Nuclear security threat assessment issues were discussed in Yerevan

With the technical support of the Center for Nuclear and Radiation Safety, a workshop entitled “Evaluation of nuclear security threats and management of design-based threats” was held in Yerevan. The event was organized by the RA Nuclear Security Regulatory Committee and the Sandia National Laboratories operating under the US Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration.


The workshop was attended by experts from the USA, as well as representatives of the Armenian Nuclear Regulatory Authority, the Armenian Atomic Power Plant, the RA Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Foreign Intelligence Service, the National Security Service, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the State Revenue Committee.


The main objective of the event was to strengthen Armenia’s capabilities to assess nuclear security threats and develop physical protection systems based on design baseline threat assessment to ensure the safety and security of the Armenian nuclear power plant.


The participants discussed the current challenges of protecting nuclear power plants from radiological sabotage, referred to the relevant guidelines of the International Atomic Energy Agency and discussed the methods of evaluating the effectiveness of physical protection systems.


The main topics discussed were:


Threat assessment. Assessing the motives, intentions and capabilities of potential external or internal/own enemies.


New risks. countering cyber threats, other unforeseen threats, and the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) by potential adversaries.


Scenario exercises. developing attack scenarios using the Lone Pine nuclear power plant model, conducting Tabletop Exercises and planning Force-on-Force exercises to assess the performance of physical defense systems.


The event emphasized the importance of close cooperation between competent state authorities and organizations operating nuclear facilities to strengthen nuclear security, reduce the risks of nuclear terrorism, and ensure the safe and peaceful use of nuclear energy.


The workshop also reaffirmed the ongoing cooperation between Armenia and the US in the field of nuclear security, in accordance with international standards and IAEA guidelines.

—

Verelq: The brothers beat their mother to death with a rolling pin and hid her body

On July 22, Aragatsotn regional administration received a report of R., born in 1970. About the disappearance of M. The criminal police of Aragatsotn, implementing operational information, obtained factual information that in March of this year, during an argument over domestic issues in their apartment in Melikgyugh village, 25-year-old and 20-year-old brothers killed their mother, R. To M.


In order to cover up the crime and eliminate the traces, they moved the body to a half-built building near the mentioned address and hid it under the soil layer. This is reported by the Ministry of Internal Affairs. On July 22, the brothers were found, arrested and taken to the Aragatsotn Regional Department of the Criminal Police, where one of them confessed what had happened. The young people and the prepared documents were sent to the pre-trial body. As part of the initiated criminal proceedings, the body of a 56-year-old woman was found in the indicated place, under the soil layer. The 25-year-old and 20-year-old youths were arrested and taken to the detention center. The investigation is ongoing.

—

Asbarez: Tina Demirdjian Named Glendale’s Next Poet Laureate

Tina Demirdjian

GLENDALE — The City of Glendale and the Library, Arts & Culture Department are pleased to announce the appointment of Tina Demirdjian as Glendale’s next Poet Laureate. Demirdjian’s appointment will begin in September, the position serves as an ambassador for Glendale’s rich culture and diversity, promoting the art of poetry.

As Poet Laureate, Demirdjian will develop workshops that engage community members of all ages and abilities in poetry writing, performance, and poetry appreciation. Demirdjian, a Glendale resident, says she is passionate about creating impact and strengthening communities through poetry, art, story, and the power of finding common ground, “Sometimes I change people’s minds: about themselves, about poetry and about each other.”

Demirdjian says she wants to be a bridge to amplify voices from the community, acknowledging the diversity of our city and highlighting the abundance of opportunities for experiencing poetry throughout its environs, “the potential of where and how poetry can be amplified in Glendale is an open field through installations in businesses and institutions which become transmitters of these voices.”

“We are excited to welcome Tina Demirdjian as Glendale’s next Poet Laureate,” said Library Director Lessa Pelayo-Lozada. “Tina’s work as a poet and artist has brought community members together through her workshops led at Brand Library, in her teaching in our local schools and at gallery spaces where she has exhibited her work; her appointment as our city’s Poet Laureate is an impactful step for the Poet Laureate program.”

