Skip to main content

Armenia and Azerbaijan agree ceasefire after border clash, Armenian Defense Ministry says

CNN
Nov 16 2021

MoscowArmenia and Azerbaijan agreed on Tuesday to a ceasefire at their border, the Armenian Defense Ministry said, after Russia urged them to step back from confrontation following the deadliest clash since a war last year.

Armenia had asked Moscow to help defend it after the worst fighting since a 44-day war last year between ethnic Armenian forces and the Azeri army over the Nagorno-Karabakh enclave that killed at least 6,500 people.

That conflict ended after Russia, which has a military base in Armenia, brokered a peace deal and deployed almost 2,000 peacekeepers to the region. Turkey took the side of Azerbaijan, which regained swathes of land it lost in an earlier conflict.

“In accordance with an agreement mediated by the Russian side, fire ceased on the eastern section of the Armenian-Azeri border, and the situation is relatively stable,” Armenia’s Defense Ministry said.

Azerbaijan’s Defense Ministry did not immediately reply to a Reuters’ request for comment.

Earlier on Tuesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan discussed the situation on the border by phone, the Kremlin said.

Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu also spoke by phone to the Armenian and Azeri defense ministers by phone, Interfax news agency said.

The Armenian Defense Ministry said its troops had come under fire from Azerbaijan and that 12 of its soldiers were captured, while two combat positions near the border with Azerbaijan were lost.

Eduard Aghajanian, head of the Armenian Parliament’s foreign relations committee said 15 Armenian soldiers had been killed.

The Azeri Defense Ministry said it had responded to large-scale “provocations” after Armenian forces shelled Azeri army positions, and that its own operation had been successful.

The French foreign ministry had said it was very concerned about the deteriorating situation and called on both countries to respect a ceasefire.

Russia obliged to defend Armenia in case of war with Azerbaijan – Yerevan

RT – Russia Today
Nov 17 2021

After a series of firefights and fatalities reported on the country’s border with Azerbaijan, Armenia has said it expects Russia to step in and help prevent a return to all-out conflict that threatens the Moscow-backed ceasefire.

The secretary of the national security council, Armen Grigoryan, claimed that Azerbaijani forces had entered Armenian territory “as an act of aggression” on Wednesday. “In 1997, Armenia and Russia agreed to mutually help each other in such cases,” he said. “In this regard, we turned to Moscow.”

When asked to explain what kind of assistance Yerevan is requesting, the official said that it hopes to arrive at a resolution through diplomatic channels. If this is not possible, however, “then it is necessary to solve the problem by military means.”


The situation at the Azerbaijani-Armenian frontier has stabilized since reports of skirmishes on November 16, according to both sides. Russia’s Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu implored the two former Soviet republics to stop any actions which could worsen tensions. Moscow subsequently announced there had been a pause in fighting.Azerbaijan announced on Wednesday that seven of its servicemen died during combat operations and that 10 had been injured. Yerevan, meanwhile, has reported one fatality, but said that it had lost communication with 24 of its personnel, who are still unaccounted for.

Both sides have both pointed fingers at one another for the latest clashes, with Armenia accusing Azerbaijan of invading its territory and taking numerous soldiers prisoner, as well as capturing installations on the border.

Azerbaijan has claimed that it was acting in self-defense, however, looking for Armenian anti-tank weapons that had allegedly shot at its positions across the frontier.

The clashes sparked concerns over a resumption of full-blown conflict, with both nations having fought a bloody war last year over the disputed province of Nagorno-Karabakh. The region is a de jure part of Azerbaijan, but has been run in recent years by the ethnic Armenian majority.

A Moscow-brokered deal ended conflict in the region and saw peacekeepers sent there. The agreement also required Yerevan to sign over a significant amount of territory to Baku, including most of the lands held by Armenians since a bloody conflict in the early 1990s.

Amid Azerbaijani pressure, Armenian government under internal attack

EurasiaNet.org
Nov 17 2021
Ani Mejlumyan Nov 17, 2021
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan at a cabinet meeting to discuss a new round of fighting with Azerbaijan. (photo: primeminister.am)

As clashes erupted again on the Armenia-Azerbaijan border, the Armenian government is coming under fire for what many criticize as its ineffectual response to Azerbaijani offensives.

