Skip to main content

Human rights activist: More and more people demand action from Armenia’s political leaders every day

Panorama, Armenia
Nov 19 2021

More and more people in Armenia demand action from the country’s political leaders every day, human rights activist Ruben Melikyan says.

“Several conclusions:

1) Intolerance towards these scourges is increasing with every passing day,

2) Every day, more and more people strongly demand action instead of words from the political leaders,” he wrote on Facebook on Friday.

“The older generation should remember well Lenin’s statement made in October 1917: ‘Yesterday was too early. Tomorrow will be too late. Today is the day!’” Melikyan added.

ATTN PRESS: SF Bay Area Artsakh Task Force Raises $100K for Families of Fallen Artsakh Soldiers

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

San Francisco Bay Area Artsakh Task Force Raises $100,000

Insurance Foundation of Servicemen (IFS) Proud Recipients

San Francisco, CAOn Friday, November 12 the San Francisco Bay Area Artsakh Task Force Humanitarian Aid Committee (SFBAATF-HAC) donated $100,000 to the Insurance Foundation for Servicemen in Armenia (IFS) at KZV Armenian School in San Francisco, CA.

Earlier this year, SFBAATF- HAC hosted a virtual fundraising event which raised $100,000 for wounded Artsakh soldiers and families of fallen soldiers. 

The first-ever “For Our Soldiers” virtual gala and auction attracted over a few hundred attendees. Participants enjoyed touching musical performances, listened to encouraging messages from Bishops Hovnan Derderian and Torkom Donoyan and watched moving personal messages from Artsakh soldiers. 

The donations went through the nonprofit foundation, Friends of the Armenian Soldier and Family (FASF), and then sent to the Insurance Foundation for Servicemen in Armenia (IFS). IFS is a non-governmental organization that provides monetary compensation to the families of deceased and wounded soldiers in Armenia and Artsakh. 

About SFBAATF

The San Francisco Bay Area Artsakh Task Force (SFBAATF) was established in October 2020 in response to the 2020 war in Artsakh with a specific focus on providing assistance to Artsakh by coordinating regional efforts. More information can be found at www.facebook.com/BayAreaArtsakhTaskForce.  

PHOTO CAPTION:

IFS Leadership Receives $100,000 donation from the San Francisco Bay Area Artsakh Task Force Humanitarian Aid Committee 

Left to Right: Sona Baghdasaryan (IFS), Tatevik Yaghjyan (IFS), Christyne Davidian (SFBAATF-HAC), Angelique Arzoumanian (SFBAATF-HAC), Dicko Shahvekilian (SFBAATF-HAC), Narine Galstyan (IFS), Hrayr Sarkissian (SFBAATF-HAC)

###

Media Contact: 

David Ojakian

510.393.1806

David Ojakian

510.393.1806


SFBAATFHAC_IFS_100K_11.12.2021.jpeg

JPEG image

Azerbaijani press: Facebook temporarily bans Russian expert due to complaint of Armenian users

By Trend

Armenian Facebook users sent a complaint to the administration of the social network due to the publication of the editor-in-chief of the National Defense magazine, Russian military expert Igor Korotchenko, Trend reports on Nov. 19.

“Facebook banned me for three days for the question: Why during almost 30 years did Armenians destroy everything and build nothing in the occupied territories of Azerbaijan?” Korotchenko wrote in Telegram.


Asbarez: Pan-Armenian Council Meets With Armenia’s Human Rights Defender

Armenia’s Human Rights Defender Arman Tatoyan with members of the Pan-Armenian Council of the Western U.S.

GLENDALE—The Pan Armenian Council of the Western United States met with Armenia’s Human Rights Defender Dr. Arman Tatoyan on Tuesday.

During the meeting, Tatoyan presented the humanitarian crisis caused by Azerbaijan’s massive attack on the eastern border in the Syunik Province in an attempt to breach Armenia’s sovereign territory. He also outlined the human rights abuses committed by Azerbaijani Armed forces, discussed border security and the illegal deployment of Azerbaijani forces on the roads between the communities of Armenia which endanger people’s lives and well-being, and the unlawful detention of POWs. The meeting led to a constructive discussion on the role which Diaspora organizations and communities can play in helping to secure the future of the Armenian homeland.

