The Declaration of Independence is a declaration of conflict: Nikol Pashinyan

Aysor, Armenia
Mar 19 2026

The issue of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution is Armenia’s internal matter, Nikol Pashinyan told reporters.

“It is necessary for us, not for others, for us to position ourselves in the world,” he noted.

According to Pashinyan, the Declaration of Independence is a declaration of conflict and a declaration of dependence.

“I will present all of this in the near future, but I want to emphasize again that we need this conversation. We have not discussed it with any external force, we are not discussing it and will not discuss it. We are discussing it with our people,” he said.

Pashinyan is in a panic and has grounds for it: Marianna Ghahramanyan

Aysor, Armenia
Mar 19 2026

Pashinyan is in a panic and has grounds for it, said Marianna Ghahramanyan, spokesperson for the Strong Armenia party.

“In response to inquiries received from a number of media outlets regarding Nikol Pashinyan’s desperate statements, we fully understand him. Nikol Pashinyan clearly sees and realizes what is happening.

The latest sociological surveys show that he will soon leave office – in two months. His reaction is very natural. Pashinyan is in a panic and has grounds for it… If he needs help, we are ready to help,” Ghahramanyan noted. 

The Civil Contract voted “abstain” on the question “Azerbaijan should not int

Aysor, Armenia
Mar 19 2026

Hayk Mamijanyan, head of the I Have Honor faction in the National Assembly of Armenia, provided details from Brussels.

He noted that members of Civil Contract “abstained” on the question stating that Azerbaijan should not interfere in the internal affairs and territorial integrity of Armenia.

Mamijanyan also said that Civil Contract members once again voted against including a proposal on the Armenian Genocide in the statement.

Details are available in the video.

After the ICRC’s departure, the status of Armenian prisoners in Baku remains

Aysor, Armenia
Mar 19 2026

The relatives of the Armenian prisoners held in Baku have been deprived of the opportunity to see them for more than two years. The families are deeply concerned about their health. The last time the Armenian prisoners had independent access was to representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross. The ICRC was the only organization that visited their places of detention, but on September 3, 2025, it ceased its activities in Azerbaijan at the request of the government of that country. This is stated in the statement released by Ruben Vardanyan’s family.

In these circumstances, the issue of the legal status of prisoners, in the sense in which it is considered under international humanitarian law, acquires special significance. It is with a request to obtain clarification on this issue that Veronika Zonabend appealed to the President of the International Committee of the Red Cross, Mirjana Spoljaric Egger.

We publish the letter and reiterate our request to provide clarification on the legal status of Armenian prisoners during the period when ICRC representatives visited them:

“Dear President Spoljaric,

I am writing to you on behalf of my husband, Ruben Vardanyan, an Armenian citizen, philanthropist, and former State Minister of Nagorno-Karabakh, who was illegally detained by the Azerbaijani authorities on 27 September 2023 while attempting to leave Nagorno-Karabakh for Armenia.

I would like to express my sincere appreciation for the work of the International Committee of the Red Cross. ICRC’s role and mandate are truly unique and unparalleled. In times of cruelty, war, and injustice, the ICRC remains a rare symbol of dignity, compassion, and humanity with the noble mission of protecting the vulnerable. The ICRC is one of the few international organizations in which team members have not lost their sense of mission and continue to approach their work with humanity and care. We deeply appreciate the ICRC delegates’ visits to Ruben at his place of detention in Azerbaijan. For our family, and I am sure for the families of other detained Armenians, your visits mean far more than a formal procedure.

I write with full understanding of the ICRC’s humanitarian mandate, as well as its long-established principles of confidentiality, impartiality, and neutrality. At the same time, for the families of individuals who remain unlawfully detained, it is of profound importance to receive an impartial and professionally grounded understanding of the detainees’ legal status in Azerbaijan at the time of the ICRC delegates’ visits.

