Pipelines Aplenty: Iranian Official Announces Plan for Second

ArmeniaNow.com, Armenia
September 15, 2006
Pipelines Aplenty: Iranian official announces plan for
second Iran-Armenia gas line

By Marianna Grigoryan
ArmeniaNow reporter

While the first Iran-Armenia gas pipeline is still under construction,
representatives of the countries this week discussed plans for a
second one.

Iranian and Armenian leadership had a pipeline chat this week.

Last Monday and Tuesday (September 11-12), Speaker of the Islamic
Republic of Iran, Gholam-Ali-Haddad-Adel led a delegation from Tehran
to Yerevan, where he announced the pipeline plans during a joint-press
conference with National Assembly Chairman, Tigran Torosyan.
The first Armenian-Iranian pipeline construction, which is supposed to
be completed by the end of the year, should have had great strategic
significance. Besides the fact that it promised benefits in terms of
Armenian-Iranian cooperation, the pipeline was supposed to create an
opportunity to export Iranian gas to Europe through the territory of
RA, which was also highly significant for Armenia’s economic and
political development.
But, above all, the pipeline was meant to guarantee Armenia’s
energetic independence from Russia.
However, the sweet dreams of energy independence vanished on June 30,
when the Russian `Gazprom’ company representative re-declared the
company’s intention and concrete plans to purchase the pipeline.
(See also
&IID=1090&CID=1731&AID=1615&lng=ar m
The Russians announced they’d buy the pipeline. And though the deal
has not been confirmed by the Armenian side, it is also understood
that the Russian plan would not allow Armenia to transport gas,
therefore negating its chance for transit fees.
The second pipeline would make export possible.
The Russian-related news did not sit well in Tehran, and became a
topic of conversation when Armenian President Robert Kocharyan visited
Iran, July 5.
And, while Tehran apparently has concerns, so do members of Armenia’s
opposition.
Suren Surenyants, political analyst of the Republic political party,
told ArmeniaNow that plans of a second pipeline are `just talk’. `Even
the first pipeline’s destiny is absolutely in limbo yet.’
Surenyants sarcastically voiced a mounting concern among political
analysts and others in Armenia, centered on Armenia’s growing
dependency on Russia.
`Apparently, Armenia’s foreign affairs are determined in the Kremlin,’
Surenyants said. `Consequently even the high-ranking Parliament
Speaker of isolated Iran is hardly apt to discuss relevant matters
with Armenia, without the Kremlin’s permission.’
Assembly Chairman Torosyan, however, says the proposed pipeline is
exemplary.
`The Armenian-Iranian relations should serve an example for the whole
territory, despite the religious differences of the two nations,’
Torosyan says. `It is very important, that the Armenian-Iranian
relations progress, especially in the field of power engineering,
which is of strategic significance.’

Armenian Church Festival Scheduled

Burbank Leader, United States
Modified Sep 15, 2006 – 22:04:19 PDT
Armenian church festival scheduled
By Ani Amirkhanian
The Western Diocese of the Armenian Church will host
its inaugural Festival of Faith and Culture on
Saturday and Sunday at the Western Diocese
headquarters in Burbank.
“It’s a good tradition to have for the Armenian
church,” said Shoghig Giragosian, festival committee
chair. “Once a year, it’s for people to get together,
to get to know the various diocese and to know the
services that are available to them.”
– Church fetes centennial
– Armenian church festival scheduled
– Genocide suit moves forward
– IN THEIR OWN WORDS

The festival will begin at 10 a.m. today with the
opening ceremonies starting at 11 a.m.
Thousands are expected to attend, Giragosian said.
“We are going to have a lot of visitors and we truly
want this to be a festival for the people,” Giragosian
said.
Comedian Kev Orkian will host the two-day event, which
will feature performers, including Vartan and
Siranushe Dance Group, Winds of Passion, Menuet Dance
Group and more. advertisement

Participating Armenian comedians include Lori
Tatoulian and Chuko.
A children’s program presented by Vaco and a panel
discussion on modern Armenian identity is scheduled
for Saturday.
The festival will continue from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. on
Sunday.
Archbishop Hovnan Derderian will conduct an open-air
divine liturgy at 10:30 a.m. on the occasion of the
Feast of the Exaltation of the Cross.
“We have titled the first festival ‘Festival of Faith
and Culture,'” Derderian said. “It gives a specific
message to our parishioners and community members. We
cannot possibly forget it in our lives, they are
closely intermingled with one another.” Following the
liturgy, the archbishop will partake in the ceremony
of the Blessing of the Stone Crosses.
Representatives from the Armenia Tree Project and the
Armenian Bone Marrow Foundation will be recognized for
their deeds within the diaspora communities,
Giragosian said. “The western diocese has been around
for some time,” Giragosian said. “It seems to have
been rejuvenated since the arrival of the archbishop
[in 2003]. The entire western diocese has taken on a
new vigor, a new zeal.”
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Aliens Not Above Law