Dr. Tatoyan has been invited to the United States by the Armenian National Committee of America-Western Region, a PAC-WUSA member organization, to engage with a number of community stakeholders, elected officials, academic circles, and other interested parties throughout California to discuss the latest developments in the region.

Arman Tatoyan obtained his LLM and Ph.D. from the Yerevan State University, Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics. He holds a Master of Laws degree from the University of Pennsylvania Law School. In 2016, Tatoyan was elected as the Human Rights Defender (Ombudsman) of Armenia. He also serves as an Ad Hoc Judge in the European Court of Human Rights, a Permanent International Advisor at the Council of Europe’s Directorate General of Human Rights and Rule of Law, and lectures at the Yerevan State University, American University of Armenia, and the Academy of Justice of Armenia. He previously held positions in the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Armenia (2013-2016) and the Deputy Representative (Deputy Agent) of the Government of Armenia before the European Court of Human Rights (2013-2016). He has also been involved in different working groups for drafting laws and strategies for Armenia.

Michel says Azerbaijan, Armenia leaders to meet in Brussels

POLITICO
Nov 19 2021
European Council President Charles Michel | Pool photo by Olivier Matthys/AFP via Getty Images

The leaders of Azerbaijan and Armenia will meet in Brussels next month on the sidelines of the EU’s Eastern Partnership summit, European Council President Charles Michel announced Friday.

Michel’s announcement of the meeting between Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan came just days after renewed military clashes between the longtime enemies. Armenian officials said at least 15 of their soldiers had died in that fighting. A renewed truce was reached Tuesday.

A roughly 30-year conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia over the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh was settled last year after Armenia conceded defeat and surrendered. The capitulation capped a month-long skirmish in which Azerbaijan, backed by Turkey, reclaimed territory long occupied by Armenians who viewed it as the independent territory of Artsakh.

But a post-war truce and border agreement, negotiated by Russia and signed this past January in Moscow, has proven fragile.

Michel said that in preparation for December’s meeting, Baku and Yerevan had set up a direct line of communication between their defense ministers to provide crisis management. A news release issued by Michel’s office said the line would function as an “incident prevention mechanism.”

If the meeting between Aliyev and Pashinyan indeed goes forward on the margins of the December 15 summit, Michel will have reclaimed a role for the EU in the long conflict, and potentially upstaged Russian President Vladimir Putin — if only for now. Russian officials have been trying unsuccessfully for weeks to arrange a meeting between the two leaders.

Friday night’s deal was reached after a flurry of calls between Michel, his counterparts, and their advisers.

The EU launched the Eastern Partnership in 2009 as an outreach effort to former Soviet countries including Azerbaijan and Armenia, as well as Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova. Belarusian dictator Alexander Lukashenko pulled out of the program after the EU imposed sanctions over the country’s fraudulent presidential election in August 2020.

Michel has previously intervened to help ease tensions between Azerbaijan and Armenia, and last spring helped broker a deal in which Azerbaijan released Armenian prisoners of war in exchange for maps to landmines in some of the territories it had recaptured.

Perspectives | Iran-Azerbaijan: A new cold war? [Azeri Opinion]

EurasiaNet.org
Nov 19 2021
Eldar Mamedov Nov 19, 2021
The Khodaafarin Bridge on the Azerbaijan-Iran border. (president.az)

As tensions subsided following weeks of saber-rattling and hostile rhetoric, the foreign ministers of Iran and Azerbaijan had a November 5 phone call in which they blamed “ill-wishers” for trying to exploit “recent misunderstandings between the two neighbors,” as the Iranian readout put it.

But the short-term rapprochement and blame-shifting only serves to obscure larger shifts in the relationship: While the war games and insults have abated, diverging geopolitical choices continue to pull Baku and Tehran in opposite directions, augmenting the risks of periodic eruptions in the future.

Azerbaijan’s victory in the 2020 war against Armenia, achieved with Turkish and Israeli support and Russian acquiescence, convinced Baku that its military-diplomatic strategy was vindicated and that there is little reason to alter it. Iran, by contrast, was sidelined by the war: Its peace plans proposed during the fighting elicited little interest in Baku, and Tehran has been unhappy about post-war developments, particularly by its arch-foe Israel’s expansion of its foothold on Iran’s northern borders.

