Official nonsense is becoming an “industry” in Armenia

As a result of new investments, we are turning the healthcare sector into an industry in Armenia, Nikol Pashinyan said at the government meeting.


In fact, official empty talk is becoming an “industry” in Armenia. In other words, to use some phrases or expressions that leave the impression of a “poor” speech on those public layers that are guided by words, not thoughts.


As a philosopher once pointed out, most people do not have thoughts. Instead of thoughts, they have words in their heads, which are perceived as thoughts. And when a new word comes along, people seem to have an idea in their head.


Now, Nikol Pashinyan is trying to leave an impression of his thoughts on his electorate with words.


Health care in Armenia has turned into a business process a long time ago, which of course has its good and bad sides. But, in general, Nikol Pashinyan’s government has no merit in the “industrialization” of Armenia’s healthcare system. Comprehensive health insurance is not the merit of Nikol Pashinyan’s government, but the taxpayers of Armenia. The merit of the government would be the developed reform, which would ensure for citizens not only the “freedom” of a certain part of health services, but the convenience of using the first-line service. And that means convenience for the service provider as well. for the doctor.


In practice, the law on AHA, which was hastily adopted at the end of the year, is just a solution to an attempt to collect money from taxpayers and thereby create a pre-election propaganda impression of “free” healthcare, relying on the fact that people will perceive the very words as thought.


Because, I will repeat, the implemented system does not provide a really developed comfortable system of providing and receiving service, which could be achieved in case of implementation of a really developed concept.


But people, the power that is not able to introduce even a basic convenient system of paying for city transport, so that a person does not have to become a technology specialist in order to use it, naturally will not be able to present to the public a truly convenient health insurance system. Instead, the public’s ears will be filled with words.


Hakob Badalyan




Decisions regarding the people of Artsakh are made without Artsakh

Decisions regarding the people of Artsakh are made without discussion with the people of Artsakh, the RA government acts in disregard of the principle of participation in these matters. All important decisions were made that way. Organizing an event where the employees of the regional administrations and extended communities of Artsakh will thank the government and municipal authorities with paper and without paper is a method that has not been used since the Brezhnev period.


It is not necessary to return to the revolutionary period, it is better to work with the figures representing the people of Artsakh, to ensure participation, to make the existing programs more effective, to develop new ones. Heads of Artsakh communities, heads of regions can act as such representatives, they maintain ties with their population, are well aware of problems, and can offer effective solutions.


We see that the RA government avoids communicating with the political-state circles of Artsakh, in this case the best institution is the representatives of the local self-government and territorial administration bodies of Artsakh, which were not politicized.


Former deputy of Artsakh National Assembly, former Minister of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure Hayk Khanumyan




Specialists continue to join the “Offer to Armenia” initiative

Economist Narek Kostanyan joined the “Propose Armenia” initiative.

The “Offer to Armenia” project is an unprecedented re-party platform with a great potential for consolidation, which, touching upon the multifaceted challenges facing our motherland and justifying the urgency of their systemic solution, is capable of uniting experienced and reputable professionals and patriotic individuals from various fields.

Taking all this into account, I join the “Offer to Armenia” project and am ready to use my knowledge, experience and abilities to contribute to the strengthening of our motherland.

Why has this step not been taken yet? it could have saved the lives of our soldiers

Narek Karapetyan, chairman of the board of the “Strong Armenia” party, responded to the criticisms that refer to the involvement of foreign specialists in their security program, in particular, the participation of an Israeli expert.


According to Karapetyan, to ensure the safety of soldiers, it is necessary to cooperate with the best specialists in the world, regardless of their country. According to his presentation, the general involved in the program is considered one of the leading experts in the field of air defense.


“We have made great efforts to involve him and his team in the process of restoring and modernizing the air defense system of Armenia,” he said, reminding that a significant part of the Armenian losses in the 2020 war was due to the problems of the air defense system itself.


Referring to the criticisms, Karapetyan formulated the issue more sharply.
“If your son is at the border, in the positions, and “Bayraktar” flies over his head, will you say why you brought a Jewish specialist to shoot him down, or will you say that you did the right thing?”

Pashinyan described the statements of the President of Azerbaijan as very dangerous

Photo: primeminister.am

The Prime Minister of Armenia, Nikol Pashinyan, called the statements of the President of Azerbaijan, which contain territorial ambitions for Armenian sovereignty, very dangerous.


