Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr was appointed as the new secretary of Iran’s Security Council

According to the decree of the President of Iran, Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr was appointed the new secretary of the Supreme National Security Council of the Islamic Republic. Mohammad Mehdi Tabatabai, head of the public relations department of the presidential office, informed about this.


“With the approval of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution and the President’s decree, Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr was appointed the Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council,” wrote Tabatabai on his X page.

Verelq: Mongolia can provide significant benefits to Armenian businesses

The draft law “On ratifying the temporary trade agreement between EAEU and Mongolia” is aimed at facilitating and promoting mutual trade. Narek Hovakimyan, Deputy Minister of Economy, announced this at the session of the National Assembly.


The agreement signed in 2025 regulates a wide range of economic cooperation issues. In particular, customs regulation, sanitary and phytosanitary measures, as well as problems related to other areas.


The attached lists with 367 product positions for each party are an integral part of the agreement. The parties are ready to provide tariff privileges for these products. “In the proposals presented by the Armenian side, products of primary interest for export to the Republic of Armenia were mentioned,” said Hovakimyan


The deputy minister noted that the opening of the Mongolian market will provide more competitive supply conditions for Armenian exporters for such products as: tobacco products (Mongolia’s rate: 30%), cognac (rate: 15%), chocolate (rate: 5%), mineral waters (rate: 5%) and canned fruits (rate: 5%).


“The privileges provided by Mongolia will cover around 98% of exports from Armenia to Mongolia. The average rate of customs duty on goods exported from Armenia to Mongolia will decrease from 7.5% to 1.2%. As a result, savings due to customs privileges in the case of exports from Armenia to Mongolia can be up to 1 million dollars per year,” explained the representative of the Government.


The agreement also provides for a three-year validity period, with the possibility of extending it for another three years in the future. However, it is possible that the parties will agree on other terms.

Asbarez: ‘Pashinyan is Usurping the People’s Free Will to Choose,’ Opposition

The opposition Hayastan bloc in parliament on Apr. 9, 2024


Opposition forces in Armenia are sounding the alarm about deteriorating democratic norms, saying that Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan is actively “usurping the people’s free will choose.”

Pashinyan late last week told reporters that if any opposition force were to be elected Armenia would face war and urged the public to vote for him and his Civil Contract Party, claiming that they have ushered in peace after decades of war.
He reiterated those sentiments during a pre-election campaign stomp on Sunday announcing that if opposition forces are elected in June, a “catastrophic war” will be imminent by September.

“It [war] will happen in September, not any later,” Pashinyan declared, “There will be a war in September—a catastrophic war.”

Artsvik Minasyan, who represents the opposition Armenia faction in parliament called Pashinyan’s war mongering “criminal.”

“It is a threat to influence the people’s will, which is prohibited and a criminally punishable act,” Minasyan told Azatutyun.am on Tuesday. Another opposition lawmaker, Taguhi Tovmasyan, who represents the “I Have Honor” bloc said Pashinyan effectively was blackmailing voter.

Minasyan said Pashinyan is committing a crime, and the Prosecutor General’s Office must initiate criminal proceedings under Article 421 of the Criminal Code for actions aimed at renouncing sovereignty through the threat of violence.

“You see, one of the important elements of sovereignty is the _expression_ of democracy—the will of the people. When he threatens the will of the people with a possible, probable war, that is, with possible violence, he is already committing a crime against sovereignty. And if we had a normal Prosecutor’s Office – a Prosecutor’s Office that upholds the law, the constitutional norm, an Anti-Corruption Committee, an Investigative Committee, criminal proceedings should have been initiated by now,” Minasyan emphasized.

If the Prosecutor General’s Office does not take steps regarding Pashinyan’s statements, Minasyan does not rule out that his faction would appeal to law enforcement bodies.

Tovmasyan, the other opposition lawmaker, said she believed that Pashinyan’s actions against the free _expression_ of voters should become the subject of attention not only in Armenia, but also by international organizations.

“If we were a truly normal, democratic, developing country, and the Central Election Commission of the Republic of Armenia was not a subsidiary of the ‘Civil Contract’ party, but a truly independent commission, it should have already recorded that there is a violation of the will of the citizens of Armenia, and this violence is manifested in the form of blackmail: ‘If I am not elected, there will be war,’” Tovmasyan added.

Pashinyan claimed that the main opposition forces would walk back the peace agreement he reached with President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan in the White House last August, saying that those forces also had territorial claims from Armenia’s neighbors. Foreign Minister Arart Mirzoyan concurred with the prime minister, telling parliament on Monday that opposition forces pose territorial claims against “almost all of Armenia’s neighors.”

“We have never had territorial claims,” Minasyan countered, explaining that raising the issue of the fundamental freedoms and rights of Artsakh Armenians cannot be seen as incitement to war.

“We are not talking about territorial claims,” Minasyan said. “First of all, we are talking about a mechanism for the international acceptance of the dignified return of Artsakh residents with security guarantees and rights. We have never had territorial claims. No political force has officially presented a territorial claim, nor has it actually been spoken about it.”

The opposition insists that a so-called peace that prioritizes Baku’s whims cannot be real. Therefore, the main opposition forces of calling for international guarantees to establish peace—a position articulated by the prime minister in the past.

The opposition forces would like to renegotiate the current document that is not a peace agreement, but rather an initialed paper that expresses the sides’ willingness to work toward peace.

“It is necessary for there to be a mechanism that will make that peace long-term. It will be either an international consortium, so to speak, which will become the guarantor of peace,” Minasyan, the Armenia faction lawmaker, said.

He said that if Azerbaijan disagrees with such a mechanism that signals that Azerbaijan does not want peace.