The November 16 fighting, which Armenian officials say was the result of an Azerbaijani cross-border incursion, was the worst since the two sides fought a war last year.

Exact figures on the Armenian casualties are not clear: On November 16 ruling party member of parliament Eduard Aghajanyan reported that 15 Armenian soldiers had been killed, but the next day the Ministry of Defense reported one killed, 13 taken captive, and 24 missing.

The fighting followed weeks of intensifying pressure from Azerbaijan on various fronts, and the conflicting information on casualties only fed the narrative that the current government is incapable of dealing with the serious national security issues the country now faces.

The international reaction, as is often the case, tended to call for an end to the violence without blaming one particular side. Many Armenians saw that as a failure of the country’s diplomats.

One article on the news website 168.am, headlined “Diplomatic disgrace: the Ministry of Foreign Affairs proves it doesn’t exist,” described the various international reactions as “both-sidesing” the fighting rather than directly laying responsibility on Azerbaijan.

“The MFA did not manage to get even documentation of an obvious fact from its closest partners at such a difficult stage,” the website wrote. “The topic is being actively discussed on the internet, both by politicians and ordinary people, who describe it as a diplomatic defeat.”

Prominent journalist Tatul Hakobyan, who reported from close to the scene of the fighting on November 17, said on Facebook that “the reaction of the international audience clearly shows that Armenia has no allies.” 

Another journalist, Arshaluys Mghdesyan, posted on Facebook: “Can you remind me of a single structure or country that is clearly condemning Azerbaijan’s aggression against the sovereign territory of Armenia? How would you assess the work of our Foreign Ministry?”

Recent weeks have seen a renewal of Azerbaijan’s pressure campaign against Armenia, apparently with the aim of forcing Yerevan to sign new agreements on cross-border transportation routes and on formally demarcating their border.

Azerbaijani troops have restricted traffic on two key roads in Armenia, killed a civilian in Karabakh and engaged in multiple skirmishes with Armenian forces.

Meanwhile, Armenian government officials, led by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, have been emphasizing the positive and trying to sell Armenians on the potential benefits of the new deals, including economic gains from the new trade routes and the chance to finally live in peace with their neighbors.

“We have adopted the agenda of opening an era of peaceful development,” Pashinyan said in a November 7 interview with public television. “We received the mandate to open this era from our people as a result of the snap parliamentary elections.”

To many, though, that message smacks of naïveté in the face of what they see as Azerbaijan’s attempts to intimidate Armenia. “Azerbaijan and Turkey want peace with Armenia, but with an Armenia that is kneeling before them,” Hakobyan said in a recent interview with RFE/RL

The situation is not helped by the Azerbaijani media’s tendency to portray Pashinyan positively, as someone interested in making a deal but thwarted by the revanchist opposition.

If Azerbaijan is trying to use the escalation to force Armenia to sign the agreements, it may be a miscalculation, as the unstable situation leading up to the recent events already has spoiled Pashinyan’s attempt to agree to a deal with Azerbaijan.

In October, the well-connected news website Aliq Media reported that the two sides had tentatively reached agreements on transportation and border demarcation and that Pashinyan and Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev would sign them on November 9, the one-year anniversary of the ceasefire that ended last year’s fighting.

That date is notorious in Armenia – the ceasefire agreement is seen as a capitulation – and the reports about the potential new deals caused an outcry.

“Pashinyan will sign every disastrous document there is,” said Armen Grigoryan, a documentary filmmaker, in an interview with the TV network Fifth Channel. “After Pashinyan signed the capitulation, if he signs any more documents that will be the end of him.”

Pashinyan later walked out on the deal, Aliq reported.

Following the recent fighting, the political opposition called on the government to step down.

“Nikol Pashinyan’s government brings casualties, territorial losses, division and chaos,” the main opposition fraction in parliament, the Armenia Alliance, said in a statement. “The ultimate solution to this situation is the departure of these authorities. Nikol Pashinyan’s resignation should be followed by the unification of all possible forces and the formation of a new government.”

