Artsakh President refuses to comment on Pashinyan-Aliyev meeting

NEWS.am
Armenia –

Artsakh President Arayik Harutyunyan categorically refused to comment on the ongoing meeting in Brussels between Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev.

Arayik Harutyunyan, who is participating in the forum in Stepanakert, did not answer questions from the press, not even deeming it necessary to stop.

Nevertheless, the journalists, following the outgoing Harutyunyan, voiced the question of whether he had an opinion about the Pashinyan-Aliyev meeting in Brussels, to which the Karabakh president shook his head without turning around – either as a sign of unwillingness to speak, or lack of opinion.

Signing of any document is not planned in Brussels: Armenian Security Council Secretary

ARMINFO
Armenia –
Naira Badalian

ArmInfo.Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and President of the European Council Charles Michel are not planning to sign any document at their upcoming trilateral meeting in Brussels, the  Secretary of the Security Council of Armenia Armen Grigoryan said in  response to a query from Armenpress news agency.

The Secretary of the RA Security Council also touched upon the  criticism that the agenda of the meeting is classified. “That’s to  say the least a strange criticism because the current agenda of our  discussions with Azerbaijan is well known. These are: the points  presented by us and by Azerbaijan for the normalization of relations  or launch of peace talks, which are also disclosed and include the  topic of the NK conflict settlement, issues of return of captives and  revealing the fate of those missing, issues relating to opening of  regional connections, delimitation and demarcation of borders, as  well as issues relating to the launch of the work of the trilateral  commission dealing with border security. This is the same agenda that  was discussed during the previous meetings.” 

Armen Grigoryan stated that there are no plans to sign any document  in Brussels, because, for example in the issue of opening regional  connections a working group co-chaired by deputy prime ministers is  active and discussions on agreements reached on the highest level  must continue in that format. “The same can be said on the other  issues which are being discussed more in detail in working formats.  Therefore, no document is planned to be signed in Brussels.  Presumably there will be a press release on the results of the  discussions,” he pointed out.

Karabakh planning to transition to semi-presidential system of government

PanArmenian
Armenia –

PanARMENIAN.Net – Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh) is planning to transition to a semi-presidential system of government, according to a draft concept from the Constitutional Reforms Commission.

“Taking into account the imperative for ensuring the security of the Republic of Artsakh, the challenges facing the Republic of Artsakh, as well as with the goal of ensuring flexibility of the state administration system in times of martial law or state of emergency and in emergency situations, it is proposed to transform the government system by transitioning to a semi-presidential system of government,” reads the concept, according to Armenpress.

The semi-presidential system would rely on two centers – the President and a Prime Minister – who will work with the parliament.

“The President, being the guarantor of the sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity and security of the Republic of Artsakh, will coordinate the work of the state bodies in the defense area, and will be the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces and the President of the Security Council,” the draft says.

“The executive power will be vested in the government led by the Prime Minister, who will coordinate the work of the 15 members of the Cabinet (ministers). Currently, the President is the head of the executive power. There is no position of a prime minister now and the government is composed of the State Minister and Ministers who are appointed by the President.”

Given the current military-political situation, the commission also proposed to hold general elections gradually – parliamentary elections in 2023 and presidential elections in 2024. At the same time, the concept proposes to reserve parliament the right to elect a President in exclusive cases.

iGorts program for Diaspora Armenians recognized by UN Migration Agency

Public Radio of Armenia
Armenia –

The United Nations International Organization for Migration (IOM) has added the iGorts program of the Office of the high Commissioner for Diaspora Affairs to the Repository of Practices, which showcases replicable practices and serves as an inspiration for actors involved in GCM (Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration) implementation at the global, national, regional, and local levels.

iGorts is the first program that invites Diaspora Armenian professionals to serve in the public sector and the government of the Republic of Armenia.

The Program was launched in September 2020 and is a 12-month Fellowship which allows for 50 Armenian professionals from around the world to serve in the Government of Armenia. The Office of the High Commissioner for Diaspora Affairs covers the cost of a round-trip air ticket; a monthly stipend of 336.000 AMD to cover living expenses for the duration of their fellowship; emergency medical insurance, and the fee for a one-year residency permit.

