‘Screamers’ and Genocide: Talk w/Serj Tankian From System of a Down

nd-genocide_b_35126.html

The Huffington Post
RJ ESKOW

‘Screamers’ and Genocide: A Talk With Serj Tankian From System of a Down
11.29.2006

‘Screamers,’ a documentary by Carla Garapedian, just won the Audience
Award at the AFI Film Festival. It uses archival footage, interviews,
and live music to reflect on the Armenian genocide, its aftermath, and
the effect that later denials of the atrocity had on history.

‘Screamers’ examines efforts to have the Armenian genocide
internationally recognized, and ties it to other genocides, past and
present – particularly Darfur. It’s a powerful document, both
politically and artistically.

The film centers around the highly popular Armenian-American rock band
System of a Down and its lead singer, Serj Tankian, as they tour
Europe and discuss the issues of Armenia, genocide, and human rights.

Last week I spoke with Serj about the film and his own political work.
Serj cofounded Axis of Justice with Rage Against the
Machine/Audioslave guitarist Tom Morello, to mobilize musicians and
music fans around progressive issues.

Here are some excerpts from our conversation:

What politicized you? As an Armenian-American, was it your family’s
memories of the Armenian genocide?

It was the denial of genocide, more than the genocide itself, that
politicized me. I was troubled by the idea that this kind of violence
could occur, only to be ignored or covered up. It made me feel I had
to act and react. There are so many things going on in the world today
that are receiving the same treatment – including, but not limited to
Darfur and Rwanda.

In a way, the hypocrisy of the denial is more politicizing than the
act itself. I think that the memory of Armenia’s genocide opened my
eyes at an early age to the existence of political cynicism.

What’s your definition of "genocide"? The diplomatic community has
one, but does the word have a more personal meaning for you?

My thing is figuring out how to put things in a simple way, so here’s
my definition: If someone gets attacked because they look different,
act different, or pray differently, that’s genocide. And if the mass
execution of a people is organized and perpetrated by a government,
that’s definitely genocide.

But anytime people are made to suffer as a group because they’re
different from others – to me, that’s genocide too.

____________

A lot of political leaders, even well-meaning ones, might say that
forcing Turkey to acnowledge the Armenian genocide would limit our
ability to fight terror or do other good things in the world. What
would you say to someone who argues that the genocide took place
almost a century ago, and that they’d rather concentrate on what we
can do today?

Look: Correct recognition of the past affects the present. It’s as
simple as that. If we’re at the point where we’re going to use
genocide as currency to get something we want from another nation
… well, we’re really fucked, aren’t we?

Let me put it another way: You can’t do the wrong thing for the right
reason. It won’t work. It never has.

____________

The movie shows your efforts to get Denny Hastert to advance a
resolution recognizing the Armenian genocide. The film’s equally rough
on the first Bush administration and Clinton’s over this issue. Do you
think the resolution will do any better now that the Democrats control
Congress?;

You mean, are they real reformers or just "corporate Democrats"? We’ll
see. So far everybody’s enjoying the general feeling of optimism, but
Congress hasn’t even convened yet. Nobody’s really "in" over there
right now.

____________

What do you say when people complain about musicians and other
celebrities who speak out about politics?

I agree with them, in a way. What do musicians know that other people
don’t? Nothing. Plumbers can speak. Electricians can speak. Everyone
can speak. They should speak.

Lech Walesa was an electrician, and he became the leader of Poland.

Exactly. Good for him. I don’t want to spend all my time working as an
activist. I don’t get satisfaction out of it. I’d rather be doing
something else. I’m a musician.

I’ve noticed something about people who say they don’t like actors and
musicians having political opinions, if you ask them who they think
was the greatest President eve,r they always answer "Reagan." And what
was Reagan before he went into politics?

(laughs) Exactly. If anybody wants to speak up, they should speak
up. I don’t want to be a politician …

____________

Serj discusses other topics, including the balancing act between music
& politics and how it felt to become the target of jingoistic attacks
after 9/11, here. "Screamers" opens in Los Angeles on December 8.

LINKS:

http://w ww.axisofjustice.org
http://axisfeature.sparkart.n et/radio.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rj-eskow/screamers-a
http://www.screamersmovie.com

Confronting Turkey’s Armenian Genocide

Weekend Edition
October 14-15, 2006
"Suddenly, Those Armenian Graves Opened Up Before My Own Eyes"
Confronting Turkey’s Armenian Genocide

By ROBERT FISK

This has been a bad week for Holocaust deniers. I’m talking about
those who wilfully lie about the 1915 genocide of 1.5 million Armenian
Christians by the Ottoman Turks. On Thursday, France’s lower house of
parliament approved a Bill making it a crime to deny that Armenians
suffered genocide. And, within an hour, Turkey’s most celebrated
writer, Orhan Pamuk–only recently cleared by a Turkish court for
insulting "Turkishness" (sic) by telling a Swiss newspaper that nobody
in Turkey dared mention the Arm! enian massacres–won the Nobel Prize
for Literature. In the mass graves below the deserts of Syria and
beneath the soil of southern Turkey, a few souls may have been
comforted.

While Turkey continues to blather on about its innocence–the
systematic killing of hundreds of thousands of male Armenians and of
their gang-raped women is supposed to be the sad result of "civil
war"–Armenian historians such as Vahakn Dadrian continue to unearth
new evidence of the premeditated Holocaust (and, yes, it will deserve
its capital H since it was the direct precursor of the Jewish
Holocaust, some of whose Nazi architects were in Turkey in 1915) with
all the energy of a gravedigger.

Armenian victims were killed with daggers, swords, hammers and axes to
save ammunition. Massive drowning operations were carried out in the
Black Sea and the Euphrates rivers–mostly of women and children, so
many that the Euphrates became clogged with corpses and changed its
course for up ! to half a mile. But Dadrian, who speaks and reads
Turkish fluently, ha s now discovered that tens of thousands of
Armenians were also burned alive in haylofts.

He has produced an affidavit to the Turkish court martial that briefly
pursued the Turkish mass murderers after the First World War, a
document written by General Mehmet Vehip Pasha, commander of the
Turkish Third Army. He testified that, when he visited the Armenian
village of Chourig (it means "little water" in Armenian), he found all
the houses packed with burned human skeletons, so tightly packed that
all were standing upright. "In all the history of Islam," General
Vehip wrote, "it is not possible to find any parallel to such
savagery."

The Armenian Holocaust, now so "unmentionable" in Turkey, was no
secret to the country’s population in 1918. Millions of Muslim Turks
had witnessed the mass deportation of Armenians three years earlier–a
few, with infinite courage, protected Armenian neighbours and friends
at the risk of the lives of their own Muslim families–and, o! n 19
October 1918, Ahmed Riza, the elected president of the Turkish senate
and a former supporter of the Young Turk leaders who committed the
genocide, stated in his inaugural speech: "Let’s face it, we Turks
savagely (vahshiane in Turkish) killed off the Armenians."

Dadrian has detailed how two parallel sets of orders were issued,
Nazi-style, by Turkish interior minister Talat Pasha. One set
solicitously ordered the provision of bread, olives and protection for
Armenian deportees but a parallel set instructed Turkish officials to
"proceed with your mission" as soon as the deportee convoys were far
enough away from population centres for there to be few witnesses to
murder. As Turkish senator Reshid Akif Pasha testified on 19 November
1918: "The ‘mission’ in the circular was: to attack the convoys and
massacre the population… I am ashamed as a Muslim, I am ashamed as
an Ottoman statesman. What a stain on the reputation of the Ottoman
Empire, these criminal people..! ."

How extraordinary that Turkish dignitaries could speak such truths in
1918, could fully admit in their own parliament to the genocide of the
Armenians and could read editorials in Turkish newspapers of the great
crimes committed against this Christian people. Yet how much more
extraordinary that their successors today maintain that all of this is
a myth, that anyone who says in present-day Istanbul what the men of
1918 admitted can find themselves facing prosecution under the
notorious Law 301 for "defaming" Turkey.

