Skip to main content

Armenia’s Samson Option – a fictitious scenario

By David Davidian
The following fictional Red Cell scenario is intended to stimulate alternative thinking and challenge conventional wisdom, tying together events in operational fiction with national realities.
The goal was to ensure there was no chance of an accidental activation of Armenia’s Samson Option After all, there is no way of reversing the effects of detonating Armenia’s Metsamor Nuclear Power Station (NPP) operating at full power. The Samson Option refers to the strategy whereby Israel would launch a massive nuclear retaliatory strike if the state itself was being overrun, just as the Biblical figure Samson is said to have pushed apart the pillars of a Philistine temple, bringing down the roof and killing himself and thousands of Philistines who had gathered to see him humiliated. 
An Armenian Samson Option would be the absolute last-ditch effort to deter capturing and eliminating what remains of the Armenian homeland and its people. Suppose an enemy of Armenia plans on attacking Armenia, destroying or cleansing its population and what remains of its culture. In that case, it will be met with so much radioactive contamination and fallout that the enemy will surely think hard about destroying what remains of Armenia and capturing its land. What remains of Armenia and surrounding lands will be uninhabitable for centuries. Armenia’s enemies are just outside of Armenian borders, and the radioactive contamination carried by prevailing atmospheric conditions will wreak havoc on them to such an extent as to make the Chernobyl nuclear disaster look insignificant. Chernobyl was due to blatant human error. Armenia’s Samson Option will be planned for maximum effect. 
Armenians either live on what remains of their once vast homeland, or nobody does. Two-thirds of Armenians in Asia Minor were exterminated in the 1915 Turkish genocide of the Armenians, with their lands carved up between Turkey and the Soviet Union. This genocide extended into lands outside of Turkish borders into Persia, Tsarist Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan. Armenian history is tragic, but the Armenians have decided to write their own epilogue. Is this option ethical? It is just as ethical as the Cold War nuclear standoff with the United States and the Soviet Union armed with almost 60,000 nuclear warheads, enough to destroy all life on earth hundreds of times over. That was tolerated. Since the fall of the Soviet Union, wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Serbia, and Ukraine have all been justified, with many hundreds of thousands of innocent people murdered. All these actions were planned, justified and tolerated. The Armenian Samson Option is no different than any of these post-WWII examples of acceptable human behavior. The Armenians were finally serious and made friends with horror.
After a diasporan conglomerate purchased Armenia’s Metsamor NPP from Rosatom and the international intrigue died down after the theft of its spent nuclear fuel, ‘The Division’ was still looking for the twenty-four spent fuel assemblies that were unaccounted for in the aftermath of this heist. The Division was the moniker for Armenia’s National Security Services (NSS) branch that dealt with integrating advanced technologies in the country and investigating high-technology crimes. A new level of state security clearance was added to the existing Confidential, Top Secret, Of Special Importance levels. This new level was called the Black Level (BL). Anybody with a BL clearance doesn’t have much of a life, has a high IQ, and is highly multi-disciplined. A BL cleared individual undergoes periodic reinvestigation and, counter to its ancient Soviet-era counterpart, is mandated to independently undertake the most critical operational decisions. It is no surprise that those at this security level are neither married nor have a family. Armenia’s NSS was transformed from a top-down organization to something horizontal with constant checks and balances.
Armenia’s geopolitical situation is one where it cannot afford to make any strategic mistakes. BL’s overarching function was the continued updating and implementation of Armenia’s Grand National Strategy. BL operatives enabled the implementation of Armenia’s Samson Option. BL was crucial in planting targeted individuals in the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), and its agents accompanied sanctioned IAEA inspections of the Metsamor NPP. Within BL’s charter was an active program to create and gather “kompromat” on foreign leaders of importance to Armenia’s national security.
Five issues had to be overcome to successfully design Armenia’s Samson Option, each with its challenges:
1) Secrecy.
2) Placing nano-thermite and a new experimental high explosive bis(1,2,4-oxadiazole)bis(methylene) dinitrate, or BOM for short, in strategic locations in Metsamor NPP’s infrastructure. This was the best performance per unit volume explosive available.
3) Ensuring there is no chance of a self-detonation (such as with nuclear weapons), being disabled or detonated by an enemy EMP class of weapon.
4) Addressing the diplomatic fallout upon the “denial of such capability.”
5) Purging, co-opting, or compromising spies.
The detonation was accomplished with three independent circuits, each with digital controllers that, even before power was applied (a combination of line and battery backup) to the networked detonators, each ran a diagnostic on the detonator side. A result code was sent to The Division headquarters and several undisclosed locations, each with different transport mechanisms. The diagnostics ran on an average of once every hour. In reality, they ran randomly to avoid prediction. This redundancy was to ensure that it would work in case of a planned or auto-enabled detonation, with the chance of an accidental detonation being effectively zero. Months of testing were performed in a mock reactor building, including developing techniques for insulating detonators circuits from high temperatures in many vital locations.
Of course, autonomous systems would take over the detonation of Metsomor given an incapacitated state apparatus. This capability used a combination of social media, radio and electronic monitoring, AI algorithms, and the combination of several layers of redundancies, each based on mutually exclusive information. Several redundant systems connected The Division’s headquarters with the Metsamor NPP, including a human to press the final button inside Metsamor if all else failed. The NSS BL had nearly unfettered access to Metsamor and performed periodic and unannounced security inspections due to the heist of spent fuel. It was the perfect cover to place explosives, detonation components, and their networking.
Explosive devices would be planted and disguised, while others physically placed at the last minute. Some devices would be robotically placed, especially those near Metsamor’s VVER-440-230’s reactor vessel. Metsamor’s spent fuel heist allowed Armenia’s NSS special access to the refueling cranes, pullies, and rails. Suicide drones (UAVs) would also be used to ensure maximum destruction of Metsamor NPP’s cooling infrastructure and reactor building as a backup mechanism if something prevented either manual or auto-destruction of Metsamor. Specific details of the interaction of these and other redundancies were not available at the time of this writing.
The map below details the extent of nuclear contamination that would result from an accident at the Metsamor NPP. Ironically, it comes from a Turkish study. The effects of the destruction of Metsamor would be many times more devastating due to its planned optimization.