The two main goals of the program are the improvement and development of Armenian public institutions as well as the promotion of professional repatriation. Diaspora professionals are placed in state agencies across different sectors in need of their expertise and contribute to the improvement and the development of programs and policies within the state institution.

For the duration of the 12 months of their fellowship, they work on different projects, offer their knowledge of international best practices and offer advice as to how to improve the government systems. The program also offers excursions/work tours to the different provinces of Armenia to its participants in order to encourage their knowledge of the country, as well as encourage the creation of ties between the participants and their homeland. Networking events and opportunities are also created for the participants in order to promote opportunities for future employment for them as well.

https://en.armradio.am/2022/05/20/igorts-program-for-diaspora-armenians-recognized-by-un-migration-agency/

The citizen is the key guarantor of democracy in Armenia – PM Pashinyan

Public Radio of Armenia
Armenia –

The citizen is the key guarantor of democracy in the Republic of Armenia, Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan said at the Armenian Forum of Democracy.

He noted that Armenia is the right place for holding the forum.

“The citizen of the Republic of Armenia knows that he is a decision-maker, that he is the main, key subject as provided by the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia,” PM Pashinyan stated.

“The Republic of Armenia went through great shocks after the 44-day war in 2020, and it was the citizen of the Republic of Armenia who prevented the collapse of the statehood of the Republic of Armenia, the loss of sovereignty and independence,” he noted.

He pointed out two key questions – to what extent democracy is able to protect the country’s security and to what extent democracy is able to protect and preserve the sovereignty and independence of the country.

“The answer to the second question is unequivocal: democracy is the most important and key factor in preserving the sovereignty, guaranteeing and preserving the independence of the Republic of Armenia today. Our task is to prove that democracy is able to ensure the external and internal security of the country. In this regard, I would like to emphasize the importance of the peace agenda adopted by the Government of the Republic of Armenia, for which the citizen of the Republic of Armenia has given a mandate,” Nikol Pashinyan continued.

In general, he said, “it’s very important to formulate and discuss the peace agenda with the logic that, in the end, the key decisions in the country are made by the citizen in accordance with the rules of democracy, the Constitution and the legislation.”

“It is very important that we provide complete and relevant information to the citizen so that he or she is sufficiently informed in making his or her decisions,” the Prime Minister said.

Azerbaijani press: As Belarus premier embarks on Azerbaijan visit, expert weighing the pros and cons [INTERVIEW]

 18 May 2022 11:10 (UTC+04:00)

By Ayya Lmahamad

Belarus Prime Minister Raman Halowchanka (Roman Golovchenko) will pay a working visit to Azerbaijan on May 18, Azernews reports.

The two-day visit program includes meetings with the country’s leadership, a visit to the Ganja automobile plant, international exhibitions Caspian Agro and Inter Food, as well as industrial enterprise Iglim. A business meeting between the business circles of the two countries is also planned as part of the visit.

A political-military analyst of Belarus, professor of the Academy of Military Sciences of Russia, Alexander Tikhansky, commenting on the visit of Golovchenko to Azerbaijan in an interview with Azernews, stated that the visit will focus on concrete and practical issues in general.

“If the Azerbaijani side is not interested in some areas, maybe they have more favorable proposals from other states, then we need to find new ones. That is, in general, how Golovchenko announces his visit to Azerbaijan,” the expert said.

He added that the visit also includes the need to identify if there are opportunities to increase trade turnover between the two countries, in the light of those tough sanctions, in which Belarus finds itself.

“Therefore, today it is simply necessary for both Azerbaijan and Belarus to get a real, so to speak, cross-section of the situation and identify points of growth that we can promote and substantively discuss. This is the main goal of the visit,” he said.

Speaking about the bilateral relations between Azerbaijan and Belarus, the expert noted that the development of relations between the two countries is a progressive process.

“We can find such a reference point in this on November 12 last year, when the Belarus president received Azerbaijani ambassador, and two days later President of Azerbaijan had an audience with the Belarus ambassador. During these meetings, an exchange of opinions took place between Baku and Minsk,” he said.