Minasyan explained that he is advocating for engagement in diplomacy with international partners that “want peace in the region.”

“If they want peace, but Azerbaijan does not want it, it means that that international consortium becomes the entity that is talking to Azerbaijan, not Armenia,” Minasyan added.

Pashinyan, on the other hand, said discussing guarantees signals the willingness in engage international peacekeepers into the region and Armenia—a plan he has supported by asking for and receiving a European Union mission to Armenia, which will continue is mandate until early next year.

At Fresno ARF Day Benefactor Alice Gureghian Bequeaths Additional Portion of H

105th Anniversary of Soghomon Tehlirian’s Heroism Marked

The Fresno community turned to mark the 135th anniversary of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation on March 14 organized by the ARF Soghomon Tehlirian chapter. The event held at the Garo and Alice Gureghian Armenian Cultural Center.

Benefactor Alice Gureghian with Fresno ARF Chapter Chair Raffy Chekherdemian

A surprise announcement by benefactor Alice Gureghian, who pledged to bequeath additional funds from her estate to the Fresno’s Armenian Cultural Foundation to ensure the maintenance and upkeep of the center that is named after her and her husband.

The Fresno ACF extended its utmost gratitude to Gureghian for her unwavering support of the organization and the center, which serves as vibrant hub for the community.

Garo Gureghian, who is the son of late Asbarez Editor Melik Shah, and his wife Alice announced a donation of $300,000 to the ACF Fresno Center in 2014.

Mr. and Mrs. Garo and Alice Gureghian (center) are flanked by community leaders and the Prelate following the ribbon cutting ceremony in 2017

A capacity crowd of more than 400 community members gathered in 2017 for the grand re-opening of the Fresno Armenian Center, which was rechristened that day as the Garo and Alice Gureghian Armenian Cultural Center.

Screenshot

Mr. and Mrs. Gureghian were on hand and ushered community leaders in the ribbon-cutting ceremony, which kicked off the evening’s festivities to celebrate this milestone.

A year after their generous donation, in 2015, the ACF honored Mr. & Mrs. Garo and Alice Gureghian during their annual gala, citing their unwavering and decades-long support of the organization and its mission to advance the aspirations of the Armenian people.

The ARF Day Celebration on March 14, under the banner of “Honoring Our Legacy,” not only brought together the Fresno community, but became a success due the attendance of community and ARF members from the Bay Area and Los Angeles.

The evening’s program began with Master of Ceremonies Nshan Der Kalousdian who highlighted the role the ARF has, and continues to play, in our modern Armenian history, as well as the Fresno Armenian community.

Der Kalousdian also introduced other guests, among them former Western Prelate Archbishop Torkom Donoyan.

Van Boghossian relayed the ARF Soghomon Tehlirian chapter’s message, after which the chapter president, Raffy Chekherdemian introduced a special video tribute to all Fresno ARF members who had passed away during the past more than 40 years.

DJ Raffy and Hratch Gaydzagian provided the evening’s entertainment.

A day after the event, on March 15, a special Requiem Service was held at the On the Holy Trinity Armenian Church in memory of great National Hero, Soghomon Tehlirian, marking the 105th anniversary of his heroic fete to bring justice for the Armenian Genocide.

Following the church services, Fresno parish priest Very Reverend Ashod Khachadourian led a memorial service at the Soghomon Tehlirian Monument that is located at the Masis Ararat Armenian Cemetery.

The event began with the Homenetmen Fresno Sassoon Chapter scouts marching toward the monument and laying a wreath. A brief program, once again, was led by Der Kalousdian, who invited Boghossian to present a message on behalf of the ARF Soghom Tehlirian chapter.

Zvart Boghossian recited a moving poem marking the occasion, following which the attendees sang the traditional ode “Verkerov Lee” in remembrance of Soghomon Tehlirian. Following the recitation, Armenian Youth Federation Kevork Chavoush Chapter Chairman Berj Karamanlian presented remarks on behalf of the youth.

“The success of this weekend was not the ARF Soghomon Tehlirian Gomideh of Fresno alone, it was a success for the Region since so many from all over came together to support and show respect to our Martyrs. We also extend many thanks to Archishop Torkom Donoyan and Mrs. Alice Gureghian for attending the event,” said Chekherdemian, the ARF chapter chairperson.105th Anniversary of Soghomon Tehlirian’s Heroism Marked

The Fresno community turned to mark the 135th anniversary of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation on March 14 organized by the ARF Soghomon Tehlirian chapter. The event held at the Garo and Alice Gureghian Armenian Cultural Center.

Benefactor Alice Gureghian with Fresno ARF Chapter Chair Raffy Chekherdemian

A surprise announcement by benefactor Alice Gureghian, who pledged to bequeath additional funds from her estate to the Fresno’s Armenian Cultural Foundation to ensure the maintenance and upkeep of the center that is named after her and her husband.

The Fresno ACF extended its utmost gratitude to Gureghian for her unwavering support of the organization and the center, which serves as vibrant hub for the community.

Garo Gureghian, who is the son of late Asbarez Editor Melik Shah, and his wife Alice announced a donation of $300,000 to the ACF Fresno Center in 2014.

Mr. and Mrs. Garo and Alice Gureghian (center) are flanked by community leaders and the Prelate following the ribbon cutting ceremony in 2017

A capacity crowd of more than 400 community members gathered in 2017 for the grand re-opening of the Fresno Armenian Center, which was rechristened that day as the Garo and Alice Gureghian Armenian Cultural Center.

Screenshot

Mr. and Mrs. Gureghian were on hand and ushered community leaders in the ribbon-cutting ceremony, which kicked off the evening’s festivities to celebrate this milestone.

