UKRAINE IS READY TO SEND PEACEKEEPERS TO NAGORNY KARABAKH
UNIAN , Ukraine
Sept 8 2006
Addressing students and professors of Slavic University of Baku on
Friday, Victor Yushchenko said Ukraine was ready to send peacekeepers
to Azerbaijan to help settle the lasting conflict in Nagorny Karabakh,
according to the President’s press-office.
Ukraine believes it is necessary to recognize the territorial integrity
of the Republic of Azerbaijan and to withdraw troops from the occupied
territory, he said.
“The use of force and pressure yields no results and dead-ends the
conflict,” he opined.
The Head of State also said he believed it was important to let
refugees return to their homeland and later decide the status of the
Karabakh autonomy at a national referendum.
He said peacekeeping effort in the region could help stabilize the
situation, adding Ukraine was ready to participate under the aegis
of OSCE or the UN Security Council.
“I told Ilham Aliyev at our meetings Ukraine was ready to offer
peacekeepers to resolve the conflict,” he said.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

UN CONCERNED ABOUT FIRES IN ARMENIAN-OCCUPIED LANDS
By Emil Danielyan
Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Sept 8 2006
The UN General Assembly expressed concern late Thursday at fires
reported in Armenian-controlled Azerbaijani territories, in a
compromise resolution that seeks to placate Azerbaijan and address
Armenia’s strong opposition to UN involvement in the Nagorno-Karabakh
peace process.
The assembly called for an urgent “environmental operation to suppress
the fires in the affected territories and to overcome their detrimental
consequences” and threw its weight behind the OSCE’s decision to send
a fact-finding mission to occupied Azerbaijani districts surrounding
Karabakh. It asked the American, French and Russian co-chairs of
the OSCE Minsk Group to submit the mission’s findings to the United
Nations by next April.
The resolution also instructs the UN Environmental Program to assess
“the short-term and long-term impact of the environmental degradation
of the region, as well as in its rehabilitation.”
Azerbaijan has for months been accusing Armenian forces of deliberately
setting fire to deserted Azerbaijani villages east of Karabakh. Armenia
and the self-proclaimed Nagorno-Karabakh Republic have rejected the
accusations, saying that the bushfires are caused by natural factors
such as hot weather. The Azerbaijani allegations were also effectively
dismissed by the OSCE’s field representatives in the conflict zone.
Official Baku rejected, however, the findings of their two inspections
of the occupied lands, leading the Minsk Group and the OSCE’s
rotating chairman-in-office to promise to conduct a more thorough
investigation. The authorities in Yerevan and Stepanakert agreed to
the idea.
Armenia threatened to boycott the next round of Karabakh peace
talks when Azerbaijan moved to include the issue on the UN General
Assembly agenda last week. An Azerbaijani draft resolution submitted
to the assembly accused the Armenians of pursuing a “scorched earth”
policy in the occupied lands and demanded a separate UN inquiry
into the problem. But it underwent radical changes as a result of
behind-the-scene talks between Armenian and Azerbaijani diplomats and
the international mediators. Azerbaijan’s UN Ambassador Yashar Aliev
described the text, adopted by consensus, as “honest and appropriate.”
Aliev’s Armenian opposite number, Armen Martirosian, said: “As a
result of our consultations with the Minsk Group Co-chairs, we have
come to agreement on a text that simply reiterates support for the
OSCE mission. In this regard we would like to welcome the readiness
of all the parties to negotiate in the spirit of compromise under
the able and very effective mediation of the Minsk Group co-chairs.”
Still, Martirosian added that Yerevan decided to dissociate itself from
the document because it disagrees with its title that refers to “the
occupied territories of Azerbaijan.” The diplomat also objected to the
“the general idea of this agenda item and a UN resolution under it.”
The Minsk group co-chairs, for their part, issued a joint statement
saying that “fires of both natural and manmade origin are a regular
occurrence in the region in question.” “We commend the spirit of
goodwill demonstrated by both Armenia and Azerbaijan in agreeing to
cooperate to address the situation raised through this resolution,”
they said.
The mediators are due to hold separate talks with the Armenian and
Azerbaijani foreign ministers in Paris next week, in a fresh attempt
to clinch agreement on the main principles of a Karabakh settlement
which they made public in June. Their statement renewed calls for
the conflicting parties to sign up to the proposed peace deal.

ARMENIAN EDITOR JAILED FOR 4 YEARS
By Hovannes Shoghikian
Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Sept 8 2006
The young editor of an Armenian newspaper critical of the government
was found guilty of illegally avoiding military service and sentenced
to four years in prison by a Yerevan court on Friday.
