Garnik Isagulyan: The World Realizes That NKR Is A Full-Fledged Stat

GARNIK ISAGULYAN: THE WORLD REALIZES THAT NKR IS A FULL-FLEDGED STATE

ArmRadio.am
04.12.2006 17:22

"RA Presidnet has clearly presented his stance on the Karabakh issue
from very high platforms. It is for sure that there has never been
any shift either in the position or in the format of activity. The
President’s positions remains unchanged," said Garnik Isagulyan,
Assistant to RA President on National Security Issues, excluding the
hearsay that a non-beneficial agreement for Armenia was signed during
the latest meeting between the Presidents of Armenia and Azerbaijan.

According to him, the forthcoming Constitutional Referendum in NKR
proves once again that it a more full-fledged and democratic state
than some other countries in the region. "The world also recognizes
that the Nagorno Karabakh Republic is a full-fledged state, and
imposing something to it is very difficult and can have unpredictable
consequences," the Adviser underlined.

Garnik Isagulyan is confident that there is no political struggle
in Armenia, since "the political forces have not comprehended that
for leading a firm struggle they should come forth with alternative
platforms."

Speaking about the National Security Strategy of Armenia, the Adviser
noted they tried to create a document that would proceed from our
reality and which clearly formulates the internal and external threats,
challenges and the mechanisms for countering these. Garnik Isagulyan
said that after investigating the experience of 30-40 countries, it
became clear that that we need to have strategy rather than law. "In
this changing world we need to respond very rapidly and implement
corresponding changes, therefore for assuring flexibility we needed
to elaborate a strategy, Mr. Isagulyan said.

VoA: Three Faiths Share Adjoining Sites In Istanbul Neighborhood

THREE FAITHS SHARE ADJOINING SITES IN ISTANBUL NEIGHBORHOOD
By Miguel Angel Rivera

Voice of America
Dec 4 2006

One of the themes of Pope Benedict’s visit to Turkey last week was to
strengthen the bonds between the Roman Catholic Church and Eastern
Orthodox Christians. But he also began his pilgrimage by expressing
sympathy for the pressures felt by religious minorities within the
Muslim world.

And he is expected to sharpen his calls for what the Vatican calls
"reciprocity" — the idea that Muslim demands for greater respect
in the West must be matched by increased tolerance and freedom for
Christians in Muslim countries.

Turkey itself is 90 percent Muslim. But in parts of the large cities,
there are pockets of people of different faiths, living together
peacefully. VOA’s Miguel Angel Rivera looks at the relationships
between three houses of worship that share adjacent sites in one
Istanbul neighborhood.

Kuzguncuk, is an ancient part of Istanbul, the only city in the world
that lies in two continents; Asia and Europe. For hundreds of years it
has been inhabited by Muslims, Jews, and Christians; Turks, Armenians
and Greeks. Kuzguncuk lies on the Asian side of the Bosporus Strait.

There is a church, a mosque, and a synagogue, right beside each
other. The priest of the Armenian Orthodox Church, using a key made
in 1835, opens the doors to a Christian world within a Muslim one.

The priest is one of a few who come from another part of Istanbul to
serve the faithful. And when he says faithful, he is referring to
Jews and Muslims, as well as Christians, who enter this holy place
to pray. "There is no difference between us. Muslims come in here
to light a candle. Yes, Muslims come to pray here. They light the
candle and they pray. There is no difference. There is only one God
and different paths to that God."

The church leader, Mehmet Biraz, says cooperating on every level is
vital for offsetting the religious negativity he finds in politics.

He says ties with others are still strong. "We have good relations
with the neighborhood. We are buying things from this area because we
want the local merchants to benefit from our trade. In the political
world there is the appearance that religions have problems among
themselves. But at the people level, we have no problems among
ourselves."

One woman has lived in front of the church and mosque for 20 years
says, "Very beautiful… We live in peace here. Everybody loves each
other. This mosque on this side, and the synagogue on the other,
being so close to each other, shows that Turks really accept different
religions and cultures."

It is a fresh late morning, after a rain, and faithful Turks await
the arrival of the imam or hoja, the religious leader to direct them
in midday prayers, and prepare to pray with ritual cleansing.

The land the mosque sits on was a gift — from the Armenian Orthodox
Church.