A year after their generous donation, in 2015, the ACF honored Mr. & Mrs. Garo and Alice Gureghian during their annual gala, citing their unwavering and decades-long support of the organization and its mission to advance the aspirations of the Armenian people.

The ARF Day Celebration on March 14, under the banner of “Honoring Our Legacy,” not only brought together the Fresno community, but became a success due the attendance of community and ARF members from the Bay Area and Los Angeles.

The evening’s program began with Master of Ceremonies Nshan Der Kalousdian who highlighted the role the ARF has, and continues to play, in our modern Armenian history, as well as the Fresno Armenian community.

Der Kalousdian also introduced other guests, among them former Western Prelate Archbishop Torkom Donoyan.

Van Boghossian relayed the ARF Soghomon Tehlirian chapter’s message, after which the chapter president, Raffy Chekherdemian introduced a special video tribute to all Fresno ARF members who had passed away during the past more than 40 years.

DJ Raffy and Hratch Gaydzagian provided the evening’s entertainment.

A day after the event, on March 15, a special Requiem Service was held at the On the Holy Trinity Armenian Church in memory of great National Hero, Soghomon Tehlirian, marking the 105th anniversary of his heroic fete to bring justice for the Armenian Genocide.

Following the church services, Fresno parish priest Very Reverend Ashod Khachadourian led a memorial service at the Soghomon Tehlirian Monument that is located at the Masis Ararat Armenian Cemetery.

The event began with the Homenetmen Fresno Sassoon Chapter scouts marching toward the monument and laying a wreath. A brief program, once again, was led by Der Kalousdian, who invited Boghossian to present a message on behalf of the ARF Soghom Tehlirian chapter.

Zvart Boghossian recited a moving poem marking the occasion, following which the attendees sang the traditional ode “Verkerov Lee” in remembrance of Soghomon Tehlirian. Following the recitation, Armenian Youth Federation Kevork Chavoush Chapter Chairman Berj Karamanlian presented remarks on behalf of the youth.

“The success of this weekend was not the ARF Soghomon Tehlirian Gomideh of Fresno alone, it was a success for the Region since so many from all over came together to support and show respect to our Martyrs. We also extend many thanks to Archishop Torkom Donoyan and Mrs. Alice Gureghian for attending the event,” said Chekherdemian, the ARF chapter chairperson.

ARS Participates in Series of UN Programs on Status of Women

The Armenian Relief Society once again actively participated in this year’s 70th Session of the United Nations Commission on the Status of Women, held at United Nations Headquarters in New York, through a series of initiatives and engagements.

The ARS delegation had the privilege to attend the official opening session of the Commission, which took place on Monday, March 9, 2026, at UN Headquarters, under the theme: “Ensuring and strengthening access to justice for women and girls, particularly through the promotion of inclusive and effective legal systems, the elimination of discriminatory laws, policies and practices, and the removal of structural barriers.”

The ARS delegation also participated in a town hall meeting with United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres. In addition, the delegation attended a ministerial-level meeting of the EUestablished “Group of Friends for the Prevention of Violence Against Women and Girls.”

Also, the ARS UN Committee, in collaboration with the Armenian Legal Center for Justice and Human Rights and the Armenian Bar Association, organized a parallel event March 17 at the UN Church Center, entitled: “From Displacement to Justice: Strengthening Protection, Rights and Recovery for Conflict-Affected Women and Girls.”

The panel included presentations by Dr. Kevork Hagopjian, Gev Iskajyan, and Areni Hamparian, and was moderated by Talar Abdalian.

During the two weeks of the proceedings, the ARS delegation was joined by the five members of the Central Executive Board, members of the Eastern USA Executive Board, as well as representatives from Eastern USA, Canada, and South America who participated in a series of high- level meetings.

Among these, the session titled “Prosperous, Healthy, and Dignified: Policy Pathways for Older Women in Developing Countries” was of Particular significance.

The Armenian Relief Society, as a non-governmental organization, has been actively engaged with relevant United Nations bodies since 1976. Since 1988, it has held consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC).

In addition, an ARS delegation attended the 61st Session of the United Nations Human Rights Council from March 16 to 18, in Geneva, where safeguarding civil liberties, preventing discrimination, and equality were discussed.

Asbarez: Right to Return, Right to Know, Right to Reparations

Dr. Kevork Hagopjian speaks remotely to a UN panel on Mar. 17


BY DR. KEVORK HAGOPJIAN, ESQ.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Dr. Kevork Hagopjian, Esq. made a presentation on March 17 at a United Nations panel entitled “From Displacement to Justice: Strengthening Protection, Rights and Recovery for Conflict-Affected Women and Girls.” Speaking on behalf of the Armenian Legal Center for Justice and Human Rights, Hagopjian highlighted the plight of Artsakh women who were forcibly displaced in 2023.

Below is Dr. Hagopjian’s presentation

A Legal Crisis in Plain Sight

Distinguished panelists, honored delegates,

Imagine waking up one morning to find that the legal architecture meant to protect you — international humanitarian law, CEDAW, the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement or refugees — exists in full, on paper. And yet you are homeless. Your husband is a prisoner of war in a foreign country. You do not know whether he is alive. Your house has been destroyed, your land confiscated, and there is no court for redress.

This is not a hypothetical. This is the lived legal reality of tens of thousands of indigenous Armenian women from Nagorno-Karabakh — Artsakh — who were displaced, forcibly displaced, in September 2023. More than 150,000 ethnic Armenians fled within days. More than half of them were women and girls.

The Armenian Legal Center for Justice and Human Rights — ALC — pursues accountability for victims of this conflict through international legal mechanisms. Today I want to speak from that legal vantage point: not only to describe suffering, but to name the specific legal obligations being violated, with precise figures, and to argue that this Commission must treat access to justice not as an aspiration, but as an enforceable standard.