I’m not sure that Holocaust deniers–of the anti-Armenian or
anti-Semitic variety–should be taken to court for their
rantings. David Irving is a particularly unpleasant "martyr" for
freedom of speech and I am not at all certain that Bernard Lewis’s
one-franc fine by a French court for denying the Armenian genocide in
a November 1993 Le Monde article did anything more than give publicity
to an elderly historian whose work deteriorates with the years.

But it’s gratifying to find French President Jacques Chi! rac and his
interior minister Nicolas Sarkozy have both announced that Turkey will
have to recognise the Armenian death as genocide before it is allowed
to join the European Union. True, France has a powerful
half-million-strong Armenian community.

But, typically, no such courage has been demonstrated by Lord Blair of
Kut al-Amara, nor by the EU itself, which gutlessly and childishly
commented that the new French Bill, if passed by the senate in Paris,
will "prohibit dialogue" which is necessary for reconciliation between
Turkey and modern-day Armenia. What is the subtext of this, I
wonder. No more talk of the Jewish Holocaust lest we hinder
"reconciliation" between Germany and the Jews of Europe?

But, suddenly, last week, those Armenian mass graves opened up before
my own eyes. Next month, my Turkish publishers are producing my book,
The Great War for Civilisation, in the Turkish language, complete with
its long chapter on the Armenian genocide entitled "The ! First
Holocaust". On Thursday, I received a fax from Agora Books in Is
tanbul. Their lawyers, it said, believed it "very likely that they
will be sued under Law 301"–which forbids the defaming of Turkey and
which right-wing lawyers tried to use against Pamuk–but that, as a
foreigner, I would be "out of reach". However, if I wished, I could
apply to the court to be included in any Turkish trial.

Personally, I doubt if the Holocaust deniers of Turkey will dare to
touch us. But, if they try, it will be an honour to stand in the dock
with my Turkish publishers, to denounce a genocide which even Mustafa
Kamel Ataturk, founder of the modern Turkish state, condemned.

Robert Fisk is a reporter for The Independent and author of Pity the
Nation. He is also a contributor to CounterPunch’s collection, The
Politics of Anti-Semitism. Fisk’s new book is The Conquest of the
Middle East.

http://counterpunch.com/fisk10162006.html

RFE/RL Iran Report – 11/29/2006

RADIO FREE EUROPE/RADIO LIBERTY, PRAGUE, CZECH REPUBLIC
_________________________________________ ____________________
RFE/RL Iran Report
Vol. 9, No. 44, 29 November 2006

A Review of Developments in Iran Prepared by the Regional Specialists
of RFE/RL’s Newsline Team

******************************************** ****************
HEADLINES
* IRAN WILL PROCEED WITH HEAVY-WATER REACTOR
* ZIMBABWEAN PRESIDENT VISITS IRAN
* IRAQI’S VISIT TO TEHRAN POSTPONED
* TEHRAN DECRIES REFUGEE PRESENCE
* LABOR LEADER DETAINED IN TEHRAN
* KURDS IN TEHRAN BARRED FROM CONGREGATIONAL PRAYERS
* STUDENT KILLED IN FRONT OF FIANCEE
* COMMEMORATION FOR SLAIN DISSIDENTS BANNED
* SENIOR CLERIC DIES
* JOURNALISTS DETAINED AT MEHRABAD AIRPORT
* PORNOGRAPHERS FACE DEATH IN IRAN
* DEBATE SHARPENS OVER GENDER SEGREGATION
* IRAN SOCCER SUSPENDED FOR ‘GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE’
************************************ ************************

IRAN WILL PROCEED WITH HEAVY-WATER REACTOR. U.S. Ambassador Gregory
Schulte said in Vienna on November 23 that Iran’s request for
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) assistance in completing
its heavy water reactor in Arak, a city south of Tehran, was waived,
RFE/RL reported. "The removal of Arak — an action taken by consensus
— reflects the [IAEA] board’s continued concern about the nature
of Iran’s nuclear program and the intentions of its leadership.
Heavy water reactors are well suited to producing significant
quantities of plutonium, a key ingredient in building nuclear
weapons."
Adding that the 40 megawatt reactor could produce enough
plutonium annually to make two nuclear bombs, Schulte called for
United Nations sanctions against Iran. "The time has now come to back
international diplomacy with international sanctions. Meaningful
measures are needed to convince Iran’s leaders to make the right
choice — a choice for constructive engagement over continued
confrontation, a choice for serious negotiation over repeated
noncompliance."
IAEA Director-General Muhammad el-Baradei, furthermore,
encouraged Iran to be more cooperative with the nuclear watchdog.
The U.S. and many other countries suspect that Iran is trying
to develop nuclear weapons, a charge that Iran rejects. The Iranian
government claims its nuclear program has only peaceful applications,
such as medicine and energy production.
Developing countries feared that rejection of the Iranian
request would set a precedent that would retard their nuclear
programs, "The Washington Post" reported on November 20. According to
"The Washington Post," the IAEA does not have a legal basis for
denying Tehran’s request.
The IAEA governing board will not consider assisting the Arak
project for two more years. Ali Asqar Soltanieh, Iran’s envoy to
the IAEA, tried to portray the IAEA governing board’s decision as
a victory, saying on November 23 that the U.S. failed to prevent
Iran’s submission of a request for assistance, Iranian state
television reported. Soltanieh said Iran’s request was backed by
the non-aligned countries, the Group of 77, China, and Russia.
Soltanieh continued, "this is a proof that the Islamic Republic is
right and that the Islamic Republic’s programs are peaceful and
there is no legal logic in preventing the Islamic Republic from going
ahead with its nuclear activities."
Foreign Minister Manuchehr Mottaki had a different take on
events, telling reporters in Tehran on November 23, "Tehran did not
ask the IAEA for any assistance in the Arak Project," the Islamic
Republic News Agency (IRNA) reported. Mottaki said Iran would
"appreciate" IAEA help, but if it is not forthcoming, "we will do it
on our own."
Soltanieh effectively said the same thing on November 21. He
said Iran intends to build a heavy-water reactor at Arak regardless
of the level of assistance from the nuclear watchdog, state radio
reported. "Even if the IAEA rejects Iran’s request for
technological assistance, the project to complete the reactor will
not stop," Soltanieh said.
President Ahmadinejad, meanwhile, is continuing his defiant
stand and promoting the country’s nuclear pursuits. He said on
November 20 in Tehran that the Islamic republic intends to build
60,000 uranium centrifuges by March 21, the Iranian Students News
Agency (ISNA) reported. This step is necessary to meet the
country’s nuclear-fuel requirements, he said. (Bill Samii)

ZIMBABWEAN PRESIDENT VISITS IRAN. Robert Mugabe, the president of
Zimbabwe, arrived in Tehran on November 20 for a four-day visit,
Radio Farda reported.
Zimbabwe is currently experiencing hyperinflation and has
massive food shortages in some parts of the country. The 82-year-old
Mugabe — whom South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu has called a
"caricature of an African dictator" — has ruled since 1980. The
African Union’s Executive Council has criticized Mugabe’s
government for the arrest and torture of opposition members of
parliament and human rights lawyers, arresting journalists, the
preventing freedom of expression while stifling other civil
liberties. Mugabe and many members of his government are banned from
traveling to the European Union.
Mugabe and President Mahmud Ahmadinejad discussed political
and economic cooperation.
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei used a meeting with
Mugabe on November 21 to denounce alleged Western efforts to dominate
other countries, IRNA reported. "However, it is witnessed that the
resistance of world nations and independent countries can lead to
constant failure of the world arrogance — particularly the U.S. —
in Iraq, Palestine, Lebanon, Afghanistan, and other regions,"
Khamenei said. He also praised the confiscation of white farmers’
land in Zimbabwe.
Iranian Energy Minister Parviz Fattah said in the November 23
edition of Harare’s "The Financial Gazette" that, in a meeting
with his counterpart, Mike Nyambuya, the Islamic Republic was asked
to build a 1,600 megawatt power station on the Zambezi River. There
also are plans to build a 600 megawatt thermal power plant, to
conduct a feasibility study for an oil refinery, and to erect a
hospital. Iran will accept minerals as payment, the newspaper
reported.
Mugabe, his wife Grace, and Zimbabwean officials returned to
Harare on November 23, ZBC Radio Zimbabwe reported. (Pete
Baumgartner, Bill Samii)