Tina Demirdjian is the recipient of numerous grants, including two from the City of Los Angeles Department of Cultural Affairs, the Durfee ARC grant, and the California Council for the Humanities. She is the author of “IMPRINT,” her first poetry collection, and a contributor to “Birthmark: A Bilingual Anthology of Armenian-American Poetry” and recently anthologized in “Remain In Light: Visions Of Homeland And Diaspora” by UC Regents.

Her work has appeared in Moria, High Performance, Texas Observer, The Midwest Poetry Review, and she has performed throughout Los Angeles. She is the owner of POETRY CONSULTS and is a facilitator, team-builder, and producer of events. Through her experience in schools, museums, libraries, She is also a Board Member of Brand Associates that supports the rich array of cultural, arts, and educational programming at the Brand Library & Art Center. In collaboration with art historian Valerie Taylor, she co-created ARTful Conversations at Brand Gallery to bridge community members with writing poetry using art in the exhibits as inspiration.and companies for 30 years she believes in the power of building and sustaining partnerships.

Demirdjian’s mission as a poet, educator, businesswoman, and culture bearer is to continue to engage and empower all communities to write, edit, and recite poetry using their experiences, observations, and connections to the past as a means to lead in their lives.

Tina Demirdjian with Raffi Joe Wartanian, who served as the inaugural Poet Laureate of Glendale, CA

Glendale’s Poet Laureate Program began in 2023 after a grass roots call from the public. Tina Demirdjian succeeds Glendale’s first Poet Laureate, Raffi Joe Wartanian after three years of increasingly building an audience of attendance at Poetry Workshops through the library and publishing submitted poems to the Library, Arts & Culture’s annual poetry publication, Jewel City Anthology. Wartanian will hold his final Poetry Workshop in his role as Poet Laureate with the City of Glendale in September, while launching the third volume of Jewel City Anthology.

Learn more about Library, Arts & Culture’s Poet Laureate program as well as upcoming workshops online.

Founded in 1907, the Glendale Library, Arts & Culture Department includes eight neighborhood libraries including the Brand Library & Art Center, a regional visual arts and music library and performance venue housed in the historic 1904 mansion of Glendale pioneer Leslie C. Brand, and the Central Library, a 93,000 square foot center for individuals and groups to convene, collaborate and create.

The department also serves as the chief liaison to the Glendale Arts and Culture Commission which works to continually transform Glendale into an ever-evolving arts destination. Glendale Library Arts & Culture is supported in part through the efforts of the Glendale Library Arts & Culture Trust. For more information visit the website, or contact Library, Arts & Culture at (818) 548-2021 or via email at [email protected].

Known as the “Jewel City,” Glendale is the fourth largest city of Los Angeles County. With a population of almost 200,000, Glendale is a thriving cosmopolitan city that is rich in history, culturally diverse, and offers nearly 50 public parks & facilities, with easy access to a municipal airport. It is the home to a vibrant business community, with major companies in healthcare, entertainment, manufacturing, retail, and banking. For more information visit the website or follow on social media @MyGlendale.

—

Top Turkish OSCE Official Pledged to Assist in Pashinyan’s Campaign to Remove

OSCE Secretay General Feridun H. Sinirlioğlu of Turkey makes a public address standing in front of a photo of Kemal Ataturk in 2023


Rights and Christian Groups Urge OSCE Official Clarify Remarks

The Secretary General of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, Feridun H. Sinirlioğlu of Turkey, in recent remarks publicized on various media outlets appeared willing to lend his office’s support to the campaign to remove Catholicos Karekin II spearheaded by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and his government.

While the provenance of Sinirlioğlu’s remarks is dubious, at best, nevertheless the top OSCE official made them.

Sinirlioğlu made the comments to Russian pranksters, who telephoned him and impersonated Pashinyan. The recording of the “phone call” has been circulating on some social media platforms, as well as various Russian media outlets since July 8.

Thinking that he was speaking to Pashinyan, Sinirlioğlu accused Catholicos Karekin II of politicizing the Armenian Apostolic Church. He then agreed to “look into” how the OSCE might support the person impersonating Pashinyan in the matter of removing the Catholicos.