During the briefing held in the government on March 19, the head of the executive emphasized that this process requires competent management and an exclusively legitimate, state-centered approach. Answering the question about the methods of combating such aggressive rhetoric, the Prime Minister pointed out the effect of mirror reflection in diplomacy.


According to him, when slogans about the belonging of Ararat, Artsakh or Dadivank are heard in Armenia, it gives Baku a good opportunity to promote the concept of “Western Azerbaijan”, and vice versa. In order to break through this vicious cycle of mutual historical demands, Pashinyan called for the logic of a “strategic deal” between the two states.


The Prime Minister reminded that the first important step on that path has already been taken. the peace agreement has been initialed, and now the parties need to build further work on this very basis, minimizing political vulnerability.

Aliyev’s man, the guarantor of keeping Armenia on the bottom

Imagine a situation when someone in your neighborhood has told you very directly to your face for years that he will come to solve your and your brother’s issues, he said it is not enough, and he has also regularly shown that he is preparing for it. He buys weapons, trains, comes and scouts the location of your house and your yard.


In short, you have put your hope on the neighboring “good guys” that if they come, they will stand behind you, there will be no one to say anything to you and your brother. One day they come after you, no “good guy” comes from the side yard, instead he silently watches how they solve your problems. During this fight, your brother is seriously injured or we can say killed, and you are also plastered on the floor. Now after that the murderer says: look, I’ll come after you too, if I don’t see you suddenly, get up, you’ll be plastered on the floor, you’ll stay like that, one thing: I’ll solve your questions. During that time, distant neighbors and friends come and say: come, let’s help you get up from the floor, exercise a little, get stronger, we can stand on your back for a while, you will come to your senses. Instead, you say no, you start worshiping your brother’s killer, justifying him, telling all the policemen that he did the right thing, I never had a brother like him, I was wrong to think about a healthy life. You become his henchman, you don’t want to get up in any way, you start to make it normal and pleasant to be lying on the floor. Then, when people come with the goal of training, getting stronger, and self-defense, you say, “Why, you have to stay down.”


Aliyev’s man, the supreme “mutilovshik”, is the guarantor of keeping Armenia on the ground, so whoever comes, good or not so good, but puts forward any idea to get up from the ground, is aggressive, gets to the point.


The man who came in 2018 with unprecedented popular support, in the last eight years brought three wars, actual genocide, brought upon us Aliyev’s concept of aggression, brought humiliation and humiliation, agreed to become Aliyev’s man, alone, to stay in power and ensure that Armenia remains at the bottom. It won’t work. Armenia will stand up, even if alone, precisely because the enemy has directly said to its front that it will come from behind, and this time it is necessary to prevent that fateful day by being strong, not relying on the neighboring “good guys” or the enemy’s non-existent goodwill…


Azerbaijani scholar Tatevik Hayrapetyan




Why is the government maneuvering in Karapetyan’s case? Surens

Photo: primeminister.am

The pre-election processes and the reorganization of the opposition field continue to be at the core of Armenia’s domestic political agenda. What is the effect of the government’s legal actions against political opponents, especially the prime minister? Nikol Pashinyan thrown into battle Samvel Karapetyan Is it possible to fully consolidate the opposition and will foreign political discourses play a decisive role in the decision of the voters? VERELQ talked with political scientist Suren Surenyants about these and other key topics.



 


The photo shows Suren Surenyants, source: 168.am


VERELQ. Mr. Surenyants, as a political scientist, how do you interpret keeping Samvel Karapetyan in prison for a long time? first in prison and then under house arrest. Is this really a way to weaken his influence or, by and large, strengthen him in terms of the final effect?


Suren Surenyants. I think that in the beginning, that imprisonment was rather a punitive action, because at the initial stage, it was difficult to calculate how Samvel Karapetyan would behave in the election process. And in the beginning, the authorities obviously followed the path of repressive methods. if you remember, pre-trial detention was chosen as a deterrent, in a rather strict regime, in the National Security Service. But when the election process started, that is, it became clear to them that Samvel Karapetyan is becoming one of the main actors, they began to at least wonder how to deal with the restraining order. It was during that time that a milder measure of restraint was chosen, a relatively mild house arrest, which is no longer adequate for the person’s actions, naturally, not adequate at all. I think that now the government does not have a clear answer to this question and is maneuvering itself. choose not to leave with a signature or keep under house arrest? It is not really obvious which deterrent works more for the government or against it.