The court backed prosecutors’ claim that Arman Babajanian of
“Zhamanak Yerevan” used fake documents to win exemption from the
two-year compulsory duty in 2002. But the presiding judge, Mnatsakan
Martirosian, dismissed as “unfounded” a separate accusation that
Babajanian stole the documents from an Armenian couple based in
California.
Still, the jail sentence is only six months shorter than the one
demanded by the prosecutors. It is also quite harsh for individuals
convicted of draft evasion in Armenia. They usually get between two
and three years in jail. Babajanian’s defense counsel is therefore
likely to appeal against the verdict.
The 30-year-old editor looked resigned to going to prison as he
delivered his final court remarks two hours before the announcement
of the ruling. “Whether I will be in jail or at large, my homeland
Armenia will remain my dearest place,” he said. “It looks as though
I have to lose liberty in order to win back my right to again live
in the homeland. If this is so, I will pay the price and duly accept
any prison sentence set by the court.”
Babajanian added that he resorted to fraud after failing to extend
the deferment of his military service and study in a U.S. university.
He claimed that military authorities repeatedly rejected medical
documents testifying to his poor health.
Under Armenian law, virtually all young men aged between 18 and 27
must serve in the armed forces for two years. Those who are admitted
to state universities before coming of age have to be drafted after
finishing their studies.
Babajanian used to study in an Armenian religious seminary and had
his service deferred until 2001 before moving to the United States in
1998. He was arrested in June just weeks after returning to Armenia
and starting to publish the newspaper in Armenia. In a subsequent
statement released from his prison cell, he accused the authorities
of trying to muzzle an “independent and incorruptible media outlet
supporting the removal of the illegal regime and the establishment
of a legitimate government in Armenia.”
The “Zhamanak Yerevan” staff say Babajanian would not have been
prosecuted had his paper supported the government, a claim dismissed
by the prosecutors.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

ARMENIAN LOBBYING GROUP TO FIGHT ON AGAINST NEW U.S. ENVOY
By Emil Danielyan
Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Sept 8 2006
A leading Armenian-American lobbying group has pledged more efforts
to block the congressional confirmation of President George W. Bush’s
pick for new U.S. ambassador to Armenia, which cleared a key hurdle
on Thursday.
The Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA) said it is undaunted
by career diplomat Richard Hoagland’s crucial endorsement by the
U.S. Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee. His confirmation by the
full Senate now seems a forgone conclusion.
The committee had twice delayed the vote this summer due to its
pro-Armenian members’ protests against Hoagland’s refusal to refer to
the 1915 mass killings and deportations of Armenians in the Ottoman
Empire as genocide. Washington’s outgoing ambassador in Yerevan, John
Evans, is believed to have been recalled for publicly recognizing
the genocide.
“The ANCA remains firmly opposed to the Hoagland nomination, and
will continue to seek to block his confirmation until he publicly
states that he does not question the Armenian Genocide, and the State
Department explains both its firing of the current Ambassador as well
as the role of the Turkish government in this controversy,” the ANCA
executive director, Aram Hamparian, said in a statement. Hamparian
thanked the five senators who voted against Hoagland and denounced
the Bush administration for its continuing refusal to use the word
“genocide” with regard to the slaughter of some 1.5 million Ottoman
Armenians.
The Armenian Assembly of America, a more moderate advocacy group, also
praised those lawmakers but stopped short of calling for Hoagland’s
rejection by the Senate. “We appreciate the remarks of the Senators to
squarely affirm the Armenian Genocide and to urge the Administration
to review and rethink its current policy,” its executive director,
Bryan Ardouny, said in a statement. “The historical truth is undeniable
and we will continue to pursue universal and irrevocable affirmation
of the Armenian Genocide.”
The Assembly’s praise was also addressed to those senators who called
for U.S. recognition of the genocide but voted for Bush’s nominee,
citing U.S. national interests. Among them was Senator Joseph Biden
of Delaware, who demanded last month an official explanation from
the State Department regarding Evans’s dismissal.
Another ranking Democrat, John Kerry of Massachusetts, remained adamant
in rejecting Hoagland’s candidacy and accusing the White House of
caving in to pressure from Turkey. “For us to allow an ambassador
to be recalled because he uttered the word ‘genocide’ is to kowtow,
it’s to cave in, to those who change history,” Kerry told the Senate
panel during a 45-minute debate that preceded the 13-to-5 vote.
“We’re not going to allow revisionism … We honor history and we
honor the truth,” he added, according to AFP.
Senator Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat, likewise said she can
not support Hoagland “until we call the first genocide of the 20th
century by its rightful name.” “In Darfur we are witnessing the first
genocide of the 21st century and the Bush administration called it
that,” Reuters quoted her as saying.