IRAQI’S VISIT TO TEHRAN POSTPONED. Iraqi President Jalal
Talabani, who was scheduled to arrive in Iran on November 26, has
postponed his visit because of a curfew in Baghdad and the
airport’s closure, Reuters reported. Tehran had invited Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad to join Talabani and President Mahmud
Ahmadinejad for a trilateral summit, Reuters reported on November 21.
U.S. State Department spokesman Tom Casey said on November 20
that such an event would be welcome because Iraq should have good
relations with all its neighbors, RFE/RL reported. "While there have
been positive statements from the Iranian government about wishing to
a play a positive role in Iraq, those statements haven’t been
backed up by actions," Casey said. "And so very much what we’d
like to see the Iranian government do is desist, first and foremost,
from negative actions it’s taken in Iraq." (Bill Samii)

TEHRAN DECRIES REFUGEE PRESENCE. Deputy Interior Minister and Bureau
for Aliens and Foreign Immigrants Affairs chief Ahmad Husseini said
in the West Azerbaijan Province city of Urumiyeh on November 20 that
more than 1 million Afghans reside in Iran illegally, IRNA reported.
Husseini said 950,000 Afghans and 60,000 Iraqis are documented
residents. Some 250,000 Afghans were arrested this year as they tried
to enter the country illegally, he added, while 10,000 Afghans,
Bangladeshis, and Pakistanis were arrested as they tried to leave
Iran and illegally enter Turkey. Afghans resist leaving, he said,
because of violence, poverty, and unemployment in their home country.
On October 31, a labor organization official said in Isfahan
Province that 238,000 people are unemployed there, provincial
television reported. He said the problem could be resolved by getting
rid of foreign workers who do not have permits. A law enforcement
official in the governor-general’s office urged employers to
reconsider hiring Afghans over Iranians.
In Geneva in October, Iranian Interior Minister Hojatoleslam
Mustafa Pur-Mohammadi expressed concern that Afghans are not
returning home as rapidly as desired (see "RFE/RL Iran Report,"
October 17, 2006). (Bill Samii)

LABOR LEADER DETAINED IN TEHRAN. Mansur Osanlu, head of the Tehran
bus drivers syndicate, was detained by plainclothes security
personnel on November 19, ISNA and the Iranian Labor News Agency
(ILNA) reported. Ebrahim Madadi, deputy head of the syndicate, told
Radio Farda that he was with Osanlu when they stopped to buy a
newspaper at around 9 a.m. Intelligence and Security Ministry
personnel detained Osanlu, according to Madadi, and one of them
pulled out a handgun when Osanlu’s companions objected. Madadi
said the security officer fired his weapon into the air to get the
crowd to disperse. Madadi added that Osanlu had received a summons
the previous day to appear in court on November 20. Osanlu was
arrested in December 2005 and held for approximately eight months
(see "RFE/RL Iran Report," January 9, 2006). (Bill Samii)

KURDS IN TEHRAN BARRED FROM CONGREGATIONAL PRAYERS. Jalal
Jalalizadeh, who represented the predominantly Kurdish city of
Sanandaj in the Iranian parliament from 2000 to 2004, said on
November 19 that Sunni Muslims in Tehran have not been allowed to
hold congregational prayers for two weeks, ILNA reported. Jalalizadeh
noted the absence of a Sunni mosque in Tehran and explained that
Sunnis therefore gathered at the Pakistani Embassy’s school.
"But, as of two weeks ago, as a result of the pressures exerted on
the embassy, they closed the school and moved it elsewhere, where it
is not possible to hold the prayers," Jalalizadeh said. Given the
lack of options, Sunnis gathered in Mellat Park to pray on November
17. Police and plainclothes agents broke up the crowd. Some 9 percent
of Iran’s population is Sunni, while 89 percent is Shi’a.
Shi’a Islam is the state religion. (Bill Samii)

STUDENT KILLED IN FRONT OF FIANCEE. Students gathered outside the
Teachers Training College in the city of Sabzevar on November 19 to
protest the reported killing of a student the previous day, ILNA
reported. Tohid Ghafarzadeh, a student at the city’s Islamic Azad
University, was stabbed to death by a member of the student Basij at
the Teachers Training College on November 18, Radio Farda reported.
Mustafa Sedaqatju, a former member of the student union, told
Radio Farda that this was not a political incident. Ghafarzadeh was
standing in front of the Teachers Training College talking to his
fiancee when the Basij member inquired about their relationship. The
two argued and Ghafarzadeh was killed.
Sedaqatju noted that the authorities have done nothing about
this incident and have remained silent, but they have been very
critical about an event at the University of California-Los Angeles
earlier in the week. In that incident, 23-year-old Iranian-American
Mustafa Tabatabainejad was tasered by police when he refused to
provide his identification or leave the library, the "Daily Bruin"
reported on November 15. A bystander videotaped Tabatabainejad
accusing the police of abusing their authority while he resisted
them. (Bill Samii)

COMMEMORATION FOR SLAIN DISSIDENTS BANNED. The children of two
Iranian dissidents who were murdered eight years ago invited their
compatriots to commemorate the anniversary of the killings, Radio
Farda reported on November 20, citing ISNA and ILNA. Parastu and Arsh
Foruhar, the daughter and son, respectively, of Hezb-i Mellat-i Iran
leaders Dariush and Parvaneh Foruhar, said the event will take place
on November 22.
The Foruhars — as well as poet Mohammad Mokhtari and
writer-translator Mohammad Jafar Puyandeh — were allegedly killed by
so-called "rogue elements" in the Ministry of Intelligence and
Security. The reputed ringleader of the crimes reportedly committed
suicide before his trial, and the killers were sentenced in January
2001 after a trial that failed to establish who actually ordered the
murders.
In August 2001, the Supreme Court reduced the original death
sentences to served time, and in January 2003 those sentences were
reduced again (see "RFE/RL Iran Report," January 29 and August 27,
2001, and February 3, 2003). Parastu Foruhar said the authorities
have yet to respond to their request for a permit to hold a public
gathering, so the event will take place at their home.
On the day the commemoration was scheduled to take place, the
authorities prevented any sort of gathering. Parastu Foruhar said,
"Since this morning, law enforcement personnel have closed off the
two ends of the street on which the Foruhar house is located and they
are even preventing the entry of close relatives," ISNA reported.
(Bill Samii)

SENIOR CLERIC DIES. Grand Ayatollah Mirza Javad Tabrizi has died in
Qom, Fars News Agency reported on November 21. The funeral procession
took place in Qom on November 22. The Iranian government declared a
day of national mourning for Tabrizi, who was in his early 80s. (Bill
Samii)

JOURNALISTS DETAINED AT MEHRABAD AIRPORT. The Iranian
journalists’ guild on November 21 denounced the detention of
correspondents who had just arrived at Tehran’s Mehrabad airport
after undergoing training in Holland, Radio Farda reported. The
journalists were interrogated for several hours. A hard-line
newspaper, "Siyasat-i Ruz," earlier denounced the journalists, and
the Aftab website argued that the timing of the arrests signals a new
wave of media repression. (Bill Samii)

PORNOGRAPHERS FACE DEATH IN IRAN. Tehran prosecutor and press-court
Judge Said Mortazavi warned on November 21 that producers of
pornographic videos will be put to death and their distributors will
be punished severely, state radio reported. An uproar followed news
that a video purporting to show intimate scenes of an Iranian
television star and her boyfriend is currently available on the
Internet (see "RFE/RL Iran Report," November 21, 2006). (Bill Samii)