VERELQ. It is clear. And now, when various sociological polls are ordered and carried out, how do you assess his chances, Samvel Karapetyan? Does the power he created really have a chance to come second or win? Do you see that desire to win in him at all?


Suren Surenyants. You know, the question has two layers. This electoral process differs from others in that, I think, there is no obvious opposition favorite. But that doesn’t mean that there is no opposition leadership, just that leadership is multi-polar. In other words, there are three to four opposition consolidation centers. for example, Tsarukyan, Samvel Karapetyan, Kocharyan, as well as Arman Tatoyan has a certain consolidation around him. This is the feature of this electoral process, the multi-polarity of the opposition leadership. Therefore, at this time it is very difficult to predict with certainty what the configuration of these poles will be. Samvel Karapetyan’s pole is certainly one of the inevitable guiding forces. As for the desire to win, honestly, I don’t want to give an assessment. I think yes, he wants to win. But talking about the victory of one force is pointless in any case, because the model that existed in Gyumri can really be repeated. In other words, there must be several opposition forces, it is inevitable, because one opposition pole cannot win, even the sum of two opposition poles will not satisfy. In case of victory, the new government must have at least three components here.


VERELQ. Got it. In other words, you don’t see the formal consolidation of the opposition in the pre-election period, i.e. in one list, but is it possible in the post-election period? 


Suren Surenyants. No, it is utopia, impossible and unnatural, and from the point of view of the electoral process, even harmful. Because it is not clear that a single opposition list will lead to the consolidation of the entire opposition electorate. In general, when society sees unnatural associations, a number of opposition groups with strong principled positions may even be disappointed due to their value orientations. And so, in the presence of three or four poles, all opposition groups will find their microphone. That is, when everyone unites in an unnatural way, everyone has their favorite or disliked figure there, and based on that they either vote, or not. It is not a fact that it will bring success, especially since there is no such leader with a big advantage in terms of rating, around which everyone will naturally unite. For example, there is no Levon Ter-Petrosyan phenomenon of 2008, no Vazgen Manukyan phenomenon of 1996, that one person is incomparably ahead of everyone else in terms of rating, and people naturally unite around him. If there is no such thing, this multi-polar structure of the opposition is much more optimal and will cover the opposition electorate to the maximum.


VERELQ. And what effect will foreign political discourses and discussions have on this pre-election struggle? Will the impact be strong, decisive or not?


Suren Surenyants. The government will do anything to push that narrative, understandably, because they have a clear position, and that’s why they put the hybrid threat legend or myth into circulation. But, for example, I was in Goris yesterday and without a microphone I just talked with ordinary citizens on the streets. I can say with certainty (it’s not just the image of Goris, I made that approbation in Yerevan as well) that people are primarily interested in their quality of life and social problems.


VERELQ. In other words, are these narratives used for elitist discussions in Yerevan?


Suren Surenyants. Well, they have a certain role, but it will be very difficult to get out of the circles of the elite. the general classes of society are very little interested in it.

No biography, no experience. Iveta Tonoyan’s answer to Pashinyan

In response to the requests of my colleagues from various mass media, I will briefly respond to today’s statements of the head of the authorities.

The vast majority of the members of the political team that came to power in 2018 did not even have a work book and their first job was to occupy a minister, deputy or other high-ranking government positions. We are all facing the painful consequences of running the country with lack of biography and experience.

Perhaps this is the reason why the head of today’s political force has a pronounced antagonism towards those figures who built, not destroyed, created good, not destroyed values ​​in Armenia and Artsakh throughout their lives.


Iveta Tonoyan




Verelq: Pashinyan told yet another disgusting lie

Lilit Galstyan, member of the ARF Bureau, member of the National Assembly “Hayastan” faction, writes:


“Today, another disgusting lie was told once again. At the press conference, Pashinyan announced that the director of the Genocide Museum-Institute, E. Gzoyan, was fired by J. D. Van for dedicating the book “The Artsakh Question” and disrupting the peace process. A LIE and a disgusting LIE…


The book dedicated to Vance has the following title: “Azerbaijani aggression against Armenians in Transcaucasia in 1905-1921 according to American press/sources”.