Projected Trajectories of Radioactive Contamination from a Metsamor NPP Accident Over a Period of Thirty Years. The dot shows the location of the Metsamor NPP.

BL and NSS agents with specific scientific backgrounds slowly secured positions within the Metsamor NPP, as many of those who worked at the NPP were purposely offered well-paid jobs outside of the NPP. 
During periodic NSS inspections of the Metsamor NPP, the best locations to place explosives were determined. It was not as difficult as one might expect. Primary systems were targeted, but what is known as a “secondary cooling contour” needed to be taken out. However, as difficult as it may be for some policymakers, some of these systems must not be entirely disabled. Their partial operation would contribute to more geographically dispersed radioactive contamination. In other words, planners had to optimize the destruction of the Metsamor NPP for maximum effect. In addition, a special operation was planned for what remained in the Metsamor’s spent fuel pool. BL planned to raise the reactor’s control rods to their maximum height without sounding alarms and overcoming mechanical safety features. This procedure would immediately increase the temperature of the reactor core, raising the pressure of the already superheated steam and begin the process of mechanically deforming the fuel assemblies. When the control rods are fully inserted, the reactor shuts down but is still hot. If the rods are fully extracted the reactor becomes supercritical (how supercritical depends mainly on the average age of the fuel) accompanied by an immediate spike in heat generation. Any mechanical deformation of the fuel assemblies would interfere with using gravity to drop the control rods into the fuel, typically putting the reactor in a sub-critical condition. Computer simulations are still ongoing, but this supercritical operation would have to be accomplished at the maximum speed the rods could be withdrawn, which was never designed to be fast. Even if this supercritical plan were impossible, the explosives would fulfill Samson’s goal. In any case, adding complexity to an already challenging operation is never desirable. Slowly and methodically devices were planted at specific locations through the Metsamor’s VVER-440-230 reactor infrastructure during the various security inspections performed by a specialist from NSS’s BL team. A classic positioning of explosive devices was done during the upgrading of the scores of temperature and pressure sensors scattered around reactor vessels, pumps, stream generators, etc. See accompanied layout of a VVER-440 Model 230 plant.
Not only did state-of-the-art enhanced sensor technology make operators in the control room happy, but because the mandated upgrade to the Metsamor NPP required external monitoring of vital system parameters, the NSS utilized miniature sensors within the same or slightly larger sensor units with the extra space filled with explosives, nano-thermite, digital controllers, detonators and networking hardware. Over eighty sensors were eventually “upgraded.” Of particular concern was the control rod positioning motors to prevent a gravity drop of the control rods, even if the plant to extract the rods could not be accomplished. A unique procedure was used near the control units and actuators for the control rods to at least keep them in their current positions, as the rest of the plant was destroyed. Finally, the BOM chemical explosives and nano-thermite were placed near the base of the reactor vessel, ensuring an atmospheric exposure to the fuel assemblies. Computer simulations would determine each sub-system’s detonation order and relative explosive intensity. Any nuclear engineer would know that destroying all six primary cooling loops and emergency cooling would be the minimum required while disabling control rod insertion to achieve Armenian’s Samson Option.
A Generic Diagram of a Russian VVER Nuclear Reactor
For millennia, it has been claimed that battles are won on the ground, but wars by diplomats. It took several years to replace Armenia’s business-centric, oligarch-serving diplomatic corps with one that enabled business and economic ties with the world while serving the interests of Armenian sovereignty. The former is not a guarantee of the latter, as was demonstrated through a generation beginning in 1991 when Armenia declared independence from the Soviet Union.