With its newly consolidated alliances and fresh military confidence, Baku felt it could largely ignore its southern neighbor’s concerns. That explains the arrest in September of two Iranian truck drivers transiting Azerbaijani-controlled land en route to Armenian-controlled parts of Karabakh. While the incident could have been resolved through quiet backroom diplomacy between the two capitals, Baku chose to send a public message to Tehran that it won’t tolerate what it saw as encroachments on its sovereignty. That triggered unprecedented Iranian military exercises next to the Azerbaijani border.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev tried to put on a brave face but couldn’t hide his surprise and unease about Tehran’s escalations. While pro-government websites responded to the crisis by extolling the might of Azerbaijan’s armed forces, military confrontation with Iran – a country with eight times the population – clearly is not in Baku’s interests. All the more so because even Baku’s main ally, Turkey, is unlikely to fight a war with Iran on Azerbaijan’s behalf.

In recent years relations between Turkey and Iran have been on a downward spiral in several areas. The South Caucasus is one of them, as Tehran resents Ankara’s expanding reach there, most of all its rising influence in Baku. Both sides, however, have been mindful not to let things deteriorate too badly and have taken steps to de-escalate. On November 15, Iran Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian shared his “delight” at hosting his “brother” and Turkish counterpart Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu in Tehran. That visit was reportedly a precursor to a visit to Tehran by Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, during which some kind of roadmap for future relations is expected to be discussed.

Even if such a document were to be signed, it likely wouldn’t drastically change the current trajectory of Turkish-Iranian relations. With political Islam receding in Turkey, and conservative nationalism resurgent, Ankara will continue to bolster its alliance with Baku while trying to expand its influence further east into the Turkic republics of Central Asia.

That explains Turkey’s support for a transportation route linking it with Azerbaijan (what Baku calls the “Zangezur corridor”) through Armenia, potentially cutting off Iran. But preserving channels of dialogue can make the differences between Ankara and Tehran more manageable. Turkey also realizes that, should relations sour further, Iran can leverage its ties with the Kurdish Workers’ Party (PKK) against Ankara. Policymakers in Baku would be wise to realize the limits of the Turkish support in any potential future conflagration with Tehran.

Azerbaijan’s close relations with Israel represent a different set of variables. Baku strongly benefited from Israel’s military technology, particularly drones, during the war with Armenia. Pro-Israel organizations also are a mainstay of Baku’s lobbying efforts in Washington directed, in no small degree, to neutralizing the rival Armenian lobby and blunting human rights criticisms. In exchange, Azerbaijan is expected to continue providing a platform for Israel’s intelligence activities aimed at Iran.

Meanwhile – already after the latest Baku-Tehran spat cooled down – the state-run Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy is proudly hosting a member of a group of Washington pundits who openly advocate for Iran’s dismemberment on ethnic lines because that, in their view, would benefit Israel. In this context, given the bellicose statements from Israeli officials concerning Iran’s nuclear program and the uncertainty surrounding the revival of the multilateral agreement that held it in check, Tehran continues to see Azerbaijan as a potential staging ground for an Israeli military attack.

This growing threat perception is leading Iran to build up its deterrence against Baku. Recently, the influential website Iranian Diplomacy, linked to former high-ranking diplomat Sadeq Kharrazi, published an article criticizing the government’s purported “appeasement policy towards Ankara and Baku” and calling for a more robust defense of “Iran’s national interests in the north.”

In practical terms, one immediate way of doing so is for Iran to pivot towards Armenia. Many in Baku saw the recent trucking spat as ending in Azerbaijan’s favor, as Iran committed to banning its trucks from travelling to Nagorno-Karabakh. The reality, however, is more complex: While Tehran indeed conceded on that issue, it also has made it clear that it will henceforth prefer Armenia, rather than Azerbaijan, as its conduit for north-south trade, thus depriving Azerbaijan of some potentially lucrative business opportunities.

Resurgence of irredentism

Other Iranian moves could be even more fraught for Azerbaijan. Iran’s efforts to cultivate pro-Iranian constituencies, primarily through Shiite religious organizations, have not yet borne fruit. Few in Azerbaijan are attracted to the Iranian system of governance, and not all devout Shiites are pro-Iran.