Armenians have been further enraged by videos that have spread in social media of Azerbaijani soldiers humiliating Armenian captives.

Another documentary filmmaker who has recently released a film critical of Pashinyan, Hovhannes Iskhanyan, called on the political opposition to topple the government. “Go to cafes, restaurants, cinemas, and call on everyone to remove the Turkish agents [a common epithet for the Armenian government] from Armenia,” he wrote in a Facebook post.

Shortly after the post was published, police arrested Iskhanyan “on suspicion of preparing an attempt to usurp power,” a crime punishable by up to 15 years in prison, though formal charges haven’t yet been filed.

 

Ani Mejlumyan is a reporter based in Yerevan.

 

As Azerbaijan pushes advantage against Armenia, Russia’s role again under scrutiny

EurasiaNet.org
Nov 17 2021
Joshua Kucera Nov 17, 2021
A Russian peacekeeper mans a checkpoint in Lachin this month. (Russian Defense Ministry)

As conflict again erupted in the Caucasus, and Armenia reports that Azerbaijani troops again crossed their international border, a familiar question is again being asked: Where is Russia?

Following hours of heavy fighting on November 16, resulting the largest casualty totals since last year’s war, Russia managed to broker a ceasefire late in the day. November 17 passed without any violent incidents reported.

Armenian officials said that much of the fighting took place inside its territory, but did not specify a precise area. Many Armenian media reported that it was near the lake Sev Lich in the Syunik region, where Azerbaijani soldiers crossed the border in May and have reportedly remained since then.

The renewal of the border incursion prompted Armenia to seek help from its treaty ally, Russia. The chair of Armenia’s National Security Council, Armen Grigoryan, said on November 16 that the country was appealing to Russia on the basis of a 1997 mutual defense treaty. The next day, Russian newspaper Kommersant followed up with him and asked what sort of assistance Yerevan was seeking. “We are in favor of the problem being solved diplomatically,” he answered. “But if it can’t be solved diplomatically, then it will have to be resolved militarily.” He added a warning of a sort: that while Armenia was relying on Russia, “if a resolution isn’t found, then we will have to look at other possibilities.”

Russia’s public response has been understated. On November 17, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitriy Peskov said that President Vladimir Putin had undertaken “active efforts” to stop the fighting, including speaking with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan (but not, apparently, Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev). “Thanks to these mediating efforts the Russian side was able yesterday to restrain the conflicting sides,” Peskov told a press conference.

But the repeated incursions across Armenia’s border would seem to call for a stronger Russian response. Russia has security guarantees, both bilaterally and via the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), that oblige it to come to Armenia’s defense in case of attack.

At a meeting of the National Security Council on the evening of November 16, Pashinyan said that Azerbaijani forces controlled about 41 square kilometers of Armenia and blamed the fighting on the “silence from our international partners.” (The figure of 41 kilometers has been used since May, following the incursion into Sev Lich and also in another region, near Vardenis. That would suggest that no new land was occupied in this newest round of fighting, but the Armenian Defense Ministry also reported that it had lost two military positions in the fighting.)

While Pashinyan was careful not to name names among “international partners,” others were more specific.

“Why do the CSTO and Russia ignore their alliance commitments to Yerevan when Azerbaijan is regularly and openly conducting incursions into the sovereign territory of Armenia,” wrote journalist Tatul Hakobyan. “What are the red lines, if any, beyond which Russia will no longer remain silent?”

Hakobyan also reported, citing unnamed diplomatic sources, that during their phone conversation, Putin had dissuaded Pashinyan from formally appealing for assistance from Moscow.

Russia’s inaction also was the source of much speculation during last year’s war. But that war was conducted in and around Nagorno-Karabakh, on territory that had been controlled by Armenian forces since the 1990s but internationally recognized as Azerbaijani and so not subject to the mutual defense pacts. These recent incursions into Armenian territory proper are different.

(Technically there is no border between the two countries in the absence of a bilateral agreement, and they are currently negotiating on a formal demarcation of their shared border. But the two sides have already come to a de facto agreement based on Soviet maps, most visible on the road through southern Armenia that passes through some slices of Azerbaijani territory. According to those maps however, Sev Lich lies firmly in Armenian territory.)

