Skip to main content

Ara Fidanyan was dismissed from the position of the Secretary General of the Ministry of Internal Affairs

20.03.2026

RA Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan signed a decision, according to which Ara Fidanyan was dismissed from the post of Secretary General of the Ministry of Internal Affairs.


“Guided by Article 16, Part 1 and Article 37, Part 1, Clause 1 of the Civil Service Law, Ara Khoreni Fidanyan shall be dismissed from the position of Secretary General of the Ministry of Internal Affairs from March 20, 2026,” the decision states.

“Science is not a branch of the party.” The political scientist was fired with a bang

Photo: primeminister.am

The recent dismissal of the director of the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute found a wide response in the Armenian society, quickly going beyond the scope of an ordinary personnel decision. For many, the move became an alarming indicator of how the relationship between the state and independent science is changing, while others saw it as an attempt to block pain and memory. What is more important in this dismissal: the demand for total loyalty during the pre-election period, the lack of understanding of the principles of academic freedom, or the government’s desire to take control of all public institutions? of the country about the real motivations of the leadership, the limits of the political conjuncture and why the ruling team finally bet on the bureaucratic resource to replace the lost social legitimacy,to VERELQ the director of the Caucasus Institute, a political scientist, told in the interview Alexander Iskandaryan:



Photo: Alexander Iskandaryan, source: RBC (РБК)


VERELQ: It cannot be said that what happened is unprecedented, but the release of the director of the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute, nevertheless, received a sharp public resonance. What is the sign of this dismissal and, in your opinion, to what extent has it undermined Nikol Pashinyan’s position in society?


Alexander Iskandaryan. The logic of this release, as seen by the ruling team, is quite transparent. As a matter of fact, Pashinyan himself directly announced that and not only him. The essence comes down to the following. if a person is a civil servant and receives a salary from the state, he is obliged to support the political course of the government and has no right to act contrary to its provisions. And in the case of donating a book, apparently, it is required not only not to oppose the government, but also to guess in advance what its position is on this or that issue.


In general, the logic of the authorities is clear, but in this case we are talking about the director of a scientific institution. The Scientific Institute is not a regional department of the “Civil Contract” party. In the academic environment, at least in the part of the world to which our government is oriented, there are such fundamental concepts as academic freedoms. Science develops due to the clash of different views, and a scientist has every right to disagree both with his colleagues and with people far from science.


An understanding of academic freedoms, the right to have one’s own opinion and its diversity is vitally necessary, because without it, science, including public science, simply does not exist. It cannot function in a paradigm where it is required to serve the one true top-down narrative; under such conditions it ceases to be science.


Judging by everything, the authorities do not have this understanding, or at least it disappears during the pre-election period, when such values ​​seem to them to be completely marginal. I’m not inclined to attribute what happened solely to someone’s personal feelings. Of course, the personal factor may be present, but to prove it or to know for sure what the personal motives are there is impossible. Another thing is important. we are dealing with a clear trend that can be seen in many areas.


And now that trend has reached the social sciences, a field where the existence of independent opinion is presupposed from the start. The authorities are trying to introduce an approach, which in science is called “presupposition” (presupposition). when you define the desired outcome in advance and know from the very beginning exactly what you have to prove, adapting to changes in the political conjuncture. Requiring a scientist to work in a strictly defined ideological paradigm shows a deep lack of understanding of the working mechanisms of science, including state-funded science. After all, funding by the state and blindly serving the interests of the government are completely different things.


VERELQ: If we talk about the impact of this incident on the ratings of the government. how will this affect them given the extreme sensitivity of the subject?


Alexander Iskandaryan. You know, it seems to me that this topic is really sensitive, but only in those circles and classes of society, which either will not go to the upcoming elections at all, or if they do, they will definitely not vote for the ruling party.


The government obviously does not bet on Yerevan’s scientific intelligentsia. First of all, in terms of quantity, that capital intelligentsia is not so much to have a decisive influence on the outcome of the vote. Second, the electoral calculation is based on completely different groups of the population. And to what extent the problem of academic freedoms and the attitude towards history concerns the residents of small towns and villages, or the older generation with a not so high level of education, this is already a question, the clear answer of which we will get only on the day of the elections.


VERELQ: A logical question arises. Is this a manifestation of a personal desire to take full control of all state and public institutions (after parliament and the judiciary) in order to maximize power? Or is the main goal to ensure total bureaucratic loyalty? And maybe this is a preventive measure to prevent any step that could negatively affect the peace process?