DEBATE SHARPENS OVER GENDER SEGREGATION. Conservative elements in
Iran are pushing to increase the segregation of men and women in
public.A new park for women is due to open in the capital, Tehran,
and reports say plans are under way for single-sex hospitals and
women-only public transport. Supporters claim the effect will be a
more moral and Islamic society, but activists warn that the moves are
aimed at curbing women’s participation in public life.
The separation of men and women has arguably been part of
Iranian culture for longer than its Islamic-based government. But
gender-based segregation in public life was institutionalized
following the establishment of the Islamic republic in 1979.
Some fundamentalists consider it a solution to prevent social
interaction that they regard as a potential source of evil.
Iran’s schools are already segregated to some extent.
Young men and women sit in separate rows in university classes. All
metro trains in the capital have distinct compartments for women, and
women and men must sit in separate sections on public buses.
In the past 27 years, there have been attempts to introduce
segregation in other pubic places — including health institutions
and parks. So far, those attempts have failed in part due to
impracticality, but also because of efforts by vociferous opponents.
Since former hard-line Tehran Mayor Mahmud Ahmadinejad
assumed the presidency, the segregation efforts appear to have gained
momentum. As mayor, Ahmadinejad reportedly imposed a system of
segregated elevators.
The recent moves to further separate the sexes are backed by
some senior clerics and legislators.
Former reformist legislator Fatemeh Rakei tells RFE/RL that
she thinks the new push for segregation is unlikely to succeed.
"In the early years of the revolution, some people wanted to
do the same in the universities and, as far as I know, the late Imam
[Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini] opposed it," Rakei says. "But currently
there are some strange radical views, which also exist in the Islamic
world — unfortunately — but I don’t think they can implement
these views."
Despite such criticism, advocates of segregation appear
determined to enforce gender segregation in public arenas.
In one of the latest initiatives, a senior official within
Iran’s Social Welfare Organization, Abbas Maleki, ordered that
gender segregation be implemented in that organization’s offices
as soon as possible.
In mid-November, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s
representative to universities, Hojatoleslam Mohammad Mohamadian,
called for segregated classes and said boys and girls can currently
mingle more easily in universities than in parks.
Conservatives say such measures would lead to a healthy
Islamic society. But critics reject it and say gender segregation has
neither a religious basis nor scientific support.
Ex-lawmaker Rakei says clerics and open-minded Islamic
scholars should speak out against the push.
"I speak as someone who is deeply religious — the
segregation of men and women is not essential to a moral life," Rakei
says. "Instead of such physical measures, they should explain
teachings by different religions on issues such as morality and
spirituality."
Azadeh Kian, a lecturer in political science and an Iran
researcher at France’s National Center for Scientific Research
(CNRS), says she thinks it is difficult to enforce segregation laws
beyond some government offices.
"How do they want to apply segregation, for example, on all
public transportation?" Kian asks. "How do they want to segregate
parks, hospitals, and streets? Women would have to walk on this side
of the street and men on the other side. Currently women who are
close to the government are on the city councils — what do they want
to do about that? For example, how would they have meetings of
Tehran’s city council? They would have to put women in one room
and men in another."
Some backers of segregation have conceded that it is
impossible to implement such a policy in all public places. But they
have said men and women should be separated where possible if it does
not hinder the workflow.
A member of the parliament’s education committee,
Mussalreza Servati, recently told the semi-official ILNA news agency
that it would be good — if possible — to implement segregation in
universities like that in schools.
Servati also expressed support for segregation in workplaces
and said it would liberate workers from certain obligations. He cited
as an example the danger of women in mixed workplaces falling in love
with colleagues and leaving their husbands.
One female legislator, Efat Shariati, was quoted as saying
recently that segregation in the office would lead to increased
efficiency and commitment.
Former legislator Rakei warns that the new push for gender
segregation could prompt a backlash.
"Those who have such views and do such things should know
that by stepping up such measures, they will have negative results,"
Rakei says. "People will escape from the religion [that those people]
advocate."
There have been conspicuous public calls for women to return
to their traditional roles as housewives in recent months.
Kian tells RFE/RL that support for gender segregation is the
result of a patriarchal view in which women should be confined to the
home, housework, and satisfying the desires of their husbands.
"Instead of bringing up the issue of gender segregation, I
think the current government should express the depth of its view —
and that is that women should not be active in public spheres, with
the exception of those who hold the same view as the government,"
Kian says.
Ahmadinejad said in October that women should devote more
time to their main mission of raising children. He suggested that
women can work part-time on full-time salaries. The comments were
denounced by activists as an attempt to isolate women.
One senior cleric, Grand Ayatollah Safi Golpayegani, recently
described mountain hiking by women as shameful, and said there is no
honor in women being elected to city councils. He instead praised
housekeeping as a "holy" job.
Kian says the new measures will meet resistance from women
who now compose about two-thirds of new university students.
"These attempts will fail, because today women in Iran have a
very high level of knowledge," Kian says. "They are very active in
public spheres, and they can’t — through public segregation —
force women to return and stay in their homes." (Golnaz Esfandiari)

IRAN SOCCER SUSPENDED FOR ‘GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE.’ FIFA, world
soccer’s governing body, has suspended Iran from all
international competition.
In an interview with RFE/RL, FIFA spokesman Pekka Odriozola
said the decision was made on November 22 and that it was due to
Iranian government interference in soccer matters.
"The FIFA Emergency Committee took this decision after
determining that the Iran Football Federation was not adhering to the
principles of the FIFA statutes regarding the independence of member
associations, the independence of the decision-making process of the
football governing body in each country, and the way in which changes
in the leadership of associations are brought about," Odriozola said.
Earlier this year, Mohammad Dadgan, the Iranian
federation’s elected president, and his board were forced out of
office by Iranian authorities.
Odriozola said the Iranian federation then failed to meet a
FIFA deadline of November 15 to reinstate Dadgan and his board and to
comply with FIFA rules.
"In this respect, FIFA and the AFC [Asian Football
Confederation] adopted the clear position that Dr. Dadgan and the
members of his board remained the recognized and legitimate president
and leadership of the Iran football federation," Odriozola said.
"This deadline was not met by the Iran Football Federation."
Iran took part in the 2006 World Cup in Germany and last week
beat South Korea 2-0 to qualify for next year’s Asian Cup.
To play in that cup and other events, FIFA said in a
statement that the Iranian federation must meet a "road map" of
conditions, including drafting new statutes based on FIFA rules and
holding elections to appoint a new president and board under the
supervision of FIFA and the AFC.
The Zurich-based FIFA also called on the Iranian federation
to set up a "normalization committee." Its members would be appointed
by FIFA and the AFC to oversee Iran’s full compliance and
implementation of the road map.
Iran is the second country to face recent FIFA sanctions.
Last month, Kenya was also suspended for failing to respect signed
agreements and for recurrent problems in its federation. (Jeffrey
Donovan)

******************************* **************************
Copyright (c) 2006. RFE/RL, Inc. All rights reserved.

The "RFE/RL Iran Report" is a weekly prepared by A. William Samii on
the basis of materials from RFE/RL broadcast services, RFE/RL
Newsline, and other news services. It is distributed every Monday.

