Arctic cold reaches Armenia. the temperature will drop by 8-10 degrees

`

Cold arctic air currents will enter Armenia, the air temperature will drop by 8-10 degrees, Deputy Director of “Hydrometeorology and Monitoring Center” Gagik Surenyan said.


“Throughout the day today and tomorrow until the evening, Armenia will be in the zone of influence of south-western sun-drained warm air currents, as a result of which warm and rainless weather is expected in the entire territory of Armenia. From the late evening hours of May 28, on May 29, 30, Armenia will be in the zone of influence of the cyclone entering from the Black Sea, as a result of which short thunderous rains are expected in the sunny region on those days.”

The RA Ministry of Defense considered the former symbol of the army “lifeless” and contrary to the essence of the army

There were a number of heraldic, morphological, and ideological defects in the previous coat of arms. This was announced by the Ministry of Defense, justifying why they changed the emblem of the army.


“The former coat of arms of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Armenia, approved in 2001, had a number of heraldic, morphological, and ideological flaws, so in the context of the transformation of the army, the process of revising the coat of arms was also initiated. The main character of the former coat of arms, the eagle, has significant heraldic and aesthetic flaws. The eagle is depicted with a closed beak. In heraldry, a closed beak is considered a calm, non-combat state, and is often perceived as a lifeless figure, which contradicts the essence of the army. The main body of the eagle, the torso, is missing, it is molded into the general surface, creating an eagle-like image assembled only from feathers. The eagle’s limbs, claws, weapon are missing. this creates the appearance of a mutilated, powerless, vulnerable being, which is unacceptable for an army symbol.


The central figure of the new coat of arms, the eagle, has been reinterpreted, depicted fully alive and fully embodied. The head, body, wings and claws are clearly visible, overcoming the omissions of the previous coat of arms. The eagle’s beak is open, which in heraldry symbolizes vitality, readiness, vigilance, the right to speech and power, the clear and dynamic posture of the eagle directly symbolizes the alertness and fighting spirit of the Army of the Republic of Armenia, it embodies the army’s mission to protect the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Armenia,” the statement said.

Elections in Armenia: pro-West or pro-Russia?

EuroTopics
May 29 2026

29 May 2026

Armenia will hold parliamentary elections on 7 June. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan is hoping that the vote will bolster his pro-Western course. On Thursday, US President Donald Trump declared his “full and unconditional support” for Pashinyan. Meanwhile, Russia is stepping up the pressure on Yerevan by imposing import bans on Armenian goods and threatening to disrupt supplies of natural gas.

https://www.eurotopics.net/en/358404/elections-in-armenia-pro-west-or-pro-russia#





Yerevan denied receiving notices from Moscow about the termination of gas agreements

Yerevan has not received notifications from Moscow about the possible termination of the agreement on the supply of natural gas, oil products and rough diamonds. This was reported by the Ministry of Territorial Administration and Infrastructures of Armenia.


“The Ministry of Territorial Administration and Infrastructures of Armenia has not received any letter or notice from the Russian side regarding this issue,” the department told “Armenpress” agency.


As “Kommersant” newspaper wrote earlier, Russian Energy Minister Sergey Tsivilev sent a letter to Armenia’s Ministry of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure, warning about the possibility of unilateral termination of gas agreements.


The letter states that Russia may suspend or unilaterally cancel the agreement signed in December 2013 on the supply of natural gas, oil products and rough diamonds if Yerevan continues on its path to EU membership.

The restoration of the driver’s right after deprivation will be simplified. New regulations of the Ministry of Internal Affairs

Today, on May 27, the Government of Armenia approved the legislative project presented by the Ministry of Internal Affairs, which significantly changes the procedure for restoring that right for citizens who have been deprived of the right to drive. The project will be presented to the National Assembly for consideration.


The project proposes:


♦ the right of persons who have been deprived of the right to drive, upon application within 1 year after the expiry of the period of deprivation, to restore the right once without passing qualification exams, by paying the state duty prescribed by law, and to establish a probationary period for a period of 1 year. And the second or next time, restore only after passing qualifying exams.


♦ if a trial period is established, allocate 6 points instead of 13 points.


♦ in case of consumption of 6 penalty points by a person on probation, provide for deprivation of the right to drive vehicles for a period of one year.


♦ impose a state fee in the amount of fifty thousand drams to restore the right to drive without qualifying exams and to set a probationary period.


At the same time, a transitional provision is established, according to which after January 1, 2020, deprived persons will be able to restore their right to drive only once more, by paying the appropriate state fee and allocating 6 penalty points, subject to a 1-year probationary period.