The person impersonating Pashinyan asked for Sinirlioğlu’s support in the event of any public criticism, to which the OSCE Secretary General responded with “Okay, I’ll do my best, I’ll try.”

In a statement issued on Thursday, four human rights and religious organizations—the Armenian Center for Political Rights, the Helsinki Committee of Armenia, the Forum for Religious Freedom – Europe, and Christian Solidarity International—expressed their deep concern and condemned Sinirlioğlu for the statements he made and demanded immediate public clarification by the top OSCE official.

“We are conscious of the provenance of these remarks. They were obtained by Russian pranksters, who telephoned the Secretary General while impersonating Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan. The call was made public on July 8. These pranksters have a track record of targeting politicians and officials to secure statements on sensitive public matters. We do not condone deception of this kind. Nevertheless, while we recognise that the exchange was engineered, the Secretary General’s own words reveal a posture that cannot be reconciled with the responsibilities of his office,” the statement by the groups said.

After detailing the content of the recording, the four groups emphasized that at no point in the conversation did the “Secretary General object that the forced removal of a religious leader by the state would violate the very freedoms the OSCE is committed to uphold.”

“Principle VII of the Helsinki Final Act 1975 sets out the OSCE’s foundational commitment to “human rights and fundamental freedoms, including the freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief.” That commitment has been reaffirmed repeatedly and is binding on all 57 participating states, including Armenia. The autonomy of religious organizations, and their freedom to govern their own internal and canonical affairs, lie at the heart of that guarantee. Since the Secretary General is charged with upholding this commitment, he should not be offering even qualified encouragement to a government bent on deposing the head of a church,” the statement explained.

“These remarks cannot be viewed in isolation. Since May 2025, the Armenian government has pursued a systematic and sustained campaign against the AAHC [Armenian Apostolic Church] as part of a broader attack on democracy and rule of law. Prime Minister Pashinyan has publicly called for the removal of Catholicos Karekin II, published a ‘roadmap’ setting out steps to depose him, and levelled unsubstantiated accusations against the Catholicos and senior clergy. Travel bans have been brought against the Catholicos and several bishops, and high-ranking clergymen have been detained on criminal charges that appear politically motivated. Taken together, these actions constitute a state-orchestrated effort to subordinate the Church to the government’s will, putting at risk the separation of church and state enshrined in Armenia’s Constitution,” the statement charged.

The four organizations stressed that the Armenian Apostolic Church “is no ordinary party to a political dispute. Since Armenia’s adoption of Christianity in 301 AD, the Church has played a critical role in preserving the Armenian language, culture and national identity, a role recognized under Article 18 of the Armenian Constitution as an ‘exclusive mission.’”

“Far from politicizing the Church—as the Secretary General claims—the Catholicos has sought to discharge this constitutional responsibility by defending the rights of the Armenian people, not least those ethnically cleansed from Nagorno-Karabakh in 2023. Any state-led effort to depose the Catholicos thus violates not only Armenia’s commitment to religious freedom, but also the country’s settled constitutional order,” the organizations went on to point out.

They called on Sinirlioğlu to publicly clarify and retract any suggestion that the OSCE would support the removal of the Catholicos or otherwise interfere in the internal governance of the Armenian Apostolic Church; reaffirm the OSCE’s commitment to protecting freedom of religion or belief in Armenia, consistent with its human dimension commitments; and engage with the Catholicos to ensure that the rights of the Church, its clergy and its faithful are fully respected.

“We stand ready to meet with the OSCE to share further information and our concerns, and we will continue to monitor the conduct of its leadership closely. The head of the OSCE should be a bulwark against the violation of religious freedom, not a willing accessory to it. On the evidence of these remarks, Secretary General Sinirlioğlu has failed that test, and he must now make plain where he stands,” the statement concluded.

The statement to the OSCE was signed by John Eibner President Christian Solidarity International; Rafael Ishkhanyan President Armenian Center for Political Rights; Ján Figeľ President Forum for Religious Freedom – Europe; and Siranush Sahakyan President Helsinki Committee of Armenia.