This need for clarity is rendered all the more urgent in light of the manifestly deficient judicial proceedings in Azerbaijan, including trials that lack fundamental guarantees and charges that appear devoid of factual and legal basis. The suffering inflicted on the families of the detainees as a result of their unlawful detention and the conduct of proceedings that lack fundamental fairness is further aggravated by the dissemination of misleading information and the deliberate misrepresentation of the detainees’ status by the Azerbaijani authorities, who publicly and repeatedly label them as “terrorists.”

In this context, I respectfully ask for clarification of the specific legal status under which Ruben and other Armenian detainees were visited by ICRC delegates. In particular, we seek to understand whether they were considered by the ICRC as persons deprived of liberty in relation to an armed conflict, and as such whether they were prisoners of war, security detainees, internees, or have another status under applicable rules of international humanitarian law.

Such clarification would be of exceptional value. It would provide much-needed reassurance to families and contribute meaningfully to an objective understanding of how the detainees are regarded under international humanitarian law and the ICRC’s humanitarian visiting standards.

Allow me to conclude by expressing sincere gratitude for the humanity and dignity the ICRC brings to its work, qualities that remain indispensable in a world where they are too often in short supply.

Finally, I address you not only in your official capacity, but also with a deeply personal appeal to the organization whose mission has always been to place the protection of human life, dignity, and justice above formalities and political considerations. For families like ours, who are living through the anguish of prolonged and unlawful detention of our loved ones, this belief in the ICRC’s humanitarian conscience is a source of hope. I sincerely trust that this same spirit will guide your attention to the situation of Ruben and other Armenian detainees.

Yours sincerely,

Veronika Zonabend”

Connecting the energy systems of Armenia and Turkey will have a serious econom

Aysor, Armenia
Mar 19 2026

We discussed the issue of connecting the energy systems of Armenia and Turkey with the Turkish Minister of Energy, David Khudatyan, Minister of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure, said in response to a question from Aysor.am. According to him, it could have a serious economic impact on Armenia’s economy.

Khudatyan noted that the two countries have decided to conduct studies on this issue to understand the scale of the necessary investments.

“We are ready to make these investments and start the work in advance, with the understanding that our Turkish partners will also do the same, which will provide additional strength to the energy systems of Armenia and Turkey,” the minister emphasized.

When asked whether he sees risks of security problems, David Khudatyan responded: “The energy system of Armenia is connected to the energy systems of Iran and Georgia. These countries import and export electricity, and we are going to do the same with Turkey.”

Zakharova: Russia expects Armenia to fulfill its obligations within EAEU

ARKA, Armenia
Mar 19 2026
19.03.2026, 10:31

Moscow expects Yerevan to fulfill its obligations within the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova stated at a briefing on Wednesday.
YEREVAN, March 19. /ARKA/. Moscow expects Yerevan to fulfill its obligations within the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova stated at a briefing on Wednesday.

Speaking about the Armenian Prime Minister’s statement in the European Parliament regarding Armenia’s continued European integration, Zakharova said it was unclear what such a statement was based on, “given the deep crisis into which the European Union has driven itself.”

She noted that Armenia is a full member of the CIS and the EAEU, including the rule-making processes within these associations.

According to her, Armenia’s economy is demonstrating growth above the global average and is largely linked to trade and economic cooperation within the EAEU.

“We have repeatedly stated that simultaneous participation in European and Eurasian integration projects is impossible. “This defies logic and the laws of economics. This isn’t a political assessment—it’s Armenia’s sovereign matter—but a statement of fact,” she said.

Zakharova also expressed hope that the Armenian leadership, which had previously stated its intention to continue cooperation within the EAEU and not create obstacles for Russian business, would honor its commitments or clarify its position.

Earlier, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan stated that Armenia is moving toward compliance with EU standards while maintaining its membership in the EAEU. He added that while both are possible, Armenia will remain a member of the Eurasian Economic Union, and when that becomes impossible, “we, together with the citizens of Armenia, will make a decision dictated by the free _expression_ of the will of the Armenian people.”

#EAEU

Pashinyan offers increase in housing aid for Nagorno-Karabakh refugees ahead o

OC Media
Mar 19 2026

Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has announced plans to increase funding for the state housing programme supporting Nagorno-Karabakh Armenian refugees seeking to purchase homes in areas near the capital. The move, announced on Wednesday, comes ahead of the  parliamentary elections scheduled for 7 June.

