Read the full article here: Horizon
—
—
Armenia’s Investigative Committee has opened a criminal case against Nadezhda Pirozhkova, a Russian national who publicly criticized the traditions of the Vardavar holiday. The agency confirmed the case to the Russian news outlet Vot Tak.
On Vardavar, the Armenian summer holiday that falls 14 weeks after Easter, getting soaked with water is the whole point — and no one is supposed to take offense. “The water is believed to have healing properties on this day,” the outlet Novosti-Armenia said, “so being doused only brings good luck.”
On July 12, Pirozhkova posted a reel on Instagram complaining about the tradition of dousing people with water during Vardavar. “This isn’t a manifestation of culture, it’s a manifestation of disrespect toward people who don’t want to participate in it. […] If I’m in your country, I’m not obligated to follow some traditions. This is a direct display of aggression!” Pirozhkova said.
According to Vot Tak, she also posted a story showing water being poured over her, in which she called Armenians “rat-like” — a detail that made its way into a write-up by the propaganda outlet Sputnik Armenia, which was also covering the criminal case against her. The story has since disappeared. Meduza couldn’t find it.
Pirozhkova’s comments sparked widespread outrage. Her reel about Vardavar drew more than 250,000 views and over 5,000 comments, which have since been closed, and was condemned by both Armenians and members of the Russian diaspora. “My civilized ones! Those who love saying things like that about Armenia. So why do you keep coming here? Oh right, there’s gasoline, the internet works, and you can buy clothes?” blogger Galina Tish said in response to Pirozhkova’s video.
On July 14, Pirozhkova posted an apology: “I understand that many saw this as disrespect toward the Armenian people. And I really am sorry. I did not have that intention, and I do not have it now.” Most commenters doubted her sincerity: some said she should leave Armenia if she doesn’t like the local way of life, others called for her to be deported or jailed, and some comments included insults.
Pirozhkova is using the situation to promote her blog. In recent reels, she has said the viral videos about Vardavar boosted her reach and drew new followers. She has discussed what it’s like to endure a wave of negativity, why she keeps posting, and whether it’s acceptable to “capitalize on the Armenia hype.” Her profile bio now reads “That Same Nadya 🇦🇲 Vardavar,” and one of her recent videos is titled “Why an Entire Country Hates Me.”
Pirozhkova makes no secret of her attempts to profit from her Instagram presence. The blogger has said she came to Armenia from Russia with her husband and child after the war [in Ukraine] began — what she calls “the situation everyone knows about.” She has since separated from her husband and lost access to her documents because of a dispute with her landlord. Pirozhkova has said she also can’t return to Russia because she has debts there and fears being barred from leaving the country as a result — a restriction that would keep her from seeing her child in Armenia. In her stories, she sells info products on blogging and ”the facets of being seen.”
The criminal case against her was filed under a statute covering public statements that incite hatred, an offense punishable by up to four years in prison. Pirozhkova has said she was detained for three days before being released. She is now under a travel ban.
—
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said Armenia could seek financial compensation from Russia over the operation of South Caucasus Railway CJSC, which Russian Railways (RZD) has managed under a concession agreement since 2008.
In February, Pashinyan suggested that Russia consider transferring the concession rights for Armenia’s railway network to a friendly third country, naming Kazakhstan, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates as possible candidates. In April, he clarified that Yerevan would not discuss issues related to the railway behind Moscow’s back.
Pashinyan has now said Armenia could take the dispute to international arbitration. He stressed that the country’s railway infrastructure belongs to the Armenian state and that the government has the right to decide how it should be managed. He also noted that Yerevan had refrained from making financial demands on Moscow for many years.
“There may be issues for which we have asked for nothing over the past 30 years, but now we may seek as much as $2 billion a year,” Pashinyan said.
He added that the Armenian government hopes to resolve the matter through friendly negotiations.
Andrey Krasov, First Deputy Chairman of the Russian State Duma Committee on Defense, urged the Armenian prime minister to focus on his country’s economy instead of making multi-billion-dollar claims.
“He should think about where Armenia will sell its vegetables, fruit, and fish, because Russia has no need for low-quality products. Pashinyan’s statements about multi-billion-dollar lawsuits only damage bilateral relations that took years to build,” Krasov said.
The lawmaker argued that Russian support has played a major role in preserving Armenia’s sovereignty and infrastructure. He also warned that any deterioration in relations with Moscow could seriously affect Armenia’s agricultural sector, which relies heavily on exports.
—
Sokrat Khanyan, an Armenian poet, translator, and literary scholar whose career spanned more than seven decades, has died at 96. He passed away on July 30.
Khanyan was born on January 22, 1930, in the village of Aknakbyur, in the Hadrut region of Nagorno Karabakh. He completed his early schooling in his native village in 1944, then worked from 1947 to 1948 as secretary of the local communist organization and head of the village’s house of culture, before pursuing higher education at the Baku V. I. Lenin State Pedagogical Institute, where he studied Armenian language and literature between 1949 and 1953.