First, let me remind you that the “Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute” is a foundation, and the appointment and dismissal of the director is carried out by the board of trustees.


Nevertheless, Pashinan publicly admitted that Gzoyan was fired on his orders. And Minister Andreasyan devoted himself to the cause and the idea.


In an awkward situation, the KGMS minister had to give up the initial hypothesis that he put into circulation that the removal of the director was related to the construction of the memorial complex, but the facts speak of something else.


A few days ago, Hranush Kharatyan, a member of the board of trustees, in his post and in an interview with “Aravot” (March 11) confirmed that “According to their official information, the reason is construction, it is related to the renovation of the memorial complex.” We are talking about the meeting of the board of trustees, in which Minister Andreasyan participated.


Now Zh. Andreasyan circulates on another basis. “It’s about governance,” he declares from the top of the bastion of democracy, continuing his sophistic and revealing speech. or “There was a situation that shouldn’t have happened and it found its conclusion”, then he continues: “I don’t need to present an explanation to anyone”.


The name of that situation is “foreign policy and protocol,” Pashinyan reveals.


Which foreign policy? the one approved by the government’s 2021-2026 program, where Artsakh is mentioned 16 times, or the foreign policy chapter, where the recognition and prevention of the Genocide is a foreign policy priority? Why do you continue to deceive the public?


Which protocol? And what protocol did you provide to the Museum? Are you aware that the relevant US authorities have checked and approved their protocol and procedure on the spot?


In that case, why wasn’t the actual culprit, the person in charge of the “protocol” of the CP, dismissed from his job?


And do you know that the given book was given to several dozen guests and it was done very well, because the revision of history and identity to which the regime and its slavish henchmen are engaged has one name: NATIONAL DENIAL.


And how good it is that the five members of the Board of Trustees of the Museum-Institute, the French-Armenian Raimon Gevorgyan, the American-Armenian Stepan Asturyan, Hranush Kharatyan and Harutyun Marutyan, and AGBU Armenia’s head Yaghubyan, did not have their scientific and national dignity undermined.


The problem is not really the book and its title, nor the dismissal of one official.


You can humiliate yourself as much as you can, this is your choice, your vision of a small person and your will.


You can become a merchant of the Turkish dream, but no one has allowed you to auction our identity, our past and our future…”

Asbarez: Dr. C. L. Max Nikias: The American Trojan

Max Nikias


BY NANE AVAGYAN

At the heart of the University of Southern California’s campus stands the iconic statue of a Trojan warrior, a symbol of strength, resilience, and honor that has come to embody the spirit of the university.

It is a fitting emblem for an institution that, under its 11th president, C. L. Max Nikias, rose to the highest echelons of American academia. General David Petraeus once called Max Nikias “The American Trojan,” and the title carries the full weight of myth.

It is also the title of his book, “American Trojan,” in which Max Nikias chronicles the remarkable journey from war-torn Cyprus to the pinnacle of American higher education. Like the ancient heroes of Greece, Nikias is a man forged by loss, driven by vision, and defined by an unshakable will to build something lasting from the ruins of what was taken from him.

A descendant of a civilization steeped in philosophy and courage, Max Nikias has lived his own odyssey — one that began in a small village in Cyprus and led him to the United States. Yet his journey was not myth; it was marked by war, displacement, and loss.  “In less than a month, our families had gone from living happy and successful lives to losing everything,” he recalls of the 1974 Turkish invasion of Cyprus. “To escape the deadly bombs being dropped by Turkish aircraft, they left overnight without any of their possessions, believing they would be able to return once the bombing stopped. But they soon realized they were now refugees.” 

It was during this time that Nikias came to understand the true meaning of the Greek word “apatris” — stateless. It is a wound that does not heal. And yet, rather than be defined by that wound, he chose to be defined by what he would build despite it. He arrived in America carrying nothing but intellect, character, and the deep cultural inheritance of a civilization that had survived far greater storms. “I never used the word ‘refugee’ from day one we arrived in America,” he has said. “I wanted to be judged by my work, not by sympathy for past experiences. I did not want to be seen as a victim in any shape or form.”