Russian troops guard some sections of Armenia’s border, and during last year’s war made a show of force, albeit a quiet one, by setting up new guard posts along the Azerbaijani border. They have continued to expand that presence since the war, including one new post along the northern section of the border next to the Azerbaijani exclave of Askipara (which Armenians call Voskepar). It is not clear, however, whether the Russians have set up such a post around Sev Lich, which is in a difficult-to-access area.

While Azerbaijan has claimed that this new round of fighting was set off by Armenian “provocations” along the border, it is a pretext that few take seriously. Azerbaijani analysts suggest that it was instigated by Baku in order to force Yerevan to sign new agreements, on border demarcation and new cross-border transportation routes, in support of last year’s ceasefire agreement.

But if that is the case, it is a direct challenge to Russia, which not only has mutual defense treaties with Armenia but also is the cosigner and guarantor of the ceasefire agreement.

Russia may, though, not have many options to respond.

“Russia has no room to maneuver here,” wrote Sergey Markedonov, an analyst of the Caucasus at the Moscow State Institute of International Relations, on Facebook. “This is Armenian territory, not disputed Karabakh. Turkey’s influence is many times greater than it was a year ago, so sharp movements would be problematic as it could put [Russia] at odds both with the West and Ankara.”

While it appeared that Azerbaijan was most likely “using force as pressure on the negotiations,” Markedonov added, “silence is dangerous and the information space now is not in Moscow’s favor. […] Simply staying quiet and putting out optimistic statements is not a solution!”

 

Joshua Kucera is the Turkey/Caucasus editor at Eurasianet, and author of .

SPbPU and the Russian-Armenian University Strengthen Cooperation

Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University and the Russian-Armenian University (RAU) summed up the results of the third joint conference school, discussed the results of scientific and pedagogical cooperation in 2021, and discussed a pilot project to open a joint postgraduate school. Productive talks took place during the visit to the RAU of an official delegation from SPbPU, which included the Academic Supervisor, Professor of the Higher School of Applied Physics and Space Technologies Sergey MAKAROV and Deputy Director of the Institute of Electronics and Telecommunications Maksim VINNICHENKO.

The visit took place within the framework of the state project «Implementation of a set of measures to improve the efficiency of the Russian-Armenian (Slavonic) and Belarusian-Russian universities in training professional personnel for the digital economy through the development of research programs, additional education and advanced training programs for students and young scientific and pedagogical staff, including the use of modern distance technologies.» This project is funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation and aims to develop cooperation between SPbPU and the two Slavic universities.

One of the key topics on the agenda was summarizing the results of the third Joint international conference on Astrophysics for Young Scientists, organized by SPbPU, RAU, and the Bürkan Astrophysical Observatory. During the conference, leading experts in astrophysics, space technology, radio astronomy, and navigation systems presented their reports, while young novice specialists had the opportunity to learn about the latest achievements in these scientific fields and share the results of their research. The organizers of the school stressed the importance of its holding in the issue of attracting the young generation to research works in the field of applied astrophysics and related fields and agreed to organize the fourth conference in 2022.

Another important topic of the talks was summing up the results of scientific and pedagogical cooperation between SPbPU and RAU for 2021 in the areas of «Physics of Nanostructures» and «Modern Telecommunication Technologies.» We have completed a textbook and several articles for highly ranked journals from the first quartile. In addition, we outlined the range of conferences where theses were sent to present and approve the results of joint scientific work, stressed Sergey MAKAROV. «Plans were also developed for further joint work under the ongoing Russian-Armenian RFBR grant for the study of single- and multi-particle optical effects in quantum dots Ge/Si.»

SPbPU and the RAU also held a separate meeting to discuss the organization of the 23rd All-Russian Youth Conference on Semiconductor and Nanostructure Physics and Semiconductor Opto- and Nanoelectronics, scheduled for late November 2021. The meeting resulted in the formation of a working group to organize the conference and a program committee to review the papers sent to the conference. The parties discussed the details of the conference, as well as approved online the list of invited speakers — leading scientists and experts — with the program committee.

