Azerbaijan is ‘ready’ to start peace talks with Armenia, president tells FRANCE 24

France 24
Sept 28 2021

Exactly one year after the start of the 44-day war between Azerbaijan and Armenia for the control of the contested Nagorno-Karabakh region, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev granted an exclusive interview to FRANCE 24 from the capital Baku. Aliyev said Azerbaijan was ready to “work on a future peace agreement” with Armenia, but warned that any move by Yerevan to reclaim territory lost in last year’s war would be met with a fierce response by his country.


The president of Azerbaijan told FRANCE 24 that the first meeting between the foreign ministers of Azerbaijan and Armenia last week in New York was a “good indicator” that dialogue could be restarted and a peaceful solution sought. He said he was ready to enter peace negotiations but lamented that Armenia’s leadership had so far failed to respond “adequately”. Aliyev added that if the OCSE Minsk Group of mediators (France, the US and Russia) set up a meeting with Armenian PM Nikol Pashinyan, he would have no objections.

However, he issued a warning to Armenia, stressing that any intention to reclaim territory lost in last year’s war for Nagorno-Karabakh would be met with a fierce response by his country. He claimed the conflict between the two countries had been “resolved” once and for all and there should be no return to the previous situation. Aliyev also denied that he had any additional territorial claims on Armenia. 

The Azerbaijani president insisted that the issue of granting some kind of autonomy to the Nagorno-Karabakh region, which he had offered for years, was now “off the table” and that both Armenia and the OCSE Minsk Group of mediators should accept this new reality. 

Aliyev rejected claims by Human Rights Watch that his country was holding and torturing Armenian prisoners of war, saying they had all been freed. The president also strongly denied that he had sent operatives to attack Mahammad Mirzali, a Azerbaijani blogger who is a refugee in France and who was badly injured in a stabbing in March.

  

Azerbaijan-Iran relations strained over truck driver arrests

EurasiaNet.org
Sept 28 2021
Heydar Isayev Sep 28, 2021

Azerbaijan’s relations with Iran, its large neighbor to the south, have been in flux since the end of last year’s war with Armenia. The most recent rocky period started when Azerbaijan began charging fees to Iranian trucks on a road through southern Armenia that passes through slices of Azerbaijani territory in some places.

At first, Iran remained silent even after Azerbaijani police and customs confirmed the practice. Armenian media reported that some of the trucks targeted had been “transporting cement to Yerevan and Stepanakert,” the de facto capital of Nagorno-Karabakh. The territory is internationally recognized as Azerbaijani but had been controlled by Armenian forces since the first war between the two sides in the 1990s.

The drivers had been detained because they “entered Azerbaijan illegally from Armenia and relevant measures will be taken,” spokesperson of the Ministry of Interior Affairs of Azerbaijan Ehsan Zahidov confirmed the following day. Azerbaijan has long held that entry into Karabakh via Armenia amounts to an illegal border crossing.

Iran’s foreign ministry responded by demanding the release of the drivers and to meet with Azerbaijani officials to resolve the issue.

A series of meetings have taken place since then but the fate of the drivers is still unknown.

Iran’s ambassador to Azerbaijan, Abbas Mousavi, met with Hikmet Hajiyev, the senior foreign policy adviser to Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev, twice in a week. In a tweet, Mousavi said the two “reviewed the current situation and the future of our good relations and other issues of interest.”

On September 23, Azerbaijan’s Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov met with his Iranian counterpart Hossein Amir-Abdollahian on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly. In a statement, the Azerbaijani MFA noted that the ministers reviewed the “current situation in the region.” Amir-Abdollahian, in his own comments, alluded to “third parties” coming between Iran and Azerbaijan, which in Iran was interpreted as a reference to Israel, Iran’s archenemy, which has a warm relationship with Baku.

Tension has been exacerbated by naval military exercises conducted jointly by Turkey and Azerbaijan in the Caspian Sea. Iran’s foreign ministry said that the drills violated an international convention banning foreign military forces from the sea. (Azerbaijani analysts retorted that Iran is the only Caspian littoral country not to have ratified the convention.) Iran then held its own military drills close to its border with Azerbaijan.

Meanwhile, in Iran a variety of officials have been heaping abuse on Azerbaijan. One Iranian member of parliament, Ahmad Naderi said on Twitter that Azerbaijani officials have “gotten carried away” and have been making statements that are “bigger than their size and capacity,” the Tehran Times reported

Another MP, Mohammad Reza Ahmadi Sangari, said that Baku had become arrogant because of its military victory over Armenia, which he said was the result of “Turkish doping,” referring to Ankara’s heavy support of Azerbaijan. “The age of your small country is less than that of our youngest lawmaker,” Sangari added.

In Baku, however, analysts say the government appears to be motivated by long-running irritation at Iranian trucks supplying Nagorno-Karabakh.

Following Azerbaijan’s gaining control of some stretches of the road, which connects the key southern Armenian cities of Goris and Kapan and which is Armenia’s only highway to Iran, Baku has been able to act on those Iranian deliveries.

The war also resulted in Azerbaijan regaining territory very close to the Lachin corridor, the road that connects Armenia to Nagorno-Karabakh. That has allowed Azerbaijan to surveil the road for what it sees as illegal border crossings. President Aliyev, in a September 27 interview with Turkish media, said that in the period between August 11 and September 11 Baku had counted 60 Iranian trucks using the road. Some of them, he said, appeared to be trying to hide their identity by using Armenian license plates.

