168: Ahead of the expected increase in gas prices, the PSC puts a soft cushion in the city

July 11, 2026

Despite the fact that the Public Services Regulatory Commission has decided to review the price of gas sold to the population on its own initiative and leave it unchanged, this does not mean that it will not become more expensive from next year. The commission approved tariffs, knowing full well that they would be in effect for a number of months.

“Practically, with this decision, until the end of the year, until December 31, we closed that issue. “Gazprom Armenia” can take such an initiative from January 1, if there are objective reasons and such problems that the tariff should be revised,” says the president of the PSC, Mesrop Mesropyan, indirectly making it clear that gas tariffs may increase from next year.

As is known, the term of the Russian gas import contract at the current price is coming to an end.  After that, it is expected that Armenia can receive Russian gas at a much higher price than it receives today. The Armenian authorities have been informed about this for a long time. The Russian side warned months ago that it could unilaterally suspend or cancel the preferential supply of a number of goods to Armenia, including gas.

Let’s remind that Russia sells gas to Armenia without export duty. And the export duty is 30 percent. If it is included in the price, the Russian gas supplied to Armenia will become more expensive. We are not talking about another possible price increase yet.

Read also

  • Investors see what is happening with investors and business in general in Armenia
  • Considered a dictator, Aliyev “warns” Pashinyan that dictatorship rarely ends well
  • We cannot rule out that the Russian Federation will continue to deteriorate its relations with Armenia. Political scientist

The Russian side has repeatedly announced that Armenia receives Russian gas at preferential prices as a strategic partner, and this is a free investment of the Russian side in the Armenian economy. In case of removing itself from that status, Armenia will be deprived not only of receiving gas at preferential prices, but also can buy Russian gas at international prices. The recently deepening tension in Armenian-Russian relations increases the possibility of this. Against the background of that tension, the Russian side has already managed to impose restrictions on the export of many Armenian products.

The authorities hoped that these problems would be resolved soon. Nikol Pashinyan announced that he would go and solve all the issues immediately after the elections. He said that he has an arrangement for a meeting with the President of Russia.

A month has passed since the elections, but Nikol Pashinyan has not gone anywhere.

Moreover, the Russian president has not only not congratulated him, not only is he not ready to accept him, but also seems to be out of touch with him. Perhaps that was the reason why Nikol Pashinyan had to have a telephone conversation with the Prime Minister of Russia the other day.

“At the initiative of the Armenian side, the President of the Russian Federation, Mikhail Mishustin, had a telephone conversation with the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia, Nikol Pashinyan. The heads of governments discussed topical issues of cooperation in the trade-economic, scientific-technological and cultural-humanitarian spheres,” the press of the Russian government announced after the telephone conversation. the service.

The press service of the Armenian government repeated the same, of course, without mentioning that the telephone conversation took place on the initiative of the Armenian side. But the problem was not at all whose initiative the telephone conversation took place. Judging by the brief content of the announcement about it and even more, Nikol Pashinyan’s silence, the conversation did not go very smoothly. There is no mention even of the Russian Prime Minister congratulating Nikol Pashinyan.

It is clear that the main purpose of this telephone conversation was to solve the problems of exporting Armenian products in the Russian market. But Nikol Pashinyan’s silence shows that nothing has been achieved. Otherwise, now Facebook was flooded with it.

This proves once again that the Armenian-Russian relations have entered a rather deep transformation, and its consequences can be felt not only by the exporters of Armenian goods to the Russian market, but also by the entire population of Armenia, through a possible increase in the price of gas, even a sharp increase.

What the National Gas Commission did by leaving the gas tariff for the population temporarily unchanged, does not mean that there is no longer a risk of gas tariff increase. On the contrary, these risks are becoming increasingly relevant.

Today, as long as the population does not face an increase in tariffs, the PSC did not do the citizens a favor by leaving the tariffs unchanged. Tariffs should have been lowered a long time ago. But instead of the population, they decided to lower the price of gas supplied to thermal plants.

From August 1, thermal plants will receive gas for only 91.1 dollars, almost twice lower than the price at which Armenia buys gas. Until now, CHPs received gas for 146.2 dollars. We will not say at whose expense they lowered it, but it is clear that they did it to avoid an increase in the electricity tariff. This year, the share of thermal plants in energy production has increased dramatically, significantly increasing the pressure on electricity tariffs.

