ANKARA: EU Could Use Armenian Genocide Against Turkey

EU COULD USE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE AGAINST TURKEY
By Selcuk Gultasli, Brussels

Zaman, Turkey
Dec 18 2006

Intensified efforts to make Turkey recognize an Armenian genocide
during World War I have fallen on the European Union and Turkey’s
membership process.

The Armenian Revolutionary Federation says Turkey should be made to
recognize the genocide before it can become an EU member.

Kiro Manoyan, the director of the organization, said the EU had used
Greece and Cyprus against Turkey and the time for Armenia would come
as well.

According to the PanArmenian agency, Manoyan said the Armenian issue
would eventually become an instrument for the European Union and
urged all Armenians to be ready for such a development.

The genocide issue and the Armenian lobby have a significant impact
on some EU countries. France and Holland, two countries seemingly
against Turkey in the EU, have made the matter an internal one.

A bill making it a crime to deny the existence of an Armenian genocide
passed in the French parliament on Oct. 12. The bill awaits approval
from the Senate and President Jacques Chirac, through probably will
not pass.

On Oct. 22, three Turkish electoral candidates in Holland were removed
from their party lists for denying the genocide.

TEHRAN: Iran, Armenia Exchange Views On Regional Developments

IRAN, ARMENIA EXCHANGE VIEWS ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENTS

Tehran Times, Iran
Dec 18 2006

TEHRAN (IRNA) — Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council
(SNSC) Ali Larijani said here Sunday that the Islamic Republic of
Iran and Armenia have always exchanged views on the most significant
regional and international developments.

Larijani made the remarks at a joint press conference with Armenian
Foreign Minister Vartan Oskanian.

The press conference was held after a meeting between the two
officials.

At the meeting, the two sides reviewed the most important regional and
international developments along with Iran’s peaceful nuclear issue,
Larijani said.

Expressing satisfaction with the current level of political relations
between the two countries, he expressed the hope that the current
regional crisis would be resolved as soon as possible.

The Armenian foreign minister, on his part, said the Islamic Republic
of Iran has always played constructive role in resolving regional
issues.

Given very constructive and sensitive role of Iran in regional
developments, he described his meeting with Larijani as very important.

Armenia attaches importance to this visit, he pointed out.

Referring to his meeting with Foreign Minister Manuchehr Mottaki,
he said the two sides discussed expansion of bilateral relations.

In A Bear Hug

IN A BEAR HUG

The Economist, UK
Dec 18 2006

Belarus will suffer as Russia raises gas prices

Belarus, for so long the recipient of Russian largesse on gas pricing,
is under intense pressure to pay much more for its gas from 2007 and
to surrender control over its energy industry. President Alyaksandr
Lukashenka’s pro-Russian stance no longer trumps Gazprom’s commercial
interests, and he is likely to cede at least partial control of
national pipeline network Beltransgaz in order to cap gas prices
at around US$135 per 1,000 cubic metres, rather than the US$200
that Gazprom is now demanding. However, even at this level it is
questionable whether Mr Lukashenka’s economic model will remain
functional-particularly given that Belarus’s lucrative trade in Russian
oil trading is set to end too. And with few bargaining chips left,
Belarus is likely within a few years to be paying even more for
its energy.

Gazprom is prepared to cut off Belarus if no agreement is reached
on gas pricing from 2007, senior officials of the state-controlled
monopoly were reported as saying on December 14th. Currently Belarus
pays US$46.67 per 1,000 cu metres while Gazprom is demanding US$200
per 1,000 metres. The Belarusian side has reluctantly accepted that
it will have to pay US$135 per 1,000 cu metres, in line with the rate
agreed with Ukraine. However, Russian officials are only willing to
concede this price if, as with Ukraine, Belarus concludes side deals.

In the case of Ukraine, these deals have not been reported. In the
case of Ukraine, Gazprom has long coveted at least 50% of Beltransgaz,
Belarus’s national gas network, which is responsible for approximately
a third of the Russian gas running through the country.

(The other two thirds go via the Yamal-Europe pipeline, which is
already majority owned by Gazprom.) The two sides have been negotiating
over Beltransgaz for over a year, but they still differ widely in
their valuations.

The end of the line Last year, Belarus was the only former Soviet
state that did not face Russian demands for at least a doubling of
the gas price; Belarusian prices remained unchanged. Today, however,
Mr Lukashenka’s unflinching support for Russian domestic and foreign
policies is no longer sufficient to keep gas flowing so cheaply. There
are two reasons for this.