But over decades of international ostracism, Iran has developed highly adept skills of asymmetric warfare. The fact that Tehran today lacks any credible proxies or allies in Azerbaijan does not mean that it won’t keep trying. Iran will simply adapt to a strategic landscape that is different from Lebanon or Iraq, where the “proxy strategy” has so far proved more successful.

Internal developments in Azerbaijan and Iran, meanwhile, are contributing to a deepening of the divide between the two nations.

Authorities in Baku have been using the crisis with Tehran to launch a crackdown on alleged “Iran sympathizers” in the country, by closing down a number of Shiite religious websites and detaining some prominent Shiite clerics, even though the evidence of their pro-Iranian activity is flimsy at best. Meanwhile, the state-affiliated media continue to accuse Iran in harsh terms of meddling in Azerbaijani affairs.

While in Azerbaijan there has been a resurgence of irredentism inspired by the thought of “reunifying” the territory of the Republic of Azerbaijan with the northern Iranian provinces largely populated by ethnic Azerbaijanis and known to nationalists as “southern Azerbaijan,” in Iran a countervailing movement also has gained momentum.

From this angle, it is Azerbaijan that must be reunified with the “Iranian motherland” after being forcibly incorporated into the Russian empire in the 19th century. These views have gained fresh prominence in Iran, especially on the level of public discourse. The influential reformist daily Shargh is instrumental in disseminating them. But such views are not limited only to reformist circles, as Iranian nationalism is increasingly serving as a glue around which different segments of the population can rally.

With both Baku and Tehran digging in on their current foreign policy trajectories, and public attitudes in both countries increasingly seeing each other through an adversarial lens, both neighbors appear destined to continue on this collision course for the foreseeable future. 

 

Eldar Mamedov is a political adviser to the Progressive Alliance of Socialists & Democrats in the European Parliament. This article reflects his personal views and not necessarily the opinions of the S&D Group and the European Parliament.

  

Producer Eric Esrailian Gets Papal Medal, Announces Terry George Northern Ireland Peace Process TV Project

VARIETY Magazine
Nov 18 2021

Courtesy Eric Esrailian

Los Angeles-based physician and producer Eric Esrailian, who recently received a medal from Pope Francis for his philanthropic activity around awareness of the Armenian Genocide, is developing a TV series entitled “Ceasefire” about the Northern Ireland peace process.

Oscar-winning Irish writer-director Terry George (“In the Name of the Father”) is attached to direct. 

“Ceasefire” is to depict the dynamics and diplomacy that facilitated the historic Good Friday peace agreement of April 1998, which helped transform Northern Ireland after decades of bitter conflict, in hopes that it can help similar political situations.

“You look at the events around the world and you say: ‘Where has there been a successful brokering of peace between two hostile opposing forces?’” Esrailian said, citing other political flashpoints such as the Israel–Palestine conflict and the civil war in Ethiopia’s Tigray region.

“If you read more about the ceasefire between Loyalists and republicans in Northern Ireland you see how the tension goes back literally hundreds of years,” he added.

“You can’t find two groups of people more bitterly opposed to one another, yet a ceasefire was successfully accomplished,” Esrailian noted. “I think that’s a fascinating subject matter; it’s relevant and timely.”

Esrailian also underlined that George — who has depicted “the Troubles” in Northern Ireland in early work like “Some Mother’s Son” and “The Boxer” — has a great grasp of the series’ subject matter and of the U.S. involvement in brokering the peace treaty. The “Ceasefire” series is being shopped around and “there is a lot of interest,” he said.

George previously directed Armenian genocide drama “The Promise,” which was bankrolled by late billionaire Kirk Kerkorian, and starred Christian Bale and Oscar Isaac. In 2017, prior to its U.S. release, the movie screened at the Vatican Cinematheque in a clear sign of Catholic Church support.

More recently, Esrailian was among the producers of the Discovery Plus doc “Francesco,” directed by Evgeny Afineevsky, in which the pope talks candidly about hot button issues such as same-sex couples, women’s rights and sexual abuse in the church. “Francesco” also features footage of Francis’ 2016 visit to Armenia, during which he used the term “genocide” to describe the slaughter of an estimated 1.5 million Armenians by Ottoman Turks during World War I, sparking an angry reaction by the Turkish government, which strongly denies that a genocide occurred.