Alexander Iskandaryan. I don’t think this is just someone’s personal ambition. This is a very clear and conscious position of the ruling class. They understand rationally within the government. in the conditions of the current low social legitimacy (and it is really low and obviously will not increase) it is necessary to bet on bureaucratic legitimacy.


In other words, the main problem in the upcoming elections is not to increase popularity and ratings, but to concretely confirm that bureaucratic legitimacy. Make it the basis on which the government will stand. In this sense, their actions are extremely rational, and the deep division of society can be used as a tool for the ruling team to successfully pass the electoral stage.


I repeat, this is not a question of psychology or a simple personal desire of one particular person. Even if the subjective factor is present, the global calculation is built on the critical importance of bureaucratic loyalty. That loyalty must be ensured absolutely everywhere, because it is what the government relies on now and intends to rely on in the future. The period from 2018 to 2021, when the country’s leadership relied on broad social legitimacy, incredible popularity among the people and unimaginable ratings, has passed irretrievably. This political tool is lost, it’s gone, and that’s why they are forced to act in such a way.

Verelq: The charioteer started, Caligula’s horses continued. consider software

Yesterday ended with sibekh, and began with sibekh judgments about “strong and weak”. The charioteer started, Caligula’s horses continued. Let’s say the program debate has started. Accordingly. In my opinion.

1. A strong figure is the one who would understand the process and accept the proposal to stop the war early, saving thousands of lives and national dignity.

2. A strong leader will not live with the obsession of catching people and will not scare others with an investigator.

3. A strong leader will not call to leave the house, take a bushel and go and die.

4. A strong leader will not indulge in self-forgetfulness after creating an endless Erablur during his rule, after sacrificing an entire generation.

5. A strong leader will not encourage false liturgies.

6. A strong leader will emphasize the value of his speech and will not present himself to the public with street vocabulary.


I am sure that the burden of what you have done is tormenting you, a very heavy burden, you know what “accomplishments” you have during your years of power, which will never be forgotten.

There will surely be more opportunities to answer. So the rest later.


Political analyst Arman Abovyan




Asbarez: 3 Armenians Appointed to L.A. County Commissions

From left: Jack Hadjinian, Ashod Mooradian and Vasken Yardemian


The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday voted to reappoint two Armenian-American community leaders with long-standing involvement in the Armenian National Committee of America and its Western Region affiliate.

Jack Hadjinian was reappointed to the Commission on Alcohol and Other Drugs by L.A. serving County Supervisor Hilda Solis’ District 1.

Vasken Yardemian was appointed to another term to the L.A. County Economy and Efficiency Commission. He will represent Supervisor Kathryn Barger’s District 5.

Last year the Board of Supervisors appointed Ashod Mooradian to the L.A. County Consumer Affairs Advisory Commission. He, too, represents Solis’ District 1.

AGBU Manoogian-Demirdjian School Raises $4 Million at 50th Anniversary Gala

LOS ANGELES — A night of celebration, legacy, and community spirit marked a historic milestone for AGBU Manoogian-Demirdjian School as nearly 900 guests gathered for its 50th Anniversary Gala, raising over an extraordinary $4 million in support of the school’s future.

Held in the elegant Los Angeles Ballroom at the Fairmont Century Plaza, the gala brought together an esteemed audience of supporters, families, alumni, AGBU Central Board members from across the globe, dignitaries, and community leaders, all united in celebration of five decades of educational excellence and impact.

The evening featured a thoughtfully curated program, with eloquent Master of Ceremonies, Dr. Edrick Dorian, a former student from the early days of St. Peter AGBU Day School.  Under the direction of Arick Gevorkian, the middle school students, accompanied by Emmy Bejanyan, set the tone with their beautiful performances of the National Anthems, while Alec Van Khajadourian and Sarkis Demirjian delivered masterful piano performances.

Dr Edrick Dorian (l) and Kevork Zoryan

The evening’s invocation was delivered by His Eminence Archbishop Hovnan Derderian and Father Shnork Demirjian.