First, Mr Lukashenka has this year won re-election and so Gazprom and
its controllers in the Russian government no longer feel an obligation
to be sensitive about Belarus’s political dynamics.

Furthermore, the Russian leadership is reportedly frustrated that
Mr Lukashenka has failed to make good on promises to push forward
integration with Russia; most likely, given the business focus of the
Kremlin, this refers mainly to the control of Belarusian industrial
assets by Russian capital. The haggling over Beltransgaz is only one
aspect of this.

Second, Gazprom will in the next few years struggle to produce or buy
(from Central Asia) enough gas to meet rising demand at home and
abroad. On one independent estimate, by 2011 it could be short by
approximately 92bn cu metres annually. Two-thirds of Gazprom’s output
is sold on the domestic market, where it charges a price that is below
production cost, and the company’s ability to force higher prices or
consumption cuts is limited. As a result, its focus on closing the gas
supply gap-partly through raising revenue to pay for more investment
or gas purchases-is on the export side. According to data for the first
quarter of this year, three-fifths of Gazprom’s output goes to European
states at an average price of US$242 per 1,000 cu metres. Two-fifths
goes to former Soviet states for an average price of US$89 per 1,000
cu metres. In this context, the obvious commercial solution for
Gazprom is to sharply increase gas prices to the former Soviet Union,
in order to boost its revenue and curb CIS gas consumption.

That said, Russia is not pushing a uniform pricing structure on those
countries; politics still plays an important role. As a senior Kremlin
spokesperson, quoted in the Financial Times on December 12th said,
countries that co-operate with Russia and are ready to share ownership
of domestic assets would be given time before prices reached "market"
levels. States that were "unloyal" or refused to sell assets will be
forced to European pricing levels immediately.

In the case of Belarus, with a view to Gazprom’s "supply tightness"
problem, the Russian monopoly arguably has no room for generosity. In
CIS terms, Belarus is a sizeable gas consumer as it uses 21bn cu metres
of Russian gas each year-more than twice the consumption of Georgia,
Azerbaijan and Armenia combined. Belarus consumed the same volume
of Russian gas as Italy in 2005, and more than half the Russian gas
consumption of Germany.

Out of options Mr Lukashenka has consistently refused to be browbeaten
on Beltransgaz, but he is now backed into a corner. According to a
former governor of Belarus’s central bank, Stanislav Bogdankevich,
60% of Belarusian industry is barely profitable or loss-making at
present-and this in a situation where gas is priced at less than US$50
per 1,000 cu metres. If gas prices quadruple, there is a serious risk
that the Belarusian economy would go into meltdown as its exports
would be priced out of their principal market, Russia.

Mr Lukashenka is under additional pressure economically because Russia
is threatening to place an export duty of around US$180/tonne on
crude oil exports to Belarus. Currently, Belarusian refineries import
Russian crude at below-market prices and then sell their processed
output on to west European markets at world prices. Russia has also
suggested that the proceeds from this trade-which generated almost
US$5bn in export revenue for Belarus in 2005-be redistributed, with
Belarus increasing its export duty sharply and then transferring 85%
of its windfall earnings to Russia.

Feel the pain Even assuming that Mr Lukashenka manages to limit the
rise in the price of gas next year to US$135 per 1,000 cu metres, the
impact is likely to be severe. The government will be forced to loosen
its fiscal policies in order to accommodate both significantly higher
gas import prices and its existing social programmes, agricultural
subsidies and generous wage policies. The budget deficit is therefore
expected to expand to around 3.5% of GDP in 2007. Russia’s move on
oil export duties will hit hard too, causing Belarus’s oil windfall
revenue to fall at a time when the need for subsidies across the
Belarusian economy will increase.

Moreover, the price paid for Russian gas will push up import costs
substantially-by roughly US$1.7bn. Growth in Russian demand for
Belarusian exports is also likely to slow, all of which will stretch
the current account deficit to around 8-9% of GDP annually in 2007-08.

The worst is yet to come Part of the reason for Mr Lukashenka’s
extreme reluctance to part with Beltransgaz is a recognition that he
has relatively few bargaining chips left with which to secure cheap
Russian gas and oil supplies in future years. The fact that the two
sides are now bickering over Beltransgaz, which handles the one-third
of Russian gas exports via Belarus not already under Russian control,
emphasises just how close Gazprom is to meeting its acquisition
objectives in Belarus. The Russian gas monopoly might of course fix
its eye on other energy-sector assets in future, in line with its
desire to diversify into power and oil, and to move downstream and
abroad in all three energy businesses; this would give Belarus a few
more bargaining chips.