For hundreds of years, the Ottoman Empire promoted religious
tolerance. Modern Turkey’s founder, Mustafa Kemal, also known as
Ataturk, rejected tying his new government to Islam, even prohibiting
the use of traditional clothing in favor of western wear. Religious
tolerance was also his government’s policy.

A resident, Mahmut Uslu, says, "We have good relationships with our
neighbors the Armenians and the Greeks. They come to our funerals. We
go to their funerals. The Armenian Church is older than ours.

Ataturk’s new republic had an open door policy to all religions. You
can come to our home. Religion is important, not what religion you
belong to."

Imam Aydin Vantan has led prayers in the Kuzguncuk mosque for years.

"We are all very close, like the flesh and fingernail. We are all
together. Nobody can separate us, Christians, Jews, and Turks."

There are more than 22,000 Jews in Turkey. Most of them live in
Istanbul. There was an influx into the Ottoman Empire during the last
years of the fifteenth century, after Jews and Muslims were expelled
from Spain during the reign of Ferdinand and Isabella..

Jews held senior positions in the sultan’s government. Rabbi Cenk
Misraji is the highest-ranking Jewish leader in Asian Turkey. "From
the moment of our arrival more than 500 years ago, there has been
great religious tolerance in Turkey. We have been able to follow our
religion, and open our synagogues wherever we desired. We were free
to follow our traditions, practices and Jewish customs."

There have been some glaring exceptions to the general tolerance of
Turkish society. The Christian Armenians say they were the victims
of Ottoman genocide in 1915, when thousands died. The Turks deny the
accusation. Turks and Kurds — fellow Muslims — have battled each
other for years in parts of the country where the Kurds are found.

And there have been terrorist attacks against Jewish targets, most
recently in 2003.

But in this neighborhood, there is a different story.

Here a Muslim, in a gesture of brotherhood, designed, constructed, and
donated a small park with its delicate fountain in front of the doors
of the synagogue, behind, and adjoining, the mosque and the church.

Intercultural Festival On European Youth Policy To Be Held In Tsakhk

INTERCULTURAL FESTIVAL ON EUROPEAN YOUTH POLICY TO BE HELD IN TSAKHKADZOR

ArmRadio.am
04.12.2006 17:58

December 8-12 the "Pan-Armenian Youth International Center" Foundation
is organizing an Intercultural Festival and a training course on
European Youth Policy, Programs and Structures (December 13-16)
to be held at the Youth Center in Tsakhkadzor. Young students and
representatives of youth organizations in Armenia are invited to learn
the basics of intercultural learning and participation in European
youth projects respectively.

In Politics One Should Speak About Alternatives Rather Than Inevitab

IN POLITICS ONE SHOULD SPEAK ABOUT ALTERNATIVES RATHER THAN INEVITABLE SITUATIONS

Yerevan, November 30. ArmInfo. In the politics one should speak about
at least two alternatives rater than inevitable situation, says
the president of the Association of Political Experts of Armenia,
MP Hmayak Hovhannissyan while commenting to ArmInfo on the article
by Rezonansi (Georgia) reporting him as saying that Armenia will
inevitably secede from the Collective Security Treaty Organization
and join NATO if the Kars-Akhalkalaki-Tbilisi-Baku railroad is built.

In fact he spoke about two scenarios: the second and no less possible
alternative is that the Armenian authorities will stop restraining
the Armenian national movement in Javakheti which may lead to a
situation similar to Abkhazia and South Ossetia. If the Armenian
authorities stop pacifying the leader of the United Javakhq movement
Vahagn Chakhalyan, this scenario is quite possible. In such a case,
the geo-strategical region of Javakheti, with the Kars-Akhalkalaki
railroad and the Javakheti section of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil
pipeline, will be go under control of Armenian nationalists.

There is also third alternative: even if Armenia begins drifting from
CSTO to NATO, it may simply fail to keep the situation in Javakheti
under control.

Modern Turkey Facing An Identity Crisis

MODERN TURKEY FACING AN IDENTITY CRISIS
By Sabrina Tavernise / The New York Times

International Herald Trobune, France
Dec 4 2006

ISTANBUL: For every stereotype of a Muslim country, Turkey has a fact
to break it.

