Prime Minister participates in the informal summit of the heads of the CIS member states

 20:18,

YEREVAN, 26 DECEMBER, ARMENPRESS. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan took part in the unofficial summit of the heads of CIS member states in St. Petersburg, the Prime Minister's Office said.

First, the participants posed for a family photo, then the Russian President Vladimir Putin greeted the participants.

According to the source, issues related to cooperation in the CIS zone were discussed at the meeting.

Before that, the leaders of the CIS countries had visited the "Pavlovsk" State Artistic and Architectural Palace and Park Museum-Reserve, the Catherine Palace, the complex of Peterhof palaces and gardens, and during the tour got acquainted with the exhibits of historical significance.

Kremlin announces Armenia and Azerbaijan ready to finalize peace treaty

 20:22,

YEREVAN, 26 DECEMBER, ARMENPRESS. The Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan and the President of Azerbaijan  Ilham Aliyev, have expressed their readiness to finalize the peace treaty, Russian mass media reports, quoting Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov.

“They are ready to conclude peace negotiations, issue a joint document, to sign the peace treaty," Peskov said in an interview with Channel One during the unofficial summit of the CIS in St. Petersburg. When asked whether it is not risky to gather conflicting parties in one place, Peskov responded: "There is no danger here."

Armenpress: Aliyev invites Lukashenko to visit Azerbaijan

 20:56,

YEREVAN, 26 DECEMBER, ARMENPRESS.  President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev has invited President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko to visit Baku,  BelTA reports.

"We are waiting in Azerbaijan," BelTA quoted Aliyev, as saying.

The two leaders discussed the international agenda and Aliyev provided a detailed overview of the situation in the Caucasus region.

The meeting of the leaders of Azerbaijan and Belarus took place in St. Petersburg, where they had arrived to take part in the unofficial summit of the heads of CIS member states.

RFE/RL Armenian Service – 12/26/2023

                                        Tuesday, 


NATO Official Hails Armenia’s ‘Foreign Policy Shift’

        • Astghik Bedevian

Georgia - Javier Colomina, the NATO secretary general’s special representative 
for the Caucasus and Central Asia.


Armenia is moving away from Russia and seeking closer links with NATO, according 
to a senior official from the U.S.-led alliance.

“Armenia has decided very clearly to make some shift in their foreign policy, to 
take some distance from Moscow,” Javier Colomina, the NATO secretary general’s 
special representative for the South Caucasus and Central Asia, told Georgian 
state television in an interview aired on Monday. “We have welcomed that.”

“Armenia’s citizens are free to make decisions and this is what they have 
decided. In my view, Armenia has already started moving closer to us,” Colomina 
said, adding that Yerevan is now asking NATO for “more cooperation and political 
dialogue.”

“We were and remain part of a security architecture which has demonstrated its 
inefficiency, and any rational sovereign state would draw conclusions from that 
and try to use new tools for ensuring its security,” Arsen Torosian, an Armenian 
lawmaker from the ruling Civil Contract party, said in this regard on Tuesday.

Torosian did not clarify whether that means Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s 
government could eventually pull Armenia out of the Russian-led Collective 
Security Treaty Organization (CSTO).

Pashinian declared in early September that his government is trying to 
“diversify our security policy” because Armenia’s long-standing heavy reliance 
on Russia has proved a “strategic mistake.” He claimed that Moscow is “unwilling 
or unable” to defend its South Caucasus ally. Russia denounced this and other 
“unfriendly steps,” accusing Pashinian of “destroying” Russian-Armenian 
relations at the behest of the West.

Despite mounting tensions between the two longtime allies, Pashinian and other 
Armenian officials insisted afterwards that they have no plans to change 
Armenia’s foreign policy “vector.” The Russian Foreign Ministry dismissed these 
assurances in late November as Pashinian boycotted a summit of the Russian-led 
Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO).

Still, Russian President Vladimir Putin downplayed the rift between Moscow and 
Yerevan earlier this month. The Russian ambassador to Armenia similarly said 
last week that the two nations remain “strategic allies.”




Parking Fees In Central Yerevan To Skyrocket

        • Narine Ghalechian

Armenia - A view of the Victory Bridge in central Yerevan, February 28, 2023.


Ignoring vehement objections from its opposition members, Yerevan’s municipal 
assembly approved on Tuesday a more than tenfold increase in car parking fees 
set for the city center.

The fixed annual price of on-street parking in the city’s central Kentron 
administrative district will jump from 12,000 drams to 160,000 drams ($400) 
starting next month. Mayor Tigran Avinian pushed the unpopular measure through 
the Council of Elders with the effective help of a notorious video blogger 
wanted by Armenian law-enforcement authorities.

The main official purpose of the measure is to reduce mounting traffic 
congestion in Kentron. The two main opposition groups represented in the council 
dismissed that rationale, saying that the municipal authorities should address a 
continuing lack of public buses in the Armenian capital before collecting much 
higher fees from motorists.

