Putin tells Scholz that Kyiv is stalling peace talks with Moscow

Save

Share

 14:54,

YEREVAN, MARCH 18, ARMENPRESS. Russian President Vladimir Putin told German Chancellor Olaf Scholz during a phone call on Friday that Kyiv was attempting to stall peace talks with Russia but that Moscow was still keen to continue negotiations, Reuters reported citing a press release from the Kremlin.

“It was noted that the Kyiv regime is attempting in every possible way to delay the negotiation process, putting forward more and more unrealistic proposals,” Reuters quoted a readout issued by the Kremlin.

“Nonetheless the Russian side is ready to continue searching for a solution in line with its well-known principled approaches.”

Turkish, Ukrainian FMs hold phone talk

Save

Share

 15:03,

YEREVAN, MARCH 18, ARMENPRESS. Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu held a phone conversation with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba, Milliyet reported.

The situation in Ukraine was discussed during the phone talk.

A day before Cavusoglu and Kuleba held a meeting in Lviv.

Before traveling to Ukraine, the Turkish FM visited Russia and held several meetings with government officials.

After the visits, Cavusoglu said that he has higher hopes for a ceasefire in Ukraine.



Fearing arrest, Russian critics of Ukraine war find refuge in Armenia

France 24
Text by:Tiffany FILLON

Russia’s crackdown on journalists, dissidents and critics of the war in Ukraine is pushing many people to flee the country, fearing arrest. FRANCE 24 spoke to four Russians who found refuge in the Armenian capital, Yerevan, after voicing their opposition to Vladimir Putin’s war.

Sasha, Marina, Yulia and Kseniia had never met before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Today, they live together in exile, on the outskirts of Yerevan, the Armenian capital.

When the Kremlin ordered its forces into Ukraine on February 24, the four Russian nationals joined many fellow citizens in voicing their opposition to the war, both online and on the street. 

But when a crackdown on dissent escalated, they bought the first tickets they could find and flew out to Armenia, one of the few countries in the region where Russians can travel without a visa.

“We left everything behind, but we feel safer here than in our country,” said Sasha, a business owner from western Russia, who flew out with his wife and two children.

Sasha’s family left in the wake of new legislation toughening sanctions against the media and critics of the bloody conflict in Ukraine, which Moscow refuses to call a “war”. Under the law, passed on March 5, Russians face up to 15 years in jail for spreading “fake news” about the country’s military.

The “scorched-earth” policy has turned Russia’s media landscape into a “wasteland”, said Amnesty International, detailing the impact of Moscow’s latest crackdown on the press.

“By blocking the most popular critical media outlets, closing independent radio stations and forcing dozens of journalists to halt their work or leave the country, the authorities have almost completely deprived people in Russia of access to objective, unbiased and trustworthy information,” the advocacy group said in a statement.

At least 150 journalists have fled the country since the start of the war, according to Agentstvo, an investigative news site that can no longer be accessed from Russia. 

Seeking to stifle all dissent on social media, Moscow has also cut off access to Facebook and severely restricted Twitter. This week, it moved to block Instagram, the most popular social media platform among young Russians.

Even before Moscow pulled the plug on social media, Sasha had felt increasingly threatened, his anti-war posts prompting ever more “menacing” comments. Kseniia, who worked in the banking sector in Russia, shared “independent news” content on social media and signed a number of petitions against the war. Yulia, meanwhile, posted criticism of Putin on her Instagram account and used the hashtag #нетвойне (no war) – a dangerous move in Russia, where using the terms “war”, “invasion” and “attack” to refer to Russia’s military offensive in Ukraine can lead to jail. 

Earlier this week, in an extraordinary show of dissent, journalist Marina Ovsyannikova held up an anti-war poster on Russian state television before being arrested and fined. She was later released by the authorities, but still faces up to 15 years in jail for her brazen on-air protest, which made headlines around the world.

In an interview with FRANCE 24, Ovsyannikova spoke out against Russian state “propaganda” and called for an end to the “fratricidal” war in Ukraine.

The propaganda starts early on – “as early as nursery school,” said Marina, one of the four Russians who sought refuge in Yerevan. At her children’s school, pupils were told to write postcards in support of Russian troops. “I had to explain to my daughter that the soldiers had no choice but to obey orders,” she said.

“The Russian people don’t know what is going on in Ukraine,” Marina added.

Relatives have also come under pressure from Russian authorities, said Sasha, whose mother and sister have been quizzed by the police about his whereabouts. He was already in Armenia when he got a phone call from the police summoning him for an interview.