America gave him the ground to grow, and he never forgot to give back. As president of USC, he raised $7.16 billion in eight years, transforming the university into one of the nation’s most prestigious private research universities. His scientific research contributed to national defense. His leadership philosophy, rooted in humility, accountability, and the conviction that true leadership means serving others, became the architecture of an educational empire. 

His influence would extend far beyond academia. Four decades after the Turkish aircraft bomb his homeland, the man he had become helped prevent another crisis from spiraling out of control. In August 2020, a dangerous Greek-Turkish military standoff over the island of Kasos was escalating rapidly, and only Turkey’s narrative was reaching the White House. Greece’s ambassador in Washington was struggling to reach National Security Adviser until C. L. Max Nikias stepped in. With a single phone call, he helped shift the balance at a critical moment for his homeland.

Max Nikias’ story resonates with particular depth within the Armenian American community, whose own history of displacement, survival, and renaissance mirrors his own. He has spoken openly of his special affinity for Armenians rooted in a childhood in Cyprus spent alongside Armenian neighbors, and later expressed through his championship of the USC Institute of Armenian Studies and his commitment to recruiting Armenian American students to the university.

“American Trojan” by C.L Max Nikias

“This memoir is the story of the American Dream,” wrote Robert C. O’Brien, the 27th U.S. National Security Advisor. 

Days before the release of “The American Trojan”, Dr. Nikias reflects on all of it in the conversation that follows the trauma and the triumphs, the philosophy of leadership, the meaning of home, and the profound conviction that education is not merely a path to success, but the most powerful force we possess to heal the wounds of history and build a future worthy of those who came before us.

The Beginning of an Odyssey

Nane Avagyan: Your book tells the story of a refugee who lost everything during the Turkish invasion of Cyprus in 1974. Can you take us back to that moment? What were your emotions when you first realized you had to leave your homeland and begin an entirely new life?

C. L. Max Nikias: It was a life-changing moment.  Once you lose everything – your property and your possessions, the businesses you’ve built, and photo albums that collect your memories – there is no going back. It is then that you understand the true meaning of “apatris”, which is the Greek word for “stateless.” In many ways, it is a scar that always stays with you, a wound that never heals, a trauma that stains the soul.  And yet, amid tragedy, being stateless also contains the hope for its opposite – a chance to find a new home, which we would later do in America.  For the rest of your life, you never get “too relaxed” because you know evil forces may always arrive and sometimes the best you can do is to minimize their impact because you are not able to stop them.

Nane Avagyan: Arriving in America as a refugee, what were the most difficult personal challenges you faced as an immigrant? Were there moments of doubt, times when you questioned whether starting over was truly possible, and if so, what gave you the strength to persevere. What empowered you to pursue your goals?

C. L. Max Nikias: I never used the word “refugee” from day one we arrived in America. I wanted to be judged by my work and not from any sympathy from past experiences. I did not want to be seen as a “victim” in any shape of form. The first time I have used the word characterizing myself as “refugee” is when I started writing this book a few years ago. Arriving to America as an immigrant, I was full of insecurities and not having a clear path how to plan our future. However, I dedicated myself to my university studies and very quickly developed a “drive” and “determination” to succeed in my graduate studies in engineering. The refugee experience and my heritage— rich in classical history and philosophical inquiry—instilled in me “unshakable optimism” that propelled me through “near penniless” arrivals and professional ascents. This is the immigrant spirit, isn’t it?

Nane Avagyan: What did you find in America that no other country could have offered you?

C. L. Max Nikias: America welcomed my wife and me with open arms! America offered us first class education and opportunity; if you work hard, watch your behavior, realize that you are here as a guest initially, focus on your work to impress people with your accomplishments, prove yourself, and eventually you will reap the benefits of what America has to offer. There is no other country in the world that can embrace immigrants like me and offer them so many different opportunities for a better life. If I were to characterize America in one word, it is OPPORTUNITY!

Nane Avagyan: At what point did you stop feeling like a refugee and begin to feel like an American? Was there a defining moment or a gradual transition?

C. L. Max Nikias: When did I feel like an American? It happened gradually not overnight. From day one I knew I did not come to America to remain Cypriot. I came to America to become an American! And yes, when my wife and I became naturalized citizens, it was a day of celebration – we were Americans!! We were full of gratitude to this country. This is the reason in the book that the chapter where I described our experiences becoming naturalized citizens is entitled “Second Homecoming.”

