At Par With HIMARS! Why Indian Pinaka MBRLS For Armenia Is Giving Sleepless Nights To Azerbaijan


Recent reports in Azerbaijani media claim that the first consignment of India’s Pinaka Multi-Barrel Rocket Launcher System (MBRLS) has been delivered to Armenia via Iran. According to media reports, the shipment has really upset Azerbaijan, which is at odds with Armenia.

India’s reported sale of the Pinaka MBRLS to Armenia under an export contract valued at US $250M has been a breakthrough in defense exports as India looks to become a key defense exporter.

The export contract was likely for the Pinaka Mk-1 MBRLS and not the Pinaka Mk-2 or Pinaka Mk-2 EPRS. The longer-range Pinaka-2 systems, with optional (INS/GPS) guided rockets, had cleared user trials, but their production has most likely not begun.

In contrast, the first Pinaka Mk-1 Indian Army regiment was raised in February 2000. Production of the Pinaka Mk-1 system is underway, and the Indian Army is fielding 10 Pinaka Mk-1 regiments.

Besides ongoing system production, the production capacity for Pinaka Mk-1 rockets is well established and exceeds 5,000 per annum. As a result, India can easily export the system without affecting its defense readiness.

Pinaka Mk-1 is a free-flight artillery rocket area bombardment system with a range of 38 kilometers, quick reaction time, and a high rate of fire. A single Pinaka system fires a salvo of 12 rockets from a multi-barrel launcher in 44 seconds, while a battery can fire 72 rockets.

The 214mm bore Pinaka rocket has a payload of 100 kilograms and can be fitted with various warheads like anti-tank mines and blast-cum-pre-fragmented high explosives.

A battery of Pinaka consists of six launcher systems, six loader-cum-replenishment vehicles, three replenishment vehicles, and a command post vehicle with a fire control computer and meteorological radar.

Over 7.2 tons of payload in the form of lethal warheads can be delivered up to a range of 38 kilometers and effectively neutralize a target area of 1000 meters by 800 meters. A Pinaka regiment comprises three batteries plus reserves.

Armenian defense forces are mostly equipped with Soviet-era defense systems. In 2015 Armenia bought some newer Russian systems. Because of its Special Military Operation underway in Ukraine, Russia is likely unable to meet additional Armenian weapon system requirements.

The DRDO developed the Pinaka system as a replacement for the Russian GRAD BM-21, which equips the Armenian armed forces. Another important reason for Armenia’s choice was likely its adversary Azerbaijan’s heavy use of drones, including suicide drones.

For an MBRLS to survive in a drone-saturated battlefield, it must have the ability to shoot and then disappear quickly. The Pinaka Mk-1 has precisely that ability.

It requires no separate survey to position and orient, making the launcher autonomous. The launcher features brushless servo motors/drives that facilitate quick laying with accuracy within one milli-radian, allowing the system to respond to fire requests quickly.

Shoot and Scoot capability enables the launcher to escape the counter-battery fire. Pinaka support vehicles have matching mobility and logistics commonalities.

Other reasons for the Armenian choice are likely to be low cost, ready availability, simplicity of operations, assured supply of spares, and availability of future upgrades.

It would be easy for the Armenian Army to absorb the Pinaka Mk-1 MBRLS based on its familiarity with the Grad system. Our established production capacity for the system and rockets guarantees an unrestricted supply of spares and ammunition.

India has already developed and tested an enhanced capability Pinaka Mk-2 system with range & accuracy at par with the US M270 & HIMARS.

The Pinaka MBRLS export contract is the first genuinely indigenous system with near-zero import content. In the past, major weapon systems exported by India, such as the Dhruv helicopter and Brahmos missile, have featured major foreign OEM assemblies. Export earnings were split between India & the OEMs.

The Pinaka MBRLS was developed in partnership with private sector Tata Electric and L&T, who developed the Launcher and Command Post Vehicle, OFB (Ordnance Factory Board), which developed the rocket, and OFB and Bharat Earth Movers Ltd (BEML), who together developed the Loader-cum-Replenishment Vehicle.

The Indian defense industry, including the public and private sectors, has made significant investments in establishing a production capacity for over 5,000 Pinaka rockets.

The export of the Pinaka Mk-1 to Armenia, where the MBRLS could be used extensively in its ongoing hostilities against Azerbaijan consuming spares and ammunition, will ensure that our production capacities don’t languish and the jobs associated with the abilities remain secure.

If the Indian defense industry is to flourish, such export orders are essential. Production costs are dependent on the length of production order runs. The longer the runs, the greater the profits and incentives for private-sector investments.

Exporting a major weapon system to a combatant during hostilities represents a significant paradigm shift in India’s defense export policy. The export marks a sharp & bold departure in Indian foreign policy, which hitherto was averse to meddling in conflict zones.

The export heralds India’s coming of age as a significant power in the emerging multi-polar world. Some leading defense hardware exporting countries like the US, Israel, and France have thrived on exports to conflict zones.

There is no reason for India to shy away from doing the same. India has to seize opportunities when they arise and establish itself as a reliable defense partner if it wants to grow in stature on the world stage.

Such a bold policy will encourage Indian private sector investments in the defense sector more than unending tweaks in our DPP (Defense Procurement Policy).

Senior DRDO officials have asserted in the recent past that Indian rocket and missile technology has matured to a level that can be considered world-class. Consequently, the MoD has banned future imports of missile systems.

The recent successful maiden tests of the VSHORADS (Very Short Range AD System) suggest that the DRDO has seized the initiative to develop missile systems with no global analogs.

DRDO’s sustained efforts to master missile technology over many decades will yield even more promising results. The Pinaka MBRLS is likely just the first of many missile systems that India will export in the future.

Hopefully, the newfound boldness in our foreign policy will persist and facilitate India’s emergence as a great power.