“Is our public transport fleet big enough to enable people to go to the city 
center by bus instead of paying 160,000 drams? I think the answer is obvious: 
it’s not,” said Hayk Marutian, a former mayor whose National Progress party 
finished second in recent municipal elections.

Council members representing the radical opposition bloc Mayr Hayastan, which 
came in third, were even more critical, calling the price hike a “plunder.” A 
group of its activists picketed the municipality building early in the morning 
in protest.

Armenia - Opposition members of the city council protest against a proposed suge 
in parking fees in central Yerevan, December 19, 2023.

Avinian, who is affiliated with Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian’s Civil Contract 
party, countered that proceeds from the much higher parking charges will finance 
the purchase of 30 new buses planned by him.

Mayr Hayastan and National Progress boycotted the beginning of the council 
session in a bid to prevent the legislative body from making a quorum and thus 
scuttle the price hike. However, councilors representing blogger Vartan 
Ghukasian’s Public Voice party did not join the boycott, allowing Civil Contract 
and its coalition partner to easily push the measure through. Some Mayr Hayastan 
councilors reacted furiously to that, accusing Ghukasian of secretly 
collaborating with the Armenian government despite his opposition rhetoric.

A former police officer nicknamed Dog, Ghukasian emigrated to the United States 
about a decade ago. He has since attracted large audiences with his hard-hitting 
YouTube videos on political developments in Armenia spiced up with foul 
language. Earlier this year, law-enforcement authorities issued an international 
arrest warrant for Ghukasian and arrested his associates in Armenia on charges 
of blackmail, extortion and fraud.

Ghukasian’s loyalists already helped Civil Contract install Avinian as Yerevan 
mayor in October after the ruling party fell well short of a majority in the 
council in the September 17 vote. They refused to back potential opposition 
candidates for the post of mayor and blocked an opposition attempt to force a 
repeat election.




Karabakh Dissolution Decree Not Valid For Armenian Opposition

        • Ruzanna Stepanian

Armenia - Hayk Mamijanian of the opposition Pativ Unem bloc attends a session of 
parliament,September 13, 2021.


A major Armenian opposition group on Tuesday joined Nagorno-Karabakh’s president 
in saying that his September 28 decree disbanding the self-proclaimed 
Nagorno-Karabakh Republic and its government bodies is null and void.

Samvel Shahramanian sparked a storm of criticism from Armenia’s ruling Civil 
Contract party late last week when he essentially described his decree, signed 
over a week after an Azerbaijani military offensive, as unconstitutional.

Senior Civil Contract figures also said that continued activities of Karabakh 
leadership bodies would pose a threat to Armenia’s national security. Some of 
them said that would be a “time bomb” planted under the country.

“It is [Prime Minister Nikol] Pashinian and those [pro-government] parliament 
deputies who are the biggest time bomb against Armenian statehood and the future 
of Artsakh,” said Hayk Mamijanian, the parliamentary leader of the Pativ Unem 
bloc mainly comprising former President Serzh Sarkisian’s Republican Party of 
Armenia (HHK).

“Artsakh had been set up by blood, not a piece of paper, and it cannot be 
liquidated by a piece of paper,” Mamijanian told reporters. “I will refrain from 
giving Mr. Shahramanian advice. I think that we have yet to see what the Artsakh 
authorities are going to do.”

Shahramanian’s office and other exiled Karabakh bodies must continue to operate 
from Armenia, he said, adding that this would help to keep the Karabakh issue on 
the international agenda.

Pashinian indicated last week that the issue is closed for his administration. 
Pativ Unem and other opposition groups hold him responsible for Azerbaijan’s 
recapture of Karabakh. They say that Pashinian paved the way for the Azerbaijani 
offensive by recognizing Azerbaijani sovereignty over the region.




Azerbaijan Expels Two French Diplomats


Azerbaijan - The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry bulding.


Azerbaijan announced the expulsion of two French diplomats on Tuesday after 
repeatedly accusing France of siding with Armenia in the Nagorno-Karabakh 
conflict.

The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry said that it summoned French Ambassador Anne 
Boillon to express a “strong protest over the actions of two employees of the 
French Embassy” which are “incompatible with their diplomatic status." The two 
were ordered to leave the country within 48 hours, it said without specifying 
those actions.

There was no immediate reaction from Paris to the move, and it was not 
immediately clear what prompted it. Tensions between the two countries have 
climbed in recent years, as France has stepped up support for Armenia and 
escalated its criticism of Azerbaijan.

Like other Western powers, France condemned Baku’s September 19-20 military 
offensive in Karabakh that restored Azerbaijani control over the region and 
forced its population to flee to Armenia. Paris also initiated an emergency 
session of the UN Security Council on the situation in Karabakh.

France has also pledged to provide military aid to Armenia, citing Azerbaijani 
threats to its territorial integrity. In late October, it became the first 
Western nation to sign arms deals with Yerevan.