Armenia was somewhat irrelevant on the international scene. The prevailing thought was that the bullies would ignore you if you hid in the schoolyard of international relations. History has demonstrated such a myopic position is short-lived.  However, in stark contrast to past follies and naïve ideas about geopolitics, Armenia’s diplomats were now well prepared for what was to be an unprecedented global situation. Israel’s Samson Option was offensive – if you engage in our destruction, you will be destroyed with nuclear weapons with multiple delivery systems. Armenia’s Samson Option was defensive. If you engage in the destruction of Armenia, not only will Armenia be inaccessible for centuries, but most of the land area in a 1500 km radius will be heavily contaminated, and delayed cancer deaths from radiation would number nearly a hundred million. 
Rumors began to leak out about Armenia’s Samson Option, especially after the Metsamor NPP was declared a military facility. The international community demanded inspection as they did just after Metsamor’s spent fuel heist. It turned out to be a game of cat and mouse until Armenian diplomacy used the limited “kompromat” provided by the NSS BL. The Armenian diaspora learned much about such techniques in the aftermath of the Jeffrey Epstein affair. By offering sexual exploits on his private island to influential people and world leaders, Epstein had an enormous amount of damaging, embarrassing, and compromising (kompromat) information on powerful people and world leaders.
The developing synergy between the NSS and select disciplines available in the diaspora allowed the BL to purchase kompromat on a few regional leaders. This kompromat was used in diplomatic meetings demanded by Armenia’s existential enemies. The regional rhetoric died down rather quickly since it was not clear just how much kompromat was in the hands of the Armenian diplomatic corps. This was similar to Imperial Japan’s problem after atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Japan had no idea how many atomic bombs were in the US arsenal. The US only had two more! How much more kompromat did Armenia have? Nobody would take the chance to find out. Armenia learned fast to use this newly acquired sovereignty projection to influence policies in neighboring countries as it set null and void all previous alliances, both military and economic.
Armenian authorities knew there would be immediate plans drawn up to “secure” Metsamor along the lines that would be used (by the USIsrael and India) to secure Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal if that country went rogue or its weapons fell in the hands of sub-state actors. Secret negotiations took place between Armenia and individual members of the UN Security Council and regional powers. Each agreement was as unique as Armenia’s Samson Option. Internationally, however, states with nuclear power plants signed a new agreement where each would declare their nuclear power plants weapons of mass destruction. Every state with nuclear power plants signed that agreement – except Armenia.
Yerevan, Armenia
Author: David Davidian (Lecturer at the American University of Armenia. He has spent over a decade in technical intelligence analysis at major high technology firms. He resides in Yerevan, Armenia
https://wgi.world/armenia-s-samson-option-a-fictitious-scenario/ 
Armenian Version


Iran, Armenia plan to expand regional transit

IRNA (Islamic Republic News Agency) – Iran

Tehran, IRNA – Iran Minister of Transport and Urban Development Rostam Ghasemi in a meeting with Minister of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure of the Republic of Armenia Gnel Sanosyan on Monday discussed the details of bilateral transit cooperation and joint infrastructural projects.

During bilateral talks, Iran and Armenia expressed their willingness for reaching agreements that would facilitate transit and trade between the two countries and in the region.  

In the meeting, Kheirollah Khademi, director-general of Construction and Development of Transportation Infrastructures Company, pointed to the previous negotiations and visits to Armenia for the implementation of the road route from Nurduz to Yerevan and re-design of Iran’s routes to Nurduz, informed of Iran’s preparation to participate in the construction of the southern part of the strategically important Tatev Road in the Sisian (southern Armenia) to Nurduz, particularly the construction of a tunnel and also the development of Nurduz Terminal.

Moreover, Iran is ready to export technical and engineering services to Armenia by Iranian contractors and companies for completing the construction of the Corridor stretching from Nurduz in Iran to Yerevan with higher productivity.