Direct comments to A. William Samii at [email protected].
For information on reprints, see:
p
Back issues are online at

Technic al queries should be e-mailed to: [email protected]

HOW TO SUBSCRIBE
Send an e-mail to [email protected]

HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE
Send an e-mail to [email protected]

NEWS BROADCASTS ONLINE
Listen to Radio Farda broadcasts daily on our website:

PERSIAN-LANGUA GE BROADCASTS ON SHORTWAVE. Local shortwave broadcast
frequencies are available on the Persian Service website:

_______________ ______________________________________________
RAD IO FREE EUROPE/RADIO LIBERTY, PRAGUE, CZECH REPUBLIC

http://www.rferl.org/about/content/request.as
http://www.rferl.org/reports/iran-report/
http://www.radiofarda.com
http://www.radiofarda.com

xi/29

Sunday, November 26, 2006
*********************************************
ON SELF-KNOWLEDGE
****************************************
Of the many forms of ignorance the worst is ignorance of the self. If you don’t know yourself you don’t know where you are going, and once you get there you may even discover it was a big mistake getting there. If you don’t know yourself, what else can you possibly know and understand?
*
My troubles begun on the day I decided I was smart. That’s when life went into action and devised a thousand ways to prove that I was a damn fool.
*
On the day you close your mind, life will start opening it, and the longer you resist and keep it shut, the harder and more painful the operation will be.
*
For a long time I didn’t see any practical benefit in using my imagination until I realize that reality has so many layers that the only way to penetrate them is by using my imagination.
*
Memo to readers who find me depressing:
Read our great writers instead and if you find them even more depressing, have the courage and honesty to admit you are what the pigswill of our propaganda has made you, “a compulsive liar drunk with the folly of deceptive wine” (Gregory of Narek).
#
Monday, November 27, 2006
*******************************************
CRIME STORIES
*********************************
My kind of writing is not my favorite kind of reading. May I confess that I have never been able to read Montaigne’s ESSAYS from beginning to end. I prefer crime stories. I love Ed McBain, Richard Stark, Simenon. THE KILLERS is the only Hemingway story I have read three times. Chandler’s FAREWELL, MY LOVELY I have read four times with undiminished excitement for its poetic use of slang. No other story has given me as much pleasure as Hammett’s DEAD YELLOW WOMEN. I love these writers not so much for the suspense they provide as for their wit, humor, and dialogue. If I could, I would write crime stories. But my experience with cops and killers is next to nil. I have been inside a police station only once, many years ago, when I reported a roaming German shepherd attacking pedestrians. The burly cop at the desk didn’t even bother to look at me, he simply grabbed the phone on his desk and I didn’t wait long enough to hear what he said.
*
My fascination with crime stories began with Edgar Allan Poe, Arthur Conan Doyle of Sherlock Holmes fame, and Dostoevsky’s CRIME AND PUNISHMENT. And my fascination with Simenon (the most prolific of them all, over 600 titles) began with Andre Gide’s JOURNALS, where he describes at considerable length his own fascination with Simenon.
*
There are some crimes stories in which the guilty party is neither the butler nor any of the usual suspects, but the narrator himself. On second thought, perhaps I too write crime stories when I focus on the origins of our complexes and contradictions, and instead of naming the obvious suspects (bloodthirsty neighbors and cynical West) I cross-examine myself.
*
A headline in this morning’s paper reads: ISTANBUL: ALMOST 25,000 PROTESTERS DENOUNCE POPE BENEDICT. Nothing astonishes me more than the self-righteousness of the guilty. Instead of denouncing Muslim extremists, terrorists, insurgents, and jihadists, they protest against a remark made by a Christian emperor a thousand years ago. Figure that one out if you can.
*
Speaking of self-righteousness: One of Simenon’s favorite themes is the guilt of the victim. In many of his stories, Simenon explains and to some extent justifies the criminal by exposing his victim’s insensitivity and unawareness of the consequences of his actions. And that’s what I am after too – our past and present unawareness, which at times assumes criminal dimensions.
#
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
****************************************
WRITERS AND CRITICS
***********************************
The Catholic novelist and winner of the Nobel Prize (1952) Francois Mauriac (b. 1885) gave up writing fiction after Sartre, (b. 1905), a relative newcomer on the French literary scene and an atheist to boot, published an essay critical of his work. This may suggest that a competent critic has the power to deconstruct, demolish, and reduce to silence even a universally admired great writer.
*
I look forward to the day when someone with average or even below average intelligence will give me a similar treatment and I will quit writing this stuff and go back to writing fiction. But so far I haven’t had much luck in my critics. If they are not brainwashed partisans or brown-nosing self-appointed Turcocentric pundits, they are intellectually challenged skinheads whose insults I find stimulating rather than wounding.
*
Are we heading in the direction of a new renaissance or are we on our way to the devil? If you answer this question by resorting to chauvinist clichés and platitudes, then we have nothing to look forward to.
*
I grew up with the notion that there was more truth in an Armenian lie than in an odar truth. It took me many years to realize that a lie is a lie and it makes no difference whether it is spoken in Zulu, Turkish, or Armenian. The same could be said of propaganda.
#
Wednesday, November 29, 2006
*********************************************
LET’S TALK TURKEY
**********************************
Common sense tells us, when two witnesses contradict each other, both can’t be right.
*
Experience tells us, to say all politicians lie except ours, is to declare oneself to be a certifiable dupe of nationalist propaganda.
*
Warning: If you question the validity of these two assertions, no need to read any further.
*
Since some of my Armenian readers are convinced I am a pro-Turkish denialist, and some of my Turkish readers take it upon themselves to correct my occasional pro-Armenian and anti-Turkish lapses, I must conclude I am on the right path. It is not part of my agenda to please, mislead, or accuse anyone. There are already more than enough hirelings who make a comfortable living (thank you very much) by doing these things.
*
“The Armenians were punished because they sided with the enemy,” a gentle Turkish reader reminds me. By “punished” he probably means deported and not massacred. Which is it? Since both of my grandmothers survived and both my grandfathers perished, I must conclude some were deported, others “terminated.” As for siding with the enemy, this may indeed be true of Armenians on the Russo-Turkish border, but definitely not of Armenians on the mainland, except for the very few agitators and revolutionaries who may have acted in the name of the people but who represented no one but themselves, very much like the Talaat, Jemal, Enver troika. The overwhelming majority of Armenians in the ghetto of refugees where I grew up were both illiterate and devoid of political awareness. To accuse them of harboring secret territorial ambitions and betraying the Empire is not just wrong but absurd. I don’t remember my father saying anything remotely kind about our political parties or remotely unkind about Turks. I write these lines not as an Armenian but as a human being, and my intention is not to assert moral superiority but to understand why two people who lived side by side for six centuries prefer to believe their political leaders and to ignore the testimony of witnesses who value honesty and objectivity above prejudice and nationalist propaganda.
*
How can any tribe, nation, or race assert moral superiority and believe in it? Even worse: How can it also believe that in doing so it will not arouse the contempt and hatred of all men? The ancient Greeks knew better. They believed that pride or arrogance (hubris) is punished by the gods (Nemesis). And yet, in their eyes, all non-Greeks were barbarians. What happened next we know. They were defeated and colonized by Macedonians, Romans, and last but far from least, Turks. And unbelievable as this may see, even after centuries of enslavement, even in their present bastardized condition, they continue to cling to the notion that they are the real Chosen People. Figure that one out if you can.
#

Civil Disobedience Movement Launches Demonstration In Front Of CC

CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE MOVEMENT LAUNCHES DEMONSTRATION IN FRONT OF CC

Panorama.am
14:24 27/11/06

Civil Disobedience Movement (CDM) has launched a demonstration in front
of the Constitutional Court (CC) calling the judges and CC chairman to
express their disobedience to authorities-in-power. Arkady Karapetyan,
commander of Yerkrapah detachment and a member of initiative group,
said they want to mobilize all public and political forces as well
as the individuals, "The whole Armenian nation," Karapetyan said.

"We celebrate one year of referendum on constitution with a protest
action. An exceptional event happened on November 27, last year. More
than one million fraud was drawn and the referendum passed," Michael
Apresyan, commander of Arstakh detachment, said. The initiators
connect little hope with CC administration to join the group. Apresyan
claims only 180,000 people participated in the referendum. "Where
are the remaining 1 million 200 thousand? People have boycotted the
referendum. They have written it was held," he said. The commander of
Artsakh detachment said the verdict of CC on incompliance of alienation
of property with the constitution was in vain. "The decisions of the
CC have no power in this country," he said.

One of the initiators of the movement, ex-minister of foreign
affairs, Alexander Arzumaynay, demanded resignation of the president,
pre-term presidential elections and formation of free, fair and lawful
authorities in power.

Initiative Aims To Change Power

INITIATIVE AIMS TO CHANGE POWER

Panorama.am
16:08 27/11/06

Initiators of Alternative, Nikol Pashinyan and Vahagn Khachatryan,
told reporters today Alternative is organization which is above a
political party and any citizen, despite of party affiliation, may join
it in case of supporting its ideology. The ideology is connected with
the principles of the Armenian Pan-National Movement (HHSh) in 88s.

The initiative aims to change the authorities-in-power with clearly
defined mechanisms. They intend to mobilize the masses and invite
them to gatherings at Azatutiun Square.

