians went through but not a
genocide… Israel should not determine a historical or philosophical
position on the Armenian issue.
If we have to determine a position, it should be done with great care
not to distort the historical realities.” (‘Peres: Armenian Allegations
are Meaningless’, Turkish Daily News, 10 April 2001; Haig Boyadjian,
‘Peres Claims Armenians Did Not Experience Genocide’, Asbarez, 10
April 2001).
Turkey accepts that the Armenians went through a tragedy during the
1915 Relocation Campaign, yet the Government has never accepted that
the tragedy was genocide. According to the Turkish approach most of
the Armenians died due to the bad weather, war curcumstances, epidemic
diseases and ethnic clashes, mostly the Kurdish tribal attacks. More
than 520.000 Turkish and Kurdish were killed by the Armenian gangs.