With this step, in fact, they tried to control the increase in the price of electricity. But it is clear that it is also temporary. if the Russian gas supplied to Armenia became more expensive and no equivalent replacement resources were found, the price of electricity cannot be avoided either.

By the way, instead of reducing the prices of gas sold to the population, the PSC found it appropriate to increase the salaries of “Gazprom Armenia” employees, making an exception for high-ranking management personnel. He increased the average salary by 45 thousand, making it 303 thousand drams.

But, probably understanding the coming of the heads, he warned that in case of a possible increase in the price of gas imported from Russia to Armenia, those amounts may be reduced from the tariffs again.

HAKOB KOCHARYAN




—

Roza Tsarukyan’s health worsened after the video published by the Central Committee, dr

July 11, 2026

In the morning, the media spread information that the health condition of 93-year-old Roza Tsarukyan, the mother of the leader of the “Prosperous Armenia” party Gagik Tsarukyan, has deteriorated sharply.

of 168.am in a conversation with PAP press spokesperson Iveta Tonoyan confirmed this information and elaborated.

“Ms. Roza Tsarukyan’s health condition worsened after the publication of the videos and photos published after the search of the PAP leader’s residence. Mrs. Tsarukyan learned about them later.

Thank God, Mrs. Tsarukyan’s health is good at the moment.”

Read also

  • Investors see what is happening with investors and business in general in Armenia
  • Nikol has no value system, this country is nothing for him, he specially destroys everything. Zhanna Aleksanyan
  • KUCHI KRIV, RAZBIRAT, TERROR… people, is this what you wanted, was it unconditional to fight with Russia to make jam, sell apricots and roses in Europe? Artur Khachikyan

To the question whether she is at home or in the hospital at the moment, Iveta Tonoyan answered that she does not know the details, she just managed to verify that she is feeling well at the moment.

“I think this is the case when even a foreigner, after watching that video, could not have negative emotions and feelings. In this case, when we talk about the PAP leader’s mother, the state of mind and feelings in which 93-year-old Roza Tsarukyan found herself is natural. In this specific case, red lines were crossed, unwritten laws were violated, it concerns the right to the integrity of the home, family, hearth, which, unfortunately, was violated. I don’t know any other details,” added Iveta Tonoyan.

We also asked him where the wife and mother of Gagik Tsarukyan were during the search of Gagik Tsarukyan’s private house. There are various reports that they had to stay in their rooms during the entire search and could not move freely in the private house, Iveta Tonoyan answered.

“I don’t have any information, there was no reason to talk about it, and everyone knows about the process, how limited it was, even the lawyers were able to enter the private house after hours. There has not been an opportunity to talk about that yet, so I cannot comment.”

Let’s remind that on July 6, for almost 13 hours, the masked and armed officers of the National Security Service took control of the private house of the leader of the “Prosperous Armenia” party, Gagik Tsarukyan, and the investigators were conducting a search inside the private house. Along with the mansion, searches were carried out in the companies belonging to Gagik Tsarukyan’s family, the doors of several companies were broken.

After the searches, the NSS officers arrested Gagik Tsarukyan and transferred him from the private house first to the Investigative Committee, then a petition was submitted to the court to detain him, after which he was detained for 2 months. was detained.

After leaving the investigative committee, Gagik Tsarukyan briefly said about these actions.

“The accusation is completely made up, it’s a lie, it’s a bubble, there’s nothing 100 percent true, everything will be clear.”

According to the report issued by the Investigative Committee, one of the criminal proceedings under investigation in the main department of investigation of economic crimes and smuggling has obtained factual data that a number of persons organized by G.S. apparently committed particularly large-scale fraud and money laundering during the years 2022-2024.

By the way, after the search of Gagik Tsarukyan’s private house, the KP released a video showing how masked and armed National Security Service officers broke into the private house and threw Gagik Tsarukyan to the ground, who came to meet them without showing resistance.

We should also remind that back on May 26, during a meeting with journalists, Gagik Tsarukyan said that he does not have any personal interests, he does everything for the country, and he clearly stated his approaches.