Referring to the transit of 22500 Armenian trucks and 24000 Iranian trucks in 2021, Hedayati, the general director of Iran Transit and International Transportation Bureau at Iran’s Road Maintenance & Transportation Organization, proposed for commercialization of Iranian and Armenian Corridors beyond trade ties for increased regional transit, because the demand for transit is increasing due to the International North-South Transport Corridor (INSTC) and recently signed Persian Gulf-Black Sea Agreement.

For the rail connection, Miad Salehi, head of the Islamic Republic of Iran Railways, pointed to three possibilities for rail transit between Iran and Armenia. The first two rail connections are i) Jolfa-Nakhchivan-Yerevan and ii) Jolfa-Nurduz (in Iran) and Yerevan-Nurduz (in Armenia) railroads which were agreed 7 years ago though not realized by now. The third possibility is multi-modal transit from Yerevan to Jolfa by road and then southward to the Port of Bandar Abbas by rail.

Previously in October 2021, Iran’s Deputy Transport Minister Kheirollah Khademi, heading a delegation, went to Armenia to consider the participation of Iran in completing the Tatev Road as an alternative route to Goris-Kapan Road which bypass Azerbaijan territory due to the heavy tolls levied to Iranian fleets. 

3266**2050

 

Ukrainian crisis may affect Russia’s interest in South Caucasus [Turkish Opinion]

ARAB NEWS



The Ukrainian crisis has prompted many initiatives in the international arena and the situation in the South Caucasus is one of them.
One chapter of the South Caucasus file is Russia’s relations with Georgia or its fait accompli to declare Georgia’s two autonomous republics — Abkhazia and South Ossetia — independent. Russia is not likely to backpedal from these initiatives unless there is a tectonic change in the region. On the contrary, it may continue to press more countries to recognize the independence of the two autonomous republics. It may be aiming at a scenario in which these two republics will seek to join the Russian Federation as it now is planning to do for Donetsk and Luhansk. Georgia is reluctant to become part of cooperation among three South Caucasus countries — Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia, because of Russia’s involvement in the initiative.
The second chapter is Georgia’s interest in becoming a member of the EU and, if possible, of NATO. Russia acquiesced without much resistance to Ukraine’s EU membership, so we may conclude that it may not strongly oppose Georgia’s EU membership either. However, NATO membership is a more sensitive issue. It will probably raise stronger objections to Georgia’s NATO membership. It may do so even if it emerges weaker from the Ukrainian crisis.
Because of the Ukrainian crisis, Sweden and Finland have become uneasy about Russia’s interest in expanding its zone of influence. Moscow is already active in Transnistria and Moldova. These countries have every reason to be worried. We will see the ultimate outcome if and when a new defense architecture is worked out in Europe.
The third chapter in the South Caucasus is Nagorno-Karabakh. While Turkey is not part of the South Caucasus, it is part of the regional security architecture because of its close relations with Azerbaijan.
Russia was and still is to a large extent the game-maker in the South Caucasus, but it may have moved this question to the backburner, because most of its energy is being absorbed by the Ukrainian crisis.
Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan continue to work on a framework initiated by Putin. It would become a good precedent if they could continue this pattern without Putin’s supervision or intervention.

Despite goodwill on all sides, stabilization in the South Caucasus may not be expected soon.

Yasar Yakis

Azerbaijan and Armenia do not agree on all issues, but their leaders give positive signals. A contention with roots going back centuries may not be solved easily. Putin has laid the foundations for negotiations by persuading the Azerbaijani and Armenian leaders. He did this to keep the situation in the Caucasus under Russia’s control. There may be pitfalls on the road, but reasonable decision-makers on both sides seem to be aware that if the present negotiations derail, they may grind to a halt. Bearing in mind the uncertainties created by the Ukrainian crisis, it would be difficult to foretell where the present Azerbaijani-Armenian efforts will lead.
The Artsakh (Karabakh) lobby is influential in Armenia’s domestic politics. It is composed of far-right nationalist Armenians who seek to annex Karabakh to Armenia, whereas if a stable administration could be established in Karabakh, Armenians may benefit from oil-rich Azerbaijan’s economic resources in their capacity as full-fledged citizens of Azerbaijan.
The fourth chapter of the South Caucasus file is the relations between Turkey and Armenia. Armenians and Turks have lived in the same geographical area for more than 1,000 years. There is a high degree of appreciation for Armenians among the Turks. They enjoyed similar fortunes and faced similar hardships. They helped each other in difficult times.
After the dismemberment of the Soviet Union, Turkey was one of the first countries to extend diplomatic recognition to Armenia — together with Azerbaijan and Georgia. It sent humanitarian assistance to Armenia and invited it to join as a founding member of the newly established Black Sea Economic Cooperation organization.
After Armenia’s occupation in 1993 of the autonomous Karabakh region of Azerbaijan, Turkey closed its borders with Armenia. There were several attempts to mend relations between the two countries. On Oct. 10, 2009, Turkey and Armenia signed a protocol to establish diplomatic relations and open the borders. The Armenian church and Armenian nationalist political parties reacted against the protocol and the Armenian government had to refrain from submitting the protocol to parliamentary approval. Therefore, the protocol remained a dead letter.
Pashinyan sees the advantages of normalization with Turkey. The 2009 attempt at reconciliation failed for emotional reasons. Turkey had not taken Azerbaijan on board before embarking on a rapprochement with Armenia. This time, Ankara is closely coordinating with Baku, but this does not mean that it may not fail again for other reasons. Irrelevant third parties may step in and spoil the process.
Despite goodwill on all sides, stabilization in the South Caucasus may not be expected soon.