The initiators say the do not want to put an aim of participation in
upcoming elections because they do not want anyone to think it is
an issue of seats in the parliament. "We want to be free citizens
and the choice of freedom must be at Freedom Square," Pashinyan
said.

Rector Of European Academy Vs Minister Of Education And Science

RECTOR OF EUROPEAN ACADEMY VS. MINISTER OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE

Panorama.am
18:08 27/11/06

Today the rector of the European Regional Academy in the Caucasus,
Viktor Martirosyan, made a statement to journalists explaining the
reasons for the lack of state accreditation of the institute, as
minister of educational and science, Levon Lazarian earlier pointed
out. The rector said the European Academy is created based on the
decision of the government and intergovernmental agreements signed
with France, Italy and Germany.

"The academy has the status of intergovernmental higher educational
establishment just like the American, French and Armenian-Russian
universities," he pointed out. Last year 40 graduates were granted MA
degree of the European Academy. "They received diplomas equal to other
intergovernmental and government higher educational establishments
of the republic. Amendments in the law on higher education and
post-diploma education cancelled the notion of state diploma. Like in
many other countries, every educational establishment grants diplomas
of its establishment," Martirosyan noted.

Martirosyan said the academy has no obligation to copy the curriculum
of other educational establishments and has the right to have its own,
responding to Lazarian’s statement that the academy’s curriculum
is not approved by the state and differce from the program of other
higher educational establishments.

Reminder: The ministry of education and science opened a lawsuit
against the academy. The first court hearing will be held on December
1 in a district court.

European Regional Academy was opened on October 4, 2002. President
Robert Kocharyan took part in the ceremonial opening. Arthur
Baghdasaryan, ex-speaker of parliament and leader of Orinats Yerkir
party, is the chairman of the board of trustees of the academy.

Ad Blitz Satirizes Lebanon’s Divides

AD BLITZ SATIRIZES LEBANON’S DIVIDES

Ya Libnan, Lebanon
Nov 28 2006

Provocative Signs Target Pervasive Sectarianism
Beirut – The evening was tense, as most are these days in Beirut,
its Maronite Catholics, Greek Orthodox, Sunni and Shiite Muslims and
Druze perched imprecisely between war and peace.

Malak Beydoun, a young woman, pulled her car into a parking lot in
the Christian neighborhood of Ashrafiyeh. She peered at a billboard
overhead, alarmed and then indignant.

"Parking for Maronites only," it read.

Beydoun recoiled. "How did they know that I was a Shiite?" she
remembered asking herself.

Part provocation, part appeal — with a dose of farce that doesn’t
feel all that farcical — advertisements went up this month on 300
billboards across the Lebanese capital and appeared in virtually
every newspaper in the country. Thousands of e-mails carried the ads
across the Internet to expatriates. Each offered its take on what one
of the campaign’s creative directors called a country on the verge of
"absurdistan" — cooking lessons by Greek Orthodox, building for sale
to Druze, hairstyling by an Armenian Catholic, a fashion agency looking
for "a beautiful Shiite face." At the bottom, the ads read in English,
"Stop sectarianism before it stops us," or, more bluntly in Arabic,
"Citizenship is not sectarianism."

The campaign, designed for free by an ad agency and promoted by a
civil society group, has forced Lebanon to look at itself at a time
when the country is spiraling into one of its worst political crises
in years. The timing was coincidental, the message universal, in a
landscape with ever dwindling common ground: The forces that dragged
Lebanon into one civil war are threatening another.

Many have praised the ads for asking uncomfortable, even taboo
questions about a system in which sectarian affiliation determines
everything from the identity of the president to loyalty to sports
teams. Some have mistaken the campaign for reality. Across the capital,
one in six billboards was torn down, prevented from being put up or
splashed with paint, usually the tactic of choice for conservative
Muslims irked by lingerie ads.

"They didn’t get it," said Fouad Haraki, a 53-year-old shawarma vendor,
idly dragging on a cigarette next to a kerosene tank, across the
street from billboards that had been defaced. "They just read what
was written on top, not what was on the bottom."

The result in his neighborhood, he said, was "a sectarian clamor."

It is almost a cliche that Lebanon is home to 18 religious sects —
from a tiny Jewish community to Shiite Muslims, the country’s largest
single group. The system that diversity has inspired has delivered
minorities a degree of protection unequaled anywhere else in the Arab
world. But it has left Lebanon a country where individual rights and
identity are subsumed within communities and, by default, the personas
of their sometimes feudal leaders, who thrive on that affiliation.

By tradition, the president is Maronite, the prime minister Sunni, the
parliament speaker Shiite. Other posts are reserved for Greek Orthodox,
Greek Catholic and Druze. Boy scouts are organized by community, not
country — the Mahdi Scouts for the Shiites, for instance. Television
stations have their own sectarian bent — the Lebanese Broadcasting
Corp. for Christians, Future for the Sunnis.

Christians are partial to the Sagesse basketball team, Sunnis the
Riyadi team. There are even two Armenian soccer teams — Homenmen
and Homenetmen — one faithful to Armenian leftists, the other to the
community’s right wing. Before this summer’s war, Sunni soccer fans
loyal to Ansar brawled in a stadium with Shiite youths loyal to Nijmeh.

The system, known as confessionalism, dates to long before Lebanon’s
independence in 1943. But there is a growing sense that the decades-old
principles underlying Lebanese politics have grown obsolete. In some
ways, today’s crisis is about the assertion of power — a coup to
its critics — by the long-disenfranchised Shiite community led
by Hezbollah. Hardly anyone can forecast with certainty how the
struggle will end, but almost everyone sees it as a turning point,
a crisis that intersects raw ambition with ideology, foreign policy,
perspective and history, all awash in sectarian combustion.

"This is today a very explosive situation where you have all those
sects being triggered, teased and hammered by all their leaders,"
said Bechara Mouzannar, the regional creative executive director for
H&C Leo Burnett in Beirut, which authored this month’s ad campaign.

He calls himself "a little dazed and confused."

"Something is about to explode, unfortunately," he said.

Added his colleague, Kamil Kuran: "If we keep thinking like this,
the future is going to look like this."

The inspiration for the campaign came almost by coincidence in their
cramped offices, its walls cluttered with ads for L&M cigarettes,
a poster for the film "Reservoir Dogs" and memorabilia from last
year’s protests after the assassination of former prime minister Rafiq
al-Hariri. Those protest signs appear a little dated; "Independence
’05" and "All of us for the nation." On one window hangs a handwritten
quote: "The greatest thing to be achieved in advertising, in my
opinion, is believability."

Manal Naji, a 27-year-old senior art director, had glanced at a
r?sum? tucked underneath another piece of paper. "Christian," it
read. "We were so shocked," she recalled. In the end, it turned out
it was the name of the applicant’s father, but it gave Naji an idea.

"What if it actually existed," she said. "What if it reached the
point of putting it on your job application."

"We wanted the same shocking effect," added Reem Kotob, a 25-year-old
member of the creative team.

This weekend, the two sat with another member of the team, 26-year-old
Yasmina Baz, in the agency’s conference room, looking over the ads
they designed in a burst of energy on that first night and a later
session at a nearby bar, Club Social.

One is a doctor’s plate: "Dr. Mohamed Chatila, Muslim Sunni." Another
is a three-story banner that reads, "For Druzes, Building for Sale."

A license plate is pictured: "A Shiite car," it says in Arabic,
"Shiite" in English. And an ad for a car: "2000 model, in near
perfect condition. Owned and maintained by a Maronite. Never driven
by non-Maronites."

The team took the ads to Amam 05, a grass-roots group that grew out of
last year’s protests. The name means "ahead," an acronym of the Arabic
for civil society. It states its mission, admittedly ambitious, as "a
modern, sovereign state built on non-feudalism, non-confessionalism
and non-clientelism." But even its leaders admit to being a little
glum, given today’s crisis.

"Very frustrated," said Nicole Fayad, one of the activists.