“I am very calm, I warned the most important thing at home, the most important thing is my mother, dear to me, I said, dear, it will be a temporary thing, don’t suddenly get upset, I may go to the exam, it will be a temporary thing for 1-2 months, we have not done anything real, so that they will do anything to the person for this. If they want to make me a hero, I am very happy.”

—

With the introduction of the IDMS system, data related to Armenia will not be stored in Azerbaijan

July 11, 2026

On July 1, in the article titled “What place has Baku allocated to the National Security Service of the Republic of Armenia in having an IDMS system related to missing persons? Are there any risks in the offer to the citizens of the Republic of Armenia?” we have alerted about specific risks.

On the same day, we sent a written request to the RA National Security Service to specifically find out whether the arrangements of the former director of the National Security Service of the National Security Service Armen Abazyan were moved to a practical stage, or whether the National Security Service of the Republic of Armenia was proposed to create a joint database on missing persons, if yes, why was it left out of the process in this case, and whether RA citizens will transfer relevant confidential information to Baku through the National Security Service, how will this risky process be controlled, etc.

And until Nikol Pashinyan’s National Security Service answered our questions, Azerbaijan  is running online inquiry center (OIC) as a digital platform for collecting, processing and coordinating data on missing persons.

Moreover, in the context of the process of registration of missing persons, Baku raises several dangerous questions, which we referred to on July 4 in another article: “Aliyev’s proposal to the citizens of Armenia and Pashinyan’s response: “The issue of legal evaluation of the “genocide” against Azerbaijanis is more than relevant.” in the article.

Read also

  • The general said that it is possible that the opposition has put something up against the wall… Nazik Amiryan
  • Political loyalty in exchange for the economy. the insoluble knot of Armenian-Russian negotiations
  • KUCHI KRIV, RAZBIRAT, TERROR… people, is this what you wanted, was it unconditional to fight with Russia to make jam, sell apricots and roses in Europe? Artur Khachikyan

And on July 6, we published “Aliev “cleanses” himself. Why did Baku remember Manvel Grigoryan, who will be next? the article because the propaganda machine of Baku remembered Manvel Grigoryan, noting that although the war between Armenia and Azerbaijan is over, the peace process is being pushed forward, there are initialed and signed Washington documents, but the First War and its consequences do not give rest, especially when, according to Baku, they have 4,000 missing persons.

After this, we received the response of the RA National Security Service, which states:

“Your letter dated 07.01.2026, addressed to the Director of the RA National Security Service. In connection with the inquiry, we inform you that in order to increase the efficiency of the work aimed at finding out the fate of missing persons, the Interagency Commission dealing with issues of prisoners, hostages and missing (whereabouts unknown) persons (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) cooperates with all competent bodies and international partners involved in the issues of missing persons, including the International Commission on Missing Persons (ICMP).

The IDMS (Integrated Data Management System) system developed by the International Commission on Missing Persons (ICMP) is intended for each country to manage data on missing persons at the national level. The IDMS system is being implemented in Azerbaijan to unify the various databases that exist in Azerbaijan on one platform.

It does not refer to the creation of a joint Armenian-Azerbaijani database or the storage of Armenian data in Azerbaijan. Each side maintains its own national database, and cooperation is conducted exclusively in a humanitarian format.

In the Republic of Armenia, work is also underway to create a unified electronic registry of missing persons, the purpose of which will be to ensure the most effective management of information, interaction and coordination of work between all involved structures dealing with the issues of missing persons.

As for the search for missing persons between Armenia and Azerbaijan, they are carried out in the working format approved by the respective commissions of both sides, in accordance with the principles of international humanitarian law.

The Republic of Armenia will continue to take all possible measures in 2020. in the direction of finding out the fates of the missing persons during the 44-day war, as well as in the period preceding and following it.

At the same time, we inform you that the Commission publishes all the information subject to public disclosure.”

Let’s record that the NSS did not clearly and concretely address the question whether the arrangements of the former director of the NSS Armen Abazyan were transferred to the practical stage, which was related to the implementation of joint search operations, especially when after that the Azerbaijani side regularly finds relics of its missing persons in the first war in various territories of occupied Artsakh.

After all, information was transmitted before the specific arrangement mentioned by Armen Abazyan.

The NSS directly subordinated to Nikol Pashinyan bypassed another very important question: will the citizens of RA pass relevant confidential information to Baku through the NSS? Hopefully, it is under control and no citizen will try to become a tool in the hands of Azerbaijan against any Armenian, freedom fighter, soldier, commander who went through the first war.