It has Islamic feminists (a few), and Israeli tourists (many).

Reality dating shows have had the highest ratings on television and
Islamic fashion sashays down Turkish runways.

For decades in Turkey, the competing forces of the religious
and secular, Christian and Muslim, east and west, were muted, as
authorities scrubbed the country of differences while they built a
modern state. But Turkey has become more democratic in recent years and
those forces have burst into full view, creating a sort of modern-day
identity crisis.

"We have started to think very differently about our history," said
Leyla Neyzi, an anthropologist at Sabanci University, one of Turkey’s
first private colleges. "The past is being re-thought in terms of
the demands of the present."

Nowhere is that questioning more apparent than in Istanbul, the lively
port city that is the cultural and intellectual center of the country.

Aynur Dogan is a Kurdish singer with a powerful voice who grew up
in war. Turkish forces and Kurdish separatists were fighting in the
southern part of the country where she lived, and where talking her
native Kurdish was illegal. Tapes of Kurdish music were buried in the
yard when government forces entered her village. Her family fled to
Istanbul in 1992 to escape fighting by Kurdish guerrillas that was
being brutally suppressed by the Turkish state.

She took an interest in Kurdish music, but in the late 1990s the only
audiences were underground. In Turkish society, Kurdish was a bad word.

"It looked impossible," she said, smoking a Winston Light in a dark
cafe lined with murals.

By 2004, she was appearing on mainstream Turkish television singing
in Kurdish. That year, she released her first album, "Kurdish Girl."

It was temporarily banned by the government, but not before it sold
large numbers of copies and its sale was again permitted. Now, two
years later, she performs frequently in Europe, and a film about
Istanbul’s music scene has featured her singing.

There are still limits in Turkey. Sponsors of Kurdish musical events
are hard to find and it is difficult to get a venue, but young Turks
in the music shops eagerly recommend her album.

"I felt there was this new group of people emerging," she said.

Many forces helped release the river of memory. One has been a
steady series of reforms Turkey has enacted to gain entry to the
European Union.

The push to join, led by the pro-Islamic government of Recep Tayyip
Erdogan, elected in 2002, has recently faltered, souring Turks on
the process. But the reforms, which have opened Turkey’s society and
economy, have stuck.

Another factor has been the changing international landscape. The
Muslim world has grown angry at the West, particularly the United
States, for what Muslim countries say is behavior that singles out
Muslims and creates a backlash against Islamic identity. Turkey is
no exception.

But Turkey has also matured. The young professionals who walk along
Istanbul’s central avenues at a New York pace clutching cellphones
and BlackBerry devices are only a few generations away from the time
when Turkey became a state in 1923. Yet they are far enough away from
the secular revolution of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, Turkey’s founder,
to start to question it.

There has been a flurry of films, books and oral histories about
Turkey’s past in recent years, and it feels more democratic than at
any time in its short history, Neyzi said.

Turkish Jews now have a museum. Turkey last year held a conference on
the Armenian killings of World War I, described as genocide by many
in the West but not by the Turkish state. (Estimates of deaths given
by the allies at the end of the war ranged from 600,000 to 800,000.)

It is a painful process. When Orhan Pamuk, a Turkish novelist who
has spoken out on the Armenian question, won the Nobel Prize for
Literature, the president of Turkey did not congratulate him. That is
because Pamuk is seen as a tool of anti-Turkish forces, whose views
of the country can be critical, instead of being seen as a writer
who made the Turkish novel universal, Neyzi said.

"All the skeletons in the closet are spilling out," said Neyzi,
who chose to return to Turkey after earning a doctorate from Cornell
University. "It’s creating a lot of conflict in society."

The danger, Turks said, is that too abrupt a process would sharpen
nationalist and Islamist sentiments and possibly lead to another coup
by the army, a traditional safeguard of the country’s secularism.

There have been three in Turkey’s short history.

That, in turn, would set back reforms, roll back debate and could
seriously damage the significant economic gains Turkey has made in
the past six years.

To prevent that, intellectuals like Nazan Olcer, an art museum
director, are bringing up the past in small bits. Shortly after the
2002 opening of the museum, it arranged to show a collection of an
Armenian from Ottoman times.