Three Rights, Three Failures — With Numbers
The CSW70 priority theme asks us to eliminate structural barriers to justice. Allow me to name three structural failures where international law is clear, obligations are binding, and the gap between law and reality is measurable.

The Right to Know — Missing Persons and Enforced Disappearance
Under the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols, all parties to an armed conflict have a binding legal duty to search for missing persons, provide information about their fate and whereabouts, and facilitate the return of remains. When states fail this obligation, the families of missing persons — overwhelmingly mothers, wives, and daughters — suffer a continuing violation of their own rights: to family life, to be free from cruel treatment, and to an effective remedy.

Here are the numbers behind that legal failure:
429 persons still missing from the 2020 war and subsequent hostilities — ICRC tracing requests, 2020–2023
195 additional missing from the September 2023 offensive alone — International Commission on Missing Persons, September 2024
777 missing from the first Karabakh war — still unresolved after three decades — ICMP Armenia report, September 2024

That is more than 1,400 people whose fate is unknown to their families across the two Karabakh wars and the 2023 displacement. Behind each number is a mother, a wife, a daughter waiting — in some cases for thirty years. This is not a bureaucratic gap. It is a continuing legal violation, recognized as such under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the jurisprudence of the ECHR, and CEDAW General Recommendation 30.

ALC, together with partner organizations, has submitted cases before the UN Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances and engaged the ECHR precisely because the right to know is not a political courtesy — it is a justiciable right. When legal channels fall silent, women bear the burden alone.

POWs, Detainees, and the Weaponization of Legal Categories
International humanitarian law is clear: prisoners of war must be treated humanely, granted family contact, monitored by neutral actors, and repatriated after active hostilities. These are not aspirational standards — they are binding obligations under the Third Geneva Convention.

What has happened in practice is a systematic legal reclassification that transforms these protections into bargaining chips. Consider the trajectory of acknowledged detainees:
72 Armenians acknowledged in custody — ECHR/Committee of Ministers notification, March 2021
23 acknowledged in custody — four years later — ECHR update request, October 2025
19 confirmed held today, after the January 2026 release — post-swap baseline, January–February 2026

These declining numbers might appear to indicate progress. They do not. They reflect a deliberate legal strategy: from February 2021 onward, Azerbaijani officials publicly claimed there were “no POWs left” — reclassifying remaining Armenian detainees as criminal suspects. Criminal cases were opened against more than sixty Armenian POWs and civilians, with short and sham trials, heavy sentences, and releases tied explicitly to negotiations rather than to legal standards.

Critically for this panel: the ICRC ended its physical presence in Azerbaijan in September 2025. The one organization with a mandate to conduct confidential detention monitoring — to be the neutral actor guaranteed by IHL — is no longer there. Families of the 19 confirmed remaining detainees now have no independent monitor, no confidential channel, no eyes inside those facilities. This is the worst possible moment for the international community to look away.

The Right to Return and Reparations — Justice as a Matter of Geography
The right of displaced persons to voluntary, safe and dignified return is enshrined in the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement and in CEDAW General Recommendation 32 on gender-responsive approaches to displacement. Housing, land and property restitution is a core component of reparations under the UN Basic Principles on the Right to a Remedy.

For Artsakh women displaced to Armenia and third countries, none of these rights have a functional mechanism attached to them. There is no restitution process, no property claims body, no international monitor with physical access to the territory.

There is also the dimension of torture and secondary victimization that the UN Committee Against Torture shadow report of March 2024 places squarely on the table: families described as ‘secondary victims,’ harmed by public humiliation videos, uncertainty, and threats. The report documents abuse from capture through transport to closed detention. Impunity for perpetrators — in some cases, their glorification — is itself a form of ongoing harm to women who wait for information.

From Documentation to Adjudication: What ALC Does
The ALC’s work proceeds from a conviction that international legal mechanisms — imperfect as they are — remain essential tools for communities who have no army, no territory, and no state resources to compel accountability. Let me describe three dimensions of our work directly relevant to this panel.

Documentation as a Legal Foundation
Legal accountability begins with evidence. ALC conducts systematic documentation of violations committed against indigenous Armenians across the 2020 war, the 2022–2023 blockade, and the September 2023 displacement. Our documentation includes survivor testimony, open-source intelligence, satellite imagery, and forensic methods recognized by international tribunals.

Trauma-informed documentation that centers the experience of women survivors is not a methodological preference — it is a legal imperative, recognized by the ICC Policy on the Crime of Genocide and its framework for gender-based crimes.

Strategic Litigation — International and Regional Courts
ALC has been engaged in supporting ECHR proceedings on behalf of Armenian POWs, civilian detainees, and displaced persons. The ECHR’s Rule 39 interim measures framework has been invoked repeatedly to seek information about detainees’ fate and to demand safeguards — because without that pressure, ‘acknowledged’ numbers would be even harder to obtain.

The UN System — Advocacy and Treaty Body Engagement
ALC engages with Universal Periodic Review submissions, Special Procedures communications, and treaty body reviews. We submitted to the UN Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances, highlighting how video evidence of captives in custody can coexist with official denial of their detention — a perverse but legally significant dynamic.

We have called for the CEDAW Committee to exercise its inquiry procedure under Article 8 of the Optional Protocol where there is evidence of grave or systematic violations. The Special Rapporteur on IDPs, the Working Group on Disappearances, and the Special Rapporteur on Torture all have active mandates with direct application to what is described in this room. Their engagement is not optional — it is required.