—

We cannot rule out that Russia will follow the relations with Armenia

July 11, 2026

On June 7, the day of national elections in Armenia, Nikol Pashinyan had a briefing with journalists after voting at the polling station. During the briefing, he also referred to the so-called tense relations with Russia and the observation that Russia imposes sanctions on Armenia, Nikol Pashinyan said that such problems happen all the time, it’s another thing that they are being covered now.

“In other words, it is covered due to the interest of the circles of forces operating in Armenia known to you, expenses, etc. Labor issues related to EAEU, not only Armenia-Russia, but also among all countries, there are labor issues of this kind.

Every time on the agenda of the meeting of the EAEU intergovernmental council, we discuss dozens of issues related to such phenomena: phytosanitary issues, standards, exports, re-exports, problems related to the origin of products, because all EAEU countries are worried that the goods of third countries are imported into an EAEU country, become an EAEU product and re-exported to another EAEU country. had said Nikol Pashinyan.

What is the perspective of Armenian-Russian relations after the elections? Is it possible that the RA government will take practical steps regarding the EAEU and the CSTO?

Read also

  • Investors see what is happening with investors and business in general in Armenia
  • Considered a dictator, Aliyev “warns” Pashinyan that dictatorship rarely ends well
  • Before the expected increase in the gas price, the PSC puts a soft pillow under the heads of the citizens

Political scientist Davit Harutyunov according to the assessment, at the moment, the Armenian side is trying to ease the tension, that is, there is an aspiration for mutual contacts at the highest possible level, at the same time, there is a certain reduction of rhetoric.

“It is interesting that Alen Simonyan is leaving the post of Speaker of the National Assembly, because he was one of the main speakers who constantly made anti-Russian statements. Of course, Alen Simonyan is not the only one, and domestically, the authorities are trying to present to the public that the problems that are manageable during contacts will somehow be solved, etc.

And from the Russian side, we see that, on the one hand, there is no deepening of relations, nor are those economic restrictions against Armenia deepened, and on the other hand, contacts with Armenia are being made, but at a low level, because we saw that after the elections, Nikol Pashinyan-Putin did not meet.” 168.amDavit Harutyunov said in a conversation with

According to the political scientist, Russia’s steps in these processes are somewhat unclear, that is, the crisis that started a few months ago was aimed at putting pressure on the RA authorities, or is it about the long-term, consistent deterioration of relations with Armenia, and will these trends continue? There are currently no answers to these questions.

“I think that both options cannot be ruled out, because there were similar tensions in the past, which were somehow resolved, but now we cannot rule out that Russia will continue to deteriorate relations, because Russia will be able to endure without Armenia.

There may be a third option in Armenian-Russian relations, that is, these relations may remain in such a frozen state for a long time,” the political scientist added.

Regarding the CSTO and EAEU, Davit Harutyunov said that the EAEU is a very important structure for Armenia from an economic point of view, therefore, Armenia’s economy will have unpredictable consequences if it is left out of the structure. Although at the moment, Armenia will not leave EAEU on its own initiative, moreover, the government says that it is interested in the work, and they are trying to resolve the tension.

“It is difficult to say what the Russian side will do. In terms of the CSTO, Armenia does not receive many things from the structure at the moment, for a long time, the activity of our country in that structure has been frozen. That’s why I don’t rule out Armenia leaving the structure. At the same time, I think that the structure was left for further “trade”, that is, if the Armenian-Russian relations improve at some stage, then Armenia will start to become more active in the CSTO,” emphasized Davit Harutyunov.

—

Nicole stole the election from us

July 11, 2026

It seems that the regime has further strengthened its position after the last elections.

However, in reality, that “election” was neither legitimate nor fully legal in the true sense of the word.

The international community also understands that Nikol Pashinyan’s government no longer has the legitimacy it once had.

It is impossible to imagine that under the conditions of such administrative pressures, threats, use of social leverage and, as has been mentioned many times, election bribes, it would be possible to obtain the announced results.