"It was a hot iron," said Olcer, sitting on a gilded love seat in
her office near the museum, funded, like Neyzi’s university, by the
Sabanci family, the Turkish equivalent of the Rockefellers. "Everyone
warned us not to do it."

In the end, people came. By the time they left, they understood a
little more about the collector and were questioning some of their own
assumptions, she said. "You remind people to think twice," she said.

In 2005, the museum brought the first Picasso to Turkey, and this
year held an exhibition of Rodin sculptures. The nude figures did
not seem to bother the Turks, many of whom are devout, Olcer said.

On Tuesday, in another dip into the past, the museum will open an
exhibition of Genghis Khan, including some of the earliest Turkic
writing and inscriptions. "A very important dialogue is beginning,"
Olcer said. "I want to tell them the history. Not with a heroic
approach. Not with strongly accented nationalism. What they were
missing was the knowledge."

Sebnem Arsu contributed reporting from Istanbul.

Swedish Foreign Minister Is Concerned Over The Fact Of Discovering M

SWEDISH FOREIGN MINISTER IS CONCERNED OVER THE FACT OF DISCOVERING MASS BURIAL OF ARMENIANS AND ASSYRIANS ON TURKISH TERRITORY

Yerevan, December 4. ArmInfo. On December 6, the Swedish Parliament
will hold hearings at Swedish MP Hans Linden’s request concerning the
mass burial site discovered on the territory of Turkey on October 17.

In Swedish historian David Gaunt’s opinion, these are the graves of
270 Armenians and Assyrians killed by the order of the Young Turks’
leadership of Mardin province.

The newspaper says that the Swedish Foreign Minister has already sent
the inquiry to the diplomatic representatives of Sweden in Ankara
and Istanbul. Besides, a special commission consisting of Swedish
diplomatic representatives have already left for Nusaybin county of
Mardin province to investigate the graves discovered by the residents
of Xirabebaba village.

According to the source, the Turkish authorities ordered to completely
close the access to the place of the mass burial site for journalists,
instead of holding their own investigation. The local police told mass
media representatives that the burial site is already covered up with
earth and the villagers are not allowed to show the way to the graves.

Kocharian ‘Will Retain Key Government Role After Exit’

KOCHARIAN ‘WILL RETAIN KEY GOVERNMENT ROLE AFTER EXIT’
By Ruzanna Stepanian

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Dec 4 2006

President Robert Kocharian intends to continue to play a key role in
Armenian politics and government affairs after completing his second,
presumably final term in office in just over a year from now, his
national security adviser said on Monday.

Garnik Isagulian predicted that Kocharian will retain his "big
influence" on political processes in the country, giving more weight to
suggestions that the Armenian leader is aiming for another high-level
government post.

"The role to be played by President Kocharian [after his anticipated
resignation] will be quite large," Isagulian told reporters. "Life will
tell," he said when asked to specify what concrete forms it might take.

Armenia’s constitution bars incumbent presidents from staying in
power for a third consecutive term, and Kocharian has so far left no
indication that he will try to find a legal loophole for contesting the
presidential election due in early 2008. There are growing signs that
his most influential and longtime associate, Defense Minister Serzh
Sarkisian, is his preferred candidate for the Armenian presidency.

The Armenian press has been rife with speculation that Kocharian
would like to serve as prime minister after 2008. The 52-year-old
president, who came to power in 1998, himself stoked it at a November
2005 meeting with university students in Yerevan. "Who is better than
I in terms of knowledge, experience, hard work and resilience?" he
said, answering a question about his political plans for the future.

Kocharian has been heavily linked with a new but extremely ambitious
party set up by Gagik Tsarukian, one of Armenia’s wealthiest
government-connected men. The party called Prosperous Armenia has
effectively kicked off its well-financed campaign for next spring’s
parliamentary elections recently with a large-scale distribution of
relief aid to impoverished farmers across the country.

Local analysts believe that Prosperous Armenia’s main mission is to
win strong presence in the next parliament and serve as Kocharian’s
main support base. Some say it is also meant to hold Sarkisian and
the governing Republican Party of (HHK) in check.

But Isagulian, who makes no secret of his strong support for
Sarkisian’s apparent presidential ambitions, denied any rivalry between
Armenia’s two most powerful men. He also indicated his intention to
team up with the HHK ahead of the upcoming parliamentary polls.