However, Committee Chairman Richard Lugar, an Indiana Republican,
countered that rejecting a qualified nominee “because of concerns
of U.S. policy toward that country (Armenia) would set a troubling
precedent.”

RSPP FOUNDER ARKADY VOLSKY, 74, DIES
By Valeria Korchagina
Staff Writer
The Moscow Times, Russia
Sept 10 2006
Roman Denisov / Itar-Tass
Volsky speaking with reporters while in Grozny for peace negotiations
during the first Chechen war in June 1995.
Arkady Volsky, who is credited with preventing an industrial collapse
after the Soviet demise and founded the Russian Union of Industrialists
and Entrepreneurs, died Saturday in Moscow. He was 74.
He died of complications from leukemia, NTV television reported.
Volsky, a critic of the Yukos affair, was an active player in business
and politics until last year, when an internal squabble at the powerful
big business lobby, known as RSPP, saw him pushed aside and handed
an honorary post.
“Volsky’s death is a big loss, not only for the RSPP but for the entire
business and political community of the country,” Alexander Shokhin,
who replaced Volsky at RSPP’s helm, said on Ekho Moskvy radio.
Volsky represented a relatively rare breed of the country’s political
and business leaders who managed to have equally successful careers
under Communist rule and during the first wild years of Russian
capitalism.
Born in Belarus on May 15, 1932, and raised in an orphanage, Volsky
started out at a ZiL car factory as an ordinary worker and eventually
became the factory’s party boss.
Moving into government, he served as an aide to Soviet leader Yury
Andropov in the early 1980s. As an aide, he pressed for the return
of Andrei Sakharov from exile in Gorky, now Nizhny Novgorod.
In the late 1980s, he joined the Communist Party Central Committee’s
division in charge of industry. At the time, he also tried to settle
an ethnic and territorial conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia over
Nagorno-Karabakh. During the 1994-96 Chechen war, he participated in
peace talks with rebel leaders.
In 1990, Volsky founded an organization uniting some of Russia’s
first capitalists. The group later grew into the RSPP.
During the August 1991 coup attempt, Volsky managed to call Soviet
President Mikhail Gorbachev, who was under house arrest in Crimea,
and confirm that he was not ill, as the nation had been told.
Volsky quit the Communist Party in disgust after the failed coup.
Gorbachev said Saturday that Volsky played a key role in making sure
that industry did not collapse completely after the fall of the Soviet
Union, Interfax reported.
He praised Volsky for his attempts to establish a dialogue between
business and the state.
>From 2000, Volsky was also among the few public figures in Russia who
dared to criticize publicly the state’s legal onslaught on Yukos and
its founder, Mikhail Khodorkovsky.
Liberal politician Irina Khakamada said she had known Volsky since
1989 and recalled that even though he was a senior Communist official,
he had supported private entrepreneurship, Interfax reported.
Condolences also were expressed by President Vladimir Putin, Prime
Minister Mikhail Fradkov and former President Boris Yeltsin.
Volsky will be buried at Moscow’s Novodevichy Cemetery on Tuesday,
Interfax reported. A civil memorial will be held from 10 a.m. to
noon at ZiL’s House of Culture. A church service will be held at the
Novodevichy Monastery at 1 p. m. and be followed by the burial.
Volsky is survived by his wife, Lyudmila, a son, a daughter and six
grandchildren.

AZERBAIJAN TO HOST GUAM MEETING TO ESTABLISH PEACEKEEPERS
Azeri Press Agency, Azerbaijan
Sept 8 2006
GUAM (Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldova) meeting for
establishing peacekeeping forces of the alliance will be held in
Azerbaijan.
The issue is being discussed at the level of deputy chief of General
Staffs of the member states, Ivan Androsenko, Ukrainian Defense
Ministry International Military Cooperation Department chief told
the APA exclusively.
“Measures are being implemented in establishing joint peacekeepers
of GUAM member countries after the Tbilisi meeting at the level of
deputy chief of General Staffs. Prior to that meeting, we had met in
Kyiv in June. The deputies chief of General Staffs are working out the
scheme of establishing peacekeeping contingent,” Mr.Androsenko, said.
He said they are considering the UN and OSCE proposals on the matter,
and the results will be sent to them. Now the yare discussing issues
on management and structure of the peacekeepers.
“The peacekeeping forces will operate under the auspices of the UN
and OSCE,” he said.
Androsenko also said GUAM peacekeepers might be dislocated in Nagorno
Garabagh only after the UN and OSCE decisions.
He also said there is a high level bilateral military cooperation
between Azerbaijan and Ukraine. Defense Ministers of the two countries
had a fruitful meeting in Baku May this year.