His first published poem appeared in 1950, dedicated to the memory of his elder brother, poet Suren Khanyan, who had died in the Second World War. Khanyan spent the following decade working as a journalist at the “Communist” Armenian Republican newspaper in Baku, and became a member of the USSR Writers’ Union in 1958. His debut poetry collection, “Karkach,” followed in 1959.
Khanyan returned to postgraduate study in Baku from 1962 to 1965, defending a thesis on the dramaturgy of Nairi Zaryan and earning the degree of Candidate of Philological Sciences. He moved to Stepanakert in 1969, following the closure of the Lenin Institute’s Armenian department, where he continued teaching at what became Artsakh State University. Over the following decades, he held a series of leadership positions there, including chairman of the Student Scientific Council from 1974 to 1988, dean of the Linguistic Faculty from 1978 to 1981, and head of the university’s Armenian language, literature, and journalism department from 1984 to 2007.
He also chaired the NKR Regional Committee for the Defense of Peace from 1985 to 1990. In 2002, Khanyan defended a doctoral thesis on the fate of the homeland in Armenian poetry between 1950 and 1990, earning the degree of Doctor of Philological Sciences, and received his professorship in literature in 2004.
Khanyan’s honors included the NKR’s Mesrop Mashtots medal, awarded by President of the Artsakh Republic Bako Sahakyan on Khanyan’s 80th birthday in 2010, along with the Vachagan the Pious medal, the Maternal Gratitude medal, and prizes named for the poets Muratsan and Yeghishe. In January 2020, he marked both his 90th birthday and 70 years of published poetry.
Khanyan is survived by his family, including his grandson, Armenian pianist and composer Hayk Melikyan.
—
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan mentioned Alexander Lukashenka in connection with his words in 2024 that, allegedly, “Armenians are needed by no one” except Russia and its partners in the post-Soviet space. He recalled this while discussing the choice between the European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), Panorama.am reports .
“Why is it constantly assumed as a prerequisite that we are a ‘bad partner’? What bad has the Republic of Armenia done to anyone that the President of Belarus stated: ‘Who needs Armenia anyway?’ How can one speak like that about a sovereign country?” Pashinyan fumed.
He expressed conviction that Armenia “is needed by China, the USA, the EU, Iran, Georgia, France, Poland, Germany, Great Britain” – just as all these partners are needed by Armenia itself.
Pashinyan reminded that Armenia has signed documents on strategic partnership with China, the USA, Great Britain, the Netherlands, France, and many other countries. It did not have such a number of partners before, he noted.
“Russia sees the problem precisely in this: either relations must be exclusive, or there should be no relations at all. We do not accept such an approach,” said the head of the Armenian government.
In August 2024, Lukashenka criticized Yerevan’s political course in an interview with journalist and State Duma deputy Evgeny Popov on the “Rossiya” TV channel. He then contrasted Belarus with other post-Soviet states that begin to “flounder” and “want to take something from Russia, but give nothing in return.”
“Who needs Armenians, besides us? No one. They are needed by no one. Let them develop their economy and focus on what they have. What France, what Macron? Tomorrow Macron will be gone, and everyone will forget about this Armenia,” Lukashenka then stated.
His words caused great indignation in Armenia and led to a strong deterioration of mutual relations, which remains relevant to this day.
—
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan stated that the country’s government considers the South Caucasus Railway, which runs through its territory, to be its property. He emphasized that the country must be able to use the infrastructure at its own discretion and suggested that Armenia could demand payments from Russia of up to $2 billion per year.
The railway infrastructure legally belongs to the Armenian government but is managed by the South Caucasus Railway (SCR), a wholly owned subsidiary of Russia’s Russian Railways (RZD). Pashinyan expressed a desire to resolve this issue amicably but left open the possibility of resorting to arbitration in the event of disagreements.
The prime minister stressed that Armenia may begin to demand compensation for the use of property that had been provided free of charge for 30 years. He stated unequivocally that this railway is the property of the republic and that there can be no other option.
Source: NEWS AM.
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan stated that Russian restrictions on imports of Armenian products could lead to the de facto collapse of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).
As a reminder, Russia banned the import of dairy products from Armenia starting July 27. The Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance of the Russian Federation (Rosselkhoznadzor) attributed this to alleged violations discovered during inspections of Armenian dairy processing plants.
—
—
Nikol Pashinyan’s telephone conversation with Vladimir Putin on July 27 did not solve the main problem, for which the Armenian prime minister actually turned to the Russian president. Restrictions on the supply of Armenian products to Russia’s sanctions remain in force, specific dates for their cancellation have not been named, and manufacturers continue to incur losses. Two days after the conversation, Pashinyan tried to present it as a political dialogue that had taken place, but his own statements confirmed that there was no practical result on the export issue yet.
On July 29, after a meeting of the Civil Contract board, Pashinyan said that the conversation with Putin “turned out” because the leaders talked for a long time and allegedly came to a common understanding on a number of issues. According to him, Russia recognizes Armenia’s “legitimate right” to form foreign policy and economic alternatives. Pashinyan also said that he told Putin: Armenia has announced a move to the side The EU will continue to follow this path, especially since voters supported the relevant program of the ruling party.