During the program, AGBU MDS honored distinguished members of our community whose dedication and service to our school span decades: Bedros and Anna Oruncakciel (Lifetime Legacy Award), Principal of Demirdjian Middle & High School, Anahid Nalbandian Pezeshkian (Lifetime Service Award), Director of Artemis Nazarian Preschool, Tagoush Khodabakhshian (Lifetime Service Award), and Dr. Raffi Svadjian, Class of  1993 (Distinguished Alumni Award). Certificates of recognition were presented to all our honorees by Congressman Brad Sherman and Councilmember Adrin Nazarian. 

Additionally, President of AGBU, Sam Simonian, and Honorary President, Berge Setrakian, honored long-time supporter and Central Board Member, Sinan Sinanian, with a heartfelt surprise tribute, bestowing upon him the AGBU Boghos Nubar Award, the highest honor AGBU bestows upon community members who elevate others and work tirelessly in service of society.

(l to r) Sam Simonian, Sinan Sinanian, Berge Setrakian, Kevork Zoryan

Longtime benefactor Christine Simone was recognized for her enduring generosity and unwavering support, highlighted by the naming of the Manoogian Simone Collaborative Learning Center Complex in her honor. The school also proudly announced that, through Alex Demirdjian’s generous contribution, the DHS Expansion will continue to carry the Demirdjian family name.

“This milestone celebration was not only a reflection of our past achievements, but a powerful testament to the strength and unity of our community,” said Chairman of the Board, Kevork Zoryan. “Together, we are building the foundation for the next 50 years of impact at AGBU MDS.”

Guests were immersed in the rich history of MDS through a beautifully presented Heritage Library exhibit showcasing memorabilia spanning the decades, including vintage uniforms, photographs, and treasured artifacts. The display sparked a deep sense of nostalgia and pride, highlighting the school’s enduring legacy.

Head of School David Ghoogasian, on behalf of a grateful school community, expressed his profound gratitude to all who have contributed and continue to contribute to the success of AGBU MDS, past and present, emphasizing the dedication of the faculty and staff, pride in the students, and enthusiasm toward what is yet to come.

AGBU MDS Board of Trustees AGBU Central Board

A heartfelt thank you to the incredible Gala Committee and 50th Anniversary Chair, Ailine Vakian, Class of 1992, and Gala Chair, Zanni Kalaydjian, for their tireless efforts and leadership.  Their passion, fundraising efforts, and dedication to the event ensured we had an impeccable program. We are equally grateful to our Class of 2005 alumna event planner, Lusine Vartanian of Event Du Jour, for elevating the evening with exceptional creativity.

Gala Committee

Adding to the evening’s energy, a vibrant silent auction and Student Council-led raffle engaged attendees and raised over $70,000 in additional support of the school’s mission.

Student Council Heritage Library

Proceeds from the evening will support the school’s strategic expansion initiatives, as well as the establishment of an academic endowment to invest in innovation of curriculum and instruction. 

Centered around the theme “Imagine the Possibilities,” the gala cast a bold vision for what lies ahead, while honoring the Changemakers, the early visionaries whose belief in the school laid the foundation for its success. Their foresight and dedication transformed possibility into reality, paving the way for the next generation to dream even bigger.

As AGBU Manoogian-Demirdjian School looks ahead to a new chapter of expansion and growth, the 50th Anniversary Gala stands as a defining moment, honoring its legacy while advancing its vision for the future.

https://asbarez.com/agbu-manoogian-demirdjian-school-raises-4-million-at-50th-anniversary-gala/?fbclid=IwY2xjawQrHc1leHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEeI9l24QsxqwmJ-lW4m8Y0GNg6nSwfqmxcvwAmJ37In90Ed0Q1LNM1EZ452Uo_aem_i1benxOMz6AhKtLY5n_I0w


Film on Armenian ‘Hidden Grandmothers’ to Premier at Fresno

The Armenian Studies Program and the Fresno State CineCulture program are presenting the Fresno premiere screening of the film “Armenians, The Hidden Grandmothers,” at 5:30 p.m. on Friday, March 27. The screening is free and open to the public and will be held in the Leon S. and Pete P. Peters Educational Center, 5010 N. Woodrow Ave. (west end of the SaveMartCenter), on the Fresno State campus.

Director Alexandra Routhiau Mikaélian, French of Armenian origin, made a promise to her grandfather, to find the members of their family in Turkey based on a simple name, Shahimé, this sister he was never able to meet. From this journey through time in search of the living, Alexandra will lift the veil of one of the most deeply rooted taboos in Turkish society, those for which you still risk your life.