It is important to note that the Russian-Armenian University is well developed in the field of natural sciences because training specialists in natural sciences, engineering, and technical specialties is important for the economy of both Armenia and Russia. Polytechnic University is interested in actively attracting RAU graduates to continue their education at SPbPU, commented Maxim VINICHENKO.

At the end of the visit, the parties discussed a pilot project to open a joint graduate school and the possibility of conducting joint degree defenses at SPbPU and RAU in the field of physics of semiconductors.

 

Azerbaijani press: Azerbaijani analysts discuss Armenian PM’s frequent change of defense ministers

By Trend

Armenian PM Nikol Pashinyan has appointed a new defense minister – fourth during his four-year ruling as Armenia’s Prime Minister.

Suren Papikyan has been appointed the new Defense Minister, with his predecessor being Arshak Karapetyan.

“Arshak Karapetyan was remembered for his provocative actions, his illegal trips to the Azerbaijani lands liberated from the Armenian occupation and provocations against Azerbaijani servicemen in Lachin district and the recent aggravation of the situation,” Azerbaijani MP, political analyst Rasim Musabayov told Trend.

He said that the frequent appointment in the Armenian Ministry of Defense and the Foreign Ministry shows that Pashinyan’s regime cannot properly regulate power.

“Karapetyan committed many provocative actions, all this was a problem for Pashinyan,” Musabayov added. “I think that Russia did not like such behavior of Karapetyan.”

The Azerbaijani MP said that all these factors forced Pashinyan to appoint new people in the defense ministry.

“It is difficult to say how well the new minister will be able to control the situation,” Musabayov said. “This will depend on his skills, willpower, Pashinyan’s support, including an assessment of the real situation and adequate behavior.”

Military expert Adalat Valiyev told Trend that the dismissal of Karapetyan is connected with the tough position of the Azerbaijani side after his illegal visit to Karabakh region on November 6-8.

“It is known that after the victory in the second Karabakh war, two high-ranking Armenian officials, namely, ex-foreign minister Ara Ayvazyan and ex-defense minister Arshak Karapetyan visited Karabakh region,” Valiyev said.

He added that the fact that after these illegal trips, both were immediately dismissed from their posts, openly demonstrates Pashinyan’s position in connection with trips to Karabakh region.

Valiyev noted that the fact that the current minister of defense is a civilian rather than a military man shows that Pashinyan has no choice.

“New Minister of Defense Suren Papikyan was appointed Minister of Territorial Administration and Infrastructure of Armenia three months ago,” Valiyev said. “He was a peaceful official.”

The expert said that apparently, Pashinyan has no other option but to appoint a civilian to this position because the Armenian military elite consisting of 60 people signed an appeal against Pashinyan.

“The appointment of one of the generals who signed this appeal would mean Pashinyan’s defeat in front of the military elite,” Valiyev said.

According to the Armenian media, new Armenian Minister of Defense Suren Papikyan taught history in one of Yerevan’s schools in 2010-2016. Moreover, Papikyan, known as the “asphalt tycoon”, has a criminal record. A criminal case was filed against him for stabbing a commander while serving in the army.

Suren Papikyan, found guilty of a criminal act, was imprisoned for 2 years and 3 months on March 27, 2006. He was released as part of amnesty on February 23, 2007.

Azerbaijani press: "Democracy" summit or clear example of double standards

By Ayya Lmahamad

The “Summit for Democracy” initiated by U.S. President Joe Biden is scheduled for December 9-10 in the virtual format.

As Biden himself said he wants to gather the leaders of “various democratic countries of the world” on a single platform for a virtual summit in support of democracy. He stated that his goal is to “set a positive agenda for democratic renewal around the world”, adding that the defining question of the modern era is whether democratic countries can come together to achieve real results in a rapidly changing world.

It is worth noting here that democracy is a form of government in which the people have the authority to deliberate and decide legislation (direct democracy), or to choose governing officials to do so (representative democracy). Such a system of government is based on three pillars: the power of the people, freedom, and the rule of law.