The original idea was to actually hang the signs in the city:
"Maronites only" in a parking lot, "For Druzes" on the side of
a building. But when Asma Andraos, one of the group’s leaders,
approached the owners, they cringed.

"They called me back, and they said they loved it, that I was crazy,
and that there’s no way they could do this," she recalled. She shook
her head. "If I had a building, I wouldn’t have done it, either,"
she said.

They went instead to newspapers, placing the ads in eight papers for
two weeks this month.

One printed them for free, the others at a 50 percent discount. A
billboard agency agreed to post 300 for free for a week. In all,
it cost the group $40,000; Mouzannar estimated it would have cost
more than $500,000 commercially.

But before the billboards went up, they had to go through the
formality of getting permission from the intelligence branch known as
General Security. At first, officials refused; one compared the ads
to Nazi-era segregation. It took two hours of face-to-face meetings
to reach a resolution, by convincing the officials that the campaign
was intended to be ironic.

Then when the billboards went up, 50 were defaced or torn down. Some
residents stopped them from going up in the first place. In Lebanon
and abroad, e-mails flitted back and forth, some of their authors
believing the messages were real.

"People were seriously panicked," Andraos recalled. "Are there really
signs like that in Lebanon now? The mere fact that people think it’s
possible, that there might be signs like that in Lebanon now, means
we’re not really that far off."

Members of the group say people have criticized the timing, and
the group delayed the campaign’s next step after the assassination
last week of a government minister, Pierre Gemayel. But they plan
to distribute as early as this weekend 15,000 business cards with
the same theme at bars and restaurants in Beirut. Each card lists a
person’s name and religious affiliation. Next, they will send copies
of the cards to Lebanon’s 128 legislators.

"We want it to be raised as an issue," Fayad said, "but we don’t have
the pretension to say we have the answer."

At a cafe near downtown, Randy Nahle, a 21-year-old student,
wondered about the way out. His father is Shiite, his mother Maronite
Catholic. The neighborhood he sits in, like virtually every one in
Beirut, has its markers: the posters and religious symbols on walls,
the muezzin or the church bells that identify its affiliation.

For once, he said, something organized spoke to his rejection of being
"categorized or oversimplified."

He smiled at his favorite ads, the ones that identified doctors by
their sect. "It has infiltrated our fabric so much, almost indelibly,"
Nahle said. "If I have an earache, an Orthodox doctor will understand
it better. It’s an Orthodox ear."

He recalled sitting with a Shiite woman at a cafe near the American
University in Beirut. She treated him as a fellow Shiite until he
revealed his mixed background. She looked at him disapprovingly. It’s
bad for the children, she said. "They’re going to come out confused,"
she told him.

"I said, ‘You know, the problem of this country is we don’t have
enough confused people. The problem is we have too many people blindly
convinced by their political orientation, by their religion, by their
community’s superiority.’ "

She smiled, he recalled, and then laughed a little uncomfortably.

2006/11/ad_blitz_satiri.php

http://yalibnan.com/site/archives/

Resurgence Of Nationalism And Islam Threaten To Turn Turkey Away Fro

RESURGENCE OF NATIONALISM AND ISLAM THREATEN TO TURN TURKEY AWAY FROM WEST
Handan T. Satiroglu

World Politics Watch
Nov 28 2006

Adolf Hitler’s "Mein Kampf" and several conspiracy-themed books
depicting Turkey as under attack by American and European influences
sell briskly in local bookstores. Turkey’s $10 million movie "Valley
of Wolves," the most expensive to date, vilifying Christians and Jews
pulls in record crowds. A 28-year-old lawyer shoots a secularist judge
to death inside Turkey’s High Court. The Islamic and far-right press is
filled with stories of missionaries within Turkish borders converting
"defenseless" Muslims to "infidels."

Masked by Turkey’s 80-year Kemalist embrace of secularism, these
recent trends reflect a hard fact: Beneath the surface of the West’s
most crucial ally in the Muslim world, a dismaying anti-Western blend
of political Islam and nationalism is blossoming. A series of recent
patriotic shows of force — including angry mobs protesting the arrival
of Pope Benedict or deriding Elif Shafak for "insulting Turkishness" in
a growing chorus for restriction of freedom of speech — have revealed
an increasing backlash in Turkey towards Western values. Even as
Turkey aspires to join the European Union, the current administration
led by the pro-Islamic Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan has made
several attempts to roll back Turkey’s brand of draconian secularism:
criminalization of adultery, passage of punitive taxes on the wine
industry, and decriminalization of Hezbollah-backed Quran courses were
but a few items on the administration’s agenda as recently as 2005.

So how did this Mediterranean nation often promoted by Western
politicians and media as a "model Islamic nation" develop such a
taste for pro-Islamic nationalist sentiments? In a recent Pew poll
asking why Islam’s role is gaining strength in Turkey, the largest
reason cited was "growing immorality in our society." "The current
mood is a reaction to an anxiety felt by some people that some of the
values that are important to us are being sold out by the EU drive,"
Suat Kiniklioglu, head of German Marshall Program in Ankara, commented
in The Christian Science Monitor in 2005. Last year, "the country’s
hopes and forward-looking vision were behind the EU drive.

Now people are becoming confused. There is fatigue, and nationalism
becomes an escape route," he lamented.

Across the ocean, Jim Stroup, former Marine Corps foreign area
officer and now head of Bosphorus Consulting in Istanbul, echoed
similar sentiments: "The form of pro-Islamic nationalism we are
witnessing today is largely defensive and reactionary," he said
in an October interview. "It arises in response to what are seen
as attacks on Turkey’s viability or the honor inherent in being a
Turk." But perceived hemorrhaging of Turkish values hardly explains
why many Turks are taking to the flag and political Islam; ethnic
rivalries between Kurds and Turks and an increasing distrust of the
West, heightened by the Iraqi war and the cold shoulder given by the
EU have also been touted as possible causes for the resurgence of
nationalist pro-Islamic fervor.

A Wounded Pride

It would be simplistic to speak of a single nationalist current in
this country that has long been the guardian of the secular Kemalist
heritage. Indeed, it is viable to speak of two nationalist currents;
one "strongly positive and forward looking," as Stroup sees it, and the
second, injured and angry — the kind that is making headlines during
Turkey’s infamous controversies. The first sees grounds for optimism
on both political and social fronts and revels in the achievements of
the last decade. The country has managed to shake off some its most
dated laws against its ethnic minorities, achieved full EU candidate
status, and tamed inflation from a high 70 percent in 2002 to below
8 percent in 2005. During this period, Turkey has also managed to
attract record flows of direct foreign investment, while doubling
its foreign trade in the last three and a half years.

Articles on this Issue Borat vs. Nazarbayev: An International Incident
France: The Al-Dura Defamation Case and the End of Free Speech More
on Culture Articles by this Author Turkey and Europe: An Invitation
To Dance?

More by Handan T. Satiroglu In the last decade, the positive and
West-looking brand of nationalism prevailed as each subsequent
government led Turkey increasingly closer to the European Union. The
fiery eruption of nationalism that we are witnessing today,
however, feels humiliated and cast aside by its European and American
friends. Suggestions that Turkey is unfit to join the EU, coupled with
"campaigns of everyone from revisionist nationalist groups such as
Armenians and Kurds, and religious personages such as the new pope,"
claims Stroup, which paint Turks as "backward barbarians," gravely
offends the Turkish sense of dignity. To the Turk on the street,
the seemingly endless demands for reform and trickle of criticism
from Europe are not only deeply wounding to Turkish pride, but also
spark some historical resentment.

The perceived sense of public humiliation should come as no surprise;
the EU issue is just the contemporary face of a much older history.

Turkey was, after all, the central figure of a formidable 400-year-old
Empire, now forcibly condensed to its Eurasian backend.

In the same fashion as Arabs, the Turks perceive themselves as heirs
to a rich and diverse Islamic tradition, the focal point of all
things in their heyday. Stroup cautions that we shall see more of the
vengeful, unproductive expressions of wounded pride "that express
the sentiments of ‘enough’ and ‘we are Turks, we ruled the world,
and we will again.’" The ferociously anti-American movie "Valley of
the Wolves" that pits Turks against Americans, he concludes, reflects
this longing for a resurgence of a new Ottoman Empire, combining the
Turkish identity with principles of Islam.