“This meeting gave impetus to the development of military and military
political spheres between out countries. It opened a new door for
military-political dialogue,” he said.
He also added that two countries are discussing the cooperation on
personnel training and other issues.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

BARROSO AGAINST PUTTING SO-CALLED GENOCIDE AS A PRECONDITION BEFORE TURKEY
Turkish Press
Sept 10 2006
BRUSSELS – European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso has
announced that he is against conditioning Turkey’s EU membership on
recognition of so-called Armenian genocide.
In a meeting with representatives of the Reformist Movement (MR) at
the Belgian parliament, Barroso said that Turkey “cannot be forced”
to acknowledge the so-called genocide, and this cannot be put as an
additional precondition before Turkey.
Submitting a resolution to the Senate last summer, senators Francois
Roelands du Vivier and Christine Defraigne of MR proposed that
so-called Armenian genocide should be included within the framework of
the resolution on the Holocaust, and those who do not acknowledge it
should be sentenced up to one years in prison, and fined to 5,000 Euro.
The Belgian parliament shelved similar resolutions and motions after
debating them last year.
In the debates at the Senate’s Justice Committee, all other parties,
except MR and ECOLO (the Green Party in Belgium) expressed thought that
“a wrong legal step is being taken”, “it is not Belgian’s business
to assess and judge historical incidents”, and “recent positive step
taken by Ankara cannot be ignored”.
The last resolution, presented to the Senate, has been suspended “for
some time” due to the local elections in Belgium due on October 8th,
and the reactions of the Turkish community.

SO-CALLED ARMENIAN GENOCIDE DISCUSSIONS IN SPAIN ARE UNFORTUNATE, VURAL
Turkish Press
Sept 10 2006
MADRID – “This is a wrong and unfortunate approach,” said Turkey’s
Ambassador to Spain Volkan Vural when commenting on the move of two
Spanish MPs to bring the so-called Armenian genocide allegations to
the Spanish parliament.
Two MPs from Republican Left of Catalonia (ERC) have asked the Spanish
parliament to debate so-called Armenian genocide allegations, taking
into consideration a letter from the Armenian committee.
In the motion they submitted to the Foreign Affairs Committee of the
Spanish parliament last June, ECR MPs Rosa M. Bonas i Pahisa and Joan
Puigcercos i Boixassa asked the parliament to acknowledge the so-called
Armenian genocide saying that “a crime against humanity was committed.”
They also “insist that Turkey should recognize the so-called Armenian
genocide” and “the EU should be a means to close up this matter”.
-NECESSARY INITIATIVES LAUNCHED-
In an exclusive interview with A.A correspondent, Ambassador Vural
said, “after we learned about this motion, we launched initiatives at
the Spanish Foreign Ministry and the parliament. We sent a letter to
the two MPs and the head of the Foreign Affairs Commission in which
we deemed this move as wrong, and we told them that this will harm
Turkish-Spanish relations. And, Turkish Foreign Ministry has expressed
its concerns to the Spanish government.”
Vural thinks that adoption of the motion by the Foreign Affairs
Committee is not so likely.
“Even though it is adopted, it is obvious that it won’t have a legal
meaning. Everybody will see how wrong and unfortunate it is to make
historical incidents a tool for politics,” he commented.
Vural said, “ERC MP Rosa Bonas wrote a letter to me, and said that she
does not have any negative feeling for Turkey. She also said that she
has always supported Turkey’s EU membership and believes that Turkey
should become an EU member.”
Ambassador Vural added that he will meet Bonas in coming days.
On the other hand, Bonas said that they will change some parts of
the motion, adding, “we will take out the article asking Turkey to
recognize the (so-called) Armenian genocide.”

IRANIAN PARLIAMENT SPEAKER HADDAD ADEL TO LEAVE FOR ARMENIA
Fars News Agency, Iran
Sept 10 2006
TEHRAN (Fars News Agency)- Iranian Parliament Speaker Gholam Ali
Haddad Adel, heading a delegation, is due to leave Tehran for Armenia
on Monday.
During his three-day visit which takes place at the invitation of
the Armenian Parliament Speaker, Haddad Adel is scheduled to hold
meetings with different high-ranking officials, including his Armenian
counterpart, President and Prime Minister.
The top legislative official is also due to pay a visit to the
Iranology department of Yerevan University, where he is also to make
a speech.
Visits to other cultural and religious centers, including Kaboud
Mosque and central library of Yerevan where manuscripts in different
languages are kept and is considered as the cultural center of Armenia
are among other programs.
The Iranian Parliament Speaker is due to leave Armenia for Kyrgyzstan
on Tuesday, where he is also scheduled to attend meetings with
different senior officials.