In Rating Of Countries On Freedom Of Press, Armenia Gathered 25.5 Po

IN RATING OF COUNTRIES ON FREEDOM OF PRESS, ARMENIA GATHERED 25.5 POINTS

Yerevan, December 4. ArmInfo. According to the regular annual
investigation of the "Reporters Without Borders" organization, Armenia
takes the 101-102 places (25.5 points) by the level of the freedom
of press, having slightly increased its indicators against 2005,
when the country was at 102-105 places (26.0 points).

The neighboring Georgia, having gathered 21.0 points, has turned out
to be at the 89th place instead of the 99th place in 2005. Azerbaijan
has also advanced, though it is still behind of Armenia being at the
135-136th places instead of the 141st place in 2005. Russia with 48.67
points has turned out to be in an unenviable state by the degree of
the freedom of press. It was given the 147th place by the "Reporters
Without Borders".

As RBC reports, over 160 countries were evaluated by the level of
observance of the freedom of speech. The facts of its violation,
expressed in the arrests and convictions of journalists for the
professional activity, as well as in the acts of physical influence,
negatively reflected on the reputation of states.

As the experts note, it seems the northern climate favourably affects
the freedom of speech: only Ireland of the four leader- countries by
the level of the freedom of speech is noted for comfortable weather
conditions, that one can not say of Finland. Along with it, all these
countries are united by a high standard of living.

The term "freedom of press" is nearly absent in such countries as
Eritrea, Turkmenistan and Northern Korea, which traditionally close
the rating. Interestingly, the United States of America have lost 9
positions within a year.

What Kocharyan’s Silence Is Hiding

WHAT PRESIDENT’S SILENCE IS HIDING
Hakob Badalyan

Lragir, Armenia
Dec 4 2006

The Armenian government’s words and actions have never been as
inconsistent as presently. The wings of power, two of which are
definitely known – Robert Kocharyan and Serge Sargsyan – are avoiding
showing the controversies between them, maybe because they "have not
realized" yet that these exist. Meanwhile, their public appearances
show that there is a rather deep controversy. For instance, recently
the minister of defense has announced at the National Assembly that
82 percent of the public trust the army, and invited the members of
parliament (Victor Dallakyan) to show another government institution
"which has at least half of this rating" in terms of confidence. It may
sound as just another statement by Serge Sargsyan. However, since the
defense minister considers himself totally responsible for the army
and invokes this 82 percent of confidence as an achievement of the
organization he is in charge, this statement of his cannot be described
otherwise but a gauntlet to all the government institutions. Half of
82 is 41. This is an interesting index for several reasons. First, if
Serge Sargsyan says show another government institution with half as
much confidence as 82, he questions such government institutions like
the President of Armenia, the National Assembly, the Government. In
fact, the defense minister doubts their legitimacy, and thinks that
these institutions of statehood do not enjoy the trust of more than
41 percent of the public. Considering that the defense minister has
been a member of government for already 13 years and before that he
had been engaged in the establishment of the Armenian statehood with
another status, the defense minister should know that the President
is also a government institution, and it follows that the defense
minister acknowledged what he was saying. Moreover, it is beyond
doubt that he was absolutely sober at the moment of saying this.