Read also

  • Iranian concerns about TRIPP remain. What “mechanism” is Tehran looking for?
  • Pre-election illusions and cold realpolitik. Does Armenia have a real economic alternative?
  • Is the US at a strategic impasse in the war against Iran? Trump continues to threaten and invite “negotiations”

Details in the video




—

Aliyev, who considers him a dictator, “warns” Pashinyan that the dictatorship is rare

July 11, 2026

The fact that Nikol Pashinyan fights against opponents, initiates criminal cases, arrests is seen by everyone, and Aliyev, who repeatedly demanded from Pashinyan to “solve the issues of revanchist forces, eradicate revanchism” in RA and “did everything” to restore the current government, suddenly decided to accuse the same Pashinyan of being a dictator.

In particular, two media outlets promoting the Baku propaganda machine or Aliyev’s theses: minval.az, 1news.az, publish an article with the same title.:

Moreover, 1news.az Kamala Mamedova, editor-in-chief of the online edition, within the framework of the “Bridge of Peace” initiative twice visited Armenia:

And the Azerbaijani media draw attention especially to the post-election persecution of Nikol Pashinyan, the opposition forces and leaders, moreover, here they suddenly remember the European double standards.

Read also

  • Investors see what is happening with investors and business in general in Armenia
  • “Azerbaijan needs an opportune moment to attack.” Grigory Ayvazyan
  • We cannot rule out that the Russian Federation will continue to deteriorate its relations with Armenia. Political scientist

“European and American officials prefer to turn a blind eye to repression, because Pashinyan is pursuing a geopolitical line that is beneficial for them: distancing from CSTO and rapprochement with the EU and the USA. A classic example of a double standard. When the repressions are carried out by the “own” leader, they are qualified as “legal actions within the framework of the legal state”.

When the unwanted or “inconvenient” government does the same, it is called “authoritarianism” and becomes a pretext for sanctions.

However, Western support does not make Armenia more democratic, but rather more dependent.

Pashinyan is gradually turning the country from a Russian outpost into a tool of Western policy in Transcaucasia. History shows that dictatorships, even “pro-European” ones, rarely end well, both for the people and for the neighbors. And in this regard, Armenia is not an exception,” he wrote minval.az:

In turn 1news.az–The article’s author adds:

«During the rule of Robert Kocharyan and Serzh Sargsyan, the country was effectively a military-bureaucratic dictatorship. The government at that time relied on the power bloc and the Karabakh clan, not hiding its harsh style of management.

At that time, the collective West preferred to turn a blind eye to gross violations of human rights and rigging of elections in Armenia, based on pragmatic considerations and the so-called strategic interests related to the regional balance of power.

History repeats itself, with the difference that Western capitals persistently continue to call Pashinyan a “beacon of democracy” in the region, which they did not do to his predecessors.

This allows him to carry out more large-scale repression, taking advantage of the complete carte blanche given by his European and American partners, who prefer to maintain grave silence in the background of the mass arrests taking place in Yerevan.

The situation in the security sector is even more threatening.

Turning into an arena of violent confrontation between Russia and the West, Armenia loses the remains of its subjectivity and becomes a hostage to the game of others.

Instead of the promised stability and prosperity, Pashinyan’s authoritarian regime is persistently pushing his country into internal disturbances and new regional upheavals, making the Armenian state the main victim of the global struggle of great powers.”

Naturally, we have no desire to spread Azeri assessments, even if it is about the regime of Nikol Pashinyan, who speaks from international platforms and podiums about his country’s internal political problems, opponents, and the church.

We are writing this so that Pashinyan, who sacredly keeps confidential information that has the power to shake up the internal situation of Azerbaijan, and in no way notices the Turkish-Azerbaijani interference when it comes to supporting him, sees that the same Aliyev and the Baku propaganda machine can interfere in the internal affairs of Armenia by criticizing his administration and actions.

Aliyev himself jails opposition figures and even journalists, and by and large, it’s not like Europe takes much notice of his dictatorial actions, except for international organizations that occasionally remember imprisoned Azerbaijani journalists.

And what does Aliyev want to show with this, that Nikol Pashinyan is not better than him, that he is forgiven much more? But the dictator of Baku leaves Pashinyan with the responsibility for possible regional upheavals and clashes between the main players.

It is interesting that despite this, Nikol Pashinyan continues to spare Aliyev, and why, Pashinyan himself should answer.