Tikhansky adds that formally the history of the Azerbaijani-Belarus diplomatic relations counts more than a quarter of a century [established on June 11, 1993]. He stressed that the bilateral relations between the two countries have gone a long and worthy way toward progressive development.

“I will even say that Belarus will never forget Azerbaijan’s steps towards Belarus. When it was necessary to pay off a debt for Russian gas, Azerbaijan lent money to Belarus without any commission, without any interest. Yes, Belarus returned the money, but the point is that it was important to receive them back then. And in principle Belarusians still remember it,” he said.

The expert underlined that even the pandemic did not affect the bilateral relations between Azerbaijan and Russia. He quoted Belarus’s President Alexander Lukashenko’s words that “true friends do not put off activities that need to be carried out in time, and no pandemic can interfere with that”.

“That’s how our relations are at the moment, including in the military-political sphere. Belarus has repeatedly stated that it wants to see Azerbaijan as a member of the CSTO, even in spite of Armenia’s position,” he added.

Speaking about the current regional situation, which arise after Azerbaijan’s victory in the Second Karabakh War and the liberation of its territories from Armenian occupation, the expert noted that Belarus, as one of the key members of the CSTO, has always been in favor of peacekeeping initiatives.

“And although we have military-political, military-economic relations both with Armenia and Azerbaijan, at the same time, I would like to recall that literally within five-six years military-technical cooperation between Belarus and Azerbaijan has reached almost half a billion dollars. It should be noted,” he said.

Tikhansky added that Azerbaijan is also the closest ally of Turkey and its direct position on the admission of the new NATO members, which is very important for Belarus.

Diplomatic relations between the countries were established on June 11, 1993. The two countries are cooperating in various sectors of the economy, such as agriculture, transport, remote sensing services, etc.

The trade turnover between Azerbaijan and Belarus amounted to $424.4 million, with the exports accounting for $295.5 million and imports for $128.9 million in 2021.

Railway passenger coaches, fiberboard of wood, butter, medicaments, furniture, wood sawn or chipped lengthwise, beef, electric transformers, and cheese are the main export goods to Azerbaijan. From Azerbaijan, Belarus imports polymers of propylene, tomatoes, fruits, nuts, fresh fruits, fruit and vegetable juices, and others.

Since 2007, a number of joint projects in the field of industrial cooperation have been launched including assembly lines of Belarusian tractors and trucks. The leader of the Belarusian-Azerbaijani cooperation in the sphere of industrial cooperation is the Ganja automobile plant.

At a meeting with representatives of the public and expert community, Belarus, and foreign media in 2019, President Alexander Lukashenko stressed that relations between Belarus and Azerbaijan are an example of relations between the two Christian and Muslim states.

Azerbaijani press: Vicious circle: Armenian revanchist forces asking for another war

 19 May 2022 15:37 (UTC+04:00)

By Sabina Mammadli

Armenia’s revenge-seeking opposition forces, made up mainly of the Karabakh clan that are on the streets nowadays, are doing everything possible to derail a possible peace deal with Azerbaijan, thus pushing it into a potential third war.

Since mid-April, Yerevan’s streets have been overwhelmed by protesters, accusing Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan of plotting to “surrender Karabakh” after he called for the signing of a peace treaty with Baku.

The blood-thirsty opposition is completely rejecting Azerbaijan’s attempts to normalize relations and sign a peace treaty that would pave the way for a new chapter in the region.

Another act of Armenian provocation designed to undermine any effort toward normalization of the ties was the recent discourse of the ex-head of the Main Directorate of Training of the Armed Forces of Armenia, Maj-Gen Valerik Kocharyan. He claimed that Azerbaijan had suffered heavy losses during the second Karabakh war, and therefore, there was no need to hurry for the signing of a peace deal.

As no victory is possible without victims, Azerbaijan’s losses during the 44-day war were inevitable. However, Armenia’s official losses were several times more and the aggressor country cannot yet explain to its own people why seas of blood were shed for the war that was and will always be described as aggressive and go down in history as the war of occupation.

“Why is Azerbaijan in a hurry to sign a peace deal now? They know very well that when Armenians unite, they cannot fight with us. Today we unite around the idea of defending our country and people,” Kocharyan alleged.