Nevertheless, the example of Armenia-another supposedly close Russian
ally-might make Mr Lukashenka shudder. Nearly all of Armenia’s energy
sector is now in Russian hands, in return for which the country
has been promised cheap gas up to 2008. Thereafter, all signals from
Gazprom and Russian state officials point to prices rising to European
levels. The worrying prospect for both Armenia and Belarus is that
all they will get in return for transferring their strategic energy
assets to Gazprom is a few years’ grace before this happens.

And when it does, elites in both states are likely to conclude that
their unswerving loyalty to Russia has been poorly rewarded.

Bulgarians And The Roma: Who’s More Wrong?

BULGARIANS AND THE ROMA: WHO’S MORE WRONG?
Yana Moyseeva, The Sofia Echo

Dzeno Association, Czech Republic
Dec 18 2006

Bulgaria’s transition to democracy after 1989 was harder than anyone
expected. New democratic and socialist rulers at the time misjudged
what was needed to quickly make Bulgaria a free-market economy,
a task that countries like Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic
managed. The ultimate consequence of those misjudgments in the early
days of the republic was an economic catastrophe that resulted in
fever-pitch unemployment and a drastic decrease in living standards.

But hardest hit were the Roma. Their social and economic situation
severely deteriorated as a consequence of the post-communist
transition. Roma unemployment skyrocketed up to 90 per cent during the
1990s. Their level of education also fell at great speed. A recent
survey reveals that only 10 per cent of Roma aged 10 and above have
completed primary education, as opposed to 72 of Bulgarians. As a
result, many Roma saw no other option but to earn their bread through
social benefits and, alas, crime.

Today human rights activists, NGOs, politicians and the media continue
to argue who is right and wrong on the Roma’s condition in Bulgarian
society. Some argue that too many preserve stereotypes about the
Roma. Others argue that they simply base their perceptions of the Roma
on Roma behaviour. Meanwhile, the integrated Roma are absent from the
public view. The media still mostly emphasise negative stories. To
a great extent, this coverage is why the perception of the "dirty,
lazy, stealing Roma" remains unchanged to date. The voice of the Roma
themselves is lost. Politicians, journalists, NGO representatives –
we hear a lot through them about what everybody else thinks. But it
is time we hear from both non-Roma and Roma themselves about the idea
of living in an integrated society.

A study done with non-Roma and Roma showed that integration is easy
in words, but difficult in practice.

Through the eyes of the ordinary Bulgarians, Roma integration means
everything from "paying your bills" to "taking responsibility as well
as using your rights". Mainly, it involves "getting a smaller group,
which is somehow different from the majority, to live by the rules
and principles on which the entire society is based, to take into
consideration the established norms of behaviour, whether they are
social, cultural, or health."

But is that really enough?

Bulgaria has been a multi-ethnic society for centuries. Turks,
Armenians, Jews and Russians are only some of the minorities currently
living in Bulgaria. However, it is a fact that other minorities are
hardly ever mentioned in the public space. "This is because nobody
else creates as many problems as the Roma," said Anait Kirkorova,
a teacher in a so-called white school from an Armenian background.

The interviewed Bulgarians acknowledged that it is wrong to think
that all Roma are the same. Some are already integrated, they say –
they are educated, work, pay taxes, and obey the law like everybody
else. But examples of such integrated Roma are rare.

One of the most widely spread opinions about the Roma is that they
are highly criminal, especially regarding pick pocketing, electricity
stealing and burglary. Bulgarians especially say they resent how Roma
are caught stealing electricity but the Government forgives them,
as their lines are re-connected without payment or sanctions.

As a result, Bulgarians irritably say "Why are they allowed to get
away with this, but as soon as we don’t pay ours, we remain without
electricity until we pay the bill?" Bulgarians admit that when they
go on a bus and a group of Roma gets on, it is almost an instant
reaction to grab hold of their bags or pockets and stay alert for
the duration of the trip.

This fear comes as no surprise when looking at crime figures.

Even though official crime statistics on an ethnic basis are not
carried out in Bulgaria, some figures compiled in 2002 from the
Bulgarian police claim that Roma commit one in four crimes. Even if
such figures are unofficial, Bulgarians point towards higher criminal
rates among Roma than among Bulgarians.

The visibly higher birth rate among the Roma also puts Bulgarians
on alert.