He also said Iranian officials had repeatedly refused to act. “The first time [the Azerbaijani side issued] a verbal warning, the second, an official note, and the third, posts – customs, border, police. In this way we have begun to control the road through Azerbaijani territory,” Aliyev said. As a result, he said, the number of Iranian trucks passing through Lachin has “dropped to zero.”

While much of the Azerbaijani media coverage of the spat has emphasized a widespread belief that Iran is on Armenia’s side in the conflict, that is a misunderstanding, said political analyst Eldar Mamedov.

Iran has in fact “repeatedly supported Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity on the level of political and religious leadership,” Mamedov told Eurasianet

“When people in Baku accuse Iran of a pro-Armenian stance, they need to be reminded of the big picture: for example, Baku’s close relationship with Israel, or the persistence of the idea of ‘southern Azerbaijan’ that supposedly has to be “liberated” from Iran,” said Mamedov, referring to the northern part of Iran that is largely populated by ethnic Azerbaijanis.

As for the most recent tensions between the two countries, Mamedov suggests they will not fundamentally change the relationship.

“Iran is treading carefully in the Caucasus,” he said. “It does not need destabilization of the northern border, in addition to all the challenges it already has in other scenarios like the Persian Gulf, Iraq, and Afghanistan.”

 

Heydar Isayev is a journalist from Baku.

 

​Can ‘make trade not war’ become a new reality in the Caucasus?

The Hill – MSN
Sept 27 2021

Can ‘make trade not war’ become a new reality in the Caucasus?

Aylin Unver Noi, opinion contributor  

On Sept. 27, 2020, stalemate over Nagorno-Karabakh turned into a military conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia. For a long time, relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan had been tense over this territory, which is recognized internationally as a part of Azerbaijan but has been occupied by Armenians since 1994. That “Second Karabakh War” lasted 44 days and ended with a peace deal signed by Azerbaijan, Armenia and Russia on Nov. 10 last year. The deal allowed Azerbaijan to hold on to areas recaptured during the conflict and included the commitment of Armenia to withdraw from several other areas in the Nagorno-Karabakh.

Azerbaijan is now trying to cope with one of the biggest challenges it faces in the territories liberated from Armenian occupation after 30 years: There are still mines in the territories recaptured. Baku has demanded maps of mines Armenia laid during the war. In 2012, NATO Trust Fund projects helped Azerbaijan in clearing unexploded ordinance and mines left from the Soviet army between 1955 and 1991.

This time, Azerbaijan has only received help from Turkey, a NATO ally, to clear mines threatening security and livelihood in the areas liberated from Armenian occupation. Azerbaijan is a member country of NATO’s Partnership for Peace (PfP) Programme and has been since 1994. Azerbaijan has contributed actively to NATO-led peace support opearations in Kosovo and Afghanistan. Azeri troops recently withdrew from Kabul airport after completing their mission in Afghanistan as a partner country to PfP of NATO.

Post-war reconstruction continues in areas recaptured from Armenia, but clearing mines from these areas more quickly could facilitate further reconstruction efforts. Unexploded mines are a significant obstacle in resettling the territories and establishing transport and infrastructure – not only in Azerbaijan, but also between Azerbaijan and other countries in the region. Such joint initiatives and projects have potential to provide much needed stability, peace and prosperity for the region.

Maybe it is time again for NATO to assist Azerbaijan with the demilitarization of unexploded ordinance and mine clearance.

Turkey, Azerbaijan, Armenia – along with Turkmenistan, Krygzstan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine, Romania and Bulgaria – are already partners of the EU-financed Transport Corridor Europe-Caucasus-Asia Project (TRACECA corridor). Stability and peace in the Caucasus could revitalize these kinds of projects, improve logistical infrastructure, and make reaching Asian and European markets easier for trade.

This August, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev called for a new era with Armenia – if Yerevan shows its willingness. Both leaders said they are ready to cooperate with Armenia through developing economic relations and establishing multimodal transport lines that could facilitate trade among their countries.

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian seems inclined to go along. Armenia’s problems with Azerbaijan and Turkey have meant their shared borders have been closed since the 1990s. If Pashinian adapts his foreign policy to this new reality, he may pave the way for Armenia to become a “land-linked” country for trade in the near future.

In his statement, Pashinian emphasized the importance of opening regional transport. Any project that helps to link Armenia though multimodal transportation to its neighboring countries Azerbaijan and Turkey would also be significant for trade. Every year Armenian youth emmigrate abroad due to economic difficulties at home. This new foreign policy approach based on “make trade, not war” could create a win-win situation.

There is a negative correlation between trade and conflict. Trade agreements that improve trade lessen the likelihood of conflicts and instabilities. Economic interdependence created by trade can prevent future conflicts and contribute to peace.

It seems that there is a willingness from all sides in this case to make these aspirations concrete. Similar statements from Erdogan, Aliyev and Pashinian should be read from this perspective, I think.

In 2009, Turkey and Armenia signed an agrement to normalize relations, but never ratified it in their respective parliaments. This time, the opportunity that has emerged after the Second Karabakh War should not be missed – but its realization depends on not breaching the ceasefire and fulfilling the commitments of peace deal.

Aylin Unver Noi is a senior fellow at the Transatlantic Leadership Network and an associate professor on international relations at Halic University in Istanbul. From 2014-2018, she was senior fellow at the Center for Transatlantic Relations, Johns Hopkins University SAIS.