Kenya Times, Kenya
17 Sept 06
Aliens not above law
FOREIGNERS must be having good time in the country more than the
citizens. When Kenyans cry foul over the Government’s inability to
stem the wave of insecurity sweeping through the country, they
continue to be greeted with reports that certain cadres of foreigners
are armed to the teeth with arsenals that are not licensed.
And it is not just being in possession of firearms
illegally. Foreigners are using the arms to harass and endanger the
lives of Kenyans whose hospitality has enabled them to transact their
business in the country.
News that a son of the South Sudan Vice President Riek Machar was
arrested with a cache of arms, including AK-47 assault riffle, which
he used to threaten passers-by at their home demonstrates how far
foreigners have been allowed to break law in the country with
impunity.
It is even worrying that despite the arrests, the police remained
silent, obviously in a bid to cover-up the issue.
That this case comes before dust could settle down on the Armenian
brothers fiasco shows that the police is either sleeping on its job or
is an accomplice in the security glares that the foreigners cause.
We demand explanation from the Police Commissioner on the
circumstances under which Machar’s son acquired guns that he used to
terrorise innocent Kenyans outside their home. The police must also
allow the law to take its cause by arraigning the suspect in court to
face related charges.

BAKU: Dynamic Development of Azerbaijan and Political Stability

TREND
17.09.2006

Dynamic development of Azerbaijan and political
stability promote increase of country’s rating – chair
of parliamentary commission on economy

Source: Trend
Author: A.Ismayilova

16.09.2006

`Azerbaijan participates in global projects and
interests towards the county increases constantly. The
Country improves its legislative basis, political
stability and different factors promote increase of
rating,’ Ziyad Samedzade, the head of the permanent
preliminary commission on economic policy, told
Trend.
Sovereign rating issued by Moody’s Investor Services
on 14 September is higher by one level the rating by
Fitch Ratings and lower by one level than the
investment level. Moody’s issued Azerbaijan Ba1
rating.
However, there are some organizations that demonstrate
tendentious views.
For instance, the United States has an organization
that puts Azerbaijan below Armenia for the level of
economic freedom. It is not real. All are well known
about the investments, budget and living conditions in
Armenia. We don’t deny that Azerbaijan has problems,
while comparison is biased,’ he stressed.

Armenia: International Religious Freedom Report 2006

All American Patriots (press release), Sweden
World : Armenia: International Religious Freedom
Report 2006
Posted by Patriot on 2006/9/16 14:23:01 (42 reads)