Currently the birth rate among Roma is three to four times higher
than among Bulgarians. A common belief is that many Roma give birth
to children to use them as a means for getting easy money, mainly
through claiming children state benefits. "For the Romany gypsies,
children are not an expense, but a profit," said Nona Kuzmanova,
a teacher in a mixed school. Single mother Elizabet Ivanova added,
"When I go to take my child benefits, I join a queue mainly with
Roma women, surrounded by children". In July, Social Minister Emilia
Maslarova said 70 per cent of all 117 000 jobless who received state
benefits in the first five months of the year were Roma.

Bulgarians are also convinced that Roma exploit their children for
begging and pick-pocketing. A number of people have personally
offered a begging Roma child in the street to buy him/her food,
but in response the child said it wanted money instead. All of the
interviewed Bulgarians were convinced that if a Roma family has four
children, it can earn more money from child support benefits than
if both parents were earning the minimum wage of 180 leva. Thus,
Bulgarians said, it is not the case that there are no jobs; rather
they simply don’t want to work because "It is easier to have more
children and make the most of welfare," the interviewees claimed.

Experiences of hiring or working with Roma are also negative. "They
would always try to get away with doing as little as possible, leave
work earlier than everyone else and on top – not do the job properly,"
said Konstantin Kirilov, a company director. In the eyes of Bulgarians
this work ethic raised a question as to whether the Roma actually
want to be integrated.

Some Bulgarians argue that most Roma don’t want to be integrated
because this requires making an effort. "They run away when the first
obstacle comes along. Why make an effort if you can choose the easy
way and carry on living day by day," argues Yordanka Pochinkova,
a social worker. But others believe that no one would choose misery
if given the option for a better life, such as having a job, a house
or access to quality education.

Although some Bulgarians express the rather extreme view that "Roma’s
low intelligence has turned into a genetic attribute as a consequence
of their primitive way of life during centuries," most Bulgarians
interviewed agree that the problems are rooted mainly in their lack
of education.

According to data compiled in 2001, 15 per cent of the Roma population
are illiterate, 30 per cent have only elementary education and
another 30 per cent have finished eighth grade, the required
minimum by law. Only five per cent have finished twelfth, or final,
grade and less than one per cent hold a university degree. The
lack of education and the high illiteracy among the Roma makes them
uncompetitive. According to Konstantin Kirilov "No job means poverty,
and poverty is a prerequisite for defects in society". But this
situation has much to do with the efficiency of the Government.

Compulsory primary education and sanctions for those caught not
sending their children to school exist even now. But the evident
poor state of the great majority of Roma speaks for a massive lack of
oversight. Roma children often drop out of school, a fact admitted by
the Government. Each year ten million Euros are given on average by
American and EU funds for various Roma integration programmes. Yet,
both Bulgarians and Roma are convinced that this money goes in the
wrong hands, such as Romany bosses and politicians. The bottom line
is that there are few if any signs that the lives of the Roma have
improved.

"Whatever the ghetto was 30 years ago, it is still exactly the same.

There is no canalisation, running water, people still scavenge
rubbish bins," said Orlin Parvanov, a company manager. While some
Bulgarians admit there are things they can do to integrate the Roma,
such as interact more with them and get to know their culture better,
the majority of those interviewed have an extremely negative attitude.

"If they were to behave differently, their problems and those of the
entire society would diminish significantly," he said.

But what most people don’t realise is that the Roma are the most
disadvantaged part of a society with many problems. While Bulgarians
embrace the idea of integration, study results show they don’t want
their children to study with Roma or to have Roma neighbours, the
hallmarks of integration.

Bulgarians themselves are not the best role model.

"We too throw our empty packs of crisps on the street. Only when
we learn not to do that will we be allowed to judge other people,"
said Kiril Pochinkov, an architect. But such self-critical thoughts
are still uncommon. The majority of Bulgarians remain pessimistic
over the success of Roma integration and don’t see much development
for at least another 30 to 40 years. But perhaps this is in fact not
such a long time, considering the complexity of integration. Minority
issues have never been easy to solve and like any bruise, the negative
consequences of the transition period in the early 90s requires a
few generations to heal.

On May 19 the BBC broadcast a report about Bulgaria on how ready,
or, rather, not ready, it was to join the EU in 2007. One of the most
memorable images to demonstrate the backwardness of the country was
a shot of a lonely Roma woman, warming her hands on a fire at what
looks like a distant Sofia suburb. Most Bulgarians are ashamed of such
images. But it is also the image which destines those Roma who are
already integrated to a constant battle with stereotypes and prejudice.