A Year After Unleashing War Crimes Against Indigenous Armenians, Azerbaijan’s Threats And Violations Continue

Forbes
Sept 27 2021
A year ago today–on September 27, 2020–The Republic of Azerbaijan, with Turkey’s full military support and over 1,000 trafficked Syrian jihadist mercenaries, launched a war against the indigenous Armenians in the disputed territories of Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh). Throughout the 44-day war, Azerbaijan’s indiscriminate use of cluster munitions, drones, and artillery rockets included phosphorous bombs which scorched forests causing severe burns among soldiers and civilians.

Among other heinous war crimes, the Azeri military posted social media videos boasting beheadings and torture of captured Armenian civilians and military. A strong-arm trilateral agreement on November 10, 2020, negotiated between Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia, ended the war and stationed 2,000 Russian peacekeeping troops in Artsakh.

The spoils of the war left nearly two-thirds of the indigenous Armenian lands in Artsakh occupied by Azerbaijan. With over 5,000 Armenians killed, 110,000 displaced, 10,000 fighters wounded and 200 POWs detained illegally in Azerbaijan prisons and tortured–there are still hundreds of unaccounted Armenian MIAs. 

A year later, the Azeri assaults on the Armenian population continue. In the occupied Hadrut Region, Azeri soldiers desecrated Armenian cemeteries. The French Journalist, J-Christophe Buisson tweeted about the masked armed Azeri soldiers who stopped the Artsakh Armenian youth soccer team bus on its way to Armenia for a soccer match. Using a dagger to scrape off the Artsakh flag from the surface of the bus, the soldiers inspected the war-traumatized children’s phones, stating Nagorno-Karabakh is part of Azerbaijan.

Last month during a CNN Turk interview, Azerbaijan’s president Ilham Aliyev had a warning. “…if Armenian fascism tries to raise its head ever again, we will crush it again. The defeat in the second Karabakh war should be a lesson for them……It seems that the second Karabakh war has not been a lesson for everyone yet. If this is the case, then we are ready to teach them another lesson.”

The U.S. House of Representatives on September 23, passed the Cardenas-Schiff-Sherman amendment demanding Azerbaijan “immediately and unconditionally return all Armenian” POWs and captive civilians. It also called for a report on Azerbaijani war crimes, use of illegal munitions and white phosphorus against Armenian civilians, and an investigation into the use of U.S. technology in Turkish drones that targeted Armenian civilians during the 2020 war.

The Republic of Armenia “instituted proceedings against the Republic of Azerbaijan before the International Court of Justice,” the principal judicial organ of the UN. Earlier this year, Armenia also filed interstate complaints against Turkey with the European Court of Human Rights.

“Human rights abuses and violations of international humanitarian law were widespread after Artsakh was attacked. Mercenaries and jihadis were deployed from Syria and Libya under Turkey’s command. These perpetrators were responsible for horrific crimes, which are ongoing despite the ceasefire agreement. Columbia University’s Artsakh Atrocities Project has been documenting events. We hope that the information we’ve compiled can be used to hold Turkey and its cohorts accountable for its wanton abuse of civilians, including women and children, as well as cultural crimes,” says David L. Phillips, Director of the Program on Peace-building and Rights Institute for the Study of Human Rights, at Columbia University.

While Azerbaijan refutes the legal right to self-determination of the Armenian population of Artsakh, last year’s war echoed memories of September Days 1918 and the systematic extermination of nearly 15,000 Armenians in Nakhichevan and Artsakh. Similar to their brethren Ottoman Turks’ occupation of Armenian properties and landmarks during the 1915 Genocide of 1.5 million Armenians, Azerbaijan continues desecrating Artsakh’s churches, ancient cemeteries, sacred cathedrals and historic sites dating back a millennium. 

Citing recent Caucasus Heritage Watch (CHW) report, Hakim Bishara reports in Hyperallergic how “over a dozen Armenian churches, cemeteries, sacred cross-stones (Khachkars), and other cultural properties have either been destroyed, damaged, or threatened by Azerbaijan.” Azerbaijan’s President Aliyev ordered the removal of medieval Armenian inscriptions from churches, calling them “fake” and rebranding the sites as “ancient Azerbaijani” landmarks.  The 2019 groundbreaking forensic reportage in Hyperallergic by Sarah Pickman and Simon Maghakyan details Azerbaijan’s long history of erasure and destruction of indigenous Armenian sites including “89 medieval churches, 5,840 intricate cross-stones, and 22,000 tombstones.”

Well-orchestrated PR campaign machinery, constructed in advance of last September’s war by high-end U.S. PR agencies and lobby groups, orchestrated a widespread misinformation campaign against Armenia, as Azerbaijan carpet bombed Artsakh. Anti-Armenian reports and articles germinated across top media outlets most prominently led by Carlotta Gall, The New York Times’ Istanbul bureau chief. International organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch issued pro-Azerbaijan reports accusing Armenia of instigating the war, and then changed their claims.  DataPoint Armenia offered the most comprehensive analysis on the “social media narrative warfare during the war” or “astroturfing” concluding that pro-Armenian social posts had “small effect on international audiences.”

While diaspora Armenian communities demanded justice against the Azerbaijan-Turkey alliance, diaspora Turks unleashed hate crimes defacing Armenian churches, schools and cemeteries. When France sent humanitarian relief aid to Artsakh, calling for the region’s recognition, Azerbaijan’s parliament called for France “to be stripped of its mediation role in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict to punish the French Senate.”