—

Ruben Vardanyan’s Case Submitted to European Court of Human Rights

Ruben Vardanyan addresses a court in Baku during his sham trial in 2025


An appeal was filed at the European Court of Human Rights regarding the case of former Artsakh State Minister Ruben Vardanyan, who is serving a 20-year sentence in a Baku prison after a sham trial, which found him guilty of unfounded charges.

Vardanyan was among Artsakh leaders who were captured following Azerbaijan’s brutal attack in 2023 that resulted in the forced displacement of the entire Armenian population there.

Siranush Sahakyan, head of the Center for International and Comparative Law, and representative of the interests of Armenian captives at the ECHR announced the filing on Wednesday, saying that she will be the lead attorney on the case.

The application details violations of eight articles of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, supported by comprehensive legal and factual arguments, Sahakyan outlined in her statement.

“The court did not read the judgment in its entirety. Later, from the verdict made available through his family, it became clear that Vardanyan was found ‘guilty’ on 41 counts, based on 21 articles of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Vardanyan’s individual guilt was not substantiated by facts or evidence in the verdict. Instead, the court concluded that the ‘criminal community,’ referring to the administration of the unrecognized Republic of Artsakh, had operated in Nagorno-Karabakh since 1988, and that Vardanyan joined this ‘community’ in December 2020, even though he was residing in Moscow at that time,” Sahakyan explained in the statement.

“The court interpreted Vardanyan’s assumption of a civilian administrative post as a violent seizure of power, his commercial and charitable activities as illegal entrepreneurship and financing of terrorism, and his entry into Nagorno-Karabakh through the Lachin Corridor as an illegal crossing of Azerbaijan’s state border,” Sahakyan added.

Unlike the other 15 Artsakh leaders who were tried separately, Vardanyan did not appeal the verdict, considering the trial staged and predetermined, and all domestic remedies ineffective. Indeed, it is impossible to protect one’s rights within a system that inherently denies the right to a fair trial. In these circumstances, he chose to seek justice through international legal mechanisms.

In an interview with News.am, Sahakyan said that “it is predicted that the military court’s verdict will be upheld” in the case of the 15 Artsakh leaders who appealed their cases.

“No court in Azerbaijan can serve as a mechanism for protecting the violated rights of ethnic Armenians, especially when dealing with any matter related to the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict,” Sahakyan explained.

She added that Vardanyan’s case was appealed to the ECHR, because “it is impossible to protect rights within a system that from the outset rejects justice and rights, and where the trial is a ceremony for carrying out the executive branch’s political decisions.”

She explained that she was able to review the Vardanyan’s verdict and “it immediately became clear why the sessions were held behind closed doors, without the participation of international observers and international media representatives.”

“Through the family, we gained access to the verdict, which was translated into English and submitted along with the relevant documents. We expect that the ECHR, in accordance with its procedures, will proceed with the complaint,” added Sahakyan.

“It is obvious that during the more than one-year preliminary investigation and the one-year trial, they [Azerbaijani authorities] actually failed to find any reasoning even remotely close to logical for the ‘charges’ they themselves had invented. We are dealing with an unprofessional, fragmented document that cannot withstand any professional criticism whatsoever, called a ‘verdict,’ on the basis of which our compatriots are, in essence, being held as illegal hostages in that country,” Sahakyan said.

The human rights attorney delineated in the News.am interview the violations of the European Convention on Human Rights pointed out by her in the case.

“First and foremost, this concerns the right to a fair trial guaranteed by Article 6 of the Convention. Moreover, the violations concern all three points of this article. The violation of this article alone already casts doubt on the entire judicial process and the legality of the verdicts rendered. Violations of certain other rights were also raised in the context of the prohibition of discrimination and the prohibition of restricting rights for political motives,” Sahakyan said.

The attorney explained that the military court in Baku characterized Vardanyan’s assumption of the Artsakh State Minister position as a “violent seizure of power”; his commercial and charitable activities as “illegal entrepreneurship and financing of terrorism”; and his entry into Nagorno-Karabakh via the Lachin Corridor as “illegal crossing” of Azerbaijan’s state border.