One such person is 18-year-old Hristina Georgieva. Currently studying
journalism, she says "In a few months time we will all be doing our
work placements in various media. And I am 100 per cent sure that
even though people will be nice to me, they will always have this
thought in mind ‘Yes, but she is Roma.’ and I know that this will
show in one way or another".

Georgieva has never lived in a gypsy ghetto. She has only studied
in mixed schools and doesn’t speak the Roma language. Yet, she
says, her features and skin colour forces her and her colleagues to
constantly prove themselves to others. "We are clean, well dressed,
speak Bulgarian amongst each other and have tickets for the tram. Why
are we then still looked at as criminals?" she said.

She is highly sceptical of the entire concept of Roma integration.

Bulgarians argue that if Roma were educated, had decent jobs,
lived out of ghettos and obeyed the rules that everybody else obeys,
there would be no reason for Roma to be isolated and a lot of their
problems would be solved. However, it seems that those requirements
are by far not enough to make the integrated Roma feel integrated.

Genoveva Sotirova, a Roma who holds law degree, said: "I want to be
considered for a job because of my skills and qualifications, not
the colour of my skin or my face features. I want to be let in dance
clubs and not being told that ‘tonight it is a private party’ when
it clearly isn’t. I want to be on a bus where people are not holding
tight their bags as soon as a person with gypsy features gets on".

To integrated young Roma, being integrated does not mean being
accepted. Daniel Asparuhov argued that "Despite Roma being part of
Bulgarian history for centuries, people are still not used to them
and refuse to accept them". Nonetheless, the interviewed Roma, who
identify themselves as integrated, acknowledged that most of the
stereotypes surrounding their ethnicity are indeed justified.

During the interview, they agreed that the majority of Roma are
uneducated, steal, beg and cause social problems. They called them
"the degraded part of Bulgarian society". But what angers them,
said Georgieva, is that the exceptions are not accepted. The typical
prejudiced Bulgarian mind makes it extremely difficult for us to
prove that we are not all the same, she added.

Quality education, good jobs, and being part of a society are equally
as big priorities for some Roma as for Bulgarians, Turks and Jews.

Antonina Zhelyazkova from the Centre for Study of Minorities said it
must be acknowledged that in the past few years at least some good
things happened for the Roma. "With the help of sponsorship programmes,
a Roma elite of up to 5000 people managed to be formed. A number of
young people were given scholarships which allowed them to leave the
ghetto or the small village they lived in, gain good education and
make something of themselves," Zhelyazkova said.

Five thousand out of approximately 800 000 Roma may seem a small
fraction. But it is progress. The point is that such young and
ambitious Roma exist and yet still only the poor, uneducated, begging
ones appear in news stories. Moreover, there are hardly any known
Roma politicians, journalists, actors, doctors, teachers, or sports
personas. This lack of popular, integrated Roma figures for the public
is a big problem.

Desislava Rumenova, a teacher in a mixed school, said "If they don’t
show us or talk about us, if they are prejudiced in offering us
high-rank jobs, what model can we be for the rest of Roma?"

Her class colleague, Sotirova, adds that when she goes back to her
village, Roma people there ask her, "You graduated from university
and are still without a job. What is the point then of sending our
children to school? Not only will they suffer discrimination but they
won’t be able to get a job afterwards."

But Genoveva’s response is always that such attitude leads to a dead
end. "So, I am a gypsy. Does that mean I should not develop myself
and stop living? Exactly the opposite!"

Unlike the Bulgarians who were interviewed, the Roma seemed much more
self-critical and willing to admit defects within their community.

Nonetheless, they blame mostly Bulgarians for the way they are
treated. The Roma who were interviewed said their efforts to break
stereotypes are constantly undermined. Their everyday experiences
have made them extremely pessimistic and sceptical of the concept
of integration and believe that until Bulgarians start seeing beyond
stereotypes, integration will not be achieved.

Even the Government, the students said, doesn’t give a positive
example by not appointing Roma for state administrative positions.

Having two deputy ministers in the current Government is definitely
a step forward. But considering the fact that the Turkish minority
have their own party which is also in the ruling coalition, there is
much more to be asked for.

Take, for example, the National Council for Ethnic and Demographic
issues. Out of about 20 employees in its directorate, there is only
one Roma worker. At an interview in June this year, Maya Cholakova,
the recently hired director there, justified the lack of Roma employees
by saying it is "anti-constitutional and discriminatory to consider
people’s ethnic background for a job." But some NGOs ask if is it
really not better to have Roma working on Roma-related issues?