  • Vijainder K Thakur is a retired IAF Jaguar pilot. He is also an author, software architect, entrepreneur, and military analyst.
  • Article Republished Due To Readers’ Interest
https://www.eurasiantimes.com/at-par-with-himars-why-indian-pinaka-mbrls-for-armenia/

Food for Longsuffering Christians in Besieged Nagorno-Karabakh


July 27 2023

Can You Help Send Aid to Christians and Alleviate the Growing Humanitarian Crisis in Nagorno-Karabakh?

“A few days ago in the Martakert region, two children in one of the villages drowned in search of food. Pregnant women have already been registered as children not born due to malnutrition.” This was just the beginning of Bishop Vrtanes Abrahamyan’s speech at a rally in Yerevan on July 25th.

Nagorno-Karabakh, an Armenian Christian region within the territory of Azerbaijan, has been cut off from Armenia for over seven months. Azerbaijan began its blockade of the Lachin Corridor, the only land route linking Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh, in December 2022.

The Bishop continues, “We have cases of premature death, problems with transport and lack of medication; many patients, especially those whose life depends on the periodicity of blood from dialysis, literally wait to see when they will die. What else is needed to realize the seriousness of the situation?”

Conditions continue to worsen in Nagorno-Karabakh, with many suffering from malnutrition due to shortages, with some even dying while they wait in line for what little food is available [Image credit: Artsakh Information Center]

A call for aid in this life-and-death moment

“We are receiving alarming news from [Nagorno-Karabakh] on a daily basis. 120,000 of our brothers and sisters continue to live the hardships of the illegal blockade by Azerbaijan,” said Bishop Hovakim Manukyan in a recent email to the Diocese of the Armenian Church of the UK and Ireland.

Praise God that Barnabas has been active in providing aid to suffering Christians since the blockade began. Through your generosity and God’s provision, we have been able to get aid into the region, delivering 200 tons of food and other aid, as well as supporting livelihoods through livestock so Christian villages can support themselves.

Food is desperately short, especially in the cities. Can you help? [Image credit: Marut Vanyan]

The need is still growing, especially in urban areas. Those in villages have their agricultural livelihoods, but those in the cities are desperately short of supplies. While the blockade and harassment from the Azerbaijani military persists, please pray for those who are struggling to survive in this trapped region.

If you can give a gift to help as well, thank you.

Giving any amount, large or small, will give hope to our suffering brothers and sisters in Nagorno-Karabakh, by providing essentials such as lentils, beans, rice, oil, flour, salt, sugar, and powdered milk for infants as well as soap, laundry detergent and toothpaste.

$20 could provide 22 lbs of food and hygiene essentials

$30 could provide 33 lbs of food and hygiene essentials

$100 could provide 110 lbs of food and hygiene essentials

https://www.barnabasaid.org/us/latest-needs/food-for-longsuffering-christians-in-besieged-nagorno-karabakh/



Mothers gather to raise awareness of crisis in Armenia

A group of local Armenian-American mothers who are deeply concerned about the children and people in Artsakh braved the heat and gathered for a third round of demonstrations in front of the American Red Cross office in Los Angeles on Thursday. 

As this humanitarian crisis continues — a disturbing recent report mentioned that the number of miscarriages has increased in the region.

“Open the road of life—open the road of life,” they chanted.

“We are here to support the 120,000 Armenians that are being starved as we speak in Artsakh – they’re being starved by Azerbaijan for no other reason than ethnic cleansing – and we are here to pledge and ask and demand from Red Cross to deliver humanitarian aid to Artsakh.”

The next protest is scheduled for Tuesday, Aug. 1 at 7 p.m. in front of Glendale City Hall.

Right now, 360 tons of humanitarian aid is sitting still in Armenia—unable to be delivered to Artsakh because Azerbaijan continues to block the only road which connects Armenia to Artsakh. 

The Lachin Corridor has been blocked for seven months and counting. As supplies run out, 120,000 people living in Artsakh are on the brink of starvation. In fact, no food, medicine, or humanitarian supplies have entered the region in more than a month. The International Committee of the Red Cross was previously allowed to make limited deliveries through the Lachin Corridor – but now access is being denied. Concerns are growing – as are calls to action.

After reading an article by Amnesty International about the illegal blockade by Azerbaijan, musician and activist Serj Tankian, came up with the idea to draft an open letter alongside other well-known artists and actors to bring awareness to how serious the situation is.

“We can’t put pressure on such a dictatorial regime. So, it’s important for our democratic nations to put pressure on them, especially utilizing sanctions as we’ve used against Russia. And that’s important to do,” Tankian said. “There has to be a price to pay for creating this kind of humanitarian disaster, for trying to do ethnic cleansing, for trying to do a genocide. There’s got to be a price to pay. And you know, we have to try to impose sanctions on Azerbaijan to get that to get that message out.”

While a number of international human rights organizations and members of Congress have repeatedly called for the road to be reopened, many argue the State Department and the Biden Administration haven’t done enough.

Azerbaijan is calling Armenia’s attempt to send humanitarian aid into the region a “provocation”– while trucks loaded with rations of baby food, cooking oil, flour, pasta, powdered milk, salt, sugar and essential medicines— are sitting at the border. Azerbaijani has proposed that humanitarian aid can be routed to Artsakh through the Azerbaijani town of Aghdam. European Union’s foreign policy chief says this should not be seen as an alternative to the reopening of the Lachin Corridor.

Tankian also says Russia peacekeepers are not doing their job of keeping the Lachin Corridor open, which was part of the trilateral agreement between Azerbaijan, Armenia and Russia following the 2020 war. Tankian says it is unacceptable that people are on the brink of starvation– there’s humanitarian aid at the border, but the government of Azerbaijan is restricting access.

Click here to read Tankian’s full interview with Spin magazine.

‘Everything is lost for them’ – A humanitarian crisis for Armenians

 . 6:22 PM 

If you’re an American, you might not know much about a decades-long conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan, two small countries located in the Caucasus region, where Europe and Asia meet. 