Armenia: International Religious Freedom Report 2006
Released by the US Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
This report is submitted to the Congress by the Department of State in
compliance with Section 102(b) of the International Religious Freedom
Act (IRFA) of 1998. The law provides that the secretary of state, with
the assistance of the ambassador at large for international religious
freedom, shall transmit to Congress “an Annual Report on International
Religious Freedom supplementing the most recent Human Rights Reports
by providing additional detailed information with respect to matters
involving international religious freedom.”
Armenia: The constitution, as amended December 8, 2005, provides for
freedom of religion; however, the law places some restrictions on the
religious freedom of adherents of minority faiths, and there were some
restrictions in practice. The Armenian Apostolic Church, which has
formal legal status as the national church, enjoys some privileges not
available to other religious groups.
There was no overall change in the status of respect for religious
freedom during the period covered by this report. Some denominations
reported occasional acts of discrimination by mid- or low-level
government officials and isolated incidents of police harassment. An
amendment to the 2004 law on alternative military service took effect
on January 26, 2006, criminalizing evasion of alternative labor
service. Conscientious objectors maintained, however, that military
control of the alternative labor service amounted to unacceptable
military service.
The generally amicable relationship among religious groups in society
contributed to religious freedom; however, societal attitudes toward
some minority religious groups were ambivalent.
The U.S. government discusses religious freedom issues with the
Government as part of its overall policy to promote human
rights. During these discussions, the U.S. government emphasizes to
authorities that continued eligibility for the $235 million Millennium
Challenge Compact remains contingent upon the Government’s performance
in meeting good governance indicators, which include standards of
respect for religious freedom.
Section I. Religious Demography
The country has an area of 11,500 square miles and a population of 3
million.
The country is ethnically homogeneous; approximately 98 percent of the
population was ethnically Armenian. Many Azeris left the country
during the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh from 1988 to 1994,
increasing the country’s religious and ethnic homogeneity. Religious
observance was strongly discouraged in the Soviet era, leading to a
sharp decline in the number of active churches and priests, the
closure of virtually all monasteries, and the nearly complete absence
of religious education. As a result, the number of active religious
practitioners was relatively low. For many citizens, Christian
identity was an ethnic trait, with only a loose connection to
religious belief. An estimated 90 percent of citizens nominally
belonged to the Armenian Apostolic Church, an Eastern Christian
denomination with its spiritual center at the Etchmiadzin cathedral
and monastery. The head of the church, Catholicos Garegin II
(alternate spelling Karekin), was elected in 1999 at Etchmiadzin with
the participation of Armenian delegates from around the world.
There were comparatively small communities of other religious
groups. There was no reliable census data on religious minorities, and
reports from congregants themselves varied significantly. The
Government does not provide official figures for numbers of religious
adherents, but congregants offered the following unconfirmed
estimates: Catholic, both Roman and Mekhitarist (Armenian Uniate)
(120,000); Yezidi, an ethnically Kurdish cultural group whose religion
includes elements derived from Zoroastrianism, Islam, and animism
(40,000 nominal adherents); unspecified “charismatic” Christian
(10,000); Jehovah’s Witnesses (8,750); Armenian Evangelical Church
(8,000); Molokan, an ethnically Russian pacifist Christian group that
split from the Russian Orthodox Church in the 17th century (5,000);
Baptist (2,000); the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
(Mormons) (2,000); Greek Orthodox (1,200); Seventh-day Adventist
(950); Pentecostal (700); Jewish (600); and Baha’i (200). There was
no estimate of the number of atheists.
Yezidis were concentrated primarily in agricultural areas around Mount
Aragats, northwest of the capital, Yerevan. Armenian Catholic and
Greek Orthodox Christians were concentrated in the northern region,
while most Jews, Mormons, and Baha’is were located in Yerevan. In
Yerevan there was also a small community of Muslims, including Kurds,
Iranians, Indians, and temporary residents from the Middle East.
Several minority religious groups sponsor missionary programs in the
country, including both expatriate and local participants. Levels of
membership in minority religious groups remained relatively unchanged.
Section II. Status of Religious Freedom
Legal/Policy Framework
The constitution, as amended on December 8, 2005, provides for freedom
of religion and “the exclusive mission of the Armenian Apostolic Holy
Church as a national church in the spiritual life, development of the
national culture and preservation of the national identity of the
people of Armenia.” The law stipulates some restrictions on the
religious freedom of adherents of faiths other than the Armenian
Apostolic Church. The constitution also provides for freedom of
conscience, including the right either to believe or to adhere to
atheism. The 1991 Law on Freedom of Conscience, amended in 1997 and
again in 2001, establishes the separation of church and state but
grants the Armenian Apostolic Church official status as the national
church.
Extended negotiations between the Government and the Armenian
Apostolic Church resulted in a 2000 memorandum providing a framework
for the two sides to negotiate a concordat. Although they had not
concluded negotiations by the end of the period covered by this
report, the Government and the church used the memorandum as a basis
for dispute resolution and policy agreements.