After all, they best know the problems and needs of their communities,
said Iskra Stoikova from the Romani Baht Foundation.

Indeed, in certain situations, employing people with a Romany
background as well as from other ethnicities should be regarded
as positive discrimination. This is of extreme importance when
talking about ethnic minority integration, as the case with the Roma
currently is. As a result, the absence of Roma from the management
of the country is one of many criticisms that Roma people, NGOs and
human rights activists address to the Government. The Roma students
criticised the Frame Programme for Roma Integration – the Government’s
official policy – saying that it is simply a piece of paper which no
one takes seriously. Also not working, they say, is the Commission
for Prevention of Discrimination.

Scepticism is not only an occurrence among Bulgarians but is also
spread among the integrated Roma. It must be realised that the absence
of such intelligent and educated Roma from all public spheres has a
much more profound effect on the integration process.

The status of the Roma ethnic group will not change until they start
seeing members of their communities succeed. Currently, the majority
of young Roma don’t have someone to look up to. They learn from
the limited life experience of their parents, and thus live in the
vicious cycle of illiteracy and low morals. Should this cycle change,
it won’t be long until those Roma who need integration begin changing
their minds about education, ambition, and determination. It is, in
fact, strange that so many governments to date have not come around
to comprehending this very simple formula to a successful integration.

Bulgarians will undeniably also benefit from more Roma in the
public space. They are more likely to become less prejudiced and more
open-minded if they see a teacher from Roma ethnicity being interviewed
on television, or a Roma pop star in the charts. The study showed that
Bulgarians’ keenness on Roma integration is mainly in words. Despite
the fact that to an extent we can’t blame them for their negative
attitude and pessimism, they are far from understanding the true
meaning of integration. Thus, at least for now, it remains just a
vague concept which the majority of society is not prepared to grasp.

Arkady Ghoukassian: International Community Could Construct Its Rela

ARKADY GHOUKASSIAN: INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY COULD CONSTRUCT ITS RELATIONS WITH KARABAKH REGARDLESS OF AZERBAIJAN

DeFacto Agency, Armenia
Dec 18 2006

The Nagorno-Karabakh Republic President Arkady Ghoukassian expressed
satisfaction with a meeting held with the European Union Special
Representative for the South Caucasus Peter Semneby. The meeting took
place December 17 at the NKR Permanent Representation in RA.

‘~RI am satisfied with the meeting, in the course of which we discussed
a number of important issues. One of the principal subjects was
a Constitutional referendum and the international response to it,
which I do not comprehend. It is not the fact of the referendum’s
conduct that should have been discussed, but the essence of the
Constitution, whether it is good or bad, if it corresponds to the
European criteria. Perhaps, it would be more correct to compare the
NKR Constitution with that of Azerbaijan. It would be logical. As
for the EU response, in my opinion, it was illogical, and I told Mr.
Semneby about it’~R, A. Ghoukassian said.

According to the NK President, the international community should
promote democratic processes in the Nagorno-Karabagh. ‘~RThe
Constitution’s adoption does not hamper the talks; on the contrary,
it promotes the negotiation process. It is very important for the
international community to be aware of the NK people’s sense and its
approaches to various issues’~R, the NKR President stated.

Another important topic of the discussions held between the NKR
President and the EU Special Representative for the South Caucasus
was the necessity to establish close connections between the NKR
and EU. According to Arkady Ghoukassian, Peter Semneby reacted quite
positively to the idea. ‘~RMr. Semneby will visit the NK. The call
is likely to be paid late January 2007. We have agreed to discuss
the issues referring to our interrelations in detail in the course
of the visit. I believe the subject is of great importance for us.

Naturally, we are all interested in the rapid settlement of the NK
issue. However, we have got no guarantees that it will be resolved
in the near future. It is not the NK people’s fault that they live in
the unrecognized country, being deprived of all privileges enjoyed by
the people living in the recognized countries. The ties may be both
political and economic. We discussed some subjects. I am sure the
meetings of the kind will be held more often’~R, A. Ghoukassian stated.