Four Calls to This Commission
This Commission has the opportunity — and the responsibility — to produce agreed conclusions that close specific accountability gaps. On behalf of ALC, we urge the following:

First: Name POW families and families of the missing explicitly.
The agreed conclusions must recognize that women who are family members of missing persons, POWs & hostages, and disappeared individuals suffer distinct, continuing violations. With over 1,400 persons missing across the Karabakh conflicts and 19 confirmed hostages still held — with no independent monitor present since ICRC’s departure in September 2025 — this Commission cannot afford generic language. States must be called upon to implement IHL obligations on missing persons and detainees as legal duties, not as political choices.

Second: Condemn the weaponization of legal categories.
The practice of reclassifying POWs and hostages as criminal suspects to extend detention and extract political concessions must be named as a violation of IHL and international human rights law. The agreed conclusions should affirm that domestic criminal proceedings cannot substitute for compliance with POW repatriation obligations under the Third Geneva Convention.

Third: Integrate the right to return into gender-responsive justice frameworks.
Displaced women’s access to justice requires legal recognition of housing, land and property rights that are independent of documentation gaps caused by the displacement itself. The agreed conclusions should call for accessible, gender-sensitive property claims mechanisms and for international support for legal aid to displaced populations.

Fourth: Address the monitoring vacuum and Call for the immediate and unconditional Release of POWs and Hostages.
The ICRC’s departure from Azerbaijan in September 2025 creates a dangerous monitoring gap. This Commission should call on states to facilitate the immediate restoration of independent detention monitoring — and on the relevant state to grant the ICRC and other neutral actors unobstructed access, as required under IHL. No monitoring means no protection. What would be even more important is to call for the immediate and unconditional release of all remaining POWs and hostages.

Justice Is Not Patience

“States are not permitted to remain passive in the face of the suffering of victims of serious violations of international law.” — Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Velásquez Rodríguez

The women of Artsakh did not choose displacement. They did not choose to have their husbands taken as prisoners of war and hostages, their names entered into a missing persons database, their properties confiscated, their right to return suspended indefinitely in the corridors of geopolitics. They chose to survive. And survival, when the legal system functions as it should, is the beginning of a claim — not the end of one.

Today, 19 men remain confirmed in Azerbaijani custody — several with life sentences handed down just weeks ago. More than 1,400 families do not know the fate of their loved ones. There is no functioning restitution mechanism for the property lost by 150,000 displaced Armenians. And the one neutral body mandated to monitor detention has been absent since September 2025.

These are not abstract legal failures. They are the daily reality of women in Armenia and in diaspora communities around the world — women who come to organizations like ours not because they believe in the perfection of international law, but because they believe that the alternative to accountability is silence, and silence is what perpetrators prefer.

ALC will continue to file cases, submit reports, document violations, and argue before every available forum until these obligations are met. We ask this Commission to share that commitment — in the agreed conclusions, in the follow-through, and in the political will to treat women’s access to justice as a non-negotiable foundation of the international order this institution was created to defend.

The women of Artsakh are here. Their cases are filed. The law is on their side. What they need is for this Commission to be on their side too.

Thank you.

168: Why does the government carefully hide the 7-year declines in the report? 3:

March: 24, 2026

The 2025 five-year plan of the government’s activities was launched in the parliamentary committees. performance report discussions. This is the last report of the five-year plan of this government, before the elections.

The danger of losing power is becoming more and more real and CP needs to create the impression of unprecedented achievements like air and water in order to somehow save the non-existent rating. They presented such a magnificent report that the reader will think that they have achieved world-class achievements. not a failure, not a failure, not a broken promise. All shortcomings, failures, unfulfilled promises and plans have been carefully noted.

The whole logic of the report is summarized in this naturalist.

“The year 2025 is the first calendar year since the independence of Armenia, when there were no casualties or injuries as a result of crossfire between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Peace was established between the Republic of Armenia and the Republic of Azerbaijan on August 8, 2025. The year 2025 is the first year since independence, when emigration of RA citizens from the Republic of Armenia was replaced by immigration. A high economic growth (7.2%) was recorded, as a result of which in 2021-2025 The average annual GDP growth was 7.9 percent,” this is enough to make it clear what logic the entire government report is based on. They want to say that the peace they brought is already real, no more soldiers die on the border, the economy is flourishing, and emigrants are returning to Armenia.

Read also

  • Entering the classroom is not a game. the majority of teachers receive very low salaries. Serob Khachatryan
  • WOULD YOU TRUST THE STEERING WHEEL OF YOUR AIRPLANE TO A TRACTOR DRIVER? PROFESSIONALS SHOULD LEAD THE STATE. YOU HAVE TO BE A CHILD NOT TO UNDERSTAND WHAT WILL HAPPEN AT THE END. VARDAN ARAMIAN
  • Citizens will have no reason to rejoice

All the points of the government’s program of activities, which were related to Artsakh, were implemented exclusively to the detriment of the Armenian people and to the benefit of Azerbaijan. At the cost of persistent efforts, they handed over Artsakh, “resolved” the conflict and boasted that they brought peace.

Even after that, as we are convinced every day from the statements from Azerbaijan, there is no peace. After that, they are proud that they brought peace. They brought “peace” at the price of surrendering Artsakh and breaking the resistance of their own people.

This is enough to evaluate the achievements of the government’s foreign policy. Now let’s turn to the economic “achievements”, which flooded the entire report like a flood.

They say that we not only fulfilled the promised average annual economic growth of 7 percent, but also exceeded it, instead of 7 percent, we achieved an average annual economic growth of 7.9 percent.

We are opening the government’s 2021-2026. the activity program and reads the economic targets set by the government.

“The minimum level of average annual GDP growth is 7 percent (9 percent in the case of a favorable external environment),” the government’s program literally reads.

It is needless to say how favorable the external environment has been for Armenia’s economy in recent years. The increases, which, in most cases, even if formal, were recorded, were mainly due to it.