Neither Azerbaijan nor Turkey has earned human rights awards in recent years. 

Democracy Today NGO’s report “Never Again–44-day war: war crimes and international law”  documented the Azeri/Turkish war crimes during and after the 44-day war and attacks on civil population, children, journalists, members of humanitarian missions, and religious, cultural, and educational institutions and civil property. The report documents Azeri torture and inhumane treatment of civilians and some 200 POWs–filed and referred to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) by the Government of Armenia as a permanent documentation for world history of crimes committed by Azerbaijan and Turkey. 

Formed in November 2020, the Center for Truth & Justice (CFTJ) provides “a voice to victims of human rights violations.” The unaffiliated, all-volunteer NGO is run by approximately 25 American-Armenian attorneys, who oversee a law clinic in Armenia and train local law students and young lawyers to collect evidence through witness interviews with survivors of the 44-day war. To date, CFTJ has conducted nearly 150 interviews and trained 100 people in Armenia and Artsakh to obtain testimonial evidence.

“What CFTJ does is bear witness to the stories of war survivors, create a record of the stories, and secure the records so that no one can ever try to rewrite the stories. In a world of fake news, where the truth constantly gets buried, we believe firsthand testimonies are one of the last few reliable sources of evidence,” says Tamara Voskanian, an ethics attorney and one of CFTJ founders, who explains how interview questions are designed to garner evidence to support legal prosecutions. After the interviews conclude, the evidence collected is categorized into potential legal causes of action. CFTJ has already provided evidence to lawyers in several countries who are working on cases in their own jurisdictions.

Since most CFTJ volunteers, both inside and outside Armenia, are women, interviews often present challenging cultural dynamics when the witness is male, and the interviewers are female. In the traditional patriarchal Armenian society, men are often discouraged from opening-up and being vulnerable–critical components of a successful interview–so CFTJ’s training guides the law students and lawyers around such complexities. Female interviewers are taught to establish their neutral authority early on and to build trust with their witnesses prior to recording any discussions.

A portion of CFTJ’s interviews are with returned prisoners of war (POWs) and their families. Nearly a year after the war’s end, Azerbaijan continues to hold nearly 200 Armenian POWs, while publicly admitting to holding fewer than 40. The joint statement to end active hostilities, signed by Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia last November 9, required all captives on both sides to be released. In compliance with the statement, Armenia does not currently hold any Azerbaijani POWs, while Azerbaijan continues to hold Armenian POWs–violating both international law and the joint peace statement.

“The accounts of torture from released POWs interviewed by CFTJ are entirely consistent,” Voskanian says. POWs were subjected to burning of fingers, electric shocks, beatings while blindfolded, humiliated, and beaten repeatedly in the same areas of their bodies so that their injuries would appear to be old rather than recurring.

CFTJ’s recent White Paper, presenting the evidence of inhumane treatment and torture of Armenian captives, was sent to select members of U.S. Congress, which Voskanian says provides a basis for conducting congressional hearings into Azerbaijan’s violations of human rights. It also urges Congress to sanction and withhold aid from Azerbaijan until they release all Armenian hostages.

According to CFTJ, Azerbaijan is violating international law by prosecuting Armenian POWs in sham trials as during this past summer, when Azerbaijan tried and convicted dozens of Armenian POWs. In some ongoing trials, they deprive Armenian captives of the most basic legal protections while the sentences are arbitrary and excessive, unsupported by any factual evidence but are more of a show.

Returned female POW Maral Najarian spoke to CFTJ after her release from Azerbaijan this March. The Lebanese citizen moved to Artsakh after the Beirut blast, and following the ceasefire agreement, was captured along with her partner, Vicken Euljekjian, and held by Azerbaijan for four months accused of being a “mercenary” but was not convicted. Euljekjian, however, was tried and convicted in a Baku court in June and is now serving a 20-year prison sentence in what Voskanian calls a travesty of justice.

As the neighboring Armenia and Azerbaijan have been at war since before both countries formally broke away from the Soviet Union, the lack of diplomatic relations has created a deep information vacuum following the most recent war, says Voskanian.

With men comprising 45% of Armenia’s population, over 10,000 are now disabled veterans, while hundreds suffer from severe burns caused by the white phosphorus used by Azerbaijan. This lays most of the responsibilities of managing displacement and survival primarily on the women. 

Women comprise 30% of the IT workforce in Armenia while the global average share of women employed in IT is less than 20%.  To create high-paying job opportunities for displaced women, the Gyumri Information Technology Center (GITC) educational foundation is offering free web development courses to 100 female members of the veterans’ families. The initiative is supported by U.S.-based Armenian donors, including Fund for Armenian Relief.

“The GITC initiative provides women with skills that they can learn quickly and opens opportunities for building a solid, high-paying IT career with possibilities for flexible remote work that accommodate the women’s family and domestic responsibilities,” explains Amalya Yeghoyan, Executive Director at Gyumri Information Technologies Center who is negotiating job placement opportunities with the private sector for the beneficiaries of the GITC program.

The International Christian Concern (ICC)’s Artsakh project manager, Claire Evans, says nearly 60,000 Armenians were displaced from Artsakh. Most of the displaced now live in Armenia. 