The law requires all religious denominations and organizations to
register in order to operate without restrictions. There were no
reports of the Government refusing registration to religious groups
that were qualified for registration under the law. The Department of
Religious Affairs and National Minorities, which replaced the former
Council on Religious Affairs (CRA), oversees religious affairs and
coordinates activities with the cabinet’s chief of staff. A
high-ranking official from the former CRA serves as the prime
minister’s advisor on religious affairs. The Office of the State
Registrar registers religious entities, and the Department of
Religious Affairs and National Minorities performs a consultative role
in the registration process. To qualify for registration, petitioning
organizations must “be free from materialism and of a purely spiritual
nature,” and must subscribe to a doctrine based on “historically
recognized holy scriptures.” A religious organization must have at
least 200 adult members. Religious groups are not required to
register, but unregistered religious organizations may not publish
newspapers or magazines, rent meeting places, broadcast programs on
television or radio, or officially sponsor the visas of visitors. By
the end of the period covered by this report, the Government had
registered fifty-six religious organizations, some of which were
individual congregations within the same denomination.
Yerevan’s one surviving eighteenth-century mosque, which was restored
with Iranian funding, was open for regular Friday prayers. Although
not registered as a religious facility, the Government did not
restrict Muslims from praying there.
The law permits religious education in state schools. Only personnel
authorized and trained by the Government may teach in schools. The
history of the Armenian Apostolic Church forms the basis of this
curriculum; many schools cover global religions in elementary school
and the history of the Armenian Apostolic Church in middle
school. Students may choose not to attend religious education
classes. Religious groups are not allowed to provide religious
instruction in schools, although registered groups may do so in
private homes to children of their members. On occasion, priests from
the Armenian Apostolic Church teach classes in religious history;
however, the use of public school buildings for religious
“indoctrination” is illegal.
The military employs Armenian Apostolic chaplains for each division,
but no other religious groups are represented in the chaplaincy.
The Government’s human rights ombudsman and the head of the Department
of Religious Affairs and National Minorities met with many minority
religious organizations during the period covered by this report.
Restrictions on Religious Freedom
During the period covered by this report, most registered religious
groups reported no serious legal impediments to their
activities. However, the 1991 freedom of conscience law prohibits
“proselytizing” (undefined in the law) and restricts unregistered
groups from publishing, broadcasting, or inviting official visitors to
the country. The prohibition on proselytizing applies to all groups,
including the Armenian Apostolic Church; however, the term used for
proselytizing implies that someone has been taken away from a “true”
faith, and the prohibition effectively restricts only minority
religious groups.
According to the head of the Department of Religious Affairs and
National Minorities, some minority religious groups, including the
Molokans and some Yezidi groups, have not sought registration.
Although the law prohibits foreign funding of foreign-based
denominations, the Government has not enforced the ban and considers
it unenforceable. A 1991 law required all religious organizations,
except the Armenian Apostolic Church, to obtain prior permission to
engage in public religious activities, travel abroad, or invite
foreign guests to the country. In 2001 this law was rescinded by
presidential order and, in practice, no travel restrictions were
imposed on any religious denomination.
On July 13, 2005, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon)
officials reported that police officers briefly detained, harassed,
and threatened two foreign missionaries. The missionaries said that
one of the officers, after warning them to leave the country, placed
the barrel of his unloaded gun against one missionary’s head and
pulled the trigger. Church officials filed a police report, and the
Government opened an investigation. According to the Department of
Religious Affairs and National Minorities, Armenian Apostolic Church
officials filed a counter-complaint against the Mormons within a week
of the incident, alleging the missionaries were illegally
proselytizing on church grounds. Police officials claimed the officers
questioned the missionaries and asked them to stay away from the
church but denied that the questioning constituted harassment. On
October 4, 2005, a police inspector sent Mormon representatives a
letter informing members that the national police intended to drop the
investigation and leave the incident unresolved. Other religious
groups reported isolated events involving police officials questioning
missionaries and their acquaintances about their activities.
Abuses of Religious Freedom
The law on alternative military service took effect in 2004 and
allowed conscientious objectors, subject to government panel approval,
to perform either noncombatant military or civil service duties rather
than serve as conscripted military personnel. The law was applied to
subsequent draftees and those serving prison terms for draft
evasion. Conscientious objectors maintained, however, that military
control of the alternative labor service amounted to unacceptable
military service. An amendment to the law, which took effect on
January 26, 2006, criminalized evasion of alternative labor service.
According to leaders of Jehovah’s Witnesses in Yerevan, twenty-five
members of their religious group remained in prison for refusal, on
conscientious and religious grounds, to perform military service or
alternative labor service. An additional eighteen members signed