The chief lawmaker is accompanied by a number of MPs, including
representatives of the Iranian Armenians at the Islamic Consultative
Assembly.
Once through with his visits to these northern neighboring states,
Haddad Adel will return home on Thursday.

THROUGH THE EYES OF A CHAMPION
Info Tennis, France
Sept 8 2006
Bill Simons, Publisher and Editor of Inside Tennis, recently sat
down with Andre Agassi for what would turn out to be an interview
for the ages. In this candid interview, Agassi discusses his upcoming
retirement as well as his evolution from flashy player, to humanitarian
to father.
INSIDE TENNIS: So how are you feeling about saying goodbye?
ANDRE AGASSI: Well, I’m looking forward to this summer. I feel every
bit as good about my decision as the days have passed. But, obviously,
there’s a certain sadness to it and bittersweet feelings.
You sort of want it to last forever, but you know it can’t.
IT: Arguably, no other athlete has changed so markedly over the
years. When all is said and done, what are the two or three keys
about transformation, about changing yourself? Is it about listening
to yourself? Facing fears? The willingness to change?
AA: For me, it’s always been about the process – the battle, not the
destination. Whether it’s trying to figure out my tennis or something
else, it’s about everyday actuality and appreciating that life happens
in between your plans. That’s where the joy is for me.
IT: You’ve told us that tennis is such a great teacher. Does it teach
you patience, discipline, a willingness to go to plan B?
AA: You’re out there by yourself and have to figure a way to get
the most out of yourself regardless of how good you are. Some days
you’re at 100 percent and produce your best. Other days, you can’t,
but you have to realize that getting 100 percent out of an 80 percent
day is a major accomplishment. It’s about always trying to find a way
of getting the most out of yourself. It’s discipline, problem solving,
perseverance, patience.
IT: Was your best fighting result on court in ’99 in the French Open
final, when you were down two sets to Andrei Medvedev?
AA: For sure, because I was paralyzed out there. I was nervous.
Seeing how I started and how I finished, it was probably the greatest
example of problem solving because I was fighting myself first. Then,
once I started to loosen up, I still had to deal with him and being
two sets to love down.
IT: That win was even more important than your first Grand Slam –
Wimbledon ’92 – after seven years of futility in the majors.
AA: There was just so much more on the line, from where I was
personally at the time, coming off a difficult time in my life [his
divorce with Brooke Shields]. Plus, clay was never my best surface.
It was the last of the four Grand Slams that I won. It was the pressure
and what was on the line for me personally and professionally which
brought out the worst and the best of me all in one match.
IT: And as a kid you were more than feisty. What do you think that
young teenage persona would think of Andre Agassi the family man,
the community man, the reflective guy who talks with such insight?
AA: All those qualities were in that teenager. So I hope he would’ve
recognized a lot of it. I’m not sure if that’s the case, but I always
cared about a lot of things. I just never knew how to communicate,
never understood or really accepted responsibility for myself, and
that’s a growing process. I don’t know if any of us would recognize
ourselves when we were 17 or 18 years old.
IT: I sure wouldn’t have. Where do you think you picked up the stand-up
quality of accountability, where you take responsibility for all your
actions in word and deed?
AA: It’s been a hard evolution. I always had a certain level of desire
to face the truth. I just grew into a lot more than my little world.
IT: Always a desire to face the truth? So what about facing the truth
this spring when you were struggling with your body and knew the end
was near?
AA: This year was the toughest part of this whole process. The
decision to retire wasn’t as difficult or emotional a decision as
I anticipated. But the process to get there was uncomfortable and
frustrating. It’s so easy to question yourself at 36, to second guess,
to be unsure. And at the same time, you’re pulling a lot of people
along with you, your family and coaches and years of hard work, so you
just don’t want to get out there and feel ordinary. So it was a real
struggle this year, missing Australia, plus that two good days/two bad
days rhythm that I had for months. But the time off and skipping the
clay allowed me to get my arms around it. I managed to hold it off as
long as I could. I held off on more injections until after Wimbledon,
and it became pretty clear how I wanted everything to go from there.
IT: So you’re happy?
AA: Yes, absolutely. Parts of it were tough. I don’t feel like
there’s any real heavy drama to this process outside of the emotion of
feeling very connected to a lot of people that I won’t be around as
much. That’s why it’s good I live in Vegas. It gives people a reason
to say, “I’ll go to Vegas. Hey, Andre is there.” They’ll [come to]
say hello. [The time] after the U.S. Open and early this year was very
difficult on me. I tore all the ligaments in my ankle and couldn’t
compete, move or train the way I wanted… I got behind the eight
ball. The process of fighting to still have a competitive year was
quite frustrating. I was in torment because you never like being
ordinary out there. You’re not used to it. You’re not comfortable.