• Yasar Yakis is a former foreign minister of Turkey and founding member of the ruling AK Party.

 

Pashinyan says Armenia not pleased with CSTO countries’ response

“The problem is not new. Armenia has raised and discussed it many times in a working order. This issue needs further discussion. The issue of rapid response is important for Armenia. As you know, last year these days the Azerbaijani army infiltrated into the sovereign territory of Armenia. Armenia applied to the CSTO for the use of mechanisms envisaged by crisis response procedure.

 

Unfortunately, the organization’s response was not the one Armenia had expected. Also for a long time we were raising the issue of CSTO member states selling weapons to the countries unfriendly to Armenia and used against Armenia. The response of the CSTO member states during and after the 44-day war in 2020 did not make Armenia and the Armenian people very pleased,” he said.

Armenia, EU to discuss prospects of launching Visa Liberalization Dialogue

Public Radio of Armenia

The fourth meeting of the EU-Armenia Partnership Council will take place in Brussels and touch on bilateral relations and political matters.

EU member states and Armenia will exchange views on the state of implementation of the EU-Armenia Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement, and of the Economic and Investment Plan.

They will also discuss political dialogue and reform, democracy, rule of law and human rights, economic, and trade and sectoral cooperation, as well as the prospects of launching a Visa Liberalization Dialogue. 

Participants will have an exchange on regional issues (Russia/Ukraine, Turkey, Iran), and Nagorno Karabakh.

Weapons sold to Azerbaijan by SCTO member states were used against Armenia – PM Pashinyan

Public Radio of Armenia

The reaction of the CSTO to Azerbaijan’s invasion of Armenia in May last year did not come up to Armenia’s expectations, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said at the CSTO summit in Moscow.

“The Organization did not act as Armenia would expect it to,” PM Pashinyan said.

“For a long time, we have been raising the issue of arms sales by CSTO member states to unfriendly countries for Armenia. As a result, these weapons were used against Armenia and the Armenian people. This is also a problem,” the Prime Minister said, adding that “the reaction of the CSTO member states during and after the 44-day war in 2020 did not “encourage” the Republic of Armenia and the Armenian people.

Nikol Pashinyan emphasized the special role of the President of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin in stopping the war in Nagorno-Karabakh and reiterated Armenia’s commitment to the trilateral statements November 9, 2020, January 11, 2021 and November 26, 2021.

“Armenia, as a founding member of the CSTO, is committed to the further development of the organization and considers it a key factor for security and stability in the Eurasian region, the security of the Republic of Armenia,” the Prime Minister said.

Azerbaijani press: Turkic states willing to enhance media cooperation to combat fake propaganda

By Vugar Khalilov

On May 14, the members of the Organization of Turkic States met in Istanbul, Turkey, to explore the expansion of media cooperation in the fight against fake news propaganda.

The 4th meeting of the ministers and high officials in charge of the media and information of the Organization of the Turkic States (OTS) was co-hosted by Turkey’s Presidency Communications Director Fahrettin Altun and OTS Secretary-General Baghdad Amreyev.

The meeting, which brought together government officials from Turkey, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan, as well as observer countries Hungary and Turkmenistan, aimed to promote media and communication cooperation between the Turkic speaking states.

Addressing the event, the head of the Azerbaijani delegation, presidential aide Hikmat Hajiyev stressed that the Turkic world is facing ongoing misinformation and false news propaganda.

“We have been under such attacks from the first days of Azerbaijan’s independence. Especially during the 44-day Karabakh war, we faced all the elements of a hybrid psychological war. We have managed to deliver the truth and justice to the world thanks to the interaction and joint efforts of the Azerbaijani and Turkic media, like in all other areas,” Hajiyev emphasized.