The West — Foe or friend?

The nationalist outburst is not limited to perceived displays of
public humiliation. Inside the country, simmering tensions between
Turks and ethnic Kurds proves to be a fertile cause for nationalist
zeal. While today’s escalating violence is nowhere near the bloodshed
witnessed in the 90s, which claimed the lives of an estimated 35,000,
the potential of Kurdish separatist violence has come back to haunt
the Turkish social landscape. Images of mothers and wives wailing in
wretched sorrow, kneeling over their sehit (martyr) wrapped in the
Turkish flag have become commonplace in the mainstream media. The
emotionally charged funerals are not only public events for the
soldiers who died fighting Kurdish rebels in the rugged southeast,
but are also becoming the focus of growing anti-U.S. sentiment.

Many Turks cite the U.S. invasion in Iraq as the most important
factor in the rise in Kurdish terrorist group PKK’s violence. Despite
stabilization in U.S.-Turkish ties after the immediate fallout of
the war, Turks have come to believe Washington’s inaction against the
PKK is a ploy to divide the Middle East. As Yektan Turkyilmaz, a Ph.D.

candidate at Duke University, observes, the current nationalist
outburst is a reaction to perceived imperialistic goals to divide
Turkey along ethnic lines, "in order to destabilize the entire
region and intensify exploitative efforts." Turkish media is rife
with provocative articles about the pro-American activities of Kurds
in Northern Iraq, as well as stories linking the PKK with the U.S.

occupation force or the CIA. "There is widespread belief in Turkey
that the U.S.’s new Middle East project also entails the formation
of an independent, but satellite, Kurdish state not only in the Iraqi
soil, but also on Turkey’s southeast," Turkyilmaz said in an interview
earlier this month. Convinced that the West is fueling ethnic tensions
in the same spirit with which European influences brought down the
Ottoman Empire, a growing number of Turks have come to "take on an
anti-EU and more specifically anti-American position," he explains.

Add to this the perceived illegitimacy of the U.S.-led war in
Iraq, Turks’ confidence in most Western projects has plummeted to
record levels. Probably nothing characterizes this disillusion more
graphically than the recent figures published by the Pew Research
Center: Seventy-one percent of Turkish people believe that the United
States may someday threaten their country, while a mere 12 percent
held a favorable opinion of Americans. Similarly, positive opinions
about Christians have fallen from 31 percent in 2004 to 16 percent,
just one percent higher than their dislike of Jews.

With only 35 percent of the public in favor of the EU (half of what
it was in 2004), a sense of drift away from the EU accession has also
deepened in the country — a mood that is unlikely to change with the
just-released highly critical "Progress Report" by the EU Commission.

The report lists a host of problems in human rights, freedom of
expression, and judiciary and military reform, and highlights Turkey’s
failure to make concessions about the Cyprus issue. In a thinly veiled
cautionary note, the Commission indicates it will suspend some parts
of the EU negotiations if there is no further progress over Cyprus

Meanwhile, Turks fault the country’s old rivals Cyprus and Greece
for the acrimonious report, claiming they are lobbying Brussels
to take a stance against Turkey’s refusal to open its ports to
Greek-controlled Cyprus. Today, demands that Turkey acknowledge the
Greek part of Cyprus, as well as the changes aimed at bringing Turkey
closer to Europe, are seen by many as undermining the integrity of
Turkey. In a recent poll, 51 percent of Turks claimed to see the
EU-inspired reforms as a reproduction of the widely despised 1920
Treaty of Sèvres, which led to the dismantling of the Ottoman Empire by
Western interests. Echoing a populous sentiment held by everyone from
storekeepers in villages to college students relaxing in cafes, Ahmet,
a cab driver in the boisterous streets of Ankara, expressed the point
in percipient bluntness: "Europe is asking a lot. I believe all these
reforms are designed to weaken the state in order to break it up."

For a very long time Turkey has been touted as a model secular
Muslim state. But the sweeping tide of Muslim nationalism might leave
Turkey more isolated by the West than it has ever been before. For
decades, Ataturk’s Turkey looked to the West for political, social
and economic cues. That, however, is fast changing as a result of
bitter relations with the EU and the Iraqi war, which has everyone
from leftists to Islamists angered. The rocky relationship with the
West would not be so alarming if it weren’t for the shift in Turkish
attitudes towards the Muslim Middle East. Alliances with neighboring
Damascus, Dubai and Tehran, as opposed to Washington and Brussels,
now seem to make more sense to Turks. For the first time since the
inception of the Turkish republic in 1923, a growing number of Turks,
primarily of the populous rural constituency, seem comfortable with
the notion of aligning with the greater Islamic ummah, rather than
traditional American and European allies.

Indeed, Turkey’s next presidential and parliamentary elections
should help determine the country’s direction. If center-right and
center-left parties manage to defeat the Islamists, Turkey’s Western
ambitions might continue. If the current pro-Islamic and nationalist
AKP is victorious, then what will happen is anybody’s guess.

Handan T. Satiroglu is a sociologist and writer who divides her time
between the U.S. and Europe.

x?id=368

–Boundary_(ID_HRCXTg0Mye2lBrwTVy21VQ)–

http://worldpoliticswatch.com/article.asp

Aliev, Kocharian In Fresh Karabakh Talks

ALIEV, KOCHARIAN IN FRESH KARABAKH TALKS
By Harry Tamrazian in Prague and Emil Danielyan

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Nov 28 2006

The presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan were meeting in the Belarusian
capital Minsk late Tuesday for crucial peace talks which international
mediators hoped will produce a breakthrough in their long-running
efforts to resolve the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Robert Kocharian and Ilham Aliev came face to face for a third time
in less than a year on the sidelines of a summit of former Soviet
republics making up the Commonwealth of Independent States.

An Armenian diplomatic source told RFE/RL that the talks, held at the
Russian embassy in Belarus, began in the presence of Russia’s Foreign
Minister Sergey Lavrov and the chairman-in-office of the Organization
for Security and Cooperation in Europe, Belgian Foreign Minister Karel
de Gucht. French, Russian and U.S. diplomats co-chairing the OSCE’s
Minsk Group were also in attendance before the two leaders continued
their discussions in a tete-a-tete format, the source said.

Kocharian’s spokesman, Victor Soghomonian, was quoted by the Russian
Regnum news agency as saying that no statements are likely to be made
after the talks.

The Minsk talks were widely seen as the last real chance to settle
the Karabakh conflict before national elections that are due to take
place in Armenia and Azerbaijan next year and in 2008. The mediators
have indicated that failure to cut a framework peace deal now would
keep the conflict unresolved at least until 2009. They arranged the
latest Armenian-Azerbaijani summit during a visit to Baku and Yerevan
last week. It followed a series of negotiations between the foreign
ministers of the two South Caucasus states.

Those talks reportedly centered on what the Minsk Group co-chairs
call "complementary elements" to their existing peace plan that was
discussed by Aliev and Kocharian during their two previous encounters
earlier this year. The two men failed to reach any far-reaching
agreements, contrary to unusually high expectations of a breakthrough
in the Karabakh peace process.

The Minsk Group plan calls for a gradual resolution of the dispute
that would lead to Armenian withdrawal from most of the Azerbaijani
districts surrounding Karabakh and culminate in a referendum on
the disputed territory’s status. Officials in Yerevan have said the
peace formula is largely acceptable to the Armenian side. Official
Baku’s position on the issue is more ambiguous, with Aliev repeatedly
stating that he will never recognize Karabakh’s secession from Soviet
Azerbaijan.

The unpublicized "complementary elements" are aimed at helping the
parties bridge their differences. Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian
and his Azerbaijani counterpart Elmar Mammadyarov indicated after
their recent talks that they managed to make further progress towards
that goal.

However, Kocharian sought to cool fresh talk of Karabakh peace during
a visit to Germany earlier this month, saying that he is not optimistic
about the success of the Minsk meeting.