Answering a DE FACTO question, the NKR President said he had
discussed the issue of the Armenian refugees with the EU Special
Representative. ‘~RI can’t recall any meeting I held with the
international community’s representatives, in the course of which
the issue was not discussed. It was also considered at the meeting
with Mr. Semneby. I do not understand the logic, according to which
they are trying to resolve the problem of the Azeri refugees first
and only then to return to the Armenian refugees’ issues. I can’t
say the international community’s representatives believe it should
be like this; however, the issue’s logic is so obvious that, in my
view, both Mr. Semneby and the representatives of other international
structures will pay attention to the fact by all means. It is dangerous
to consider an issue out of the context’~R.

The NKR President reminded that in the course of his two
electoral campaigns he had promised to the NK people to do his
best for the NKR to have its Constitution. ‘~RI considered it’s
my duty to promote the issue’s solution. We could have adopted the
Constitution much earlier. However, there were a lot of questions to
be replied. First, we had to summarize the fifteen years’ experience,
realize what we need, what sort of country we are constructing –
Parliamentary, Presidential or semi-Presidential, which government
mechanisms we should adopt. We have solved a lot of political and
non-political issues for these years. And it is our business – to
have a Constitution or not. Sure, we could have lived without it. We
have adopted the Constitution first of all for ourselves, because,
I think, the Constitution opens a new page in the NK life and creates
new possibilities for the NK’s democratization’~R, the head of the
Nagorno-Karabagh stated.

Answering a question if the NKR expected such a reaction of the
international community, Arkady Ghoukassian mentioned active work
Azerbaijan carried on at the international structures. ‘~RAzerbaijan’s
hysterics and its pressure are familiar to me. I know Azerbaijan
talks to the international community in the ultimatum’s language. It
blackmails: either you condemn, or we break off our relations with the
EU. It is not clear for me, why the international community surrenders
to the intimidation; it does not promote either the democratization of
Azerbaijan, or NK. I think the international community could construct
its relations with the Nagorno-Karabagh regardless of Azerbaijan’~R,
the NK President said.

In his words, the NKR is ready to construct its relations with the EU
and the organization’s Special Representative for the South Caucasus
within the frames of his functional responsibilities. ‘~RWe have come
to an agreement to discuss the issues in detail in Stepanakert late
January. I have presented specific issues Mr. Semneby promised to
discuss. Besides, I have informed him of the fact that we are going to
hold Presidential elections in July – August, and I asked him if we
should hold them or not. However, to Mr. Semneby’s honor, he said he
considered the elections necessary and very important and personally
he believes they must not be condemned’~R, A. Ghoukassian noted.

When asked to express his attitude to the possibility of reducing
the talks’ activeness before Parliamentary elections in RA Arkady
Ghoukassian remarked the process could hardly be artificially
activated or vice versa. ‘~RCurrent negotiation process is a bit
strange, as there are no talks within the Minsk group’s frames. The
OSCE Budapest summit just charged the Co-Chairs to organize talks
with all the conflict parties. It is not being done. Actually,
the MG Co-Chairs do not fulfill their duties on the resumption of
an active negotiation process within the MG frames, where the NK,
Armenia and Azerbaijan are presented’~R, Arkady Ghoukassian stated.

Summing up the results of the current year, the NKR President said,
‘~Rthis year we have continued what we did not manage to finish in
2005. There is one incontestable truth for me. We are approaching
the ideals we have charted step by step. Economic situation has
considerable improved. The political situation is healthy and
competitive. We have got opposition, but we have no hatred. We have
got no tension, we have got inner stability’~R.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Azeri POW ‘Resisting Repatriation’

AZERI POW ‘RESISTING REPATRIATION’
By Ruzanna Stepanian

Radio Liberty, Czech Rep.
Dec 18 2006

An Azerbaijani soldier who was taken prisoner by Karabakh Armenian
forces earlier this month claims to have been badly mistreated by his
commanders and fellow conscripts and does not want to be repatriated,
according to the authorities in Stepanakert.

Vusal Garajayev reportedly crossed into the Armenian-controlled
territory east of Karabakh on December 7. The International Committee
of the Red Cross has since been trying to negotiate his repatriation.

In the words of Arkady Ghukasian, president of the self-proclaimed
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, the 19-year-old "consciously crossed"
the heavily fortified frontline to escape systematic hazing at the
hands of other Azerbaijani servicemen.

"According to his accounts registered by representatives of the Red
Cross, he was regularly and continuously beaten by fellow soldiers,"
Ghukasian told reporters in Yerevan.

"That soldier has been placed at the disposal of the International
Committee of the Red Cross which is holding negotiations with
relevant structures in Azerbaijan," he said. "At least until now,
he has said that he does not want to return home because he does
not want to again face the people who beat him and because he fears
government retribution."