—

DiasporArm at ASOF 2026. Leadership, Knowledge, and Values ​​/ DiasporArm ASOF

English below

 

Dear colleagues,

 

I would like to share with youASOF(Association of Armenian Scientists) annual conferenceDiasporArm, as well as to present DiasporArm’s participation in the aforementioned conference with its three initiatives.«The Leadership Gap» (Leadership Gap), «Armenian encyclopedia»the (Armenopedia) and: «Light»the։

 

https://diasporarm.org/hyw/portfolio/armenian-society-of-fellows-annual-conference-2026/

https://diasporarm.org/hye/portfolio/armenian-society-of-fellows-annual-conference-2026/

 

https://diasporarm.org/hyw/portfolio/diasporarm-at-asof-2026-leadership-knowledge-and-values/

https://diasporarm.org/hye/portfolio/diasporarm-at-asof-2026-leadership-knowledge-and-values/

 

Dear colleagues,

 

I would like to share with you DiasporArm’s article on the Annual Conference of the Armenian Society of Fellows (ASOF), as well as an overview of DiasporArm‘s participation in the conference through its three initiatives: Leadership Gap, Armenopedia, and Luys.

 

https://diasporarm.org/portfolio/armenian-society-of-fellows-annual-conference-2026/

https://diasporarm.org/portfolio/diasporarm-at-asof-2026-leadership-knowledge-and-values/

 

Best regards,

 

Anahit Torosyan

Project coordinator

 

—

Contributor: The Trump administration succeeded in Armenia where others fell s

Title: Contributor: The Trump administration succeeded in Armenia where others fell short
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2026-06-08/trump-administration-armenia-azerbaijan

By Kristina A. Kvien

Guest contributor 

The U.S. and Europe tried unsuccessfully for 35 years to end the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Moscow also failed, sending “peacekeepers” after Azerbaijan’s attacks on Nagorno-Karabakh in 2020; these forces idly watched when Azerbaijan took the entire region and drove out 110,000 ethnic Armenians in 2023.

President Biden’s measured response to the exodus continued the stale “balanced” regional policy that could not overcome decades of hostility. But the dynamic changed under President Trump.

Shortly after taking office for the second time, Trump’s administration decided to quietly but directly engage the Armenian prime minister and the Azerbaijani president to see if a deal could be done in the South Caucasus — a move prompted in part by the powerful American evangelical community that supported Armenia as the world’s first Christian nation. At a summit at the White House last August, both parties committed to the inviolability of international borders, the inadmissibility of the use of force and the opening of regional transportation links.

The Trump administration’s admirably swift progress in a famously difficult part of the world can be credited to favorable conditions combined with innovative approaches not attempted by previous administrations. When Trump assumed office in January 2025, Armenia and Azerbaijan were both seeking to restrain Russian influence in the region. Both saw benefits to working with each other to resolve issues, which was itself a new and positive step. While the work of the Biden administration and European diplomacy set a foundation, their adherence to traditional approaches was not enough to overcome the power differential between the two countries and a peace deal was elusive.

The Trump administration’s frequent high-level engagement with the Armenian prime minister, starting with a White House meeting with Vice President JD Vance less than three weeks after the inauguration, have bolstered Armenia’s position in the talks and incentivized the Azerbaijani president’s more constructive approach.

The element that set the Trump administration’s diplomacy apart was its proposal to develop a U.S.-Armenia project called the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity, an east-west link between Central Asia and Western Europe that will benefit every country along its path by creating or restoring rail, fiber optic and gas pipeline connections.

Direct U.S. involvement in the proposal — branded with Trump’s name — provided each country enough assurance to reach agreement on an issue that had long been a point of contention. Because of U.S. commitments, Armenia expects to control the infrastructure and Azerbaijan expects to retain access.

Once construction is underway the route will provide Armenia with a de facto security guarantee in its most vulnerable region, increasing regional stability and ensuring sovereignty, territorial integrity and jurisdiction — something no other outside negotiator has managed to achieve.

While each conflict is unique, some lessons from Trump’s success in the Caucasus could apply elsewhere. Trump’s public support for the Armenian leader and on-the-ground presence reduced the power imbalance and incentivized Azerbaijan to come to the table.