It would seem that the 44-day war convinced the opponents of the Pashinyan government about Azerbaijan’s readiness to protect itself and fight for its territorial integrity. However, if that was not persuasive enough to those who want a third war, Azerbaijan is ready for it.

By liberating Jabrayil, Fuzuli, Zangilan, Gubadli, and Shusha, five settlements, about 300 villages, strategic heights, as well as Aghdam, Kalbajar, and Lachin, demonstrating a high-level combat readiness, the Azerbaijani army set an example during the patriotic war.

The mere parallel of the liberated Azerbaijani territories resurrected from the ruins and the ongoing demonstrations of the Armenian opposition demanding revenge, which means new blood and new suffering, convincingly proves that Azerbaijan is after creation, and Armenia is for destruction.

The reality is simple – Azerbaijan is ready for another war but what will the cost of it be for Armenia?

Video chronicles of the 44-day war are documentary evidence of the poor training of the Armenian servicemen. Moreover, any losses suffered by a country during the war must be assessed against the real state of its economy, GDP, and strategic foreign exchange reserves.

In all macroeconomic indicators, Azerbaijan by far outclasses Armenia, whose economy, is on its last leg, having long lost its independence.

Kocharyan is right about one thing: Azerbaijan is really in a hurry to sign a peace deal that opens up the way for achieving a full-fledged peace between the two Caucasus states.

The reason behind this is far different from what the Armenian general implies, the country looks into the future, and wants to work on peaceful construction and ensure further economic development.

Armenpress: Signing of documents not planned at upcoming EU-mediated Pashinyan-Aliyev meeting

Signing of documents not planned at upcoming EU-mediated Pashinyan-Aliyev meeting

Save

Share

 10:26,

YEREVAN, MAY 21, ARMENPRESS. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and President of the European Council Charles Michel are not planning to sign any document at their upcoming trilateral meeting in Brussels, the Secretary of the Security Council of Armenia Armen Grigoryan said in response to a query from ARMENPRESS.

Grigoryan also addressed the criticism on the agenda of the meeting being kept secret.

ARMENPRESS: The trilateral meeting of the Armenian Prime Minister, President of the European Council and the President of Azerbaijan is planned to take place May 22 in Brussels. There is certain criticism that the agenda of the meeting is being kept secret. What would you say in this regard?

Grigoryan: That’s to say the least a strange criticism because the current agenda of our discussions with Azerbaijan is well known. These are: the points presented by us and by Azerbaijan for the normalization of relations or launch of peace talks, which are also disclosed and include the topic of the NK conflict settlement, issues of return of captives and revealing the fate of those missing, issues relating to opening of regional connections, delimitation and demarcation of borders, as well as issues relating to the launch of the work of the trilateral commission dealing with border security. This is the same agenda that was discussed during the previous meetings.

ARMENPRESS: Is it planned to sign any document in Brussels?

Grigoryan: No, because, for example in the issue of opening regional connections a working group co-chaired by deputy prime ministers is active and discussions on agreements reached on the highest level must continue in that format. The same can be said on the other issues which are being discussed more in detail in working formats. Therefore, no document is planned to be signed in Brussels. Presumably there will be a press release on the results of the discussions.

Armenian, North Macedonian FMs discuss enhancing cooperation

Save

Share

 10:33,

YEREVAN, MAY 21, ARMENPRESS. Within the framework of the 132nd session of the CoE Committee of Foreign Ministers, Foreign Minister of Armenia Ararat Mirzoyan had a meeting with the Foreign Minister of North Macedonia Bujar Osmani on May 20, the Armenian Foreign Ministry said in a press release.

Mirzoyan and Osmani had a discussion over deepening bilateral relations and enhancing effective cooperation in areas of mutual interest. The need for intensifying political dialogue and mutual visits between the two countries was underscored.

FM Mirzoyan highlighted active partnership in the OSCE, expressing hope that during its upcoming presidency in the OSCE North Macedonia will have important contribution in regional security and peace. In this context the Armenian FM presented Armenia’s position over the peaceful settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict, underscoring the OSCE MG Co-Chairmanship’s mediating role for achieving a comprehensive and lasting resolution to the conflict. The post-war humanitarian issues of the 2020 war were also addressed.