The Azerbaijani Defense Ministry dismissed this version of events as
"Armenian propaganda," saying that Garajayev accidentally strayed into
Armenian-controlled territory. "Vusal Garajayev will be repatriated
to Azerbaijan," a ministry spokesman told the Day.az news service.

Ghukasian made it clear, however, that the conscript will not be
sent back to Azerbaijan against his will. "That said, I am sure the
Azerbaijani authorities will put pressure on his parents and relatives,
and they will eventually convince him to come back," he said. "And I
assure you that this lad will face lengthy imprisonment in Azerbaijan."

Prisoner-taking happens regularly along the Armenian-Azerbaijan
line of contact in circumstances that are not always trivial. In
some cases, soldiers were clearly not captured by force. In January
2005, for example, four Armenian soldiers who spent several months in
Azerbaijani captivity were arrested and prosecuted immediately their
repatriation. Military prosecutors said that they willingly crossed
into Azerbaijani territory and "came into contact with the enemy."

A few weeks later, three Azerbaijani soldiers crossed the frontline
in similar circumstances. They were subsequently repatriated and
reportedly faced prosecution in Azerbaijan.

From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress

Armenian Choir Was The Best

ARMENIAN CHOIR WAS THE BEST

A1+
[12:39 pm] 18 December, 2006

A competition of Christmas spiritual songs took place in St. Mary
catholic church in Calcutta. The choirs of about 10 schools
participated in it. The choir of the Armenian Humanitarian Lyceum,
conducted by Vachagan Tadevosyan also participated in the competition.

The competition started with "Our Father" after which each choir
performed two songs in English.

As a result of the competition the choir of the Armenian Humanitarian
Lyceum was declared the best winning the first prize.

Turkey Threatens Argentina

TURKEY THREATENS ARGENTINA

A1+
[12:34 pm] 18 December, 2006

Official Ankara has started threatening Argentina. The Foreign
Ministry of Turkey has made a statement condemning the decision of
the Argentinean Senate connected with the Armenian Genocide.

Let us remind you that on December 13 the Senate has decided to declare
April 24 as "day of mutual respect and tolerance between nations",
and make it a non-working day for Armenian students and officials.

The statement mentions that "Turkey condemns and rejects the
accusations about the Genocide which is groundless from the historical
point of view".

According to agency "Trend", Turkey has informed Argentina that the
decision will have a negative impact on the relations between the
two countries and has voiced hope that the President of Argentina
will not ratify the Senate decision.

Oskanyan in Iran

OSKANYAN IN IRAN

A1+
[01:15 pm] 18 December, 2006

At the invitation of Foreign Minister of the Islamic Republic of
Iran Manouchehr Mottaki, the delegation of RA Foreign Minister Vardan
Oskanyan visited Iran on December 17.

The Foreign Ministers of the two countries mentioned that after
the visit of the RA President to Iran several construction projects
are realized. The sides also discussed issues about perspectives of
enhancing cooperation in the energy field.

The Ministers referred to regional problems exchanging thoughts
about the developments in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Near
East. Possibilities of cooperating in the international structures were
also discussed. Minister Oskanyan represented the recent developments
about the settlement of the Karabakh conflict.

RA Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan was also received by Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad. Referring to the historical-cultural friendship of the
two countries, the Foreign Minister underlined that the links are a
powerful ground for the development of the relations which form in
the atmosphere of mutual trust and respect.

Kosovo Problem Cannot Influence On Settlement Of Other Conflicts

KOSOVO PROBLEM CANNOT INFLUENCE ON SETTLEMENT OF OTHER CONFLICTS

PanARMENIAN.Net
18.12.2006 13:24 GMT+04:00

/PanARMENIAN.Net/ The Kosovo problem is unique and cannot influence
on the settlement of other conflicts, the EU Special Representative
for the South Caucasus Peter Semneby said in Yerevan upon completion
of the meeting with NKR President Arkady Ghukasian.

"The Kosovo issue, in our opinion, is unique and should not have
impact on other situations. I would not like to go into detail since
it’s beyond my responsibility. But there is one big difference. The
international community represented by the UN and its Security Council
initiated the Kosovo process that is coming to an end currently. The
UN Security Council suspended Serbia’s sovereignty over Kosovo,"
Semneby said.

According to him, settlement of all conflicts should be positioned
for the international law, but besides the common basis of the
international law each conflict situation is unique, reports
newsarmenia.ru.