Washington is in a hurry to strengthen its strategic presence in the South Caucasus

After the first information about Marco Rubio’s visit spread, under the influence of domestic political and campaign sentiments, the primary perception of almost everyone was that this is being carried out exclusively for the purpose of providing political support to the current authorities of Armenia, especially to Nikol Pashinyan.


However, the subsequent events and the study of the contents of the signed documents showed a much deeper and broader geopolitical picture.


As a matter of fact, Rubio’s visit was not so much about Armenia’s domestic political agenda as it was about US global strategic interests in the South Caucasus.


The main objectives of the visit were obviously the following:


◉ Rapid establishment of US strategic presence in the region,
◉ political and legal strengthening of the TRIPP project,
◉ Expanding control of critical minerals supply chains;
◉ Integration of the South Caucasus into the Western geo-economic system,
◉ Designing a new corridor architecture bypassing Iran and Russia,
◉ Limitation of China’s “One Belt, One Road” strategy.


And only at the end of all this, a demonstration of political support for the current authorities of Armenia, before the elections.


However, there is an extremely important circumstance here.


If the primary purpose of the visit was political “support”, then it is hard to imagine that the US Secretary of State would be limited to meetings in the airport format and would actually be in Armenia for only about 40 minutes, without a full state visit protocol, without deep political contacts and even without a meeting with the Prime Minister.


This in itself is a very telling political impulse.


It shows that the priority for Washington at this stage is not the internal political fate of Armenia, but the quick fixing of a new regional geo-economic and geo-political architecture.


And the authorities of Armenia in this process are considered mainly as the current operational partner in the implementation of that strategy.


In other words, a much bigger game is going on in the South Caucasus today than the usual pre-election campaign.


The region is emerging as an important hub of global power conflict, new geo-economic corridors, energy control and global realignments.


And it is at this historical and extremely dangerous stage that our compatriots must answer the most important question on June 7. Are the current authorities of Armenia and Nikol Pashinyan able to skillfully, coolly and state-mindedly manage the helm of the country in such complex geopolitical conditions?


Can they protect Armenia’s interest in a reality where big states fight not for declarations, but for corridors, resources, spheres of influence and strategic control?


I think the answer is obvious.


The state cannot safely go through such a historical storm with random decisions, situational politics and the logic of adapting to the agendas of external forces.
At this stage, Armenia does not need another propaganda administration, but state thinking, experience, calculation and national responsibility.


Davit Ananyan, former chairman of the RA SRC




A disgraceful document in every way. If Russia signed a similar document, do

May 272026


About 40 minutes, 2 agreements and 1 speech of support to the authorities of the day. This is how the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s visit was summed up.

On May 26, Armenia and the United States of America signed the framework agreement on strategic cooperation on the project “Trump’s Way for International Peace and International Prosperity”. The initialing of the document took place within the framework of the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s visit to Armenia. Within the framework of the same visit, Armenia and the United States of America signed a framework memorandum on ensuring supply in the field of extraction and processing of important minerals and rare minerals. And in the end, the US official noted that the Prime Minister of Armenia is paving the way to a “more independent future”. this, of course, can also be considered pre-election support.

International and energy issues expert Armen Manvelyan He considers Rubio’s visit a big step in support of the authorities of the day, and the signed documents as a “disgrace”.

“A shameful document in all respects. First, related to those minerals. in fact, they come and try to take all that under their control, use it only for their own purposes. If, for example, Russia signed a similar document, can you imagine what kind of noise it would be here?

Read also

  • There is a tough competition in the world for rare metals. Syunik is becoming a zone of global interest. the key issue is Armenia’s sovereignty. Vahe Davtyan
  • It is a process of forming a political package, under which the satisfaction of Azerbaijani approaches or ambitions will take place. Hakob Badalyan
  • In the name of diversifying the arena, they cut off ties with the Russian Federation and instead, they desperately try to get weapons from here and there. David Jamalyan

America is heavily dependent on China for minerals and is now trying to provide an alternative by signing similar agreements with various countries (also Saudi Arabia signed a similar agreement). Armenia does not get anything from it. At one time, they colonized other countries with those steps.

The protocols related to TRIPP are even more shameful, because with it Azerbaijan achieved its goal. it is clear from the document that no Armenian border guard will be on that road, contrary to the fact that it is regularly mentioned about Armenian sovereignty, etc.,” he clarified, noting that the TRIPP agreement was given a higher status than the Constitution of Armenia.