Pashinyan said the relevant decision would be adopted in ‘one to two months’ and would be retroactive for certificates already issued for those communities.

Assistance will rise from ֏3 million ($8,000) to ֏4 million ($11,000) per person in each family in those communities adjacent to Yerevan.

However, allocations for Yerevan itself — currently the lowest — will not increase, in line with the government’s broader policy of encouraging settlement outside of the capital.

Armenia’s housing policy continues to plague Nagorno-Karabakh refugees

The housing programme, approved in May 2024, has faced criticism from some of its intended beneficiaries, who accuse the government of failing to take their needs into account.

It offers between ֏2–֏5 million ($5,200–$13,000) per person, depending on location, with higher amounts allocated to border and remote settlements. Despite later adjustments following low numbers of applicants to the programme and criticism, many complaints remain.

The increase in the allocation comes ahead of the Armenian parliamentary elections. In a similar manner, Pashinyan has announced plans to increase pensions in the country by up to ֏10,000 ($27) starting in April.

Separately, in March, Armenian authorities also adopted decisions to increase salaries and provide bonuses to state servants ahead of the vote, which critics say is tied to efforts at winning their support ahead of the elections.

Armenia announces plans to increase pensions ahead of elections

The pledge to increase housing aid was made on Wednesday during a conference conveyed to address the issues of Nagorno-Karabakh Armenian refugees, some of whom were in attendance.

‘I consider it very important that we help our sisters and brothers displaced from [Nagorno]-Karabakh to get out of this psychological state of searching’, Pashinyan said during the conference.

He also underscored the need to ‘help’ them to settle in Armenia and ‘permanently link their and their families’ fate with’ the country.

Pashinyan added that since 2023, when almost the entire population of Nagorno-Karabakh, over 100,000 Armenians, fled following Azerbaijan’s final offensive and the surrender of Armenian authorities, ‘about ֏145 billion ($384 million)’ had been allocated from the state budget ‘under various programs to meet the needs’ of refugees.

Citing Pashinyan’s remark that only 1,700 families have benefited from the housing programme so far, former Nagorno-Karabakh State Minister Artak Beglaryan reiterated earlier criticism of the programme. ‘We were targeted and insulted in every possible way’, he said.

Beglaryan brought up previously stated concerns that the allocated amount for the housing programme did not correspond to the market prices of apartments, arguing that Armenian authorities ‘avoided facing reality’.

Beglaryan described the proposed increase as ‘good for thousands of families, but it is an incomplete and belated decision’. He warned that the secondary market ‘will again respond and largely neutralise the increase in support’.

In turn, a former Minister of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure of the Nagorno-Karabakh, Hayk Khanumyan, criticised the format of the meeting. He  said that organising expressions of gratitude by refugees working in local administrations resembled a ‘method that has not been used after the Brezhnev era’, referring to the late Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev.

‘There is no need to return to Brezhnev-era practices. It is better to work with representatives of the Artsakh [Nagorno-Karabakh] Armenians, ensure participation, make existing programs more effective, and develop new ones’, Khanumyan wrote.

He added that such representatives could include former community and regional leaders, ‘who maintain contact with their populations, are well aware of the issues, and can propose effective solutions’.

As of 1 February, around 15,000 Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians who fled to Armenia in the 2023 exodus have left the country and not returned, according to official statistics.

For ease of reading, we choose not to use qualifiers such as ‘de facto’, ‘unrecognised’, or ‘partially recognised’ when discussing institutions or political positions within Abkhazia, Nagorno-Karabakh, and South Ossetia. This does not imply a position on their status.


Moscow accuses Yerevan of ‘destroying traditions’ in its confrontation with Ar

OC Media
Mar 19 2026

Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova has criticised the ongoing confrontation between the Armenian government and the Armenian Apostolic Church, calling it ‘extremely destructive’ and warning that it risks ‘politicising and marginalising issues of faith’.