And after that, the government did not reach its promised 9 percent average annual economic growth target. We still do not say what happened in the structure of the economy during that time.

The structure of the economy, which will create serious problems for further growth, has been made more vulnerable than ever. The largest branch of the economy is wholesale and retail trade, repair of cars and motorcycles. However, the weight of the manufacturing industry, which was committed to increase to 15 percent of the GDP in the course of these 5 years, like many other program commitments, was put on ice.

instead of 15 percent, in 2025 according to data, the processing industry made up only 11 percent of the GDP. 2021 It was 11.3 percent.

One more thing they turned the wheel backwards. And that means that they have endangered the future of the economy. Manufacturing industry is the basis of the economy, but trade has become the pioneer of the economy instead.

Not to mention that in 2020 the weight of manufacturing industry in the GDP was 12.7 percent.

Such “development” was provided in the field of processing industry and industry in general, but naturally there is no word about it in the report. Instead, they remembered that last year the volume of industrial output was 2017. increased by 100 percent. What did 2025 have to do with it? the report in 2017 with, it is not difficult to understand. they tried to create the impression of high growth.

And it is not the only case that they went – they arrived until 2017. Such comparisons are numerous in this report. They did not consider it appropriate to write about the unfulfilled obligations of the program in the report, instead, they tried to flourish the economic “achievements” with the indicators of 8 years ago.

In the same way, they probably did not consider it appropriate to write what they have brought to the head of agriculture in recent years and in general during the period of their rule, that the volumes of production of agricultural products have decreased for years. Last year there was a few percent increase, after 7 consecutive years of decline, that’s all they noticed, they didn’t notice the declines.

The only 0.3 percent overperformance of the budget’s tax revenues was specially remembered, and the indicator of taxes in GDP, which they failed to a great extent, was forgotten, although in this case, taxes-GDP is a much more important indicator. We have the fact that for the last 2 years, taxes-GDP has hardly changed, in 2023 was 24 percent, in 2025 – 24.07 percent. This means that the fight against the shadow economy and administration improvements have failed. At least in those 2 years no progress has been made.

According to the government’s activity plan, by 2026, that is, by the end of last year, 300 schools and 500 kindergartens should have been built and repaired. They should have not only built and repaired it, but also furnished it. At the end of last year, only one third of the schools and only half of the kindergartens had been built. There was not even a word about furnishing.

Poverty in the government’s 2021-2026 with the activity plan, they should reduce it by half, eliminate extreme poverty altogether. In case of halving, poverty in Armenia should have been 13%, it is almost 22%. 0.6 percent of the population is extremely poor. Hundreds and thousands of citizens continue to live in poverty.

Instead of easing the social condition of those people, the life of the representatives of the political power, state officials has improved dramatically, they have become the owners of properties and wealth, they receive millions of salaries and bonuses. That’s why they stuck to their seats and even after causing so many disasters, they don’t intend to leave.

HAKOB KOCHARYAN




Nikol Pashinyan is a traitor… Armen Ashotyan

March: 24, 2026

Armen Ashotyan writes: “This is the real image of the Turkish servant looking for the 5th column.”

Nikol Pashinyan is a traitor, based on the processes taking place in RA in the run-up to the 44-day war, Nikol Pashinyan’s deliberate mistakes, stupidities, ignorant or deliberate decisions of the main traitorous degree shown during the war.

However, Nikol Pashinyan is also a traitor with the justifications immediately after November 9, 2020.

And so, Nikol Pashinyan is a traitor from November 9, 2020 to March 2023, because.

1. Only the traitor, who became not so much a symbol (calling the ear of the attache) of defeat, as a reason, could continue to make efforts to stay at the helm of government.

2. Only a traitor could resort to such provocations to accomplish this, which instead of uniting the public and relieving them of stress, further agitated the already stressed Armenian society, leading to greater polarization and a deepening sense of injustice.

3. Only a traitor could include his own petty interest in the service chain of geopolitical interests and lead the country to senseless early elections.

4. Only a traitor could make promises on the eve of those elections, which he knew from the beginning that he would not fulfill.

In particular, on the issue of Artsakh: the right to self-determination, de-occupation, etc.

5. Only a traitor with his political existence could “put a tongue” in the mouth of Azerbaijani President Aliyev after the elections, that he received a “capitulation mandate”, that the Armenian people digested the capitulation of November 9 and sent a sinister message to the international community on behalf of the Armenian people that with 680,000 dated “for” votes, this nation is ready to enter the political history in the 21st century as the only and exclusive one. non-caste nation.

6. Only a traitor could not raise the issue of the legal and sanctions consequences of the Azerbaijani-Turkish aggression in the 44-day war in any international instance.

7. Only a traitor could not make any effort to “hurt” Azerbaijan and Turkey in any international forum.

8. Only a traitor could forget the fact of Turkey bringing militants from the Middle East, recorded by international structures.

9. Only a traitor could condone Azerbaijan’s war crimes and not take any practical steps to implement international punitive mechanisms.

10. Only a traitor could contribute to the Azerbaijani policy by agreeing to the approaches of some mediators, for example, to eliminate the concept of “Nagorno Karabakh” from the documents.

11. Only a traitor could replace “the right to self-determination of the people of Artsakh” with the term “rights and security of the Armenian population of Nagorno-Karabakh”.

12. Only a traitor could throw the responsibility of the security and future of Artsakh people into the “pocket” of others, particularly Russia, contrary to the plan of his own government.

13. Only a traitor could regularly give “hatatas” to the people of Artsakh and tolerate “140. 000 vs. 3 million”, the divisive and Turkish propaganda theses generated by their own team.