Photos of deceased Armenian soldiers in Stepanakert, Nagorno Karabakh. Ondřej Žváček/wikimedia. CC BY SA 2.5

Azerbaijan is a majority Muslim country of around 10 million people. It is three times larger than the majority Christian Armenia, which has a population of fewer than three million. 

Since the last years of the Cold War, the two countries have been locked in post-Soviet Eurasia’s most enduring conflict, involving their own militaries, and that of Turkey and other regional powers. 

Fighting has broken out periodically since 1998 over the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh, which is situated within Azerbaijan but populated by ethnic Armenians. The area is home to the breakaway state known as the Republic of Artsakh, which is closely tied to Armenia.

An upsurge in violence began in 2020 with Azerbaijan incursion against negotiated treaties. The ensuing conflict, in which both sides used loitering munitions (also known as “kamikaze drones”), is believed to have ushered in a new era of warfare dominated by deadly autonomous machines — as seen in Ukraine today.

Hundreds of soldiers were killed in the most recent major clashes at the Armenia-Azerbaijan border in September 2022, which ended with an uneasy ceasefire. 

But shortly after that ceasefire, purported environmental activists blocked the Lachin Corridor, the sole road linking Armenia with Nagorno-Karabakh. Human rights groups have said that the blockade is creating a humanitarian crisis in the disputed region — leaving 120,000 ethnic Armenians living under siege, with no electricity, and with dwindling food and medicine. 

Pope Francis has for years shown concern for the crisis in the region, and this month, dispatched Cardinal Pietro Parolin to a diplomatic mission of peace in the region.

Historically, Armenia has deep Christian roots — in 301, the Kingdom of Armenia was the first country to become an officially Christian nation. 

While Armenia remains a mostly Christian country, the majority of ethnic Armenians are Orthodox. But in Armenia, and scattered around the world, there are also a few hundred thousand members of the Armenian Catholic Church, a sui iuris Eastern Catholic Church in full communion with Rome.

Bishop Mikaël Mouradian is diocesan bishop for the Armenian Catholics of the United States and Canada. He spoke this week with The Pillar about the humanitarian crisis in Nagorno-Karabakh, behind the Lachin Corridor blockade. 

Bishop Mikaël Mouradian. Courtesy photo.

Bishop Mouradian told The Pillar that he believes the current crisis is in continuity with a genocide of Armenians 100 years ago, which killed as many as 1.5 million people. And he said Armenians need the help of American Catholics.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

The situation is this: Currently, this crisis, is I think, a continuation of the Armenian genocide of 1915. 

Why am I saying that? 

Because in 2020, when Turkey and Azerbaijan together attacked this region, the consequence of which is the crisis that we are living now, the president of Turkey boasted, saying that this is the fulfillment of “the mission of our grandfathers” in the Caucuses. 

Can you imagine that? 

This means that a genocidal mentality — to eradicate the presence of the Armenians in the Caucasus — it’s not left the mind of Turkey or Azerbaijan. 

To boast in saying that “we are fulfilling the mission of our grandfathers,” I don’t know. These people are inheriting the bloodshed or the… I don’t know how to explain it … the sense or the taste for blood, and unfortunately for Armenian blood.

The thing is this, that when in 1915 they did the genocide, Nagorno-Karabakh was far away on the east, so they didn’t reach Nagorno-Karabakh. 

Just after the First World War, there was a little free Armenian Republic, which lasted only two years: 1918-20, I think, not more. Then it was occupied by the Red Army of the Soviet Union, and Armenia became part of the Soviet Union.

Stalin was the dictator, and from what I know, he didn’t like so much Armenia. 

He dismembered Armenia. He took what is now the region of Kars and Ardahan, the historical city of Ani, which used to be one of the oldest capitals of an Armenian kingdom back in the Middle Ages. He struck this off from Armenia and gave it to Turkey.

And then he struck off the north of Armenia, which is now the southern part of Georgia. But there are 26 Armenian Catholic villages in that region — there are almost 300,000 Armenians living there. And Stalin struck this from Armenia and put it into the map of Georgia. 

Then for Nagorno-Karabakh, he took Nagorno-Karabakh and put it in the map of Azerbaijan, giving it an internal independence and autonomous status.

At the same time, he struck the Nakhchivan region in the south of Armenia, on the east side, which was occupied by the Azerbaijanis even until this day. Nowadays, there is not even one Armenian there, because during the Soviet regime, the Azerbaijani government did not give any jobs to the Armenians, and they were obliged to flee.

In 1991, when the Soviet Union collapsed, the Nagorno-Karabakh region, which was 95% Armenian, declared its independence, and wanted to join the Republic of Armenia. From that day, there was this war between the so-called autonomous republic of Nagorno-Karabakh and Azerbaijan. 

There were so many years of war. But by 2020, at first, things had cooled down, everything was okay, and the region was flourishing.

Except that during the COVID period, everyone was preoccupied with COVID. And that’s the same scenario that happened during the genocide of 1915. The entire world was preoccupied with World War I, and the Ottoman Empire saw that was the opportunity — that no one was seeing what they were doing. They organized and perpetrated the Armenian genocide. 

This was the same scenario. The entire world was preoccupied with the COVID situation. We were all in our houses. We couldn’t go out.

So beginning in 2020, Turkey and Azerbaijan did military exercises together in the valley in front of Nagorno-Karabakh. 

Then suddenly in the autumn of 2020, this military exercise turned into an unprovoked attack on the region of Nagorno-Karabakh. 

Unfortunately, during the last 20 years, Azerbaijan — with the wealth that they gained from the gas oil that they have — invested in quantities of armaments, even prohibited armaments. With the help of Turkey, the generals who planned and controlled the attack on Nagorno-Karabakh were not actually Azerbaijanis. They were three Turkish generals.

They brought from Syria and Libya Muslim terrorists, at least 6,000 of them, who participated in the war. People say that some of them were paid $2,000 a month by Turkey and Azerbaijan to participate in the war. 

I know that the drones were fabricated in Turkey, and were run by Turkish people. 