But I don’t regret any decisions I’ve made. I know it’s the right
time for me. There’s just too much to do out there.
IT: You’ve said that when you’re operating on your instincts, you
don’t trust yourself. Why’s that? Do you think you didn’t have a
chance in terms of your life as a young kid and then going off to
Nick’s academy, then finding yourself – plunk – right on the circuit
that you just didn’t have the chance to work with your instincts?
AA: I’m the kind of guy who feels something and then has to understand
it down the road. I’m not one of those who thinks something and then
puts it into practice and ends up feeling connected to it. I’m very
reactive. My heart leads my head in many cases. Experience has taught
me that I can’t always trust what I feel. That’s one of the things I
love and hate about myself. It has its good points and its difficult
ones. It’s been a lot of tough lessons, but it’s been very fulfilling.
IT: And then there’s your concern over order on the court. The ball
boy has to be exactly here, the balls have to be exactly there, etc.
Is that because you want your world to be set so you can go out there
and perform or …
AA: Strangely, I’m highly sensitive to what’s around me in many cases
and in some cases, I’m clueless. When it comes to the parameters of
the playing arena, I’m just very aware of where everybody is, and I
just prefer to keep the focus.
IT: I want to talk about generations. Your family story is just
incredible. Your great-grandfather comes from Armenia to make
furniture. Your grandfather goes from Russia on foot with a donkey
over the mountains to Tehran. Your father leaves Tehran and ends up
in Chicago with a few bucks in his pocket. Then you break through
and now you have this incredible family.
AA: I only hear the stories as you hear them. I know my father’s
history, but for me, they are just stories, too. It’s amazing when
I hear it. [But what touches me] is what his life was like in America.
Then I’m amazed. I have two kids now, and my parents had two kids
and a dog and got in a car in Chicago and drove to the West to figure
out where my dad could play tennis twelve months a year, not knowing
whether he was going to work. So he set up shop in a little desert
town called Vegas and took care of two courts at the Tropicana to
teach lessons on one and have his kids play on the other. He held
down two jobs for most of our lives to raise four children. I marvel
at that. I know what it takes just to raise the two we have with a
lot of resources.
IT: You sound like you are at peace with your father, a man who was
very difficult for you.
AA: We’ve been through our moments. As I took his passions upon my
shoulders, it created a lot of confusion and conflict inside me. At
the same time, I realize as I’ve gotten older, just how honest he’s
always been with what he cares about.
IT: What a sense of purpose and work ethic.
AA: Yeah, he’s driven. He still works every day. The man has a fire
in his belly that I admire.
IT: If you had the choice again, would you go to Nick’s academy? Or
maybe scratch it?
AA: Life was going to have a lot of trials and tribulations for
me, whatever road I ended up choosing. No, I needed to go for
this career, and tennis has been a great friend. It’s been a great
relationship. I’ve learned a lot and grown a lot and have a lot as a
result of it. It’s been 20 years of me practicing for tomorrow. I’ve
learned a lot to prepare myself now for the rest of my life.
Hopefully, God willing, my life will be a lot more than the 20 years
in tennis.
IT: All of us make mistakes in our lives. You just make it in the
public square. If the gods from the rewrite desk said, “Hey, you can
go back and change any of your decisions,” whether it was skipping
the Wimbys and the Australian Opens, or winning that 22-point rally
against Pete [on set point in the ’95 U.S. Open final], or passing
on doing the “image is everything” ad campaign, what would you choose?
AA: If I could avoid the mistake while maintaining the lessons learned,
I would rewrite all of them. But if I had to give up what I learned
as a result of them, it’s impossible. It’s been a tough road, but it’s
been well worth it. So if I didn’t have to give up what I’ve learned,
I would go back and rewrite every moment that I made somebody feel
less than they deserve.
IT: And the entertainer George Lopez said, “This guy has gone from
‘image is everything’ to ‘humanity is everything.'”
AA: That comment speaks volumes. It meant a lot to me to hear it.
IT: Your trainer and friend Gil Reyes says the character of any
athlete can be judged not so much when he retires but in ten years
or so afterwards, when you can see what he’s given back. What’s your
vision of the future?