Zakharova’s statement came in response to a question regarding Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s recent remarks at the EU Parliament in March, in which he addressed the ongoing confrontation between his government and the Church, which has been ongoing since May 2025.

At the time, he suggested that some Armenian clergy ‘were agents of the USSR KGB’, which he said ‘is proven by documents’.

In late December 2025, Civic.am, also affiliated with Pashinyan’s ruling Civil Contract party, published what it claimed were declassified documents from the Armenian National Security Service (NSS), allegedly showing that Archbishop Yezras Nersisyan, Catholicos Karekin II’s brother, had cooperated with the KGB in 1986–1988.

He further accused the Church leadership of ‘assum[ing] the leadership of the war party in Armenia, consolidating around them the former leaders of Armenia, some forces associated with them, some pro-Russian and pro-Belarusian oligarchs, and are trying to sacrifice Armenia’s independence to the interests of third countries’.

Explainer | How Pashinyan is working to topple Catholicos Karekin II

In her Wednesday response, Zakharova criticised Pashinyan for referring to the clergy as ‘KGB agents’ in his speech and accused him of using the rhetoric ‘to gain popularity among pro-Western circles’.

She further assessed the possible outcome of ‘politicising and marginalising issues of faith, religious belief, the church’, suggesting it could result in ‘a dangerous rift in society’.

‘In fact, to a greater extent, [politicising issues related to the Church] destroys not just the reputations or political, social, or religious careers of specific individuals, but the very foundations of society in which a particular religious doctrine prevails. They destroy traditions and sow disbelief’, Zakharova said.

Russian Orthodox Church accuses Armenian government of ‘engineering schism’ within Armenian Church

Zakharova clarified that she does not mean society should not be exposed to the ‘truth’ and ‘facts’.

‘There are ways, examples of how sensitive issues are resolved tactfully’, she said, without elaborating on the examples she meant.

‘Instead of focusing on the truly pressing issues of Armenian society, these politicised religious issues become a “bogeyman”, a diversionary tactic to prevent real problems from being addressed, directing attention instead toward endless quarrels, squabbles, and debates of the most destructive kind’, Zakharova said.

Armenian authorities have not responded to the accusation as of publication.

Previously, in June 2025, Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan responded to a statement from his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov, urging him ‘to refrain from interfering in Armenia’s domestic affairs and internal politics’.

This followed Lavrov calling ‘attacks on the canonical thousand-year-old Armenian Apostolic Church are a matter of grave concern’.

Armenia urges Russia not to interfere in its internal affairs

East vs West

Aside from the Armenian Church–government conflict, Zakharova was asked about Pashinyan’s remarks at the EU Parliament, in which he reaffirmed Armenia’s commitment to EU integration.

‘If the EU accepts Armenia as a full member, it is very good. If it does not, we will still benefit, because we will be a country that complies with EU standards’, Pashinyan said then.

Zakharova characterised Pashinyan’s comments as illustrative of Armenia ‘putting itself in checkmate’, while also highlighting Armenia’s benefits from its membership in the Russia-led Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).

‘In this sense, it is noteworthy that abstract “EU standards” and Armenia’s European development vector are presented as an unconditional good […] The picture is certainly beautiful, but it is unclear what it is actually based on, given the deep crisis the EU has gotten itself into’, Zakharova said.

She reiterated Moscow’s official stance that simultaneous membership in the two economic blocs was impossible.

‘Planning to implement EU standards while expecting to avoid conflicts with EAEU norms and regulations is simply unrealistic’, Zakharova said.

Growing investment and energy plans reshape Armenia’s AI future

Mar 19 2026

Rising investment, infrastructure expansion and energy planning suggest Armenia is building the foundations for a more competitive and sustainable position in the global AI landscape.

Armenia’s recent technology announcements are helping to form a clearer national AI strategy with stronger coordination. A memorandum with the US on semiconductors and AI now appears to be moving beyond symbolic commitment into action.

Momentum has accelerated with plans to expand a large-scale AI factory backed by significant investment. The project is estimated at around $4 billion and includes tens of thousands of advanced GPUs to support large-scale development.