They used even prohibited bombs like the phosphoric bombs. If you go to Armenia, there are in the hospital still Armenian soldiers whose bodies are completely burned from the phosphoric bombs, which were prohibited internationally to be used.

[Editor’s note: Azerbaijan has also accused the Armenian military of using phosphoric weapons.]

The outcome was that at least between 5,000 or 6,000 Armenian soldiers were killed. The majority of these soldiers were 19, 20, or 21 years old. 

Turkey and Azerbaijan took all the surrounding parts of Nagorno-Karabakh and seized territory from Nagorno-Karabakh. 

One hundred and fifty thousand people were obliged to leave their homes. I saw even people burn their own homes before leaving them, so that the Azerbaijanis would not use them. 

Imagine a person who worked for 30 years, 40 years to build up his home; and then he is burning it by his own hand. As I say, 150,000 were obliged to leave. One hundred and twenty thousand only remain in Nagorno-Karabakh.

So, the war ended in 2020 with three partial agreements of ceasefire between Russia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The understanding was that there would be this corridor that we call the Lachin Corridor — it is the sole road that connects Nagorno-Karabakh through Armenia and to the world. That’s the unique way to go to Nagorno-Karabakh.

Frontlines at the time of the signing of the 2020 agreement with Azerbaijan’s territorial gains during the war in red, the Lachin corridor under Russian peacekeepers in blue, and areas to be surrendered by Armenia to Azerbaijan hashed. Credit: VartanM/wikimedia Creative Commons license.

But in December of 2022, Azerbaijan occupied this Lachin Corridor, creating a humanitarian crisis. 

It began with the pretext as an ecological protest against some mining works. But then it ended up with a complete military blockade of the region, beginning April 23, 2023. 

Then in the 11th of July, the Azerbaijani authorities prohibited even the International Red Cross to pass through this blockade, which means that these people who are now in Nagorno-Karabakh, 120,000 people who don’t have electricity, they don’t have gas, they don’t have water, they are malnourished, and we don’t know what will happen with them. 

Among them, 30,000 children and almost 3,000 pregnant women.

Unfortunately for me, this is another page of the genocide. 

It is genocide because when you kill 6,000 young men of the age of 19, 20, or 21, you are killing the future fathers of a nation. 

A generation is lost, not counting the moral and psychological difficulties that the people are living in Nagorno-Karabakh. 

For example, the teacher: What kind of lesson will a teacher give to a student about freedom? He will explain that God created us free. But the student is seeing that he’s not free. 

He cannot go out of his home to play with his friends. The children are so much traumatized that when they hear thunder, they look up to the adults just waiting for them to tell them, “Okay, it’s bombing. We are going to the basement.” 

You see, the children are already in that mentality that if there are big blasts, it’s bombing. 

That’s the psychological situation in which they are, these kids.

I have heard things from our people that give you — How do you say it in English? The goosebumps.

For example, a mother telling me that as her children play, they are always pretending that maybe they will have enough food, which they don’t. I heard about another mother who had two children — she left them at home, because she didn’t have any food. She went to another village to bring some food, but coming back, she found her two kids dead, who had starved. 

Oh, these things are terrible. 

It was the same thing during the Armenian genocide.

But back before the First World War, as Americans we created what is called the National Armenian Relief Committee, which was presided over by the influential American industrialist John D. Rockefeller, Spencer Trask, and others. Back in that time, Americans were organized and they sent help to the Armenians.

There is always some way to help. One thing that we can do or Americans can do is to speak about this. We don’t hear about it in the news. I call it the forgotten war. 

We don’t speak about it in America because unfortunately as Armenia, and the region of Nagorno-Karabakh — we don’t have natural resources to give to the world. 

Azerbaijan has gas, and their gas is sent to Europe. At the same time, because they are selling their gas, they have a big income and I know that they have big investments in America. Meanwhile, Armenia doesn’t have this.

For Nagorno-Karabakh, nowadays, we have to push our government to do something about the crisis.

Yes, President Biden declared something about the Armenian genocide, but it’s not enough to acknowledge something. If you are seeing that this is a continuous thing, you have to take proper steps to stop it from continuing. 

We should ask our government to uphold section 907 of the Freedom Support Act, which basically speaks about stop giving to Azerbaijan aid until they agree to not use offensive force against the Armenians and to stop this blockade of Nagorno-Karabakh.

And then to help these people, there are organizations that are helping.

I have a fund in our eparchy, the Armenia Fund, and I am trying to find donors to help these people.

And please understand, it’s not only the people of Nagorno-Karabakh — Nowadays, there is the big risk that Turkey and Azerbaijan will attack the territory of Armenia also. 

There is real fear that Turkey and Azerbaijan will attack the southern part of Armenia and take the entire south — what is the scenic region of Armenia, to connect Azerbaijan — with the Nakhchivan region and from there to connect with Turkey. 

So, you will have all these pan-Turkic countries, which are Turkey, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, these are all Turkic countries, and if they unite, mama mia! I don’t know what will happen.

What I am trying to do is to speak loud about it whenever I am.

At the same time, I ask the Americans to share what they are hearing or reading about Armenia.

Pope Francis in Armenia. Credit: Vatican Media.

I was a priest in Armenia for 10 years — I was the first Armenian Catholic priest to go back to Armenia after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

And I helped to establish in 1995 the Caritas Armenia, the Catholic Charities office — which began with only two people, and now has 280 people working there. At the same time, we have our eparchy for the Armenian Catholics in Armenia, and we have a seminary over there, and there are 37 Armenian Catholic villages in northern Armenia.

A lot of the 6,000 or 5,000 Armenian military that were killed during the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war are from these Armenian Catholic villages. 

Last year, we helped three families to have a home in Armenia. They didn’t have a place to stay, and I found some benefactors from America to help these families to have a home, a roof over their head. Or I help children for their studies in Armenia — we can organize help to children, where a family in America can support a child in Armenia to continue studies in the universities, and we help our diocese over there to organize summer camps for the kids — because these villages are very isolated, and the sole way for the children to even leave the villages is through these these summer camps that we organize.