“I only went to one anti-war protest and stayed about five minutes, but I held a placard in my hand and I must’ve been spotted,” he said. 

Ukraine refugee crisis: Jewish orphans find refuge in Berlin

Since the start of the war on February 24, some 15,000 people have been arrested across Russia for protesting peacefully against the war, according to the independent media OVD-Info. 

Youlia, a graphic designer, took part in several such protests. She flew out of Moscow just days after the March 5 law criminalising talk of the war in Ukraine. 

“I couldn’t stay in Russia because people who state their opposition to the war can run into serious trouble,” she explained. “And I refuse to take any part in this Russian state crime.”

For Yulia, who does not have a visa to visit Schengen countries, flying to Yerevan was the only available – and affordable – option. The same applied to Kseniia and Marina, as well as “many more who want to leave Russia,” said Yulia. “It was the only way to get out.”

Once in Armenia, Kseniia met up with her French husband Donald, who flew out to meet her in Yerevan. A Russian speaker with extensive knowledge of the former Soviet bloc, he is hoping to take his wife back with him to France.

“Armenians are both Russophile and Francophile, so I thought this would be the last place in the region to turn against Russians,” he said, explaining the decision to meet up in Yerevan. “And just like Russians, French citizens can travel here without a visa.”

Donald has to return to France in a week, but his wife may have to wait longer before boarding a flight for Paris. “Kseniia is allowed to stay in Armenia for six months, but I’m trying everything I can to get the French authorities to grant her a visa before I leave,” he said.

The trouble is Kseniia must first apply for a French residency permit – in her home country, Russia. That is not an option for her right now. She’s worried she will have to wait several months in Russia while her application is processed.

>> Russian in exile over Putin’s invasion of Ukraine: ‘I hate this war’

Sasha and Marina place their hopes in a “sudden political change in Russia, towards democracy”, that would allow them to return home. Convinced that Putin “will lose the war”, they also contemplate one day moving to Ukraine.

“There’s a Russian-speaking population there and we support the Ukrainian people in their defence of their country,” said Sasha, for whom a “third option” would be to “go live in the European Union, should it accept Russian refugees”. 

Youlia’s future is also up in the air. “I’m not planning anything,” she said. “But one thing is certain: barring a major political shift, I won’t be going back to Russia.”

It is difficult to estimate how many Russians have fled their country since the start of the war. Contacted by FRANCE 24, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) had no figures to give. Russia’s embassy in Armenia and its consulate in Paris did not answer our queries.

Konstantin Sorin, an economist at the University of Chicago, estimated on March 8 that some 200,000 people had left Russia since February 24. Last week, Vahe Hakobyan, the head of the Armenian parliament’s economics committee, said around 6,000 Russians and Ukrainians were arriving in his country each day.

 

 

Armenia overhauls criminal legislation aligning it with ECHR judgments

Council of Europe

By its decision of 9 March in the Virabyan group of cases the Committee of Ministers welcomed the adoption by Armenia in 2021 of the new Criminal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure which will enter into force in July this year.

This new legislation addresses multiple issues raised by ECHR judgments in cases concerning notably torture in law enforcement and unlawful detention. It eliminates statutes of limitation for torture, provides for additional procedural guarantees against ill-treatment and unlawful detention, as well as for fair trial safeguards.

The importance of rapid adoption of this legislation had been highlighted by the Committee of Ministers on several occasions in its decisions related to the Mushegh SaghatelyanVirabyan and Muradyan groups of cases. The Council of Europe supported the preparation of the new codes with legal expertise in order for them to be aligned with the ECHR standards.

General Staff: Russia plans to transfer its units from Armenia to Ukraine

Ukraine –
The Russian Federation, trying to restore the combat capability of its units in the territory of Ukraine, plans to transfer to Ukraine some units from the 102-nd Russian military base in Armenia.

“The twenty-third day of the heroic resistance of the Ukrainian people to the Russian military invasion continues. Continuing attempts to restore the combat capability of individual units involved in hostilities, the military leadership of the russian federation plans to transfer to Ukraine some units from the 102-nd Russian military base in Armenia,” the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine posted on Facebook.

As noted, the refusal of some servicemen of the russian federation to take part in hostilities is confirmed, which is due to the low level of moral and psychological condition of the russian occupiers after the clashes with the Ukrainian defense forces. Thus, in particular, at the permanent deployment point of the 20th Motorized Rifle Division of the 8th All-Military Army of the Southern Military District, about 130 servicemen refused to take part in hostilities. The enemy personnel was demoralized, suicides and self-mutilation became more frequent.