AA: Giving back is something I’ve valued since I was a teen,
something I committed to in my own mind as early as 15. The question
was how and when. I didn’t know what success, what resources I’d
have. But I knew it mattered. For me, it starts with children and
ends with children. That’s a responsibility that falls on everybody’s
shoulders. They’re our future, so I started my foundation 13 years
ago. Now I have dreams of my school becoming the model for how
education can be in our country. Our academy is taking kids one
year to two years behind in education, and we’re bringing them up
to grade level inside a year. We’re nationally recognized for our
achievements. So we’re not just throwing money at a problem; we’re
proving you can change a child’s life by teaching them that there
aren’t shortcuts, by creating a culture. My hope would be to connect
the dots and create a road map on how this can be duplicated all
across our country. That would make me feel good.
IT: You also heard plenty of kudos at Wimbledon. The event is so
much more than a tennis tournament. It’s about tradition, culture,
and how to treat people. What are the things you’ve learned from
going to Wimbledon?
AA: This was a place that first taught me to respect the sport, to
appreciate the opportunity and privilege to play a game for a living.
People work five days a week to play on the weekend. We get to call
it a job. I learned that at Wimbledon – missing it for a few years,
coming back, being embraced, seeing the respect for tennis and the
respect for the competitors, the appreciation. The fans are here
rain or shine. They sit through some tough conditions just to see a
few minutes of play. Whether they’re queuing up outside or sitting
with their umbrellas on Centre Court, it’s quite a love. That’s what
separates Wimbledon from every other event.
IT: Is there anything more touching in sports than that incredible
spectator queue that goes on for a mile or so, for 36 hours or more?
AA: No. It’s real humbling to be driving in and see these people living
there for days to, hopefully, get in to see a little bit of tennis –
most likely on the back courts. It really makes you appreciate.
IT: And what of the U.S. Open, with all its razzmatazz?
AA: New York has taught me how to be a better player and to be
a better person. It’s the toughest environment in our sport. It’s
challenged me to be more of myself. As a result, I’ve grown in places
I wouldn’t have grown in otherwise. In turn, they’ve become my biggest
supporters. That relationship means the world to me.
IT: It must be some charge to go out in front of a full house at Ashe
at night and sense that 44,000 eyeballs are on you.
AA: Oh, yeah. I’ve had many moments, but I can almost guarantee you,
none will be more [incredible] than this year coming up.
IT: How would you assess your U.S. Open years in ’94 and ’99? These
were your two triumphs, and then there was your fabulous run last year.
AA: A lot of ups and downs. I’ve had some real disappointing moments
there [four losses to Sampras], some great triumphs, great single-match
memories that stand out, the feeling of playing there at night.
IT: And one or two matches that pop out?
AA: Well, last year’s against Blake [in the quarters]. There’s nothing
like what I felt out there that night. Playing Connors at night there
when I was a teenager.
IT: Plus, there were all your matches with Sampras.
AA: It was amazing to have that rivalry. He gave me things that I
aspired to. In many cases, he taught me what I wanted to be. And in
many cases, he taught me what I didn’t want to be. It was a rivalry
that existed on so many layers, the way we played the game, the way
we went about our sport… If we woke up as the other one, we’d both
be living in a nightmare.
IT: He would just not want…
AA: Any part of my life, nor me his. It was that way when we were going
to play on Sunday or if we weren’t. We just were complete opposites,
which lent itself to even a more special rivalry.
IT: He had a famous crack, “All I would want from his life was his
plane.” What of his would you like?
AA: His serve.
IT: Probably, Pete and Federer are the two best players you’ve ever
faced. It they’re playing against each other in the U.S. Open deep
into the last set, who emerges?
AA: I’ve been privileged to play them both. It’s a pleasure to
watch Roger when you’re in the thick of it with him, which speaks
volumes for just what he’s able to do on the court, because you’re
not in the mindset of giving somebody unnecessary credit when you’re
competing against him. But what Roger brings to the court, I’ve never
seen before.
IT: Andre, let’s briefly run through the different strokes and tell
me the toughest ones you’ve faced. Is Federer’s forehand…
AA: It’s arguably the best that’s ever been in the game.
IT: Sampras’ serve?
AA: There are others with better serves, but he defended his serve
well and that makes a difference. When you talk about a serve versus
a hold game, you’re talking about two entirely different things.
Wayne Arthurs has one of the most beautiful serves you’ll ever see.
If you gave Pete Wayne Arthurs’ serve, he would have been that much
nastier.
IT: Best backhand: Connors, Guga Kuerten or…
AA: The first person that comes to mind, in terms of the high end
of what their backhand is capable of, is [Marat] Safin. The guy
can cane the ball and hurt you off returns, off stretch balls. And
[David] Nalbandian’s backhand is one of the most controlled shots
that I’ve seen off the double-handed wing. As far as one-handers,
one of the most beautiful to watch was Guga or Tommy Hass, who has
a beautiful one-hander.
IT: And the volley – Edberg?