“With the Armenian government’s temporary housing about to expire at the end of the year, we expect a major housing crisis at the beginning of 2022, assuming that the government cannot complete its construction of new houses,” Evans explains how displaced women from the villages need start up materials as seeds for gardens and livestock, to generate income and improve quality of life in the interim.

Their immediate needs are hygienic care, including diapers and washing machines, since there’s nowhere to do laundry. Evans cites a displaced woman’s case from Hadrut whose husband was “found tortured and hung in their home and her son killed” on the battlefield–she now lives in emergency housing in Armenia’s capital city, Yerevan. 

“It’s impossible for her to ever consider returning home because Hadrut is now fully occupied by the Azeris,” says Evans. “With no source of income, she is so traumatized that she struggles to even communicate. She has secured a loan to buy a house but can’t afford the full price. We think this is the best long-term option for her.”

ICC continues to provide services for the hundreds of displaced individuals among them, an 11-year-old boy and his family eager to return to Artsakh, and the bride who had to bid farewell to her fallen father right before her wedding. Continuing to monitor Azerbaijan’s ongoing crimes against Armenian captives, the ICC’s humanitarian perspective statement urges further investigations into the Artsakh situation, calling on the international humanitarian and religious freedom community for “awareness, assistance, and advocacy.” It also calls for humanitarian observations for the remaining Artsakh residents’ needs. Azerbaijan and Turkey’s “seizure and presumed destruction of personal properties” and personal identification papers for displaced persons, further isolate “the survivors from humanitarian solutions.”

“Family members of the missing, many of whom are essentially kidnapped kids (since many soldiers were teenagers) are living a daily nightmare. As a mother, I feel deep empathy and sorrow for the families of POWs, especially the mothers and young wives,” Voskanian says the impact of this war multiplied the pressures on Armenia’s women, who were already struggling in a fledgling economy and political instability. While highly educated, women holds few positions of power–as evident in recent elections where of the 15 appointed government ministers, only one was a woman. “One of CFTJ’s goals is to expand the role of women in Armenia’s legal system, thereby raising their status in society. In working to address and heal the wounds of this war, women in Armenia are carrying the country through these difficult times and preparing it for a brighter future.”

Follow me on Twitter or LinkedIn. Check out my website. 

Silent march for Armenian women killed in Almelo [The Netherlands] stabbing

The Netherlands, Sept 28 2021

A silent march will be held in Almelo on Tuesday evening to commemorate two women stabbed to death on M.Th. Steynstraat a week and a half ago. The two women were aunt and niece, aged 70 and 52 years. “With this silent march, in addition to commemorating their loved ones, the relatives also want to express their powerlessness,” lawyer Sebas Diekstra said to RTV Oost on behalf of the victims’ family.

The victims were Maral Dermovsesian and Zonund Kardanakyan, both of Armenian descent and both members of the Armenian General Benevolent Union (AGBU), the Public Radio of Armenia reported. Dermovseisan headed the AGBU Women’s Committee. 

A 28-year-old man from Almelo, a neighbor, is suspected of killing them. He was seen waving a crossbow around and firing it from his balcony in the same building where the women were killed. After multiple attempts to approach him safely, the police eventually shot him in the chest. He was taken to hospital, and was still unconscious. According to RTV Oost, the suspect was admitted to mental health institutions several times with psychological problems.

“AGBU Holland lost two of the most active women members through a heinous stabbing crime,” the organization said to the radio station. “If we want to write about the late Maral, we may need pages and not through some words. In summary, she was the flower of our community. We pray to the Lord to rest both in peace and to their family members patience and strength in this terrible moments.”

The silent march will start on Paganinistraat, where one of the women lived, at 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday. From there, participants will march to M.Th. Steynstraat, where the other victim lived. Their funerals were held last week.  


OSCE Minsk Group negotiates with Baku, Yerevan to resume trips to Karabakh — Lavrov

TASS, Russia
Sept 28 2021
Russian foreign minister stressed that the main task of the OSCE Minsk Group today is to encourage positive tendencies which can be achieved thanks to the trilateral statement of a full ceasefire in the conflict zone
© Alexander Shcherbak/TASS

MOSCOW, September 28. /TASS/. In New York the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs negotiated with Baku and Yerevan to resume working visits in the region of Karabakh, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Tuesday at a press conference.

“Just recently, the Co-Chairs from Russia, USA and France met in New York with the foreign ministers of Azerbaijan and Armenia. As far as I know, they negotiated to resume their trips in the region to visit [Nagorno-Karabakh] and meetings on the spot with representatives of Armenia and Azerbaijan, including the meeting scheduled in Stepanakert,” he reported.

Lavrov stressed that the main task of the OSCE Minsk Group today is to encourage positive tendencies which can be achieved thanks to the trilateral statement of a full ceasefire in the conflict zone. According to him, the stability achieved in Nagorno-Karabakh should be strengthened in every possible way, ensuring the co-existence and cooperation of the Armenian and Azerbaijani communities. “I would not make more ambitious plans now,” he said.

On November 9 last year, Russian President Vladimir Putin, Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan signed a joint statement on a full ceasefire in Nagorno-Karabakh. Under the peace deal, the Azerbaijani and Armenian forces remained at their current positions while Russian peacekeepers deployed to the region.

Azerbaijan’s defense minister discusses Karabakh with Russian peacekeepers’ commander

TASS, Russia
Sept 28 2021
Gennady Anashkin replaced the contingent’s commander Mikhail Kosobokov, who held the post for just 16 days — September 9-26

BAKU, September 28. /TASS/. Azerbaijan’s Defense Minister Zakir Gasanov has held talks in Baku to discuss the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh with the newly-appointed commander of Russian peacekeepers, Gennady Anashkin, Azerbaijani Defense Ministry’s press service said on Tuesday.