“At the same time, the verdict does not cite any specific order given by Vardanyan to kill, torture, displace, or attack the civilian population, nor does it confirm his personal participation in the incidents attributed to him,” said Sahakyan.

Sahakyan told New.am that she is confident that a ruling by the ECHR will not remain without consequence sooner or later, and “I am more than convinced that we have every basis for achieving a positive outcome at the ECHR.”

However, she lamented that her experience in recent years has shown the powerlessness of international institutions, since this same Azerbaijan has not implemented resolutions of either PACE or the European Parliament, has ignored numerous appeals, and has even disregarded decisions of the International Court of Justice.

“Such an attitude by Azerbaijan does not in the least bit prevent EU leaders Ursula von der Leyen and Kaja Kallas from calling Azerbaijan’s dictator an important partner,” Sahakyan said.

—

Asbarez: Follow-Up Online Meeting of the Diaspora Mobilization Conference Held

At the initiative of the Coordinating Committee of the Diaspora Mobilization Conference, a follow-up online meeting was held on July 18, for participants of the inaugural conference that convened in Paris in April.

The meeting brought together conference participants from Armenia, Artsakh, and 25 countries across the Armenian Diaspora.

The meeting took place at a time when the Armenian people continue to confront the consequences of the forced depopulation of Artsakh, as well as serious challenges related to the protection of the collective rights of the people of Artsakh, the international pursuit of the Armenian Cause (Hai Tahd), the preservation of national and spiritual values, and the strengthening of the Diaspora’s united role. At the same time, the continuing democratic backsliding in Armenia has made the need for pan-Armenian unity and renewed national engagement even more evident.

The meeting provided an opportunity to review the outcomes of the Paris Conference, present the work carried out over the past three months, and discuss future steps. The Coordinating Committee reported on the activities undertaken since the conference, including working meetings among participants of the four roundtables, the preparation of reports and summary papers, as well as efforts to disseminate the conference’s outcomes through the press, social media, and community networks.

During the session, participants viewed a documentary video summarizing the conference, which once again underscored its significance and highlighted the positive momentum and new prospects that have emerged from it. The final summary reports of the conference’s roundtables were also presented. These addressed the strategic role of the Armenian Diaspora, the preservation of national identity and values, the development of Armenia–Diaspora relations, and the strengthening of Diasporan mobilization around shared national objectives.

Special attention was given to the conference’s dedicated website, where the complete conference archive will be made available, including reports, video recordings, photographs, the conference declaration, articles, interviews, and other materials. The website will ensure the long-term preservation of the conference’s work and make it broadly accessible to the public.

The concluding discussion focused on future directions. Participants reaffirmed that the principles and priorities articulated at the Paris Conference remain central components of the pan-Armenian agenda. They emphasized the importance of sustained, organized, and united action in advancing the national interests of Armenia, Artsakh, and Armenians throughout the world.

The online meeting once again confirmed that the Paris Conference was not a one-time event, but rather the beginning of an ongoing process of uniting the forces of the Armenian Diaspora, with the objective of mobilizing its collective potential in service of strategic pan-Armenian goals.

—

168: Capital expenditure has been “frozen”.

July 23, 2026


The government has “frozen” the capital expenditures planned in the state budget. These are expenses of primary importance, which are aimed at the implementation of economic programs, the formation of infrastructures, and the solution of defense problems.

It is those costs that have been “frozen”.

This year they spent almost half less capital expenditures.

In the first 5 months of the previous year, the capital expenditures made with the funds of the state budget amounted to almost 205 billion drams. This year they made only 109 billion.

Read also

  • While they weave myths, the famous international financial organization predicts a slowdown in economic growth in the coming years
  • The performance of targeted programs is shamefully low. They also failed the credit programs
  • PASHINIAN IS LYING. THERE WILL NOT BE AN INCREASE IN PENSIONS OF PENSIONERS BY 10 THOUSAND AMD. NAIRI SARGSIAN

They decreased by 96 billion drams. And this in the event that they had planned to carry out much larger capital expenditures this year. In the first half of the year, they were supposed to spend 376 billion drams in capital, but in 5 months they spent only 109 billion drams.