And now we are helping the seminary over there, for the Armenian Catholics, in Yerevan, the capital city. 

There are also the Immaculate Conception nuns, working in Armenia, and my own sister is a member of this congregation. They have two daycare centers in Armenia where they take care of children, and they have a center for girls’ education in Yerevan. 

These are girls who are coming from the villages. The majority of them are orphaned or poor girls who go to university in Yerevan, but they don’t have the means to stay in Yerevan. So, the nuns have this dorm for them, and they welcome them in this center, where they give them shelter, food, and they help them to pay the tuition for the university.

At the same time, there is this social media thing, #SaveArmenia, and then the Philos Project, is doing a lot to give people updates. 

There are a lot of experiences that I had over there. 

First of all, I have to say that I went there as a missionary, to preach the gospel, but I think that in some places, from what I saw, I was educated in my faith.

Just to give you an idea, for example, I heard about families that during the Soviet regime kept in secret parts of the gospel — not the entire book, just some four, five pages of the gospel of the Church.And they hid it at home, and they read it in secret. 

If they were discovered, the entire family would have been sent to Siberia.

When I got to Armenia, and tried to find the Armenian Catholic churches, we learned that in 1937, Stalin with one signature closed up all the 73 Armenian Catholic churches in Armenia, and 94 priests were sent into exile in Siberia. 

Not one of them survived. 

Only one of them had the right to come back to Yerevan, the capital, in 1973, and he didn’t have the right to go to his own village. He had to stay in Yerevan. He passed away in 1975. I went to his tomb, and I found that even during the Soviet era, people had engraved on his tombstone a monstrance, at great personal risk to themselves. 

Once, I went to visit the village of Sucwalizi, in southern Georgia. I went there by car, it was a journey of five hours from where I was.

When I arrived at the village, people were waiting for me, on the road, at least one mile outside the village. They had been waiting to see a priest, after 70 years of having no priest in their village.

They had green branches in their hands, and they walked alongside my car while I was driving to the church of their village. They were singing hymns to the Holy Virgin Mary, hymns that they were learned by secret from generation to generation during the Soviet Union.

I had tears in my eyes, because I was thinking, “Who am I that, like Jesus, people are welcoming me with these green branches?”

But they were waiting because it was something special to have a priest finally again in their village. And I am humbled even now by that. 

I learned about people who, for so many years, were baptizing their kids in secret at home, because they couldn’t bring a priest in —- and teaching these children the Our Father, to keep the faith alive.

This is the faith of the Armenian people, who are now so threatened today.

I would wish that parishes might organize a novena to the Blessed Virgin Mary, for the blockade to cease, and for these 120,000 people to have access to the essential things of life — water, medication, and food. 

And also to pray that there will not be another genocide, to pray that Turkey and Azerbaijan will refrain from attacking Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh again.

I am afraid that really, we are there, we are seeing a genocide in Nagorno-Karabakh, but I am still confident that something will change, because if it doesn’t change, at least for these 120,000 people, everything is lost for them.

Armenia calls on allies to help get aid to Nagorno-Karabakh during tensions with Azerbaijan


YEREVAN, Armenia (AP) — Armenia’s authorities on Friday called on the country’s international allies to put pressure on Azerbaijan after accusing it of carrying out a three-day blockade of humanitarian aid to Nagorno-Karabakh.

Friday,



YEREVAN, Armenia (AP) — Armenia’s authorities on Friday called on the country’s international allies to put pressure on Azerbaijan after accusing it of carrying out a three-day blockade of humanitarian aid to Nagorno-Karabakh.

The accusations mark another flashpoint in the tense relationship between Armenia and Azerbaijan which have fought over the breakaway region for decades.

The Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister, Vahan Kostanyan, accused Azerbaijan of blocking the so-called Lachin Corridor and demanded international allies step in to allow 19 trucks with 400 tons of humanitarian aid to pass. According to Armenian authorities, the trucks have been stuck there since the evening of July 26.

YEREVAN, Armenia (AP) — Armenia’s authorities on Friday called on the country’s international allies to put pressure on Azerbaijan after accusing it of carrying out a three-day blockade of humanitarian aid to Nagorno-Karabakh.

The accusations mark another flashpoint in the tense relationship between Armenia and Azerbaijan which have fought over the breakaway region for decades.

The Armenian Deputy Foreign Minister, Vahan Kostanyan, accused Azerbaijan of blocking the so-called Lachin Corridor and demanded international allies step in to allow 19 trucks with 400 tons of humanitarian aid to pass. According to Armenian authorities, the trucks have been stuck there since the evening of July 26.

“The additional pressure of our international partners on Baku is very important. We have heard statements from our various colleagues, but we don’t think this is enough,” he said.

Kostanyan previously also accused Azerbaijan of ignoring a ruling by the International Court of Justice ordering Azerbaijan authorities to ensure unimpeded movement in the Lachin Corridor, the only road from Armenia into Nagorno-Karabakh.

The ongoing dispute over the road has impeded food supplies to the region and aggravated tensions between Azerbaijan and Armenia, which have fought two wars since the end of Soviet rule.

Nagorno-Karabakh had substantial autonomy under the Soviet Union and came under control of ethnic Armenian forces backed by the Armenian military in 1994 at the end of years of separatist fighting. Armenian forces also took sizable territory surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh itself.

In 2020, Azerbaijan regained most of that surrounding territory and pieces of Nagorno-Karabakh itself in a war which killed about 6,800 soldiers. Under a Russia-brokered armistice, transit along the Lachin Corridor was to continue under the guarantee of Russian peacekeepers.

According to Armenian media, trucks and foreign diplomats are currently in the village of Kornidzor on Armenia’s border with Nagorno-Karabakh, which is at one end of the Lachin Corridor.