Nane Avagyan: America welcomed you and your wife when you arrived with nothing. How that experience shaped your sense of responsibility or obligation to give back?

C. L. Max Nikias: Absolutely! You feel so grateful to this country that you do want to give back as an American! I want to believe that I did give back through my technical contributions to national defense and through my leadership positions at USC where the programs we put in place made it possible to offer first class education to students from all walks of life. In some regard, I want to believe that through my efforts I contributed to American exceptionalism especially in the areas of technology innovation and education.

Leadership Philosophy & Education

Nane Avagyan: Coming from a land that is one of the cradles of world civilization, you carry a legacy that includes Plato, Aristotle, Epicurus, and countless other philosophical giants. You brought your wisdom and expertise to the United States, playing a pivotal role in shaping USC into one of the nation’s leading universities. How have the ideals of these ancient philosophers influenced your approach to leadership?

C. L. Max Nikias:I have always believed it is essential to go back to the wisdom found in the classical works of our civilization. We can examine the timeless truths that have guided humanity during past periods of change. There, we find that those truths can guide us reliably in our own moment. We gain wisdom for our leadership circumstances. For example, we can draw parallels to, and metaphors for, the particular challenges we face. Let’s don’t forget that our founding fathers who gave us this United States of America were very well educated in the Greco-Roman classics.

This is the reason why, at the beginning of most of the chapters in my book “American Trojan,” there is an excerpt from the Greek classics.

Nane Avagyan: How do you define true leadership in higher education and which qualities do you believe matter most?

C. L. Max Nikias: There’s a reason I started the book with a quote from the ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus: “If you do not expect the unexpected, you will not find it, for it is hard to be sought out and difficult.” Leadership is fundamentally about navigating the unexpected. You can have a bold vision, create a strategy, assemble the best team, but invariably, the unexpected will find you.  How you respond defines you and your leadership. 

The ability to inspire others, the capacity to make difficult decisions under pressure, the willingness to take responsibility for outcomes both good and challenging, and the humility to recognize that leadership is not about your own accomplishments, but about serving others. Leadership demands love for humanity, endurance, and self-restraint. The key is to lead with integrity.

Building USC – Vision & Strategy

Nane Avagyan: The transformation of USC into America’s leading research universities. didn’t happen overnight. Was there a specific turning point, a faculty hire, a research breakthrough, or a competitive victory, when you realized USC had crossed into the upper echelon?

C. L. Max Nikias:I tell the story in the book! It was the publication of the WSJ ranking in 2016 with a cover news story singling USC out as the surprise success story. The Wall Street Journal ranked USC at #15 nationally, ahead of some prestigious institutions. West of Chicago, only USC, Stanford and CalTech ranked in the top 20!

I felt at that moment that USC had finally arrived at the top tier of schools!  It is important to note that this ranking was published for the very first time; nobody knew their ranking formula; nobody was going to “game” the formula; and it turned out to be a much more comprehensive ranking formula than other publications. 

Nane Avagyan: You raised billions of dollars for student scholarships, medical research, working with donors who each brought their own temperament, priorities, and expectations։ How did you navigate these diverse personalities and competing interests while preserving USC’s mission and institutional integrity

C. L. Max Nikias:We need to remember that donors are very successful and very smart people. It’s important to build the trust with them and get them to buy into the vision you pursue for the institution. You need to articulate to donors their return-on-investment (ROI)– how their support will make a difference for the institution, students, faculty and society at large.

Donors have many choices to donate their money. They will give to your institution if they trust the leadership to see through their commitments. It’s about trust and commitment.

Nane Avagyan: Your book offers behind-the-scenes insights into major decisions and strategic moves that helped build an educational empire. Can you share one pivotal decision or defining moment that best illustrates your approach to institutional transformation?

C. L. Max Nikias: In the book you read the story of the USC medical enterprise being in real crisis in 2005 when I became provost and the behind-the-scenes decisions and pivotal moments over a period of three years to turn the crisis into a great opportunity of growth and academic ascent by buying the hospitals form Tenet Healthcare Corporation. Relevant sections in the book provide an insider’s perspective on the relentless planning, meticulous preparation, strategic announcement, and disciplined execution of a fundraising campaign that raised $7.16 billion in eight years, with the endowment expanding from $2.77 billion to $6.8 billion during the same period.