14. Only a traitor could turn Armenia into a battlefield of geopolitical giants.

15. Only a traitor could, against the background of this geopolitical tension, make efforts to cool down the problem, not enter into geopolitical games, but instead of waiting for the final decision of the fate of the IC Co-Chairs Institute, enter into separate negotiations.

16. Only a traitor could show less caress and affection towards the defeated army after the shameful defeat on November 9 than towards the police, whose officers could only dream of the rewards and material security that Armenian soldiers and officers received.

17. Only a traitor could agree after November 9 and justify through the stinking lips of his own teammates that GPS delimitation and demarcation is OK.

18. Only a traitor could give up and give up the Goris-Kapan road so easily.

19. Only a traitor could tolerate, encourage and participate in many corruption risks after the war along with various other members of his team.

20. Only a traitor could divide the society even more with actions of abuse of the law enforcement system instead of the atmosphere of public solidarity (due to his provocative, political considerations).

21. Only a traitor could continuously destroy the pillars of national identity: church, family, morality, etc.

It was also treason:

* ceding 200 square kilometers in Kubatli and Zangelan, not foreseen by the November 9 announcement,

* handing over Azerbaijani prisoners of war and persons who committed murders unrelated to the war until the return of the last Armenian prisoners of war.

* the issue of prisoners of war “escape”

* not providing minimal conditions to the army on the Armenian-Azerbaijani contact line,

* Abandoning the fundamental principles of the Central Committee and bringing the “undrunk” Almaty Declaration of 1991 to the Maidan.

* Failure to respond to Aliyev’s personal insults and political insults.

As you can see, the evidence and testimonies about the betrayal of Nikol Pashinyan are more than enough both before and during the 44-day war, and especially immediately after the war.

Well, let me not remind you about his treacherous decisions and behavior in 2023-26. Perhaps you still remember.”

Papikyan refuses to provide part of the price tags of weapons promised by Pashinyan

March: 24, 2026

On March 16, Pashinyan confirmed our information. Has the verbal agreement with Aliyev already been reached? article: published, where we referred to the possible public display of weapons acquired after 2022 in May.

Moreover, Nikol Pashinyan justified this idea by the fact that the state debt has increased because they also bought weapons, so they decided to present a public report to the public in the near future so that citizens can see what it is about.

Accordingly, on March 18, we sent a written request to the Minister of Defense of the Republic of Armenia to find out how much the state debt increased just for the purchase of weapons, or how much money was spent on the purchase of new and modern weapons after 2022. This is especially for him, because in November 2025, Pashinyan said: “8 billion foreign debt has increased, what did we do, we bought weapons”, and 168.am wrote, that months before the war, the head of the General Staff of the RA Armed Forces, Onik Gasparyan, suggested to Pashinyan that “in general, 8 billion US dollars were needed to solve the problems facing the armed forces”, which was not taken into account, and even in the case of another General Staff, the proposal to solve some problems with a smaller amount than this.

But in its response within 5 days, the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Armenia refused to provide the requested information in this regard, based on Article 8, Clause 1, Sub-Clause 1 of the RA Law “On Freedom of Information” and the Government of the Republic of Armenia dated 11.01.2024. The requirements of Clause 15 of Resolution N5Z-N, as well as Clause 172 of Order N 797-Л of the Minister of Defense of the Republic of Armenia dated May 16, 2024 “On Approving the Expanded Departmental List of Encrypted Information of the RA Defense System”.

Read also

  • You are such a “stupid” prime minister, name it, say: Putin, why are you colonizing us? Menua Soghomonyan
  • As Pashinyan handed over Artsakh to the enemy, he will do the same with Armenia. Vazgen Hovhannisyan
  • A bunch of unbelievers are trying to do all this with us. Anna Mkrtchyan

And this is the case when Nikol Pashinyan announced last year in November.

“Did we buy weapons on debt? Yes, we bought weapons on debt. Why, because we needed a lot and all at once… You don’t believe that you have the right? I say, let’s take it, show it, we can also stick price tags on it, which is what it costs.”

By the way, we got acquainted with the samples of new weapons in a closed format, there were no price tags.

We asked the Ministry of Defense to tell us how much money was spent on the purchase of weapons in 2019, as Pashinyan announced at the time that In 2019, the armed forces acquired an unprecedented amount of weapons and ammunition.

In addition, taking into account the fact that until today there are various rumors about the price of Su-30SM multi-purpose aircraft (without the missiles mentioned by Pashinyan) and Osa-AK anti-aircraft missile complexes, we asked Suren Papikyan to provide information: how much was paid for 4 Su-30s, and how much for Osa-AKs? However, the provision of this information was also refused.

It should be noted that Andranik Kocharyan, the chairman of the Standing Committee on Defense and Security Affairs of the National Assembly, has more than once “name pasted” also to the weapons bought during Pashinyan’s rule, saying. “We had wrong acquisitions of weapons. I sent the information collected by the Investigative Commission, a huge package, to the Prosecutor General of RA.”

It’s a different question, how objective and how subjective are his claims.

By the way, Andranik Kocharyan, who headed the 44-day investigative commission, seems to have decided to focus on these topics again and through this to remind the former military leaders who still left some of his statements unanswered. Let’s wait for further developments.




All the calculations of the USA have failed, the war with Iran will affect the weight of the USA

March: 24, 2026

Backing away from his ultimatum to destroy Iran’s energy infrastructure, US President Donald Trump announces that negotiations are underway with Iran, and negotiations are planned. Hours ago, US President Donald Trump announced that the United States had conducted active negotiations with Iran, and both sides had reached “important points of agreement”.

Trump announced that the negotiations held on Sunday will continue.