The initiative is already entering construction, marking a shift from concept to execution in a short timeframe. Officials have described a broader vision of building a network of AI factories across the country.

Energy planning is becoming central, with discussions around deploying a small modular nuclear reactor to meet demand. Stable and scalable power is considered essential for sustaining long-term AI infrastructure growth.

Efforts are also targeting the wider ecosystem through a Virtual AI Institute and planned GPU access for startups. These steps aim to strengthen research capacity and ensure local participation in the country’s AI expansion.

Blogger Lapshin detained again in Armenia at Belarus’s request

Mar 19 2026

Blogger Lapshin detained again in Armenia at Belarus’s request

Blogger Alexander Lapshin himself told Radio Svaboda on the afternoon of March 19 that he had been detained again in Armenia at the request of the Belarusian authorities. This happened on March 19 at Yerevan airport, from where Lapshin was heading to Strasbourg.

«I was flying out of Yerevan and was detained again at Belarus’s request, for the sixth time already,» Lapshin told Radio Svaboda. «Belarus has updated the charges. Because previously, the Armenian Prosecutor General’s Office decided to remove the search warrant. What did Belarus do? They sent a new search warrant. For absolutely the same charges — insulting Lukashenka, calls for something. The standard set. And I was detained again. This time it was very rude on the part of the National Security Service of Armenia.»

According to Lapshin, during the detention, he managed to call the police, who arrived at the airport three hours later. After that, the blogger was released, but he missed his flight.

«The police released me; the officers explained that the search warrant against me had been lifted,» Alexander Lapshin recounts. «But the plane took off without me. I was flying to Strasbourg on legal matters. Now I’m back in Yerevan, I’ll have to buy new expensive tickets. And I will file a lawsuit against the Armenian border service. I will demand compensation from them.»

Lapshin’s previous detention occurred last spring. On May 2, 2025, at the airport of Armenia’s capital Yerevan, local border guards informed Israeli citizen and blogger Alexander Lapshin that he was detained at the request of the Belarusian authorities and had to go to a police station.

«I arrived — and was detained again, spent two hours at the airport,» Lapshin told Radio Svaboda then. «They said it was again at Belarus’s request. What they do is slightly change the accusation. They add some article, I don’t even know which one. Last time there were seven articles of the Criminal Code of Belarus, now there are eight. And this, it turns out, is already a different request. I spent two hours, then they released me. But this is legal terrorism, this is exactly what the Belarusian authorities are engaged in.»

Alexander’s problems in relations with official Minsk began in 2016, when he was detained in Belarus. The reason was a criminal case initiated against Lapshin in Azerbaijan for visiting the territory of Nagorno-Karabakh, which Baku did not control at that time. And although Moscow and Israel asked for Lapshin’s release, Minsk handed the blogger over to Azerbaijan. There, Lapshin was sentenced to three years, and in September 2017, Ilham Aliyev personally pardoned the blogger, allowing him to leave for Israel.

After his release, Alexander Lapshin filed a complaint with the UN regarding the actions of the Belarusian authorities, where the violation of his rights was recognized, and he wrote and spoke everything he thought about the actions of the Belarusian authorities and Alexander Lukashenka personally. This resulted in new problems. The first time Lapshin was detained in Armenia at the request of the Belarusian authorities was in September 2024. He was then informed that Minsk accused him under seven articles of the Criminal Code, and he was released after four hours. The Prosecutor General’s Office of Armenia officially refused Belarus’s request for Lapshin’s extradition.

After that incident, Alexander Lapshin visited Armenia several more times, arriving and departing without problems. Until May 2025, when after another detention at the airport, Alexander decided to have his name removed from the «Belarusian criminal list» by filing a lawsuit with an Armenian court. In February 2026, an Armenian court recognized that Belarus’s accusations against Alexander Lapshin contradict Armenian legal norms, but it is impossible to stop the blogger’s detentions during visits to Armenia. Lapshin himself can do this by addressing his claims directly to the Belarusian authorities.