“Due to the lack of positive results and inability to fulfill the set tasks, it is planned to remove Colonel Vadym Pankov, commander of the 45th special brigade of the special purpose air force of the russian Armed Forces. He is accused of failing to perform a combat mission at Hostomel airfield,” reads the report.

Meanwhile, the pro-government russian media continue to spread false information about the armed aggression of the Russian Federation on the territory of Ukraine. The creation and distribution of staged propaganda videos through all available information channels, including in the countries of the European Union and the United States, in order to discredit the activities of the military-political leadership and the Defense Forces of Ukraine continues.

In the city of Dzhankoi, in the temporarily occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, training in local secondary schools has been suspended with their further use to accommodate servicemen of the armed forces of the russian federation arriving in the city.

In the Chernihiv region, russian occupiers are intimidating locals to quell civilian resistance.

The occupiers continue to defiantly violate the norms of international humanitarian law and destroy the infrastructure of cities, creating the preconditions for deepening the humanitarian crisis.

The Defense Forces of Ukraine continue step by step to liberate the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine in all directions, the General Staff stressed.

As reported, the total combat losses of the enemy from February 24 to March 18 are about as follows: 14,200 people, 450 tanks, 1,448 armored combat vehicles, 205 artillery systems, 72 MLRS, 43 air defense units, 93 aircraft, 112 helicopters, 879 vehicles, 3 ships/boats, 60 fuel tanks, 12 UAVs of operational and tactical level, 11 units of special equipment. Data are being updated. The calculation is complicated by the high intensity of hostilities.

Azerbaijan, Iran sign transport deal bypassing Armenia

EurasiaNet.org
Heydar Isayev Mar 18, 2022

Azerbaijan and Iran have signed a transit agreement that could have big implications for Armenia.

One of Azerbaijan’s key demands after winning the 44-day war in 2020 was for Armenia to allow it overland access to its Nakhchivan exclave, a piece of territory surrounded by Armenia, Iran and Turkey. Since Armenia surrendered, Baku has persistently campaigned for this route, which it calls the “Zangezur corridor” and which would run over Soviet-era railways and roads across Armenia’s Syunik province.

The November 10, 2020, ceasefire statement even included language that Russia would “guarantee the security of transport connections” between mainland Azerbaijan and Nakhchivan across Armenian territory.

Talks have stalled as tensions between the two nations continue to fester.

Nevertheless, it came as something of a surprise to observers in Baku when Iranian Minister of Roads and Urban Development Rostam Ghasemi arrived on March 11 to sign a memorandum of understanding allowing for new trade and communications links connecting the East Zangezur region of Azerbaijan and Nakhchivan.

Little about the memorandum was made public, but the way Baku described it as a “corridor” suggests Azerbaijani vehicles will be allowed to cross Iranian territory without submitting to Iranian customs checks.

The terms provide for a new highway, a railway as well as unspecified energy infrastructure. Additionally, four bridges will be built over the Aras River, which defines the state border between Azerbaijan and Iran – two road and two railway bridges.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Ghasemi discussed how “the new corridor would be an important international corridor for both transport and electricity,” the president’s website said.

Official statements did not clarify which side would pay for the new infrastructure, but as the prime beneficiary, it seems most likely that Azerbaijan will foot the bill.

Aliyev has repeatedly demanded Armenia open a corridor across its territory since the end of the war. The president even threatened to use force should Armenia refuse. 

In a statement to the media, the president’s senior foreign policy advisor Hikmat Hajiyev said that the new route through Iran “will put an end to Armenia’s years-long policy of blockade of Nakhchivan.”

UK-based analyst Fuad Shahbazov believes that Baku will continue pushing for the path across Armenia, but that it “will most likely be postponed for some time.” 

“What is seen is that the Azerbaijani government has decided not to wait for Armenia’s final stance on the [Zangezur] corridor as the former is more interested in strengthening regional cooperation,” Shahbazov wrote for BBC Azerbaijani.

Relations between Iran and Azerbaijan have run hot and cold for years. Last autumn, Baku and Tehran were hurling insults at each other in an unprecedented bout of saber-rattling. A few months later they agreed to a deal to swap natural gas along with Turkmenistan.

 

Heydar Isayev is a journalist from Baku.