Nane Avagyan: In an era when universities face intense pressure to make political and social statements, you’ve maintained that institutions should stay neutral on issues outside their core mission. Yet students, faculty, and alumni often demand the university ‘take a stand’ on controversial issues. How do you hold that line without appearing indifferent to injustice or important social movement?

C. L. Max Nikias:It is not easy and has always been very challenging. The university is not a foreign or a domestic government that must comment on any political event around the world. The policies of a university need to change at the Board of Trustees level and make it clear to everybody that university leadership doesn’t comment on any political event or ideology, it only comments on issues that may affect higher education and the university itself. Ensure a neutral environment where all ideas/opinions can be debated in a civilized manner without any threats expressed against any students or other faculty.

Nane Avagyan: You launched a massive fundraising campaign that created a ‘war chest’ for recruiting what you called “better than excellent” faculty. Why is strategic fundraising so critical for universities aspiring to greatness, and how did you convince donors to invest in this vision?

C. L. Max Nikias:For private universities like USC with a medical enterprise and active research programs in engineering, medicine and sciences, they do not break even financially without philanthropy money. There is no way to elevate a university academically by executing a strategic vision without massive resources to support the academic ascent. Without raising the financial resources needed, your plans and vision are only words like fireworks that become a “pipedream.”

You inspire donors with your plans and vision for the institution and if they trust the leadership then they become enthusiastic supporters.

Nane Avagyan: The rising cost of higher education has become a national crisis. Yet you increased USC’s financial aid commitment from $180 million to $336 million, the largest at any private university in America. Why was this investment so crucial, and how does it fit into your vision of balancing excellence with accessibility?

C. L. Max Nikias:We strongly believed that the only way to keep college education affordable for students was to increase the financial aid pool. The success of our fundraising campaign allowed us to do just that. We also kept tuition increases no greater than the inflation rate which was very low when I was president. The average student loan debt of our graduating class when I was president was $25,000 for the graduating students.

Higher Education & Current Challenges

Nane Avagyan: In your book, you discuss a growing crisis in higher education. What do you see as the root causes of this crisis?

C. L. Max Nikias: Universities have, to a large extend, lost sight of their core mission in recent years, and cancel culture, microaggressions, safe spaces, trigger warnings and the mob mentality of different activist groups along with antisemitism have shaken the university campuses. Certain campuses transformed from places to face challenging ideas to places where some believed they should never be challenged. Outside agitators, activist faculty of various and competing ideologies, and impressionable students hijacked the intellectual power of universities.

Nane Avagyan: For students or young professionals feeling disillusioned about the future or the American Dream, what message would you share?

C. L. Max Nikias: I tell them to embrace the moment because they live in the best country of the world where hard work gets rewarded, where there are individual freedom and economic opportunity. 

Greek-Armenian Historical Commonalities, Resilience, and Recovery

Nane Avagyan: The Greek and Armenian communities share parallel histories of profound tragedy, including the Armenian Genocide, Turkey’s invasion of Cyprus, all resulting in lost homelands, countless lives, and mass displacement. These shared traumas have created a deep bond between our nations. Do you address this experiences in your book?

C. L. Max Nikias: Through the many stories and experiences described in the book, I hope the Armenian community identifies with them because they are not different from their own!

Nane Avagyan: What recommendations do you offer regarding collective recovery, healing, and the preservation of historical memory?

C. L. Max Nikias:As I described earlier the moment I became a refugee, it is a scar that always stays with you, a wound that never heals, a trauma that stains the soul. After our second homecoming in America, the importance of remembering and the historical memories especially for the future generations become very important. They are part of the healing. “Do not forget”what happened.

Nane Avagyan: Rather than being broken by trauma, you transformed it into a powerful commitment to education, investing in USC to advance teaching human rights, resilience, and historical truth. You view education as preventative tool against future atrocities. USC’s Shoah Foundation and its Dimensions in Testimony project have created an extensive archive of genocide survivors’ testimonies, including those from the Armenian Genocide. How can educational institutions like USC not only preserve truth, but also foster a culture where acknowledgment, remembrance, and justice are inseparable from academic excellence?