Armen Manvelyan answered the question: in the case of a different government, is it possible to renegotiate and redirect those initialed and signed documents, declarations, with the assurance that it is possible, because they are not final sealed documents.

“They are mostly declarations, and we not only can, but also have to review them, and in that context the most important thing is TRIPP. we need to understand who the 3rd party is, Armenia should increase its share, at least 51 percent of the device, the desire of Azerbaijanis that they should not see an Armenian on that road should be eliminated.

By the way, false information is being spread that allegedly Chinese goods will also come and go to Europe and vice versa. Believe me, Chinese goods will never come or go that way, because first of all, it is under American control. That road will be purely to serve the political and economic goals of Turkey-Azerbaijan.” 168.amhe elaborated in the conversation with

When asked whether there is any economic opportunity for RA from TRIPP, from the point of view of diversification, in order to somehow reduce Russian dependence, the international affairs expert responded: “There is none, and, on the contrary, we are just going to replace one dependency with another.”

Russian Deputy Prime Minister Overchuk ruled out the EAEU summit to be held in Astana

May 272026

Deputy Prime Minister Overchuk ruled out the adoption of restrictive measures against Armenia at the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU) summit to be held in Astana.

The Eurasian Economic Forum, which will be attended by the leaders of the member states of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU), will be held on May 28 in Astana.

“There is no question of changing the contract. A consensus is needed to amend the agreement, and as far as we know, Armenia is not going to leave the EAEU. There, they understand very well both the volume of privileges and the volume of trade with other EAEU member states, which was largely possible due to the preferential regimes that operate for Armenia,” said the Russian Deputy Prime Minister.

According to him, these are zero customs duties, harmonized standards, and harmonized technical regulations. Today our markets are open and there is a free movement of goods, said Overchuk.

“Therefore, naturally, Armenians understand very well the advantages that membership in the Eurasian Economic Union gives them, and they do not want to leave. There are political forces in that republic whose goal is to declare rapprochement with the European Union and membership in that union. Everyone understands that it is incompatible, this is a new situation, and it is necessary to assess it,” said the vice-president of the Russian government.

From the document signed yesterday with Rubio, it can be seen that TRIPP is only Armenian-American

May 272026

“If, God forbid, Nikol declared himself prime minister after June 7, then on behalf of Armenia, he will donate a certain share of TRIPP to Azerbaijan and Turkey,” RPA Vice President Armen Ashotyan said a little while ago, referring to the one-hour visit of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio to the Republic of Armenia and the pending bilateral documents signed here.

Armen Ashotyan said that Marco Rubio signed 3 documents with Armenia during his visit that lasted less than 1 hour, so he wants to briefly present important nuances and issues related to those 3 documents, which were left out of the opposition’s speech.

Speaking about the RA-US framework memorandum on supply assurance in the field of extraction and processing of important minerals and rare minerals, Armen Ashotyan said:

“At first glance, the general policy of the USA is the priority in relation to rare earth minerals and metal minerals – to have the whole world supply, etc. At first glance, it may seem that this document is against Russia or China, in fact, there is a very interesting nuance here.

Read also

  • There is a tough competition in the world for rare metals. Syunik is becoming a zone of global interest. the key issue is Armenia’s sovereignty. Vahe Davtyan
  • It is a process of forming a political package, under which the satisfaction of Azerbaijani approaches or ambitions will take place. Hakob Badalyan
  • EAEU on the verge of politicization. Will the rules of the game be preserved for Armenia?

The main, important mineral in Armenia is molybdenum, which our country has 7% of the world’s reserves, and 7% of the world’s molybdenum is near us, mainly in Syunik. According to open sources, the main consumer of this mineral is neither Russia nor China, the main consumer of this mineral is the countries of the European Union. Yes, according to the agreement signed with Washington, Armenia actually undertakes the obligation to sell and direct its rare metals and minerals to the USA in fact, at the expense of the European Union, because the No. 1 market is Belgium, Holland and a number of other countries,” detailed Armen Ashotyan, continuing that with that document Washington actually wants to take away Armenian molybdenum from Brussels. The RPA vice-president described this phenomenon as the paradox of this document.

RPA Vice President Armen Ashotyan also referred to another document, the RA-US comprehensive strategic partnership charter.

According to him, this is an interesting document because the Biden administration signed a “Strategic Partnership Charter” with Armenia in the last days of its existence.

“This is a “Comprehensive strategic partnership document”. The textual analysis shows that there are, of course, some differences, because in this new document there is a clear reference to the Washington summit last year, a reference to TRIPP, etc., etc., that is, there is a little more specificity, related to nuclear reactors, etc., which was not in the Biden document.