“No more gifts” – Armenia introduces new regulations on civil servants




  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

New rules for civil servants in Armenia

Officials in Armenia will no longer be able to receive gifts, tokens or treats. These points are now added to the number of well-known obligations of civil servants, such as respecting the rule of law and political neutrality, acting transparently and accountably.

What is a “gift” and a “treat”, what rules of conduct civil servants will have to adhere to and what results are expected after the introduction of a new code of conduct?


  • Is Armenia about to experience severe shortage of grain?
  • Opinion: Armenia is stuck between the West and Russia
  • Fleeing Russia to Armenia – alternative for people and companies amid Russo-Ukrainian war

The new code of conduct was developed by the Commission for the Prevention of Corruption with the participation of experts from the Council of Europe. It contains mandatory rules, for the violation of which officials will be held accountable in accordance with the current legislation. Decisions will be made individually by the manager – from warning up to dismissal.

There are also optional, but desirable rules, for the implementation of which you can expect encouragement, but civil servants will not be punished for their violation.

The document has been put up for public discussion on the e-draft.am platform, where projects and legislative initiatives of state departments are published. Until March 30, the citizens of Armenia can submit their proposals on this website.

There are no entries there yet, but social media is already asking why the Commission for the Prevention of Corruption believes that these “new rules” will be effective.

The rules of conduct for civil servants are spelled out in the law “On Public Service”. But the same law stipulates the need for the Commission on the Prevention of Corruption to adopt a code of conduct – based on the existing principles.

In addition, the Commission for the Prevention of Corruption believes that the rules of conduct adopted under the law “On Public Service” remained on paper, their “efficiency was not so great”.

“These are new rules that are being introduced in an institutional way, thanks to which the work of a civil servant becomes not only more free from corruption risks, but also accountable”, said Commission Chair Haykuhi Harutyunyan.

Formation of the image of an honest, conscientious and law-abiding civil servant in the commission is considered “an effective tool in the fight against corruption”.

As a result of the implementation of the new rules, it is expected

  • to strengthen the ethical system of public service,
  • to ensure the unity of the rules of conduct for all civil servants,
  • increase the level of public confidence in the civil service,
  • create another tool for preventing corruption in the public sector,
  • raise public demand for expected behavior in the civil service.

The list of mandatory rules includes compliance with laws, political neutrality and political correctness, transparency and accountability of activities, a ban on accepting gifts and “treats”. Civil servants must show integrity and dedication to the public interest, and report cases of corruption and other violations.

The draft clarifies what exactly is meant by a “gift”. This is any offering, advantage, property that “would not be reasonable to give to a person who does not hold any office”. This includes “property donated or sold at a clearly disproportionately low price, a service provided free of charge or at a disproportionately low price, free use of someone else’s property” and other corruption risks in the same context.

A treat, or hospitality, is, according to the project, “a type of gift offered, given or received to start, strengthen or develop official relations”. This refers to the invitations to receptions, entertainment, offers to participate in social or sporting events in which the “hospitable” participates or is present.

Optional rules, according to the draft, “are aimed at creating a more moral image of a civil servant”. Here the emphasis is on the need for personal work of an official on his development and improvement.

These rules include providing the necessary support to colleagues, creating a favorable working atmosphere and environment, raising awareness of their subordinates about the laws, principles of public service and the canons of behavior.

‘Armenia is a free country, unlike Russia’: rallies in Yerevan amid Russia-Ukraine war




  • JAMnews
  • Yerevan

A rally in support of Russia in Yerevan has been held today. It was organized by several pro-Russian politicians who do not enjoy a lot of public support. In Armenia, very few paid attention to the action, which did, however, raise interest, and even resonance outside the country. Against the backdrop of the Russian-Ukrainian war, the has begun to arise question of whether the Armenian authorities and society support Russia in this conflict.

The country’s authorities adhere to absolute neutrality, despite the fact that Armenia and Russia are official strategic allies. The expert community is more open about the fact that an exhausted Armenia, especially in its position after the 2020 Karabakh war, needs to strictly adhere to neutrality – as much as possible. There are both supporters of Russia in society and those who express support for Ukraine.


  • Opinion: Armenia is stuck between the West and Russia
  • Is Armenia about to experience severe shortage of grain?
  • Opinion from Yerevan: Russia-Ukraine war moves to its final stage

Hundreds of people with posters and inscriptions of letters “Z” and “V” which became symbols of Russia’s military operation in Ukraine participated in the action in support of Russia. The organizers of the rally remain unknown, but it has been attended by several politicians who are known for their pro-Russian agenda.