Planned expenses of 267 billion remained in the air. Compared to the plan, the performance in 5 months was only 29 percent.

It is clear that they will not be able to complete the remaining 71 percent in 1 month.

If they spent only 96 billion drams in 5 months, naturally, it is impossible to spend 267 billion drams in the last 1 month of the first half. And, as always, we will have the fact that the capital expenditures planned for the first half of the year will once again remain incomplete. The economic and infrastructural projects planned within those funds will not be implemented.

Among them, the planned capital expenditures in the field of defense will not be implemented.

It seems that the government no longer values ​​the capital expenditure of the defense sector. They probably think that they have already brought peace, and the strengthening of defense is secondary.

Defense capital spending has fallen by more than 68 percent this year. Compared to the previous year, they spent 290 million dollars less.

“Compared to the same period of the previous year, capital expenditures of the state budget decreased by 46.8 percent (by 96 billion drams), mainly due to the decrease of 68.3 percent (107.7 billion drams) of capital expenditures made within the framework of the “Supporting the Defense of the Republic of Armenia” program,” the Ministry of Finance recorded in the performance report of the first 5 months of the budget.

He recorded, but did not give any explanation why, compared to the previous year, the capital expenditures, including the capital expenditures aimed at strengthening the defense, decreased at such a sharp rate.

These figures show that many projects of primary importance cannot be completed on time. And for that, not only is no one responsible, but they don’t consider it necessary to give an explanation. They were probably so busy with the elections that they even ignored the plans for defense. In the pre-election period, we saw what the officials were busy with, including the Minister of Defense.

These authorities are justly blamed for burying the country in debt. But they are not able to complete the projects planned within the framework of the borrowed funds on time.

Near the end of the year, the performance of loan programs was almost zero.

“A low index was recorded in terms of loans received from external sources, which amounted to 2.7 billion drams or 1.5 percent of the half-year plan,” this is the record of the Ministry of Finance.

But the words of the Ministry of Finance are very mild in this case. They could easily say that they have completely failed the plan.

They had planned to implement projects worth 180 billion drams or 486 million dollars with credit funds, but they implemented only 2.7 billion drams or 7.3 million dollars. 472.7 million dollars worth of projects remained unfulfilled.

At first glance, it may seem that it is good that they limited the attraction of loans. But it is not so. In addition to the fact that they did not implement the planned projects within the framework of those funds, we did not get the results we were supposed to get, probably they also paid fines for the unused part of the loan funds. They buy loans, but very often they are unable to implement the programs planned within them on time, and that is why the state pays large fines.

The performance of targeted credit programs of the first semester was only 2.3 percent in 5 months. They planned to implement such projects worth 51 billion drams or about 138 million dollars, but they implemented only 1.2 billion.

Targeted loan programs of almost 135 million dollars were not implemented.

Why, for what reason, is not known.

At the expense of funds to be received from international financial organizations, they were supposed to finance 37.1 billion drams or more than 100 million dollars of targeted projects. They could not implement even one billion drams.

The same shameful situation is in the case of targeted credit funds taken from foreign countries. They planned to do 13.9 billion drams or more than 37 million dollars worth of works in the first half of the year, but in 5 months they did only 300 million drams worth of works or barely 800 thousand dollars.

In the budget, as always, they write numbers, make promises, outline plans, which in real life remain incomplete. They are not carried out on time, causing damage to the state and the economy. This is a clear failure of public finance management and it does not apply only to credit or targeted credit programs.

HAKOB KOCHARYAN



—

The issue of the release of Armenian prisoners of war held in Baku should become a state political issue

July 23, 2026

Eduard Sharmazanov writes: “The United States House of Representatives to release the Armenian prisoners of war in Baku the call deserves a high and positive evaluation.

The Foreign Affairs Committee of the US House of Representatives called on Azerbaijan to release the Armenian prisoners of war held in Baku.