“At the meeting, the situation in the territory of Azerbaijan where Russian peacekeepers are deployed temporarily was discussed. Taking part in the talks was Lieutenant-General Rustam Muradov,” the news release runs.

Muradov was the first commander of Russia’s peacekeeping contingent in Karabakh. Anashkin replaced the contingent’s commander Mikhail Kosobokov, who held the post for just 16 days — September 9-26. No reasons for the personnel reshuffle were offered.

Antonio Guterres welcomes Armenia-Azerbaijan FMs meeting

Sept 28 2021

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Monday welcomed a meeting of the Foreign Ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan and expressed the hope that such efforts will lead to a peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.”The Secretary-General welcomes the statement by the co-chairs of the OSCE (Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe) Minsk Group of September 24, on the joint meeting of the foreign ministers of Armenia and Azerbaijan that took place under their auspices on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly,” Xinhua news agency quoted Stephane Dujarric, spokesman for Guterres, as saying in a statement.One year after the hostilities in and around Nagorno-Karabakh, the Secretary-General is encouraged by the resumption of direct engagement at the level of the Foreign Ministers and hopes that such efforts will continue as part of a broader dialogue to resolve outstanding issues and reach a lasting peaceful settlement, said the statement.

Guterres reiterated his full support to the efforts of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs and the personal representative of the OSCE chairmanship-in-office to that end.He urged all concerned to focus their attention on advancing peace and cooperation at all levels for the benefit of the people in the region, it said.The UN stands ready to support such efforts through its ongoing humanitarian, recovery, development and peace-building work on the ground, said the statement.The OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs consist of representatives from France, Russia and the US.Armenia and Azerbaijan have been at loggerheads over the mountainous region of Nagorno-Karabakh since 1988.Peace talks have been held since 1994 when a ceasefire was reached, but there have been sporadic minor clashes.A new round of armed conflict broke out along the contact line on September 27, 2020.

Why the European Union is failing to build peace between Azerbaijan and Armenia

The Parliament Magazine, EU
Sept 28 2021
Although steps have been taken to find lasting peace in the South Caucasus region, more can be done by the EU to support its eastern partners, argues Parviz Yarmammad.

What did happen?

Exactly one year ago, the second Nagorno-Karabakh war erupted when Armenian attacks on Azerbaijani villages intensified. In 44 days, Azerbaijani forces rapidly liberated most of the land that was invaded by Armenia in the 90s. These areas comprised the former Nagorno-Karabakh autonomous region and seven adjacent districts (Herbst, 2020). The invasion caused around a million Azerbaijanis to live as internally displaced persons (IDPs) for almost 30 years (Babayev, Schoch, & Spanger, 2020, pp. 279-280).

On the 10th of November, a trilateral ceasefire agreement brokered by Russian President Vladimir Putin was signed, which provisioned deployment of Russian peacekeepers within parts of the former Upper-Karabakh region of Azerbaijan, an area settled by ethnic Armenians (Aydabirian, Libaridian, & Papazian, 2021, pp. 18-24). In additional to the liberated regions, Armenia agreed to withdraw its military forces from occupied territories while Azerbaijan let Armenia use the road connecting the Republic of Armenia to Karabakh.

The agreement covered the resettlement of Azerbaijani IDPs to liberated territories as well as to areas under peacekeepers’ control. It also required Armenia to open a road through its territories to connect the Azerbaijani exclave of Nakhchivan with the rest of Azerbaijan (President of the Republic of Azerbaijan, 2020).

However, today, Azerbaijanis have not yet been able to return to their homeland due to Armenian planted mines (Kuzio, 2021), and Armenia still insists on not providing a corridor for Azerbaijan through its territories (Yevgrashina, 2021).

Why the South Caucasus?

Both Armenia and Azerbaijan are partners of the European Union within the Eastern Partnership framework. Additionally, the South Caucasus region is an important region for the Union due to the region’s geopolitics. The region is under the active political and economic influence of Russia, Turkey, Iran, and even sometimes China. It is therefore not politically desirable for the EU to have Eastern Partners come under the influence of the Union’s ideological rivals. Moreover, the South Caucasus has important transport linkages between Asia and Europe. Similarly important, the South Caucasus, particularly Azerbaijan, is crucial for the Union’s drive to diversify energy sources and decrease Russian influence in the EU energy market (Borrell, 2021).

“If the European Union wants to be more active in peacebuilding, the implementation of concrete socio-economic projects with the mutual participation of Azerbaijan and Armenia is vital for peaceful interaction of the two nations”

Prospective Steps by the European Union

From the EU side, in July, High Representative Josep Borrell stated the Union’s readiness to build peace and several EU Foreign Ministers subsequently visited the region (Borrell, 2021). On the other hand, European Council President Charles Michel, in his interactions with the leaders of Azerbaijan and Armenia, expressed the EU’s willingness to contribute to the peace process. Charles Michel always emphasised the need for confidence-building between the sides. Indeed, facilitating the exchange of Armenian detainees with mine maps on June 12 and the visit paid by Michel to Azerbaijan and Armenia were remarkable steps by the EU (Muradov & Rzayev, 2021).