Baku condemned those deals in November, saying that they will “bolster Armenia’s 
military potential and its ability to carry out destructive operations in the 
region.” Armenian officials countered that these and other arms acquisitions by 
Yerevan are a response to an Azerbaijani military build-up which has continued 
even after the 2020 war in Karabakh.

Earlier in October, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev cancelled a planned 
meeting in Spain with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian, French President 
Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and European Union Council 
President Charles. He objected to Macron’s presence at the talks.

Speaking on December 15, Aliyev said that “some political leaders in France want 
to be more Armenian than the Armenians.” He had earlier accused Paris of 
fomenting “Armenian separatism” in Karabakh.



Reposted on ANN/Armenian News with permission from RFE/RL
Copyright (c) 2023 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, Inc.
1201 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Washington DC 20036.

 

Blood and Oil—How Azerbaijan Greenwashes Its Human Rights Record | Opinion

Newsweek
Dec 20 2023
By Stephan Pechdimaldji

As one of the leading symposiums on climate change, the United Nations Climate Change Conference has become one of the most important dates on the environmental calendar as countries from around the world meet to measure progress and negotiate multilateral responses to global warming. Also known as COP, the annual summit represents all that is good in the world as attendees tackle one of the biggest existential threats of our time. The conference, however, can also be used for nefarious purposes.

Take for example, Azerbaijan, a country that has been ruled by a petro-dictator, Ilham Aliyev, who has exploited their vast natural resources to buy a seat at the world's table. For years, Azerbaijan has tried to shape the world's perception of them as a country that is open for business, with oil and gas playing a vital role in those efforts. It's one of the reasons why Azerbaijan is celebrating the U.N.'s decision to name them as next year's host for COP29, which is shortsighted, confounding, and dangerous. Put simply, Azerbaijan is trying to cover up its dreadful environmental and human rights record through events like COP.

By awarding Azerbaijan this honor, the U.N. is sending the wrong message to the world and is undermining the core mission and ethos of the annual conference and organization as a whole.

When Azerbaijan hosts COP29 next year, it will do so as a country that relies heavily on oil and gas, which accounts for around 95 percent of its total export revenues. That production will only increase as the European Commission inked a deal with Azerbaijan in 2022 to double imports of natural gas by 2027, to help the bloc reduce its reliance on Russian energy.

And when attendees attend COP29 in Baku, they will also be visiting an area known to be "the ecologically most devasted area in the world," due in large part to oil spills and a country home to one of the most polluted places on Earth.

While there is no denying how Azerbaijan's oil and gas has done irrefutable harm to the planet, it is their weaponization of environmentalism that is more troubling. It promises to create a dangerous precedent for other autocrats looking to greenwash their ulterior motives. It was under the false pretense of environmentalism that Azerbaijan implemented their illegal road blockade of the Lachin corridor that forced more than 120,000 ethnic Armenians from their homes in Nagorno-Karabakh, which many leading scholars including Luis Moreno Ocampo, the former chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, called a "genocide." The group of Azeris who initiated the blockade claimed that they were raising the alarm about eco-terrorism in the region, but were also from the same country that inflicted harm on the environment during the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war with Armenia.

During that conflict, Azerbaijan used chemical weapons to burn down forests where civilians took shelter from Azerbaijan's attacks. Video evidence showed Azeri military forces using white phosphorous munitions containing elements of chemical weapons in the primary forests of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Azerbaijan did not just limit their harm to the environment during the war with Armenia. They also continued to spread their ongoing policy of Armenophobia.

As the host city for COP29, Baku is also home to Azerbaijan's Military Trophies Park, Aliyev's ethnic hatred theme park that glorified and extoled his 2020 victory over Armenia by featuring hundreds of helmets taken from Armenian soldiers killed during the war. And when global heads of state meet to discuss how to address climate change, Armenian political prisoners, who are former leaders of Nagorno-Karabakh, including Armenian humanitarian Ruben Vardanyan, will be sitting near them in Azeri jail cells.

Environmentalism has historically been used as a platform for good and enacting change. Cities like Paris (The Paris Climate Agreement) and Kyoto (Kyoto Protocol) have become symbols for environmental justice and models for climate transparency and openness. But environmentalism can also be used to mask injustices. As this year's host for COP28, the United Arab Emirates used the forum to whitewash its poor human rights and environm

Environmentalism has historically been used as a platform for good and enacting change. Cities like Paris (The Paris Climate Agreement) and Kyoto (Kyoto Protocol) have become symbols for environmental justice and models for climate transparency and openness. But environmentalism can also be used to mask injustices. As this year's host for COP28, the United Arab Emirates used the forum to whitewash its poor human rights and environmental record, which drew widespread criticism from climate advocates like former U.S. Vice President Al Gore.

Azerbaijan is the latest country to turn to this playbook. That is why environmentalism and human rights are not mutually exclusive. It allows dictators like Aliyev to use their natural resources to fund their illegal wars and armed aggressions, and then hide behind international forums for perceived legitimacy.