The question is raised of how a country like Armenia, where human rights are grossly violated, is invited to the summit, and countries like Azerbaijan, Turkey, and Hungary are not.

A few days ago, UN Human Rights Committee experts expressed concern about undue legal restrictions on the freedom of peaceful assembly, unjustifiable police interference in peaceful demonstrations as well as arbitrary and prolonged detention of demonstrators.

Summit – clear example of double standards

In an interview with the local media, Azerbaijani MP Vugar Iskandarov said that it is ridiculous that countries such as Azerbaijan, Turkey, and Hungary are not invited to the summit, where the level of democracy is much higher than that in the majority of invited countries.

The MP noted that the organization of such a summit by the U.S. is itself already absurd. He stated that by organizing it, the U.S. wants to present itself to the world as a “patron of democracy”.

“By organizing such a summit, the U.S. wants to present itself to the world as a ‘patron of democracy’, as if the U.S. is the guardian of democracy and not all the countries of the world. While we all remember what happened in the last U.S. presidential election when Joe Biden tried to beat Trump. Opinion polls show that U.S. citizens still favor Trump over Biden, and Trump is still saying in his statements that he will not accept Biden’s results. So where is democracy?” he said.

“Divide and conquer” policy

Political scientist Shabnam Hasanova told the local media that the U.S-organized summit amid growing problems of democracy in this country is aimed at dividing the world into camps based on the “divide and conquer” policy.

“The world has witnessed in recent years that U.S. intentions to ‘embrace democracy’ in Syria, Yemen, Iraq, Libya, other Muslim states in the Middle East have led to tragedies and bloodshed,” she said.

The invitation of Armenia, which at the state level supports terror, to the summit, and the absence of Azerbaijan, Turkey, and Hungary from the upcoming event, create a clear idea of the criteria by which the event’s participants were selected, the analyst added.

Biased approach

Commenting on the absence of Azerbaijan and Turkey in the list of guests invited to the summit, American analyst Paul Goble considered such a decision by Biden strange.

“As for the criteria of inviting [countries] to the upcoming summit, I do not have much understanding. I think the U.S. bases its decision on the assessments of human rights activists from different countries, mainly those opposed to Azerbaijan and Turkey,” the analyst told the local media.

He noted that this summit is not the best way to promote democracy, given that there are no countries in the world without problems in this direction. Goble added that promoting democracy and supporting countries on this path is laudable, but it is not easy to implement this in practice.

“In the early 1990s, the U.S. held a summit like this in the hope that it would encourage countries to move in what the U.S. believed was the right direction. This year, the number of countries participating is comparatively smaller, indicating a decline in interest in the event. I don’t think that such meetings are the best way to promote democratic values, given that there have always been and always will be problems with democracy,” he said.

Armenian diaspora

The Baku-based news website Day.az stated that how Armenia ended up among democracies is not a difficult question.

“No need to go deep into the previous years, it is enough to see what has been happening and continues to happen in Washington-Armenian diaspora relations over the past year. The curtsies of American diplomacy towards Yerevan, the endless anti-Azerbaijani discussions and decisions made at the insistence of the Armenian lobby speak for themselves,” the website stated.

Another Baku-based news website noted that the fact that, for example, Iraq and Congo received invitations to the summit, but Hungary, Azerbaijan and Turkey did not is absurd.

“It turns out that if the leadership of a country pursues a foreign policy that disagrees with the U.S. position, it automatically becomes an outcast and has no right to its own, different from the U.S. opinion. Those countries that pursue independent policies aimed at protecting their national interests are put on the list of ‘undeserving’ and ‘undemocratic’ ones,” the website said.

The selective choice of countries participating in the Biden-led “democracy” summit suggests that America and its leader are fundamentally distorting the concept of democracy by forcing it to certain limits.

Azerbaijani press: Mine attack against Azerbaijani general under investigation

By Vugar Khalilov

The Military Prosecutor’s Office has launched criminal proceedings into the case of mine attack against Amy’s Maj-Gen Hikmat Hasanov, the Prosecutor-General’s Office reported on November 16.