However, before building confidence between conflicting sides, the EU itself needs to gain the trust of both parties. For example, in July, the European Union allocated €2.6bn to Armenia, whereas Azerbaijan got only €140m (BBC News, 2021)(Mejlumyan, 2021). However, Azerbaijan suffered more than Armenia during the war; Azerbaijani cities were bombed, while cities that were invaded were left completely demolished and mined (QC, Becker, & Kern, 2021, pp. 34-44)(BBC News, 2021). Conversely, none of this happened to Armenia. In order to maintain the return of IDPs and the reconstruction of the cities, Azerbaijan needs more financial support from the European Union. The unequal distribution of resources brings the impartiality of the EU into question.

“We, as an Azerbaijani community in Europe, expect the European Union to take active steps for peace and stability in the region”

Furthermore, if the European Union wants to be more active in peacebuilding, the implementation of concrete socio-economic projects with the mutual participation of Azerbaijan and Armenia is vital for peaceful interaction of the two nations. Considering the limitations of the EU’s political engagement, the projects could be implemented within the Eastern Partnership framework. Unfortunately, so far, there have not yet been any such concrete steps.

Moreover, maintaining face-to-face interaction through the European Parliament could be helpful in boosting the peacebuilding process. The European Parliament’s dialogue and mediation were successful in the Georgian crisis (Paul & Maisuradze, 2021). In the Karabakh case, instead of releasing biased one-sided resolutions (European Parliament, 2021), the Parliament is able to push political leaders for more dialogue and concrete action alongside building bridges between Azerbaijani and Armenian parliament members.

We, as an Azerbaijani community in Europe, expect the European Union to take active steps for peace and stability in the region. We hope no war will take place again and the winning side will always be the people of the region.


Bibliography

Aydabirian, R., Libaridian, J., & Papazian, T. (2021). A White Paper: The Karabakh War of 2020 and Armenia’s Future Foreign and Security Policies.

Babayev, A., Schoch, B., & Spanger, H.-J. (2020). The Nagorno Karabakh deadlock: Insights from successful confict. Frankfurt: Springer VS. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25199-4

BBC News. (2021, July 22). BBC News Azerbaijani. Retrieved from Aİ yardımı Ermənistanı çətin “Qarabağ seçimi” qarşısında qoyur?: class=”gmail-MsoBibliography” st1yle=”margin:0px 0px 20px;padding:0px;border:0px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.75em;,sans-serif”>Borrell, J. (2021, July 2). European Union External Action Service. Retrieved from Why we need more EU engagement in the South Caucasus: class=”gmail-MsoBibliography” st1yle=”margin:0px 0px 20px;padding:0px;border:0px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.75em;,sans-serif”>EU Neighbours East. (2021, June 3). EU Neighbours East. Retrieved from European Union calls Armenia and Azerbaijan to engage in renewed negotiations: class=”gmail-MsoBibliography” st1yle=”margin:0px 0px 20px;padding:0px;border:0px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.75em;,sans-serif”>European Parliament. (2021, May 20). Press Releases. Retrieved from Human rights: Chad, Haiti and Armenian prisoners of war in Azerbaijan: class=”gmail-MsoBibliography” st1yle=”margin:0px 0px 20px;padding:0px;border:0px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.75em;,sans-serif”>Herbst, J. E. (2020, November 10). Atlantic Council. Retrieved from Putin gains and loses from Armenia-Azerbaijan ceasefire deal: class=”gmail-MsoBibliography” st1yle=”margin:0px 0px 20px;padding:0px;border:0px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.75em;,sans-serif”>Kuzio, T. (2021, April 16). New Eastern Europe. Retrieved from Mines, Karabakh and Armenia’s crisis: class=”gmail-MsoBibliography” st1yle=”margin:0px 0px 20px;padding:0px;border:0px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.75em;,sans-serif”>Mejlumyan, A. (2021, July 15). Eurasianet. Retrieved from Armenia gets aid boost from EU: class=”gmail-MsoBibliography” st1yle=”margin:0px 0px 20px;padding:0px;border:0px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.75em;,sans-serif”>Muradov, M., & Rzayev, A. (2021, June 13). Topchubashov Center. Retrieved from The 12 June Armenian-Azerbaijani deal: larger implications: class=”gmail-MsoBibliography” st1yle=”margin:0px 0px 20px;padding:0px;border:0px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.75em;,sans-serif”>Paul, A., & Maisuradze, I. (2021, April 30). European Policy Center (EPC). Retrieved from Georgia’s road ahead: Time for the EU to show some tough love: class=”gmail-MsoBibliography” st1yle=”margin:0px 0px 20px;padding:0px;border:0px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.75em;,sans-serif”>President of the Republic of Azerbaijan. (2020, November 10). Retrieved from Statement by the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia and President of the Russian Federation: class=”gmail-MsoBibliography” st1yle=”margin:0px 0px 20px;padding:0px;border:0px;font-size:16px;line-height:1.75em;,sans-serif”>QC, S. K., Becker, D., & Kern, J. (2021). Armenia-Azerbaijan Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Targeting of Civilians in Azerbaijan September-November 2020: An Interim Report. London: 9 Bedford Row.