statements saying they would not leave the country pending the
completion of preliminary investigations, and six more were assigned
conditional punishment ranging from one to three years.
Representatives of the Jehovah’s Witnesses stated that all of the
prisoners were given the opportunity to serve an alternative to
military service rather than prison time, but that all refused because
the military retained administrative control of alternative
service. Twelve of those in prison reportedly received two-year
sentences.
There were reports that hazing of new conscripts was more severe for
minority group members such as Yezidis and Jehovah’s Witnesses. Some
Yezidi leaders reported that police and local authorities subjected
their religious community to discrimination. Other Yezidi leaders
denied the allegations.
There was no officially sponsored violence reported against minority
religious groups during the period covered by this report. Other than
Jehovah’s Witnesses who were conscientious objectors, there were no
reports of religious prisoners or detainees.
Forced Religious Conversion
There were no reports of forced religious conversion, including of
minor U.S. citizens who had been abducted or illegally removed from
the United States, or of the refusal to allow such citizens to be
returned to the United States.
Section III. Societal Abuses and Discrimination
The generally amicable relationship among religious groups in society
contributed to religious freedom; however, societal attitudes toward
some minority religious groups were ambivalent.
The Armenian Apostolic Church is a member of the World Council of
Churches and, despite doctrinal differences, has friendly official
relations with major Christian denominations, including the Eastern
Orthodox churches, the Roman Catholic Church, the Anglican Church, and
some Protestant churches.
Suppressed through seventy years of Soviet rule, the Armenian
Apostolic Church has trained priests and committed material resources
to fill the spiritual void created by the demise of communist
ideology. Nontraditional religious organizations are viewed with
suspicion. Representatives of foreign?based denominations frequently
cited as evidence statements including “one God, one country, one
church,” noting they had been warned against “stealing souls” from the
Armenian Apostolic Church.
Societal attitudes toward most minority religious groups were
ambivalent. Many citizens were not religiously observant, but the link
between religion and Armenian ethnicity is strong.
According to some observers, the general population expressed negative
attitudes about Jehovah’s Witnesses, because the latter refused to
serve in the military, engaged in little understood proselytizing
practices, and because of a widespread but unsubstantiated belief that
they pay the desperately poor to convert. Jehovah’s Witnesses
continued to be targets of hostile sermons by some Armenian Apostolic
Church clerics and experienced occasional societal discrimination. The
press reported a number of complaints for allegedly illegal
proselytizing lodged by citizens against members of Jehovah’s
Witnesses.
Some members of the press stoked suspicion of nontraditional religious
organizations. On April 4, 2006, an opposition newspaper published a
short editorial alleging that “a top police official” had information
that “religious sects” including Mormons and Pentecostals had enlisted
well-known criminals to protect the “sects'” interests against the
Government. The paper’s publishers claimed the unnamed source of the
article was “credible” and that the allegations were factual, but
despite repeated requests, they declined to elaborate on them.
On April 5, 2006, a pro-government tabloid published a short editorial
entitled, “Is the American University of Armenia being Mormonized?”
The writer claimed that the newspaper had learned from sources that “a
Mormon” would be appointed vice rector of the American
University. According to the authors, if the rumors were true, the
country would have taken a serious step, negative in the tabloid’s
view, toward “Mormonization.”
Flanked by Armenian Apostolic priests during an April 19, 2006, press
conference, Armenian Center for Rehabilitation and Assistance to
Victims of Destructive Cults Director Alexander Amaryan continued his
public assertions that the presence of nontraditional religious
institutions “threatens the spiritual life of Armenia.” Armenian
Apostolic priests alleged “religious sects,” which they identified as
Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormons, “conquered members of our flock” by
“abducting children and church members, and criticizing national
traditions.”
Unlike in previous years, the Jewish community reported no incidents
of verbal harassment during the period covered by this report. On
March 18, 2005, a court issued a three-year suspended sentence to the
leader of the Union of Armenian Aryans, in response to his conviction
on charges of public hostility for calling for the country to be
“purified” of Jews and Yezidis.
Section IV. U.S. Government Policy
The U.S. government discusses religious freedom issues with the
Government as part of its overall policy to promote human rights. The
U.S. ambassador and embassy officials maintain close contact with the
Catholicos at Etchmiadzin and with leaders of other religious and
ecumenical groups in the country. During the period covered by this
report, U.S. officials consistently raised the issue of alternatives
to military service with government officials. The embassy also
maintained regular contact with resident and visiting regional
representatives of foreign-based religious groups such as the Mormons
and raised their concerns with the Government. Embassy officials
closely monitor trials related to issues of religious freedom and take
an active role in policy fora and nongovernmental organization
roundtables regarding religious freedom.
The U.S. embassy hosted several roundtable meetings and receptions in
honor of U.S. representatives of religious organizations. Leaders of
local minority religious groups were regularly welcomed at these
events.
Released on September 15, 2006
Source: US State Dept.