The commission voted in favor of Azerbaijan with 44 votes in favor and 7 “against”, calling on unconditional and immediate release of all Armenian hostages, amending H.R. In Bill 9087 (Law on Diplomatic Service of the House of Representatives).

This amendment was introduced by Congressman Brad Sherman (Democrat, California), the vice-chairman of the Armenian Affairs Committee of the Congress, with the support of the chairman of the committee, Brian Mast (Republican, Florida).

This initiative is extremely important and proves that there are figures in the ranks of both the Republican and Democratic parties in the USA who condemn this anti-humanist action by Baku.

The issue of the release of Armenian prisoners of war held in Baku should become the primary component of our state and nationwide political campaign.”

—

Public call to break this chain of silence. “100 Armenian Women” initiative

July 23, 2026

“100 Armenian Women” initiative issued a statement.

“One week ago, the “100 Armenian Women” initiative, which includes scientists, cultural figures, entrepreneurs, various fields and civil leaders, sent an urgent appeal to foreign diplomatic missions and international structures accredited in Armenia, including the US Embassy, ​​the EU delegation, the UN, the Council of Europe, the UK Embassy, ​​high-ranking EU representatives, embassies of all EU countries and other organizations.

The application presented in detail the worrying reality that is deepening in Armenia day by day, in particular. The complete subjugation of the judiciary to the executive, the targeted prosecutions and lengthy, arbitrary detentions of political and civil opponents, including women leaders, the illegal use of police force and an incredible increase in repression at the state level, unconstitutional violations of property rights, the de facto seizure of companies and massive economic repression of opponents.

In order to protect the participants of the initiative from state prosecutions, arbitrary arrests and professional pressures, we initially applied to all organizations under the condition of confidentiality, however, the seven-day stone silence of the international community has passed seven days after sending the application. In the conditions of seven days of judicial violations, arbitrary arrests and violation of civil rights, those international structures and diplomatic representatives, which declared themselves guardians of democracy and the rule of law, maintain a deafening silence. This passivity is not neutrality. this is a manifestation of diplomatic adaptation, which legitimizes state crimes in Armenia and sends an impulse of absolute impunity to the executive power. Today we reject that silence and present our collective speech to the public. We take this step fully aware of the serious personal, legal and professional risks involved. However, when secrecy serves only to hide state wrongdoing from the eyes of the international community, anonymity becomes an unacceptable compromise.

We declare with full responsibility. if any participant of this initiative is subject to state repression, arbitrary persecution or professional pressure after this announcement, the responsibility will also be borne by the international community, whose silence makes these illegalities possible at the RA state level. Our Demand We call on international partners, accredited ambassadors and multilateral institutions. Publicly break this chain of silence. Give a clear and objective assessment of the loss of independence of the judiciary, the practice of using detention as a punitive tool, and the state policy of targeting political and civil opponents and public voices. Officially respond to the applications submitted by the civil society. End the practice of silently archiving urgent civil society alerts and form an accountable, transparent dialogue with independent civil society. Make any international support conditional on the full protection of human rights. Ensure that the diplomatic, financial and political partnership with RA is strictly conditioned by the actual fulfillment of international obligations, and not by political expediency.

We did not make our professional merits to silently observe how the democratic foundations of our country are systematically destroyed. Armenia’s democratic future cannot be sacrificed to diplomatic adaptation. We expect an early response to our public call,” the statement of the initiative states.

—

Confiscation without accountability. anti-corruption policy or

July 23, 2026

Immediately after the end of the elections, the process of politically motivated confiscation of private property gained new momentum in the country.

The government justifies its actions with the need to return property of illegal origin to the public and protect the public interest. While it is noteworthy that this policy is again applied exclusively to influential political opponents.

Such selectivity raises the question. Is this really an anti-corruption policy or politically motivated retaliation through property redistribution? What is happening forms a solid public perception of selective justice.

As a result of the measures taken, the government assumes the functions of an economic entity, establishing control over various economic sectors of the country and enterprises related to significant financial flows. However, the transfer of the asset to the state does not in itself guarantee the efficiency of management and does not eliminate corruption risks. It only changes the environment of occurrence and reproduction of risks.