Trusted public institutions like the United Nations have a responsibility to ensure that human rights and the rule of law are conditions for hosting events. They should expect countries that attend these gatherings to be good stewards of their land and people. The bar should be the same for where those meetings are being held.

Stephan Pechdimaldji is a communications strategist who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area. He's a first-generation Armenian American and grandson to survivors of the Armenian genocide.

https://www.newsweek.com/blood-oilhow-azerbaijan-greenwashes-its-human-rights-record-opinion-1853936 

Azerbaijani President and Armenian PM Shake Hands: A Step Toward Peace?

 bnn 
Hong Kong – Dec 26 2023

By: Momen Zellmi

In an unanticipated turn of events during an informal summit of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan made a significant gesture, extending hands to each other. This handshake, simple yet profound, carries weight in a context of strained relations and unresolved issues, particularly in the wake of the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

The conflict, an intense six-week battle, concluded with a ceasefire orchestrated by Russia. However, the ceasefire, while halting immediate hostilities, left many issues hanging in the balance, keeping the diplomatic atmosphere between Azerbaijan and Armenia taut. It’s in these troubled waters that the handshake between the two leaders emerges, a potential beacon signaling a willingness to engage in dialogue.

Being an informal summit, the CIS provides a unique platform for leaders to engage in direct, less rigid discussions. This setup can sometimes pave the way for progress in diplomatic relations, as it allows for more relaxed, personal interactions. The handshake between President Aliyev and Prime Minister Pashinyan, while not necessarily indicating a breakthrough in Azerbaijani-Armenian relations, is a gesture that could be interpreted as a step towards more constructive engagement in the future.

While it’s crucial not to overstate the handshake’s significance, it’s equally vital not to dismiss it outright. The broader implications of this interaction are yet to unfold. Given the lingering tension from the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and the historical rivalry between the two nations, this handshake might just be the seed of a more conciliatory phase in Azerbaijani-Armenian relations. It could be the beginning of a dialogue that brings these two nations closer to resolving their differences and fostering peace in the region.

Azerbaijan and Armenia Leaders Ready to Finalize Peace Treaty

 bnn 
Hong Kong – Dec 26 2023
By: Momen Zellmi

The longstanding conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia over the Nagorno-Karabakh region may soon see resolution. This follows an announcement by Dmitry Peskov, the Press Secretary for the President of Russia, stating that the leaders of the two nations have shown readiness to finalize a peace agreement. This development signifies a major stride towards ending hostilities and establishing enduring peace in the South Caucasus.

According to Russian media reports, the Prime Minister of Armenia, Nikol Pashinyan, and the President of Azerbaijan, Ilham Aliyev, have expressed their willingness to finalize a peace treaty. This came to light during an informal CIS summit in Saint Petersburg on December 26. The leaders’ readiness to reach a consensus on a single document underscores a potentially historic breakthrough in the protracted dispute.

The conflict over the Nagorno-Karabakh region, which dates back to the times of the Ottoman and Qajar empires, has triggered two wars between the countries. Despite ongoing negotiations, challenges and tensions continue to persist. The Azerbaijani Foreign Minister stressed that a peace treaty would not resolve all disputes, while the Armenian Prime Minister expressed optimism about signing a peace agreement if Azerbaijan accepts mutually agreed principles.

Amid these hopeful developments, relations between Azerbaijan and France have been strained, with Azerbaijan declaring two French embassy employees as personae non gratae. This comes as Baku accuses France of favoritism towards Armenia in European-mediated peace talks. Despite initial hopes for a comprehensive peace agreement by the year’s end, negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan, facilitated by international mediation, have shown minimal progress.

https://bnnbreaking.com/politics/azerbaijan-and-armenia-leaders-ready-to-finalize-peace-treaty/




Festive Bonuses for Armenian National Assembly Members

 bnn 
Hong Kong – Dec 26 2023

By: Momen Zellmi

As the year draws to a close, the members of the Armenian National Assembly and their staff are celebrating with festive bonuses, equivalent to a month’s salary. The decision was taken by the Speaker of the National Assembly, Alen Simonyan, as an advance gesture for New Year’s and Christmas festivities.

The Head of Public Relations and Communication of the National Assembly, Laura Antonyan, revealed that over half a billion drams, approximately 1.25 million dollars, were allocated for these bonuses. This figure is inclusive of taxes, and marks a significant increase from last year when nearly 300 thousand dollars were designated for similar bonuses for the National Assembly members, staff, and other workers.

While the gesture is sure to be welcomed by the recipients, it may raise questions about the use of public funds, especially given the substantial increase from last year’s allocation. Amidst the festive cheer, it remains to be seen how the public and various stakeholders within the political arena react to this development.