AA: Just the fundamentals on volleys? Yeah, Edberg. He’s the one you
felt like would miss the least volleys. But then you got a guy like
[Patrick] Rafter who was such an athlete. The way he could cover the
net presented a whole different kind of problem.
IT: And quickness? It used to be Chang. Now it’s Nadal or Hewitt.
AA: No, no. Hewitt’s not in Nadal’s league as far as speed goes. I
would put Nadal up there. You could argue Federer, or you could argue
[German] Bjorn Phau. That might shock you, but he’s lightning.
IT: Mental toughness – Connors, McEnroe or maybe…
AA: You give value to somebody who’s done it for years, but I’ve
never seen anybody treat every point as importantly as Nadal. He
treats every point like that’s the point he wants to win. He doesn’t
care what he has to put himself through. I’ve seen him be down 6-0,
3-0 against Roddick at the U.S. Open that one year, and win a game
and fist pump and mean it.
IT: Few others have seen more changes in tennis. What adjustments did
you have to make since the early days of Connors, McEnroe and Lendl?
AA: The fitness level has only increased over the years. Connors was
5-foot-9. Now you’ve got guys routinely that are 6-foot-3 and above.
It’s rare that you play somebody under that. The physicality has
changed dramatically. Compare Nadal at 20 to me at 20. It’s a sport
that has started to figure out that the stronger and more physical you
are, the more capable you are as an athlete. I was onto that earlier
than most, building my strength and the base that was the foundation
of my game. As a result, I served bigger and was able to handle pace
better so as the game got faster, I could just shorten my swing. I
got smarter with my shots. I’ve had to get more aggressive.
It used to be where I could just run people around until they fell
to the ground. But guys are just too strong now. It’s a different
game than in the past.
IT: So how would Andre of today handle Andre the 20-year-old? Would
it be a pretty fast match?
AA: I want to hope so, but if I can’t rotate or lunge, or if I have
some of the ailments I’ve had the last few years and you stick me on
the wrong day, it could be a pain for Andre – whichever one you’re
talking about. It depends what day I’m having. It’s been a lot of
that for me. But I want to believe that I’ve gotten better over the
years. This year is a bit of an exception. I haven’t found my best,
that’s for sure.
IT: Years from now, when Jaden’s kid comes up to you and says, “Hey,
gramps, what did you contribute most to that game of tennis?” what
would you…
AA: When I first came onto the scene, I was the first person to hit
the ball big off both wings, [to] take the ball early and give it a
good ride if I was in position off both sides. I would love to feel
like I was part of that evolution of the game, that I helped the game
and those around me get better.
IT: Let’s switch and talk about women’s tennis. When you look at
Stephanie’s game…it’s still hard for me to call her Stephanie…
AA: Sure. You don’t have to. Her mom calls her Steffi.
IT: Okay. Steffi had so many weapons. Do you see anyone on the circuit
now who could take her down?
AA: A sport goes through periods where it changes a lot, where athletes
get stronger and better. I haven’t necessarily seen that over the
last seven years in the women’s game. The Williams sisters had a real
opportunity to raise the athleticism and the standard of the game. But,
it just seems that everyone’s been plagued with injury. And Steff has a
game that, to this day, is tough for people to handle. Her backhand was
a low slice, and she had that big forehand, and she moved really well.
IT: Underrated serve, tough competitor.
AA: Yeah, she moved really well. That’s key. You had to be able to
sort of get in on her backhand. That was the most you could hope for.
IT: You’ve had exceptional relationships and marriages with incredible
women: obviously Barbra Streisand, Brooke Shields and Steffi. You’ve
experienced some of the more compelling women of our…
AA: Not just women – people. Barbra is one of the most fascinating
people you’d ever meet.
IT: Because of her intensity, her mind?
AA: Talk about somebody who strives for perfection, who holds a
stronger light on herself than others do. It’s admirable in so many
ways, and it’s also a curse. It’s the simple things in life, though.
It’s not how you think; it’s how you choose to live. Sometimes the
most profound moments come from the simplest of actions. That’s the
beauty of my life now. I get to live with [that quality] every day.
I’m with someone who speaks volumes with how she chooses to live
every moment. It’s a beautiful thing.
IT: You’ve quipped that you feel no more pressure than when you’re
cutting your daughter’s fingernails? The heck with center court or
a final-set tiebreaker.
AA: It’s some of the most pressure when your child is trying to
cough up a piece of fruit that they didn’t quite swallow. Getting
that piece out of their throat is as much pressure as I’ve ever felt.
IT: So, in the end, this tennis career of yours has been a great ride,
hasn’t it?
AA: It’s been an amazing, amazing ride.