Genocide Suit Moves Forward

Burbank Leader, United States
September 17, 2006
Genocide suit moves forward
By Tracy E. Gilchrist
GLENDALE – A judge’s ruling on Monday to move forward in a
class-action suit against two German banks accused of withholding
money and property from victims of the 1915 Armenian Genocide brings
their descendants a step closer to restitution and recognition of the
tragedy, their attorneys said.
“It’s a watershed moment,” said Los Angeles attorney Mark Geragos, who
represents the plaintiffs who are descendants of the victims of the
genocide.

United States District Judge Margaret M. Morrow’s ruling marks the
first time a lawsuit against
a non-insurance company regarding assets withheld from Armenian
Genocide victims’ descendants has gotten this far along, Geragos said.
Officials from Deutsche Bank could not be reached for comment.
Descendants accuse German banks Deutsche Bank A.G. and Dresdner Bank
A.G. of holding on to assets deposited by Armenians prior to the 1915
genocide and holding on to assets the Ottoman Turkish Empire looted
from the victims. .
The suit further contends that by concealing and preventing recovery
of the assets, the banks profited from atrocities committed against
the Armenian people within the Ottoman Turkish Empire. advertisement

“The ruling allows us to proceed with discovery and depositions,”
Geragos said.
Morrow delivered a 78-page decision, which Geragos called
“well-reasoned and involved.”
“She did a fantastic job of analysis,” said Vartkes Yeghiayan, an
attorney working with Geragos, said of Morrow’s ruling.
“Armenians lost and banks benefited,” Yeghiayan said.
Plaintiffs have won several lawsuits against insurance companies that
benefited from the Armenian tragedy, Yeghiayan said. “It’s only a
question of time to file a lawsuit against Turkey,” for committing
genocide, he said.
The ruling comes a week before Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is expected
to sign a state Senate bill that allows for the victims’ descendants
to pursue the assets that financial institutions kept, said Haig
Hovsepian, community relations director with the Armenian National
Committee of America – Western Region.
“The state of California has an interest in returning wrongfully
withheld assets,” Hovsepian said of the timing of Morrow’s decision
and the bill, which the group anticipates will be signed within a few
days.

BAKU: Agenda of Caucasus Intercultural Festival Conference in Kars

Azeri Press Agency
Agenda of Caucasus Intercultural Festival conference
in Kars changed after Azerbaijanis’ protest
[ 16 Sen. 2006 15:48 ]
The Conference of the Caucasus Intercultural Festival
started in the Turkish region of Kars today.
Azerbaijani consul in Kars Hasan Zeynalov told the
APA.
The conference was to be held yesterday, but it was
delayed for today.
`We think it was delayed by Azerbaijani
representatives’ protest. As far as I know I the
agenda of the conference has been changed too. It will
not touch the issue on opening of Armenia-Turkey
borders. The conference will end tomorrow,’ the consul
said.
Azerbaijani invitees to the event have returned.
Zeynalov also said Kars people do not take the
conference serious.
Armenian and Azerbaijani folklore groups, invitees to
the Festival, came into conflict several days ago.
Armenians behaved immorally against Azerbaijani
representatives using insulting words in Armenian.
Azerbaijani folklore group protested against this and
left Turkey yesterday. /APA/