The Armenian National Assembly is the legislative branch of the government of Armenia, consisting of 105 seats. It is responsible for passing laws, ratifying international agreements, and overseeing the work of the government. The Speaker of the National Assembly, currently Alen Simonyan, is the third-highest official in the country.

The Child’s Sorrow: A Poignant Tale Amid Nagorno Karabakh Conflict

 bnn 
Hong Kong – Dec 26 2023

By: Momen Zellmi

The sorrow of a child in the midst of conflict is a poignant reminder of the human cost of war. Eight-year-old Artur, from Chartar, is a living testament to this harsh reality. He’s been missing his classmates from Artsakh for three months now, a direct result of the turmoil in Nagorno Karabakh. The absence of his friends, their whereabouts and well-being unknown, provokes a quick emotional response at the mere mention of their names. Undoubtedly, the innocence of childhood has been swept away by the tides of conflict.

For weeks, Azerbaijan and Armenia locked horns in Nagorno Karabakh, a region marred by bloody clashes and escalating hostilities. The anti-terrorist operation launched by Azerbaijan was a catalyst, triggering an international outcry. The shelling claimed the lives of civilians and military personnel alike, while the bombardment of Stepanakert, the de facto capital, was reported by ethnic Armenians within Nagorno Karabakh.

Caught in the crossfire, the civilian population faced a deteriorating humanitarian situation. The conflict has led to chronic malnutrition and energy deficiencies, as the blockade of the Lachin Corridor potentially edged the local Armenian population towards genocide. Despite the efforts of the ICRC, there’s an urgent need for impartial humanitarian relief to reach this beleaguered region.

The blockade has resulted in a dire humanitarian crisis in Nagorno Karabakh. UN experts have called for its lifting to alleviate the suffering of thousands, but tensions escalated after Azerbaijan tightened a checkpoint and claimed contraband discovery in Red Cross vehicles. Both Armenia and separatist authorities accused Azerbaijan of blockading the region, while Baku offered an alternative route for supplies.

The remote southern reaches of the Syunik Region, home to the village of Nrnadzor, bear witness to the human cost of this conflict. The village, known for its harsh living conditions, is home to 141 residents, including 13 displaced from Artsakh. Here, amidst rocky roads, a lack of water, gas, and cable internet infrastructure, the primary source of income is dwindling pomegranate orchards. The insufficient irrigation further paints a picture of the grim reality.

Yet, amidst these dire circumstances, the story of Artur stands out. His longing to reconnect with his friends, their shared laughter, and games resonate deeply. It is through his eyes that we see the true cost of conflict – a child’s stolen innocence, a generation’s uncertain future.

https://bnnbreaking.com/world/armenia/the-childs-sorrow-a-poignant-tale-amid-nagorno-karabakh-conflict/

How Azerbaijan Found Victory, and Armenia Defeat, in Nagorno-Karabakh

Dec 26 2023
Armenia has played a weak hand badly while Azerbaijan has grabbed a once in many generations opportunity with both hands. After taking over Nagorno-Karabakh, Azerbaijan now eyes a corridor through Armenian territory to the Azeri enclave of Nakhchivan. This could draw Turkey and Iran into the fight, threatening the stability of the entire region.
BY ATUL SINGH, ANTON SCHAUBLE

DECEMBER 26, 2023 01:40 EDT
SAVE

On February 21, one of the authors of this piece explained the backstory of the Armenia–Azerbaijan conflict. Armenia was once a part of the Ottoman Empire, while Azerbaijan belonged to the Qajar dynasty of Iran. As both empires weakened and fell, Armenia and Azerbaijan ended up in the Soviet Union.

In 1991, the Soviet Union fell as well. Since then, Armenia and Azerbaijan have been at odds with each other over Nagorno-Karabakh and Nakhichevan. Until two months ago, Armenians lived in Nagorno-Karabakh, an area within Azerbaijan. Azeris still live in Nakhichevan, an area within Armenia that borders Iran and Turkey. Yes, this sounds complicated but so are most imperial hangovers.

Map dated 2016 © osw.waw.pl/.

On September 19, Azerbaijan launched a large-scale military offensive against Nagorno-Karabakh. This autonomous ethnic Armenian enclave called itself the Republic of Artsakh. Within 24 hours, this so-called republic ceased to exist. Now, Azerbaijani military forces control Nagorno-Karabakh. The Artsakh Defense Army stands disbanded and people who lived here for centuries, if not millennia, have fled to Armenia.

David J. Scheffer of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) states that Armenians are “experiencing ethnic cleansing at warp speed.” Others defend Azerbaijan and argue that its troops are only restoring sovereignty to territory that is rightfully theirs. Armenia had controlled Nagorno-Karabakh and surrounding areas, all legally Azerbaijani territory, until a few years ago.

Azerbaijanis claim that this Armenian exodus is voluntary. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev promised to protect Armenian civil rights in Nagorno-Karabakh, but fleeing Armenians feared persecution and massacre “after years of mutual distrust and open hatred between Azerbaijan and Armenia.”