C. L. Max Nikias: I’m very proud of the fact that I secured the transfer to USC of the Shoah Foundation archives produced by Steven Spielberg, the 380 interviewees of Armenian genocide produced by Dr. J. Michael Hagopian and the more than 1,000 interviews of the Richard G. Hovannisian Armenian Genocide Oral History Collection. These testimonies provide critical material for curriculum development and for teaching the current and future generations of students remembrance and acknowledgement. They provide material for academic scholarship in history and social sciences. 

Nane Avagyan: You have strong connections with the Armenian community and played a major role in championing the USC Institute of Armenian Studies. You also established a targeted strategy to recruit Armenian American students to USC. What motivated these initiatives, and what impact do you hope they will have on both the students and the broader Armenian community?

C. L. Max Nikias: Given the large population of Armenian Americans in California and especially in the LA basin, I felt strongly that we should reach out to the Armenian American community in a similar manner the university did for the Asian American and other communities. I must confess that I have a special affinity for the Armenian American community given my upbringing in Cyprus – I grew up socializing with many Armenian children in my neighborhood – and our common culture and religion. I’m very proud that I worked closely with Charly Ghailian, Judge Tevrizian and many other leaders of the Armenian community to establish the USC Institute of Armenian Studies. 

Nane Avagyan: How do you envision the relationship between USC and the Armenian community evolving, and what role do you see the Institute playing in preserving Armenian cultural heritage?

C. L. Max Nikias: The role of the institute is that of a catalyst between USC, the Armenian American community, and the universities in Armenia, bringing all of them together for the benefit of academic scholarship and culture. USC’s Viterbi School of Engineering has established partnerships with a number of universities in Armenia, and the USC Institute of Armenian Studies can help strengthen and expand those partnerships. 

Nane Avagyan: You visited Armenia two years ago, served as a keynote speaker at the 2024 WCIT Conference. What aspects of Armenia, whether its people, culture, innovation ecosystem, left the strongest impression on you?

C. L. Max Nikias: I must confess that I was very impressed by the high-tech industry sector and the people I met and interacted with. This is an enormous economic strength of Armenia. Having served on the board of directors of Synopsys (SNPS) – an S&P 500 company; largest tech employer in Armenia – for 13 years, I knew about the brain power of Armenia in engineering, sciences, and mathematics. But still, I was pleasantly surprised how strong it is!

The delicious food and culture as well as the various monasteries and churches and the stunning view of Mount Ararat made a lasting impression on me! Finally, the visit to The Genocide Museum-Institute dedicate to the victims of the Armenian genocide was a very emotional experience.   

Nane Avagyan: What message did you share with the WCIT audience?

C. L. Max Nikias:My keynote address at WCIT was on semiconductor chips as the brains behind the artificial intelligence revolution. I should also point out that Synopsys in Armenia develops software for the design and verification of semiconductor chips!

Nane Avagyan: During your visit, you toured the TUMO Center for Creative Technologies, and you’ve since endorsed TUMO Los Angeles. What excites you most about TUMO, and how do you see it shaping the future for youth?

C. L. Max Nikias: The exciting part about TUMO in Los Angeles is that it will give the opportunity to young people of LA to experience this state-of -the-art self-learning high-tech environment in creative technologies. It is a contribution of an Armenian innovative program to the benefit of the children of LA.

The TUMO visit was very impressive, putting the young children in charge of their own learning in creative technologies! TUMO is an investment for the high-tech future of the country! 

Nane Avagyan: America has become your second home, yet you’ve remained deeply connected to your Greek heritage. How important is it to maintain this dual identity, being both a dedicated American citizen and someone faithful to their ancestral culture, history, language, and homeland?

C. L. Max Nikias:Very frequently remind our daughters who were born here in America that they should feel fortunate because the democratic ideals of the American culture are, in many ways, the same ideals of the Athenian democracy of Pericles and those of the Spartan constitution. I hope our daughters and in the near future our grandchildren as they grow up are proud of the fact that their ancestral heritage dovetails so clearly with the American culture they have been born into.

Nane Avagyan: Your story is one of resilience, vision, and mission-driven work. How do you want readers to be inspired by “American Trojan”?

C. L. Max Nikias: I hope they will be inspired by the many parallels they can draw from the stories in the book into their own experiences. I hope they appreciate the importance of endurance, hard work, resilience as well as the importance of family.