This story is the story of these millions of Armenians and Turks, those we call the “hidden Armenians” or the “remnants of the sword,” descendants of women and children converted and forcibly integrated into the Turkish population during the Armenians genocide. For the first time, we tell the missing stories of these women, victims of the genocide, the Armenian grandmothers who passed on their stories by whispering.

As the writer and lawyer Féthiye Cetin, who appears in the film, explains: “Every Turk discovers that he may have Armenian blood in his veins and every Armenian, including in the diaspora, realizes that he may have Muslim cousins in Turkey.”

111 years after the events of 1915, it is time to open the book of this common history in a documentary but above all the doors of silence, to finally be able to wound together and build bridges towards reconciliation.

Alexandra Routhiau Mikaélian

Alexandra Routhiau Mikaélian is a French writer, director, and producer of Armenian descent. After ten years as a journalist for French national television channels, she attended “La Fémis school” and began creating and producing her own documentaries. Now as a documentary filmmaker, she focuses her work on the memory of the Armenian diaspora. A form of film therapy framed by the intersection of family stories and universal History. Beyond emotions, her cinema pursues the dream of making films that bring people together and build bridges between peoples.

For more information about the film screening contact the Armenian Studies Program at (559)278-2669, visit the Facebook page @ArmenianStudiesFresnoState or  the CineCulture website.

Pashinyan Claims Opposition Poses a Threat of War

Continuing his campaign against Armenia’s opposition forces ahead of the June 7 elections, Prime Minisdter Nikol Pashinyan on Thursday warned that Armenia could face imminent war if some opposition forces, whom he claimed were controlled from abroad, win the elections.

Speaking to reporters following a cabinet meeting, Pashinyan did not name specific parties, but insisted that these groups sought to “revise” what he called the recently established peace.

“I want to say this very directly, without any pretense, that [if the opposition wins it will be a war with the loss of not only territory but also sovereignty of the Republic of Armenia,” Pashinyan said at a press briefing.

He said he expects his Civil Contract party to garner enough votes to form a parliamentary majority, which would allow the processes underpinning regional peace to become fully irreversible.

“We expect to achieve a constitutional majority as a result of these elections because that is what will guarantee that, particularly in the context of regional peace, we will make the processes fully irreversible,” Pashinyan said.

He accused certain opposition forces of preparing a “new war with Azerbaijan.” He claimed some of those forces “do not even understand what statements they are making,” implying that these statements were written in a foreign country.

“These parties and circles first say that they are not against peace, and secondly, they say that if they come to power, they will start revising peace.”

In response to a follow-up question about why these forces want to trigger a new war, Pashinyan said that aim is to keep Armenia as “peripheral state, as it was during their time they were in power.”

“They see that Armenia has become independent and have a problem with that because they are determined not to allow Armenia to be independent. Yesterday or the day before, I saw some pictures saying ‘Strong Peace,’ or headlines saying, ‘Forgive us, Artsakh, we will do… whatever.’ What is all this about? It is about subjecting peace to revision, and any attempt to revise peace is war—immediately. Or they say, ‘Ararat is ours,’ ‘Dadivank is ours.’ That is war!” Pashinyan said.

Responding to a question about what these forces would gain from a war, Pashinyan emphasized that “they would gain the status of leaders of an outpost, not a country, because history has shown this to be financially profitable for them.:

“They will also preserve the billions they have in certain countries because they were told: if you don’t solve the problem, what is formally registered in your name will no longer exist. These main forces—the three who operate from that position—have billions in Russia and Belarus,” Pashinyan said.

During a speech at the European Parliament last week, Pashinyan referenced “oligarchs from Russia and Belarus” when telling European lawmakers about what he perceived as foreign threats to the upcoming elections.

The European Union’s foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas said on Monday that the EU will send a “hybrid rapid response” team to Armenia to weigh in on potential threats ahead of the June 7 elections.

Speaking to journalists in Brussels following a meeting of EU foreign ministers, Kallas said that “supporting the resilience of democracy in the region remains of paramount importance.”

“We will not leave Armenia alone in the fight against external interference. Democracies under pressure can rely on Europe,” the diplomat assured, recalling that Yerevan had requested assistance.

The mission will be comprised of nine to 14 experts and will arrive in April, according to a document obtained by Azatutyun.am, which reported that the EU personnel will help authorities counter hybrid threats and foreign information manipulation.