The presidential aide described 2021 as a significant year when the major transformation occurred in the history of the Organization of the Turkic States at the Istanbul Summit.

“At that summit, the Turkic World Vision 2040 document was adopted, which identified very serious responsibilities and tasks for cooperation between our countries in the area of information and media like in other fields,” Hajiyev recalled.

Stressing that the group, which was established within the organization to carry out joint work in a more systemic and coordinated way, would provide support for improving the interaction between member states, Hikmat Hajiyev said that especially the decisions made by the Azerbaijani and Turkish leaders at the 7th Baku Summit in 2019 set cooperation in such areas as media and TV as a target.

Hajiyev recalled the previous year’s media forum, which, he said was successful in terms of not just bringing together media leaders from both nations, but also fostering collaboration between relevant authorities.

He underlined the need for media collaboration, identifying it as one of the most essential tools for competition and struggle between countries.

Hajiyev reminded the meeting that Azerbaijan faced injustice in information warfare during the occupation of 20 percent of its historical lands by Armenia, as well as during the 44-day war in 2020.

He added that after the war with the participation of about 30 media representatives from OTS countries a special media tour was organized to Azerbaijan’s liberated territories to effectively inform the world media about the devastation carried out by Armenia for 30 years in these lands. Within the framework of the media tour, the guests visited Baku and Ganja and the liberated regions such as Shusha, Jabrayil, Fuzuli, and Aghdam.

He also thanked the Turkish media for their support in preventing the Armenian lobby’s provocations against Azerbaijan in the information field, fighting false news, and conveying Azerbaijan’s just position during the war.

Moreover, the presidential aide said that Azerbaijan is interested in developing cooperation in the field of information and media with other fraternal and friendly countries within the OTS.

“It is important to coordinate our cooperation and activities in this area to prevent the spread of negative trends, information provocations, and false information against our countries on social media platforms. In this sense, it would be useful to create effective and flexible mechanisms for coordinating our joint activities on social media,” Hajiyev added.

Speaking at the meeting, Altun noted that the solidarity between Azerbaijan and Turkey during the Karabakh war, which resulted in the glorious victory, was also reflected on social media.

“We fought together with Azerbaijan on the information front. As a result, we contributed to the glorious victory,” he stressed.

Altun added that the OTS has improved and become an international organization within a 13-year-long existence and that this event will further enhance the current relationship.

“The leaders have taken important steps towards the development and unity of this organization. We must contribute to further strengthening the unity of our countries. The development of the media is in the hands of those who represent it,” he underlined.

In his video address, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said that the fight against disinformation is vital in terms of ensuring the safety of political and social life.

“The lies and slanders we witnessed during the Second Karabakh War reminded us once again of the importance of this issue and showed how important it is for us to unite. The war was fought not only on the battlefield but in areas, from written and visual media to social media during the 44 days,” Erdogan stressed.

The meeting, which brought together government officials from OTS member states – Turkey, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, as well as observer members Hungary and Turkmenistan – aimed at improving cooperation between the Turkic states in the field of media and communication.

The meeting featured panels session on “The rising power of public diplomacy in the Turkic world: series-film sector”; “The digital future of the Turkic world: metaverse”; “The possibilities for cooperation in public broadcasting in light of the Turkic world’s common future vision”, and “Combating disinformation in the post-truth era”.

On the sidelines of the event, Hajiyev met with Kazakh Information Minister Askar Umarov.

At the meeting, Umarov proposed to broadcast programs of Balapan, Kazakh TV, Khabar24 TV channels in Azerbaijan.

He noted that specific measures would be taken to ensure the broadcasting of Kazakh TV channels in Azerbaijan, and invited Azerbaijani specialists to the largest media event in Central Asia – Astana Media Week.

In turn, the Azerbaijani delegation expressed interest in the experience of Kazakhstan in the media sector, including in the production of animation, and its intention to take part in the event.

Azerbaijani press: Azerbaijan-Turkey: Beyond lofty asseverations

By Orkhan Amashov

The past three decades have seen Azerbaijani-Turkish relations evolve from a deep-entrenched strategic partnership, founded on a shared past underpinned by ethno-linguistic roots, to the level of an integrated alliance, buoyed by an increased emphasis on a common destiny.

The Shusha Declaration, which constitutes the current apex of bilateral ties, is by no means, the final destination, but rather a comprehensive framework which is to be a prelude towards a further deepening of these relations.

“We are friends, brothers and now officially allies”, said Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev whilst addressing an enthusiastic and jubilant audience in Turkey on 14 May. This concise and punchy line could be deemed as a reference point, enabling one to cast a light on the present degree of interconnectedness between the countries, envisioning a bright future in store.