One of them is the chairman of the Constitutional Right Union party, a member of the executive committee of the Strong Armenia with Russia movement, Hayk Babukhanyan, who stated the following:

“Today we stand with Russia, as our brotherhood has been proven on the battlefield and on the borders, where the Russian soldier defends Armenia and Artsakh. We will strengthen our brotherhood, unity. We are supporters of freedom, self-determination, Armenian-Russian friendship. Today our ally is waging a civilizational struggle. This is a civilizational conflict. By defending Russia, we are protecting our identity, traditions, our traditional families, the church”.

“Friendship with Russia should be honest and non-pragmatic. This is the foundation of relations between our countries. We are participating in this event today because we want Armenia to be strong and sincere in its friendly relations. And when there is a fight against Nazism, we express our position. We are here for the sake of a strong Armenia, its strong relations with a strategic partner”, announced Tigran Urikhanyan, leader of the Alliance party.

At the end of the speeches, the participants of the action marched to the Russian embassy. Here they announced that their rallies will be periodic and the next one will take place on March 26th.

The action was organized in support of the Russian military operation in Ukraine, but outside of Armenia it was also perceived as the consent of the Armenian society and authorities to enter the Union State with Russia and Belarus.

Discussion of such a development of events began after another scandalous statement by the President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenka. In early February, the Armenian media quoted and discussed the following words of his: “Armenia has nowhere to go. Do you think anyone needs them?

This statement caused resonance not only in society, but also in the Armenian parliament, and the press secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Vahan Hunanyan was forced to comment on the attitude of the authorities to this statement:

“We are convinced that the peculiar geopolitical analysis of the President of Belarus aims to serve, first of all, his own domestic political agenda and has nothing to do with Armenia and its foreign policy”.

But as the talk continues unabated, the Armenian news agency Infocom has asked the Armenian foreign minister if he sees any possibility of the country joining an alliance with Russia and Belarus.

On March 18, the following response was received from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs:

“According to the first article of the RA Constitution, the Republic of Armenia is a sovereign, democratic, social, legal state”.

This was followed by an explanation: there are no discussions on this issue on the government’s agenda.

Political observer Hakob Badalyan, on his Facebook page, commented on the few not very crowded rallies that have been held in Armenia in support of one or another side of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict:

“A significant part of society is quite rightly outraged by the rallies carried out in Armenia in support of the Russian military campaign in Ukraine. […] But just as Armenian communities can hold actions in different countries that do not comply with the state policy of that country, so any “community” in Armenia can hold such an action.

Armenia is a free country, unlike the same Russia.

Of course, part of the Armenian society does not like the protest action in front of the Russian embassy, the other part does not like the action in defense of the Russian “Z” campaign. […]

In my opinion, these actions acquire significance only because of their condemnation. Or maybe the expectation is that there will be noise, because if there is no noise, these actions remain within the “marginal” limits of their organizers. And the noise allows, firstly, for more attention to be paid to the “rallies”, and secondly, which is no less important, it allows one to “remotely” manage the public agenda and moods in Armenia.

Accordingly, no matter how difficult it is to restrain oneself from the point of view of emotions, it is important to “ignore” these actions from the point of view of rationality, showing that the Armenian society has its own “resistance agenda” and is not subject to remote control of various manipulations.

In the end, those who are interested in the public and state behavior of Armenia probably know best of all that these actions are “marginal”, and not an _expression_ of the general mood, and can hardly be used to assess the current situation in the country.

UN envoy briefed on humanitarian situation in Karabakh

PanARMENIAN.Net – Armenian Human Rights Defender Kristinne Grigoryan on Friday, March 18 detailed the humanitarian situation in Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh) to the UN’s Resident Coordinator in Armenia Lila Pieters Yahia.

The Human Rights Defender weighed in on the interruption of gas supplies to Artsakh for more than a week and Azerbaijan’s obstruction of the restoration of the outage, as a result of which over 100,000 people were deprived of heating in cold weather conditions.

Grigoryan also presented the situation in the border villages of Artsakh, the acts of intimidation by the Azerbaijani armed forces against the population of the village of Khramort and a number of other settlement, accompanied by intense shootings, which have unfortunately resulted in injuries among civilians.

100,000 residents in Karabakh have been deprived of gas for over a week now, and because the pipeline has been damaged in territories currently under Baku’s control, the Azerbaijani military won’t allow the Armenian side to eliminate the problem.

The Azerbaijan armed forces have also been violating the ceasefire and using loudspeakers to spread panic among the population of Nagorno-Karabakh, attempting to force them to leave their homes.