Over time, various empires have conquered and controlled the South Caucasus. Generals like Cyrus, Alexander and Pompey swept through this mountainous region. In antiquity, winning in the South Caucasus was essential if you wanted to be called “the Great.”

Why is the South Caucasus so important for the likes of Cyrus or Alexander the Great? Geography provides us the answer.

The South Caucasus lies at the crossroads of empires. To its west, lies the Mediterranean Sea which was the locus of the Macedonian, Roman and Ottoman empires. To its north and east (beyond the Caspian Sea), lie the great Eurasian grasslands that were once dominated by the Mongols and now by the Russians. To the south of the South Caucasus lie the Tigris and Euphrates rivers — historically known as Mesopotamia — and the Iranian plateau that was the power base of the Persian Empire.

This mountainous region has been the meeting place for great empires and the battleground for great powers. Romans and Persians traded Armenia back and forth. Over the past five centuries, Safavid Persia, Ottoman Turkey and the Russian Empire have controlled different parts of this territory at different times. Their successor states still jostle over the South Caucasus today.

World War I was critical in forging modern South Caucasus. Tsarist Russia faced disastrous defeat. In 1917, a revolution erupted and Russian control of this region evaporated. Idealists forged the Transcaucasian Democratic Federative Republic, which disintegrated into Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia within five weeks. In this age of ethnic nationalism, a multiethnic state proved a bridge too far, especially for the fractious South Caucasus.

Like the Russians, the Ottomans fared poorly in World War I. Armenia took advantage of Ottoman weakness to take control over Nakhchivan. Rebellions by the local Muslim population followed but Armenia managed to retain control. In the case of Zangezur and Karabakh, Azerbaijan stood in Armenia’s way and both these young countries fought inconclusively. 

When World War I ended, the Ottoman Empire collapsed as well. Mustafa Kemal Atatürk set out to create a modern Turkish nation state. Out went a multiethnic empire, in came a more ethnically homogeneous nation. The Turks expelled the Greeks and the Armenians from this new state. Modern Turkey was built through ethnic cleansing, although the Ottomans had set the ball rolling with the Armenian Genocide in 1915.

Atatürk was rebelling against the peace settlement imposed by the victorious allies in 1920. The Treaty of Sèvres wrested the Arab and Greek portions of the Ottoman empire from Turkish control. The British and the French divvied up the Arab lands between themselves. Along with Italy, they also carved Turkey into spheres of influence. Atatürk defeated the occupying forces, scrapped the old treaty and negotiated the far more favorable 1923 Treaty of Lausanne.

The now largely forgotten Treaty of Sèvres provided for an independent Armenia. The idealistic Woodrow Wilson proposed that the US be the protector of this new Armenia. The 1920 treaty envisioned an Armenia four and a half times larger than the one today. Sadly for Wilson and Armenia, the US turned isolationist at the end of the war. The US Senate withdrew from the League of Nations and torpedoed Wilson’s plans for Armenia.

While the US turned inward, the newly formed Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), now better known as the Soviet Union, went back to its expansionist imperial Russian roots. As one of the authors explained in his earlier piece, the Soviet 11th Army took over the South Caucasus, including Armenia and Azerbaijan, in 1920 itself. The Treaty of Sèvres was stillborn.

For the next seven decades, Armenia and Azerbaijan were Soviet republics. Moscow drew their borders largely on ethnic lines. The USSR granted Zangezur to Armenia, Nakhchivan became an Azerbaijani exclave and Karabakh became an autonomous province within Azerbaijan. The Soviets dubbed Karabakh the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (NKAO) because Nagorny Karabakh in Russian simply means the highlands of Karabakh.

By the late 1980s, the Soviet empire began disintegrating. The Berlin Wall fell on November 9, 1989. On December 31, 1991, the Soviet Union itself dissolved. Ethnic tensions held in check by communist repression erupted like a dormant volcano. 

In 1988, ethnic Armenians living in the NKAO demanded their region be transferred from Soviet Azerbaijan to Soviet Armenia. Conflict exploded into all-out war when the Soviet Union collapsed. Fighting only ceased in 1994 and Armenia emerged as the winner. Armenian troops took control over Nagorno-Karabakh and seven adjacent districts. Armenia now controlled 20% of Azerbaijan. An estimated one million Azerbaijanis became refugees and internally displaced persons. Armenia did not have it all its own way though. About 300,000–500,000 Armenians from Azerbaijan, Nagorno-Karabakh and Nakhchivan made their way to Armenia.

The end to war in 1994 did not lead to peace. Deadly incidents continued. Both sides used troops, special operations forces, artillery, other heavy weaponry and, more recently, drones. In April 2016, fighting broke out but stopped after just four days. Yet hundreds died on both sides. On the whole, an uneasy peace persisted until 2020.

During this uneasy peace, Armenia forged a security partnership with Russia while Azerbaijan developed a close relationship with Turkey. A shared Muslim faith and a common Turkic ethnic identity helped. Even though Armenia and Russia are part of the Oriental Orthodox Christian traditions, Moscow still sold weapons to Azerbaijan and played both sides.

Starting 2007, things changed dramatically. BP discovered gas at “a Caspian-record depth of more than 7,300 meters” about 70 kilometers southeast of Baku. Flush with gas wealth, the balance of power began to shift in Azerbaijan’s favor in the 2010s. Under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Turkey rejected Atatürk’s secular European identity and embraced a neo-Ottoman foreign policy. Erdoğan’s political Islam led to greater military support for Azerbaijan and Baku’s geostrategic position improved. More gas money and Turkish military support gave Azerbaijan the edge over Armenia in the latest edition of South Caucasus geopolitical chess.

In late 2020, Azerbaijan made its decisive move and succeeded in reclaiming much of the territory Armenia had occupied since 1994. The Second Nagorno-Karabakh War lasted 44 days and left at least 6,500 dead. Azerbaijan was unable to break through the defenses of Artsakh and Russia brokered an uneasy truce. Nearly 2,000 Russian peacekeepers were to enforce the peace. These troops were deployed along the three-mile-wide Lachin corridor, the sole overland route connecting Nagorno-Karabakh to Armenia.

The ceasefire agreement granted Azerbaijan control of Nagorno-Karabakh’s cultural capital, Shusha, which Armenians refer to as Shushi, and several other towns. Azerbaijan also gained surrounding Azeri territories that Armenians had held since 1994. Local Armenians got to retain control of the northern half of the region, along with Stepanakert, the capital of Artsakh. Future peace talks were to decide the final political status of Nagorno-Karabakh.

Needless to say, the peace did not hold. In December 2022, Azerbaijan closed off the Lachin corridor. The Russia-Ukraine War had broken out on February 24, 2022. The 2018 Velvet Revolution had ousted the Russia-friendly Republican Party that had been in power since 1999. After the revolution, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan took charge. Armenia began to extricate itself from the arms of Russia and started flirting with the US. This poked the Russian bear and earned Pashinyan’s Putin’s ire.

Azerbaijan had a once in many generations opportunity and Baku seized it with glee. In December 2022, Azerbaijan violated the 2020 ceasefire agreement and closed off the Lachin corridor. This ten-month blockade denied 120,000 Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh food, fuel and medicine. Putin’s peacekeepers stood idly by and Artsakh’s fate hung in the balance.

By April, Armenians found themselves in a dire situation. Pashinyan dramatically relinquished Armenia’s claim to Nagorno-Karabakh in an effort to stop the long-running conflict. This failed to bring peace. On April 23, set up a checkpoint on the Lachin corridor, which was called “the road of life” for Artsakh. Neither Russian peacekeepers nor Western powers did much to help. By September, it was all over. Azerbaijan controlled all of Nagorno-Karabakh, Artsakh evaporated and Armenians fled to Armenia.

A little more than two weeks before Azerbaijan’s decisive move, Pashinyan had declared that “solely relying on Russia to guarantee its security was a strategic mistake.” History may judge his ill-judged statement as a historic blunder. Pashinyan turned to the West in general and the US in particular to guarantee Armenia’s safety. However, to paraphrase a Chinese proverb, the mountains were high and the emperor was faraway. The US had far too many pots on the boil to worry about Armenia.

Pashinyan forgot one simple fact: realpolitik is a rough game. The EU needs Azerbaijani gas after putting sanctions on Russia. In 2021, Europe imported 8 billion cubic meters (bcm) of gas from Azerbaijan. This year, gas imports are expected to be 12 bcm and are on track to double by next year. Clearly, gas supplies trump the unity of Christendom for the EU. Post-Brexit UK is in the money because of BP. So, Armenia can expect little help from a land that was once the realm of Richard the Lionheart.

Azerbaijan has also been able to win over Israel to its side. According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), 13% of Israel’s arms exports were destined for Azerbaijan in the 2017-2021 period. They comprised more than 60% of Azerbaijani arms imports and included drones, missiles, and mortars. Furthermore, the Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC) reveals that 65% of Israel’s 2021 crude oil imports came from Azerbaijan.

Much more discreet than SIPRI and OEC figures are the close strategic collaboration between Israel and Azerbaijan for realpolitik reasons. Intelligence Online claims that Israeli military and intelligence contributed to Azerbaijan’s victory in Nagorno-Karabakh. Naturally, Israel has an ax to grind. Azeris comprise 16% of Iran’s population, three times the population of Azerbaijan. Although they have yet to rebel against Tehran, Azeris report widespread discrimination despite being largely Shias. By backing Azerbaijan, Israel is winning over Azeris and could foment trouble in the future against Iran. More importantly, Israel’s elite organizations — Unit 8200, Mossad and Sayeret Matkal — reportedly use Azerbaijan as a base of operations against Iran. For Israel, Armenia is eminently expendable in the pursuit of its national security goals.