The case is under investigation under Azerbaijani Criminal Code Articles 29, 120.2.7 (attempted murder of two or more persons) and 29, 120.2.12 (attempted murder with national, racial, religious hatred or hostility), the report added.

It should be noted that Hasanov was injured in an armored vehicle as a result of the mine explosion during his visit to liberated Aghdam region on November 20, 2020.

Armenia deliberately and constantly laid mines on the Azerbaijani territories, in violation of the 1949 Geneva Convention, thereby being a major threat to regional peace, security and cooperation.

Some 160 Azerbaijanis have been killed or injured in the explosion of mines planted by Armenians in Azerbaijan’s formerly occupied regions since the end of the war in autumn 2020 that saw Azerbaijan liberate most of its territories in and around the Nagorno-Karabakh region.

On June 12, Azerbaijan handed over 15 Armenian prisoners in exchange for a map detailing the location of 97,000 mines in formerly-occupied Aghdam.

On July 3, Armenia submitted to Azerbaijan maps of about 92,000 anti-tank and anti-personnel mines planted during the occupation of Fuzuli and Zangilan regions.

In his interview to CNN Turk channel on August 14, President Ilham Aliyev said that the accuracy of the maps provided by Armenia at the latest stage is only 25 percent.

Azerbaijan and Armenia signed a Russia-brokered peace agreement on November 10, 2020, to end 44 days of fighting and work toward a comprehensive resolution.

Azerbaijani press: Two Armenians to stand trial in Ganja on terror charges

By Vugar Khalilov

Two Armenian citizens will stand trial in Azerbaijan’s Ganja city on terrorism charges, Trend reported on November 17.

The preliminary investigation into the criminal case of terror suspects Sargsyan Ishkhan Ashot and Rafaelyan Vladimir Otari has been completed, the report added.

According to the report, the criminal case materials were submitted for consideration to the Ganja Grave Crimes Court.

Earlier, both Armenian citizens were reported to be charged under Article 214.2.3 (terrorism committed with the use of firearms and objects used as weapons) of Azerbaijan’s Criminal Code.

Prime Minister Ali Asadov earlier said that Azerbaijan and Armenia exchanged 122 servicemen and detainees with the participation of Russian peacekeepers from December 2020.

Asadov underlined that Azerbaijan fully complies with the paragraphs of the trilateral ceasefire deal signed by Baku, Moscow and Yerevan in November 2020, which also envisaged the transfer of detained servicemen.

“With the participation of Russian peacekeepers, a total of 122 servicemen and detainees have been returned since December 22, 2020. Of these, 105 returned to Armenia and 17 to Azerbaijan,” the prime minister said.

Referring to the 62 Armenian servicemen who were detained on the Azerbaijani territory after the signing of a trilateral statement, Asadov stressed that “according to all international laws they are not considered prisoners of war”.

“They were detained after the war, entered our territory with a subversive purpose, and the status as prisoners of war does not apply to them. However, Azerbaijan returned 29 of them to the Armenian side. Thirty-three of this group were convicted by our courts and will be held responsible,” he added.

Azerbaijani press: Azerbaijan discloses number of servicemen killed in recent border fighting with Armenia


BAKU, Azerbaijan, Nov. 17

Trend:

Seven servicemen of the Azerbaijani army were killed during the military operations conducted on November 16 on the state border due to the provocations of Armenia, Trend reports citing the Azerbaijani Defense Ministry.

Their names are Umid Niftaliyev (lieutenant), Orkhan Jabbarov (warrant officer), Natig Aliyev (super-conscript junior sergeant), Elchin Aghayev, Elmin Alizade, Elchin Aliyev and Murad Khalilov (soldiers).

Besides, according to the ministry, 10 Azerbaijani servicemen were wounded in the battles.

“The situation on the Azerbaijani-Armenian state border has stabilized since the evening of Nov. 16. The provocation committed by Armenia on the state border failed,” the ministry said. “The operational situation is controlled by the units of the Azerbaijani army. The Armed Forces of Azerbaijan continue to serve in the sovereign territories of the country.”

The responsibility for the tension and confrontation that arose as a result of the Armenian provocation rests entirely with the military-political leadership of Armenia, added the ministry.