But the problem is not only that, because the Trump administration likes, so to speak, to tune this or that direction received from Biden and make it unprecedented, here the word “comprehensive”, that is, the word “comprehensive” should not confuse you.

I especially want to draw your attention to the following. Therefore, “comprehensive” strategic partnership also implies clear cooperation in the security and defense spheres. It is thus comprehensive, that is, all spheres must be involved, including the security sphere, which is important for both the US and us.

However, when you open the 3rd section related to the security sector, we see that there is nothing serious, objective. The United States does not assume any obligation to ensure the defense and security of Armenia with this Comprehensive Strategic Partnership document, except for generously allowing Armenia to purchase American-made weapons in the future through appropriate mechanisms. In other words, this document does not envisage any serious impact on Armenia’s defense capability, security, there are no new guarantees, the USA does not undertake any obligations related to Armenia’s security and defense,” said Ashotyan.

He also detailed that the USA is also grateful to Armenia, that Armenia has its participation in global security topics: Afghanistan, Iraq, Kosovo, Lebanon, Mali. “The 2nd point of that 3rd block is very interesting, it is entirely about the political and military legacy left during and thanks to Serzh Sargsyan, because Afghanistan, Iraq, Kosovo, Lebanon, Mali, all these topics either started during Serzh Sargsyan’s rule, or continued, if I am not mistaken, only Afghanistan, which was done before that,” Ashotyan said.

He explained that in Section 3, which is called Security and Defense, no security guarantees are given to Armenia, which contradicts the concept of comprehensive partnership.

Referring also to the framework agreement on strategic cooperation regarding the third RA-USA “Trump’s Way for International Peace and Prosperity” project (TRIP), Ashotyan said that there are very serious threats here.

He noted that this document confirms his earlier concern that this project may turn into an Armenian-American-Azerbaijani, Armenian-American-Turkish project instead of an Armenian-American project.

“There is no prohibition for the parties to resell or in any other way transfer their shares of TRIPP to third parties with this new document. Moreover, a mechanism is provided for how the parties, if they want to transfer those portions to other parties, should resolve this issue.

“Problem one, this agreement emphasizes our concern that this TRIPP project will not remain Armenian-American. It is obvious with this agreement that the parties can transfer their actions to 3rd parties by mutual consent. It is obvious, isn’t it, that Turkey and Azerbaijan stand first among those 3rd parties.

Yes, agreement is expected from Armenia, if Armenia agrees, it can happen. Does anyone doubt that if Turkey wants to buy it, or Azerbaijan, the Americans said, okay, the current authorities of Armenia will be able to say no?

In other words, “it is not an absolute guarantee that the redistribution of those actions will depend on the current authorities of Armenia”, on the contrary, it is one of the biggest threats, because this government is Turkish, pro-Turkish and pro-Turkish, and this is clear. Let me tell you more, I do not rule out that if, God forbid, Nikol declares himself the Prime Minister after June 7, then Nikol himself will give a certain share to Azerbaijan and Turkey on behalf of Armenia.

Remember these words of mine. If we did not prevent Nikol’s reproduction on June 7, then Nikol will redistribute our portion in TRIPP to Azerbaijan or Turkey, or resell it symbolically on behalf of all of us,” he said.

The next concern, according to him, is that the TRIPP corporation, which is created in parts, has the right to have subcontractors and decide to hire new parties for this or that operation, this or that function, this or that direction.

“Those new parties are called 3rd parties, it is also obvious here that they can be Turkish-Azerbaijani firms, companies, to which TRIPP Corporation will, so to speak, delegate certain powers and functions.

And those 3rd parties, for example, this or that Turkish company, or Azeri, will receive the same rights to ensure that function,” Ashotyan said, continuing that there is a window in which they can formally keep the Armenian-American project, but on the ground, reassign, delegate, order all functions to the Turkish or Azerbaijani parties.

“The next problem in this agreement is that, in fact, Armenia is really deprived of its own sovereignty over that territory. Armenia completely gives the rights related to that territory, except customs, tax, current, security, etc., to that corporation, where 74% is not Armenian.

In other words, to talk about sovereignty under this regime, which, apart from everything else, is ready to give our own land to another party, in front of our eyes, is just a joke, this is something equal to state treason, especially considering the fact that this agreement stipulates that if the provisions of the agreement contradict our laws, then this agreement is valid, if it does not contradict the Constitution.

Well, how Nikol wants to reshape, reshape our Constitution, if he remains in power, we all already know and imagine very well,” explained Armen Ashotyan.