ANKARA: Gul Invites France to Join History Commission

Journal of Turkish Weekly
Gul Invites France to Join History Commission
Saturday , 16 September 2006
Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul has invited France to take part
in `the joint commission of historians’ established to probe Armenian
genocide allegations.
The Armenian question was among the topics discussed during minister
Gul’s official visit to France this week.
During his meeting with French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy,
Gul indicated that Turkey did not abstain from discussing the alleged
Armenian genocide and stated that they officially proposed the
creation of a joint commission of historians from both sides.
Gul also said that Turkey declared it would accept the outcomes of the
joint endeavor.
While Armenian authorities have not yet responded to Turkey’s offer,
Gul has offered France participation in the commission.
It has been reported that although Douste-Blazy carefully listened to
Gul’s proposal, he gave no definite answer.
In response to the French criticism over Article 301 of Turkish penal
code, Gul said that there was no difference between that article and a
drafted law submitted to the French parliament regarding the
punishment of those who deny the existence of the Armenian genocide.
Pointing out that it was a contradiction for France to demand the
abolition of Article 301 on the one hand, and to attempt to adopt the
legislation on Armenian genocide allegations on the other, Gul
stressed that a historical controversy such as Armenian genocide
allegations needed to be clarified by historians.
Criticizing the political decisions of the parliaments that recognized
Armenian genocide allegations, Gul said: `No one should expect that we
will admit what we did not commit. How can we assume the
responsibility of what we did not commit?’
French Want Turkish Nuclear Energy Bid
France showed `a special interest’ toward minister Gul.
Drawing attention to the warm welcome of Gul by President Chirac and
minister Douste-Blazy, the diplomats on the trip asserted that the
atmosphere of the visit was very different from that of previous ones.
It has been reported that the warm welcome stemmed from Turkey’s
decision to send troops to Lebanon, in addition to bids for Turkey’s
first nuclear energy plant, which came to the agenda during the
Chirac-Gul meeting.
France has shown serious interest in winning the tender.
Zaman
15 September 2006

Western Prelacy News in Brief – September 16

September 16, 2006
PRESS RELEASE
Western Prelacy of the Armenian Apostolic Church of America
H.E. Archbishop Moushegh Mardirossian, Prelate
6252 Honolulu Avenue
La Crescenta, CA 91214
Tel: (818) 248-7737
Fax: (818) 248-7745
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: <; HOLY MASS AND MADAGHORKNEK ON THE FEAST OF THE EXALTATION OF THE CROSS Sunday, September 17, is the Feast of the Exaltation of the Cross, and the name day of Holy Cross Cathedral in Montebello. On this feast day, H.E. Archbishop Moushegh Mardirossian, Prelate, will conduct Holy Mass and deliver the sermon at Holy Cross Cathedral. Assisting at the altar will be Very Rev. Fr. Muron Aznikian. Following church services, the Prelate will officiate over madaghorhnek services at `Baghramian' Hall. PRELATE MEETS WITH THE CENTRAL BOARD OF THE ARMENIAN CHURCH YOUTH ASSOCIATION On the evening of Tuesday, September 12, the Prelate met with the central board of the Armenian Church Youth Association, to discuss issues of concern to the youth. Accompanying the Prelate were Christian Education Department Director Very Rev. Fr. Muron Aznikian, and Rev. Vazken Atmajian, Pastor of St. Mary's Chruch. PRELATE REPRESENTED AT THE UNVEILING OF THE ARMENIA FUND TELETHON LOGO On the evening of Wednesday, September 13, the administrators of Armenia Fund had organized a special reception at Alex Theatre in Glendale to unveil the logo for this year's telethon. In attendance were Armenia Fund director Maria Mehranian, members of Armenia Fund, Consul of the Republic of Armenia Arthur Mardoyan, the mayors and city representatives of Glendale and La Canada, sponsors, and representatives of various Armenian organizations. Very Rev. Fr. Barthev Gulumian represented the Prelate. Accompanying him were Rev. Vazken Atmajian, Rev. Ardag Demirjian, and Rev. Gomidas Torossian, Pastors of St. Mary's Church, and Rev. Nareg Pehlivania, Pastor of Holy Cross Cathedral. THE PRELATE VISITS OUR SCHOOLS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE ACADEMIC YEAR It has become a tradition that at the start of each academic year, the Prelate visits Prelacy schools to convey his blessings and guidance to the students and staff. On Wednesday, September 13, the Prelate visited Levon & Hasmig Tavlian Pre-School in Pasadena. On the same day, the Prelate visited Vahan & Anoush Chamlian School, On Thursday, September 14, the Prelate visited Rose & Alex Pilibos High School. On Friday, September 15, the Prelate visited Richard Tufenkian Pre-School, followed by a visit to Mesrobian High School. During all his visits, the Prelate was accompanied by the local Parish Pastors, and was greeted warmly by the directors, principals, staff, and students of each school. The Prelate also had the opportunity to visit classrooms and personally convey his message and encouragement to the students. HAMAZKAYIN VALLEY CHAPTER CELEBRATES ITS 25th ANNIVERSARY, UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE PRELATE On Sunday, September 17, the Hamazkayin San Fernando Valley `Barouyr Sevag' Chapter will celebrate its 25th anniversary with a banquet held under the auspices of the Prelate. The banquet, set to start at 5:00 p.m., will take place at `Ojahk' Restaurant in North Hollywood. Very Rev. Fr. Muron Aznikian will represent the Prelate and convey his blessings. ARMENIAN APOSTOLIC CHURCH OF CRESCENTA VALLEY CELEBRATES ITS FIRST ANNIVERSARY On Friday, September 22, under the auspices of the Prelate, the Armenian Apostolic Church of Crescenta Valley will celebrate the first anniversary of its establishment at Brandview Collection in Glendale. Very Rev. Fr. Barthev Gulumian will represent the Prelate. Proceeds will be allocated to the parish's projects.