The solid foundations upon which the contemporary ties between Baku and Ankara are contingent are multilayered having, at its premise, what one may call an “emotional vortex”, engendered by a panoply of commonalities.

All interstate relationships are deeply rational and based on common interests, as is the case for the Azerbaijani-Turkish situation. But had it not been for that incessantly revitalised emotional vortex, recurrently reinforced and moulded to meet temporal needs, the current depth of interaction would not have been achieved.

Nevertheless, the intention here is to investigate the subject, as the title suggests, beyond lofty asseverations, and focus on the rational crux of the relationship. Azerbaijan and Turkey are mutually interdependent. The former’s success maximises the latter’s influence and vice versa. This is particularly relevant in the realms of defence, diplomacy and energy.

One nation, one military

In a volatile world in which security risks run high and stability is constantly threatened, the military dimension of the relations looms large. Turkey did not just provide indispensable political and moral support for Azerbaijan in a time of strife and played a critical role in strengthening Baku’s military prowess through training and arms exports prior to and during the Second Karabakh War, but also, as President Aliyev made abundantly clear in his numerous interviews given during the war, effectively blocked the danger of third-party intervention. Naturally, the nature of that party is known to us all.

Back then, the Azerbaijani leader did not specify the identity of the potential interloper, following the time-honoured adage of diplomacy in line with which enough should be said and nothing should be harmed.

The Shusha Declaration, in addition to reaffirming the pre-existing military arrangements, has crystallised the provisions on cooperation in this field, and, more importantly, a collective defence mechanism, akin to Article 5 in NATO’s founding treaty. In fact, Baku and Ankara had been coming to this point of formalisation for over a decade. The year 2010 was crucial, and the succeeding 11 years gradually brought the whole alliance to fruition.

The incisive Can Kasapoglu, writing for the Jamestown Foundation, believes by virtue of intensive joint drills and increased interaction, Azerbaijan and Turkey have already progressed from “one nation in two states” to “one nation and one military”.

This may appear a slightly precipitated conclusion just now, but this seems to be the logical objective of the policies pursued by Baku and Ankara. The Azerbaijani Army is currently being reconstructed along the lines of the Turkish model, and President Aliyev himself remarked the intention is to create a smaller version of the Turkish army.

Diplomacy and energy

Baku and Ankara also consult on a wide array of international issues and act in a coordinated manner. Whilst in Kenya in early May, I had a chance to converse with the Turkish Ambassador in Nairobi, His Excellency Ahmet Cemil Miroglu, who confided to me that Turkey – ranked the fifth country across the globe in terms of the number of worldwide diplomatic representations, has a massive footprint, and wherever Azerbaijan is not represented, Ankara provides its ally with necessary information and steps in, if necessary.

Azerbaijan has its own uniquely pivotal place in the energy market. Although Baku is no match for Russia in terms of providing gas for Europe, it is still a reliable and trusted supplier. It may play an even greater role in coming to the rescue of south-eastern Europe, namely the Balkans. This enables Turkey to increase its leverage over its western neighbours and to be indispensable within the whole scheme.

OTS

Azerbaijani-Turkish relations are critical to the future of the Organisation of Turkic States (OTS). Some commentators believe the Shusha Declaration will be a model, both for the relations between Turkey and other Turkic states and interconnectedness among the members of the organisation in general.

The OTS has no chance to be a global force to be reckoned with without its biggest and most powerful member – Turkey. Ankara alone cannot bring cohesion to the entity. Azerbaijan is indispensable, inter alia, as a gateway to Central Asia, enabling the Turkic power with the most impressive international clout to connect with the eastern branch of the organisation.

Aliyev-Erdogan chemistry

Although it is undoubtedly true that Azerbaijani-Turkish relations are beyond the mundane vicissitudes of international politics and, irrespective of the governments in charge, will always meet certain high standards of sufficient closeness, it is important to ascribe due importance to the impact of a personality factor.

Aliyev and Erdogan, for a period spanning almost two decades, have managed to establish an extraordinarily excellent rapport, upgrading the “one nation in two states” to a whole new level. This relationship has passed many tests of time, including the 2009 conundrum engendered by an ill-conceived Turkish-Armenian normalisation, the necessary basic conditions for the inception of which did not exist at the time due to the then-ongoing former Armenian-Azerbaijani Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Both leaders rose to the occasion and transformed what seemed to be an unfortunate misunderstanding into an opportunity, and the momentum gained thereafter has never been lost, but fostered and reinforced. 