Azerbaijan’s Foreign Ministry said that it viewed Armenia’s attempt to send a convoy to Nagorno-Karabakh “under the guise of ‘humanitarian aid’” as a violation of Azerbaijan’s “territorial integrity and sovereignty.” Azerbaijan also accuses Armenia of smuggling weapons into Nagorno-Karabakh.

The latest flare-up comes weeks following talks in Brussels and Washington aimed at calming tensions between the two countries after Azerbaijan opened a checkpoint on the Lachin Corridor in April. At that point, the road had already been blocked for four months by demonstrators who were protesting what they claimed to be illegal mining and other ecological abuses by Armenians in the area.


https://www.thestar.com/news/world/europe/armenia-calls-on-allies-to-help-get-aid-to-nagorno-karabakh-during-tensions-with-azerbaijan/article_254f13b7-4539-5210-b04d-619dbe59b20a.html


READ ALSO

https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/armenia-calls-allies-aid-nagorno-karabakh-tensions-azerbaijan-101770464


Diplomats go to border of Armenia where there is cargo for NK

  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

Diplomats in Kornidzor near the Lachin corridor

Representatives of the diplomatic corps and international organizations accredited in Armenia, at the invitation of the government and the Foreign Ministry, went to the southern Syunik region near the village of Kornidzor, on the approach to the Lachin corridor. Since the evening of July 26 there has been a convoy heading from Armenia to Nagorno-Karabakh, with humanitarian cargo of almost 400 tons.

The diplomats got acquainted with the situation on the ground. They were accompanied by the governor of the Syunik region Robert Ghukasyan who said “Baku is talking about integration. But it wants to achieve it by bringing people to starvation? Right there, in Syunik, the ambassadors participated in a closed discussion.”

The Armenian authorities hope that Russian peacekeepers will still deliver humanitarian aid to the unrecognized NKR. They announce that they informed not only RMK, but also Azerbaijan “through the appropriate channels” about the transportation of the cargo. However, Baku calls the Armenian government’s initiative a provocation.

The Lachin corridor, the only road connecting Nagorno-Karabakh to Armenia and the outside world, has been blocked since December last year. Since June 15, 120,000 Armenians have been living under a strict blockade – Azerbaijan will not allow even humanitarian supplies to be delivered.


  • A positive impetus to the negotiations? Baku and Yerevan on the Moscow meeting of foreign ministers
  • “Azerbaijan is creating a ghetto in NK” and other statements from Pashinyan interview
  • “Azerbaijan’s aggression towards Yeraskh is a threat to peace” – Ombudsman of Armenia

Deputy Foreign Minister Vahan Kostanyan, who accompanied the diplomats, told journalists this in Kornidzor. He assured that the Armenian side will continue to inform international partners and carry out appropriate work so that “Azerbaijan fulfills its obligations at the international level.” In particular, the November 2020 statement signed by the leaders of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia, as well as the decision of the International Court of Justice.

“The additional pressure of our international partners on the Azerbaijani authorities is very important,” he said.

The Deputy Foreign Minister recalled that in recent days, partners from various countries have made statements, but “this is not enough.”

“It is necessary that the international community act as a united front and not only send clear signals to the Azerbaijani authorities, but also take steps that will ensure the passage of people, goods and vehicles through the Lachin corridor,” he said.

Kostanyan said that “official Yerevan will try to ensure the opening of the Lachin corridor by all political means available to it.” But he did not elaborate on which.

All information about Armenia’s attempt to deliver humanitarian aid to compatriots, statements from Yerevan and Baku, the reaction of international partners

The day before, during the discussion of the issue of delivering humanitarian cargo from Armenia to NK, the public television of Armenia aired information that another 500 tons of cargo were waiting to be sent. They are kept in Syunik, in the city of Goris. Another batch of humanitarian aid, about 380 tons, is stored in warehouses in Yerevan.

“There are other organizations that are ready to provide assistance. It all depends on when the road will be open and when we can send it. We need to deliver this cargo as soon as possible. The situation of our compatriots is getting worse every hour,” Yury Khachyan, Deputy Permanent Representative of the unrecognized NKR in Armenia, said.

During a press conference, the Prime Minister of Armenia stated that the government is in no hurry to apply to the UN Security Council to consider the situation in NK, since the result is more important than the fact of holding hearings

Azerbaijan has long been promoting the possibility of delivering humanitarian cargo to Nagorno-Karabakh through its territory, through Aghdam. The head of the European Council, Charles Michel, spoke about this after the Pashinyan-Aliyev talks in Brussels.

However, the Armenians of NK categorically refuse such an opportunity. Ten days ago, they held an action, blocked the road from Askeran to Aghdam, put up barricades and hung out a poster “Our right to self-determination is not for sale.”

As the humanitarian crisis deepens, locals are declaring: “It is better to starve than to receive aid from Azerbaijan.” They believe that the offer to receive assistance through Aghdam is “a political way of integration into Azerbaijan, which will mean the expulsion of Armenians from Artsakh.”

Opposition member of the Armenian parliament Tigran Abrahamyan stated that Azerbaijan has set itself the task of ensuring that any goods come to NK from the territory of Azerbaijan. Thus, Baku, in his opinion, is trying to eliminate ties with Armenia.

“Azerbaijan believes that this step will accelerate the process of Azerbaijanization of NK, because in this way it will fall under complete dependence on Azerbaijan. Today we are talking about humanitarian cargo, tomorrow we will talk about trade, the day after tomorrow about gas, electricity and other things,” he said.

Protests taking place in Yerevan in support of the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh, at the UN office and embassies, as well as an expert’s comment

Political observer Hakob Badalyan believes that one should not place great hopes on the statements of the ambassadors of different countries, when there is already a decision of the International Court of Justice, which Azerbaijan does not comply with. In February 2023, the Hague ordered Azerbaijan to ensure unhindered movement along the Lachin corridor.