“For nearly 100 years the Turkish government influenced storytelling in the United States by suppressing the story and pressuring the U.S. State Department,” Esrailian noted.

But in 2019, the U.S. recognized the Armenian genocide through two congressional resolutions passed by both houses of Congress.

“I’m someone who loves working in storytelling for social impact,” said Esrailian, who on Oct. 25 received the Benemerenti medal from Pope Francis for exceptional service to the Roman Catholic Church, becoming the first Armenian to receive this honor.

 

Ankara sets new preconditions for reopening dialogue with Yerevan – Armenian FM

Public Radio of Armenia
Nov 20 2021

We have received positive signals from Turkey to reopen the dialogue, but Ankara sets new preconditions, Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan said in an interview with Le Figaro

“We have always stated that we are ready to normalize our relations without preconditions, despite the huge support provided by Turkey to Azerbaijan during the war against Artsakh, both politically and through the supply of weapons and the deployment of thousands of foreign mercenaries,” Minister Mirzoyan said.

“We have received positive signals from Turkey to reopen the dialogue, but it remains complicated. Ankara is setting new preconditions. Among them is the “corridor” connecting Azerbaijan and Nakhichevan. It can in no way be a subject of discussion. States must allow transit while maintaining sovereignty over their own territory. All communication channels in the region must be reopened,” the Foreign Minister said.

While Armenia is talking about peace, Azerbaijan is multiplying xenophobic statements – FM

Public Radio of Armenia
Nov 20 2021

Armenia makes every effort to establish lasting peace in the region. However, for this process to be effective, the efforts must be bilateral, Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan said in an interview with Le Figaro.

“The rhetoric of the two sides is very different. Armenia speaks of opening all channels of communication, while Azerbaijan insists on the so-called “corridor” (with Nakhichevan). Armenia, as a manifestation of goodwill, is ready to hand over all the maps of mines located in the region at its disposal, but Azerbaijan, despite its obligation, does not release the Armenian prisoners of war,” the Foreign Minister said.

“While we are talking about peace, Azerbaijan is multiplying xenophobic statements. Testament to that are the speeches of the President of Azerbaijan, the so-called “Military trophy park” that opened in Baku this spring,” the Foreign Minister noted.

Asked how far this hate speech can go, the Foreign Minister said. “The answer to this difficult question is in Baku. Hatred can lead to annihilation or genocide. The Armenian people know that.”

“Lasting peace is important, but it is difficult to imagine the presence of the Armenian population in the territories controlled by Azerbaijan. As a result of the war, no Armenians live in the territories under the control of Azerbaijan, which is a factual proof of ethnic cleansing,” Ararat Mirzoyan stated.

Armenia: A thread of memory – New documentary by Italian Rai 1 TV reflects on Artsakh War

Public Radio of Armenia
Nov 20 2021

Armenia: A thread of Memory – a new documentary by the Italian Rai 1 TV touches upon the 44-day Artsakh War, its causes and consequences, Turkey’s role in that war, the post-war realities in Armenia and Artsakh, and the border situation.

The documentary by famous journalist Stefania Battistini starts with footage from Yerablur military pantheon.

The film also talks about the Christian heritage of Armenia and the Republic of Artsakh. It is noted that as a bearer of ancient Christian civilization, Armenia is a natural bridge between the East and the West.

The author visits the Matenadaran repository of ancient manuscripts, the Armenian Genocide Memorial and the Museum-Institute, Armenian churches, the issues of preservation of the Armenian historical-cultural Christian heritage on the territories currently under the control of Azerbaijan is touched upon.

The film also features interviews with Armenian President Armen Sarkissian, His Holiness Karekin II, Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos of All Armenians and Human Rights Defender Arman Tatoyan.

President Sarkissian speaks about the causes of the war unleashed by Azerbaijan against Artsakh, Turkey’s involvement, the post-war situation, humanitarian issues, and the Armenian prisoners of war still held in Azerbaijan.

The film emphasizes the importance of cooperation between Armenia and Italy, two friendly countries with ancient Christian values, and touches upon the current interstate relations, and the official state visits of the President of the Republic of Armenia Armen Sarkissian to Italy and his official visit to the Vatican in October.