www.westernprelacy.org

Harper Leaps into the Foreign Policy Pond

National Post, Canada
Sunday, September 17, 2006

Harper leaps into the foreign policy pond
Mike Blanchfield, CanWest News Service Published: Saturday, September
16, 2006 OTTAWA – Stephen Harper had every intention of spending his
first hours over the Atlantic Ocean as Canada’s new prime minister
squirrelled away in the front of his government Airbus poring over his
briefing books, to prepare for upcoming meetings with Britain’s Tony
Blair, and his first major summit, the Group of Eight in Russia.
But, as he soon found out, a troubled world does not allow its leaders
such luxuries.
Just before Harper’s plane took off, Israeli bombs tore up the runway
of Beirut International Airport and a new war was breaking out in the
Middle East — something Harper could not ignore.
Harper soon found himself in a familiar pose of travelling prime
ministers: commenting on a world gone wrong to the journalists at the
back of his plane. He voiced unwavering support for Israel in its
quest to rescue two of its soldiers, kidnapped days earlier along the
Lebanese-Israeli border by the Hezbollah terrorist group. Harper said
Israel had a right to defend itself, and that it had shown a “measured
response” in its attack on Lebanon.
For many, Canada’s 22nd prime minister had redefined his country’s
position towards the intractable Middle East conflict by showing such
clear support for one side of the conflict over the other. Harper was,
quite literally, making foreign policy on the fly.
For all his efforts to focus his agenda on five domestic priorities,
Harper was forced to face a sixth, one that comes with the job of
being prime minister: defining Canada’s role of the world.
So far, Harper has offered no grand sweeping vision of Canadian
foreign policy. There have been clues and fragments, some more obvious
than others: the military mission in Afghanistan and the need to
support our allies in the war on terrorism, especially the United
States; the need to strengthen that relationship with Washington after
years of tension under the Chretien and Martin Liberals and his
unequivocal support of Israel in the Middle East.
Along the way, he has lashed out at Iran, snubbed China, recognized
the Armenian genocide thus angering NATO-ally Turkey, and his was one
of the first western countries to cut aid to the Palestinian
Authority, after the stunning election victory of the Hamas terrorist
organization in January.
Overall, this has made Jews and Americans, in particular, quite fond
of Harper, while Arabs, Muslims and peace-loving, war-loathing
Quebecers who kicked the Conservative party’s tires during the last
federal election are getting their backs up.
Former Liberal foreign affairs minister John Manley — who was an
outspoken U.S. supporter when he held the portfolio at the time of the
9/11 attacks — says Harper has hurt himself in Quebec because of his
foreign policy shift on the Middle East.
Manley said he was pleasantly surprised by how well Harper’s rookie
minority government had been performing — until the Middle East
reared its head, forcing Harper to react.
“When you venture into foreign policy shifts, you want to be really,
really sure that you understand how you got to where we were,” says
Manley. “It wasn’t a Liberal policy on the Middle East. It was a
Canadian policy, and the policy that I was responsible for as foreign
minister was in every significant respect the same that it was when
Joe Clark was the foreign minister for Brian Mulroney.”
Manley says Harper has broken the most important rule of Canadian
foreign policy: don’t get too close to the U.S. and don’t get too far
away from the U.S.
“That’s unpopular with a lot of Canadians, especially unpopular in
Quebec where they hoped to get their majority. I think the war is
unpopular in Quebec. All wars have been unpopular in Quebec,” says
Manley.
“On the Middle East and Canada-U.S. relations, they kind of plunged in
with gut reactions before really fully understanding what the delicate
balances were.”
But, changing the way Canada operates in the world is not a bad thing,
according to the experts. How you do it, though, is important.
“There are certainly the ingredients there to articulate a policy
framework that would resonate for Canadians,” says Fen Hampson,
director of the Norman Patterson School of International Affairs at
Ottawa’s Carleton University.
“We’re missing a policy. A policy that is one that sets clear goals
and strategies, has conceptual underpinnings that explain why we’re
doing certain things.”
Hampson says Harper’s take on the world could best be defined as “high
principled multilateralism” because of the close ties he is fostering
with the U.S. through fighting the war on terror in Afghanistan.
Hampson gives Harper an A for his management of Canada-U.S. relations,
resuscitating it after the rampant anti-Americanism of the Liberals
under Jean Chretien and Paul Martin effectively silenced Ottawa’s
voice in Washington.
But, pumping money into the military and making speeches about how
Canada stands with its number one ally and neighbour fighting
terrorism in Afghanistan does nothing to address other issues such as
how he views the massive economies of China and India, or what Canada
really thinks of the United Nations these days, let alone navigating
the political minefield of the Middle East.
“For the rest of the world: C minus,” Hampson says.
“He has to look at his other subjects if you want to use the report
card analogy. He’s still got a lot of homework to do.”
**** That work continues this week when Harper gives his first major
speech at the United Nations General Assembly. He will follow that by
hosting Afghan President Hamid Karzai in Ottawa. During his short
televised address last week on the fifth anniversary of the 9/11
attacks, Harper gave indications he supports the UN, reminding
Canadians their troops are serving on a NATO mission in Afghanistan
under the authority of the world body.
But Harper has given no indication he wants Canada to be a major
player in UN reform, and he’s not one to go around spouting the
“responsibility to protect” doctrine Martin was so passionate about,
especially when it came to helping the war-ravaged people of Sudan’s
Darfur region.
Some say Harper has also given short shrift to the epic humanitarian
disaster in Darfur.
“Paul Martin took on personally the role of moving Canada into the
dossier of Darfur,” says Liberal Senator Romeo Dallaire, the retired
general who headed the UN’s ill-fated mission to Rwanda that was
ignored and understaffed and was powerless to stop the 1994 genocide
there that cost 800,000 lives.
In Darfur, a three-year-old conflict that has displaced upwards of two
million people and claimed at least 200,000 lives, Canada committed
about 100 armoured personnel carriers as part of a commitment of about
$210,000, a pledge that that includes $40,000 Harper added in May.
But Dallaire says that since taking power in February, Harper has
dropped the ball on Darfur, silencing Canada as a major international
player, which included playing an active role in hammering out the
shaky Darfur peace agreement in Abuja, Nigeria.
Allan Rock, Canada’s ambassador to the UN and an active Darfur
advocate, has since moved on. And Harper sacked the Darfur advisory
team that Martin had created that included Dallaire, fellow
Sen. Mobina Jaffer and former UN ambassador Robert Fowler.
“Unceremoniously, sometime in February we were simply dumped by the
current government, no thank you, no nothing, just we don’t need you
anymore. I’m sitting there with all this information, possibly advice,
and I’m still waiting for somebody to call,” says Dallaire, an author
and activist who has a stellar international reputation as an Africa
advocate.
Dallaire said he offered his services to the new government in a
45-minute meeting with Foreign Affairs Minister Peter MacKay several
months ago — and that’s the last he’s heard from the government.
“Certainly the information I am getting from staff is that Africa is
not very much in the target area of this government’s foreign policy,”
says Dallaire, who has continuing contacts with the Canadian
International Development Agency, Foreign Affairs and the Defence
Department
And that, says Dallaire, is an abandonment of a major foreign policy
priority considering that African development was the main subject of
Canada’s 2002 chairmanship of the Group of Eight, not to mention the
hard work that was taking place behind the scenes with Darfur.
“On the political side, we were in Abuja, we were pushing the
belligerents, pushing the yardsticks in New York. We had Allan Rock
there, all working in a leadership role,” says Dallaire.
Harper has also managed to snub and anger the world’s fastest growing
economy — China — first by taking a broad public swipe by accusing
them of fostering economic espionage in Canada, and then by ignoring
them; as of last week, the Chinese Embassy in Ottawa was still waiting
for the their first meeting with MacKay.
China is not used to being treated that way. Chretien made building
economic ties with Beijing a cornerstone of his foreign policy,
something Martin carried on. The Liberals were accused of doing this
at the expense of human rights.
But Harper has swung the pendulum back the other way — too far, says
Hampson.
It is simply not in Canada’s long-term interest given its high-level
of immigration and growing trade with China “to build a policy on
single pillar, the human rights pillar.”
And, Harper has also managed to alienate Canadian Arabs and Muslims
with his vocal support of the Israeli military’s attack on Lebanon in
an attempt to crush the Hezbollah militia.
A recent poll commissioned by the National Council on Canada-Arab
Relations found that one-third of those surveyed believe Harper
favours Israelis over Arabs.
The same poll, conducted by SES Research, also found that 54 per cent
said they would consider changing their vote in the next election
based on the government’s policy towards the Middle East.
“It quite well may be that foreign policy may play a significant role
in the dynamic of the next federal election,” said SES President Nik
Nanos.
Ottawa Citizen