Badalyan proposes to ask diplomats accredited in Armenia the question “whether their countries are able to take steps for the decision of the Hague Court to come into force, are they ready to take real action.” He claims that it is the society of Armenia that should be exacting:

“At the official level, of course, it is incorrect to talk about this. The authorities need to work with all ambassadors and their countries, with international structures, no matter how dissatisfied we are with their inaction.”

According to Badalyan, although there are Russian peacekeepers in the Lachin corridor, all the actors involved in the negotiation process have their own obligations to unblock the road. He believes that, along with the question of the responsibility of Russians, attention should also be focused on the responsibility of other external actors:

“We must not allow anyone to freely and without hesitation turn the fate of Nagorno-Karabakh into a stone with which it will be possible to break the Caucasian window of the Russians – against the backdrop of expressed concern and various calls.”

https://jam-news.net/diplomats-in-kornidzor-near-the-lachin-corridor/

What do the mediators say at the talks between Azerbaijan and Armenia? Comparative analysis from Baku

  • JAMnews
  • Baku

Comparative analysis of intermediary statements

“Everything that we see on the pictures of the screens, the statements of politicians, the tweets of the ambassadors – this is all, of course, interesting, but the main thing is the negotiation tracks and the texts of the statements in Brussels and Moscow, where the leaders and foreign ministers of the countries participated,” political observer Farhad Mammadov says.

The expert analyzed points by point the statements made by the main mediators at the talks between Azerbaijan and Armenia, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and President of the European Council Charles Michel.


  • Armenia sends humanitarian cargo to NK, Azerbaijan calls it a provocation
  • “You were, like, our republic.” What do Russians who arrived from Sochi to Batumi by cruise ship say?
  • US closely monitoring arrest of Azerbaijani politician

“So what do we have on topic:

⁃ The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan once again fully reaffirmed their respect for the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the other country. Based on the fact that the territory of Armenia is 29,800 km2, and the territory of Azerbaijan is 86,600 km2.

⁃ The most sensitive of them was and remains the problem of guaranteeing the rights and security of the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh in the context of ensuring the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan in full accordance with the 1991 Declaration signed by the leaders of the former Soviet republics in Alma-Ata. Its effectiveness has been confirmed today by both the Azerbaijani and Armenian leadership. In accordance with this, work on a peace treaty is being built.

Lavrov said following the talks that the regional agenda was discussed, “primarily related to the situation in and around Nagorno-Karabakh”

⁃ Both leaders reaffirmed their unconditional commitment to the 1991 Almaty Declaration as the political basis for border delimitation. I welcomed the meeting of the two border commissions.

⁃ We paid special attention to the issues of delimitation, which are closely related to the entire set of problems under discussion, and the issues of the early conclusion of a peace treaty between Baku and Yerevan.

Here the EU has the mark of 1991 and the emphasis on the bilateral format, while Russia has the context of a peace treaty. And there is no reference to the maps of 1975, which Armenia insisted on.

⁃ We have discussed the terms of future transport agreements that will respect the principles of sovereignty, jurisdiction and reciprocity. The construction of the railway connection must be undertaken immediately. The EU would be ready to make a financial contribution.

⁃ The closest result at this stage is the achievement of an agreement in a trilateral working group headed by three vice-premiers who are engaged in agreeing on specific issues of unblocking transport communications in the region. In this context, prospects for the implementation of promising projects in the transport sector will also open up.

The most interesting thing is that the EU “immediately” has funding, sovereignty, while Lavrov has an emphasis on the trilateral format, that is, the functionality of Russia on the territory of Armenia.

⁃ The current state of affairs is clearly unsustainable. I stressed the need to open the Lachin road. I also noted Azerbaijan’s readiness to deliver humanitarian aid through Aghdam. I consider both options important and encourage humanitarian deliveries from both sides to ensure that the needs of the population are met. I also welcomed the ICRC’s resumption of medical evacuations.

⁃ We outlined to our interlocutors the assessments of the Russian side, taking into account the reports made by the Russian peacekeepers in Nagorno-Karabakh, on the steps that it is highly desirable to take promptly, without delay in the interests of providing the population of Karabakh with food, medicine, basic necessities, ensuring uninterrupted electricity and gas supply. This is in the interests of ordinary people, Armenians, residents of the region.

The EU mentions both routes, separately opening the Lachin road specifically, Lavrov does not mention the Lachin road. Both do not have the resource provision imperative through Armenia.

The President of Azerbaijan commented on the situation between official Baku and the Armenian population of Karabakh

⁃ Local people need reassurance, first of all regarding their rights and security. In this context, I expressed the EU’s encouragement for a direct dialogue between Baku and representatives of the Armenians living in the former Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region. This dialogue should provide much-needed trust for all involved.

⁃ The most sensitive of them was and remains the problem of guaranteeing the rights and security of the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh in the context of ensuring the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan in full accordance with the 1991 Declaration signed by the leaders of the former Soviet republics in Alma-Ata. Its effectiveness has been confirmed today by both the Azerbaijani and Armenian leadership. In accordance with this, work on a peace treaty is being built. The Armenian side understands the need to convince the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh to meet as soon as possible with Azerbaijani representatives to agree on the rights arising from the relevant legislation and from international obligations (in this case, Azerbaijan), including numerous conventions on ensuring the rights of national minorities.

⁃ The Azerbaijani side is ready to provide the same guarantees on a reciprocal basis with respect to persons living on its territory. Armenians are ready to do the same with respect to the application of all conventions to citizens residing in the Republic of Armenia.

Both statements do not (!) require the international format of the dialogue between Baku and the Armenians of Karabakh. Lavrov has detailed rights and security within the legal field of Azerbaijan.

⁃ We also discussed the issue of detainees. The leaders reaffirmed their commitment to the gentleman’s understanding that the release of soldiers who inadvertently switch sides will be facilitated.

Sergei Lavrov did not comment on this.