Any sober reflection requires a mind unblemished with feelings. As stated at the outset, in relations between the two Turkic nations, there are too many uncontaminated fundamentals which precede the rational crux.

This year Ankara and Baku celebrate the 30th anniversary of the re-establishment of diplomatic relations, the very inception of which goes back to 1918 when Ottoman Turkey recognised the Azerbaijani Democratic Republic (1918-20). The present chronological vantage point provides an excellent opportunity to throw a retrospective glance at history.

If there is one aspect that Turkophiles in Azerbaijan and Azerbaijanophiles in Turkey must keep in mind, it is that at no point should it be assumed that supreme refinement has been achieved. Nothing that seems to be a foregone conclusion should be taken for granted. Turkey and Azerbaijan are bound to constantly strengthen, compose and re-attune themselves, moving towards an ever-closer union.

Turkish press: Turkiye’s minorities celebrate Foundations Week

Rabia İclal Turan   |16.05.2022

(File Photo) Bedros Sirinoglu, head of the Armenian Foundations Union in Istanbul

ISTANBUL

Turkiye has long been celebrating Foundations Week in the second week of May every year. But over the recent years, it has acquired a special meaning for many foundations belonging to the country’s minority communities.

“There was no such thing until today to invite minority foundations to the events held for the foundations week,” Bedros Sirinoglu, head of the Armenian Foundations Union in Istanbul, told Anadolu Agency in an interview.

“They have accepted us as foundations, but they did not invite us to the events,” he said.

“Now, all foundation managers, Muslim or non-Muslim, are being invited,” he added, for which he thanks Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

“We owe this to our president and we are grateful to him,” he said.

Many foundations across the country come together throughout the week and hold several events, which were halted for two years due to the pandemic.

“It is important in terms of bringing all foundations together and creating the opportunity to chat with the minister, general manager (of foundations) and regional managers,” said Sait Susin, president of the Syriac Kadim Foundation.

The Turkish Jewish Community Foundation also took part in the events throughout the week

“In this context, an exhibition and a concert are held every year in our Grand Synagogue of Edirne, which was restored by our State’s General Directorate of Foundations,” Ishak Ibrahimzadeh and Erol Kohen, presidents of the Jewish Community of Turkiye, told Anadolu Agency in an email interview.

Minorities of Turkiye

When asked about how it feels about being an Armenian in Turkiye, Bedros Sirinoglu said: “Living in Turkey gives us happiness. This country is our country. We are citizens of this land.”

“I am a man who has traveled the world, spent 24 days touring America, but missed my country, Turkiye, on the 10th day,” he said.

In recent years, he said a church was built and many churches and schools were renovated without any hurdles from state institutions — something unheard of in the past.

Sait Susin of the Syriac community said: “Assyrians, who have a history of 5,000 years on these lands, were born in the last century, left their places of residence and dispersed all over the world. Currently, a large part of our population of 25,000 people lives in Istanbul.”

Kohen and Ibrahimzadeh said Jewish communities have settled and lived all over Turkiye.

They underlined that the weight of this “rich cultural history” is a huge responsibility for the present-day “considerably diminished Jewish community.”

The first synagogue ruins ever discovered in the world are located in Turkiye, in the ancient city of Sardis, right on the border of Izmir, the representatives of Turkish Jewish community recalled. “These ruins are estimated to be 2,200 years old,” they said.

Regulations regarding minority foundations

President Recep Tayyip Erdogan last year in March announced a “human rights action” plan, including several reforms and regulations regarding the community foundations of the minorities.

“This plan was highly welcomed by our community,” Ishak and Kohen said.

“We look forward to its release and implementation (at the) soonest possible,” they added.

The Syriac community also welcomed the plan and some legal amendments, Susin said. “For the first time in the last 20 years, we have a school that provides education in Syriac language.”

We are also trying to build a church in Istanbul on land that was allocated to us by President Erdogan — setting a precedent in Turkiye, Susin said.

Armenpress: Catholicos Aram I departs for Egypt to attend general assembly of Middle East Council of Churches

Catholicos Aram I departs for Egypt to attend general assembly of Middle East Council of Churches

Save

Share

 10:43,

YEREVAN, MAY 16, ARMENPRESS. His Holiness Aram I, Catholicos of the Great House of Cilicia, departed for Cairo, Egypt, on May6 16 to participate in the general assembly of the Middle East Council of Churches, His Holiness Aram I said in a statement on social media.

Catholicos Aram I will participate in the general assembly as an honorary guest.

All churches of the Middle East will attend the assembly with their delegations.

The delegation led by Catholicos Aram I consists of 5 people.