In Ukraine, a larger and better armed autocrat also threatens a smaller, weaker democracy. Trump-branded projects there could help deter Russian attacks on key infrastructure; the Trump-initiated U.S.-Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund could be a mechanism to develop these joint ventures. Refocusing diplomatic attention from Moscow to Kyiv could better balance the power differential and show Russian leader Vladimir Putin that he stands to lose by obstructing peace.

Positive momentum in Armenia continues. Late last month, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio visited the Armenian capital to keep the commitments moving forward. Sunday’s parliamentary elections affirmed the Armenian public’s support of U.S. engagement and its government’s approach. It also demonstrated that Armenia, like other former Soviet states before it, have tired of toxic Russian “partnership.”

More needs to be done to secure lasting stability, including delimitation of the Armenia-Azerbaijan border, signing and ratification of the peace agreement, Turkish action to open its border with Armenia, Azerbaijani release of Armenian political prisoners and the actual construction of the promised route.

Despite the many other global challenges requiring the attention of the Trump administration, including the U.S.-Israeli-led conflict with neighboring Iran, we may now be seeing the best opportunity in decades for lasting peace in the South Caucasus. Sustained focus and adherence to the principles of last summer’s White House summit offer a promising path forward that should be replicated elsewhere.

Kristina A. Kvien, a career diplomat who was the U.S. ambassador to Armenia from 2023 to 2026, is the president and chief executive of the Pacific Council on International Policy.

Insights

L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.

Viewpoint
This article generally aligns with a Center Right point of view. Learn more about this AI-generated analysis

Perspectives

The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.

Ideas expressed in the piece

  • The article argues that, after 35 years of failed efforts by the United States, Europe and Russia to end the Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict, the dynamic shifted only under President Trump’s second term, particularly following Moscow’s ineffective “peacekeeping” role during the 2020 war and the 2023 exodus of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians.

  • It contends that President Biden’s more traditional and “balanced” regional policy, though contributing some groundwork, could not overcome deep hostility and the power imbalance between Azerbaijan and Armenia, whereas the Trump administration’s decision to engage both leaders quickly and directly produced tangible results.

  • The piece maintains that high-level, early and frequent engagement by Trump officials — including meetings at the White House within weeks of the inauguration — strengthened Armenia’s bargaining position and encouraged a more constructive stance from Azerbaijan, creating conditions for a breakthrough.

  • It highlights the August White House summit, where the Armenian prime minister and the Azerbaijani president committed to the inviolability of borders, the inadmissibility of force and the opening of transportation links, as a historic turning point that brought the parties closer to a sustainable peace than any previous initiative, aligning with descriptions of that declaration in outside analyses.[1][2][3]

  • The article credits the Trump administration’s “innovative” approach, especially the proposal for a U.S.–Armenia infrastructure initiative branded as the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity — a new east-west rail, fiber-optic and gas corridor — arguing that direct U.S. involvement, and Trump’s personal imprimatur, gave both sides the confidence needed to close long-standing gaps.[1][2]

  • It emphasizes that, under the deal, Armenia is expected to control the corridor’s infrastructure while Azerbaijan retains guaranteed access, and it presents this arrangement as a de facto security guarantee for Armenia’s most vulnerable region, enhancing its sovereignty, territorial integrity and jurisdiction in ways other outside mediators never achieved.[1][2]

  • The column suggests that the South Caucasus experience offers a template for other conflicts, asserting that Trump-branded projects and a U.S.-led reconstruction investment fund in Ukraine could help deter Russian attacks on key infrastructure and rebalance power in favor of Kyiv, much as U.S. backing rebalanced power for Yerevan.

  • It interprets continuing U.S. engagement — including a visit to Armenia by the secretary of State and recent Armenian elections endorsing the government’s pro-Western course — as evidence that Trump’s policy has public legitimacy in Armenia and has accelerated the country’s drift away from reliance on Russia.

  • Finally, the article concludes that, although key steps remain — such as border delimitation, a signed and ratified peace treaty, Turkish-Armenian border opening, the release of Armenian political prisoners and actual construction of the route — this moment represents the best opportunity in decades for lasting peace in the South Caucasus if the Trump administration sustains focus and replicates these principles elsewhere.