Thus, the negotiation tracks, in principle, meet the expectations of Azerbaijan and create a favorable basis for progress. And the provocation with trucks is just the reaction of the Armenian leadership to the failure of their negotiating positions,” Mammadov concluded.

https://jam-news.net/what-do-the-mediators-say-at-the-talks-between-azerbaijan-and-armenia-comparative-analysis-from-baku/

India sends arms to Armenia via Iran

Economic Times, India

Synopsis
An arms consignment from India to Armenia based on the bilateral deal was transported via Iran, according to persons familiar with the development. Last year India signed a significant export order for missiles, rockets, and ammunition to Armenia.

Azerbaijan, which has been in a conflict situation with Armenia over the Nagorno-Karabakh issue, has cried foul and raised the matter with the Indian envoy. Head of the department of foreign policy affairs of Azerbaijan Presidential Administration, Hikmat Hajiyev, raised the matter during a meeting with Indian Ambassador to Azerbaijan, S Madhusudhanan.

“At a time when Azerbaijan is negotiating a peace treaty with Armenia, the supply of deadly weapons by India opens the way to the militarization of Armenia and aggravates the situation, hindering the establishment of sustainable peace and security in the South Caucasus region. This is not in line with India’s foreign policy, which is based on the norms and principles of international law, declared by itself, as well as the historical ‘Bandung principles’ of the Non-Aligned Movement, to which India has joined,” Hajiyev emphasized during his meeting.

Book: Armenians and Jews, two parallel genocides

“And now, as Christians and Europeans, we must stand by and watch in silence, and even cajole the sultan! What a shame! For all of us!”. Words of Kaiser Wilhelm II commenting not only on the carnage of Armenians (anticipation of the genocide) which between 1894 and 1896 claimed two or three hundred thousand victims, but also on the political and diplomatic cover which the Turks benefited from on the part of Germany (but also of others) and on which William himself was in disagreement with his government. For the German Empire it was a matter of “Realpolitik” (= political realism): one shouldn’t disturb an ally, at the cost of relieving him of an immense massacre of women and children. If that of 1894-’96 was already an unspeakable horror, the consequences in the following decades proved to be even worse.

A volume by the German historian Stefan Ihrig is in the library, Justify the Genocide. Germany, Armenians and Jews from Bismarck to Hitler, edited by Antonia Arslan. The book identifies a line of continuity between the Armenian Genocide of 1915-1918 and its impunity (“the original sin of the 20th century”) and the subsequent horrors, including the Jewish Holocaust, which Adolf Hitler carried out, by his explicit admission, even in light of the disinterest shown by the West for the fate of the Armenians, and with the certainty that a corresponding atrocity against the Jews would be remitted. Ihrig analyzes the German attitude to the Armenian question in particular, but the scope of his analyzes is more general: it is the whole of the West that for a hundred years has turned away in order not to see, has minimized or has denied the Genocide, and according to the author at the root of the problem is precisely the so-called “Realpolitik”, which often turns into a caricature of Realpolitik: crimes are forgiven thinking thus of avoiding worse troubles, and instead the criminals feel authorized to do worse and worse.

It may seem that the West has learned its lesson, at least on the specific point concerning the Armenians, given that the Pope, the European Union and, most recently, Biden’s America have recognized the historical reality of the Genocide; but it is legitimate to ask whether this new awareness is real, in the light (for example) of Western disinterest and inaction in the Nagorno-Karabakh affair; let me be clear, a possible intervention would not necessarily mean that we must take the side of the Armenians against the Azeris and Turks, absolutely not, on the contrary, everyone’s wrongs and rights should be weighed and discussed, but it would be appropriate to discuss them, rather than simply ignoring what is happening .

Then the question arises of who can throw the first stone: from the extermination of the Red Indians to the trafficking of blacks, the whole history of Western imperialism is studded with crimes, not to mention the Jewish Holocaust. However, the Armenian Genocide has a peculiarity: while millions of books are printed on the Red Indians, the black trafficking and imperialism in America and Europe, films and TV programs are made, textbooks are written and courses are held at the university, and the same happens for the Holocaust in Germany, in Turkey whoever talks about the Armenian Genocide goes to jail. Turkish public opinion itself is the victim, forced by law to be uninformed and unaware of its national history.

As Roman history teaches us, the Armenians were already living in Anatolia thousands of years before the first Turkish tribes arrived on the peninsula. Then, suddenly, during the First World War the Armenians disappeared. How come? According to the denial vulgate, there was no Genocide, but only a certain (limited) number of deaths in combat both among the Turks and among the Armenians. And how then did the Armenians appear? It is not known; in denialist books you read phrases like “they moved”.

According to Ihrig’s documented analysis, the link between the two Armenian and Jewish genocides is direct. Already long before Hitler, the racist Germans assimilated Armenians to Jews (negatively); and after the 1914-1918 war, nationalist propaganda in Germany indicated (positively) Turkey as a sort of “parallel Germany”: the two nations, allies in the Great War, had been defeated not only and not so much (it was said) by armed forces of the Entente, as much as from an alleged “stab in the back”, which in the German case was attributed to the Jews and in the Turkish case by the Armenians. In the 1920s, the Nazis became enthusiastic about the national revival led by Kemal Atatürk, and considered the elimination of unwelcome ethnic minorities as necessary for the rebirth of Turkey and as an example to be imitated in Germany.

The parallel between the Armenian Genocide and the Jewish one was also well perceived by the Jews who, after Hitler’s seizure of power, suffered Nazi persecution. The novel The Forty Days of Mussa Dagh, on a famous episode of armed self-defense by Armenians against a Turkish attack, was widely read in the Jewish ghettos, and when it seemed that Rommel’s Afrika Korps was about to break through in Egypt and reach as far as Palestine, the Jews who lived on the lands of future state of Israel prepared an armed defense on Mount Carmel and called it “Plan Masada” (in reference to Jewish history) but alternatively also “Plan Mussa Dagh”. Two stories and two parallel struggles.

https://www.breakinglatest.news/entertainment/armenians-and-jews-two-parallel-genocides/