“We had very, very productive negotiations. We will see what they will lead to. I would say that we agreed on many important points, almost all of them. “We will probably hold negotiations over the phone today,” he said.

Trump added that the talks are being led by his special envoy for the Middle East, Steve Wittkoff, and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner. He did not name the person in Iran with whom the US negotiated, but said that a high-ranking, respected leader was involved. Trump stated that the United States did not receive any information from Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei.

Read also

  • Trump announced a five-day moratorium on deploying marines, Iran does not believe in negotiations. Sergey Melkonyan
  • As Pashinyan handed over Artsakh to the enemy, he will do the same with Armenia. Vazgen Hovhannisyan
  • WHO ARE YOU, MERCIFUL DESTRUCTION… THEY DIDN’T SIT YOU HERE TO EAT SIBEK WITH A STICK, SHOOT CORN, SNAP YOUR FINGER.  I WILL NOT GET. Nina Karapetyans

He said that he does not know whether Khamenei is alive or not, and added that he does not want him to be killed.

The American leader claims that Iran has agreed not to create nuclear weapons and is ready for a peaceful settlement. “Now Iran has another chance to end its threats against America and its allies, and we hope they will take advantage of it,” he said, adding that if successful, “America and the whole world will become much safer.”

Trump also noted that the United States seeks the withdrawal of nuclear materials from Iran and considers that the negotiations are proceeding “almost perfectly”.

In his assessment, the implementation of the agreements “will essentially end this conflict”.

In addition, the US president considered possible serious political changes inside Iran. According to him, a “very serious change of regime” may take place in the country, the creation of a “joint leadership” with the participation of an unknown Iranian leader is also not excluded. At the same time, some officials in Tehran continue to deny the fact of the negotiations, which, according to Trump, may be due to the fact that the information “has not reached everyone”.

According to Axios data, Pakistan, Egypt and Turkey act as mediators. Direct and indirect contacts with Washington are denied in Tehran. According to Israeli sources, Iran’s contact with the American side is maintained by the Speaker of the Parliament, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf. The Jerusalem Post, referring to its sources, reports that Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the Speaker of the Iranian Parliament, is participating in the negotiations with the US from Iran’s side. Axios journalist Barak Ravid also writes about this, referring to the Israeli official.

He wrote in X that the special envoy of the US president, Steve Wittkoff, and the son-in-law of the American leader, Jared Kushner, communicated with Ghalibaf. Ghalibaf’s participation in the negotiations is also confirmed by the Israeli Ynet, at the same time noting that the process is mainly conducted through mediators, and it is not clear whether the speaker of the Iranian Parliament maintains direct contact with the Americans. Ghalibaf himself denies this.

He called the news about negotiations with the USA “fake news”, the purpose of which is to manipulate the financial and oil markets.

“The Iranian people demand full and severe punishment of the aggressors,” he wrote in X.

The spokesman of the Iranian Foreign Ministry denied that negotiations had taken place with the United States, just after the President of the United States, Donald Trump, announced that the parties had found “important points of agreement” in the last few days. The state news agency IRNA, citing the spokesman of the ministry, reports that in recent days, friendly countries have sent messages according to which the United States has asked to start negotiations to end the war, but Iran has not responded to that offer.

Parallel to all this, Tehran and Tel Aviv continue military strikes. On the 25th day of the war, Israel continued to attack the cities of Tehran, Tabriz, Spahan and Karzi, as well as the province of East Azerbaijan. There are victims, including children. Iran reported that Israel struck energy-related facilities in Isfahan and Khoramshahr regions. Iran, in its turn, hit both the capital Tel Aviv and the southern and central regions of Israel. According to Israeli media, there are injuries and destruction. Iran has also hit Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. According to Reuters, the operation of Amazon Web Services, a cloud services giant, was disrupted in Bahrain by a drone strike. The Strait of Hormuz, through which about 20 percent of the world’s consumed oil passes, is still closed.

Russian analyst Fyodor Lukyanov 168.amtold that the war of the USA and Israel against Iran has reached a milestone, when it is no longer clear to the initiators what should be done next, because this war is dragging on a lot.

According to him, Trump’s hope was the quick capitulation of Iran, which should have happened as a result of several strikes.

“That was the calculation and hope of the US, based on the belief that Iran does not have sufficient resources to resist, repulse, respond to its opponents, it does not have leverage. It was also a big miscalculation that by eliminating Iran’s leaders, Iran’s power pyramid would collapse. It turned out that this was a miscalculation. Iran’s real potential, levers, influence in the region were not fully appreciated, obviously Iran’s recent attacks on the energy infrastructure of the US allies in the region, together with the inflation of energy carriers and the closing of the Strait of Hormuz, became a serious problem for the US. However, Iran has often announced this,” Lukianov said.

He does not understand how such calculations could actually be the basis of such a serious decision, how Iran could be considered in the same way as, for example, Venezuela.

“In any case, a long war was not planned, so the delay of military operations violated all scenarios,” he said, continuing that Trump has found himself in a rather difficult situation and is trying to get out of it. found himself in a situation that he cannot control and which causes increasing problems for everyone else.

“Therefore, Trump is trying to present the negotiations as a victory, stating that they are going well when Iran denies them, the war continues, and the United States is trying to bring Iran to the negotiating table through mediation, trying to return the situation to a manageable field. In this whole situation, the world really felt the importance of the Strait of Hormuz in practice, this is the reason why Trump announces that he will also control the situation there, even though it is still closed by Iran. Obviously, although the situation is difficult for Iran as well, Iran will not negotiate easily,” Lukianov said.

In his opinion, how the American side will resolve the situation will determine the weight of the US on the world stage, as the real capabilities of the US are revealed.

“And it is decisive for all regions, including the South Caucasus, where the US has been strengthening recently,” he said.