Read also

  • There is no guarantee that Turks and Azerbaijanis will not come to invest in these companies. economist
  • Parliamentary Mandate, Boycott and Voter’s Will
  • The new game of the European Union in the South Caucasus. What messages did Ursula von der Leyen have in Yerevan and Baku?

A situation has been created where the government simultaneously acts as both the owner and the regulator, and the authority that makes managerial decisions about the enterprises that have come under its control.

In the absence of transparent and dignified procedures for the appointment of professional managers, boards of independent directors and managers, an obvious conflict of interest arises. it is possible to compensate the consequences of inefficient management at the expense of budget funds or increased tariffs, and unjustified economic or politically motivated commercial decisions can be justified with abstract conversations about “strategic” and “social” problems.

This practice is contrary to the Organization for Economic Development and Cooperation (OECD) 2024 Corporate Governance of State-Participated Enterprises. landmarks.

They demand to clearly separate the ownership function of the state from the functions of market regulation and policy making, to provide operational independence to state enterprises and to form their boards with professional, dignified and transparent procedures. The OECD emphasizes that combining the roles of regulator, owner and market participant creates a conflict of interest and undermines a level playing field.

The accumulated experience of state management of commercial assets in Armenia does not inspire optimism. The most obvious warning is the fate of the notorious ANIF, about which all public questions and discussions remain a “dialectic wasteland”.

This state fund operated for years without a clear mandate, accountability mechanisms and performance indicators. In 2024, after the disappearance of huge budget funds, the RA government adopted a decision to stop the activities of ANIF and liquidate it. The government not only failed to report on the failure of its own “strategic initiative”, but also placed the entire financial burden of its consequences on the state budget, i.e. the taxpayers.

The public was never presented with a comprehensive conclusion about which managerial decisions led to the failure, who was personally responsible for them, what institutional changes are needed in the state asset management system to prevent the recurrence of such problems in the future. The lack of answers to these and other important questions allows us to conclude that the purpose of ANIF’s liquidation was to cover up the “case” and clean up the tracks, without the necessary legal and political consequences.

Lack of accountability and transparency are key issues in the management of assets confiscated and transferred to the state. First of all, we do not have a unified public register of assets transferred to the state. Then, it is not known on what basis the managers are elected, what goals are set before them and by what standards their activities are evaluated.

It is unacceptable that there is a lack of comparable data on the value of assets at the time of transfer and formed after the period of state administration, received revenues and budget expenditures, liabilities, purchases, transactions with major partners and related parties. It is even unknown whether the object in question is functioning and what decisions are taken on behalf of the state, or rather, the taxpayer.

Under these conditions, statements about “restoration of justice” or “strategic importance” of assets become slogans covering up management failures, non-transparent decisions and abuses.

According to the OECD guidelines, SOEs must be held to the same high standards of accounting, information disclosure, compliance and auditing that apply to private companies. Their financial statements must be audited annually by an independent auditor. State control or state audit cannot replace external audit.

In order to exclude the above-mentioned risks, in addition to the legal grounds for expropriation, the current status and estimated value of each enterprise transferred to the state, information about the managers, the goals of public ownership management, financial results, the amount of state support, as well as the scenario of further management, such as keeping the enterprise under state ownership, transferring it to a specialized operator, or privatizing it through an open tender, must be publicly presented.

Financial statements and performance audit results should be published regularly, not after a scandal or liquidation. Otherwise, the lack of information does not allow either to assess the validity of the decisions taken or to analyze the effectiveness of the management of confiscated assets.

Therefore, the main question is not how much property the government has confiscated, but how much it has preserved and increased its value, provided professional and accountable management and measurable public benefit.

The main guarantee against turning nationalized enterprises into a source of political rent is not the high-sounding words about “state interest” and “restoration of justice”, but the pre-defined and published goals of their management, professional management, independent audit, transparency, and the inevitability of personal responsibility in case of failure to ensure the specified results of economic activity.

ARMEN MARTIROSYAN

Deputy of the RA Supreme Council and the National Assembly (1990-99)

Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary Ambassador of the Republic of Armenia




—