Different views on the topic

  • In contrast to claims that the White House summit produced a definitive peace, some analysts emphasize that the August 8 joint declaration is a political framework rather than a legally binding peace treaty, noting that it does not itself end the 37-year conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh but instead sketches goals such as border delimitation, renunciation of force and the opening of transport links that still require arduous follow-through.[2][3]

  • Critics point out that Azerbaijan’s behavior since the declaration — including what human rights advocates describe as sham trials of Armenian detainees and demands that Armenia change its constitution as a precondition for signing a peace agreement — demonstrates that Baku continues to wield its military and political advantage to exert pressure on Yerevan, calling into question the notion that the power imbalance has been fully addressed.[3]

  • From this perspective, the current arrangement is seen as fragile precisely because it sidesteps unresolved justice issues: observers stress the need for clarity on the fate of missing persons, the return or fair treatment of prisoners of war and accountability for abuses against Armenians from Nagorno-Karabakh, arguing that without such measures the deal risks cementing an unequal status quo rather than delivering a durable, rights-based peace.[1][2][3]

  • Some peacebuilding organizations therefore describe the August framework not as a final settlement but as a “fragile framework” that requires sustained international engagement, warning that setbacks in border demarcation, security guarantees or political will in either capital could quickly undermine the progress made in Washington.[3]

  • In addition, several policy experts argue that focusing too narrowly on a single U.S.-branded corridor is insufficient to lock in long-term stability; they instead advocate a broader regional economic compact among Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkey, backed by the United States, the European Union and Gulf partners, and call for a South Caucasus stability fund to coordinate multiple projects so that peace dividends are widely shared and not tied to one route.[1]

  • Regional specialists also note that key elements of a comprehensive peace — including a finalized and signed peace treaty, detailed border delimitation and robust confidence-building measures — remain incomplete, leading them to caution against portraying the Trump initiative as a finished success rather than a step in a longer, uncertain process.[1][3]

  • Conflict trackers add that the risk of renewed confrontation has not disappeared: outstanding disputes over the Armenia-Azerbaijan border and unresolved questions about the future or possible return of Armenians displaced from Nagorno-Karabakh are cited as potential flashpoints that could re-ignite tensions despite the Washington declaration.[2][3]

  • Finally, some observers emphasize continuity across administrations, noting that years of diplomacy by previous U.S. governments, European institutions and the OSCE Minsk Group, combined with battlefield outcomes in 2020 and war fatigue in both societies, steadily moved the parties toward compromise; in this reading, the 2025 breakthrough is better understood as the culmination of a protracted process rather than the singular achievement of one administration.[1][2]

—

Arrmenpress: Qatar urges U.S. and Iran to continue negotiations

Iran18:00, 10 July 2026
Read the article in: FrançaisՀայերենRussian

Qatar has called on the United States and Iran to remain committed to the memorandum of understanding reached between them and continue negotiations to prevent further escalation.

Qatari Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani said in a post on X that he made the call during a phone conversation with Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty.

The two ministers discussed bilateral cooperation between their countries and ways to support and strengthen it. They also reviewed the latest regional developments, particularly diplomatic efforts and joint coordination aimed at reducing tensions and enhancing security and stability in the region.

Al Thani also stressed the importance of safeguarding freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, warning that safe passage remains a key prerequisite for regional security.

He reaffirmed Qatar’s full support for all efforts aimed at de-escalation and achieving a comprehensive agreement that would ensure lasting peace in the region.

Read the article in: FrançaisՀայերենRussian

Published by Armenpress, original at 
—

Hungary to receive €10 billion in EU funding

Europe19:08, 10 July 2026
Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

European Union finance ministers have approved the allocation of €10 billion in funding to Hungary.

Hungarian Prime Minister Péter Magyar announced the decision in a post on X.

“The billions in EU funding will finally arrive. We promised, and we delivered.

Hungary’s EU Recovery and Resilience Plan has just received the unanimous approval of EU finance ministers. This removes the final obstacle to unlocking up to €10 billion in EU funds.

Many did not believe it could be done. Many thought it was impossible. Fidesz tried to obstruct it, while we worked tirelessly for three months and delivered.

The billions in EU funding are finally on their way and will go exactly where they belong: to the Hungarian people, by directly supporting transportation infrastructure, energy security, healthcare, water management, and local businesses.

Long live a European Hungary!” Magyar wrote.

Read the article in: ArmenianRussian:

Published by Armenpress, original at 
—