The team is expected to stay in Armenia for 10 to 15 days, Azatutyun.am reported on Tuesday.

The experts are expected to assist Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s office and the National Security Council in developing crisis management plans and regulatory mechanisms to address cyberattacks and foreign information interference.

https://asbarez.com/pashinyan-claims-opposition-poses-a-threat-of-war/?fbclid=IwY2xjawQrHntleHRuA2FlbQIxMQBzcnRjBmFwcF9pZBAyMjIwMzkxNzg4MjAwODkyAAEeDJiKYHPemqeDiqQ4IDt_olwQ50Ow8ul39KgzRAzA5pEUa1BF8qcF6gLpO2s_aem_TcVAY_DqVp8dqJwWsG6xow


Asbarez: ARF Western U.S. Diaspora Conference Concludes: A Beginning, Not an E

The ARF Western Region convened its Diaspora Conference at the Beshir Mardirossian Youth Center in Burbank, California, over the weekend of March 14–15. The two-day internal working conference brought together distinguished diaspora scholars, educators, community leaders, and ARF members for a structured dialogue dedicated to one purpose: honest and substantive reflection on the diaspora’s present realities and future direction.

The conference did not seek to produce declarations or headlines. Participants engaged across nine thematic sessions covering the historical characteristics of the diaspora, Armenia-Diaspora political dynamics, Armenian education and language, diasporic identity and culture, the Armenian Cause in the 21st century, and the possible goals of diasporic nation-building itself.

What emerged most clearly was that the Armenian diaspora cannot be understood only as a sentimental extension of the homeland, nor merely as a loose collection of communities trying topreserve memory and identity. The discussions pointed instead to a more demanding and complex reality: if the diaspora is to remain meaningful, it must be approached as a multilayered, multicenter transnational network, self-aware, and evolving, with responsibilities that go beyond institutional maintenance.

This was visible in the very structure of the conference. Education was discussed not simply as a pedagogical issue, but as a question tied to language continuity, identity formation, and long-term communal resilience. Youth was examined not only as a demographic category, but as the site where questions of belonging, leadership, and future commitment will ultimately be decided. Discussions on the Armenian Cause were not limited to inherited formulas, but opened the door to preliminary rethinking about mission, scope, and relevance under new realities. Crucially, the agenda made clear that these themes are deeply interconnected — a diaspora that weakens in language and culture will eventually weaken in political clarity; one that does not cultivate young leadership will struggle to sustain its institutions.

The final group discussions were especially important in this regard. By dividing participants into working groups around language, identity, educational structures, youth, leadership preparation, and the rethinking of the Armenian Cause, the conference began moving from diagnosis toward possible direction. No final doctrine was announced, and none was expected. But that was precisely the point. The value of the conference lay not in manufacturing artificial consensus, but in helping identify the real questions, tensions, and priorities that require further work.

What made this conference significant was not merely its agenda, but its premise. At a moment when both Armenia and the diaspora are navigating profound and simultaneous transformations — geopolitical, demographic, generational, and cultural — the relationship between the two can no longer rest on inherited assumptions. The fall of Artsakh, the reconfiguration of Armenia’s alliances, the accelerating assimilation of diaspora communities, and the emergence of a generation that relates to Armenian identity on its own terms have all converged into a single urgent question: what does it mean, in 2026, to be part of one Armenian world — and what kind of partnership that world actually requires.”

The conference follows directly from the public debate-discussion held on March 12 at the Krikor and Mariam Karamanoukian Glendale Youth Center, which explored Armenian diaspora nation-building opportunities before a wider community audience, and two preparatory articles published in Asbarez that framed the stakes and the educational agenda of the gathering. Taken together, these three moments — public debate, press preparation, and internal conference — represent a deliberate sequencing: understand before acting, and reflect before declaring. 

This conference should be seen as a beginning rather than a conclusion. The issues placed on the table are too large, too layered, and too consequential to be exhausted in one weekend. In the coming period, public articles will be shared reflecting on the major the key questions and challenges that deserve wider communal consideration. The conversations held over these two days were internal in process, not in purpose — their work belongs to the broader Armenian world. What was discussed in Burbank will not stay in Burbank.

CC: Questions Raised Over Criminal Record Certificate In Case Involving Ruling




Innocent Armenian Laid To Rest