However, more evidence comes that he was conscious of his words, which
makes the circumstance of 41, half of 82, more interesting. The point
is that officially Robert Kocharyan got as much votes in the first
round of the presidential election n 2003. And Serge Sargsyan is the
person who surely knows the real percentage of votes Robert Kocharyan
got. Robert Kocharyan also knows this, who removed Serge Sargsyan from
the headquarters of his election campaign and replaced him by the ARF
Dashnaktsutyun. Meanwhile, judging by official figures, 41 percent is
not bad for the first round of election, and it is strange why Robert
Kocharyan was dissatisfied not to trust his second round to Serge
Sargsyan. Perhaps, because Robert Kocharyan knows perfectly the rate
of trust for the government institutions. In other words, the defense
minister is not inventing anything but he is only reminding the past
things, perhaps because his motto is "the one who forgets the past has
no future". We only need to find out for whose future Serge Sargsyan
is recalling Robert Kocharyan’s past, his or Robert Kocharyan’s. With
regard to this, the situation would be much clearer if Robert Kocharyan
also said something. However, he would not speak. Although, on the
other hand, his silence tells much more and testifies that Serge
Sargsyan is, nevertheless, recalling the past of the president for
the sake of his own future. Serge Sargsyan seems to realize that
his interest and Robert Kocharyan’s interest are at the historical
watershed. The silence of the president is evidence to this. If Robert
Kocharyan approved the actions of the defense minister, he would
certainly hurry to announce it personally. His years of presidency
show that Robert Kocharyan would not allow the public think for even
a moment that any process in the economic or political spheres takes
place without the direct participation of the president, be it a horse
race or operation of heavy industry. And now the president’s silence
shows that the president does not mind the events underway. It is
strange, however, that he would not speak up this time, and at best
he conveys certain things through his speaker. Therefore, it seems
more likely that Robert Kocharyan’s silence is hiding his disagreement
with the actions of the defense minister in this particular case. The
point is that if the president stated that he disagreed with what
is underway, either he would have to dismiss the defense minister
or he would display unintentionally that he no longer controls the
actions of the leadership of this country. And in this case, he should
resign for the sake of the security of the state. Meanwhile, Robert
Kocharyan’s silence aggravates the danger threatening the state. What
if it is not established yet? Such countries are more vulnerable in
such situations. It is clear that in case of dismissing the defense
minister Robert Kocharyan would face up to several vacant offices
at once, on the other hand, however, the president would have a good
chance to employ about ten citizens of the Republic of Armenia.

OSCE Sees New Hope For Karabakh Peace

OSCE SEES NEW HOPE FOR KARABAKH PEACE
By Emil Danielyan and Harry Tamrazian in Prague

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Dec 4 2006

The settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict may again be on the
cards following the latest meeting of the presidents of Armenia and
Azerbaijan, senior officials from the Organization for Security and
Cooperation in Europe said on Monday.

"Hope is emerging especially as concerning Nagorno-Karabakh,"
the OSCE’s chairman-in-office, Belgian Foreign Minister Karel De
Gucht, was reported to declare in Brussels as he opened a meeting of
foreign ministers of 56 nations making up the Transatlantic security
organization.

The unresolved conflicts in Karabakh and elsewhere in the former
Soviet Union are high on the agenda of the two-day conference. De
Gucht, whose country holds the OSCE’s rotating presidency, urged
fellow ministers to give a new impetus to protracted international
efforts to resolve those disputes.

The Belgian official was present, along with his Russian counterpart
Sergey Lavrov, at the opening of crucial talks between Presidents
Ilham Aliev and Robert Kocharian that took place in the Belarusian
capital Minsk last Tuesday. Both presidents indicated afterwards that
they made further progress towards a mutually acceptable peace accord,
with Aliev saying that the Karabakh negotiating process is nearing its
"final stage."

Goran Lennmarker, chairman of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly,
was quoted by the Associated Press news agency as saying that the
Aliev-Kocharian encounter has created a "golden opportunity" for
Karabakh peace which must be seized at the Brussels meeting.

Addressing the gathering, Armenian Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian
agreed that the conflicting parties are now close to cutting a
compromise peace deal. "The last meeting of presidents gives hope
that agreement is possible even on the most problematic issues on
which we don’t see eye to eye," he said.

Azerbaijan’s Foreign Minister Elmar Mammadyarov said late last
week that the parties have reached agreement on all but one of a
dozen basic principles of the conflict’s resolution that have been
suggested by American, French and Russian diplomats co-heading the
OSCE’s so-called Minsk Group.

Oskanian, however, seemed to deny this as he spoke with RFE/RL by
phone later on Monday. "I am not sure that there remains only one
[unresolved] issue," he said.

"Of course, our positions are now close on some difficult issues,"
he added. "But since these negotiations are multi-layered — there
are principles and details — it is really hard to say that we have
agreed on eight principles and need to agree only one more principle.

I find it difficult to say that."

The most important of those principles is a referendum on
Karabakh’s final status that would take place after the liberation of
Armenian-occupied districts in Azerbaijan proper. Oskanian indicated
the parties still disagree on important practical modalities of the
proposed vote, saying that Azerbaijan has yet to fully accept the
Karabakh Armenians’ "right to self-determination."

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress