Public speaker, media expert Gor Madoyan writes: “So? “trace”Armen is called to 25-day gatherings. A person goes to serve, comes and shares notes. That we had weapons, there was no oil, we would service the weapons and the combat situation would be safe.

There were bullets, but no weapons, no grenade launcher, but there were warheads, there was a drone squad, but on paper. Yes, we didn’t even have an ax to at least break grass, burn it, and warm it up.

Armen is an ordinary citizen, one of us, a journalist who wrote this out of compassion for solving problems, realizing that silence does not advance the problem.

Now the Ministry of Defense has responded, threatening that if you write such things again (military secret or what), there will be consequences. He doesn’t threaten the head of the General Security Service, one more thing, he took a whole staff of the General Security Service and took them to positions, made them take pictures with guns and bullets, put the camera in front of him and promised that I am here now and everything is fine.

A good army is a system, with chains, officials of various circles who receive millions of salaries, social insurance, pay, assistant, bonuses, pass certification. Well, there is no specialist in frontline supply and other chains in the huge chain of the army. The chief of the General Staff should go and check the ammunition. Well, you understand that by showing this, you are proving that you are either terribly idle, or there is no one in place, and Armen’s writing is still not enough.”

—

The main department of the investigation of economic crimes and smuggling of the RA Investigative Committee is examining the criminal proceedings initiated by G.T. and other persons in connection with the cases of fraudulent theft and money laundering of properties and funds worth 8 billion 126 million 946 thousand 460 AMD equivalent to 21 million 72 thousand 827 USD.

On the basis of the obtained sufficient evidence, a public criminal prosecution was initiated against the former general manager of the concern, the chairman of the board of directors, S.A., and the director of the company, A.D., under Article 46-255, Part 3, Clause 3 of the Criminal Code (especially assisting in large-scale fraud) and Article 46-296, Part 3, Clause 3 (especially large amounts of money). assisting with washing).

On August 5, 2026, on the basis of decisions made by the body implementing the proceedings, SA and AD were arrested for the purpose of being brought to court.

The investigation is ongoing.

Notice: the person accused of a crime is considered innocent until his guilt is proven in accordance with the procedure established by the Code of Criminal Procedure, by a legally binding verdict of the court.

—

Official Baku welcomes the “real Armenia” concept adopted by Yerevan. Hikmet Hajiyev, assistant to the President of Azerbaijan, told Turkish journalists.

According to him, the Armenian-Azerbaijani peace process consists not only of statements on paper. He added that Azerbaijan “confirmed its commitment to peace with practical steps”.

“We positively assess the fact that the current administration of Armenia has adopted the concept of “real Armenia” as a fundamental approach. We expect that it will be included in the Constitution. We do not intend to interfere in the internal affairs of Armenia. They made statements about adopting a new constitution,” Hajiyev said.

He added that after the adoption of the new constitution, Armenia will have no problems signing a peace treaty.

“Our goal is to complete the peace processes between Armenia and Azerbaijan, as well as between Turkey and Armenia, by conducting them in parallel,” he added.

Aliyev’s aide also stated that the opening of the “Zangezur Corridor” is a part of the new geopolitical reality. “It serves both our and Armenia’s interests, as the country realizes the need for transit opportunities in the region,” Hajiyev said.

—

They are going to attract the next loans with 2 projects not reported in the agenda of the regular session of the government.

According to the project developed by the Ministry of Finance, it is planned to receive a budget loan of 150 million dollars from the Asian Development Bank, which will be provided for 15 years, with a floating interest rate of 4.58.  The first component of this credit agreement is intended to support the strengthening of fiscal management, public debt and financial risk management policies, as well as strengthening the stability of infrastructure investments. The second component implies the improvement of the state securities market, the third, the expansion of the range of financial instruments and investors, as well as the transparency of companies.

The second loan agreement was signed between the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development․ the amount of the loan is 170 million dollars. These credit funds are planned to be directed to the liberalization of investments, trade and the promotion of competition, to ensure greener and more resistant growth. The term of the loan is 28 years, the annual interest rate is 3.9 percent.

In other words, they are taking on new DEBT to manage, for example, the risks of the public debt, or to direct the expansion of the range of investors, while the policy pursued by Nikol Pashinyan’s government in this direction is not exemplary at all.․ 2 big investors are currently under political persecution. are detained.

Let’s remind: the total volume of the state debt of the Republic of Armenia, according to the latest data, has crossed the border of 14 billion dollars. It is noteworthy that after the well-known velvet revolution of 2018, the burden of public debt has almost doubled.

And in that debt burden, the foreign debt, which, according to the latest index,  6.7 billion dollars it also comes from loans provided by international donor organizations, such as the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank, etc.

Davit Ananyan, member of the management board of the Unity Wings party, general director of the D-ES Consulting Group company, former head of the RA State Revenue Committee (SRC), candidate of economic sciences., referring to the regular credit involvements 168․amto the questions, noticed that though there is a practice of attracting credit funds to plan budgetary risks, but the control over it should be strengthened.

“It is assumed that it was taken to mitigate certain risks. There are certain sectors related to the economy, which suffer losses related to these restrictions, and, most likely, it aims to implement additional subsidies not provided for in the budget. Davit Ananyan mentioned.

In general, in response to our clarifications about the rapid growth of the debt burden, the economist emphasized that, from a professional point of view, the public debt, according to the debt/GDP ratio indicator, is still within manageable limits, but there are problems with the quality of the economy’s structure.

“And the reason is that industry is not the dominant force in the structure of the economy. And if at the moment it is even industry, then it is mining, which is due to the increase in copper prices in international banks, the existence of quite high copper prices. In other words, even if the industry today has some vitality (we are not talking about the processing industry, but the mining industry, which is based on the export of concentrates and not of higher value finished products), the economy is still not good in its structure, although it has a certain size. Therefore, if we are talking arithmetically, the debt is manageable from a macro perspective, but qualitatively, the future is rather murky.” he elaborated.

Speaking about another factor, the vague economic prospects caused by Russian restrictions, and in response to our observations, referring to the estimates of some officials-experts close to the government, that the damage to the RA economy will be 1-1.5 percent under the conditions of total economic restrictions by the Russian Federation, Davit Ananyan noted:

“For example, the Security Council of Russia published indicators of 15.1 percent economic and 26.3 percent industrial decline, as well as 14 percent inflation. These, it seems to me, are within the limits of extreme estimates, but what is the methodology behind the numerology presented by the Russian Council of Ministers, or what are the goals of our Russian partners, what calculations did they make, how much will they increase the price of gas?․․․ there are still uncertainties that are not known to us. I think that the judgments of the Central Bank and the government can be thoughtful and optimistic, and, for example, those of the partners of the Russian Federation, thoughtful and pessimistic. And in that amplitude there are quite a few economic indicators, which are still unknown. We cannot say which judgment is closer to the truth, which is realistic.” he said.

—

The Armenian Parliament started working with a new political composition on August 2, almost 2 months after the elections. The Central Electoral Commission of Armenia has officially summarized and distributed the mandates of the National Assembly, thus completing the electoral process. Nikol Pashinyan was re-elected as Prime Minister.

Moreover, the leaders of Russia and China did not send public congratulatory messages to Nikol Pashinyan. «Civil contract» to the party leader on his election victory, although similar congratulations were sent in 2018 and 2021. Usually, congratulations of this level are considered not only as a ceremonial necessity, but also as a political impulse in the context of bilateral relations. Apparently, the silence should be understood as a diplomatic gesture, especially considering the role of Russia and China in Armenia’s foreign policy agenda. The works of the National Assembly of Armenia of this convocation also took place without the blessing of the Catholicos of All Armenians.

As for Russia, immediately after the elections in Armenia, the press secretary of the Russian President Dmitry Peskov warned that Moscow will express its attitude towards them after the announcement of the final results. “For now, we are carefully recording all the messages that appear around these elections. Among them, we also record the messages about the many violations that took place during these elections,” the representative of the Kremlin clarified.

More is tough to express Dmitry Medvedev, the former president of the Russian Federation and currently the vice-chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation. «RA Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s attempts to eliminate his rivals on the eve of the parliamentary elections make the voting illegitimate»:

It was expected that after the elections in Armenia, the burning of passions would subside.  However, the situation, on the contrary, has worsened. In response to opposition forces not recognizing the election results, the government unleashed a large-scale campaign of political repression. In the period that passed after the elections, the CEC of Armenia satisfied the request of the Prosecutor General’s Office to deprive former President Robert Kocharyan of his immunity from immunity and initiate (initiate) a criminal case against him. They blocked his departure from the country.

Samvel Karapetyan, the leader of the “Strong Armenia” alliance under investigation, which also entered the parliament (29 mandates), said that a total of 760 members of his political organization were persecuted under various pretexts.

Avetik Chalabyan, coordinator of “HayaVote” public movement, Andranik Tevanyan, leader of “Mother Armenia” party (“Mother Armenia” merged with “Prosperous Armenia” party (PAP) to participate in the elections), Aregnaz Manukyan, a member of “Prosperous Armenia” party, were arrested. The criminal prosecution against PAP leader Gagik Tsarukyan began two days after the end of the parliamentary elections, on June 9, when he announced that his party’s votes were “miscalculated” (deceived) due to his refusal to play the role of a “pocket” opposition in the parliament. The point is that, after Tsarukyan’s resignation, the CEC adjusted (changed) the number of votes received by the party so that it could not overcome the 4% barrier necessary to enter the parliament.

On the morning of July 6, on the day of his visit to Yekaterinburg to meet with Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin within the framework of the “Innoprom-2026” international industrial exhibition, Nikol Pashinyan issued an order to suspend the activities of almost all companies of the “Multi Group” concern, including the “Araratcement” factory, whose owner is Tsarukyan. Large-scale searches were conducted in the companies of this concern, as well as in the apartments of their directors and Tsarukyan’s house itself. The investigative committee of the Republic has confirmed that searches are being carried out simultaneously at more than 70 addresses related to Tsarukyan and his companies. The employees of his “Multi Stone” factory went out into the street. They demanded an explanation as to why the workshops and warehouses for finished products were sealed, stating that they had nothing to pay for utilities and feed the children. Tsarukyan himself, being in the investigative isolation cell, accused the authorities of hitting the economy.

The actions against Tsarukyan on the day of Pashinyan’s visit to Russia can hardly be considered a coincidence. According to Armenian analysts, the Prime Minister hoped to “improve his negotiating position” in this way. According to them, “Pashinyan decided to take Tsarukyan hostage in order to bargain with Russia”, for example, in exchange for opening the Russian market for Armenian products.

Another subject of blackmail, the Prime Minister of Armenia recently chose the “South Caucasian Railway”, the infrastructure of which was handed over to the 100-percent daughter of Russian Railways under the concession agreement until 2038, and threatened Demand 2 billion dollars from Russia for this concession։

Political scientists agree that Moscow has invested too many resources in the Armenian economy to simply turn a blind eye to attempts to nationalize joint ventures. We are talking about railways, trade projects and the strategic North-South transport corridor. Russia has every right to protect its investments. If Yerevan decides to finally break off relations, it will have to raise the issue of compensation. The Armenian leadership, showing loyalty to the West, risks losing the privileges it received almost for free.

It is not the first time that the Prime Minister of Armenia plays a double game. Apparently, he wanted to repeat the combination when he organized a summit of the European political community in Yerevan in early May and arrived in Moscow almost simultaneously for a meeting with the Russian president. However this time, the Kremlin did not grant him the high-level meeting he had promised his voters immediately after the election.  Had to get to a meeting with Prime Minister Mishustin, which he made public admitted:

The Prime Minister of Armenia reconciled with the lowering of the status of the negotiations.  The point is that in Armenia the prime minister is the de facto head of state, and in Russia the head of state is the president. V. V. Putin met N.V. quite often. with Pashinyan. Since 2018, the Prime Minister of Armenia has visited Russia 32 times in order to participate in bilateral negotiations with the President of the Russian Federation, EAEU, CIS and CSTO summits, as well as international forums. In 2024-2026 alone, he visited Russia seven times, where economic and integration cooperation, energy, transport links in the South Caucasus, the work of the Armenian NPP, the regional agenda and military-technical cooperation were discussed. He almost always met with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Now, especially after the continued persecution of pro-Russian opposition politicians and businessmen, contacts with him are likely to remain on a pragmatic basis, as the economic ties between the two states are too deep to be severed by a single decision.

Moreover, Moscow refused congratulations and lowered the level of representation (the Armenian Prime Minister was met at the airport by the deputy head of the State Protocol Department of the Russian Foreign Ministry), demonstrating its attitude towards Yerevan’s current policy.

However, Pashinyan decided to make his first official visit to Russia after the elections, because the practical significance of the visit was more important for Yerevan than diplomatic etiquette.

Experts see this visit as Armenia’s attempt to find a balance between European promises and real economic losses.  The main task of the Prime Minister of Armenia was probably to return Armenian capital to the Russian market and restore full trade. Such haste is probably related to the fact that hopes for financial support from the European Union did not justify themselves. Prime Minister Mishustin did not give any concrete guarantees to Pashinyan, because Moscow wants to follow Yerevan’s further practical steps. In fact, this allows us to talk about the failure of Pashinyan’s mission to Yekaterinburg. Armenia remains in an uncertain state in that direction.

RA Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s visit to Yekaterinburg followed the recent negotiations in Yerevan with the head of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, who promised much less than expected and demanded by Yerevan. The European Union refuses to provide any legally binding guarantees, especially in the field of trade, limiting itself to small monetary tranches and easing in the import of Armenian products. No documents were signed during the visit. only announcements were made about the prospects of cooperation, which has little to do with the real and current problems of Armenian farmers and other producers. Von der Leyen also stated that the EU is ready to help Armenia diversify its energy sources, citing Ukraine and Moldova as examples.  European countries, despite loud announcements about sanctions, continue to buy Russian energy through third countries. Basically, Armenia is offered to buy three times the same, but with a “non-Russian” label, to formally match the anti-Russian rhetoric.

In addition, the Armenian NPP works with Russian technologies, uses Russian nuclear fuel, and is serviced by Russian specialists. Such a system cannot be changed by a single political decision. it will take years and multi-billion investments.

The leadership of Armenia has found itself in a difficult situation. From May to the end of July, Russia gradually introduced bans and restrictions on the import of almost all agricultural products from Armenia, from flowers and fresh vegetables to fish and dairy products, almost all of Armenia’s food exports to the Russian Federation came under restrictions. Since up to 90-94% of Armenian fruit and vegetable, flower and fish exports went to the Russian market, the blow was quite significant. According to the data of the Food Safety Inspection Authority of Armenia, in June 2026, the export of agricultural products to Russia will increase sharply. has decreased (collapsed). by 74.5% compared to June 2025. Experts: Armenia’s potential losses from the severance of integration ties with Russia they appreciate up to 14% of GDP. Moreover, it will not be difficult for Russia to replace Armenian products. Armenia’s share in the gross merchandise turnover does not exceed 0.9%, and the indicator of Armenian supplies to the rest of the EAEU countries is even lower., said Reshetnikov, head of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation.

At first glance, the restrictions on imports from Armenia have a political context, but at the same time, experts note the systemic managerial crisis in Armenia. After the dissolution of the Ministry of Agriculture by order of Pashinyan in 2019, the state control system was disrupted. Hundreds of small companies are now entering the market, whose products are often of “unknown origin”. Thus, re-export schemes have been revealed, when products from third countries are imported into Armenia without phytosanitary control, repackaged and sent to the Russian Federation as “Armenian”. Russia insists on the implementation of the Russian “Mercury” type digital traceability system (the “Mercury digital traceability system is the Federal State Information System”) created by Rosselkhoznadzor (Federal Service of Veterinary and Phytosanitary Control) to control the circulation of animal products. It allows you to follow the path of the product from the producer to the final consumer, ensuring veterinary safety and traceability), which Yerevan is not yet technically ready for.

In this regard, we should not talk about the political context of the restrictions, but about the previous unfair concession to the quality of imports from Armenia. Economist Gagik Makaryan, president of the Union of Employers of Armenia, also agrees with this. “I do not agree with those experts who see a political context in everything. In most cases, Rosselkhoznadzor’s inspections and assessments are completely reliable. We really have problems.”

The Armenian leadership tried to sell the public the illusion of a quick turnaround. On the eve of the elections, Nikol Pashinyan promised Armenian farmers to solve the issues of the supply of various agricultural products to the Russian Federation immediately after the vote. He said that the deterioration of relations with Moscow is temporary, and as soon as he is re-elected, trade will be restored. However, this did not happen. The Russian market did not open, and it cannot be replaced in one season. Money transfers cannot be replaced by declarations. Gas at an acceptable price cannot be replaced by political applause. Pashinyan convinced the citizens that entering the European markets would compensate for the damage caused by the break with Russia.  However, so far these promises have not been backed up by actual contracts or finance. Unlike the EAEU, the European Union offers complex and bureaucratized support schemes, and in the Eurasian Union, the rules are more transparent, and access to partners’ markets has not been the first year to bring concrete benefits to Armenian producers.

We have repeatedly warned that, even if Brussels actually opens its platforms a little for Armenian producers, in order for Armenian products to really appear on European counters, it is necessary to pass certification, meet strict quality standards, find counterparties, sign long-term contracts and ensure stable logistics.  And even when all these procedures are passed, European farmers will force the governments of their countries to stop the entry of competitors, as happened with Ukrainian products.

On July 2, 2026, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced the introduction of autonomous trade measures that will exempt up to 80% of EU Armenian exports (fresh fruits, vegetables, beverages and alcohol) from customs duties. A €52 million support package and the deployment of experts to support certification were also announced. However, On July 23, 2026, Politico reportedthat the EU actually rejected Armenian tomatoes. supplies never started due to non-compliance with EU standards. Authors of the article wordthe promises were pre-election in nature and were given to ensure Pashinyan’s victory in the parliamentary elections:

A similar situation has been created with fish. on July 16, the RA government approved the procedure for fish export to the EU, but in practice, the certification and logistics were not ready, and the European market showed no interest. Armenian representatives of fish farms had to hold a protest in front of the government building, demanding to develop real and effective mechanisms of state support to the sector due to serious export problems. According to the participants of the action, about 15,000 tons of fish products have already accumulated in warehouses, which they cannot send to foreign markets after the closure of Russian products.

Armenian farmers also organized a protest action, blocking the Yerevan-Yeraskh international highway, which leads to the border with Iran. The protesters demand to solve the problems of selling the crops. Ursula von der Leyen’s promised 52 million euro aid and the government’s own compensation ($22 million) either did not reach the producers or did not compensate for the loss of the main market.

The key question today is not whether the EU market is legally open, but how open it is in practice. If the producers are forced to protest, then there is a serious gap between the official statements and the real situation.

Experts with data“Many European countries have already alerted the EU leadership that they are not ready to open their markets to Armenian products to the detriment of national producers.”

Of course, as propaganda actions, the EU will organize demonstration purchases, such as the same 10,000 roses that European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen sent from Armenia to Latvia.: However, the volume of these supplies to the EU will be incomparable with the previous volume of exports to the Russian Federation. Russia has remained the main sales market for decades, thanks to already existing logistics routes, common EAEU technical requirements and stable business ties. It is impossible to rebuild such a system in a short time.

It is fundamentally important to note that von der Leyen’s July visit to Armenia took place on the eve of the decision of the Constitutional Court regarding the legitimacy of the last elections. Due to multiple violations, the court could order a second round. Դիտորդները կարծում են, որ Ուրսուլա ֆոն դեր Լայենի Երևան գալը և նրա խոստումները նման սցենարը բացառելու և ստատուս-քվոն ամրագրելու ակցիա էր:

Indeed, on July 4, the CC rejected all the opposition’s complaints, leaving the CEC’s decision in force. In response, five opposition forces – Strong Armenia and Hayastan alliances, Prosperous Armenia, Armenian National Congress and National-Democratic Pole parties issued a joint statement calling the court’s decision the beginning of a new phase of political resistance. The main goal was declared to remove the current leadership from power as the only condition for the restoration of the constitutional order. Opposition blocs that have entered parliament have chosen to gain parliamentary seats, seeing them as political leverage to oppose the authorities. However, resistance strategies also include street demonstrations, building systemic institutional structures, and working with the population to create public demand for change.

In light of this, neither Moscow nor other EAEU members are going to sponsor Armenia’s move to Europe.A joint statement was agreed with the leaders of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan at the EAEU summit held in Astana on May 29. In it, they expressed concern “in connection with the preparation of the Republic of Armenia’s accession to the European Union, as well as the need to prevent harm to the member states of the Union.” In this regard, they demanded from the leadership of Armenia to decide on the future direction of integration: “to hold a nationwide referendum in the Republic of Armenia as soon as possible on whether to join the European Union or to be part of the EAEU in the future.” regarding”. It was also decided that by December 2026, the members of the Eurasian Intergovernmental Council (the EAEU body consisting of the prime ministers of the participating countries) will assess the risks of possible suspension of Armenia’s membership in the Union.

In other words, EAEU members insist that the historical choice that will determine the future fate of Armenia should be made not by the current leadership, which enjoys the support of only less than half of the population, but by all its citizens, publicly and democratically. Then it will be the people’s own choice and their own responsibility.

Russian President Vladimir Putin during a telephone conversation with Nikol Pashinyan on July 27 (the conversation took place at the initiative of Yerevan) confirmed his loyalty to the joint statement of EAEU members in response to the request of the Prime Minister of Armenia to take measures to settle the situation related to the import of Armenian products, which have entered the panorama of the political crisis.

Judging by everything, the Armenian leadership will have to find a compromise between the commitments to the Western partners and the objective dependence of the Armenian economy on cooperation with the EAEU. In this sense, Pashinyan’s government will not be able to endlessly dodge between Europe, where it aspires on an ideological level, and Russia, on which it depends practically.

ALEXANDER ANANEV

Retired senior adviser to the Russian Foreign Ministry

Translation by Zhanna Avetisyan

—

A few days ago, the new parliament started its work, but it is already clear that it will not meet the expectations of the public.

However, the opposition electorate has certain expectations.

The citizen who voted for the opposition expected that his preferred political force would win the elections.

When this did not happen, there was some disappointment.

The citizen went to the election expecting victory, not defeat, and the opposition should understand these public sentiments.

Details in the video:

—

On August 4, Vahagn Aleksanyan, the candidate for the NA vice president referred to To the Su-30s bought during the reign of Nikol Pashinyan, responding to the statement of Artur Khachatryan, deputy of the “Hayastan” faction, that “During the 44-day war, the Su-30 fighters, which were bought expensively, did not take off.”

“You made the Su-30 history, you say, look, they bought the Su-30, but the missile was nowhere to be found. Don’t you know that whenever you buy a weapon, it takes time to get the full kit? And those Sus are there now, with air-to-air missiles, too, and everything is normal.” emphasized the KP deputy.

Of course, during the 44-day war, Su-30SM multipurpose fighters solved a certain combat problem, but not what they were capable of. Yes, there was an agreement with the Russian side to purchase 8-12 units, but the current authorities bought only 4 units and stopped at that. Yes, there are political speculations about both Su-30s and Iskander, but this is not what we are talking about now.

The problem is that Vahagn Aleksanyan was a member of the Defense and Security Committee of the previous National Assembly, participated in the sessions of the 44-day investigative committee and put his signature under the report, which also refers to the acquisition of Su-30s, and, to put it mildly, not under a very positive guise.

About a year ago 168.am“The subjective aspect of the investigation commission report. With the inscription “Following the facts”. article: published, in which we wrote that, in particular, he was an expert in the Investigative Commission RA Armed Forces Colonel Vahan Avetisyan, former head of the Radio-Electronic Combat Troops Department of the Russian Armed Forces, which involved the well-known arms case of 42 million drams, “metal scraps”, in the context of which the name of the third president of the Republic of Armenia, Serzh Sargsyan, was mentioned.

Later  we wrote that Avetisyan is no longer accused in this case, however, as the RA Investigative Committee informed us: “taking into account the complexity and large-scale nature of the preliminary investigation of the criminal proceedings, the preliminary investigation is still ongoing.” In other words, the case related to 2017 is not closed.

According to that, the report regarding the 44-day period can be subjective, because there will naturally be a reference to the issue of whether the REP funds are effective or not, and even if in 2020 during the war, Vahan Avetisyan did not hold a position in the armed forces, but he held a leadership position in the relevant field, and those years cannot be ignored, especially since the authorities announced that the achievements of pre-war and earlier armaments will also be taken into account.

Now, if the RA means of the Armenian side worked effectively during the war, what about it on one occasion? had spoken Minister of Defense of Azerbaijan Zakir Hasanov, then the metal was not bought at the time, and Nikol Pashinyan was lying, when he pointed an accusing arrow against Serzh Sargsyan. In this case, Avetisyan will emphasize the efficiency of the sector he leads. But if, in any case, there were some problems with the REP funds, then Vahan Avetisyan could try to cover it up. Reason enough for subjectivity, right?

As for the actual topic of the article.  2020 In April, Colonel Vahan Avetisyan, who was still being held in “Yerevan-Kentron” prison at that time open letter corrected Nikol Pashinyan, saying that “he is being harassed by the head of the State Security Service Artak Davtyan and his deputy Stepan Galstyan”, in particular, noting. “After the velvet revolution of 2018, I had the courage to express a professionally substantiated opinion and question the feasibility of acquiring Su-30 aircraft for the RA Armed Forces.”

This is the first.

Second, we  We wrote that very late Andranik Kocharyan, who was against the acquisition of Su-30s, attached to the report of the 44-day investigative commission his several-page letter-analysis related to them, which he presented to Pashinyan, and which was also mentioned in the investigative commission during Pashinyan’s questioning.

The third episode last year in the National Assembly, the purchase of Su-30SMs was also addressed by the then Speaker of the National Assembly, Alen Simonyan, and how we have informedhad put the “blame” of their acquisition on the military and considered them not theirs, and nothing that they worked with them after the change of power.

«When you say that you brought the Sus, is it possible that we sat like that? open the menu and see what to take, your military gave us advice, the military give us advice, they say: we need this or that.” Alen Simonyan announced. That is, he essentially did not support the idea of ​​acquiring Su-30s.

And now, when Vahagn Aleksanyan in the National Assembly is upset with the opposition that they are making a story about the Su-30s, is he not familiar with the positions of his colleagues, or did he put his signature under the report of the Investigative Commission, which, by the way, until recently, as far as we know, did not have the signatures of former members of the CPSU, Kristine Poghosyan and Hayk Sargsyan?

Here, however, it should be said that the RA Defense Minister Suren Papikyan considers the Su-30SM to be a very good fighter, therefore, as 168.am wrote, provided the necessary “add-ons” for them. In particular, we are talking about the Iranian “Yasin” planing aerial bombs, which international experts noticed under the wings of the Su-30s during the May 28 military parade.

By: open data, The Yasin high-precision bomb with a planning and correction module weighs 300 kilograms, the mass of the warhead is 225 kilograms, and it belongs to the MK-82 class. The aerial bomb is designed for hitting stationary targets using GPS satellite navigation and inertial navigation systems. According to available information, the range of the bomb under standard conditions is 50-60 kilometers, and in case of release or throwing from the optimal height, it can reach up to 120 kilometers.

—

The case regarding determining the compliance with the Constitution of the obligations stipulated in the framework agreement on strategic cooperation between RA and the USA regarding TRIPP was accepted for examination.

The trial will begin on September 15, 2026, and will be conducted by written procedure. Judge Edgar Shatiryan of the Constitutional Court was appointed a reporter in the case.

If the high court recognizes the obligations of the international treaty as conforming to the Constitution, it will be sent to the National Assembly for ratification.

—

Against the backdrop of the crisis in Armenia-Russia relations and the future of Armenia’s membership in the EAEU, Nikol Pashinyan had a telephone conversation with the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan Kasim-Jomart Tokayev.

According to the press release of the RA Government, the President of Kazakhstan congratulated Nikol Pashinyan on his re-appointment and wished him success for the good of Armenia and the Armenian people. According to the report, Pashinyan thanked Tokayev for the congratulation, as well as for awarding him with the highest state award during his official visit to the Republic of Kazakhstan, emphasizing the importance of the consistent development of Armenia-Kazakhstan relations.

“At the same time, the Prime Minister wished President Tokaev success in the Kurulta elections to be held on August 23, emphasizing the strategic importance and consistency of the domestic and foreign policies implemented by him. The Prime Minister invited Kasim-Jomart Tokaev to visit Armenia. The president of Kazakhstan accepted the invitation,” the message said.

According to the report, the interlocutors also discussed a number of issues related to the agenda of Armenia-Kazakhstan relations, as well as reflected on the prospects of further development of cooperation. Before that, on the same day, Tokayev sent a congratulatory message to Pashinyan. And the remarkable thing is that in the message there is no mention of discussions on EAEU, when this has currently turned into the most urgent foreign policy issue of Armenia due to the economic restrictions and political ultimatum initiated by Russia against Armenia.

By the way, Tokayev was one of the EAEU leaders who adopted a statement on Armenia on May 29, proposing to hold a referendum in Armenia on the choice between the EU and the EAEU.

It is also worth reminding that the telephone conversation between Pashinyan and Tokaev takes place on August 6 in Cholpon-Ata, Kyrgyzstan, ahead of the meeting of the EAEU Intergovernmental Council. Nikol Pashinyan announced his participation in it weeks ago, noting that he will use the session to raise the problems that have arisen for Armenia in the Eurasian direction.

To remind, a few days ago, the informal meeting of the heads of the Central Asian states and Azerbaijan took place in Cholpon-Ata, where the issues of regional cooperation, transport corridors, energy interconnection and economic integration were discussed.

Returning to the Pashinyan-Tokaev telephone conversation, its context and deep layers are much wider than it seems at first glance. First of all, against the background of the growing crisis and accumulated problems around Armenia within the EAEU, it is obvious that Yerevan is trying to activate bilateral diplomatic channels, expecting some balancing support or at least constructive neutrality in contacts with Astana. Therefore, with high-level contacts, Nikol Pashinyan strives to reduce the political pressures exerted on Armenia on the Eurasian platform.

Russian analyst Vladimir Yevseyev in a conversation with us he stated that In recent years, Armenia-Kazakhstan relations have also changed, so during a high-level telephone conversation, bilateral developments and especially developments in the South Caucasus regarding transport and infrastructure issues can be discussed.

He mentioned that in recent years the direction of Central Asia-South Caucasus has acquired a completely different meaning.

“The convergence of Central Asia and the South Caucasus is taking place amid a broader geopolitical realignment, with major players seeking to reshape traditional trade routes. The “Middle Corridor” project and other projects arising from it bring the two regions closer together, many interested parties are trying to turn all this into a single logistic and economic area. Kazakhstan is an active participant in these logistics future plans, and discussions, judging by many developments, are ongoing with many other parties. Therefore, Yerevan and Astana have something to discuss in this sense.” said the analyst.

According to him, in the conditions of these realities, the Pashinyan-Tokaev dialogue is aimed not only at alleviating the existing tension in the EAEU, but also at reaching agreements between Yerevan and Astana in broad regional communications.

“Besides EAEU, Armenia and Kazakhstan currently have another agenda in the face of these projects.” he remarked.

As a result, the upcoming session of the EAEU Intergovernmental Council and the high-level contacts preceding it will become the litmus test that will show how well Armenian diplomacy manages to combine Eurasian harsh realities and new regional vectors. If Pashinyan, in the end, clearly raises the accumulated problems, and at the same time deepens bilateral economic ties with Central Asian partners, Armenia will be able not only to protect its interests, but also to breathe new life into the process of foreign policy diversification.” As for EAEU, the analyst believes that the President of Kazakhstan is congratulating Pashinyan considering this bilateral agenda.

“I think Kazakhstan has the same position in EAEU as before, when it joined the EAEU leaders’ statement. However, I do not think that Kazakhstan will publicly criticize Yerevan’s steps, but will also be guided by the consensus that prevails in EAEU on key issues. I think that Moscow will continue to raise this issue in the EAEU, because Kazakhstan had the closest relations with Armenia in the EAEU.”he said.

—