For the US, Azerbaijan is of vital national interest because it borders both Russia and Iran, two key enemies. Washington cannot displease Baku too much and push it into the arms of Russia. Despite a powerful Armenian American diaspora that has historically backed the Democrats, the Biden administration turned the Nelson’s eye to Azerbaijan’s actions and did not back Armenia.

In contrast, Turkey is backing Azerbaijan to the hilt. Less than a week after Azerbaijan’s victory in Nagorno-Karabakh, Aliyev hosted Erdoğan in Nakhchivan. The two hailed this victory and signed a deal for a gas pipeline. Erdoğan was “very pleased” to “connect Nakhchivan with the Turkish world.” Turkey’s support for Azerbaijan paralyzes NATO, which cannot support Armenia. Most Muslim countries in the nearby Arab world to the more distant Pakistan, support Azerbaijan.

Poor Pashinyan is isolated. He has found himself with two not-very-useful friends: neighboring Iran and faraway India. Both are not powerful enough to stave off disaster for landlocked Armenia. Besides, the Israel-Hamas war raging has cast Armenia further into the shadows. No one is likely to act against further Azerbaijani aggression.

Erdoğan and Aliyev have clearly signaled that Nakhchivan is next on the menu. They fear that Armenia could do this 460,000 strong Azeri enclave what Azerbaijan did to the Armenian enclave in Nagorno-Karabakh. Ethnic cleansing is a game two can play and Azerbaijan must press home its advantage before the tide turns.

Therefore, Baku seeks the Zangezur corridor, a transport link through Armenia’s southernmost province Syunik to Nakhchivan. This landlocked Azerbaijani territory has a small border with Turkey and a much larger one with Iran. The former backs the Zangezur corridor while the latter opposes it. The descendants of the Ottomans and Safavids are clashing again in the South Caucasus. 

Under Erdoğan, Turkey aims to breathe fire into the Organization of Turkic States, an attempt to bring together Turkic peoples all the way till Kazakhstan. Once Turkish horsemen dominated Central Asia. Today, Erdoğan is looking east and south, not west and north, to expand Turkey’s influence. Therefore, the Zangezur corridor is an opportunity to create a new trade route between Europe, the Middle East, Central Asia and China.

Despite academics like Anna Ohanyan calling the Zangezur corridor a violation of Armenian sovereignty and a challenge to the global rules-based order, Yerevan and Baku are engaged in peace talks. On December 7, they agreed to exchange prisoners of war. After failed mediation by the EU, the US and Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan are engaged in direct bilateral discussions. Yet mutual distrust is high and both sides are unlikely to come up with a lasting peace deal.

So far, Armenia has played a weak hand badly. Pashinyan has lost much of the goodwill he gained during the Velvet Revolution. Even before Azerbaijan’s conquest of Nagorno-Karabakh, Pashinyan’s popularity was declining precipitously. Now, many Armenians revile him as a weak and ineffective leader who has led the country to disastrous defeat.

Pashinyan has continued to offend Moscow by refusing to allow Russian troops to conduct military exercises and declining to attend an alliance summit. Armenia has also joined the Treaty of Rome that established the International Criminal Court (ICC). The ICC has issued an arrest warrant for Putin. By joining such an organization, Pashinyan is spitting in the tsar’s face and inviting further Russian wrath.

Notably, Armenia is economically dependent on Russia. The country’s landlocked geography does not make things easy. Turkey lies west, Azerbaijan east, Georgia north and Iran south. Therefore, about 40% of Armenian exports make their way to Russia. Armenia depends on Russian grain, oil, gas and basic goods almost completely. Gazprom owns all of Armenia’s gas distribution infrastructure. The country depends on remittances from Armenians working in Russia. In 2022, $3.6 billion out of the total remittances of $5.1 billion came from Russia.

Armenia still remains a member of the Russia-led Collective Security Treaty Organization, Commonwealth of Independent States and Eurasian Economic Union. Since the beginning of the Russia-Ukraine War, the Armenian economy has become even more dependent on its Russian counterpart. Currently, Pashinyan is visiting Russia, promising greater economic bloc cooperation but Putin is unlikely to give his rebellious satrap much of a break. Russia is grinding down Armenia into submission and will only relent when Pashinyan is no longer prime minister.

With little external support or internal legitimacy, Pashinyan is in no position to make peace. With Turkey’s help, Azerbaijan will put Armenia under duress and drive a hard bargain. If Pashinyan does not capitulate, Azerbaijani troops can drive home their advantage. This time, the conflict might draw Turkey and Iran into the fight. Russia will wait and watch but eventually intervene. Israel, NATO, the UK and the US might also find themselves sucked into this conflict. Yet again, the South Caucasus has become a powder keg but few are paying this region the attention it deserves.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

https://www.fairobserver.com/world-news/how-azerbaijan-found-victory-and-armenia-defeat-in-nagorno-karabakh/#