Yevgrashina, L. (2021, September 23). The Tribune. Retrieved from Rapid breakthrough unlikely in deadlock on Armenia-Azerbaijan transit routes: https://www.thetribune.com/rapid-breakthrough-unlikely-in-deadlock-on-armenia-azerbaijan-transit-routes/


This article reflects the views of the author and not the views of The Parliament Magazine or of the Dods Group

Rapid breakthrough unlikely in deadlock on Armenia-Azerbaijan transit routes

The Tribune
Sept 24 2021

BAKU

By Lada Yevgrashina

Months of discussion on resolving outstanding differences between Armenia and Azerbaijan have produced a deadlock unlikely to be resolved quickly as the first anniversary approaches of the outbreak of the six-week blitz resumption of their conflict in which Baku rapidly recaptured large swathes of territory lost in the 1990s.

Little common ground has been found on the main issues separating the two ex-Soviet states – principally the restoration of blocked transit routes, now the focal point of attempts to move on from the hostilities which left Armenia badly bruised militarily and diplomatically.

Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan – re-elected with a landslide last June despite the crushing military defeat but watchful of nationalists in his own camp — has in the past month made what appeared to be overtures to open new communications links.

But there were caveats.

His rejection of Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev’s proposal to reopen the “Zangezur” link, a rail route between Azerbaijan and its exclave of Nakhchivan – passing through Armenian territory — and on to Turkey made the appeals non-starters at the negotiating table.

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Azerbaijan’s strategic and military backer in last year’s lightning war, was perhaps the most forthright in rejecting them.

Erdogan disclosed that Pashinyan had offered to meet him as part of the Armenian prime minister’s proposal to build relations and end more than a century of enmity with the Turkish state. He ruled out any meeting until Pashinyan gave ground on that thorniest of issues – the reopening of Zangezur transit pathway closed since 1993.

“On the one hand, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan says he opposes opening the Zangezur corridor. On the other hand, he says he wants to meet me,” Erdogan told reporters. “This gives pause for reflection. If you want to meet…you have to take certain steps…Opening the the Zangezur corridor would remove a problem in the relations between Azerbaijan and Armenia.”

Pashinyan rejects any notion of reopening the route – and especially any reference to it as a “corridor” that he says implies special international status.

“It is very much in our interest to open up communications as this offers the opportunity to overcome the blockade imposed on us for more than 25 years,” Pashinyan said in a public appeal to visiting Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexei Overchuk. “It is very important for us to secure rail links at long last with Russia to open new opportunities for developing our economy.”

ARMENIAN “NO” TO CORRIDORS

But Pashinyan, looking over his shoulder at nationalists decrying last year’s “defeat” on the battlefield, made clear he ruled out any reopening of Zangezur.

“Armenia is ready to reopen regional communications with Azerbaijan, but cannot offer a corridor to Nakhchivan…through its own territory,” he said last month. “Armenia has never discussed and will not discuss any questions about the logic of corridors. By making declarations about corridors, Azerbaijan is seeing to destroy the process of opening regional communications.”

Russia oversaw the armistice that ended the hostilities in November last year and maintains “peacekeepers” in the region. After his talks last month, Overchuk acknowledged a lack of progress on the issue.

“We don’t have corridors on the working group agenda,” Overchuk told reporters. “The parties aim to unblock transport and economic ties in the region. Unblocking, building and restoring transport communications will create new opportunities for expanding and increasing trade.”

Azerbaijan’s Aliyev, has shown considerable impatience in recent months with Armenia over the blocked transit routes, slow progress in demarcating the border inherited from Soviet times and efforts to determine the location of land mines left by Armenian forces as they retreated in last year’s fighting.

AZERBAIJANI RESTRAINT

But Aliyev was restrained, even conciliatory, in trying to persuade Yerevan to agree to the transit route.

“Regional transport projects play an important role in long-term development, providing stability and reducing the risk of war to zero. All countries in the region come out winners from them,” he said. “Azerbaijan would be linked with Nakhchivan and Turkey. And at the same time Russia could open the rail link to Armenia.”

Aliyev’s foreign minister, Jeyhun Bayramov, drove home the point.

“A new Zangezur transport corridor would link not only Azerbaijan and Turkey but would provide a link between Azerbaijan and Nakhchivan, subject to a blockade for 30 years,” he said. “And, in addition, it would boost transport and trade links with the region as a whole.”

Last year’s hostilities resulted in Azerbaijan recouping areas held without concessions for three decades by Armenian forces and ethnically cleansed of their Azeri residents.

EU SAID TO FAVOUR CORRIDOR

Aliyev has said that the European Union supports the reopening of the Zangezur link – including during lengthy discussions with Charles Michel, President of the European Council, over the course of two visits to the region in recent months.

The armistice, however shaky, remains in place after Azerbaijan’s recapture of large swathes of territory.

Pashinyan has, in contrast, lobbied for progress in ensuring passage along the Lachin corridor – now controlled by Russian peacekeepers – providing a link between Armenia and the territory known as Nagorno-Karabakh under Soviet rule.

Nagorno-Karabakh was the focus of the original war between Armenia and Azerbaijan in the immediate aftermath of the 1991 Soviet collapse – more than 30,000 people were killed.

Populated mainly by ethnic Armenians but part of Soviet Azerbaijan since the 1920s, Armenian forces went far beyond the borders of the territory to seize seven adjacent regions of Azerbaijan. Azeris were ethnically cleansed and towns systematically looted.

It is believed 30,000 Armenians still live in the region, mainly in the region’s administrative centre, Stepanakert. Aliyev has declared the issue closed with the recapture of the territory and has effectively said that Nagorno-Karabakh is a Soviet entity that has ceased to exist.

Sep 24, 2021