However, the duration of the conversation by itself does not mean that agreements have been reached. The official communications of the parties do not contain a decision to lift restrictions, nor an agreed mechanism for the return of Armenian goods to the Russian market, nor a specific time frame for resolving the crisis.
According to the Armenian government, Pashinyan told Putin that restrictions on the export of goods of Armenian origin contradict the Armenian-Russian legal framework and regulations of the EAEU, and then asked to take measures to solve the problem. The Kremlin, for its part, said that the conversation took place precisely on the initiative of the Armenian side. In other words, it was Pashinyan who called Putin with a request to intervene in the situation, and not the Russian president who called the Armenian prime minister with a proposal to lift restrictions.
Instead of promising to restore the previous trade regime, Putin again emphasized the need to hold a referendum on joining the EU or staying in the EAEU in Armenia as soon as possible. It is this difference in official accents that best shows the real outcome of the conversation: Yerevan was talking about goods and losses, Moscow was talking about Armenia’s geopolitical choice.
The story of Putin’s lack of congratulations on the results of the parliamentary elections is also indicative. To a direct question from journalists, Pashinyan replied: “If he didn’t want to, he didn’t congratulate,” and then added: “He didn’t congratulate, but then who was he talking to?” Thus, the prime minister tried to present the very fact of the telephone conversation as an indirect recognition of his status and election results. But such an argument looks strained. Moreover, according to the Kremlin’s official statement, the initiator of the call was not Putin, but the Armenian side. Moreover, Pashinyan said that the parties agreed to meet in the future, but there is also no specific date for the meeting yet.
More details: https://www.eadaily.com/en/news/2026/07/30/the-beginning-of-the-end-of-the-eaeu-or-the-end-of-illusions-armenias-choice-after-putins-conversation-with-pashinyan
—
Kazakhstan has described its hosting of the 2026 Games of the Future as a historic milestone, emphasizing the event’s role in preparing for future challenges in sports and technology.
Astana is currently hosting the third edition of the Games of the Future, bringing together traditional sports and modern digital technologies.
Speaking at a press briefing, Meiram Sapargali, an official representative of Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Tourism and Sports, emphasized the significance of holding this international tournament in Kazakhstan, noting that the country is using the event to elevate both traditional and phygital sports to a new level.
“In previous editions of the Games of the Future, national teams participated. This year, however, the format has changed. Clubs from different countries now take part, and their squads may include athletes from various nations. Another important change concerns the competition system. Each host country selects the disciplines itself. This year, eight disciplines have been chosen: football, basketball, several Counter-Strike formats, and, for the first time, sport dancing has been included in the program,” he said.
According to Sapargali, Kazakhstan’s main goal is to develop phygital sports in the country, and Kazakh athletes are already achieving strong results on the international stage. Next year, Kazakhstan is also expected to host the World Esports Championship.
“Previously, the Games of the Future were hosted by Russia and Abu Dhabi. Experience shows that the tournament format is gradually shifting toward club-based competitions. First, this makes the event more interesting, and second, esports athletes are already accustomed to competing as part of clubs rather than national teams. Since phygital sports are not equally developed in all countries, the club format is probably the most practical solution.
Kazakhstan is consistently working to develop technologies, including digital technologies. This is a historic moment, as Kazakhstan is hosting the Games of the Future for the first time. If previously they were held in countries with highly developed infrastructure, Kazakhstan has now become the first country in Central Asia to host this prestigious competition,” he emphasized.
More than 800 athletes and esports representatives from over 30 countries will compete in Astana.
Published by Armenpress, original at
—
U.S. President Donald Trump said that the “Board of Peace” reached an agreement for the complete disarmament of Palestinian Hamas militants and other armed groups in Gaza, Reuters reports.
Trump cast it as a “major milestone in the implementation of the Trump 20-Point Plan” to end Israel’s war in Gaza.
Trump said on social media that the deal would be carried out in phases, with Israeli forces withdrawing as disarmament proceeds and an International Stabilization Force working with a new Palestinian police force to secure the area.
He thanked mediators Egypt, Qatar and Türkiye.
“This agreement is a critical step towards Gaza finally being governed by a new Palestinian government that will work closely with the Board of Peace to help the Palestinian people,” Trump said.
“At the same time, Israel will have the security it deserves,” Trump added.
Earlier in the day, Reuters cited sources as saying that talks between mediators and Hamas leaders in Cairo on implementing a U.S.-brokered Gaza peace plan made rare progress although an Israeli official said proposed terms were not satisfactory.
Israeli strikes killed at least six Palestinians in Gaza on Thursday, including two children, medics said.
A senior Hamas official has told the BBC the group has agreed to the Board of Peace’s plan to completely disarm in Gaza and that an official statement would be released soon. Israel has yet to comment.
The board, created and led by Trump, said in a statement that the agreement concludes months of “intensive, good faith negotiations”, and that its focus is now on implementation.
Published by Armenpress, original at
—